User talk:Useddenim
 | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Copyright status: File:BSicon lhSTR3+1ae.svg
[edit]
Copyright status: File:BSicon lhSTR3+1ae.svg
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:BSicon lhSTR3+1ae.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
vABZgr-ABZgr
[edit]
Was the small white triangle placed intentionally? elLeGiMark@ 13:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- But, looking better, there is something wrong: the thickness of the upper left track is 110 px instead of 100. elLeGiMark@ 16:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Fixed, thank you. Useddenim (talk) 16:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- But, looking better, there is something wrong: the thickness of the upper left track is 110 px instead of 100. elLeGiMark@ 16:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Your repeated mistake on talkpage Talk:BSicon/Renaming
[edit]Hello Useddenim. Could you please correct your mistake on talkpage Talk:BSicon/Renaming, which brings the page in the Category:Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls. As you can see on Template:Url you can use it with "1=" and "2=" or without both name of parameters, as I corrected it with my given contributions summary. Thanks. -- ato (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Ato 01: Done, and FWIW, your correction didn't fix it either. Useddenim (talk) 11:56, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
"Long" icons
[edit]There is no use whatsoever for icons with a height greater than 500px, right? At least I cannot think of one, except to create unnecessary white space. (See icon 
(cL)) Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 15:35, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- They're the creation of a single Russian editor who insists on doing his own thing. I think Tuvalkin tried reaching out to him a few years ago but didn't get any response. I've put them all into Category:BSicon/experimental/railway/double-size. Useddenim (talk) 18:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. Thank you for the clarification. Hotdog with ketchup (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2024 (UTC)