User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive48

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


March - April 2021

Wikidata weekly summary #457

File deletion

Hello Christian, could you please take a look at this deletion request? I have nominated the file a week ago and the case is clear. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah yes, but can you take a look at this deletion request then? I think the reasons for deletion in this case are clear as well. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for your help! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Olá Christian, received this notificatoin ("No source specified since 14 December 2020") https://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Aberta/Racismo_e_tecnologia, with your name. I'm unsure of ths problem and I would like to fix it. Would you mind helping me out? Telamiel (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Christian, could you please take a look at this deletion request and perhaps delete the file? Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:33, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! Have a nice weekend. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I found another image [[1]] that is clearly just a photoshopped picture of this image [[2]] 74.104.130.117 07:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Found another one [[3]] [[4]] clearly stolen from this site. [[5]] 74.104.130.117 07:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Hello, thanks for the notifications. I deleted the first image because though the web version is more recent it is also a higher resolution (and less photoshopped) of the same photo (same shadow and light, same gunstock). I did not deleted the second photo because it don't looks to be the same photo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:33, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

The 2nd picture is a photoshop taken from a website. Here's another example [[6]] [[7]] [[8]] 74.104.130.117 16:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Christian, I have found two file which are ready to get deleted:

Thanks in advance for your help, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Christian, could you please take a look at this deletion request and perhaps delete the both nom'ed files? Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Good day Christian, could you please take a look at the following DRs and delete the files?

Thanks in advance for your help. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! I think this section could be archived. Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Luiz Gastão de Orléans

Hi, you recently deleted a file and it has been uploaded again. I nominated it for deletion, but now I realise speedy deletion is the most appropriate procedure in this case. How should I proceed, once I have already nominated it for ordinary deletion? Thanks a lot. Awikimate (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC).

  • Hi, thanks you for the notification, I deleted the files. Yes for the files that have been already deleted or for the new files tagued as "own work" and you found a prior non free publication in the web you can use {{Copyvio}}, but if you already made a regular DR it's not a big issue, the main one being that the files have been detected. Note that to tag several files at the same time, either for speedy deletion of for regular deletion, you can use Help:VisualFileChange.js, and in case of regular deletion it is also more easy for the administrators as all the files are in the same DR. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello again. Because you deleted the file, would you mind dealing with it once more? It has been uploaded here? Thanks a lot. Awikimate (talk) 16:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

DRs

Hi. In 2019 I DR'ed several files from Category:Erica Nicoli for being FB files. One of them, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erica Nicoli (1452377964589).jpg was closed by you and a couple of them by admin Gbawden, all as delete. Now I see an SPA has added several images to the same cat; of course I do not remember, after two years, how the images looked like. Still, I have a feeling that maybe one or the other of the deleted files came back to the cat. Can you have a look? Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 17:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Fan de politique

Hello,

j'ai vu que tu as fait le bloc final de Fan de Politique, et un ou deux précédents. J'ai trouvé deux comptes qui ressemblent beaucoup à des faux-nez, et j'ai laissé une requête aux CU dans ce sens. Comme je ne suis pas habitué à utiliser cet aspect de Commons, il y a sans doute des trucs que j'ai laissé passé. SI jamais tu vois passer quelque chose, ou si tu vois quelque chose à rajouter... Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 21:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal in Sète at dusk - February 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
please denoise the sky --Tesla Delacroix 15:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
No I think it's ok like that, but no problem if you think it is not a QI. --Christian Ferrer 16:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support On this page often a mostly denoised sky is preferred. But the little noise in the sky of this photo is not excessive, especially if we consider the file size; the sky looks natural and is not irritating. IMHO it would be a pity to reject this photo just because of a little bit noise in the sky. --Aristeas 11:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 Comment Wording changed to avoid misunderstandings. Feel free to change this to “discuss” if you think that the noise is a significant problem; then a consensual review is appropriate. Thank you! --Aristeas 18:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Distoleon tetragrammicus, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CAPTAIN BADR (ship, 1978). Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)  Support Мне нравится. --Mike1979 Russia 11:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #458

Image deletion

Dear Mr Ferrer, thank you for reviewing our draft! :)

You have deleted some of the images we have uploaded so I would like to communicate their purpose and source with you. Listed below there are photos that are owned by us (Elaphe Propulsion Technologies) and we believe are appropriate to be shared on Wiki.

File:Elaphe logo.jpg -> Original image by Elaphe. It is communicating our visual identity and how people can remember us (with a philosophy around "the wheels", "turning things around".

File:Elaphe 1.jpg -> The picture with founders and their first motor "Elaphe 1", communicating the history component and the progress we have done (how the design is totally different than on Elaphe-motor-family.jpg.

File:Elaphe-motor-family.jpg -> Original image by Elaphe, visually representing the scope of our in-wheel motors. The picture contains some data (educational topic).

File:AnyConv.com winding - Copy.jpg -> Original image by Elaphe, educating users about our unique winding of the motors. Also, a motor close up is seen. AnyConv.com used - converting the image from .jfif to .jpg.

File:Elaphe motor components.webp -> Original image by Elaphe. Elaphe is one of the few companies having a totally different motor structure (external rotor, internal stator). This photo is representing how the motor is assembled.

File:Collage Elaphe.jpg -> Original image by Elaphe. Commercial topic - collage showing our focuses, activities - all in one image.

File:Audi R8 with Elaphe's in-wheel powertrain - accelerating to 100,02 km-h in 3,540 s..jpg -> Original image by Elaphe. This Audi X6 on the photo is converted by our in-wheel motors. There is also data about its acceleration on the photo, uplifting the important data showing the market differentiation.


Please let me know your thoughts on the written. We will be more than happy to answer any of your questions.

Best, Tjaša, Marketing Assistant at Elaphe — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElaphePropTechn (talk • contribs) 18:13, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Hi, I'm not editor in English Wikipedia, thus I can't review your draft. The files you uploaded were stored in the project called Wikimedia Commons, and I deleted the images because the copyright holder is Elaphe Propulsion Technologies http://in-wheel.com/en/ . An official authorization from the company must be sent to our permission system. The local relevant policies are com:Licensing and com:Scope, note also that the media files must "be realistically useful for an educational purpose". Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #459

de la foto que usé, tengo el permiso de uso de la autora

de la foto que usé, tengo el permiso de uso de la autora, marisa farber https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blues_de_Argentin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liz writerAr (talk • contribs) 21:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carpobrotus eduli, shoreline of Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks at Corniche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crique de l'Anau, east part.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Minor purple CAs at some of the rocks in the bottom-right corner, but not irritating. --Aristeas 10:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
✓ Fixed thanks you, I missed it, this very little Sony camera is quite satisfactory except for a small loss of quality and the presence of purple fringes in the contratsed areas in the edges of the photos. --Christian Ferrer 12:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 Comment Thank you very much! Now the photo is indeed even better. (And yes, the image Quality of that little camera is really astonishing …) --Aristeas 15:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

IdQ

Bonjour Christian,

Il y a certaines photos de mon ami photographe Philippe que j'aimerais proposer au label "Image de Qualité", mais comme c'est moi qui uploade depuis des années ses photos (avec OTRS & Co) j'ignore si je peux le faire, vu que la page dit bien que les photos doivent être "réalisées par des Wikimédiens". Qu'en penses-tu ? Amitiés, FredD (talk) 13:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@FredD: Bonjour, non cela ne passera pas, j'ai vu des tas d'images se faire refouler pour cette raison. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Ok, c'est bien ce que je pensais. Merci ! :) FredD (talk) 17:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadowed path in Prémian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality--Horst J. Meuter 16:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal du Rhône à Sète toward Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Beautiful but noisy. Without the noise, I would have said it was a potential FP, but it's a large file and IMO a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 08:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion requests to close

Hello Christian, could you please delete this file? Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Have a nice day! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Christian, could you please delete the file in this deletion request? Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Christian, here I have three files which are ready to get deleted:

Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:55, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Christian, I have found three more files:

Perhaps you can take a look at them and delete the respective files. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:27, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your help! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Christian, I have found some files which are ready to get deleted:

Can you take a look at them and perhaps delete them? Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Wish you a nice upcoming week! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello Christian, could you please remove the first version of File:P&ID Turbo Compressor Symbol.svg since I have uploaded a new version with reduced size. Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick help! Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi Christian, here I have one deletion request which could be closed by deleting the file. Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, have a nice evening! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:13, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedydelete request

Hello Christian!

Could you please take a look at the file (File:SnimakZaslonaMicrosoftEdgeCroatian.png) that I just recommended for speedydelete?

Best regards, Koreanovsky (talk) 17:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #460

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks at La Corniche - March 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Wonderful. --XRay 12:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 Comment Yes, like a good Romantic seascape painting. Please nominate at FPC, or I can nominate if you prefer. -- Ikan Kekek 19:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks but we should wait a bit, I took other images that same day, we will see if there are better ones, I will upload them in April. --Christian Ferrer 20:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
OK, sure. -- Ikan Kekek 04:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Canal du Rhône à Sète toward Sète.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canal du Rhône à Sète toward Sète.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Grau-du-Roi cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:50, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #461

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau du Vialais - March 2021 - A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:46, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passerelle au quai François Maillol - Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal de la Peyrade - March 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy but beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 19:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Dear Christian,

I hope you are healthy and safe. Thank you so much for taking the time to review my materials and for your feedback. I am a little confused as what is the difference between Wikipedia Commons ("The Wikimedia Commons" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tafer_Hotels_%26_Resorts#Deleted_content) where I seemed to have landed and English Wikipedia English Wikipedia where I am guessing you are suggesting I go to. But no need to elaborate as I am only interested in preparing a Wiki article similar to what, for example, Hilton Hotels has (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilton_Hotels_%26_Resorts)

Could you simply point me in the right direction? Both main pages, Wikipedia Commons and Wikipedia English seem so alike that I am not even sure that I understand your message. As I said, could you just copy/paste the correct link where I need to go? Or, if you have a minute to spare, a three step bullets?

I know busy you must be dealing with newbies like myself. I appreciate your time.

All the best

Jorge Vilanova — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tafer Hotels & Resorts (talk • contribs) 13:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Hello, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for the articles and Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository where you upload almost all medias used in Wikipedia (excepted the Non-free content). I am not very proficient nor in charge of Wikipedia but I deleted, here in Wikimedia Commons, the images that you uploaded because they have been already published in the web or elsewhere without the compatible licenses. The relevant policies are com:Scope and com:Licensing. Such content can only uploaded if permissions are sent to our permission system by the legitimate copyright holder(s) of the logos and photos. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #462

Deletion request

Hello Christian, I have found two files which are ready to get deleted.

Thanks in advance & have a great start into the week. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello Christian, could you please take a look at this deletion request. I think all the nom'ed files should be deleted now. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for your help & have a nice weekend. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Christian, could you please take a look at the following deletion request and perhaps delete the files?

Thanks in advance for your help! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, have a great week! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I think I found another image that should be deleted. I doubt it's original work and it looks like it was taken from Pinterest. [12] [13] 74.104.130.117 07:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passerelle au quai François Maillol - Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal de la Peyrade - March 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit noisy but beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 19:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Dear Christian,

I hope you are healthy and safe. Thank you so much for taking the time to review my materials and for your feedback. I am a little confused as what is the difference between Wikipedia Commons ("The Wikimedia Commons" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tafer_Hotels_%26_Resorts#Deleted_content) where I seemed to have landed and English Wikipedia English Wikipedia where I am guessing you are suggesting I go to. But no need to elaborate as I am only interested in preparing a Wiki article similar to what, for example, Hilton Hotels has (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilton_Hotels_%26_Resorts)

Could you simply point me in the right direction? Both main pages, Wikipedia Commons and Wikipedia English seem so alike that I am not even sure that I understand your message. As I said, could you just copy/paste the correct link where I need to go? Or, if you have a minute to spare, a three step bullets?

I know busy you must be dealing with newbies like myself. I appreciate your time.

All the best

Jorge Vilanova — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tafer Hotels & Resorts (talk • contribs) 13:19, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Hello, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for the articles and Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository where you upload almost all medias used in Wikipedia (excepted the Non-free content). I am not very proficient nor in charge of Wikipedia but I deleted, here in Wikimedia Commons, the images that you uploaded because they have been already published in the web or elsewhere without the compatible licenses. The relevant policies are com:Scope and com:Licensing. Such content can only uploaded if permissions are sent to our permission system by the legitimate copyright holder(s) of the logos and photos. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #462

Deletion request

Hello Christian, I have found two files which are ready to get deleted.

Thanks in advance & have a great start into the week. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello Christian, could you please take a look at this deletion request. I think all the nom'ed files should be deleted now. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:08, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for your help & have a nice weekend. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Christian, could you please take a look at the following deletion request and perhaps delete the files?

Thanks in advance for your help! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, have a great week! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I think I found another image that should be deleted. I doubt it's original work and it looks like it was taken from Pinterest. [15] [16] 74.104.130.117 07:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Christian, could you please delete this file? Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Already done by Leyo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Ah yes, but thanks anyway! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks at La Corniche - March 2021 - A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Deleted images of Chloe wary

Dear Christian

Actually I am Chloe Wary, Ouarior is my pseudo (« ouari » = phonetic of « Wary » and « or » it’s a word game with « Warrior ». Please get back the images because this wiki page about me really needs it.

Best regards Ouarior (talk) 20:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Hello, no I can't. 2 images are book covers, the 2 others are photo taken from the web. There are issues for the copyrights, publication here implies permission for commercial reuse, which can only be given by the copyright holder(s). Our relevant policies are com:Scope and com:Licensing. For the photos coming from the web, the sources must have compatible licenses, otherwise the copyright holder must send a permission to our permission system. Same thing for the book covers, the permissions must be sent by the copyright holder (even if it is you). Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Bonjour, j'ai bien lu votre message, j'ai pris connaissance des règles mais je ne comprends pas ce que je n'ai pas respecté... Pourquoi mes photos sont elles supprimées ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucasbustostopage (talk • contribs) 17:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Sobre File:Congreso da GOLPE DE ESTADO - Periódico. Protesta contra Merino.png

Hola. La quisiera que restaure la imagen borrada ya que iba a proceder a editarlo para que sí pueda estar en la Wiki. Gracias de antemano.

(Rolo Mai (talk) 00:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC))

Wikidata weekly summary #463

Revdel request

Hello Christian, I hope you're doing great!

Could you please revdeleted the two revisions of February 24, 2018 and May 3, 2018 on the File:LocationSerbiaInEurope.png? The problem is, beside the overwrite, that I used a complete different map and that I do not know which one it was exactly, so I cannot give attribution to the original one.

Best regards, Koreanovsky (talk) 18:06, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks at La Corniche - March 2021 - B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 19:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 11:49, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks at La Corniche - March 2021 - D.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good ! --Sebring12Hrs 15:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocks at La Corniche - March 2021 - C.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and very nice! --Tournasol7 06:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
You beat me to this. I was going to say, this is beautiful and consider picking your favorite photo of this motif to nominate at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC) thanks, there are still a few other photos to upload... --Christian Ferrer 11:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #464

REQUEST RESTORE ALL THIS FILE OF ME

All file in this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_User:C7pmc All files here are owned by us, you cannot rely on an opinion of a wikipedia admin to delete our files, I suggest you do not abuse the admin rights and restore it's right — Preceding unsigned comment added by C7pmc (talk • contribs) 02:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I want to thank you and apologize! Al.radovski (talk) 11:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

La Défense FOP cases

Hi Christian, it looks like you closed some DRs as "delete per nomination" where none of the participants actually advocated deletion: e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Défense 2012-03-03.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Défense at night, June 2014.jpg. Could you please reopen them? -- King of ♥ 03:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

  • Hello, no I can't, however I clarified the rationale within the DRs. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
    It is not the job of the closer to evaluate whether an exception to COM:FOP such as COM:DM is met for a particular image; that is a highly subjective judgment which is the job of the participants. The job of the closer should simply be to evaluate whether the arguments are based in policy. And here a majority have favored keeping the image based on DM, with there being no strong argument presented as to why DM is not met. -- King of ♥ 03:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
    I always considered that the job of the closer was especially to evaluate if a deletion is justified or not, not that my job was to count the votes within a kind of contest, neither that the DRs are that kind of contest where a few "keep" votes can potentially surpass the copyright laws. In the files I deleted I don't think that the architecture is DM of below ToO, and FoP in France dont allow Commercial reuse, therefore there are potential copyright issues and a deletion is justified. The deleted files are similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg not yet deleted, I wonder how it is possible to consider the architecture DM, or below ToO, and if this is me who close that DR, I will very likely close it as deleted too. And as regard to let potentially some room to discussion, the files have aleardy been deleted within another DR, restored at UDR, and then nominated again for deletion since now 8 month. Apart to undelete the files, thing I don't understand the reason, and therefore that I will not do, I don't understand what you wait from me. Maybe you should avoid to nominate for deletion the files that you believe should be kept, especially when the files have already been deleted and undeleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
    The original batch DR was overturned at UDR for procedural reasons, so renomination was a precondition for undeleting the images. And the closer's job is to count any vote that represents a reasonable interpretation of copyright law, not to impose your own interpretation on the participants. If you want to do that, you should be participating in the DRs rather than closing them. -- King of ♥ 01:39, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
    Regarding the big number of files I deleted since I'm administrator, and the small number of issues I had with those deletions, and seeing our current discussion, I conclude more that if I want to avoid potential troubles I should maybe avoid to close DRs opened by you. But this is not going to happen, and without searching those DRs opened by you I'm not going to try to avoid them. I go reguliraly in Commons:Deletion requests/2020/08, and in similar pages, in order to close old DRs. I'm sorry for that but be aware that if I think I have to close those DRs as deleted, I will do it. If you're not happy with one particular deletion, I suggest you to go to UDR, and if either the file(s) is(are) again undeleted, this time don't nominate it(them) again for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coronilla glauca - Roquebrun 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orb River weir - Roquebrun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunaria annua - Roquebrun 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good, the flowers/trichomes are impressively sharp for f5.6… Is it really not a focus stack? --Nefronus 18:24, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
no, not only it is not a focus stack but is was taken with a 35mm lens, I myself was surprised by this quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Notre-Dame de Douch - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice morning light. --Tuxyso 21:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunaria annua - Roquebrun 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #465

Pictures published yesterday

Hello Christian

As you can see I am a new user around here and I am facing problems not only to understand what I can publish or not, but also having problems in establish a proper communication with Wikipedia and its administrators.

Basically I don't know where to ask and how to find proper tutorials.

Those pictures that I published yesterday, as far as I know, they have more than 70 years, most of than already in public domain and able to be published based on a fair use.

My purpose here is to learn how can I contribute with Wikipedia to preserve memories, events and facts.

I appreciate your concern and waiting for some help with those questions. Sorry for write here, but I have no other choice, since I really don't know where I can ask those things. Best regards Felipe Scama

  • @Felipe Scama: Hello, I moved your message from my user page to my user talk page, as talk pages are the right plces to write messages to other users, not in the user pages.
    We don't accept fair use in Wikimedia Commons, and the CC licenses the you put on the files were bogus, only the copyright holder can do such a thing, see Commons:Scope and Commons: Licensing. Also that an artwork have more than 70 years is not sufficient to say that it is in the public domain. Many country gives a protection for 70 years after the death of the creator, that means that in almost cases you have to identify the author, the year, the country, and often also the year of publication. See also:


Note that you can also ask help or for informations in various places such as e.g. Help:Contents or Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Hope that help. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

I appreciate Christian Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felipe Scama (talk • contribs) 22:04, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedydelete request

Hello Christian, I hope you are doing great!

I just requested a speedydelete on this file: File:Compass Card (hr).svg. The problem with it is, it is a derivative work made out of another commons file, but I really do not remember which one it was, so the source is unknown. Could you please take a look at it? I will probably create a new one and there is already a replacement file that could be used for the hr.wiki-template.

Best regards, Koreanovsky (talk) 09:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

I am really not sure, but I see that the German version is a public domain. Do you know what would be the best to do in this case? Best regards, Koreanovsky (talk) 12:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Do we need to change something about the licence? --Koreanovsky (talk) 15:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
No that's fine IMO, in the extand the source is PD, you had the possibility to use the license of your choice. As you used a cc-by-sa-4.0, I reinstalled it, but if you want to use a less restrictive license tag, such as {{PD-self}}, {{Cc-zero}} it's fine too. {{PD-simple}} seems fine too. As you want. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your help! Best regards, Koreanovsky (talk) 11:56, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vignes près du Pic de Vissou - October 2020 - A01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 14:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)