User talk:0x0a

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2020 - 2022, 2023, 2024

Review 2

[edit]

Hello 0x0a, Can you please review these images?

Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 02:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image

[edit]

Can you please review this image?

Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 17:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@0x0a Please. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 23:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aurelio Sandoval This screenshot is quite blurry. I recommend capturing this one instead. 0x0a (talk) 04:38, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@0x0a They are photographs, and I don't know if these photographs are from that channel. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 15:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What Permission Details are Required of Her?

[edit]

@0x0a, Thank you for reviewing my image upload, but what specific information or permission details are required of her in the email? Also, do I personally have to write to Commons too or her email will be enough? Stephenranks (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stephenranks The permission should be send by the photographer normally, or by the subject of the photograph if the copyright was explicitly transferred by contract. Please direct her to this page to release the rights to this work. 0x0a (talk) 23:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check Lisence my countray

[edit]

{{PD-Iran}} . . / . . All my Files Have This Permission. Check Details. . . / . . M najafvand (talk) 13:58, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

مجوز Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

[edit]

{{cc-by-4.0}}
Are you problem by this licence?? Instagram Have This Permission. M najafvand (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@M najafvand: :The vast majority of images found on the internet, inluding Instagram and Facebook, are copyright-protected and may not be uploaded. The fact that an image has been posted to a publicly-available website does not give you implied permission to re-use it nor to upload it here.

_______

@0x0a: Dear:

When dealing with photographs of people, we are required to consider the legal and moral rights of the subject. These rights may restrict or impose obligations on those taking, uploading or re-using a photo. These issues are quite distinct from the copyright status of the photo. A Creative Commons licence or public domain status, for example, means that the copyright owner (usually the photographer) has waived or lost certain rights and that their permission to use the photo is not required. However, this does not affect any rights belonging to the subject of the photograph. more : https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people حقوق هر شخص و هر کشوری قابل احترام است.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M najafvand (talk • contribs) 09:16, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Third-party images published by the National Weather Service

[edit]

I've now reviewed 1,000 images uploaded under the rationales expressed in the {{PD-NWS}} template and requested deletion of several.

The arguments for deletion, and to keep, are now following repetitive, predictable patterns and it would greatly help all involved if we could centralise discussion and obtain some wider community input.

Therefore, I have opened an RfC to gather opinions. Apologies in advance: it's long and detailed, but is frankly nothing compared to the words and time expended by all parties up to this point. Probably the most crucial issue revolves around how we interpret a general disclaimer published at weather.gov (Q.1 in the RfC).

Your advice is greatly appreciated! --Rlandmann (talk) 10:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Android Auto UI.png

[edit]
File:Android Auto UI.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

shizhao (talk) 02:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:0x0a&oldid=930094801"