User talk:XIIIfromTOKYO

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, XIIIfromTOKYO!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

File:5158 ueb typoblanc.jpg[edit]

File:5158 ueb typoblanc.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Ze (talk) 11:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais universitaire Rennes circa 1910.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

File:Palais universitaire Rennes circa 1910.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

-Pymouss Tchatcher - 00:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IEP Rennes entrée ouest.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

File:IEP Rennes entrée ouest.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

-Pymouss Tchatcher - 00:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Université Rennes Cloitre faculté économie.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

File:Université Rennes Cloitre faculté économie.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

-Pymouss Tchatcher - 00:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, XIIIfromTOKYO!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Panorama Rennes Campus Villejean.jpg is uncategorized since 17 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Université Rennes 2 campus villejean plan.JPG[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai demandé la suppression immédiate de cette image car le but de la photo est clairement de reproduire le plan afin qu'il soit lisible. Or, ce plan est soumis au droit d'auteur, et ne saurait être reproduit ici sans l'autorisation de son auteur ou ses ayant-droits. Il faudrait se renseigner sur place. Cordialement, Alchemica (talk) 08:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category name is not correct (不正確なカテゴリ名)[edit]

日本語: 突然の連絡、失礼いたします。Category:Presidents of Tokyo Universityの件ですが、調べたところ「Tokyo University」は誤用？(少なくとも大学自身は用いていない)のようで、正しくは「The University of Tokyo」だそうです([1]。他のカテゴリも大抵はUniv. of Tokyoになっていますcategory:Tokyo University, Category:University of Tokyo参照)。既にカテゴリ名修正依頼(User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands)は提出いたしました。今後のご参考までに。失礼いたします。

English: Hi. I see a category Category:Presidents of Tokyo University, you created. But, I am afraid that "Tokyo University" does not exists, but "The University of Tokyo" does. See [2], category:Tokyo University, and Category:University of Tokyo, please.

And I submitted request of category move (User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands).

Sorry for my poor English.

--Hohoho (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IUFM Bretagne[edit]

Autant pour moi!! Je viens de le voir sur le site, il y a bien le logo de UBO sur le site de l'IUFM. Étant donné que UBS c'est vannes, et UBO brest, je pensais que pour rennes il y avait un autre UB.--Gaëlle FILY (talk) 10:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pays de Brest[edit]

Collecte[edit]

Nous somme en train d'organiser une collecte de photos afin d'illustrer les 89 communes du Pays de Brest sur Commons. Certaines ne rassemblent aucune photo, d'autres moins de 20 et quelques unes sont largement représentées. Retrouvez ici la page listant la quantité de photos pour chaque commune.

En consultant vos contributions sur Commons je me suis rendue compte que vous publiez des photos sur ce territoire. Je vous invite à participer à cette action si vous n'en avez pas déjà connaissance.

Consulter l'article de lancement de la collecte
Consulter l'article annonçant 60 photos de plus sur Commons concernant le Pays
Aujourd'hui plus de 380 nouvelles photo

Groupe brestois[edit]

Rejoignez aussi la liste brest@wikimedia.fr. Cette liste permettra de communiquer sur des actions telles que cette collecte, de réfléchir ensemble sur d’autres projets comme Brest 2012 et de proposer des rencontres. Merci de me faire savoir si vous souhaitez être inscrit (en envoyant un mail à contact at wiki-brest.net), car pour l’instant seuls les abonnés de l’association Wikimedia France peuvent directement s’abonner à la liste.

Wiki-Brest[edit]

Je vous invite également à participer au projet Wiki-Brest, site participatif sur le patrimoine et le vivre ensemble au Pays de Brest http://www.wiki-brest.net

--Gaëlle FILY (talk) 13:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images good descriptions[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:FIL 2011 - 9988.JPG and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing!

High Contrast (talk) 08:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images better names[edit]

العربية ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded File:FIL 2011 - IMG 0833.JPG and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

Mathonius (talk) 10:02, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FIL 2011 - IMG 0805.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful picture, QI for me--Riotforlife 10:54, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Dear XIIIfromTOKYO,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ships_at_Tonnerres_de_Brest_2012[edit]

Ships at Tonnerres de Brest 2012 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Badzil (talk) 18:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorient en 1866 - Quais.jpg[edit]

Salut,

Je viens de faire un peu de ménage sur ce fichier : correction de la licence (il ne faut pas rajouter du CC sur du PD), géolocalisation (à vérifier), et ajout d'un lien vers l'ouvrage sur Gallica. Par contre, j'ai regardé l'ouvrage sur Gallica sans arriver à trouver cette photo, aurais-je mal regardé ou bien me tromperé-je d'ouvrage ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, merci. J'ai corrigé la géoloc, je me suis laissé trompé par la tour de la Découverte que j'estimais plus proche. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photos region lorient - coin[edit]

Alors ma region de survol habituelle: tout ce qui est entre Groix-PontAven-Quimperle-Plouay-Etel, c'est notre local, donc c'est ce que je vais le plus souvent. Quand je vais plus loin, je le mets sur la page https://www.facebook.com/pages/Breizh-Eskell/125800647520896.

--Zabador (talk) 17:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama Rennes - Université Rennes 2 - Bâtiment L et EREVE.jpg[edit]

File:Panorama Rennes - Université Rennes 2 - Bâtiment L et EREVE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 15:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama Rennes - Université Rennes 2 - bâtiment L.jpg[edit]

File:Panorama Rennes - Université Rennes 2 - bâtiment L.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 15:10, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nathalie Appéré - Février 2013 - 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Category:Université_de_Bretagne_Occidentale[edit]

Université de Bretagne Occidentale has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FIL 2013 - Yvon Morvan.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality imo. --JLPC 16:41, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FIL 2013 - Henri Morvan.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me --AleXXw 06:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Croix du bourg de Saint-Servant[edit]

Bonjour,
Je viens de voir les ajouts sur la Category:Croix du bourg (Saint-Servant), mais j'ai un gros doute... Les fiches Mérimée PA00091718 et IA00121434 ne me semblent pas correspondre à cette croix en particulier. Le MH serait "seulement" constitué d'un piédestal du XV^e (ou XVI^e) avec un bas-relief représentant un Crucifixion, auquel à été ajouté une croix du XIX^e. Si on s'en fie à ces fiches, le monument actuellement catégorisé comme Croix du bourg (Saint-Servant) ne serait donc pas le MH PA00091718. Mais je voulais avoir ton sentiment avant d'effectuer quelque modfication que ce soit. Bonne soirée, --Fab5669 (talk) 15:44, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

Après lecture de IA00121434, c'est vrai que cela semble plus correspondre aux photos que PA00091718, et du coup pas d'objection au changement d'identification.

Comme je (ou quelqu'un d'autre) devrais repasser dans le même coin pour prendre en photo la fontaine du bourg, je jeterais un coup d'oeil autour pour voir si elle n'aurait pas été déplacée ailleurs (cimetière...) vu qu'elle n'est pas au niveau de l'église

Au passage merci pour tous les suppléments de catégorisation que tu abats à chaque fois après mes uploads, et bonne soirée,

--XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 20:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour à tous deux. Désolé de me mêler à la conversation (en général, je ne fais que lire pour m'instruire), mais ma curiosité a été piquée par le sujet de la photo

Comme le dé porte l'année 1861 et que le nœud est gravé 1601, la catégorie supérieure à la catégorie de cette croix (16th-century architecture in Morbihan) ne correspond à aucune de ces deux années. 17 et/ou 19° conviendrai(en)t mieux si la date du nœud est avérée. Mais pas 16°...

Ce sont les deux faces de la même croix ? Celle datée de 1601 fait moulage en béton. Au jeu des sept erreurs, je trouve aussi que le joint ciment de raccord du nœud au tronc n'a pas la même forme ni la même couleur sur chaque face et, s'il n'y avait pas un plan général de la croix, je dirais que ce ne sont pas les mêmes...

Dis, XIII, petite question technique : qu'as-tu sur ton X4 ? Le 18/55 du kit ?

Bonne semaine. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 00:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Je rajoute, pour information, le commentaire de Llann.

C'est fait, les mentions de la protection MH sont supprimées et la datation rééchelonnée. (Si,si, toutes les photos se réfèrent au même objet)

Et de rien. J'avais fait un gros travail sur la Category:Morbihan, que je considère un peu comme mon "bébé" sur Commons. Alors quand j'en voit passer, je refais un petit tour. Mais je dois reconnaître que les tiennes ne demandent que peu de boulot :) (J'ai aussi refait ensuite Category:Côtes-d'Armor et, après une pause déménagement et WLM, me remets bientôt sur Category:Finistère.)

Bonne journée, --Fab5669 (talk) 06:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

@Fab5669, du coup tu utilises quoi comme outils pour voir toutes les images uploadées dans une catégorie donnée ?

@Llann .\m/ , oui, c'est le 18/55 de base. Pas mauvais du tout comme première optique, mais à force je commence de plus en plus à voir la déformation. J'ai un 55-250 en plus (toujours du kit de base), mais pour la chasse aux MH il n'est pas vraiment utile (par contre pour un festival...).

Cdlt, --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 07:20, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ce petit outil très pratique. Il donne toutes les modifications sur les images d'une catégorie choisie (ici, la Category:Bretagne), avec une profondeur donnée (ici, 5). Ca permet en outre d'être assez réactif. --Fab5669 (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

J'a aussi doublé la conversation chez Fab.

@XIII : je demandais ça pour le recul : plus tu te mets loin et plus tu zommes, moins la contre-plongée est effective, ce qui permet d'avoir une vue plus "horizontale" sur le sujet. Essaies avec ton 55-250 en prenant du recul. Perso, j'ai le 18/55 du kit de l'EOS 550D plus le 28/80 du kit du 500N (le même que le D mais en argentique) et un 75/300 (acheté au Pas-de-la-Case, moins cher) que j'avais aussi avec mon 500N. J'ai acheté le 500D pour, justement, pouvoir me servir de ces deux autres objectifs, amis ça contraint à trimbaler un sac ou d'avoir une veste à grandes poches. Oui, il y a de grosses déformations (les bâtiments sont un peu trapézoïdaux...) en dessous de 50, mais cette focale est pratique quand le recul est impossible (sinon, je me sers de mon cellulaire qui est en dessous de 18, 15 je crois). Avoir les 18/55 et 75/300 dans un festoche n'est pas très pratique, surtout dans le pit

mais je ne suis pas mécontent et ma veste a de grandes poches

.

@Fab : ton lien est en HTML, et je ne sais pas quoi en faire, comme je te l'avais dit précédemment.

Bonne semaine. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 16:46, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Écrasement volontaire d'image ?[edit]

Bonjour,

En faisant le tour des fichiers de la catégorie Rennes, je suis tombé sur File:La Vilaine à Rennes.JPG où tu as écrasé une ancienne version du fichier par une de tes photos. Est-ce que tu ne pourrais pas plutôt télécharger ta version sous un autre nom (plus explicite tant qu'à faire ) ? (je peux m'occuper du remplacement automatique par ta photo avec User:CommonsDelinker puisqu'elle est effectivement « better colors/frame/photo » ).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:57, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Moscow State Historical Museum - IMG 3550.JPG

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 00:07, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow State Historical Museum - IMG 3550.JPG[edit]

File:Moscow State Historical Museum - IMG 3550.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear XIIIfromTOKYO,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear XIIIfromTOKYO,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Merci ;)[edit]

Et un chaton mignon en l'honneur de ceci ! --EdouardHue (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

⧼Wikibase-terms/XIIIfromTOKYO⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear XIIIfromTOKYO,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menhir de Kergo 7509.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice mood. --Dirtsc 20:24, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine Sainte-Julitte (Remungol) 8162.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please crop left border a little bit to get rid of the stone top left or clone it out. --Cccefalon 06:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC) Done removed --XIIIfromTOKYO 08:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:51, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Puits de la Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Manéguen[edit]

Hello,

j'ai un petit doute sur cette catégorie (et surtout pour sa catégorisation comme MH). En cherchant un peu sur place, je n'ai pas trouvé de fontaine, mais une fois dans le bourg, je suis tombé sur cette fresque murale qui me fait penser qu'il y a bien une fontaine (MH) en plus du puit.

Cdlt, --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 17:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Sur cette question, et après quelques recherches, je n'arrive pas à me faire une opinion définitive. topic-topos confirme que ce bâtiment date de 1705 (et pourrait donc être le MH) mais l'inscription "1828", que je n'avais pas vue en première intention, peut faire penser le contraire (même si ce ne serait pas la première fois qu'une date ultérieure à la première construction est apposée). L'image de la fresque me fait penser à la Fontaine Sainte-Julitte de Rempungol située dans la commune voisine... J'ai finalement trouvé une notice sur glad, qui parle d'une "Fontaine de dévotion du Manéguen" (qui ressemble à la fresque) au nord de Keroperh (et donc au sud de Manéguen, comme dit la notice Mérimée), mais, d'une part, la datation ne correspond pas, et d'autre part, cet édifice ne serait pas protégé MH. Pas de certitude donc, mais avec une tendance à admettre que je suis allé un peu vite en besogne (et donc, je défais, en repartant des infos de la notice de la chapelle, soit un puits de 1715). Bonne soirée, --Fab5669 (talk) 18:25, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renommage Category:Traditional hat from Pays de Fouesnant[edit]

Bonjour XIII

Le nom Pays Fouesnant ne me semble tout à fait juste (voir l'article Giz Fouen), je propose un renommage en Category:Traditional hat from Pays Giz Fouen ou Category:Traditional hat Giz Fouen ou Category:Traditional hat from Pays de l'Aven. Qu'en penses-tu ? Au fait j'ai pris (sans le savoir) une photo de la carte. Je te l'envoie. --Didier Chérel (talk) 21:25, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 en France, 24 September 2014[edit]

Votre photo « Église Notre-Dame-de-Joie (Merlevenez) 3984.JPG » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 24 September 2014. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

Trizek ^{from FR} 16:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Trizek: et pourtant son oreille est aussi flou que celle de Nathalie Apperée :p

et si en même temps il y a moyen de mettre dans le même colis que le T-shirt la chaussure que Jean-Fred m'a piqué la dernière fois en revenant de Carnac... :p

--XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

L'oreille importe peu. Quant à la chaussure, elle est chez moi. Tu passes quand tu veux ! Trizek ^{from FR} 19:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:FIL 2014 - Femmes Gaéliques - Ruth Keggin quartet - 1419.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FIL 2014 - Femmes Gaéliques - Ruth Keggin quartet - 1419.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 18:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Merci pour tes photos de la vidange 2015 du lac de Guerlédan. Lionel Allorge (talk) 16:46, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Université de Bretagne Occidentale - bibliothèque fac lettres.JPG

And also:

File:Université de Bretagne Occidentale - fac lettres cours intérieure 1.JPG

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:FIL 2016 - The City Of Auckland Pipe Band - 4780.webm[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:FIL 2016 - The City Of Auckland Pipe Band - 4780.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:FC Lorient - June 27th 2013 training - Raphaël Guerreiro.JPG[edit]

File:FC Lorient - June 27th 2013 training - Raphaël Guerreiro.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Asevov (talk) 20:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Festival de Cornouaille 1981 - défilé bagad 1.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, - Revent^talk 22:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kristian Hamon - carte actions Bezen Perrot.svg[edit]

File:Kristian Hamon - carte actions Bezen Perrot.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:12, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DDD[edit]

Bonjour XIIIfromTOKYO. Vu que tu as considéré que le logo de la DDD (Discussion Débat Dauphine) était non libre, que penses-tu de cette image ? Mon premier réflexe était de la supprimer, à cause du logo - je serais étonné que cette association place ainsi ses photos sous licence libre - mais j'ai un doute. Sammyday (talk) 13:05, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sammyday:

si tu parles de ce qui ressemble à un watermark en bas à droite, je pense que ça peut assez facilement être traité.

Si tu parles sur le logo que l'on voit en fond d'image, ce n'est pas le sujet de l'image (commence à être flouté par le bokeh de l'image, et est coupé.

Dans les 2 cas, je ne pense pas que cela puisse être invoqué pour la suppression. Il reste la question de la paternité réelle de l'image, et là les EXIFS me font penser que les clichés ont été pris quelque part. L'asso peut très bien tenté de faire sa pub en plaçant les cliché sous CC BY SA. La licence serait respectée. Cdlt, --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, c'était surtout le watermark qui me faisait penser à une erreur de l'asso. Si c'est douteux, on peut laisser. Merci en tout cas. Sammyday (talk) 22:51, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hôtel de Kerret[edit]

Bonjour,
Alors que je m'apprête à créer un article sur l'hôtel de Kerret à Hennebont, je m'interroge sur la seule image correspondant à ce bâtiment dans la catégorie. Photo que tu as prise en 2013 (déjà 5 ans...). Celle-ci représente une plaque et est légendée "plaque de classement de l'hôtel de Kerret à Hennebont". Or, cette plaque semble bien porter sur la place, et non sur le seul hôtel, comme en témoigne son texte :

Restauration de la place Maréchal Foch

Classée monument historique

Inaugurée le 12 juillet 1986 par Mr Didier Cultiaux sous-préfet

commissaire adjoint de la République de l'arrondissement de Lorient

et Mr Jean Le Borgne maire d'Hennebont

Par ailleurs, sans que ça ait valeur de preuve - notamment eu égard des "distances visuelles" à parcourir - je ne la vois pas sur l'hôtel via Street view, ni d'ailleurs sur le reste de la place. Aurais-tu des souvenirs ou des précisions sur l'endroit de cette prise de vue ? Merci d'avance, --Fab5669 (talk) 09:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fab5669:

Sur la question du lieu, si je me souviens bien, c'est sur le revers du muret qui entoure le parking[3]. Donc on ne peut pas la voir depuis la rue, il faut être sur le parking pour la voir.

Pour la question de l'identification, Hennebont est un énorme bazar concernant l'identification (rue dont le nom change, numérotation pas fiable...). La place n'est pas classée MH, mais plusieurs bâtiments autour, oui. Donc l'image s'applique à l’hôtel, mais n'est pas l’hôtel. On avait fait une sortie avec 2 autres photographes, et à la fin de la journée on s'est rendu compte que personne n'avait de photo de ce bâtiment. Plutôt que ne rien mettre, j'ai mit la plaque qui permet au moins de voir quand des travaux ont été faits pour ce bâtiment.

C'est ce que je crois me souvenir un dimanche matin, 5 ans après les faits. Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 10:38, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour le retour. Après renseignement (atlas des patrimoines croisé avec la fiche Mérimée de la basilique), il semble qu'une partie de la place soit classée comme abords de l'église depuis 1939 : "square ; ancien cimetière limité à l'Ouest par l'hôtel de Kerret, au Sud-Est par la rue de Launay et à l'Est par la R.N. 165 ; terrain public à l'Ouest, au Nord et à l'Est de l'église jusqu'à une distance de 40 m de l'édifice". Je pense que la plaque fait réellement référence à cette place en tant que MH, et non à l'hôtel. L'emplacement de celle-ci, en plein milieu, semble d'ailleurs le confirmer. Si tu es d'accord avec cette analyse, je propose de réattribuer la photo à une catégorie "place Maréchal-Foch (Hennebont)", qui serait elle-même catégorisée comme place MH. Qu'en penses-tu ? --Fab5669 (talk) 12:25, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fab5669: pas de problème pour réattribuer, mais pour faire correspondre à quel MH ? Sauf erreur il n'y a pas de fiche Mérimée pour une place MH à Hennebont. Donc on la rattache à quel(s) MH(s) ? Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 12:36, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eh bien, eh bien... Je pensais à quelque chose comme ça :

Place Maréchal-Foch (Hennebont) : {{Mérimée|type=classé|PA00091279}} [[Category:Monuments historiques in Hennebont]] [[Category:Squares in Morbihan|Hennebont, Marechal-Foch]] [[Category:Monuments historiques in France (squares)|Hennebont, Marechal-Foch]]. Certes, c'est le même identifiant que la basilique, mais est-ce gênant ? --Fab5669 (talk) 12:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Au final on va arriver avec deux éléments Wikidata (via les catégories Commons) qui vont avoir le même numéro Mérimée, et qui désignent deux choses bien différentes, avec deux géoloc différentes. Je pense que cela peut être un soucis. Il faudrait sans doute poser la question sur le projet:MH sur Wikipédia pour en être certain. Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 12:49, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Discussion lancée sur la page du projet. Merci en tout cas pour les échanges. --Fab5669 (talk) 15:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question carte Nantes[edit]

Bonjour XIIIfromTOKYO,

Je vous contacte pour savoir comment vous avez fait pour faire cette carte https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_Nantes.jpg ? Je serai intéressé pour une autre ville, comment faites vous ressortir les limites administratives ?

Merci :) --Woodtech587 (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

j'avais utilisé Open Street Map pour avoir le fond de carte. Il y a une option «exporter», qui permet d'avoir une carte cadrée avec les coordonnées géoloc (important à bien noter si tu veux faire un modèle de géoloc ensuite). Les limites des villes sont déjà présentes. Je n'ai fait que modifier rapidement les couleurs ensuite pour bien faire figurer celles-ci. J'exportais en .jpg, donc même avec Paint c'est faisable. Il faut juste retracer ces limites à la mains avec un pinceau d'une bonne épaisseur.

Aujourd'hui sur wiki FR, on peut faire directement des cartes dynamiques, donc c'est plutôt ça que j'utiliserais (cf ici, sous l'infobox, pour un exemple d'usage).

Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 12:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merci d'avoir répondu :) Quand j'exporte un depuis osm, j'ai un fichier map.osm et non jpg, donc ne s'ouvre pas. As-tu une idée ? Je note pour la carte interactive.

Bonne soirée :-)

--Woodtech587 (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

En passant par «partager» (colonne à droite de l'écran) tu peux choisir le type de fichier que tu veux obtenir ;)

Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 16:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah d'accord ! très bien, merci bcp :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodtech587 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Demande de de supression du fichier. "Bro gozh ma zado -O Breizh ma Bro- (Version orchestre).ogg"[edit]

Bonjour, suite à votre demande de supresion du fichier :Bro gozh ma zado -O Breizh ma Bro- (Version orchestre).ogg. J'aimerais savoir si étant depuis peu devenu l'hymne officiel de la région Bretagne et que ce fichier précisément appartient à la région Bretagne puisque c'est la version remagné pour l'occasion, sa licence d'utilisation ne serait elle pas libre d'accès? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mazapan3210 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Musée de Bretagne - 971.0037.5285 - Lorient - Stade du Moustoir.jpg

And also:

File:Musée de Bretagne - 980.0023.1587.2 - Lorient - Stade du Moustoir.jpg

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 08:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@VIGNERON en résidence: J'arrive après la bataille, mais quel était le problème ? Je crois que me souvenir de bien avoir fait les recherches pour limiter au BY-SA. Une date sinon pour l'upload des fichier du Musée de Bretagne ? J'ai vu qu'il y avait pas mal de photo des derniers FIL qui pourraient finir directement dans les articles. Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 17:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, pas de problème, je suis là pour répondre aux questions, même après la bataille.

Alors, soit il y a eu un bug (d'interface ? de catalogage ?) soit un problème de filtre mais ces images étaient sous licence CC-BY-NC-ND donc incompatible avec Commons.

Je ne sais pas ce que tu entends pas « l'upload des fichier du Musée de Bretagne », vu la quantité (+200 000) et la qualité (des images en doubles ou presque, des notices parfois très succinctes, etc.), je ne peux pas importer tout. Je pensais faire quelques imports ciblés de corpus cohérent, as-tu repéré des images en particulier ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 08:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai vu passer des photos des deux dernières éditions du FIL, et d'une autre édition plus ancienne (années 90). Mais plus largement ce qui est lié à Lorient, voir au Morbihan en fonction du nombre de photos concernées. Peut-être voir aussi avec les contributeurs brestois (@Kergourlay: ) s'ils peuvent trouver des trucs intéressants. Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 07:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Fanch Gourvil.jpg

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 11:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Données d'objets depuis Wikidata[edit]

Salut,

Pour information, je viens de finir l'import des objets du parcours permanent du musée de Bretagne sur Wikidata (ou presque, parce qu'il y a toujours des choses à vérifier/améliorer, les bases sont là en tout cas).

Cela permet du coup de reprendre directement les données de Wikidata dans Commons et plus concrètement de faire ce genre de chose : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mus%C3%A9e_de_Bretagne_-_point_d%27eau.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=777727760 (n'hésite pas à me dire soit s'il y a un problème/oubli/question/remarque au niveau des données, soit si tu préfères l'ancienne méthode - pour le moment, Commons reste dans un entre-deux indécis par rapport à Wikidata).

Cdlt, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @VIGNERON en résidence:

Pas de problème pour le remplacement par le modèle.

Si je comprends bien comment {{Art Photo}} fonctionne, il est de toute manière possible de renseigner une valeur en locale si Wikidata n'est pas assez précis, non ? Et sur le long terme, autant tout centraliser sur Wikidata. Cdlt, XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 17:08, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, c'est une règle d'or : il doit toujours être possible d'utiliser des valeurs locales et celles-ci ont la priorité. En fait, on utilise Wikidata indirectement, techniquement ce sont les données structurées (le Wikidata dans Commons cachés sous l'onglet du même nom) qui sont utilisées. Cdlt, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 07:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:XIIIfromTOKYO

File:5158 ueb typoblanc.jpg[edit]

File:Palais universitaire Rennes circa 1910.jpg[edit]

File:IEP Rennes entrée ouest.jpg[edit]

File:Université Rennes Cloitre faculté économie.jpg[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

File:Université Rennes 2 campus villejean plan.JPG[edit]

Category name is not correct (不正確なカテゴリ名)[edit]

IUFM Bretagne[edit]

Pays de Brest[edit]

Collecte[edit]

Groupe brestois[edit]

Wiki-Brest[edit]

Please give images good descriptions[edit]

Please give images better names[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Category:Ships_at_Tonnerres_de_Brest_2012[edit]

File:Lorient en 1866 - Quais.jpg[edit]

Photos region lorient - coin[edit]

File:Panorama Rennes - Université Rennes 2 - Bâtiment L et EREVE.jpg[edit]

File:Panorama Rennes - Université Rennes 2 - bâtiment L.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Category:Université_de_Bretagne_Occidentale[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Croix du bourg de Saint-Servant[edit]

Écrasement volontaire d'image ?[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Moscow State Historical Museum - IMG 3550.JPG[edit]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Merci ;)[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Category:Puits de la Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Manéguen[edit]

Renommage Category:Traditional hat from Pays de Fouesnant[edit]

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 en France, 24 September 2014[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:FIL 2014 - Femmes Gaéliques - Ruth Keggin quartet - 1419.jpg[edit]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Copyright status: File:FIL 2016 - The City Of Auckland Pipe Band - 4780.webm[edit]

File:FC Lorient - June 27th 2013 training - Raphaël Guerreiro.JPG[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Kristian Hamon - carte actions Bezen Perrot.svg[edit]

DDD[edit]

Hôtel de Kerret[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019[edit]

Question carte Nantes[edit]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France ![edit]

Demande de de supression du fichier. "Bro gozh ma zado -O Breizh ma Bro- (Version orchestre).ogg"[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Données d'objets depuis Wikidata[edit]

Navigation menu

Search