User talk:Krd/archive/2023
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sock puppetry: Oytrfu et. al.
Could you comment on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 91#Sock puppetry? Elizium23 (talk) 13:04, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- I think I shouldn't comment on an archived discussion. If you like to request CU, please post at Commons:Requests for checkuser, so that we have the required links and reasoning documented properly. --Krd 15:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Neutral maps
Something is not right with these. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neutral_countries.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neutral_countries_map.svg They don't match up with this page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_country HelpfulHens (talk) 17:49, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello HelpfulHens. That may be, but as long as they are in use, there is no reason to delete them. Better option is to get mistakes fixed, is there are any. --Krd 02:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Neutral re colour
Andorra, Austria, Costa Rica, Ireland, Japan, Liechtenstein, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Moldova, Panama, Rwanda, San Marino, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vatican City all need to be green. Afghanistan, Albania, Argentina, Belgium, Bhutan, Cambodia, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, Greenland, Hawaii, Hungary, Iceland, Iran, Italy, Laos, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, China, Tonga, Turkey, Ukraine, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Slovenia, Croatia, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Kosovo all need to be that colour of pink/purple. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neutral_countries.svg HelpfulHens (talk) 14:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Another neutral re colouring
Andorra, Austria, Costa Rica, Ireland, Japan, Liechtenstein, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Moldova, Panama, Rwanda, San Marino, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vatican City all need to be green. Afghanistan, Albania, Argentina, Belgium, Bhutan, Cambodia, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, Greenland, Hawaii, Hungary, Iceland, Iran, Italy, Laos, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, China, Tonga, Turkey, Ukraine, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Slovenia, Croatia, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Kosovo all need to be that colour of blue. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neutral_countries_map.svg HelpfulHens (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that the same problem was already solved on 20th August 2022. So I don't know if you missed it or if the problem was not solved and the template was deleted for no reason. Thank you for your reply and have a nice day. Tschechische Länder (talk) 13:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- I think this wasn't resolved. The logo is unlikely own work of the uploader. --Krd 07:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Löschen Foto von Urs Tillmanns
Hallo
Wer sind Sie? Inwiefern sind Sie berechtigt, den Löschantrag rückgängig zu machen?
Freundliche Grüsse
Monica Boirar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monica Boirar (talk • contribs) 17:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Guten Tag Monica Boirar. Als Administrator dieses Projekt steht mir die Entscheidung zu, dass dieses Bild bei laufenden Löschdiskussion nicht aus den genannten Grund schnellgelöscht wird, sondern die Löschdiskussion abgewartet wird. Ich bitte darum, das nicht erneut rückgängig zu machen. --Krd 18:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Wonder if you might reconsider this deletion? You deleted it as lacking permission, but there was an open deletion request on the image and a pretty good case that it is in the public domain in Peru. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 18:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Frage aufgrund eines gelöschten Bildes
Ist eine Montage von zwei in Commons gespeicherten Bildern zu einem einzigen Bild nicht mehr erlaubt? Virum Mundi (talk) 16:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Ich bin zwar nicht Krd und weiss auch nicht, um welche Bilder es geht, aber da ich gerade zufällig hier "vorbeikomme", mische ich mich mal ein: Doch, das ist natürlich erlaubt (Commons akzeptiert nur Lizenzen, die auch Bearbeitungen inkl. Montagen erlauben), aber das abgeleitete Werk muss unter die Lizenzen der verwendeten Werke gestellt werden (es sei denn, es handelt sich um Bilder, die gemeinfrei / public domain sind) und je nach Lizenz müssen deren Urheber genannt werden (was z.B. bei CC-BY-SA der Fall ist). Ich kenne die Gründe für die Löschung des von dir hier nicht konkret genannten Bildes nicht, aber wahrscheinlich kam es da zu Unstimmigkeiten. Gestumblindi (talk) 16:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:PINK PANTHERZ Expresso (Fresno Ca.) bikini barista with face mask.jpg
Bikini baristas are clearly in scope, and this uploader has uploaded a variety of images of bikini baristas, which are presumably all in scope. This image, showing a bikini barista from a different venue to most of the other images, is presumably even more valuable. Why is it out of scope? Brianjd (talk) 07:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have restored the file. --Krd 08:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Apparent blatant hoax
Dear Krd, with respect to File:ИПС.jpg, Emblem with two-headed eagle, planted there illegaly, belongs to the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Serbia, not to the Institute of political science (or Belgrade University), nor to the Ministry of education or the Ministry of science of Serbia. Therefore its hoax.Recommended action: speedy deletion. Regards. 198.203.28.215 10:24, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
You deleted this file as ‘no permission’. The same uploader is now the subject of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Highschooler mooning.jpg, which claims that a ‘highschooler’ is likely to be underage and therefore the file is likely to be child pornography. Do you have any thoughts on this? Should either file (or both files) be reported to the WMF legal team? Brianjd (talk) 10:38, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see anything that make that likely. "Teen" is from 10 to 19, so it's possible that the subject is not underage even with this description. The description can also be wrong. But, it's of course possible that the subject is underage, and if you feel that it should be reported, than I think you should report it. --Krd 10:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted media File:Antenna Theory Propagation.webm
You deleted File:Antenna Theory Propagation.webm but to my best knowledge it was in public domain. Would you like to discuss ~Shubjt (talk) 09:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Why do you think this is in public domain? --Krd 05:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- The caption says it's a Royal Canadian Air Force training film and was published in 1959. So I think it's in public domain as per Template:PD-Canada (Crown Copyright). ~Shubjt (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have restored the file. --Krd 05:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- The caption says it's a Royal Canadian Air Force training film and was published in 1959. So I think it's in public domain as per Template:PD-Canada (Crown Copyright). ~Shubjt (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
request
File:Md Joni Hossain And Nayon Sorkar.jpg I have permission to use it. I took permission before taking the picture Md Joni Hossain (talk) 10:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:VRT --Krd 11:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Permission received for deleted file
Hi! I see you deleted the file because there was no ticket permission. I sent a permission email and it was received and updated here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Undelete&target=File%3AIgbo+community+MC+online+conversation.png×tamp=20221218074135&diff=prev is the permission ticket different from the permission I sent via email? Olugold (talk) 05:29, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- In the e-mail conversation there was no permission achieved, per the raised issues. Please follow up with the e-mail again. --Krd 05:33, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I have added template:FoP-China to this file, an FoP license. --Leiem (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- I have restored the file. --Krd 08:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Leiem (talk) 12:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Could I have the reason for the removal of this file? 2A02:A03F:E49A:F900:7C2D:9429:7667:84C 21:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- No permission was provided for showing the depicted symbol. --Krd 08:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Krd, both files were under {{subst:PP}} and it haven't been 30 days yet. Why were they erased? The license permissions have already been mailed by the authors. Could you restore them back? Thanks you. Lmalena (talk) 20:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- The files will be restored as soon as the permission is confirmed. --Krd 10:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Please delete cropped picture too
Hi, since you deleted a picture (File:Saiyesha with sumit dad.png), after an arguable non-permission-template got inserted, you should at least delete the cropped file (File:Saiyesha with sumit dad (cropped) - Sumeet Saigal.png), which was properly linked in the deleted source, too. Thanks in advance. --Mirer (talk) 15:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Why this one was at least debatable, see: User talk:Sebastian Wallroth/Archives/2023/January. Unfortunately the user who tagged the file (not Sebastian) didn't react to the ping. --Mirer (talk) 15:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi. I have restored the image and converted to DR. --Krd 15:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
The Game Awards files
Hi, could you please restore the following files? The ticket permission has been approved (ticket:2023011410002122) but the 'permission pending' template shouldn't have been copied across when the files were cropped (my bad!).
- File:Al Pacino presenting Best Performance, The Game Awards 2022 (cropped).png
- File:Cameron Monaghan, The Game Awards 2022 (cropped).png
- File:Death Stranding 2 announcement at The Game Awards 2022 (cropped).png
- File:Geoff Keighley presenting at The Game Awards 2022 3 (cropped).png
- File:The Game Awards 2022 audience (cropped).png
- File:Josef Fares presenting Game of the Year, The Game Awards 2022 (cropped).png
Thanks! – Rhain ☔ 06:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 06:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete Revision Request
These revisions are really offensive, please delete it:
--121.202.148.136 22:39, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see anything offensive, please elaborate. --Krd 08:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi! Are you working on this ticket? I tried to help by adding a note. Not sure if that made ticket disappear from your list. --MGA73 (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Please feel free to take the ticket if you like. --Krd 18:28, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Krd, You deleted the above photograph, which had a pending copyright permission ticket in the queue. Why did you do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian Christian (talk • contribs) 17:30, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
- Because the permission has not been achieved in a reasonable time. --Krd 06:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Please delete this reupload
Hi, I noticed that you deleted this file twice: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Photo_of_Jimmy.png. The uploader has reuploaded the same exact file at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2photo.png. Is there any way you could delete this one as well? This same person keeps spamming the same copyvio image and it's really annoying that we keep having to wait 7 days to delete it. Thanks! BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 04:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 05:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Porzsolt Kálmán
Dear Krd! Please delete the Category:Porzsolt Kálmán, because according to the custom here, I moved the content to Category:Kálmán Porzsolt.Thank you very much! Bizottmány (talk) 17:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Krd! You were very quick again. Thank you very much!--Bizottmány (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Images Permission
Hello Krd I have taken permission for uploaded photos. luv sinha photo uploaded by me by mistake hai please delete it Bermuda9999 (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide a link to the file. --Krd 16:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Kmarksanight.jpg : permission given to VRT…and still DELETED LOL
I was asked on December 11 to provide the license or permission to this file. On December 13 I sent the permission(with translation) to VRT via email and responded User:Mitte27 on my talkpage. Now I find out that the file was then deleted on Dec 19???
(My talkpage link:)
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AlbertHog?markasread=58341532&markasreadwiki=commonswiki#File_tagging_File%3AKmarksanight.jpg.
AlbertHog (talk) 18:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- What exactly is your question or request? --Krd 18:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- I would like it to be undeleted, if possible. AlbertHog (talk) 14:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Did you get a reply from the VRT? Krd 15:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- I would like it to be undeleted, if possible. AlbertHog (talk) 14:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oh my, it appears that I did get the reply (I don't check my mailbox regularly, you guys should have notified me). The reply really bummed me out though. I just don’t get it: I've got the permission in written form from the copyright holder – as I know, this is pretty much enough to solve the legal issues. Or, in other way, has EVERY single picture uploaded on Wiki been confirmed via email by all those photographers and graphic artists? Sounds like nonsense, this is funny though. Anyway, here's this guy's official website: https://sergeygorinov5.wixsite.com/photo (non-English, sorry) – his email you can find there and it matches the one I've got the permission from screened. What is wrong in this case? AlbertHog (talk) 00:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please follow up in the ticket e-mail. --Krd 05:46, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oh my, it appears that I did get the reply (I don't check my mailbox regularly, you guys should have notified me). The reply really bummed me out though. I just don’t get it: I've got the permission in written form from the copyright holder – as I know, this is pretty much enough to solve the legal issues. Or, in other way, has EVERY single picture uploaded on Wiki been confirmed via email by all those photographers and graphic artists? Sounds like nonsense, this is funny though. Anyway, here's this guy's official website: https://sergeygorinov5.wixsite.com/photo (non-English, sorry) – his email you can find there and it matches the one I've got the permission from screened. What is wrong in this case? AlbertHog (talk) 00:30, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Why should I? Isn’t it what this thread is used for? I've wasted my time to get the permission…I've emailed the permission (there is a file added lol…), it gave me nothing. Sometimes the degree of stupidity in this community leaves no chance for me to forward someone here, no way. If WP was what it is supposed to be by most people, maybe I would…but certainly not in this case, or some other really insanely awkward cases. Have a good time reading through all those emails, dear Mr.…whatever you say you are, to me you're just a big jerk, and that's it. AlbertHog (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- So on:
So, in case you’re a bit too shy to communicate, I'ma quote the December response on my mail:
We are unable to accept forwarded permission statements or proxy statements for legal reasons. Please ask the copyright holder to email us directly, if possible using the interactive release generator available at:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator
Yours sincerely, Sasha Szagartz
Well, the thing is: I didn’t forward it, or proxy it, or smth…I just took a screenshot of the email response from the author, and mailed it to "the team". What goes next, looks more like a joke…You, WP guys that some have real big egos, and some have sick love to making problems(!), are asking me to write this guy (!)once again and ask him to ask you(?!) for the permission for me to post HIS WORK on a free resource… Why even bother, right? I'm sorry, but the fact is that it's far from resolved, guys. AlbertHog (talk) 21:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Martin Gruber (ÖVP)
Hello,
this picture has a free-to-use license, read or translate the description from the State of Carinthia below. Everyone can use these pictures.
ktn.gv.at (Carinthia state government)
Free for download and free to use license:
https://www.ktn.gv.at/Service/Fotoservice-Nutzungsbedingungen Fotoservice und Nutzungsbedingungen Land Kärnten Punkt 1: Das Fotoservice des Landes Kärnten (Landespressedienst) enthält Fotos, an denen die Rechte dem Land Kärnten zustehen. Ausgenommen hiervon sind Fotos, bei denen ein Hinweis angebracht ist, dass die Rechte bei Dritten liegen. Die Fotos, an denen die Rechte dem Land Kärnten zustehen, dürfen unter Beachtung der Nutzungsbedingungen kostenfrei heruntergeladen werden. Eine Registrierung des Nutzers ist nicht erforderlich. Mit dem Download akzeptiert der Nutzer die Nutzungsbedingungen dieser Fotos. Das im Fotoservice enthaltene Bildmaterial ist nach dem Urheberrechtsgesetz geschützt. Punkt 2: Wird Bildmaterial herunter geladen, an dem die Rechte nicht dem Land Kärnten zustehen, so ist vor dem Download mit dem jeweiligen Fotografen Kontakt aufzunehmen und mit ihm eine Vereinbarung über die Nutzung des Bildmaterials zu treffen. Punkt 3: Soweit nicht ohnehin das Recht auf freie Werknutzung, insbesondere gemäß § 42 UrhG besteht, erteilt das Land Kärnten die nicht übertragbare, nicht ausschließliche, zeitlich und räumlich unbeschränkte Bewilligung des Fotoservice-Bildmaterials, an welchem dem Land Kärnten die Rechte zustehen, kostenfreizeitlich und räumlich unbeschränktenicht ausschließliche,nicht übertragbare, zu nicht kommerziellen Zwecken, zu redaktionellen Zwecken von Medien und zu Zwecken im Bereich der politischen Bildung zu vervielfältigen, zu verbreiten, zu senden, öffentlich vorzuführen oder im Internet zur Verfügung zu stellen. Eine darüber hinausgehende Nutzung, insbesondere für Werbezwecke, ist nicht zulässig. Punkt 4: Bei Veröffentlichung des Fotomaterials muss das abgebildete Sujet der Bildquelle und dem jeweiligen Fotografen zugeordnet werden können. Das gilt auch für Sammelbilder. Das Fotoservice des Landes Kärnten/Landespressedienst ist als Bildquelle und (mittels Schrägstrich nachgesetzt) der Name der Fotografin bzw. des Fotografen zu nennen. Beispiel: LPD/Max Mustermann. Punkt 5: Bei Nutzung des Bildmaterials des Fotoservice ist eine Bearbeitung ohne vorherige schriftliche Genehmigung durch das Land Kärnten (LPD) nicht gestattet. Davon ausgenommen sind Größenveränderungen, geringfügige Farbkorrekturen und geringfügige Ausschnittveränderungen. Heruntergeladene Bilder dürfen auch nicht in einem sinnentstellenden Zusammenhang benutzt werden. Es sind die Bestimmungen des Urheberrechtes, insbesondere die des Bildnisschutzes (§78 UrhG) einzuhalten. Jedenfalls unzulässig ist die Verwendung des Bildmaterials, die zu einer Herabwürdigung abgebildeter Personen oder des Ansehens des Landes Kärnten führen. Punkt 6: Von jedem Druckwerk, das unter Verwendung von Bildmaterial des Fotoservice hergestellt wurde, ist dem Land Kärnten kostenlos ein vollständiges Belegexemplar zu übermitteln (Landespressedienst Kärnten, Arnulfplatz 1, 9020 Klagenfurt). Bei Nutzung der Bilder in Online-Medien, ist dem Land ein Hinweis auf die entsprechende Seite mit Angabe der URL zu übermitteln – abt1.lpd@ktn.gv.at . Punkt 7: Ein Verstoß gegen die Nutzungsbedingungen bewirkt das sofortige Erlöschen der erteilten Werknutzungsbewilligung. Nach unberechtigter Nutzung eines Fotos ist auch ein neuerlicher Erwerb einer Nutzungsbewilligung für dieses Foto ausgeschlossen. Punkt 8: Die Haftung und Gewährleistung des Landes Kärnten beschränkt sich auf das Bestehen der erteilten Werknutzungsbewilligung und vorsätzlichem oder grob fahrlässigem Verschulden. Eine darüber hinausgehende Haftung und Gewährleistung ist ausgeschlossen. Die Rechtsfolgen einer aus der Nutzung des Bildmaterials entstehenden Urheberrechtsverletzung richten sich nach dem geltenden Urheberrechtsgesetz. Das Land Kärnten haftet nicht für Schäden, die dem Nutzer aus dem Erlöschen der Werknutzungsbewilligung entstehen. Punkt 9: Gerichtsstand für allfällige Streitigkeiten aus der Nutzung des Fotoservice ist ausschließlich Klagenfurt. Die Nutzung unterliegt österreichischem Recht. Bei Fragen im Zusammenhang mit der Nutzung des Fotoservice - wenden Sie sich bitte an den Landespressedienst abt1.lpd@ktn.gv.at . Glasperlenspieler (talk) 14:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly "zu nicht kommerziellen Zwecken" is not sufficient for Commons. --Krd 14:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- What ? It clearly says that the picture can be used for media purposes. Glasperlenspieler (talk) 17:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, um für die Zukunft gewappnet zu sein habe ich eine Frage, die bisher nicht zu 100% geklärt ist. Es geht um die Persönlichkeitsrechte. Du hattest oben erwähnte Datei gelöscht, mit der Begründung : No ticket permission achieved for more than 30 days. Diese Bild wurde dann abermals hochgeladen und offensichtlich braucht man dort jetzt kein Ticket permission mehr, da es von Michael Grüber selbst hochgeladen wurde. Nun meine eigentliche Frage : welches Formular muss ich für Permissions von einem Künstler oder einer Person (oder deren Nachkommen) ausfüllen und unterschreiben lassen wenn ich ihr/sein Foto, welches ich persönlich gemacht habe, auf Wikipedia veröffentlichen will ? Es gibt so viele veröffentliche Fotos von Personen, die kein Ticket Permission aufweisen. Hier habe ich mich mit einem wohl nicht ganz korrekt ausgedrücktem Formular, was den Urheber angeht (bin ja ich), versucht: File:Traute Gruner im Juli 2022.jpg Kannst Du bezüglich eines korrekten Formulars helfen ? Grüße Olga Ernst (talk) 12:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Siehe bitte: Commons:Volunteer Response Team/de. Es wird kein Formular benötigt, das Support-Team braucht nur alle nötigen Angaben in zutreffend und in einer verständlichen Form. --Krd 12:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank Krd, so langsam fange ich an das Ganze zu verstehen ;-) Es ist ein komplexes Thema und gibt noch viel nachzulesen. Grüße Olga Ernst (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
I have to ask: What were you thinking?!? The was no consensus for "keep" here:
Useddenim | ![]() |
Xover | ![]() |
Plutowiki | mixed |
IronGargoyle | ![]() |
Cmuelle8 | ![]() |
Ellywa | comment |
As for the four icons that were listed as "in use":
![]() mABZgte2 ) |
now replaced with correct icon |
![]() thSTRa ) |
only used on list/catalog pages |
![]() uthKRZW ) |
incorrect use replaced; now only used on list/catalog pages |
![]() uexthKRZW ) |
replaced with correct icon |
I therefore suggest that you reverse your closure, especially given that it is in a particularly niche area that you do not appear to have any experience with. Useddenim (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- There was also no censensus for delete. The deletion request was open since 21 September and closed by me as the current oldest one at 11 February. I refuse your request as unreasonable. --Krd 04:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but you're the one who's unreasonable. The inclination to "keep" (aside from the original uploader) was based on the four (out of a total of 17) that were "in use". Now that that has been addressed, there is no reason to keeping of them. And closing a DR simply because it's "old" and you want to make things look tidy is an abuse of admin privileges. Useddenim (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- We could talk about this if you decided to abstain from personal attacks. On the current level I'm definitely out. --Krd 04:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Be careful about accusing people of personal attacks: you said I was unreasonable when I was simply pointing out that your decision appeared to be made on outdated assumptions. Useddenim (talk) 23:03, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- We could talk about this if you decided to abstain from personal attacks. On the current level I'm definitely out. --Krd 04:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but you're the one who's unreasonable. The inclination to "keep" (aside from the original uploader) was based on the four (out of a total of 17) that were "in use". Now that that has been addressed, there is no reason to keeping of them. And closing a DR simply because it's "old" and you want to make things look tidy is an abuse of admin privileges. Useddenim (talk) 04:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Bariloche Coat of Arms
Hello Krd, I saw that you deleted File:Bariloche Coats of Arms.svg, may I ask why? The log says "No permission since 13 January 2023" but I can't find any information to back that claim. Best wishes. Gspahr (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Gspahr. There was a claim that this coat of arms was "created in 1978, not pd-old-70, needs a permission". --Krd 04:47, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Krd, thanks for your kind reply. I will contest and reclaim the coat of arms to be restored then. As per Argentine law (National law 22.382, article 3, section f) State symbols (including municipal ones) cannot be registered under copyright law, therefore are free domain. Gspahr (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Krd 07:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Krd, thanks for your kind reply. I will contest and reclaim the coat of arms to be restored then. As per Argentine law (National law 22.382, article 3, section f) State symbols (including municipal ones) cannot be registered under copyright law, therefore are free domain. Gspahr (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Wamiqa Gabbi.jpg
Hi Krd I uploaded wamiqa gabbi 2 .jpg photo by mistake. Please delete it Thanks Bermuda9999 (talk) 01:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:SPEEDY --Krd 07:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Permission for photo John K Byrne
Hi there,
The photographer who took my picture, Ricardo Salazar, sent an email regarding permissions for the photograph: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_K._Byrne.jpg. Originally it was used on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_K._Byrne
I noticed that still doesn't resolve the issue. Should he send a photo of his ID or something, or what can we do to keep the photo from being deleted. Can you assist?
Thanks! JByrne404 (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello JByrne404. The permission sender please should answer our followup question. --Krd 04:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Permission für Foto von Cornerstone
Hello Krd, der Fotograf des Bildes File:Cornerstone Live 2013.jpg, Horst Armbrust, hat an und für sich schon eine Mail zwecks Genehmigung zur Verwendung gesendet. Ursprünglich hat er eine Freigabe "zur Verwendung auf Wikipedia" geschickt, aber nach ein paar Diskussionen hat er dann ein weiteres Mail unter Verwendung der Template für die Permission verwendet, Lizenz sollte CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 sein. Kannst Du das bitte checken - auf der Fileseite steht immer noch "Awaiting process", ich möchte das aber zuerst geklärt wissen, bevor ich das Foto für einen Artikel verwende. Besten Dank im Voraus! Ddy1984 (talk) 14:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Der Einsender der Freigabe hat erneut eine Rückfrage erhalten, die er bitte beantworten müsste. Krd 16:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Upload Images
Hi krd I see that you have deleted the photos uploaded by Bermudaa9999, how can I upload them? thanks Pater181 Peter181 (talk) 09:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:VRT --Krd 09:11, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Theshipragoyal.jpg
I have uploaded File:Theshipragoyal.jpg photo some time ago, is it correct. Peter181 (talk) 10:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- No, please don't upload photos when you don't have permission from the photographer. --Krd 12:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- how need permission. Peter181 (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry? --Krd 13:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- Theshipragoyal.jpg Permission Ticket Number: ticket:2023022010008229 Peter181 (talk) 12:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry? --Krd 13:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- how need permission. Peter181 (talk) 13:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded this file a few weeks ago and got a notification about it's vague copyright stance. I did update the page but why was it removed? Throwaway865432 (talk) 09:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- It was removed because it was not noticed that you updated that page. To get ist restored, please advise why pd-textlogo does apply. Is the depicted text a simple text without artistic components? --Krd 10:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. The depicted text is considered a calligraphy. Throwaway865432 (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- If it is calligraphy, then I think it is artwork per definition, isn't it? --Krd 20:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- Of course. Throwaway865432 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- So we need permission from the creator. --Krd 05:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's a recreation made by me. Besides why do you need permission? As if Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is going to submit a takedown, because it's their flag. Throwaway865432 (talk) 16:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:L --Krd 16:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then why is it fine with my other uploads??? Throwaway865432 (talk) 18:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think nobody said that it is fine. What is your intention? Krd 18:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- So others can use it everywhere and whenever they want. Throwaway865432 (talk) 08:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't understand the question, and I doubt that it is relevant for the problem discussed here. What is your intention? --Krd 09:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- What question? I already answered your question. Throwaway865432 (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- You know what? I don't care anymore. You can delete everything I've got. I'm sick and tired of you people deleting or replacing my stuff. "Yeah let's delete this guy's post because it depicts a recreation of an irrelevant group's logo, delete the file even though he fixed it and never respond back to him in the talk page.". What kind of retard would think it wouldn't be okay for me to post an image of a dissolved fucking group's logo in Iraq from 2004??? Who the fuck is going to be contacted for permission???? The group is already dead you fuckwit! And I doubt anyone remembers it and it is impossible to know who made it in the first place. All of this happens even though it's a fucking recreation. Oh yeah, let's give him a motherfucking wall of text, I'm sure he'll read it when he first signs up! What brainless fuck thought this would be okay in the first place??? I try to add files or upload an improved version and you people have to fuck with it in some way or another! But when other people do it it's fine! Yes siree, no problem! And who the fuck are you to delete my file anyway? You don't appear in any admin panels or anything. Fuck you and your piece of shit rules you annoying prick! Throwaway865432 (talk) 13:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- What question? I already answered your question. Throwaway865432 (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- I don't understand the question, and I doubt that it is relevant for the problem discussed here. What is your intention? --Krd 09:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- So others can use it everywhere and whenever they want. Throwaway865432 (talk) 08:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- I think nobody said that it is fine. What is your intention? Krd 18:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Then why is it fine with my other uploads??? Throwaway865432 (talk) 18:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:L --Krd 16:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- It's a recreation made by me. Besides why do you need permission? As if Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is going to submit a takedown, because it's their flag. Throwaway865432 (talk) 16:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- So we need permission from the creator. --Krd 05:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
- Of course. Throwaway865432 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- If it is calligraphy, then I think it is artwork per definition, isn't it? --Krd 20:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- No. The depicted text is considered a calligraphy. Throwaway865432 (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Krd is an administrator, it says so right on his user page. That's what it means to be an administrator, to enforce our rules. And also to accept the wholly unjustified vitriol from literal throwaway accounts, unfortunately. COM:L, which he pointed you to, explains the reasons for this rule - we don't just host files that we probably won't get sued for hosting, we only host free files as a matter of principle, because it's the right thing to do. They're not his personal rules, they're our rules. If you want to lobby to change them, you can try - we're a group of volunteers, after all, our rules are those we set ourselves. There's a village pump for that, for example. I don't think it'll work, but I've been wrong before, and we do have some places where we make the pragmatic choice as well as the idealistic one. But please don't call Krd names personally, he doesn't deserve it. --GRuban (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- What's done is done. Just delete everything I've done. Throwaway865432 (talk) 16:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Resolved huh? Pathetic! At least complete the job and delete everything you lazy cunt. Throwaway865432 (talk) 08:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
your assistance please...
You deleted File:Royal Oak Inn - s1465 fl0377 it0026.jpg, as "No license since 1 January 2023".
Royal Oak Inn is in my neighbourhood. I uploaded a bunch of recent images. This file name suggests I looked for some historic images.
There are some rogue bots that slap no license on flickr images that are under a public domain mark.
Could you please provide me with the information template for this image?
Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Geo Swan (talk page stalker) It looks like this was deleted in error; I undeleted it and am verifying the permission. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Wow, great! Geo Swan (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Can you approve a revision on the DE Wikipedia?
This is sort of above and beyond your Commons duties, but you're the only German editor I know, and it is sort of Commons-related. Also, it should be easy! Ana Ularu, an actress, uploaded a noticeably better image of herself to Commons, and told me, because I had been the editor who had uploaded a worse image of her that had been used on our articles about her for a couple of years now. We got it approved via VRT, and as a sign of gratitude to her for doing it, I changed the version on most Wikis. On DE though, it seems the article is revision protected or something, and as I'm not much of a DE editor, my edit, updating the worse image to the better one, is review pending. German seems particularly improtant to her - even though she's Romanian, her husband is German, and she gets a noticeable amount of German work. Can you approve the latest revision to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Ularu that updates the image there? Danke Schoen! --GRuban (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Done Wow, that was fast; thank you User:Mirer! --GRuban (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Jubbar Ali.jpg
Hi Krd. Would you mind checking to see whether File:Jubbar Ali.jpg is the same file you deleted on January 19, 2023, or a different file with the same name. The latest upload is sourced to Facebook, but there's no indication the file has been release under a license Commons accepts. In addition, the uploader of each file is different and I don't know whether that means the same uploader using two accounts or two different uploaders uploading a file with the same name. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:18, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- It is the same photo. --Krd 13:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying this and also for tagging the file with {{Npd}}. What about the other uploads of Im Safiqul Islam. They also seem to be sourced to various social media accounts and none of them have verifiable licenses. I've already tagged File:Road Work.jpg since it appear at best to be a case of {{PD-scan}} if the original work is PD, but it's EXIF data looks like it comes from Facebook. File:Bhaktardoba Model Hospital.jpg appears to have a watermark, but its EXIF data also looks like it also comes from Facebook. The others are either directly sourced to Facebook or some other social media account. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- If able please nominate them if there is a reason. I'm unable to check this in detail at the moment. --Krd 17:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying this and also for tagging the file with {{Npd}}. What about the other uploads of Im Safiqul Islam. They also seem to be sourced to various social media accounts and none of them have verifiable licenses. I've already tagged File:Road Work.jpg since it appear at best to be a case of {{PD-scan}} if the original work is PD, but it's EXIF data looks like it comes from Facebook. File:Bhaktardoba Model Hospital.jpg appears to have a watermark, but its EXIF data also looks like it also comes from Facebook. The others are either directly sourced to Facebook or some other social media account. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I only now saw that the anonym has put my photo to delete. I made this collage out of my photo I live there, all the photos are a respectable category. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 22:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Please comment in the current deletion request, --Krd 17:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd made a comment. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 18:18, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- And this one File:Kalininaul.png. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also restored now. --Krd 06:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! These are my old photos. Basically used Nokia 33, poor quality! Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also restored now. --Krd 06:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- And this one File:Kalininaul.png. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd made a comment. Takhirgeran Umar (talk) 18:18, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
A technical question
Hi Krd, I have one small technical question. I'm using Serbo-Croatian language on Commons and until few days, when I was clicking on "edit" the title was giving this:
- Uređujete stranicu [file name]
- Translated: Editing [file name]
But some 3-4 days ago, it was changed to this version:
- [file name] – uređivanje
- Translated: [file name] - editing
Now editing is far more complicated when multiple tabs are opened. So I'm wondering who changed it, where and why? And can it be restored to the previous version? It has something to do with interface, and I'm not expert for it. Sorry for asking you directly instead of using technical village pump, take your time to answer. Thanks in advance. --Orijentolog (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. I sadly not competent in this matter and cannot help. Sorry. Krd 06:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
二ノ瀬仁奈
Hellow! Please let me know your progress on the next two images.
二ノ瀬仁奈.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E4%BA%8C%E3%83%8E%E7%80%AC%E4%BB%81%E5%A5%88.jpg
二ノ瀬仁奈20230218.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E4%BA%8C%E3%83%8E%E7%80%AC%E4%BB%81%E5%A5%8820230218.jpg
‐ 我羅夢 (talk) 04:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't speak the language the permission is written in. Krd 05:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- I understand I posted on the bulletin board. 我羅夢 (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:23, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Author of photo Aleksey Nesterov (photo@alexeynesterov.com) sent permission to VRTS for publication and use. What's the problem with this photo? Floridorus (talk) 10:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. I don't understand the question. --Krd 11:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Tag added: "This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status." - Please check the letter from the author Alexey Nesterov (photo@alexeynesterov.com) Floridorus (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- It will be checked at it's turn, we generally don't jump the queue. --Krd 12:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- You have deleted this photo. Can you explain the reason for removing the photo? What needs to be done to restore the photo? Floridorus (talk) 05:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- The reason is that there is no verified permission. Verification of the sent permission will take place as soon as possible, but not earlier than possible. Please be patient. The sender will get a reply in any case. Krd 05:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- You have deleted this photo. Can you explain the reason for removing the photo? What needs to be done to restore the photo? Floridorus (talk) 05:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- It will be checked at it's turn, we generally don't jump the queue. --Krd 12:44, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Tag added: "This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status." - Please check the letter from the author Alexey Nesterov (photo@alexeynesterov.com) Floridorus (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Deletion
Hi Krd. You have closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Human Flaccid Penis.jpg as deleted but the image is still right there. A1Cafel (talk) 10:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. It is a case of phab:T244567. --Krd 03:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Wappen der italienischen Gemeinden
Hallo Krd, ich bin Admin bei Wikipedia Ligure (genuesische Sprache) und hab in den letzten Tagen (etwa gestern) festgestellt, wie viele Wappen von italienischen Gemeinden entfernt wurden. Ich habe schon einmal eine Erklärung auf meine Frage bekommen, trotzdem macht mich immer stutzig die Tatsache, dass die letzten drei Bürgermeister meines Dorfes nie befragt wurden, ob jemand das Wappen unserer Gemeinde fotografieren und hochladen durfte. Dieses Wappen erscheint auf Wikipedia Italia, wohl aber nicht auf Wikipedia Ligure (das habe ich dort nie eingesetzt). Meine Frage lautet: was sollte ich mit dem jetzigen Bürgermeister vereinbaren, damit ich legal das Wappen auf Wiki Ligure hochladen dürfte? Herzlichst, Luensu1959 (talk) 10:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Luensu1959. Bitte gib einen Link auf die Seite an, auf der das Wappen verwendet werden soll. --Krd 10:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Krd, das ist aber keine Antwort auf meine Frage: Was soll ich mit dem jetzigen Bürgermeister vereinbaren, damit ich legal das Wappen unseres Dorfes auf Wiki Ligure hochladen darf? Viele Grüße, --Luensu1959 (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Diese Frage kann nicht sinnvoll beantwortet werden, weil der Bürgermeister wahrscheinlich nicht zuständig ist. Um das Anliegen zu klären müsste ich wissen, worum es genau geht. Darauf zielt meine Frage. Krd 15:29, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Die Bürgermeister sind in Italien Amtspersonen, die in Sicherheitsfragen dem Innenministerium (wo ich u.a. als Beamter arbeite) untergeordnet sind. Aber jetzt zur Sache: der Bürgermeister meines Dorfes möchte gerne wissen, da er für den Gebrauch des Wappens und der Fahnen zuständig ist, was er tun sollte, damit das Wappen legal auf allen Wikipedia-Seiten erscheinen kann (muss er beispielsweise eine Bescheinigung unterschreiben mit Stempel und Unterschrift, die ich auf Commons hochladen könnte?). Klarer könnte ich an dieser Stelle nicht sein. Luensu1959 (talk) 10:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Die Sachen, die Du hören möchtest, stehen in COM:VRT. Ich gebe zu bedenken, dass das evtl. so nicht funktionieren wird. Krd 10:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Die Bürgermeister sind in Italien Amtspersonen, die in Sicherheitsfragen dem Innenministerium (wo ich u.a. als Beamter arbeite) untergeordnet sind. Aber jetzt zur Sache: der Bürgermeister meines Dorfes möchte gerne wissen, da er für den Gebrauch des Wappens und der Fahnen zuständig ist, was er tun sollte, damit das Wappen legal auf allen Wikipedia-Seiten erscheinen kann (muss er beispielsweise eine Bescheinigung unterschreiben mit Stempel und Unterschrift, die ich auf Commons hochladen könnte?). Klarer könnte ich an dieser Stelle nicht sein. Luensu1959 (talk) 10:15, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Diese Frage kann nicht sinnvoll beantwortet werden, weil der Bürgermeister wahrscheinlich nicht zuständig ist. Um das Anliegen zu klären müsste ich wissen, worum es genau geht. Darauf zielt meine Frage. Krd 15:29, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Krd, das ist aber keine Antwort auf meine Frage: Was soll ich mit dem jetzigen Bürgermeister vereinbaren, damit ich legal das Wappen unseres Dorfes auf Wiki Ligure hochladen darf? Viele Grüße, --Luensu1959 (talk) 14:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Traute Gruner im Juli 2022
Hallo Krd, bei diesem File, welches Du gelöscht hast, ist wohl etwas schief gelaufen. Das Bild von der Künstlerin Traute Gruner habe ich selbst aufgenommen und hochgeladen, mit Genehmigung von der Künstlerin. Unter dem File stand eine Bemerkung von Permissions, dass eine e-mail bezüglich dieser Datei eingegangen ist, ich aber noch etwas Geduld haben müsste, da die Warteschlange noch nicht abgearbeitet ist. Also wartete ich ! Ich hatte einen nicht ganz korrekte Erlaubnis, unterschrieben von Traute Gruner als Urheber eingereicht. Natürlich bin ICH der Urheber des Fotos, wusste aber nicht wie ich noch eine Unterschrift von Traute Gruner an Permissions bekomme, dass sie mir die Erlaubnis tatsächlich gegeben hat, das Foto von ihr zu veröffentlichen. Inzwischen weiß ich, dass ich diese Unterschrift von ihr wohl gar nicht benötige. Könntest Du das bitte regeln und das Foto wieder veröffentlichen ? Oder muss ich es nochmal hochladen ? Grüße Olga Ernst (talk) 13:52, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Erledigt. --Krd 14:31, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Herzlichen Dank für die schnelle Erledigung Krd ! Grüße --Olga Ernst (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Hallo dear Krd Ich möchte darauf hinweisen, dass eine Datei, die Sie in der Vergangenheit gelöscht haben, der Lizenz entsprechen würde, die der Uploader eingegeben hat, und möchte Sie daher fragen, ob die Datei Ihrer Meinung nach wiederhergestellt werden könnte? oder ob dir vielleicht eine provisorische Wiederherstellung einfallen würde?? Ich habe die Quelle von artnet.com gesehen und muss bestätigen, dass die Informationen in der Datei mit denen der Quelle übereinstimmen?? warum also so lassen?? 212.46.38.176 15:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Bitte gib die genaue Quelle an, aus der die Datei stammen soll. --Krd 17:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ich schicke ihm den mit der Datei verbundenen Link:
Ich bin überrascht von Ihrer Antwort, denn als Administrator sollten Sie die gelöschte Datei sehen können, heheheh Ist die Quellenangabe gut? --212.46.38.176 10:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Good Morning, would you be so kind to look after this image again. It seems to be not deletet yet after this deletion request. Kind regards Lukas Beck (talk) 06:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 06:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Löschung
Hallo Krd,
Du hast
File:1_Tonne_Katzenstreu_das_Geschenk_des_Künstler_Duo_UnterbezirksDada_Cornel_Wachter_und_Elmar_Schmidt_an_Herman_Götting_und_seine_24_kleinen_Miezen_Köln_1989_Capitol-Kino.jpg gelöscht, weil es ohne Lizenz sei.
Ich habe am 13.3.2022 mit dem Cropping-Tool einen in einem Artikel genutzten Ausschnitt erstellt, wobei das Cropping-Tool imho die gelieferte Lizenz in den Ausschnitt mit kopiert, was augenscheinlich auch geschehen ist. Daher wundere ich mich, dass bei der gelöschten Datei die Lizenz gefehlt haben soll. Kannst Du da mal nachschauen? Im Zweifel müsste sonst auch der Crop gelöscht werden, was schade für den Artikel wäre in dem er genutzt wird. --Superbass (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Das Bild ist ziemlich sicher nicht eigenes Werk des Hochladers, daher habe ich den Crop jetzt auch gelöscht. Danke für den Hinweis! --Krd 03:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kann ich nicht sicher sagen, aber nach Selbstauslöser sieht es nicht aus, das stimmt schon. Ich schreibe den Uploader mal an, ob er da ggf. den eigentlichen Fotografen identifizieren kann. Wir bekommen sonst eher kein Foto von Herrmann Götting. --Superbass (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo KRD, ich habe Cornel Wachter angeschrieben und er hat mir per Mail mitgeteilt, das Foto sei per Selbstauslöser gemacht worden. Ich hatte das den Anschein nach nicht für naheliegend gehalten, aber gleichwohl ist das technisch natürlich ohne weiteres möglich. Wir können wir damit umgehen? Genügt Dir das um die beiden Bilder wieder herzustellen oder soll der Uploader noch etwas unternehmen? Superbass (talk) 20:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hast Du möglicherweise meine Antwort übersehen? Ich freue mich über einen Hinweis, danke! Superbass (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Danke fürs Nachfragen, ich hatte das nicht übersehen, aber falsch gelesen. Ich denke die Freigabe sollte im VRTS gehandhabt werden. Selbstauslöser halte ich persönlich für ausgeschlossen. Krd 04:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hast Du möglicherweise meine Antwort übersehen? Ich freue mich über einen Hinweis, danke! Superbass (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo KRD, ich habe Cornel Wachter angeschrieben und er hat mir per Mail mitgeteilt, das Foto sei per Selbstauslöser gemacht worden. Ich hatte das den Anschein nach nicht für naheliegend gehalten, aber gleichwohl ist das technisch natürlich ohne weiteres möglich. Wir können wir damit umgehen? Genügt Dir das um die beiden Bilder wieder herzustellen oder soll der Uploader noch etwas unternehmen? Superbass (talk) 20:36, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Kann ich nicht sicher sagen, aber nach Selbstauslöser sieht es nicht aus, das stimmt schon. Ich schreibe den Uploader mal an, ob er da ggf. den eigentlichen Fotografen identifizieren kann. Wir bekommen sonst eher kein Foto von Herrmann Götting. --Superbass (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
User:Jack-Gobe is another sock of User:Kikijaco
They haven’t edited since 2013 but could still be revived since the sock master is a repeat offender. Could you block and mark them as a sock? Dronebogus (talk) 08:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- I'd prefer to understand the relation first. Please advise where the information comes from. --Krd 09:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Himachal Pradesh flag
Can you please check what went wrong with this file File:Himachal Pradesh Flag, India.png. A number of articles use this image. Shylame (talk) 23:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- There is a deletion discussion that points out the relevant arguments. Please elaborate why this image is free to use. --Krd 04:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Okispatz
Was muß getan werden, damit in der Wikipedia dauerhaft auf die Datei zugegriffen werden kann?
G. Bach G. Bach (talk) 08:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Um welche Datei geht es? Krd 08:11, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Um diese: File:Okispatz.jpg --G. Bach (talk) 08:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Siehe: COM:LIC, COM:VRT: Wir brauchen die Freigabe durch den Urheber oder Rechteinhaber. --Krd 09:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Copyright Algeria
Hello Krd,
I have noticed that you deleted some of my uploaded works that are concerning Algeria, I just want to make a quick clarification.
It's clearly mentioned that the state works made available to public are not protected and free from copyright Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Algeria according to (Art. 9, 2003) and you can check the french version here.
Art. 9. — Les œuvres de l’Etat rendues licitement accessibles au public peuvent être librement utilisées à des fins non lucratives, sous réserve du respect de l’intégrité de l’œuvre et de l’indication de la source.
And here is it translation here :
Art. 9. — Works of the State lawfully rendered publicly available may be freely used for non-profit purposes, subject to respect for the integrity of the work and the indication of the source.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Riad Salih (talk) 13:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Non-profit use is not sufficient for Wikimedia Commons, see: COM:LIC Krd 18:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Restored plan of Roman Bath at Isthmia
Could you please explain reason for the deletion of the image File:RB_restored_plan.jpg
I see the statement "No permission." As director of the excavation that is in control of this image, I have ultimate authority over the release of images related to the archaeological project. I do not know what other permission is needed. Freyjona (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please send permission by e-mail, see COM:VRT. --Krd 18:25, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Portraits
hi dear Krd.
I would like to ask you to restore the following portraits by an unknown artist:
File:Portrait du Guido Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Jean-François Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Louis III Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Frédéric Ier Gonzague.png File:Portrait du François II Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Duc François III Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Duc Guillaume Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Duc François IV Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Duc Ferdinand Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Charles Gonzague-Nevers.png File:Portrait du Duc Charles II Gonzague.png File:Portrait du Duc Ferdinand Charles Gonzague.png
appear to have been scanned from the title of a book called ("i Gonzaga. i Volti della Storia", di Giancarlo Malacarne, 2015) could it restore the following files?? since I also recently discovered a PDF weblink that also has additional information in portrait references, if you could restore them I could post that link :)--Altremus12 (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
VRT
Hello, I emailed VRT. Should I upload the images, or wait for the response? Kadı Message 14:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- Upload the images. --Krd 14:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
@Detlef Dauer: This image is under discussion for "Did you know..." on the EN Wikipedia at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Lithophane - I was asked to weigh in, which I did at the bottom there. As I wrote there, a few years ago you closed a very large deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Detlef Dauer with the comment Kept: per OTRS permission., and I'm guessing that permission either explicitly applies to this image, or is merely very likely to also apply. I'm not on the OTRS/VRT team so can't read the permission https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2019070810004344 explicitly, but could you check, and if it does apply, could you say so so we could put that tag on this image as well? Also as I later noted on the DYK discussion, note that the oblivion-art source page for this image explicitly says "• 2019, August – veröffentlicht in commons wikimedia", so it is pretty clear they mean this image too! --GRuban (talk) 14:44, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- I think this image is covered by the ticket. --Krd 15:19, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:38, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleting an image File:Poster omens.png for a reason "No ticket permission since 15 February 2023"
Hello, can you please help me to return the image which you deleted.
I have a problem that this image belongs to a person (Aleksey "BOLT" Dmitriev) with whom I am in constant contact. He sent a letter to agents VRT to obtain a Creative Commons Attribution 4 license, but his application was rejected, since the original source of the image is a video from YouTube video hosting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEDcbxYGf7M&t=4s, and not a source from the gamejolt website https://gamejolt.com/p/recall-that-our-game-has-a-discord-server-if-you-find-any-bug-or-h-hfppp9b5. But at the same time, both the gamejolt page https://gamejolt.com/games/SonicOmens/469351 and the YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@BOLTanim belong to the same person - him. Can you please help in this situation? JustWikiGuy (talk) 00:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket is still open, please be patient. --Krd 06:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- No problem! I can wait as long as it takes. Can you please explain what you mean in "ticket"? JustWikiGuy (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket is the thing that tracks the processing of the permission. --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- No problem! I can wait as long as it takes. Can you please explain what you mean in "ticket"? JustWikiGuy (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
File:Orlowski-Balogh Edit.png and 2 others deleted
Hello, what was wrong with the permission, because it was sent on February 19th. It's true, the sender left my message in it, in which I wrote what text must be sent. Wikizoli (talk) 07:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- The permission is still pending and will be processed as soon as possible. --Krd 07:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi! This file was deleted for the following reason: No license since 14 March 2023.
Meanwhile I have marked that this file have no copyright according to Belarusian law. This screenshot was taken from magazine "Uzvyšša" and it must be threaten the same as
Plaga med (talk) 11:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- I have restored the file, please complete the license information. (It's currently said that you are the author, and that the author died more than 70 years ago.) --Krd 11:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you! I hope now it's fixed. Plaga med (talk) 13:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, since you deleted File:Aam Aadmi Party symbol.svg about 3 days ago, the (3) svg is an extract [1] which you've tagged for permission in the past. I think you can go ahead and delete it as well? -- DaxServer (talk) 21:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 04:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you closed the DR at Commons:Deletion requests/File:South stand after tear gas fired in to the crowd - Narasi TV.jpg. Would you mind also deleting File:Kanjuruhan disaster tear gas trajectory.jpg on the same grounds? I mentioned this image in the first DR before it was closed, as the same rationale applies. Thanks. Yeeno (talk) 23:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 04:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi. You previously closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Henry Burney.jpg as keep because the file was in use, though evidence had been presented that those uses were clearly erroneous. I've since removed those erroneous uses, and tagged the file as an inferior duplicate of File:Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston.jpg. Please delete it without leaving a redirect, thank you. Also, it might have been a good idea to explain to the nominator the technicality that prevented the file from being deleted, so that the appropriate actions could be taken. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Not sure if the lack of response was due to an edit conflict or otherwise intentional, but bumping just in case. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:19, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 13:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Orlowski-Balogh Edit.png and 2 others deleted – again
My question wasː Hello, what was wrong with the permission, because it was sent on February 19th. It's true, the sender left my message in it, in which I wrote what text must be sent. Wikizoli (vitalap) 07:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Your replyː The permission is still pending and will be processed as soon as possible. --Krd 07:06, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
What is the situation now? -- Wikizoli (talk) 08:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- The same as before. We don't have many colleagues who can read Hungarian. If you can resend it in English, chances are better. --Krd 12:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- I hope to have it tomorrow. Wikizoli (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Solved by Hungarian colleagues. Thanks. Wikizoli (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- I hope to have it tomorrow. Wikizoli (talk) 14:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
![Checkmark](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg/20px-OOjs_UI_icon_check-constructive.svg.png)
Hey, do you think you could undelete this file? I tagged it as no permission as, IIRC, it was put as "own work" but I couldn't find the original back in January, but I've found it here, and it might be able to go under PD-CAGov. reppoptalk 16:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:01, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Media missing a license
How much work would it be to add a task for Krdbot to create the next month to Category:Media uploaded without a license? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
- Prepared that, please let me know if it doesn't work. Krd 08:18, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
pls reactivate File:Folies Bergere Tropicana Matchbook back closeup.jpg
pls reactivate File:Folies Bergere Tropicana Matchbook back closeup.jpg. The front side of the matchbook has been reactivated with {{PD-US-no notice}} Gumballhead1of2 (talk) 21:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- What axactly has been reactivated? --Krd 14:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
FILE
Hallo liebe @Krd
Ich schreibe, um die Wiederherstellung der folgenden PD-Lizenzdateien anzufordern, die Ende des 18. und Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts fotografiert wurden und die Sie fälschlicherweise gelöscht haben, da Sie eine Massenlöschung ohne vorgenommen haben:
- File:The Royal Procession for the Wedding of the Duke of York and Princess Mary of Teck.jpg
- File:Courtyard of Buckingham Palace during The Wedding of the Duke of York and Princess Mary of Teck.jpg
- File:The wedding of Princess Maud of Wales and Prince Charles of Denmark.jpg
- File:His Majesty King and Queen of Italy and the Duke of Aosta visit the pavilions.jpg (PD-Italy)
sie sind alle von einem unbekannten Autor. und für die Quelle der Fotos können Sie sie selbst sehen, da Sie das Privileg haben, die gelöschten Dateien sehen zu können :) Larriur12 (talk) 16:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Выступление на сольном концерте в 16 Тонн в 2022.jpg
Why you deleted this file? The photographer gave permission via his social network to use this photo with CC 4.0. attribution. It was indicated by the link in the description. The licencing was also indicated correct. SergioOren (talk) 08:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:VRT --Krd 10:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ok.
- >>I/We publish on social media (Facebook, Instagram, etc.)
- Edit the post containing your photo to indicate that it is published under a free license. If the platform does not allow editing of posts (e.g. Twitter), then make a new post referring back to the photo. Please ensure that visibility is set to public.
- It is. SergioOren (talk) 22:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please contact VRT. Krd 04:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- 1. Everything is ok
- 2. Ruined it
- 3. WTF?!
- 4. Please contact VRT
- fine SergioOren (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please contact VRT. Krd 04:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Suggestion with respect to the course of action related to the File with the government origin
Dear Krd, I am addressing you with respect to the File:ЈЕЛЕНА БЕГОВИЋ.jpg, where despite the fact that VRT agent/officer made a contact by email with the senior public servant with generally broad authority, I strongly advise that this file after 21 day i.e. after the 15. of the next month (April 15.2023.) be deleted, unless other government official, with explicit authority for media matters provide a clear permission that this file in possession of the Serbian government or Ministry (i.e. NITRA) could be used for Wikimedia projects. My concern is that such a file related to the Government minister may not be even under the jurisdiction of the Ministry itself, but rather the Government could be the sole holder of the photo. Still, bearing in mind that the source is trustworthy, to clear up this apparently complicated legal matter, we as Wikimedia may give a chance to the Ministry (or government) to a provide clear a permission (for further process here), from another independent subject/agent/official from the Serbian government. By saying all that, I don't suggest that the mentioned public servant is not authorized or untrusted, but rather it is unclear what is the scope and jurisdiction of his/hers/this general authority or discretional rights. Therefore, in my opinion another Serbian Government officer should provide the needed permission for the file, to clarify this situation. If not provided, after 20 days I will myself nominate this file for the speedy deletion. Sincerely yours,ВАЊА (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)<
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Undelete Request for files like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vivian_Van_Der_Merwe_unfinished_self_Portrait.jpg
Dear Krd, I am trying to put together a Wikipedia page for a professional older artist friend of mine. For this I uploaded several of his artworks to Wikipedia commons, and have started editing the page in my sandbox. There has been a lot of to and fro between the artist, myself and a moderator called Alfred Neuman, see email link below. The artist (Vivian Van Der Merwe) is happy to assign whatever licenses are necessary for the digital impressions of his artwork to appear on Wikimedia commons. The photographer is also happy to sign whatever licenses are necessary. What is the way forward now?
I believe Vivian has sent a signed email to Alfred Neuman. Should I get the photographer of the artworks to also send a signed email granting license permission? (to Alfred Neuman or to you?)
Could you then undelete these pictures that I uploaded so we could use them in the page?
thanks and regards Paul Harper
Forwarded message ---------
From: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023, 09:53 Subject: Re: [Ticket#2023021510011878] To: Vivian van der Merwe <vivianvdmerwe@gmail.com> Paulusjharp (talk) 11:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- Please let the photographer send the permission by e-mail. Undeletion of the images will happen when the permission is approved. --Krd 12:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
TrackMania Nations Remake Logo.png
Hey, I was wondering if you could reopen Commons:Deletion requests/File:TrackMania Nations Remake Logo.png. I was the person who opened the DR, but my position was that the file should NOT be deleted. However, because someone else had tagged another version of the file as ineligible for Commons, I felt there needed to be a discussion. Ultimately my hope was that the file would be kept, and I'd be able to transfer en:File:Trackmania (2020 video game) logo.svg to Commons as well. Would you be willing to re-open the discussion? Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- To open a deletion request in order to not delete the file appears not the best strategy to m. Anyway, I think the logo is a borderline TOO case, and I personally prefer not to keep it on Commons without permission. --Krd 04:37, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
certain deletionists here like Alfcafel has been gaming the system by not putting the same image in full and cropped version for nomination in the same DR request so admins end up deleting the one where no discussion is taking place, case in point the one above where the real discussion is happening in the cropped version of the image DR or my image DR by the same troll..its not fair cause then they use the fact that an admin deleted that image even though they never actually saw the full discussion on a version of that image also put on DR..I urge you cause the other admins here are being gamed by him as well to perform due diligence before deleting something or it will start setting a bad precedent, we can post hte same 'keep' in multiple version of the same Image's DR every time one gets nominated..a few of my images wrongfully got deleted the last 2 years because of this.. Stemoc 08:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the notice. I think I have corrected this now, if anything is missing, or if there are more cases, please let me know. --Krd 08:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- well you kinda forgot the image of mine he nominated hehe, the reason i pointed this out is cause this user over the last few years has a habit of logging out and nominating images for deletions and then also voting on those images (logged in) to get deleted, i'll give a few exhibits lol, A, B, C, D, did it for a long time before you caught him earlier this year but for something else, again the blocking admin has always been sympathetic to him for some odd reason and 2 weeks wasn't justified as he has been doing this for a few years now..The problem with deletionists trolls (its what i call people whose only contribution to the project is getting things deleted and yet keep mass uploading out of scope images off flickr daily) is that they refuse to accept or understand licensing policies so please due diligicen of DR's please.... there aren't many admins left on this project i still trust.... :( ... Stemoc 09:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- I also merge the DRs for the mentioned files. If there is more, please let me know. --Krd 09:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- well you kinda forgot the image of mine he nominated hehe, the reason i pointed this out is cause this user over the last few years has a habit of logging out and nominating images for deletions and then also voting on those images (logged in) to get deleted, i'll give a few exhibits lol, A, B, C, D, did it for a long time before you caught him earlier this year but for something else, again the blocking admin has always been sympathetic to him for some odd reason and 2 weeks wasn't justified as he has been doing this for a few years now..The problem with deletionists trolls (its what i call people whose only contribution to the project is getting things deleted and yet keep mass uploading out of scope images off flickr daily) is that they refuse to accept or understand licensing policies so please due diligicen of DR's please.... there aren't many admins left on this project i still trust.... :( ... Stemoc 09:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Mariette Teisserenc (French): all images deleted
Hello @Krd,
You have deleted all images from fr:Mariette Teisserenc's page. I don't understand why. Could you give me some explanation? Thank you, Olmathie (talk) 20:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:LIC --Krd 04:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Krd, thank you for your message but I own the copyright for these images hence my question ;) could you reinstate them ? Thanks Olmathie (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Then please see: COM:VRT Krd 10:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Krd, thank you for your message but I own the copyright for these images hence my question ;) could you reinstate them ? Thanks Olmathie (talk) 10:37, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Hallo dear krd, ich schreibe Ihnen, weil ich Sie bitten möchte, dieses Foto eines unbekannten Autors, das um 1893 aufgenommen wurde, zu restaurieren. Da sie aus dem 19. Jahrhundert stammt und ebenfalls unbekannt ist, scheint die Lizenz in Bezug auf die Daten, die die Quelle hat, korrekt zu sein. Könnten Sie sie wiederherstellen? 212.46.38.176 20:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Alexey Mikhailov
Hello, I'm asking you to restore this file: File:Алексей Юрьевич Михайлов.jpg. The photographer (Yana Ross) sent permission from her email. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 14:48, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- The file will be restored when the permission is confirmed. --Krd 14:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I guess the ticket is: Ticket#2023040310008231 Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 06:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Tickets are processed in natural order; there is no way to jump the queue. Krd 06:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, I guess the ticket is: Ticket#2023040310008231 Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 06:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
VRT
Hello, Krd. Last month I uploaded 6 photos of Sarı Köşk. Did you receive email from Mesut Dundar via VRT? Kadı Message 15:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please ask the permission sender to send it again. --Krd 18:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Nanahuatl, could you tell this to Mr. Dundar? Kadı Message 18:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- [2] Ticket number is 2023031810005109. Kadı Message 18:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Permission sender does not provide reasonable answer to our followup question, perhaps because if a language barrier. Krd 18:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- CC: @Nanahuatl Kadı Message 07:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Kadı: , I don't really want to bother him. I'd be glad if you contact. You can reach his mobile number by a Google search. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- As said, there is no reason to assume that we can establish communication with them. Besides that, the VRT never actively approaches anybody, and certainly not by phone. Krd 07:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Kadı: , I don't really want to bother him. I'd be glad if you contact. You can reach his mobile number by a Google search. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- CC: @Nanahuatl Kadı Message 07:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Permission sender does not provide reasonable answer to our followup question, perhaps because if a language barrier. Krd 18:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- [2] Ticket number is 2023031810005109. Kadı Message 18:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Nanahuatl, could you tell this to Mr. Dundar? Kadı Message 18:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
fehlerhafte Zuordnung
Hallo Krd: Die Bilder
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25694).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI_25695).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25696).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25697).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25698).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25699).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25700).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25701).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25706).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25707).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona (DOI 25708).jpg
- File:Abitazione con giardino a Ronco sopra Ascona.jpg
(ich hoffe, ich habe alle erwischt) zeigen kein Sujet von Ronco sopra Ascona, die Kategorie Ronco sopra Ascona ist demnach nicht richtig. Ich kenne das Dorf fast wie meine Hosentasche, und eine Einheimische, die kulturhistorische Führungen durch Ronco macht, hat mir ebenfalls bestätigt, dass die nicht von dort stammen. Aus welchem Ort sie stammen, können aber weder ich noch die erwähnte Einheimische sagen. Einfach löschen kann ich ich die Kategorie Ronco sopra Ascona allerdings nicht, denn die Bilder hätten sonst keine Kategorie mehr. Was macht man dann? Gruss, --Freigut (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Freigut. Dazu habe ich leider auch keine Idee. Die falsche Kategorie rauszunehmen erscheint mir allerdings sinnvoller als sie drin zu lassen. --Krd 05:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Danke! --Freigut (talk) 07:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Habe inzwischen bei der Bibliothek der Architektur-Akademie in Mendrisio nachgefragt, die die Fotos Wikimedia zur Verfügung gestellt hat. Die haben den Ball dankend aufgenommen. Gruss, --Freigut (talk) 08:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Danke! --Freigut (talk) 07:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I don't understand English and I write using Google Translate... Can you explain to me why the file was deleted? It complied with the copyright rules. Thanks in advance אייל (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:LIC --Krd 13:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I know the rules, there were no problems. אייל (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Are you the photographer who created the photograph? --Krd 18:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- license = {{PD-author|1=אליהו טופיק}}
- source = https://www.hamichlol.org.il/%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%91%D7%A5:%D7%AA%D7%9E%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%AA_%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%91_%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%94%D7%95_%D7%90%D7%91%D7%90_%D7%A9%D7%90%D7%95%D7%9C.jpeg אייל (talk) 18:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I think I cannot help further as I cannot read Hebrew. Krd 18:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I know the rules, there were no problems. אייל (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- We do not have Hebrew speaking license reviewers. Only the admins from he.wiki. I've passed the licence review. -- Geagea (talk) 23:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, could check the page you deleted again? I added the licence as asked on the page several days before your deletion (it was a simple copy of a Wikimedia logo). Thanks. Triton (talk) 20:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- The file is now restored. --Krd 05:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Please help me
Hello I request a copyright for this photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hossein_Rajabian_Prison_shot.jpg I personally prepared this photo from Mr. Rajabian's documents. And I ask you to help me for the right to publish it. thank you Bavaran (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Who is the photographer who created the photo? Krd 10:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- I asked Mr. Hossein Rajabian to take a photo of his imprisonment document and send it to me. To update the historiography of imprisoned artists. I can tell Mr. Hossein Rajabian to send you an email and send this photo to you personally by email as an attachment to the email. Is this good for you? Of course, I need the ticket number so that they write it as the subject of the email. Please confirm and guide me. Bavaran (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Mr. Rajabian sent you a permission letter with his personal email by this link:
- I asked Mr. Hossein Rajabian to take a photo of his imprisonment document and send it to me. To update the historiography of imprisoned artists. I can tell Mr. Hossein Rajabian to send you an email and send this photo to you personally by email as an attachment to the email. Is this good for you? Of course, I need the ticket number so that they write it as the subject of the email. Please confirm and guide me. Bavaran (talk) 13:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator ...
- Please confirm me recived.
- best regards Bavaran (talk) 14:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is ticket number recived mr Rajabian:
- [Ticket#: 2023041510004613].
- Bavaran (talk) 14:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is Mr. Rajabian the photographer who created the original photo? --Krd 15:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Do you have access to the summary of the correspondence in the email through the above ticket number?
- If not, I can write the summary of Mr. Rajabian's correspondence by email here. Bavaran (talk) 22:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but the ticket content is pointless anyway. He cannot be the copyright holder of his own mugshot. It is either in the public domain by a reason to be elaborated at the file page, or the image cannot be used. Krd 23:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is it not possible to use the law on publishing identity documents? He has a picture of a document that was given to him while he was in prison, and he smuggled it out of prison. He plans to publish a part of that document, a photo of himself face as a political prisoner, to support the revolution that is going on in Iran. In fact, nobody one owns this photo and wants to claim its ownership. I have already seen many identity documents uploaded and published on Wikimedia, such as passports, etc. Thank you for helping us publish these documents. We plan to publish the documents of political prisoners who were in prison to fight against the dictatorship. Because the Iranian dictatorship does not allow the free circulation of information to political prisoners. thank you Bavaran (talk) 06:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please discuss here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hossein Rajabian Prison shot.jpg Krd 06:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is it not possible to use the law on publishing identity documents? He has a picture of a document that was given to him while he was in prison, and he smuggled it out of prison. He plans to publish a part of that document, a photo of himself face as a political prisoner, to support the revolution that is going on in Iran. In fact, nobody one owns this photo and wants to claim its ownership. I have already seen many identity documents uploaded and published on Wikimedia, such as passports, etc. Thank you for helping us publish these documents. We plan to publish the documents of political prisoners who were in prison to fight against the dictatorship. Because the Iranian dictatorship does not allow the free circulation of information to political prisoners. thank you Bavaran (talk) 06:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but the ticket content is pointless anyway. He cannot be the copyright holder of his own mugshot. It is either in the public domain by a reason to be elaborated at the file page, or the image cannot be used. Krd 23:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is Mr. Rajabian the photographer who created the original photo? --Krd 15:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Unberechtigte Löschung der Datei File:Fritz Wurlitzer Kontrabass-Klarinette.jpg
Hallo Krd, warum hast du das Bild gelöscht, obwohl der Fotograf Enrico Weller am 11.3.2023 die Permission dazu gegeben hat, sh. ticket:2023031110003865 ?? Ich bitte darum, die Löschung wieder rückgängig zu machen Gisbert K (talk) 22:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist wiederhergestellt. --Krd 06:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
User_talk:CommonsDelinker let me know that because of "No ticket permission since 16 March 2023" you needed to delete this file:
Stephen_R._L._Clark_11th_February_2023_Photo_1.jpg
However, when I contacted Stephen R. L. Clark who had provided this image to me, he replied that both he and the commercial photographer who took the picture had sent emails to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org giving permission for this image to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International free license. Is it possible to review this case or to let me know what steps to suggest to Stephen R. L. Clark in getting this resolved so that he and his photographer can release this image? Thank you for any help in this. -- Jjhake (talk) 00:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please ask the permission sender to answer our followup questions. --Krd 05:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
You may close this request now as you have deleted all files there for the reason "created by abuser". Thanks. Anster (talk) 01:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 05:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
You deleted the above file. This was a 2-dimensional image of a part of an egyptian papyrus which has been in the public domain for about 2000 years. Please recreate the page. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 07:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 07:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Bot copyvio tagging of Flickr PDM images
Often, PDM images from Flickr are uploaded with {{Remove this line and insert a public domain copyright tag instead}}{{No license since|month=June|day=22|year=2022}} in the licensing section and the bot replaces the "no license since" with {{Copyvio|external source, no license, no permission.}}. Could it be modified to exempt any images that use the template {{Remove this line and insert a public domain copyright tag instead}}? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Of course that can be done. Please give an example. --Krd 06:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: ? --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Sure: File:Gretchen Whitmer (52360188596) (1).jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Should be done now, please let me know in case it doesn't work. --Krd 16:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Sure: File:Gretchen Whitmer (52360188596) (1).jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: ? --Krd 06:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Logo TMZK nv2.jpg
Hallo, Krd. Der Nutzer und Ersteller des Logo TMZK-Zeichens (Datei Logo TMZK nv2.jpg), Leszek Majewski, ist ein älterer Mann, weshalb ich ihn persönlich zu Hause besuchte und dabei half, eine 'ticket permission' (Eintrittsgenehmigung) zu schicken. Das war am 15. März dieses Jahres um etwa 17 Uhr von einer E-Mail-Adresse leszekmajewski5@gmail.com. m.f.G. Kelvin (talk) 07:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Er hat am 16. eine Antwort mit einer Rückfrage erhalten. --Krd 10:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Meinst Du 16. März? Er benutzt eigentlich keine E-Mail selbst. Ich werde zu ihm gehen müssen (15 km). Könntest Du mir bitte diese Anfrage zusenden? Kelvin (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ja. Nein, wir können aus dem Ticket nicht vertrauliche Daten an dritte weiterleiten. Krd 11:13, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Meinst Du 16. März? Er benutzt eigentlich keine E-Mail selbst. Ich werde zu ihm gehen müssen (15 km). Könntest Du mir bitte diese Anfrage zusenden? Kelvin (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Mass deletion of Photos from BOAG
Hi, I see regrettably that some 200+ images (e.g. File:BOAG 26 02 2023 (161).jpg) have been deleted since the VRT had apparently not received authorisation from the photographer. Not being a VRT member, I had not realised this, thinking that the review and confirmation of those images was simply in a queue (we're all volunteers after all). The photographer confirmed to me on March 21st that she had sent authorisation, so unless she was fibbing to me, something must have been lost in the mix.
I presume that if I got her to send another email, there is no way to restore those files and I would be starting from scratch?
It would be immensely helpful if you could drop the uploader a line letting them know that such an issue has occurred before taking such sweeping action. For one or two files it might not be an issue but we are all volunteers here (VRT included) and I do not have time to start from scratch with 200+ files. Had I received a note on my talk page last week then it might have been a simple thing to rectify. All the best, Hemmers (talk) 14:31, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please just encourage the permission sender to send the permission, or to reply to followup questions. It doesn't matter if the images are deleted, they can be restored as soon as the permission is confirmed. --Krd 14:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:The Coronation of King George V; Edward, Prince of Wales doing Homage.jpg
Hi Krd. I noticed that you deleted File:The Coronation of King George V; Edward, Prince of Wales doing Homage.jpg, which I think was uploaded by me and you gave the following reason: "created by abuser". May I ask what abuse you were referring to exactly? The work was published in 1912, its author has been dead for 96 years, and since it was published before 1928 it's in public domain in the US as well. I'd be glad if you could provide some context because it was not my intention to abuse anything. Regards. Keivan.fTalk 02:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- It was not uploaded by you but by an.account who constantly make wrong license claims. You are free to re-upload it if you have checked the copyright situation. Krd 04:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt response. In that case I must have confused it with a similar file that I had uploaded. I will try to reupload it under the same name and if I encounter any difficulties I'll let you know. Cheers. Keivan.fTalk 04:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'm wondering if this was a procedural error. File:Tsubakisannomiya2023portrait.jpg is still subject to discussion in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Tsubakisannomiya2023portrait.jpg, and should not be speedy-deleted in my opinion. Can you undelete it? I might have forgotten to remove the SD template when I converted it to a deletion request. My apologies if that is the case. whym (talk) 13:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- The file got deleted because a ticket was received but not yet processed. Such files usually get deleted after 30 days and restored as soon as the permission gets confirmed. Do you suggest to restore it based on the ticket, or based on the assumption that no ticket is needed? Krd 13:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- I think no VRT process is necessary, unless someone gives me more reason to doubt the file's copyright status. I closed the ticket as "no response needed" in April 14. whym (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. Somebody already restored that file, so I think this is resolved. If anything is missing, please let me know. Krd 18:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- I think no VRT process is necessary, unless someone gives me more reason to doubt the file's copyright status. I closed the ticket as "no response needed" in April 14. whym (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
User:DaxBot task modification
Hi Krd. Thanks for the approval of the bot. Up until now, I was downloading the files for the task from the official website which is watermarked with the date of download. Ex: File:Predator discrimination of prey promotes the predator-mediated coexistence of prey species.pdf I just discovered that the files are also available without the watermark at PubMed for direct API access (via their OA Web Service API), ex: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/utils/oa/oa.fcgi?id=PMC9727501. I'd like to use this. I'll update the |source=
in the Information template to be like |source=https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220859 via PMC Open Access Subset API direct link
. I hope this modification is minor and does not require re-approval? -- DaxServer (talk) 09:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'd say this is a minor modification that is no problem. Please consider to put some documentation on the bot's user page. Krd 09:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- The list API at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/oai/oai.cgi?verb=ListIdentifiers&set=rsos&metadataPrefix=pmc gives as it seems in ascending order. Would it also be considered a minor change if I upload in the same order and not by Issue-after-Issue as I proposed in the approval? -- DaxServer (talk) 16:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Naturlehrpfad Hans Schmid.jpg
I see that you deleted File:Naturlehrpfad Hans Schmid.jpg as "No permission since". I would have appreciated a somewhat more wordy deletion rationale, as author and permission fields were filled in (I don't remember how the source was specified), and as I understand truthfully.
I also think it is a mess to have this (and some of the other files in the batch) deleted separately from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ArtRedaktion, especially as we probably want to add the to an undelete in category.
–LPfi (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Noted. Please advise what is your exact request. --Krd 04:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Lhotak
Bitte benachrichtigen Sie mich, bevor Sie Fotos löschen. Danke schön, --Svajcr (talk) 08:55, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
hi
I got permission to uploading all those images in wiki, already sended licenses permissions to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
but i dont get any response and images keep remove.
نقش عربي في وادي ملكان 1.jpg
نقش عربي في وادي ملكان.jpg
مسجد الصحابي جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي.png
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 8.png
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 7.png
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 9.png
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 5.png
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 6.png
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 4.png
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 2.jpg
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 3.jpg
أحد بوابات مسجد جرير البجلي التاريخي.jpg
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي 1.jpg
مسجد جرير بن عبدالله البجلي التاريخي.jpg
رسومات صخرية في وادي ملكان 1.jpg
رسومات صخرية في وادي ملكان.jpg
وثيقة تتحدث عن معركة الماوية.jpg
قرية سدوس التاريخية 3.jpg
قرية سدوس التاريخية 2.jpg
قرية سدوس التاريخية 1.jpg
بوابة مزخرفة في قرية سدوس التاريخية.jpg
نقوش حفرة لقط.jpg
نقوش حفرة لقط 1.jpg
نقوش صخرية في الشويمس 5.jpg
نقوش صخرية في الشويمس 6.jpg
نقوش صخرية في الشويمس 4.jpg
نقوش صخرية في الشويمس 3.jpg
نقوش صخرية في الشويمس 1.jpg
نقوش صخرية في الشويمس 2.jpg
نقوش صخرية في الشويمس.jpg
بيت الجشي التاريخي.jpg
بيت الجشي التاريخي 1.jpg
قصر ابراهيم التاريخي (2).jpg
بيت الجشي التاريخي 2.jpg
بيت الجشي التاريخي 3.jpg
حي النعاثل التاريخي في الأحساء.jpg
قرية الكلادا التاريخية 6.jpg
قرية الكلادا التاريخية 7.jpg
قصر الملك عبدالعزيز في المويه (3).jpg
نقوش في جبل حبران ( منطقة حائل ) 2.jpg
نقوش في جبل حبران ( منطقة حائل ).jpg
نقوش من موقع خبة التماثيل 1.jpg
نقوش من موقع خبة التماثيل.jpg
بوابة مزخرفة في قرية سدوس التاريخية.jpg
جبل حبران ( منطقة حائل ) 1.jpg
بيت الجشي التاريخي 2.jpg
بيت الجشي التاريخي 3.jpg
حي النعاثل التاريخي في الأحساء.jpg
قرية الكلادا التاريخية 6.jpg
قرية الكلادا التاريخية 7.jpg
قصر الملك عبدالعزيز في المويه (3).jpg
نقوش في جبل حبران ( منطقة حائل ) 2.jpg
نقوش في جبل حبران ( منطقة حائل ).jpg
نقوش من موقع خبة التماثيل 1.jpg
نقوش من موقع خبة التماثيل.jpg
قصر ابراهيم التاريخي (2).jpg
قصر ابراهيم التاريخي (3).jpg
قصر ابراهيم التاريخي (1).jpg
قصر ابراهيم التاريخي (4).jpg
علامة قصر ابراهيم التاريخي.png
جرهام (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please send the permission again. --Krd 17:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- is this email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org accept permission in Arabic or should be in English? جرهام (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Arabic will be ok but may take longer to process than English. Krd 08:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- is this email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org accept permission in Arabic or should be in English? جرهام (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, please retrieve as its a court judgement which falls under (CC0 1.0) license. In fact Supreme Court of India has clearly stated that certain acts shall not constitute an infringement of copyright and "any judgment or order of a Court, Tribunal or other judicial authority, unless the reproduction or publication of such judgment or order is prohibited by the Court, the Tribunal or other judicial authority." I will update the license of the file once you retrieve it. Thanks. --अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 11:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- If the file is in the public domain by law, CC-0 is the wrong license. Please advice which PD license tag will apply. --Krd 12:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Then it should be (CC BY-NC-SA). अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 12:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:LIC Krd 12:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure about CC. May be {{PD-EdictGov}} works here. अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 12:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure either, and I'd prefer if you could get this resolved via COM:UNDEL for additional feedback. Krd 12:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks I have put my point on undeletion request page. अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure either, and I'd prefer if you could get this resolved via COM:UNDEL for additional feedback. Krd 12:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure about CC. May be {{PD-EdictGov}} works here. अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 12:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:LIC Krd 12:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Then it should be (CC BY-NC-SA). अजीत कुमार तिवारी (talk) 12:16, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Dateiüberprüfung
Hallo, Krd, ich bin hier auf Commons nicht so firm. Gibt es hier so etwas wie die DÜP in der de-WP? ich halte file:Visier Rol.jpg für eine URV, weil das offensichtlich aus einem Buch kopiert wurde. Wie mache ich das hier kenntlich? Gruß--91.221.58.21 05:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC) (in de:WP Benutzer:LW-Pio)
- Es ist leider kompliziert, siehe: Help:QuickDelete --Krd 07:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Danke, dass du das markiert hast. Es ist wirklich kompliziert; dennoch danke für den Hinweis. Gruß--91.221.58.21 08:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)(LW-Pio)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
VRT Status of Porua.png
May I please inquire about the current status of the VRT permission? Is it still pending? I have an written permission from the creator from the file and i have already send an mail to vrt team. But, they told me to send the request from the creator. creator has already send the mail to Wikimedia, but the permission is still pending.
Thesaurabhsaha (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket from today, please be patient. --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, this file was deleted. I created it but must have forgotten to add the correct copyright permissions. Can it be reinstated please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElliotAWS (talk • contribs) 14:31, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 14:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:42, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Can you please restore this? I will be happy to provide a license. Schierbecker (talk) 00:28, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please go ahead. --Krd 04:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Done. I'll admit I was a little ticked that this file was deleted without warning. GCSD-F5 specifies a seven-day grace period after tagging. This is the first time I've had a file deleted without any warning. In any case, thanks for restoring. Best, Schierbecker (talk) 04:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- The file was tagged by yourself during the upload at 5 May. Krd 04:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- You are absolutely right. I do apologize. Schierbecker (talk) 04:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- The file was tagged by yourself during the upload at 5 May. Krd 04:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Done. I'll admit I was a little ticked that this file was deleted without warning. GCSD-F5 specifies a seven-day grace period after tagging. This is the first time I've had a file deleted without any warning. In any case, thanks for restoring. Best, Schierbecker (talk) 04:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Lhotak
Bitte stellen Sie gelöschte Dateien wieder her. Ich habe ein Ticket "2023040810002521" dazu (e-mail Nummer "2023040810002558"). File:230406 Lhotak Zdenek Vystava Vlasim 01.jpg - File:230406 Lhotak Zdenek Vystava Vlasim 10.jpg Danke, --Svajcr (talk) 05:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Die Dateien werden mit der Bearbeitung des Ticket wiederhergestellt. --Krd 05:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:20, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, please provide an update for this image. 𝕃𝐖 (talk) 11:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Big pic9.jpg and Big_pic7_1.jpg were in use on enWS for s:Mold Web Course, which through s:Index:Mold Web Course.pdf is backed by File:Mold Web Course.pdf. That is, the images were presumably {{Extracted from}} that PDF which was produced by the EPA (i.e. presumably {{PD-USGov-EPA}}). I don't know what info actually made it onto the two .jpg file pages (clearly not the license tag), but if they at least identify that PDF as the source then perhaps that's enough to get them undeleted? (I know jack-all about the files beyond having run across them in CommonsDelinker's contribs over on enWS). Xover (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Xover: I have undeleted the files, and renamed them to something descriptive. The files didn't reference the PDF, though they did reference the EPA website. To me it was a situation where some education and assistance to the newbie contributor would have been more beneficial than a straight deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Plants vs Zombies Garden Kombat (Cancelled)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqyxW9FQlz4 103.109.244.3 06:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
File:YABLONER REBBE 1975 GRADUATION.jpg
Hi, This file as well as associated files (uploaded together, see below) were deleted, but were actually authorized by the owner using Wikimedia VRT release generator with the following syntax; YABLONER REBBE 1975 GRADUATION.jpg|YABLONER REBBE LATE 1970S.jpg|YABLONER REBBE WITH YABLONER CHASIDIM IN KFAR HASIDIM C.1926.jpg|Yabloner rebbe - Palestine 1925.jpg|Pini Dunner at Yabloner rebbe's grave.jpg| Albertinon (talk) 07:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:VRT. --Krd 04:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello Krd, I have been trying to improve a number of design related articles (especially by adding visual reference material). I'm not sure I understand why the photograph of w:Michael Young (Industrial designer) was deleted again. The user who uploaded the photo seems to be legitimate and is trying in good faith to upload photographs to help improve the article. When I added the image to the article, it had a note about VRT confirmation being processed, so I was a little surprised to see it deleted. Is there anything I can do to help solve the problem? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- The copyright holder did not provide permission for the file. --Krd 08:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Did you try to contact the uploader directly? I'm trying to help them, but my level of knowledge on Commons is limited. They may be able to help if you're able to give some guidance. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm trying to save the photograph and use it on WP. Please hold-off archiving this discussion for the time being. Thank you -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Everybody who contacts the VRT by e-mail does get a reply. If they don't answer followup questions we sadly are unable to push the case further. Please let the uploader contact the copyright holder again. --Krd 07:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'll try that (again). I put a link to this discussion on their talk page, but have yet to receive a reply. Thanks for your help! -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you both for engaging and thank you very much Cl3phact0 for trying to help me out here.
- As mentioned I am trying my best to upload images correctly and following the guidelines accordingly. I am particularly surprised by the removal of this image as I am the person who took the photo. I went through the VRT emailing process on the 11th of April. I have not received any followup questions since.
- I look forward to working this out together. Again thank you both for engaging. LexLevels (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'll try that (again). I put a link to this discussion on their talk page, but have yet to receive a reply. Thanks for your help! -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Everybody who contacts the VRT by e-mail does get a reply. If they don't answer followup questions we sadly are unable to push the case further. Please let the uploader contact the copyright holder again. --Krd 07:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you both for following up on this! I will re-link the photo to the article now. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Why have you deleted the picture from District Coordination Officer page.. Nonsense
Why have you deleted the picture from District Coordination Officer page.. Nonsense. 2001:16A2:C0B6:2AE0:8DF4:2F65:1196:9209 21:17, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide a link to the page you are talking about. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted Lexington Flag
Good Evening, I noticed that you deleted the flag of the City of Lexington, KY due to not providing permission. Since the flag was adopted by the Lexington City Council— it becomes a law and thus public domain. I attached the City Council meeting and the Wikipedia policy regarding public domain into the permission box.
is there a reason it was still deleted? Snakshopp (talk) 00:58, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- The PD reason provided in the file page was different, and the licence mentioned in the file page was even more different. Please discuss this at COM:UNDEL. --Krd 03:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Please help
Dear administrator Krd,
please help me to rename File:Makedonska opozicija Igor Janev.jpg into the more meaningful File:Igor Janev.jpg. (with more accurate meaning for an individual person).
Thank you very much. ВАЊА (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: Commons:File renaming --Krd 10:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for information. Regards, ВАЊА (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
User talk:AngelicDevil29 unblock request
AngelicDevil29 has made an unblock request. As you are the blocking admin and a CheckUser, I would appreciate your input at User talk:AngelicDevil29 as to (1) which other accounts were being abused by this user and (2) if you can review any technical evidence you have of this. Best, —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Answered there. Unblocked, likely some kind of mistake at my side I don't understand based on the data still available. --Krd 04:48, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 03:46, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Bjørn Krogstad-bilde deleted
Hi, I have a feeling I have heard that you are Swedish, Krd, but I take no chances, so here goes – in English:
I uploaded this file in April this year, and on April 21 the artist/copyright holder sent a permission mail to (me and) permissions-no: File:Bjørn Krogstad Dyrehode og fugl.jpg Why have you deleted it? There must be a misunderstanding here Hoping to hear from you – and that the file will be restored. Kjersti L. (talk) 07:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- The permission ticket is still open, and the file will be restored as soon as it is approved. --Krd 07:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- I see. I will write to one of the permissions-no people and have him approve it! Kjersti L. (talk) 07:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:48, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Moin!
Du hast das Bild gerade gelöscht, obwohl auf der Seite, von der es hochgeladen wurde, inzwischen die beiden Dateien mit der folgenden Angabe veröffentlicht sind: FÜR PRESSEFOTOS: CC BY-SA 4.0. Gab es dazu einen weitergehenden Grund, oder hast Du das nur übersehen? Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 10:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weder noch, er war nur nicht sinnvoll angegeben. --Krd 11:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Deletion of several images
Hi there I just noticed that you deleted almost every photo I put on the "A Love Supreme (Fanzine)" wiki. I had asked the owner of the images for permission to use the images and they sent that email template to the right place so I don't understand why they have been removed. If you could explain why that would be a great help thanks. AdrianThompson1973 (talk) 11:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. When they sent that email template to the right place, what answer did they receive? --Krd 12:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- They received an initial reply asking to confirm copyright permission to which they replied and confirmed. Reading other messages from other people it looks like they too have had images deleted when permission has been given, perhaps it would be better to get in touch with the person uploading the images before deleting them fully next time. I was doing this for a university project and half of the work I have done is now missing. A lot of the photos posted were originals from A Love Supreme themselves and were actually put on the page as a way to reference things that were said. AdrianThompson1973 (talk) 12:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide a file name or ticket number. Krd 04:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- They received an initial reply asking to confirm copyright permission to which they replied and confirmed. Reading other messages from other people it looks like they too have had images deleted when permission has been given, perhaps it would be better to get in touch with the person uploading the images before deleting them fully next time. I was doing this for a university project and half of the work I have done is now missing. A lot of the photos posted were originals from A Love Supreme themselves and were actually put on the page as a way to reference things that were said. AdrianThompson1973 (talk) 12:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
The sources indicated in these files are false. The one in the images is not the dust jacket of the first edition copy of The Great Gatsby held by the Indiana University's Lilly Library (see https://web.archive.org/web/20200821232624/https://www.newswise.com/articles/iu-experts-available-to-discuss-great-gatsby-in-advance-of-new-film), but it is the dust jacket of the copy auctioned by Nate D. Sanders in 2014 (see https://natedsanders.com/Exceedingly-Rare-First-Printing-Dusjacket-of-The-LOT25507.aspx), whose images are subject to copyright. --Frognall (talk) 18:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please nominate the files for deletion. --Krd 19:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- I've just done it. A greeting. --Frognall (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- Those files have been deleted for copyright violation. Now I can request the deletion of the derivative File:The Great Gatsby Cover 1925 Retouched.jpg; but can I do it for COM:CSD#F3 or for COM:CSD#G8? --Frognall (talk) 10:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- I think it doesn't matter. --Krd 13:14, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's done. Thanks. --Frognall (talk) 13:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Is this revert without a reason correct? --Frognall (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Probably not. --Krd 19:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Is this revert without a reason correct? --Frognall (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's done. Thanks. --Frognall (talk) 13:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- I think it doesn't matter. --Krd 13:14, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Those files have been deleted for copyright violation. Now I can request the deletion of the derivative File:The Great Gatsby Cover 1925 Retouched.jpg; but can I do it for COM:CSD#F3 or for COM:CSD#G8? --Frognall (talk) 10:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- I've just done it. A greeting. --Frognall (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Who's permission are you demanding? The dead photographer? My permission, or the person who the image was gifted to and had it in their collection? RAN (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Obviously we need the permission from the heir of the photographer. --Krd 17:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- And who do you think that heir is? It is me. The license is my permission. There are over 1,000 images using this license, why is this particular family image being challenged? I can see if someone is claiming that they are the heir of Ansel Adams or Richard Avedon. This is clearly a family taken image of a non Wikipedia famous person, taken by a family member. You also deleted the image, even after I fixed the missing bracket "}" in the license. --RAN (talk) 18:18, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have no clue who the heir or current copyright holder is, as there is no comprehensible documentation about that. Please see COM:VRT. Krd 06:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Review Request
Hello, please check these three removal pages. thank you
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:EisaZarepour.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by S-M-T-AA
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:تجویونگ.jpg
CaesarIran (talk) 07:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
You deleted the base file, but there are several derivatives: Template:Other versions/1121-Txernobylgo zentral nuklearrerako sarkofago berria. All of these files has gross factual error: object's width is not 165 m, but 260 m (it was fixed in Russian file version, but since that comparing with Bizcaia Bridge doesn't make sence). Because of that, I request you to delete all of these files (and template). MBH 12:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 15:45, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- ...and template? MBH 15:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Now also done. --Krd 15:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Wait, what? Why has this file been deleted? Theklan (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- The file was deleted as there was no evidence of permission. If some exists, please advise. --Krd 15:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Wait, what? Why has this file been deleted? Theklan (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Now also done. --Krd 15:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- ...and template? MBH 15:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:12, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
I will repeat: all of these files has gross factual error, object's width is not 165 m, but 260 m (it was fixed in Russian file version, but since that comparing with Bizcaia Bridge doesn't make sense). Is this not enough for deletion of these files? They spread disinformation now. MBH 11:01, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please correct the error. Krd 06:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. You have deleted this image despite permission being given. The sole representative of the copyright owner copied me on their release email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I can fwd that email if need be. I'd like to understand what went wrong here. I can't give you a ticket number as that was on the file page which has now gone. Quilt Phase (talk) 05:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- Likely the permission sender did no respond to our followup questions. Please encourage them to do so. --Krd 06:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
A question on File:許浚申280.jpg
Can you tell me why this picture was deleted? My signature photo was hung on my own personal homepage, and the gratuitous end was deleted? Chanson taku (talk) 09:12, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- I have no disrespect at all, but I really wonder why my signature note was deleted. Is it a violation of any regulations? Chanson taku (talk) 09:15, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- The text shown in the image is your personal signature? Krd 11:14, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Restoration of a photo
DarwIn restored File:Hiking in Panchthar, Nepal (53862392).jpg because that is the only file of hiking in Panchthar, Nepal. Although the usefulness of the image is debatable, IMO it may be inappropriate to restore a file after the DR has passed, without notifying the nominator (and the admin who delete that file). I wonder if DarwIn has talked to you about this restoration? A1Cafel (talk) 10:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- They haven't, but is is commonly known that I am ok with having my admin actions overturned without notice. Krd 11:04, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Krd immer nett
Hallo @Krd, danke für die prompte Antwort auch am Feiertag. Armin Pangerl (talk) 17:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Lucian Freud
Hallo Krd, kannst du vielleicht etwas hierzu sagen? Gibt es eine VRT-Freigabe, die sich explizit auf das Gemälde im Foto (d.h. nicht nur auf das Foto) bezieht? Wenn nein, würde ich mich dafür aussprechen, zur "zensierten" Version zurückzukehren, auch wenn diese unschön ist und eine Erklärung in der Dateibeschreibung benötigt. Gestumblindi (talk) 07:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Es wurde das Foto freigegeben und es liegt die Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers an dem Gemälde vor, dieses Foto mit dem Gemälde für jeden Zweck zu nutzen. Ich sehe erstmal keinen Grund, zu der zensierten Version zurückzugehen. --Krd 07:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Danke, ich habe Gnom gerade auf diese Auskunft hingewiesen. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Please remove copyright warnings from cropped images of an approved image.
Hi,
File:Salzburger Landesregierung 2023-2028 (ÖVP-FPÖ).jpg
has been approved by you, but the cropped images of the people in it are still not approved and have a copyright warning. Please approve all the cropped pictures too. Thanks. The Pollster (talk) 18:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:10, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have added the permissions (ticket) for the cropped pictures + license and removed the copyright warnings. The Pollster (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Hallo krd, Ich möchte Ihnen die Restaurierung dieses Porträts vorstellen, das um das 17. Jahrhundert von der italienischen Schule der Gebrüder Casini angefertigt wurde. Die Informationen der Quelle stimmen mit den Daten der Datei überein. Könnten Sie dieses Porträt reaktivieren --95.214.53.70 23:32, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Could you undelete the files for which I took a lot of time to undelete? I would be great if you take a bit more care about your deletions. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Of course. Just for the record, can you advise where I have been careless? --Krd 15:33, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- I mentioned in COM:UDR that I was undeleting them. Don't you read that board? Yann (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for undeleting these files. Yann (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, and I think it's not possible to follow that board all the time. I noticed them via User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests, and the usual situation is incomplete deletion because of tool failure. Krd 19:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for undeleting these files. Yann (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- I mentioned in COM:UDR that I was undeleting them. Don't you read that board? Yann (talk) 17:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:53, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Dear Krd You deleted my file allegedly due to lack of permission. Please explain why and how I suddenly have to get permission for my own file, which has been happily existing for two years? Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 15:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC) From whom and how should I reap permission if I am the author myself? Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:VRT --Krd 17:55, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Krd. Ich bin per E-Mail gebeteb worden, diese Datei wieder herzustellen, da die Schutzfrist ageblich abgelaufen ist. Man hat mir außerdem geschrieben, dass du aus Zeitmangel dich nicht selbst darum kümmern könntest, aber generell mit der Wiederherstellung einverstanden wärst. Bei dem Löschgrund, den du angegeben hast, halte ich das aber für Unsinn. Wollte daher mal deine Meinung einholen. De728631 (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wenn die Anfrage von einem etablierten Benutzer kommt, und inhaltlich Sinn hat, kannst Du es machen. Vermutlich kommt sie aber von einer Socke des Störenfrieds; in dem Fall lass mir bitte gern den Benutzernamen per E-Mail zukommen, damit die neuen Socken gesperrt werden können. --Krd 08:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I see you closed the request as kept: in use. The only page is ar:ويكيبيديا:أحدث الملفات العربية على كومنز. It's a page to update the latest Arabic files on Commons which is updated automatically by a bot. --Karim talk to me :)..! 00:09, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 05:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deletion of several images
Pasting in prior thread that was deleted/archived.
Deletion of several images Hi there I just noticed that you deleted almost every photo I put on the "A Love Supreme (Fanzine)" wiki. I had asked the owner of the images for permission to use the images and they sent that email template to the right place so I don't understand why they have been removed. If you could explain why that would be a great help thanks. AdrianThompson1973 () 11:48, 11 May 2023 (UTC) Hello. When they sent that email template to the right place, what answer did they receive? --Krd 12:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) They received an initial reply asking to confirm copyright permission to which they replied and confirmed. Reading other messages from other people it looks like they too have had images deleted when permission has been given, perhaps it would be better to get in touch with the person uploading the images before deleting them fully next time. I was doing this for a university project and half of the work I have done is now missing. A lot of the photos posted were originals from A Love Supreme themselves and were actually put on the page as a way to reference things that were said. AdrianThompson1973 () 12:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC) Please provide a file name or ticket number. Krd 04:35, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
NEW 30/05/23 11:20 I don't have the ticket number but I can provide all the files that we're deleted. I will list them below:
- File:9 Awards cropped.jpg
- File:RedmenTV using ALS to interview Sobs and Bally.jpg
- File:9 Awards.jpg
- File:Peter Andre The Big Breakfast.jpg
- File:Edwards mural.jpg
- File:ALS say no to racism.jpg
- File:RJX Side angle of Shop.jpg
- File:Stall outside A Love Supreme.jpg
- File:Front of ALS shop.jpg
I actually think some may have been removed from you. This whole thing has taken far too long too resolve. I asked for permission to use their photos and they complied, I would say to make things easier they could make an account and add the photos themselves but the Wiki rules say that people shouldn't edit their own pages so then there would no doubt be another issue there. As far as I'm aware they have emailed the VRT team but the replies take a while. It would be really helpful if you could undelete the images or make it plain and simple what needs to happen, because as far as I am aware everything that needs to happen has happened, and yet the images are still not on the page. Quite frustrating when I spent a lot of my free time doing this... AdrianThompson1973 (talk) 11:16, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide the VRT ticket number or please ask the permission sender to send the permission again. Krd 11:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Is the ticket number missing from the files (there should be a {{Permission received}})? –LPfi (talk) 15:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- I cannot find any {{Permission received}}. Krd 04:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- So perhaps the filenames were never included in the email exchange? The ticket number should have been included anyway, so if AdrianThompson1973 has access to the correspondence (or even a single reply), they should have the number. –LPfi (talk) 07:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket number is ticket:2023032710010041 AdrianThompson1973 (talk) 12:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket is still under discussion. --Krd 06:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket number is ticket:2023032710010041 AdrianThompson1973 (talk) 12:04, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- So perhaps the filenames were never included in the email exchange? The ticket number should have been included anyway, so if AdrianThompson1973 has access to the correspondence (or even a single reply), they should have the number. –LPfi (talk) 07:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- I cannot find any {{Permission received}}. Krd 04:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Is the ticket number missing from the files (there should be a {{Permission received}})? –LPfi (talk) 15:32, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For your swift VRT work! WikiLinuz (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2023 (UTC) |
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
hi! Why did you erased the file? Thanx --Simoz (talk) 12:07, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- See COM:LIC --Krd 15:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- I already read them.
- Can you please be more specific?
- It was all ok...
- --Simoz (talk) 17:10, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- I have restored the image, please continue the discussion here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carica cavalleria colonnello Vittorio Barattieri.jpg --Krd 07:42, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Justin Rossack.jpg
Hi, Krd, how are you? You removed a F10 tag from File:Justin Rossack.jpg while adding VRT permission, but didn't offer any explanation. Was that a mistake – the image is a low-quality selfie by a non-contributor, is it not? NB If I'm wrong about that, please explain why, and accept this apology in advance (I've recently been threatened by Yann with a block from this project if I make another mistake in nomination for deletion). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:25, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Justlettersandnumbers: This file is indeed probably out of scope as personal image by a non contributor. You can create a regular deletion request with the proper rationale. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Did you read the category? All photos received permission from all authors, and you took and deleted the photo. [3] Please restore the photo, I am one of the authors of the monument and it turns out that you violated my and two other authors' permission to use the photos. Kodru (talk) 07:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- The COM:VRT process was not completed. Please encourage the permission sender to contact VRT again. --Krd 07:12, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Monument_to_Patriarch_Alexius_II_of_Moscow_in_J%C3%B5hvi you mean it's not finished? open the category and look at the permission, all 3 authors sent letters and they told me that in this case the permission to use is put in the category so that all photos of the monument automatically receive permission to use. Kodru (talk) 07:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly this information is wrong. The permission has to be in the file pages, because nobody looks into the category. Additionally a category holds files from different sources, so specific permission for a undefined category is not the correct approach. Krd 08:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- you can restore the file and set the permission? Kodru (talk) 08:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly not, because I cannot read the language the permission is in. @Lvova: Can you assist? Krd 10:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Everything with this permission is ok, I placed it in the category and in all likelihood I missed something on the file page. Please, restore it. Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- ...and this is permission on the monument in the country without fop, not on the file, so I know dozens of marked categories without marking files in them. Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- A techical problem is that the admin processing deletion requests or other copyright tags will never check the categories for any general permission. Another problem is that from the current entrie in the Category it is not crystal clear what the permission is exactly for. It's usually better to resolve this via templates.
- Anyway, as far as I'm concerned, that's ok for me as it is now. Krd 10:30, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Anyway I suggest to also put the permission directly into this file, or at least remove the permission-received tag, as otherwise we'll meet here again in 30 days. Krd 10:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- But templates have another problem: they may be used anywhere without triggering a filter that allow to mark only for agents; or not? Анастасия Львоваru/en 10:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- If the template describes the use case it applies to in enough detail, there is not much room for misuse as any use out of appliance is obvious. Krd 10:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly not, because I cannot read the language the permission is in. @Lvova: Can you assist? Krd 10:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- you can restore the file and set the permission? Kodru (talk) 08:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly this information is wrong. The permission has to be in the file pages, because nobody looks into the category. Additionally a category holds files from different sources, so specific permission for a undefined category is not the correct approach. Krd 08:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Monument_to_Patriarch_Alexius_II_of_Moscow_in_J%C3%B5hvi you mean it's not finished? open the category and look at the permission, all 3 authors sent letters and they told me that in this case the permission to use is put in the category so that all photos of the monument automatically receive permission to use. Kodru (talk) 07:15, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
You deleted this file even after the uploader clearly provided a link proving that the work was published under a Commons-compatible free license (this one), as instructed by the {{No permission since}} template. Please be more careful in reviewing the page history and/or contact an active user who speaks the language before deleting the next time, so the unneeded hassle can be avoided. Thanks, — Yerpo Eh? 16:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
File:Overhead photos of contract workers locked in Katutura, Windhoek workers compound.jpg & File:Overhead photos of contract workers locked in Katutura, Windhoek workers compound. Part 2.jpg wrongfully deleted
These files were wrongfully deleted after I submitted a VRTS to prove said permission by the author. Through which I got the author to both email directly the permission and forwarded it to make sure it was received. I received no follow-up or ask for clarification before deletion. Please contact me on my talk page or respond here, any help would be greatly appreciated. --LoomCreek (talk) 18:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
- It appears the VRTS ticket moved out of attention. It has now been answered. Krd 04:55, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ah okay, I'll try to email them a third time if I can for them to go through the permission process.
- I'll note after the VRTS ticket submission, I later learned the copyright has expired under Namibian copyright law, as it's past the 50 years from the original photographs publishing. LoomCreek (talk) 05:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- If that is the case it can be discussed if there is evidence for such publication. I'd prefer to follow the permission process first, as it appears to me more likely to be successful. Krd 05:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Okay I appreciate the help. It will likely be a while since I've already I've already had them give permission twice. (the first one I forwarded, from before I knew about the Wikipedia vrts process) And the second more official one directly from them which I'm not sure why the VRTS hasn't received? I'll try to do it through link this time. I understand it's just procedure. LoomCreek (talk) 05:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- If that is the case it can be discussed if there is evidence for such publication. I'd prefer to follow the permission process first, as it appears to me more likely to be successful. Krd 05:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello @Krd, I assume that I did something wrong. The deleted files have {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} from the author Laia Campos. All her photos have PDM license: https://www.flickr.com/photos/189957956@N07/51137347582/ -- Docosong (talk) 08:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- You uploaded this file and during the uplaoded specified "This file doesn't have a valid license." What is you intention? Krd 09:26, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for my bad English. I try to explain. I uploaded this photos according to {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} & Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-06#Public Domain Mark files. So when I have uploaded this files with Flickr2commons it automatically shows "This file doesn't have a valid license" & "No license since...". Therefore, the question is can I delete the first line, the second line or none. I assume that a reviewer user has to validate the photograph's license is correct. For instance, Special:diff/773117553.-- Docosong (talk) 13:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think you should just leave out the line "{{Remove this line and insert a public domain copyright tag instead}}{{No license since|month=June|day=9|year=2023}}" during the upload. Krd 13:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry for my bad English. I try to explain. I uploaded this photos according to {{PD-author-FlickrPDM}} & Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-06#Public Domain Mark files. So when I have uploaded this files with Flickr2commons it automatically shows "This file doesn't have a valid license" & "No license since...". Therefore, the question is can I delete the first line, the second line or none. I assume that a reviewer user has to validate the photograph's license is correct. For instance, Special:diff/773117553.-- Docosong (talk) 13:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi, warum hast du diese Datei wieder hergestellt? --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- Sehr gute Frage! Entweder wurde da ein Edit nicht gespeichert, oder ist hab einen Fehler gemacht. Ist nun korrigiert. --Krd 18:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hallo, kannst du das bitte wiederherstellen? F.Siegmund = de:Frank Siegmund = 2001-2005 Vorsitzender und seit 2013 stellvertretender Vorsitzender der DGUF. Zudem einer der vergleichsweise wenigen Archäologen, der den Wiki-Projekten nicht nur gewogen ist, sondern auch immer mal wieder aktiv ist. Es bringt uns gar nichts, wenn wir solche Leute mit sowas einfach nur deprimieren. Wenn er schreibt er ist der Urheber dann, hat das seine Richtigkeit. Er "ist" neben Eingen Anderen letztlich die DGUF. Grüße. Marcus Cyron (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- Bitte stell es gern selbst wieder her. Krd 15:19, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Bitte um Hilfe/Korretur
Hallo Krd,
ich habe Mist gebaut: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Mobile_app/Feedback&diff=prev&oldid=775144165 Als ich es bemerkt habe, konnte ich es nicht mehr rückgängig machen. Kannst Du das bitte korrigieren. Ich habe da nur von Hand eingreifen wollen, da ich per App kein Feedback senden konnte. (leider muss ich jetzt auch los.) Tut mir leid! Molgreen (talk) 08:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ich glaube ich habe es repariert. --Krd 09:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Löschung von Bildern
Hey Krd, Du hast einige Bilder gelöscht welche nachweislich per Email eingeschickt Creative Commons Lizenz hinterlegt hatten. Da ich die Seiten nicht mehr einsehen kann bin ich etwas verwirrt über die Löschung und würde gerne den Grund wissen. File:2020 Uwe Schröder Stella Cover.jpg File:2015 Uwe schröder Pardié Collage.jpg File:Wettbewerbsbeitrag- Museum der Bayerischen Geschichte, Regensburg 2013.jpg Lieber Gruß Usarch Usarch (talk) 08:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- In den genannten Bildern ist kein Hinweis auf eine Freigabe hinterlegt. Bitte sende die Freigabe erneut. Krd 09:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, da muss ein Fehler unterlaufen sein ich schick die Freigaben nochmals raus.
- danke dir schonmal für den Hinweis!
- Lg Usarch (talk) 12:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:25, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Could you please take a look and and answer my question? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 15:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Socket puppet
This all users upload images kindly remove those images 103.67.157.76 10:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Archivos borrados
A partir del documento oficial (Boletín Oficial del Estado) subí en su momento las imágenes de las diversas uniformidades aprobadas para el Ejército de Tierra de España. Compruebo que dichos ficheros han sido eliminados por Ud. por "No license since 11 May 2023" (Carecer de licencia desde el 11 de mayo de 2023).
De acuerdo con lo que especifica el propio BOE en https://www.boe.es/informacion/aviso_legal/index.php, y copio literalmente:
Condiciones generales de reutilización
En particular está permitido:
La copia y difusión de la información aquí contenida.
La modificación, adaptación, extracción, reordenación y combinación de la información.
La reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transformación, necesaria para desarrollar la actividad de reutilización autorizada, en cualquier modalidad y bajo cualquier formato, para todo el mundo y por el plazo máximo permitido por la Ley.
Incluyo una traducción al inglés de dicho párrafo:
General conditions of reuse
In particular it is allowed:
The copying and dissemination of the information contained herein.
The modification, adaptation, extraction, rearrangement and combination of information.
The reproduction, distribution, public communication or transformation, necessary to carry out the authorized reuse activity, in any modality and under any format, for everyone and for the maximum period allowed by Law.
El enlace antes indicado fue puesto en cada una de las imágenes subidas y por lo tanto ignoro los motivos por los que han sido eliminadas, y hago especial hincapié en el último punto:
La reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transformación, necesaria para desarrollar la actividad de reutilización autorizada, en cualquier modalidad y bajo cualquier formato, para todo el mundo y por el plazo máximo permitido por la Ley.
Le ruego me indique los motivos para considerar que dichas imágenes carecen de licencia cuando el propio BOE autoriza el empleo de las mismas.
Angel Matilla (talk) 15:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide a link to a file in question. Krd 18:50, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted file added again
Hi, Krd:
Regarding this file:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colorado_GOP_2016_Senate_Nominee_Darryl_Glenn_Portrait.jpg
I added an NPD template a week ago, and you deleted the file. Thank you.
Now the original uploader has uploaded the same picture again. It is here: File:Darryl Glenn (Colorado Politician) Portrait.jpg
Can you please have a look?
(Also, the English Wikipedia article Darryl Glenn, was nominated for deletion and changed to a redirect, and an editor has re-created the article.)
Thanks, Jeffrey Beall (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)/
- Seconding this, it's definitely the same picture that you deleted. I also came here to ask you to delete the reupload haha. This is the link to the reupload: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Darryl_Glenn_(Colorado_Politician)_Portrait.jpg BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 21:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) deleted and warned. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Datei wurde schon wieder gelöscht...
Hey Krd, kannst due diese Datei wiederherstellen File:03 2291 1.3 © Aldo Amoretti.jpg Es sind dazu hinterlegte belege bezüglich der rechte per email zugeschickt worden. Es wurde auch schonmal wiederhergestellt. Gruß Usarch (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Wenn die Freigabe-E-Mail an das Support-Team geschick wurde, wird die Datei im Rahmen der Bearbeitung der Freigabe wiederhergestellt. Krd 14:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Vor längerer Zeit ist das passiert kannst du mir erklären warum die Seite gelöscht wurde Obwohl sie wiederhergestellt wurde. ich finds langsam echt ein bisschen anstrengen alles doppelt zu machen... bei den letzten 3 Bilder die du gelöscht hast mussten auch schon 2 mal emails geschickt werden. Gibts ne Möglichkeit diesbezüglich irgendwo eine Beschwerde einzureichen? Usarch (talk) 15:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild wurde gelöscht, weil der Einsender der Freigabe nicht auf Rückfragen reagiert hat. Krd 15:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Alles klar, danke das hilf dann werde ich nochmal Kontakt aufnehmen und bitten die Email zu beantworten. Bester Gruß Usarch (talk) 08:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild wurde gelöscht, weil der Einsender der Freigabe nicht auf Rückfragen reagiert hat. Krd 15:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- Vor längerer Zeit ist das passiert kannst du mir erklären warum die Seite gelöscht wurde Obwohl sie wiederhergestellt wurde. ich finds langsam echt ein bisschen anstrengen alles doppelt zu machen... bei den letzten 3 Bilder die du gelöscht hast mussten auch schon 2 mal emails geschickt werden. Gibts ne Möglichkeit diesbezüglich irgendwo eine Beschwerde einzureichen? Usarch (talk) 15:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Undeleted File:ChrigelMaurer.jpg
Hi Krd. I wanted to let you know that I undeleted File:ChrigelMaurer.jpg (logs), which you deleted for lack of a license. I actually had added the license, but forgot to remove the {{Nld}} tag. I undeleted without consulting you because I thought it would be uncontroversial, but if you disagree please feel free to send the file to DR. Best, —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- I'm always happy when somebody corrects my mistakes, no need to ask or inform me. On the other hand, please consider to also fix the source and author fields accordingly. Krd 13:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Good catch,
Done. Thanks! —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Good catch,
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Andrew Goudie book cover deleted image. Can you please advise how to have this reinstated, now the Royal Geographical Society have agreed to its release? They were sent the form when the image copyright was contested, but now there is no longer the image on file in Wikimedia to approve. Chrisdevelop (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. Aside from reading this entire lengthy article, what should I do? Do we start from scratch, or is the file sitting somewhere waiting for approval? Chrisdevelop (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- What you please should do is encourage the copyright holder to send the permission by e-mail as described. Krd 19:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. Aside from reading this entire lengthy article, what should I do? Do we start from scratch, or is the file sitting somewhere waiting for approval? Chrisdevelop (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Krd,
I apologize for the direct ping on your userpage about a post at RFCU, but I noticed that it's likely that the CU data for the master (who last edited on April 5) is likely to expire at midnight tonight (UTC). If you have the chance, would you be willing to take a look at this ASAP, before the data expires?
Cheers!
(cc: Elcobbola, Jameslwoodward, and Trijnstel).
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Done by Elcobbola. --Krd 13:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Juniorsportlerin des Jahres 2021 Sarah Vogel.jpg
Hallo Krd,
du hattest das Bild von Sarah Vogel gelöscht. Laut der Deutschen Sporthilfe steht dort folgendes „Ein kosten- und rechtefrei nutzbares Bild von der ausgezeichneten Juniorsportlerin des Jahres Sarah Vogel gibt es hier als Download“ : https://www.sporthilfe.de/fileadmin/images/juniorsportler_des_jahres/2021/img_Juniorsportlerin_des_Jahres_2021_Sarah_Vogel.jpg. Welche Lizenz hätte ich eintragen müssen, damit das Bild nicht gelöscht wird? MfG Quick-O-Mat (talk) 16:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Quick-O-Mat. Wo genau steht "rechtefrei"? --Krd 16:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hier am Ende der Seite, gefolgt vom Link zum Bild: https://www.sporthilfe.de/ueber-uns/medien/pressemitteilungen/stabhochspringerin-sarah-vogel-ist-juniorsportlerin-des-jahres. MfG Quick-O-Mat (talk) 16:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Erledigt. Krd 16:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Danke. MfG Quick-O-Mat (talk) 16:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Erledigt. Krd 16:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hier am Ende der Seite, gefolgt vom Link zum Bild: https://www.sporthilfe.de/ueber-uns/medien/pressemitteilungen/stabhochspringerin-sarah-vogel-ist-juniorsportlerin-des-jahres. MfG Quick-O-Mat (talk) 16:46, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
Eine Frage hätte ich noch: Darf ich das Bild mit dem CropTool bearbeiten und einen Ausschnitt davon auf Commons hochladen? Gruß --Quick-O-Mat (talk) 17:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Ich sehe nichts, was dagegen spricht. Krd 17:26, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Danke für deine Auskunft. Wünsche dir noch einen schönen Sonntagabend. Quick-O-Mat (talk) 17:30, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
This image has been deleted, but I dont know why. I am sure that the copyright holder uploaded the file, but maybe something was missing. What should we do to restore the image? Deligabi (talk) 20:50, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- See COM:VRT Krd 21:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
File:JanKopecny1.jpg
Dobrý den, chci se zeptat na podrobnosti ohledně smazání fotografií File:JanKopecny1.jpg - JanKopecny6.jpg.
Jsem v kontaktu s tímto českým zpěvákem a vyplnil a odeslal povolení k použití jeho fotek. Tyto fotky si objednal pro sebe a zaplatil u fotografa. A v této objednávce přešla autorská práva na něj. Tak se chci zeptat, kde je chyba?
Děkuji Lusylka83 (talk) 15:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:VRT --Krd 15:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Četla jsem, ale protože nejsem na Wiki dlouho, stále nechápu, co bylo špatně. Vše jsem dělala dle návodu a rad od jednoho administrátora. Tak prosím o konkrétní informace o chybě. Ještě jednou děkuji. Lusylka83 (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- Please send permission by e-mail as described in COM:VRT Krd 04:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Četla jsem, ale protože nejsem na Wiki dlouho, stále nechápu, co bylo špatně. Vše jsem dělala dle návodu a rad od jednoho administrátora. Tak prosím o konkrétní informace o chybě. Ještě jednou děkuji. Lusylka83 (talk) 16:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
I come for the deletion of the file of Boris Ket, I forgot to provide the sources earlier, here is the source of the free license, please restore it to me to:
Boris Ket-1 Boris Ket-2 Boris Ket-3 Boris Ket-4 Boris Ket-5 Boris Ket-6 Boris Ket-7
Here is the link: https://awukustudios.com/boris-ket-qui-est-til/ Videke (talk) 11:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- The provided link does not exist. Krd 11:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Löschung Rahn Education
Du hast die drei Löschanträge Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rahn Education Campus Graphisches Viertel in Leipzig.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luftaufnahme Campus Graphisches Viertel in Leipzig (Foto Rahn Education).jpg und Commons:Deletion requests/File:Freie Fachoberschule und Oberschule mit Inklusion der Rahn Education in Leipzig (Foto Rahn Education).jpg geschlossen, ohne genauer zu schreiben weshalb. Ich glaube nicht, dass wir die Fotos wegen der fehlenden VRT Freigabe löschen müssen, diese fehlt zwar, im dewiki ist der Account allerdings verifiziert de:Benutzer:Rahn Education, was doch eigentlich ausreichen sollte. GPSLeo (talk) 07:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Die Benutzerkontoverifizierung sagt nicht aus, dass der Hochlader auch Rechteinhaber an den Fotos ist. Daher ist eine Freigabe erforderlich. Krd 07:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Laut Aussage auf der dewiki Seite sind die Fotos von Mitarbeitern entstanden, verlangen wir in solchen Fällen wirklich die Arbeitsverträge, um sicherzustellen, dass die Verwertungsrechte dort entsprechend abgegeben wurden? Wenn sie direkt auf deren Webseite unter freier Lizenz ständen, würde wir das ja auch nicht machen. GPSLeo (talk) 07:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wo genau soll stehen, dass die Fotos von Mitarbeitern gemacht wurden? Krd 08:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hier: [4] GPSLeo (talk) 08:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Die Angaben dort sind leider nicht ganz vollständig, und die Hinweise an den Account sind leider auch suboptimal. Einfacher wäre es, wenn er sich über den Freigabeprozess melden würde. --Krd 14:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Das Stimmt, eine richtige VRT Freigabe wäre natürlich am besten und das der Account seit Februar nicht mehr aktiv ist, wirkt schon merkwürdig. Ich hatte dich vor allem angeschrieben, weil du nur die Standardbegründung gesetzt hast und ich daher nicht sicher war, ob du die Verifikation im dewiki berücksichtigt hast. Wir müssten dann jetzt allerdings auch alle anderen Fotos des Accounts Löschen. GPSLeo (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Die hab ich tatsächlich nicht berücksichtigt, aber es ist auch kaum machbar für jede Datei auch noch auf Benutzer- und Diskussionsseiten in Wikipedias nachzuschauen, ob irgendwo noch etwas hilfreiches steht. Krd 14:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Das Stimmt, eine richtige VRT Freigabe wäre natürlich am besten und das der Account seit Februar nicht mehr aktiv ist, wirkt schon merkwürdig. Ich hatte dich vor allem angeschrieben, weil du nur die Standardbegründung gesetzt hast und ich daher nicht sicher war, ob du die Verifikation im dewiki berücksichtigt hast. Wir müssten dann jetzt allerdings auch alle anderen Fotos des Accounts Löschen. GPSLeo (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Die Angaben dort sind leider nicht ganz vollständig, und die Hinweise an den Account sind leider auch suboptimal. Einfacher wäre es, wenn er sich über den Freigabeprozess melden würde. --Krd 14:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hier: [4] GPSLeo (talk) 08:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Wo genau soll stehen, dass die Fotos von Mitarbeitern gemacht wurden? Krd 08:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Laut Aussage auf der dewiki Seite sind die Fotos von Mitarbeitern entstanden, verlangen wir in solchen Fällen wirklich die Arbeitsverträge, um sicherzustellen, dass die Verwertungsrechte dort entsprechend abgegeben wurden? Wenn sie direkt auf deren Webseite unter freier Lizenz ständen, würde wir das ja auch nicht machen. GPSLeo (talk) 07:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Bilder von Herbert Wittmann
Hallo. Ich versuche gerade, mich schlau zu machen, wie die rechtliche Situation der von Benutzer Herzemann hochgeladenen Bildern des Urhebers Herbert Wittmann ist. Anscheinend kennt Herzemann Wittmann persönlich und hat seine Genehmigung, Bilder unter CC-Lizenz auf Commons hochzuladen. Du hast in File:Kruzifixus in Bichlbach.jpg ORTS-Ticket-Nr. 2023062510003388 hinzugefügt, es gibt aber auch Template:Images by Herbert Wittmann mit Ticket-Nr. 2010110610003241. Da ich keine Rechte besitze, die Inhalte der Tickets einzusehen, wollte ich fragen, auf welche Werke und welche genaue CC-Lizenz sich die Tickets beziehen. Beinhalten Sie auch zukünftig von Herzemann hochgeladene Bilder von Wittmann? Falls ich helfen will, bei zukünftig hochgeladenen derartigen Bildern fehlende Lizenzinformationen einzutragen, darf ich das, ohne Mitglied des ORTS-Teams zu sein? Und was wäre dabei die bevorzugte Vorgehensweise? So wie in File:1774 Martinau hl. Antonius.jpg (Source: Herbert Wittmann, Author: Creator:Herbert Wittmann, Abschnitt Licensing: Template:Images by Herbert Wittmann)? Bruno413 (talk) 09:25, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Herbert Wittmann cc-by-sa gilt für alle Werke von Herbert Wittmann, deren Bilder von Benutzer:Herzemann hochgeladenen wurden oder werden. Das darfst Du ggf. auch gern entsprechend eintragen. --Krd 09:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Vadim Musayev (RUS).jpg
Hello! Why did you delete the file Vadim Musayev (RUS).jpg ? Digitalberry (talk) 08:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- If you are the copyright holder of the photo, please provide permission per COM:VRT. --Krd 14:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not a copyright holder. But I don't quite understand why this file has copyright issues, but the file Grimmepreis 2023 06.jpg (for example) doesn't. Digitalberry (talk) 11:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The mentioned photo was created by myself. Did you create the photo you uploaded? Krd 11:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- I did not upload this photo and am not affiliated with the author in any way. But it is quite possible that the photo in question was created by the person who uploaded it. Digitalberry (talk) 12:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The uploader of the base file File:Musaev Vadim RUS.jpg claimed that copyright holder of the image is the depicted person, which is unlikely and requires confirmation via COM:VRT. --Krd 12:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- I did not upload this photo and am not affiliated with the author in any way. But it is quite possible that the photo in question was created by the person who uploaded it. Digitalberry (talk) 12:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- The mentioned photo was created by myself. Did you create the photo you uploaded? Krd 11:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- I am not a copyright holder. But I don't quite understand why this file has copyright issues, but the file Grimmepreis 2023 06.jpg (for example) doesn't. Digitalberry (talk) 11:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Frage zu File:Carsten Fock ©Maria Bayer.jpg
Hallo Krd, Du schreibst hier, dass ein entsprechendes Schreiben von Frau Bayer Dich oder das VRT-Team erreicht hat, so dass es sich um keine URV handelt. Nun gut.
Nun steht aber in den Metadaten des Bildes "Bildveröffentlichung nur mit Copyrightangabe „© Maria Bayer“". Wie ist denn dann damit auf Wikipedia umzugehen? Müsste das hier z.B. dann nicht in der Bildunterschrift stehen? Gruß, --2003:C0:8F14:FB00:F8A5:7A14:8B3C:D560 09:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Das ist nicht erforderlich, da Copyrightangabe nicht mehr zutrifft. --Krd 14:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Deletition of numerous pictures
Dear Krd,
Why did you deleted my pictures how ever I fulfilled all the requirements by Wikimedia Commons. I gone through all the online process and I got all the confirmaiton mails as well. I was on all the pictures that you deleted some of them was taken with my phone or my own camera.
Please explain it and let me know what is the legal way to add those picture of me to the page about me!
Thank You! Desertpointer (talk) 19:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:VRT Krd 20:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
File:MeAndLimmy.jpg permission question
Hi. Just a query about File:MeAndLimmy.jpg which was flagged for no-permission and processed by you. It was a personal photo where the uploader was plainly claiming to be the person in the image. Does Commons have a reason to doubt that claim? Or are we acting in the interests of the possible third party who took this photo of their friend at their request, but didn't grant their friend permission to CC-licence it? Belbury (talk) 11:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:VRT Krd 17:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm familiar with VRT. Is that a "yes" to the second question, then, that any personal photo where the subject isn't visibly holding the camera should be flagged for lacking permission? Belbury (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- I won't answer for any photo, but in this case: yes. Krd 04:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- And what's special about this one - that it includes a minor celebrity, so a friend who potentially took the photo might have demurred over freely licencing it in case they could have gotten some money for it? That the setting makes it unlikely that the uploader was able to set their own camera on a timer? Or something else?
- Just curious what I'm misunderstanding about Commons stance on selfies here, as I would have flagged the photo for deletion, if I'd known. (I cropped it for use in an enwiki article, which is why I was alerted to its deletion as no-permission.) Belbury (talk) 08:14, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps a combination of multiple factors, including copyrighted material visible in the background. Krd 08:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll try opening an undeletion discussion if you aren't sure why you deleted it. Belbury (talk) 09:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- As said, I deleted it because I think COM:VRT is required. Please feel free to open an undel request. Krd 09:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll try opening an undeletion discussion if you aren't sure why you deleted it. Belbury (talk) 09:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps a combination of multiple factors, including copyrighted material visible in the background. Krd 08:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- I won't answer for any photo, but in this case: yes. Krd 04:01, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sure, I'm familiar with VRT. Is that a "yes" to the second question, then, that any personal photo where the subject isn't visibly holding the camera should be flagged for lacking permission? Belbury (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Image check request
Hi Krd. Would you mind checking to see whether File:Aclu shoot.jpg is that same as File:Dorian Rhea Debussy.jpg? You deleted the latter on May 6, 2023, for not having proper permission, and the other file was uploaded by the same person a couple of days later. FWIW, the latest upload can also be see used here with some added graphics. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is the same image. Krd 04:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Yesterday I made this request to @Fitindia. Unfortunately, you redeleted the file before I could even have a look at it. I am just a simple volunteer, nl.wiktionary is not my day job: I need some time to look at the picture and to evaluate whether there are valid reasons to keep the picture of what would constitute a proper replacement. So would you please undelete the picture again for a week? MarcoSwart (talk) 06:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 06:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mecca Gate
Did you forgot to delete two photos at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mecca Gate? Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not forgotten but the tool sometimes has some problems. Now fixed. Krd 09:11, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Please undelete
Hello, you recently deleted some pictures uploaded by User:Univerzita Karlova, a technical account of the Charles University, such as this one. They likely (by mistake) did not contain an OTRS template. Please can you undelete them? I will readd the OTRS permission promptly. Sorry for the trouble. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 18:05, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 08:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, ist zu diesem Bild/Ticket inzwischen eine direkte/gültige Freigabe von der Lizenzgeberin bei OTRS eingetroffen? --Túrelio (talk) 16:43, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Nein. --Krd 16:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Bilder von Herbert Wittmann (2)
Noch mal eine Nachfrage zu Bilder von Herbert Wittmann: Ich habe jetzt bei mehreren Bildern {{Images by Herbert Wittmann}} unter Permission eingetragen, was, soweit ich verstehe, die Lizenz {{Herbert Wittmann cc-by-sa}} mit Link zum ORTS-Ticket und Category:Files by Herbert Wittmann hinzufügt. Damit sollte doch alles stimmen? Trotzdem gab es eine Botmeldung wegen fehlender Lizenz. Ich würde gerne mithelfen, aber das kann ich nur, wenn ich weiß, was ich tun soll. Kannst du bitte detailliert sagen, wo das Problem liegt und was man wo genau eintragen muss, damit Lizenz, Angaben zum Urheber, ORTS-Ticket und Kategorien richtig sind und keine Botmeldungen kommen?? Bruno413 (talk) 08:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Für das genannte Bild sieht für mich alles gut aus. --Krd 08:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Habe gerade von Benutzer Herzemann einen Hinweis bekommen, dass er zunächst bei {{Images by Herbert Wittmann}} eine geschweifte Klammer vergessen hatte. Dann war das wohl das Problem.
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
two files
hi, you delited the files: and
. I did sent thire permissions to permissions-he@wikimedia.org on 15.6.23. 09:09, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Nizzan Cohen (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- The files will be restored as soon as the permission was successfully processed. Krd 10:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- thanks. I remailed it. Nizzan Cohen (talk) 10:57, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Two images
On File:1826 five pounds obverse.jpg and File:1984 five pound reverse.jpeg, could you please undelete, a fresh grant of permission has been sent by Heritage Auctions on ticket ticket:2021050510006991. Actually, a week ago. Wehwalt (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- The files will be undeleted when the ticket is processed. --Krd 05:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Permission should have been received now. Wehwalt (talk) 18:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Undelete Request
Hi, I would like to point out that the two files loaded by the LTA a1cb3 would be in line with the licenses that applied to the two files, given that they are both paintings?? could you check if you could opt for their restoration??
--149.50.96.51 23:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Please reinstate Tribocharge_generated_from_a_sliding_drop.tif
The original author has sent CC 4.0 permissions to the permissions email address. 2601:246:5B7E:7300:9C4C:4EA:7B4D:DAA1 13:06, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- I know. And they have got a reply. --Krd 13:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This page is outdated and inaccurate, is it possible for you to go through the list of admins here and refresh the page? --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- What is the list good for? Krd 13:04, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- Beats me. Probably a list for users to contact if they intend to port fair use files over to the respective wikis --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm generally not a fan of lists and statistics that are of questionable use. I think we should consider to delete it. Krd 05:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Beats me. Probably a list for users to contact if they intend to port fair use files over to the respective wikis --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:27, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello Krd. The photo didn't get deleted despite thw closure of the associated DR as deleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Also, this photo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Technical reasons, please see: phabricator:T244567 --Krd 05:22, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Krd,
Ich möchte auf dieses von Ihnen annullierte Porträt hinweisen, das 1922 von Glyn Warren Philpot angefertigt wurde. Der folgende Künstler war 1937 gestorben, und daher hatte die Datei diese Lizenz: (PD-old-auto-expired|1937), wäre es möglich, ihn für eine Reaktivierung des Porträts neu zu bewerten?? Die eingegebene Lizenz stimmt mit dem Sterbedatum des Künstlers überein, Könntest du es sehen, wenn du Zeit hast?? --Ladrrionesius (talk) 12:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Krd, eine Frage, kann man die Datei noch umbenennen in "Lichtinstallation: Brauchen wir Licht? 1997" und hätte das Auswirkungen auf die Freigabe? LG, Naomi Hennig (talk) 13:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Siehe bitte: COM:RENAME. Krd 15:14, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Krd, demgemäß wäre die Umbenennung m.E. zulässig, da Positivkriterium 1 vorliegt und kein Negativkriterium. Gibt es seitens OTRS eine Einschränkung oder reicht ein redirect? --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Es gibt keine Einschränkungen, außer dass Umbenennungen nerven. Krd 05:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Krd, demgemäß wäre die Umbenennung m.E. zulässig, da Positivkriterium 1 vorliegt und kein Negativkriterium. Gibt es seitens OTRS eine Einschränkung oder reicht ein redirect? --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Deletion Proposal - Not Flickrwashing.
@Krd
File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou.jpg File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou & George - Lena Rally.jpg File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou & Archbishop Iacovos.jpg File:Παπαδημητρίου Παπουλιας καραμανλης.jpg File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou Greek MP.jpg File:Dukakis & Papadimitriou & Spirou (middle).jpg File:Eleftherios Papadimitriou (age30).jpg File:Papadimitriou & Mitsotakis.jpg File:Mikis Theodorakis & Eleftherios Papadimitriou.jpg
The latter photos on FLICKR are under Public Domain Dedication (CC0).
Flickr is an online photo and video sharing platform. It allows users to upload, organize, and share their photos and videos with others.
According to EU LAWS: It is important to note that copyright laws and privacy laws can differ between EU member states, as they each have their own national legislation in these areas. Therefore, it is recommended to consult national laws and seek legal advice specific to the country in question when it comes to the right of use on photos within the EU.
https://euipo.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/web/observatory/faq-da
@Krd I request to withdraw your deletion request. For further information please feel free to contact me. ModernTacitus (talk) 07:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please comment in the actual deletion request. --Krd 10:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
In this DR, you deleted the file "per nomination", but my nomination was procedural only; I !voted keep. Could you please confirm you meant to delete the file at issue as above TOO? Best, —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think I was confused or didn't read it. I think we shouldn't open DRs when there is no reason to delete. Krd 17:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I did it because Jameslwoodward may have thought of something I didn't; I should've brought it up on his talk instead. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Bitte um Löschung einer Dateiversion
Hallo Krd, ist es möglich, die Version vom Uploadzeitpunkt 14:48, 29 July 2023 der Datei File:20230729 xl 1558-Hans-Albers-Str..jpg zu löschen? Mir wäre es lieber, wenn die Werbung dauerhaft entfernt wäre. Viele Grüße Molgreen (talk) 03:27, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Das ist erledigt. --Krd 04:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Herzlichen Dank! --Molgreen (talk) 05:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
It is not clear to me
why you deleted pictures (3, I think) of the Po'pay statue in the US capitol recently when there are several other pictures of the same statue elsewhere here. i believe that all these pictures should remain. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 19:27, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is not clear to me which files you are talking about. Krd 19:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I can't find the several files now but they were all more or less something like, "Po'pay by Cliff Fragua". Carptrash (talk) 16:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I can't find the either. --Krd 10:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I can't find the several files now but they were all more or less something like, "Po'pay by Cliff Fragua". Carptrash (talk) 16:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
File: Gesù Buon Pastore Torino
Per quale motivo hai cancellato il file? Ho mandato una mail ai volontari VRT per ricevere il permesso di tenere il file su Commons e non mi hanno risposto, e tu senza nemmeno aspettare la risposta cancelli il file frettolosamente? Così non si fa, non è corretto, bisognava aspettare la risposta dei VRT. E sinceramente sono anche arrabbiato perché non ho avuto un minimo di collaborazione da nessuno, chiedo aiuti e nessuno mi risponde, complimenti! SkorpioDecano (talk) 08:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps it can help if you provide the VRT ticket link. Krd 09:12, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket is:ticket:2023072310003175 SkorpioDecano (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket was processed yesterday, permission sender got a reply. --Krd 03:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket is:ticket:2023072310003175 SkorpioDecano (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
A permission has been sent
Please restore File:Світлана Керимова.jpg
The permission from author has been sent today to permissions-uk@wikimedia.org
Thank you! --Perohanych (talk) 10:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- The file will be restored when the permission is processed. --Krd 10:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
hello. Why was this photo deleted? copyright belongs to me. Atakhanli (talk) 11:58, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- See COM:LIC. --Krd 12:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- please restore i will send the license Atakhanli (talk) 12:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Please send the license, and we will restore it. --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- please restore i will send the license Atakhanli (talk) 12:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi, copyright is not violated. Atakhanli (talk) 12:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- See COM:LIC. --Krd 12:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- please restore i will send the license Atakhanli (talk) 12:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Are you personally the photographer who created the two photos? --Krd 13:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- please restore i will send the license Atakhanli (talk) 12:08, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
File:ROU BH Saniob CoA.jpg und File:ROU BH Tamaseu CoA.jpg
Hallo Krd, zu Deiner Zurücksetzung: Die genannten Wappen sind keine offiziellen Wappen von den rumänischen Gemeinden Sâniob und Tămășeu. Beste Grüße, Stoschmidt (talk) 07:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Stoschmidt. Das war leider kein technisch korrekter Löschantrag, und solange die Dateien in Verwendung sind, ist ein Löschantrag aus diesem Grund auch aussichtslos. --Krd 07:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Krd, danke für Deine Auskunft, aber was meinst Du mit technisch unkorrekt und wie sieht der richtige aus; danke im Voraus. Gruß, Stoschmidt (talk) 08:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Es ist leider kompliziert, siehe bitte: Commons:Deletion requests/de#Löschantrag stellen Krd 08:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Krd, das ist das gültige Wappen der Gemeinde Sâniob in Rumänien. Habe es auf der Website der Gemeinde gefunden, was 2021 entschieden wurde. Gruß, Stoschmidt (talk) 18:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Das mag sein. Dennoch werden die genannten Dateien nicht gelöscht, solange sie in Benutzung sind. Krd 21:06, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Krd, das ist das gültige Wappen der Gemeinde Sâniob in Rumänien. Habe es auf der Website der Gemeinde gefunden, was 2021 entschieden wurde. Gruß, Stoschmidt (talk) 18:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Es ist leider kompliziert, siehe bitte: Commons:Deletion requests/de#Löschantrag stellen Krd 08:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo Krd, danke für Deine Auskunft, aber was meinst Du mit technisch unkorrekt und wie sieht der richtige aus; danke im Voraus. Gruß, Stoschmidt (talk) 08:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Please, undelete File:Vilnius Landmarks 103.jpg
See here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gediminas Monument in Vilnius. A comment suggested it was deminimis, but your close made no mention of this particular file. Can you temporarily undelete that one image, if possible? Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 16:47, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think this can be considered de-minimis. What would a temporary undeletion be good for? --Krd 21:05, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete image
Hello, why did you delete the photo I uploaded?
مریم اسلامی Kibsaj (talk) 06:25, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- See User talk:Kibsaj Krd 06:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 06:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Is there any explanation apart from "I don't see any reason ..."? On all or most pictures listed, the people are certainly identifiable. Thanks --A.Savin 18:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Most of photos on Commons which depict people do depict identifiable people. There is nothing wrong with that. With the given pictures there I see no reason to assume there is any violation of personality rights. Most or all of them have been taken in the street, supposedly with explicit or implicit consent. We can delete them on request if there is evidence that of missing consent, but the sole assumption is not sufficient, not least because the uploader has no possibility at all to prove consent. --Krd 06:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but random people as "Beiwerk" on street scene or building photo is by far not the same as intended close-up of human face. Take as example this picture, where the woman is clearly identifiable and the EXIF data shows a focal length of 264mm, which indicates that the picture must have been taken at a distance of maybe more than 10 meters (even if we don't take the crop into account) and it's quite possible that the person didn't even notice the shooting. It's taken in Germany, and the consent requirements for Germany are clear -- note also that even if the lady (and the other people affected) approved to be photographed, this does not necessarily mean that she approved for the photo to be published, too. --A.Savin 08:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Where do we know from that the uploader didn‘t obtain consent? What can the uploader do to have the images kept? Krd 09:11, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know. But do we really have to assume by default that there is consent? --A.Savin 09:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I see no other option, except when there is reason for doubt, or it is obviously created in private sphere. See Category:Wolfgang Lieb. A non-public speech, not a person of contemporary history in this case. I have talked to the subject before the event and achieved consent from him, but how can I prove this? (The VRT generally does not process personality rights releases because they are impossible to verify, and they are also pointless because they are revokable by the subject.) Krd 09:31, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know. But do we really have to assume by default that there is consent? --A.Savin 09:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Where do we know from that the uploader didn‘t obtain consent? What can the uploader do to have the images kept? Krd 09:11, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, but random people as "Beiwerk" on street scene or building photo is by far not the same as intended close-up of human face. Take as example this picture, where the woman is clearly identifiable and the EXIF data shows a focal length of 264mm, which indicates that the picture must have been taken at a distance of maybe more than 10 meters (even if we don't take the crop into account) and it's quite possible that the person didn't even notice the shooting. It's taken in Germany, and the consent requirements for Germany are clear -- note also that even if the lady (and the other people affected) approved to be photographed, this does not necessarily mean that she approved for the photo to be published, too. --A.Savin 08:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Maya Tesa.png
Hi Krd. Can you tell whether File:Maya Tesa Independent for Warrandyte by-election.png that you deleted has been reuploaded as File:Maya Tesa.png. — Marchjuly (talk) 06:47, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- It is a different image. Krd 06:49, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, bitte stelle die Datei wieder her. Selbst nach Commons-Maßstäben hat das Wappen keine SH. -- Chaddy (talk) 13:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 13:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Fußball-Logos
Hm, du hast offenbar noch mehr Fußball-Logos gelöscht. Gesehen hab ich jetzt zumindest noch File:FC St. Pauli logo.png, File:Fc st pauli logo.svg und File:SC Freiburg Logo.svg. Auch die sind zumindest für de-WP völlig problemlos. Könntest du mir die Dateien bitte zukommen lassen nebst Bildbeschreibungsseite und Einbindungsliste? -- Chaddy (talk) 14:18, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wie genau zukommen lassen? Krd 15:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Z. B. per Mail. Oder du stellst die Dateien kurzzeitig wieder her, so dass ich sie herunterladen kann (dieses Vorgehen haben auch schon andere Commons-Admins durchgeführt). -- Chaddy (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Die Dateien sind kurzzeitig wieder hergestellt. --Krd 04:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Z. B. per Mail. Oder du stellst die Dateien kurzzeitig wieder her, so dass ich sie herunterladen kann (dieses Vorgehen haben auch schon andere Commons-Admins durchgeführt). -- Chaddy (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank. Ich hab sie mir gesichert. -- Chaddy (talk) 05:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Krd
hi krd. Why did you remove the picture I put in on the page about skater Stein Olav Krosby? He is a friend. He called me today and ask why the picture was removed. I did not have a answer. I am not experienced editing wiki-pages. I did my best. If possible, reactivate the picture. My mail is post@jesperenerstvedt.com. I am a established novelist.Nice if you also explain what I did wrong. Thank you. Jesper Enerstvedt (talk) 22:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:LIC, COM:VRT. Krd 04:38, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:46, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
This edit..
Krdbot unintentionally, because it is a bot, tried to add wiki-linking brackets ([[....]]) here in a link where a ticket number was mentioned. It should not have happened. ─ The Aafī (talk) 16:25, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- That's a good one. Now fixed. Thank you! --Krd 16:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd, Thanks a lot Sidi. ─ The Aafī (talk) 07:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:31, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Please delete
Hello, this file (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Janelle_Bynum.jpg) has been tagged as "insufficient copyright tag" for longer than 7 days. Can you please delete it? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 22:39, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 04:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Please Undelete
Hello, Krd deleted the following images that I had uploaded: File:Candi Carpenter Striped Sweater.jpg, Candi Carpenter - Photo By Said Del Diaz.jpg. This was due to "No ticket permission since 23 June 2023", however, emailed permission was sent by the copyright owner on that date. It's 7 August 2023 now, so I presume that would be processed? Please let me know if there is a problem with the permissions; the copyright owner has given clear confirmation of the commons license. Thank you! Alden Witt (talk) 00:56, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- The permission sender has got a followup question, which they did not answer. --Krd 04:09, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- They said they responded - is there another way I can resolve this? I have ownership of the license. Could I switch it to the license where says "I am the owner"? Alden Witt (talk) 22:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please ask the copyright holder to contact again. --Krd 04:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Bayram Hüseynzadə.png
hi, the copyright of the photo belongs to me. please restore the photo. Atakhanli (talk) 20:26, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:VRT --Krd 04:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:37, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Dateien zum Löschen
Hallo Krd, könntest du eventuell die folgenden Dateien löschen / Löschanträge schließen?
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Strukt vzorec Pb3O4.PNG
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:সিঁদুরের রাসায়নিক গঠন.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Acetamid.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Frovar1.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:카복사마이드.png
Vielen Dank, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Löschung von Dateien
Hallo Krd, könntest du die folgenden Dateien löschen?
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:الأميدات2.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Etidocaína.png
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Quinacridone.svg
Vielen Dank udn viele Grüße, — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Nur ungern. Diese Seite wird nicht die Anlaufstelle für bevorzugte Bearbeitung einzelner Löschdiskussionen. Krd 18:33, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Alles klar! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:39, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Plato 2022.jpg and 2022-Plato Openday.pdf
Hi, why did you delete my pictures File:2022-Plato Openday.pdf and File:Plato 2022.jpg? I sent a confirmation from the European Agency on 24 June to permissions-cs@wikimedia.org regarding these images. The receipt of this confirmation was recorded by a robot for the images, yet the images were deleted.
What should I do in this case? It is not my fault that colleagues at OTRS didn't follow up on my email for a month. Packa (talk) 21:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please wait until the ticket is processed, or consider to re-send it in a different language. --Krd 06:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick reply, but I don't really understand why to wait. Can colleagues from OTRS view deleted images? As far as I know, not unless they are also administrators. And why should I send it in another language? The confirmation from the European Agency is in English... --Packa (talk) 20:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide the ticket number. --Krd 06:34, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick reply, but I don't really understand why to wait. Can colleagues from OTRS view deleted images? As far as I know, not unless they are also administrators. And why should I send it in another language? The confirmation from the European Agency is in English... --Packa (talk) 20:53, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't have a ticket number. I sent a confirmation email to permissions-cs@wikimedia.org (I'm sending you a copy via Email this user), and after a few days I saw a robot's confirmation on the image page that the email had arrived and was waiting to be processed (I don't remember the exact wording). Now, of course, I don't see the confirmation when it was deleted with the image. As far as I know, there was no ticket number. --Packa (talk) 11:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- The ticket is in cs language. It is not yet processed. After it is sucessfully processed, the image will be restored. I don't know how long it takes. If you an send it in English, things can go more quickly. Krd 11:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I sent it again in English --Packa (talk) 17:41, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't have a ticket number. I sent a confirmation email to permissions-cs@wikimedia.org (I'm sending you a copy via Email this user), and after a few days I saw a robot's confirmation on the image page that the email had arrived and was waiting to be processed (I don't remember the exact wording). Now, of course, I don't see the confirmation when it was deleted with the image. As far as I know, there was no ticket number. --Packa (talk) 11:03, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination?
Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Short North Murals was deleted per nomination? This feels completely unfair and incorrect. There weren't even any delete votes, simply comments and a keep vote. And these works have to be able to be copied to upload as fair-use images on Wikipedia, and many of these are duplicates of Public Domain works and thus are free to use. Please undo this closure, this makes absolutely no sense on multiple fronts. Pinging back @RodRabelo7: . ɱ (talk) 22:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't see any duplicates of PD works here but consider the reproductions to have of originality. Please go to COM:UNDEL. --Krd 06:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, what? This is such a farce. You're not even remotely apologetic or even bother to read the discussion? It is extremely unfair for you to simply delete the files 'per nomination' when there is so much commentary and literally 0 delete votes. I also have no idea how you "don't see any duplicates of PD works here" when I literally listed four as the most recent comment. Then you simply say you "consider the reproductions to have of originality" just to twist the knife at me? What the heck? How the fuck does a simple mural reproduction of an old painting "have originality"? And lastly I am sick and tired of simply the most fucking awful closes being defended by a "if you don't like it go to UNDEL". Maybe don't make the closes so pathetic. Undeletion processes never work, and deletionist-minded folk patrol them like crazy. You'd think people would follow the rules around me and not be so awful when not only do I contribute lots of great photos, but I also manage to contribute enormous collections. The Media contributed by Columbus Metropolitan Library is one of the largest GLAM collections shared in the United States, which I made happen. Should I even bother helping to further Commons' mission anymore when one of its most powerful users can't even bother to write a proper close to a deletion discussion I'm trying to save? And is completely apathetic when I try to fix things? ɱ (talk) 13:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- The deletion nomination is "No FoP for 2D artworks in the United States.", which is the exact reason why these files cannot be kept. Ikan Kekek seconded this in the discussion. I accept that you don't like the result, but I don't see any reason to make this personal. Krd 13:53, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Kekek never voted and was just replying to all the comments. This doesn't allow you to close without bothering to even write your decision out. I am not telling you here that these files should be kept, I am saying that the closure must allow me time to upload fair-use images on Wikipedia. This would retain some of the content and its usefulness; instead when they are deleted it makes the task almost impossible or impossible. As well, 2D artworks that are in the Public Domain have FoP. So as I noted, the duplicates of American Gothic, Cliff Dwellers, Café Terrace at Night, and Mona Lisa must be retained, and have no standing for protection per copyright law. ɱ (talk) 13:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
The debates are not votes, and the closing admin will apply copyright law and Commons policy to the best of their ability in determining whether the file should be deleted or kept.
- Kekek never voted and was just replying to all the comments. This doesn't allow you to close without bothering to even write your decision out. I am not telling you here that these files should be kept, I am saying that the closure must allow me time to upload fair-use images on Wikipedia. This would retain some of the content and its usefulness; instead when they are deleted it makes the task almost impossible or impossible. As well, 2D artworks that are in the Public Domain have FoP. So as I noted, the duplicates of American Gothic, Cliff Dwellers, Café Terrace at Night, and Mona Lisa must be retained, and have no standing for protection per copyright law. ɱ (talk) 13:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- The deletion nomination is "No FoP for 2D artworks in the United States.", which is the exact reason why these files cannot be kept. Ikan Kekek seconded this in the discussion. I accept that you don't like the result, but I don't see any reason to make this personal. Krd 13:53, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, what? This is such a farce. You're not even remotely apologetic or even bother to read the discussion? It is extremely unfair for you to simply delete the files 'per nomination' when there is so much commentary and literally 0 delete votes. I also have no idea how you "don't see any duplicates of PD works here" when I literally listed four as the most recent comment. Then you simply say you "consider the reproductions to have of originality" just to twist the knife at me? What the heck? How the fuck does a simple mural reproduction of an old painting "have originality"? And lastly I am sick and tired of simply the most fucking awful closes being defended by a "if you don't like it go to UNDEL". Maybe don't make the closes so pathetic. Undeletion processes never work, and deletionist-minded folk patrol them like crazy. You'd think people would follow the rules around me and not be so awful when not only do I contribute lots of great photos, but I also manage to contribute enormous collections. The Media contributed by Columbus Metropolitan Library is one of the largest GLAM collections shared in the United States, which I made happen. Should I even bother helping to further Commons' mission anymore when one of its most powerful users can't even bother to write a proper close to a deletion discussion I'm trying to save? And is completely apathetic when I try to fix things? ɱ (talk) 13:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- If you want to transfer them to Wikipedia, just say who and when and we will have them temporarily restored for that time. This never has been or will be any problem, unless you decide to make one of it. --Krd 14:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I get it, 'not a vote'. Been here long enough to know that, but when the discussion hasn't even wrapped up sufficiently, and there's only one person convincingly aiming to delete it, against me, it's not quite fair to summarize the close so curtly. Can you let me know which files were in use on Wikipedia? I can no longer even see that data to request specific transfers. ɱ (talk) 14:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- There are en:Special:Diff/1168694754 and en:Special:Diff/1168694749. If there are file redlinks not removed by Commonsdelinker, I cannot see them either. Do you think there are any? --Krd 14:38, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, those could be the only two right now. I don't see a fair-use case for either. I did open an undeletion request for the PD murals, and will put those into articles if undeleted. ɱ (talk) 14:58, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- There are en:Special:Diff/1168694754 and en:Special:Diff/1168694749. If there are file redlinks not removed by Commonsdelinker, I cannot see them either. Do you think there are any? --Krd 14:38, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I get it, 'not a vote'. Been here long enough to know that, but when the discussion hasn't even wrapped up sufficiently, and there's only one person convincingly aiming to delete it, against me, it's not quite fair to summarize the close so curtly. Can you let me know which files were in use on Wikipedia? I can no longer even see that data to request specific transfers. ɱ (talk) 14:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- If you want to transfer them to Wikipedia, just say who and when and we will have them temporarily restored for that time. This never has been or will be any problem, unless you decide to make one of it. --Krd 14:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Ɱ, if you open an undeletion request, please ping me there. Cheers, RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Name in ticket
Hi, Could you please check in the ticket 2023081010007551 for this file what is the correct name of the photographer? I think it may have been misspelled by the uploader in the author field (and in the title). Thanks. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Name now corrected. --Krd 17:42, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Violation warning
Could you please review my violation warning and assist me on the questions I asked on my talk page? Thanks! Oleh325 (talk) 12:28, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Which exact questions? --Krd 12:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- The ones concerning deleting of the File:TeryFirstAlbumCover.jpg and the other one about uploading the photos after administration has received the approval via email to use the photo. Because the letter needs to contain a link to the uploaded media, but I can't get it before uploading. Will be waiting for your replies, thanks! -- Oleh325 (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Your files was deleted because you didn't provide permission. If you sent anything, please send it again and please expect followup questions. Krd 13:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- But the file was definitely marked with the "subst:pp" marker (permission pending) and the email has been sent. Why was it deleted then? And also, can I upload after the permission is sent? If yes, provide me with a link to that information please, it would be of much help to me. -- Oleh325 (talk) 13:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- The permission sender got an e-mail reply. Please encourage them to send the permission again. Krd 13:14, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- I will do that, thanks. Now about uploading after the permission has been sent — is it possible? If not, how may I be responsible for uploading when the photographers I have to work with sometimes take too long of a time to finally send the e-mail? I can't just force them to do so, that would be inappropriate. They are not so responsible sometimes, but I can't fix that in most cases. -- Oleh325 (talk) 19:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- No. But it‘s a good idea not to upload the same file again when no permission was achieved. Krd 19:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- But when I'm in talks with a photographer, then I should change the photo every time? That doesn't sound right to me, but I'll do my best communicating with photographers next time. Thanks. -- Oleh325 (talk) 13:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- I cannot follow. Please say again what is the issue. Krd 13:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- But when I'm in talks with a photographer, then I should change the photo every time? That doesn't sound right to me, but I'll do my best communicating with photographers next time. Thanks. -- Oleh325 (talk) 13:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- No. But it‘s a good idea not to upload the same file again when no permission was achieved. Krd 19:45, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- I will do that, thanks. Now about uploading after the permission has been sent — is it possible? If not, how may I be responsible for uploading when the photographers I have to work with sometimes take too long of a time to finally send the e-mail? I can't just force them to do so, that would be inappropriate. They are not so responsible sometimes, but I can't fix that in most cases. -- Oleh325 (talk) 19:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- The permission sender got an e-mail reply. Please encourage them to send the permission again. Krd 13:14, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- But the file was definitely marked with the "subst:pp" marker (permission pending) and the email has been sent. Why was it deleted then? And also, can I upload after the permission is sent? If yes, provide me with a link to that information please, it would be of much help to me. -- Oleh325 (talk) 13:12, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- Your files was deleted because you didn't provide permission. If you sent anything, please send it again and please expect followup questions. Krd 13:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- The ones concerning deleting of the File:TeryFirstAlbumCover.jpg and the other one about uploading the photos after administration has received the approval via email to use the photo. Because the letter needs to contain a link to the uploaded media, but I can't get it before uploading. Will be waiting for your replies, thanks! -- Oleh325 (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Bhumbol coronation 2.jpg
Hi. You recently deleted File:Bhumbol coronation 2.jpg as "No license since 5 August 2023", though the file had existed much longer and had previously gone through a deletion request. Could you check the history to confirm that the licensing information wasn't removed in bad faith? Thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- You are right, this deletion was wrong. File is now restored. Sorry for the trouble. --Krd 11:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Frohnmaier
Hi, du hattest die Datei File:Frohnmaier-06.jpg gelöscht. Was war der Grund für die Löschung? --Jensbest (talk) 13:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- Es lag keine Genehmigung zur Nutzung vor. --Krd 13:37, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Krd, Could you please have a second look at the permission for this file? I think the permission is clear. It uses YouTube CC-BY, and the video is released under a Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed). Hope this helps to clarify any doubts. Kind regards, -Chien (talk) 05:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. I think I was confused by the author entry being a link and not a name. Now fixed. Krd 05:49, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Flughafenfeuerwehr Düsseldorf Wappen entfernt
Hallo, ich habe auf der Wiki Seite Flughafenfeuerwehr Düsseldorf ein Wappen von unserer Feuerwehr hinzugefügt was dann wegen Urheberrechte wieder entfernt wurde. Meine Wikifizierung, das ich Mitarbeiter der Flughafenfeuerwehr bin, wurde zwischenzeitlich auch abgeschlossen. Nun möchte ich gerne wissen was noch fehlt um dieses Wappen zu nutzen, weil die Urheberrechte bei meinem Arbeitgeber liegen und ich die Erlaubnis habe diese Datei zu nutzen. Schöne Grüße Flughafenfeuerwehr Düsseldorf (talk) 07:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Das Logo ist jetzt wiederhergestellt. Krd 08:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
LicenceReview
Can you review licence of some of the images, as it takes time to get reviewed and the free website of Government of Bihar, being a dynamic one deletes the image after some years. Hence, its necessary to confirm that those image were present there. Few of those images are reviewed by other reviewers but they got busy now.-Admantine123 (talk) 08:48, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- File:Nitish Kumar with JDU functionaries.jpg
- File:Nitish Kumar and Tejaswi Yadav examining the work of Patna Metro.jpg
- File:Nitish Kumar and Tejaswi Yadav inaugurating the work of Patna Metro.jpg
- License review has a backlog, and I'd don't like to create a precedent do jump the queue. Please be patient. --Krd 09:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
hi @Krd I ask you please if you could see this file and tell me if it was possible to restore it, it is a photograph taken by Ignoto around 1902. Your license would be PD-old-90, but I would say that being the author of the photograph anonymous, that 90 could easily become a 100, but I would like to ask your opinion, since it was you who deleted that file please do not ignore me please
the copyright of that photo is in line with the license and bon the source information. Ladrrionesius (talk) 18:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
What do you mean no permission since 12 August 2023?? Govvy (talk) 08:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- The uploader is not the orginal creator of the logo and didn't provide a license or evidence of permission. --Krd 09:06, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- The copyright started in 1928 upon its creation, the artist died many years ago, however the copyright is owned by the club still per infinite of Dutch copyright law. Does that help you? I would like the image put back if at all possible. Regards. Govvy (talk) 09:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:UNDEL --Krd 09:24, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- The copyright started in 1928 upon its creation, the artist died many years ago, however the copyright is owned by the club still per infinite of Dutch copyright law. Does that help you? I would like the image put back if at all possible. Regards. Govvy (talk) 09:17, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Banda Vingadora
File:Banda vingadora, Porto Seguro.png
Delete? 🤔 why was it turned off? Fox de Quintal (talk) 23:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:VRT Krd 08:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Can you please explain the deletion reason for this, given as "No permission since 16 August 2023". It was INUSE, uploaded in 2014. At the start of August [5] it appears to have been correctly licensed as own work. At the very least, this needed a check of the file history, or a DR. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I agree and have restored the image. Sorry for the trouble. Krd 11:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks.
- I suspect that the IP here is another identity for the Polish editor who has been deleting dozens of German railway images by giving spurious DR rationales. Commons being what it is, obviously most of these then ended in deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Please restore file, it used to be uploaded without permission, but i updated it (not logged in) for correct attribution and permission by myself (i am the one in the picture). CAVIFAX (talk) 16:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:VRT --Krd 07:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Images supprimées
Bonjour, Une demande d'autorisation de republication a été reçue le 05.06.2023 11:59 alors que les photos ont été supprimées le 6 juillet 2023 à 05:38 - Le ticket porte le numéro Ticket:2023060510007359 voir [6] - Pourriez vous restaurer ces cinq images - Merci de votre action Lomita (talk) 13:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- As far as I understand from the ticket, the permission in incomplete. Please ask again when the ticket is ready to be approved. --Krd 14:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deletion
Hi Krd, you closed this DR as deleted, but File:Zu Beginn der Wanderung auf dem kleinen Waldparkplatz vor der Hinweistafel der Wanderregion und der Markierung des offiziellen Nacktwanderweges.jpg is still on Commons. A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- This happens once in a while when the DR gadget has some hiccup. Such files appear at User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests shortly afterwards. Krd 05:01, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Krd. When you have a moment would you mind undeleting this file for me? It forms a pair with File:Chania San Rocco south side from SE (1992).jpg, but when I copied and pasted the description I accidentally omitted the license, and then somehow I missed the deletion warning. I'll tag it with CC 4.0 as soon as you restore it. Many thanks. Choliamb (talk) 11:59, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:29, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Suppression of Erwin_Félix_Lewy_Bertaut.jpg on August 27th, why?
Hi Krd, could you explain why there was no permission for the image Erwin_Félix_Lewy_Bertaut.jpg (deleted on Commons par Krd ; motif : No permission since 19 August 2023) or why the permission was incomplete? I thought it was complete; I described where it came from and how the rights were ceded to the public domain. Thanks in advance. AvdL34 (talk) 12:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- See COM:LIC, COM:VRT. --Krd 15:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Krd,
who has been the uploader? I would like to help him with restoration.
Thanks in advance.-- U. M. Owen (talk) 13:13, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3AReinhold+Tüxen+auf+einer+Exkursion+mit+dem+VfN+Lüchnow+in+das+Hannoversche+Wendland.jpg --Krd 13:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, bitte stelle die Datei wieder her, für eine Löschung gibt es keinen Grund. Der Text ist gemeinfrei.
![]() |
This image is in the public domain according to German copyright law because it is part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment (official work) issued by a German authority or court (§ 5 Abs.1 UrhG).
|
![]() |
Grüße --A. Wagner (talk) 16:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Das ist erledigt, danke für den Hinweis! --Krd 17:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, warum hast Du diese Datei gelöscht? Es gab doch eine ganz klare Lizenzangabe. Auch den primären Löschantrag habe ich nicht verstanden. Die Lizenzangabe war schon vor dem Löschantrag da. Ich habe dann anschließend nochmal zusätzlich etwas ergänzt. Bitte nochmal um Überprüfung. --Furfur ⁂ Diskussion 04:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Die Datei ist jetzt wiederhergestellt. --Krd 04:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Dear Krd, A while ago you removed this photo from wikicommons for lack of permission. However, Margit Cohn uploaded this photo herself (as well as another photo of hers) that were taken by her, and declared that the photo was free to use through the online form. She received confirmation with respect to both. Could you please clarify what problem caused the removal? Many thanks, YR on wiki (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- The permission sender did not react to our followup questions. Please encourage them to send the permission again. --Krd 18:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
mind your own business..
rude Sahaz1505 (talk) 00:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi, could you please undelete File:Justice_scale_silhouette,_medium.svg, as the file was created by me, based on other files on Commons. (Specifically, File:Imbalanced justice scale silhouette.svg, which itself is derivative etc.) I think I just missed the window to figure out the exact license template needed. Thanks, HTGS (talk) 04:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 08:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:35, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Stimmenzählung
Mir kam bei der Checkuser Wahl die % etwas unstimmig vor und zählte nochmals nach und nach meiner Zählung hätte es 15 opposes. Bis jetzt sind nur 12 angegeben. 2 opposes sind etwas versteckt, und von solchen die erst supported haben.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- Abzüglich der beiden Stimmen, die nach Ende der Abstimmung eingingen, sind es für mich zugunsten des Kandidaten 12 Gegenstimmen. Auf das Ergebnis hat das keinen Einfluss. --Krd 09:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Concerning ticket:2023090710009821
Dear @Krd, would you be so kind to review and approve 4 images under the following Ticket: ticket:2023090710009821
I'm currently working on the following Article [7] and would like to finalize it by publishing those photos. Appreciate in advance! CalvinCandy (talk) 14:43, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- The permission send received a followup question less than one hour after we received the ticket. We need their reply. --Krd 15:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Krd, is there any way I could chase them to speed up the process? CalvinCandy (talk) 17:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- If you have the contact, you can of course encourage them to reply, or to send the permission again, if that may help. Krd 17:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd, probably I misunderstood the process here. So, once again, you've mentioned above "The permission send received a followup question..". Who is "permission send"? Is that team on Wikimedia side? or this is a person who sent the permission for those files initially? CalvinCandy (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- This should be read as "The permission sender…" --Krd 03:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Krd, I've just reached out to the permission sender and he claims he has not received any responses from the "permissions-commons". Can you please clarify what has been asked in this follow up question and what could be done to sort this out? Thanks! CalvinCandy (talk) 23:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- They can send the permission again. Krd 23:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Krd, just to avoid going infinite loops in communication, can you please indicate what should be added/adjusted in the previous e-mail so that permission is accepted by the "permissions-commons" without follow-up questions? CalvinCandy (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- We won't disclose what the permission sender told us. They please just like to respond to our followup questions, which are in most cases very simple. Krd 14:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Dear @Krd, just to avoid going infinite loops in communication, can you please indicate what should be added/adjusted in the previous e-mail so that permission is accepted by the "permissions-commons" without follow-up questions? CalvinCandy (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- They can send the permission again. Krd 23:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Krd, I've just reached out to the permission sender and he claims he has not received any responses from the "permissions-commons". Can you please clarify what has been asked in this follow up question and what could be done to sort this out? Thanks! CalvinCandy (talk) 23:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- This should be read as "The permission sender…" --Krd 03:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd, probably I misunderstood the process here. So, once again, you've mentioned above "The permission send received a followup question..". Who is "permission send"? Is that team on Wikimedia side? or this is a person who sent the permission for those files initially? CalvinCandy (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- If you have the contact, you can of course encourage them to reply, or to send the permission again, if that may help. Krd 17:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Krd, is there any way I could chase them to speed up the process? CalvinCandy (talk) 17:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Demande d'explication pour suppression d'image de Monument sur Wikimedia Commons
bonjour, J'espère que vous allez bien ? S'il vous plaît, Puis-je savoir pourquoi vous avez supprimé les images de la Basilique Notre Dame de la Paix de Yamoussoukro que nous avons ajouté sur Wikimedia Commons ?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Basilique_Notre_Dame_de_la_Paix_de_Yamoussoukro_02.jpg Aristidek5maya (talk) 15:48, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- The reason is in the mentioned deletion request. Krd 15:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Видалення фото
Добрий вечір. Чому були видалені мої фото в статтях Сіверськ, Яма річка, струмок Ширшов? Dolomit74 (talk) 17:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide the link to the deleted file page. Krd 17:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Permission ticket:2023091910000539
Hi krd Permission granted for Main File: Munmun Dutta 2023.jpg. Its copyright number is 29351826 and the name of the photographer is Danish Khan. Please enter permission. Thank you CEO181 (talk) 13:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket waits for reply of permission sender. --Krd 08:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:47, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
VRT
Hello, I sent an email via VRT. Could you evaluate it? Kadı Message 17:54, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. It may sound weired, but all VRT e-mail are processed in their order, ans the more it is asked about it, the longer it will take. Krd 18:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This is a Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie by me. What type of permission is needed for it to be hosted on WM?-TonyTheTiger (talk) 03:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- P.S. you seem to be quite confused about the w:WP:DCM that this photo got tangled up in. It was never at issue in the DCM. The DCM was regarding the photo by a professional photographer that was twice attached by him in the email thread.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 03:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. --Krd 05:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- P.S. the DCM was about File:20230208 Honest Company headshot of Carla Vernón.jpg this file (which the photographer attached to 2 emails in the thread). Can we get this processed by VRT.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 18:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. --Krd 05:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fb/Yes_check.svg/20px-Yes_check.svg.png)
-TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Kenneth Koma photos
Hi! I upload three images (Kenneth Koma) with the consent of the owner, who send all the necesary information about it. You deleted the three photos without advice me in any way and without a fully explanation, and nobody answered to the mails Mr. Sejakgomo and me claryfing the situation of the images. He upload the photos to Facebook, he had the originals, there was no other places where the photos being published so there was no prove against his allegations of being the ownee. We follow all the steps to have the photos released and we were just ignored. I consider this is disrespectful (not just for me but for Mr. Sejakgomo) and I asking for an explanation.
Thanks and sorry for my english.--FelipeRev (talk) 08:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:VRT --Krd 08:07, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Chhanchhana zote hmar
Hi again. Chhanchhana zote hmar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) appears to be abusing TPA. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's still in limits, but will have an eye on it. Krd 09:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
PULC pics
Hi I wanted to know why the PULC pics were removed from wikimedia as well as from the (Punjab University Law College) article? Dawood Ch 471 (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please provide a link. Krd 18:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Незаконное удаление файлов
Это мои произведения, файлы удалены незаконно!!! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_A.byk77 A.byk77 A.byk77 (talk) 22:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:VRT --Krd 08:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:26, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Chhanchhana zote hmar
Hello, I saw your comment on User talk:Chhanchhana zote hmar. Prior to that I have posted at COM:ANB#Chhanchhana zote hmar on the user. Maybe it's time for a longer block? Jonteemil (talk) 18:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- If nothing relevant happens in the next fews days, I think it's time for an indefine block. It seems impossible to communicate with them. --Krd 19:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Jonteemil (talk) 02:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- That user has an alternative account Chhanchhana zot hmar. I saw you blocked the main account. Another one is left. --Haoreima (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Btw, Lalchhanhima zote hmar seems to be the same user so their uploads are likely copyvios as well if Chhanchhana's uploads were. Jonteemil (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Just have to acknowledge how crazy it is that me and Haoreima posted our comments about an alt account exactly the same time lol. Additionally Hmarzotechhanchhana also seems to be an alt account however it hasn't edited on Commons so far. Jonteemil (talk) 09:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Other suspected additional accounts are User:Lalchhanhima zote and User:Lalchhanhima96. These two accounts' uploads seem to be completely deleted. --Haoreima (talk) 09:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Just have to acknowledge how crazy it is that me and Haoreima posted our comments about an alt account exactly the same time lol. Additionally Hmarzotechhanchhana also seems to be an alt account however it hasn't edited on Commons so far. Jonteemil (talk) 09:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Jonteemil (talk) 02:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
This does not feel resolved since Krd hasn't responded.Jonteemil (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think this is done. If not, please advbise what is missing. --Krd 07:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:27, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Wissenschaft_und_Restaurierung_ISL_Enderlein_Tyroller_2022.pdf
Hallo Krd, nach unserer Diskussion im September 2022 ist es mir endlich gelungen, die Einverständniserklärungen zu erhalten. Falls Du Dich der Wiederherstellung annehmen möchtest: ich habe sie gestern mit dem Betreff [Ticket#ticket:2022081510004304] Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber)
an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org geschickt. Gruß, --ThT (talk) 11:09, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Das ist leider irgendwie schief gegangen. Wird in Kürze bearbeitet! --Krd 08:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Temporary undelete files
Can you please undelete these files again File:Glerárkirkja2.jpg File:Glerárkirkja3.jpg File:Háskólabíó.JPG. Ymblanter had undeleted them as per our discussion but you deleted them again before I could transfer them to the Icelandic Wikipedia. Steinninn ♨ 08:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 08:45, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, and sorry, there are three more files: File:Gerðarsafn.JPG File:Fífan.JPG File:Egilshöll.jpg --Steinninn ♨ 08:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 08:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you --Steinninn ♨ 09:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, and sorry, there are three more files: File:Gerðarsafn.JPG File:Fífan.JPG File:Egilshöll.jpg --Steinninn ♨ 08:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Krd, thanks a lot for keeping track of these, but specifically for Icelandic files (the discussion is on my talk page) I will take care of. I make it clear in the undeletion summary, and I am deleting these after they have been transferred. Ymblanter (talk) 10:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please consider to remove the DR from the file if the restored phase lasts longer, because otherwise they show up at User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests and it is expensive to catch all possible exceptions. Krd 11:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will start doing this now. Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please consider to remove the DR from the file if the restored phase lasts longer, because otherwise they show up at User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests and it is expensive to catch all possible exceptions. Krd 11:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Bildausschnitt
Hallo Krd, ich bin gerade über dieses Bild gestolpert. Dabei handelt es sich, wenn ich das recht verstehe, um einen Bildausschnitt von diesem hier, das von Dir im Juli gelöscht wurde. Hätte in dem Fall nicht der Bildausschnitt auch gelöscht werden müssen? Gruß, --2003:C0:8F16:3B00:79E1:7D6B:91F:B892 17:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ja. Krd 21:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Falsche Bildanzeige
Hallo Krd, du hast File:Leona Riemann 03.jpg die Ticket permission ergänzt. Das Bild wurde bei Wikipedia in den wiederhergestellten Artikel de:Leona Riemann eingebaut und von mir gesichtet. Soweit so gut. Allerdings wird für nicht angemeldete Benutzer und auch bei Google weiterhin das ältere Bild angezeigt. Ich habe den Artikel absichtlich nicht weiter ausgebaut oder korrigiert, damit dieser Fehler überprüft werden kann. Was ist da los? - Beste Grüße, --Stobaios (talk) 09:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ich weiß es nicht. Das wird sich vermutlich mit der Zeit von selbst erledigen. Krd 17:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey, before deleting pdf or djvu files used by Wikisource, please drop us a warning! Permission for this file had been given by the publishing house, probably it just wasn't correctly displayed on the file page. We'll send you the necessary info so that you can undelete it. Candalua (talk) 12:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please see: COM:VRT --Krd 12:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd ecco il Ticket#ticket:2023090110006852 - 0 Noctis 0 (talk) 16:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket is still open and will be processed as soon as possible. --Krd 07:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd, ti comunico che è stato concesso una versione aggiornata del libro. Si dovrebbe associare VRT la seguente email e indica in modo più chiaro il contenuto concesso e secondo le linee guida stabilite:
- Da: spe.estero
- Inviato: giovedì 12 ottobre 2023 14:07
- A: 'permissions-it@wikimedia.org' <permissions-it@wikimedia.org>
- Oggetto: PARZIALE ESTRATTO da Il mago di Oz - Cinelibro (1950)
- Cordiali saluti - 0 Noctis 0 (talk) 12:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- As said this will be processed as soon as possible. --Krd 14:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket is still open and will be processed as soon as possible. --Krd 07:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd ecco il Ticket#ticket:2023090110006852 - 0 Noctis 0 (talk) 16:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Deletion
Why you delete Grace Wan picture. What is wrong it's a license picture. 199.7.159.87 08:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Headshot
Grace Wan picture is not personal picture. Its a headshot. 199.7.159.87 08:34, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Subsecretaria Verónica Pardo.png
The image must have not be deleted. It belonged to a site with a CC authorized by the Chilean government. I posted the link of that licence on discussion section as well and as the features of the picture. What else could I do to upload it again?
- See: COM:VRT --Krd 12:33, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
SelfaMK325SEMKO17 01.jpg
The pictures was uploaded with a quote from the photographer that the pictures are free to use, as well as a link to him making that explicit statement. Hence the deletion of that series of pictures are faulty and should be reverted. BP OMowe (talk) 07:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- See: COM:VRT Krd 07:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Restoring files
I need the link information found for the listing in User_talk:BP_OMowe#Copyright_status:_File:Semko17-03.jpg in order to send them to VRT for review. How do I access those? BP OMowe (talk) 08:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please just provide the mentioned talk page to the VRT. That should be sufficient. Krd 08:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Please see
Krd,
Please see: this note
I am addressing it today. Sphilbrick (talk) 12:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you. --Krd 15:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
File deletion
Heyy! Why did you delete File:Masha Danilova singer.jpg? I belive it had a VRT ticket, and marked as received by the team? Or were there problems with the photographer again? Thanks! --Oleh325 (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Permission sender did not reply to followup questions. --Krd 14:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Reverted edits regarding file is up for deletion
Hi! I noticed you reverted about 50 edits I did tagging images for deletion by this User:Hendri Ferdinan Barus (Special:Contributions/Hendri_Ferdinan_Barus) for no license/source. Could you kindly care to explain why you revert them back?
The reason why I tag the images are because all the images that particular user upload does not have Metadata. The user claim that all of the images are his own work, but after I did a little research, the images that he uploads are from Google Maps. Hereby I sample a few for proof:
Thanks. Christian Advs Sltg (talk) 04:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think we cannot delete them with "no license" as rationale because they do have a license. If the license is invalid because the uploader is not the copyright holder, I think in this very case they should be nominated for deletion as a complete batch., because it doesn't make any sence to evaluate each individually. Krd 06:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Noted, thanks for the explanation.
- Please kindly help by nominating all the files (uploaded by the mentioned user) as a batch for deletion.
- Or please let me know what is the correct procedural step to report and nominate for deletion images that is non-free such as mentioned above. I am an administrator in Indonesian Wikipedia, and many times users attach non-free images to articles. If the images is uploaded on Indonesian Wikipedia, I can directly delete it, but here in Commons I have no authority. Christian Advs Sltg (talk) 09:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please see your personal settings for this wiki, Gadgets setion, VisualFileChange, or see: Help:VisualFileChange.js This will help you to mass process files per category or per uploader. Krd 11:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for your info/help. I just successfully submit one request. Christian Advs Sltg (talk) 07:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Please see your personal settings for this wiki, Gadgets setion, VisualFileChange, or see: Help:VisualFileChange.js This will help you to mass process files per category or per uploader. Krd 11:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Please explain why File:NationalLibraryofIsraelJan052023.jpg was deleted?
Maybe I miss something - it was uploaded by me, the photographer, and as in many other imaged I uploaded - it was declared by me. Please undelete or advise what to do to make it come back. Agmonsnir (talk) 08:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Geagea: Can you have a look? --Krd 08:36, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
@Agmonsnir. -- Geagea (talk) 08:46, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Geagea @Krd The picture was made by me and I believe (I cannot check as it was deleted) that as in the many other images I uploaded, I declared that. Please check and update me,
- התמונה צולמה על-ידי ואלא אם טעיתי (ואין לי איך לבדוק את זה כי התמונה נמחקה) כך ציינתי בזמן העלאתה
- Agmonsnir (talk) 09:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Agmonsnir, I restore the file. It was my mistake. I apologize about this. I confused this file with the file that was forwarded to me by the National Library. -- Geagea (talk) 13:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Would you please look into the subject section? COM:VRTN has a similar section. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 04:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
I do not know why you deleted this image, it has a licence that allows it to be at Commons. It was also used in its reproduced work at English Wikisource, so while whomever extracted it way way way back in 2010 could have done a better job, it should not have been deleted, and could have been easily have source information resolved without deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging @Yann: , who inserted the no-source tag. While I should have noticed that instead of deleting the file, we on the other hand shouldn't insert no-whatever tags when no deletion shall happen. Cleaning up old things should IMO not be delegated from one admin to another. --Krd 11:04, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Careful
I don't think you meant to do this (and I can't revert it, because the page is full-protected). DS (talk) 15:18, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have reverted that. Krd 15:51, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Why image was not deleted
I stubbled on a discussion to delete image Bahá'u'lláh_1868.jpg Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Islam90 and in September last year you decided to delete it. But it never got deleted. Can you explain why? Steinninn ♨ 11:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The file was deleted by Yann in 2017 and reuploaded later. --Krd 11:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Are you talking about another file? I don't see it being deleted in 2017. And why wasn't it deleted in 2022. --Steinninn ♨ 11:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The file File:Bahá'u'lláh 1868.jpg was kept as pd-old-100. If the doesn't apply, please nominate it again. Krd 11:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, that explains it. You didn't mention that in the discussion so I was confused. Thanks for the clarification. --Steinninn ♨ 12:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- The file File:Bahá'u'lláh 1868.jpg was kept as pd-old-100. If the doesn't apply, please nominate it again. Krd 11:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Are you talking about another file? I don't see it being deleted in 2017. And why wasn't it deleted in 2022. --Steinninn ♨ 11:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Moheen
user has been blocked on enwp for copyvios. can you check the tickets Moheen closed as an additional layer of verification? Thanks. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- I think that is a bit too early. I suggest to wait a few days, talk with them, and then get in impression if the Commons admin and VRT member status have to be reconsidered. --Krd 14:31, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Minorax: Moheen voluntarily retired from info-en and permissions. Ticket processed by them have benn check by DCB and myself, and no major issues have been found. One ticket will be reopened for clarification, but there is no indication of wrong misprocessing as far as we noticed. --Krd 14:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Please delete
Hello, I noticed that you deleted File:MayorBarry.jpg. Can you please also delete the cropped version of that photo, File:MayorBarry (1).jpg? It has been tagged as "no evidence of permission" since October 26. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 18:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Halogen5848's confirmed status + a filter change
Any reason this needs to be permanent now that they're autoconfirmed? Or can this be removed?
P.S. Re your change to Special:AbuseFilter/281, ("confirmed" in user_rights)
will match both for confirmed and autoconfirmed users, so I did that to save a condition.
Best, —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure variant was the best but wanted to save the user additional iterations. Please feel free to correct it! Krd 19:04, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
File Status Verification, with the ticket no: "ticket:2023102710000762"
Hello, I want to verify the status of this image: File:P-Square.jpg.
A template was added to the image demanding a valid permission, whereas the author have sent all the evidence. Do well to read the permission sent. Thanks. Delimane (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- The permission sende has not send all evidence. The ticket is still open and being processed. --Krd 20:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- What are the remaining evidence that needed to be sent? Because the author has already responded to all the questions asked by Vrt on email. Delimane (talk) 06:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- If you are the ticket sender, please await further processing. If not, we sadly cannot tell you, please ask the permission sender to watch for additional requests. --Krd 06:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- What are the remaining evidence that needed to be sent? Because the author has already responded to all the questions asked by Vrt on email. Delimane (talk) 06:11, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 20:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
No liscense
Hello, I reveived notifications for two of the pics I uploaded saying they are No Liscense. I took the pics myself. Is there any way I can prove this and reinstate those pics? Thanks. 松照庵 (talk) 04:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- I was notified that they are "Derivative works" but they are the pictures I took directly at the objects, not the picture of a previous taken photo. 松照庵 (talk) 04:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- and they are both ancient inscriptions on stones. 松照庵 (talk) 04:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Permission received
I know that there is a process and this isn't it, But I see that the Nebraska athletic department finally sent in the permission for a photo they sent to me on the 19th.
File:Nebraska Women’s Basketball 2023-24.jpg
Email sent 10:02 AM (33 minutes ago) 27 Oct EST
I want to add it to the article but I'd love to see the OTRS or VTRS whatever it's called permission acknowledgment before I inserted in the Wikipedia article.
Thanks in advance for anything you can do. Sphilbrick (talk) 14:37, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- I generally don't jump the queue on request, especially for tickets creates minutes ago. Others are waiting, too. Please let's process this in it's natural order. Krd 14:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Asamblea ADA mayo 2012.jpg
About File:Asamblea ADA mayo 2012.jpg, it was deleted for being a selfie. It was proven the user was promoting himself and some law he claims exists in Argentina. The uploader was globally block for becoming an LTA account after making several spamming edits on various Wikipedias. Can I see what user submitted the ticket in order to check his/her global contributions? MexTDT (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
- The users's contributions are visible publicly. We cannot disclose the content of the ticket as it is strictly confidental. --Krd 07:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t need to see the ticket details, just the user who submitted it since the uploader has a global block. If it was a different user, that is a violation of the global block and it must be reported to Meta.
- Just a little comment here, I can see that this project is not like the Wikipedias it supports. It doesn’t matter if the user is problematic, if he harass or insults others, if he uploads for self promotion unless is trying to sell a service or if users have been blocked for cross-Wiki LTA. As long as it has no copyright violation, it is OK with you. It makes one think you are of not much help to other projects when it comes to stuff like this. MexTDT (talk) 22:17, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- It appears the that file you are addressing here war wrongly linked to a totally different ticket, so it got approved mistakenly. I think this was my mistake. I have deleted the file. Thank you for raising the isssue! If there are more things the check in this relation, please let me know. Krd 09:16, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
In the latest deletion discussion at the above page, three files were noted as being photographs of paper cranes and not the monument, so should not have been deleted:
- File:ChildrenHiroshima2.JPG
- File:Hiroshima7.jpg
- File:Paper cranes hanging outside of the Children's Peace Monument.jpg
Opencooper (talk) 08:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- I cannot read this from the deletion request. Please contact User:The Squirrel Conspiracy for clarification. --Krd 09:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean you can't read that there? I'm the one who said it: "Except for the following, which are photographs of paper cranes and not the monument…" Anyway, I'll contact them instead. Opencooper (talk) 02:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Photos removal
@Krd: Good evening, On November 1, 2023, you deleted many photos from the Wikimedia with a notice: No license since 24 October 2023. What was the reason that these photos lost the right to be included in the Wikimedia resources? Regards Szelma W (talk) 21:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Good evening. Please ignore my original message. I found out the reason. Regards Szelma W (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Moin Krd, ich hatte den Hochlader dieser Datei "begleitet", weil er wegen des nicht erkennbaren Fortschritts bei OTRS etwas beunruhigt war. Kollege Moheen hatte am 3. Oktober geschrieben, dass eine Genehmigungsmail eingetroffen sei[8]. Ist die eingetroffene Mail inzwischen als negativ/unzureichend gewertet worden? Hinzu kommt, dass die Quelle (pdf) eigentlich bereits eine eindeutige CC-Freigabe (S. 2) enthält[9]. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo, danke für den Hinweis! Das lief leider in ein OTRS-internes Problem, da der Kollege Moheen inzwischen keine Freigaben mehr bearbeitet, und daher die Sache unterging. Es ist jetzt erledigt. Krd 07:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Danke fürs Kümmern. --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Regarding a delete
Hi
I have created a file which was deleted by you.
Here is the case.
The file is just an edited version another file which is under free license(I just edited in front of the user and uploaded during the Wikiconference India). I have just modified the text fix for Santali language and uploaded. The same I have done for Odia Logo. Because of my work schedules or forgetting the message on my talk page, I was not able to respond to the deletion request.
I just wanted to check, Haven't I mentioned any information regarding the license or wrong licensing information? Is there a provision to undelete the same?
Thank you. Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 07:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- The file page did not have any information at all. Krd 07:53, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Hallo! Leider sehe zu spät, dass mit dieser Datei wohl irgendetwas nicht stimmte und sie inzwischen schon gelöscht wurde. Warum eigentlich? Wurde sie nicht ordnungsgemäß hochgeladen? FCGermaniaH ist der Urheber des Bildes, hat aber nicht so viel Erfahrung mit Commons. Deshalb habe ich das Bild nach dem Hochladen kategorisiert. Es lag kein Lizenzverstoß vor. Kann man das Löschen rückgängigmachen? --Rießler (talk) 10:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Siehe bitte Diskussionsseite des Hochladers. --Krd 10:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Since of course I can't see the ticket, is the permission from someone who owns the copyright to the model that is depicted here (which was my issue here)? I have no doubt the the photographer legitimately licensed their portion of the work. - Jmabel ! talk 15:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it is from Airbus Helicopters. Krd 17:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi, please review the subject section. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:51, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:10, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
file:P-Square.jpg and ticket: 2023102710000762
Hello, I want to verify the status of this image: File:P-Square.jpg with the ticket number
- 2023102710000762. What is the update of the license declaration?
Delimane (talk) 08:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- The issue is being discussed with the permission sender. --Krd 08:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- A VRT member pointed out something about the image URL.
- The uploaded image can be found here: https://www.instagram.com/p/ClIlr1JrFAS/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
- But the singer did not tag Meaches Production on that particular post, However he credited 'Meaches Production' on another post with same outfit here: https://www.instagram.com/p/CkGuJ2ILrFk/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
- I would later contact Meaches Production for verification and consent. Delimane (talk) 19:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Please discuss this in the ticket only. Krd 05:27, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Krd. Thank you for confirming that the file is to be kept - much appreciated. However there seems to be a glitch somewhere, because we now have three tags on the above page, all with the same message. (Though it is nice to have good news repeated!) Storye book (talk) 10:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Storye book: I fixed that for you. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Krd 10:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- You're welcome. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you both. Storye book (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- You're welcome. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. --Krd 10:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 10:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
File:P-Square.jpg Ticket: 2023111510005895
what is the update of the image licensing below?
File:P-Square.jpg
Ticket: 2023111510005895 Delimane (talk) 14:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
matrika - stránka
Dobrý den, já neumím anglicky, ale matrika jako taková je volné dílo ve stáří 70 let a déle. Načtená stránka je vlastně yobrazené dílo, která vzniklo v době zápisu. martin wolf
- I which year has the record been created? What is the file good for, why is it in Commons project scope? --Krd 12:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Rock hyrax midden image deletions
Greetings, You have recently deleted several images from a page I created, with the common reason being no ticket permission:
curprev 05:00, 18 October 2023 Filedelinkerbot talk contribs 57,101 bytes −4,234 Bot: Removing Commons:File:CHASE 2015.jpg (en). It was deleted on Commons by Krd (No ticket permission since 17 September 2023). undo
curprev 04:51, 18 October 2023 CommonsDelinker talk contribs 61,335 bytes −114 Removing Midden_strat_crop.jpg; it has been deleted from Commons by Krd because: No ticket permission since 17 September 2023. undo
curprev 04:51, 18 October 2023 CommonsDelinker talk contribs 61,449 bytes −270 Removing Midden_examples.jpg; it has been deleted from Commons by Krd because: No ticket permission since 17 September 2023. undo
curprev 04:51, 18 October 2023 CommonsDelinker talk contribs 61,719 bytes −129 Removing Gifberg_Pass_rock_hyrax_midden.jpg; it has been deleted from Commons by Krd because: No ticket permission since 17 September 2023. undo
These images are all my property, and have previously received permission to post them through the process that established that I had permission to post the other material on the page. Could you please clarify for me how we could rectify this issue and undelete these images?
Thanks in advance. DrBMChase (talk) 09:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Licence was given: "PD old" Ruchhöft-Plau (talk) 06:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- We please still need permission from the photographer who created the photo of the painting. --Krd 06:51, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
New Zealand National Party photos
On 2 October, you deleted a set of photos from the New Zealand National Party because no permission had been received. I'm in communication with the permissions team as that permission has finally come through. Here's a link to one such deleted file from that set. Not sure whether you need to be involved, or whether the permissions team has an admin in their midst who can do the undeletion. Schwede66 21:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- All good; the photos have now been undeleted. Schwede66 17:29, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, should this photo be attributed to Robert Wilton? 0x0a (talk) 08:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- The permission sender approved that page as it is. Krd 08:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem. 0x0a (talk) 08:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
I think you might be needed to close this request. Thanks. 20 upper 14:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'd like to avoid to close this as unsuccessful as one of the oppose voters. @EugeneZelenko and Jameslwoodward: pinging crats who have been active recently. Krd 14:10, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 18:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Undeletion request for File:StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNeSs (xkcd).png
Hello! File:StAr TrEk InTo DaRkNeSs (xkcd).png is in fact licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0: Munroe released one of the panels in this diff and clarified that it applied to the entire comic here. Would you be able to undelete it? Best, HouseBlaster (talk) 19:36, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. --Krd 07:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Deletions requested
"Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ushiwaka1189" ("General von Kortzfleisch.png", "Franz J. Müller.gif"), "Koyata Yamamoto – group photo (1956).jpg", "Shinano Bridge Movie Institute opening ceremony, 13 April 1924.jpg" (Error: he isn't Koyata Yamamoto). — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.248.236.86 (talk) 08:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
File:James J. Sexton(1).png
What is the status of the VRT? File:James J. Sexton(1).png your bot is involved. Ticket#2023120510000308 -> URL of this file was in the email and copyright holder email permission was in the proper format. Thanks,BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 02:16, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @BeFriendlyGoodSir: Ticket:2023120510000308 will be queued for perhaps 3 days until the copyright holder gets an email message (perhaps carbon-copied to you?) or the status changes on-wiki. Thank you for your patience. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:31, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 05:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Ich hatte eine Lizenz hinzugefügt. Warum wurde das File trotzdem gelöscht? War die Lizenz falsch? ariser (talk) 08:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Welche genaue Lizenz soll es werden? --Krd 09:04, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ich glaube ich hatte zuletzt PD eingetragen, mir aber auch egal, kann CC-BY-SA werden, meinetwegen, das scheint ja gebräuchlicher zu sein. ariser (talk) 09:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} ? Krd 09:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ja, gern. Aber welchen Fehler hatte ich gemacht, hatte ich die Lizenz falsch formatiert oder im falschen Feld eingetragen? --ariser (talk) 09:38, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Du hast nur ccbysa geschrieben, das ist nicht eindeutig. --Krd 09:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Verstehe. Das nächste Mal verwende ich wieder das Dingsbumstool, wo es die Lizenzen zur Auswahl gibt. Da scheint nix anzubrennen. ariser (talk) 14:55, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Du hast nur ccbysa geschrieben, das ist nicht eindeutig. --Krd 09:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ja, gern. Aber welchen Fehler hatte ich gemacht, hatte ich die Lizenz falsch formatiert oder im falschen Feld eingetragen? --ariser (talk) 09:38, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} ? Krd 09:35, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ich glaube ich hatte zuletzt PD eingetragen, mir aber auch egal, kann CC-BY-SA werden, meinetwegen, das scheint ja gebräuchlicher zu sein. ariser (talk) 09:34, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 09:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Hallo Krd...
...ich wollte mal nachfragen wegen der Abbildungen des Rathausbuchs in dieser Kategorie. Der Autor des Buchs Karl-Georg Pfändtner, der auch Herausgeber des Buchs ist und Leiter der Staatsbibliothek Augsburg, in deren Besitz sich die in dem Buch abgebildeten Kupferstichoriginale von 1527 befinden, hat auf meine Bitte hin dem Freigabeteam eine Freigabe-Bestätigung für das Faksimilewerk übermittelt. Nun sehe ich, dass offensichtlich noch eine zusätzliche Freigabe erfolgt ist, über die Du schreibst „Möglicherweise fehlt eine freie Lizenz, die Herkunft der E-Mail ist unklar, oder sie kam nicht vom Urheber bzw. Inhaber der Nutzungsrechte.“ Sollte es noch Fragen geben, bin ich gerne bereit, zur Klärung beizutragen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 17:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC) PS: Wir haben seitens der MUC-KulturTouren überlegt, einen Artikel über das Buch bzw. die spannende Geschichte der Kupferstichoriginale, die erst in jüngster Zeit in der Augsburger Bibliothek entdeckt wurden, zu erstellen, weshalb es gut wäre, wenn die Abbildungen problemlos in den Artikel eingebaut werden könnten. Viele Grüße --Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 17:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Die Freigabe wurde noch nicht erzielt, auf die Rückfrage des Support-Teams von 9. September wurde nicht geantwortet. Krd 17:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Danke für die Antwort, - Rückfrage an wen, an mich als Hochlader, oder an Dr. Pfändtner, dem Herausgeber des Buchs mit den Kupferdrucken, ich kann gerne nachhaken, wenn ich weiß, worum es geht, und zur Klärung beitragen. Kann es sein, da es sich um Kupferstiche von 1527 handelt, dass eine Freigabe gar nicht vonnöten ist? --Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 18:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Im Ticket ist von Frau „R.“ die Rede. Wer tatsächlich die Rechte hat, kann man sicher nochmal diskutieren, aber bitte nicht hier öffentlich. Krd 18:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Danke für die Antwort, - Rückfrage an wen, an mich als Hochlader, oder an Dr. Pfändtner, dem Herausgeber des Buchs mit den Kupferdrucken, ich kann gerne nachhaken, wenn ich weiß, worum es geht, und zur Klärung beitragen. Kann es sein, da es sich um Kupferstiche von 1527 handelt, dass eine Freigabe gar nicht vonnöten ist? --Pimpinellus((D)) • MUC•K•T 18:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 12:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
I think this might have been wrongly deleted. The song in the file is "The East Is Red", which has long been in the public domain in China (and the movie from whence it came is uploaded in full on Wikimedia)) ATOMICMOLOCH (talk) 04:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- The file was tagged as pd-ineligible, which cannot be true. Which is the correct PD reason? --Krd 05:47, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- The recording features music played by a satellite, (as in, generated by the satellite, and not played from any externally existing recording) which is definitely an edge case in copyright law. I frankly can't find any information that directly concerns such a situation, or any analogous situations.
- If the 'creator' of the music is interpreted to be the satellite itself, I think it might fall under pd-ineligible.
- If it's interpreted as a 'performance' or 'broadcast', such things are protected for 50 years after creation in China, so it lapsed into the public domain in 2020 ATOMICMOLOCH (talk) 21:58, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have restored the file. --Krd 12:55, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Krd
Hi @Krd, I have just noticed you have deleted some photographs which I have uploaded with the OTRS ticket available. Can I know why it has been deleted? ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 16:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Only if you provide the links, please. Krd 16:22, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- 31 photographs got deleted. Listing 2 of them
- File:Talk by Muhammed Yaseen - OSM Kerala community meetup 2023.jpg
- File:Talk by Jothish babu - OSM Kerala community meetup 2023.jpg
- All the photographs have the same OTRS ticket. ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:00, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly the permission sender did not reply to our followup question. Please encourage them to answer or to send the permission again. Krd 17:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'll reach out to the permission sender. Thank you for your prompt assistance. ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:14, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sadly the permission sender did not reply to our followup question. Please encourage them to answer or to send the permission again. Krd 17:04, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 17:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Zweitmeinung
Hallo,
bist du gleicher Meinung wie unter User talk:Wnme#"keine_Freigabe_erforderlich" durch Wnme dargelegt? Rillke(q?) 06:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Antwort folgt dort. --Krd 07:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:08, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Clarification on C:VRT
You have deleted a few of my images because verification had not been supplied yet. The team specified that they had received email verification, but a month has gone by so I understand the deletion. On this page it says:
If there is sufficient evidence of a valid permission, the volunteer will mark the file(s) concerned as reviewed. The volunteer will also act to restore any files which may have been deleted before the permission could be verified, so when following the procedure described here, there is no need to request undeletion.
So this means, once the team verifies the images they will come back? I just want to make sure there is nothing I can do in the meantime. Panini! (talk) 17:05, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Which image do you speak of? Krd 17:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- There's four of them, all of which had cropped versions. They were all done at the same time:
- Panini! (talk) 17:21, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Please encourage the permission sender to react to our followup questions. Krd 17:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd Oh, were they emailed by VTRS? Panini! (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- There was a reply to their permission e-mail, which wasn't answered. Krd 17:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Got it, I'll give him a heads up. Panini! (talk) 17:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd, they have asked who the sender is. Is it usually a specific member of the team, or is it permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in general? Panini! (talk) 21:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in general. Krd 08:19, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd, they have asked who the sender is. Is it usually a specific member of the team, or is it permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in general? Panini! (talk) 21:46, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Got it, I'll give him a heads up. Panini! (talk) 17:38, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- There was a reply to their permission e-mail, which wasn't answered. Krd 17:37, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd Oh, were they emailed by VTRS? Panini! (talk) 17:25, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Please encourage the permission sender to react to our followup questions. Krd 17:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
perhaps undelete an obvious self-made image?
You just deleted File:Comparison_of_the_Runge-Kutta_methods_for_the_differential_equation_(red_is_the_exact_solution).svg. I'm not precisely sure since the image and its description are now deleted, but judging from the edit summaries on w:Runge–Kutta methods this was just a simple English translation of File:Runge-kutta.svg done by a Wikipedia/Commons user. Any human looking at this should be able to tell it was a user-made translation of an image released under CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported license. It doesn't look like there was any effort made to contact w:User_talk:Profywld, nor was there ever a post made to w:Talk:Runge–Kutta methods. –jacobolus (t · wp · wt) 06:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- The user didn't apply any license to their modification, so without the fdeedback I think this isn't possible. Krd 07:03, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Jacobolus: Profywld should have continued with the CC-BY-SA 3.0 Unported license or the CC-BY-SA 4.0 International license upon upload, and then after they were notified on 26 November. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:38, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- This is a person who makes about 1 edit on Wikipedia every 3 months. Sending them a talk page message on commons is extraordinarily unlikely to get a response within 1 week. –jacobolus (t · wp · wt) 17:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Jacobolus: That's too bad, perhaps you can duplicate their work, with a license this time. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G. It is too bad. It's yet another example of semi-automated Wikimedia bureaucracy insensitively clobbering someone's effort.
- @Krd – The uploader indicated at w:User_talk:Profywld#Runge-Kutta_translation_image_was_deleted_at_Commons that they intended to release their work under a free license. Can you undelete this so they can add the appropriate template? –jacobolus (t · wp · wt) 16:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please let the go ahead. Krd 18:22, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Jacobolus: That's too bad, perhaps you can duplicate their work, with a license this time. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 06:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- This is a person who makes about 1 edit on Wikipedia every 3 months. Sending them a talk page message on commons is extraordinarily unlikely to get a response within 1 week. –jacobolus (t · wp · wt) 17:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Bitte mal abgleichen
Hallo Krd, kannst Du bitte mal dieses von Dir gelöschte Bild mit diesem abgleichen?
Mir scheint das Bild nicht besonders problematisch (Panoramafreiheit dürfte gegeben sein, nach einem Profi-Foto sieht's auch nicht aus, "selbst fotografiert" halte ich für glaubwürdig), allerdings hatte mich dieser Revert einer Bildentfernung durch den Dateientlinkerbot irritiert. Gruß, --2003:C0:8F36:8E00:4D76:FED3:8A2B:E34E 11:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Es handelt sich um das gleiche Bild. Krd 11:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Why did you delete this? Is there anything not mentioned in the DR? Yann (talk) 11:39, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- The file was already deleted, so I closed the DR (admittedly without reading it). Please feel free to correct it. Krd 11:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Yann: Túrelio deleted it 08:57, 9 December 2023 (UTC), apparently at the request of uploader Martin wolf in this edit in Czech (which was not adorned with {{Vd}}), as well as his original speedy tag. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:28, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Few images here failed to get deleted. Perhaps some technical issue but are those meant to be kept? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:53, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- No need to worry, the tool sometimes has problems, but thing will be found at User:Krdbot/lost deletion requests. Krd 10:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Why were these deleted? The nomination was withdrawn because it was pointed out that the pictures were actually from a less restrictive FOP jurisdiction. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. That was a mistake, I think I did read the request in the wrong way. Now restored. Sorry for the trouble. --Krd 16:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Images deletion big error
Hello, you've deleted some important images by mistake, but it's not your fault. User:Yann had made a mass deletion request. However, this request was based on misconceptions that were correctly contradicted. Yann admitted he had made a mistake. The discussion and evidence can be found Commons:Bistro/archives/2023/11#Licence des cartes IGN. Can you restore these images?
Here are them I follow.
- File:État des travaux du projet de la Famille missionnaire de Notre-Dame à Saint-Pierre-de-Colombier en juillet 2020.jpg
- File:Vue aérienne du lac de Caussade (Pinel-Hauterive, Lot et Garonne, France).png
- File:Vue aérienne de La Lanterne de 2021 (Versailles, France).png
- File:Bassine agricole de Pouillac (Cramchaban, Charente-Maritime, France).png
I don't know how to fix the deletions of other deleted images that I don't follow. User:Yann This is a serious problem and I would like you to find a solution. Can we restore them to the wikipedia articles where they were removed?
Regards. --Abalg (talk) 17:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- The new discussion about this case (in French) is here : Commons:Bistro#Images satellites de l'IGN. You can write in English. ----Abalg (talk) 17:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Answered there. --Krd 08:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete this ASAP!
Hello! Please delete this file as soon as possible. Regards. File:Millat FC.svg – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 16:53, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Done --Krd 16:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 16:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Status of images
Hello there, hope all is well. The bot has tagged these images as "permission received" and from my understanding it usually takes 3 days or so to be reviewed by a VRT member. I was wondering if someone will be able to look at it or if there was a follow-up or question to the permission sender, which I may not be aware of.
- File:Regine Rocks - SM Mall of Asia Arena - opening.jpg
- File:Regine Rocks - SM Mall of Asia Arena - opening 2.jpg
- File:Regine Rocks - SM Mall of Asia Arena.jpg
Thanks kindly. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:36, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- If there have been any followup questions, which is very likely, then the permission sender has got or will get an e-mail reply. Krd 16:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- My apologies if I may have been dabbling back and forth on your page and the noticeboard about it. Finally got the sender to tell me the email reply. It mentions in the first two images the main subject appears to be the scene design and not any person. As the scene is likely copyright protected, do you have permission from the copyright owner to publish your photo under a free license? If yes, what is the exact agreement? Not quite sure what is being asked, but for some context the owner of the photos captured these during a concert of which he is a photographer for said artist. His work has been used in articles such as the one by Billboard Philippines [10]. I did notice that the first 2 pictures taken were wide angle shots of the stage of which the subject is part of. Could I ask for clarification on what is required? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pseud 14 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- In the first picture I don't even see any artist, but a scene installation only, which has to be considered a copyrighted design. We also need permission from the copyright holder of that scenes. Krd 16:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Got it - and who is the copyright holder of the scene? Would that be the set/stage/visual designer? If so, do we need to ask them to send the same email consent to permissions-commons address? Pseud 14 (talk) 16:31, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know who the copyright holder is, but I think the artist management likely knows. Yes. Krd 16:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have reached out to the set designer for the 2 photos with scene installation images. For the third image however, would the first email consent from the photographer suffice? Pseud 14 (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Pseud 14: The third image is mostly background, you might have to go back to the set designer. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: File:Regine Rocks - SM Mall of Asia Arena.jpg the third image's focus I believe is the main subject, which is front and center and from the looks of it the background isn't even clear and somewhat overshadowed/blended by lighting. Further, the email reply only mentions the 2 images so I'm of the opinion that the third image seems fine? Pseud 14 (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Pseud 14: The third image is mostly background, you might have to go back to the set designer. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have reached out to the set designer for the 2 photos with scene installation images. For the third image however, would the first email consent from the photographer suffice? Pseud 14 (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know who the copyright holder is, but I think the artist management likely knows. Yes. Krd 16:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Got it - and who is the copyright holder of the scene? Would that be the set/stage/visual designer? If so, do we need to ask them to send the same email consent to permissions-commons address? Pseud 14 (talk) 16:31, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- In the first picture I don't even see any artist, but a scene installation only, which has to be considered a copyrighted design. We also need permission from the copyright holder of that scenes. Krd 16:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- My apologies if I may have been dabbling back and forth on your page and the noticeboard about it. Finally got the sender to tell me the email reply. It mentions in the first two images the main subject appears to be the scene design and not any person. As the scene is likely copyright protected, do you have permission from the copyright owner to publish your photo under a free license? If yes, what is the exact agreement? Not quite sure what is being asked, but for some context the owner of the photos captured these during a concert of which he is a photographer for said artist. His work has been used in articles such as the one by Billboard Philippines [10]. I did notice that the first 2 pictures taken were wide angle shots of the stage of which the subject is part of. Could I ask for clarification on what is required? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pseud 14 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
My upload being deleted
Hi, all the images I have ever uploaded to Wikipedia got deleted for no reason I am leaving here email that you can talk to that will confirm that the photos that I uploaded I got permission to upload. Until you send that email please upload the rest of my files. I took them personally!!!! אנונימי 06428 (talk) 18:35, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- AlonS@ch2news.tv אנונימי 06428 (talk) 18:36, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Hallo Krd, kannst du mir bitte bei dieser Datei helfen, ich habe damals bei der de:ASFINAG angefragt, die mir auch die erlaubnis gab und es als keinSChöpfungshöhe daklariert hat. Mehr bekomme ich von denen auch nicht. danke und einen guten Rutsch --lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 17:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo. Für mich hat das SH. Krd 17:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dann mussen wir es leider löschen, denn von der ASFINAG bekam und bekomme ich keine Lizenz. Außerdem ist das ja amtlcihes Symbol auf der Autobahn und damit auch nicht lizenzfähig oder nötig---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 17:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ich seh da leider auch kein amtliches Werk. Was genau ist denn die Quelle? Die angegebene Website existiert ja nicht. Krd 17:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Na dann lösche es. ich habe dieses Logo ja direkt von der ASFINAG erhalten - eben mit diesen Angaben. Das es von der ASFINAG, ist es eben amtlcih. ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 17:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- "Autobahnen- und Schnellstraßen- Finanzierungs-Aktiengesellschaft" klingt für mich wie ein privates Unternehmen. Sorry. Krd 17:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Wobei gleich am Anfang des WP Artikels steht: Die Aktien stehen zur Gänze im Eigentum der Republik Österreich. ;-) ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 20:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Das ist leider nicht relevant. Krd 21:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Aber vielleicht reicht das ASFINAG-Gesetz https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblPdf/1982_591_0/1982_591_0.pdf ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 21:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Welchen Punkt dieses Gesetzes hältst Du für relevant? Krd 21:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Das die ASFINAG ein staatliches Unternehmen ist. ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 09:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nicht im Sinne des Urheberrechts. Versuch es gern nochmal unter de:WP:URF. Krd 09:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, dann lösche es. Ich will mich da nicht weiter wegen einer eh inzwischen veralteten Grafik weiter beschäftigen. lg und einen guten Rutsch -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 14:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Nicht im Sinne des Urheberrechts. Versuch es gern nochmal unter de:WP:URF. Krd 09:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Das die ASFINAG ein staatliches Unternehmen ist. ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 09:45, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Welchen Punkt dieses Gesetzes hältst Du für relevant? Krd 21:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Aber vielleicht reicht das ASFINAG-Gesetz https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblPdf/1982_591_0/1982_591_0.pdf ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 21:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Das ist leider nicht relevant. Krd 21:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Wobei gleich am Anfang des WP Artikels steht: Die Aktien stehen zur Gänze im Eigentum der Republik Österreich. ;-) ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 20:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- "Autobahnen- und Schnellstraßen- Finanzierungs-Aktiengesellschaft" klingt für mich wie ein privates Unternehmen. Sorry. Krd 17:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Na dann lösche es. ich habe dieses Logo ja direkt von der ASFINAG erhalten - eben mit diesen Angaben. Das es von der ASFINAG, ist es eben amtlcih. ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 17:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ich seh da leider auch kein amtliches Werk. Was genau ist denn die Quelle? Die angegebene Website existiert ja nicht. Krd 17:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Dann mussen wir es leider löschen, denn von der ASFINAG bekam und bekomme ich keine Lizenz. Außerdem ist das ja amtlcihes Symbol auf der Autobahn und damit auch nicht lizenzfähig oder nötig---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 17:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of File:IE road sign P-052.svg
Hi there, it seems you have deleted this file despite it not being included in my DR. I would appreciate if you would be able to reinstate it. Thanks. EthanL13 | talk 17:23, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- I have no idea what happend there. File is restored. Krd 17:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- That happens when you nominate redirects for deletion. DelReqHandler will not touch the redirect, but delete the target instead. --Didym (talk) 17:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- That makes sense, thx for the explanation. Didn't notice that before. Krd 17:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- That happens when you nominate redirects for deletion. DelReqHandler will not touch the redirect, but delete the target instead. --Didym (talk) 17:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 15:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Darf man ...
... eigentlich, lieber Krd, etwas abfotografieren, die Foto als eigenes Werk deklarieren (was ja zutrifft, nur ist das Abfotografierte nicht eigenes Werk), und schon ist das Abfotografierte gemeinfrei? Dann würde ich das nämlich auch dann und wann machen, war aber bis anhin der Meinung, das gehe nicht. Konkret spreche ich etwa von der Datei File:Studie Aussehen Randenburg.JPG. Die Skizze ist aus Georg Hartmanns Buch 400 Burgen um Zürich. Skizzenbuch eines Burgenfreundes (siehe hier; von 1967, weiss nicht, wie der Hochlader auf 1995 kommt, vielleicht ein Nachdruck). Gruss, --Freigut (talk) 12:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Nein, das darf man so nicht. --Krd 14:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ich muss präzisieren und mich korrigieren. Die Zeichnungen sind nicht aus dem oben angegebenen Buch (ich habe es eben nachgeschlagen), sondern davon inspiriert (teils aus anderer Perspektive, teils abgezeichnet). Die abfotografierte Publikation kenne ich nicht; die Zeichnungen sind gemäss Angabe auf der Foto unten links von einer Sus. Grubenmann, verfertigt 1995 («nach G. Hartmann»). Falls die heraufladende Person Sus. Grubenmann wäre, dann wäre nichts dagegen einzuwenden. Falls – denn sie ist es eher nicht, sonst hätte sie das «G. Hartmann» kaum als «E. Hartmann» gelesen, wenn die heraufladende Person das Buch vor sich gehabt hätte. --Freigut (talk) 09:37, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Freigut: Bitte entschuldige die späte Antwort, das war wohl irgendwie untergegangen. Ich kann dem ganzen nicht ganz folgen, und in wie fern "abgezeichnet" eher eine Kopie oder eher eine eigene Schöpfung ist, kann man pauschal nicht sagen. Man müsste es sehen.
- Ich kann dir eine Foto des Originals via Wikimail schicken. Wobei das kaum etwas an der Sache ändert: Die neuen Zeichnungen von Sus(anne?) Grubenmann sind wohl selbständig genug (so wie ich sie in Erinnerung habe, das Bild ist inzwischen gelöscht), aber sie sind ja ihrerseits in einer Publikation erschienen sind (die ich, anders als diejenige von Hartmann, nicht kenne), die allem Anschein nach von der Rechteinhaberin nie freigegeben worden ist. --Freigut (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo @Freigut: , Du kannst es mir gern zuschicken. Krd 15:50, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Freigut: Bitte entschuldige die späte Antwort, das war wohl irgendwie untergegangen. Ich kann dem ganzen nicht ganz folgen, und in wie fern "abgezeichnet" eher eine Kopie oder eher eine eigene Schöpfung ist, kann man pauschal nicht sagen. Man müsste es sehen.
- Ich muss präzisieren und mich korrigieren. Die Zeichnungen sind nicht aus dem oben angegebenen Buch (ich habe es eben nachgeschlagen), sondern davon inspiriert (teils aus anderer Perspektive, teils abgezeichnet). Die abfotografierte Publikation kenne ich nicht; die Zeichnungen sind gemäss Angabe auf der Foto unten links von einer Sus. Grubenmann, verfertigt 1995 («nach G. Hartmann»). Falls die heraufladende Person Sus. Grubenmann wäre, dann wäre nichts dagegen einzuwenden. Falls – denn sie ist es eher nicht, sonst hätte sie das «G. Hartmann» kaum als «E. Hartmann» gelesen, wenn die heraufladende Person das Buch vor sich gehabt hätte. --Freigut (talk) 09:37, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 11:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Лого. Савёловский машиностроительный завод.jpg
Добрый день. Почему удалили файл File:Лого. Савёловский машиностроительный завод.jpg в Русской википедии. Файл загруженный для добросовестного использования в статье Савёловский машиностроительный завод. Всем требованиям для добросовестного использования в русской википедии файл соответствовал. Перед загрузкой проходило обсуждение на форуме по авторскому праву. Прошу восстановить файл. Возможно, надо было загружать на русскую википедию, а не на викисклад --Балагуръ (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Загрузил в русскую википедию. Не совсем разобрался по теме добросовестного использования. Поэтому обращался на форум.--Балагуръ (talk) 05:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Filedelinkerbot upgrade?
Hey Krd, I know Filedelinkerbot and @Grin's CommonsDelinker bots have been around a long time, i was wondering if its about time both had an update?... 5 years ago, it wasn't doable but now it may be useful, since wikidata was created, it allowed all articles (and images) to be housed under one dataset. Currently both bots removes links to images that have been deleted on commons but what it should also do is replace the image that has been deleted with the image that was previously on that article or the one used by wikidata for that article to ensure a major article is not left without an image cause someone who did not understand copyright policy replaced it with an unfree one and it got deleted and subsequently goes un-repalced... before wikidata existed, if i found an image used in more than 10+ wikis was a copyvio, i'd try to find a replacement and then use the GlobalReplace tool to change the unfree image before reporting the copyvio to ensure when the image does get deleted here, the articles don't lose out on having a free image on it.. since wikidata came along, i had to do less of it cause wikidata ensure images added there appeared on the articles on regional wikis (except enwiki who apparently think of themselves as superior).
I tried to discuss this on IRC but to no avail as enwiki as usual has chosen to opt-out of something that makes their project better, its bad enough that images added to commons do not appear on article infoboxes on enwiki, its worse when a free image of someone major like a leader/ politician is available but not being used on enwiki because after the copyvio was deleted, no one bothered to replace it, seen it happen far too many times so was wondering what if your bot (Magnus's bot is more global than yours which is active in 3 wikis only) also restored the previous image that was on the article before it was deleted or if there was no image there, added the one used on its wikidata (what use is wikidata if the data there cannot be used on the biggest wiki on wikimedia)...sure users can remove/replace it later if they don't like it but say someone replaced it with another copyvio and it got deleted, the bot will again restore the free one... ensures the articles always has a free image available cause no one ever scrolls down to the bottom to click the wikimedia commons link and the new SKIN has made it even harder for people who browse wikis and use it to navigate through to other wikis. Its bad enough that we have 1000's (if not tens of thousands) of images on commons not being used on enwiki when it could be due to this lame opt-out nonsense ( i know this cause i have added more than 200 that could be used but isn't on enwiki and you know i can't edit enwiki), if we could make it better by using your bot to restore free images as well as removing deleted copyright ones, i'd think that will be great for wikimedia as a whole....don't you? Stemoc 03:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that it could be a good idea, but before I start I would like to see this as a flow chart or similar, to be sure we agree on the same thing. --Krd 04:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- I am not sure you could describe a computationally feasible way to find "an image used before a deleted image", and I am also not sure that it would be very useful. In my observation most images work the way that
- it gets uploaded
- it gets inserted into the article or template (or recently wikidata)
- so there is no "previous image" in the majority of the cases. Also it is usually not "computationally distinguishable" when someone edits an article or just replaces an image; a little additional formatting may break this fragile guesswork.
- Of course smart code can do a lot of guesswork, heuristics, but even in the fairly simple CommonsDelinker case there are a lot of problems, exceptions, breakage due to extreme wikiscript syntax deviations and flexibility.
- I'm not sure a bot is the best way to handle interpretation of edits, I'd say humans are much better in that, but that's my opinion. (There could be a bot replacing recent deleted_image edits with a human defined replacement_image, but I have my doubts about its resilience against abuse.)
- As Krd said you could try to define what the bot would have to do and you would very possibly realise that it would handle 70% of the cases right and would break (or miss) 30% of the rest. :-/ And it'd be very bad efficiency. IMHO. grin ✎ 09:38, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 04:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)