User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive23
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
2013 • feb-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec |
January - February 2017
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Agricultural building in Colombiers cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf05.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Close up on the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Castle of Les Baux-de-Provence cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Castle of Les Baux-de-Provence cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Landscape Nissan-lez-Enserune cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf03.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Close up on the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Bonne Année 2017 !!!
Bonne Année 2017 ǃǃǃ Tous mes vœux pour cette nouvelle année. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 16:35, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Lev. Anthony: Merci, toi aussi, tous mes voeux! :) Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Sofia Georgieva
Hello Christian Ferrer Why you have deleted the photo of Sofia Georgieva? Image is Sofia Georgieva and its property. Thank you for your attention.
- Hello, I deleted it because the image can be found previously published on the web, exemple, a permission must be sent to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Camila & Haniel Pictures
Christian, good afternon!
I`m Henrique Rodriguez, agent and public relations of singers Camila & Haniel. All images used for the creation of the article are the company PowerFun (owner of the image rights of the singers). The other images are public (all are with the links of identification of sites from where the searches were made) please please review the content. If there is any doubt, I am willing to clarify.
thks for u time
--Henriquerodriguez (talk) 21:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, album covers can only be freely licensed by their copyright holders, to give us a link to the visual of the album is not sufficient, exemple, "℗ 2015 Sony Music Entertainment Brasil ltda." has rights on the visual on this album. For all artworks (promotional photos, album/EP covers, screenshots....) that have been previously published somewhere, we need that the copyright holder of each artworks send a permission to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf06.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Close up on the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour, Tu as supprimé les images, mais tu as clos la discussion comme "Kept". Cordialement, Yann (talk) 08:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, c'est arrangé, merci! Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Changes
Thanks... I guess. 
I'll have to read up on what a patroller is supposed to do though, but thanks for the vote of confidence. Best, cart-Talk 21:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf04.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Close up on the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
German Mascots - American Football
Hallo Herr Ferrer,
ich bin ein Verifizierter User der German Mascots - American Football. Die Bilder sind alle orginal erstellt worden und ist das logo sowie die Bilder gehören den German Mascots - https://www.facebook.com/GERMascotsAF/
Wo liegt also das problem bei Ihnen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GermanMascots (talk • contribs) 18:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
--GermanMascots (talk) 18:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I can not read or answer in German, but I assume you talk about the files that I just deleted. Half of them include a background [1] already published without a free license. And all includes characters/icons published in the facebook account, exemple. For artworks already published, we requires that the copyright holder send a permission to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
![[1]](http://blog.topdeck.travel/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/shutterstock_226797532.jpg){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hôtel de Manville cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orb River, Bédarieux cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Street in Les Baux-de-Provence cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Montady cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eristalis tenax, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Close up on the bridge Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Deletion
Hello, you have deleted two files that I uploaded on Wikipedia: File:Omne Poké Ball.png and File:Bursa Pokémon IV Generation.png that I took from Bulbapedia, the community-driven Pokémon Franchise encyclopedia in english. It was stated that those two pictures were free of copyright and totally usable by the users. I am wondering why you deleted them, since they are part of the free content that everyone can find on Bulbapedia.net.
I thought I would request to undo the operation, but I did not understand how to "create an undeletion", I can't write to anybody and what i am requested to do seams difficult and too technical. Why? I am sincerely asking for your help with this.
Thank you in advance --YariDarling (talk) 17:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello YariDarling, those files are not allowed here, as you can read there in the section "licensing", this is a derivative work coming from Pokémon game, and it is allowed only for fair use, the copyright holder is the The Pokémon Company. When you upload a file here you give a license for your upload, however you have not the right to license a work owned by someone else unless they give themselves the permission. We do not allow fair use here on Wikimedia Commons, you can find more informations in com:Licensing. There is nothing we can do, it is useless to create an undeletion request. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Sofia Georgieva
Hello Christian Ferrer Why you have deleted the photo of Sofia Georgieva? Image is Sofia Georgieva and its property. Thank you for your attention.
Hello, I deleted it because the image can be found previously published on the web, exemple, a permission must be sent to OTRS, where you can read how to do so. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello again, just can not understand why when someone takes my personal photo from my personal Facebook page, you're deleting the photo?!!
https://www.facebook.com/SofiaOfficialPage/?fref=ц
Do I need to be a programmer to make my simple page on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.154.29.93 (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- A photo is an artwork protected by copyright law. When a photo is uploaded here then a specific license is added to the file, however only the copyright holder can give this license for his work. As the image is available in the web, we requires now that the copyright holder send an explicit permission to OTRS where you can read on how to do so, because we can not be sure that the uploader is the copyright holder. All this is done to protect the rights of the copyright holder. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orb River, Bédarieux cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lido de Thau, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
US Rep pages
I'm confused. I uploaded a number of congressional photos from websites that have now been deleted because of possible copyright violations. I feel I've been singled out, as there are other images that have been posted for a longer period of time are still published and on wikimedia commons and wikipedia.
Photos I've uploaded that have been deleted or nominated for deletion:
- File:Brian Mast.jpg
- File:Tom Suozzi.jpg
- File:Mike Johnson.jpg
- File:Val Demings.jpg
- File:Nanette barragan.jpg
- File:Rep. Jack Bergman.jpg
- File:Don Bacon.jpg
- File:Tom Garrett Jr.jpg
- File:Jodey Arrington.jpg
- File:Claudia Tenney.jpg
Files uploaded by others using the same sources and still available on commons and wikipedia:
- File:Neal Dunn, official portrait, 115th Congress.jpg
- File:Charlie Crist, official portrait, 115th Congress.jpg
- File:Francis Rooney official congressional photo.jpg
- File:Lloyd Smucker official congressional photo.jpg
- File:Kustoff2.jpg (this appears to be a source that is not in the public domain)
Please either restore the images or tell me how my images are different than the ones I listed that are still available on commons...Pvmoutside (talk) 07:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- They are not different, I deleted the first fourth and nominate the fifth for deletion, thanks you for to have pointed those files to me. A lot of image are uploaded every days in Wikimedia Commons, and a non-negligible share are indeed copyright violations, if you find some of those copyright violations you will be helpful to nominate those files for deletion. Some politicians may use for their official profil/account on facebook or everywhere personal photos made by greater photographer that they prefer to the official photos made by government employees. There is no information on thoses facebook accounts about the true source of the images nor about the photographers of each photos. When there a significant doubt we can not consider those image in Public Domain. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Congressional portraits are free
Thanks for deleting Congressional portraits, which are government work and thus public domain. Some member's official Congressional website do not provide the portrait on their actual site, and sometimes they only upload them to social media. This has been the case for many years. Deleting very obvious official Congressional portraits with absolutely no discussion whatsoever crossed a line that should not have been crossed. Gage (talk) 20:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed with the above. Unilaterally deleting longstanding images that are obvious official government portraits (which are public domain) without any kind of discussion or individual consideration at all is counterproductive at the very least. Connormah (talk | contribs) 21:22, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Info I also deleted those ones : [2]. Social medias are not free until the evidence of the opposite. And I wonder how an image that have been uploaded only on a social media can be in public domain, and we don't know the photographers names, and thus if they are indeed government employees. Some politicians may use for their personal profil/account on facebook, or everywhere, personal photos made by greater photographer that they prefer to the official photos made by government employees. It is not because there is a USA flag in background that the photo have been taken by a government employee, this is IMO not enough to determine if a photo is in PD or not. If there is other valid sources, as evidence of public domain, then those source should be provided instead of links to facebook accounts which are not free licensed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:39, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- What is wrong with you deleting all these free pictures? This is vandalism, nothing else. You should be banned immediately. --Poliglott (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- You should not be a Commons administrator. Gage (talk) 21:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- But did you bother to check any of these before deleting them? Many have/had metadata clearly identifying them as US Government works and can also be found on the respective person's official government websites. (here's one for example: [3]). At the very least I feel that these should be undeleted and a discussion should take place over these. These deletions have affected hundreds of articles on en.wp in which these images have stood for years. Connormah (talk | contribs) 02:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- I confess I didn't check the metadatas, because usualy when an image come form facebook, the metadatas are "FBMD....", regarding the source, I copy and paste that I wrote above "If there is other valid sources, as evidence of public domain, then those source should be provided instead of links to facebook accounts which are not free licensed." But I'm going to take a look to the metadatas of the deleted files. And maybe too to open an UDR in order to have the opinion of the other experimented users on how to deal with those content. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- But did you bother to check any of these before deleting them? Many have/had metadata clearly identifying them as US Government works and can also be found on the respective person's official government websites. (here's one for example: [3]). At the very least I feel that these should be undeleted and a discussion should take place over these. These deletions have affected hundreds of articles on en.wp in which these images have stood for years. Connormah (talk | contribs) 02:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- You should not be a Commons administrator. Gage (talk) 21:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- What is wrong with you deleting all these free pictures? This is vandalism, nothing else. You should be banned immediately. --Poliglott (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
The better path would be to undelete so everyone can review them, not just sysops, then raise a DR if necessary. The original speedies were out of process, so follow process now. --Fæ (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not opposed to that, see [4] Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Small boat, Étang de Thau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lido de Thau, Sète cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Lido de Thau, Sète cf04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lido de Thau, Sète cf04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Удаление фотографий
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Shelkovoy Почему удалены фотографии, помеченные как собственные или авторство которых отныне принадлежит и установлено? --Shelkovoy (talk) 07:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- The rationale for the deletion is "Unlikely to be own work: small size, no EXIF. ". I/we think there is a reasonable chance that the images have been previously published somewhere. See Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Why you deleted all of my upload?
I just read your comment when you upload my photos coz it's not fair when you said "taken with 3 different cameras, dubious own works" Why i can't used the different cameras if i have?
PANNclub (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Your images have been nominated for deletion with the rationale "Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s)". Furthermore I noticed in the EXIFS that the photos were taken with at least 3 different cameras. Therefore I applied the Precautionary principle, and my exact rationale was "per nomination, and taken with 3 different cameras, dubious own works". Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Hamadruas sp 05600.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hamadruas sp 05600.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tour de télécommunication du Plateau de Caume cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orb River, Bédarieux cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cedrus libani cone, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Close up on the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
OTRS permission has been accepted, restoring the files
Hello, about this deletion requests. File:Ulkoilua_Tikkurilassa.jpg, file:Lumon_lukio,_Vantaa.jpg and file:Sirkustaide.jpg OTRS permissions has been accepted and archived in the Wikimedia OTRS system (Template:Cc-by-sa-3.0.). Can you restore this files? Ticket link:[5]. Thank you. –Makele-90 (talk) 20:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Makele-90: Hello, it's done, please add the ticket to the files as I've not OTRS access, thanks you. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lifeboat the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lido de Thau, Sète cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
why have you deleted my picture to the page from Subject? How you got to know there is any violation to copyright??? Please explain that to me.
The picture is cover of the book which we have published two months ago in Czech Republic.
All the best, M Hajek — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A00:1028:9195:B5D6:7585:51FA:EEDA:DE13 (talk) 11:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, book covers are artworks protected by copyright law. Only the copyright holder can license such artwork. To be sure the copyright holder, even if it is you, agree with a publication here, we require that he send a permission to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so. All this is done in purpose to protect the rights of the copyright holder. In case of book covers, likely the publisher have the rights, or at least some of the right regarding the visual of the book cover. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bow of the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Près de la source du Lez cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello Christian Ferrer and @Gunnex: , here Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Farnavaz according to the rules you deleted some photos, but now STC DELTA has changed its copyright (see ► [6]) and we can share their photos under {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Could you restore those photos that are from DELTA's page? File:Didgori medevac.jpg & File:MEDEVAC-STC-DELTA-.jpg are definitely from there. --g. balaxaZe★ 15:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Done restored and reviewed, but the license is Cc-by-4.0. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Christian Ferrer, how about the rest of shipbucket images uploaded here under Creative Commons License Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported? Should all be maintained? -Hanjin (talk) 18:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Hanjin, no I don't think we can keep them, I created Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from Shipbucket. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Please tell which file license should I put on Wikimedia Commons when unloading the images on the Internet me tips Christian Ferrer. -Jonfrer (talk) 02:21, 23 January 2017
- This image is not free and you can not upload it here. You can only upload the images you're the copyright holder, or that have a compatible license which has been given by the copyright holder. See our licensing policy. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- FYI that was yet another fritella's sockpuppet. --Vituzzu (talk) 15:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Deletion of shipbucket images
Hi - please delete ALL the Shipbucket images on wikimedia. Thanks! 136.62.4.143 02:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from Shipbucket Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Winch on the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lez River, Saint-Clément-de-Rivière cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Why requesting to delete my images?
Hi Christian Ferrer, Why are you requesting to delete my images? Sources and all permission are there. Please, let me know if I need to add additional information or if I missed some information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezequiel Jimenez (talk • contribs) 13:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Ezequiel, I answered in the request. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Christian for the feedback. Please, do not delete the files yet. I will send email of each artwork licensing for the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. Please, let me know if that works. Also, On Jan. 10 and 8th, 2017 I sent two emails for Permissions-Commons for the following images, File:En su divina mano.jpg and File:Ezequiel jimenez Studio.jpg, and you are requesting for delete it. Below confirmation receipt. [Ticket#2017010810008551] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Permissions-Commons [...]) [Ticket#2017011110002514] Confirmation of receipt (Re: declaration of conse [...]) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.185.79.79 (talk) 02:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- I answered in the request. Please, if you write again a message regarding those images, write your message in the request instead of here. In order to keep the discussion in one place and in order that the administrator who will close the request can read the full infos, thanks you. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, Christian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezequiel Jimenez (talk • contribs) 21:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Winter-Regnitz-PC310004.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter-Regnitz-PC310004.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Side of the Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stairs near Lez River cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Tomorrowland
These images are mine because I was present at the festival in Brazil! Tomorrowland Brasil 2016.jpg Tomorrowland Brasil.jpg--Wiiilokan (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- One of those image can be found previously published in the web, and in higher resolution, therefore it have been speedy deleted. The other image is nominated for deletion there, where you can write your comments/answer regarding the deletion request rationale. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Lez River, Saint-Clément-de-Rivière cf01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lez River, Saint-Clément-de-Rivière cf01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete Request
Hi, can you delete .svg)
, thanks.
(Ragilnih) 22:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, no I can't, the file is widely used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lez River, Saint-Clément-de-Rivière cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Can you be more careful in mass nominating images for deletion? Several of the images in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from Shipbucket were actually uploaded by the person that drew them. See User_talk:Jcb#Re_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:Files_from_Shipbucket. Thanks! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, I answered in Jcb talk page. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Lido de Thau, Sète cf05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lido de Thau, Sète cf05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lez River, Saint-Clément-de-Rivière cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
You closed this twice, with different reasons. It's an easy mistake to make. I'm not sure which one you want, so I'll leave it to you to fix. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed One reason for each parts, thanks you Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Images Deleted
Some images were taken off with no real valid reason. Images are free to use everywhere and where taken from their official page and their social networks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chamanas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petemayor (talk • contribs) 22:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- In case of an image have been previously published somewhere, we require that this publication was done under a license compatible here, and we must verify this license with a relevant link provided by the uploader. Or we require that the copyright holder send a permission to OTRS, where you can read on how to do so. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the help, will adding a picture from Flickr that has CC in it work? I dont want to mess up again and be banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petemayor (talk • contribs) 02:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- It will work only if the Flickr account has the right to license the image.
"Sometimes, users will upload an image from a website that claims to release it under a free license, but in fact that website is itself using the image without permission (and often without any attribution!). This is called license laundering."
We also delete the images when we see license laundering. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Great. I think I got it. Can you please check this image if its correct can you review: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Chamanas.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petemayor (talk • contribs) 05:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- At first view, for me it's fine, but maybe someone will ask an additional permission because the image is also used at [7]. And it may be unclear if it is Diego Lucero or if it is "The chamanas", the copyright holder of the photo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
A mussian star
|
Artist Awrd |
| For your amazing visual and music material than make you be in another level the commons artist!!!. Thanks Christian The Photographer 23:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lez River, Saint-Clément-de-Rivière cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Thanks for all the help Petemayor (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC) |
Ticket#2016122810017217
Hello Christian,
I had written to you around late December/early January about uploading the new seal for the school American University of Antigua. The school's president received this today:
Subject: Re: [Ticket#2016122810017217] Wikipedia Copy Right Ownership Verification
Dear Neal Simon,
I have made the necessary modifications to the file page.
Thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons.
Yours sincerely, Alessio Rutveno
Does this mean that it's OK to upload the Seal again? I don't want to prolong this any further, so I am writing to you with hope that you can provide me with direction. Should I have the president create a Wikipedia Account and upload the seal himself or will I be fine uploading it?
Thanks,
Sean — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shughes0610 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, no it's not necessary to upload it again, the file has been restored. See File:AUA COM Seal 200x200.png. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
So, it's not up on the "American University of Antigua" wikipedia page. So, I do have to re-insert it into the page then? Again, I just don't want to mess anything up. Thank you for all your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shughes0610 (talk • contribs) 17:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes indeed you have to re-insert it into the page. We have only restored the file here, but it is up to you or to someone else to put it again in the relevant article in Wikipedia(s). Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shughes0610 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
_cf02.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Effacement
Bonjour. Un wikipedien anglais a eu la bonne idée de recadrer Titanus giganteus MHNT dos.jpg ; par contre il l’a fait de façon automatique et a coupé l’échelle dans cette version Titanus giganteus MHNT dos (cropped).jpg. J’ai trouvé qu’il avait raison et j’ai corrigé l’original. Mais du coup comment effacer la mauvaise version qu'il a de plus beaucoup degradé ? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Bonjour Didier, J'ai remplacé l'image par la tienne dans l'article ou il l'avait placé et j'ai nomminé son image pour deletion, c'est le seul moyen, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Titanus giganteus MHNT dos (cropped).jpg Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Merci parfait --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Film Festival Ankara
Salut, je viens de recevoir une autorisation OTRS pour toute une série de posters que tu avais éliminé et je voulais être sûr qu'il est possible de les récupérer. Vois par exemple File:3._AUFF.jpg, c'en est un de la série.
Du point de vue des droits d'auteur, il ne semble ne pas avoir de problèmes, une fois le ticket OTRS accepté, mais tu avais noté comme raison pour l'élimination que ce n'était pas un matériel recevable, or j'ai vu pas mal d'autres posters su Commons. Peux-tu m'expliquer où était le problème (droits d'auteur ou problème de matériel)? Merci --Ruthven (msg) 09:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: salut, c'était un problème de droit d'auteur. C'est un des messages type qui sort en utilisant Visual Change. Je n'ai pas accès à OTRS, si tu pense que les autorisations sont ok, alors tu peux les restaurer, je n'y vois aucun inconvénient. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, merci bien pour éclaircir la question. Le ticket OTRS est ok. --Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Titan beetle image
Was it you that edited the image? If so, thank you, and I'm grateful the scale has been moved in to save whitespace. However there remains quite a bit of whitespace which is not needed in all applications and would be better cropped further. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Chiswick Chap: No it was not me, it's the author Archaeodontosaurus himself, maybe if we ask him he can modify a bit more the image. In all case if you think that any changes should be required, it's usualy better to contact the author because he can modify the image from it's source (usualy a RAW file), and in a case like this one he can move the scale. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry to bother you. I think we can live with the situation now, it's better than it was. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
_cf03.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf10.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Line scan camera
Hi Christian, you may remember me from FPC and QIC.
I'm applying for a Wikimedia grant for a line scan camera. This is a high-speed camera that only captures a single column (or row) of pixels, and I hope to use one for capturing scenes similar to the work of Adam Magyar [8], as well as rollout photos such as [9] (but of a much higher resolution than can be achieved with a typical video camera).
If this sounds exciting to you, I would really appreciate if you could endorse my grant proposal: meta:Grants:Project/Rapid/dllu/Line_Scan_Camera. Thanks! dllu (t,c) 20:36, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf11.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phoenicopterus roseus, Lido de Thau cf07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_cf04.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
_cf05.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf12.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Capsized ship out of water, Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
_cf06.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf13.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
User:ThanhPeters
I saw you temporary block this user @ThanhPeters: . However, i found his possible socks @ThanhPeters1990: . Where i should report it in wikicommons? Matthew hk (talk) 08:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unless they don't abuse with the other account, in my understanding there is no reason to do anything, and here I see no contributions. However one of the right places to report it can be Commons:Requests for checkuser. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Matthew hk: Well, thank you for the notification now the other account have been used during the block, this may be a block evasion and I made a request there. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf14.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_cf07.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cettarames (ship, 1980) cf07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_cf15.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rio Tagus (ship, 1979), Sète cf15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Edits
Hi, I see you edited my page. I understand why you would do it but it is MY PAGE. DO NOT EVER EDIT MY PERSONAL PAGE AGAIN! OK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABBAlover11011 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, well, it will depend on what you put on it. We will see. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Tags
Hello Christian! I'll ask direct. IMO you have more experience. It's about COM:OVERCAT. There is a similar problem at Category:Black and white photographs. I requested to respect COM:OVERCAT (on the talk page - there are other old issues too). The category is too large and a lot of images are not member of the top category. I didn't have seen the hint "use as tag" for years because I never start with the top category. Do you think, "as tag" is useful? Do you think other users know the usage "as tag"? How can we handle this? Or should we wait for real tags, for example with structured data? --XRay talk 18:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- I think you're right, categories and tags are two different things, and our category tree is very powerfull because we have COM:OVERCAT. I think we should also have tag but not categories "as tag". Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your information. But it is always better to give an Information to involved people. I'll do my very best. --XRay talk 19:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Autoportrait de Félix Nadar - edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Napoléon Henri Reber, portrait photograph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
deletetion of File:Nalini Ranjan Chatterjee with Ashutosh Mukherjee.png
Hi
I believe this should be un-deleted - I have made a request as well. This photo is at least 90 years old as can be seen from the people in the photograph. Asutosh Mukherjee(Mookerjee) and Nalini Ranjan Chatterjee retired as sitting judges by 1926. So this photo is at least 90 years old and free from any copyright issues.
Requesting to please re-instate it
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pont-canal de l'Orb cf07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
(Sorry to write in Engilsh)
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Vic-la-Gardiole, Hérault 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vic-la-Gardiole, Hérault 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sète, lighthouse and harbour cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
,_S%C3%A8te_cf01.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jean Yanne (ship), Sète cf01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.