User talk:Dmitry Dzhagarov

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dmitry Dzhagarov!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:16, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Внеклеточные везикулы. JPEG (*.jpg).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 08:39, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Индуцированные Стволовые Клетки.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

El Grafo (talk) 13:04, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Архитектура комплекса экзосома.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 16:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Биогенез и секреция Wnt.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

ThatBPengineer (talk) 15:52, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This drawing was first drawn by me. The link you submitted is a copy from my original drawing and nothing more. Did I forbid them to copy my work? A copy of my work can not serve as a basis for deleting the original. Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 18:10, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know how to remove the tag for deletion. Please delete it yourself.Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The drawing was first made by me for an article in "Biomolecule" in 2012. https://biomolecula.ru/articles/vazhneishie-strelochniki-kletok-organizma-belki-wnt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk • contribs) 19:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Коронавирус

[edit]

Дмитрий, Вам картинка нужна или нет? Уже два дня жду Вашей реакции. --Kaidor (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Извините, ложная тревога. На исходную картинку уже выдали лицензию. Так что ее удаление больше не грозит. Простите что побеспокоил.Кстати, только что посмотрел Ваш вариант он не хуже исходника. Так что может быть (если понадобится новый вариант, а он вскоре может понадобиться) модифицировать будем уже с него.Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 06:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Во-первых, не понял что значит "выдали лицензию"? Здесь лицензии не выдают, а только проверяют походит лицензия конкретного изображения для викисклада или нет. Во-вторых, если Ваш файл подпадает под лицензию CC-BY-2.0-DE, значит на его основе можно создавать другие, производные изображения, что я собственно и сделал. И эти производные будут иметь точно такую же (или более свободную) лицензию, а значит их можно загружать на склад. Поэтому свою картинку я всё же загружу, пусть в добавок к вашему варианту будет ещё один - векторный. Вы главное проверьте всё ли правильно и ответьте про прямоугольник с красным крестом. (И, к слову, это не "точная копия". Другие цвета, шрифты, расположение надписей в данном случае имеют значение.) --Kaidor (talk) 07:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Дмитрий, если мы ничего не сделаем - файл удалят. Помогите мне спасти его. --Kaidor (talk) 19:50, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

К сожалению материал где был использован этот файл был удален как не соответствующий "высокому уровню" Википедии. Извините, но меня самого хотели заблокировать ни за что ни про что Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 07:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Я полностью перерисую картинку так, что никаких претензий к ней не будет. Если помните, я уже делал это. И те изображения до сих пор лежат на складе и никто их не трогает. То же самое я сделаю и в этот раз. От Вас потребуется только научная консультация. Всю графическую и юридическую часть я беру на себя. Это непорядок, что в википедии до сих пор нет приличной иллюстрации на столь актуальную тему.--Kaidor (talk) 13:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Перересуйте, но только другую картинку https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-020-05985-9/figures/1 только боюсь что и она уже устарела также как Ваша. Тут все очень быстро меняется. Лучше подождать пока устаканится. Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 14:07, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Мою правку удалили так что не куда добавить картинку см. "Другие потенциальные терапевтические подходы включают помимо 1. разработки вакцины на основе белка шипа SARS-CoV-2: 2. ингибитор трансмембранной протеазы серина 2 (TMPRSS2) для блокирования активации белка шипа (например камостат); 3. блокирование поверхностного рецептора ACE2 с использованием анти-ACE2-антитела или пептидов; и 3. разработку рекомбинантного белка в виде растворимой формы ACE2, которая должна замедлять проникновение вируса в клетки посредством конкурентного антагонизма с SARS-CoV-2 и, следовательно, уменьшать распространение вируса, а также защищать легкое от повреждения благодаря своей уникальной ферментативной функции[1]." см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Коронавирусная_инфекция_COVID-19&diff=next&oldid=105689634 Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 14:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Не совсем понял. То есть информация на той картинке, что я собирался перерисовать была ошибочной? И что мне делать с этим текстом? --Kaidor (talk) 14:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Не ошибочной, а не полной. Подождите 1-2 недели, там видно будет какую картинку сделать Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 19:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ну ОК. Когда ситуация прояснится - дайте знать. Так всё нарисуем, что ни одна зараза (вирусная :) ) не сможет удалить. --Kaidor (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Two ways for the design of inhibitors of viral entry.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Two ways for the design of inhibitors of viral entry.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

HyperGaruda (talk) 07:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frailty.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 02:26, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:EV PMC8493967.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:EV PMC8493967.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, shizhao (talk) 02:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do I or Wikipedia needed these images? If Wikipedia needs images, let the bots take the trouble to contact the authors of the original source and ask for permission themselves. I help Wikipedia, but I'm not a bot. Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
With today's IT technology, it's also not difficult to convert these images into new permission-free drawings. Why destroy labor when you can transform it! Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Потенциальные терапевтические подходы