User talk:Túrelio/Archive4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talkpage archive from 2009

Torre de Cristal

Hola: he enviado el correo con la contestación del autor, que te adjunto, a la dirección de correo que me has comentado. Es suficiente así? Saludos, --Zufs (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Faltaría mas, necesitas que haga algo o te encargas tu ¿?

[MM]Marcos Martínez mm@mmweb.es www.mmweb.es 981 646 238 618 255 606 ________________________________________ De: Oscar Benito [1] Enviado el: viernes, 02 de enero de 2009 13:10 Para: MM Web Asunto: Autorización para Commons

Hola Marcos, podrías autorizar esta foto tuya para su uso en Wikimedia Commons?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Torre_de_cristal.jpg

La quiero usar en Wikipedia para un artículo sobre Ocean’s, pero como no es mía, exigen que el autor lo autorice.

Saludos, Oscar

Answered on User talk:Zufs. --Túrelio (talk) 13:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for that

I posted the question which for some reason didn't show up but seems some how it double posted (with one going in the wrong spot.) Thanks for fixing that up. :) Bidgee (talk) 13:25, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Feuerwehr Herrenberg

Hallo,

die ganzen Bilder sind von mir, meinem Vater oder von einem Kollegen, dessen Zustimmung ich habe, aufgenommen worden. Daher steht manchmal die Feuerwehr dran. Aber vielen Dank für die Info.

Gruß --Herrenberger (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eppelheim Christkönigkirche Innenraum.JPG

Hallo Túrelio, alles Gute zum Neuen Jahr! Eine Bitte: könntest Du Dir nochmals meinen Löschantrag [2] anschauen? Vielen Dank! --3268zauber (talk) 09:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC) PS. Das Bild von der Weihnachtskrippe auf Deiner Benutzerseite ist wunderschön!

Hallo 3268zauber,
ich habe dort einen Kommentar abgegeben. Falls du eine Beschwerde erhalten hast, sag das (dann geht eine rfd schneller durch). Du könntest natürlich mal beim erzbischöflichen Bauamt Heidelberg nachhören, ob sie was dagegen haben; aber das wäre mehr zur eigenen Beruhigung als für die Rechtssicherheit. Beim Bild von der Weihnachtskrippe ist die Rechtslage genaugenommen ähnlich wie bei deinem (nicht weniger schönen) Innenraum-Bild: innen also kein FOP (in D.), ohnehin nicht permanent aufgestellt, andererseits fragliche Schöpfungshöhe und kein singuläres Kunstwerk. Grüße und auch meinerseits ein gutes neues Jahr! --Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

PLS delete an image.

this is it: File:Конаково. Личные и wiki 030.jpg. I create it without paying any attention to the filename. Then i uploaded it again as File:Усть-Нера, 1960-е.jpg. Please kill the old one, there is no need in it absolutely. Thnks! - Zac allan (talk) 17:06, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

China photograph

Hi,

I've re-uploaded File:Mother and two kids.jpg and File:A man and his two kids on a bike.jpg and I don't get it how it change the content of the logs by them self. Your help will be appreciated. BTW, policy in China is not as hard as you think, but your remarks makes sense anyway.

BR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stougard (talk • contribs) 13:24, 13. Jan. 2009 (UTC)

File re-uploaded File:Man Riding a bike with two kids.jpg and File:Woman pushing a bike with two kids.jpg. Thanks for your help to delete the original one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stougard (talk • contribs) 14:26, 13. Jan. 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Stammtisch Aachen

Hi Túrelio, ich wohne in Aachen und würde in der Tat gerne mal beim Stammtisch vorbei schauen. Den letzten Hinweis habe ich für August 2008 gefunden - da war ich leider nicht in der Stadt.Gibt es so etwas wie eine mailliste, wo man sich eintragen kann oder wie erfährt man vom nächsten Treffen? Lieben Gruss aus AC --MBO163 (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Auf deiner Disku geantwortet.--Túrelio (talk) 11:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Margret Hofheinz-Döring

Ich habe nun nochmal auf Deinen Rat hin einige Bilder mit dem OTRS-Hinweis eingestellt. Alle haben den Hinweis, daß das Verfahren pending sei. Dabei gibt es ja eine Nummer, und ich würde wesentlich schöner finden, diese gleich einzufügen, dann muß sich auch niemand mehr die Arbeit machen, das zu ändern. Schau Dir doch bitte mal das Otto-Hoffmeisterhaus an! Ist es so korrekt? --Galbrima (talk) 15:05, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Galbrima, nur auf die Schnelle: Ja, bei File:Otto-Hoffmeisterhaus, by Margret Hofheinz-Döring.jpg sieht nun alles perfekt aus. -Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

About image:Eeriekwang.jpg file delete

It is my self-made image right. but it is original big size version. if I upload this original file, I'll have disadvantage on my advocacy after. through this reason, I delete this original size file, and I'll upload little size of this image file again. please delete this image file quickly.--EerieKwang (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

O.k. It's gone. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Hello Túrelio, Only after uploading several pictures by Witkiewicz did I notice that he actually died less than 70 years ago. Sorry about that, it's all due to my absent-mindedness... --Szater (Talk) 20:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm afraid I won't remember to upload them once again next year :) But anyway thanks for your help and understanding and once again sorry for being such a trouble maker --Szater (Talk) 14:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

I requested deletion of my image due to broken (and irreparable) thumbnail generated by commons. The deletion log for File:Knud-Rasmussen-bust-kangerlussuaq-airport.jpg mentions 'copyright violation' as one of two reasons. Since this is my own photograph, could you explain your reasoning behind your 'copyright violation' designation in this case? --Algkalv (talk) 13:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Ah, sorry. My explaination for that is gone with the deletion. The statue shown in this image was probably made by a living artist (sculptor) or by one who isn't dead since >70 years. Thereby, the artist still holds his copyright. And as there is no freedom of panorama for non-buildings in Denmark (I think that is also true for Greenland), any image of this statue is a derivative and, without a permission by the artist, a copyvio.--Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

cat correction

Hi there, thanks for correcting my typos. How did you come to spot it, though? Watching new files? --Eusebius (talk) 21:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Watching new files? Exactly, but actually the image itself catched my eye. --Túrelio (talk) 22:02, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Good answer, you've earned yourself a voucher for a free support vote in a future VI/QI nomination! :-P --Eusebius (talk) 22:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
A moment ago, I thought to propose that to you, but you were faster ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 22:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

File:I don't travel to eSStonia.jpg

Is there any reason you have added speedy to File:I don't travel to eSStonia.jpg, when it is currently under discussion? It has the PD-text-logo template, which states: This image, or text depicted in it, only consists of simple geometric shapes and text. They do not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and are therefore public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, this image may still be subject to other restrictions. See WP:PD#Fonts or Template talk:PD-textlogo for more information. --russavia (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. I didn't look at the "threshold of originality"-tag. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

image advice (File:Dorall Death 2006.jpg)

hey Turelio,

Thanks for the comment re image of Death.

The work is actually made by me, photographed by me and still owned by me. I guess i chose the wrong options when loading the image. If you could advice me on what options to choose so that i am not in violation/derivative etc, that would be much appreciated, or if there is a link advising this.

Many thanks

Slaterd4479 @ Daniel Dorall — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slaterd4479 (talk • contribs) 08:49, 27. Jan. 2009 (UTC)

Hi Daniel,
sorry, I couldn't guess that from your user name. It's great that you are willing to offer reproductions of your works of art to the public. However, in cases of works of art from professional artists (I guess you are one, as you had already exhibitions) we ask for a written permission by the artist or copyright holder in order to give re-users of our media at least some certainty that they won't be sued if they use an image according to license conditions. So this is neither mistrust against you as user, nor complicated. Just go to Commons:Email templates, read thoroughly the boxed declaration text, especially if you aren't yet well versed in "free" licenses (for more details see: Commons:Choosing a license). Be aware that for media uploaded to Commons, commercial use must be allowed. Then copy the template text into your email program (use an account that clearly identifies you as the artist; this will not be disclosed to the public), enter either the name of the file already uploaded or of this you want to upload, choose a fitting license (click on blue link in the box) and mail it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. After some time a volunteer from the OTRS team will then put a so-called OTRS ticket on the image description page(s) and everything is fine. Hope that helps. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Annaberger Bergaltar

Hast du http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Bildrecht_verletzt.3F_.28File:Annaberger_Bergaltar.jpg.29 gesehen? Würde mich freuen, wenn du alles weitere in die Wege leiten könntest. --Nairem (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Scouts book

Hi. This is my photo, made by professional photographer for my all documents. Krzychu025 (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Fine. Thanks for feedback.--Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Images regarding Dennis Huntley

Thank you for your comments. I should perhaps have said "Wikimedia Commons" instead of "Wiki".

Mr.Huntley is fully aware that his images may be used commercially by whomsoever wishes.

I do not want to see the images withdrawn. Could I not simply amend the wording used when uploading the images.

Your help would be much appreciated.

{Weglinde (talk) 07:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)}

Portuguese

I don't speak English! RmSilva pode falar! 10:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Y yo no sabe portuguese, perdon. You can ask User:PatríciaR who is fluent in portuguese. --Túrelio (talk) 11:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Obrigado por traduzir. Eu já recebi esse alerta através de um usuário da Wikipédia e prometo parar com isso.
RmSilva pode falar! 11:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your help and advice, Turelio. What if a photo was taken by a family member who has been dead less than 70 years?--Jeanne boleyn (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

When a family member (who is not also a professional photographer) took a photo, we usually can assume he/she would give you permission. If you want to be more sure, you might ask his/her heir(s). --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

explanation

i have sent an email containing permission from eyal bartov that i can use his images in Wikipedia, i have uploaded several images for this copy right holder before, u can see it in my first emails if u still keep them or in the start of this email I've sent. if u didn't get the email replay 2 me and i'll send it again. greets. Bassem Bassem (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Bassem, thanks for your reply. If your OTRS-ticket 1919877 is good also for the later uploads, then you should copy the full OTRS template (the string within {{...}} ) from the first upload to your later uploads. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 21:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Kirkcaldy Town House pictures

hello

read your replies on the two town house pictures for speedy deletion. sadly, i don't know how to retouch and lighten the colour of the pictures. can you show me? Kilnburn (talk) 00:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Try the freeware program JPG-Illuminator. I've discovered it only recently, seems to be powerful and easy to handle. --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

File talk:Kunawodna3.JPG

My fault, i didn't see it is on talk page.   ■ MMXXtalk  09:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome.--Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Notice

Hi all right because my picture deleted? this image is in accordance with the laws you had nothing to erase the next time I'm not trying to help erase the articles with pictures but when you erase the last image that I made was in accordance with the laws not delete my image that is wrong the wikipedia needs help with image! Wagnelson (talk) 15:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Wagnelson, sorry, but I am not sure I do understand you clearly. What image are you speaking of? File:Fabinho.jpg? That was from a website with the note: © Copyright 1999-2009 Futebol Interior - Todos os direitos reservados. In case you want to speak to somebody who is fluent in portuguese, I can recommend User:PatríciaR to you. --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

In case you miss it

[3]  — Mike.lifeguard 17:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the nofication. Afterwards Martin H. had blocked him for incivilty against him for 1 week. At the next incident he'll get indef. --Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Appreciation

I just want to thank you for defending some of my photos, such as the Sicilian ones. Sorry if my family pictres annoyed so many people. I was just trying to be helpful as the fashion categories are lacking images. Thanks for your help and good advice.--Jeanne boleyn (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome.--Túrelio (talk) 21:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Atriplex confertifolia.jpg

You write: (Copyright violation: ©Al Schneider). This is hardly sufficient. Please point me to your source of the information that this image is a copyright violation. --Ayacop (talk) 19:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I had to look in the deletion log. There I found the reason: the image was taken from http://plants.usda.gov/java/largeImage?imageID=atco_005_avp.tif. There it is marked with: Author: Al Schneider @ USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database. Usage Requirements. Any use of copyrighted images requires notification of the copyright holder. That hardly suggest it to be a free image. Also, in the image itself there was a (C) note ©Al Schneider at the bottom left. Hope that helps. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Richard Melo da Silva

Hello Túrelio. Could you please proceed with the bloking of Richard Melo da Silva (talk · contribs)? Despite all the warnings (here and on pt.wiki), he's still uploading copyright pictures. Thanks in advance. --Whooligan (talk) 08:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:Kunawodna

As you can see in information template I'm not the author. Now I'm out of the internet but I will try to find out sth about it later. Thanks for your hint. Ludmiła Pilecka (talk) 09:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

File:2008 06 Clearwater, Florida - Operation Sea Arrgh 635.jpg, etc

Hey, I agree with your edits, am just in the middle of utilizing a tool for the uploads, feel free to edit these pages, or else I will do a similar bunch of edits to yours shortly. FWIW, you can see similar ones from the same flickr user, in the category Category:2008-06 Clearwater, Florida "Anonymous" anti-Scientology protests. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Go on with your tool/script, that will be faster and more efficient. Cheers.--Túrelio (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your help along the way. Cirt (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help with those. Cirt (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

User: Victor afc

Hello Túrelio, I wonder if you could have a look at this subpage. It contains all the images uploaded for User:Victor afc. An IP adress warned me on es-wiki that all the images of the user would be copyvios from Skyscrapecity. I've only found one but I suspect that the rest are also copyvios. Could you have a look?. Danke shön Dferg (commons-meta) 11:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

User: Vallenty

hi Túrelio, I am shocked, why you canceled MY pictures concerning Anna Staniszewska paintings. I know, that maybe I had not written properly my copyrights to this pictures - but it would be better to ask first, or to help me... These photos of the pictures I have done by myself, and Anna Staniszewska is my Mother, and fully accept publishing her painting in Wikipedia. What else can I do? Please - take this pictures back and in future try to explain the situation first, before writting the angry mail... Vallenty (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Valenty, just for your information: I did not delete your images, but I tagged them as copyvios and I notified you on your talkpage. Also, I did not write you any angry mail. You probably think of the "no more copyvio"-message on your talkpage. That is a standard template (not indidually written for you) that everybody receives who uploads more than 1 copyvios. The deletion was performed by User:Polarlys. You may ask for un-deletion here: Commons:Undeletion requests. But before doing so you should note that you do not own any copyright of a photo of a work of art (here a painting) by an artist who still holds his/her copyright over the original. In most countries of the world the copyright belongs to the original artist until 70 years after his/her death. If I remember right, the images of Anna Staniszewska were quite professionally looking. Therefore I strongly recommend you to ask your mother for a written permission, using the email template on Commons:Email templates.--Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Ex-chiesa di san pancrazio 03.JPG

Wait a minute, I didn't wanted to take the sculpture as main subject, I just wanted to shot the hall... I reverted to normal delete process, please explain you reason there. --Sailko (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! --Sailko (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

hi Turelio. the picture not allowed is my favourite picture from maplestory. pls can i keep it? From Enochkim94

maplestory

Hi Tirelio. The picture is like a game picture. Come on. Pls keep it. User:Enochkim94

Hi Enochkim94, what do you mean? File:3ie6325.tmp.jpg? This picture may be o.k. if it was really made by yourself. But you should add a meaningful description and you must add a fitting license. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Redaktion ddz

Hi!

danke für die Hinweise!

HAbe das erste Mal was in Wiki geändert... Ist im Auftrage des DDZ (=Artikel, den ihch geändert habe)

Hat voll Spaß gemacht!!!

Kann ich denn die Lizenzen irgendwie noch weiter einschränken, wär dem Chef glaub ich lieber...? Und wie kann ich mit anderen, die scheinbar, wieso auch immer, an dieser Seite herumbasteln, kommunizieren (Visi-Bot zum Beispiel)? Und wie kann ich verhindern, das der Nächstbeste mutwillig einfach die Dinge, die ich nun alle mühevoll eingegeben habe, löscht?

Lieben Dank!!!

Redaktion-DDZ

P.S.: Genau, kann ich meinen Benutzer-Namen noch einmal ändern? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redaktion ddz (talk • contribs) 16:50, 10. Feb. 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Redaktion ddz, deinen Usernamen kannst du hier Commons:Changing username ändern lassen, solltest das aber nur tun, wenn du hier noch weiter Dateien hochladen willst, da das einiger Aufwand für Dritte ist. Deine Frage zum Schutz vor Änderungen bezieht sich wohl auf ein anderes Projekt, auf Wikipedia vermute ich. Nun, da dort jeder mitmachen kann, kann auch jeder etwas ändern. Andererseits ist das DDZ ja kein so furchtbar "umstrittenes" Thema, das ständige Änderungen erwarten lassen würde. Wenn dir an einem Artikel "etwas liegt", bleibt dir nichts anders übrig, als ihn auf deine Beobachtungsliste zu setzen; dann bekommst du auf deiner Liste immer angezeigt, wenn etwas geändert wurde. Wie ich dir schon auf deiner Disku geschrieben hatte, fehlen bei File:Roden-2007 143.jpg noch sämtliche Angaben; kopiere sie einfach von den anderen Versionen dieses Portraits herüber. Denn die kleineren Versionen werden früher oder später gelöscht, weil es von jedem Bild nur 1 Version geben soll, also keine in unterschiedlichen Größen. Zu deiner Frage bzgl. "eingeschränkte Lizenz": auf Commons sind nur bestimmte Lizenzen, die ziemlich frei sein müssen, überhaupt zugelassen. Die von dir gewählte GNU-Lizenz ist eine geeignete Wahl, wenn du die Verwendung eines Fotos außerhalb von online-Projekten verhindern willst, weil diese Lizenz verlangt, dass neben dem Foto der gesamte Lizenztext abgedruckt wird. Deshalb kann man ein solches Foto kaum auf eine Kaffeetasse oder ein T-Shirt setzen. Darüber hinaus sind Portraitsfotos von lebenden Personen auch durch Gesetze außerhalb des Urheberrechts geschützt, z.B. durch das Persönlichkeitsrecht. Das verbietet z.B. entstellende Veränderungen eines solchen Fotos. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Ridewiththedevil.jpg

This image was an image that I have found on wikipedia english. So, I can put this image on commons. Sorry for the orthograph fakes. Utopies (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Interesting. Speedy Removal of picture

The reason this is defamatory is that it's a picture of Slimvirgin. 83.78.14.55 01:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

PD-Iran

Please read again carefully the contents of {{PD-Iran}}. Some notes also added here. Thanks from a kitty! ;) -- Meisam (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, ok, it just caught my eye, when going to delete that file, that the 17 years-after-death wasn't exactly correct. As the uploader had reacted to the speedy, I've asked him for proof of year of photo or publication on File talk:Allame-Tabatabai-youth.jpg. Also I don't understand the meaning of "Source=Mehr-e-Taabaan".--Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your attention. Mehr-e-Taabaan (in persian: مهر تابان) is a memorial book [4] [5] about the life of Allame-Tabatabai (the subject of photo) which is published in ~2 years ago. Thanks again for your kind consideration. Meisam (talk) 21:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

POV, Kategorie

Guten Tag. Ich möchte Sie auf die Wiederherstellung der Category:Tskhinvali after Russian attack, 2008 von demselben Kerl hinweisen. Er scheint kein Interesse an einem Gespräch auf der Diskussionsseite zu haben. Wenn seine Handlungen für eine Blockierung nicht genügen (was ich nicht weiß, da ich hier kein regelmäßiger Benutzer bin), könnte ich Ihnen nur vorschlagen, die Kategorie nach der Löschung zu schützen, damit einige Löschungen pro Woche nicht notwendig werden. MfG Bogorm (talk) 09:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

To stop delete the image File:Regional Science High School III on February 12, 2009 (Part 2).jpg

Please, download the image. Then, edit in higher resolution. Then replace the file to stop the deletion of my image. Thank you! GPI-MediaWiki Union (talk) 13:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure that I understand what you are saying. As I told you on your talkpage, this image shows mainly the back of a woman and not of a school as the filename suggests.--Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Graffiti for Arka Gdynia at ulica Jozefa Bema in Gdynia 2.jpg

Hello!

Please delete. I uploaded without correction contrast. Later I uploud better version. --Pomeranian (talk) 14:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done.--Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Tierra y Libertad

File:Tierra y libertad (película).jpg I need this file because it's necessary for this page. It's a poster of an old film... why did you delete it? --García Oliver (talk) 22:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but it doesn't matter for what you need an image if it is not free. You put on a "PD-self" license, but that is invalid as you are not the photographer/artist. How old is the poster actually (source) and who is the artist/agency who produced it? --Túrelio (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
The film is from 1994 [6], but I don't know who produced the poster... I'm new in Commons... Can you tell me how can I know who produced the poster and the license he put on the image? And, if I buy the film and take a photo of a still of the film, can I upload this image with a PD-self license? --García Oliver (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
@García Oliver, thanks for checking for the film. Well, if the film is from 1994, you have to forget using anything from it. By buying the film as DVD, you do neither buy the right to take stills out of the film nor to scan the DVD case cover and to publish it. You know, even if you really own a Picasso painting, you are not allowed to take a picture of it and publish that. That right still belongs to Picasso until 70 years after his death. This is not Commons policy, but the law in Europe and most other countries of the world. To see some examples what you can freely upload to Commons, look at Commons:Image casebook. To come back to the poster: if you find out who has the rights on this poster (should probably be written somewhere on the poster, usually at the bottom and with the prefix (C) ), then you could ask them, if they would give you permission to upload a photo/scan of the poster under a free license to Commons. But, honestly, it is highly unlikely that they will give you permission. Cheers.--Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
First of all, thank you for all time you are spending on helping me. I will not search the owners of the poster's rights, because I see that task is very difficult for me. I think I'll put another photo in the article. --García Oliver (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Careful with deleting categories!

Hi there,

I've noticed you've deleted Category:Makaryev Monastery due to moving the content to Category:Macarius of Zhyoltye Vody Monastery of the Holy Trinity. Leaving aside the issue whether the new name is the best possible, I would like to suggest that you should never just delete a category without first checking if it's used (via "commonscat") in wikipedia pages. I don't know how to do it automatically (there used to be tools, but I am afraid they are broken now), but at least you can see if there are interwikis in the Commons cat page already, and also do an obvious search in the major languages' wikipedias, and than adjusting the content of the "commonscat" template there. If you can't to do that, you probably should leave the old "incorrectly named" category alone, and just leave it as a redirect to whatever is "correct".

Now I'll need to go edit en:Makaryev_Monastery etc myself, although I feel it that keeping Wiki pages in sync with the Commons cat names is the responsibility of whoever decided to change the Commons cat name in the first place. Vmenkov (talk) 01:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Vmenkov,
I'm sorry, if the deletion resulted in additional work for you to do. But the cat had been tagged for speedy deletion due to {{Badname}} by User:Demidow. At the time of deletion there were no more Commons-cats and no interwikis present. I do look for that of course. But to check in other wikipedia without any special hint for that and without functioning tools for that (S3 database is >1 month old) and with so few active admins on Commons and a backlog of about 1000 requests for speedy deletions, not speak of the many other backlogs ... I feel it that keeping Wiki pages in sync.. agreed; I would recommend you to tell that User:Demidow. Maybe, next I'll use more redirects. Cheers.--Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Zupa Jarzynowa (talk · contribs)

Protestuję przeciw nagminnemu usuwaniu wszystkich plików które przesłałem. W zaistniałej sytuacji czuję się prześladowany. Zupa Jarzynowa

Sorry, but I don't understand polish. Write in english or german, or ask an administrator with knowledge of polish, such as User:Herr Kriss or User:EugeneZelenko, for example.--Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Rihanna photo.jpg

How can I improve if an article can not I upload images? What it takes to get me to upload? This last image that you deleted, I followed the instructions of another image that was not erased, deleted, and you ... Vitorvicentevalente & Rihanna (msg) 15:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)")

Hi Vitorvicentevalente,
when you want to upload an image that was not taken (photographed) by yourself, you have to make sure, the image was released by the photographer under a free license compatible with Commons. Being on a website for everybody to see, does not mean an image is free. This "Rihanna photo" was uploaded from Flickr, but on the right of the image there is a clear statement "(C) All rights reserved". Uploading such an image to Commons is a coypright violation; the same is true for Flickr image, that are restricted to non-commercial use (CC-NC licenses). However, you may ask the Flickr account holder if he/she is willing to give you written permission to upload the image under a Commons-compatible free license. But this would not help with the "Rihanna photo" as the Flickr user is rather surely not the copyright holder for this image. So you have to look elsewhere for a freely licensed image. Cheers.--Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Polish National Catholic Church

Excuse me, but I do not know English well. Polish National Catholic Church is an independent Catholic church from the Vatican. In Poland, the Church is called Kościół Polskokatolicki (Polish Catholic Church). I am a member of Polish Catholic Church in Warsaw. See here:

Michcik (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2009 (UTC), Warsaw, Poland

Inappropriate name of file

Hi. I saw your change on croatian wiki. In croatian, also in serbian, the name File:Mrs jebacu ti mater 45.JPG means "I will f**k your mother", so the name of this file is really inappropiate, and i would suggest you to delete it --Ex13 (talk) 09:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the alert. I didn't know that of course, because I don't understand a word of serbian or croatian language. Do me the favour to check all filenames of this guy Special:Contributions/Drogan082. By the way, what mean "Source=ivana"? Is that a name or "own work"? --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Other names are pretty undescriptives. "Ivana" is the name. Hm, all files are licenced PD-Gov, but i don't see relevant governmental source. --Ex13 (talk) 16:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks.--Túrelio (talk) 16:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Spider Macros

Hi Túrelio,

I used a Nikon D50 to take the spider close-ups. For the really close ones, I used a 60mm f2.8 macro lens with 68mm of extension tubes. Without cropping, that gives maybe a 3:1 magnification ratio, but I cropped too. For the obviously grainy ones I used a 70-210 zoom, also with extension tubes. Some day, I'm planning to trade in all my Nikon gear for a Canon EOS 40D with a 100mm macro and the MPE-65. If you want to take spider macros, that is a pretty darn good rig. Nikon doesn't have anything like the MPE-65. Some people get great results with point-and-shoot cameras with special lenses on the front, like eyeglasses for their camera. If you are willing to experiment a little or a lot, you can take great shots very cheaply that way. www.Flickr.com is the best resource for this kind of stuff. --GlenPeterson (talk) 19:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

do you know why

Do you know why we will have a lot of pictures waiting for deletion in Unknown. How we can keep this category up to date, could you discuss with other administrators.--Motopark (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Do you know why - yes, because we are too few admins on Commons. Currently there are 2 rfa's ongoing, be so kind to give your vote at Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes. Thanks for the notification.--Túrelio (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy del candidates

Hi Túrelio, I'm a bit puzzled by edits like this one. As I understand it, there's really only three alternatives when we review a file nominated for speedy del. 1) If it's an obvious delete, delete it, 2) If it's an obvious keep, remove the speedy tag, or 3) If there is reasonable doubt, list the file at DR stating that it was tagged speedy but you'd like second opinions. If this image is in use then it's obviously not a speedy -> remove tag. Or am I getting something wrong here (I haven't been working this category a much)? Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 21:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

No, you got nothing wrong here - at least for the perfect world with 10 times the admins we actually have. only three alternatives - well, you're right by principle (and probably by policy) ... but sometimes I see a rationale to deviate a little bit from that, especially when I think a short feedback from the requester can solve the open question more easily. When a speedy is changed to regular rfd, which I also do, it often takes far longer until deletion, if that's the outcome. Still open rfd’s from last year speak for themselves. Cheers ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I see your point, and it's certainly useful for me to find those notes of yours when I come along. The rfd backlog is the curse of this project (well, actually we have a lot of backlogs...). Hopefully Tryphon&okki will clean all those backlogs once they gets the tools ;)Finn Rindahl (talk) 12:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

OTRS

Hi Stifle,
could you eventually check what's going on with File:Cirque jaffar.jpeg. It's marked as "no permission" since Jan 24, whereas an OTRS "ticket #2009012410006243" is mentioned here. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

That ticket is an email which an OTRS user sent out to the source site requesting a free license; it was sent nearly four weeks ago and there has not been any reply. Stifle (talk) 11:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Ah, thanks. Then bye-bye for the image.--Túrelio (talk) 11:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Nirvana 1.jpg

Thanks. I think the trlog was bad because my session had expired. Cameta (talk) 14:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Marina Ruy Barbosa 01.jpg deletion

Sorry, but all images I've uploaded are taken by myself and I have the copyrights.

I am Marina Ruy Barbosa's father, and I also the responsable for her blog [7] and her website [8].

I just want to put one photo on Marina wikipedia site http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marina_Ruy_Barbosa

Please email pauloruy@gmx.net if you have further questions.

Thank you.

Paulo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pauloruy (talk • contribs) 20:40, 18. Feb. 2009 (UTC)

File:Marina Ruy Barbosa 01.jpg deletion

File:Marina Ruy Barbosa 01.jpg deletion:

Sorry, but all images I've uploaded are taken by myself and I have the copyrights.

I am Marina Ruy Barbosa's father, and I also the responsable for her blog [9] and her website [10].

I just want to put one photo on Marina wikipedia site http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marina_Ruy_Barbosa

Please email pauloruy@gmx.net if you have further questions.

Thank you.

Paulo (pauloruy user)

--Pauloruy (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletions by an author's request

Please see a discussion Commons:Village pump#Deletions by an author's request. --ŠJů (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

@ŠJů, thanks for the notification. But I was off-line for >24 hours.--Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Tag anything you like.jpg

Hello I notice you fired a deletion to my LabelTag picture Tag anything you like.jpg I confirmed with the actual drawer we have payed for each photograph. we are allowed to use it in external publication. With best regards Maarten Kuijper (wiki user: leeuwenborchweide) Leeuwenborchweide (talk · contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeuwenborchweide (talk • contribs) 16:50, 20. Feb. 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello Turelio,

More informatio about the photo's: We buy the photo's from : www.fotolia.com.

Fotolia is an international stock image agency where people can buy and sell images to use for professional and commercial brochures, advertisements, magazines, websites, etc Fotolia offers low-priced, royalty free images using our credit system (1 credit = $1). A member can buy credits and download our images at the inexpensive rate of just $1 (1 credit). Contributors who sell images will be paid a commission depending on the type of license that is purchased. The average commission is around 40%.

So we are allowed to use the photo's for any purpose, like a nice wiki-page

Thanks

Maarten Kuijper Leeuwenborchweide — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeuwenborchweide (talk • contribs) 20:47, 20. Feb. 2009 (UTC)

Category:Elster Purzler

I requested that category Elster Purzler for deletion because I thought that this category and Elster Pouter were the same breed of pigeon which is why i requestd its deletion.. However i found out today that they are actually 2 different breeds of pigeon so can I please request an undeletion... My mistake.. thanks.. --Ltshears (talk) 16:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Undeletion of a cat doesn't really make sense. Just create it new, that's easier.--Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thank you i just realized that. i thought i had to request its undeletion.. thanks--Ltshears (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


Hello, Túrelio. You have new messages at Ww2censor's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 20:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, wyh did you deleted my photos? It is my self-made image right and they are from panoramio. OK? Bye--Baki66 (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, Panoramio says they are "© All rights reserved" and from Elshan Rahimov (File:Nəsimi metrostansiyası 4.jpg, File:Bəhram Gurun heykəli2.JPG, File:Bəhram Gurun heykəli.JPG, File:Üzeyir Hacıbəyov heykəli.jpg). If you are Elshan Rahimov and you have made these photos, then you have to send us a written permission from your Panoramio account or from an email account that clearly identifies you as Elshan Rahimov. For the permission please use the text template on Commons:Email templates.--Túrelio (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks --Baki66 (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Mikle uuu (talk · contribs)

Hello, You've just written me

Hello Mikle uuu,

You have uploaded several files that are copyright violations and you have done so despite our requests not to do so, and despite our instructions. If you do not stop uploading pictures that are not free, your account will be blocked. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Image casebook useful. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. --Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

So, how did you know that it is copyright violation? That was my own pics, that i made by myself. If i did something wrong let me know, because i can't understand what's the deal...

Hi Mikle uuu,
I thought I had left you enough explaining messages on your talkpage. Please read Commons:Image casebook#Album covers before uploading album covers. It doesn't matter that you paid for a CD/DVD, including the case; you don't become owner of the rights by that, whether you scan it or take a picture of it. In the case that you are a member of the band or their promoting or creative agency, then you should check who is the real rights owner for the album covers; it may be the record company or the band. We then do need a written permission on behalf of the rights owner, sent directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, from an email account that has clear evidence to come from the rights owner. For the text of the permission, please use the template on Commons:Email templates. --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

about my pictures

1) Though I'm willing to believe you, how do you explain the caption Toni Mihajlovski in his TV show Opušteno for exactly this image at en:Toni Mihajlovski?
2) File:AlexanderBustAirportSkopje.jpg: O.k., I've added an interwiki to en:User:Cukiger, who is blocked indef (!) on :en, and removed the no-permission tag. However, you have to find out, who made this sculpture and whether he is dead since 70 years.[11] This bust may still be copyrighted.--Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, if File:ZoranJolevski.png, File:Gjorgje-ivanov.png, File:DraganVucic.png, File:TitoPetkovski.png, File:ToniMihajlovski.png and others aren't screenshots, Wikcom, how did you manage to make them? You managed to stand right in the middle of the room in a TV studio and in various political press conferences (didn't the TV camera operators tell you to step aside? You must have been in their way all the time!), and each time you managed to create a photograph that is so bad in quality it looks exactly like a screenshot? That, indeed, must require some special skill, and/or some special sort of camera.
Also, Wikcom, is en:User:Sunnoo also you? He uploaded en:File:MacedoniansGERberlin.png as self-made on enwiki, and then you uploaded it again as File:MacedoniansGERberlin.png here, but as a work of Cukiger.
So, you and Sunnoo and en:User:Spand are evidently all sockpuppets of Cukiger, who is banned on en-wiki for serial copyvio image abuse. – Túrelio, I'm not in a position to provide exact proof right now, but if I were you I'd block this account and delete all their images. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Just as an update: it's been confirmed by checkuser on en-wiki (en:User talk:Nishkid64) that en:User:Spand was a sock of Cukiger. Wikcom is clearly the same person as Spand, as his uploads match Spand's edits involving the same images on en-wiki. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. As you may've seen, I've nominated his TV capture images for deletion. I still hope to encourage him to honest cooperation on Commons, though that may be in vain.--Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Zetalion

The copyrights of the images are mine, as the copyright holder transferred them to me. ”Images are free to use.” they are taken in the Church and the priests allow reuse, distribution, commercial use and derivative works, in any way. They gave me blessing to use this photographs.

What other "license" do i need? Please help me!!! --Zetalion (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

File:SAMA persian ceiling1.jpg

Hello

Plese explain how File:SAMA persian ceiling1.jpg is different from the sculpture pictures listed on Dale Chihuly.--Zereshk (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying more probable copyvios. But now it's your task to provide evidence why a work of art of a contemporary artist in the US should not be copyrighted until 70 years after his death.--Túrelio (talk) 22:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
because:
1. the focus of the picture is not the sculpture itself, but the space of the hallway of the museum in which it hangs from (otherwise I would have cropped the image to depict only the sculpture itself). And that, as you must know, is not copyrighted.
2. The sculpture in question is part of the building's architecture. It's the ceiling of the hallway of the museum. And [12] permits derivative works if they are architectural.--Zereshk (talk) 22:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
ad 1) please, be honest to yourself.
ad 2) I somewhat doubt that this would qualify as "architectural works". Anyway, I will not speedy-delete your remaining image as I've invited a general discussion about Images of artworks by Dale Chihuly.--Túrelio (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
If I was not being "honest", dont u think I'd crop the image to get rid of the wall, door, windows, etc? That's almost half of the entire image field of view.--Zereshk (talk) 23:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Imágenes de Javierito92

¡¡¡Hola Túrelio!!! Te escribo porque dudas sobre las fotografias que he subido. Son de una páguina de un amigo. Esta páguina es de dominio público, es decir, se pueden editar las fotografías. También son de: Páguina de transportes públicos. Te escribo, para que no me borres las fotografías. Gracias. Las imagenes eran: Línea 22.jpg

(Sorry, but my level of English is poor, I write you in Spanish. Thanks a lot) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javierito92 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 23. Feb. 2009 (UTC)

Gracias para tu feedback (perdon, yo no sabe mucho castellano). I will look into that later. Could you please put into the description of every image that has been taken from this website or from you friend, a deep-link to the source website? --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

In the description of every image, the website of my friend? --Javierito92 (talk) 10:37, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

La pagina original de donde el imagen es. Put it in the field "Source" (fuente?).--Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

OK OK, but, the page of the pictures, I put in this page (in your page) or in the pages of the pictures. If is in the page of the picture, plis, tell me how I put it. Thanks a lot --Javierito92 (talk) 10:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

No, not in my page, pero en la descripcion de cada de las imagenes que no son tuyo pero de una pagina web o de tu amigo (si el tiene una pagina web con los imagenes). Por exemplo, por dar est informacion para File:Recorrido L74.gif, use este link.--Túrelio (talk) 11:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok! Thank you!--Javierito92 (talk) 11:26, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

  • ¡Hola de nuevo amigo!

-SPANISH: He modificado lo que me dijiste, y en las nuevas páguinas he puesto la web de procedencia. Espero que ahora este todo en orden. Gracias. Si hay algun problema contacta con migo.

-ENGLISH: I modificated the pictures that you say. The new pictures that I up in Wikimedia Commons, I put the web of the picture. If are something wrong, plis tell me. Thank you.

--Javierito92 (talk) 12:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

some prove that my pictures are free pictures

Hello, Turelio. The pictures I have uploaded here are indeed free. I just made them smaller with the paint program. I have uploaded some of the "real" pictures with camera info on the page, so you can see:

please write me back. Regards Wikcom (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

please write me back - maybe tomorrow, I'm going off-line now. Regards.--Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. I will log in tomorrow and hope to see your answer what will happen with the pictures. Regards Wikcom (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Finally I have looked into the 4 newly-uploaded images and made comments at the RFDs for the earlier-uploaded cropped/lower-res versions of these images. It does look promising at least for those four.
However, you know that your account is under suspicion of being a sock-puppet of another account that was banned for uploading copyvios. You should think for yourself how you want to go on (see also my earlier comment on your talkpage). In case you have uploaded dubious or copyrighted images in the past, you should request their deletion by yourself, for legal reasons and as a sign that you are willing to play by the rules from now on. Otherwise they will be discovered earlier or later anyway, and then you might be banned.--Túrelio (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Well, what's the best? I think it's best to let all images that are mentioned on my talk page deleted and then i will upload the "whole/true" images with image information, like the four above (so it can be seen when they have been taken and that they are not copyrght). Is that ok? In that case you can delete them at once and I will upload the whole images in a few days. Regards Wikcom (talk) 16:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

please tell me what you think about my proposal. regards Wikcom (talk) 17:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Babynaamaw (talk · contribs)

But the images that i've uploaded were not copyrighted and those images were Creative Common licensed in Flickr. --Babynaamaw (talk) 11:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

They were not "Creative Common licensed in Flickr". I have checked everyone of them. However, at Flickr the user can change the license at any time and you will not know it. He/She could have changed it after you uploaded the images to Commons and he could have changed it again after I found them (C) and deleted them. But even if the Flickr license would have been o.k., with that sort of images remains the question, whether the Flickr user actually has any copyright over them. We see a lot of "Flickr washing" these days.--Túrelio (talk) 11:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Instead of Deleting those images directly, you could have at least request those pictures for deletion instead. Please undo those deletions, those images were not copyrighted.Babynaamaw (talk) 11:45, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

At the time of my check, they were marked as copyrighted on Flickr and had to be deleted as such from Commons. Anyway, you can request undeletion here.--Túrelio (talk) 11:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Please make a review for those images and undo your deletion for those images that i've uploaded Babynaamaw (talk) 11:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done.--Túrelio (talk) 19:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

fair use images

Because the images and "font" are copyrighted by en:Dankook University. Thanks.--Caspian blue 18:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Help regarding images of magazine covers

Túrelio, I am contacting you regarding your messages about copyright violations on images I have uploaded of Wilson Quarterly covers (WQWin09.jpg, WQAut01.jpg, WQNY86.jpg, WQAut08.jpg, and WQAut76.jpg). I am the managing editor of the Wilson Quarterly and we do hold license to these covers (as well as the artwork that is on them). My intent is to illustrate the Wilson Quarterly wikipedia page entry with representative samples of past covers (no more than the ones I have uploaded). This usage, it seems to me, is exactly the same as was done by Harper's Magazine on their wikipedia entry. At this point, I must admit that I do not understand what I am doing wrong. Nor do I understand why an image such as WQAut76.jpg would represent any problem at all, since it does not carry any additional image. Is there a way to upload our covers in a way that is acceptable to Wikipedia Commons? I would appreciate any help or advice you can give me.

James Carman (jameshcarman) Jameshcarman (talk) 18:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Túrelio, thank you for your advice. I have given this matter some thought, as you suggested, and would like to follow the procedure you proposed. I am placing here my proposed licensing for three of the deleted magazine covers (the fourth can be removed, as we have decided not to post that one). As you stated previously, you suggested that you could un-delete the images and tag them, at which point I will send a Permissions Email to OTRS. Please let me know if there is anything else I should do in the meantime.

For http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WQNY86.jpg: License will be Creative-Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) 3.0. Artist: Karl Bodmer, reproduced by permission of the Inter/North Art Foundation/Joslyn Art Museum. Cover image copyright © 1986 by The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

For http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WQAut01.jpg: License will be Creative-Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) 3.0. Artist: Matthew Trueman. Cover image copyright © 2001 by The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

For http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WQWin09.jpg: License will be Creative-Commons-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) 3.0. Artist: Ryan Etter. Cover image copyright © 2009 by The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

You may permanently delete image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WQAut08.jpg 13:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

May take until the weekend as I'm currently on travel.--Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Vicente Guerrero Images (File:Guerrero vicente1.jpg, File:Vicente guerrero realistic.jpg)

Hi, you deleted without a VALID reason the image of Vicente Guerrero from wikicommons. The page that you cited http://www.geocities.com/tele_historia2/vicenteguerrero.html DOES NOT HAVE any copyrights on the image they present. This image is a motiff of a painting by Ramón Sagredo, and was made in the mid's 1800s. So no copyright exits because of its age and because is in the public domain. The image should have been kept. However, I would recommend to remove from wikicommons the spurious altered reproductions of another painting of Guerrero made in 1850 by Anacleto Escutia. You can see his original painting and that of Ramón Sagredo here: http://www.inehrm.gob.mx/Portal/PtMain.php?pagina=consumacion-galeria and here http://www.reprodart.com/a/escutia-anacleto/vicente-guerrero-1783-183.html ... Compare with the material existing in Wikicommons, that is the one that should be deleted. I think that the original images from both Escutia and Sagredo should be added to Wikicoomons. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.165.77.211 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 24. Feb. 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. I'll look into this Wednesday or Thurday, when I'm back.--Túrelio (talk) 20:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Manizalita11 (talk · contribs)

Hallo Túrelio!

Wenn in der de:WP einer so massiv durch URV auffällt und auf keine einzige Ansprache reagiert, wird er gesperrt. Ist das hier anders? Gruß --Euku:⇄ 20:55, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Euku,
nun ja, im Vergleich zu :de/en sind wir hier schon etwas mehr "mellow" - überwiegend liegt es aber daran, dass es hier viel zu wenige aktive admins gibt und dass gerade solche Fälle wie dieser hier noch zusätzlich zeitraubend sind, weil man die copyvio schon irgendwie nachweisen muss. Bei so Angaben wie source=google.com kann man im Prinzip nur das {{Nsd}}-tag setzen, wie du es ja auch gemacht hast, und nach mindestens 1 Woche muss sich dann nochmal jemand dran machen und schauen, ob etwas nachgeliefert wurde, sonst halt löschen. Wenn du in jedem dieser Fälle, wie ich es jetzt hier mal getan habe, nach einer Quelle als "copyvio-Nachweis" suchst, sind 20 admins fulltime beschäftigt. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Danke dir! (ganz schön lang diese Seite.. :) --Euku:⇄ 23:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


Lilogoes2011 (talk · contribs)

Hello Túrelio!

This picture to get of Lavras do Sul municipality, state of Rio Grande do Sul, Southern of Brazil.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilogoes2011 (talk • contribs) 22:35, 7. Mär. 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I've updated File:Carnaval780000.jpg accordingly.--Túrelio (talk) 21:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Hotaka.S

Hi,Túrelio! I have an issue to want to dicuss. The pics I uploaded are not copyright violation. I own the right to use. How can I put them back?

Hmmm, not sure what you are meaning. File:SMhuntercover.jpg was labeled to be "All rights reserved by Pink Eiga Inc" by yourself. In addition to that, DVD/CD covers are always copyrighted. And File:Shuji Kataoka pic.jpg was taken from http://pinkeiga.com/HTML/directors/shuji_kataoka.html, a site that carries a clear copyright note "© Copyright 2008, Pink Eiga Entertainment, Inc. (unless otherwise noted). All rights reserved." You can upload such material only, if a written permission is sent by the rights holder to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Foto vom Tammer Rathaus

Hallo, das Foto ist von dort: http://www.meinestadt.de/tamm/bilder/detail?id=71435

Weiß allerdings nicht wie man da nach den Rechten fragen soll.

Grüße, derhuebiii (talk) 00:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Hallo derhuebiii,
wenn es das Foto von Frank Piskalla war, könntest du hier versuchen, mit ihm Kontakt aufzunehmen.--Túrelio (talk) 16:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Cornelia Dörr (Schauspielerin)

Danke für die Nachricht, habe die gewünschte eMail an "permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org" geschickt. War das alles? Grapes-taste (talk) 23:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Du könntest jetzt noch auf den Seiten aller davon betroffener Fotos, das {{Disputed}} durch {{OTRS pending}} ersetzen (einfach überschreiben), weil es immer etwas dauern kann, bis einer vom OTRS-Team dazu kommst, den Vorgang zu bearbeiten. --Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Nachdem ich ewig lange erfolglos versucht habe zu verstehen was du meinst und versucht habe die Stelle zu finden die du beschrieben hast, möchte ich dich bitten, den Austausch für mich vorzunehmen, die Seite zu sichten und freizustellen. Danke!! Grapes-taste (talk) 11:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Willie Colón and Fania All Stars pictures

Willie Colón's face is taken from the Commons of Flickr.com but I can not precise where exactly since I have very recently started to upload images and I have learnt just a few days ago that I should mark from whom I take it and so on.

About Salsa Collage, it's a mixture fo images of mine and of Commons Creative of Flickr put together. I think it is perfectly legal. I don't see the problem there.

One last thing: File:Willie e Fania All Stars.JPG is a poster from the metro. You can see that the plastic is a bit broken down to the right. :)

Thank you.--Atobar (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok. What a lack of freedom, then, if not even a temporary poster on a metro can be reproduces homemadely. Anyway, about Colón's face, here you are the URL in Flickr: http://flickr.com/photos/11294307@N04/2372404418/--Atobar (talk) 16:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. As you can see, the image is totally unfree. "lack of freedom" - no, it's a question of property, the people who made this poster put money and artistic effort in it, and can expect some outcome. One cannot simply take it and do with it what you want ;-) --Túrelio (talk)

I understand. Then, I guess it will have to be erased because it would take me hours to refind each image that was not mine; in fact, most of them are irrecognizable to the point that I don't even know where to start from. I'll keep aware for coming pictures.

Thanks for being willing to learn ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Strong Vincent

You query about the license for using File:Vincentstatue.jpg. I have stated that the source is "Engelsk wiki" which is danish for "English wikipedia". Vincentstatue Here you will find that the picture has been photographed by Pat Noble, and that he has put on a GNU Free Documentation License. I hope this answers your questions. Kind regards.--NHH (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, thanks. If you can find out the name of the sculptor that would be fine, but not necessary.--Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

San pellegrino carving.jpg

sorry but i only have a 50kb modem so i am just going to answer you as i can. this picture i found in flickr it was taken by a local tourist that lives,if i remeber right,in Frassinoro.The carving is ,i think ,in one of the museums located in San Pellegrino in Alpe, a hamlet in the tuscany apennines(you can see where it is located by reading the Bibulca Way article).Please don't be fed-up with me , i am lonely at home in not very healthy conditions.--Gionataconti (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I could locate the photo on Flickr. Please check for yourself whether you took it from there. The problem is, it is fully copyrighted [13], so we have to delete it. Sorry. The other possibility would be for you, to personally ask the Flickr photographer SergioBarbieri here for a permission. I wish you all the best. --Túrelio (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

File Tagging Image:UST Singers 03.jpg

File Tagging Image:UST Singers 03.jpg

You posted to me this text: 

This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:UST Singers 03.jpg. This image is missing permission information.
A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license 
the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license
information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS 
(permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days.
Thank you.

I wanna know how can I send a copy of written permission for this image. How is this permission? Witch are its characteristics? Thank you. --Xavitenor (talk) 23:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Xavitenor,
the problem with this image results from the fact that you are not the author, but a "Lluis Garcia", though you have - wrongly - written "own work". As the image is not yours you have to show that it is free as claimed. This can be done either by providing an online-source of the image containing a free license or by getting the photographer/rights holder to mail a written permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. If you will try the latter, then go to Commons:Modelos de mensajes, take the second boxed template (Declaración de permiso ..), enter the file's web address (URL) and the license name, and mail it to the photographer. He has to sign and date it, and to send it back to the adresse mentioned above. By the way, the same may apply for File:Estudi XX Nadal 07-2.jpg that has "Xavier Teruel" as author. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

my pictures again

Hi Turelio! I wrote you two times when I asked you about my proposal, but I did not get an answer from you (see section above "some prove that my pictures are free pictures"), that is why I removed the tags. I thought the cases are forgotten. Please answer me now whether you consider the idea of my pictures getting deleted as good, so that i can upload the true photographs so there is no doubt. regards Wikcom (talk) 15:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Wikcom, well yes, but anyway, you can't simply remove legitimate rfds. Above you asked: What's the best? ... to let all images that are mentioned on my talk page deleted and then i will upload the "whole/true" images with image information, like the four above (so it can be seen when they have been taken and that they are not copyright). No, in my opinion it would be better to do with the remaining images as you have done with the other four. Upload them now (but do not add "free" to the filename, just an additional number like ..._2.jpg). By comparing the new ones with the ones tagged with rfd, other users and the closing admin can see that they are o.k. (and that eventually also the old ones were o.k.) and in addition it may improve your reputation. Also, in the current situation it may take long until the old rfds are closed. And with uploading the better versions now, you'll have the images available in an non-rfd version immediately. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

hi! just wanted to say that i have uploaded some pictures in the real format. others will follow. regards and i hope cases will be closed soon. :) Wikcom (talk) 10:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Nicole cooke pic

Hi Turelio,

Sorry about mixing up the photo im new here this shot is freely avaiolable i think We got it from the halfords press office who own the rights to it. I write on forums for bikers and have been allowed to use the picture they pay a proffesional for the shots. I did not mean to make out i am the creater, but was unsure which categorie this would fall under. please could you advse many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cycle Fan (talk • contribs) 17:30, 13. Mär. 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very mutch for your help!

Best regards--Ankara (talk) 09:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Author info

Per OTRS, Andreas Heldal-Lund is the owner/copyright holder of the image File:2008 03 31 Jason Beghe with Tory Mark Andreas.jpg. As far as your concern expressed in the edit summary here [14], please assume good faith - it is quite possible the group used a camera with an automatic-delay picture function. Cirt (talk) 10:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Seems sort of duplicative to have the exact same link to another image page on two separate places within the information template, doesn't it? Cirt (talk) 11:50, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
May be, but in most of the 4 cropped images, the source entry simply wasn't correct (the link to the root of Andreas Heldal-Lund's website is not correct). You may remove the "other versions"-entry, as most uploaders leave that out, anyway. But in this special case it would make sense. Besides, the descriptions of most of these images are extremely "duplicative" or redundant as they consist mostly of a template texts, that has little to do with what is shown in the images.--Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The owner/copyright holder wished to be attributed as such. Cirt (talk) 12:01, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
I think the formatting on the image pages in their present state is fine, sound okay? Cirt (talk) 12:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
O.k.--Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks - I do value your input. Cheers, Cirt (talk) 13:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Yelle.png

Hi Turelio, the video at [15] (from which File:Yelle.png is a screenshot) is licensed under CC-BY-3.0-us. There's a CC logo and link right under the video. Am I missing something here? Cheers, Pruneautalk 14:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I stand corrected. I only saw the "© 2008-2009 ZenCat Productions, LLC" at the bottom of the website.--Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Cucina siciliana or of Sicily ?

Hi Turelio. The problem is here Category:Cuisine of Italy, that all the other regional cuisines of Italy are written "cucina". --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I see. I've replied at Commons:Bar italiano. --Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Category:Cuisine of Italy

Hallo, I think it is better to move all italian names in Category:Cuisine of Italy, otherwise, they might try to continuously "uniformise" it in Italian. I have a problem finding all the proper city names (most are obvious). --Foroa (talk) 16:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, then my last comment at Commons:Bar italiano was sort of counter-productive.--Túrelio (talk) 16:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
I noticed only after my move that the names in Category:Cuisine of Italy are in Italian, and the discussion on Commons:Bar italiano. We will see what the conclusion is (I am a "uniformist", not a purist ;). --Foroa (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The most names are of Regions: Liguria, Abruzzo, Calabria, Campania, Lombardy, Piedmont, Apulia (<- "pugliese"), Sardinia, Umbria, Sicily. An under-region of Apulia is the Salento. Cucina of cities are: Siracusa, Venezia, Vicenza. --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hallo Turelio. Was ist beschlossen worden in den vergangenen Tage für alle "cucine" in der Category:Cuisine of Italy ? Ich hatte es auf eine Art gelöst, die nicht angenommen und rollback wurde. Und nun? Herzlichen Dank. --DenghiùComm (talk) 08:07, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Hallo DenghiùComm,
ich glaube "beschlossen" wurde garnichts. Ich hatte ja, wie oben erwähnt, die Frage in der Bar italiano zur Diskussion gestellt, weil ich es zunächst mal als Sache der Italian community betrachtet habe. Zwischenzeitlich hatte Foroa, der das noch nicht gesehen hatte, bereits einen redirect von Category:Cucina siciliana auf Cuisine .. gelegt. In der Bar italiano ist die Diskussion nicht weiter gegangen, weil anscheinend keiner Interesse daran oder keine Probleme damit hatte. Da der momentane Name der Ober-Category:Cuisine of Italy unserer language-policy entspricht, könnte das IMHO so bleiben. Konsequenterweise müssten nun aber auch die 12 verbliebenen Cuicina-cats noch umbenannt werden. (Dafür habe ich momentan keine Zeit.) Wenn du das als völlig falsch or unpassend betrachtest, solltest du versuchen, nochmal eine breitere Diskussion darüber zu starten, vielleicht auf Category:Categories for discussion. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Hallo Turelio. Alles umzubenennen ist eine riesen Arbeit! Ich habe es nur im ganz kleinen Rahmen für Sizilien gemacht, und es war ein richtiger Krampf, und nun ist alles für nichts. Ich verstehe: da ist das Problem der Sprache. Aber so wie du alles in einem Nu wieder rückgängig gemacht hast, könntest du nicht auch die anderen "cucine" ändern? Ich vermute dass du (wie auch andere admins) möglichkeiten habt solche riesen Arbeiten irgendwie auf eine automatische (oder halb-automatische) Weise, im grossen, neu zu beschriften, was für uns einfache User nicht möglich ist. Dass ich nun jedes einzelne Bild von allen Cucine Italiane zuerst öffnen und dann umbenennen muss, da brauche ich ja Monate! Ich kann das nicht. Und ich vermute dass auch die anderen Italy-User dasselbe meinen, darum wird nichts unternommen. Habe ich vielleicht falsche Vorstellungen über eure Möglichkeiten? Herzlichen Dank für deine Antwort, und überhaupt für alles was du unternehmen kannst oder willst. Best regards. --DenghiùComm (talk) 10:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Hallo DenghiùComm, ich war es zwar nicht der alles in einem Nu wieder rückgängig hat, sondern Foroa; aber es ist schon richtig, das ist eigentlich bot-Arbeit. Es gibt dafür m.W. schon bots, die auch von nicht-admins beauftragt werden können. Allerdings kenne ich mich selbst mit bots überhaupt nicht aus. Frag am besten mal Foroa, ob er dir was raten kann. Ich hab momentan auch nicht die Zeit alles zu Fuß zu machen. Gruß.--10:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Nochmals herzlichen Dank. Ich könnte auch nicht mit Bot handeln, also schauen wir mal wer es dann machen wird. Saluti. --DenghiùComm (talk) 11:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
If you put the needed moves in User_talk:CommonsDelinker/commands, I'll execute whatever is needed. --Foroa (talk) 19:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Gregor Pöck.jpg

Was Sie schreiben, leuchtet mir ein, denn der Photograph des Bildes ist wohl noch nicht 70 Jahre tot. Das Bild ist aus dem Archiv, hat keinerlei Kennzeichnung, ist nicht einmal sehr gut photographiert (unten verschwommen). Was soll man da tun? --Melchior2006 (talk) 18:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Melchior2006, ich würde - wie ich auf deiner Disku (hier ist eher das "du" üblich) bereits angedeutet hatte - schauen, ob es aus der Hauptwirkungszeit dieses Abtes nicht irgendwelche Zeitschriften, Förderer&Freunde-Mitteilungsblätter, o.ä. direkt aus seinem Kloster (was ich bei Heiligenkreuz auf jeden Fall erwarten würde) oder von den Zisterziensern in Österreich gibt, in denen sich dieses Bild findet. Dann hätte man zumindest eine Vorstellung wann das Bild aufgenommen wurde. Idealerweise könnte es dort auch eine Angabe des Photographen geben, zumindest sofern dieser kein Klosterbruder war.--Túrelio (talk) 19:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Das ist mir derzeit zu aufwändig, geht leider nicht. Soll ich das Bild löschen? --Melchior2006 (talk) 07:55, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Das wär natürlich schade. Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass dasselbe Bild, wenn auch in s/w, auch auf http://www.orden-online.de/wissen/p/poeck-gregor/ steht, wobei "Foto: Stift Heiligenkreuz" als Quelle angegeben ist. Es sollte doch nicht zuviel Aufwand sein, beim Stift Heiligenkreuz[16] mal nachzufragen, ob sie das Urheberrecht an dem Foto haben (vielleicht sogar wissen, wer es wann gemacht hat) und, wenn ja, bereit wären, es unter einer freien Lizenz der Allgemeinheit zur Verfügung zu stellen. So was lässt sich doch mit einer Email oder einem Anruf bewerkstelligen. Eine Textvorlage für die Erlaubnis findet sich hier. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi. Thanks for deleting the user requested images (File:Hoteldesuede6.jpg etc.). My wikibreak interrupted my own work on doing that. /Lokal_Profil 19:00, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Bruno loodts.jpg

Hello!

Yes, he/she's a newbie and cannot manage to remember his/her password: according to this discussion and the history of the corresponding articles on fr: (fr:Gabrielle Loodts and fr:Bruno Loodts), 195.244.164.98=Pepsi=Pepsimax123=Pepsimax22=Fandegabrielle. He may therefore be difficult to reach to ask him to post the demand for deletion here on commons, so I've posted it instead of him. GillesC (talk) 07:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I've deleted the image accordingly.--Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! GillesC (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

P. Karl Wallner mit Baby.jpg

Hallo Melchior2008, das Foto File:P. Karl Wallner mit Baby.jpg ist zwar sehr hübsch, ich hoffe aber, dass du die ausdrückliche Zustimmung des Paters und der Eltern des Kindes zur Veröffentlichung hast, da die Persönlichkeitsrechte im deutschen Sprach/Rechtsraum sehr strikt sind. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe umfassende Erlaubis. Wiederholt und ausdrücklich. Soll ich das schriftlich irgendwo hinterlegen? --Melchior2006 (talk) 08:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Ja, würde ich in diesem Fall einfach formlos bei Permission hinzufügen, um zukünftige Nachfragen zu vermeiden. Übrigens was hat es eigentlich mit User:Melchior2006 und User:Melchior2008 auf sich? --Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Die Quasi-Doppelung User:Melchior2006 und User:Melchior2008 war ein Fehler von mir. Am liebsten würde ich User:Melchior2008 löschen. Wie kann ich das machen? Kannst Du als Administrator helfen? --Melchior2006 (talk) 08:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Da muss ich mich auch erstmal schlau machen. Ganz löschen geht aus rechtlichen Gründen nicht, weil jedes Hochladen einer Datei unter einer freien Lizenz ja auch ein Rechtsakt ist, der dauerhaft archiviert werden muss. Benutze am besten nur noch 1 account. Dann sehen wir irgendwann weiter. Ich habe mal einen kurzen Hinweis auf Melchior2008 gelegt, damit dich keiner als Sockenpuppe verdächtigt. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Zuviele Talk-Einträge

Lieber Túrelio, könntest Du nicht die Zahl der Talk-Themen reduzieren? Mehr als 200 macht das Navigieren schwierig. Muss das alles so lang auf der Seite bleiben? Barmherzigkeit! --Melchior2006 (talk) 08:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Huge list of copyright violated pictures

I not so recently added a bunch of images of synagogues around London onto wikimedia, to help improve the synagogues category. However most of the photos I took from websites and didnt have written permission to be on wikimedia, and so I have recieved a 7 day warning, then they will be removed. However I did actually take 2 of those picture myself, on my own camera, and 3 more were taken by my father and put on one of the websites I took from. I could even get the permission (via-email) from most, if not all of the websites, but I need an extension on the warning. I don't think that I am able to collate all the permisions for the images in under a week, is it possible to have an extension of 5 more days? -- Colt .55 (talk) 23:35, 16 March (UTC)

Of course, that would be no problem. Just put a list of those, for whom you are really trying to get a permission, either here or on your talkpage. I will then put an OTRS-pending-tag on them.--Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

The picture I have already filed permission on are:

The pictures which my father took/created, and uploaded onto www.sacps.org.uk, and from which i copied are:

This picture was taken and uploaded by a family friend, so I should be able to get permission: File:Haim Potter and the Megillah of Fire.jpg (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Haim_Potter_and_the_Megillah_of_Fire.jpg)

For all other pictures, I have already/ am in the process of e-mailing them for the consent and permissions needed. -- Colt .55 (talk) 00:19, 19 March (UTC)

Your Choice Records - the 7 inches (album)

Lieber Túrelio, ich weiß nicht wie du auch die Idee kommst, dass es Sinn macht die Cover von der Seite zu löschen. Selbstverständlich ist die kommerzielle Nutzung in Verbindung mit dem Upoad erlaubt worden. Auf der Seite von Your Choice findest du die Permission: [Your Choice Records] (See #4!!!) Bitte mach die Löschung rückgängig und wenn es etwas zu beanstanden gibt, dann wende dich bitte vorab an mich und verrate mir was zu tun ist, damit ich mich um alles kümmern kann. Party diktator (talk) 11:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Party diktator, wie ich auf die "Idee" kam (übrigens habe ich die quasi bestellte Löschung nur ausgeführt), kannst du auf der jetzt "ent-löschten" File:Your-choice-rec-the-7-inches-cover.jpg sehen. Es handelt sich um ein album cover, also etwas was praktisch immer unter Copyright steht. Du hast das Cover-Foto beim Upload als "own work" angegeben, was hier aber viele tun und (bei Covern) meistens nicht stimmt (nicht persönlich nehmen, ist halt so). Dein Username hat auch keine erkennbare Beziehung zum Label "Your Choice Records". Wenn die hochgeladenen Cover-Bilder direkt von der Website stammen, wäre es besser, gleich das jeweilige deep-link anzugeben. Dann wäre das Link unter Genehmigung vermutlich auch gebührender beachtet worden. Und schlußendlich hat auch noch dieser m.E völlig überflüssige Text unterhalb dem Infokasten - zumindest bei mir - zur Verwirrung beigetragen: "For educational or informational content, I allow commercial reuse. As the owner of the work have the freedom to use and perform the work, the freedom to study the work and apply the information, the freedom to redistribute copies, the freedom to create and distribute derivative works." Auch für den Fall, dass du der Urheber bist, interessiert das überhaupt nicht, weil die Informationen auf der Beschreibungsseite ja nicht für dich, sondern für "Wiederverwerter" gedacht sind und angeben sollen, welche Rechte ihnen vom Urheber eingeräumt worden sind.
Quintessenz: mangels deep-link kann ich dir im Moment nur glauben, dass die Fotos von der Website stammen, und nur dafür gilt ja die Genehmigung "All artwork and photos on this webpage can be used for Wikipedia. Photos available under CC-BY 3.0 license". Hinzu kommt, dass wir Genehmigungen a la "can be used for Wikipedia" hier auf Commons nicht mögen, weil das streng genommen ein Einschränkung ist. Und der nächste Satz "Photos available under CC-BY 3.0" klingt eher so, als seien CC-lizensierte Fotos auf Anfrage verfügbar. Also, vieles nicht so ganz klar. Ich möchte dich daher bitten, die Angaben bei der ent-löschten Datei soweit zu bereinigen, dass solche Mißverständnisse in Zukunft vermieden werden; d.h. konkret: das deep-link angeben und Löschung des o.g. überflüssigen Textes. Danach werde ich gerne die anderen auch wiederherstellen.--Túrelio (talk) 12:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Lieber Túrelio, ich hoffe du meinst mit der ent-löschten Datei das verbliebene Cover von "Neurosis": Dort habe ich jedenfalls den o.g. überflüssigen Text gelöscht und einen deep-link zu den ganzen Covern angegeben. Ich hoffe, dass ich alles richtig gemacht habe und bitte dich, die anderen Cover wiederherzustellen. Danke! Beste Grüße Party diktator (talk) 13:22, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Nee, ich meinte eigentlich File:Your-choice-rec-the-7-inches-cover.jpg. Hab die restlichen inzwischen wieder hergestellt. Bitte alle wie die von dir erwähnte "bearbeiten". Zählt File:Your-choice-rec.-Samiam-7inch.jpg, die ich nicht gelöscht hatte, auch dazu?--Túrelio (talk) 13:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Lieber Túrelio, ich habe alle Dateien wie von dir gewünscht geändert, bis auf das File:Your-choice-rec.-Samiam-7inch.jpg, und File:YCR-Sam-7inch.jpg, beide ‎konnte ich nicht mehr finden. Bitte stelle die Seite wieder so her, wie sie war. Das war alles viel und gut gemeinte Arbeit und langsam fängt es auch an zu nerven! Gruß, Party diktator (talk) 17:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Nur eine der beiden hatte ich gelöscht, die andere jemand anders. Ohnehin ist File:Your-choice-rec.-Samiam-7inch.jpg ist ein überflüssiges Duplikat von File:YCR-Sam-7inch.jpg. Jetzt sind erstmal beide wieder da; die eine habe ich aber als dupe getagged. langsam fängt es auch an zu nerven - na ja, uns Admins nervt es auch, wenn hier ständig nicht, falsch oder unklar lizensierte Dateien hochgeladen werden. Schließlich macht Löschen und Wiederherstellen kein besonderes Vergnügen. Aber ich denke, nach meiner ausführlichen Erläuterung (s.o.), welche Lizenzangaben nötig sind, wird es bei weiteren Uploads deinerseits keine Probleme mehr geben. Schönes Wochenende.--Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

ALRIGHT, hab die fotos also wieder auf die seite gepackt, hoffe, dass jetzt alles in ordnung ist! wenn noch was fehlt, dann gib mir bitte bescheid. beste grüße, Party diktator (talk) 08:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for cleaning up the mess which ToL encouraged me to make. It is also not the first time you have deleted things that I found which were wrong or unnecessary. It is really good to see these things gone quickly like that. -- carol (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome.--Túrelio (talk) 19:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Fink weekly 2007.png

f*INK Image: Hi Turelio, please see f*INK for references I have just added showing that f*INK has indeed been a free publication. Any help or suggestions would be great. Thanks! :Cargill208 (talk) 23:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Your link f*INK does lead to nowhere. I've answered on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Copy Vio

Did you see this case The uploader is flagrantly abuses Commons. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. Both files deleted.--Túrelio (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your help Admin Turelio. I only upload quality pictures...always with the flickr owner's permission like these timeless images below:

I hope you like them. If I ask people on flickrmail if they are willing to license their images freely for Wikipedia, many are happy to do so. If not, I thank them for their time. Thank You from Canada --Leoboudv (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Tips for finding pictures that are uploadable

Dear Túrelio, do you have suggestions on where one can hunt for photos on the internet, where one can be sure that are definitely not under copyright restrictions? --Melchior2006 (talk) 06:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, that's a question that could take days to answer. It strongly depends on the image topic. For images of current subjects, Flickr.com is a good source, though you have to keep in mind that not every image on Flickr is free. You have to look at the licensing information, usually at the right; images licensed NC or ND are not allowed on Commons. There are also bad source, see Commons:Bad sources. A helpful information not about source, but about what in general can be uploaded to Commons, is here: Commons:Image casebook. And, of course, you may take photos by yourself, but even then you have to obey copyright (if taking images of paintings or buildings of some artistic quality) and personality rights (if taking images of people).--Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Image deletion

Thanks for deleting that image. I screwed up by misunderstanding Flickr and Commons. I would like to help by transferring images between Flickr and Commons but am not quite sure what's right and wrong, I'm a bit new here. Thanks anyway. --Holnwham (talk) 10:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Lippisches Landesmuseum

Hallo Túrelio, das Lippische Landesmuseum setzt mich massiv unter Druck. Wenn die Bilder (Senner pferde.jpg, Lopshorn01.jpg, Zeiss-Heiligenkirchen.jpg) nicht bis zum Wochenende gelöscht werden, wollen sie die Angelegenheit einem Anwalt übergeben. Was ist zu tun? --Nikater (talk) 17:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Nikater,
setz den ersten Satz ruhig auch in die Löschdiskussion des Pferde-Bildes (und ggf. auch der beiden anderen), damit die anderen sehen, was gespielt wird. Jetzt mal für dich: wenngleich das nach Rechtsbeugung seitens LLM riecht und wir natürlich keine Präzedenzfälle für die Gelüste anderer Museen mögen, werden wir dich da auch nicht reinrasseln lassen. Bis Samstag ist ja noch Zeit ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 17:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

too much deleting?

You can complain to me. I appreciate the cleanup that much and would respect any problems you have cleaning the mess I made. -- carol (talk) 22:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem with that. Cleaning-up wrongly-named or scientifically incorrectly named categories is fine and I've no problem with performing the final step of the deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I tried to research things before requesting moving and deleting. My research and your deleting have been undeleted and no research shown. See http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?limit=50&tagfilter=&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=MPF&namespace=&year=2009&month=3
I might have made a mistake with that Ziziphus zizyphus stuff, but I make mistakes and showing the urls and such is a really nice way to show I made a mistake.
I think it is a problem when categories like this simply get changed and moved without some pointing to references elsewhere (ie. not any of the wikipedias or wikispecies or personal taste or some weird long-standing tradition here).
Do you have a suggestion of what can be done? Something that is productive and does not once again stagnate the resources here while users play little name games and such?
I like that UniProt url that I paste often because (I think) they are sequencing the dna of the species of things and putting them into a sensible and non-political position in that tree.
I would like to have this stuff set up sensibly and easy to upload to and looking kind of nice and respectable. It is my only motivation. Do you have a suggestion for how to make the apparently un-researched renaming stop? -- carol (talk) 05:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Bild Image:TZ-ChristineGrueter 2007.jpg

Danke für den Hinweis zu dem Bild. In Deutschland sind Totenzettel öffentlich!

Es bedarf dazu kein Rechtehinweis. Aber vielleicht kannst du als Admin dazu einmal einen guten Tipp geben.

--Kateer (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Was meinst du genau mit "öffentlich"? Wenn es etwa so ist wie der "öffentliche" Inhalt einer Website, die sich auch jeder ansehen kann, dann hab ich erhebliche Zweifel, denn "öffentlich" in diesem Sinne heißt nicht etwa "frei von Rechten". Und da das Foto der Verstorbenen wohl eher jüngeren Datums ist, dürfte der Photograph noch keine 70 Jahre tot sein. "Öffentlich" im Sinne von "keine Persönlichkeitsrechte", die verletzt werden, das könnte ich verstehen; aber das alin reicht nicht. Gibt es keine Nachfahren, von denen das Foto stammnen könnte? Ist es übrigens dieselbe Dame wie hier?--Túrelio (talk) 15:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Bilder - Situla und Moser

Kannst du mal bitte auf meine Seite schauen. Probleme wegen Löschung. Die entsprechenden Unterlagen wurden per e-mail längst gesendet. --Bauer Karl (talk) 19:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC) Danke

Ähem, wo denn, wie denn, was denn? Da alle Nachrichten auf deiner Disku älter als 3 Wochen (vom 7. März) sind, weiß ich jetzt nicht, was du mit "Probleme wegen Löschung" meinst. Die in meiner Erläuterung auf deiner Disku erwähnten Bilder sind ja schon alle mit OTRS-pending getagt worden. Da es relativ wenige OTRS-Mitarbeiter gibt, dauert es immer etwas bis das Ticket ausgestellt und auf die Bildseite gestellt wird. Wenn es schon mehrere Wochen her ist, dass du bzw. die Rechteinhaber die Permissions gemailt haben, kannst du auch einen OTRS-Mitarbeiter direkt ansprechen (ich bin keiner); eine Liste findet du hier. --Túrelio (talk) 19:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup

Hi. I see you are the admin that deleted copyvio image File:Brent.everett.jpg. Please also delete this page: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brent.everett.jpg. I accidentally nominated the image for deletion originally. Thanks. --✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 16:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Serious issue

OK I am going to check my later pictures, author description and license. Sorry for mistake

--Toxicotravail (talk) 19:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Image:Iberia Lgo.jpg

this file has permission from the owner, to be displayed. I have sent it to OTRS (permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org) in the day that was marked to be deleted. I do not understand why it was deleted. I would appreciate if you undeleted the image please. Thank you.

Zorglub

18:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

I've undeleted it, though I didn't delete it; I had only notified you about the missing permission. But now, go to Commons:OTRS/pt and ask a OTRS volunteer to check for the permission mail, please--Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Volodymyr Ivasyuk, Music-book.jpg

Hello Túrelio,

You can see one the Metadata that it was een scan from a book. I bought this book in the Ukrain, the same is with the Memory-book. I hope, I did nothing wrong. This Image you find back in several on-line bookstores. I was thinking gives no problems. I want to use it in a WIKI artcle. With regards -- KJL 68 Watchdog 13:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Labberté K.J., thanks for your feedback. However, there is a problem because bookcovers are copyrighted (except the book is so old that it's public domain), see: Commons:Image casebook#Book covers. So, I'm afraid, we have to delete it.--Túrelio (talk) 14:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I understand! But working on this article I was thinking its simular with: File:Volodymyr Ivasyuk.jpg in the en.wiki Cat. Fair use etc. but I have all understood the politics in the several wiki's is not the same....So may be....with greetings-- KJL 68 Watchdog 14:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Yes. Fair-use is somewhat deceptive... But, as it is legal only in the US, on Commons we do not accept it. But it is allowed on :en and probably on a few other wikipedias.--Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

File:00000kwp.jpg

Usage at cs.wiki replaced with another of same bishop (was used as illustration in a template). I think the image should be deleted unless you hear from the uploader soon. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 17:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I've asked Finish-speaking admin colleague Joku Janne‎ whether he could contact the likely source website in Finland.--Túrelio (talk) 18:35, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Mungo.jpg

Hi Túrelio. I do not understand why you moved File:Mungo.jpg to File:Mungo Man.jpg. Are there any name agreements or anything similar so that I used the wrong file name or are there any other reasons? The old file is used in 4 wikipedias, that's why I ask. Thanks, Yellowcard (talk) 10:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Yellowcard,
well, the description of what is shown in that image is actually "Mungo Man" and mungo is the common name of an animal. Therefore, the old filename seemed somewhat unfitting to me, as being too generic and as of a potential risk that somebody could locally upload a file called Mungo.jpg and thereby produce a conflict. Filenames should be quite specific, but it's not about wrong or right. I've now replaced all uses with the new name. Cheers.--Túrelio (talk) 11:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Túrelio, that sounds quite logical. Thanks for your explanation. Cheers! Yellowcard (talk) 11:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Fischer_1960_crop.jpg

Wie sieht man, ob eine Datei irgendwo benutzt wird? Oder können das nur Admins? Vielen Dank, --Conspiration 19:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Nö, das kann jeder. Du brauchst nur auf der Bildseite auf den "Reiter" Nutzung zu klicken. Kann aber etwas dauern, weil das über ein externes Programm auf dem Toolserver abgewickelt wird. Gruß.--Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Problemas com fotos.

Olá! Eu estou colocando as fotos aqui, e enfrentando muitos problemas. AS fotos estão sob copyright. Já utilizei dezenas de licenças, e sempre deletam miha imagem. Primeiramente, não entenda que estou fazendo de propósito, é pq eu criei uma página com muita dedicação, e não consigo colocar uma foto lá, pois sempre deletam minha imagem. Já utilizei todas as licenças do Flickr, já upei diretamente aqui, utilizando umas duas linceças para produto com copyright, e sempre apagam. São screenshots de dvd's da série Prison Break. Inclusive utilizei liceças de screenshots, mas quando utilizei a que vejo na maioria dos screenshots aqui, a "non-free", ou algo do tipo, na hora já aparece uma mensagem enorme sdizendo que minha imagem será deletada pq se trata de material com copyright. Eu só quero saber o que fazer, pois minha página está sem foto, uma página que demirei dias pra fazer, para pesquizar, traduzir. E agora não tenho instrução alguma de como colocar devidamente uma licença numa foto. Obrigado. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlanABBA15 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 10. Apr. 2009 (UTC)

@AlanABBA15, sorry but I don't really understand portuguese; solo un poco de espanol. Tu puedes hablar con User:PatríciaR o User:Dantadd que hablen portuguesa.--Túrelio (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry Túrelio, but I thinkes you were brazilian. =P I'm gonna contact them. Thank you for the fast answer! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlanABBA15 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 10. Apr. 2009 (UTC)

Problems to upload the photos

That's ok. So could you please tell me what I have to do to upload a screenshot here? I just wanna know that. I can see many screenshots with the "non-free" license, but if I use that, my file is gonna be deleted. But their files arent't. I read many articles here about the licensing, but I haven't found anything about screenshot of DVDs, only screenshots of animes or games. I just want to do a good job here, only that. I created a great page here, that I prepared for a long time. But it doesn't have the photo. Please, help me. I have to know e=what to do. And, yesterday I tried to upload a "promotional photo" of Prison Break, I used the ShareAlike lincense, bu it didn't work. I have already tried all the licenses of Flickr, but it didn't work. And I don't know how to use the licenses "copy-and-paste", you know? I ask you one more time, help me. Thanks.

Hey, here is an example. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PB_S4_Intro.png Ok, the person is using the "non-fre" licensing. But I can't use that here. When I copy the "code" to my picture, it show a big warning that you're gonna delete my image. What is happenning? Why does this person use a non-free" license, and I can't use as he/she does? Thanks one more time.

Oh, I forgot one thing.; The only license I found was the "Copyright for free license", I don't know if it's right, but I think so. I used this lincese, because of the copyrighted material. But my image was deleted some moments after. And I think it's the only license for copyrighted material here, isn't it? I'm looking for instruction, only that. Thanks.

Another example: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scofield_1.jpg It's exactly what I did, EXACTLY. I put my profile at Flickr, the link of the photo, used the ShareAlike, and the both are screenshots. So, why does this picture isn't deleted as mine? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlanABBA15 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 11. Apr. 2009 (UTC)

National Register of Historic Places in Florida

Hi, I see that you recently cleaned up at least one stray category name left over from Commons:Categories for discussion/Current requests/2009/02/Registered Historic Places categories. Thanks for you attention to that detail. I am writing to you because I realize that I never finished tagging the large number of categories in Florida, and some of the categories that I did tag were missed. I tagged as far down as the county level, but there are many city-level categories needing to be moved, specifically Category:Registered Historic Places in Orlando, Florida, Category:Registered Historic Places in Glen St. Mary, Florida, Category:Registered Historic Places in Punta Gorda, Florida, Category:Registered Historic Places in Lake City, Florida, Category:Registered Historic Places in Tampa, Florida and one of its subcategories, Category:Registered Historic Places in Cedar Key, Florida, Category:Registered Historic Places in Lakeland, Florida, Category:Registered Historic Places in St. Augustine, Florida, and other subcategories in Category:National Register of Historic Places in Alachua County, Florida, Category:National Register of Historic Places in Lake County, Florida, Category:National Register of Historic Places in Marion County, Florida, Category:National Register of Historic Places in Orange County, Florida, Category:National Register of Historic Places in Putnam County, Florida, and Category:National Register of Historic Places in Volusia County, Florida.

If you don't want to process these, please advise me on who or where to ask for help. I hope there is an automated process that could handle these. --Orlady (talk) 23:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Template:Nopenis (category version)

hi;

you have protected this template, without really providing a good reason.

i feel that this template violated wm policy & i want to prod it.

please unprotect it so that i may do so.

i do not know hoe often you check in here, so if i do not hear from you within a few days, i will be contacting another admin, please don't be offended if i do so.

thank you

Lx 121 (talk) 07:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi Lx121,
well, I provided the reason clearly ion the edit summary "recent vandalism". Meanwhile, Nagy has unprotected the cat already. No problem with asking other admins. Cheers.--Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Gracias

Gracias (Thanks), Túrelio, no lo había pensado... (sorry, en=0, de=0)... --Manuel Trujillo Berges (talk) 15:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

File:TBMM_aerial.jpg

You mistakenly deleted the image TBMM_aerial.jpg from Commons, because a small car renting company in Ankara has used it on its website (also using other images that they downloaded from Wikipedia, not vice-versa) 151.57.163.125 02:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Here's the website of the small car renting company that uses images from Wikipedia (not vice-versa): http://www.otokiralamaank.com Please recover this deleted image and correct your mistake. Thanks. 151.57.163.125 02:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Not so sure about that, because the image on the website had an URL watermark on it, that was not present on the image on Commons. When it is restored, the uploader will need to add some more proof. By the way, are you the uploader? --Túrelio (talk)
Restored for now. As anybody can see now, the image on the website shows a larger image (compare the lower parts). Obviously, the uploader of the image on Commons cut the lower part to removed the URL watermark. Without any further proof, it will be deleted agains.--Túrelio (talk) 06:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Túrelio. Yes, this photo of Paulo Autran was taken by myself in 2006. Bye! Kika Salvi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kika salvi (talk • contribs) 18:22, 15. Apr. 2009 (UTC)

File:Musee-sciences-villette-ext.jpg deleted

Perhaps an error. There is no discussion page. Do you use the good template ? for the good file ? --Pline (talk) 07:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Pfarrhaus Kirch Grambow Wedendorf.jpg

Hey Turelio,

It says the move was approved by you, but there is no license...? Ciell (talk) 08:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I've notified the uploader.--Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Eiffel Tower EU.jpg

Sir, it seems that you deleted my uploaded image. Well, that's totally took by myself when I went to Paris last month. I have no idea why it's not right to upload my self-taken picture. Well, that's fine. It's not the first time people on wiki arbitrarily delete others' own work w/o even asking, and I am used to it. Tsungyenlee (talk) 09:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage.--Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I see. I'd also like to apologize for such emotional, and thank you for contributing on wiki to make it better.Tsungyenlee (talk) 04:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome.--Túrelio (talk) 06:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

File:FDP1010009.JPG

Turelio,

I don't understand this. None of the links work and I don't know what this image is. Is it meant to be something I uploaded? I think all the pictures I've uploaded have been ones I took myself.

Flexdream --Flexdream (talk) 17:23, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it was uploaded by you (see upload log below), recently identified by someone else to violate the French-special copyright of the illuminated Eiffel tower and consequently deleted by me, as there is no freedom of panorama in France. Here's the original upload log:

18:56, 15. Nov. 2008 . . Flexdream (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) 1.200×1.600 (431.292 Bytes) ({{Information |Description={{en|1=Eifel Tower at night. New Year 2006}} |Source=Own work by uploader |Author=Flexdream |Date=1/1/2006 |Permission= |other_versions= }}
--Túrelio (talk) 18:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

My images

Hi Turelio. You block 3 images about my books covers (Capas_livros_Leandro_Müller.jpg, Pthses.gif, Capa O Código Aleijadinho.jpg). It's divulgation images free. It's possible unblock? You can check in my editors websites: http://www.garamond.com.br/produtos_descricao.asp?lang=pt_BR&codigo_produto=32 http://www.eusal.es/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=229&Itemid=52 Best regards. Leandro Müller, Rio de Janeiro, 19-04-2009 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocegonha (talk • contribs) 17:43, 19. Apr. 2009 (UTC)

I'll lock into it later. --Túrelio (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done and asked to send a permission email to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

File:KWAN.2009.jpg image

First of all, i can't english well.

This is my photo. I participated the reception. DO NOT BLOCK. you're not wikipedia's master. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Top on ice (talk • contribs) 20:32, 26. Apr. 2009 (UTC)

I do not know what you want from me and why you try to insult me. Did you even realize who added what to this image? An anonymous user (IP 70.20.68.130) proposed it for deletion for alleged copyright violation [17]. Because he/she did not provide a source/proof for that, I questioned this deletion proposal by adding the line "source URL?" [18]. --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
oh, you're not, it's 70.20.68.300. anyway, Jina is my nickname at www.feverskating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Top on ice (talk • contribs) 11:56, 27. Apr. 2009 (UTC)

File:Martens_P4I4254_k.jpg

Hi!

The copyrights have been adjusted for these images: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martens_P4I4254_k.jpg and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martens_P4I4254.tif Therefore, the tags can be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmartens (talk • contribs) 07:37, 27. Apr. 2009 (UTC)

O.k. --Túrelio (talk) 08:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

File:AllisonCroweThisLittleBird.jpg

This file that you marked with a unknown copyright status as a copy (witch is also hiperlinked from the information template) with otrs confirmaion on english wikipedia here. I dont know how to confirm its status nor do i have a otrs account. I hope you could be of some use to corfirm its license status. Tm (talk) 23:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I've changed to the OTRS-pending tag. Please go to Commons:OTRS and ask a OTRS volunteer to add the OTRS ticket from :en to this image.--Túrelio (talk) 05:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for the quick answer. I´ve already done as you adviced. Tm (talk) 17:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete

Please, also delete my monobook.css. You deleted its talk page a couple of times without deleting my mono. Locos ~ epraix Beaste~praix 22:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done (already by someone else). --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Ernst Späth.jpg

Ich habe gerade gelernt, dass die Bronze-Büste nach einer Gips-Plastik des Bildhauers Heinrich Zita (1882-1951) angefertigt wurde und sich im Arkadenhof der Hauptuniversität ein weiterer Bronze-Guß befindet (1961 aufgestellt) - es wär damit also wohl sinnvoller ein Bild dieser zweiten Büste zu machen und dieses hier zu ersetzen...

Liebe Grüße, --Anna reg (talk) 18:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Danke für die info. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Noch einmal zu File:Ernst Späth.jpg

Hallo Túrelio!

Wie Du vielleicht gesehen hast, hat UV die erste Version des Bildes als eigenes Bild (File:Ernst Späth 2.jpg) wieder auf commons gestellt. Ich habe UV hier auf Deine Bedenken aufmerksam gemacht und dadurch gelernt, dass die österreichische Panoramafreiheit auch Bilder in öffentlichen Gebäuden erlaubt. Ich dachte, diese Information könnte auch für dich interessant sein.

Liebe Grüße --Anna reg (talk) 10:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Tatsächlich ist FOP in Österreich etwas großzügiger als in Deutschland. Tu felix Austria! --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Pub?

Hi. Do you think this use should count as publication? If so, I got plenty more for you here ;-)). Lycaon (talk) 21:52, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I do think so. You know, I wrote the "definition" media publication (in the broadest sense) by myself and, regrettably, most of the pub-tagging was done by me, as of yet. May be, at a later time and with many more entries we could stratify media stricte sensu versus the rest. But, I'm open to a general discussion about this. --Túrelio (talk) 19:20, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Mother Teresa.jpg

Hi, thanks for your message. Yes, that is a blatant violation of copyright. I guess that happens with a lot but still, I will see what I can do. And no, I am not Evert Odekerken but since he gave the only copy of that image to me which I scanned and uploaded... :) Garion96 (talk) 22:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Helpful link

Hi Turelio, ein sehr nützlicher Link für Flickr Bilder, den ich häufig verwende wenn zb Bilder von Flickr mit "static"-Link in Foren etc. eingebunden sind, ist http://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?id= . Die id ist bei http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3361/3496039137_c9fccbce0e_m.jpg z.b. die 3496039137. Viele Grüße, --Martin H. (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Guter Tipp. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Alf M. Landon.jpg

Warum schreibst du als Admin in ein speedy deletion template? Wenn du denkst es ist nicht sicher, ersetze das template durch eine normale Löschungsanfrage wo diskutiert werden kann. Hekerui (talk) 10:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Weil dieser Weg eine Lösung oft beschleunigt. Der rfd-Backlog auf Commons reicht oft Monate zurück. --Túrelio (talk) 10:04, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Hat sich mitlerweile erledigt. Gruß Hekerui (talk) 13:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

NASA......URL?

[19] NASA URL?? hahahahaha

My friend, do you live in Mars? What about create some articles to help, instead to ask so silly thing? You realy need a ....URL? From where do you think an american astronaut image in working clothes come? From Rolling Stone magazine? From elsewhere it could come? hahaha

Get your ..url...[20] MachoCarioca (talk) 11:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

PS Some people here are just burocratic robots, do not think. Never.

Dateibeschreibung Image:TZ-ChristineGrueter 2007.jpg

Warum wurde das Bild gelösccht? Es handelt sich dabei um einen Totenzettel, der beim Begräbnis der Verstorbenen öffentlich verteilt wird und ähnlich einer Todesanzeige zu behandeln ist. Bitte daher das Bild wiederherstellen! --Kateer (talk) 12:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe es nicht gelöscht. Hier ist der Lösch-log: Shizhao (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) hat „File:TZ-ChristineGrueter 2007.jpg“ gelöscht ‎ (In category Unknown as of 3 April 2009; no permission). --Túrelio (talk) 12:07, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Berlin-Scientology-2007.jpg

Turelio,

I am Dutch and I am not aware of specific German laws on privacy such as de:BDSG. I made the picture during my vacation in Berlin in 2007. However, I am not sure whether you have a legal case, because Wikipedia pages are hosted outside of Germany. Much of Wikipedia is hosted in the USA and the Netherlands. Therefore, it would, IMHO, constitute extraterritoriality of German law. Nevertheless, I will change the description to satisfy your request.

--Coenen (talk) 16:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Historical marker redirect

Hello. I was wondering if you would consider reversing your deletion of the redirect at Historical marker. It was deleted with the notation that it was a self-referential page, however I do not believe that was the case as it was actually a redirect to the Historical markers page (which is itself part of Category:Historical markers). Specifically, I created the redirect so that a {{MultiLink}} could be used with the en.wikipedia article. This redirect is necessary because of the spelling differences between the Commons and Wikipedia articles. Note how historical markeren no longer works since the redirect was deleted. Thank you for your time and consideration, Kralizec! (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Done and the wrong redir corrected.--Túrelio (talk) 16:01, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

==pt:Usuário:MachoCarioca

Mercedes Ambrus, um das pole dancers favoritas do MC, mostrando que é grande fã da Gilette Presto-Barba..
Mercedes em PB. MC ama muito tudo isso. :-)

==

Machocarioca asked me on Wiki-pt[21] for you read what he has to say on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism‎#User:MachoCarioca. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 01:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh, if he really meant me, he might have taken the effort to write my username correctly. --Túrelio (talk) 06:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

HAHAHA, he's really bad to say/wite names. Even mine he doens't get it. That's why he calls me Mizu. Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 16:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Turélio. I did what you suggested and spoke to Cornelius, Drini and Dantadd about the problem. MachoCarioca was blocked.

Now, MachoCarioca was unblocked. I respect the opinion of Mitchazenia and Tryphon. However, still there are personal attacks on the user talk of MachoCarioca. Other attacks has being made on Wikipedia (see here). What should I do? Thanks. Fred Xavier (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

@Fred Xavier, any personal attacks or vandalism outside of Commons should be dealt with locally, not here. Actually it doesn't matter much what a user does elsewhere (well, except continued copyright violations). If there are still personal attacks or insults against you or other Commons-users on the talkpage of MachoCarioca, they should be considered in the current discussion or, even better, simply removed from his talkpage. However, this shouldn't be done by you, but by an admin. But you may ask for that, of course. Now I have to go offline until tomorrow. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 16:58, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Duplicate

Hi Ltshears,
was there any special reason why you tagged File:Jambu Fruit-dove (Ptilinopus jambu) at Louisville Zoo.jpg for deletion as duplicate, even though the file is less compressed than the other duplicate File:JambuFruitDove.jpg ? --Túrelio (talk) 20:58, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Well for starters it is my image.. 2nd , the image I tagged as a duplicate had less things linking to it then the other one so i figured it would be easier to just remove the one that required less moving at other places, and i didn't realize that the kb was different. i looked at the dimenstions and thought it was exactly the same.. Either way i have switched it now and sorry for the mix up..... --Ltshears (talk) 22:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Restore this image?

Dear Admin Turelio,

Can this image be restored: [22] I checked the flickr license and is now "cc by sa." So, it is now acceptable for Commons, I think. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

request image deletion

Hallo Turelio, wie geht's? I need an admin's help. I just uploaded an image, File:Elisabeth untersberger.jpg, but now I am not so sure anymore that it's fair use. The image, I thought, was from the early 1930s, but it could be from the 1940s also. The artist died in 1944, and I think the publishing company (Ars Sacra Verlag) was bought out and still exists, though under a different name. Now, I thought I read somewhere that whoever uploaded a file could delete it themselves, but I can't seem to find that anywhere. Can you help me out? I would like the file deleted, just to stay on the safe side, since if the image is NOT fair use I need to stay on the possible copyright owner's good side. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:22, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Drmies,
whether it's "fair use" is actually irrelevant on Commons as we do not accept fair use, because fair use is a legal construction of the US copyright law and is applicable only in the US. Therefore it is accepted on :en, but requires for the uploader to provide a fair-use-rationale. If the artist died in 1944, the image is protected until end of 2014. So you are right in your conclusion that the image should be deleted, except Ars Sacra-Verlag has the full right and you get a permission from them (that's not impossible because they probably don't sell it anymore). I will delete it, but in case you get a permission it can easily be undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Wow, I'm glad there's smart people at Commons to figure this out. But if the copyright expires in 2014 (let's say, hypothetically, that Ars Sacra no longer exists), is it copyright-free everywhere? I'm asking also because I am hoping to use this and other images in a publication. For this image, I will get in touch with Ars Sacra, at least for the publication--getting the image on Commons is lower on my priority list. Thanks for all your help, Drmies (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
In most countries of the world a work of art becomes public domain 70 years after the death of the artist. Before that date you need permission by the heir(s) of the artist. If you can't find them by yourself, the publisher (in this case: Ars Sacra) may know them. --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Tibetan writer Woeser 210.jpg

Dear Túrelio,

You deleted File:Tibetan writer Woeser 210.jpg, with reference to the article [23]. This article, however, is dated "Monday, 27 April 2009, 11:22 a.m." This is later than the photograph was uploaded. So it can never have been the source for this article. Davin7 (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Next to that, the Metadata shows camera type and more details, which shows that the uploader has a copy of the original photograph. Could you please be so kind to restore the image? Davin7 (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
I've done as requested. But as you are interested in this image, you should try to fix its many inconsistencies. What is "RFA" (=source)? Why is date=2006, whereas EXIF says 2007? If the uploader did really shot this photo, how can a journal publish[24] the same photo and even a larger cut of it? --Túrelio (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
When I Google the uploader's name "Nick Gulotta" + "Radio Free Asia" (RFA), I get 11 hits, what may explain RFA and the fact he indeed took the image. Viewing his edits he's nearly not on Wikipedia, so I don't know if verifying will help. Is this reassuring enough? Davin7 (talk) 15:49, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Think so. --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Chris Leech page

A page containing information about Chris Leech was recemtly added then deleted, i would like to request undeletion. There was no malice in the article, just factual information which didnt abuse chris leech. Please reconsider and publish this page again. Everybody should have the chance to share their life story with people and a lack of fame (even though he's been on tv) should not stand in the way of this. Bring back Chris Leech please. --92.234.122.35 16:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC) David Gaddess, 17th May 2009

What was the filename? --Túrelio (talk) 16:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Chris Leech. P.S. Nice work catching copyvios in general Turelio. — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 18:39, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
@Kanonkas, thanks. However, the gallery Chris Leech wasn't deleted by me (but by Wutsje), I did delete File:Leechy.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
I didn't know there was a photo too. Thanks for the info. Best regards, — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 19:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
@David, I you think Chris Leech is a notable person, write an article in any Wikipedia and, if it is accepted, we will think about un-deleting his image. A gallery here on Commons is not necessary at all for 1 image. By the way, was it you who later uploaded File:Chris Leech.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, I am Wilson Wong, the person who took all the photos uploaded under the username Longbomb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longbomb (talk • contribs) 09:59, 18. Mai 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the feedback. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
The photo should be PD. Sorry for the confusion but thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longbomb (talk • contribs) 10:04, 18. Mai 2009 (UTC)

Que paso

Mira, acabo de ver que varias de mis fotos han sido borradas. El caso es que pensaba que todas la simagenes de Flickr podían utilizarse. --Lagurion (talk) 14:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Y en cuanto la foto del ZIfio varado en Tenerife en 1860, la cogi de una pagina web que lo dice. Por lo tanto me vi libre de hacerlo [25]. En cuanto lo de las imeganes de Flickr, hay alguna pagina (enm español) que lo explique? Gracias Un Saludo --Lagurion (talk) 14:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Entschüldigung, Jetz ich weiss dass du von Deutschland bist. Ich habe habe dass alle photos von Flickr Frei sein Gedenk. Der foto von ifio Varado in Tenerife, in dieser link [26] sagt dass ist von 1860. Danke fúr deine atenzion --Lagurion (talk) 14:33, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Hola Lagurion,
yo sabe solo un poca de castellano. Hay la pagina Commons:Flickr files que explica mucho sobre images de Flickr. Muchos imagenes en Flickr no pueden usado por Commons/Wikipedias porque tienen una in-compatible licencia, por exemplo CC-NC o CC-ND o (C). Saludos. --Túrelio (talk) 16:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

URV an File:FW Eiffelturm1.jpg und File:FW Eiffelturm2.jpg

Siehe bitte Disk! -- Freedom_Wizard (talk) 20:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for catching my idiot blunder. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 03:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 06:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Soshana

Hello Turelio!

Thank you for the advice. It is helpful that you wrote because I am quite new on wikipedia and still need some help.

The problem is that I am the son of the artist on the photo and I have the rights over all her works including photographs and paintings. You can also see her homepage www.soshana.com, where you will find my name: Amos Schueller. How can I prove thate I have the explicit permission? Does wikipedia need a document signed by Soshana? I would be thankful if you could help me out with this question.

Concerning the other person on the photo, I did researches on every photo where Soshana is seen with another person, to check if it is some famous personalitiy, but in this case I did not find any name or information.

Thank you, Amos

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Ihre schnelle Hilfe!

Leider weiß ich nicht genau, wie ich auf meiner eigenen talk-page Ihnen antworten kann und ob das überhaupt möglich ist, daher schreibe ich wieder hier.

Ich werde erstmal alle weiteren Bilder von Soshanas Werken hochladen und dann, wie Sie vorgeschlagen haben, die Erlaubniserklärung mailen. Glücklicherweise existiert auch eine email-adresse mit ...soshana.net.

Was die historischen Fotos betrifft, so wurden diese zum größten Teil von Soshanas Vater, also meinem Großvater erstellt, dessen Erbe ich bin. Ist es in diesem Fall auch notwendig, eine ähnliche Erklärung zu mailen?

Herzliche Grüße --Amos.schueller (talk) 10:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Photos von Großvater. Nein, da ist keine Genehmigung nötig. Nur sollte in der Author-Angabe der Name des Großvaters stehen.
Re:Auf der eigenen Talkpage antworten: Das ist ganz einfach. Auf die eigene Talkpage gehen, auf den 3. Reiter von links ("Bearbeiten", wenn Userpage auf deutsch eingestellt) klicken und an die Stelle gehen, wo Sie/du etwas hinschreiben willst, eigene Signatur nicht vergessen und auf Speichern klicken. --Túrelio (talk) 12:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Hideo Kuze on Purgatory

Hi Túrelio, thank you for your concern regarding the cover of Purgatory. Actually, I do indeed have permission to reproduce the cover image from both the author and publishing company of this novel.

It is my sincere hope that you checked this with me in the interests of maintaining this community's integrity and not in the aim of simply being a nuisance.

With respect,

Kuze Hideo

Hi Hideo,
if you do have permission from the rights owner, sent it in the proper form (as described on Commons:Email templates) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (=OTRS). I'll put an OTRS-pending-template on the image.
You may (or may not) know that current book labels are copyrighted, usually by the editor, and that therefore the upload to Commons under a free license always requires a permission by the rights holder. As book cover are a business thing, violations are likely to result in copyright infringement. I well remember that you yourself threatened re-users with "copyright infringement suit" in one of your uploads. As we can't take the risk that Wikimedia, or re-users who re-use such images according to license, might find themselves in a law suit, we require written permission by the rights holder. Thats our (not my personal) policy.--Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Shabran_2.jpg

picture on ware was made by unknown author. I have already change it.--Interfase (talk) 21:42, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. But how about the "Copyright 2002-2008 © IRS-Наследие"-note on the source website? --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

It was my mistake. But here[27] is nothing about "Copyright 2002-2008 © IRS-Наследие"

Ok, I've removed the no-permission-tag. However, if you are not the author, you can't put it under GFDL. PD might be more adequate. --Túrelio (talk) 22:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.--Interfase (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Yukhu.jpg

Photo of group was made by unknown author. I have already change it.--Interfase (talk) 21:52, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm. "unknown author" by a contemporary group? --Túrelio (talk) 22:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Photo was made in beginnings of 1990s, and there is no information about author. One used it in azwiki.--Interfase (talk) 22:15, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Azeri_cloths.jpg

Author of photo (not of article) is unknown/ I wrote this already.--Interfase (talk) 21:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Did you ask the author[28]? --Túrelio (talk) 22:10, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

I cannot connect with author of article. And in article there is no information about this photo. Maybe author copied it from somewhere. This is why I wrote, that author is unknown.--Interfase (talk) 22:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Then you should at least do a thorough search to look if the image is also found elsewhere, because it doesn't look to be very old. And now I go to bed. --Túrelio (talk) 22:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

FOP and Australian images

Hi Túrelio - I just wanted to let you know that images containing the {{FoP-Australia}} tag like File:Kylie minogue statue at waterfront city.jpg‎ don't need the category FOP added, it's already included by the tag. It doesn't show up on the image page because it's a hidden cat. This should save you some work. :-) Dcoetzee (talk) 15:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I had noticed that already after some instances and then left the others untouched. --Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Bitte um Wiederherstellung

Hi Túrelio! Bitte stelle das von dir gelöschte Bild 1661 Carlos.jpg (vorerst) wieder her, denn ich bin mir sehr sicher, dass es weder eine exakte Kopie noch eine verkleinerte Version von Carlos II; Koning van Spanje.jpg, sondern vielmehr die in Bezug auf die Farbgebung wesentlich realitätsnähere Darstellung des in Frage stehenden Gemäldes war. Sollte ich mich diesbezgl. irren, werde ich nach deiner Wiederherstellung natürlich selbst einen entsprechend begründeten Löschantrag stellen. -- Danke und Gruß Sir Gawain (talk) 09:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. Du musst noch selbst das dupe-tag entfernen, was ja der Anlaß für die Löschung war. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Dankeschön! -- Gruß Sir Gawain (talk) 11:27, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Duplicated/Superseded

[29] When you delete a file because it is duplicated or superseded, you should either check that it is unused or ask CommonsDelinker for universal replacement... --Eusebius (talk) 09:35, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I do always and I did even in this case. But in both instances on Cafe and VP, it was exactly a comment (already striken through) about replacing the (now deleted) bad version by the better one. Replacing those two wouldn't have made any sense. --Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
OK. --Eusebius (talk) 10:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Ivo Pauwels gardening.jpg‎

Dear Túrelio,

To reassure you about the {{Personality}} for this picture, I have the authorisation of my good friend Ivo Pauwels (see my user page) for putting this picture on Commons.

Ivo Pauwels is a well-know Flemish author who has written about 60 books on gardening, etc. I am intended to create a biography page "Ivo Pauwels" in the near future. This has been discussed and agreed previously with administrator Valérie Chansigaud.

Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 07:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

File:GodsAndDevilscover-300.jpg‎

Dear Túrelio, Just wanted to let you know that I have forwarded an email from the artist Muntu Valdo, who owns the copyright to that picture that I uploaded for the album cover. Could you please unmark the picture for deletion. Let me know if you need any more information. Thanks Kevin --KevinKieran (talk) 23:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Vektorgrafiken

Hab ich irgendeine neue Diskussion verpasst, was das Löschen von svg/png-Duplikate betrifft oder war das ein Irrtum: File:Wappen Alterode.svg, File:Wappen Klein Wanzleben.svg, File:Wappen Wanzleben neu.svg“. So weit ich es mitgekriegt habe, ist der Antragsteller der Meinung, das svg-Dateien nach deutschem Gesetz nicht zulässig sind und stellt deshalb Schnelllöschanträge mit falscher Begründung. -- Cecil (talk) 11:21, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Also ich habe lediglich bei jeder Datei geprüft, ob sie noch im Einsatz ist, was bei keiner der Fall war, und einen Sichtvergleich mit der verbleibenden Variante vorgenommen. Die vom nom angegebene Begründung war meiner Erinnerung nach in den meisten Fällen "duplicate". Wenn die Dateien eher bleiben sollen, stell ich sie natürlich gern wieder her. --Túrelio (talk) 12:17, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Der Nominierende hat vor einiger Zeit im Forum die Meinung vertreten, dass die svg-Dateien nicht rechtens wären. War eine ziemlich lange Streiterei, in deren Rahmen er auch 1 Tag gesperrt wurde, weil er ständig die Vektorgrafiken zur Löschung vorgeschlagen hat. Mir sind die drei Löschungen jetzt auch nur aufgefallen, weil ich ihm den SLA da schon je mindestens einmal abgelehnt hatte und sie daher auf der Watchlist hatte. Seine Begründung ist auf jeden Fall nur eine Ausrede und angesichts der Tatsache, dass es eigene Bausteine gibt, damit die Wappen alle vektorisiert werden, halte ich zumindest eine Schnelllöschung für nicht richtig. Der CommonsDelinker würde im Falle einer vorhandenen Verwendung einen Ersetzungsbefehl auch ignorieren da svg. IMO sollte der Nominierende seinen Streit doch in einem normalen LA austragen und nicht mit Falschaussagen (badname) einen SLA stellen. Wobei ich jetzt das Ergebnis der Diskussion nicht kenne. -- Cecil (talk) 13:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Ok, machen wir's so, ich stelle die Wappen wieder her, dann können das die Wappen-Experten (zu denen ich nicht zähle, kein Interesse) das unter sich ausmachen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, jetzt habe ich folgende wiederhergestellt und den sp-tag jeweils auf die Disku verschoben:

Please take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Superseded. We have this rule for a reason. Multichill (talk) 08:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Not totally sure about the meaning. All above listed COA images had been tagged for speedy deletion by {{Badname}} (not by supersededSVG or similar), though this seems to have been without cause, so that I un-deleted them, after being notified by Cecil. Obviously COAs are another minefield of Commons. In the future, I'll let them clog the backlogs.--Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Strategy is quite simple. If not the same hash, than don't speedy it, but keep it. We have a separate section about it in the deletion policy. Multichill (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Ecografías

But she uploaded the photos, with her name. She wants to be identified. You can watch it in the source. --Rizome (talk) 11:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

That doesn't matter and we can't really be sure about that. Or do you have any real proof that the Flickr-uploader is the patient? We or a re-user may get legal problems for prívacy and personality rights violation. By the way, did you remove the EXIF data or why are they missing (at least from File:Ecografía 2D - Feto 14semanas A.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 12:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Ok: I'll delete her name. No problem.--Rizome (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
You may not have noted it, but I've done that already days ago. Currently all these images of threatened with deletion (not by me) because they may be copyrighted by the doctor, not by the patient who uploaded them. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Zip HydroTap.jpg

Hi Turelio,

Your main page states that you are on vacation - sorry to disturb!

You've advised me that all four of the images I recently posted on the page I created for my friend Michael Crouch are going to be deleted.

I built the website for Michael's company and have created a page for him here because he's a brilliant, but very old man, and I wanted to see his work documented: Wiki is an incredibly good way to expand on the story of somebody like Michael. I'm hoping some of his old friends/colleagues/employees will contribute to his page and fill in some of the blanks.

The images are all taken from the archives of Zip Industries, scanned and in some instances photoshopped by me. The older ones do not have photographers associated with them - that we know of! A loose negative in a paper bag, although it clearly shows a young Michael, is almost impossible to track back to the photographer. The images all belong to Michael, have been restored or created by me and used with Michael's permission.

Please advise best course of action to avoid deletion!

Best wishes,

Matt --MatDale (talk) 04:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Matt,
the tags that I put on the images uploaded by you don't result in a speedy deletion, so you still have some time to add missing information. My main issue was about copyright and authorship. So lets go file by file.
  • File:Michael Crouch 1962.JPG - was this 1962-photo really shot by yourself? If yes, please put your username in the author field. If no, then who shot it or, if really not known, who has the copyright, the company?
  • File:Michael Crouch AO.jpg - if this photo was shot by you, put your username in the author field, and eventually add the year when it was taken.
  • File:Zip HydroTap.jpg - this looks like a commercial promo shot from/for a catalogue. If this photo was really shot by you, put your username in the author field. If not, then who shot it and/or who has the copyright?
  • File:Zip Logo.JPG - this was rather surely not shot by you or? Anyway, the logo is owned by the company. Did they give the permission to upload it under a free license? You surely shouldn't put this in the public domain (that means everybody can do nearly everything with it).

--Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

rrr

Hello Túrelio. We were discussing with WE, and come to a conclusion that the abuse of my files. Do not abuse or do you draw the administration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMUCH (talk • contribs) 21:21, 31. Mai 2009 (UTC)

Cool

Bueno, voy a tratar de averiguar si la penúltima imagen que subi a Commons, que yo mismo la saqué con mi cámara digital, corresponde a derechos de copia de una persona que está fuera del Sistema Solar o mirando Casados con Hijos en la Patagonia. Aparte, si yo quiero subir archivos a Wikipedia, porqué tengo que pasar automáticamente a Commons?.

Igual, recomendame un anuncio para que sea un buen wikimedista. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMUCH (talk • contribs) 21:31, 31. Mai 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand what you are talking about. After uploading 3 copyvios and even one from Getty Images, you don't have much to complain, I think. However, if you want to talk to an admin with better knowledge of Spanish, take a look at Commons:Administrators. --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Giulio Superti-Furga-academy-crop.jpg

Lieber Turelio,

Betreff Ihre Nachricht gestern: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marcbrehme&diff=0&oldid=21124628 bezüglich copyright von Bild: "Giulio Superti-Furga-academy-crop.jpg". Quelle © ÖAW / R. Herbst. Es ist eindeutig erwähnt, daß das Bild zu Berichterstattung über die ÖAW verwendet werden darf. Giulio Superti-Furga ist Direktor eines Institutes der ÖAW, dem CeMM. Daher vestehe ich nicht, weshalb dies eine copyright-Verletzung sein soll. Zitat: "Nutzungsbedingungen: Sämtliche auf dieser Seite veröffentlichten Bilder stehen zur honorarfreien Verwendung zur Berichterstattung über die Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften zur Verfügung. Bedingung ist die Quellangabe sowie die Nennung des Fotografen (falls angegeben). Diese Ermächtigung zur Nutzung kann jederzeit ohne Angabe von Gründen widerrufen werden."

Bitte um Genehmigung des Bildes und danke recht herzlich,

Marc.

Hallo Marc,
zunächst sorry, wenn dich die Meldung auf deiner Disku etwas erschreckt hat. Aber es handelt sich dabei einfach um eine der dafür vorgesehenen Standardmeldungen (abgesehen von meinem individuell hinzugefügten Satz).
Das von mir auf deiner Disku verlinkte und hier von dir angeführte Wording der Nutzungsbedingungen zeigt unmißverständlich, dass es sich bei dem Bild um ein "Pressebild" handelt, dessen Verwendung nur dann honorarfrei ist, wenn es "zur Berichterstattung über die Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften" eingesetzt wird. Das ist völlig legitim, aber nicht ausreichend für uns hier. Denn die Bilder auf Commons werden nur selten zur Berichterstattung genutzt (eine Enzyklopädie wie Wikipedia fällt eigentlich auch nicht darunter) und können, gemäß der Konzeption des Projekts, für alle möglichen Zwecke eingesetzt werden, jedenfalls was das Urheberrecht angeht. (Im Fall von Einzelpersonen gibt es natürlich zusätzliche Einschränkungen durch das Persönlichkeitsrecht.) Wenn dir das Foto für das Projekt (Commons oder Wikipedia) wertvoll erscheint, würde ich dir empfehlen, die ÖAW (oder den Photographen R. Herbst) direkt anzusprechen und um die Erlaubnis zu bitten, das Bild, notfalls in etwas reduzierter Auflösung, unter einer freien Lizenz auf Commons hochladen zu dürfen. Diese Erlaubnis muss schriftlich erteilt werden, wenngleich der erste Kontakt natürlich mündlich o.ä. erfolgen kann. Eine Vorlage für eine Genehmigungserklärung findest du hier: Commons:Emailvorlagen#Einverständniserklärung für alle Anfragen. Wenn du das machen willst, kann ich das Bild vorläufig ent-löschen. Gruß.--Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for reconsideration: use of picture file "Giulio Superti-Furga-academy-crop.jpg"

Dear Turelio, I would like to use the picture file indicated above. I do not understand why it should be a copyright violation. It is clearly stated that the image can be used for publications on the Austrian Academy of Sciences. Nutzungsbedingungen: © ÖAW / R. Herbst Quote: "Sämtliche auf dieser Seite veröffentlichten Bilder stehen zur honorarfreien Verwendung zur Berichterstattung über die Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften zur Verfügung. Bedingung ist die Quellangabe sowie die Nennung des Fotografen (falls angegeben). Diese Ermächtigung zur Nutzung kann jederzeit ohne Angabe von Gründen widerrufen werden." Giulio Superti-Furga is the Director of an institute of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW), therefore this is clearly a contribution on the Academy. Thank you for reconsideration and I would appreciate the permission to use this image. At least instructions on how I can use it. Best wishes, Marc.

Replied here: User talk:Túrelio#File:Giulio_Superti-Furga-academy-crop.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: Request for reconsideration: use of picture File:Giulio Superti-Furga-academy-crop.jpg

Lieber Turelio,

vielen Dank für die Infos. Ich bin bereits mit dem Photographen bezüglich der commons-lizenz mit dem vorgegebenen email-template in Kontakt. Bitte, das Bild vorläufig zu "ent-löschen".

Grüße, Marc.

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Indef is a bit long for a IP?

Hi Túrelio, Just a question about a block placed on 67.189.132.118 (talk · contribs), Having an indef block is probably a bit harsh for a first time block and could also be a shared IP or is there more to this IP? Bidgee (talk) 15:01, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

@Bidgee, I won't object if you lower it. However it was vandalism + personal attack (against somebody unknown to me). Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I'll lower it for 1 day but if the IP does the same vandalism and attack again it will just get longer (IE: 1 week, 1 month ect). I didn't want to go behind your back. Bidgee (talk) 15:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I just wanted to note that indef blocks on IPs are always wrong, regardless what they've done. Please set an expiry. Thanks  — Mike.lifeguard 13:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding File:Cover_sharp_instead_v1.jpg, File:Cover_sharp_instead_v2.jpg & File:Cover middels.jpg

Dear Túrelio,

I'm just helping the band Dreadlock Pussy adding their pages to Wikipedia. Although I do not own the images myself user Twanb is one of the original bandmembers and I'm convinced they don't might me adding the albumart.

Kind Regards,

--ldebrouwer, 6 June 2009

Hi ldebrouwer,
I do not question your motives. However, the files uploaded to Commons need to be free not only for use on other Wikimedia projects, but also for everybody else. We don't want to risk that a re-user, who uses an image uploaded to Commons, get's sued for copyright infringement. Record/CD covers are usually copyrighted, either with the band or the record company. We therefore always require written permission by the rights holder. If you want to ask for such a permission, go to Commons:Email templates, take the permission template and proceed as advised over there. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

About the images i have uploaded

I just found them at the Sengoku Jidai Database site and then i found it interesting, i need to use them in my pages, what i have to do to not delete them?

First, as advised already, you have to provide full source information (deep-link), so that we can check whether these images are really under a free license. But Martin H. has written you already in more detail on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

My uploads

Hello, my mistake then. It's just that i didn't really know the author of these pictures or what to write there. Can you please tell me what am i supposed to write in every required place to upload correctly a picture? Sorry for the bad english, haha! Thanks. Victor Kbça (talk) 02:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Victor,
in the field "Author" (or whatever it is called in your language) you should write your name/username only if you made the photo really by yourself, not if you took it from somebody or somewhere else. In the field "Source" you should write either "own work" (if you made the photo by yourself) or the location from where you got it, usually an internet adress.
Both of your uploads, File:AndersonMartins.JPG and File:VandersonVitória.jpg, come from sources that are not the original source (neither http://ofutebol.com.br nor http://www.canalecvitoria.com.br did take these image by themselves) and therefore cannot give any permission. You have to find the original source/photographer and ask him if he gives you permission to upload the photos under a free license to Commons. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment

Dear Admin Turelio,

If an image is on a link, then I would consider asking the flickr user. (and I have done so many times including for this featured photo which failed flickr review: File:Praying mantis india.jpg) But in this case, Manuel Vicente deleted it likely because he doesn't want it used on Wikimedia Commons...or any other web site. If I asked him about it, how do you think he will feel seeing it here? This image is not used anyway on wikipedia so there is no loss to Commons. It should just be deleted.

With kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, I've already the deleted the other very similar image (wasn't as sharp as this one) and had some hope, we could "safe" it. But you are probably right. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Its quite OK. Personally, I am certain the image of the church was uploaded on a free license by Mac9. Mac9 (unlike Urban) seems to know all the licensing requirements in 2005/2006 (I have seen his excellent work here) but sadly, there was no flickrreview at that time and people change flickr licenses so much. Since there are other iamges of the church interior, I felt a CSD was appropriate. But I don't mind if the community decides here. Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

 Comment: Its incredible this image: File:Korea-E.mart-tea-02.jpg has lasted on Commons for so long...since it failed flickrreview on the same day it was uploaded. Shocking! --Leoboudv (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. Well, that has to be expected with 4.5 mio files. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 06:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank You. I had not noticed that the image failed flickr review too on the same day...until I checked the date of upload and flickr inspection. However, I have seen a few images in the past where the flickrbot says there is no image on the link when the image is still there. So, I guess the flickrbot can make mistakes too. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Scandinavian image

Indeed, that image should be deleted. Non-notable person, not in use. The text is dificult to make sense of without knowledge of the personal circumstances, probably more a joke than an attack. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

[30]

Whoops, pressed the wrong button there. Thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 18:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

About deletion requests

Dear Túrelio,

Two file that I up-loaded. It has been deleted at time when this is very early. What is this?--Corpse Reviver (talk) 17:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Corpse Reviver,
sorry, but I couldn't find out about which files are you talking. Could you give me a clue? --Túrelio (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Are you talking about File:Une Station 12.jpg? It was tagged for del. by User:KENPEI for "Copyright violation of map,and copyright violation of art(illustration)." I performed the deletion as there is no FOP in Japan for non-buildings.
The same problem ("Copyright violation of art(illustration,map)") with File:Shosha Engyoji115.jpg.
And the same problem ("Copyright violation of art(illustration,map)") with File:Shosha Engyoji095.jpg, that hasn't been deleted yet. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
OK . I understood. Thank you for teaching. --Corpse Reviver (talk) 13:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Computerdetail-by-RalfR-47.jpg

Nabend, das ist mir aus Versehen reingerutscht, kannst du es bitte löschen? --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 19:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Propio trabajo

Hello Túrelio,

I uploaded an image entirely my own work and taken by my camera, but they put me a template asking me copyright.

What can I do in this case.

Hola Túrelio, como ví que entiendes un poco de español te lo escribo en español.

Pues quería decirte que subí esta imagen [31] producto de mi trabajo y tomada por mi cámara, pero me pusieron una plantilla pidiemdome el derecho de autor.

Qué puedo hacer en ese caso, saludos--Inefable001 (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Hola Inefable001,
eso puede ser porque el imagen (File:Romeo .jpg?) no tiene EXIF data. Could you upload it again with intact EXIF (meta) data; you know the camera data that are in the original image produced by all digital cameras. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok i'll try to upload it again without losing the EXIF, saludos.--Inefable001 (talk) 21:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I already uploaded it File:Romeo_.jpg--Inefable001 (talk) 22:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: File:AirportRochefort Mirage2000.jpg

Hi, I'm pretty sure that my description is good, so I will remove the 'disputed' template. --KGyST (talk) 13:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Image:Kira-miro-en-la-presentacion-de-quiereme.jpg

Hello. You nominated for deletion: Image:Kira-miro-en-la-presentacion-de-quiereme.jpg uploaded by User:Chinock.
Do you remember why it was designed as a copyvio?
The image, has been licensed as cc-by. Any error?
PD: sory for my bad-english; I'm spanish speaker --Rizome (talk) 16:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Hola Rizome,
I nominated a prior upload (has already been deleted) of this image for deletion because it was found/taken from here. I see now that this page is licensed CC-BY. However, the question remains whether this image belongs really to that page. And I have found the image also here and here. I think the best way would be to ask the peliculas.info for a written permission to upload it under CC-BY on Commons. If they are not the real copyright holder of the image, they will not give that permission, if they are, they will give permission. --Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you.--Rizome (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Martin garrod.jpg

Hi Túrelio! You asked for source on this image. The test says "Source Own work by uploader" so it seems to me that there is a source. If you doubt the source is correct or whatever the reason may be perhaps maybe you could make an ordenary deletion request and explain the problem? --MGA73 (talk) 09:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

As many other copyvio-uploaders this one labeled all his uploads as "own work" including this File:Sam manekshaw.jpg warfare theatre image from about 1971. Therefore, the original source entry is totally incredible. Maybe I'll file rfds when I've time for it. --Túrelio (talk) 11:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. It takes a little longer to explain what the problem is, but it mages it easyer for others (me?) to understand the problem and delete the file. If a note is written on the users talk page it is also easyer to see that the user is untrustworthy. --MGA73 (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

?

Sag mal, wäre es nicht sinnvoller ein Noch-ein-erregierter-Penis-Selbstbildnis zu löschen, statt einen Copyrightbabberl reinzubabberln? Oder, falls Du den Penis für nicht out of scope hältst, zumindest den Speedy-Babberl vorher rauszunehmen? sугсго 12:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Von einem puristischen Standpunkt aus vielleicht ;-) Aber beides (out-of-scope & CV) sind voneinander unabhängige, nicht interagierende Löschargumente, und deren Addition/Kumulation kann die letztliche Löschung erleichtern. Und, ja, ich halte es für out-of-scope, hatte gestern spät aber irgendwie keine Lust es zu löschen. --Túrelio (talk) 12:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion request

Hallo Túrelio, ich wollte nur eben sagen, dass ich deine Anfrage im Deletion request gesehen habe, jedoch bisher nicht die Zeit gehabt habe, das zu ändern (sprich umzubauen, Links korrigieren). Ich hoffe, dies heut abend bzw. morgen früh erledigen zu können. Vielen Dank für deine Geduld. --The Evil IP address (talk) 12:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

O.k. --Túrelio (talk) 12:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

@April@

You are talking about File:April Deep Purple 1969 Disc ОАО Грамзапись Moscow 1996.jpg, right? The man in a sort of modern looking boat in the right upper corner of the cover is really also in the original painting? --Túrelio (talk) 11:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
1. Yes, it is the File:April Deep Purple 1969 Disc ОАО Грамзапись Moscow 1996.jpg. 2. This is a album, not cover. 3. Original painting by Bosch, XVI century. --Vizu (talk) 12:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
But how about my question about "The man in modern looking boat"? --Túrelio (talk) 12:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

ThaNk you for reply(more help) Yohanna File

So where could I find a permission or should I find the same image from another site and upload again so you could see please. Does this mean I should get a permission from the photographer in some way? How do i get this written permission? (I know I am aggravating you sorry) Could you help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashanm10 (talk • contribs) 21. Juni 2009, 13:56 Uhr (UTC)

Moved my reply to Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Attention#File:Yohanna.jpg to keep the discussion at one place. --Túrelio (talk) 12:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for two recent deletes of duplicates! --Iotatau (talk) 20:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Regarding PD / OTRS Pending File

Yes, sorry, I was advised to submit to the OTRS Pending email on most file submissions so I may correctly label the license. However its is not entirely important now as the OTRS says that it is still copywritten material and will be shortly deleted. The scan / photo of the material was in BC, Canada. Sorry for the trouble. --Forgott3n (talk) 21:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I have not asked for, nor obtained, explicit permission from the source (Church of Scientology, Local Vancouver Organization) as I assumed it was a public document due to public distribution, etc. etc.. However, OTRS replied to me stating "...a document which is "distributed in a public forum with no copyright, ownership, or authorship information" does not become public domain. Only an express copyright disclaimer from the copyright holder, the effluxion of time, or the operation of law can place a document into the public domain". The OTRS member then stated the file will be deleted shortly. If it is possible, then, I will try to obtain permission from the Vancouver chapter (however I doubt I will succeed) and will shortly reply to the OTRS with the release. --Forgott3n (talk) 08:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
✓ Release request email sent. I'll be following up with a phone call tomorrow. Hopefully they'll release under a free license. Since this is a typed document that I've scanned, what is the most appropriate license to use? --Forgott3n (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Hilfe mit falsch benannten Dateien

Hallo, ich habe vor kurzem mehrere Dateien einer Kirche falsch benannt. Auf die falsch benannten stellte ich dann einen Löschantrag. Du machtest daraus irgendeine komische Vorlage. Was ist nun mit den Dateien (z. B. File:AgahtaIllereichen16.JPG, etc.) - wird das dann "irgendwann" mal von einem Admin erledigt? Neu uploaden kann ich sie nämlich auch nicht mehr....deswegen wäre ich langsam aber sicher durchaus froh, alle so zu sehen, wich ich es gerne "gehabt hätte".....dank im voraus. -- Thomas Mirtsch (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Wenn ich mich recht entsinne (du hast leider keine von mir bearbeitete Seite verlinkt), habe ich in einige deiner speedys nicht "irgendeine komische Vorlage" sondern die reguläre Umbenennungsvorlage {{Rename}} eingefügt. Ausgeführt wird die Umbenennung von einem Bot, der nicht von mir abhängt. Was ich allerdings nicht verstehe, ist dein "Neu uploaden kann ich sie nämlich auch nicht mehr" - wieso nicht? Wenn du jede der falsch benannten Dateien erneut unter dem korrekten Namen hochgeladen und anschließend die falsch benamte Version als {{Duplicate}} getagt hättest, wäre alles längst erledigt. --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Ich wollte sie ja hochladen, allerdings kam da im Commonist immer eine Fehlermeldung mit massig vielen Fehlermeldungen: siehe: User:Thomas Mirtsch/gallery. Wie lange braucht den der Bot i. d. R.? Danke für Deine Hilfe -- Thomas Mirtsch (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Wie lange braucht denn der Bot? - für die Ausführung ein paar Minuten; er wird vom Betreiber aber nur an und ab angeworfen, in der letzter Zeit allerdings häufiger als früher. Einige Tage kann es aber durchaus dauern. --Túrelio (talk) 20:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Tja, dann hoffe ich mal, das er es "langsam" macht....die Bilder warten ja schon seit Donnerstag....Herzlichen Dank für Deine Antworten!!!! Gut Nacht -- Thomas Mirtsch (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

User:HamidGhanbari and User:Iraj Mirzaee

Hi! I'm Raamin from fa.wikipedia; I'm a sysop there. last week User:Leylaz uploaded several images without proper copyright information, which I deleted. Now I see 2 new users, User:Iraj Mirzaee and User:HamidGhanbari have uploaded exactly the same images with the same filename and with starnge informations (source: www.rover.com, Author: Gourdaafarid ?!). I believe these images are all copyvios and these 2 accounts belong to "Leylaz". Raamin (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. But I'm going to bed now. Better post it at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. --Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Bildrecht-Frage

Hallo Túrelio!

Was sagst du zu der Quellenangabe/Lizenzierung bei diesem Bild. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Wenn Deniss nicht mit "Feldwebel Reichert (Germany)" identisch ist, wird eine permission benötigt.--Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Das denke ich auch, ich bin mal gespannt. --High Contrast (talk) 15:08, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Danke

Hallo. Gracias por el rapido rapido de Jim McGreevey. You know, every photo I have uploaded in 2009 I edited on Picasa to try it out. I knew it was inferior to Photoshop, but I didn't think the Category:2009 Tribeca Film Festival pics came out too bad using it. I'm about to upload a series of photos of former NJ Governor McGreevey doing his prison ministry, and there were challenging lighting conditions - so I decided to use Photoshop for the first time this year. It's not a surprise, but really the difference was stark. The shot you deleted was done on Picasa - and it was the best I could do using it. It was too shadowy in addition to many other issues (not the least of which was that Picasa robs a LOT of megapixels in its conversion from RAW to JPG). Anyway, thanks for the help, as always. I probably should have done all those Tribeca shots in Photoshop - I always have the original raw files, if anyone wants it to try their own attempt on any of my shots. --David Shankbone (talk) 01:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 06:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Template:Location dm

Hello Turelio, I saw you reverted my delete request here. Are you sure you have read the content of this template before reverting my edit? Vinhtantran (talk) 02:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Vinhtantran, yes. The problem is, while I don't know the purpose of that template, it is used on 50+ pages. I would therefore recommend to file an RFD instead of a speedy. That would allow comments of user who may know to purpose of the template. --Túrelio (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I've filed a RFD now by myself. --Túrelio (talk) 05:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of personal Images

I see your point at [32] - but can I delete my own images with the exception of one current one (I know, I have allowed their circulation) --Olaf Simons (talk) 13:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

If you are shown in the image (and if it's not used on any project) we will likely delete it out of courtesy. But dupe was the wrong rationale. You can either put a speedy on it with "personal reasons and there is another image of me still available" as rationale or you can file an regular rfd ({{Delete}}) that will likely take a little longer. --Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
...as you find best. Lets take the first. I regret I can't do it myself. Gruß --Olaf Simons (talk) 13:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
I regret I can't do it myself. - was meinst du denn damit? Wenn du gern admin auf Commons werden möchtest, nur zu; die werden hier noch dringend gebraucht. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Nicht ganz sicher - bin nicht so der Löscher und weiß gerade nicht, wie sich mein Job entwickelt (die Photoecke räume ich auf, um bei Bewerbungen nicht zuviel Bilder kursieren zu lassen). Tatsächlich wollte ich längst einige Hundert Titelblätter des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts hochladen, die bei mir auf dem Server liegen, stattdessen mache ich das immer nur wenn ich irgendwas schreibe und so'n Ding verwenden kann... (PS - can't do it myself sagte ich weil ich diese praktischen Knöpfe auf de.wp hab und hier nun andere fragen muss, bin generell in Bildrechte nicht so eingearbeitet wie ich's gern wäre.) --Olaf Simons (talk) 13:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Ah, merci. --Olaf Simons (talk) 13:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

What is easier for you ?

Hello Túrelio, I would like to thank you for taking care of this for me.I would also like to ask you what is easier for administrators to rename or to delete an image. I am asking because sometimes I need to rename my images. I wish I were able to do it myself, but everybody knows that I cannot be trusted , so I cannot rename the images myself. I need help in doing this, but I would really like to make admins job easier. If it is less work to rename an image, next time I would add rename template. If it less work to delete an image, I could re-upload it with the correct name, and nominate the wrong one to be deleted. So please tell me what is easier for you as administrator to do, and I will add the appropriate template next time. Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 (talk) 19:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mila,
the reason I changed it formally from speedy to duplicate (which is actually also speedy) is purely practical. The template {{Duplicate}} produces a message on the description page that immediately shows the other ("better") version and slightly eases the steps that the deleting admin is required to follow. The reason why it wasn't processed further (aka deleted) yesterday, was the persistantly failure (see here) of the Toolserver that made it impossible to check the usage of images. I've just checked usage of that image, quite some pages; may take some time.
About your question: if the image to be renamed isn't used anywhere, it's easier for the admin to simply the delete it - though admins sometimes prefer (by gut, not per policy) to correctly named version to be uploaded before the other is deleted. If the image already used on many pages, rename might be better because the required substitution process of the file on the usage pages can be automated. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much!Next time I will know what to do. Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

How to deal with license violations

I just noticed the comment you made about being a victim of unlicensed image use at Category talk:Images used by media organizations but violating license terms. This seems to have happened to me (for the first time I am aware of). Is there a place in Commons where I can raise this? Is it worth bothering? (I'm no legal expert so I'm not 100% sure a violation has occurred.) I can give details of where the republishing has occurred if you are interested. --Dr Greg (talk) 12:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Dr Greg,
first, IANAL. On Commons there is actually no instance that will take care of copyright violations committed against the copyright of a user/contributor. One reason for that may be, that in many countries only the rights holder can file that claim. But of course there has been quite some community discussion about how to decrease the amount of copyright violations, for example by integrating a default "credit line" into the description template (see: Commons:Credit Line). When I see one of my images used without complying with the license, either by not crediting me or not mentioning the license, I contact the "violator" and request proper credit by explaining that any use without complying with the license is unlicensed. In cases of such unlicensed use on commercial websites or newspapers/magazine I wouldn't hesitate to send them a bill for the time of unlicensed image use. However, for practical reason that can only be done if the violator is located in my own country.
You may record correct or incorrect use of your image by putting the following template onto the talkpage of the respective image; in case of incorrect use, write "no" in the field "legal". {{published| author= |date= |url= |title= |org= |legal=}} Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. I'll have a think about this...! --Dr Greg (talk) 20:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Schau mal bitte

Ein Fall von Ich hab ne Mail oder lese was und denke mir mal ne Lizenz dazu, zumindest reicht der Text auf der Seite der Datei nicht. Der User wird mir gleich ein wenig zu patzig um selbst zu diskutieren und er hat auch gleich revertiert. Kümmerst du dich kraft deines Admin-Amtes bitte darum?--D.W. (talk) 18:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Hallo D.W., spontan scheint mir die übersetzte Erlaubnis von der Quellwebsite ausreichend, aber es ist halt nur eine Übersetzung. Da es hierbei auf das genaue wording ankommt, frage doch mal einen niederländisch sprechenden admin wie User:Kameraad Pjotr oder User:Foroa. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

This image

The dark figure over the cenotaph was removed from the structure because it was rusting away. Some of the rust fell onto the cenotaph. Anyway, it is still the same cenotaph. please delete the low resolution image here as a good faith uploader request:

I already provided a higher resolution replacement....and we have too many low resolution pics here anyway. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 05:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Empty cats

Hi! Multichill talked about deleteing empty cats by bot. That will be easyeer than doing it manually. --MGA73 (talk) 20:51, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

For sure, especially as it's >5000. ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Indeed. I could do it myself but my bot have no adminflag so it will flood recent changes if I do it. --MGA73 (talk) 21:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Zdjęcia1 481.jpg

I have a technical question. This file was aksed to be renamed, cos of incorrected, nondescriptive name. I see that u've already removed it - but how had u earlier corrected linking pages from different wikis? You "asked" CommonsDelinker for that, did it manually or re-linking is a part of renaming? Masur (talk) 23:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure if I understand that "how had u earlier corrected linking pages from different wikis" correctly. Do you mean whether the filename change was also performed on those wiki pages where this image was used? That is usually done by the bot (BetacommandBot) that performs the renaming. But the admin who finally deletes the old-filename version, has always to check whether the image with the old filename is still used somewhere and then has to correct that manually. --Túrelio (talk) 05:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

AuFaisanDoreKingdom01.jpg and 02.jpg · Thank you for resolving the situation

Dear Túrelio, I noticed that you took it upon yourself to remove the yellow boxes that Multichill's bot had installed on the pages of those two images. Thank you! I am a newbie and all these technical subtleties are alien to me. I looked around in the help files but I quite simply couldn't figure out how to do it by myself. Could you possibly tell me how you did it so that I will be able to remedy the situation if the problem arises again in the future? Also, can you give me a hint as to why Multichill has not responded to either of my requests? Was it something I said? Thank you so much for your help so far. Oclupak (talk) 15:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

You should remove this template-message only after checking whether the categories are correct (which type of categories are correct and which not, you will learn over time; see also here). After that, you simply open the editing field and remove the template-message, as I have done here; just compare left and right half. I don't know why Multichill has not responded, probably because he's busy and surely not because of your wording. He also hasn't yet responded to a question of mine. --Túrelio (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick response. I'm sure that I'll be able the handle the situation by myself if the problem arises again. You do understand that a lot of these technicalities are pretty confusing for someone who has just joined Wikipedia and who doesn't yet know how to perform what is expected of him. Again, thank you for your help and comment. Oclupak (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Montagnier photo

May be I'm blind, but could you tell me where exactly they added the missing credit to my Montagnier-photo as you claimed on File talk:LucMontagnier1995 065.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

That'll be my fault for rushing through an OTRS ticket and getting distracted halfway. I have sent another email on the OTRS ticket asking that a proper credit be added and have reset to illegal use. Apologies for the mistake. Stifle (talk) 10:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Credit is now added. Stifle (talk) 15:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the update. --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Info

Further to your block on this one, you may note this & this. Persistent I think! Regards --Herby talk thyme 15:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I had just thought he/she might not be well-versed in english, however, that would be unlikely in the Philippines. --Túrelio (talk) 16:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help.

Thank you for helping me with the deletion of the pictures I requested. It has been bothering me for a long time, and I hope to replace all of them with newer and better pictures, in the next couple of days. (Bygdeknøl (talk) 19:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC))

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Forensic aspects paraphilias.jpg

Hello thanks for your notice regarding this file. This belongs to a cover page of a book written by me. The whole book, including the cover is copyrighted by me. I had stated this. Also I sent an email from my email (dr_anil@hotmail.com) to Wikimedia Commons. If there is anything else, I need to do, please do let me know. Thanks. Regards Anil Aggrawal (anil1956)

Hi Anil,
after you had added more information, I had removed the{{Cover}}-tag[33]. Everything seems to be fine now. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 20:46, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

BArch-Kategorien

Hallo Túrelio, beim Zuordnen oller Ottersleben-Photos in Category:Ottersleben ist mir aufgefallen, dass du die Category:Images from the German Federal Archive, location Ottersleben gelöscht hattest, obwohl sie noch in de:Ottersleben eingebunden war (hab's schon umgebogen). Zu den BArch-Kategorien gibt's hier auch eine Disk. Beim Einsortieren von diesen drei Bildern bin ich noch über diese m.E. überflüssige Kat. Category:Images from the German Federal Archive involving sports gestolpert. Die Bilder könnten doch den Sportarten zugeordnet werden. Noch frohen Schaffen beim Ein-, Um- und Aussortieren. --Hystrix (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Danke für die Infos. Die Disk auf dem Forum ist erst losgegangen als die meisten der fast 6000 mit speedy markierten cats schon gelöscht waren - dabei nur ein kleiner Teil von mir. Eigentlich war das ein bot-Job, aber anscheinend hatte niemand Lust einen bot entsprechend zu programmieren und die speedy-Schlange durfte nicht wochenlang mit tausenden cats verstopft bleiben. Nach den Sportler-Bildern werde ich event. kommende Woche mal schauen. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 22:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting the images I accidentally uploaded with wrong names. I think that's two of mine you have done now. Cheers! Benkid77 (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Anapji Pond-Gyeongju-Korea-2006-07.jpg

Hello, Túrelio, would you take a look at the file in question? Because due to Magnus Flickr uploader having a some problem, the file was uploaded by the tool multiple times even though I did not push the upload button more than once. So it has unnecessarily long file history on the uploading. Would you delete the other 6 versions? And in that case, what template could be useful to notify admin of this sort of things? Thanks in advance.--Caspian blue 16:06, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Caspian blue,
you are aware that the same image was already uploaded a week ago (File:Anapji pavilion 2006.jpg)? Could we actually delete it completely? Eventually you want to paste portions of your more detailed description to the other one. The problems of the Flickr uploader may have resulted from the many problems of the Wikimedia servers on the last two days[34]. --Túrelio (talk) 16:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I know, but the duplicated image titled "pavilion 2006" would be tagged with "bad name", and that is not what I'm asking you. I want to make a consistency on images taken by a same user. I know the Commons has a hard time, but when I face such situation, "what template" could be used, and can you delete the 6 unnecessary versions? --Caspian blue 16:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I can't even see your image, neither the thumb nor the full version. When I click on high-res version I get this: "While trying to retrieve the URL: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6f/Anapji_Pond-Gyeongju-Korea-2006-07.jpg
The following error was encountered: Unable to forward this request at this time."
In case this is solved some time (I have no idea when these problems will be gone), I might try to delete the unnecessary versions, though - if I remember correctly - even this was made more complicated some months ago. (Taken together you may see that it would be far easier to delete your upload and then eventually rename the older one) About the template: I don't really understand whom you want to notify about what. About the Flickr uploader problem? Plain text would be best. --Túrelio (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I guess the server is seriously crashing right now (really frustrated, I have a ton of images to upload), so you may see the image after some time passes by. Given your answer, we don't have any template pertinent to the specific issue when uploading bots upload a same image over multiple times. Thank you for the answer anyway.--Caspian blue 16:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
You might try to look here, but it's unlikely that there is a template for that. --Túrelio (talk) 16:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


File:The Book of Fathers.jpg

Dear Túrelio!

I have permission to use this picture from the author. I sent it to the Hungarian Wikipedia permissions.

Thanks, Vadszederke

@Vadszederke, could you sent this permission (or ask it to be send) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, or ask the Hu-OTRS-people to put a OTRS-ticket on the image on Commons? --Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

permissions-hu@wikimedia.org from User:Grin --Módis Ágnes Vadszederke (talk) 14:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Notice

Hi, I am administrator in the Hungarian Wikipedia, so I know what copyright is:-) I was the uploader of the next 5 pictures in the Wikimedia Commons:

I found them in the Hungarian Wikipedia, uploader was Madura Máté. He is a good and trusted contributor in the huwiki, me made 2 featured articles, many good photos. It looked a good idea uploading his pictures into international level, but this 5 pictures was stolen from a skyscrapercity.com topic. I found the original pictures in the Skyscrapercity forum yesterday, then I marked the fake licensed copys in the Wikimedia Commons immediately to deletion. I think the real recipient of this five real fine templates is Madura Máté.
Viele Grüße aus Ungarn! --Beroesz (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the inadvertent embarrassment. Thanks for notification. --Túrelio (talk) 11:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Synagoge_Kaschlgasse_Wien.JPG

This image has been taken by myself, with my own camera

bmartens (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

{{Hewiki main page}},

Thanks for that, I got called away for a few minutes and hadn't finished. Cheers. Lycaon (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 12:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Moves and Commons:File_renaming#Usage

Hi Túrelio! You moved images like this one File:Statua cavallo blur 1.jpeg are you sure this move was legal in accordance to the Commons:File_renaming#Usage? Second are you sure the images a ok? I see no permission or note of when the author died. --MGA73 (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi MGA73,
1) no, I didn't move it nor did I order the move originally[35]. I only formally confirmed[36] the move after the first trial had gone ill. As the move was ordered by the original uploader and as the image wasn't widely used if I remember right (Toolserver again not running), I didn't bother much. 2) Well, the image is so bad, unlikely it's stolen. However, as it's taken in Italy, if the sculptor (unknown to me and not provided) isn't dead since >70 years and de minimis isn't applicable, it would be a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Ok, if it's a user request... But moving creates a duplicate and therefore more work cleaning up. That is a waste of time if the image is'nt free (no FOP in Italy). Even if you help deleting dupes. --MGA73 (talk) 19:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Duplicate

See http://stable.toolserver.org/delinker/index.php?image=Pierre-Auguste_Renoir_145.jpg&status=&max=50 Multichill (talk) 16:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

May be I can't think straight today. But seriously, what did you want to tell me with that? --Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
You didn't replace all usage before deleting the image. Now the image got delinked. Multichill (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Oh, that's it. Will check how that happened, as I usually always painfully check and manually replace all dupe-deletions. Anyway, thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Mac9

Do you know anything about Mac9's work in your time as an Admin? If you do, please feel free to make a comment in this mass DR--either for or against, its up to you. Mac9 has been away from Commons since Sept 10, 2008 and cannot respond...for himself unfortunately. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll take a look later. However, a mass DR is likely not to be closed soon. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

for your help with the Berne category renaming (especially all the deletions). -- User:Docu at 14:00, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Athous bicolor detail

Hallo, it is n o t an exact copy, and I asked for deletion of the old version allready. If you could do it, you are wellcome --Siga (talk) 08:01, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Du kannst ruhig auf deutsch schreiben. Hab dir im Forum geantwortet. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Template:Infobox musical artist

You deleted this template two times in the last three or so days. As this template is useless for Commons but is often recreated, wouldn't it be better to protect this page to prevent recreation? --Denniss (talk) 10:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done, though this was the first time I protected a deleted file. --Túrelio (talk) 12:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

RE: Thanks

No problem. I'm sure you would have done the same if it was my or anyone else's talk page. Bidgee (talk) 13:04, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Problem with BRONSON77

Dear Turelio,

Thanks a lot for your very kind and helpful response. I don't have experience with the use of wikimedia and I realize that you are very busy. Please if you could help me sending such information to the appropriate person that you consider I would be very grateful. Perhaps it is just a mistake of BRONSON77 instead of an intentional deleting of the information. Cheers,

Replied at COM:AN/V. --Túrelio (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Dear Túrelio, Thank you very much again. Following your indications, I have just contacted BRONSON77 indicating this point. I have also given two external links: 1) an official NASA website: http://leonid.arc.nasa.gov/s-jmfrias.html which includes a brief biographical information, and 2) an official Spanish website (exit directory of scientific information): http://www.directorioexit.info/consulta.php?directorio=exit&campo=ID&texto=1387 which includes further data about the researcher evidencing, in my opinion, the scientific impact of his work and publications. I hope this information is enough to re-incorporate Dr. Martinez Frias into the list of renowned Spanish geologists--130.206.92.101 08:00, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Argentino1993 (talk · contribs)

Turelio, yo tengo la confirmaciónes para usar esas imágenes, sino no las hubiera subido nunca. Trabajo para una agencia de noticias por si no sabías. --Argentino1993 (talk) 22:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 22:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

OK

Te pido disculpas, pude haberme equivocado, esta bien, pero la próxima ve me voy a tomar un sorbe de cianuro antes de cometer errores así. --Argentino1993 (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Post: No hablo inglés bien. Por eso te hablo en español. Si tengo dudas, te consulto, es posible? Gracias

Tried to reply on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Stöhrfall

Hatte ich inzwischen kapiert, du bist halt schnell, habe das Template 2 ja wieder eingesetzt. - Habe die Dame eindringlich befragen lassen, genau so wie Du mich. Es ist ihr Beruf den sie liebt, sie steht dazu, sie will sich nicht verstecken.--Stöhrfall (talk) 14:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok. Mit dem Template wird ja nichts versteckt. Das Bild ist auf den Wikimedia-Projekten uneingeschränkt nutzbar, zumal dort normalerweise dafür gesorgt wird, dass niemand solch ein Bild "verunstaltet", z.B. durch Anbringen diffamierender Veränderungen. Was in der Vorlage steht (der engl. Text klingt übrigens weniger dramatisch), ist eigentlich selbstverständlich und entspricht der deutschen Rechtslage. Das wird halt nur gerne mal vergessen. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Danke - fand es übrigens schon prima, wie Du mitgedacht hast. Überlegte gerade, ob ich ihr Deine Bedenken auch noch einmal mitteile. Weiter so! --Stöhrfall (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Lake County Courthouse.jpg

I have changed the license on my Flickr photo page of the Lake County Courthouse. I hope I used the correct license, if not please let me know. I am sorry for all the confusion regarding this photo. Thank you.--Pdepalma (talk) 13:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Category:Papaver

Hi,

As you have seen I have tried to put some order in the category Papaver and its sub-categories.

As usually I try to follow the modern taxonomy as that of GRIN taxonomy and NCBI taxonomy.

These two taxonomies put the alpine taxa as subspecies of Papaver alpinum. This is different from the European floras (see Tela Botanica). I had to make a choice...

Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 17:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Makarios statue Athens.jpg

Hello Túrelio. I do not know who the sculptor is -I could go and look if my way gets me there, but I don't know if there's any point: since the monument was erected in 2001, the statute is probably a modern creation. As is most of the sculpture in Athens, Greece hasn't got such a great tradition in that art. Many users uploaded due to the ambiguity of the FOP legal passage in the greek law, as I have commented elsewhere. We are checking law publications and analyses to nail down what the law means exactly; there's been some progress, pending the summer holidays of course, which is also the reason there might not be much feedback in the DR's by users. Of course you're free to close the DR anytime. Regards, - Badseed talk 13:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I've recommended to leave the rfd open for more time. --Túrelio (talk) 18:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Why?

Hi Túrelio! Why did you delete this Commons:Deletion_requests/File:20000vtd.jpg? File:20000vtd.jpg is now nominated for deletion without a subpage. Same with File:500000Vtd.jpg. I'm trying to empty Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage and almost half of the "problems" are now sorted out. --MGA73 (talk) 20:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

I really don't remember the rationale for a deletion that was performed nearly 3 months ago. Maybe it was (or appeared) as an orphan rfd-page, as happens every now and then. After restoring the page everything is clear: the deletion was requested by the nominator, as he had filed a mass-rfd[37]. --Túrelio (talk) 20:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
OK. Then I suggest we simply change the link so it links to the mass DR. Ok with you? --MGA73 (talk) 10:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Of course. --Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Translation

Thank you!! Philippe (talk) 02:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:File:Reykjavik 871 Geisterbild 3.jpg

Ich bin einfach von der üblichen Wikimedia-Praxis ausgegangen, dass Aufnahmen aus Museen aufgenommen werden können. Falls das für Island nicht zutrifft, müssten diese Bilder selbstverständlich gelöscht werden. Ich wäre an dieser Frage sehr interessiert, weil ich weitere Museumsbilder aus Island einstellen möchte Xenophon (talk) 12:27 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Das Problem ist nicht, dass sie in einem Museum hängen, sondern dass die Originalbilder nach meinem Eindruck (bitte korrigieren, wenn unzutreffend) von einem jüngeren Künstler (also nicht schon vor >70 Jahren verstorben) stammen und damit dessen Copyright unterliegen. Wenn es in Island FOP gäbe und die Bild-Location dessen sonstige Bedingungen erfüllen würde, könnte es u.U. trotzdem reproduziert werden. Letzteres dürfte hier aber nicht der Fall sein. Bei Fotos von Kunstwerken in Museen ist die Copyright-Lage des fotographierten Kunstwerks entscheidend. Ist das reproduzierte Original gemeinfrei (PD), ist ein Foto davon auch frei, wenngleich Fotos durch die Eintrittsbedingungen des Museums verboten sein können, was aber nicht das Copyright betrifft. --Túrelio (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Du hast sicher recht. Ich habe daher auf die drei betroffenen Bilder ein "Speedy deletion"-tag mit der Begründung "Copy right violation" gelegt. Ist die Angelegenheit damit erledigt? Xenophon (talk) 0:37 2 August 2009 (UTC)
+ --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Mechanical Fasteners

Can you please undelete. This isn't pointless, and it wasn't an empty category until user:les the nominating deletionist de-categorised all of its members this morning. Thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Andy, formal "un-deletion" of categories doesn't make sense. You can simply re-create the cat, everybody can do that; no admin needed. If the cat wasn't empty, you should inform User:les about that. --Túrelio (talk) 16:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Como puedo subir Imagenes

Como subo imagenes de capitulos de Los Simpsons, South Park, Padre de Familia y American Dad pero las pongo en Flickr y las hago como dice pero me la borran, asi que dime como la hago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francisco97 (talk • contribs) 5. August 2009, 20:38 Uhr (UTC)

Pienso que no es possible porque eso images ya son protectos (copyright) por los producentes de los series (Simpsons, etc.). Perdon, pero continua en ingles porque no sabe sufficiente espanol. You could ask FOX or the other film companies whether they could provide you a copyright-free or Creative-Commons-licensed image of these series, but it is unlikely that they will do that. --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

About renaming category:Ribbon bars by country (Borodun) and subcategories

Please, look here → Category talk:Ribbon bars by country (Borodun). Regards, --Borodun (talk) 08:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied on cat-talk. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Foto hochladen

Hallo, Die Fotos wurden in meinem eigenen Auftrag (Heinz Egger) zu meiner eigenen Verwendung (wie auch immer geartet)zur uneingeschränkten Verwendung gemacht. Kein Fotograf in Österreich stellt für die eigenen Privatfotos eine Lizenz aus. Wenn sie meinen, dann löschen Sie mein Bild einfach heraus. Das ist mir alles zu kompliziert. mfg Heinz Egger (wallstreet)

Hallo Wallstreet,
warum hast du denn dann geschrieben "zur privaten Verwendung"? Mir geht es nicht darum, das Bild zu löschen, sondern dass es sich hier in einem legalen Zustand befindet. Im Unterschied zu den USA verbleibt im deutschsprachigen Raum das Urheberrecht m.W. immer beim Photographen. Und ich weiß auch nicht, was daran so kompliziert sein soll, den vorgefertigten Erlaubnistext zu vervollständigen, dem Photographen zu mailen und um Rückmail an die angegebene Adresse zu bitten. Commons ist nicht irgendein Internetforum oder Flickr, wo sich keiner groß darum kümmert, ob der Hochlader überhaupt die Rechte hat. Wir möchten den Re-Usern unserer Medien eine (gewisse) Sicherheit geben, dass sie die Medien auf Commons legal benutzen dürfen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Mejorjair

Hi Túrelio, I think little Mejor is too young to understand without assistance, the difference between the sites he has uploaded to before and WC, (and as he is young, then add a bit of arrogance for good measure) . Also, I suspect that he can not understand English when it suits him. Therefore, I do not think a reply in English will elicit any meaningful response. However, I have added a bit more to his talk page and if this does not elicit is not meaningful reply, then by all means block.--P.g.champion (talk) 22:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of. --Túrelio (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Images of User talk:MaxtorNP.

Hi, I have added the {{Attribution}} template to images of User talk:MaxtorNP and removed the "missing permission" tag, also added the Garman text to Permission field, but some of the images are already deleted, is it possible to undelete them.   ■ MMXXtalk  14:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I have filed an undeletion request   ■ MMXXtalk  15:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Undeleted: File:Airport Nuremberg Business Center.jpg.
undeleted: File:Airport Nuernberg Neues Parkhaus P3.jpg.
undeleted: File:Airport Nuremberg Germany Tower Outside Architecture.jpg.
undeleted: File:Airport Nürnberg Aussengelände.jpg

--Túrelio (talk) 15:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, About those two images I believe they are from same source, but I can not verify it, I searched the www.airport-nuernberg.de website but I couldn't find the names and I don't remember what was the images.   ■ MMXXtalk  02:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Replied at UD-discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Links to images

Hey Tùrelio, On my image page here you noted that 5 pages are linking on this picture. How did you find them? When I click «what links here?» I can only see two pages. Thanks – Simon / ?! 14:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Simon, dazu musst du auf den Reiter "Nutzung" (oder engl.: Usage) klicken. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 17:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh. Den gibt es in der Beta-Vorschau nicht. Alles klar, danke :) – Simon / ?! 06:53, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

User:Nima Farid

I downloaded the map from Iranian Gitashenasi organization website (Gitashenasi publishes atlases). The map was released on the website for public use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nima Farid (talk • contribs) 10:59, 12. Aug. 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. But you should then add the exact URL (website adress) to each of your uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Fotografías

Hola Turelio, no entiendo como especificar donde se pone el autor. Además la Imagen File:Jcloaiza.JPG es una imagen libre y no fue sacada de la página que tu mencionas, eso fue un plagio ya que esa página es un blog. Juan25 (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Hola Juan25,
si tu no eres el autor/photographo original, tu no puedes poner tu nombre como autor. Y en todos casos en que tu has "tomado" el imagen de una pagina web o has reproducido un imagen que era hecho por una otra persona, tu debes escribir la fuente exactamente. Eso es porque cada image tiene el copyright con el autor original hasta 70 an~os despues de su muerte. --Túrelio (talk) 16:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Poultry images

Hi there,

I am an editor for http://www.poultryhub.org and my boss has asked me to upload our photo database onto commons. I will provide deeplinks to the photos, how is this done? I'll have a look around the Help Section.

Cheers

Erik

Hi Erik, in case you don't know what a "deep link" is, it's simply the complete URL of the respective image. You can copy it from the address line of your browser and then paste it into the "source" field of the image description mask. --Túrelio (talk) 21:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Your nonsense edit

Huh? You just added newline; edit-conflicting me.--Elvey (talk) 21:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

When I added the mugshot cat by HotCat.javascript, the image only had 2009 as cat, nothing else. That's no reason to call that a "nonsense edit" - just remain civil! --Túrelio (talk) 21:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Sinimäed Waffen-SS monument

Hi Túrelio, please consider renaming the Category:Sinimäed Waffen-SS monument you have created since it's in conflict with defamation. There are a number of living people portrayed in a public place who get labeled as SS due to this category ( and the image names attached to those) FYI, I have also notified the uploader User:Petri_Krohn on the issue. Thanks for understanding!--Termer (talk) 03:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

PS. the monument is not a "Waffen-SS monument" in the first place.--Termer (talk) 03:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Termer, actually I didn't choose that name; all images now in that cat already used that cat(see here) though it still wasn't created. While I am totally open to rename this cat, I suggest to discuss this first with the uploader of all those images. --Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your response, I have notified the uploader, ...however, as we're dealing with a disruptive editor on Wikipedia who has been banned several times, please see W:User:Petri Krohn, and W:Wikipedia:DIGWUREN#Petri_Krohn, I don't expect results really since his agenda on wikipedia has always been portraying Estonia/Estonians as a Fascist country and his image naming choices in this case fit the pattern. So I appeal to you as an administrator on Commons to do something about the situation. Thanks!--Termer (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh, oh, this appears to be a deeper mud than first thought. Likely I will be able to care for that issue not earlier than a week from now. --Túrelio (talk) 12:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Please see Category_talk:Requested_moves#Category:Sinim.C3.A4ed_Waffen-SS_monument thanks!--Termer (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Info

Mail :) Regards --Herby talk thyme 10:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Cohen Brothers JPG

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CohenBrothers.jpg

Actually the picture is correct, it's just that for some reason, it shows up in the wrong position. Is there some way to correct the photo so that it appears with the men right side up?

Thanks

As you may have seen already, I had tagged it with the rotate template. The rotation will be performed automatically by a bot. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
OK, I'm sorry, as you can tell, I am no expert about these things. Do you know how long it will take to effect the rotation? Thanks
Usually less than a hour. But I don't know the schedule of the rotate bot (here it is: User:Rotatebot). Of course, if it takes too long for you, you can simply rotate the image on your PC and upload it over the existing image (simply use the "upload a new version"-link on the image description page). --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

File:PicTure.jpg

Ich würde das Bild gerne gar nicht nutzen und auch wieder unzugänglich machen, also löschen. Danke! Party diktator (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Catchthetrain.jpg

so wise man how can i put the theatrical poster of the taking of pelham 123 in the article in wikipedia pl metro strachu ? answer me and don't delete it cause this is from the flickr and i dont know how in some other way i can upload it and put in the article would you like to be willing to help me ? ciao! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogillando (talk • contribs) 30. August 2009, 01:35 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 23:41, 29 August 2009 (UTC))

Hi Rogillando or Rogiller, you simply cannot. Posters, of films, theatre performances, etc, that contain more than simple text are works of art and as such copyrighted. Even if you go to the cinema or theatre building and take photo of the poster by yourself, your photo is still copyrighted by the copyright holder of the poster. On :en wikipedia a low-resolution image might be accepted due to the "fair use"-clause in the US; but that is not allowed on Commons and likely not on :pl. Simply no way, sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 23:41, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Your great work here is much appreciated

Hi Túrelio, almost every time I tag one of my images with {{badname}}, 9 times out of 10 it seems as though it is you that deletes the old version for me. You hard work and dedication to the Commons is really appreciated. Thank you! OSX (talk • contributions) 04:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Ich schließe mich meinem Vorredner an: Vielen Dank für das geduldige Prüfen und Löschen auch meiner, oft ziemlich doofen und allzu oft auch leicht vermeidbaren Tippfehler in Kategorienamen. Allerdings möchte ich an dieser Stelle Besserung geloben und möchte in Zukunft mehr darauf achten, die Voransicht genau zu studieren, bevor ich auf „Seite speichern“ klicke;-). Weiterhin frohes Schaffen! --Demidow (talk) 05:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. Thanks to both of you. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

We Love Túrelio

the best ever! That is Túrelio. You could not ask for a more helpful person for a complete computer idiot such as myself. Túrelio is one of a kind and has helped me from being one of those "Computer Casualties" they find hanging from their own belt beside their computer....with no suicide note, because they could not figure out how to print it from their microsoft word file. Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU!!!! --Jackie ohlsen (talk) 15:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, "love" is a bit overdone, but I see actions by Túrelio more often than actions by other administrators (perhaps even all of them combined). Until now, all of those actions were clearly OK. That's hard, doing a lot, but (seldom or) never making a mistake. Erik Warmelink (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

MetroNizami

Hallo, Turelio.

In Subway station habe ich diese photos gemacht. Work ist photos, kein bild.--Interfase (talk) 10:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

"Works of art", either paintings or mosaics, in subway stations may still be under copyright. It depends on who and when the originals were made. Also COM:FOP#Former_Soviet_Union in your country does not cover such reproductions. --Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Aber die Bild is for non-commercial purposes.--Interfase (talk) 10:24, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Auf Commons dürfen nur Bilder hochgeladen werden, die auch for "commercial use" frei sind, sorry. Wann lebte Mikail Abdullaev, oder lebt er noch? --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Er lebt heute nicht, aber in Azerbaijan sind seine Bilder in public domain.--Interfase (talk) 10:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Also laut {{PD-Azerbaijan}}, ist ein Azerbaijanisches Kunstwerk public domain wenn es vor dem 1. Januar 1949 veröffentlicht wurde und der Künstler vor diesem Tag verstorben war. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, Ich habe das gelaut.--Interfase (talk) 11:02, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Cat and lion

Thank you for taking care of incorrectly named Korean images. Since you're often the person who deletes images that I request, I have an interest in looking at your user page today. The lovely sleeping cat looks like a female lion, so I'm bemused. The fact that he was 18 years old is even more surprising. Anyway, I'm just saying "hello". :) Have a good day.--Caspian blue 11:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

P.S Oops, I did not carefully read the caption on the file page. Sorry if I remind you a sad memory with the message.--Caspian blue 11:31, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
No problem, it wasn't my own cat, just a friend's one. You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 11:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Why remove speedydeletion on File:LEMUR.JPG?

Why was the speedydeletion request on File:LEMUR.JPG removed? The file is clearly out of the project scope and has no quality at all. I know it's someone's user page image, but the person has only made 3 contributions (uploading the image, posting it to his user page, and then adding text about the image to his user page), and he's been inactive for over a year (since putting the image up). Should I just post a regular deletion request instead? –Visionholder (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Visionholder, yes, my main reason for removing the speedy was the use of the image on the uploaders userpage. For such kind of images we accept somewhat lower standards. However, tagging with {{Userpageimage}} also means it can be deleted if it's no longer used in that way. If you really bother about that small image, file an rfd. --Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Understanding in Xian 0546.jpg may be deleted

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−
Understanding in Xian 0546.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Understanding in Xian 0546.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 16:26, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

OTRS

Hi Stifle,
today I was notified by HersfoldOTRSBot that no permission for File:Understanding in Xian 0546.jpg has reached OTRS. However, when I contacted the photographer, he told me (and forwarded me his original email) that he had send permission already on July 26th. To ease the search, part of his email account string is Simon.Krupp . Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

It's Ticket:2009072610022774, but it's in German. German permissions queue is backlogged 49 days at the moment :\ Stifle (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care. I've taken the liberty to ask at Commons:Forum for more German-speaking volunteers for OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Andreas0063

I have been just two minutes late ;) You've had a really nice timing. odder (talk) 08:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Sega logo.jpg

Thanks for deleting this one. It's been a long time I wanted this one to be gone. But there is a problem about it, it had a DR going on. Could you open the DR for this one? AND...I have some other bad and duplicate images, could you deleted them for me, pls .Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 01:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

RE the jpg-version: I don't see problem as this was deleted as unused dupe. I understood that the running rfd includes File:Sega logo.jpg. Please tag your other dupes with {{Duplicate}}, though currently the dupe-backlog is about 1,000. --Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Hehe, they were all tagged a long time ago. For there are so many dupes I asked you this.Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 (talk) 13:27, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Album covers

Hi. Thank you so much for getting back to me. I'm new at this. I'm a fan of a band, and wanted to put up their album cover pics on their Wikipedia article. They told me that it was not a problem (I can get that in writing if need be I'm sure), that the album cover pix appeared already in multiple places on the web including their site, but suggested that I simply follow the Wilson Philips low resolution album cover approach and that should work. That's what I tried to do. although I may not have done it correctly. I was simply trying to put it up the same way [38] is up, and then used in the article on that band. But it didn't work. Can you guide me as to what I should do that I didn't do? Thank you very much for helping.--VMAsNYC (talk) 06:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi VMAsNYC, what you are describing is "fair use". That is a US legal construction for using copyrighted images under very specific circumstances. It is not allowed on Commons, but on en-Wikipedia. So you have to go to :en and upload it locally. Before uploading you have to draft a fair-use rationale for the use of this specific image. For more information and instructions see here: en:Wikipedia:Non-free content. For another example of a fair-use image see: en:File:Sderotchilddrawing.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! I will try to wade through it and do it correctly. Thanks for the direction.--VMAsNYC (talk) 06:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Ping

Please check your mail inbox. Best regards, — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 21:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Please check it again. This mail is kind of urgent. — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 07:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Benjamín Palencia

Ok. Thanks. Happy weekend!--C3PO (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Category:Saxifraga tolmiei

Hi Túrelio; Is it OK to restore Category:Saxifraga tolmiei with the content {{category redirect|Micranthes tolmiei}} (please see Commons:Rename_a_category#Should_the_old_category_be_deleted.3F)? Since Saxifraga tolmiei remains in widespread use, it is very likely that others will upload images as Saxifraga tolmiei.[39][40][41] Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 14:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Miley Cyrus.jpeg

Hi again Turelio. If you look closely to this image and File:Miley Cyrus crop.jpg, you'll see a small change. Thus it's not really a duplicate. It's such an easy mistake! Best regards, — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 12:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. But should we really keep both versions? --Túrelio (talk) 12:57, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Some contrast difference too, so I would keep those files. It's not a major change, but it's okay. — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 13:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Starscream/Rough copy

Thank you that showed my error. I modified the request in this crimson quadrangle. --Starscream (talk) 18:04, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Do not hesitate also to make corrections of the text in the crimson quadrangle, if it contains speech defects. I think that it contains. Greetings. --Starscream (talk) 16:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you! Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

YOU asked for a reason.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GabrielVelasquez#Second_opinion_on_specified_diffs

I won't stop until all of my photos and diagrams are deleted/purged.

They should all have the same, wiki only permissions, which I hereby revoke, rescind, remove.

GabrielVelasquez (talk) 02:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. However, you released your images by yourself under CC-BY[42] and that act cannot be revoked. --Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for our mistakes

Now we understand how to apply dates on the photo. At this moment, we are editing dated on the images we upload. Sorry for our mistakes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monarchians (talk • contribs) 7. September 2009, 08:16 Uhr (UTC)

GabrielVelasquez

Hi, Túrelio. as far as I can tell the "license changes" by GabrielVelasquez did not change the legal status of the underlying works. However, those edits did change the moral status, in my opinion. Anyone is legally allowed to use GV's pictures under the original license, but it isn't nice anymore.

Because of that, I see no compelling reason to forbid GV to tell they don't like reproduction and I certainly do not consider it "vandalism" to mention that sentiment on images they uploaded theirself. There definitely could be better ways to express that sentiment, but as far as I can tell, very little attention has gone to describing how people may express that feeling.

I do not consider their edits to be vandalism, the edits are problably (OK, certainly) not helpfull, but what was vandalized by those edits? As far as I can tell, almost any single image uploaded by GV certainly gave more to commons than all their latest edits combined might have taken.

But most of all, if my assumption about the license is correct, there is no compelling reason to revert. And that is quite important, I think, because reverting will always/often only deepen the rift which caused the original edits. The chances that GV theirself will restore the original license description has dropped from "possible"/"likely" to "impossible". Erik Warmelink (talk) 11:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Erik, with all due respect, removing a legitimate license by yourself and thereafter crying "copyvio, delete it" is vandalism, IMHO. Every now and then users ask for the deletion of their uploads and, out of courtesy, we often grant that if they present a reasonable cause. What is not reasonable is 1) requesting deletion for being angry about things that happened on another project, 2) proceeding as described above, 3) lying in order to get your will, and 4) insulting other users in rfd discussions. Anyway, as I have already voiced here I think the best for Commons would be to delete all his files from Commons and ban him permanently. --Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Once again, what was vandalized? Erik Warmelink (talk) 03:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
If you want to be his advocate, fine. But stop wasting my time. I've already lost too much time in this helpless case and I've voiced my opinion here, where any further discussion should take place.
For the last time and as explained already above, releasing an image under a free license as he did for example here, is a legal act that cannot be revoked, especially not 11 months later. Removing the license[43] from a once released image and then crying hey, it has no license, it has to be deleted, is vandalism, if not worse. EOD. --Túrelio (talk) 06:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Loshenkov-a-20183.png

[44] The description tells us that the image was nationalized. Look at this article, «On 25 August Boris Yeltsin by his Decree No. 90 nationalized the property of the CPSU in Russia». Thus I decided to remove a template.194.154.80.145 17:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, that wasn't clear from your edit. Could you put that information also on the image description page? --Túrelio (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
That's just a translation of Russian text written by the uploader. I will add it now, thanks for an advice.--194.154.80.145 18:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
In the meantime the file was deleted; please undelete it. Thank you.--194.154.80.145 18:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: Your Uploads

Hi Túrelio,

Thanks for your comments. I work for the PR Company for Palazzo Versace Gold Coast and Palazzo Versace Dubai and that is why I have uploaded the new images and corrected the two wiki pages. I have premission from the Emirates Sunland Group, Palazzo Versace and Versace to use these images for any promotional purposes so what licence would i need to stop the images being deleted?

Why have the two pages i edited reverted back to their old and incorrect status?

thanks

Guy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gscarborough (talk • contribs) 10. September 2009, 10:14 Uhr (UTC)

Hi Guy, I'll have to go offline now, will reply later this evening. --Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry

I wouldn't have uploaded File:Drax power station ariel.jpg if I'd noticed the text, all I noticed was that it was supposedly under a creative commons license. As for the other images you have notified me about, it may take a day or two for me to get them to send emails with written permission. Fintan264 (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

No problem. You have at least one week, and if that's not enough, you may leave a note under the template on the image description page. In the momment when the permission has been sent to OTRS, you should put {{OTRS pending}} on each image page. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

UABJO Image

Thanks -- rename noted and applied. My brain has had a short circuit in the "logic" department lately. Cheers! --Nsaum75 (talk) 23:26, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 23:28, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Help

I want to contribute the logo of the school. Do not you give advice to me?

Hi CJLB,
"fair use" is allowed on :en-wikipedia, but - per policy - not on Commons. So, you cannot upload anything that can legally only be used per "fair use". The copyright and usability of logos depends of their design and originality. Please see image casebook and especially COM:CB#Trademarks. Hope that helps. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you！I understood your advice.However, I have one doubt（question）.
How does the license same as Tokyo Institute of Technology become known to a hand?
It is the license of the red yen C mark.（⇒A copybook→東工大の例
）--CJLB (talk) 13:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, I don't really understand your last comment. Lets start again: a logo might be very simple (no originality), then it is likely without copyright, though it may be under a trademark -> it can be uploaded to Commons when adding the {{Trademark}} template. A more original, copyrightable logo may be so old (depends on copyright law of the country), that it is already PD -> can be uploaded to Commons. A logo that is still copyrighted cannot be uploaded to Commons without a written permission by the rights holder. --Túrelio (talk) 13:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
{{Trademark}}tag ,Roger.
Hmm, I'm sorry. I am still a greenhorn.
I do not seem to have got communication well. Please forgive it.
Thank you for giving an advice
(σ≧▽≦)σ 感謝☆--CJLB (talk) 14:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Jeanne Weber

Hi Túrelio. Du hast gestern File:JeanneWeber1907.jpg gelöscht: ‎"duplicate or a scaled down version of File:JeanneWeber2.jpg". Ich wollte das eigentlich andersrum: Auf JeanneWeber2.jpg befindet sich nämlich ein blödsinniger Copyrightvermerk (was ich erst nach dem Uploaden gemerkt habe), auf JeanneWeber1907.jpg ist das Bild ohne Copyrightvermerk (das die Webseite ja eh nicht hat). Jeanne Weber1907.jpg ist somit die "schönere" Version. Kannst Du die bitte wiederherstellen und die "unschönere" Version löschen? Danke, --Troete (talk) 08:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. Optisch ist die andere Version zwar besser, aber das mit dem (C)-Zeichen ist nachvollziehbar. --Túrelio (talk) 14:12, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of Azov (Rostov oblast) 2006.jpg

Why did you wrote "no longer reason for speedy"? It's worse version of new SVG coat of arms which I have uploaded today.

Now I'm working on replacing the old one by new in all language articles.--WWay (talk) 20:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

According to our deletion policy this is not a reason for a speedy deletion (I was even admonished by my colleagues some months ago when performing such deletions). Of course you may file a regular deletion request ( {{Delete}} ). --Túrelio (talk) 20:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Ok, thanks.--WWay (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Removal of images from Article Jef Van Campen

As stated with the images, we have approval from the artist to use these 2 portrait images from his website. Where is the copyright violation?? Lightningbit (talk) 22:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 06:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Shema Glicozida.png

Hallo Túrelio. Dein Editkommentar ist leider nutzlos für die Interpretation, weshalb du ein weisses Rechteck (= Bild ohne Inhalt) als behaltenswert einstufst. --Leyo 08:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo, ich hatte mich damals schon über den Löschgrund "empty file" gewundert. Bei mir zeigt diese Datei eine ganze Menge chemische Formeln, wie ich in meinem Editkommentar "as file not empty" auch angedeutet habe. Bei dir nicht?
Ich kann die Abbildung gerne mal als jpg hochladen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Bei der Quelldatei ru:Файл:Схема гликолиза.png sehe ich die Strukturen, hier aber nur eine weisse Fläche. Glauben tue ich dir's aber natürlich schon (also bitte keine JPG-Version hochladen). --Leyo 11:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Biedron-robert03.jpg

Hi, Krzysztof Nowak, from picture with Robert Biedroń is a Polish gay activist, editor of some Polish gay web sites. He was presented in documentary of HBO about Polish gay community (movie: Homo.pl). Hes pictures was already published in Polish newspapers and web pages regarding a LGBT problems in Poland, so hes face is known: on PinkPaper in England and hier pictures in polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza. By the way: he is my partner, who with me together persuade a Polish gays in England to civil partnerships. Thank you for your concern :) Zboralski (talk) 15:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 15:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Russian

Do you speak Russian? Should someone say anything to User:Schekinov Alexey Victorovich about the uploads being made in Cyrillic? Evrik (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Evrik, sorry no, I don't speak and understand any Russian. Admins User:Ahonc, User:AVRS and User:Butko are all well versed in Russian and may help. --Túrelio (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:File:Tanja Bakić.jpg

she's my sister, and I have taken the photo --Helios13 (talk) 08:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Helios13, oh that may explain why she looks so relaxed in this photo. Anyway, as this photo is found elsewhere in the web, it might be wise to write "(brother of depicted person)" behind your username in the author entry of the image decription, if that is no problem for you. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
It is done!--Helios13 (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Fine. --Túrelio (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

File:sdp1.jpg

Hi Turélio. Sorry for the nuisances but I need help on this matter. The person depicted in the photo gave me through email this pic and as far I know it was taken by her brother. How can I provide this data to avoid removing? I'm 2 days old as contributor... Thank you so much! Ximena 2009Sep15--Xgm324 (talk) 13:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Ximena, you should then forward the original email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Thereafter you should put {{OTRS pending}} on the image description page, this will prevent deletion for some time. --Túrelio (talk) 20:53, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Curious about: (saved jpg without CMYK option)

I saw that you did something to my recent picture upload:

I was just curious as to what it might be. I note that it is more green toned than I remember it being originally. The comment left was:

(saved jpg without CMYK option)

Thanks for the help. GloverEpp (talk) 19:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Gloverepp, as you may have noticed, your image didn't display on Commons in its original version. As I've often made the experience that this happens with CMYK-coded JPGs, I've downloaded your image, opened it in IrfanView and saved it again without changing anything, except that I did not choose CMYK, so it gets saved RGB-"coded". Then I uploaded it again. SO, if the current color is not what your original had, you should try to save your original without this CMYK-option and upload it again. --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Túrelio OK, I found out what CMYK and RGB stand for. I reviewed the upload screen and don't see an option for selecting either one. Is this topic just too far over my head and I should forget it, or is there something I should do when I upload photos? thanks GloverEpp (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I reviewed the upload screen .. - No, no. This is not a function of Commons, it's of your own graphics program that you used to work on that file. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Shah Ismail Hatayi.jpg

Hi Túrelio. This is a coloured reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The work of art itself is a medieval European rendering by an unknown Venetian artist and the original is kept in the Uffizi Gallery museum. More information on painted image you can get here: bakitebriz@inbox.az--Melikov Memmed (talk) 04:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. --Túrelio (talk) 06:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Ownership of images uploaded

I have sent permission requests to all owners of the images I have uploaded. They should be responding shortly. Thanks. Reef1944 (re mouse imaging.jpg, bruker spectrometer.jpg, JEOL Fe-100.jpg)

That's fine. When you have a positive response, put {{OTRS pending}} on the image page. --Túrelio (talk) 12:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Files

Hello. I'm new here, and I'm still learning the process to charge images in Commons. Maybe you see some mistakes. For this I'm seeing the discussions sent to my user and with this correcting my mistakes. The categories, Links of the files, and permissions now are being added to files. Thanks Felipe lord (talk) 16:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

File:SDM-4000.jpg

Hi. This is a claimed own work, but several lower res versions are available on the internet, including on the website of the maker company. I'd file a DR on this basis, but I have JS issues... Would you please do something about it if you think it is needed? --Eusebius (talk) 07:31, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, but do you have a copyvio-link to the image in this resolution? A quick Google search only yielded lower res images. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
No, otherwise I'd have gone for a speedy. I just say "own work" is pretty doubtful. --Eusebius (talk) 07:38, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
There is also File:SDM-4000 black.jpg by the same uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
I've put nsd-tags on all his uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
OK. --Eusebius (talk) 07:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Małgorzata Kożuchowska with amateur chosen on the entertainment casting session performs the scene of the TV series 'M jak miłość' 1.jpg

Hello

This isn't Małgorzata Kożuchowska. I uploaded irregular file. This file show Rafał Mroczek. This name misinforms. Please to delete. Later I will load with the correct name. --Starscream (talk) 12:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Starscream, the problem is, speedy-deletion by {{Bad name}} requires the existance of a (correctly named) duplicate file. That is missing here. Couldn't you first re-upload the image under the correct name? Or, simply put a {{Rename}} on it? --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Why you are so fundamentalist? During next of a dozen or so hours, I will not be able to load nothing. Meanwhile, I am ashamed that I mistook the woman and the man. --Starscream (talk) 13:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC).

Capa do CD

Essa imagem era a nova capa do sasha fierce. nao revertas!!Beyonce4ever (talk) 10:21, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Beyonce4ever, I'm not totally sure that I understand you completely as I don't speak/read Portuguese. But you should know that album covers are usually copyrighted (by the group and/or publisher) and you therefore need written permission from the rights holder. I doesn't matter whether you legally own a CD/DVD album. For more information see: Commons:Image casebook. --Túrelio (talk) 13:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Images

Hello About Fotofoforilação aciclica.jpg and vacúolo contrátil.jgp it was made by me. But the other images I have to put where it comes from. I'll made my better. Felipe lord (talk) 21:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I've put {{Own}} on the two. But for File:Dorothy.JPG and File:Osama x bombaatomica.JPG you have to provide the original sources. --Túrelio (talk) 21:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


Ahoj Túrelio

Ďakujem za uvoľnenie fotografie s vyznamenaním Slovenskej republiky. Na požiadavku ohľadom Petra Valacha som nezabudol. Je to sochár ročník 1968. Absolvent Vysokej školy výtvarného umenia odbor sochárstvo. Povolenie na zverejnenie jeho fotografií mám. Bol zamestnancom nášho výtvarného štúdia. Základne údaje do anglického jazyka preloži moja dcéra Ivana. S pozdravom Peter Zelizňák

Hi Peter, sorry I don't understand what you have written as I don't even know in what language you wrote. If you don't know english or german, look at Commons:Administrators for an admin who speaks your language. --Túrelio (talk) 22:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Rubus canescens.JPG

pls read here Commons:Help desk#deleting a file
Eitan f (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Then why didn't you write that rationale when adding the image to Category:Candidates for speedy deletion ? The latter is not the way to way request a speedy deletion. Anyway, due to the uncertain identification, I've speedied it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thank you. however, even now i wouldn't know how to ask for a deletion. to my opinion there are not clear instructions and it shoud be:
do A
do B
do C
etc.
same for changing the name of afile. i wish to know how to do this.
Eitan f (talk) 08:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
The last first: nobody on Commons (as opposed to the wikipedias) can directly change a filename. It is done by inserting {{rename|newname.xxx|reason for renaming}}. The latter can be omitted when it is evident. However, due to the potential consequences of renaming a file, this request must be confirmed by a user who is authorized for that. Thereafter, a bot performs the renaming which results in the creation of a duplicate file with the new name, while the original file must be deleted manually - quite a process ;-(
About clarity of deletion instructions, you might point that out on COM:AN or COM:VP. --Túrelio (talk) 08:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Kind of spam from a true Muslim

Hi! There was a man who added in every picture of prophet Muhammed image note please remove all similar photos as there are no photos for prophet Muhammad Peace Be Upon Him. Do we have a kind of bot to remove all his contribution? Thanks. --Shakko (talk) 11:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I was offline for most of the day. --Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Undue burden

How could you in File talk:AshevilleNC at dusk.jpg require a take-down email? Was not this obvious? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

To 1) have you ever asked Flickr[46], Photobucket[47] or alike to remove an image of yours that had been placed there by somebody else contrary to your rights as author/photographer? The first thing they ask (as of the DMCA law[48]) to provide evidence and to sign a binding declaration that you have the rights and that this violates your copyright. So, I requested far less.
To 2) no, it wasn't in my view, if I remember right (it was a full month ago). Request made by IP; alleged source website did exist, but didn't yield the incriminated image; no deep-link had been provided. --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
The photo had professional quality. This was first uploaded to enwp, and after a brief look at en:User talk:Chad01 it is clear that that contributor cannot be trusted. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

CMYK option

Hi, Could you make the same modifications as you made for 2 of my pictures ( like "uploaded a new version of "File:Muscadet sans dénomination 1.jpg": saved jpg without CMYK option") on these 2 files [File:Muscadet-Côtes de Grandlieu 1.jpg] and [File:Muscadet-Coteaux de la Loire 1.jpg], cause I dont know how to do this. Thanks Cyril5555 (talk) 19:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. It's rather easy. I uploaded the file, opened it in w:IrfanView and simply saved it again, thereby removing CMYK coding, that seems to cause display problems. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Cyril5555 (talk) 13:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Category:Amorphophallus

Dear Túrelio,

As you are seeing, I am cleaning/updating the content of this category.

I thank you (again) for your appreciated support.

Best botanical regards, --Réginald (To reply) 10:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Own image 1.gif

Hi Probirpaul, are you the person who is shown in this image? If not, do you have his permission? If the painting was made by the person shown in this image, do you have his permission to publish his work? -Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

hi Túrelio I am not that person.His name is Nilmoni Chatterjee. A famous Bengali Artist. I have his full permission. the painting is made by him and i have full permission to published his image in the Internet. --Probirpaul (talk) 06:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. Could you add the date (year) of the photo and, if possible, the name of the painting to the description. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Image

Thanks. Dédi's (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 18:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikimania

This is this way temporarily reasons while we are uploading the official photostream whis is ~650 files and we need to keep track of what is uploaded and what is not. It will be refined later. Barcex (talk) 08:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, but then you should be aware that I had already removed the Wikimania main cat from a lot of images in the sub-cats. --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Paez.jpg

Hello Túrelio : Why you reset Paez.jpg? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Labkey (talk • contribs) 22. September 2009, 22:18 Uhr (UTC)

Hi Labkey, please read what I had written before on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I´m Federico Sancho. I´m trying to upload my works, but sometimes it´s difficult because I can´t find the correct form. How to do Creative Commons in this file? : Regina.

Hi Federico,
to put an upload under a Creative-Commons license, you have to add the appropriate template for the license you have choosen. For example, if you want to put an image under the unported CC-BY-SA 3.0 license, you add {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}, but if you yourself are author/photographer of the work you should add {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}. As you seem to be from Spain, the localized license {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-es}} might be of interest for you. Above you mentioned a file Regina, but you surely meant File:Regina Dörr.jpg, didn't you? --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Forman_a_Schwarzenberg.jpg

Please, recovery this file. ORTS it here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MZV_36237.jpeg (same case, this orts it for all files from old.mzv.cz pages) --Fredy.00 (talk) 17:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Or, dont, im find better image on flickr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredy.00 (talk • contribs) 22. September 2009, 19:26 Uhr (UTC)
✓ Done. But now you have to ask an OTRS volunteer to check whether it is covered by that ticket and then to put it on the image. --Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Im mediator of settlements betwen wikipedia and MZV, im know content of deal.--Fredy.00 (talk) 18:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Wappen weingarten baden.jpg

Hallo, ich bin totaler Anfänger und hab mich da verklickt. Hab auch nicht mehr gefunden wie ich das jetzt ändern kann. Das Wappen ist das richtige was ich wegen Lizenz angeben muss weiss ich leider nicht.

Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du mir da helfen kannst.

Viele Grüße

Andreas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wengerder (talk • contribs) 23. September 2009, 12:22 Uhr (UTC)

Hallo Andreas, du müsstest dich halt mal schlau machen, ob das Wappen tatsächlich unter {{PD-Coa-Germany}} (wird auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite angezeigt) fällt. Falls ja, entferne das {{Fair use}} von der Seite, und zwar möglichst bald. Das ist schon alles. --Túrelio (talk) 10:25, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Löschdiskussion

Hallo!

Kannst du diese Löschdiskussion schließen? Das Bild wurde von dir gelöscht. Danke im voraus! --High Contrast (talk) 18:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

About Image Licence

Hello Túrelio.

I saw your alert about my image(s) in my personal page. All my images and medias in Commons are completely free for use, including commercial use. I will remove any observation in contradiction, and I am allowing you to do the same, if urgent. Please do not remove any of my images commons. I use them in my articles. Anything wrong with them, I will fix it as soon as possible.Thanks to your attention.

Thanks.

--Lauro Chieza de Carvalho (talk) 20:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Yann has already removed your non-commercial restriction from File:XPS equipamento.jpg, so it is fine now. --Túrelio (talk) 20:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

A mail has been send to OTRS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.212.202.249 (talk • contribs) 24. September 2009, 11:45 Uhr (UTC)

File:Ulica Wyszyńskiego.jpg

Szczepann (talk) 19:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC) yes, I want, pleace do this

Szczepann (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2009 (UTC) Very Thanks ! Btw. Don Kristoffo he's not me, but this is my friend and he's let me upload this photo here. I'm sorry for my english, and I'm sorry that I have made disaster, but this upload was a my first time. I have hope, that licence is good, my friend could write email to you, if you don't belive me.

Hellow

All were taken on 23 September 2009. When the got to put them all the time, but then disappeared again and I'm not much of it, could you add it for me? Thank you.--BeneharoMencey (talk) 10:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Good luck

We're just waiting for your acceptance here. Good luck! — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 21:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Done and thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Empty category deletion

Hi, I mentioned you in my request at Commons:Bots/Requests/Category-bot-helper. Thanks for the numerous times you performed administrator tasks for images I categorized. -- User:Docu at 09:27, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Moraea tricuspida

Hi Saw your note. Please remove Moraea tricuspida and Category: Moraea tricuspida and the files in both (Two pics). The correct name is Moraea tricuspidata where I have put a correctly named photo. Many thanks. Andrew massyn (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I've copied the "Taxonavigation" template from the deleted cat/gall into the talkpages of the current ones, in case they are of use. In case the two images in Talk:Moraea tricuspidata are have a wrong name, put a rename-tag on them. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Many thanks. Andrew massyn (talk) 21:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Pics unter Operation SoKo Pelztier

Vielen Dank für den (automatischen?) Hinweis, dass die von mir verlinkten Bilder wieder gelöscht werden, wenn die Urheberin dies nicht formal absegnet. Bevor ich die Bilder eingesetzt habe, bat ich Sie telefonisch um Erlaubnis. Da ich weiß, dass sie gelegentlich Mails länger übergeht, hoffe ich, dass sie rechtzeitig das nötige Mail an das Wikipedia/Wikimedia-Support-Team schickt. Kann ich irgendetwas dazu beitragen, dass ich im Fall, dass sie nicht rechtzeitig reagiert, nicht alle Eingaben noch einmal machen muß? --Onsemeliot (talk) 15:34, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Nun, jedes Bild, das gelöscht wird, kann auch wieder ent-löscht werden (in der ursprünglichen Version mit sämtlichen Inhalten). Sobald Sie von der Rechteinhaberin/Photographin eine Zustimmung, sei es auch nur vorläufig, erhalten haben, sollten Sie auf den Seiten der betroffenen Bilder folgendes einsetzen: {{OTRS pending}} . --Túrelio (talk) 15:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Großartig. Ich werde noch mal telefonisch um Bestätigung der Freigabe via E-Mail an das Wikimedia-Team bitten. :) --Onsemeliot (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

MotorMag Cover Image (File:Cover of Mauritius car magazine MotorMag Issue 21.jpg)

Hi Turelio, a signed and marked permission letter had been sent to OTRS but still image "Mauritius car magazine MotorMag Issue 21.jpg"has been deleted. Can you please give me an explanation why it has been deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JFranswa (talk • contribs) 27. September 2009, 16:35 Uhr (UTC)

Ok, I've undeleted it for now. It had been deleted by Yann for Copyright violation. Now you should put this {{OTRS pending}} onto the image page. --Túrelio (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Michael Klimas 001.jpg

hallo turelio. du hast mir den link geschickt für die anträge. was mache ich aber wenn ich selbst der fotograph bin. dies ist auf der künstlerseite (http://www.klimas-music.com/gallery.htm) vermerkt. ebenso im /impressum.htm Leilani artwork (talk) 08:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Das macht die Sache noch einfacher. Wie ich auf deiner Disku angedeutet habe, gehst du zu Commons:Emailvorlagen, nimmst dir die Vorlage, fügst die Namen der durch die Erlaubnis erfassten Dateien und deine Wunschlizenz ein, setzt das Datum und deinen Realnamen drunter und mailst das ganze von einer eindeutig mit dir (als Photograph, z.B. von deiner Websitendomain) assoziierten Emailadresse an die OTRS-Emailadresse. Anschließend solltest du auf den Seiten der davon erfassten Bilder folgendes einfügen: {{OTRS pending}} . Deine Email wird dann von einem OTRS-Freiwilligen geprüft und, im positiven Fall, den Bildseiten ein sog. OTRS-ticket beigefügt, womit alles erledigt ist. Deine Genehmigungsmail wird nicht veröffentlicht. Sie kann nur von den relativ wenigen OTRS-Freiwilligen eingesehen werden. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
super. vielen dank! :) Leilani artwork (talk) 08:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
darf ich noch erfahren warum du sämtliche kategorien gelöscht hast? Leilani artwork (talk) 18:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, sämtliche Kategorien? Also die Kategorien "Pressphoto" und "Singer-songwriter" existieren garnicht. Selbst wenn letztere existieren würde, wäre sie nicht angebracht gewesen, weil bereits "Singer-songwriters from Germany" gesetzt war. Die Kat. "Music" war nicht sinnvoll, weil ein Foto i.a. keine Musik ist und weil "Singer-songwriters" weiter unten im Kategoriebaum sowieso zu Musicians führt. Für die Kategorisierung gilt auf Commons die Regel, dass man die spezifischsten Kat. nehmen sollte; in diesem Fall eben "Singer-songwriters from Germany" anstelle von "Singer-songwriters" oder gar "Musicians". Davon abgesehen, nicht vergessen, "it's a wiki", d.h. hier kann jeder ändern, muss aber auch die Rückänderung ggf. in Kauf nehmen. --Túrelio (talk) 18:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
achso, ich wollte nur nachfragen. sind meine ersten fotos die ich hochgeladen habe :) wie lange muss man eigentlich auf diese OTRS genehmigung warten? Leilani artwork (talk) 10:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Letzteres kann durchaus ein paar Wochen dauern, weil diese Prüfung durch einen der relative wenigen OTRS-Freiwilligen erfolgen muss. Dafür gibt es ja das OTRS-pending-Etikett. --Túrelio (talk) 12:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
achso okay, super danke :) Leilani artwork (talk) 17:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Tom Photos

Hi Turelio, I bet you've never talked to anyone confused, right?

I want to change my licensing for photos I uploaded in vio of the licensing policies. I want to get them restored, not deleted. It is my fault for licensing them incorrectly, but I admit to being a total novice and totally lost when I found the licensing I gave them.

Please help me, thanks, tom wise user: Tom Photos.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tom_Photos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom Photos (talk • contribs) 27. September 2009, 07:14 Uhr (UTC)

I'll reply later. Anyway, everything that has been deleted can be un-deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I tried to deal with the issue immediately, on the date of original discovery, by Deniss..None the less, I want or rather need a link to the licensing page to discover what licenses are available to me. I thought I had found that and described it to you on your talk page...so: linky please~ tom photos.Tom Photos (talk)Oct 4th 2009, 1522 ESTTom Photos (talk)

Replied at your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Acis ionica flower.jpg

Dear Túrelio,

Copy of a message I have put on the Common talk of Administrators.

I just have uploaded picture File:Acis ionica flower.jpg.

I have originally found this nice picture on Flickr. I have contacted the author asking him whethter he allowed me to upload it to Commons. See hereafter the written authorization he has sent to me toghether with the picture in original size.

Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 09:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear Réginald,
attached is the original image. [I also have just taken some shots of Cyclamen rohlfsianum that I grew from seed in 1995 and has only just flowered for the first time this year!!]
I hereby give my permission for Réginald Hulhoven (alias Meneerke bloem on Wikipedia) to upload the attached image on my behalf.
Best Wishes,
Steve Covey. [VC7/8]
http://www.wiltshiredragonflies.org.uk
http://www.wildlife-galleries.co.uk/
http://wiltshire-dragonfly-news.blogspot.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/15121707@N00/
Réginald, thanks for the information. Can't take care about for the moment. --Túrelio (talk) 18:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Cross in Diveevo end.jpg

Hi Túrelio, please remove this version of the image. --Smolov.ilya (talk) 16:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done.--Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Operation SoKo Pelztier Fotos

Die Fotografin der Bilder (Wien_130609.jpg und Wien_180609.jpg), die ich im Artikel "Operation SoKo Pelztier" eingesetzt hatte, hat bereits am 2. Oktober die Freigabe ihrer Fotos unter Adaption des entsprechenden Mustermails an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org geschickt. Leider hat Eugene Zelenko am 4. Oktober trotzdem nicht nur diese beiden Bilder gelöscht, sondern auch das Logo im Artikel: "Initiative Zivilgesellschaft" (Logo_initiative-zivilgesellschaft.jpg), dessen Urheber ich selbst bin. Das Zeichen ist rechtlich nicht gechützt und daher habe ich definitiv das Recht über dessen Lizenzierung bzw. Einsatz zu entscheiden. Was muß ich tun, damit diese Dateien wieder freigegeben werden? Ich dachte das Mail der Fotografin würde genügen, damit jemand die Bausteine von den Detailseiten der Bilder löscht, nachdem er sie eingesehen hat. (Es würde ja wohl keinen Sinn machen, wenn ich selbst die Bausteine über die fehlende Lizenz entferne. Oder ist das doch so gedacht?) --Onsemeliot (talk) 14:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Onsemeliot, zunächst mal keine Panik, alles Gelöschte kann entlöscht werden. Da es nur relativ wenige OTRS-Freiweillige gibt, die Erlaubnismails bearbeiten (d.h. bewerten und ggf. das Freigabe-Ticket auf das Bild "kleben"), kann es nach Eingang der Email einige Wochen dauern bis das erledigt wird. Deshalb überrascht mich die beobachtete Abfolge nicht. Ich werde die Dateien irgendwann am Abend entlöschen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Wie du schon gemerkt haben wirst, habe ich die beiden Demo-Fotos wiederhergestellt. Bei dem Logo-Bild (File:Logo initiative-zivilgesellschaft.jpg) wäre es aber gut, wie Eugene bereits vorgeschlagen hat, wenn du als Autor selbst eine Erlaubnis als OTRS mailst. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für Deine Hilfe. (War gerade einige Tage weg vom PC.) ~~----
Die erwünschte Signatur erzeugst du übrigens mit der umgekehrten Zeichenfolge: --~~~~ . --Túrelio (talk) 18:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Mc winkend.jpg

hallo Turelio - sie hat sich gewuenscht, dass ich das Bild reinstelle. Mittlerweile hat sie es sich aber wieder anders ueberlegt. Was macht man eigentlich, wenn man das Bild von zum Beispiel dr Schriftstellerin bekommt und es dann als copyright violation bezeichnet wird...

(sorry)also: auf die Frage, ob ich das Bild, aud dem MC winkt abwertend finde: die Autorin hat es ausgesucht.

--Julia ri (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Julia, ich bin jetzt etwas verwirrt: Mittlerweile hat sie es sich aber wieder anders ueberlegt. - das bezieht sich auf das Bild, wo sie winkt? Falls ja, würde ich dir wirklich empfehlen, es zur Löschung vorzuschlagen, denn es wirkt m.E. wirklich etwas ..na ja.. und du möchtest sie doch sicher nicht in ein schlechtes Licht rücken. Außerdem gibt es m.W. ja noch andere Fotos von ihr. Hab erst jetzt gesehen, dass du das schon gemacht hattest; habs gelöscht. Zur 2. Frage Was macht man eigentlich, wenn man das Bild von zum Beispiel dr Schriftstellerin bekommt und es dann als copyright violation bezeichnet wird... - immer wenn du etwas hochlädst, das nicht von dir selbst (original) erstellt worden ist (und außerdem noch nicht alt genug ist, um bereits gemeinfrei zu sein), brauchst du eine Erlaubnis des Urhebers. Um eine solche einzuholen, gibt es hier fertige Vorlagen. --Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Schade, dass sie auch File:Mariana Codrut.jpg weghaben möchte. Aber warum auch die Zeichnung? --Túrelio (talk) 15:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio, ich finde File:Mariana Codrut.jpg auch schoen. Die Zeichnung gibts ja noch auf ihrem Blog. Sie wollte sie nicht mehr bei wiki - ich weiss nicht, warum. Hast Du denn etwas von ihr gelesen? Kannst Du rumaenisch? (Julia ri (talk) 09:45, 12 October 2009 (UTC))

Weder etwas von ihr gelesen noch kann ich rumänisch ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Josémazuelospérez.jpg

Hi, Turelio. The seven point of legal information says litterally "La reproducción pública no autorizada de tales contenidos constituye un delito de apropiación indebida" ("The public reproduction not authorized of such contents constitutes an offense of improper appropriation."). So, it isn't free content as it suggests you here. Bye. --Sonsaz (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

I refered to #9: Respecto de las fotografías y dibujos, se permite cualquier tipo de reproducción privada o pública, renunciándose expresamente a los posibles derechos que las leyes puedan otorgar,... - doesn't that suggest (without mentioning a special license) free with attribution? --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

File:AK ksiegi pamiatkowe.jpg

Jestem autorem tej fotografii i ja zamiescilem ja na Commons, co powinienem zrobic, aby nie bylo zastrzeżeń.--Drużnik (talk) 11:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand Polski. --Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I am author of this photo and I put it at the Commons. What should I do, that you have no reservations?

By the way I thing would be much easier if polish spaeking administrators would inform about any problems. It is not easy to discuss about legal or technical problems in English by foreigner.

I'm also a "foreigner". My mother language is German. ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Ok. If you shot this photo, then why did you write "Author=Bartłomiej Wróblewski" and "Source=http://www.archiwumkorporacyjne.pl"? --Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Currently active Polish admins are User:Ala z, User:Herr Kriss and User:Julo, for example. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Das ist aber gut, dass wir beide Fremde sind! Ich heisse so und deswegen habe ich auch meinen Namen angegeben. Ich fuehre aber auch einen Verbindugsarchiv und Verbindungsmuseum (http://www.archiwumkorporacyjne.pl/en/index.php/about-the-archive/fraternities-archive) und deswegen gebe ich immer diese Daten an. Alle Photos, auch meine, gehoeren dem Archiv. So ist die Lage. Recht schoenen Dank fuer Geduld und Hilfe.--Drużnik (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Wenn du ein Photo selbst gemacht hast, kannst du bei Quelle/Source {{Own}} angeben. --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Sollte ich also die Information "www.archiwumkorporacyjne.pl (© Archiwum Korporacyjne)" beseitigen und statt dessen etwas anderes schreiben? Oder wie kann ich das jetzt koriegieren?--Drużnik (talk) 13:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Am besten schreibst du: Source={{Own}}; also on http://www.archiwumkorporacyjne.pl . --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Leider es ist unmoeglich, weil ich gleichfalls 1000 andere Photos beschreiben muesste. Wie sollte ich in diesem Fall an der Wiki handeln.--Drużnik (talk) 13:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, ich verstehe nicht, was du mit "1000 andere Photos" meinst. Du hast doch bisher nur wenige Photos hochgeladen. Schau mal hier. Da habe ich selbst getan, was ich dir empfohlen hatte. --Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe gedacht, dass Du erwartest, dass ich eine solche Information beim Photo auf der Internetseite des Archives angebe. Dies waere schwer machbar. Ich danke Dir, dass Du es mir gezeigt hast, was ich in einem solchen Fall zu machen habe. Noch eine Frage dazu. Immer noch steht diese Photo unter Verdacht (http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:AK_ksiegi_pamiatkowe.jpg). Wird es sich aendern oder es wird so bleiben.--Drużnik (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Da du in Bezug auf dieses Foto oben gesagt hast, dass du es selbst gemacht hast, werde ich das no-permission-tag entfernen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Noch einmal recht schoenen Dank. Ich verstehe jetzt ein bisschen besser, wie es funkzioniert. Ich wurde versichert, dass die fehlenden Urheberzustimmungen bald an Wiki gesandt werden.--Drużnik (talk) 14:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Komers PKM-u 2008.jpg

Odnosnie plikow: Komers PKM-u 2008.jpg oraz Byli prezesi Stowarzyszenia.jpg zwrocilem sie do autora plikow Tomasza Pomina, aby tak szybko jak to mozliwe przeslal zgode na "permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org". Jesli nie bedzie zastrzezen, podobnie uczynie w przypadku pozostalych fotografii budzacych watpliwosci. Bede bardzo wdzieczny za wyrozumialosc i pomoc, jesli jeszcze nie beda spelnione jakies wymagania.--Drużnik (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand Polski. --Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

As for the files "Komers PKM-u 2008.jpg oraz "Byli prezesi Stowarzyszenia.jpg" I asked the author to send a permission. If it works I will try to resolve the other problems. Thanks a lot and ask for passions!--Drużnik (talk) 12:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Fine. After the author agreed to you, place the following on the image pages: {{OTRS pending}} . --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

I am not sure. The author should send you or me an acceptence? And if you, should I inform you, that he has alredy sent it? or should I wait?--Drużnik (talk) 13:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

What I mean is this: when you ask the author/photographer by email, he will likely answer "no" or "yes, I will do it". When you have his first positive answer, then put the OTRS-template on the image site. By the way, when you ask the author/photographer, please use the permission template on Commons:Szablon zapytania o prawa autorskie. He shall sent the permission mainly to OTRS (permissions-commons-pl@wikimedia.org), not to me. --Túrelio (talk) 13:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Danke. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komers_PKM-u_2008.jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D Ist eine korekte Loesung?--Drużnik (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Ja. --Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Personal note template

You are welcome. I very much like when users this kind of lovely personal notifications. I was happy to translate it :) Regards --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Request (File:Wspolne zdjecie SFPoznKA, Poznan 2000 a.TIF, File:Ksiegi pamiatkowe korporacji.jpg)

May you delete the files: "Wspolne zdjecie SFPoznKA, Poznan 2000 a.TIF and Ksiegi pamiatkowe korporacji.jpg(file)"--Drużnik (talk) 12:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

But why? Do you not need them or will you not get a permission? --Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Because in both cases I mistakenly put it twice. So the last one version is enough.--Drużnik (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Informacja o pliku File:Cyrkiel PKM.jpg

Dodalem dokladne zrodlo: http://www.archiwumkorporacyjne.pl/index.php/muzeum-korporacyjne/poznan. Czy to jest juz wystarczajace, czy nalezy cos jeszcze zrobic.--Drużnik (talk) 11:15, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand Polski; but I have removed the no-source-tag. --Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!

Answering about the photographer

Hi Turelio. You'd asked me: Hi Luiz Carlos Cappellano, who made the original photo of File:Ignez Apparecida Picchi 019.jpg ? --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

My answer: Hi Turelio, I don´t know who had take my mother's original picture File:Ignez Apparecida Picchi 019.jpg . In 1955 she was very young (19 years old), a single girl who had just graduated as a teacher. Jundiai was a small town that times, and perhaps the photografer was Mr. Luiz Ravagge or his son, Darcy Ravagge. Probabilly the father.

Obtido em "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Luiz_Carlos_Cappellano"

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi again (I don't speak English well, pardom me): The "original" picture had been copied many times, and I think my copy is the "third edition" (in the 80's I had done the first copy). My mother don't remember who was the first photographer: Darcy Ravagge was a close friend and his father, an French Gentleman called Louis (Luiz) Ravagge was the most famous photographer in Jundiai that times, and, in this way, one of them had done the first photo. Mister Luiz Ravagge died in the 70's and Darcy Ravagge in the 90's. My parent's wedding picture (the original) was taken by Darcy Ravagge.

Oh, your english is quite perfect. Did Darcy Ravagge have any children, whom you might ask for permission, out of courtesy? --Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Frage

Hallo Túrelio, könntest du bitte mal überprüfen, warum meine folgenden Bilder "File:Calanthe sylvatica Orchi 013.jpg" und "File:Cattleya maxima Orchi 007.jpg" nicht sichtbar sind. Vielen Dank! Grüße. Orchi (talk) 22:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Also für mich sind beide perfekt sichtbar, obwohl ich mit IE 8 brause, der im Durchschnitt die meisten Macken hat. Veilleicht musst du deinen Cache mal leeren (Crtl F5 beim IE). --Túrelio (talk) 22:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
danke, dann muss ich mein "Opera 10" mal überprüfen. Gruß. Orchi (talk) 22:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Also in meinem Opera 10 (Reservebrauser) seh ich auch beide perfekt. --Túrelio (talk) 22:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
...dann scheint bei mir was faul zu sein. Opera und IE kein Bild. Firefox Bild sichtbar. Orchi (talk) 22:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
...auf meinem Reserverechner sind die Bilder da. Danke für die Hilfe.Orchi (talk) 22:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Gern geschehen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

File:101229131 194548b297 o.jpg

Hi Turelio, I've done. Thank's. Greetings. Dorieo (talk) 12:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC) PS: ¿Hablas español?

Hola Dorieo, solo un poco. File deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 13:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Father and daughters

Hi! Why did you remove this category from File:Welcome home.jpg? The text stated that this is the father and his daughter... Electron <Talk?> 14:14, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I did remove and re-add it, to be precise. Was just a click-mistake when I wanted to copy/paste the cat to the other image where you had a typo in this cat-name. --Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
OK. Electron <Talk?> 14:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Einverständniserklärungen

Hallo, die Lizenz für File:Babykreuz .jpg hab ich an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org gemailt. Für File:General Wolfgang Schneiderhan - Verleihung des Verdienstordens B-W 2009.jpg und die anderen Bilder hab ich dem Staatsministerium geschrieben. Wie erfährt man, ob das StM schon die Einverständniserklärung zurückgeschickt hat? Grüße -- A.Fiebig (talk) 09:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Wenn du das StM nicht um CC für die Erlaubnismail gebeten hattest, wohl erst wenn die Sache von einem OTRSler bearbeitet worden ist. Dann kann manchmal ein paar Wochen dauern, weil es nur wenige Leute sind. Ich hab das Kreuzbild mit OTRS-pending getagt, damit es nicht versehentlich gelöscht wird, und in der Löschdiskussiom zum Verdienstorden-Foto deine Anfrage erwähnt. --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Klasse, vielen lieben Dank. Ich hab dem StM die Vorlage der Einverständniserklärung für CC beigefügt. Das OTRS scheint noch ein paar Leute gebrauchen zu können, wie mir scheint. Grüße -- A.Fiebig (talk) 14:58, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

VP topic

Not sure if this is really an appropriate topic. Given the context, the file should probably be deleted. -- User:Docu at 08:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, not sure what you mean by "appropriate topic". The image in itself seems to be without problems (nothing demeaning is shown or claimed) and could even be useful, provided it's correctly licensed and provided we know who is the depicted. On the other hand, when the person can be identified, the image might be identified as a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
It seems to have been uploaded only for to that article, thus speedy deletion for files "solely for" should be possible. Use in that article without any caption is, at least, not unproblematic. -- User:Docu at 10:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
I had removed it already from the article as the related text portion seemed to be unsourced. --Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Feroze Varun Gandhi.jpg

Hi, I have full rights to that image, and I'm the one who put it into electronic format. What kind of proof would you like? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitant8899 (talk • contribs) 21. Oktober 2009, 09:53 Uhr (UTC)

Thanks, but by putting an image into digital format you don't become the author. So, first you should add the original photographers name to Author; secondly, as you are not the photographer, but the rights holder (as of your above statement), you should go to Commons:Email templates, copy the boxed permission template, enter the filename or the full URL (on Commons), add the license of your choice, put the date and your legal name under it, and mail it back to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). An OTRS volunteer will then work on it and put a so-called OTRS-ticket on the image that shows it's o.k. Your permission email will not become publicly available; only OTRS volunteers may have access to it. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

I clicked the photo as well. I was specifying that I have full rights to the photo, not just being the person who took it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitant8899 (talk • contribs) 21. Oktober 2009, 23:47 Uhr (UTCTúrelio (talk) 06:22, 22 October 2009 (UTC))

I find that hardly believeable, these image look like newspaper cutout scans posted on neutral backgrounds. If someone had access/allowance to take Gandhi's pictures, they wouldn't be of this low quality. Hekerui (talk) 22:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Please feel free to reach out to him and verify what I'm saying. That's what I meant by having full rights. These are with his express permissions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitant8899 (talk • contribs) 22. Oktober 2009, 05:06 Uhr (UTC)

@Nitant8899, could you 1) add to the image description when (at least the year) this photo (the original, not the scan) was shot, and 2) I would prefer if you could sent a permission by your own as described above in my first reply. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 06:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

X-ray image

Hi, Re: File:Pathologic fractureIV.jpg. I was under the impression that the uploader was the author, and I put "own" to indicate that it was the authors own work. Anyway, I have asked the uploader about the file on his page on en wiki; see user page. I hope there is clarification soon. Snowmanradio (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm, seems you misunderstood me. My edit summary was not directed at you, but at the uploader. And the {{Own}} was already present at upload.[49] I tagged it with no source, because an already deleted identical dupe (File:FemurIIIII.jpg) by the same uploader had Source=Google and Author=unknown, so the own-entry now smells untrue. But, lets wait for the uploaders reply. --Túrelio (talk) 18:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm. I found the image while searching google on a website were doctors are trying to figure out what should be done about the paitient. I did not know what to put the permission under since the file was already released to the public. What should I do? The doctors released it so now what? - BennyK95 - Talk 19:27, October 21 2009 (UTC)
The best would be to put the link to the source onto the image page on Commons. An additional question is what you mean by "released to the public". For example, press images are sort of released to the public, but usually they are not free and are not allowed on Commons. To publish is not equivalent to be free from copyright or to be under a so-called free license. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
This image is not allowed? Whoops I geuss I could scan my pathologic frature but the paper is all crumbled up. Oh well. Thanks for letting me know I won't do it again. - BennyK95 - Talk 19:41, October 21 2009 (UTC)
Here is the website if it's any help.[50]- BennyK95 - Talk 19:46, October 21 2009 (UTC)/?contentUrl=%2Fedu%2Fcas%2Fyourhelp%2Fcase15%2Fcase_015.jsp]
Hi BennyK95, thanks for the link. When you click on Legal on the head of that website, you will read: ... "None of the Material may be used for any commercial purpose. Particularly, you may not license, sublicense, sell, resell, transfer, assign, distribute or otherwise exploit or make available to any third party the Material in any way." ... Therefore, this nice image has to be deleted for now.
As a general comment, being presented on website, doesn't mean it's free (except it's so old, that it's public domain), there need to be an explicite statement "free for any purpose" or one of those Creative-Commons licenses that are allowed on Commons. Of course, even if all that is missing, you can always try to contact the rights holder and ask him/her specifically whether he/she is willing to release an image under a free license. (Here is some help for that.) Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for finding the problem and pointing out the guidelines to Benny. I think there are better examples of a pathological fractures anyway. I thought there was some bone loss just above the fracture, but it was difficult to see on the small image. Snowmanradio (talk) 22:51, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Other Image (Image:Ankle prosthesis..jpg)

Please don't delete Image:Ankle prosthesis..jpg I am currently getting permission from DePuy orthopedics. By the way, if you don't mind me asking what are you recovering from? If you don't want to answer that's fine. - BennyK95 - Talk 23:54, October 21 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I've left a note about that on the image page.--Túrelio (talk) 06:19, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Benny, have you copied anything else? Snowmanradio (talk) 10:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
@Benny, what are you recovering from - oh, nothing physical, actually from a severe WikistressCommonsdisappointment. --Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorting

Hi Túrelio, could you please sort TOL categories like this? Multichill (talk) 10:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Great. I had my bot sort all subcategories of Category:Myrmicinae. Did this catch everything? Compiling a list of categories now btw. Multichill (talk) 10:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Whitout questioning your rationale, I had the impression that even without this piping the subcats appeared in the correct order Aa, Ab, Ac ... Did this catch ... will check later (may be weekend). And for your to know, I still didn't (and will not until weekend) get through with creating all used-but-not-created ant-cats. So there are some more to come, but likely only sub-cats/species. One more question: as of now I have left the genus-galleries such as Solenopsis in the over-cat Category:Myrmicinae as they were. Is that correct even when a sub-cat Category:Solenopsis has been created, or should it be moved into that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Túrelio (talk • contribs) 22 okt 2009 13:04 (UTC)
It's the defacto standard in the TOL tree to sort this way otherwise all subcats will show up at the same letter. For example at the A in Category:Acromyrmex. I will have my bot do some more checking. I compiled a list at User:File Upload Bot (AntWeb)/Most used categories. I can make it longer or I can also compile a full list sorted by alphabet. About the gallery: I like to place it in the category with the same name, other people like to place it in the category above. No clear consensus so I just ignore these galleries. Multichill (talk) 11:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Acanthiza chrysorrhoa (Yellow-rumped Thornbill).jpg

Hi and thank your for contacting me about above image that i moved here from flickR.. i suppose the author on Flick R must have changed his license on all his images since the image was moved here.. And since this image never got a flick R Review, then i guess it should probably be removed.. Thanks --Ltshears (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes i had a look around at the many many photos on commons by this author, he has changed the license on all of them.. Most of the images were uploaded using the Upload bot, so the license was verified at that time.. It makes no sense why people change the license like that.. Either way, there are better images of that species available on this site and don't think it is important to keep it at this point.. thanks --Ltshears (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. As the toolserver seems to be down in part, I can't check whether the image is still used; but if not, I'll propose it for deletion. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 20:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Finally deleted.--Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Clear-script-19th-ctry.png

Hallo Turelio,

Ich wende mich in dieser Sache an sie als Mediator, da ich möglichst eine sachliche Diskussion anstrebe, die Lässliches wie „nonsense“ ausschließt.

Zur Sache:

Diese Abbildung einer Seite aus einem Manuskript befindet sich in meiner Privatsammlung und wurde erstmals von mir in dem als Quelle angegeben Buch veröffentlicht. Latebird hat daraus einen „scan“ in Wikipedia mit unvollständiger Bildbeschriftung und Quelle veröffentlicht.

Die korrekte Bildbeschriftung lautet: „Text aus einer oiratischen Handschrift, »Klare Schrift«, 19. Jhdt. (Sammlung der Autorin)“. Wie zu ersehen, schließt die Bildbeschriftung die Angabe der Sammlung mit ein.

(In meinem eigenen Buch wurden auch alle weiteren Quellen korrekt (inkludiert Sammlungen und Archive, wenn vorhanden unter Angabe von Inventarnummer) wie wissenschaftlich üblich angeführt. Bei Abbildungen aus Privatsammlungen habe ich mir jeweils die entsprechende Erlaubnis von diesen eingeholt. Darüber gibt es sogar einen eigenen Vertragspunkt mit dem Verlag.)

Die von Latebird in Wikipedia angeführte Quelle ließ weiters auch Seitenangabe und Bildnr. vermissen.

Zum Grundsätzlichen: Ich bin mit einer Verwendung in Wikipedia einverstanden! Doch möchte ich gewahrt wissen, dass weitere User sowohl die Quelle als auch die Sammlung korrekt anzugeben haben. Jeder der dies tut, kann die Abbildung verwenden. Dies scheint für mich kein Problem darzustellen.

Ich empfehle für ähnliche Verwendungen von Manuskriptabbildungen auch mal einen Blick in das Digitale Turfanarchiv und die Einsichtnahme des „MERKBLATTs für die Benutzung von Handschriften aus der Berliner Turfan-SammIung“:

http://www.bbaw.de/forschung/turfanforschung/dta/index.html

Ich selbst bin diesem gefolgt, als ich zu Lehrzwecken einmal zwei Abbildungen verwendet habe und habe es nicht als Anmaßung gefunden, dass dies gewünscht/gefordert war.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.171.97.82 (talk • contribs) 10:44, 23. Okt. 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Otgonbayar, es tut mir leid, wenn der erste Eindruck von Commons nicht so freundlich gewesen war, wie er sein sollte; das war sicher auch von Latebird nicht beabsichtigt. Ich schlage vor, die Diskussion auf der Diskussionsseite der Abbildung zu führen, gerne auch auf englisch, sofern bevorzugt. Wenn es Ihnen nichts ausmacht, können wir uns duzen, wie es hier in der Community üblich ist. Mit Ihrer/deiner Erlaubnis werde ich den vorstehenden Text auf die Bild-Disku kopieren, um die gemeinsame Diskussion zu erleichtern. Übrigens, falls du hier irgendwann einmal selbst Bilder o.ä. hochladen möchtest, wäre es einfacher, wenn du dich richtig anmelden, dir also einen Username zulegen würdest (siehe Kasten "Anmelden" auf Commons:Willkommen). Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Turelio, Gegen eine Verlegung der Diskussion ist nichts zu sagen. Nach Möglichkeit wäre ich aber auch an deine oder/und andere als Latebirds Meinung zu dieser Sache interessiert. Gruss - Otgonbayar

Natürlich. Gerade die Verlegung in den sog. "Namensraum" (während wir hier im "Userraum" sind, sorry für die Wikipedia-Welt-Begriffe) sollte das ja erleichtern. Zudem kannst du jederzeit, wenn du mit der Beteiligung nicht zufrieden bist, z.B. auf Commons:Forum andere deutschsprachige User zur Diskussion einladen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

take care of image orientation

I dunno why, but on my pc they result right oriented.. Fale (talk) 21:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
I see.. I'll look for this function ;) Fale (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

File:V.M. Doroshevich-Sakhalin. Part II. 141.png and other

Please don't add rotate templates. These files keep orginal book orientation. Rotated and cropped files are in Category:Vlas Mikhailovich Doroshevich - Sakhalin. Part II. Images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok.--Túrelio (talk) 22:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Category:Coat of arms of New Town (Prague)

Hello. Why you moved Category:Coat of arms of New Town (Prague) and erase them even thought there was an objection at the talk page? Do You suppose Prague New Town has more coats of arms? --ŠJů (talk) 10:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Don't remember precisely, but likely because all other COA cats are in plural. Anyway, sorry for not seeing your objection note before the move. I can "move" it back, of course. But, is it really that important for you whether its Coat or Coats? Likely in the near future somebody else will see, oh, it's Coat instead of Coats and the same will happen again. --Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
I suppose, everybody knows the basic distinction between singular and plural. We have the category "birds", but it doesn't mean that we have to rename Category:London to Category:Londons (is it really important?). We can have a category Churches in England, but it doesn't mean that we have to use plural for every category of some specific church in any village. Analogies shouldn't be applied thoughtlessly. If one wants to change singular to plural, he should be sure that the subject isn't unique only. Categories designed for media related to one subject shouldn't be confused with categories for a group of objects.
Btw, generally, every subject have only one coat of arms usually. The "of" prepositon is ambiguous. Flags of England can mean either a flag which symbolizes England, or a flag of some other subject in England (i. e. "Flags from England" or "Flags of subjects in England"). We shouldn't mix both meanings into one category. --ŠJů (talk) 11:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Images attibuted to "Ricky Romero"

Hello, I noticed that you deleted a copyvio image of Iván Calderón. Based on his edits at Wikipedia, its obvious that he is exclusively uploading copyrighted images and claiming attribution so he can edit war there. Maybe you could help me deal with the rest of this user's copyvio barrage. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:06, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Caribbean, as I'm busy in real-life today, post your request also at COM:AN/U, so that other admins may help. --Túrelio (talk) 06:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

KSB Bilder

Hallo Turelio,

ich bin von der KSB Aktiengesellschaft beauftragt, deren Wikipedia-Eintrag zu verbessern. Zugehörige Bilder habe ich vorab in Commons eingestellt und möchte dann darauf verlinken. Eine Bestätigung des Konzerns schaffe ich bei.--Chawarma (talk) 14:08, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Sehr schön. Benutze dafür einfach diese Vorlage. Trage dort die URLs der davon abgedeckten Bilder und die gewünschte Lizenz ein. Dann mail es an den Zuständigen der Firma, der das Datum und seinen Namen druntersetzen und es an die auf der oben verlinkten Seite angegebene Emailadresse senden sollte. Diese Email wird übrigens nicht "veröffentlicht"; nur die OTRS-Mitarbeiter können sie einsehen. --Túrelio (talk) 14:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion - Foto eines WP-Treffens

Hallo Turelio, eine Kollegin verfolgt hier File:02-06-01.jpg eine ganz andere Politik als ich - das ist das Bild eines Berliner WP-Treffens (ich habe sonst nichts damit zu tun), allerdings nicht genutzt. der Hochlader ist ein Admin in der deutschen WP. Macht die Speedydeletion Sinn? (Umgedreht baut LadyInGrey haufenweise die Cat:Men in alte, schlechte Selbstportäts ein....) Hm, und Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 13:36, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

schon erledigt - hat jemand revertiert. Cholo Aleman (talk) 14:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Aber ich hatte bereits gestern den Photographer, Ralf Roletschek, gefragt, ob er an den Bildern noch interessiert sei, weil sie halt nicht benutzt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 14:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

delete it ！

about File:Youtube_remake.jpg this file,
just do it !
I will reupload the new one.

If you have a better (but also legal) one, you may upload the image just over the existing one, from the page of that image, using this link. --Túrelio (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


Hello, Túrelio. You have new messages at Docu's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Replied.--Túrelio (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Betrifft:LINKELS Josy"JOLI",Kunstmaler aus Luxemburg.

Guten Tag Túrilio,

Ich bedanke mich für Ihre soeben erhaltene Email und ich muss Ihnen gestehen dass ich mich anhand Ihrer Aufklärungen deutlich erleichtert fühle was meine eventuelle Einführung in Wikimedia- und Wikipediawelt betrifft.Auch bin ich sehr froh Sie in DEUTSCHER Sprache zu begrüssen und verständigen zu können.Ich hatte ja die englische Sprache sieben während sieben Jahren studiert aber da ich kinderlos bin bot sich kaum die Gelegenheit ENGLISCH weder zu sprechen noch zu schreiben, was auch meine falschverstandene Reaktion bekunden tut.In der Tat hatte ich verstanden meine übertragene Photos meiner Bilder sowie mein Eigenbildnis würden gelöscht.Es stimmt dass mein Eigenbildnis zweimal übertragen worden ist, da ich sicher gehen wollte und geglaubt hatte irgeneinen Fehler begangen zu haben denn ich muss gestehen dass ich mich erst seit sehr kurzer Zeit mit der Elekronik beschäftige und dies noch mittels eines Laptops der Marke ASUS Eee PC 900, also ein Modem-bestücktes Miniteil mit Minischirm mit verstärkter RAM(2GB) usw. und via HUB an Farbprinter,CD-DVD-Reader,Brenner,usw.,einer Zusatzfestplatte und noch mit einem Floppidiskreader ausgestattet könnte ich mich Tag und Nacht beschäftigen aber wer malt für mich.- So wie ich Ihre Erklärungen verstehe ist ein identisches Selbstbildnis von mir zurecht gelöscht worden und die drei Gemäldefotos zurückbehalten worden.


Herr Túrilio,

Entschuldigen Sie die Unterbrechung aber der Punkt zum Schluss meines Berichtes hat mir weder ein Dnkeschön noch das verlangte Anbringen meiner Unterschrift verweigert.Das mache ich jetzt so wie es sein soll und bedanke mich für Ihr wohlwollendes Verständnis Besten Dank und eine geruhsame Nacht wünscht

Gern geschehen und danke gleichfalls. Übrigens können Sie Ihre Kommentare auf Talkseiten mit folgendem Code "unterschreiben": --~~~~
--Túrelio (talk) 21:09, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Category:Haus der Presse (Dresden)

Das war kein incorrectly named duplicate, sondern die Kat wurde verschoben (warum auch immer). Anyways, entweder der Admin prüft, ob auf die Kategorie noch irgendein WP-Artikel verweist (hier noch der Fall), oder aber der alte Name sollte als soft redirect bestehenbleiben. Gruß, --X-Weinzar (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

@X-Weinzar, sorry, hab ich in der Eile wohl nicht drauf geachtet. Bad-name markiert hatte die cat allerdings User:WikiAnika, ich hab sie nur gelöscht. Ich vermute, dass du das verlorene Link schon selbst korrigiert hast. Falls nicht, kannst du mir das Ziel ja hier hinterlassen. Gruß. --Túrelio (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Na-na-na, mit "nur" gelöscht kannst du dich aber nicht rausreden ;-) Nennt sich Vier-Augen-Prinzip. Naja, im Artikel inzwischen angepasst. Nicht weiter tragisch, nur so als Hinweis, falls du das öfter machst ;-) Gruß, --X-Weinzar (talk) 04:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Miwa Asao 2007 net.jpg

You just deleted this file, and I was not given a chance to check what the problem was (I was only just notified minutes ago; lucky I happened to be at the computer). Please restore the file, or at least show me the link to the original flickr page, so I can see what the problem is. This file originally had an appropriate license and it is possible that the photographer accidentally changed it; I can easily e-mail him and have the license fixed. Rjanag (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

As you may see now, it is licensed NC and ND[51], both not compatible with Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Ok, thanks. I will e-mail the photographer in a moment; I can't sign in to my flickr account right now. Please hold off for a moment on deleting the file, as this should be fixed shortly.
The file File:Miwa Asao 2007 serving.jpg was also deleted recently for the same problem; once I've gotten in touch with the photographer and had the license fixed I'll let you know so that it can be restored. Rjanag (talk) 21:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Ok, the license has been corrected for both of the images linked above (the original pages on flickr are at [52] and [53]). I have removed the copyvio tag from the one you deleted, and am messaging User:Polarlys to get the other one undeleted. Thank you, Rjanag (talk) 01:48, 4 November 2009 (UTC) Actually, Polarlys does not seem to be active right now, so if you feel comfortable doing so I would appreciate it if you could undelete File:Miwa Asao 2007 serving.jpg. (If you feel like that would be wheel-warring, no worries, I guess I could just wait for the other admin.) Rjanag (talk) 01:53, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:41, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Test templates

Hi Túrelio, a question: I'm wondering, why do you almost never place test templates on the user talk pages of "contributors" who conduct tests in images or even vandalise them? Regards, Wutsje (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, [54], [55]? In general, when an IP adds 1 or 2 silly or useless image annotations (IMHO the stupidest job creation scheme ever of Commons), I just revert that because I don't expect them to repeat or to even look at their IP talkpage. From 3 annotation on, I sometimes put a test-template on their talkpage. If people overwrite an existing image with their own one, I don't use the test template as it wouldn't really help, but I explain it to them directly, see [56]. Anyway, when I expect a vandalism to be only singular from the current IP, placing a test template doesn't make sense to me. --Túrelio (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Ah, okay, so you look at his number of contributions first. That is indeed a different approach. I see your point. I usually just template the guy, the sense of that being imo that I can thus spare myself the time of studying his contribs. Even if he never comes back, it might be useful for the next editor using the ip. Thank you for your answer, Wutsje (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Löschung zurück : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leigh.JPG

den Löschantrag kannst Du zurückziehen - man kann es wirklich behalten, in der Cat, die ich reingeworfen habe, gibt es komischerweise wenig ähnliches. Für das, was sonst unter den unkategorisierten Dateien zu finden ist, ist das noch ein richtiger lichtblick Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:57, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Dann setze doch noch ein {{Vk}} vor deinen comment. Die rfd muss allerdings wohl noch ein paar Tage offenbleiben. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
done - ich errätsele, dass es "vote keep" oder sowas heißt. Cholo Aleman (talk) 09:10, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Genau. Das Gegenteil davon ist {{Vd}}. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

About Commons talk:削除依頼

Hi Túrelio:

The article is Japanese, It may be talk about the histry of Deletion policy but I don't understand. Should find a Japanese to deal it.--Fanghong (talk) 00:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

was ist das bitte?

Hier ist eine Datei, eingetragen mit Missing permission, aber anscheinend nicht richtig eingetragen, siehe File:Christine Chen.jpg. Keine Ahnung was das soll. Grüße und Dank im Voraus Cholo Aleman (talk) 07:48, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Hier siehst du was passiert ist: der Uploader hat den korrekten Code des no-perm-tag ersetzt durch die Nachricht, die auf seine Uploader-Disku gehört (und dort auch steht). Habs mal korrigiert. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Danke! - bis ich sowas handeln kann, wird noch einige Zeit vergehen. Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

ausgefeilte Beschreibung

Sie Dir mal etwa bitte die ausgefeilte Beschreibung hier File:Suyomamai3.jpg an - da ist wieder jemand, der die Commons vergackeiern will. Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Dafür gibt's dann dies: {{Description missing}} --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Railway line .jpg

I saw the comment you added to the deletion notice on this file. Just to clarify, yes the license for the photo on Geograph is compatible with Commons, but it is not the work of User:93gregsonl and the PD license is invalid. Better to delete and reupload IMO, as has been the case with several other photos. Small-town hero (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. Replaced by File:DisusedRailwayLineBanksUK 8109b2d7.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! Small-town hero (talk) 16:56, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Vielen Dank

...für die Einordnung meiner User-Kategorien. :-) --Alkab (talk) 09:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Schloss Nossen

es ist die Datei Image:Nossen-Schloss--edit-2009-11-5-SabsLE.jpg

Die Vorgängerversion Nossen-Schloss--edit-2009-11-SabsLE.jpg hing auf der linken Seite zu weit nach unten.

-- SabsLE (talk) 16:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok, gelöscht wie erbeten. --Túrelio (talk) 16:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Danke, SabsLE 7.11. 21:12

File:UtCONTl.svg

Warum löscht niemand diese Datei? Sie ist ein Duplikat, der Name ist falsch, sie ist niemals irgendwo verwendet worden und sie ist bereits seit Tagen zur Löschung nominiert. Andere Dateien bzw. redirects die ich zwischenzeitlich nominiert hatte sind bereits gelöscht worden ... Gruß axpdeHello! 00:07, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Wundert dich das angesichts des Backlogs in duplicates, other speedy deletions, usw? Commons hat nunmal viel zu wenige aktive admins; der Job hier ist halt weniger spannend als auf :de. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Mir ist schon klar, dass die Admins hier ziemlich überlastet sind, ich bin auch schonmal gefragt worden, ob ich mich nicht bewerben wolle ... im Prinzip hätte ich schon Lust – auch wenn ich selber gerade nicht allzu viel Zeit übrig habe, im Moment scheitert's eindeutig daran, dass ich dann ja einen "Bewerbungstext" schreiben müsste – und nichts hasse ich mehr ;-) Gruß axpdeHello! 13:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Nee, den "Bewerbungstext" schreibt i.a. derjenige, der dich vorschlägt. --Túrelio (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Hmmm, bei Commons:Administrator#How do I become an administrator? klingt das aber anders ... wie auch immer, so einen müsste ich dann wohl auch erst mal finden ;-) Gruß axpdeHello! 18:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Ach ja, danke für's Löschen :) axpdeHello! 13:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Empty gallery

Just curious, why didn't you delete Hypergerus atriceps after removing all the images from the page? We have a empty gallery in a category (that has the same exact info) which would also be empty if it wasn't for the gallery and the fact that it's categorized in itself because the genus category it would normally be in redirects to it. A nice little self-contained mess; all we're missing is the content. ;) Rocket000 (talk) 00:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't remember exactly. Eventually I didn't want to "destroy" the work that has been left in the gallery after removing of the images. In addition, I wasn't sure what was meant by the note on Talk:Hypergerus atriceps. After reading your note, I've scanned Flickr for images of that bird; there were quite some, but all fully (C). --Túrelio (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

IT WAS FREE

ITS NOT COPYRIGHT, NO ONE DIRECTLY TOOK THIS PICTURE!!! Mario & Luigi RPG 3 (talk) 00:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

So, it came by magic into the world? You, the uploader, have to proof that it is copyright-free, plan and simple. --Túrelio (talk) 00:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

how do I do THAAT?!!!!!! Mario & Luigi RPG 3 (talk) 01:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

First you have to find out, who is the rights holder. That is likely not this Rachel who got this dedicated photo of her star, but the depicted or his agency. So you should ask him whether he would be willing to release this or another photo of himself under a free license. If he's not willing to give a release for the high-resolution version, ask for a lower-resolution. Example letters for such requests you can find here and here. --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

sorry - - eigene Kunst ?

sorry für die falsche Speedydeletion - war ja dämlicherweise als "Unidentified person" categorisiert. Bei den Unidentified.... -Dateien finden sich teilweise wahre Schätze, etwa seltene Fotos aus einem Pueblo Jovenes bei Lima (Independencia, von ca. 1960), eine selbstgebaute Stadt, eine unglaubliche Gegend, zu der ich verwandschaftliche Beziehungen pflege. Ganz was anderes: hier http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Claire_le_catelier hat eine Französin eigene Kunstwerke hochgeladen, gar nicht mal schlecht. Aber: welche Kategorien nehmen?? Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:54, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Ist nach eigener Angabe Acrylmalerei und da liegt das Problem. Dafür gibt es erstaunlicherweise noch keine eigene Kategorie. Da ich mich mit Malerei nicht besonders auskenne, frag doch einfach mal im Forum oder der VP nach Vorschlägen bzw. ob sich dort jemand damit auskennt und wie der Kategoriestrang sein sollte. Denkbar wäre m.E. cat:Acrylic paintings. Zu klären wäre aber wo diese cat wiederum eingeordnet werden soll. --Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Wenn da kein "educational value" auftaucht sollten die gelöscht werden. Hekerui (talk) 21:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Es fällt mir auch schwer da einen Educational Value zu destillieren - aber normale Löschanträge könnt ihr stellen, ich stelle nur Schnelllöschanträge :) Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Ich weiß zwar nicht, ob der Künstler, der anscheinend auch der Uploader ist, schon bekannt ist, aber da besteht m.E. grundsätzlich schon ein Educational Value. @Cholo Aleman, sooo schwer ist es aber nicht einen rfd zu stellen, zumal dir nach Eingabe von {{Delete}} die auftauchende Meldung doch alles vorgibt, samt Links. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

.....Ich lerne demnächst dazu. Schönen Abend noch Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

nochmal zu den normalen deletion requests: ich habe einfach keine Lust, die massenhaft offenen DRs zu vermehren, siehe Category:Deletion requests - für Juni sind massenhaft welche offen. Was bringt ein Verfahren, das im Zweifel so lange dauert? Würde mich interessieren, welche Gründe außer mangelndem Interesse noch dafür bestehen. noch kleines Beispiel: die Händlerschürze File:Händlerschürze.jpg gab es seit 2006, 2009 merkt dann einer, dass es derivativ ist. Das ist schon alles ziemliches Kraut und Rüben. Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Tool sharing

Hi, do you have a JS tool for tagging an image as DW? I saw a nice speedy tag with a standard-looking reason, and an associated DW template on the user page. If it is some kind of gadget, I could use that... --Eusebius (talk) 22:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Not that I'm aware of it. If you refer to File:Popejohn2.gif, the tagging was completely by hand [57] and [58], and used {{Derivative}}. --Túrelio (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
OK. --Eusebius (talk) 08:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Jooseppitunturi and more

Hi,

thank you for deleting the copyvios of Jooseppitunturi. Actually I think all of the photos claimed to be taken by User:Herr stahlhoefer in Finland are copyvios.

I also looked through some other places in his gallery: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Herr_stahlhoefer/gallery and it seems to me that there might be copyvios in other countires too. For example I found these:

File:Mt Hood and a John Deer Tractor over the Wooden Shoe Tulip Fields Monitor Oregon.jpg Which also can be found in Panoramio: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/1946749

File:Thunderstorm over Thunderbolt.jpg In Panoramio: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/2127008

I find it very hard to believe now, that any of the photographs claimed by him are really his.

--Estormiz (talk) 18:18, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violation

yes, some of my photos were copied from the website Panoramio, but when i uploaded, didn't know about the site rules and now I don't know how I can delete them.

Herr Stahlhoefer (talk) 22:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok, but then put a list of the not-your-own uploads (ideally together witht the URL of the real source) on your talkpage, so that we can check which ones can be saved (because they are free, though not your own) and which ones have to be deleted. Otherwise you might risk a summarily deletion which has already been suggested by others. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

ok, be in my talk page all the imagens copied from Panoramio. happy 20th berlin wall down birthday --Herr Stahlhoefer (talk) 18:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your cooperation. --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but i really dont understand, why the pictures wont be deleted? i thought all the photos which the license is not correct would be deleted Herr Stahlhoefer (talk) 17:12, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

If you refer to my note on your talkpage, it says "do not delete these files summarily". That is because, when I checked the first file in your own list, I found that it has already been re-used by a prominent blog. Now it would be irresponsible to simply delete this file and don't tell them what has happened. That is meant by my note. You see, what you did causes us and others a lot of problems. Only today, I likely spent hours in searching the web for the sources and then for re-uses of your uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 19:47, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

what a shame Herr Stahlhoefer (talk) 19:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

did I really take the picture?

yes I did, why is it so difficult to believe?

Flavio piacenza — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flavio Piacenza (talk • contribs) 00:29, 9. Nov. 2009 (UTC)

Because it is a portrait-photo of you. It's not impossible to take such a photo by yourself, but it's less likely than been taken by another person. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

So What?!!! ITS A PHOTO OF HIMSELF!!! THESE RULES ARE OUTRAGEOUS, IF ITS A PHOTO OF HIMSELF, IT SHOULDNT MATTER IF SOMEONE ELSE TOOK IT!!! ITS HIS PORTRAIT, SO NOW YOUR JUST ACTING LIKE A DUMB IDIOT, INCOMPETENT FOOL!!! 98.67.183.94 02:44, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

A pedestal was used, autoshoot was used and the computer for editing.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.11.78.223 (talk • contribs) 12. November 2009, 11:08 Uhr (UTC)

O.k. --Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


I dont know why or who is defending me, but you know what, I just wanted to write an article about my pizzeria in order to introduce this type of food to people in spain, but I do not understand this tag things and how to write si is does not look like an advert, so please delete all of my fotos, as the article is being deleted anyway, or tell me how I can do it myself

Flavio Piacenza

Hi Flavio,
to request deletion of an image you should open the description page of the image, enter {{delete|write here a reason for the deletion request}} , click save and then do what you are advised to in the red-framed message windows that appears on the image page. Sorry to hear that your article was deleted. You might try to enter some information in the article about pizza in general (should be es:Pizza on :es-wikipedia). --Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Dancer

Hi! Now Bastique has reopened the DR that you had encouraged me to make. Regards, /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry about vandalising

I am sorry !

Your assistance please

The record shows you deleted File:Medic with the Afghan National Army.jpg, as a copyright violation. Did you overlook that the description says: "Joint Combat Camera Afghanistan Photo by Sgt. Jennifer Cohen"

I wrote to the ISAF flickrmail address that had uploaded that image:

You have uploaded thousands of images -- and you have marked them all as "all rights reserved". Yet most or all of those images were taken by American GIs, in performance of their duties.
The work of employees of all agencies of the US Federal government, including the DoD is in the public domain. Marking these images as "all rights reserved" is highly inappropriate. It may even be a crime.
I urge you to change the liscensing on all images taken by employees of agencies of the US Federal government to something more appropriate.

This is their reply:

Here's the official policy on our Flickr site:
Images uploaded to Flickr are for the free intended use for dissemination by media outlets and all other interested persons or organizations for newsworthy or educational media products. They are not, however, and in accordance to Flickr policy, to be used with the intention of reproducing and selling the images without prior consent of the releasing authority, or by extension, the photographer whose name should be included in the description. Please credit "Photo by ISAF Public Affairs" unless otherwise noted. The releasing authority is the Public Affairs Officer for ISAF Headquarters or any persons designated by the Public Affairs Officer, any of whom can be contacted at pressoffice@hq.isaf.nato.int.

Of course they are incorrect. Images taken by GIs, in performance of their duties, like the one you deleted, are permanently in the public domain. ISAF can't claw them back and assert intellectual property rights over them.

However it seems more responsible heads have prevailed, as some or all of the images uploaded by the flickr-id isafmedia seem to have been changed to cc-sa. I'd like us to check the flickr page of the flickr image you deleted to see whether the ISAF staff are now complying with copyright. Geo Swan (talk) 03:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. Does it make a difference whether a photo was shot as of their duties (a press officer's job) or in performance of their duties (a fighting GI, who likes to takes photos, though it's not his job)? --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I added {{Cc-by-2.0}} and {{Flickrreview}} because the the flinfo robot now reports the image as being liscensed as {{Cc-by-2.0}}.
Well, IANAL. I had my doubts about the Abu Ghraib photos, which were taken by the GIs personal cameras, when they were officially "on-duty" -- but when senior officials said, essentially, "not that shaggy", ie "we didn't officially tell then to go that far." So I had my doubts whether those images could survive a challenge as to whether they were really "in performance of their duties".
IANAL, but I think if a GI was on a 24 hour pass that image could not be described as "in performance of their duties".
IANAL, and I am not sure whether a GI could claim, "that is my image, not the DoD's, because I took it with my own camera, when Sarge told us to 'take five'." I suspect that, when a GI is on a patrol, they are considered "on duty", even when Sarge says "take five".
This particular photo might qualify for {{PD-Afghanistan}}. I keep mentioning that I think the wikimedia foundation should get the professional opinion of a lawyer who specializes in intellectual property law as to the pecularities of the copyright status, if any, of images taken in Afghanistan. Afghanistan has no domestic copyright law. And it is not a signatory to any international copyright agreements.
I've asked for input on the village pump, and elsewhere, for opinions on whether this means images snapped in Afghanistan are in the public domain.
While those who weighed in when I have raised this on the village pump all agreed, in general, that images snapped in Afghanistan were in the public domain, those who weigh in on specific images take different positions. Some of them claim that all the intellectual property rights to images snapped in Afghanistan belong to the first individual or organization to publish them in a country that has intellectual property laws. They treat the images like gold mines, who belong to the first prospector to stake them out, and file a claim.
There is an image of w:Dilawar (torture victim), taken by his family, shortly before his capture and murder in US custody. A freelance photographer sought out the family, and acquired a copy of that family photo -- and subsequently claimed he owned all the intellectual property rights to this photo.
User:Rama has called our treatment of images taken in Afghanistan as in the public domain as "theft". As an administrator I think he should have tried harder to set an example, and used more moderate, less inflammatory language. My response to his assertion was to remind him why countries grant copyright, patents to intellectual creators. The deepest reason modern countries do this is that copyrights and patents are seen as being in the public interest. We want inventors to make some money from their inventions, because we believe inventions, inventiveness are in the public interest, and we want them to go on and make more inventions. Copyright is granted to writers, musicians, photographers and artists, because we see their works as worthy of protections because they are in the public interest. I have a theory as to why post-Taliban Afghanistan hasn't become a signatory to international copyright agreements. Many of the warlords Karzai relies on, and many of the legislators Afghan have elected are so traditional that they do not believe in "progress" -- intellectual progress. So, the continuing lack of intellectual protection in Afghanistan reflects modern elements in the Afghan body politics ongoing failure to convince the conservative elements that intellectual creations have value for the general public, and are worthy of protection. Rama's response was that the Taliban have no reservations against using modern AK-47s and RPGs to fight ISAF. But this is typical of luddites everywhere. They alwasy overlook some technology that is so ubiquitous that they take it for granted, and do not regard it as technology that contradicts their luddite philosophy.
Let me share an observation on intellectual property from the w:SARS crisis. SARS was scary. Canada was affected about an order of magnitude more than the USA. And health care workers were among the most deeply affected. There was one drug that was believed to protect individuals from being infected, when exposed. Canada's Minister of Health wanted to issue this drug to the front line health care workers most likely to be exposed, and to those known to have come in contact with infected individuals. The Minister personally phoned the Canadian headquarters of the company that owned the liscense to market that drug in Canada, in order to get the doses for those front line health care workers. Whoever he spoke with at the HQ told him the firm could not produce those doses. So he invited other firms to bid to produce those doses. The firm with the liscense rights went nuts. But I think this was an instance when respecting the intellectual property rights that company was fighting to protect were in conflict with the public interest. Their attempt to withhold the distribution of the drug, in Canada, was definitely not in Canada's interest. One option that company had would have been to have told the Minister, we can't produce the drugs you requested, but we are prepared to help other firms produce the drugs, temporarily -- in return for a liscense fee. Ironically, it turned out that this firm had a stockpile of the drugs large enough to issued those drugs to the Canadian health care workers, and still leave a reserve stockpile. But the executives at the Canadian HQ were Americans, who decided all their reserve of drugs in Canada should be reserved for the US market, in case the impact of SARS in the USA rose to the Canadian level.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 14:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
@Geo Swan, thanks for your answer. I hadn't meant to provoke such an elaborate work with my question ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Please check link pages before just deleting commons categories

Before you delete Commons categories and replace them with new names, please check pages linked to them in the various Wiki sites... you have broken many links by these deletions, which significantly degrades Wikipedia's quality. Example : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_D_class_submarine links to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:British_D_class_submarine which is now broken. Bad. The reason for the deleted categories appears to be a rather pedantic choice over whether categories should be singular or plural. I doubt if anybody actually cares. Regards, Rod (also a friend of a cat) Rcbutcher (talk) 09:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry. Depending on the speedy-deletion template that was applied to the cat, there is often no easy way to find out whether a cat is linked to pages in other projects. I've corrected the link in en:British D class submarine now. About the reason for the deletion: I didn't tag the cat, but only performed the deletion. However, cat names shall usually be in plural. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:Trzciana, Lesser Poland Voivodeship

I see you replaced this category (which is based on en:Trzciana, Lesser Poland Voivodeship) with Category:Trzciana (powiat bocheński). The convention is to have the English name for a category. Could you please undelete the category and move all contents to it? Multichill (talk) 13:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I've undeleted the cat. All this had been initiated by User:Selso, who likely also had moved the content from this cat, as it was empty when I deleted it. --Túrelio (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done the contents-moving. --Túrelio (talk) 22:11, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

this is my certificate.

excuse me！
MCAS Excel 2007.PNG is really my certificate.
my name is SHAO-JI CIOU
here is my userpage onlymyself65536
Onlymyself65536 (talk) 09:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)onlymyself65536

Hi Onlymyself65536,
I do not doubt that. But did you create the original certificate by yourself? Likely not. You got it from Microsoft. If you buy a music CD, it is your own. But you didn't buy the copyright of the CD cover, so you are not allowed to (scan and) upload it to Commons or anywhere else. Exactly that is the problem here. Of course, you may ask Microsoft whether they agree to publishing (and redistributing) a reproduction of your own certificate. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

It takes too many process！

If you think MCAS Excel 2007.PNG is not allowed.
Just delete it.
Because I don't have more energy to get the permission.
Onlymyself65536 (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)onlymyself65536

Abigor's mass deletions

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Images_of_User:Quahadi --Anto (talk) 14:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I've seen it and wondered a bit about the rush, after I had taken the pain of a very selective deletion. You may request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests. --Túrelio (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

This DR

Dear Turelio,

Shouldn't this old DR have been closed as delete long ago? It certainly cannot be kept since there is no FOP in the US for modern art. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Unfortunately, if simply DR's like this are not closed, then I can see why the backlog of more complicated DRs grows and grows here. Regards from BC, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:Crocus albiflorus

Dear Turelio,

I do not agree with this new category.

Crocus albiflorus is indeed an obsolete synonym for Crocus vernus subsp. albiflorus. If you want to create a category for it, you should preferably create it as a sub-category of Crocus vernus.

Best botanic regards, --Réginald (To reply) 11:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Réginald,
no problem, I just "created" this category that was already used while it didn't exist. What would you recommend? Create Category:Crocus vernus subsp. albiflorus (as subcat to cat:Crocus vernus) instead or what else would make more sense? File:Crocu vernus ssp. albiflorus (Crocus printanier).jpg is in cat:Crocus vernus, but that cat is already rather full. --Túrelio (talk) 11:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Dear Turelio,
Create Category:Crocus vernus subsp. albiflorus (as subcat to cat:Crocus vernus) would indeed be an excellent idea.
Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 12:22, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Buchcover?

Hallo Turelio, stimmt das File:Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Der Untergang der Titanic 1978.jpg wirklich, dass hier ein Copyright drauf ist? würde mich ja sehr wundern, dass das Werk des Designers nicht geschützt ist. Cholo Aleman (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

@Cholo Aleman, du meintest sicher hier kein Copyright, oder? Ich vermute der Uploader hat sich einfach vertan, weil alle anderen Cover, die er hochgeladen hat, nur Text enthalten. Habs mal getagt. --Túrelio (talk) 17:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Danke! dämlicher Schreibfehler, war natürlich "kein" gemeint - sind im Gegensatz die Cover mit Text denn wirklich frei? Eine trickreiche Unterscheidung, auch da ist doch ein Layout dahinter. Aber für sowas will ich gar nicht zu einem Experten werden. Cholo Aleman (talk) 17:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Tendenziell würde ich reine Text-Cover ohne ausgefallenes Hintergrunddesign als frei betrachten. Übrigens habe ich von File:RainForestFire.jpg dein OOS-Speedy entfernt, weil es in hoher Auflösung vorliegt und m.E. doch brauchbar ist. Zudem hat der Uploader noch 2 weitere Bilder im gleichen Stil hochgeladen. --Túrelio (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

wegen dem RainForestFire - danke für das Bescheidsagen, habe ich von mir aus nicht bemerkt. Wenn bei vielleicht 50 SpeedyDeletions mal eine revertiert wird, finde ich das eine vertretbare Quote. Ich bezweifele ja ehrlich gesagt, ob solche selbstgemalte Kunst wirklich sinnvoll ist, aber Du kennst Dich in der Konzeption der Commons viel besser aus als ich. Solange es Kategorien hat, stört es mich ja nicht mehr... - gibt diverse solcher Fälle, etwa der Kollege Emminger, siehe http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/EMMINGER - out of scope ? - drei davon sind schon speedy gelöscht worden, nur einer hat eine Kat "Cartoon", wenn ich recht sehe. Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:47, 17 November 2009 (UTC) (+ Sehr wahrscheinlich alle unbenutzt seit 2006. Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC))

Uploading error

Dear Turelio,

When I uploaded File:Tithonia diversifoliaRHu2.JPG and File:Tithonia diversifoliaRHu3.JPG a server error occurred. Could you please check what happened and correct this error? I can neither retrieve them in my contributions nor in Category:Tithonia diversifolia.

Thanks, --Réginald (To reply) 17:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

As the server seems still to have hick-ups, I can't do much in the moment. But I'll look into it tomorrow morning. --Túrelio (talk) 17:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
I have re-uploaded these two files. It looks now OK. --Réginald (To reply) 08:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

wrong image appearing; permissions not acknowledged

Hi I am utterly baffled; have been trying to upload to Commons an image originally called peter3.jpg on my computer but then changed to Robin Eldridge and on the Wiki page it appears as someone entirely different (I have never seen that image before!) when I look at it in preview. Also, a number other images I have used I am getting warnings about permission; if I have put in the wrong permission I apologise; however I have long ago emailed permission from for soho nights images given by willie russell and photographers' gallery to use - images already in public use. The ones of peter evans was copyrighted by self, and the one of robin eldridge is copyright by peter evans but commons doesn't seem to want to accept there 'permissions'. Why don't you have a permission of copyright by writer of teh wiki article, etc... please help me sort these problems out!Gilberta (talk) 14:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Replied at your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

New files uploaded

Dear Túrelio,

As you can see I have uploaded some 40 pictures of wild plants I have taken during my trip in the Nothwest of Thailand. I have also taken a lot of pictures of ornamental plants. I will upload the best of them during the next days.

Thank you for your appreciated help, --16:33, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Johan Halvorsen, Oslo

Hallo Túrelio! Danke für's löschen; hier sind noch zwei: [59] und [60] Gruß --Sir James (talk) 20:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. Gruß --Túrelio (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Liquid Stranger images

Dear Túrelio,

I am trying to upload pictures for the liquid stranger wikipedia page. I noticed that the pictures another user uploaded had been deleted and I wanted to help out. Apparantly, I have made some kind of mistake with the licensing, since you deleted the pics again.

I would really appreciate if an experienced user like yourself would look into this so that the pictures can be restored.

--Frogkick (talk) 20:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Which images would you like to have restored? I've added some likely helpful information on the talkpages of your uploads:
File talk:Anywhere and me cover.jpg
File talk:Liquid stranger promo pic.jpg
File talk:The intergalactic slapstick cover.jpg my reply at this may refer to all images from that Flickr source
File talk:The invisible conquest cover.jpg
Hope that helps. --Túrelio (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Dear Túrelio,

As you can see I have uploaded a lot of pictures of plants from Thailand. Thank you for deleting my 4 wrong duplicates.

Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 13:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 13:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

User:192.197.54.136: Thank you

I just realized that the User:192.197.54.136 seems to be a vandale, as he only tried to change links in the metadata of a frequently linked image (which was uploaded by me) to his own homepage. I only want to thank you for reverting this :-). Verflixt und zugenäht, warum schreibe ich eigentlich auf English? Aber da sieht man doch mal wieder, warum gesichtete Versionen eine gute Sache sind :-). Also, herzliche Grüße von einem Gelegenheitshochlader, --Frakturfreund (talk)

Gern geschehn. Heute hat er es auch an File:SPD logo.svg versucht. --Túrelio (talk) 16:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Mir kannste das nächste Mal auch auf Deutsch antworten lol Hekerui (talk) 00:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Wenn ich auf Commons angemeldet bin, stelle ich mich halt ›innerlich‹ auf English um … und merke dann erst später, dass mein Gegenüber auch ein deutscher Muttersprachler ist. Noch ein schönes Wochenende wünscht --Frakturfreund (talk) 09:47, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
@Frakturfreund, Hekeruis Anmerkung hatte, glaub ich, mit deiner Nachricht nichts zu tun sondern bezog sich auf einen Kommentar von mir auf seiner Disku. Grüße. --Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Ja, sorry. Hekerui (talk) 10:06, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Tippett mccluhan 2008.jpg

Hi, please Flickr review this image, and close deletion request. I have persuaded author to change license. -Justass (talk) 19:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Danke! - und Copyrights

Hallo Turelio, danke für die Identifikation der französischen Strasse neulich, die ich fälschlich auf Speedy gestellt hatte. Erst nach dem Speedy kam ich darauf, danach zu suchen, hatte aber auf die Schnelle nichts gutes gefunden. Noch was anderes: hier sind ohne richtige Kats ein paar tolle Fotografien hochgeladen worden, etwas zu toll für meine Begriffe, vor allem diese hier von einem Robert Häusser:

File:06 Moor V, 1984.jpg
File:04 Bank im Moor, 1984.jpg
File:02 Moor, II 1984.jpg
File:10 Verlassener Ort, 1984.jpg
File:Signaled Order! 1960.jpg - braucht das nicht eine OTRS-Freigabe?? Du bist ja ein Experte für sowas. Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done. Erstaunlich wie das solange unbemerkt blieb. Danke für die Info. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Murray 2nd Ward Bldg.JPG

Please explain why Murray 2nd Ward Bldg.JPG is a copyright violation as it is public domain due to it being a National Historic Register Photo (FEDERAL GOVERNMENT). What exactly is the violation?

Though I only performed the deletion, the deletion rationale by User:Nyttend was as follows: "it is taken from this page, which contains only privately-taken photographs, not photographs taken by individuals in the employment of the federal government." Please sign your comments with --~~~~ . Túrelio (talk) 16:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

nochmal Copyright File:Detmarschmoll5.jpg

noch eine Profifotoserie - diesmal vom Jadebusen. Von den Fotos gibt es wieder eine ganze Runde von User:Tniemann, wo mir das Copyright unklar ist. Kann gut sein, dass der Hochlader wirklich der Fotograf ist. Danke für Deine fleißige Arbeit! Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:25, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Heute muss ich überwiegend anderswo fleissig sein. Hättest du nicht Lust mal selbst den Originalphotographen zu kontaktieren? Email: mail@detmarschmoll.de , Website: http://www.detmarschmoll.de/ Vorgefertigte Anfragentexte für solche Situationen gibt es hier: Commons:Emailvorlagen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

OK, danke für den Hinweis, mache ich in der nächsten Zeit. Cholo Aleman (talk) 12:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Jack Merridew 08:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

hallo from professor uwe kils ny and mikki turku

we have all copyrights and the films. lamilli and richie stole it from us. have a nice day user kils user uwe kils — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.214.137.214 (talk • contribs) 25. November 2009, 15:05 Uhr (UTC)

Hi Unknown,
may be, but we can't take images down simply if an anonymous user writes so. If your claim is serious/true, then please mail your complaint to the email adresse on Commons:OTRS. It will be handled confidentially, but you have to provide some proof. --Túrelio (talk) 14:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

I think I have this set now.

Thank you for replying. I've already started requesting the deletions for most of my uploaded images, but wish to keep one. Likewise, at this point, I think I would like to keep the account open for postings of more meaningful (and less potentially objectionable) content, if that is okay; if it is not okay, I would be fine with further deletions. I deleted my last self-post message(s) at my user page, now that I've researched how to do that. Thanks again for the reply and sorry for the bother.Eng446w4 (talk) 17:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)(I'd just posted this at my own site by accident, or was that where this was supposed to be?)Eng446w4 (talk) 17:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

You are free to either post here or answer directly on your talkpage. The latter has the advantage that the discussion is kept at one place. Deletion of files/images (except copyright violations) may take some days as other users can participate in the deletion discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 17:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks,and I'll post at my own talk page from here. Thanks again.Eng446w4 (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I wonder...

I noticed that you have deleted some old images that failed Flickr review. The top of Category:Recent unfree Flickr images says "Images in this category should be deleted if reviewed within 7 days after upload. If they are older, please place them into Category:Possibly unfree Flickr images". The same with User:FlickreviewR/reviewed-fail-recent "If this image was recently uploaded, it may be speedy deleted.". So it seems that at some time it was decided that unfree images can be speedied if they were reviewed within 7 days of upload. Now I wonder what if they failed review a year after upload? Can we still speedy or should we make a DR? --MGA73 (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi MGA73, honestly I didn't reflect about that at all, because I usually work only on the backlogs of the "classical" speedy-cats, i.e. Category:Copyright violations, Category:Other speedy deletions, Category:Duplicate and less frequently on Category:Universally replaced by CommonsDelinker. So far, I've simply ignored Category:Recent unfree Flickr images, which wasn't that full anyway. When stumbling over Flickr cases as mentioned above, I usually follow a somewhat "approximative" approach, meaning I check whether the image is currently used in any project, then check whether the uploader originally provided the correct Flickr URL (to somehow sense whether I can assume good faith), then try to guess the value or the uniqueness of the image, and so on. However, IMHO the problem is that while in case I decide for deletion, the outcome is clear (deletion), but in case I don't feel right for deletion, then what? Usually I leave the file open as it was, not very satisfying or even effective. --Túrelio (talk) 19:54, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Ok. Well if in doubt a DR is always good :-) --MGA73 (talk) 21:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Question

Dear Turelio,

Can this DR be closed as delete. We are infringing on the flickrowner's rights...and it was never free. The DR is also 1 week old by now. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your help. it is regretabble that this quality image has to go but if people don't allow non-Commercial use, one must respect their decision. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment: As an aside, the 5 images listed in this DR are all flickrwashes. Even the uploader does not dispute this. Perhaps they should be deleted since the DR is more than 1 week old now. Just a suggestion. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

AvN Gallerie

Okay, Galerie neben Kat, aber hier wirklich wenig Sinn, weil das zweimal gleiche Bild nicht Annmemarie von Nathusius ist, sondern Luise von Nathusius, geb. Behmer, die mit Annemarie eigentlich nichts zu tun hat, also nicht Mutter oder Grossmutter ist. Ohne sie bliebe dann nicht viel übrig. Ich hielte Löschen für sinnvoll, da das eine dann noch zu verwendende Foto eh in der AvN-Kat ist. Gruss --Wistula (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

In welcher Beziehung steht denn diese Luise zu der Annemarie? --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Angeheiratete Tante ca 3. Grades, also weiter weg als viele bei unter Category:Nathusius (family) genannte Personen. Es gibt auch sonst keinerlei Verbindungen, hier ist jemandem bei Galerie-Bildung wohl nur ein Fehler unterlaufen. Gruss --Wistula (talk) 17:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Ok, hab die Gallerie liquidiert. --Túrelio (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
merci --Wistula (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Goldenknitter

Goldenknitter hat das Foto File:NirmalaRajasekarUN.JPG das ich getaggt habe und dass du gelöscht hast drei mal hochgeladen und versteht wohl nicht so richtig wie Commons funktioniert. Als ich das Bild zum ersten Mal getaggt hab lag es trotz der Benachrichtung wie OTRS geht sieben Tage rum und wurde gelöscht, bei der Löschdiskussion nach dem zweiten hochladen hat er/sie erst nicht geantwortet und dann nachträglich einen Kommentar auf der Talkpage hinterlassen. Und das dritte Mal war eben gespeedied. Ich habe noch mal eine Erklärung hinterlassen, kannst du ihm/ihr da helfen? Hekerui (talk) 19:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Hab ihm hier einen Hinweis hinterlassen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Davide santon.JPG

Túrelio, I didn't understand. That images was from Flickr, with the same license of this one. - which is from the same user and was "confirmed to be licensed under the terms of the cc-by-2.0".

I found it using the type of advanced searh in Flickr that shows only pics that could be uploaded to wikicommons.

Why was it deleted? --Caio Brandão Costa (talk) 02:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Hola Caio Brandão Costa,
thanks for asking. The problem with File:Davide santon.JPG was that it is restricted to no-commercial (NC) use on its Flickr source (see the striken-through $-sign). Images uploaded to Commons have to be free also for commercial use, as of our policy. Now, what is the difference to File:Ibrabalotelli.jpg that comes from the same source? This image was uploaded in May 2009. At this time the image did not have the NC restriction, as our Flickr-review robot has checked and confirmed. Obviously thereafter the Flickr user luiginter changed the license from cc-by-2.0 to cc-by-SA-NC-2.0. That it a typical problem of Flickr. Users there can change the license of their images at will and these changes aren't transparent. If you had uploaded the Santon image in May, there wouldn't have been a problem. The only thing you could do now is to contact Flickr user luiginter and ask him whether he would release the image without the NC restriction. This could be done in two ways: either he changes the licensing on Flickr (you should then re-upload it) or he sends a written permission for the image without the NC restriction to OTRS, see Commons:Email templates for details. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Template:JULIANDAY

Hi Turelio, would you double-check and undelete? It broke things. -- User:Docu at 13:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. Actually before deleting this I did check usage and there was none visible. --Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. (in reply to your question on my talk page:) Some pages with {{Move}} still display error messages, but I think it will be ok once they are refreshed. -- User:Docu at 13:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
BTW where did the edit summary come from? -- User:Docu at 13:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Which one? This "((incorrectly named) duplicate of Template:Cite patent/doc)[61]"? I haven't a clue, also not why it is not shown in the current edit history[62]. I didn't tag this file by myself, but only found it in cat:Duplicate or in Category:Duplicate - bad name. --Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I guess it was Template:Template doc. I should have removed the unused stuff from en.wp. -- User:Docu at 13:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
So should this be undeleted too? --Túrelio (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
No, it should be ok now. -- User:Docu at 14:01, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
BTW could you delete the last five revision here? -- User:Docu at 07:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
@Docu, do you mean a version deletion of this edit? Anyway, this can only be done by an Oversighter, which I am not. In case you are in contact with User:Xoser, recommend him to contact Lar or Raymond. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
You could delete the page and restore all but the last versions. OS isn't necessarily needed. No, I'm not in contact with him, but he seems to have read my comment. -- User:Docu at 07:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I will try. You seem to know better than me. Why aren't you admin? --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. -- User:Docu at 08:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Re Deletion

Hello Turelio; I was just checking the status of an image deletion request that's been approved, so now I'm just wondering how long, on average, does it take for the image to actually be removed? I had changed it to a speedy delete today. Thanks for all your help, both past and present. Eng446w4 (talk) 21:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

As of yet nobody else had commented at your deletion requests. I have done that now. But DRs should run at least 1 week. --Túrelio (talk) 21:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much on all counts, action-wise and info-wise! Eng446w4 (talk) 00:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

falscher LA

Hallo! Ich hab vor dem Löschantrag leider den normalen angelegt: Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Thomas Andasch. Kannst du das bitte heilen? Danke! --Martina Nolte (talk) 23:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Hat der DRbot inzwischen schon erledigt, wenn ich das richtig sehe, oder? --Túrelio (talk) 06:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Ah, die Bots sind immer wieder super. Danke. --Martina Nolte (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

This DR

This DR here should be closed as delete. Its more than 1 week old and its not used anywhere. It also failed review twice already. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Aeronwy.jpg (in Commons)

Hi - thanks for note re template etc - it comes after HOURS today spent trying to find what's required and mailing dead Wiki links etc etc etc - and then getting a new email agreement (AGAIN) from copyright holder only to find the file had been removed. Administrative vandalism and overkill - very discouraging. I'm not totally unintelligent, but this system lacks clarity - if you can help ensure this photo is there in Commons to be used on the Aeronwy Thomas page in English and Italian, both I and the Italian biographer would be most grateful. Tony in Devon (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, the start on platforms like Commons is sometimes a bit hard for newscomers. The reason why we admins (and some others patrolling the new uploads) may sometimes act a little bit harsh (or may look to do so), is because quite a lot of people come here and upload anything they found somewhere on the web and then claim it to be theirs. Besides leaving you that explaining not, I've already put your image Aeronwy.jpg in wikipedia articles about that lady. As you seem to have a general permissio by the rights holder already, you should put this {{OTRS pending}} onto the image description page. The image will then not be deleted for several weeks, until the permission has been checked. --Túrelio (talk) 22:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Gründe für "Speedy deletion"

Hallo Turelio, sieh mal, Meister Pruneau meint, dass "Out of Scope" kein Grund für einen Antrag auf Speedydeletion ist, siehe [63] - abgesehen von dem speziellen Fall, den er anspricht: wenn er recht hat (ich habe die Regeln nicht nachgelesen), müsste man alle von mir beantragten und meist von Dir und Abigor ausgeführten "Speedydeletions" rückgängig machen, was?? :) :(... Ich kann mir schon vorstellen, dass Pruneau auf dem Papier recht hat. Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 08:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Cholo Aleman,
das ist richtig. U.a. deshalb habe ich ja auch manche deiner speedies rückgängig gemacht oder in eine RFD umgewandelt. Im Commons-Alltag wird diese Regel derzeit öfters nicht so genau eingehalten, weil es hier zu wenige aktive admins gibt, eine RFD ein erheblicher Mehraufwand ist und die Warteschlangen von zu löschenden oder problembehafteten Medien bzw. seit Monaten oder gar Jahre offenen RFDs eh schon lang genug sind. Pauschal braucht von den erfolgten Löschungen sicher nichts rückgängig gemacht werden, aber auf Anfrage natürlich immer. Die momentane Situation ist einfach suboptimal. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Danke! - Pruneau hat mir zu meiner Verblüffung simpel Recht gegeben und auch eine Diskussion gestartet, um die Policy zu ändern, siehe [64]. Eben darum, weil ich es schon gewohnt bin, dass Regeln in Wiki-Projekten gleichzeitig gelten und nicht gelten, kümmere ich mich auch ungern um sowas. Sicher schwierig, da Missbrauch vorzubeugen. Es waren ja auch nur ganz wenige, die Du revertiert hast, m.W. zwei Stück, das eine davon ("weiße Mutter mit Kind") wirklich fast eine Seltenheit - das ist dann klar nicht "out of scope". Es gibt "Jahre" offene Löschanträge?? - Welche aus dem Mai hatte ich gesehen. Muss ich mir bei Gelegenheit mal ansehen. Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 19:00, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Mohammad al-Amin Mosque 2009.jpg Speedy request

When was it built ? When I uploaded the photo I thought it was very old and just restored. I was just about to add the image to the enwiki article and there read that it was finished in 2007...a bit too recent unfortunately - Peripitus (talk) 04:17, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

26 static band pic

G'day. I have a pic that was removed from 'commons' because of 'non-free flikr'. File:Green_Static_Pic_of_the_Band.jpg

the photographer is the band members partner and i got her verbal permission to use the pics from the bands page for a wiki page. What do I need to do to have this pic restored on the wiki page?? Do I need written permission from the photographer? A blood sample? A wiki donation? :)

thanks --Wiki alterator (talk) 05:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Busy at the moment, will reply later. --Túrelio (talk) 07:18, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Wiki alterator,
the problem was that at its source on Flickr this image was "(C) All rights reserved" and thereby had to be speedy-deleted. Now, if you have the consent of the photographer, then you should go to Commons:Email templates, take the permission template, enter the filename of the image and the license of choice, then mail it to the photographer and ask her to put her name and the date under it and to mail it back to the address shown in OTRS. When you have done that, you can leave me a note. I'll then undelete the image and put an OTRS-pending tag on it. If the permission mail is confirmed by an OTRS volunteer, it will be "cleared" and everything will be fine. --Túrelio (talk) 21:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Deletion request

more than 20 photos of the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Palace_of_the_Parliament. 79.112.34.190 07:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Busuresti-Intercontinental.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/79.112.19.138 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/79.112.18.133

All these images violate the copyright law of Romania. 79.112.34.190 07:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Deletion thanks

Thanks.[65] I think I have it figured out for future uploads. --IP69.226.103.13 (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Could you check some deletions?

Hi! Could you check if the speedy deletions listed on User talk:Kpetrole were justified? I have not seen those images, but going by the file names, this all seems very minor (and maybe out of scope, or maybe the uploader was testing how far he could go). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Actually I had performed those deletions, though not tagged the image by myself. If I remember right, they all showed things that can be considered works of art. Whereas I don't think File:Temple_VI_Foundry_Mark.JPG is copyrightable. --Túrelio (talk) 15:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

professor uwe kils

hallo! we do have the copyright for the 6 high resolution macro images, the films and receipts of the models, 500 000 dollars a piece - with beautiful, high resolution photographs beate uhse and jimbo whales earned a fortune. see FOTO KILS FOUNDATION - if you give us a mail address on my user page we will send the certified contracts. Beste Gruesse Uwe kils (talk) 10:30, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Barra de Catuama.jpg & File:Zé do Carmo.jpg

Hi, sorry for my english, i'm brazilian, but, the photos Ze do Carmo and Barra de Catuama are authorized, send at the manager of the Flickr (rilsonjoas@yahoo.com.br) i say for he that!!! i'm not one crazy, copying images from all. ok???

again sorry for my english,

Mauro Costa (talk) 19:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mauro,
the problem with both images is that they are (C) All rights reserved! on Flickr. If Flickr-user Rilson Joás is really the owner of these images and if he is willing to grant you the images under a free license (such as Creative-Commons-BY(-SA) ), then you may go to Commons:Email templates (also in other languages), take the permission template, fill in the filenames of both images and the license of choice and mail it to Rilson Joás. He should then put the date and his name under it and mail it back to the email-account given in OTRS. When you got his agreement to that, drop me a not here and I will temporarily un-delete the images and then get (or not) their clearing by an OTRS volunteer. --Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Commons as a media source

Hallo Túrelio,

du hast bei einem meiner Bilder ein Label eingefügt, das ich bislang nicht kannte. Meine Bilder sind (unverdient ;-) hundertfach in Web- und Printmedien verwendet worden - sowohl in lizenzrechtlich einwandfreier (oder zumindest akzeptabler) Weise, aber vielfach auch unter Verletzung der Lizenzbestimmungen. - soll ich die nun alle in dieser Weise labeln? Welchen Sinn hat das eigentlich?

Ich habe das bei obigem Beispiel mal versucht und ein eigenes Label hinzugefügt, bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob ich die Tags richtig interpretiert habe. Gibt's dafür irgendwo eine Anleitung?

Beste Grüße, --Mosmas (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Mosmas,
Informationen (aber nicht sehr viel) zu diesem Template gibt es hier: {{Published}} und hier Category:Commons as a media source. Das Ziel war/ist, die Nutzung der auf Commons gehosteten Bilder etc. in Medien außerhalb von Wikimedia-Projekten zu erfassen - ursprünglich möglicherweise als "Lebensberechtigungsbeweis" z.B. gegenüber Sponsoren gedacht; meine Vermutung. Wie viele andere kleine Initiativen auf Commons, die irgendwann mal angeregt und begonnen werden, dann aber völlig der Initiative einzelner überlassen werden, gibt es hierfür keine feste policy. Ich, als vermutlich einer der aktivsten "Tagger", habe die Kriterien zunächst eimal weit interpretiert, d.h. nahezu jede mir auffallende Nutzung (Medien, Blogs, etc.) erfasst. Langfristig ist das nicht unbedingt sinnvoll. Bislang gibt es aber ohnehin keinerlei systematische Erfassung dieser Nutzung. Aktiv suchen tue ich ohnehin nur für meine eigenen Photos. Andere tagge ich nur wenn sie mir zufällig über den Weg laufen, wie neulich in einer Handwerkskammer-Zeitschrift beim Frisör. Für den einzelnen User mag ein Nutzeffekt darin liegen, von ihm/ihr vielleicht garnicht bekannten Nutzungen zu erfahren und ggf. gegen lizenzwiderrechtliche Nutzungen vorgehen zu können. Du hast bei deinem ersten Versuch übrigens gleich alles richtig gemacht. --Túrelio (talk) 11:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Danke für die ausführiche Antwort. Ich denk mal drüber nach - aber es wird viel Arbeit ;-) --Mosmas (talk) 13:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Du kannst ja für dich die Latte etwas höher setzen, also z.B. nur Nutzungen in Medien im engeren Sinne und auf nicht-privaten Websites erfassen. Da bist du völlig frei. --Túrelio (talk) 13:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Marcello Baraghini.jpg & File:Wijdan Mikhail Salim.jpg

Maybe the DRs for these 2 images here should be closed as delete since it is more than 1 week old? Is this reasonable? --Leoboudv (talk) 20:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

I've deleted one, but will wait with the other as MGA73 has contacted the Flickr-user only yesterday to ask for a free release. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your edit on SmartMedia SVG image

Hello. This is your edit: [66]. What do you mean "the other image is far smaller"? In terms of dimensions, that is just a parameter you specify in the SVG file. A image can be small or big, and it still contains the same amount of information and take up the same space. If you meant "the other image is far smaller in terms of file size", it is also irrelevant, because some SVG images contain far more metadata than other images. There are also numerous ways to express all other kinds of data in an SVG. So I don't really see the meaning in any of the stuff that you can mean by that. Please clarify what you meant. --Ysangkok (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

My main reason was that the to-be-deleted image appears far larger than the other version. If you feel that to be irrelevant in that case, you are free to re-tag it. --Túrelio (talk) 06:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Federal Hall NYC 22.JPG

Please ask Gryffindor, who is the original uploader. I just edited the pic as per Gryffindor's request, and have no opinion either way on the deletion suggestion. - MPF (talk) 13:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thx, will do. --Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Kalka

Please still delete these junk files, author agrees, he simply did not realize that you can upload the new version over the old ones.

--Berillium (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:File:Alfa Romeo G1 1921.jpg

L'immagine rimossa File:Alfa Romeo G1 1921.jpg era stata scaricata da flickr, [67] dove è inserita con licenza CC-sa-2.0. In ogni caso, se qualcuno ha verificato trattarsi di copyviol, nessun problema. Alla prossima.

  • Traduzione automatica: Image removed File:Alfa Romeo G1 1921.jpg had been discharged from Flickr [68] where it is incorporated under license CC-sa-2.0. In any case, if anyone has checked question of copyviol, no problem. Bye.

--Ligabo (talk) 07:57, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Ligabo, it was tagged as copyvio because it was also found here with a photographer credit and (C) and dated from 2005. And somehow, this page seemed to be the more real source than Flickr, which dated the image from 2009. However, if you can provide any evidence to the contrary, I'll be glad to undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Nessuna prova del contrario. Anzi, hai fatto un ottimo intervento. Buon lavoro e ciao.
  • Automatic translation: No evidence to the contrary. In fact, you did a great speech. Good job and hello.
--Ligabo (talk) 12:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

File:BennyBufanoPeace3448042569.jpg

I was completely unaware of Freedom of Panorama. Assuming that the photographer can get copyright permission from the San Francisco Arts Commission which was amenable to Wikimedia Commons, should said permission be then included in the image description itself? Many thanks. Kencf0618 (talk) 02:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Kenneth, freedom of panorama (FOP), in case you didn't know that already, may allow the use of photos of works of art that are still copyrighted. However, the US FOP law allows that only for buildings, not for sculptures and other works of art. Of course, if you get the permission by the original rights holder to redistribute an image of a work of art, then it can be used. In order to ease your effort and to get it right from the beginning, you should go to Commons:Email templates, take the permission template, enter the URL of the now deleted file and the license of choice (by the photographer) and mail that with an explaining letter to the rights holder and ask him/her to put the date and his/her name under it and mail it back permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Shortly before sending the request to the rights holder, drop me a note here. I will then temporarily un-delete the image, so that the rights holder can see what you are talking about. If they give permission, after some time an OTRS volunteer will put a so-called OTRS-ticket on the image page and everything will be fine. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Sounds good. I've written the letter. All-in-all an interesting study!Kencf0618 (talk) 04:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
I've temporarily un-deleted the image. Hope you are successful. --Túrelio (talk) 06:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

your badname-tags

I made mistake during uploading. I assigned wrong name to this images and both of them should be removed. Uploaded again with correct name: File:Pope John Paul II Polish Center in Yorba Linda.jpg--WlaKom (talk) 10:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I know that. But then why did you upload it under the correct name but with 1/4 of the original resolution? --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyright status

Hi! You may delete this File:Predmetybita.jpg File:GorodNadym.jpg File:Gorodishe.jpg images because later I'll upload the photo-designed by me. Sorry for the problem. If I knew how to remove images I've would do it myself.--Pelivanov Yuriy (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I'll look into it later. --Túrelio (talk) 16:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:CafeGratitude Sign.jpg

Hello,

You deleted the first iteration of this image on November 29 as a derivative. It was reuploaded again, prompting a regular deletion request. I'm bringing the DR to your attention since you deleted the first upload. Thanks. BrokenSphere 21:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

This image

Is this not a copy vio? It has been missed somehow. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:00, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

This image

Hi Túrelio, I'm having trouble getting a permit from Getty Images, I prefer that you delete this picture, if I get a license from Getty Images I make uploading the picture again.

I'll do so. --Túrelio (talk) 10:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Last photo

This last DR should also be closed as delete. The uploader just cannot be trusted.

✓ Done.--Túrelio (talk) 23:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
This is rather difficult. Photographer should be contacted; I've put his email on the rfd page. --Túrelio (talk) 23:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
  • The train photo was taken many years ago and there is no guarantee she is still at this place of learning. Everyone seems to believe Amgine except Hekerui. I had filed the DR to delete it and then suddenly Amgine noticed my DR and popped up. This is the problem on old images in the pre-flickr review days--no way of verifying the license on orphaned flickr accounts unless you trust the uploader...and there seems little reason to doubt this person. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
  • By the way, you may be interested in this DR by me. I'm not convinced the uploader is jsousa. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
You are talented to pick the most difficult cases ;-). --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

(no longer) Unidentified objects

What categories are missing here? "Augenklappe in Art"?

Hallo Turelio, ich wollte Dir nur ein wunderbare Fundstück aus den "Unidentified subjects" zeigen, finde ich wirklich lustig, vor allem der grimmige Ausdruck des rechten. Außerdem: müsste es nicht eigentlich "Unidentified objects" heißen? Und wir brauchen noch eine Kategorie neben "107"! - hier steht doch 107B, das ist noch nicht erfasst.... :) - Grüße Cholo Aleman (talk) 22:35, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Danke. Bin auch schon mal drüber gestolpert und konnte es nicht identifizieren. --Túrelio (talk) 00:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Das sind Shmoos! Dieses selten-dämlich benannte Photo ist ein Duplikat von en:File:CHICOS Shmoos.jpg, der Rest ergibt sich ... {{Rename}}? axpdeHello! 06:55, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Super, Bild nach >2,5 Jahren identifiziert ;-). Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

This DR

Dear Turelio,

The above DR is 10 days old and I doubt the photo can be kept. It should be deleted...because the uploader simply has too little experience uploading flickr photos sadly. There is even 1 copyvio notice now on another photo by the uploader. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Frank Farian.jpeg

Turelio, that upload is indeed not a copyright violation, as I have taken it myself with my own camera. Please restore it right away. --Natraj (talk) 11:47, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Now, now. How comes that this your photo is in the same resolution as your upload on http://www.norbertodenoah.com/biografia.php with "Norberto de Nöah © 2009"? --Túrelio (talk) 12:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, obviously that guy took the photo from Commons? You recognized, that I uploaded the photo already in March 2008 (the days when I took it)? --Natraj (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I'm willing to un-delete it. However, you should request from the owner of norbertodenoah.com to correctly credit photographer and source of this image on his website, because its lack was the reason why it was tagged as copyvio by another user (not me). Also, it would be nice if you could re-upload the image in a somewhat higher resolution than the current 703x928 pix. --Túrelio (talk) 13:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
See File talk:Frank Farian.jpeg. BTW, the copyvio process is not well-designed, if the uploader does not have the chance to comment on the accuse for at least a few days. Not everybody's logged into Wikipedia all day long... --Natraj (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
True, as you have no interwiki-links to other projects on your userpage and hadn't been active since July 2008, I had to assume that you were gone for long. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

thanks

thanks for deleting and letting me know! --Effeietsanders (talk) 23:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for not notifying, seems I have missed that.--Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Passed image

I helped pass this image here after the flickr owner agreed to change the license: File:Lepanthes Ophelma.jpg So, I do try to save used photos if possible.

But these 2 likely cannot be kept and they are not used anyway:

Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Thymophylla acerosa.jpg does not show Pectis papposa?

Without an actual voucher specimen identification cannot be determined with certainty so the file should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pompilid (talk • contribs) 03:46, 14. Dez. 2009 (UTCTúrelio (talk) 07:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC))

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

re: see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Template:Rename broken

It is irrelevant with my edit. I editted only "Quick adding" link. Best regards. Kwj2772 (msg) 02:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Note

If this is a poster, it may be copyrighted. But I don't know. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done, rather sure a copyvio/derivative, as not FOP in Norway, except for buildings. --Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: File:Muhabbet.jpg

Hello. No, it wasn't me. Why should I? Regards pjahr @ 20:25, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Wiggles images

Hi Turelio,

Earlier today I downloaded some images of The Wiggles from Flickr. Then they failed a review by a bot, and you subsequently deleted them. I have to admit that I struggle with ensuring that the images I download here and use on Wikipedia follow free-use and copyright policies, so could I please have your assistance? What is it about those images that failed them? To give you some more information, the photographer agreed to donate her pics. I requested that she download them here on Commons, and she also agreed, but then seemed to drop off the face of the earth. She never downloaded them, and hasn't responded to my repeated attempts to contact her again. After waiting a sufficient period of time, I acted on her permission and began to download them myself. Obviously, I'm doing something wrong! What do I need to do to ensure that they and the other images I want to download aren't deleted? I really appreciate your assistance and/or tutelage in this matter. --Christine 22:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Christine,
I'll want to go to bed now, as it's already nearly midnight in my timezone. Therefore in short: your two uploads, related to "The Wiggles" as I remember, were both (C) All rights reserved on their Flickr source; File:Fingerwagging.jpg at http://www.flickr.com/photos/shanna_shattan/3805074467/ and File:Wakeupjeff.jpg at http://www.flickr.com/photos/shanna_shattan/3806017102/. Since some time we Flickr-review all uploads tagged with Flickr as source, because Flickr-users can easily change the license of their image without any outside possibility to view the record of that. As a consequence we had to delete scores of Flickr-sourced images uploaded to Commons in the early times when there was no Flickr-review process. So the Flick-review-bot checked the license on the Flickr source page provided by you and found the images not to be licensed under any Commons-compatible licence and tagged them consequently as "failed". There are two ways out of this, both requiring action by the rights holder. She may temporarily change the license on Flickr, so that our Flickr-review-bot can run again. Or she can sent you a written permission for her images under a free-enough license. You will find a ready-made permission template here Commons:Email templates, including some instructions how to proceed. Hope that helps. --Túrelio (talk) 22:56, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for responding before your bedtime. It looks like I'll have to submit a copy of the email with her permission. I'll go that route. Have a good evening, and happy holidays. --Christine 23:38, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Saluting the "janitor"

I noticed that you've been mopping up after my clumsy attempts at copyvio-tagging, and just wanted to thank you.

While I'm at the source: Is there a way of flagging a suspected copyvio without requesting deletion? Regards, Paradoctor (talk) 23:31, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Paradoctor, about your "Is there a way ...": well, not really, because copyvios deserve deletion ;-). The lowest tag for something that seems fishy is {{Disputed}}. However, that usually leads to nowhere (puts it on none of the "attention"-lists or -categories). If you suspect copyvio, but have no proof, you should write what is the rationale for your suspicion. You could therefore file a regular deletion request (rfd) by inserting {{Delete}} and adding the reason for the copyvio suspicion. Of course, filing a complete rfd requires quite more pastes and clicks to do than a speedy-deletion request such as {{Copyvio}} or {{Speedy}}. But that would be the best in cases of weak suspicion. For special cases as album/DVD/record covers, there is {{Cover}}. For a full list of "problem tags" see Category:Problem tags.
Warum schreibe ich eigentlich auf englisch, wenn du deutsch sprichst? Aber du hast damit angefangen ;-). Übrigens habe ich dein File:Benton 1959 The Clock Problem (Clock Paradox) in Relativity - 07 - page 01.png mal aufrecht gestellt; wenn es dir nicht gefällt, einfach auf Originalversion zurücksetzen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Ein Spielplatz ist langweilig, wenn niemand mitspielt. ;) Danke für die Tips. Paradoctor (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Duplicate / rename

Good to see that someone helps keeping duplicates down. I noticed that some users upload a new version to get files renamed. In that case they break the file history. If file was moved history would be intact. So I wonder if "renames" like deleting File:Flag of Miyagi.svg and replacing it with File:Flag of Miyagi Prefecture.svg should really be done. And if it should be done maybe we should move old file on top of new one to merge history. Or the other way around move the new one to the old one to minimize the changes around the world? --MGA73 (talk) 21:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, in case of File:Flag of Miyagi.svg, where both files (last versions) are identical, the renaming of the original one (w history) might be a better solution, though that would first require deletion of File:Flag of Miyagi Prefecture.svg (without long history). But as the latter one is used on 165 pages, the deletion should be followed within seconds by the renaming of the original file to avoid delinking. --Túrelio (talk) 21:22, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
If you move an image "on top" of an other you are asked if you want to delete excisting file. That way image will only be deleted for less than a second. You can then restore history by deleting and undeleting as fast as you can. Then it should only be deleted for 5 seconds. And then history should be merged. You can then look in file history and recreate the filepage as you want. --MGA73 (talk) 22:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Re: File:ShawnPyfrom.jpg

Der Photostream war allerdings der eines offiziellen Blogs von Microsoft, und die haben die vollen Informationen dazugegeben. Aber egal. Hekerui (talk) 09:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Zugestanden, aber ob Microsoft die vollen Rechte erworben hat, wissen wir nicht. WireImage gehört zu Getty Images und da werde ich sehr "nervös" - du erinnerst dich sicher noch an die deutsche Firma, die von einem deutschen Gericht für die Nutzung von 6 unlizensierten Getty-Bilder zur Zahlung von € 14.000 an Getty verurteilt wurde. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Image:Vedavyasapriya.jpg

Please do not delete this image, because it is an original image, i am the owner of this image. It meets all relevant policies and copyrights.

Sorry, but it was deleted by someone else. However, you may request undeletion. --Túrelio (talk)

Empty categories

I noticed you deleted a few categories because they are empty (example Category:Vehicles of Northern Ireland). In that case you can delete more than 1.000 found here Commons:Batch uploading/Geograph/cat-matrix. But they are a part of a preparation for a batch upload (Commons:Batch uploading/Geograph). If we do not create the categories before images are uploaded they will end up in a few very large categories. So categories should only be deleted if the can't be relevant. Like if there is no Mountains in Northern Ireland or whatever the reason might be. --MGA73 (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

To be precise, I deleted the cat you mentioned, because it was tagged for speedy deletion by User:MartinHansV and only after checking whether it was used, which was not the case. Anyway, if larger numbers of cats are created for special upload projects and may remain empty for some time, it might be wise to add a note to the cat that explains this and may thereby prevent others from tagging them for empty-speedy and again others from delete them accordingly. In this case it might have saved unnecessarily spent time of at least three people, the tagger, the deleter (me) and you. I've undeleted that cat now, as well as Category:Aircraft of Northern Ireland and Category:Cranes in Northern Ireland. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
When created we (Multichill and I) thought that Commons got extra space "soon" so that is why I did not add a notice on the category. But sadly it has been delayed more than once. We still hope the new server will be up soon. I'll ask Multichill if there is any news.
Just for fun I checked Commons:Deletion_guidelines#Categories and it seems that "empty" is not a valid reason for speedy deletion. It should only be deleted if it is misspelled and "unlikely to be used by other people". Personally I wait a week or so before I delete categories unless uploader requested. That way others have a chance to protest. If I'm not sure I ask the person who created the category if (s)he is still active.
But it seems that it is only a handfull of admins that help cleanup in the CSD so I only have to tell a few admins more ;-) --MGA73 (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Though there's no need to extend that discussion, being empty seems to be a speedy-reason for cats as it is listed in section Commons:Deletion policy#Speedy deletion. Otherwise I would have acted terribly wrong, as I've deleted empty cats all my admin-life. Anyway, tagging such cats with a small note like the one I now added to Category:Cranes in Northern Ireland etc. would be best to avoid such things. --Túrelio (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Yeah... And unless we get that server soon or unless we manage to "push images down" to these new categories I will "steal" your text and add it to empty categories. So far only 5 has been deleted. Thats why I have not done it before :-) --MGA73 (talk) 20:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyright File:Deveze-66-2005.jpg

Hi Túrelio. I've modified the license of this image on Flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dreadcast/4211814022/?edited=1

--Dreadcast (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for feedback. I've removed the cv-tag and added a FlickrReview-tag. The only problem might be that the bottle label might be copyrighted, though I'm not sure whether such minimal design is copyrightable. But that can be discussed afterwards. --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Dear Túrelio, Thank you for your restless good work as admin. :-)


--Neozoon (talk) 15:08, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

You are welcome, Neozoon. --Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Mbz1 (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hannukah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!



Thank you, Túrelio, for your comment. It was really kind of you and I was touched that somebody cares. I guess it is rather sad that few months later Commons still cannot not get rid of me :) --Mbz1 (talk) 17:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Seasonal greetings

Fresh off the camera - with thanks for your support in 2009 and regards --Herby talk thyme 13:58, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The black and white one is a very fine image indeed. Thanks for the wishes and I agree with the hopes too - hopefully 2010 will be good for us and for Commons. --Herby talk thyme 16:38, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Grüße

Hallo Túrelio,
ich möchte Dir ein frohes Weihnachtsfest und alles erdenklich Gute für das neue Jahr 2010 wünschen.
Herzlichen Dank für Deine Hilfen.
Viele Grüße.
Orchi (talk) 22:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

dito etc.

Hallo Turelio, auch Alles Gute zu Weihnachten, und noch ein paar Kleinigkeiten hinterher... Hier habe ich eine eigene Datei, die gleich wieder speedy entsorgt werden kann: File:Denkschrift Harnack 1.tif - ist was für Wikisource, aber nicht so mit 12 MB ... Außerdem habe ich es geschafft, zwei reguläre Deletion Requests für Nonsense-Daten zu stellen, siehe Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Roland von Bagratuni und Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Jelger de goochelaar, wenn Du mal nichts anderes vorhast. Die Diskussion über die Deletion policy habe ich um eine Beispielgalerie ergänzt, siehe natürlich Commons_talk:Deletion_policy#Out_of_scope_files -, hoffentlich bringt das was, die Diskussion ist ja nicht gerade lebhaft (was auch ein Vorteil sein kann). Nochmal : schöne Feiertage und guten Rutsch! Cholo Aleman (talk) 11:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Dear Túrelio,

Merry Christmas and Happy Newyear to you!

As you know I have uploaded more than 1,000 pictures on Commons. I realise that not all -mainly the first I uploaded- are of premium quality. However I have always tried to identify and classify them correctly, so that they are of scientific interest for other people.

Thank you for your nice collaboration.

BR, --Réginald (To reply) 11:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Image

Túrelio! This is a good file, but this is bad, as his qualitiy flea. Doncsecz (talk) 09:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Doncsecz, thanks for the feedback. But, as suggested in the rfd, could you repeat the retouching process on the full-resolution version? --Túrelio (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done, finally. --Túrelio (talk) 14:21, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Túrelio/Archive4&oldid=91551829"