User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive19
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
2013 • feb-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec |
May - June 2016
Tall Ship Royal Albatross
Dear Christian
I noticed you removed the Royal Albatross from Wikipedia's Tall Ship's page due to a copyright violation. Please note that Tall Ship Adventures is the owner of the Royal Albatross and the copyright owner of photo we uploaded (below) to Wikipedia. Can you undo the removal please?
(cur | prev) 21:57, 11 January 2016 CommonsDelinker (talk | contribs) . . (33,436 bytes) (-23) . . (Removing "RoyalAlbatross.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by Christian Ferrer because: Copyright violation: copyvio via (example) http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20151007006625/en/Tall-Ship-Royal-) (undo)
Regards
Peter Pela Managing Director Tall Ship Adventures Pte Ltd pete@tallship.com.sg
- Hello, Peter. A lot of copyright violations are uploaded every days here. And one of our bigger concern is to delete them in the purpose to protect the owners rights. Following your link above, the photo was previously published there with no clear evidences that it can be uploaded here under a free license, then it is, for us, currently a copyright violation. To differentiate between uploaders who have a permission and those who have not, we have com:OTRS, please send a permission there, don't forgot to mention "File:RoyalAlbatross.jpg", and the file will be restored as soon as permission is treated by volunteers. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi Christian - I've followed your instructions and submitted the file to com:OTRS. Hopefully Royal Albatross' page can be restored soon. BR. Peter
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rhapsody (ship, 1996), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Rhapsody (ship, 1996), Sète cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rhapsody (ship, 1996), Sète cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg){kind=link}
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, czar 07:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Is this image copyright?
Hello. I found this image online that I would like to add to my article that I'm working on, but I don't know if it's copyright or not. I didn't notice any "all rights reserved" but also didn't see a license allowing people to use it. Since you seem to know if images are copyright or not, could you help me figure out if this image is copyright. Thanks and heres the link - http://delawarepublic.org/post/wilmington-begins-work-comprehensive-plan#stream/0 . Jonesrmj (talk) 20:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)jonesrmj
- Hello, you were right to ask me, sadly this content is not free. At the bottom of the page there is written "© 2016 Delaware First Media". It's another way for saying "all rights reserved". Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg){kind=link}
Rhapsody (ship, 1996). General view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Deletion request
Hi Christian! The following doesn't make sense to me: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Human baby.JPG and looks more like the work of a vandal. Would you take a look at it please? Atsme 📞 13:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Done speedy kept Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gorges d'Héric, Haut-Languedoc cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gorges d'Héric, Haut-Languedoc cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
File for FP nomination
I consider this a strong FP candidate. I can't nominate it myself at the moment, but I will, eventually, if you don't get to it. Great work!
All the best,
Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Ikan, I'm glad you like, thank you for coming to tell me... Feel free to nominate it if, or when, you want it. I have not decided anything yet about this picture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruisseau du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf04.jpg)
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
,_S%C3%A8te_cf04.jpg){kind=link}
Nao Victoria (ship, 1992).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruisseau du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Images by User:Alisonkaye
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:One Time Mountain "Back to you" 2015 Official Music Video.jpg, could you delete the other images by Alisonkaye (talk · contribs)? All appear to be for promotional purposes only (for en:Kate Eppers which was just deleted as non-notable advertising) and the licensing is suspect. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Images speedy deleted except 2 which are nominated for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruisseau du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruisseau du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ruisseau du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Serre de Coste Grande, Haut-Languedoc cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont du Vialais. Rosis, Hérault, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Douch hamlet, Rosis cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Pont du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pont du Vialais, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roquebrun and Orb River cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alley in Roquebrun cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour de Roquebrun cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image - not sharp enough
Hello Christian,
I'm writing to you, because you recently marked an image of me in Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list as not sharp enough. This happens to about 40% of the images I propose, I guess. However, my problem is that I don't see it. Could you please tell me (1) where / how I can see that an image is not sharp enough and (2) how I can fix this?
Best regards, --MartinThoma (talk) 11:51, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @MartinThoma: , hello. In my opinion there is two possibility, or this is a little camera shake, but most likely it is out of focus. You can compare with an other file of you, whitch is sharp but overexposed at upper right. An image is unsharp when there is an impression of vagueness, or as if you look through a thick glass, we also can call that "blurred".
This is a perfect exemple, where only the feet are sharp because they are in the area within the depth of field. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alley in Roquebrun cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alley in Roquebrun cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alley in Roquebrun cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Uprooted tree, Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Abandoned building, Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pine trees, Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aphyllanthes monspeliensis, Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Roquebrun and Orb River cf02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roquebrun and Orb River cf02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Bea Kyle Standing Fire Engine and Pickle 1924, edited.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bea Kyle Standing Fire Engine and Pickle 1924, edited.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aphyllanthes monspeliensis, Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plage, Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Étang de l'Ayrolle, Gruissan cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pterophorus pentadactyla, Vic-la-Gardiole cf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Suaeda vera, Vic-la-Gardiole cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/2016/06 : sorry for mistake
I just realize that I just close some recent deletion requests coming from above. I thought being in the process of closing the oldest until I make me realize my mistake. Sorry for the mistake, for my part I think they would have been closed in the same way anyway. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pine trees, Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roquebrun and Orb River cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Île Saint-Martin, Gruissan cf22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pisaura mirabilis, Vic-la-Gardiole cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Passerelle du Moulin de l'Evêque, Montpellier cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pisaura mirabilis, Vic-la-Gardiole cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passerelle du Moulin de l'Evêque, Montpellier, France. South view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Kamchatka Brown Bear near Dvuhyurtochnoe on 2015-07-23.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kamchatka Brown Bear near Dvuhyurtochnoe on 2015-07-23.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pisaura mirabilis, Vic-la-Gardiole cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pisaura mirabilis, Vic-la-Gardiole cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Content alleged to be copyright
You have proposed to remove content alleged to be copyright from an article about the author of a book for which the content is for. This is not copyright material for the reason outlined above. It is the property of the author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obltkg4 (talk • contribs) 23:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- I guess you talk about File:One Day in August 978-0345807700.jpg and File:AugustEnigma.jpg, a permission via com:OTRS must be sent by the copyright owners and if the permission is valid the files will be restored. However in most cases regarding books edition, the author must guarantee the exclusive right given to the publishers, then I think very likely that only the publisher have the right to give the permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Re : Adah Sharma
Hi
i am the Media Manager of Indian Actress Adah Sharma . I am making the changes as instated by her . The Profile pic pf Adah Sharma is Very which she want to change .and also she want to add her official Verified Facebook Twitter and Insta Pages to Wikipedia.
This are the below details need to be changed.
The changes which am made are very genuine i dont understanding why you guys are changing it back .
Facebook Page : https://www.facebook.com/RealAdahSharma
Twitter : https://twitter.com/adah_sharma Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/adah_ki_adah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manoj4334 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, some of your uploads have been deleted because they can be found previously published in the web, and with not the mandatory explicit permissions or licenses for a publication here. When a file is previously published elsewhere and if you're the copyright owner or if you have the permission from the copyright owner, the copyright owner must send the permission via com:OTRS. This process is valid for your next potential uploads or for the later deleted files for which you have the permission. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
,_Roquebrun_01.jpg) |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Escagnès (hameau), Roquebrun 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Escagnès (hameau), Roquebrun 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
,_Roquebrun_01.jpg){kind=link}
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Mantis religiosa, immature female, Sète 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mantis religiosa, immature female, Sète 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Regnitz-Baum-1012073.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regnitz-Baum-1012073.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
A book for you
|
A nice sunset to read a book |
| As I know you're french and a wikidrama lover like others. I think that you could love read Orgueil et Préjugés. See you The Photographer (talk) 19:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC) |
- Hey, apparently I see, you too, you're keenly interested...then welcome to the club! Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Remy LaCroix 69
Still more copyright violations by Remy LaCroix 69 (talk · contribs) despite your warning. clpo13(talk) 18:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Done user blocked, thank you. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Parnassius mnemosyne - Dumanlı apollo 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parnassius mnemosyne - Dumanlı apollo 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Barrage du Salagou cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Celles cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|