User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


November - December 2016


Hello Christian,

I am the founder of the UCL Emperors. You recently removed our logo from the Wikipedia page. This logo was designed by the team and was given to me as a gift with no copyright attachment to it. I own the image now and wanted to use it to decorate our Wikipedia page and educate people about American Football in the UK.

I'm not very adept at touching up Wikipedia pages (it's all kind of foreign to me), so I was wondering if you could place the logo back on the page.

Thank you,

Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfoxallsmith (talk • contribs) 13:12, 01 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de télécommunication du Plateau de Caume cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Braemar (ship, 1993), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition from which quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviera (ship, 2012), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Degard Paintings

Dear Christian i received your message this morning about the imagery for degard1. I understand your concern but there is no reason for concern. i own all the copyrights to all these paintings. These are original paintings. Further i also own the copyrights to the photographs since i have purchased them in advance of doing the paintings. i purchase the images from getty, image collect, alamy and some of the images are free. thank you very much Dee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Degard1 (talk • contribs) 14:07, 03 November 2016 (UTC)

DEGARD AGAIN !

hi Christian i am utterly at a loss. Myself and my colleague have been desperately trying to understand what you require in terms of proof.

i own all the photos. i took the photos of my own paintings to which i own the copyright. i have all this work currently in storage waiting to go to museums.

would you like me to send you a signed document with this statement? very best Dee 7.48pm uk time 11/3/16 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Degard1 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 03 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canal de Sète juste avant crépuscule 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minerve cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame des Clans, Celles cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Honoré Muratet, Agde cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations

I apologize for having loaded those photos, please do not block my account. I will not do it again--Halcón 601 (talk) 13:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Canal de Sète juste avant crépuscule 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Canal de Sète juste avant crépuscule 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Hi Christian. I see an image was removed due to copy write violation of Riccardo Silva. This image was in no way a breach or copywrite, What is the quickest way to get the image re-instated? Njm 78 (talk) 22:07, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chillibilli

Ich wäre um eine Löschungsbegründung der betroffenen Dateien dankbar. Auch habe ich keine Info über Löschungsanträge und -diskussionen erhalten.--Chillibilli (talk) 10:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cistus albidus, Saint-Rémy-de-Provence cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape of vineyards, Castelnau-de-Guers cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Nice sharpness--Lmbuga 17:29, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abou Karim II (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang de Thau depuis Mèze cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 19:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quai Commandant Réveille, Agde cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abou Karim II (ship, 1979).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Étang de Thau depuis Mèze cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Braemar (ship, 1993), Sète cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. File size is not very useful :-) --Ermell 19:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

page WIKIPEDIA et images

Je n'arrive pas à vous joindre pour dire (et redire) que je suis l'auteur du tete et des photos que j'ai voulu mettre sur une page La Cuisine Méditerranéenne de Mireille. mireille sanchez destimed-sanchez@orange.fr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimi Sanchez (talk • contribs) 12:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi Christian, you deleted a picture that was included in my article ben Salomo on DE-Wikipedia: (Ben_Salomo_2015.png entfernt, auf Commons von Christian Ferrer gelöscht. Grund: Copyright violation: http://images.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RFuvJg1V9u4/maxresdefault.jpg&imgrefurl=https) The photographer ( a newbie) has asked me for help, he does not understand, why the photo has been removed. He says it is his own work and he is willing to load it up again. Is that possible? Why do you think, he violated copy right? --Siesta (talk) 13:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Hi, I assume you talk about File:Ben Salomo 2015.png uploaded by Mazzelman, the image have been previously published in the web, in several places and in much higher resolutions, e.g. there. We must have a free source or the copyright owner of the photo must send a permission to OTRS, and if the permission is valid the file will be undeleted. The uploader uploaded 2 times the same photo, and 2 times it have been deleted, the third time will likely lead to a block of the account. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

the picture was taken from the facebook site RAP AM MITTWOCH from RAM in köln date 22.5.2015 and im the owner of it--Mazzelman (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

  • You're the owner of the photo only if you are the photographer, or only if the photographer worked for you. If you're indeed the owner of this photo, in order to restore the photo, you must contact OTRS and give to them all the relevant informations. Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, I informed Mazzelman about your response on my talk page. --Siesta (talk) 14:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

yes i was the organisator of the event in cologne an the photographer was working for me! so why it was deletet? i hooked the button where i answered the question that im the owner! i wasnt lying...why you decided to delete?--Mazzelman (talk) 20:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mazet in Castelnau-de-Guers cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roc du Mayne, Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Baux-de-Provence cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape of vineyards, Castelnau-de-Guers cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dawn on the harbour of Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I like how you got the shining of the lights... Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks you, this come from some photoshop filters, e.g. high-pass filter with attenuations like density color --Christian Ferrer 14:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


New Campus of CEIBS

These is no photo on wikipedia page, but there are 1000's of them there on internet.

I don't have original photo. How to upload a photo from internet to wikipidia??? there is no other way — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karansingh47 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

MROBerTOs_aggregating_in_swarm_experiment.gif

Hi Christian, the .gif file "MROBerTOs_aggregating_in_swarm_experiment.gif" was deleted few days ago because you said it was copied from the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-kuOcyjWsQ. I am the original creator of both the video and the .gif file so could you please add the file back to Wikipedia? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beeboobeep (talk • contribs) 03:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Book covers

bonsoir Monsieur,

j'ai reçu votre message concernant les images que je mets sur mon brouillon , je vous confirme que ce n'est en aucun cas une violation de droit d'auteur. que faut-il que je fasse pour vous le prouver ? merci de votre aide --RLEB (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Bonjour, les livres, ainsi que leur couvertures, sont protégés par le droit d'auteur, et seuls les ayants droits ont le droit de (re)licensier leurs oeuvres (chose que nous faisons ici lorsque nous téléchargeons une image). Une photo de livre est une oeuvre dérivée de ce livre, et les droits d'auteur du livre se répercutent sur la photo. Dans le cas de livres, les maisons d'éditions ont souvent leur mots à dire, et peuvent souvent détenir des droits sur les livres qu'elles publient. Quoi qu'il en soit, pour toute oeuvre qui a déjà été publiée d'une manière ou d'une autre, nous requérons que les ayants droits, envoient une permission à OTRS, ou vous pourrez lire les instructions sur comment procéder. Si une permission est envoyée pour une image éffacée, et que cette permission est jugée valide alors l'image sera restaurée. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Rio Tagus

Bonsoir Christian, comment vas-tu?
Une personne de Robin des Bois m’a signalé que le Rio Tagus allait être détruit prochainement à Barcelone (si son état permet un remorquage) ou à Sète. Est-ce que tu pourrais faire des photos du départ ou de la démolition, selon le choix retenu?
Merci par avance pour ta réponse.
Bonne soirée. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 17:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

  • @Lev. Anthony: Bonjour, ça va impeccablement, merci. Bien sur, avec plaisir, j'essayerai de prendre des photos du départ ou du démontage, bien que si le départ se fait pendant mes heures travail ça va etre dur... et j'ai pas un patron très cool... En cherchant des infos je suis tombé sur france3-regions qui utilise une de mes images, non seulement sans me citer mais en apposant un joli © D.R, moi c'est CF! Si tu apprends une date potentiel du départ n'hésite pas à me prévenir. J'essayerai de toutes façon de faire quelque bonnes photos de plus tant qu'il est à quai. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Merci de la rapidité de réponse J’ai demandé à Christine Bossard de me tenir informé si elle avait plus d’infos, je te tiendrais au courant. Robin des Bois a été plus cool que France 3, ils ont pris une de mes photos (que je leur avais envoyée en mail il y a plus d’un an), mais ils ont mis mon crédit (page 11). Par contre, j’avais déjà eu le cas du vol de photos en mai, avec la mairie de Challes-les-Eaux qui avait réutilisé une de mes photos de l’église de Challes-les-Eaux pour les flyers et posters de Mai en Musique sans aucun copyright (le pire, c’est qu’ils me connaissent, puisque j’y suis souvent...).
Bonne soirée et merci d’avance pour les photos --Lev. Anthony (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète 09.jpg
File:Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf10.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Bonsoir,
Merci des photos supplémentaires Je n’avais pas remarqué qu’il s’était autant enfoncé...
Christine Bossard ne m’a pas donné de nouvelles, donc je suppose qu’elle n’a pas eu de nouvelles infos.
Je ne sais pas si tu as su, mais il y a eu un "pépin" avec le Cettarames, donc son départ avait été abandonné. Annick m’a dit que 2 personnes étaient intéressés pour le reprendre, mais c’est encore à l’étude. (il était question qu’il soit converti en théatre en septembre 2015, mais le second naufrage avait fait coulé le projet. Je ne sais pas si c’est ce projet qui est revenu) Je te tiendrais au courant quand j’aurais plus d’infos.
Bonne soirée. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 21:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Re-bonsoir
Quelques nouvelles d’Annick : le bateau doit être repris par un restaurant. Elle m’a dit qu’il serait détruit dans un mois si elle n’avait pas de nouvelles. Si éventuellement tu passes là-bas à l’occasion, pourrais-tu refaire quelques photos avant son départ? Je te tiendrais au courant quand la décision définitive aura été prise.
Également, as-tu des photos de l’Edoil avant et pendant sa démolition?
Bonne soirée. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 22:01, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Oui d'accord, j'essaierai de photographier le Cettarames, mais pour l’Edoil la réponse est non, et je ne le connais pas. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Bonsoir Christian,
Désolé pour mon retard dans les réponses, je suis dans les révisions pour les partiels qui approchent.
Merci par avance pour les photos du Cettarames Quant à l’Edoil, c’était un cargo abandonné à Sète pendant de nombreuses années (on le voit derrière le Bni Nsar sur cette photo). Il a été détruit sur place pendant l’hiver 2013/2014 (on voit deux photo des première découpes sur cette page).
Bonne soirée. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 23:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Ha, ça y est, je me rapelle de ce bateau, non je n'ai pas pris de photo, la zone portuaire a un accès restreint, je serai le plus heureux du monde si je pouvais y accéder pour faire des photos, crois moi! :) Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dawn on the harbour of Sète cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dawn on the harbour of Sète cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

undeletion

Hi Christian, I've undeleted the 4 images out of Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Rehgina, which you had deleted earlier. In between, the parliament of Belgium had enacted a Commons-compatible FOP-exception for Belgium. --Túrelio (talk) 22:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

why deleted

why you delete my photo... what the problem with you of that photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacHuum (talk • contribs) 13:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape of vineyards, Castelnau-de-Guers cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Vieux et Cathédrale Saint-Nazaire de Béziers cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 18:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

My apologies

Hi Cristian. I wanted to apologize for my inappropriate behavior toward you at FPC. I've had a pretty bad week or two when it comes down to it. I said I wouldn't vote any more on your nominations, but that was an over-reaction. I like your work too much to stick to such a statement. There have been a couple times when you withdrew an FP nomination where I really liked the image, but it's your decision and I should've just respected that. I just had a tooth pulled today, so my mood should brighten up again... Bonne journée mon ami. lNeverCry 07:15, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

  • Thanks you, I accept your apologies with pleasure. In the past I had the bad habit to nomine a maximum of images of which a good part was not featurables. Now I do a much more drastic sorting, but some are still somewhat questionable. FPs must be the finest. I prefer to risk embarrassing the voters a little, but in purpose to have really only the finest being promoted. The advantage is the finest is really the finest and me I can be really proud of my FPs. But you're not entirely wrong, I deserve a bit all this. It will not happen if I chose a little better my candidates, this is the lesson I retain. So I thanks you for your frankness, and I beg you not to get rid of it. Bonne journée et à bientôt! Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
    I'm glad we've got that settled. I hate to be at odds with people, and especially someone like you who I consider a friend. As for your nominations, we have a saying "every man is his own worst critic", meaning we tend to be tougher on ourselves than anyone else. I still remember that photo of yours with the horned cattle in the green field. I kept a copy for my personal collection I liked it so much. Just try not to underestimate your talent. You do some great work, especially when it comes to lighting. Many of your works have very pleasing and delicate lighting that remind me of my favorite landscape paintings. lNeverCry 00:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont d'Occitanie, Béziers cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Neuf and Pont Vieux, Béziers cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

material related to author Dimitris Lyacos

Dear Christian Ferrer, You have deleted material related to author Dimitris Lyacos. This is to inform you that Dimitris Lyacos himself has given permission to OTRS for each image and all are therefore suitably appearing in the public realm. All images are work of are commissioned by the author. Should you feel in the future amendments need to be made to pages relevant to the author please consult with us at info@lyacos.net Sincerely, Shorsha Sullivan

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:RUS-2016-Bolshoi Zayatsky Island-Stone House.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RUS-2016-Bolshoi Zayatsky Island-Stone House.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Demande suppression d'image

Bonjour, j'ai importé l'image File:Femme et son Double.jpg avec l'accord initial de l'auteur, mais ce dernier s'est ravisé et préfère sa suppression. J'accepte tout à fait cette suppression. Peux-tu t'en occuper ? Merci d'avance. --Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 13:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Éric Messel (talk • contribs) 13:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for nominating my photo.
Sincerely,
Dominicus Bergsma (Famberhorst).

  • Cloning is just fine, thank you.

Sincerely,
Dominicus Bergsma (Famberhorst).--Famberhorst (talk) 16:27, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Recreating works

Hi Christian,

You have deleted material related to the works of Dinosaur Island and My Pet Monster. This is to inform you that all permissions have been given for the relevant images to appear in the public realm by Little Monster Productions, Extinct Productions and Hive Studios. All images are work of are commissioned by the author. Please stop deleting these images as we have every right to place them in the public domain. Please advise. --Snaggy01 (talk) 07:49, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Les Baux-de-Provence cf03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Les Baux-de-Provence cf03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyards, Minerve cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice quality and nice landscape -- George Chernilevsky 20:37, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Poterne, Minerve cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:29, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fuchsia 'Freundeskreis Leonberg' 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuchsia 'Freundeskreis Leonberg' 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks again

Thanks again for your FP. nomination of my picture

File: Fuchsia 'Freundeskreis Leonberg' 01.jpg,

Sincerely,

Dominicus Bergsma.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

GENRENALE deletion

Dear Christian,

you have deleted our GENRENALE logo recently. What do I have to do in order to get this logo listed here? We are the festival, our designer, who has the copyright on this logo and the name, has given us all rights to work with his work for us, this logo and everything. So there should not be any problems concerning copyright. How can we accomplish the listing of our logo here at wiki commons? Thank you and Best regards, killerspots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerspots (talk • contribs) 16:00, 04 December 2016 (UTC)

Janette Fennell photos

Thank you for your tags of copyright violation! I am a student at Northeastern completing a wikiedu project and I uploaded the two pictures without fully understanding the copyright regulations. I have now read and understand them. I had deleted the photos from the page itself but didn't realize I would also need to delete them from the commons!

Thank you for your guidance!

--Character.zero (talk) 14:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lagarosiphon major flowers on Salagou Lake cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minerve cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 18:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

 Request

Good afternoon,

We would like to amend the photo of Braemar on this page please as it is showing it when it was being painted, and isn't completed - we have images of the ship that can be used instead, but unfortunately cannot seem to attach it to this page, so please let us know how we can either edit this or send to you for you to amend.

Many thanks and kind regards,

Shona Michell Fred. Olsen Cruise Lines

FredOlsen (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

14:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredOlsen (talk • contribs) 14:24, 07 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Hello, I don't understand exaclty what you are asking for, I assume you talk about one of my photos or at least you are talking about a page showing one of my images:
File:Braemar (ship, 1993), Sète cf02.jpg
File:Braemar (ship, 1993), Sète cf01.jpg
File:Braemar (ship, 1993), Sète cf01 (cropped).jpg
  • 1/ if you want to change my image in a wikipedia article by an image you think more relevant, you're are free to do it. But you have to edit the wikipedia article and you have to replace the name of my image by the one you have chosen. If you still need help for that you should ask in the wikipedia instead of me.
  • 2/ if you are the owner of a photo not yet in Wikipedia Commons, you're also free to upload it here. In this case please read this first and also this.
    Hope this helped. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry :/

Lol I need to stop being lazy but I'm sorry for everything j — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryeedwards (talk • contribs) 17:25, 09 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minerve cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 03:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice!--Famberhorst 18:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Attaques personnelles à mon égard

Salut C'est moi Panama2014. J'ai été victime d'une attaque personnelle de la part de compte tendance CAOU dont l'un est un banni de Wikipedia. J'ai alors fait une RA qui n'a pas été traitée et le banni est venu me harceler. Je crois que la RA n'a pas été traitée car les propos tenus sont en français. Par ailleurs on assiste aussi à une désorganisation depuis commons. J'ai des diff. Pourrait on parler ? Pourriez vous faire quelque chose ? Cordialement. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum fonscolombii, female, Sète cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Deleted images

Hello Sir, you have deleted 2 of the images I uploaded. These image does not violate any copyright as I have taken the photos personally. File:Gps tracker.jpg Gps-tracking-unit.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baaluo (talk • contribs) 09:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-canal de l'Orb cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object with nice town in background --Michielverbeek 19:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Please innovation future shoefie total women world

Immediately restores the file image: selfies Shoes by Miz Mooz.jpg no copyright infringement are images are the other. --User:Daniel CaselsIDaniel Casels (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jean François Deniau (ship, 2015), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Delete request by uploader please

Hello can you please do me a favor and delete speedy delete as request by uploader [1] and [2] ? Sagecandor (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

One more sorry

Can you please speedy delete this [3] ? Sagecandor (talk) 06:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2015-07-27 20-51-30 Macroglossum-stellatarum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015-07-27 20-51-30 Macroglossum-stellatarum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

About Tour de télécommunication du Plateau de Caume cf03.jpg

Hi, I like a lot this image of yours, if you can use a software like RawTherapee (is opensource so free) it is very easy to reduce noise from your raw file, there a lot of others tools but I am not expert on then, regards --Cvmontuy (talk) 19:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Whoops this is awkward :/

Sorry for uploading content that was deleated i didn't know better since :/ anyways Im still in school working a On a website and I need to get my head out of the gutters :0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryeedwards (talk • contribs) 02:17, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de télécommunication du Plateau de Caume cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway bridge in Béziers, Hérault, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyards, Minerve cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

In regards to your deletion of File:Mama - ulazna vrata i display .jpg

Dear Christian Ferrer you deleted a File:Mama - ulazna vrata i display .jpg marking it copyrighted without checking the source!

File was produced and owned by Multimedia Institute - organization that promotes actively Free software and content, as well as localizer of Creative Commons in Croatian language. All of their content is free and available for re-use.

Plese un-delete this photo and revise the methods of your policing work on Wikipedia by informing yourself! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zblace (talk • contribs) 17:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

  • The source on the file page was "Own work", however the image have been previously published there without an explicit free license. In order to restore the file, our policies require that a permission from the copyright holder must be sent to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. If a free license, e.g. "this image is licensed under cc-by-sa-4.0" is included in the web page I linked, or in a previous web page that I missed, so the file can also be undeleted. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Southern American English

Dear Christian: In the English spoken in the southern United States, "I learned him all about ____" is actually a common use. Jim is from the northern states where they use "I taught him all about ___". Just a silly thought for a happy Friday. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Krestovsky Stadium 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Krestovsky Stadium 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpilles landscape cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall, Minerve cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the deep shade, but good quality.--Famberhorst 17:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean François Deniau (ship, 2015).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Détails qui clochent!

Bonjour, je travail dur ce matin pour intégrer le modèle {{Art Photo}}. J'y suis arrivé, sauf pour le 2e volume où j'ai une erreur que je ne comprend pas; peux tu m'éclairé sur mon chantier ici :Accademia - Francesco Maffei - Mythological Scene.jpg. Les deux premières lignes sont en erreur alors que je crois les avoir rempli. Merci. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Bonjour Didier, ça y est j'ai arrangé le modèle. Ton erreur a été de scinder le modèle en deux parties (cela se fait automatiquement). Ce que tu dois utiliser c'est la partie qui se trouve dans la section usage : {{Art Photo}}
    Autre chose, j'ai modifié ton en-tete car il avait pour effet de supprimer le cadre de la première partie, je l'ai remplacé par:
<table cellpadding="4" class="toccolours vevent" style="width:100%;direction:{{Dir|{{int:Lang}}}}"> <tr><td colspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;background:#E3E3E3;text-align:center;font-size:1.6em;font-weight:bold"> {{c|Accademia - Francesco Maffei - Mythological Scene|''Mythological Scene'' }} by Francesco Maffei, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice. </table>
Cela dit si cela ne te plait pas tu revert une fois et tu retrouvera ton en-tete, tel que tu l'avais fait. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
C’est parfait ! Je me demande comment je fais pour me pourrir la vie alors que les choses sont si simples. Merci, je ne me servirai que de se modèle pour les tableaux . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
J'ai fait le meme genre d'essai sur une autre de tes photos pour intégrer l'en tete, si cela ne te plait pas, tu peux toujours revenir en arrière. Sinon tu pourras l'utiliser pour tes prochain téléchargements. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
C’est Noel avant l’heure ! Super je garde les deux modèles. Çà donne envie de faire de belles légendes; est c’est le plus important. Merci de tes connaissances. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Ok j'ai "branché cette page". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

GENRENALE deletion

Dear Christian,

you have deleted our GENRENALE logo recently. What do I have to do in order to get this logo listed here? We are the festival, our designer, who has the copyright on this logo and the name, has given us all rights to work with his work for us, this logo and everything. So there should not be any problems concerning copyright. How can we accomplish the listing of our logo here at wiki commons? Thank you and Best regards, killerspots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerspots (talk • contribs) 16:00, 04 December 2016 (UTC)

Janette Fennell photos

Thank you for your tags of copyright violation! I am a student at Northeastern completing a wikiedu project and I uploaded the two pictures without fully understanding the copyright regulations. I have now read and understand them. I had deleted the photos from the page itself but didn't realize I would also need to delete them from the commons!

Thank you for your guidance!

--Character.zero (talk) 14:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lagarosiphon major flowers on Salagou Lake cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minerve cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 18:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

 Request

Good afternoon,

We would like to amend the photo of Braemar on this page please as it is showing it when it was being painted, and isn't completed - we have images of the ship that can be used instead, but unfortunately cannot seem to attach it to this page, so please let us know how we can either edit this or send to you for you to amend.

Many thanks and kind regards,

Shona Michell Fred. Olsen Cruise Lines

FredOlsen (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

14:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredOlsen (talk • contribs) 14:24, 07 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Hello, I don't understand exaclty what you are asking for, I assume you talk about one of my photos or at least you are talking about a page showing one of my images:
File:Braemar (ship, 1993), Sète cf02.jpg
File:Braemar (ship, 1993), Sète cf01.jpg
File:Braemar (ship, 1993), Sète cf01 (cropped).jpg
  • 1/ if you want to change my image in a wikipedia article by an image you think more relevant, you're are free to do it. But you have to edit the wikipedia article and you have to replace the name of my image by the one you have chosen. If you still need help for that you should ask in the wikipedia instead of me.
  • 2/ if you are the owner of a photo not yet in Wikipedia Commons, you're also free to upload it here. In this case please read this first and also this.
    Hope this helped. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Sorry :/

Lol I need to stop being lazy but I'm sorry for everything j — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryeedwards (talk • contribs) 17:25, 09 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minerve cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 03:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haut-Languedoc, Rosis cf14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice!--Famberhorst 18:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Attaques personnelles à mon égard

Salut C'est moi Panama2014. J'ai été victime d'une attaque personnelle de la part de compte tendance CAOU dont l'un est un banni de Wikipedia. J'ai alors fait une RA qui n'a pas été traitée et le banni est venu me harceler. Je crois que la RA n'a pas été traitée car les propos tenus sont en français. Par ailleurs on assiste aussi à une désorganisation depuis commons. J'ai des diff. Pourrait on parler ? Pourriez vous faire quelque chose ? Cordialement. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sympetrum fonscolombii, female, Sète cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Deleted images

Hello Sir, you have deleted 2 of the images I uploaded. These image does not violate any copyright as I have taken the photos personally. File:Gps tracker.jpg Gps-tracking-unit.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baaluo (talk • contribs) 09:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-canal de l'Orb cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object with nice town in background --Michielverbeek 19:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Please innovation future shoefie total women world

Immediately restores the file image: selfies Shoes by Miz Mooz.jpg no copyright infringement are images are the other. --User:Daniel CaselsIDaniel Casels (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jean François Deniau (ship, 2015), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Delete request by uploader please

Hello can you please do me a favor and delete speedy delete as request by uploader [4] and [5] ? Sagecandor (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

One more sorry

Can you please speedy delete this [6] ? Sagecandor (talk) 06:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2015-07-27 20-51-30 Macroglossum-stellatarum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015-07-27 20-51-30 Macroglossum-stellatarum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

About Tour de télécommunication du Plateau de Caume cf03.jpg

Hi, I like a lot this image of yours, if you can use a software like RawTherapee (is opensource so free) it is very easy to reduce noise from your raw file, there a lot of others tools but I am not expert on then, regards --Cvmontuy (talk) 19:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Whoops this is awkward :/

Sorry for uploading content that was deleated i didn't know better since :/ anyways Im still in school working a On a website and I need to get my head out of the gutters :0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryeedwards (talk • contribs) 02:17, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de télécommunication du Plateau de Caume cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 14:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway bridge in Béziers, Hérault, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vineyards, Minerve cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

In regards to your deletion of File:Mama - ulazna vrata i display .jpg

Dear Christian Ferrer you deleted a File:Mama - ulazna vrata i display .jpg marking it copyrighted without checking the source!

File was produced and owned by Multimedia Institute - organization that promotes actively Free software and content, as well as localizer of Creative Commons in Croatian language. All of their content is free and available for re-use.

Plese un-delete this photo and revise the methods of your policing work on Wikipedia by informing yourself! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zblace (talk • contribs) 17:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

  • The source on the file page was "Own work", however the image have been previously published there without an explicit free license. In order to restore the file, our policies require that a permission from the copyright holder must be sent to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. If a free license, e.g. "this image is licensed under cc-by-sa-4.0" is included in the web page I linked, or in a previous web page that I missed, so the file can also be undeleted. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Southern American English

Dear Christian: In the English spoken in the southern United States, "I learned him all about ____" is actually a common use. Jim is from the northern states where they use "I taught him all about ___". Just a silly thought for a happy Friday. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Krestovsky Stadium 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Krestovsky Stadium 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpilles landscape cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall, Minerve cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the deep shade, but good quality.--Famberhorst 17:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean François Deniau (ship, 2015).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Détails qui clochent!

Bonjour, je travail dur ce matin pour intégrer le modèle {{Art Photo}}. J'y suis arrivé, sauf pour le 2e volume où j'ai une erreur que je ne comprend pas; peux tu m'éclairé sur mon chantier ici :Accademia - Francesco Maffei - Mythological Scene.jpg. Les deux premières lignes sont en erreur alors que je crois les avoir rempli. Merci. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Bonjour Didier, ça y est j'ai arrangé le modèle. Ton erreur a été de scinder le modèle en deux parties (cela se fait automatiquement). Ce que tu dois utiliser c'est la partie qui se trouve dans la section usage : {{Art Photo}}
    Autre chose, j'ai modifié ton en-tete car il avait pour effet de supprimer le cadre de la première partie, je l'ai remplacé par:
<table cellpadding="4" class="toccolours vevent" style="width:100%;direction:{{Dir|{{int:Lang}}}}"> <tr><td colspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;background:#E3E3E3;text-align:center;font-size:1.6em;font-weight:bold"> {{c|Accademia - Francesco Maffei - Mythological Scene|''Mythological Scene'' }} by Francesco Maffei, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice. </table>
Cela dit si cela ne te plait pas tu revert une fois et tu retrouvera ton en-tete, tel que tu l'avais fait. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
C’est parfait ! Je me demande comment je fais pour me pourrir la vie alors que les choses sont si simples. Merci, je ne me servirai que de se modèle pour les tableaux . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
J'ai fait le meme genre d'essai sur une autre de tes photos pour intégrer l'en tete, si cela ne te plait pas, tu peux toujours revenir en arrière. Sinon tu pourras l'utiliser pour tes prochain téléchargements. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
C’est Noel avant l’heure ! Super je garde les deux modèles. Çà donne envie de faire de belles légendes; est c’est le plus important. Merci de tes connaissances. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Ok j'ai "branché cette page". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhora2007 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpilles landscape cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pylone du Plateau de Caume cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

email template page

Hello Christian,

I am new to this. I've uploaded images before, but never had an issue with copyrighted and trademarked images. I've filled in what I think is correct from the commons: email template page. Can you review this and/or froward this to whomever. I changed the highlighted parts of the licensing agreement to match the competitors within our industry. I believe that is all I need to do. Just some verification would be awesome.

It has our president listed as the sender. I am having him send it in and sign it and/or anything else needed for verification.

Thank you for all your help and I appreciate your patience.

Sean


To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I, Neal Simon, J.D., the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the American University of Antigua College of Medicine seal and logo as shown here: [7] [8] and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Neal Simon, J.D. American University of Antigua President and Co-Founder December 19, 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shughes0610 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Hello, yes it seems fine, you can add something like this to where you want in the mail, in order to help the OTRS volunteer:
"For information the image have been previously unploaded and deleted under the name File:AUA COM Seal 200x200.png [9]"
The most important is the person send the e-mail has the right to give the permission. It is verified in particular thanks to the e-mail address of the sender. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


Valued image promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minerve, Hérault, France. Town hall..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- DeFacto (talk). 21:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in the drift ice region north of Svalbard.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in the drift ice region north of Svalbard.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas, Christian Ferrer!
Hi Christian Ferrer, thank you for all your valuable contributions on Commons. This help fulfill the number 1 goal of Commons: To be a free, educational media repository for everyone.

I wish you and your family a merry Christmas and a happy new year.
    Poké95 01:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
* Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)   

Best Wishes!

Best Wishes, Christian Ferrer!
Hi Christian Ferrer, I wish you all the best for the Holidays and a Happy New Year 2017. Yann (talk) 18:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

AN/U

FWIW, despite that it probably looks like I'm 'fighting' for a block, I'm really not specifically doing so... I'm just trying to make sure people really understand the situation. I started the proposal because I felt that putting the question was 'due'. I'm open to any solution that the community comes up with, as long as it can actually be enforced... it simply being me watching to see if he follows the restriction I imposed is obviously not working. Reventtalk 00:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

  • @Revent: Don't worry, you do the job. The community can't fix Ad vitam æternam the mistakes of some users. The main issue is that in some clicks some users can gives to the community a lot of a very long investigation work that can consume a lot of time of several other users. We lack a platform to make people like them work, a framework that would prevent them from making mistakes that cost us time, but that allow them, if they wish, to research and to argue about PD images, which may be good for Wikimedia Commons. I mean a thing more structured than the VP, a kind of Wikiproject about PD images. A category like this should have a page (maybe the talk page or a subpage) that allow to gather all the discussions related to the topic (dr, vp discusion, all kind of other discussions...) to avoid to do several times the same investigations, or to allow to keep open discussion with complex issues. Such pages when they exist (if they exist one day) should be counted in a centralized location (Wikiproject), where discussions should be identified and accessible through according to several criteria (name of the people or film, year of creation...) a bit as for our categoy tree. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Commons:WikiProject_Public_Domain exists, but is quite defunct. Reventtalk 15:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy new year!

Merry Christmas, Christian Ferrer!
English: Hellow Christian Ferrer, Merci/Gracias/Thanks my friend for do it posible, this family of Commons, beleave that we can change world improving the educational media disponible. Take care by your self --The Photographer 03:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

--The Photographer 03:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Name of the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Sets in FP galleries

Hi Christian,

Seasonal greetings from Denmark! I have spend som time this afternoon sorting all the unsorted entries in Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings (there were many). But there is two image sets left, and I have no idea how to handle them. Do you have any proposals? -- Slaunger (talk) 17:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Hello Slaunger, thanks you and Seasons Greetings for you too!
    I usualy put in the galleries each images of each sets, I've just done it the for those both sets, thanks you for your help. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:07, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
    • OK, Christian. I'll try to remember that next time - although it strikes me that the FP sets are pretty pointless if we expand them anyway in the galleries - not that I have any better ideas. But we have never had a good process for sets, where the entire process is thought out and supported by bots, galleries and POTD. I still think, though, that the FP galleries you originally created are  Awesome! and a great way to showcase the best we have! -- Slaunger (talk) 19:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Great! thanks you Slaunger, to work, or even simply, to look ino those galleries and to some of those beautiful images makes me remember why I'm here, helps me to forgot a lot of thing, and makes me think we are lucky to participe here. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
    • Indeed. It is a priviledge to work with these particular images, when you start to think how much volunteer time has gone into every one of them. There are much worse maintenance tasks on Commons than cleaning up unsorted FPs, I agree! . -- Slaunger (talk) 23:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anchor of the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice colours, rust and blue is always working for me! Good quality. --Basotxerri 10:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Lalonde

Bonjour, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau & Bobby Lalonde at the 7th G7 summit..jpg me laisse quand même perplexe. Certes, la raison initiale de la demande de suppression n'était pas la bonne. Mais le seul fait que le proposant veuille retirer sa demande ne lui donne pas un droit de veto sur la discussion. Par contre, tous les intervenants, dans la discussion et sur le help desk, ont demandé au téléverseur de dire s'il était le photographe. Il a constamment éludé la question, ce qui est louche et laisse supposer qu'il n'a pas les droits sur la photo. J'aurais souhaité soit que la discussion reste ouverte jusqu'à ce qu'il réponde à la question ou, en cas de persistance à ne pas répondre, le fichier aurait pu être supprimé par précaution. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Merci d'avoir réactivé. J'ai ajouté une suggestion de supprimer, du moins tant qu'il y a un doute. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Railway bridge, Béziers cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Neuf et Cathédrale Saint-Nazaire de Béziers cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Vieux de Béziers cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stem of the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Source?

These uploads date from my very beginning of my contribution to WikiCommons, ten years ago. Should you find any more of them, you may go ahead and tag them as {{Unknown}} sourced by yourself: if I did not add the source later, it means that I had not marked it down back then. Now I do not upload any unsourced images any longer, these ones were most likely downloads from some art history website. Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 10:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Instituto Geográfico de Aragón

Buenas tardes Christian, Acabo de leer tu correo. He visto que se ha borrado el logotipo de la información que se ha creado sobre el Instituto Geográfico de Aragón. Cuando subí las imagenes a Commons pregunté a algunos bibliotecarios sobre el tamaño, tipo de imagen y resolución para que se visualizara correctamente el logotipo. Era mi principal preocupación porque había citado al autor del logo, que es el propio instituto y porque trabajo con la etiqueta de Template:Cuenta remunerada debe de tener. Pienso que esta institución , como otras muchas que hay en Wikipedia, debe de llevar su logotipo. Tengo permiso de la institución para publicar tanto el logo como las imágenes que considere. Comento esto porque la otra imagen que ilustra el artículo esta hecha por mí sobre imagenes de la Institución sobre las que no me han puesto ningún problema para que se publiquen. Todo lo contratio. Dicho esto, no sé si tengo que enviar un correo del Director aunque sea una cuenta remunerada. Es muy importante para mi trabajo poder publicar esta artículo lo más completo possible. Espero tu respuesta. Muchas gracias. Un saludo--Zhora2007 (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)


Bonjour Christian, Je viens de lire votre e-mail. J`ai vu que le logo de la page crèe sur l'Institut Géographique d'Aragon a été supprimé. Quand je publiai les images à Commons, je demandai des bibliothécaires au sujet de la taille, le type et la résolution de visualiser correctement le logo. Il était ma principale preoccupation parce que j'avais cité l'auteur et aussi parce que je travaille avec le modéle Template:Cuenta remunerada. Je pense que cette institution, comme des autres, doit avoir son logo. Pas de problèmes avec les autorisations. Le logo a été créé par l`institut et je peux l'utiliser. Je dois vous envoir un e-mail de confirmation même si je travaille sous le modéle Template:Cuenta remunerada? En ce qui concerne l'autre image, j`ai fais la composition final. Il est très important pour moi de publier cette information aussi complète que possible

En attendant votre reponse, Salut!! --Zhora2007 (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Bonjour Zhora2007, malheureusement, le modèle n'est pas suffisent. En ce qui concerne cette image, elle est composée de plusieurs images, chacunes de ses images est un travail protégé par le droit d'auteur, et seuls les détenteurs de ces droits peuvent licencier leurs images. Soit ils l'ont déjà fait au cours d'une précèdente publication et nous devons voir cette publication comme preuve, soit ils doivent envoyer une permission à OTRS, ou vous pourrez lire comment procéder. C'est pareil pour les logos, ils nous faut une preuve Institut Géographique d'Aragon aurorise leur publication sous les licenses que nous utilisons. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Bonsoir Christian, Malheureusement, je viens de voirque tous les images de la page de l'Institut Géographique d'Aragon ont été supprimées. Il y a quelques jours que le Directeur de l'Institut a envoyé une permission à OTRS, pour autoriser leur publication sous les licenses que vous utilisez. Nous avons reçu une cofirmation, mais les images ne sont pas encore publiées. Combien de temps il est nécessaire pour que les images soient réédités?? Je ne sais pas ce que dois-je faire. Cordialement--Zhora2007 (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Il y a une file d'attente assez longue pour les permissions, le travail esr effectué par des volontaires et cela peut prendre de plusieurs jours à plusieurs semaines, je n'ai pas accès à cette partie du projet. Mais si une permission a été envoyée et qu'elle est jugée valable alors le ou les images seront restaurées sans que vous n'ayez rien à faire. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of the file File:Poster 28 panfilov.jpg

Hello, the file File:Poster 28 panfilov.jpg is taken from the official group of the studio that has created the film and the film poster. This studio is the rights owner. I contacted the studio and asked them to add the CC-BY-SA-3.0 on their works, which they did. The poster of the film is not a derivative of non-free work, it is the original work of the studio, which the studio licensed as CC-BY-SA 3.0. You can see it here: https://vk.com/album-54033089_176058562, the phrase "Материалы этой страницы доступны на условиях лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0". Is that enough or should they do anything else? Katkov Yury (talk) 14:09, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

I was going to ask the opinion(s) of other administrator()s in an undeletion request however I just opened one more time the link provided [10] in the file page and I'm not able to find the deleted image. Can you provide a link to this image please? Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hawser rope of the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Christian Ferrer!