User talk:Túrelio/Archive13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talkpage archive from 2018


Thanks and copyvios[edit]

Hi,

Thank you for removing two versions from https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File%3ADewi-persik.jpg

I was searching where and how to notice that there are COM:NETCOPYRIGHT problems: [1][2]

Best regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Foto webcam Baustelle Seilbahn Zugspitze[edit]

Hallo Turelio,

die Begründung deiner Löschung der Bilder von der Foto webcam https://www.foto-webcam.eu/impressum/ bezieht sich auf das allgemeine Impressum und wären insofern gerechtfertigt. Es gibt jedoch für jede einzelne webcam spezifische Nutzungsbedingungen. In diesem Fall für https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/bzb-gipfel/ und https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/bzb-tal. Darin ist die Verwendung für jeden Zweck explizit erlaubt, wenn die als Quelle ein Link zu webseite der webcam angegeben wird. Konkret steht dort folgender Text unter dem Info Button: Webcam-Infos: "Verlinkung, Einbindung und Nutzung des Webcambildes: Das Setzen von Links auf diese Webcam ist ausdrücklich erlaubt, wenn als Linkziel die Adresse https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/bzb-gipfel/ genutzt wird. ... Die Nutzung und Veröffentlichung der Bilder in TV-, Druck- oder Internetmedien ist erlaubt, wenn als Bildquelle deutlich lesbar die Adresse www.foto-webcam.eu angegeben wird. Bei Internetmedien ist diese Quellenangabe als klickbarer Link zu realisieren."

Deshalb habe ich einen Antrag auf Wiederherstellung der Dateien gestellt. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Baustelle_Seilbahn_Zugspitze_-_Gipfel_webcam_2017_12_26_10_50_lm.jpg MfG--HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 14:12, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo HeinrichStuerzl,
das ist völlig in Ordnung. Ich habe die Fotos übrigens weder nominiert noch gelöscht. Als ich die zur Schnelllöschung markierten Dateien durchgegangen bin, ist mir aufgefallen, dass der LA-Steller dich garnicht informiert hatte. Das habe ich dann nachgeholt. Ich hatte mir die Quell-Website durchaus angeschaut und war danach aber nicht viel schlauer als vorher. --Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Danke fürs Informieren und die Klarstellung! --HeinrichStuerzl (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright[edit]

Hi ElVengado,
my above warning and the deletions of some of your uploads, are not a punishment. They are necessary to prevent legal actions by the copyright-holders against you and against re-users of your uploads. So, this is for your own protection.
If you want your other uploads have deleted, please request deletion directly on the image page(s). --Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a punishment, you're right, my english isn't too good and I can't find the correct word. Anyway, I saw that one of my own photos had already been deleted before I made the request. Well, thanks again for the information.

ElVengador (talk) 10:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Image[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I'd like to use your image of Mother Teresa in our quarterly published church flyer. Thank you so much.Merica1978 (talk) 19:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC) 14/01/2018[reply]

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Personal conflict moved from uk.wiki to Commons[edit]

Hello, I'm admin at uk.wiki. I blocked User:Yuriy Urban in uk.wiki on Jan, 12 during the conflict with User:Dgho. Now Yuriy Urban tries to retaliate here putting Dgho's files under deletion. I can suggest speedy closure of all recent nominations at User_talk:Dgho page.--Brunei (talk) 17:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Brunei: These nominations meet project rules. Soon I will check your photos --Yuriy Urban (talk) 17:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You can check his or mine any time, but not with nomination of obviously normal files. Here's an example of user attacking, nothing more, unfortunately.--Brunei (talk) 19:43, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Brunei: Зара гляну, рівно як і продовжуватиму супроти вас нерусів боротися опісля повернення. Гадаю більш тонко. --Yuriy Urban (talk) 17:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giorgi Danibegashvili.jpg[edit]

I'm confused by your removal of the copyvio deletion request on File:Giorgi Danibegashvili.jpg with the comment "website says "courtesy of artist" and as uploader's name suggests to be the artist himself". The uploader's name suggests he's the guy in front of the camera (the subject), not the guy behind the camera (the copyright owner). Cabayi (talk) 13:27, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the cited credit suggests that the artist has authorized at least the use of this image on the website, which allows the conclusion that he owns or has acquired the copyright. Evaluating the image scene it seems not unlikely that he even has shot it by himself, for example by using a en:Self timer. As already stated, the account-name of the uploader User:Giorgi Danibegashvili suggests that he may be the depicted artist. Anyway, I wouldn't have completely removed your speedy, if there weren't a regular DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giorgi Danibegashvili.jpg anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

It was first time I try to upload a file here. How I can know about the license of the file or image before I upload it here? Please explain and help me, thanks before.--Rachael Adrino (talk) 14:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rachael,
I am aware that this is not easy for a new user. In general, Wikia is not reliable in regard to ownership claims. People upload images and claim them as "own work", whether it is true or they have just stolen it from elsewhere. Therefore, I would not recommend to upload any image, which you have found on Wikia, to Commons. A far more reliable source for freely license images is Flickr.com. Remember: Images can only be uploaded to Commons if they are either very old and thereby out of copyright, or if they have been released by theier creator under a free license, such as CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, CC-0 (but not: CC_BY-NC, CC-BY-ND), GFDL or similar. --Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Velliapura stone inscription[edit]

To Túrelio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decan.reporter (talk • contribs) 18:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Dear Sir thanking you for directing me in the right direction source of all my pics or photos is the Velliapura palace , Velim, Goa Velliapura Place is the residence of modern day descendants of Kadambas thanking you Decan.reporter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decan.reporter (talk • contribs) 18:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Decan.reporter,
your upload File:Velliapura Stone Inscriptions.jpg looks like a copy from a book or a paper-print.
At [3] you wrote: Velliapura pics are given to me by Velliapura Family, Velim Goa, India Decan.Reporter
But, who created the original book/print/whatever?
--Túrelio (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Austroboletus eburneus 424753.jpg[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have a bit of time, please consider marking this image. Commons has only 2 species of this mushroom--and I uploaded the second image now. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leoboudv, what do you mean by "marking", reviewing the license status? --Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos Heinz_Nigg und Opernhaus-Krawall[edit]

Lieber Turelio, ich habe für beide Fotos um Permission eingegeben an: permission-de@wikimedia.org

Foto Zürich_Opernhaus-Krawall.tif: 23. Januar, 22:39 Uhr Sehr geehrtes Support-Team, ich, Heinz Nigg, erkläre in Bezug auf das Bild »Zürich_Opernhaus-Krawall.tif«, dass ich dessen Urheber/in bin. Der Künstler des Werkes, dem das Bild »Zürich_Opernhaus-Krawall.tif« zugrunde liegt, bin ich selbst. Ich erlaube hiermit jedermann die Weiternutzung des Bildes unter der freien Lizenz »Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Namensnennung – Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 international“«. Ich genehmige somit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritten das Recht, das Bild (auch kommerziell oder gewerblich) zu nutzen und zu verändern, sofern sie die Lizenzbedingungen wahren. Mir ist bekannt, dass ich diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen kann. Mir ist bekannt, dass sich die freie Lizenzierung nur auf das Urheberrecht sowie verwandte Rechte bezieht und es mir daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund anderer Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen. Gleichwohl erwerbe ich keinen Anspruch darauf, dass das Bild dauerhaft in Wikipedia oder einem ihrer Schwesterprojekte eingestellt wird. Vorgangs-Nummer: 1550-c2ec1006f359e515. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Heinz Nigg

Foto Heinz_Nigg.jpg: 25. Januar, 12:22 Uhr Anbei das Bestätigungsmail von Urs Jaudas, das er Ihne gestern direkt zukommen liess. Mit freundlichen Grüssen, Heinz Nigg Ich, Urs Jaudas, gebe das Foto Heinz_Nigg.jpg frei für die Veröffentlichung in Wikimedia Commons. Ich als Urheberrechtsinhaber erlaube es jedem, dieses Werk für jeglichen Zweck, inklusive uneingeschränkter Weiterveröffentlichung, kommerziellem Gebrauch und Modifizierung, zu nutzen. Freundliche Grüsse, Urs Jaudas <censored> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Visualstudies (talk • contribs) 11:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prima. --Túrelio (talk) 13:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi, how do I add a license to my upload? --Neriman2003 (talk) 14:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neriman2003, when you upload an image to Commons you are given several choices of licenses. However, at first you need to have a license. A license is a permission which only the creator/author can give. So, when you are not the author, but take an image from elsewhere, you first need to ensure yourself, that the creator/author of that image did put it really under one of the free licenses, which are accepted at Commons (COM:L). --Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Senator photos[edit]

Well if you actually payed attention you would notice I already listed the source as the Congressional Pictorial Directory 110th Congress. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nonstopmaximum (talk • contribs) 10:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not sufficient! We need to be able to verify your claim about the license. US gov websites are known to use also non-gov-created material, which do not fall under US-gov-PD. So, the mere claim "it's on their website" is not accepted. As you likely didn't get these images as a print, but took them from a website, why can't you give the proper URL? --Túrelio (talk) 11:19, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Queue of Visitors Take the Shuttle Buses in THSR Taichung Station 20161126.jpg[edit]

I looked at your edits. I don't understand what it means to "Commons:Categories#Over-categorization".--Kai3952 (talk) 13:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I had explained that already on COM:ANV. Anyway,
--Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why didn't he say to me? when I don't know that he has added Category:2016 in Taichung to Category:2016 Ching Chuang Kang Air Force Base Open Day, he will be seen as a vandalism by doing so. In particular, I saw he has massively removed cat, and I have not been notified by User:玄史生. At that time, I can't see anything wrong with my edits. But I'm bothered by he has his own thinking of editing the Wikimedia.Commons, and what is worse, I was "denounced" by him during my discussion with him. You can see: [7], [8], and [9]. So I can't ask him this question: "Why didn't he say to me?" This is why I don't know that he has added Category:2016 in Taichung to Category:2016 Ching Chuang Kang Air Force Base Open Day.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

question[edit]

Hello Sir,

You sent me last warning for not adding more personal photos because of violation otherwise you will block me.

Please let me know how it considered to be violation?

It's me Dr. Nihad Ibrahim the one who's in the photo. I mean I 'm the photo owner and the copyright is mine.

I uploaded my personal photo to add it to my page on Arabic Wikipedia. I marked the choice of "my own work" not a violation.

All what happened that I uploaded my photo previously following all your steps, but I wrote the file name in a wrong way. For my bad luck this fault repeated unwillingly because of wrong copy/paste process. That's why I asked "Wikimedia Commons" to delete all what I did by mistake, and tried from the beginning.

That's all what happened.

Sorry if I bother you that much.

If you have any clarification, notes or questions you are most welcome.


All my target is adding my personal photo to my page on Arabic Wikipedia. 

       Thanks for your long patience

Dr. Nihad Ibrahim — Preceding unsigned comment added by غاوى فن (talk • contribs) 14:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nihad,
first, we cannot know who is behind the account غاوى فن. And we usually do not ask, as every user is granted the anonymity he/she wants. So, you will not be forced to publicly identify your account-name with your real name.
Therefore, when غاوى فن uploaded File:Nihad Ibrahim.jpg as own work, and we found it at https://www.facebook.com/nihad.ibrahim.52, we simply had to assume, that he had copied it from Facebook and thereby violated copyright, because images on Facebook are not free and you can never know whether the owner of the page, where an image is shown, has really the copyright over that image.
The threat to block you was necessary as you had already uploaded some images, which were considered to violate copyright, and you even re-uploaded one.
So, if you are the copyright-holder of File:Nihad Ibrahim.jpg, I would recommend you, to send per email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org a statement of your ownership/copyright-holdership in this image and your intent to release it under the choosen license. In this mail you need also provide your name and at least email-address. Your email will not be made public and will be processed only by our COM:OTRS-volunteers. Thereafter or shortly before, your can re-upload your image and add {{OTRS pending}}. --Túrelio (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my photos[edit]

Hello. Yesterday you chose to delete two photos which I had uploaded. In my opinion, these photos were under the protection of fair use. Even though Getty Images was selling the photographs, they fall under the public domain, as they were photographs of the President of the United States. Under US Federal law, photos containing elected officials (like the President of the United States) are automatically in the public domain. Therefore, I am requesting you to please undelete these images. Thank you for your time. Firstclass306 (talk) 15:41, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Firstclass306,
it's good that you mention fair-use. I assume you work mainly on :en, right? US copyright law allows fair-use. However, it's bound to certain conditions, which mean that Commons cannot host fair-use images (see Commons:Fair use). They need to be uploaded locally. Also, your 2 now-deleted uploads were images from Getty-Images agency, which is quite known worldwide to sue everybody who uses their material without a proper license. --Túrelio (talk) 17:08, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Comercio de peluches en Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 47.JPG[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, ich bin mir nicht sicher wieso du gerade bei dieser Datei angefangen hast die Seite die dokumentieren, die die Datei benutzt haben. Ich habe mir über Google Images zum Spass angeschaut wo sonst die Datei (low profile da kein exzellentes Bild und damit nicht in der Hauptseite gewesen) alles benutzt wurde und ich habe es dokumentiert. Der eine ist so frech, dass behauptet, es sei sein Bild, unglaublich... Viele Grüsse, Poco2 16:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diego,
du meinst jetzt, warum bei achgut.com? Weil die regelmäßig Fotos von Commons verwenden und sauber kennzeichnen. Den copyfraud bzw. die Schutzrechtsberühmung auf https://steemit.com würde ich nicht so lassen. Ich habe zwar noch kein DMCA-Link auf der Seite gefunden, du solltest die URV aber m.E. der Geschäftsführung melden. Du kannst ja einfach auf dein Veröffentlichungsdatum auf Commons verweisen. --Túrelio (talk) 17:30, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted files with swastikas in the name[edit]

Can you protect the titles of the deleted files with swastikas in the name? --109.40.2.30 10:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can try. However, if I remember right from the past with other files, this isn't fail-proof. --Túrelio (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:Robi pe uranus, franceza.png[edit]

Hello,

You deleted this file due to "Copyright violation: Copyrighted book cover". I am uploading this picture as asked by the author of the book. He has no copyright claims over the picture and wishes to have the photo published on his Wiki page. What should I do to adhere to the copyright rules? Can you please help me?

Thanks, Vali. 30.01.2018 Valy3D (talk) 11:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vali,
both deleted cover-images show not only text, but also a photo or a graphic. While mere text (small portion) may not be a problem, graphic material always comes with copyright. So, you should ask the author whether he really has copyright over the graphic on his book's cover. If he has, then you should ask him to email a statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which he states his copyright-ownership of the complete book-cover and his intent to release the photographic reproduction of his cover (your upload) under the choosen free license. If he does not have copyright over the graphic on the book-cover, then he first must try to obtain permission from the creator of the graphic. --Túrelio (talk) 11:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion̞[edit]

Hi Túrelio. It was a special request from his family. For the very first time I ask this. Not a big deal. Thank you for your job. Well doneǃ --Regions (talk) 14:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maja Nikolić singer.jpg[edit]

Hi. Can you answer me on the talk page of that file? --ΝικόλαςΜπ. (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leon Bunn mit Ulli Wegner.jpg[edit]

Thanks a lot - vielen Dank für deine Hilfe, ich leite diese email nun an die von dir angegebenen E-Mail Adresse weiter --Eazy262 (talk) 12:02, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Julien Sansonnens[edit]

Hello, pascal Cottin has granted rights on Julien Sansonnens image, that you removed from commons. How can I write that this image has been declared by its author to be part of the public domain? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranma~frwiki (talk • contribs) 12:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Ranma~frwiki,
we need a written statement from Pascal Cottin that confirms the release of the uploaded image under a free license (not required to be PD, can also be CC-BY or CC-BY-SA) to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danish Caribbean banknotes vandalised by INeverCry[edit]

I just saw that INeverCry vandalised some PD-scans of Danish West-Indian banknotes I had uploaded yesterday, may I know how they vandalised the images (e.g. Personal attacks, or using the middle finger image)? As I were to propose blacklisting some images that could be used for vandalism (in the same way that images of genitalia are "blacklisted" and can only be used in a wiki at request). --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 13:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ähem, honestly, I've no idea what you are talking about. What I know is that yesterday late evening, when I was working on files requested for SD, I had one, which IMO wasn't qualified for SD as there was no evidence for the claimed copyvio, when I then clicked on the nominator's edits, I thought, oh, this might be INC, as the edit-summaries of a number of his latest edits consisted in an insulting slander against you. I then blocked him and began to revert and hide the insulting statements. I didn't even look at the files itself, just worked down the edit-list. He then added the same "statement" to his talkpage, so that I had to remove talkpage-access too. If you want them completely removed, you need to ask our Commons:Oversighters. --Túrelio (talk) 13:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aloha Browser Screenshot.jpg[edit]

Hi, you have deleted Aloha Browser screenshot.jpg with a reason - "non free app screenshot" which is not true, Aloha Browser IS a free app and have no in-app purchases. Plus, we as developers want to make screenshot public and free for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pozzi2 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pozzi2: Just because an app is free does not change the fact that it's still copyrighted, as you can see right on the bottom the home page here. If you are really the developer of this app, please send permission to OTRS to have the image restored. theinstantmatrix (talk) 16:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Pozzi2,
if you belong to the developers who own the rights in this browser, please send a confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . However, the now deleted screenshot did not only contain your likely own artwork (upper part), but also a photo of Putin and many icons of Ebay, Amazon, Twitter etc. which are likely not under your own copyright. You should either remove them completely or create a screenshot that does not show alien content. --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Smólnik[edit]

OK. Zrobione. Pozdrawiam. MOs810 (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fredrik Karlström.jpg[edit]

I see this file deleted on a page User:Colin/Norden. I am aware that Norden changed their licence terms to -NC last year but at the time I created that page, and Fae uploaded those files, all their images were just -SA. Can you check this deletion is valid. -- Colin (talk) 22:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Colin, I've undeleted the image for now. However, that's a general problem. While for Flickr we have records from Flickreview-bot, we don't have that for many other sources. Archive.org doesn't have site-capture for 2010, when the image was uploaded. The earliest capture of their copyright-page (June 2011) shows that "attribution" was the li.[10]. But, the earliest capture of the page with that image (April 2016) shows already the NC restriction.[11] So, we have positive record for the image itself. I think, I will open a regular DR to allow for public discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fredrik Karlström.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have the time, please review these 2 images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving Wikipedia forever.[edit]

Fk u..fk wikipedia..every time u guys r keep deleting my upload. RakibRik (talk) 12:21, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thats your own doing. You uploaded material which isn't your work and claimed it to be free. Later re-users might be sued for that. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Postcard of the Blackstone of Miami Beach Florida.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Postcard of the Blackstone of Miami Beach Florida.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Postcard of the Blackstone of Miami Beach Florida.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 12:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Logo Les Grandes Heures Automobiles.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai ajouté l'image "File:Logo Les Grandes Heures Automobiles.jpg" qui m'a été envoyée par monsieur Arnaud Bachelard, service communication L.G.H.A SAS. Ce logo est peut être déposé, mais fournit par son propriétaire — Preceding unsigned comment added by Y.Leclercq (talk • contribs) 14:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Y.Leclercq: , if you got it from Mr. Arnaud Bachelard, you should ask him to confirm towards permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org that he is the copyright-holder and that he releases the uploaded image File:Logo Les Grandes Heures Automobiles.jpg under the choosen free license (cc-by-sa-4.0). --Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images?[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can you mark these 2 high resolution images of a mushroom that Commons has no image of?

Thank You for your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Van der Trip[edit]

Hi Why did you delete my Van der Trip page on Wiki Commons? That's not fair! Any particular reason? Please put it back! It's open source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dambi12 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, because is was requested for deletion with valid rationale "Commons galleries are for collections of images, articles belong Wikipedia". --Túrelio (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Velliapura stone inscriptions[edit]

Dec. 21st 2013 out bust [1] of a group of people claiming to be members of the coterie were denied access to Velliapura compound, palace officials charged them of looting or disappearance of historical stone inscription from the compound. Later November 2014 meet between the representatives of Coterie, Velliapura palace and Good will of royal States concluded by recognizing the surnames as coterie descendants recorded in the payrolls 6 months prior to the Nov ,1855 confiscation of the Haliyal timber yard by Governor George Harris of Madras presidency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decan.reporter (talk • contribs) 17:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ↑ controversy by Kadamba coterie. Retrieved on 10 January 2018.
I have no idea what you want to tell me. --Túrelio (talk) 17:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8 final images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can you please mark these 8 final images that I uploaded today from M. Observer. I have no more images for review.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Statue of the Duke of Wellington[edit]

Hi Túrelio, why did you delete File:Statue_of_the_Duke_of_Wellington,_outside_the_Royal_Exchange,_London_(20577335756).jpg? I've been trying to upload the same image from Flickr as I was hoping to use it in an article. The existing images of that statue on Commons aren't that good. Ham II (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ham II,
because the uploader requested it 1 day after upload, which is a legitimate speedy-rationale. So, there was no problem with the file or its copyright. Feel free to reupload it.[12] --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

________________

Review images[edit]

Dear Turelio, when you have the time, please review these images below.

Thanking you for your help earlier — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decan.reporter (talk • contribs) 21:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Decan.reporter,
I've commented in the DR discussions. --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion of a video from You Tube[edit]

Hi. I note that you deleted this video from Commons. Did you request that the licence be changed from 'Standard You Tube Licence' to the 'Creative Commons Licence' option? That would have been the positive way of ensuring that we could continue to use it. I do this all time, and is much better than just deletion. Can you do that? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 09:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Llywelyn2000: , you are talking about File:Biurrun-garbiñe-etb1.jpg, right? You are correct that this is an approach which sometimes leads to success, and in rare cases I do this. However, our workload as admins and upload-patrolers is far too high for such work. This is a job for either the uploader or those interested in this image. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
'or those interested in this image.' - that includes all wikipedias (wps) which used this video? We were not informed; I suggest a little note be left for communities on such wps as ours, so that they can upload onto their own wps, under fair use licence. Thanks. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 images for review[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please mark or review these high quality images of 2 mushroom species

Best Regards and Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Verunreinigte Bilder"[edit]

Hi,

Danke fürs Korrigieren. Was war denn an den Dateien falsch (verstehe da leider wenig von) bzw. wie kann ich es selber wegmachen, damit Du weniger Arbeit hast? PS: 4 Todesdrohungen? Krass...

VG -- Jonaes02 (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, was da eigentlich los ist, weiß ich auch nicht. Ich denke, dass das irgendein Bot untersucht, der die "betroffenen" Dateien dann in ein SLA-Verzeichnis einsortiert. jpg-Dateien öffne ich einfach in der Freeware Irfanview, die ich auch sonst für einfache Graphik-Operationen nutze, drücke Shift-J, setze ein Häkchen bei Transformation:Keine und klicke auf Starten. Dann lade ich die "bereinigte" Datei wieder hoch und fertig. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank! -- Jonaes02/Diskussion->deWP 14:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Noch 'ne Frage: Darf ich den SLA danach selbst entfernen? Oder wird das als Vandalismus gewertet? -- Jonaes02/Diskussion->deWP 15:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(2 Fragen) Ja. Nein. Es ist ja keine URV oder so. --Túrelio (talk) 15:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the copyrights violation[edit]

Dear,

Kindly note that all uploads are done with the agreement with the owner (Arab telemedia Group) which represented by this account.... highlighting that this account is for accurate information purposes.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiba Falah (talk • contribs) 15:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hiba Falah: , if that is the case, then you should either identify this account towards permissions-commons@wikimedia.org as a company-account and declare that all uploads fall under the company's copyright or send a permission for individual uploads (1 permission can included a number of uploads). --Túrelio (talk) 15:17, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to the question of permission, it is a bit confusing for us and for re-user that these images, such as File:بوستر أخر ايام التوت.jpg, contain a caption/watermark saying "All rights reserved", but are under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Túrelio, user @Hiba Falah: works at Arab Telemedia Group. We already got an OTRS confirmation, but Hiba is new and didn't realize she needs to post the ticket number with each upload. An MoU between Wikimedia Levant and Arab Telemedia Group was reached last year in which Arab Telemedia Group releases some of the the posters and videos under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license into commons, conditioned that the files to be uploaded only by user Hiba Falah. She should have added the template User:Hiba Falah/MyTag which was created for this . If I may, I will restore the files, and add the missing tags. I will give Arab Telemedia Group a visit this week and talk to them again :) . Thanks. --Tarawneh (talk) 09:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tarawneh: , sure. That's great. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Dear . Att @EugeneZelenko: --Tarawneh (talk) 09:08, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deus 3.jpg[edit]

hey, did you say that my picture with Frank Mugisha belongs to you?

File:Deus 3.jpg[edit]

Image obviously copied from Facebook (see EXIF data). Depicted can hardly be the photographer. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deusdedit Kiriisa (talk • contribs) 21:26, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no. I did state exactly what you copied above by yourself, 1) that the image was copied from Facebook, and 2) that it's unlikely that the person in front of the camera is also behind the camera (to take the photo). Anyway, if you have any comment, you should make it at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deus 3.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final images for review[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If theses images haven't been market or reviewed, could you review these final images for me please? I don't have any more Mushroom photos.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have question[edit]

(talk) 22:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC) I wonder why did you delete all images I uploaded. My english is not the best, so could you explain why you deleted my files? --THE PRIME CRONUS[reply]

Hi THE PRIME CRONUS,
sure, though you find this information already on your own talkpage.
File:The prime cronus.png was sourced by you to Google-images, but actually copied from Facebook. Material on Facebook is not free per se.
File:한동근.jpg was sourced by you to Google-images, but actually copied from https://www.nautiljon.com/images/galerie/10/77/han_dong_geun_860977.jpg, which states "Copyright © 2005-2018 Nautiljon.com". So, both images were not free and the CC license, which you had added to these images was invalid. The mere fact that an image is somewhere on the web on somebodys website, where everybody can see it, does NOT mean that it is under a free license, as required by our policy COM:L. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 images? for review[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Thanks for marking some of the mushroom images I uploaded earlier today. Is it possible if you could just review these 5 images please?

It would help a lot. Many Mushroom Observer contributors vote them as good pictures at the source...but WikiCommons has no image of these mushrooms. Best Regards from Metro Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank You. The default license at Mushroom Observer is CC BY SA 3.0 The only other option is CC BY NC SA 3.0. The professional photographers use the NC version of the license but other contributors still use CC BY SA 3.0. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

photos[edit]

Why did you remvove pictures that I've ulpoaded ? I see many images on wikipedia that I can't go to the source of it , and they don't get deleted . I wonder how I make similar , but I put the sources ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filósofo Lusófono (talk • contribs) 12:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Filósofo Lusófono,
o.k. Let's see:
So, despite in all these images the source either claimed own copyright or the author was unknown, you claim them to be under a free license! Only the author can release an image under a free license, if it is still copyrighted, which is the case until 70 years after the death of the author. --Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10 images for review[edit]

Dear Turelio, Can you review these images of mushrooms which don't exist on Commons?

If you need me to review an image which you uploaded, you can contact me on my talkpage. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zwei Löschbitten[edit]

Bei Bedarf kann ich dir den Schriftwechsel zukommen lassen. Besten Dank --ST ○ 16:08, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke dir. --ST ○ 23:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images for review?[edit]

Dear Admin Turelio,

Could you just mark these 4 images that I uploaded below.

Commons also does not have this mushroom species. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Have a nice 1st Sunday of Lent. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 final images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can you review these final images. I know you are a busy person and I will not ask you to review any more images.


Thank You for all your help from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A peaceful thank you[edit]

The Barnstar of Peace
Thank you for using your wiki skills to find a way to remove and re-upload the A+F files without breaking the links. Theredproject (talk) 03:33, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backwards deletion File:P041715PS-0021 (20282064634).jpg[edit]

I think you may have deleted the opposite file from what you meant to delete: File:P041715PS-0021 (20282064634).jpg was deleted as an identical or scaled-down version of File:Barack Obama's Personal Aide Ferial Govashiri.jpg, but the second file is 1500×1000, smaller than the source at https://www.flickr.com/photos/obamawhitehouse/24129409992/ (2800×1867). --Closeapple (talk) 04:22, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Closeapple,
hmm, the above linked Flickr page (as well as https://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/20282064634/) shows max resolution 1500 x 1000 to me. The log of the deleted File:P041715PS-0021 (20282064634).jpg also shows 1.500 × 1.000 (211.411 Bytes) for the file. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:TyesonR2005[edit]

Hi Túrelio, this user ignores your "last warning" and keeps on uploading copyrighted stuff. To me it looks as if he asks to be blocked. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 15:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hat mein Kollege EugeneZelenko inzwischen schon gemacht. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

useless[edit]

all admins at wikipedia are useless, they cant even understand simple things and simple changes, what is the use of wikipedia when a person cant even edit his/her own content as he/she wants, i uploaded few files but you guys are deleting it with different different reason all time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushpeshpandey09 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well @Pushpeshpandey09: , eventually it is you who does not "understand simple things". 1) here is not Wikipedia, but Commons; 2) all your uploads were unfree images, though you claimed them to be free. But, being visible on Twitter does not mean it is under a free license, as required by our policy. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i understand things very well @Túrelio, and regarding copyright thing i have already sended email with the person written note but still there is no response from you people then who is at fault?. its really useless policy and all when the person whose biography is shown wants to edit but she cant do that coz of such peoples here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushpeshpandey09 (talk • contribs) 07:02, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware that all the people doing the "janitory" work here, are unpaid volunteers, who have a real-life? Besides, those processing permissions are not necessary the same people as those doing recent-upload patrolling (such as me). --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 image[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you mark just this single image please?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Nice image. --Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images for review[edit]

I am not taking any copyright images instead these images from public domain. Let me know whether it need to send to you for review. Imansoorshaikh (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Imansoorshaikh,
the problem-messages on your talkpage have all the information to show that these images are not in the public domain. Being published on a webseite does not mean it's "public domain". Only the creator or the copyright-law (for very old images) can out a work into the "public domain". --Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Real Life Barnstar
You are a real life Barnstar. Imansoorshaikh (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

regarding deletion of file KL_Gangster.jpg poster image[edit]

Good day Túrelio, im new to wiki. would look forward to friendly comments and guidance from you in future. regarding multiple uploads for the poster image, I was trying to select back the right licence for the image. apparently since the image has been used multiple times by various resources, i was in difficult situation to select the original image source to fit the article. problem in wiki is that i cannot find and edit 'release rights' once i have uploaded the file, and had to wait for someone to delete it before I can try another copyright options.

from now on I will select the last option in the release rights Option Wizard - "I believe this work is freely licensed or legally in the public domain. I understand that if I do not add the necessary licensing information in a timely fashion, the file may be deleted." as i cannot figure out the original source for the poster. Please do not ban me. I intend to bring good, honest, concise and neutral contents related to my home country to the wiki community for the benefit of global mankind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afifi N. (talk • contribs)

Hi Afifi N.,
o.k. Commons allows only uploads that are under a license/permission, which allows any kind of use, including commercial use. Only the creator/author of an image can release it under such a free license. Being published on a website for everybody to see, does not equal a free license. Movie posters are normally not under a free license, as the movie company has a commerial interest. --Túrelio (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HI[edit]

Hi Why delete the photos you uploaded There is an error in the name of the license to be changed and not delete the file There are a lot of files that used the same command as

,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maumed al sarif (talk • contribs) 18:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Maumed al sarif ,
I do not fully understand what you are saying. Eventually, you see that still-images from movies/videos on Youtube are treated differently on Commons. That comes from the fact that some movies/videos on Youtube are under a free license (which is compatible to our policy), while other are under the Youtube "Standard license", which is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please close Commons:Deletion requests/File:مرام البلوشي (cropped).jpg. Maumed al sarif clearly does not fully understand the difference between a free license and Standard license.--Mojackjutaily (talk) 06:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as it's less than 7 days, I've not closed, but commented for keeping. --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What I said at the end is an Arabic translation of what I said --Maumed al sarif (talk) 00:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Persiflage on the Tulipomania[edit]

Hallo! Die Category:Allegory of the Tulipomania und die von dir gelöschte Category:Persiflage on the Tulipomania sind eigentlich für zwei verschiedene Gemälde bestimmt. Es sind zwei sehr ähnliche Bilder vom selben Maler zum selben Thema. Jetzt lässt sich weder vom Werksartikel Allegorie der Tulipomanie noch vom Wikidata-Item sinnvoll nach Commons verlinken. Grüße lewenstein (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, der Hintergrund war mir nicht bekannt. Ich kann die Kat. gern wieder herstellen, wenn das sinnvoll wäre. --Túrelio (talk) 17:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, das wäre sinnvoll. Zusätzlich könnte ich die beiden Kategorien eindeutiger benennen, damit es nicht mehr zu solchen Verwechslungen kommt. lewenstein (talk) 19:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you review these 3 images please if you are free?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 Final Images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Mushroom Observer calls these images good/great images at the source but Commons does not have this mushroom species. Could you review them please?

Thank You. By the Way, Germany is certainly having an excellent Winter Olympic Games and taking many medals. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:41, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seen this and this? ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the twitter messages. I saw the German twitter messages on Canadian TV News.

PS: I hope you can mark these other 4 images too:

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

stop deleting celebrity Traci Kochendorfer photos last warning[edit]

Please do not hack or sabotage our files we upload on known persons ....we own the copyrights to these photos cause we represent her and have her permission stop deleting this celebrities profile and such. thank you do not threaten us please thank you . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrybear86 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Terrybear86:
1) You are the one threatening and slandering me! If you go one with this behavior, you may find yourself blocked from Commons.
2) If you (Terrybear86) think you "own the copyrights" of celebrity shots from Getty Images agency, nice, then provide the evidence to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ! --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

again above you just threatened us stop hacking and sabotoging other editors work please ...we did not threaten you cease and desist your threats please and hacking of other editors owned work. we have seen this who is authorizing you to do that please stop it. you have no right in vandalizing other editors contributions. be kind and move on thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrybear86 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cateory:Blue Lakes[edit]

Can you restore this category? I created this category to add photos there. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Tournasol7 (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I made an error in name: cateory. In addition it exist others Blue Lakes in the world, so I changed name to Blue Lakes, New Zealand. I think you can delete the redirect. Sorry for the trouble Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Niparko Photo[edit]

I was "playing" in my sandbox. I don't have permission for the image. Please let me know if that is an issue in the future and I will stop. I just wanted to see what a possible edit to the existing stub would look like.

Thanks for any advice you might have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregorybarry (talk • contribs) 23:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in such cases it's helpful to clearly add "test" oder "test upload" to the description and to put the file into Category:Test uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Ronan_Le_Gleut.jpg[edit]

Hi ! I see you deleted a picture (Ronan_Le_Gleut.jpg) because of copyright violation (linking to the Facebook version of this picture) but I can confirm (and prove if needed) that the author has given all rights to use it. Can you please explain how to upload it and use it ? Thanks ! --Maxib (talk) 10:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxib: , sure. You need to ask the author (Frédéric REGLAIN ?) to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which he confirms that he is the photographer or rightsholder and that he agrees to release this image under the choosen {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license[13], which allows anybody to use this image, provided the terms of the license are met. Don't forget to include the filename. See here for a permission template. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: It's done, thank you ! --Maxib (talk) 19:39, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sylvain_Maillard.jpg[edit]

Why do you delete my picture ? I'm the deputy and i want this picture for my wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smaillard (talk • contribs) 13:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Smaillard: , the image had been tagged as "(c) Assemblee nationale" by the nominator, probably as it has been found on http://www2.assemblee-nationale.fr/deputes/fiche/OMC_PA717379. Commons accepts only media (images etc.) which are evidently released under a free license according to our policy. Only the photographer or the rightsholder, to whom the photographer has transferred his copyright, can release an image under a free license. So, if your portrait-photo is wasn't created by the Assemblee nationale, but by yourself or by a photographer whom you comissioned, please send an email from your email address to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org (can be in French), confirming either your authorship (if you are the photographer) or the rightholdership (if copyrighted transferred by photographer) and your will to release it under the choosen cc-by-sa-4.0 license. And don't forget to mention the filename Sylvain_Maillard.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You Deleted our bands official record photo.[edit]

Dark Archive is band and we had our Ep photo what is taken by me and the model is my girlfriend. So what is the problem?

Darkarchive cultivate our blood in aeon ep photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quincea (talk • contribs)

Hi Quincea, both images were the professional-quality reproductions of an album cover with copyrighted artwork. Album covers are usually copyrighted by the record company or the band. Anybody here can open an account and claim anything. Therefore, we require in such cases an credible permission from the rightsholder. If you are the author of all copyrighted elements of the cover artwork or represent the rightsholder send or ask him to send a confirmation from their official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Don't forget to mention the (currently deleted) filenames.--Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aspidella hesleri 643359.jpg & File:Aspidella hesleri 798192.jpg[edit]

Dear Turelio,

As an Admin, can you please rename these two files as Amanita hesleri instead of Aspidella hesleri. You can see the files history as well as this comment for why Amanita is actually the right name and not Aspidella. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:40, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Löschung der Bilder Bruno Stane Grill und Anna Maria Grill-R.[edit]

Wie kann ich die löschungen der Bilder rückgängig machen? Ich bin die Tochter der Künstlerin Anna Maria Grill-R. und des verstorbenen Künstlers Bruno Stane Grill. Die Bilder und Kunstwerke habe ich geerbt, bzw. teilweise nach dem Tod des Vaters archiviert. Was ist zu tun? Ich komme hier nicht weiter, finde alles höchst kompliziert! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NicNic Grill (talk • contribs) 16:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NicNic Grill: . So, versuchen wir es einmal. Ich gehe die Bilder einzeln durch, weil teils unterschiedliche Dinge zu klären sind. Ich setze dabei gemäß deiner obigen Angabe voraus, dass du das alleinige Copyright an den Werken deines Vaters Bruno Stane Grill hältst (bzw. die Genehmigung deiner Mutter hast).

Wenn das alles geklärt ist, solltest du in Bezug auf die Werke deines Vaters eine Mail an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org schicken, in der du dein geerbtes Copyright (vorher klären, allein geerbt oder zusammen mit Mutter/Geschwistern?) an seinen Werken bestätigen musst. Für das o.g. Werk deiner Mutter könntest du ggf. die hier vorhandene Vorlage etwas modifizieren, wobei zwischen den beiden Urheberrechten am Werk selbst und am Foto klar unterschieden werden muss. --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, viele Dank für die Erklärung, ich werde nun alles neu angeben. Vielen Dank nochmals!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NicNic Grill (talk • contribs) 16:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

9 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you please kindly review these images below please? I would appreciate your help.

Thank You kindly, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you review these 7 images below please? It would help a lot.

I thank you for your time. Unfortunately, I am reviewing other people's image uploads right now...but I cannot review my own. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ttp logo deletion (File:Ttp logo for WP.jpg)[edit]

Hi Turelio, Regarding your deletion of the Ttp logo for WP.jpg file I uploaded to the Commons: Can you help me understand where I went afoul of the rules in uploading it? The Ttp logo is an out-of-use logo created by my business partner who gave me permission to upload it so that I could test the logo upload process. (I am preparing to upload an organizational logo to a Wikipedia article.) I uploaded it to Flickr and selected the Attribution ShareAlike option as recommended by the Commons. Do I need some further form or permission from her? She is fine with free licensing it for any and all uses. Thanks in advance for any guidance you can offer! DanDavidCook (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DanDavidCook,
in general: uploading logos, which are not created by yourself, is a difficult business, see Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Trademarks, because the threshold of originality (condition for copyrightability) differs from country to country (US: high, UK: low). In countries with a usable freedom-of-panorama exception one may use that exception, provided the targeted logo is installed somewhere permanently in the public. On the other hand, most companies do no want to release their business logo under a free license, because that would allow others to use it for their own business. Though logos might be additionally be protected as Trademark, we don't know whether Trademark would trump over free license or the other way round. That's a question for the lawyer. And you should make aware your business partner of that problem, to avoid nasty surprises.
in your case: you simply sourced your upload to www.tothepointpublications.com, which was proper. However, the source-site states "© All rights reserved 2017. To The Point Collaborative". So, there was no visible permission, which resulted in deletion.
what now? 1) whether a logo is "out-of-use" or not doesn't matter. 2) you wrote that you uploaded the logo to Flickr; but, your upload at Commons was not sourced to Flick. 3) if the creator of the logo gave you permission (according to COM:L), please forward said permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and mention the filename (even though currently deleted). --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf.jpg[edit]

Thanks for deleting this copy-vio, but you merely redirected to another copy-vio that I also nominated for speedy. Cheers, --SVTCobra (talk) 08:59, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

When you find time today, please review these 18 images. Most of these photos are rated as good or great photos at the Mushroom Observer source.

Thank You for your time. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:20, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:FC Bayern München Logo 2017.png[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, wo siehst du bei dem Logo denn bitte Schöpfungshöhe? Das besteht nur aus wirklich simplen geometrischen Formen. Deine Löschung kann ich daher nicht nachvollziehen (es gab auch keine LD dazu, weshalb ich sie auch als regelwidrig ansehe). Chaddy (talk) 17:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaddy: , es war ein SLA/speedy (da gibts keine LD), begründet mit "https://fcbayern.com/es/terms-and-conditions" (gemeint wohl: "8.2 All of the logos, photographs and other images on FC Bayern’s internet presence are protected by trademark/copyright. Any use thereof without consent of FC Bayern, in particular the unauthorised downloading of images, is prohibited and FC Bayern will pursue violators under civil law/criminal law.") und Verweis auf previous deletion request". Hochgeladen worden war die Datei als "eigenes Werk". --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Achso, ein SLA, ok.
Die damalige Entscheidung bei der svg war bereits eine Fehlentscheidung. Der Rechtshinweis auf der Website des FB Bayern spielt da keine große Rolle. Das Logo besteht wie gesagt nur aus simplen geometrischen Formen und enthält nichts, was nicht bereits vorbekannt war. Somit erreicht es selbst nach den besonders strengen Commons-Maßstäben keine SH. Auch Ping an @User:Natuur12. Chaddy (talk) 00:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
+1 selbst bei strengster Auslegung ist hier keine SH zu sehen. Nur Text, Kreise und gedrehtes Karomuster der bayerischen Staatsflagge aus dem 13. Jahrhundert. --Ralf Roleček 01:19, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nun gut, wenn ihr diese Diskussion führen wollt, dann entlösche ich die Datei und überführe sie sofort in einen regulären LA, weil der m.E. die geeignetste Diskussionplattform bietet. Aussichtsreicher wäre vermutlich aber ein lokaler (:de) Upload. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ralf Roletschek: , @Chaddy: , so die Herrschaften, zur Diskussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:FC Bayern München Logo 2017.png. --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den kleinen Dienstweg. --Ralf Roleček 11:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Danke Chaddy (talk) 12:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please try to review these images below. Most of them are considered high quality images. Mushroom Observer is doing a scheduled maintenance for 1 hour today but hopefully not at your time of review.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mijareswik[edit]

Hello, I am writing this time to ask: why were deleted some of photos that was for my article? Appassionante I would like to find a solution, I've not get down in copyright violation because all this photos come from directly of the photographer group. can you tell me how can I solve this? please. Mijareswik (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AJ Styles WWE[edit]

Hello im Photolover33 and i have this question for you: If this image has a problem can i reupload it as not my own work just to publicity please? Awnser when you can please. I'm waiting goodbye Photolover33 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Photolover33 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parti européen - Logo.jpg + File tagging File:Parti européen - Affiche.jpg + File tagging File:Louis de Gouyon Matignon.jpg[edit]

Hi, I am Louis de Gouyon Matignon, fondator of the Parti européen.This images are mine and they are free to be used. You will find them easely on my website www.louisdegouyonmatignon.com and www.partieuropeen.com.

I am totally clear with this issue you are making. Those are my pictures and I use them as I want.

Thank you very much,

Louis — Preceding unsigned comment added by AssociationDCT (talk • contribs) 09:40, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blank-map-world-reversed.png[edit]

Hi. On 8 October 2011, you redirected File:Blank-map-world-reversed.png to File:Blank-map-world-south-up.png with the summary "Redirecting to duplicate file". Actually, the latter was a duplicate of the former. Also, judging by the talk page of the original, the user who created the duplicate, may have actually created a different map. Apparently (I commented on the talk page at the time, though I don't remember), the original was a flipped map, rather than a rotated map like the duplicate. Is there anyway to restore the original? Mclay1 (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undo[edit]

Hi, I notice that:

IMO all edits of Buxeria are copyviol.--Pạtạfisik 22:13, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Patafisik,
thanks for notifying. However, currently I am busy in RL and rarely online. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die WikiEulenAcademy gratuliert zur EhrenEule[edit]

Hiermit verleihen wir
Túrelio
die Auszeichnung

EhrenEule
als Anerkennung für
herausragende Arbeit
im Dienste der Verbesserung
unserer Enzyklopädie.
gez. WikiEulenAcademy

Hallo Túrelio,


die WikiEulenAcademy schließt sich nun den Glückwünschen an und gratuliert dir recht herzlich zur WikiEule 2014.

Es ist uns eine Ehre dir neben der Eule für den Schreibtisch eine WikiEule für deine Benutzerseite zu überreichen.

Sollte dir diese zu groß sein, haben wir einen entsprechenden Babel vorbereitet:

Dieser Benutzer ist stolzer Preisträger der EhrenEule 2014.

Danke, für deine tatkräftige Unterstützung.

Wir wünschen dir noch viel Freude und hoffen auf weitere großartige Beiträge.

Vielleicht sieht man sich auch bei anderen Treffen oder der nächsten WikiCon wieder?


Liebe Grüße,
die WikiEulenAcademy (talk) 01:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank, welche Ehre! Schade, dass ich am Samstagabend schon nicht mehr in Köln war und die Verleihung deshalb verpasst habe. --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Túrelio Good Morning[edit]

I received a dire or disturbing message here [15] to which I replied forthwith; [16] and another reply; with all due resepec, I cannot understand why after more than 101,000 edit files I upload only since February this year, 2014, I am attacked and accused of many bad things; as you see in my reply, I only not opted or chose to create 2 categories and rather placed the category in one Category as sub-category; I am accused of violating the Rules on Meta or Over-Categorization; but the accuser failed to point to me the specific provision or rule that I violated; I deny the violation, for I am faithfully adhering to the rules; the thing speaks for itself; good faith in editing is presummed; no editor or administraor has messaged me on this, but only this editor, since I started this February, 2014; It is very painful and terrifying to edit and contribute and at the same time being personally attacked; Please, with your kindness and integrity give me some protection, and if I am wrong, please help me be corrected; I chose not to use my user name but just an IP Address for reasons of security. Muchas gracias Túrelio--124.106.77.79 04:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm busy in RL. I'll try to look into in the evening. --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for you time, Túrelio. I forthwith received in my talk page, a more dire message in this manner which I am quoting because of its importance and I underscore it, to wit: ::::* Sorry xxx I have given up on xxx He just does his own thing, thinking that his pictures will make "Commons a better place for researchers", "a wiser tool of knowledge for the future" and "benefit in the future". Obviously he is thinking way too much of himself and his pictures! But really, he is using Commons as his personal storage device. We have told him many times to be selective, to categorize properly, even to add better descriptions. Even after pointing out the problem, he still doesn't go back to his uploads to correct them, but leaves it to others to clean up after him. That shows that either he doesn't understand English, or he is too arrogant to care. We should just dump all his pictures in a special category like Category:Photographs by Ramon F Velasquez or Category:Photographs by Judge floro, and there nobody will be able to find them or make sense of the mess... [17];

Will all my 101,000 files [18] since February 2014, disappear[edit]

And does User: P199 which, as is shown the other account or alternate of User:Briar fallen, have the power, administrative or otherwise, to delete all my 101,000 photos and dump them in hidden category as these Users P 199 and Briar fallen decide to dump in ""a special category like Category: Photographs by Ramon F Velasquez or Category: Photographs by Judge floro, and there nobody will be able to find them or make sense of the mess... as they proclaimed, announced and stated? Hence, all my photos are rendered nugatory, hidden and can no longer be found in Commons and Wikipedia, is this for real? Please help me, thanks, Very sincerely yours.--124.106.77.79 14:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grund der Angelrute, warum zwei Konten?[edit]

Ich habe ein zweites Konto beste Turelio instant Rute unter dem Benutzernamen, dass mehr auf Ihr erklärt habe ich erstellt. Ich bin so Peter van der Sluijs. ich nur die Grundausbildung Fotograf. also abgeschlossen haben ich verbessert Dateien hochgeladen haben. Ich habe viele besondere Fotos mit Wikipedia von dort teilen möchtest. Verständnis für Menschen zustimmen, die Licht und Autist wie ich sind.Wikipedia ist manchmal sehr schwierig für mich.Große Dateien hochladen möchte bleiben. Großen Einsatz von Übersetzungs-Tools durch den Computer damit zu machen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishengel (talk • contribs) 10:26, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin schon Gambia heuer, 22. November 2014 zu diesem Foto Bericht. Datum 7 November. die alten Bilder sind von 1998 drin, ich habe, einige Dateien verbessert, so dass Menschen können sie auch für Bettwäsche etc. Fragen sie mindestens 1 mb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishengel (talk • contribs) 10:34, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Die letzten 100 Fotos auf meinem Konto sind Reisen Gambia Angelrute 7 November bis 22. November 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishengel (talk • contribs) 10:42, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

A Very Good Day to You !!!

Yesterday I saw this -> FOP case,and afterwards thought to bring forward some of my pages to your consideration,These are some of my Photographs in Commons (see below),If you think that they too come under this law,please feel free to delete them without further discussion,because I don't want to break the prevailing law in my country (Sri Lanka),notification is not necessary,NB:There could be more such Photographs in my uploads which are NOT listed below,Thanks.

1 Regency Hotel I 2 Regency Hotel II 3 SAITM I 4 SAITM II 5 SAITM III 6 SAITM IV 7 SAITM Hospital I 8 SAITM Hospital II 9 SAITM Hospital III 10 SAITM Hospital IV 11 Polgahawela Monastery 12 MIT 13 SLIIT Engineering Department

--MediaJet talk 11:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***[edit]

* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Túrelio[edit]

Jermboy entwickelt zur Zeit wieder ungeahnte Energien. Ich habe den ja schon mit gefälschten Verkehrszeichen (seine Leidenschaft) seit Jahren am Knie. Danke für die schnelle Reaktion. Leider kann ich so meinen neuen Artikel zu den DDR-Verkehrszeichen nur sehr langsam vorantreiben, da ich durch Jermboy vielfach hier gebunden werde und nun wirklich keinen Bock habe den ganzen Tag am Rechner zuzubringen, zumal es ja noch das RL gibt. Leider mußte ich auch meinen Artikel zu den DDR-Verkehrszeichen vorzeitig aus meinem Namensraum in den Artikelbereich bringen, da mich auch da Jermboy schon störte. Und ich hatte Angst daß mir das passiert, was dereinst schon der unsägliche Benutzer Korrekturen einst gemacht hat. Der hat nämlich auch Artikel angelegt, die andere schon in Vorbereitung hatten. Das hat er bei mir auch mal gemacht. So steht er nun als Artikelbegründer in den Analen, obwohl er nur einen winzigen Stub produzierte. Das war sehr ärgerlich. Solche Artikel baut auch niemand mehr groß aus. Mediatus (talk) 20:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Предупреждение.[edit]

Спасибо за предупреждение.К сожалению пошел по пути стандартных грабель.Впредь отнесусь к загрузкам более осмотрительно. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Denis.TW (talk • contribs) 14:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Image Raymi-Phénix.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,
je me permets de vous contacter, car le 30/05/2015 Mad'Gic Dream à envoyer un mail à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org concernant cette photo pour donner l'autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous les licences GFDL / CC-BY-4.0 :
"Madame, Monsieur,
Notre association est l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif de la photo publiée à l'adresse <https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Photo-raymi-phenix.jpg>.
Nous donnons notre autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous les licences GFDL / CC-BY-4.0
Je comprends qu'en faisant cela, je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence.
Nous sommes conscients de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées.
Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc.
Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.
Fait à Arenthon, le 30/05/2015
René Calcas
Président
Mad'Gic Dream Association loi 1901
15, chemin Dumonal, 74800 Arenthon
+33 6 81 64 27 36
info@madgicdream.com"

Étant avec le président de l association hier soir et à notre grande surprise la photo avait été supprimée. Nous avons donc pris le temps et il a décidé de faire un compte Flickr pour Raymi ce qui été le plus simple a ses yeux, car il devait en créer un de toute manière.
Vous faut-il un mail du président pour prouver la réalité des faits ?
Nous comprenons toutefois qu'en effet vous ne pouviez pas savoir et nous aurions surement fait la même chose à votre place.
LA page peut-elle être restaurée ?
Bien à vous --Taenarra (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je suis actuellement trop malade pour y faire face. Peut-être que ça marchera lundi. (sorry, for Google-translation) --Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Destruction of redirects[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems #Destruction of redirects by CAPTAIN RAJU and Túrelio. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm currently too ill to take care about that. Maybe I'll be a bit fitter tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Duro[edit]

Hello, I saw the message. the truth is, i spoke to the man who run the sport shop in my neighbour and he told me it's fine. Yesterday i went there to buy an inter shirt and i saw this panorama picture of duro and i asked him to make a picture. I don't have any evidence to convince you for it but i'm not lying. I've done the same before with a Dinamo tirana poster (you can see it at my uploads) in a restaurant. Please remove it, it is not a copyright. -- Sadsadas, 8 March 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadsadas (talk • contribs) 14:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sadsadas,
this is not about believing you or not. First I would like to know what thing did you actually take a picture of (in other words, on what thing is the depicted photo on)? I cannot recognize it, is it a framed photo-print, a screen, a drinking glass or what? --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a framed photo-print, it is in the entry of the shop. --Sadsadas (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, i can make another photo in daylight so you can see it better. --Sadsadas (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC

No, that's not necessary. Thanks.
The decisive question is now: who created the original photo of Klodian Duro? Because only he/she can give us/you a permission. With "creating" I mean, took his camera, went to the soccer stadium or whereever the photo has originally been shot, shot the image. Sitting in front of the TV and making a screenshot in the right moment is not valid.
If the owner of the shop bought this image somewhere else, he has only the right to "use" the physical printed image. But he cannot (legally) multiply or copy it or even give you permission, because it is not his own work.
Problem is, most people in the world have no idea about copyright, not in your country, not in my country. People buy a contemporary painting (the original) for a lot of money and think, now it's my own, I can do what I want. They are wrong. The copyright over the painting is still with the painter, even if he sold the physical painting. --Túrelio (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion removed[edit]

Hi, you removed the speedy delete tag from a list of images that easily meet the requirements for speedy delete. Why? If I added the heading in a manner that's incorrect, would you mind telling me what is proper? These images don't fall under standard DR. They are stills from a video that has been deleted for copyright violation. Thanks. Rosepoussiere (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion for a deletion request? Agree with Túrelio – this was utterly lame. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
hi Incnis Mrsi: I posted this here asking for help, as clearly I'd done something wrong, but I didn't understand what. Do you mind explaining? I wasn't looking to be called "lame" but to ask about protocols. thanks, and have a wonderful day Rosepoussiere (talk) 16:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosepoussiere, when a speedy-template (any kind of) is inserted into a deletion-request (on the image-page and/or the discussion page), then this DR and the common page for all DRs filed on the same day, are listed in the speedy-deletion category and might possibly become speedy-deleted by an inattentive admin (me included), which would be a desaster. That's what mainly behind my edit. --Túrelio (talk) 16:49, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio, thanks for explaining. Is there a different way to mark them for speedy delete? In fact, that is what these images are. There's no debate or ambiguity about them, since they derive from a nonexistent source. But perhaps anyone can alter them from speedy delete to DR and once that's done, there is no re-tagging them for speedy delete? thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosepoussiere (talk • contribs) 17:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, you could just put a copyvio-tag on each of the images. However, I would not recommend that, as the DR is ongoing. Nevertheless, I've notified my admin-colleague Sealle, who was also the uploader, about consent to speedy-closure of the DR. So, for the moment, you can just sit back and watch the process take its course. :-) --Túrelio (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Túrelio,
There is a kind of weird activity I would like to draw your attention to. Seems like this user came here for one reason and one reason only – to get rid of Rachel Kushner photos. Please take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rachel Kushner March 2015 in Zürich, Switzerland.jpg and [19]. I feel unimpressed about these attempts to dictate to the community, which photos are to be used in articles. Now, let's stick to the issue. Here's what the result of a deletion for copyright violations on YouTube looks like: [20] [21] and this is definitely not the same as in our case: [22] or [23] (depends on your settings). This apparently was a courtesy deletion, so I really did not like those groundless accusations of copyright infringement on my talk page. Accordingly, I see no reason to follow their desire and now I would prefer a regular DR. In case that video has been deleted by YouTube not for copyright concerns, then my uploads were OK because the license was irrevocable. Sealle (talk) 19:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC) UPD: I find this case similar to another one, when the subject did her best to force deleting all her photos and became happy only when a foppish one has been uploaded instead. Sealle (talk) 20:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
what is the similarity? that image is not a video still, and it's not from a deleted source. I'm very confused. what does foppishness have to do with it? that's a funny image you posted, but this discussion seems to be straying into some other territory. this issue is about putting images on creative commons that have no creative commons attribution, correct? thanks Rosepoussiere (talk) 20:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
: just responding here since this is about me. It's true that I originally asked an administrator about the image you link to, and in response, you posted many images of the author Rachel Kushner that are all stills from a video that was incorrectly declared as creative commons by librerie mollat, who were then informed of their error by the french publisher edition stock, and they immediately removed the video: they deleted themselves, thus the copyright violation notice would not appear. I alerted wikimedia that those images are pulled from a source that no longer exists. How is this weird? I respect the process of administration, and appreciate the work you do to uphold both copyright laws, and communal standards. In this case, there is no source, so the images should be deleted. Thanks, Rosepoussiere (talk) 19:31, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Brochure MeCoaching Voorkant.jpg[edit]

Dear Túrelio, Thank you for checking Commons for copyright violations and removing if appropriate. Please look closer when you delete a file according to a google search. The 22.800.000 hit may indicate that the file is licensed correctly like in this case as it is based on a CC0 Creative Commons from Pixabay https://pixabay.com/en/pretty-woman-happy-young-female-1509956/. Keep up the good work :) With kind regards, BeeBringer (talk) 19:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BeeBringer: so what? It is {{CC0}} – practically, public domain. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Incnis Mrsi: I could not understand why it was deleted on basis of copyright violations when it is public domain? BeeBringer (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, I missed the point. Supply {{Derived from}} next time to fend off copyright paranoia. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Incnis Mrsi: , thanks good tip! Greetings, BeeBringer (talk) 19:33, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@BeeBringer: , when we (patrolers) copyvio-tag a recently uploaded file, it does not absolutely proof that it's a copyvio. In case of files uploaded as "own work", such as in your example, it just shows that the same image had been published earlier, which usually is a clear indication that the "own work"-claim may be wrong. Of course, even that assumption may be wrong in a few cases. But, we are open for discussion. If the files hasn't been deleted already, you may comment on the file talkpage, which usually will prevent speedy-deletion.
We are all aware that he overall situation is far from optimal. We are flooded with new uploads, of which quite a number are copyvios, which need early detection, to prevent that re-users are exposed to litigation by the true rightsholder. But, there too few users patroling recent uploads, so the workload makes a more thorough investigation to prevent false-positive impossible.--Túrelio (talk) 19:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Incnis Mrsi: , I understand completely. No problem. Only thankful that volunteers try to keep this project running. Thanks, BeeBringer (talk) 20:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:Maria Callas.2.JPG (hist • logs • abuse log)[edit]

It was not an “exact” duplicate and even less “scaled-down” one because of larger pixel size (height = 240 px) and, of course, different cropping (breasts partially included). Don’t trust random assertions without verification – I start to deem that this problem of yours (and several other Commons sysops) is systemic. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:47, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Technically you are correct, but the (deleted) version had obviously been "enlarged", i.e. it was more blurry than the maintained version. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded a lossless crop similar to the deleted one, but without retouching. Please, restore all deleted things to make history consistent. BTW, I still expect your comments about CAPTAIN RAJU who (presumedly) duped you into deletion of six legitimate redirects. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:28, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File:PAROLE.jpg[edit]

Hii sorry for my ignorance while uploading images. how can we upload a film poster? which type licencing? and the normal image that took by me(which licence)... thank you --Yourmistake (talk) 10:17, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, movie-posters do always require an expressed license from the movie studio, which needs to be presented to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Also, the permission needs to be compliant to policy. See also: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Posters. --Túrelio (talk) 11:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Change photo[edit]

Hello! How can I change photo of Katerina Konecna, who is member of European parliament. Current photo is horrible. Iam her assistant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lodyha (talk • contribs) 15:09, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lodyha,
you need to go the the article pages on the projects (Wikipedia) where the older image is used. There you can either try to replace it directly or propose the change on the talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please review these 2 images below.

Thank You for your help. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:31, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 image[edit]

Hi. As I know almost nothing about Flickr things, wanted to ask you if the File:5000 Pledges! (16003060471).jpg does not have DW problems? Ty. --E4024 (talk) 09:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trump-Kim Meeting v1.jpg[edit]

Dear Túrelio, Thank you for your reminder, please check the source of the file and remove the notice if possible. 10:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodtiming8871 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Túrelio,
I appreciate your professional source update on the image of File:Trump-Kim Meeting v1.jpg , Have a great day. :) 20:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goodtiming8871 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted image[edit]

<courtesy deleted on request of other poster>

Rolex[edit]

Jwanah (talk) Hi Túrelio, First of all thank you for your contribution to making this platform more fair for everyone. I'd like to ask about a photo you recently deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adli_Qudsi.png

I have an Email from an official at the Rolex Foundation, which is the owner of this photo, saying I can share it as long as I attribute it to the photographer and Rolex. I can forward this Email to you. Would this be enough?

Thank you, Jwanah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwanah (talk • contribs) 04:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Little advice[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I noted that you tagged image to delete which I was uploaded as an copyright violation. if I upload like this. 

|source=Name of person who has given (email/message)
|author=Name of authorize person

is that ok, also could you please conform what basis can create category about a wikipedian like this. 

Category:Images uploaded by Túrelio

Zi.jony (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you specify about which file you are talking? --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand your question about the mentioned category. Do you want to know how to create a similar category for your uploads? --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your reply I'm talking Manisha Saxena's file, this photo get by FB messenger, because I'm connected with her in Messenger. Yes, I want to know how to create a similar category for my uploads, also want to know by which WP policy I can do it, because any time anyone can tag for delete. Zi.jony (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In regard to File:Manisha Saxena.jpg, you need to contact the assumed rightsholder and ask her whether she has the full copyright of this image and whether she is willing to release it under a "free license", such as the choosen {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}, which would allow anybody to use the image. If she agrees, she needs to send her agreement/permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alte Gesamtausgabe.JPG[edit]

Dear Túrelio,

I have uploaded the picture File:Alte Gesamtausgabe.JPG to illustrate the page Bruckner Gesamtausgabe.

The picture is a scan of a page put at the end of Max Auer's book "Anton Bruckner - Sein Leben und Werk", published in Leipzig in 1941. It is actually not a part of the book, but an annoucement for the "Bruckner Gesamtausgabe".
Max Auer deceased in 1962, and Robert Haas, who was the editor of the "Bruckner Gesamtausgabe", deceased in 1960.
Hopefully there are no problems of copy-right.

Please let me know whether I was allowed to upload it into Commons.

Thanks for your help, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 17:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Meneerke bloem: ,
nice to hear from you again. I am not sure about whether such an information sheet is above threshold of originality. Therefore, I've asked other :de users and are currently waiting for their opinions. --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So far opinion is that the page is below threshold of originality and thereby not copyrightable. I've placed it also in the :de article. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Danke vielmals! As you can see, I am still active on Wikimedia with botany, but also Anton Bruckner's works. In addition to the nice collaboration I have with John Berky and Hans Roelofs, I have now also a close cooperation with scholar William Carragan about the difficult topic of the different versions of Bruckner's works. My practice of the German language is unfortunately not sufficient to adapt the existing pages on Bruckner's works of the German Wikipedia or to create via translation the pages I have created on the English and French Wikipedias. Best regards from Belgium, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 09:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

9 images[edit]

Dear Turelio, If you can, please kindly review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Test files[edit]

Dear Túrelio, I just uploaded several SVG test samples only to learn that they (persistently) contained the same error over and over again. Would you please delete them for me, to avoid further confusion about my intentions. Thank you very much, Poeticbent talk 16:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320143212%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  2. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320143452%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  3. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320143904%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  4. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320144720%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  5. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320144924%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  6. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320145123%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
  7. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3d/20180320145802%21Struktura_ofiar.svg
Hi, you are referring to different versions of File:Struktura ofiar.svg, right? To identify the to-be-deleted versions correctly, it would be easier to list the upload-times as shown in the version-list on the file-page. --Túrelio (talk) 17:00, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This DR[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can the used image in this DR be replaced by the image I suggested on its various wikipedia pages? Just curious. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:28, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, though this didn't require admin. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:52, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel[edit]

Hi Túrelio, Could I ask that everything from [24] upwards bes revdeled please ?, I for some reason thought If I replied with something equally as stupid the IP might back off .... instead my plan backfired and I guess I just encouraged them, Lesson learnt there, Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:18, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. It's actually rev-"hidden". Admins (and higher) can still make it visible. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant thank you, –Davey2010Talk 17:38, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibreak[edit]

Túrelio is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Commons April 2018

Enjoy!   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:02, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you kindly reviw these 7 images. It is only 7 quality images...and no more.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

Hello Túrelio! I just wanted to let you know intend to use your "Mother Teresa image" for a youth magazine we give out to our members of a Swedish non-profit youth organization. Our aim is to encourage and inspire young people to live out their faith. Thanks for a beautiful image! Let us know if there is any problem of using the image! Warm Regards, Samuel Lundstrom, 3 apr — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samlun83 (talk • contribs)

Hi Samuel, that's fine for me. Just try to add the credit, as described on the image page. In case your magazine will be available online, I would be happy to learn the address. --Túrelio (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User page deletion[edit]

Hello Túrelio, I noticed at AN you deleted a user page per his request. I would be very interested to learn if this practice (which I do not disapprove) is based on a community discussion and what is the reasoning behind, since on the French project such requests are systematically declined. How about your home project and other projects you know of ? Again, please trust this is by no means a criticism. I am just interested to dig further into the matter. Cheers, — Racconish ☎ 11:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Racconish, you are likely refering to User:Mr.Polaz. In our policy the deletion of a userpage, as request by the user, falls into the category "Maintenance" and can be performed as speedy deletion. Commons is my home-project, though I started in :de, where the deletion of userpages (or pages in userspace), but NOT of user-talkpages falls also into speedy-deletion, see de:Wikipedia:Schnelllöschantrag#Sonstige_Löschgründe. I don't remember whether there was any discussion about this on :de. At :en, the deletion of userpages (again, not user-talkpages) is part of the right to vanish. --Túrelio (talk) 12:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. — Racconish ☎ 12:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 images and a question[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you review these 5 images below please first?

Secondly, I think this image below is licensed incorrectly. The copyright owner says on the source link that she licenses it into the public domain.

It seems to me that the correct license is cc-zero and not CC BY SA. If you agree, please consider changing the license to cc-zero and reviewing it. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WRT to the Sally image, that's likely a "misunderstanding". For her (and likely for most unexperienced people) a CC-license is like "public domain", anybody can use it etc. As her tweet actually confirms that she uploaded it by herself, we can safely take literally the placement of the CC-template. With portraits of living people, I feel a bit more safe (WRT to fight abuse) with a CC license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK then. Thank You for your analysis Turelio. I prefer to ask an experienced Admin on complicated copyright issues. I will pass the image on the CC BY SA license. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The missing image that is not a double & 2 more images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can you mark this image that I forgot to put on your talkpage yesterday below.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Picture_Ronan_Le_Gleut.jpg[edit]

Hi ! You may remember that we already talked about this picture and you told me to send an email to have this picture added in Wikimedia. I did it a couple of weeks ago and since, I have no news. I don't know what the process is, but I have to ask you if the picture will be soon available to be used in some Wikipedia article, can you tell me please ? Thanks ! Maxib (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxib (talk • contribs) 07:45, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, I forgot. I'll temporarily undelete it and add an OTRS-pending. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading picture[edit]

You deleted a picture on a wikipedia page called "Tim Schulz". It is my own work and I did not know how to upload it any other way than Flickr. How can I upload it on wikipedia common? While deleting pictures, you should give advices how to properly upload because people just are going to upload it again and again. And make you life harder. Harijan2018 (talk) 17:40, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload File:Tim Schulz profile.jpg had been tagged by another patroler under the suspicion of Flickr washing, as this image has metadata (EXIF) which show "Jeff Zimmerman www.m3films.com" as author and was uploaded to a one purpose Flickr account in the name of Pierre Mangold created shortly before it was uploaded to Commons. While this is not absolute proof, it is a rather solid suspicion, justifying a speedy deletion. I am sorry that the nominator did not notify you in advance about this deletion and I missed to notice this. I've explained on your talkpage what you need to do with your new upload. --Túrelio (talk) 18:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

15 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Can you kindly mark these images below please?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:07, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

pierre Milza...[edit]

le 9 avril 2018.

Hi,

about pic of Pierre Milza... Why do you remove it?

I was Pierre's friend... I was his friend for over 20 years! and it's me who took this picture years ago in front of his house of Miniac-morvan ...

I am at the origin of his wikipedia page... Official Facebook also and I manage it! This picture is on the facebook page and was removed here, since the day of his death by I do not know who !!!

I was already obliged to give these explanations a few years ago when I deposited this photo the first time!


Before arbitrarily removing an item, it would be wise to question the author and check the history of the page ... This would save all time wasting .. you like me ... Thank you for your understanding! I'll give this picture tomorow ... do not worry about my posts in the future ... Thank you, Sir censor ...

JM GROT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaainfo (talk • contribs) 19:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, before insulting other volunteers, you might take a look at your upload-log on Commons. So far, each of your uploads has been deleted for suspicion of copyright violation.
With regard to File:Perre Milza.jpg, which has been deleted 4 times already by different administrators: when you uploaded it in 2011, you claimed it to be work by Perre Milza[25] How fits this to "it's me who took this picture"? And how comes that Amazon has the same image in high resolution[26] and Hachette[27]? Anyway, you can try to convince our support-team by sending a proper confirmation, including some conatct data, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please review these 2 images please.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Österreichische Sparkassenzeitung | Cover Bild[edit]

Hallo,

Sie haben mein Coverbild aufgrund von Copyright gelöscht. Wir sind Herausgeber der Sparkassenzeitung und alle Rechte liegen bei uns. Wie kann ich also das Coverbild wieder hinzufügen?

MfG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksspv1988 (talk • contribs) 13:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Ksspv1988: ,
ein Überprüfer der neuen Uploads hat das Bild als mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung markiert, weil Magazin-Titelseiten üblicherweise nicht unter einer freien Lizenz stehen. Ich habe es daraufhin gelöscht, weil die Einschätzung plausibel war.
Das Problem ist, dass sich hier jeder x-Beliebige unter dem Benutzernamen Sparkassendirektor oder Rolf-E. Breuer o.ä. anmelden kann. Wenn du oder deine Sparkasse vorhabt, noch mehr Bilder auf Commons hochzuladen oder auf der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia etwas mitzuschreiben, dann ist eine sog. Benutzerverifizierung zu empfehlen. Dann würde das das "offizielle" Wikipedia-Benutzerkonto der Sparkasse Dingsbums.
Falls es bei ein paar hochgeladenen Bildern bleiben wird, dann lohnt sich dieser Aufwand wohl nicht. Dann müsste der bei euch dazu rechtlich Befugte für das jeweilige Bild (oder auch mehrere zusammen) eine Bestätigung an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (auf deutsch) schicken. Der Ablauf ist hier Commons:OTRS/de beschrieben; eine Email-Vorlage für die Bestätigung findest du hier: Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung (Rechte-Inhaber). Ich würde dir unbedingt empfehlen, auch für das bereits hochgeladene Logo euer Sparkasse eine solche Genehmigung zu schicken, weil sonst früher oder später mit einer Löschung zu rechnen ist, da in angelsächsischen Ländern die für einen urheberrechtl. Schutz erforderliche Gestaltungshöhe viel niedriger liegt als in D. und A.
Sobald die Genehmigung unterwegs ist, gib mir wieder Bescheid, damit ich das Coverbild wiederherstellen kann. --Túrelio (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo @Túrelio: ,
ich habe die Bestätigung gerade losgeschickt.
MfG — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.150.1.100 (talk) 09:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cover Sparkassenzeitung.jpg wieder hergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible mistake on deletion of one of my files[edit]

Would it be possible to undo your deletion?

http://www.pnas.org/page/about/rights-permissions

Requesting Permission

Anyone may, without requesting permission, use original figures or tables published in PNAS for noncommercial and educational use (i.e., in a review article, in a book that is not for sale), provided that the full journal reference is cited and, for articles published in volumes 90–105 (1993–2008), "Copyright (copyright year) National Academy of Sciences." Commercial reuse of figures and tables (i.e., in promotional materials, in a textbook for sale) requires permission from PNAS.

AriasUploads (talk) 05:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AriasUploads:
the problem is the cited clause "for noncommercial and educational use". Our policy COM:L requires that uploads are free also for commercial use. I am aware that this is not easy to understand, as Wikipedia is perceived as a non-commercial project. However, the decision was taken very early and we cannot change it. So, the only possibility would be to contact PNAS and ask them whether they or the author would be willing to license the needed diagrams/images under a CC-BY or CC-BY-SA license. --Túrelio (talk) 06:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AN[edit]

Hi Túrelio, hast du vielleicht Zeit dir diese Sache einmal anzuschauen? Ich würde deinen Input sehr schätzen! Danke und schöne Grüße --Martina talk 05:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dankeschön! --Martina talk 03:42, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:建三江湿地空港.jpg[edit]

Hello, yes, that's because it is copyright infringement. (It should be copyright-free, but it seems that it is also circulating on other sites ...)--郵便振替 (talk) 08:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How to do[edit]

Hello, it will be kind of you to see :

I don't know what to do ?
Thank you very much.--Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 21:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Hello, I have find. Thanks--Cordialement. 6PO (talk) 21:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 quality images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you review these 4 images below please?

Thank You kindly, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frage[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, danke dass du mein Foto gelöscht hast. Anschließend hast du jedoch ein Redirect angelegt - welchen Sinn hat das? Gruß Bwag (talk) 07:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ähem, da ich heute morgen zig Dateien gelöscht habe, kannst du mir eben den Dateinamen deines Fotos (oder des redirs) durchgeben. --Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Bitte sehr: [28]. Gruß Bwag (talk) 07:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Das speedy-markierte Foto war ein Duplikat der anderen, verbliebenen Datei, deshalb hab ichs in den dupe-Prozess überführt. Wenn dich das redir stört, kann ich es löschen, da deine Datei ja erst von gestern war, also auf Uploader-Wunsch auch ohne Gründe gelöscht werden kann. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, an sich ist es mir egal. Ich wollte nur generell wissen, warum oftmals in solchen Fällen ein Redirekt angelegt wird (obwohl ich diesem wenig Sinn sehe). Gruß Bwag (talk) 08:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dazu kann man kaum etwas sagen, weil das Abarbeiten der verschiedenen speedy-"Warteschlangen" ja nicht geregelt ist. Ich mache das auch nicht systematisch. In diesem Fall ist es mir halt ins Auge gesprungen und da ich vorher schon andere Duplikate entsprechend verarbeitet hatte, kam der Gedanke. Grüße --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, passt! Gruß Bwag (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

dk.logo.png[edit]

Good day Túrelio

As I explained to Vycl1994: I have taken the picture of the logo myself. However if it is a violation of copyrights, then I'm happy to remove it. I belief in ethical and legal behavior. If it transgress copyright you may delete the file, as I can take it off the page, but do not know how to delete it.

So if I transgressed a copyright I'm happy that you took it off.

User:Barry Ne — Preceding unsigned comment added by 08:55, 16 April 2018 (talk • contribs)

Hi Barry, what exactly do you mean by "taken the picture of the logo"? The uploaded image was rather clearly not a photography. It was a reduced copy of the file https://durbanvillecollege.ac.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/logo-300x300.jpg. Did you create the the original logo-image on the college's website? --Túrelio (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Túrelio, it seems that many files uploaded to Commons by Barry Ne are copyright violations. Several images listed in the upload log are either logos unsuitable for Commons-compliant licensing or low resolution and not eligible for public domain. Vycl1994 (talk) 15:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not getting into allegations. I'm an ethical person and therefore if you feel that I have transgress any copyright feel free to delete it. I'm a law obliging citizen

User:Barry Ne — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barry Ne (talk • contribs) 17:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Issues[edit]

Thank you for reporting the copyright issues that was there in the files I upploaded. I marked them for Speedy deletion. Guru3397 (talk) 09:44, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ACK. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PTT_BBS_login_screen_April_16_2018.png[edit]

Hi, I'm a bit confused by what you mean about the violation of fair use. The screenshow shows an open-source bulletin board software running on a open-source terminal emulator software (PuTTY). I seriously cannot understand how screenshot of open-source services on open-source software is considered proprietary. Kindly elaborate as I do not understand, thanks. RAMChYLD (talk) 02:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RAMChYLD, well, in your description of the image there was no indication of the original software/material being under a free license. The screenshot-problem-tag {{Screenshot}} expressedly requests: "If the screenshot shows a program or other material that is itself under a free license like GPL, please indicate this with the {{Free screenshot}} tag."
In addition, "open source" may mean different things. To be usable on Commons, it needs to be a Commons-compliant (see COM:L) license. --Túrelio (talk) 07:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by User:FDPSchweiz[edit]

Thanks for correcting my use of the copyvio template here. User:FDPSchweiz currently uploads a lot of professional pictures of politicians. I notified them that they need permission of the respective photographer in the German WP here: [29]. Can you please have a look to check if what I wrote is true and amend or correct my comments as necessary? Thanks! --Count Count (talk) 10:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

15 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can help, please review these quality images.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:42, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:Monument for the Yoshino Immigrant Village in Ji'an.jpg[edit]

I saw you deleted File:Monument for the Yoshino Immigrant Village in Ji'an.jpg. Your reason for deleting is: "There is no freedom of panorama exception for anything other than buildings in Taiwan." But I still don't understand why it was deleted. I only know that its copyright is "CC BY-SA 2.0"(See: [30]), and because I follow "Well-known_licenses" rule.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am ready to upload this photo: [31]. Can you tell me why I can't upload it?--Kai3952 (talk) 09:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Kai3952,
the user on Flickr put "his" photo of the monument under a CC license. So, formally everything seems to be o.k. However, his photo depicts a work of somebody else, a monument, which is copyrightable and likely still in copyright. So, actually, the Flickr user wasn't even legally entitled to put "his" photo under a free license, as it violates the copyright of the sculptor. That is a rather frequent problem on Flickr, as many people don't have an idea about copyright and many other don't bother about it.
So, with both images, the deleted one and the to-be-uploaded one, we can discuss in a deletion-discussion whether the depicted work is indeed above the threshold of originality, as required per copyright-law of the respective country, or whether the sculptor, if known, is already dead for >70 years. --Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even so, you should discuss first before deleting any files. The law of Taiwan is stipulated for 50 years, and not 70 years. See: [32] and [33]. The problem is that no one knows when the sculptor died, because this monument was established by the government during the Taiwan under Japanese rule(1985-1945). See: [34]. So you tell me, how to know "who" died more than 50 years?--Kai3952 (talk) 13:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"So you tell me," - Sorry, but that's not my job. It's the job of the uploader to convince Commons, i.e. present evidence, that an upload is o.k. If you want to do the research, I am willing to restore the deleted image, but will put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think this article is evidence, or is this law?--Kai3952 (talk) 18:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what these texts are about, as I don't read chinese. So, it doesn't make to continue this discussion on my talkpage. I'll put the image into an DR, so you can invite other users with knowledge about the applicable law. --Túrelio (talk) 18:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here you go: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument for the Yoshino Immigrant Village in Ji'an.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what the "evidence" you refered to is.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:34, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The CC license on Flickr is valid only if the depicted monument is already in the public domain (per local copyright law). That's what you have to demonstrate to get a keep decision from my admin colleagues. Please continue this discussion on the DR-page, as I asked you already once. --Túrelio (talk) 21:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Local copyright law? Do you mean that I cannot follow the laws of Taiwan? As far as I know, Flickr is governed by the laws of the United States.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

user:Bambimbum [35][edit]

Hallo Túrelio, ich bitte Dich den user nachdrücklich darauf hinzuweisen, dass er, wenn der Ersteller dieses Bildes (also ich) es wünscht, diesem Wunsch nachkommen muss und seine Bearbeitung des Bildes:

Betroffenes Bild für 1 Tag vollgesperrt und Hinweis erfolgt. --Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Túrelio, wie geht's nun weiter? --Simsalabimbam (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Da er sich explizit weigert und nach meinem Hinweis auch weiter gemacht hat, zumindest 1x, und sogar Einsatz von Sockenpuppen angekündigt hat, macht es keinen Sinn mehr, das hier im Dialog zu behandeln. Das muss auf ein Admin-Board. File:Brickegickel-2018-Ffm-0871.jpg habe ich jetzt zunächst mal zurückgesetzt und für 1 Monat vollgesperrt. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, danke! --Simsalabimbam (talk) 06:53, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two image files from the film Carnation Revolution[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CRAVOS_frame.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CRAVOS_soldado.jpg

Hi Túrelio,

These images have been drawn by Siné for the film in my house in May 1974. I’m the film director. They will have no other use but in the film, they are part of its contents.

What may I do?

Thanks, Portunick 11h 23 min April 22, 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Portunick: ,
hmm, not easy. Siné died only in 2016, whereby his works are in copyright til end of 2086. If these works were created for the movie, there was possibly some sort of contract/agreement that artists agreed to the use of their works by the movie company. So, you need contemplate for yourself, do you - as the film director - have enough rights to distribute these works under a free license? If you are sure about that, then send a statement of permission from your business/official email addressto permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), in which you need to elaborate a bit why also you have the copyright, mention the filenames and the choosen license. OTRS volunteers will then process this permission, eventually contact you and then put a permission "ticket" on the image pages. In case you come to the conclusion to send such a permission, the moment you send it, drop me a note, I will then undelete both images. --Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio, If you have some time, please review these 7 images.

Thank You and Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images to be review[edit]

Hello Túrelio, could you please review these 14 images. if any problem let me know.

Thanks ZI Jony (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ZI Jony: , I've no experience in reviewing images on the Bollywood-Hungama ticket. So, I would first need to read myself into the terms. As I don't have time for this today, you will get your files reviewed faster if you ask another Bollywood-Hungama experienced admin. --Túrelio (talk) 19:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Thank you. for your reply ZI Jony (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Jenkyns image[edit]

Hi, you have recently deleted File:Andrea Jenkyns.jpg, the same file has just been uploaded as File:Andrea Jenkyns 2018.jpg could you take a look to see if it falls under the same problems as the deleted image. 11:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith D (talk • contribs) 11:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's the same image. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 12:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Gálvez[edit]

Hi, why did you delete this pic: File:Christian Galvez2013.jpg? The source is this video, with CC-BY license: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plJyKINg0xg I don't understand it. Billy brown (talk) 13:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, was wrongly tagged. Image restored. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lev indický v ZOO Praha.jpg[edit]

Hi. Uploader of this photo contacted me and he wants to get a permission for OTRS from ZOO Praha. So I would ask you to restore the file. Thanks. --Harold (talk) 15:09, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, usually such files are restored only when the permission is already underway or at OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:Jan Vermeer van Delft 014.jpg[edit]

A couple of minutes ago you deleted Jan Vermeer van Delft 014.jpg as being a (scaled down) duplicate of Johannes Vermeer - Lady at the Virginal with a Gentleman, 'The Music Lesson' - Google Art Project.jpg. I object to these quick-and-dirty deletions. I have no way to check this claim anymore. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:27, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've temp-undeleted the image version, uploaded by you, however, without the description, as mediawiki wouldn't process that this moment. See, if that's enough to compare. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The image is used on several pages so there is no reason to delete. Besides, to be exact it is not een scaled down duplicate of the Google image. Who requested this deletion anyway? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WRT: the image is used you may misunderstand. The image wasn't simply deleted, it was processed as duplicate, i.e. all its uses were replaced by the target image. So, that's not really a problem.
It had been tagged as duplicate by User:John a s. The duplicate process allows to visually compare both images, which I did, and found the duplicate-claim at least not unreasonable. Anyway, if you insist I can try to restore it completely (including description history), if mediawiki allows me. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please, and the deletion procedure should be different. This is not the first time an image was tagged as duplicate and in no time deleted. Duplicates should be treated as normal deletion requests. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. You won't see the dupe-tagging and my following 3 edits, as I restored only all edits before the tagging. Luckily it worked. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Hagen Aktiv.jpg[edit]

The page said that I have one week to set a license for the image.

I am sure that I can upload it here, I was just going to officially make sure it's possible to set it to public domain in the next few days.

You deleted the file in less than a day. --D3d9 (talk) 16:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @D3d9: ,
das Logo war als copyvio markiert, nicht als no-license. Auf Commons sind wir mit Logos generell weniger "großzügig" als auf :de, weil die für einen urheberrechtlichen Schutz erforderliche Schöpfungshöhe des Logos in manchen Ländern (z.B. England) deutlich niedriger liegt als in Deutschland. Ergänze bitte noch die Quellenangabe, "Hagen Aktiv" ist etwas zu wenig; gibt es keine URL? --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Hinweise. Was soll ich in die Quellenangabe schreiben, wenn diese Datei nicht genau so online zu finden ist? Die Datei (und eine andere, die ich bald hochlade) (Edit: Für die habe ich eine Quellenangabe gefunden, ich warte nun, dass die Lizenz dazugeschrieben wird --D3d9 (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC)) wurde mir per E-Mail zugeschickt. Danke --D3d9 (talk) 09:57, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10 images please[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you please review just these 10 images please?

Thank You kindly. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:34, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guidance[edit]

then can you please tell me how should I upload the pictures of celebrities for their page? please reply ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saad123890 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent 2 uploads are suspected to be copyvios and not own work, contrary to your upload-statement. This violates not only our policy COM:L, but may also expose you and re-users of these uploads to litigation for copyright infringement. So, in the future, try to take a shot of these celebrities truely by yourself or, if not possible, try to find a freely-licensed (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA; but not: CC-BY-NC) image, for example on Flickr. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok got it i am new to all this i don't know how to upload pictures of celebrities which were present on their Instagram for public use. because they have public their account and the pictures they post can be used by their fans. so does that still comes under copyright violation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saad123890 (talk • contribs) 09:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Put to the public" does in no way equal "being under a free license". In general, images on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. are not "free" in the sense of "under a free license". There needs to be an expressed statement such as "licensed under CC-BY" or similar. --Túrelio (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok should what should I do now? remove the pictures and upload those who are taken by me or copyright? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saad123890 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot remove your own uploads. An admin will take care of that. For future uploads see my explanations above. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks for information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saad123890 (talk • contribs) 09:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC) (Saad123890 (talk) 09:39, 29 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]

I apologize for the wrong rationale.[edit]

OceanAtoll (talk) 14:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Visible watermarks are discouraged on Commons, but not forbidden. They may be a copyvio-warning siggn if they do not fit to the uploaders name. --Túrelio (talk) 15:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you kindly review these 7 images from Mushroom Observer please?

Thank You for your time, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tallinna Raekoda. Arhitekt Edgar Johan Kuusik.jpg[edit]

Hi, Please do not delete old images. These can be fixed. At the very least, they deserve a proper DR. Thanks, Yann (talk) 06:26, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I've restored File:Tallinna Kunstihoone ehitus ja nurgakivi panek.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Actually this map is not so old: the architect is Edgar Johan Kuusik (1888–1974). Sorry for the disturbance. ;) Yann (talk) 06:32, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files[edit]

Hi Túrelio, Nice to meet you! I see you have deleted the files I uploaded as possible copyright violation. When I checked, they were suddenly deleted. I didn't got any chance to defend. Therefore I request you to re-investigate and check the url, file's talk page, and nominator's history on all wikis, and then decide. Thank you--Navinsingh133 (talk) 09:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I have deleted only 1 of the images (File:Energica Ego.jpg).
But, anyway, on the talkpage of the other one (File:Energica Ego 2.jpg) I had replied to your question:
File is taken from Energica Motor Company's press release section with to use under given licence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navinsingh133 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the evidence? --Túrelio (talk) 06:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
--Túrelio (talk) 10:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Can you check with the OTRS if it is confirmed or not?----Navinsingh133 (talk) 10:35, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, as I am not an OTRS-volunteer (no access). Also, in none of the deleted files' description a permission to OTRS was ever mentioned. You'll have to ask at the Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard by yourself, if you provided a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! Sorry to bother you and thanks a lot for your help. :) --Navinsingh133 (talk) 11:10, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

why delete kurd mastiff pshdar image?[edit]

Hello. this image are my own work and not copyright. please research more. thanks Mohamad137026 (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mohamad137026,
File:Kurd mastiff (pshdar).jpg was deleted as at least 1 image (the stone relief) in this collage was likely not own work.
File:Kurd Mastiff Pshdar Dog سگ پژدر کوردی.jpg was deleted as "Copied from Instagram".
--Túrelio (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore content deleted by you by mistake[edit]

Hallo, Turelio. I request to undelete the file from Commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IEM_-_two-position_earphone.gif as well as undo your deletion of the link in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headphones#Ear-fitting_headphones and in https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%9D%D0%B0%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8&stable=0&redirect=no#%D0%9F%D0%BE_%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D1%83_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B8_%28%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D1%83%29 because there is no violation of rights - I have all right to this gif - I am a member of NeckTec team - I am the Director for external relations Matvey Fedorov, mentioned on our website www.necktec.com. You can check this by calling our number or by writting me a letter at matvey@necktec.com. WearablesLover is my nickname at Wiki. Please restore the gif and links in Wiki articles. Best regards, Matvey — Preceding unsigned comment added by WearablesLover (talk • contribs) 17:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @WearablesLover: ,
I have temp-undeleted File:IEM_-_two-position_earphone.gif and put a tag on the page that is awaiting confirmation. However, you should send an email from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org confirming that you (or your company) owns the rights for this gif image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update on image you previously deleted[edit]

Hello there, I am writing to advise you that I have uploaded again an image that you previously deleted. The image, Leveraging Wikipedia book, is a photo taken by me with written permission by the copyright holder, and this is pending the OTRS review process protocol. Thanks for your attention. Monikasj (talk) 22:07, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Monikasj,
that's the correct procedure for such cases. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

hi Hystrix, I am writing to ask you whether it would be possible to restore these files concerning some of these portraits of an unknown artist executed between the seventeenth and eighteenth century, the artist since he died for 100 years, the most correct license included in the following files was PD-100 ,,

--87.5.4.153 19:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removed filed from Wikipedia[edit]

You removed File:Crime&Safety Post Flow.png and File:Nextdoor IPhone Map@2x.png from en:User:BC1278/sandbox/Nextdoor These images were uploaded by Nextdoor Inc., the copyright holder. This sandbox article is party of an active request for a redraft of en:Nextdoor by me as a paid consultant to Nextdoor. The proposal discussion and COI disclosures are here: en:Talk:Nextdoor#Request_for_Review

The images were uploaded by the company as part of the process of improving the article, trying to get it from Start Class to Good Article en:WP:GA. Please restore these images. You may verify the uploader is the copyright holder by sending them a message or opening a discussion at the image page. All these related images should be restored.

BC1278 (talk) 16:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278[reply]

(talk page stalker) @BC1278: Please have Nextdoor send permission for those images via OTRS, post them with free licenses on their website, or upload them to enwiki as fair use. I have defanged and enwikified your links above.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:55, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

The deletion log of today states:

"06:04, 7 May 2018 Túrelio (talk | contribs) deleted page File:Querfront-PEACEnics- Diether Dehm, Lars Mährholz, Ken Jebsen Seit' an Seit' hinterm Demo-Front-Banner in Berlin @ 13.12.2014.jpg (obvious copy vio. images has lettering of tv station "RT" in it. sorry for having uploaded this. --JD {æ} 20:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)) (global usage; delinker log)"

I cannot find this diff in your contribution list, neither can I find the mentioned diff in JDs contribution list. I would like to understand the reason for this and for the deletion itself.

Kopilot (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Kopilot: ,
reine Löschvorgänge werden nicht als normaler Edit gewertet, sondern nur in der Log-Liste erfasst (ich weiß nicht, ob die für nicht-Admins sichtbar ist). Die Löschung der gen. Datei erfolgte letztlich auf direkten Wunsch des Hochladers, der selbst eine mögliche URV befürchtet hat (Indiz: Wasserzeichen RT im Foto). --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Wasserzeichen"? Das war doch vermutlich ein Foto von einer RT-Fernsehsendung. Wo ist das Problem? Kopilot (talk) 08:51, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mag sein. Screenshots oder Captures von TV-Sendungen sind per se eine URV, schließlich reproduziert man lediglich etwas, das jemand anderer produziert hat. Das wird auch nicht dadurch besser, dass jemand es unter einer angeblich freien Lizenz auf Flickr hochgeladen hat[37].--Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Achso, wenn Fotos von Fernsehsendungen generell als URV gelten, OK. Nach einem möglichen Ersatz muss ich wohl JD fragen. Kopilot (talk) 10:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Kopilot: , bzgl. Ersatz: du (oder er) könnte natürlich bei RT direkt nachfragen. Vielleicht sind die bereit, den Still freizugeben. --Túrelio (talk) 12:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revision delete[edit]

Could you delete my edits in the following files: File:The Europa series 50 € obverse side.png and File:The Europa series 50 € reverse side.png? Their dpi is higher than 72, hence they are in violatation of ECB's Decision ECB/2003/4. It was my mistake (good faith), please delete. Triplecaña (talk) 10:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hello,

I work for the Youcat Center in Aschau, a non-profit foundation. Our latest project - YOUCAT for Kids (Catechism for children with their parents) - will be released this year in August. In this regard, I wanted to ask you if it is possible to use the following photos for this international book? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.142.205.115 (talk • contribs)

Hallo Claudia,
sicher, kein Problem. Welche der "following photos" möchtest du denn benutzen? --Túrelio (talk) 17:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my profile image[edit]

Please let me know why my profile image page is deleted. I am Harshada Pathare and www.harshadapathare.com is my official website. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 223.182.189.120 (talk) 03:41, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) What profile image page?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:52, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Likely he/she is relating to File:Harshada Pathare.jpg, which was deleted due to being sourced to harshadapathare.com which is labelled as "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BY HARSHADA PATHARE ©". --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi 223.182.189.120,
if you are really Harshada Pathare, please send a mail from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org confirming that you own the full rights for the image File:Harshada Pathare.jpg to have it released under the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PC Caucus Services[edit]

Hi! Should these two images be marked as possible copyvio or DR: Michael Harris and Laurie Scott? Exif has "PC Caucus Services" as Copyright holder. The photographer is Tavis Nembhard and he released Oosterhoff's image to Commons in 2017 via OTRS. Both images are marked as Own Work and they're definitely not that. Thoughts? // sikander { talk } 13:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged both as no-perm now. Thanks for notifying. If you are in contact with Tavis Nembhard, you might consider asking him directly, whether he is willing to release them (with proper attribution, of course). --Túrelio (talk) 13:52, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Tavis confirmed that he released Lauire Scott's image, but not Michael Harris's image. OTRS ticket is 2018050910009683. // sikander { talk } 18:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio, here you go again[edit]

Túrelio, here you go again. You are sitting on two chairs. Proposing to delete a file and deleting it in no-time. Quick-and-dirty! This time it is File:Zaak Magere Josje (1959).jpg You claim it is an exact or scaled down version of File:Rechtszaak Magere Josje publieke belangstelling, Bestanddeelnr 910-8331.jpg but that is not true. The latter is just an copy from the Nationaal Archief. The first I have worked on, like scratch and dust removal. Exposure correction and cropping. I am not quite sure what exactly I did on this image but I always clean my uploads. Please stop that. Use a normal DR if you need to, but don't sit on two chairs. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:53, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You got your first conclusion wrong. I did not nominate the file as duplicate[38]. I simply processed the nomination by User:Vysotsky. So, I do not sit on 2 chairs. SD of the duplicate is an integral part of the duplicate-process.
After restoring "your" version, apart from that is functionally a crop of the original, I don't see any difference between the two. --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In Category:Duplicate currently further 19 images from the Anefo series are waiting to be processed as duplicates. Feel free to check them. --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry for the harsh words, Túrelio. I will talk to Vysotsky. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Apart from being cropped, obvious changes are rotation clockwise, and removal of scratches. But being cropped by itself does contradict the claim of duplicity. This procedure is to quick-and-dirty. Something has to change. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:59, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I do not disagree about that. As a first step you could propose at Commons talk:Deletion policy to add something like "a crop of an image is not its duplicate" to Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates. I would support that. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Answered at my talkpage. Vysotsky (talk) 12:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would appreciate it if you support this. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you kindly review these 4 images please?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it "that simple"? ;-)[edit]

Really interested in the permanent solution of a recurring problem is --Jotzet (talk) 07:19, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I didn't see that there was an ongoing DR. The deleted files had a copyvio-speedy tag. As we have many many image from "tistory" a full discussion is more appropriate. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I "saved" some files from you (and User:SLV100's fumbling). Maybe there is a blacklist entry already (see [39])? --Jotzet (talk) 07:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
P.S.: There was another discussion as well...

File:Plantix.png[edit]

Hello, Túrelio,

my boss sent a user authorization to the Wiki-Commons team 3 weeks ago, so I thought it would be ok to upload the picture again. What else can I do? Greets 07:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hallo ZeusUlrich247,
die Ehrenamtler, die sich um die Bearbeitung von eingeschickten Genehmigungen kümmern, das sog. OTRS-Team, ist z. Zt. leider völlig überarbeitet, weshalb es dort einen Rückstand von etwa 70 Tagen (!) gibt. Das ist natürlich sehr unerfreulich, aber es gibt keine andere Lösung als auf das Abarbeiten der Warteschlange zu warten. Vorsichtshalber habe ich deinen letzten Upload mit OTRS-pending markiert, um die Löschung zu verhindern. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Collage[edit]

Yes, I can provide info about all the images in the collage, but I would like to read a tutorial.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by QuinteroP (talk • contribs) 07:39, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source/author information provided[edit]

Hey,

I have already added the information. QuinteroP (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frage[edit]

Hi. Thanks for deleting my user page, upon my speedy deletion request. Just a simple curiosity? Did/does the Metawiki userpage thingy appear automatically when you delete a user page? Indeed I was hoping to have a red page, symbolizing how I blushed (vergüenza ajena en castellano) vis-a-vis some attitudes... Only hoping for a small Antwort, nothing else. Danke schön. --E4024 (talk) 08:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi E4024, yes, the userpage content from metawiki appears immediately after the deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now the Turkish delight turned red-ish... :) --E4024 (talk) 08:26, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

6 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you kindly review these 6 images please?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you review my final images from Mushroom Observer.

I thank you for all your help and am finished with this...fungi project. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1990 Vauxhall Nova L 1.2[edit]

Could you explain why you deleted both of my pictures of the 1990 Vauxhall Nova L 1.2. I take it the owner requested for it to be deleted due to "Privacy reasons" I only able to trace back to a ticket request but I do not have a account or access to Wikimedia OTRS. --Vauxford (talk) 06:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't have any further details as what was posted by the nominator "speedydelete: as per this request on OTRS also if you delete this pelase also delete File:1990 Vauxhall Nova L 1.2 Rear.jpg for privacy reason." I too don't have access to OTRS. You might ask the nominating OTRS-volunteer whether it was mainly about the car number, as it my be blurred. --Túrelio (talk) 06:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a way to make a request for it to be undeleted since I heard that can be done on the Commons. I want to try and get the images undeleted since I think they been wrongfully deleted and got valid reason why but I don't know how to appeal. I'm currently asking the volunteer and waiting for a respond. --Vauxford (talk) 08:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Vauxford: , as these deletions were performed due to OTRS-ticket, I would ask you to take the regular way: Commons:UR. --Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thank you.--Vauxford (talk) 10:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mondadori / CC BY-SA 4.0[edit]

Hi,

In this revert, you said that "Cover of the first issue of the italian magazine Focus, November 1992" is "indeed under cc-by-sa". I do not understand how. What did I miss? Can you explain it to me? Where is the clue?

Best regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 14:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lacrymocéphale,
the permission[40] had been posted to the image talkpage. I have added the link now to the permission-field. --Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Túrelio,
Thank you for pointing me File talk:Copertina Focus novembre 1992.jpg. Sorry for not having thought about checking it.
--Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete request.[edit]

So has anything been decided whether my files be undeleted? There two that support, I just don't want this ended up archived without a conclusion. --Vauxford (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the decision needs to happen on Commons:Undeletion_requests#1990_Vauxhall_Nova_L_1.2. As I had deleted the files, it wouldn't be ideal for me to decide this request. No, AFAIK, open request don't end up archived. IMO, there was no real objection against uploading a "censored" version of the images. Do you have them ready? However, IMO more important is the potential "risk" for you which I mentioned in my comment. Did you check that in any way? --Túrelio (talk) 19:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I still have the original images. Davey2010 another user from the UK putted something about it being fine if that make any sense. But what do I need to check in your comment that could pose a risk? Just want to double check. --Vauxford (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If I understood you earliest comment right, the car owner has RL-identified you to some degree; if that is correct, if we re-upload the images, even without visible car-plate, and she gets aware of it, he/she might try to put further pressure on you, by complaining to your university, hire a lawyer, whatever is possible under UK law. If that happens, though probably very unlikely, you will be on your own. I just wanted to ensure that you take an "informed decision" instea of getting badly surprised. --Túrelio (talk) 06:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: They be fine if the plate get censored which I can easily do. It very unlikely they would check the image again. In one of the emails we exchanged they were asking to blur the registration plate. Unfortunately they sent that email 2 days after I found out my pictures got deleted so I was unable to respond with their request. Another thing. What should I do if it does get undeleted. Do I update the file with the edited picture or do I reupload the edited picture myself? --Vauxford (talk) 12:20, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add I was unaware that the owner had apparently found out - Unless you took it on their driveway then no there is no law that states "You cannot take a picture of a car on a public road" and as such if it went to court or whatever the owner wouldn't have a leg to stand on,
You took an image on a public road - They found said image and complained - You reuploaded said image censoring the plate to protect their identity - The judge would see that as you listening to their concerns and taking reasonable measure to protect their identity whilst at the same time providing an image free to use for everyone so no if she doesn't like it tough luck,
Just to add on the driveway bit - Obviously taking an image on a driveway is a no no as you're literally telling millions of users where that vehicle is whereas if it's outside the house ... well it could be absolutely anyones house couldn't it?,
It's no different to taking a picture of a building or a bus and as I said there's no law that prevents you from taking an image providing it's on the road.
Not sure if wholy related but Vauxford if you've told that person what your username is here and all that then I would suggest you refrain from doing that in future - It's no one's business as to why you're taking a picture but it is courtesy to kinda give an explanation (I'm a car photographer will do),
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: Couldn't of said it any better, it was a lesson learnt. It not the first time I had feuds with car owners. I was just so humbled to have spot and let the owner know but sadly it was with the wrong person. When it comes to driveways, especially ones that are sticking out and in the public. Since my images are always cropped, most of the time it result of showing little to no details of what the house looked like, I do say what town or city it was in but that it. I most definitely not going to inform any future car owner again unless they understand the purpose why I photographed it. Although the chances of that are low. --Vauxford (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Vauxford, FWIW If anyone approaches me I just say I'm a photographer .... I never mention my Commons stuff or indeeed the Commons website because like I said it has nothing to do with anyone,
I would still avoid putting towns as anyone can go on Google Streetview and hunt around the town (and worst case scenario someone could see this image and do all sorts to the car!) - Not saying that could happen mind but you don't know how low people can be!,
Anyway as it was taken in a car park It could well be private land which would mean by rights they can refuse photography but if they only questioned or queried you and didn't say "Sorry, No photography here) then you're allowed to photograph and so again they wouldn't have a leg to stand on,
If they send you further emails demanding you take it down tell them to take a running jump (but in nicer words) and then ignore them from here onwards,
Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 22:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

I decided to upload these 5 images from Mushroom Observer. If you could review them this one final extra time, I would appreciate it.

Have a great day. Regards from Metro Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, äh, good night. ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logótipo OE com Fundo.png[edit]

This logo was created by me and a friend in collaboration for the 4th edition of a project we joined in college 2 years ago, in the hope of revamping its image which was out of date.

The user that reported it upon checking with google saw the logo on the facebook page and thought i had simply just stolen it and claimed as my own.

I expected that the description where i mention the file was based on the origin of the project to give proof of "ownership".

The file was added as we are expanding the project and to facilitate acess to our resources, we intended to create a wikipedia page for it, thus entering the file to use on said page.

Is there any specific proof I can provide to show that I am both one of the creators and I am related to the project from which the logo is used for?

(I am a decently new wiki user so I am not up to par on the best way to showcase such things)

--PfmAleixo (talk) 17:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @PfmAleixo: , you are rather correct in your analysis of the process.
Now, does this "Olimpíadas da Economia" or the college project have an own email address or facebook page? If yes, just send or make the responsible person send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org confirming that the logo, which had been uploaded as File:Logótipo OE com Fundo.png to Commons, is your own work and is correct to be released under the choosen CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. When this has happened, drop me a note. In between you may start with the wikipedia article about this project. --Túrelio (talk) 19:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, regarding confirmation I was told the email was already sent and we're hoping for a positive reply.
Have a nice day.
--PfmAleixo (talk) 14:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meldung[edit]

Hallo Túrelio,
kannst Du mir bitte zur Meldung auf diesem Bild File:Cynorkis squamosa, Habenarrinae, Orchidée (17014558304).jpg etwas sagen
und wie man damit umgehen muss? Danke und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 19:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Orchi,
ich hatte selbst bislang wenig mit diesem Problem zu tun. Ursache ist wohl die schwachsinnige Einführung dieser sog. PDM-"Lizenz", die wir auf Commons wegen der damit verbundenen Unklarheiten nicht einfach so akzeptieren. Eine gewisse Handlungsanleitung findest du in den beiden Aufklappmenüs des PDM-Bausteins auf er Bildseite. Wenn das Bild halbwegs nützlich ist, würde ich dir empfehlen, den Flickr-User direkt zu kontaktieren und zu fragen, ob das Foto von ihm selbst stammt und, falls ja, ob er dir eine echte CC-0-Lizenz (oder halt unsere üblichen CC-BY-SA 4.0) für den Upload auf Commons gibt. (Alternativ könnte er auch die Lizenz auf Flickr umstellen) Tut er das, leitest du die Email einfach an OTRS weiter, passt die Lizenz des Bildes an und setzt {{OTRS pending}} darauf. --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
...danke für die Hinweise. Scheint mir etwas kompliziert zu sein. Zu Flickr habe ich keinen Zugriff. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 20:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Es geht eigentlich: Anmeldung bei Flickr sollte - Dank DSGVO - jetzt rel. risikolos sein. Dann gehst du auf die Benutzerseite und klickst auf das Briefkasten-Symbol rechts neben dem Namen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
....ich bin immer noch mit Registrierungen etwas vorsichtig. ;-) Gruß. Orchi (talk) 10:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion File:Rest in Fear at Metaldays 2015.jpg[edit]

Hey there, you've deleted that file because it was copied from facebook - that's ok. But I'm a member of the band shown in the picture and we took it from our facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/restinfear/photos/fpp.150510238306830/1809605392397298/). The picture was taken by a friend of us for no professional or commercial use; what would you recommend to do to keep it on the Wikipedia article about Rest in Fear? Is it fine if we reupload the original file (not from facebook)?
--Romluc (talk) 11:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Romluc: , the best would be if the photographer-friend of yours would send a permission-email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, in which he/she just confirms from his official email address "I am the photographer of File:Rest in Fear at Metaldays 2015.jpg and I agree to releasing it on Commons under a CC-BY-SA license". He/She should be aware that this license allows also commercial use, as is required by our policy. --Túrelio (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tango the J 133 races off Newport Beach by D Ramey Logan.jpg[edit]

Did he actually request that? Because I can't imagine why. I did set him up with an author template and things like that, if I accidentally broke a license on some files I'm really sorry. It should all have been fixed, but this makes me wonder if I might have missed some. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, with his last edit to this file[41], which you probably can't see because deleted, he added exactly this speedy-rationale. As the image wasn't in use, I performed it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
When did he make that edit? It was used on User talk:Jeff G.#Jeff, please accept my apology "Thanks, I will even share a pic from today with the objective of putting a smile on your face. Have a good night. Cheers!". Jeff afaik didn't do anything to him since that. (some others did, but Jeff didn't) I'm asking when because he maybe made the request one or two days ago while angry and forgot he made it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Log says: 22. Mai 2018 um 04:21 Uhr. Remember, the time-stamp may show time for my time-zone. --Túrelio (talk) 20:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I actually thought it was only just deleted, but it was two days ago. Thanks. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to talk to the uploader. I've no problem to undelete the image, if he requests/agrees. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That is fine, I forgot I had used it on his page, feel free to restore. Alexis you are kind to do all that work on my photos, thank you, --Don (talk) 06:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. Túrelio, could you please undelete the image? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:15, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright blunder[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I've just uploaded four photos from the Ministry for the Environment website and only afterwards did I spot that photos are not covered by their CC-BY 4.0 licence. Could you please nuke them? Thanks. Sorry for that. Schwede66 19:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, as they were quality-shots, but now deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'm currently going through archives of their website and whilst photos have always been excluded, a number have been uploaded over the years. I'll tag them as I find them. Schwede66 19:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update on the Vauxhall Nova image[edit]

I uploaded the images but with the plate censored. However I wasn't sure whether to rename with a different name or use the existing name. I think I made a mistake by using it existing file name it ended up displaying the images in it full-size. Now I'm worried I violated a Commons rule as put by Jeff G. --Vauxford (talk) 22:00, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worry, as the UR was going to result in undelete anyway. An admin-colleague has already closed your UR request and put the OTRS-ticket on the image talkpages. --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Thank you. I thought it was better because if I leave it to be undeleted it will be the uncensored version. I sorta got into a mix up with Jeff G and told me he going to defer to you. --Vauxford (talk) 07:56, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dreamy Evening.jpg and others[edit]

Hi:

How can you say that this photo and others by the same author are not copyvio as the copyright is straight on the photos themselves? Anybody can use a wiki name identical to the one of the real author and claim that it is their work. It needs at minimum an OTRS authorization.

Pierre cb (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quite some contributors put visible copyright-watermarks on their uploads. Even I have some uploads invisibly watermarked. So, putting a visible watermark on an upload is no evidence of copyvio, especially as nearly all his uploads carry the same watermark. For each of the tagged images of this uploader I've checked Google-Images and TinEye: Zero hits. So, it's obviously not a blatant copyvio. I have asked the uploader to consider uploading these images without a visible watermark: User_talk:BilalAhmed5092#your_uploads. Of course, we could add a request to confirm to OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @Pierre cb: COM:NOTCOPYVIO - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use photo[edit]

Hello Turelio,

I would like to use your photo of "Eglise Notre Dame des Victoires, Catholic Church" in my autobiography that I am writing for my family (20 copies); it will not be sold. I was baptized in this church in 1944 and I would like to use your photo to show my family. If I may have your permission, please tell me how to credit you for the use. You may reach me at <fzwolinski@santarosa.edu>

Thank you very much for considering my request.

Sincerely, Frank Zwolinski — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 173.228.82.109 (talk) 05:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frank,
I assume you are refering to File:NDdesVictoiresSF.jpg, right. Sure, you can use this image. Just credit me like: © Túrelio (via Wikimedia-Commons), 2006 / Licensed: CC-BY-SA
--Túrelio (talk) 12:40, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request to use the image - File:MotherTeresa 090.jpg - in our textbook[edit]

Hello,

The TALI (Hebrew acronym for “enriched Jewish Studies”) Education Fund is a non-profit educational organization which works to strengthen pluralistic Jewish studies in Israeli schools.

We are now developing a new textbook for elementary school in Israel: Mine and yours - Tradition and Renewal. It will be printed in Hebrew and distributed in Israel.

After its publication, it will be uploaded to the Ministry of Education website, which is password-protected for use of students and teachers.

We wish to include in our new text book the image: MotherTeresa 090.jpg

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:ED0:425B:5C00:D989:F293:92A1:E306 (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2A02:ED0:425B:5C00:D989:F293:92A1:E306,
that's great. Just credit me, as proposed on the image page. --Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker)They might be interested in the higher resolution version to print in their textbook. You're not a salesman, are you? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chocolade vla IMG 0593.jpg[edit]

Túrelio, das gelöschte Bild https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Chocolade_vla_IMG_0593.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 ist bei mir auf dem Tisch selbst von mir persönlich fotografiert und eigens nachbearbeitet worden. Ich finde keine Löschdiskussion! Zurück mit meinem Bild samt dem ursprünglichen Hochladedatum und der EXIF-Info der Erstellung! --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 06:37, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hans, es war zur Schnelllöschung nominiert, da gibt es keine Diskussion. Die nominierende Kollegin hat dir aber auf einer Disku einen zielführenden Hinweis hinterlassen. Niemand bezweifelt, dass du das Foto aufgenommen hast. Es ist aber ein Foto von einer Verpackung, auf der sich wiederum ein Foto befindet, von dem anzunehmen ist, dass es urheberrechtl. geschützt ist. D.h., eine LD hätte kein anderes Ergebnis als die Löschung gehabt. Es sei denn, das Foto auf der Verpackung wäre auch von dir. --Túrelio (talk) 06:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Gut, die Frontseite ist so ziemlich das einige was das Bild darstellt. Dann bin ich mit der Löschung einverstanden. Eine weitere Darstellung war zum Aufnahmezeitpunkt nach 17:00 Uhr qualitativ nicht zumutbar, denn es wurden mehrere Bilder gemacht. Danke für den Hinweis. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 06:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) @Hans Haase: see COM:PACKAGING for more information. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alexis Jazz, I have already seen, thank You! --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 08:35, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:The Ponzi Factor -- Paperback.jpg[edit]

Hi Túrelio. I think the above-mentioned DR has to do with File:The Ponzi Factor -- Paperback.jpg, but not sure if Quantstyle was trying to make a COM:DRV request or actually wants the file's talk page deleted. My guess is that he/she was trying to start a DRV and just wasn't sure how to do so because there is no File talk:The Ponzi Factor -- Paperback.jpg page. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:25, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've replied at the uploader's talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 08:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, and Marchjuly, thank you for helping me through this. I'm not familiar what how this all works. In short, I have permission from ThePonziFactor.com to use this image. The owner of the copyright will email permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to give permission to use the image. --Quantstyle (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:一人の息子・画像.jpg is not a violation of copyright[edit]

Dear Turelio You delete my uploaded picture File:一人の息子・画像.jpg But I am the advertising man of this company. I don't know how to certificate but I and my company own this copyright. Please don't delete my picture which I upload. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%80%E4%BA%BA%E3%81%AE%E6%81%AF%E5%AD%90 I have to upload this wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by さとるくん (talk • contribs) 01:17, 2 June 2018 (UTC)さとるくん (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @さとるくん: , that's quite easy. Do send from your official business email address a confirmation to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (see Commons:OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Onyar a Girona. Mela Mutermilch.jpg[edit]

Good morning, I did not add this photo. Cropped them. Photo added Llunavella. Regards Tomasz Leśniowski (talk) 10:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Esculturas de Mustafa Arruf[edit]

Hola. Todas las esculturas se encuentra en calles de Melilla. Localización: 35°17′18.837″N 2°56′14.031″W (Coordenadas Encuentros)

35°17′36.626″N 2°56′25.41″W (Coordenadas Monumento Antonio César Jiménez)

35°17′34.352″N 2°56′15.774″W (Coordenadas Torso arqueado mujer desnuda) Mira los siguientes enlaces: http://www.melillahoy.es/noticia/105599/medio-ambiente/la-ciudad-recupera-las-diez-esculturas-urbanas-de-mustafa-arruf-patrimonio-melillense.html https://elfarodemelilla.es/reparan-esculturas-bronce-artista-mustafa-arruf/

Saludos. --Erisgp (talk) 16:13, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Monumento a Antonio César Jiménez[edit]

Hi. Más datos: http://www.esculturaurbana.com/paginas/arrm004.htm Saludos.--Erisgp (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Escultura Torso[edit]

Hola. Más datos sobre la ubicación: Paseo Marítimo de Melilla. Torso y otras esculuras (Street Sculptures): http://www.esculturaurbana.com/paginas/arrm004.htm

https://melilladesconocida.blogspot.com/2012/02/esculturas-en-el-paseo-maritimo.html?m=1 Saludos.--Erisgp (talk) 16:52, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please help review these images if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:23, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:30, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Escultura Antonio César Jiménez Segura[edit]

Hi! The sculpture Monumento a Antonio Cesar Jiménez Segura is installed on the street Calle Chacel (Melilla). Exact location: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monumento_a_Antonio_C%C3%A9sar_Jim%C3%A9nez Thank you.--Erisgp (talk) 16:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've added the appropriate category to the image and the applicable FoP-template. --Túrelio (talk) 06:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A question of copyright[edit]

Hi. I noticed you'd deleted File:Sir-Henry-Monck-Mason-Moore.jpg some time back, citing "Copyright violation: No evidence of permission. The EXIF data includes this note: "Unauthorised reproduction prohibited. For authorisation contact rightsandimages@npg.org.uk"" as the reason for doing so. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but isn't the copyright on the image expired, given that it was produced and published in 1942? - ක - (talk) 17:15, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jesuschristonacamel,
thanks for the links, which weren't included in the image-description. As the depicted person, the actual image-owner and the artist are in U.K., UK copyright law has to be applied. Per en:List_of_countries'_copyright_lengths#Table_of_copyright_durations_by_country, the U.K. has the usual 70 years after death of the author. However, who is the author? The source says "by Bassano Ltd" and "active 1901-1962". So, if we take the 1962, copyright would end in 2033. But, Bassano Ltd is a company, founded by en:Alexander Bassano in 1850, who died in 1912.[42] So, he himself cannot be the photographer. Overall, it's no that easy. If you are interested enough, do some reseasrch and open a request at COM:UR. --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

watermarks[edit]

Hi! You reverted my edit in File:Усадебные постройки - panoramio.jpg with the reason "in several jurisdictions the removal of a copyright-watermark is not permitted". But the watermark that is in this photo "19.08.2016. Иван Бай" is not a copyright-watermark, as it doesn't contain "copyright" symbol.

Please explain whether the files

should also be reverted to watermarked versions? --Jarash (talk) 16:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Jarash: Commons:Watermarks "In 2014, a 3rd-level court in Germany ruled that the removal of a watermark, which contained copyright information, violated the provision "You must keep intact all copyright notices for the Work" of the CC license (in this case CC BY-NC-2.0)."
However, that was a Creative Commons 2.0 license. The files linked are 3.0 and the license text regarding this was changed in 3.0. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jarash, in addition to what Alexis wrote, this is issue is a sort of judgment call. As recorded in Commons:Watermarks#Legal_issues_with_the_removal_of_watermarks, the legal dep. of the WMF some years ago gave the opinion that the removal of copyright-watermark (no watermarks in general) may violate the DMCA law. Shortly thereafter and completely indepedently, a German court decided in the same direction. Therefore, I usually advise people, better not to remove such watermarks and I ask users, who upload own images with such watermarks, to consider uploading them without a visible watermark. So, my action has a valid rationale IMO, but it's not a policy, it's not a "you must". --Túrelio (talk) 20:29, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images deleted because of Alamy[edit]

Hi, Could you please undelete the following. See Commons_talk:How Alamy is stealing your images#Wrongful deletions. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you please help review these images below?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:03, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

8 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have time, please review these images below.

I will not disturb you with any more requests after today, Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Why, are already all fungi-images imported to Commons? ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 20:41, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank You. If there are any more fungi that I am interested in uploading, I will contact you. I am taking a break from M. Observer for a short while. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:52, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore image[edit]

Hi, Túrelio - will you please restore the file File:GorillaBourbon.jpg? Thank you in advance...Atsme 📞 13:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, and added source of original image. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rest of work already done (re: Google Chrome screenshot)[edit]

Hi, I have already done the moving work and requested a file rename on en.wikipedia, see here: en:File:Google_Chrome_Version_67_Running_on_Windows_10.png. Thanks for the deletion, there's no further need for action. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion[edit]

Hi Túrelio, was sollte diese Reversion? Trzęsacz (talk) 18:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trzęsacz,
puh, das ist schon so lange her. Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, war mir die Datei beim Abarbeiten der Dateien in cat:copyvios aufgefallen. Du hattest overstockart.com als Autor/Quelle angegeben. Das Gemälde ist aber von Monet und damit PD-old. Bei 2-dimensionalen PD-Old-Werken erlauben wir per PD-Art den Upload auch wenn die Reproduktion von einer formal unfreien Quelle kommt, weil - nach US-Urheberrecht - die treue Reproduktion einer 2-dim. Vorlage kein neues Urheberrecht erzeugt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Das stimmt. Aber dieses Bild ist nicht von Monet. Es ist noch nicht einmal eine Kopie nach dessen Gemälde von 1873 sondern nur eine Adapption des Motivs und stammt von ca. 2010/2011. Von besagter Web site overstockart.com wird das Bild als Muttertagsgeschenk vertrieben. Die hier hochgeladene Version ist also die treue Reproduktion eines Bildes von 2010 oder 2011. Siehe auch bei der Hochladequelle ArtDaily.org. Trzęsacz (talk) 01:31, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deine verlinkte Website sagt zwar "Poppy Field in Argenteuil by Monet". Aber egal; ich bin kein Kunstexperte und habe auch keine Zeit dafür. Dann sollte das Bild in einer reguläre LD gehen, wo z.B. entschieden werden muss, ob der "Adaptation" tatsächlich ein eigenes Urheberrecht zugestanden werden muss. Das ist auch in deinem Interesse, weil bei einer Schnelllöschung das Risiko besteht, dass das Bild irgendwann wieder hochgeladen wird und die Chose von vorne beginnt. Da du dich mit dem Bild schon mehr beschäftigt hast, scheint es mir klüger, wenn du einen (regulären) LA stellst als wenn ich das mache. --Túrelio (talk) 06:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, hat schon jemand getan. --Trzęsacz (talk) 08:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make me a article my artist name is “Why Cue”[edit]

Looking to get a wikimedia made please email youngquan3yz@gmail — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.120.163.97 (talk) 14:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 69.120.163.97,
sorry, but likely you are talking about an article on Wikipedia. However, here you are on Commons, not on Wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 14:52, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent deletion[edit]

You might want to reconsider this deletion based on by my deletion page comments attributing the image all to the same person which I was posting just as your deleted it. Ww2censor (talk) 20:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All their other "gloria cosplay" image might also follow the same sources though I never saw them so can't be sure. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 20:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. But you will need to take care of them, as I'll leave for bed now. --Túrelio (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I revised my comments to a keep with all the link details, so maybe a different admin will close it as such based on my review. Sorry to give you more work. Ww2censor (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

I decided to upload these 2 images since Commons has no images of this species. Could you review it please?

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That Irish writer[edit]

What confused me is that I thought Wikipedia was NOT a commercial site. Apparently that's not the same as non-profit. WQUlrich (talk) 21:03, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

6 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:36, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Already done by a colleague. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IMMEDIATE ATTENTION[edit]

F*CK YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamwil (talk • contribs) 20:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please review these 4 images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:53, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nick Jones.jpeg[edit]

Hi, I've re-requested deletion of File:Nick Jones.jpeg with updated rationale. Would you be able to take another look? The previous source was poorly chosen but it's obvious this user did not take this photo. Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:56, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anarchyte,
it's often rather difficult to prove the copyvio-status of uploads as old as this one. When I reverted your first nomination, it was not as I would have been convinced that this upload is clean. Anyway, now I searched for myself and finally found a true pre-publication from 2013: http://thebeautyexperience.annabelle.ch/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Nick_Jones.jpg. Upload now deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 13:28, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images if you have the time.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:57, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lusius-malfoyi-lateral.jpg[edit]

Would you be able to restore File:Lusius-malfoyi-lateral.jpg please? The photographer has uploaded it twice, and I can see by the logs first as CC-BY-SA, then CC-BY; the second time he linked to the Landcare page which also states images are released under a CC-BY licence. But it's been taken down both times. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the 1st upload was claimed as own work by the uploader. The 2nd upload, which I've restored now, has the problem that its EXIF data state "CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0", which contradicts the expressed statement of the source "© This image by Landcare Research is published under the CC-BY 4.0 international licence unless otherwise specified." --Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

Hi Turelio, Would you know how I can update a profile photo with a new one? --Editor12007 (talk) 12:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just upload the new photo separately and then replace the old by the new one on the page(s) where it is used. --Túrelio (talk) 13:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion Request[edit]

Hello Mr. Turelio, I am writing to ask you if I can kindly show you a poccolo list of portraits and paintings from the 16th to the 18th Century, which are licensed PD--Margoth Mattiew (talk) 20:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. Besides, I've no idea what a "poccolo list" is. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have time, please review these images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:46, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. However, with File:Entoloma azureoviride E. Horak & Singer 431682.jpg there is strong discrepancy at the source between the author-credit below the image vs. at its right side. Therefore, I've added the below-image credit into our license-template. But it might be better if you would directly ask at the source whether one of the credits might be wrong. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Willy Mommer-Seite: Freigabe des Bildmaterials[edit]

Willy Mommer-Seite: Freigabe des Bildmaterials Guten Tag Tùrelio,

auf Empfehlung von McGill wende ich mich an Sie, um mir eventuell in der oben genannten Angelegenheit weiterzuhelfen. Hier die E-Mail, die mich seitens eines Wiki-Commons German namens <Name red.>, erreichte. Den Wortlaut dieser E-Mail übermittelte ich bereits an McGill, der mir riet, Sie zu kontaktieren.:

Forwarded message ---------- From: Permissions - German Wikipedia <permissions-de@wikimedia.org> Date: 2018-06-20 16:13 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: [Ticket#2018020710009647] Freigabe Bildmaterial Willy Mommer To: Mommer Marie-Claire <mc.mommer@gmail.com>


Sehr geehrte Frau Mommer,

vielen Dank für Ihre Nachricht zu den u.g. Bildern. Sie schreiben bei den Bildern auf der Beschreibungsseite - zur Quelle "Bestand Familienarchiv Marie-Claire Mommer", - zum Urheber schreiben Sie (oder der Uploader): "unbekannt".

Der materielle Besitz eines Werks reicht allerdings nicht aus, um eine solche Freigabeerklärung abzugeben; vielmehr können dies nur Inhaber des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts als immateriellem Gut machen. Es kann durchaus sein, dass Sie sich auch im Besitz der ausreichenden Nutzungsrechte befinden — zum Beispiel wenn der Urheber bereits verstorben und Sie der (alleinige) Erbe des Urhebers sind. In einem solchen Fall sind Sie zur Freigabe befähigt; geben Sie uns doch bitte kurz Bescheid. Wenn das Foto im Jahr 1959 gemacht wurde und der Fotograf wirklich unbekannt ist, ist es zwar möglich, dass er nicht mehr lebt, aber die Schutzfrist von 70 Jahren post mortem ist mit Sicherheit noch nicht abgelaufen.

Sollten Sie unsicher sein oder wissen, dass Sie nicht über ein vollumfängliches Nutzungsrecht verfügen, möchte ich Sie bitten, mir die folgenden Fragen zu beantworten:

1. Ist Ihnen der Urheber des Werks bekannt?

2. Sofern der Urheber bereits verstorben ist, können Sie mir das Jahr seines Todes nennen?

3. Sofern der Urheber noch lebt, können Sie einen Kontakt zwischen uns und dem Urheber herstellen oder alternativ direkt eine Freigabeerklärung des Urhebers erhalten? In letzterem Fall sollte sich der Urheber aber über die eventuellen Konsequenzen einer solchen Erklärung bewusst sein, da dies die kommerzielle Verwendbarkeit des Werks unter Umständen erheblich einschränken könnte.

Eine zweidimensionale Reproduktion eines geschützten Werks (z.B. Fotografie, Scan) ist nach deutschem Recht übrigens eine triviale Leistung und stellt kein eigenes Werk dar, damit ist eine solche Reproduktion nicht eigenständig schützbar.

Ich bedanke mich im Voraus für Ihre Mühen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

<Name red.>

'In der Zwischenzeit sind wir aber bereits bzgl. des Bildmaterials und seiner Urhebersuche tätig geworden und haben Folgendes herausgefunden: Hier meine Antwort vom 25.6.18 an Herrn Heinrich:

Sehr geehrter Herr Heinrich,

ich danke Ihnen für Ihre aufschlussreiche E-Mail.

Der Klarheit halber beantworte ich Ihnen Ihre Fragen, soweit möglich (jedoch mit den nötigen Erklärungen dazu):

1.- 3. 

  a) Foto Preisübergabe
  b) Foto Chor mit Dirigent beim Concorso/Arezzo 1959
  c) Willy Mommer mit Résistance-Orden als Pianist
  d) Schallplattenhülle Königliches Männerquartettt
  e) Willy Mommer Studie als Dirigent

Zu Fotos a), b), c), e) sind die Urheber bekannt: a), b) = Studio Fotografia Gaburri Arezzo (besteht nicht mehr). Offenbar ist der Nachlass dieses berühmten Fotografen (samt Foto-Studio) im Archiv "Archivio storico fotografico Aretino (ANCOS, Via Tiziano 8 in Arezzo) erhalten. Über einen uns bekannten Mittelsmann in Arezzo (Pietro Ponticelli) versuchen wir, Näheres zu erfahren, haben die Bilder dorthin gemailt und um Freigabe bzw. Erklärung der Bilder im "Public Domain" gebeten.

Zu Foto c): der Urbeber heißt Felix Vanderheyden, Eupen. Todesjahr unbekannt, sind noch auf der Suche auch nach eventuellen Rechtsnachfolgern, falls vorhanden....

Zu Foto d): es ist ein von uns persönlich angefertigtes Foto der Originalhülle...

Zu Foto e): Familienfoto aus den 60er Jahren von einem verstorbenen Sänger seines Chores aufgenommen.

Meine grundsätzliche Frage an SIE: Alle Bilder wurden von uns gescannt und als Scan an Wiki übermittelt. Löst sich das Problem dadurch nicht automatisch (Ihre Anmerkung zur zweidimensionale Reproduktion)???

Ich bedanke mich freundlichst für Ihre Bemühungen und würde gerne bald von Ihnen hören, dass die so ansprechend gestaltete Willy-Mommer-Seite auf Wikipedia wieder vollständig zurückzufinden sein wird.

Mit freundlichem Gruß Marie-Claire Mommer

Und dann ein Nachtrag (WICHTIG auch vom 25.6.18): Sehr geehrter Herr Heinrich,

NACHTRAG zu Bild c): Willy Mommer mit Résistance-Orden als Pianist

Den rechtlichen Nachfolger, Sohn des Fotografen Felix Vanderheyden, Benno Vanderheyden/Rixensart habe ich gefunden und wir erhalten umgehend eine Freigabe seinerseits.

Können Sie mir bitte ein solches Freigabe-Formular übermitteln?

In diesem Sinne stände ja einer Freigabe der Bilder c), d) und e) nichts mehr im Wege. Oder? Und dies unabhängig von der möglichen Freigabe für "gescannte Fotos/Bilder"...

Im Voraus lieben Dank


Können Sie mir da beistehen? Dafür im voraus herzlichen Dank Marie-Claire Mommer

PS: gestern stellte ich fest, dass eines der Fotos wieder in "Commons" aufgetaucht war (und dies über einen gewissen "Emmah" vor 6 Tagen). Dieses Foto wurde heute wieder von McGill in den Haupttext eingearbeitet.

Navigationsmenü Dolores18 0 Meldungen Mitteilungen (3) DiskussionEinstellungenBetaBeobachtungslisteBeiträgeAbmeldenBenutzerseiteDiskussionLesenQuelltext bearbeitenAbschnitt hinzufügenVersionsgeschichteNicht beobachten Mehr Suche

Wikipedia durchsuchen Hauptseite Themenportale Von A bis Z Zufälliger Artikel Mitmachen Artikel verbessern Neuen Artikel anlegen Autorenportal Hilfe Letzte Änderungen Kontakt Spenden Werkzeuge Links auf diese Seite Änderungen an verlinkten Seiten Benutzerbeiträge Logbücher E-Mail an diesen Benutzer senden Benutzergruppen ansehen Datei hochladen Spezialseiten Permanenter Link Seiten­informationen Drucken/­exportieren Buch erstellen Als PDF herunterladen Druckversion

Sprachen Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 26. Juni 2018 um 11:42 Uhr bearbeitet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolores18 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help request[edit]

Hi, Túrelio, good admin. A request: Would you kindly check the history of my TP and make invisible a "contribution"; reverted by Sakhalinio, another good admin (in TR:WP). It comes accompanied by a pic, you will not miss it; and I do not want to repeat or give links to words of offence. Thank you very much in advance. --E4024 (talk) 10:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC) (Note: I waited for a serious sanction to the offender; but I realize my understanding of civility and voluntary work are different than that of the general in Commons. Therefore no need to wait more or keep proofs for anything.)[reply]

Hi E4024,
I am in a hurry. Please check whether I hid the right versions. BTW, did you intentionally leave the goat-image on your talkpage? --Túrelio (talk) 12:35, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yessir, thanks. I love goats and most animals; but I cannot say the same for every species, especially for those that use poison to hunt or hurt. --E4024 (talk) 12:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logótipo OE com Fundo.png[edit]

Hi Turélio, I had previously responded with a request regarding this file and had already gotten the coordinator of our project to send and e-mail confirming my former claim.

You said to answer when it was sent and I (thought) did but there have been no further developments. Any information regardiding this would be welcome.

Kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by PfmAleixo (talk • contribs) 17:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC) --PfmAleixo (talk) 17:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, problem is that the queue of permissions is currently at 99 days, because there are too few volunteers for that. However, I've asked the deleting admin and am waiting for his reply. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for letting me know --PfmAleixo (talk) 21:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've now restored it, with consent by deleting admin, but the permission still needs to be validated by our OTRS volunteers, which will take some time. --Túrelio (talk) 06:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Разумовская.[edit]

Hi @Михаил Рус: , I am sorry, but I don't speak Russian and the Google-translation ("It would be better to have the image deleted by you, than deleted.") makes no sense to me. What file are you speaking about? --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) He speaks of the deleted copyvio File:UaqoCCjg.jpg (hist • logs • abuse log) in misspelled Russian. This user had troubles with copyright in ru.Wikipedia in the past, hence IMHO safe to ignore. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Себя игнорируйте, если хотите. Удаляете файл и русского раздела, не зная языка? Бред полный, учите тогда язык. Если было раньше что-то, то это не означает что и сейчас так. Ну вы и..., как говорил Задорнов. Михаил Рус (talk) 10:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This file had been tagged as possible copyvio by another user, as it had been found pre-published (2017) at https://bimru.ru/tvnews/series/66491. That is a clear indication of copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 11:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a deleted photo File:Benyamin Cohen portrait.jpg[edit]

A photo that I own the rights to was deleted. How can I post it again it without it getting deleted? Many thanks!

Here was the note: (cur | prev) 06:38, 27 June 2018‎ CommonsDelinker (talk | contribs)‎ . . (3,577 bytes) (-138)‎ . . (Removing Benyamin_Cohen_portrait.jpg, it has been deleted from Commons by Túrelio because: Copyright violation: https://www.benyamincohen.com/ © 2018 by Benyamin Cohen.) (undo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tfdixie (talk • contribs) 15:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tfdixie: , if you are Benyamin_Cohen by yourself, you need to send a confirmation that you really have the full copyright over this image from your official/business email address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 06:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious...[edit]

... why you deleted Category:Crystal Springs Rhododendron Garden in 2007 and Category:Crystal Springs Rhododendron Garden in 2012? -Another Believer (talk) 00:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Another Believer: , because they were requested for SD due to being empty. That's the most frequent reason for deletion of cats. Anyway, they can easily be restored if required. --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

6 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please help review these 6 images. Many are quality images on M. Observer.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal[edit]

Hello. Please, hide this revision. This is too offensive, "мудачьё" is "мудак", and it's translating to "asshole". Marshmallych 10:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted file: File:Ela craciun.jpg[edit]

Why have you deleted file? I think it is about: File:Ela craciun.jpg image. Please respond to this message to explain reason. Web Source Self-Management System (talk) 19:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the uploader, why do you ask? Anyway, the image was highly suspicious of being a copyvio; EXIF data showed that this version was copied from Facebook. In addition, I found it pre-published at https://www.cancan.ro/poze/modul-inedit-prin-care-ela-craciun-aflat-sexul-bebelusului-sau-19779969?pic=19780011 . --Túrelio (talk) 19:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It seems ridiculous violation of copyright. It has been uploaded by 0rangeq. With regards, here! Web Source Self-Management System (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images when you can.

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

coursera screenshot[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coursera in that page, Coursera Home Page in March 2016 screenshot is used. When I translated to Myanmar (Burmese), I want to use the most up-to-date screenshot of the homepage. That's the reason I screenshot that homepage. I thought it's okay to use.<Khinelay (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC) khinelay Khinelay (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khinelay (talk • contribs) 13:39, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Khinelay: , I understand. Problem is that the homepage screenshot is not free. As US copyright law allows "fair use" material under certain conditions, :en wikipedia allows such material. However, Commons does (and can) not allow it. Whether your home-wiki has a similar exemption policy as :en, you need to check by yourself. If yes, you need to upload it locally. --Túrelio (talk) 17:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio Thank you for the explanation. (Khinelay (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC) khinelay Khinelay (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

10 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have time, please review these images below.

Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:48, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

Hallo Turelio. Könntest Du Dich meinem unten in Kopie beigefügtem "Deletion request File:Anneli Raecker (1).jpg" vom 12.Juni noch einmal zuwenden. "Courtesy-deletion" ist ok, zumal keine weitere Diskussion stattgefunden hat. 

 ((This file was initially tagged by Charlydia52 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Bezugnehmender Artikelentwurf auf "Meine Benutzerseite" gelöscht. Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for SD. However, courtesy-deletion should be considered. -- Túrelio (Diskussion) 12:53, 12 June 2018 (UTC)))

Herzlichen Dank. --Charlydia52 (talk) 14:32, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please delete some photos for me?[edit]

Hi. I noticed you edit on File:Statue of Nurkhon Yuldasheva.jpg. I uploaded several other images with speedydelete tags so they could be undeleted later. The note in the speedydelete tag explains it all, and I would prefer that the images be deleted sooner rather than later so they they are not accidentally mistaken as being currently public domain (Already set up the links so they can be undeleted when copyright expired. I noticed you are an admin and since you just edited it could you please delete it? Thank you, --PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, already done by my colleague JuTa. --Túrelio (talk) 06:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Pre-uploads File:Джанибеков Владимир Александрович, 1980.jpg, File:Мадьяри Бела, 1980.jpg, File:Горбатко Виктор Васильевич, 1969.jpg, File:Волков Владислав Николаевич 1969.jpg, File:Шонин Георгий Степанович, 1969.jpg, File:Елисеев Алексей Станиславович, 1969.jpg, File:Шаталов Владимир Александрович 1969.jpg, File:1982 portrait of the deceased Pavel Belyaev.jpg, File:Yekaterina Ryabova, Guard Senior Lieutenant.jpg, File:Yekaterina Ryabova and Grigory Sivkov.jpg, File:Raising a flag over the Reichstag (original).jpg, File:Galina Burdina, Tamara Pamyatnykh, Valeria Khomyakova, Valya Lisitsina.jpg, File:Female veterans at Moscow State University.jpg, and File:Test pilot Amet-Khan Sultan, 1960's.jpg are ready for deletion. Since using a speedydelete tag messes with the undeletion categorization I used a regular deletion tag. Please delete them when you get a chance, but there will be more to come. Thank you.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:07, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Scratch that for File:Raising a flag over the Reichstag (original).jpg, it's on mil.ru where all content is under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. (Russian gov has released many photos under that lisence).--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 03:10, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images if you can.

Thank You and have a good day...watching the FIFA World Cup, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:39, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Regards. --Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete[edit]

Hi,

Could you undelete this file: [43] - the proper agreement for this file has been sent to OTRS (if you have access: [44]). Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 09:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

er: Golden Horde.jpg removed[edit]

Hello,

I am the photographer, photoshop-artist and owner of this image that has been removed. I have also used it on Soundcloud and some other places, for the artists 'The Golden Horde'.

Can we kindly replace the removed image?

yours, WikiWouse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwouse (talk • contribs) 22:13, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Wikiwouse: , you are likely talking about File:The Golden Horde (band).jpg, right? Per our standard procedure for album covers you need to send a permission from your official/business email address and to identify yourself (credit can still be your choosen artist-name/pseudonym) towards permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 10:40, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete[edit]

Can we kindly replace the removed image Élizabeth Turgeon.jpg ? This is the photo of the author concerned in the article. Il was submitted my the subject herself and the photo was taken by her husband. She gave the same photo to Bayard, her publisher.

Samourais (talk) 20:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Samourais: , you had credited the image to "David better". If he is indeed the photographer, you need to provide his permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

6 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these 3 images if you can. After this, I am taking a break from MO.

Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Germans leave Jews alone[edit]

Can you please stop deleting my content? I took the photos I posted while, at work a couple weeks ago. The photos are mine and I am the owner of EZ Fix repair. I am the sole owner of the content. Please restore my photos that you hacked into and destroyed my links. If you as a German could please leave me alone... I would really American appreciate it. Thank you for your German understanding, -FDR — Preceding unsigned comment added by FDRudd1984 (talk • contribs) 18:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr Upload[edit]

Commons:Deletion_requests/2018/05/21#File:Masjid_Negara_KL.JPG - Just for info (it took me ages to find this hint) - on the Flickr image - https://www.flickr.com/photos/40927764@N05/3770895913/ - hover the mouse over the "Taken on January 18, 2004", and the upload date pops up (July 30, 2009). Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for solving this long-standing problem w Flickr images. --Túrelio (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

pourquoi[edit]

bonjour pourquoi tu as supprimé la photo de hassiba abderaouf — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.45.23.174 (talk) 01:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi unknown, are you User:Mahdijojolotmani and talking about File:Hassiba Abderaouf.jpg? If yes, well this image carris a (C)-watermark and the source is clearly labelled as "tous droits réservés Auteur Sid menasria". --Túrelio (talk) 06:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:MoustafaMadbouly.jpg[edit]

Hi Official Government Portrait are not free. And the uploader have not proved it. It should be deleted. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission envoyée pour Élizabeth Turgeon.jpg[edit]

Le courriel de permission a été envoyé à permissions-commons@wikimedia.org par l'auteur concernant cette photo, Élizabeth Turgeon.jpg. Pouvez-vous annuler le retrait ou dois-je remettre une nouvelle photo ?

Samourais (talk) 18:07, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi@Samourais: , as File:Élizabeth Turgeon.jpg was also deleted by another admin colleague, I would recommend you to either ask him (User:Jcb) directly or to request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. --Túrelio (talk) 15:30, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Im new here, creating article for my boss and his company. how to solve copyright violation if all logos i used were came from the company itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rymvnd (talk • contribs) 05:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rymvnd: , you need to ask your legal department whether they are able/willing to release the logo images under a free license, such as CC-By or CC-By-SA. If yes, they should send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org .--Túrelio (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kareena_UNICEF14.jpg[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I noticed that you deleted the following image stating that it was a "screenshot, wallpaper or promotional poster". I'm just a little confused as the image was taken at a UNICEF event in India by a Bollywood Hungama photographer. I was the main editor who was responsible for talking to Bollywood Hungama and in the end we obtained this license. I haven't had a problem with any of the pictures I have uploaded so far. Please explain. Thanks -- Bollywood Dreamz talk 20:20, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BOLLYWOOD DREAMZ: , the file had been tagged by my admin-colleague User:Moheen Reeyad. I would recommend you to discuss this issue with him. --Túrelio (talk) 12:47, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring a category[edit]

Hi Túrelio,

Looking through my watchlist (because that's much better than going to sleep at 3am :P) I noticed my category FP by SuperJew which you previously deleted and restored was deleted once again. The deleter Daphne Lantier is blocked and therefore I am approaching you again requesting it to be restored please.

Thank you, --SuperJew (talk) 00:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done; took some time as I am in holiday.--Túrelio (talk) 12:44, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Thank you :) --SuperJew (talk) 21:54, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hinweis zu Rumänisch[edit]

Servus,

da du in User:Túrelio/Note bei français und português diakritische Zeichen verwendest, hier ein kleiner Hinweis zum Rumänischen: Exakt schreibt es sich românește. Natürlich lassen die Rumänen die diakritischen Zeichen notgedrungen weg, wenn sie eine fremde Tastatur verwenden. Grüße, -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:00, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 15:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ozaki headquarter.jpg[edit]

Hello.
How was it an “implausible” redirect? Here is not first or second such instance, it happened earlier several times. Cease to delete redirects contrary to the policy! Deletionist users unable to comprehend the valid reasons should be reported to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems, not encouraged in their deletionism which is hard to track. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The wording wasn't mine[45]. Redir restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh gods… it turns out that one Incnis_Mrsi is ultimately at fault due to this (together with Guanaco due to that). This Incnis_Mrsi helps users having wrong wording to edit Wikimedia Commons. We know, on #wikimedia-commons @ Freenode there is a faction of admins concerned with Incnis_Mrsi’s disruptions. One has to inform them about the case a.s.a.p. ☺ Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you please review these images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

License/original-file confusion at File:Lora - Wassabi IMG 1372 (2596797731) (cropped).jpg[edit]

Could you please join us at User talk:Ionutzmovie#File:Lora - Wassabi IMG 1372 (2596797731) (cropped).jpg? It relates to an image you deleted. I due to a possible misunderstanding by others of the license at a different file, I think the deletion tag I placed on this file was in error. But I don't want to wheel-war now that you've deleted it. DMacks (talk) 09:25, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've wheel-warred myself now and commented at the other talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

requesting undeletion of a picture[edit]

I respectfully request that you undelete the picture Antonio Merlo.jpg in the post Antonio Merlo. Though similar, the new picture that was uploaded was never published on a any website and is not copyrighted.Merlo.antonio (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but I've restored only the last file version, as the other were reverts resp. a duplicate to File:MerloAntonio.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures are different. They are similar but different.[edit]

The pictures are different. The picture on Wikepedia, Antonio Merlo is not published on the website that you linked when you removed it, Turelio. Responding the the below issue:

I respectfully request that you undelete the picture Antonio Merlo.jpg in the post Antonio Merlo. Though similar, the new picture that was uploaded was never published on a any website and is not copyrighted.Merlo.antonio (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Ok, but I've restored only the last file version, as the other were reverts resp. a duplicate to File:MerloAntonio.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dentyne Ice (talk • contribs) 03:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea who you are and what you want, Dentyne Ice. --Túrelio (talk) 06:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lebas Shakhsi (Courtesy of Sadouzami).jpg[edit]

I uploaded these files and, I believe, I gave adequate credit to the sources who provided these images:

Source: https://negaam.news/1397/04/18/350971/
Date: July 29 2018

Source: https://sardouzami.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B3-%D8%B4%D8%AE%D8%B5%DB%8C%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%9B-%D9%86%DB%8C%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D9%81%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%88-%DA%A9%D8%B4%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%8C-%D9%85/
Date: June 14 2009
EDIT: I found this file on NBC where it is listed as an AP File, I believe that makes it ineligible for Free Use, as described under the Intellectual Property Clause found here: http://www.apimages.com/TermsOfUse
However, it also appears in many other places; not sure what this means as far as its ability to be loaded to Wikimedia.
Could you please verify this?
Image is found in the following locations: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/iran-election-mousavi-looms-over-vote-years-after-detention-n761486
https://www.ncr-iran.org/en/ncri-statements/human-rights/17188-plainclothes-patrols-suppress-women-and-youth-in-cities-across-iran


Could you please let me know what I need to change in order to make these images compliant?

Thanks! Alaska Based (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alaska Based,
I understand the political/historical value and importance of these images. However, none of them has been credibly released under a free license. The mere publication of a photo in the web has no effect on its copyright status, i.e. it does make it free to use. Only the author/photographer can legitimately release his/her photo under a free license. With photos of such content, the photographer will surely try to remain unknown, in order to avoid reprisal from the goverment. If you want to use these photo on :en wikipedia, you should try to claim them as fair-use and upload them locally; see en:Wikipedia:Non-free content. However, for legal reasons, Commons does not allow fair-use material. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Túrelio,
Thanks for getting back to me so promptly. I hope you had a great vacation! I will look into claiming them as free use and uploading them directly to Wikipedia, as opposed to Commons. Thanks again for your help.Alaska Based (talk) 20:08, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please review these 2 images.

Thank You and Goodnight from Canada. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Good night. I've high noon. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please kindly review these images when you can.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:55, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

When you have some time, please review these images. There are many quality images here.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:27, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have a good day. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion[edit]

Hi Túrelio, you've flagged the photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dr._Ali_Mohammed_Al-Khouri.jpg for speedy deletion. This is the photo of the person claimed and it was taken for him to include in the website. Any additional sources we should include to keep it? If you still feel that it is in violation, please go ahead and delete it.

Many thanks for your time and contribution 11:06PM 20 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiclients (talk • contribs) 12:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category definition: ... by location[edit]

Hi, Túrelio! Thank you for executing the two speedy deletions. In the deletion comment I wrote "please delete with all subpages", and now I saw that you didn't do this. Did you just not see my note, or is it not possible that way? Thanks --Reinhard Müller (talk) 14:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, das hab ich wohl übersehen. Mit subpages meinst du die Seiten, auf denen der Baustein genutzt wird? --Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, ich meine z.B. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/Template:Category_definition:_Seasons_by_location/ --Reinhard Müller (talk) 15:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So,ich glaub jetzt hab ich es geschafft.--Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Danke dir! --Reinhard Müller (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cher's audio.[edit]

Please, stop removing Cher audio music from Wikimedia Commons. You don't have the right to do it! The music files are the part of the Polish Wikipedia. The material about Cher is more extensive than in German Wikipedia. Shame on you! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.88.210.7 (talk) 18:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gelöschte Category:Kaisermantel (Argynnis paphia) in Ruhland (too specific)[edit]

Hallo Turelio, ich habe noch mehr solche Kategorien (was jetzt nicht heißen soll, dass die alle gelöscht werden sollen - ich erwarte da einen enormen Zuwachs an Bildern und lege eine Kategorie daher auch vorbeugend an, manchmal kommen weitere Bilder gleich, manchmal erst später oder nächstes Jahr), ich will vor allem nicht jedes Einzelbild umkategorisieren, bei neuen Erkenntnissen und da sich auch oberhalb Zwischenkategorien entwickeln. Kannst Du die Löschung bitte rückgängig machen ? Viele Grüße --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Aber es ist besser Kat. nicht anzulegen bevor Dateien vorhanden sind. "Kategorie leer" ist ein Schnelllöschgrund. --Túrelio (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR,
I am the one who emptied Category:Schmetterlingsflieder (Buddleja davidii) in Ruhland into Category:Argynnis paphia in Brandenburg and nominated it for speedy deletion. At that time, I had not noticed that you created a whole "Category:Nature of Ruhland by genus or species" structure. And, sorry to say this, but this structure is quite bad.
First, category names should be in English and they should not include any vernacular names. Second, and most importantly, your categories don’t fit in the existing categorization logic. Cross-categorization as “species in city” is rarely used on Commons, since it is pointless to have categories with very few pictures and it makes any maintenance difficult. Things should stay simple and consistent.
A lot of categories you created within Category:Ruhland have similar problems of language and organization. I would strongly suggest that you read Commons:Categories and try to get much more familiar with existing analogous category structures before trying to create tens of new such categories. Thanks!--LamBoet (talk) 18:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(nach BK) Danke, Turelio. Ich habe gerade LamBoets Beitrag gesehen, sorry.
Danke Dir auch für die Mühe mit dem löschen umbenannter Dateien (z.B. nach Feststellen der Art von Lebewesen).
Hallo LamBoet, the names of the (or "my") bottom Categories here are in german. Better were for local categories the next level in german, too, in some cases, but its a strong rule. And because of this, if I want to hold a german categoy name, I couldn't have a sub-category there. By the way, I think, we must not discuss this here. Many and friendly greetings --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 19:16, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mal ein kleines Dankeschön, ...[edit]

dass du meine Löschanträge meist zügig abarbeitest. Gruß -- Bwag (talk) 18:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Full view of an artwork record in Rhizome’s Wikibase Catalog.gif[edit]

Hello Túrelio, I have noticed that you have just deleted Full view of an artwork record in Rhizome’s Wikibase Catalog.gif referring to COM:SS. This image is uploaded by an employee from the cultural organization Rhizome.org in preparation for an upcoming blog post for the Wikimedia blog, which I'm writing together with them, about Rhizome's use of Wikibase. I have explained the copyright issues around screenshots to the Rhizome staff, and they themselves have spent quite a bit of time to adjust the screenshot so that they would have the right to upload it to Commons. Did we miss something in that process?

  • The screenshot is deliberately made on a free software operating system (a Linux distro, I can check which one exactly), in a FLOSS browser (Firefox, Mozilla Public License 2.0)
  • It shows the Wikibase software (GPL 2.0)
  • The system font has been deliberately changed to OpenSans (Apache License 2.0)
  • The information and logo in the screenshot is from the internal database of Rhizome, and uploaded by employee Lyndsey Moulds.

Please let me know which elements are still not OK, and I will get back to them and ask them to improve that. Thank you! Warmly, SandraF (WMF) (talk) 08:23, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sandra,
the image had been copyvio-tagged by another colleague[46], which seemed plausible to me. Anyway, now I've restored the image. I would recommend you to enter your above information into the image description. Also, if this Lyndseyjm has a sort of blanket permission from Rhizome for all these uploads, it might be better to forward this permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org),so that a ticket can be issued and put on all her uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Túrelio! Thank you for restoring the image! I'll update the image's description and will help Lyndsey send an e-mail to OTRS. Cheers! SandraF (WMF) (talk) 14:12, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please help review these 2 images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Most of 23rd I was traveling. --Túrelio (talk) 07:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Its OK. Your help here is always appreciated when you are free. Thank You. It is 1:46 AM in Vancouver...so I think it is 10:46 AM in Germany (9 hours difference), Goodnight, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:46, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dietrich von Choltitz liberation of Paris.jpg[edit]

Please put back the file you deleted, the licensing stated that it was taken by an employee of the U.S. government and thus is in the public domain. This is an image of the signing of the liberation of Paris in 1944, a historically important photograph and quite relevant to the pages it was on in Wikipedia. I have no idea why it was removed, as I deleted a quick removal request not only once but twice, and once that template is taken off it shouldn't be replaced but the process moved to the next step if the editor who wants it deleted wished to continue. See the page history. So at a minimum it should be taken to a deletion board somewhere. Thanks, and please ping me on Wikipedia as I very seldom come by Commons. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Randy, I've restored the image due to the ongoing regular DR. However, while it's not totally unlikely that the had been shot by the US military, there is no evidence for it. Even the uploader wrote "author=unknown" and sourced it to a German website. The claim "taken by an employee of the U.S. government .." is just the content of the default license-template based on an assumption, nothing more. --Túrelio (talk) 14:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these 2 images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done, including renaming. --Túrelio (talk) 07:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

criteria for speedy deletion[edit]

Hey,

I'm no expert on Copyright law, but Wilhelm Sauter died on 27 June 1948, which means that he has been dead for 70 years, 60 days, so when the tag says 70 or more, I would think that it is correct. Is it not? Regards, Skjoldbro (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct in your calculation. But per law it gets PD when the 70th year has finished, i.e. on January 1st of the following year. I've put your 3 uploads into the category:Undelete in 2019. They will be restored without requirement for further action. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that is dumb, arbitrary and not very well communicated on the tag. Thanks anyways, and for the reply. Skjoldbro (talk) 16:03, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

L'affaire Maëlys[edit]

Hello !

about "File:Photo d'une pancarte Maelys prise en 2018.jpg". I'm sorry, but this photo is mine. I'm the owner , I don't understand !--Jean-Paul Corlin (talk) 20:04, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photo d'une pancarte Maelys prise en 2018.jpg is a better place for the discussion. Anyway, I wonder why this image has so extremely low resolution? --Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

7 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please kindly review these images when you can. It may be my last MO images for a while.

Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:21, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Going on holiday or negotiating w Trump the NAFTA replacement deal for Canada? ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, negotiating with Trump is like dealing with a mafia boss. He is always threatening us Canadians. Some of his threats are just smoke and mirrors but they must be taken seriously since he is the US President. Trump's words cannot be trusted....and he will offer Canada a deal that "we cannot refuse" or else he might put 25% tariffs on the cars we produce here in Canada that we export to the US. Just thank God that you are in Germany and Christian Ferrer is in France and don't have to deal directly with him. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

Hello Túrelio, as you deleted File:SCUDETTO ESECUTIVO 1ok.jpg and File:Virtus Cassino Montecatini .jpg, there is one last picture uploaded from the user: File:Virtus Cassino .jpg. I can't find it on thw web, but almost certainly it's copyviol. Bye :) --Delfort (talk) 06:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PHB at the office[edit]

Hi!

I sam that you have deleted the photo PHB at the office.png from Wikimedia Commons. Understandable, since it was flagged for copyright violations. However, as a representative for the copyright holder Investment AB Spiltan I have earlier today sent a permission to COM:OTRS (see discussion on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Spiltan) making that plus one additional photo available for Wikimedia.

I was hoping that the picture could stay online. Is there anyway we can put it back online? Or should I just simply upload it again (in a higher resolution as suggested by Patrick Rogel)? --Spiltan (talk) 13:31, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I've temp-restored the image and tagged it with OTRS-pending. An OTRS-volunteer needs to check the permission and will then add a definitive ticket to the image. Feel free to upload a higher resolution, but use the "Upload a new version of the image" link near the bottom of the image-page. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Lawrence Church Ludlow Thomas marker.jpg[edit]

Hello Túrelio, this is Didymus Ridgeland.

I understand that you removed the St_Lawrence_Church_Ludlow_Thomas_marker.jpg at 07:18 this morning believing it was a Copyright violation.

The image itself was taken by me on my phone when I was in Ludlow visiting St Lawrence. Thomas is my 11th great granddad, which is why I have been building up his page, since there wasn't much despite the many amazing things that he did and events that he took part in.

As I've said the photography is my own work, the marker itself is accessible to the public, since admission to St Lawrence is free and the marker was created for public display.

Having the image (as does the website King James Bible Translators http://kingjamesbibletranslators.org/allPhotos.php) is helpful for members of the public or indeed family doing research into ancestry for locating where Thomas had been. It may even help to bring visitors to St Lawrence like the image off the King James Bible Translators website inspired me to visit where my 11th great granddad was born.

If under these conditions the Copyright violation is nullified can you please restore the image?

If the image requires specific permission from St Lawrence Church then I can contact them and explain what I wish to use the image for. These are their contact details:

Parishes' Office No. 2 College Street Ludlow Shropshire SY8 1AN Tel. 01584 872073 website www.stlaurences.org.uk e-mail office@stlaurences.org.uk

Kind regards,

Didymus Ridgeland (Tom Holland), 30/08/2018 Didymus Ridgeland (talk) 10:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Didymus Ridgeland: ,
there was no doubt that you have taken the shot by yourself. However, the pictured board or marker contains a lot of text, which might be considered copyrightable. Regrettably, in the UK there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for 2-dimensional "graphic works" in the public. The old headshot shouldn't be a problem due to its likely age. All I can offer you is to restore the file and immediately put it into a regular (as opposed to speedy) deletion-request, which has the advantage that it allows for discussion and might eventually lead to a different result. --Túrelio (talk) 10:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So, here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:St Lawrence Church Ludlow Thomas marker.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio I have contacted St Lawrence's but since they are out of office until Wednesday I will not know whether or not I have permission until then.

Kind regards,

Didymus Ridgeland — Preceding unsigned comment added by Didymus Ridgeland (talk • contribs) 11:41, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

01/09/2018, 12:41 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Didymus Ridgeland (talk • contribs) 11:41, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Solar eclipse of 2018 August 11 in Moscow[edit]

Why do you delete these category? One narrow (specified) category is better than 3 categories — Category:Solar eclipse of 2018 August 11, Category:Solar eclipses in Moscow, Category:August 2018 in Moscow. Please do not delete such categories as "Solar/Lunar eclipse of 20XX Month XX in Moscow", for future. --Brateevsky {talk} 16:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because it had been tagged by another user for speedy-deletion, likely because it was empty. Do you have file to put in it? --Túrelio (talk) 16:33, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't empty. It contaied two files — File:Солнечное затмение 11 августа 2018 года в Москве (парк Артёма Боровика).jpg and File:Солнечное затмение 11 августа 2018 года в Москве (парк Артёма Боровика) (cropped).jpg. User:B dash made it empty, I think: diff. Anyway, this user harms to me and to solar/lunar eclipses topic by his (strange) edits. In this situation he broke category tree. And made another category, Category:Solar eclipse of 2018 August 11 in Russia, useless. Can you undelete the category? --Brateevsky {talk} 16:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:02, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You need to put images into the category. It has again been tagged for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 12:09, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Brateevsky {talk} 18:24, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image restore request[edit]

Hi, Please restore the following file File:Lyon 1er - Rue des Tables Claudiennes - Escalier - Graffiti portrait.jpg. It is valid with the Template:Non-free graffiti copyright. Thanks, Romainbehar (talk) 20:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. However, I have put the image into a DR-discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lyon 1er - Rue des Tables Claudiennes - Escalier - Graffiti portrait.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:55, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image restoration request: File:Telugu Wikisource Workshop 2017 - Padya Soundaryam group members.jpg[edit]

Hi, I request you to restore File:Telugu Wikisource Workshop 2017 - Padya Soundaryam group members.jpg. This tweet is mentioned in copyright deletion tag and it is eventually deleted referring the upload as copyvio. But tweet you mentioned is from twitter handle of CIS-A2K where I work (This is my official account which contains my team's name in brackets as a suffix) and @santhoo9 credited in that post is my twitter handle. I am the organizer of that event and uploaded it for reporting purpose. Please consider my restoration request. --Pavan Santhosh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 05:39, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From now, I will try making these things clear when I upload such pictures. --Pavan Santhosh (CIS-A2K) (talk) 05:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done already.--Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frage zu gelöschter category[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, Du hast am 7. August die Category:Wilhelmsplatz, Platz (Göttingen) gelöscht. Grundsätzlich sehe ich das ein, zumal es ja auch die Category:Wilhelmsplatz (Göttingen) gibt und das sehr doppelt aussieht. Ich habe das leider nicht bei den Categories for discussion gefunden. Ein Problem habe ich nämlich damit: Der Wilhelmsplatz in Göttingen ist ein Platz, der auch als Straßenname fungiert. Und die anliegenden Baudenkmale sind natürlich entsprechend kategorisiert. Nun ist aber beim Wilhelmsplatz auch die Platzfläche selbst ein Baudenkmal bzw. konstituierender Bestandteil des Baukulturensembles Innenstadt Göttingen, ebenso wie übrigens die Platzflächen von Joghanniskirchhof, Markt und Jakobi-, Albani- Nikolai- Paulinerkirchhof (letztere ohne die angrenzenden Straßen). In der entsprechenden Denkmalliste der Wikipedia führt der Link "weitere Bilder" jetzt ins Leere. Soll man den umbiegen auf die Oberkategorie, in die Du anscheinend die Datei verschoben hast? Das ginge, aber die Einordnung der Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Wilhelmplatz (Göttingen) ist unvollständig, wenn die Platzfläche fehlt, und wenn man die Oberkategorie da reinpackt, dann enthält sie sich selbst. Wie solte man das am besten handhaben? --Dehio (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dehio, ehrlich gesagt habe ich hier nur einen bestellten und mir plausibel erscheinenden Löschantrag ausgeführt; das war also nicht etwa Endergebnis einer eigenen Überlegung. Wenn ich selbst vor so einem Kategoris.problem stehe, schaue ich meist erst einmal wie das in ähnlichen Fällen gehandhabt worden ist und orientiere mich daran. Das würde ich dir auch empfehlen. Wenn du am Ende zum Schluß kommst, dass der jetzt gelöschte Kat.name der beste war, dann stelle ich die Kat. gerne wieder her. --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Das leuchtet mir sofort ein, und leider habe ich verpasst, damals zu intervenieren. Aber ich habe auch nicht ausreichend Zeit, da wirklich passende Parallelen zu suchen, zumal ich befürchte, dass es nur wenige gibt. In Göttingen waren die Plätze alle entsprechend angelegt, und einige davon wurden gelöscht, andere nicht. Wenn ich Zeit habe, frage ich vielleicht mal User:NiSaTi, der nach meiner Vermutung wahrscheinlich den Löschantrag gestellt hat. Ich möchte nichts widerherstellen lassen, was dann gleich wieder einen Löschantrag kassiert. Und es kann ja auch andere bessere Lösungen geben, auf die ich nur nicht komme. Vielen Dank erst mal! --Dehio (talk) 19:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you delete my pictures!!![edit]

I have full right to publish all the pictures. Put them back and ask before you do things like this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilvma (talk • contribs)

Túrelio, please have a look at File:John Lundgren.png, which is a new upload by the upset (unsigned) contributor above. Riggwelter (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Riggwelter, yes, the png is just a smaller version of the same image as File:John Lundgren.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore all the pictures you removed!!! --Ilvma (talk) 17:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ilvma, Mätt din ton.
1) You had been prenotified on your talkpage User talk:Ilvma.
2) In your Swedish reply on your talkpage you claimed: All images I post here are allowed to post. I am personal friend of John Lundger ...
This statement suggests that you did not shoot these photos by yourself. Otherwise you wouldn't need his permission. But in the description of all your uploads you claimed them to be your own work. This does not fit together.
Per your last posting to your talkpage it's clear that you are not the author, as you mention a photographer as a separate person.
3) Now, let's assume you were given all these images by Mr. John Lundgren and were asked to upload them to Commons. In this case, Mr. Lundgren needs to send a declaration (template at Commons:E-postmallar) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (or permissions-sv@wikimedia.org) in which he confirms that he is in possession of the full copyright over all uploaded images (each filename needs to be mentioned) and that he agrees to release them under the choosen free license (cc-by-sa-4.0). Only then the images can be restored. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Piotr Więcek.jpg[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Piotr_Wi%C4%99cek.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Piotr_Wi%C4%99cek_Formula_D_Atlanta_2017.jpg

I have permission to use photos and I have sent permission to the address: permissions-pl@wikimedia.org. Please restore our photos...— Preceding unsigned comment added by DamianoL (talk • contribs) 09:05, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't do this now, as both images are without license (your did not state any free license) and without evidence of a permission. If File:Pozwolenie.jpg contains the permission and you have sent it to permissions-pl, then ask a Polish-speaking OTRS-volunteer to confirm permission and license here. --Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have sent permissionand you removed them. Maybe you ask a Polish-speaking OTRS-volunteer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DamianoL (talk • contribs) 09:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's nonsense. I have no access to permissions, only OTRS-volunteers have, I cannot remove something to which I have no access. In addition: on Commons it's the job of the uploader to provide convincing evidence that his/her uplaods are o.k., not the other way round. EOD. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"(...) and you removed them" - sorry, I mean: I have sent permission and you deleted the photos... You deleted the photos, before I could write to permissions-pl...and now AGAIN I have to contact them, not you... OK, I sent second info to permissions-pl and i'm waiting for a response... — Preceding unsigned comment added by DamianoL (talk • contribs) 09:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have noticed....[edit]

....Tyler de Noche (talk · contribs), who apparently doesn't know better, flooded Category:Other_speedy_deletions with strange requests in an attempt of trying to fix what he's letting Tyler ser Noche (contribs) do. Unfortunately – not only since I'm not a “rollbacker” (up to now at least) – I find myself unable to effectively resolve this alone so I dare to pray for support. ;-) --Jotzet (talk) 09:27, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted already several hundreths of these "duplicates". As opposed to copyvios, these deletions are not urgent. So, it's no problem if they stay for some days. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yepp, I just noticed that you were involved already (Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Tyler_de_Noche). So just have a nice day :) --Jotzet (talk) 09:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 last images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, kindly review these images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. The last one were really colorful. --Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image deleted - Michel Franck wikipedia page[edit]

Hi Túrelio,

I was wondering whether you could help regarding the image of Michel Franck you deleted recently on Commons? I work at the Theatre des Champs-Elysées, and we own the rights for this image and would like to use it on Michel Franck's page. Have I not registered it correctly? I would highly appreciate your help.

Thanks in advance,

91.197.136.238 08:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC) Fiorilla[reply]

Hi Fiorilla,
as you are not logged-in (username?) and did not provide the filename of the deleted image, I have no idea about which image you are talking about (I make some hundreths deletion per day). --Túrelio (talk) 08:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Turelio,

Sorry, didn't notice I wasn't logged in. Fiorilla is my username. And the name of the deleted image was File:Michel_Franck,_par_Harcourt.jpg Thanks again for your help! Fiorilla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiorilla (talk • contribs) 14:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fiorilla,
ok. You sourced and credited the image to "Harcourt Paris". Is that identical to the theatre you mentioned above or another entity? Who is the photographer?


In such cases, where the uploader is not the photographer, a credible permission from the author or rightsholder needs to be send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ; see Commons:Email templates for permission-template. So, if you (or your theatre) is not the photographer, but has obtained rights from the photographer, you need to check whether these rights include the right to release the image under a free license, which allows everybody to use (including commercial use) this image for free, provided the license-terms are met. A licensing "only for Wikipedia" is not allowed per our policy, see COM:L. --Túrelio (talk) 06:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, Thank you. I have just sent the authorization from Harcourt to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, hope the picture will be restored soon! Thanks for your help. 

91.197.136.238 08:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC) Fiorilla[reply]

File:Sunhild Kleingaertner.jpg[edit]

Dear Túrelio,

two days ago you deleted the picture File:Sunhild Kleingaertner.jpg , uploaded by my client with the account "Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte" because of a copywright violation. Thank you for taking care, but in this case the accusation is wrong. My client is the owner of the picture and he uploaded it for free use. The website you found and linked as original source is the website of my client, who's also the owner of the picture you deleted: https://www.dsm.museum/ueber-uns/mitarbeitende/prof-dr-sunhild-kleingaertner/ The DSM Museum is the Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte like its mentioned in the subheadline.

Kind regards, 35c63n — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35c63n (talk • contribs) 08:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo 35c63n,
ich antworte mal auf deutsch, weil :de ja dein "Heimatprojekt" ist. Das Problem mit Nutzerkonten wie "Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte" ist, dass jeder beliebige so ein Konto eröffnen kann. Deshalb gibt es für institutionelle Nutzer seit einiger Zeit die Möglichkeit, das Nutzerkonto verifizieren zu lassen, wie es hier: de:Wikipedia:Benutzerverifizierung beschrieben ist. Falls du bzw. das "Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte" weitere Uploads planen, würde ich das unbedingt empfehlen. Falls nicht bzw. um das o.g. Portrait wiederherstellen zu lassen, sollte das Leibniz-Institut für Maritime Geschichte von seiner offiziellen Emailadresse an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org eine Mail schicken, in der bestätigt wird, dass das Institut entweder selbst der Urheber oder der Rechteinhaber an dem Portrait ist und zustimmt, dass es unter der gewählten freien Lizenz auf Commons verbreitet wird. (Falls der Urheber ein unabhängiger Fotograf ist, ist es Sache des Instituts im Innenverhältnis zu klären, ob er dafür seine Genehmigung gegeben hat). Wenn diese Mail abgeschickt ist, kannst du mir kurz eine Nachricht geben. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, herzlichen Dank für deine schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich bin auf der Talk Seite auf solch einen Hinweis gestoßen und an meinen Kunden weitergegeben. Das Konto wurde inzwischen, wie aufgefordert, durch ein formloses Schreiben über eine offizielle E-Mail Adresse des Instituts verifiziert. Ich habe auch schon im Auftrag des Instituts eine Undeletion Request gestellt und die Sachlage aufgeklärt. Falls das Portrait infolgedessen nicht wieder hergestellt wird, gebe die Anleitung an den Auftraggeber und Rechteinhaber weiter. Ich danke für die Hilfe. Schöne Grüße! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35c63n (talk • contribs) 10:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Túrelio,

falls du mein Edit zur letzten Nachricht nicht gesehen hast: Erstmal einmal vielen Dank für deine schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich hatte solch eine Info auch auf der User Page der Kundin gesehen und daraufhin schon drum gebeten, das Konto verifizieren zu lassen. Das ist auch direkt passiert. Ich weiß nicht wie lange die Bearbeitung nun dauern wird und ob das Portrait nun durch den von mir gestellten Undeletion Antrag wieder eingestellt wird; falls ich oder die Kundin als Urheberin das Foto erneut hochladen müssen, freue ich mich über eine kleine Nachricht.

LG 35c63n — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35c63n (talk • contribs) 07:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

deleted the image G.C Chandrashekhar[edit]

Hi why is the image deleted ! uploaded for my client with the account "aralikatte" because of a copywright violation. Thank you for taking care, but in this case the accusation is wrong. My client is the owner of the picture and he uploaded it for free use. The website you found and linked as original source is the website of my client, who's also the owner of the picture you deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:GC_Chandrashekhar.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aralikatte (talk • contribs) 07:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aralikatte,
the website gcchandrashekhar.com, which you had provided as source of the image, clearly states "Copyright ©2018 Team GC. All Rights Reserved". That is all what counts. You have to provide evidence that this image is under a free license (compliant with COM:L). Only the author/photographer can release an image under a free license. If your "client" is the legal rightsholder (obtained from the author) he has to send a statement of permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, My client will send the permission letter by EOD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aralikatte (talk • contribs) 11:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

statement of permission I hereby affirm that I, GC Chandrashekhar, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GC_Chandrashekhar.jpg. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

GC Chandrashekhar 2018-09-07

Aralikatte (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion req[edit]

Hi Túrelio, could you also delete the other corrupted images in this category: Category:Palio dela Brenta? Thank you! --Afnecors (talk) 09:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Afnecors (talk) 11:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grant MacPherson 1[edit]

Greetings, I am writing in regards to the article Grant MacPherson, who is the owner of ScotchMyst.com. The article for Wikipedia was strictly developed under his guidance and approval, for which Wikipedia can directly get in touch with him by going on ScotchMyst.com or email him at Grant@ScotchMyst.com. He will clear any doubts that may have arisen since I have written the article under the username of RolexRay. The reason I said to directly contact Grant at ScotchMyst.com for direct verification otherwise if you need me to submit any document I would be happy to do so. I totally respect the rules and policies of copyright infringements and abide by them.

Sincerely, Rolex Ray 5pm Pacific US time Sep 7th 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolexray (talk • contribs) 00:04, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I assume you are refering to the deleted image File:Grant MacPherson.jpg, right? You claimed it to be your own work. If I understand your post corrected, said Mr. Grant MacPherson is the rightsholder? If that is so, then he needs to send a confirmation of his rightsholdership to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete[edit]

Category:Aircraft by operator by function was deleted without discussion. Bidgee (talk) 01:34, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It had been speedy-nominated for "empty, unneeded, Aircraft by operator is a flat list, does not need sub-indices". Restored for now. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, sadly Joshbaumgartner has used "Being Bold" for anything that is controversial and choosing not to discuss until after the fact. Bidgee (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please kindly review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

When you can, please review these 2 images from M.O.

Thank You for all your help. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaikov_Andrey.jpg[edit]

Hello.
Why do you ignore my comment at user talk:Dogad75 #File:Kaikov_Andrey.jpg? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
because I didn't see it, as it was likely posted after the deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grant MacPherson[edit]

Greetings, I had posted an article under the name of Grant MacPherson that you had objections about under his company called ScotchMyst. I had requested to get in touch with him directly at Grant@ScotchMyst.com, to rectify any misunderstandings that may have occurred, as I per the article I had posted. Kindly let me know what is the status on this query at your earliest.

Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinhsb (talk • contribs) 16:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC) Rolex Ray — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolexray (talk • contribs) 15:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see User_talk:Túrelio#Grant_MacPherson_1. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Creating File:Zwroty nieruchomości w Warszawie (1990-2016).png[edit]

and File:Reprywatyzacja - mapa zniszczeń.png How can I prove that they are my works? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niegodzisie (talk • contribs) 22:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Niegodzisie,
1) you need to provide information about the sources of the b/w background-images. None of them is likely your own work.
2) for the first image, you need to explain why your work was published more than 1 years earlier on Facebook.
3) for the second image, you need to explain why your work was published more than 1 years earlier on Facebook.
4) if "Miasto Jest Nasze" is the true owner of these images and if you are a representative of them, you could ask them to issue a permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . However, it might be easier for you to contact one of my Polish colleagues User:jdx or User:Jarekt. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Tak w razie czego mogę pomóc. --Jarekt (talk) 11:06, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrongful deletion[edit]

Hi, the file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:New_Orleans_header_collage.png&action=edit&redlink=1 was wrongfully deleted. Every image licensed was under Creative Commons, and I released it under creative commons as well. I provided the sources and everything to prove it as I always do.--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 14:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here's where it all began. https://pt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nova_Orle%C3%A3es&action=history --TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 14:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: bump.--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 15:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, seems you are correct, at least all images mentioned as source are under a free license. Therefore I've restored the image. Wikimedia servers seem currently to have a problem create the low-res thumb. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image of the streetcar does not appear in the description of this collage, which must be immediately deleted. Chronus (talk) 22:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Boom! Added it! I would ask what your issue is by the way, since most others don't request swift deletion and instead notify me with a set time frame of finding what may have been missed...--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 23:55, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Chronus: , in such cases "no source" would be the correct tag. In addition, with obvious good-faith-uploader it might be sufficient to drop them a note on their talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: Thank you for clarifying--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prince Bader bin Abdullah bin Farhan.jpg[edit]

Hi Túrelio, this file has source information. Can you tell me what's missing and what I need to do about it? Thanks. Darley-m (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Darley-m,
"Ministry of Culture, Saudi Arabia" is not considered a sufficient source-information on Commons. We (or anybody) needs to be able to verify the source and the claimed license. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Surface Mining Hambach 200800806.jpg[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, was hast du denn hiermit gemeint? Gruß --Schniggendiller (talk) 06:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Schniggendiller,
das was ein misslungenes Einfügen. Habe es nun korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question about deletion of File:Holebifilmfestival_Logo.png[edit]

Dear Túrelio,

I noticed you recently deleted the image mentioned above. (original here: https://www.holebifilmfestival.be/logo/holebifilmfestival2015_logo_large.png)
I'm not sure what license I initially selected, but I do believe it qualifies as {{PD-textlogo}} (possibly {{trademarked}}).
Compared with, for example, File:Nielsen_logo.svg or File:Steinberg_logo.png, I think the same logic applies here.

Could you take a look ? If you agree, should I upload it again or file an undeletion request ?

thanks for your time — Kwakeroni (talk) 13:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kwakeroni,
the logo-image was deleted because you had tagged it by yourself as non-free logo, which automatically leads to speedy-deletion. After viewing the deleted image, I agree that it might go per PD-textlogo. So, I've restored it. However, be prepared that it might be nominated for deletion by anybody else. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks, I must have been confused with the different rules on Wikipedia. Anyway I'll see if it remains 'up', otherwise I'll contact the organization and request to stick a license to it. — Kwakeroni (talk) 14:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please kindly review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for reverting my change to Commons:Deceased contributors. I think it got caught in the process of removing some things that didn't belong. I agree that it should be there. Thanks again. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:28, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Social Media Marketing.jpg Is a CC0 File[edit]

Hi Túrelio, I hope you are well. I noted you deleted my uploads below as you could find them on existing sites. All of these images have been taken from Pixabay and are in the public domain under the CC0 Creative Commons licence. THe images i have uploaded have social media icons edited into them so they look quite different to the Pixabay images they are based on. Hopefully they will add value to those writing social media based works. For example the social media marketing.jpg image can be found here https://pixabay.com/en/dices-over-newspaper-profit-2656028/

In any case i can understand if you did a quick google image search that they would appear so it looks like infringement. Can you confirm how i can ensure future files i have altered from Pixabay are not deleted and what actions i need to take to undelete my 6 files below (alos included links to all pixabay files below).

I appreciate you have a difficult job with endless tasks so hoping my images will not cause issues for you again.

Thanks,

Al/Today Testing

File:Social Media Marketing Strategy.jpg https://pixabay.com/en/keyboard-computer-buttons-laptop-1983410/ File:Social Media Marketing Gamble.jpg - https://pixabay.com/en/poker-full-house-cards-972614/ File:Social Media Marketing Puzzle.jpg - https://pixabay.com/en/puzzle-joining-together-insert-3223740/ File:Linkedin Marketing.jpg - https://pixabay.com/en/workspace-wooden-table-lamp-book-2985783/ File:Social Media Marketing.jpg - https://pixabay.com/en/dices-over-newspaper-profit-2656028/ File:Social Media Addiction.jpg - https://pixabay.com/en/hand-tablets-encapsulate-health-3632914/

Today Testing (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Today Testing,
if File:Social Media Marketing.jpg is an edited version of this Pixabay image, why did you claim it as completely own work? That's the reason why another tagged it as copyvio and why I consequently deleted it.
Anyway, IMO the easiest way to prevent these edited images getting suspected as copyvio, would be to 1) upload the original (unedited) image to Commons, and then as 2) step to upload your (edited) version, under an at least slightly different filename and clearly writing in the source-entry {{Derived from|original.jpg}}. If you could do this, then I could undelete your images.
However, another advise for caution: In the description of your uploads, you asked for a credit/link to www.todaytesting.com. This might be considered as spam and either removed (or the image itself getting deleted).

--Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio Regarding your 1st question, I put it as own work after reading the below in 1st paragraph in the https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Derivative_works section. ‘In, either case, unless the underlying work is in the public domain (see Commons:Public domain) or there is evidence that the underlying work has been freely licensed for reuse (for example, under an appropriate Creative Commons license), the original creator of the work must explicitly authorize the copy/ derivative work before it can be uploaded to Commons.’ I interpreted this as allowing me to authorise my derivative work as my own as it was in the public domain and I have altered them considerably. Apologies if I misunderstood the rule there.

Regarding uploading the images, do you want me to upload all my edited versions again or just the originals – not sure because you mention undeleting the existing images in your message. Also where exactly do you input This file was derived from: Original.jpg
? Is this done by choosing ‘this file is not my own work’ and then putting code into ‘source’ or is it added to the description section?

Lastly, thanks for heads up on spam thing. Can you clarify though, the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license Wikimedia uses states under attribution –‘You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor’. Can I specify to attribute to me or my site given that rule? I understand that using the URL can be spammy but if I removed the url and just stated the name of the website would that be reasonable?

Thanks for your help,

Al / Today Testing Today Testing (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
ad 1) whether the author of a PD-released original is mentioned, is mainly a moral/ethical question. IMO, one should do it. As opposed to that, the source of your derivative absolutely needs to be mentioned.
ad 2) no, just the originals. Thereafter, I can undelete your currently deleted derivatives.
ad 3) Correct. But that has nothing to do with copyright or license; that's an application of our (Commons) policy Commons:Project scope.
--Túrelio (talk)


Hi Túrelio Thanks for the update. I have now uploaded all the originals. Not sure if this below link works for you to view them? Kind regards, Al / Today Testing https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/Today_Testing&ilshowall=1 Today Testing (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Yoann Bourgeois[edit]

Hi

I saw you removed today Yoann Bourgeois' portrait on his wikipedia page saying that we don't have permission to use it I would like to inform you that I modified his page and added this photo on behalf of Yoann as I am working with him and currently in charge of improving his wikipedia page Yoann knows personnally Geraldine and they work together very often; he has bought this photo himself exactly to be able to use it in this kind of situations. I will upload again the portrait and I would be thankful that you do not remove it again

Thank you for your understanding

All the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarievLaura (talk • contribs) 16:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
you claimed to be the author of this photo. Now you confirm that you are not. Crediting the true author is an absolute basic in every country's copyright law. So, even if Bourgeois has obtained copyright/permission from Geraldine Aresteanu, she still needs to be mentioned as author. In addition, in such cases (uploader is not author) the uploader needs to provide a written permission from the author or the copyright-holder to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . See Commons:Email templates (or Commons:Messages type in French) for the appropiate wording. --Túrelio (talk) 19:16, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If I am right, we did say that the photo was taken by Geraldine, it was written right underneath the photo Also, when we uploaded the picture, wikipedia doesn't ask us if we own the photo but if we do have the right to use it (at least this is the french translation) which we totally have Anyway, it doesn't really matter to us, maybe we made a mistake in the process and if it is the case we apologise; what we ask is, how can we now upload again Yoann's portrait in the right way ? I tried this afternoon and didn't find an answer to it... thank you for your help All the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarievLaura (talk • contribs)

The answer was already in my first response: 5th and 6th sentence. You actually cannot re-upload the same image again, as it was deleted for suspicion of copyvio. Also, it's not necessary, as it can easily be undeleted by me or any other admin. However, first you need to provide a permission as explained in my first answer. --Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please help review these 2 images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request for US Air Force Academy photos[edit]

I'm writing regarding the following files that you deleted after speedy deletion requests:

While it is technically correct that they all had "copyright" licenses on Flickr, it turns out that those licenses are incorrect, an ironic reverse of "license laundering" cases where unscrupulous Flickr users upload others' copyrighted works under free-use CC licenses. AF_Academy is the official Flickr page of the US Air Force Academy, as indicated by the USAFA official Facebook page, so all of its photos are original works of the US Air Force and thus in the public domain. This is a clear case of a false positive, and I hope you reconsider. Arbor to SJ (talk) 16:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arbor to SJ,
I was aware of the contradiction between license on Flickr and assumed status as Gov works. However, from other US gov accounts I know that they sometimes put such images under CC-BY-ND, which is formally also not accepted on Commons and where we ignored the restricted license. However, we also know that US gov entities sometimes present not-own images on their websites, as "courtesy image", which naturally do not fall under the US gov PD clause. So, when this Flickr account is indeed officially by the "AF Academy", they should know what they do. The "all rights reserved" could mean that these images are also "courtesy images" by other authors. IMO, the best would be if you would contact this Flickr account and ask them directly about the 5 images and send their reply to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any evidence other than conjecture ("could mean", "sometimes present not-own images") that these pictures are not official US government works? The Air Force Academy Flickr page puts VIRIN's on the names of all its photos (but lazily omits other descriptive info like captions and photographers, for reasons unknown). A VIRIN is "assigned to all DoD personnel who create Visual Information (VI) records", thus meaning that VIRIN's go strictly to works of the US Department of Defense. One of the deleted photos (of Wachenheim and Calhoun) has the VIRIN 160902-F-KB029-2017, the "F" in the second field standing for US Air Force. Arbor to SJ (talk) 03:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but that's not how it works here. It's the task of the uploader of not-own works to convince the community that the uploads are under a free license. If there were blatant copyvio-evidence, you would have got just 1 short sentence from me. Also, I don't understand why you did not take my hint and just contacted the Flickr-account to get clarity about the copyright. Anyway, as I am offline for the rest of the day (and eventually also tomorrow), I recommend you to take this case to COM:UDR, where other admins may view it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alright then. I just wanted to approach you first before attempting UDR. Arbor to SJ (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forum[edit]

Im Thread "fragen wegen bewohner des kohle bergwerks..." wird der Klarname eines gewissen Herrn verwendet. Sollte man den vorsichtshalber ausblenden und mit revdel verstecken? DSGVO lässt grüßen, und auch sonst mag ja nicht jeder seinen Namen im Internet wiederfinden. De728631 (talk) 16:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi De728631,
ich habs einfach mal auf die Initialen gekürzt. Danke für den Hinweis. --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Boeing 717-200 Jetstar.jpg[edit]

Why did you not only revert my speedy deletion, but also protect the talk page? The content is a duplicate of the file page, with no additional information. --80.140.127.196 07:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1) Because what you did, is edit-warring. You might even have been blocked. 2) No, it is not, I compared the content. Whether the information on the talkpage is relevant, is a different question, but it's not a duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What does edit-warring mean? Why does irrelevant information have to be protected?--146.52.1.193 09:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
en:Wikipedia:Edit warring. I didn't say it's irrelevant. Do you really have nothing better to do than to edit the talk page? Why such interest in this page? --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

When you have the time, please kindly review these images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg[edit]

This image had 2 Public Domain references (one of them is Wikipedia!!!) containing the very same information buried in much text of the Free e-book by Google that Wiki is citing Corpus Reformatorum (details below), yet my original illustration with proper embedded and explicit references through Wikipedia itself (and presently on Wikipedia) was deleted evidently maliciously, diversely, and plurally, due to the fact that subsequently also in the article the "editors" deleted all references to Polish Sarmatian Astronomer Nicolas Copernicus which is a fact of history through a number of other references, which the "editors" also deliberately deleted (about half of the references of books published in the last 500 years on Copernicus)!

The File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg that I have created, in fact specifically is cited in the Public Domain through Google e-books, and on Wikipedia, as and at Corpus Reformatorum:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Reformatorum The Corpus Reformatorum online CR 4 - 1837

Corpus reformatorum, Volume 4 C.A. Schwetschke, 1837

https://books.google.ca/books?vid=0Nk01EG-OTPT95Zn_Y2&id=QQ8RAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=%22corpus+reformatorum%22&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22corpus%20reformatorum%22&f=false

You need to scroll down to the cited page 679!

Which was stated in the deleted File:Sarmaticus Astronomus Nicolas Copernicus c 1543.jpg ... “Page 679 of vol. IV of Corpus Reformatorum, containing a letter (of Oct. 16, 1541) from Philip Melanchton to a Mr. Burcard Mithobius, with first historic reference to "that Sarmatian astronomer who is trying to stop the sun and move the earth." ...

Rosetecscc (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
please, no conspiration theories. The file had been tagged by 1 editor as possible copyvio due to "not sure where this came from, but not self made. The texts could be old, but the writing underneath does not. Plus it is text mainly, not an image." Consequently I've performed the deletion.
The problem is not the Latin text, but the separate text portions below the Latin texts, as they are far more recent and clearly within the time-frame for copyright protection. The left text mentions a source from 1953, the right one another source from 1990. So, you could crop away the two smaller portions of the likely copyrighted commentary texts and everything would be o.k., in regard to copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File deleted Székely_Norbert.jpg[edit]

Hello Túrelio, Can you help me with my file? I've took this picture with my own camera, and edit by myself on my laptop. but it has been deleted. (https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Székely_Norbert)

Thank you.

alencar.rossoni — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alencar.rossoni (talk • contribs) 08:13, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I see, it's not the same photo as the first version. However, it's not a native camera file. Could you temporarily upload the native camera file? (It can thereafter be removed). --Túrelio (talk) 08:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio,

I would like to upload with the native camera file, but the picture is available now, and it shows that the picture is duplicate, what should I do ? The native camera file is this one IMG_9409.JPG,

Thank you

Alencar.rossoni (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
if I understand you correctly, our software says it's a duplicate and does not allow you to upload the "new" file, right? If yes, then it is not really the native image from the camera, as the EXIF data of the undeleted image clearly shows no camera data at all. The data shown are from an imaging software (Adobe Photoshop), which was used to edit the image. --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Can you help me to understand, can not I edit a picture in the adobe photoshop and after upload it ? And another question, the picture is available in the commons wikimedia, Can I use it?

Thank you,

Alencar.rossoni (talk) 12:40, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion of File:A vindication of K Fleuron T070182-1.png[edit]

Hello Túrelio,

Could you explain why File:A vindication of K Fleuron T070182-1.png has been deleted, please? Your motive is: "Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion". Is it a massive deletion of all the files uploaded by a user called "Fæ"?

This file is the title page of a book published in 1711: I hardly think there might be any copyright issue.

Regards, --Daehan (talk) 15:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Fae had uploaded xxthousands of scans from old documents. A relative small nummber of them, still hundreths, contain just the scan of a line or a page-number or other useless things, as the original documents were likely scanned automatically and were then "automatically" uploaded to Commons. These to-be-deleted uploads are put into Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion, partly by Fae himself or by others. So, the deletion has nothing to do with copyright, but all with being trash-files. I usually check all, whether they are in use, which I never found. So, in case, the above mentioned file had indeed been in use, tell me and I will undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Túrelio,
Yes, I use it in two articles in French Wikipedia: it allows me to illustrate a section with extra information without creating a note. So if it's not too much trouble, I would need it.
Thank you, --Daehan (talk) 14:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I've undeleted it now. --Túrelio (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Potential copyvios[edit]

You recently deleted this file, which I tagged as a clear copyvio. Having looked, I think many other recent uploads by user Maumivi are copyright violations. Perhaps you could take a look? RGloucester (talk) 15:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will look into it later this week. --Túrelio (talk) 22:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have some time, please review these 2 images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When clicking on the MP links, I got "We're sorry, but something went wrong." --Túrelio (talk) 21:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Venus vom Hohlefels-Bild[edit]

Hallo, warum schreibst du dem Museum nicht und bittest um Erlaubnis, das Bild zu vernwenden. Damit kann man Werbung für das Museum verbinden. Die müssen doch ein Interesse daran haben (a) gut dazustehen und (b) Werbung für ihr Mmuseum durch das bild zu bekommen. In der BIldunterschrift werdne sie erwähnt. Dein Bild war erheblich bessser als das jetzt verwendete.... Gruß. Mr. bobby (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
ähem, die gelöschten Bilder waren nicht die meinen. Wo auch immer du auf meinen Namen gestoßen bist, das liegt darin dass ich als Admin sie gelöscht habe, auf dringlichen Wunsch des Fotografen, der - mit gewissem Recht - eine Klage des Museums fürchtet. --Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting previous versions of file[edit]

Hello Túrelio. Can previous versions of a file be deleted? I uploaded some files whose pages I had accidentally cut out. I uploaded the correct ones, but will like to see the old versions removed. They’re just wasting space and are of no use. Thanks. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. But you will not save any space by that, as nothing is really deleted, it's just hidden. Any admin (and higher) can undelete it. Therefore, we perform such version-deletions only if there is a good reason for it. --Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well, then there's no need. I just asked on the presumption that it will save space. Will be more careful. Thanks anyway. MonsterHunter32 (talk) 21:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borrado de la pagina: Antonio Pinto Renedo[edit]

Hola, pedi el cambio de mi nombre verdadero por el nuevo Antonio9025 para evitar que se pudieran relacionar los dos nombres, pero aunque la pagina con mi nombre verdadero a sido borrada todavia aparecen los registros donde se indica la relacion entre los dos nombres, se pueden borrar tambien esos registros? Lo digo porque si se pone mi nombre verdadero en google aparece la pagina de wikimedia kommons con los registros de actividad con el nombre antiguo y el nuevo juntos. Agradecería si se pudieran borrar tambien.--Antonio.P9025 (talk) 21:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I am not sure to understand what you mean by "los registros". I have now deleted the redirect from your old talkpage to your new talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:BW Tätigkeitsabzeichen Pioniertruppe.png[edit]

Moin, du hast leider die falsche Version gelöscht.

File:BW Tätigkeitsabzeichen Pioniertruppe.png → File:BW Tätigkeitsabzeichen Pioniere.jpg

Die PNG hatte Transparenz und war korrekt benannt. Ebenso stimmen Quellen und Angaben. Die JPG sollte abgelöst werden. Kannst du das bitte korrigieren? Danke -- Gunnar (💬) 14:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gunnar,
an sich hatte ich die Duplikat-Richtung bewußt herumgedreht, weil mir das nun verbliebene Bild schärfer erschien. Auf Transparenz und so hatte ich allerdings nicht geachtet. Nun umgekehrt. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Sulawesi earthquake[edit]

Hello. I'm PaPa PaPaRoony, the uploader of the photos of the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake. I've asked for permission for the photos and he had said that he permitted the use of the photos. However, I've just received notification s that said that you've just deleted the photos.. May I have an explanation why? PaPa PaPaRoony 21:24 UTC, 30 September 2018

Hi PaPa PaPaRoony,
I've deleted only File:Dampak-GempaPalu-1.jpg, if I remember correctly.
On Twitter[47] you had asked "Can Wikipedia use these photos for their articles? We will credit you for these photos!" Such a "for Wikipedia" permission is not acceptable on Commons, see our licensing policy. You need to ask the author/photographer whether he/she is willing to release his/her images under a free license, which allows anybody to use them, provided the license terms are met.
If you want to do that, you should 1) choose a license, which you want to propose to the Twitter user. I would recommend our preferred CC-BY-SA license. 2) You need to be honest towards the photographer, in the sense that you explain what a release of his images under such a license means: anybody can use it, even commercially; only has to credit the photographer. 3) If he agrees and confirms, you may notify me again. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Account sperren[edit]

Kannst du den Account Extramasterspongebob bitte sperren? Dein Kollege Doc Taxon hat den vor zwei Jahren in der Wikipedia auch gesperrt, falls du mir nicht glaubst. Ich wusste es nicht, dass ich diesen Account noch habe. Er gehört nämlich mir. Mit Doppelaccounts möchte ich hier eigentlich nicht direkt rumlaufen. Ich bitte um die Sperrung. Danke schon mal. --RS34 (talk) 08:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for deleting photographs of Dülmen (redirections) with the wrong names. XRay talk 08:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request: File:Part of taxon treatment of Sholicola ashambuensis (screenshot).png is from a CC BY 4.0 article and was correctly labeled as such[edit]

See doi:10.1186/s12862-017-0882-6 for source. I do not appreciate that you did not even check the source, which was properly indicated. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 10:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did indeed check before deleting, so far for your assumption. However, I looked just at the head of the article and at its end, where it says "© The Author(s). 2017". Restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 12:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neubauer Bild[edit]

Warum wurde das Bild gelöscht? Wir haben jägliche Rechte auf Ihre Bilder :(

Mfg Sandy B. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NuP2018 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sandy,
weil das Bild Code enthält, der zeigt, das von Facebook kopiert wurde. Material auf Facebook betrachten wir nicht per se als ausreichend frei. D.h., falls du das Foto nicht selbst aufgenommen hast, musst du eine Genehmigung des Photographen an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org senden. Falls du oder die Institution, für die du arbeitest, die Rechte an dem Foto halten, dann musst du dies gegenüber permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org formell erklären, unter Angabe der offiziellen Kontaktdaten, die eine Rückfrage erlauben. Deine Mail wird nicht veröffentlicht, sondern kann nur von unseren OTRS-Mitarbeitern eingesehen werden. --Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you can, please help review these 2 good images below.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:35, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion request[edit]

Plese note that according to the Finnish Copyright Act, § 46a, film stills are free after 50 years of cinematography, similarly as photographs are free according to § 49a. You can read the Act here: Tekijänoikeuslaki (404/1961).

Also, it is rather questionable to delete the file File:Kielletty-kirja.jpg “behind one’s back,” without allowing the uploader to comment on the deletion.

Please undelete the said file. --Mlang.Finn (talk) 16:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, the nominator should have notified you. However, I missed to check for that. Ok, I will temp-undelete the file, but put the request into regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here we are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kielletty-kirja.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

images[edit]

im a African editor from Namibia and i have the rights to use any of those images. i was given the duty to create wikipedias for big artist's in my country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frutnesswork (talk • contribs) 18:15, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide proof for that claim. You need to contact each of the photographers of the 2 images and ask them whether they are willing to release these images under a Commons-compliant free license (see COM:L). A permissions "for Wikipedia" is not accepted. They need to send their permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 18:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mail ?[edit]

Ich wollte nachfragen, ob meine Mail (21:04) bei Dir angekommen ist? LG, --Geolina mente et malleo ✎ 20:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, gerade gesehen und erledigt. Grüße --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen herzlichen Dank...--Geolina mente et malleo ✎ 20:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

jamila[edit]

علش بغيتي تمسح صورة sourir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamila jamola (talk • contribs) 21:01, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Judithcomm#File_copyright_status[edit]

Please read the comments on my talk page. I would say they prove I did not just opload files with the wrong copyright status. I asked the owner if it was ok and he was fine with it. --Judithcomm (talk) 09:01, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sent a mail to Andor as you suggested. It would have been nice to have been alerted in advance that the deletions were going to take place. I too take the Commons copyright policy very seriously and have done for years now. To be honest, I was offended by the threat to block me. --Judithcomm (talk) 10:52, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Threat to block? Oh, I see, it's in the template. Sorry, but the notification wasn't individually written to you. It is automatically applied when a no-perm or speedy tag is added to a file. I have zero influence on its content. Anyway, an established user doesn't get blocked so fast. --Túrelio (talk)

File:Piotr Więcek Formula D Atlanta 2017.jpg and File:Piotr Więcek.jpg[edit]

Hi,

A proper agreement to OTRS has been sent just today, regarding these 2 pictures. ticket:2018090310003585 Can you undelete them? Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 12:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --Túrelio (talk) 12:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This DR[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you wish you could close this 1 day DR as delete and delete the image...as even the uploader said he made a mistake here. It is not free. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Helsper[edit]

Hallo Túrelio! Aus welchem Grund wurde die Seite "Walter Helsper" gelöscht? Ich besitze für alle Abbildungen die ausdrückliche Erlaubnis zur Veröffentlichung durch die Erbengemeinschaft Walter Helsper. Für jedes einzelne Bild habe ich das entsprechende Formular eingereicht. Am 27. und 28.08.2017 ist der Eingang mit automatisierter Antwort von "Permissions-German wikipedia" bestätigt worden. Ich habe bis heute keine weitere Antwort erhalten, auch auf mehrere Anfragen nicht. Stattdessen sind die Bilder ohne weitere Nachricht gelöscht worden, das ist überhaupt nicht zu akzeptieren. Ich bitte um dringende Wiederherstellung aller Dateien! Vielen Dank für Deine Kooperation.--Kirchners (talk) 10:02, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kirchners,
die Galerie-Seite Walter Helsper wurde gelöscht, weil sie leer war (wenn die Bilder mal wiederhergestellt worden sind, kann ich diese Seite gerne entlöschen). Die Bilder habe ich nicht gelöscht, sondern mein Kollege User:Jcb, allerdings schon vor mehr als 1 Monat. Wenn du eine Genehmigung an OTRS geschickt hast, was in solch einem Fall der Standard ist, kann es leider recht lange dauern. Die Warteschlange (Einreichung -> Entscheidung) liegt derzeit bei 150 Tagen! Das ist eigentlich Wahnsinn; du musst aber bedenken, dass es ausschließlich Ehrenamtler sind, die die unzähligen bei OTRS eingehenden Mails bearbeiten. Da kann ich auch als Admin nichts dran ändern. (Habs mal versucht und mir eine ziemliche Abfuhr eingehandelt) --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die prompte Antwort. Wie bereits gesagt, hatte ich entsprechende Genehmigungen an OTRS gesendet. Eine Wartezeit von 150 Tagen ist in der Tat sehr bedauerlich, und in meinem Fall noch nicht verstrichen. Sicherlich kannst Du also nichts daran ändern, aber zwei kleine Verbesserungsvorschläge seien angebracht: Ihr solltet Autoren über diese Problematik grundsätzlich informieren. Die Routine "Bild mit mutmaßlichem Urheberrechtsproblem markieren" und nach gewisser Zeit ohne Berücksichtigung der gesendeten Genehmigung an OTRS bzw. ohne jegliche Nachricht das Bild löschen sollte dringend verändert werden.--Kirchners (talk) 11:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Was ich i.a. empfehle und was dann meistens auch hilft ist, gleich beim Upload, vorausgesetzt die Genehmigungsmail ist unterwegs, den Baustein {{OTRS pending}} auf das betroffene Bild zu setzen. Dann wird meistens nicht gelöscht. --Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ooopsie....[edit]

Would you please delete this nom - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Pacific_Feather_Duster_Sabellastarte_sp.jpg It's not ready yet. Thanks - Atsme✍🏻📧 15:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Images[edit]

I noticed you deleted a handful of images from In Common. I posted a DR a little bit ago due to the same issue, but I guess I didn't have to go through that method. Since you deleted some, I thought I would mention that these three images from the same source are still on Commons, and should probably be deleted as well: File:Jin in 2018.jpg, File:Jin_KBS_Song_Festival_2017.jpg, and File:Jin KBS Song Festival 2017.jpg. DanielleTH (talk) 02:01, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Foto von Simone Menne[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, du hast heute ein Foto von Simone Menne gelöscht, weil es angeblich von hercareer stammt, was nicht richtig ist. Es ist ein frei verwendbares Pressebild von ihr, dass für Veranstaltungen und Artikel genutzt werden darf sowie auf ihrer eigenen Seite www.simonemenne.de. Ich bitte dich, dass wieder rückgängig zu machen. Ich stelle keine Bilder ein, die nicht genutzt werden dürfen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnaQuickRathgeber (talk • contribs) 14:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Anna, ganz so einfach geht es nicht. Du hattest für das Foto File:20180202-13x19-JMai 0345-2.jpg "Jürgen Mai" als Urheber (also nicht du) und als Quelle "Aufnahme einer Person des öffentlichen Lebens" angegeben. Abgesehen davon, dass letzteres keine Quelle ist (höchstens ein Argument warum das Foto nicht gegen Persönlichkeitsrechte verstösst), hast du somit keinerlei für uns überprüfbaren Nachweis erbracht, dass das Foto tatsächlich unter der beanspruchten CC-Lizenz steht. "Pressebilder" gelten bei uns a priori nicht als "frei", weil ihre Nutzung in den meisten Fällen eingeschränkt ist (nur für Berichte im Zusammenhang mit der abgebildeten Person) und sie meist nicht verändert werden dürfen. Dies entspricht aber nicht unseren Vorgaben für frei lizenzierte Bilder (siehe COM:L). Zum weiteren Vorgehen habe ich dir bereits auf deiner Disku geantwortet. --Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frage zu zu löschenden Bildern[edit]

Hallo Túrelio,

du hast diverse neue Bilder von mir zur Löschung markiert. Du wirst dafür sicher einen Grund haben, aber ich verstehe leider den Grund nicht. Wo ist der Unterschied zwischen dem von selbst geschossenen Bild https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fritz-spritz_Bio_Apfelschorle.jpg zu beispielsweise diesem hier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fritz-kola-02.jpg ? Oder auch diesem hier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Monster_3_sides.jpg ?

Sollte tatsächlich ein Verstoß vorliegen, so sollen die Bilder selbstverständlich gelöscht werden.

Ich bin relativ neu, daher würde ich mich über eine Erklärung freuen.

Danke! Willibald11 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willibald11 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist so, dass Verpackungen, die mehr als nur Text enthalten, im Zweifelsfall als geschützt anzusehen sind. Das gilt insbesondere wenn es sich um Fotos auf der Verpackung handelt, wie im Fall der Hanuta-Verpackung. Generelle Info dazu (aber auf englisch): Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging. Ich habe für das andere, von dir benannte Foto ebenfalls die Löschung beantragt, allerdings als regulärer LA, um eine Diskussion zu erlauben. Von deinem Foto habe ich den SLA entfernt und in einen reguläre LA umgewandelt: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fritz-kola-02.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 14:29, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, soweit verstanden. Danke. Dann müsste aber gemäß dem von mir aufgeführten Beispiel die Fritz-Flasche durchgehen? Oder das andere Foto auch gelöscht werden. Sonst wird mit zweierlei Maß gemessen. --Willibald11 (talk) 14:36, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alles klar. Ich bin gespannt. --Willibald11 (talk) 14:38, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"zweierlei Maß" - schau, auf Commons werden täglich ca. 20000 neue Dateien hochgeladen, davon geschätzt 10% Urheberrechtverletzungen. Einige Benutzer, die aber sämtlich Freiwillige sind, kümmern sich darum, sich diese Dateien anzuschauen, ob damit Probleme bestehen. Da ist es wohl logisch, dass viele Dateien durchrutschen. Zudem sind Fälle wie die deinen keine "blatant copyvio", sondern Grenzfälle wo man abschätzen muss, liegt das noch unter oder schon über der Schwelle für einen urheberrechtlichen Schutz. --Túrelio (talk) 14:51, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Das war auch gar nicht böse gemeint! Ihr Freiwilligen macht eine tolle Arbeit. Nur will ich für meine Uploads kämpfen. Nicht, dass ich deswegen noch gesperrt werden. ;) Es gibt unzählige Beispiel von Produktabbildungen, die in meinen Augen dann ebenfalls gegen die oben genannte Regel verstoßen. Daher freue ich mich über die Diskussion, die du gestartet hast. --Willibald11 (talk) 15:04, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:2005 Honda Shadow Aero 750cc.jpg[edit]

I appreciate your help correcting my mistake. --WhiteBook (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that's easy. The image was under a license CC-BY-ND-NC[48], which is not allowed on Commons (see COM:L). Not all CC licenses are allowed on Commons, only CC-BY, CC-BY-SA and CC-0. --Túrelio (talk) 14:45, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion[edit]

Hi User:Túrelio,

You've deleted File:NIND MuseeL-bleu ISO3200.jpg minutes after it was marked as a possible copyright violation. This gives no chance to look into the matter and attempt to contact the relevant copyright holder, I don't think that is the proper way to handle deletion requests.

--Trougnouf (talk) 21:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually that is the proper way of dealing with copyright issues which was sanctioned by the Commons community. It is called "speedy deletion" for a reason. I'm sorry, but you as the uploader would have had to take care of researching the copyright status and obtaining a licence from the copyright holder before uploading the image here. Please see Commons:Project scope/Evidence. De728631 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't realize that one was a speedy deletion request as all the other related ones weren't, thank you for clearing that up. --Trougnouf (talk) 08:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images[edit]

Dear Tureio,

If you have some time, please review these images below.

Thank You kindly, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Was offline most of the day. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Pare[edit]

Next time, before you do this and have an image deleted at Commons, please actually look at the photo and see if it truly is a duplicate. In this case, it was not a duplicate but edited to be improved upon, and far beyond just being a crop of same. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Winkelvi,
that wouldn't have helped in this case. As I was able to find out now, shortly before tagging File:Jessica Pare 2014.jpg as a duplicate, another user had overwritten your retouched version with the original (un-retouched) image from Flickr. So, when I duplicate-processed the file, it was indeed a duplicate. --Túrelio (talk) 18:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Who was the editor? -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 23:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Elisfkc. Nevertheless, my fault was not to recognize this. --Túrelio (talk) 06:07, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reuploaded[edit]

Hello.

A few months ago you had deleted an image that was taken from my website and used on a computer wallpaper website without my permission and apparently copyrighted it. As a result, you deleted it. I uploaded the ORIGINAL (Mine that I am the photographer and owner of the car [1992 Camaro z28])

I am wondering how to re-edit the page so to include my photo since you deleted the "copycat"

This is the original re-uploaded one https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:100_1777_orig_size.jpg

The one that I linked originally was "1105863-1920x1080--DesktopNexus.com-.jpg," who is using my picture.

I am trying to figure out how to put it back (Mine) into the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Camaro_(third_generation)#1992 like where it was before but using my original one.. Not the one who stole it..

Thanks very much for your help,

Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camarosource (talk • contribs) 01:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Respecto a File:Masgranadafiscalia.jpg[edit]

Estimado Turelio, ruego no borres fotos unilateralmente sin consultar previamente. Dicha foto fue puesta bajo alerta por el usuario LMLM. Hablé con dicho usuario, explicándole que sobre dicha foto no había problemas de violación de copyright, puesto que la foto la hice yo, y puedo demostrarlo, tengo incluso el archivo RAW de Photoshop. Ruego, entonces y en consecuencia, que no borres todo aquello que pueda parecerte susceptible de borrar sin informarte previamente y preguntar. Muchas gracias, --Granadino7 (talk) 11:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm,
the evidence suggests otherwise, as the image was published externally earlier (than uploaded to Commons) and in slightly higher resolution.[49] Therefore it did qualify for speedy-deletion. Anyway, as you mentioned evidence to the contrary, I'm willing to undelete it and put it into a regular DR, which allows presentation of further evidence and a discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So, here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Masgranadafiscalia.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

De qué manera puedo mostrarte que hice la edición de la foto, ¿puedo enviarte a algún correo electrónico capturas de mi escritorio que lo confirmen? Desconozco qué metodos de demostración existen para casos de este tipo. Gracias por tu gentileza al recuperar la imagen provisionalmente, --Granadino7 (talk) 13:58, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, for example you could upload the original image, as it came out of the camera, with camera EXIF data. (you may label it as test upload, so can rapidly delete it) --Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dream Country CD cover 2000x2000.jpg[edit]

We have an OTRS ticket for this image you deleted. Please undelete. BTW, is this the best place to ask you to undelete files as I see more which may have good permissions? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 12:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done and yes to your question. --Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That was fast, thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 13:03, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Dera Túrelio, Thankyou for your help. Unfortunately I am not used to insert image in commons, or at least images like these. I Classified them as "OWN" because I took pics or copy of them. And the date are wrong because i insert the date of today. Really most of the pics are taken by a my collegue here in the University. I'll ask him the date as soon as possible (tomorrow morning) and I'll correct them. About pics that could be erased immediately they are taken by the same photograph that works here for us. If is possible not delete them immediately I can ask and modified the licence. It's possible that another person answer or talk with you instead of me: is Alberto Ugolini, the editir of the rewiew. Thankyou again!! --Ricce (talk) 15:05, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ricce,
I thought something like this. You didn't look like a careless copyviolator. With "date of original photography" I mean the year, of course. That's also important for the evaluation whether some of the older images might be in the public domain already. But therefore we need to know who was the original photographer (and when he/she did die). The still living photographing colleague should send a statement mentioning the file-names of the images, which he had originally shot, and the license under which he wants to release these images. I would recommend not to use PD-self, but instead CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA, which are more appropriate for images of living persons. The permission should be send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . For the wording, see Commons:Modello richiesta di permesso. --Túrelio (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio & block[edit]

Hi Túrelio, Hope all is well,

I don't usually like to ask for DRs to be closed mega early but in this case I was wondering if you could close this DR and then block the uploader (Fieryflames) for a week or 3?,

They're currently edit warring at English Wikipedia and as they've already uploaded 2 copyright violation images something tells me if the image in the DR is deleted they're going to return to immediately upload the same copyvio images,

Many thanks :), –Davey2010Talk 02:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying. Upload was indeed a blatant copyvio from Getty; this is always speedy-material. --Túrelio (talk) 06:35, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No worries and many many thanks for dealing with the DR and editor - It's very much appreciated Túrelio :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

angebliches "OTRS pending"[edit]

Hallo,

könnte Du mal einen Blick auf https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Khubaib_Ali_Mohammed_(Portr%C3%A4t).jpg&action=history werfen?

Das Bild wurde offensichtlich ohne Erlaubnis hochgeladen. Nach einer Markierung "no permission" hat der Uploader diese Markierung entfernt und "OTRS kontaktiert" als Text eingefügt (14. September).

Da am 16. Oktober noch immer kein OTRS-Baustein vorhanden war, habe ich das Bild wieder mit "no permission" marktiert. Das wurde von einer IP wieder entfernt und von der IP der Baustein "OTRS pending" eingesetzt. Am nächsten Tag dasselbe Spiel nochmal.

Da der Uploader in deWP ein bezahlter Auftragsschreiber ist und er bzw. die dahinter stehende Agentur bereits vielfach durch Urheberrechtsverletzungen auffiel, vermute ich, dass überhaupt keine Erlaubnis vorliegt und auch über OTRS gar nichts oder nichts Brauchbares eingegangen ist. Ich vermute, die Agentur versucht, mit dem "OTRS pending" die Bildlöschung zu vermeiden (zumindest so lange, bis ihr Auftraggeber gezahlt hat).

Wie kann ich in einem solchen Fall weiter vorgehen? Die Agentur spielt dieses Spiel bei einer ganzen Reihe von Bildern so. --Zxmt (talk) 05:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moin @Zxmt: ,
puuh, Kein einfacher Fall. Es sieht mir zumindest nicht nach einer "blatant copyvio" aus. Via Google-Images und Tineye habe ich das Foto sonst nirgendwo gefunden. Der Hochlader sieht auch nicht aus wie ein typischer sorgloser copyvio-Hochlader. Bei seinem anderen, inzwischen gelöschten Upload hatte er auch nicht behauptet selbst der Urheber zu sein, sondern einen anderen Namen als Urheber angegeben und ebenfalls auf eine Genehmigungsmail verwiesen. Von :de war mir das Konto bislang nicht bekannt. Wenn jemand paid-edits offenlegt und sogar den Auftraggeber nennt, sind bewusste URVs m.E. eher unwahrscheinlich, weil das ja auf den Auftraggeber zurückfällt. Das Problem ist die derzeit exzessive Warteschlange von 154 (!!!) Tagen bei OTRS. Das ist für Externe vollkommen unverständlich und eigentlich auch inakzeptabel. Solange aber nicht mehr Leute bei OTRS mitmachen, wird sich das nicht ändern. Die WMF, die auf Mio. $ sitzt, kümmert das offenbar nicht die Bohne. Zurück zum Fall: in der Gesamtwertung würde ich es insgesamt für angemessen halten, dem Hochlader die 150-160 Tage nach Ankündigung des OTRS-Kontakts (14.9.) zu geben, bevor das Bild gelöscht wird. Das ist aber nur meine Einschätzung; man kann auch anders entscheiden. --Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Einschätzung und Rückmeldung: Die Agentur ("Weltraumagentur") arbeitet halt nicht seriös (vgl. inzwischen gesperrtes Hauptkonto Timon Straub und Sockenzoo: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Checkuser/Anfragen/Timon.Straub ) Benutzer Luuuuuuka ist aber wohl nur "freier Mitarbeiter" und wurde daher (bislang) nicht gesperrt. Die Bild-URVs ziehen sich durch die Artikel der Agentur wie ein roter Faden. Für den Upload werden inzwischen auch Konten angelegt, die notwendige Rechte zumindest möglich erscheinen lassen (bei Swiss Holiday Park z.B. User:SwissHP oder bei Julia Hanzl eben User:JuliaHanzl . Bei anderen Bildern von Hanzl hatte Timon.Straub sogar vermerkt, eine OTRS-Freigabe sei "vorhanden" (vgl. z.B. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Horned_god.jpg ) Damit schafft es die Agentur natürlich, ihre Machenschaften weiter zu führen - die Kunden kriegen die Probleme im Artikel bzw. mit den Bildern erst mit, wenn die Agentur längst ihr Geld hat. Aber wenn es keine anderen Möglichkeiten gibt, dann ist das halt so. --Zxmt (talk) 07:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Bei solch einer Vorgeschichte, die mir nicht bekannt war, sieht die Situation natürlich anders aus. Da wäre eine Löschung 7 Tage nach Erstplazierung von no-perm gerechtfertigt. --Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:محلات سبع أبكار وما حلوها.jpg[edit]

Hello Túrelio I am not so experienced in using wikimedia, I feel lost sometimes, I received a notification from you concerning deletions of some my uploads, earlier I received a similar notification from the user and to seek help I asked him about the alternative map that is acceptable by wikipedia, he said OpenStreetMap is ok, and I heeded his advice, now the suggested deletions by you are taken from OpenStreetMap, why do you want to delete them?--Abu aamir (talk) 07:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC) below is my conversation with Ronhjones[reply]

Hello Ronhjones one of my uploaded sketches was deleted twice on the ground of copyrights without informing me about the alternative, how to display an image of the neighborhood with the surrounding area? my image was a naked imagery of google maps, it was I who defined boundaries and put labels.

I could have taken the same image from Wikimapia but unfortunately Wikimapia is full of scratches. I have seen much bigger images displayed on Wikipedia undeleted. I think that warning needs to be tutorial rather than threatening.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Abu aamir (talk • contribs) 20:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC) @Abu aamir: They are standard messages as generated by the system when there is a copyright issue flagged. Google Map's License is not compatible with Commons. OpenStreetMap is a normal alternative. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Abu aami,
it would help if you could specify to which files/images you are referring.

File:Affiche 835x1181 sweetcocoon.png[edit]

Hello Turelio I come to you regarding the suppression of the film poster "Sweet Cocoon" I work for the production company who owns this film's right, and which gave me the permission to publish it on wikipedia How can I do in order to make this poster acceptable for Wikimedia commons ? Thanks a lot --Lindaz818 (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lindaz818,
you need to ask the rightsholder (esma ?) to send a Déclaration de consentement (see Commons:Messages type for a template) to permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. It needs to mention the file name and the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Werxa[edit]

Werxa is just another Sol-lol sock. Checkuser sadly often takes weeks. Not sure what to do about it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:14, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what information is missing about license in my uploaded images[edit]

Hi! Turélio, can you help me? I just uploaded the following images:

I have permission on all those images, since they were created by me and the members of the band related to them. But I got a message saying that they were marked to be erased... What do I have to do to avoid it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msmourao (talk • contribs)

Hi,
let's see about "were created by me and the members of the band":
the 1st one: you wrote "Fotógrafo desconhecido", but it has a clear watermark, likely by the photographer. So, you need to provide his permission.
the 2nd one: you wrote "Fotógrafo desconhecido", but the EXIF data state "Photographer: Marcus Azevedo Fotografia". So, you need to provide his permission.
the 3rd one: you wrote "Criado por Bruno Gozzi". Ok, then you need get him send his permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
--Túrelio (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images if you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lung capacity measures.png[edit]

Can you explain why did you sack File:Lung capacity measures.png (hist • logs • abuse log)? Aren’t you handy with tracing history of Commons files? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because the now remaining image is simply (though only slightly) better, I reversed the requested duplicate-deletion. I thought indeed about that and compared both images. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.
Because you disagreed with the original tagging, you had—at very least—to document reasons for your disagreement, without making me to walk here. Now your opinion is overridden by three Commons users, mirroring my situation of October 21. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:34, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All quality-related things aside, what originally was w:File:Lung.png was released by its creator, Someone_else, into public domain, whereas the Vietnamese claimed {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} for his/her stuff. You attempted to erase Someone_else’s {{PD-self}} from publicly visible record, which is unacceptable. Merging histories could be an option which possibly would go against one Incnis Mrsi’s ideas, but could preserve the attribution chain. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
ok, you are probably correct about the missing notification to you about my reversal. So, sorry for that.
For me this was just a quality issue. --Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Willem Bartel van der Kooi - De minnebrief[edit]

Sehr geehrter Túrelio,

gestern, 20. Oktober um 17:22 Uhr, haben Sie die Datei File:Willem Bartel van der Kooi - De minnebrief.jpg gelöscht und diese Seite weitergeleitet nach File:De minnebrief Rijksmuseum SK-A-1064.jpeg.

Die erste (gelöschte) Datei ist in die Orginal-Große von 5.708 x 6.934 Pixel, die letztere in einer Große von nur 2.164 × 2.652 Pixel. Ich habe probiert um die Datei "De minnebrief Rijksmuseum SK-A-1064.jpeg" zu überschreiben mit der Datei in die Orginal-Große, aber das ist mir nicht gelungen.

Bitte setzen Sie die Datei in die Orginal-Große zurück.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Bouwe Brouwer: ,
normalerweise würde ich dir natürlich recht geben, dass die höher aufgelöste Version anstelle der geringer aufgelösten bleiben sollte. In diesem Fall habe ich die beiden Dateien aber recht genau verglichen und bemerkt, dass die höher aufgelöste Version von sichtbar schlechterer Qualität war als die andere Version. Deshalb habe ich so gehandelt. Ich kann die gelöschte Version wieder herstellen, wenn du das möchtest; aber trotzdem sollte die aktuelle Version (auch) bleiben, weil sie einfach besser aussieht. (jetzt bin ich aber ca. 2 h offline) --Túrelio (talk) 16:27, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, ich habe die beide Bilder auch genau verglichen. Die höher aufgelöste Version hat weniger Kratzer und ist farbechter. Siehe zum Beispiel die Augenbraue des Jungen: Die niedriger aufgelöste Version hat ein Kratzer durch die Augenbraue, die höher aufgelöste Version nicht. Ein anderes Beispiel ist die Hosen des Jungen: In der höher aufgelösten Version ist die Hose farbecht, bei der niedriger aufgelöste Version tendiert die grüne Hose ein bisschen zu Weiß. Ich denke, es ist besser beide Versionen nebeneinander zu haben. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du die gelöschte Version wiederherstellen würde. --Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 19:27, 28 October 2018 (UTC).[reply]

OK. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank. --Bouwe Brouwer (talk) 20:46, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please help review these images if you can.

Thank You for all your help and have a day. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:25, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ethology Ecology and Evolution images[edit]

TURELIO, my name is Alberto Ugolini, I am the editor in chief of the scientific journal in the subject. I think you know that EEE is a serious and good scientific journal (formerly Monitore Zoologico Italiano, founded at the endo of '800. I believe that it should be sufficient to convince you that our contribution to Wiki is a serious one. About the images: all the images are submitted together with the reference of their origin. I am sure you can imagine that it is impossible to know who was the author of a picture taken in the early '900! However, in this case we added the name of the person or institution that sent to me the picture. Frankly speaking I don't see any problem of copyright. Please, let me know your opinion taking into account my argumentation. Sincerely Alberto Ugolini Prof of Zoology Editor in Chief of Ethology Ecology & Evolution Dept of Biology University of Firenze Italy +3905527575152 alberto.ugolini@unifi.it — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:760:2C05:45:2DEE:77FB:CA85:D937 (talk) 08:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Prof. Ugolini,
I'll reply at the weekend. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de FABRICE DEVILLE[edit]

Hello, This photo is from flickr.com Globetrotteur17 and The copyright owner has released this work with the correct Creative Commons license. You can check Flickr.com ... Globetrotteur17 ... Album "Dans l'oeil de mon objectif" ... Fabrice Deville Best Regard --Babin bernard (talk) 08:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I did[50] already what you should have done. :-) --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on talk page[edit]

Hello, could you please protect my talk page against vandalism by VPN IPs of blocked User Bookworm, Gutmeister and currently active Mendduets. Thanks Satoshi Kondo (talk) 15:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've semi-protected (no IP-edits) your talkpage for 3 months. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fehler in Bildern[edit]

Hallo Túrelio. Erstmal danke für die Reparatur der zwei Bilder (Quellheiligtum Sudelfelsen achteckiges Bau mit Quader aus Kalksinter .jpg und Sudelfelsbrunnen.jpg) von mir gestern. Allerdings habe ich keine Ahnung was mit den Bildern nicht stimmte. Im Moment habe ich keine Kamera und muss das Handy nutzen. Dort habe ich Open Camera drauf. Seltsamerweise scheint der Fehler nicht bei allen Bildern aufzutreten die ich aufnehme. Wenn Du mir eventuell sagen könntest was bei den Bildern nicht stimmte, kann ich die Bilder eventuell in Zukunft auch selbst prüfen und entsprechend reparieren. --Starkiller3010 (talk) 18:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Starkiller3010,
beim Upload (oder kurz danach) wird automatisch (Bot) geprüft, ob die Datei irgendwelchen Code (Daten) enthält, der nicht zu dem jeweiligen Format gehört. Falls ja, wird die Datei entsprechend zur Löschung oder Reinigung markiert. Bei JPEG-Dateien, bei denen so etwas anscheinend am häufigsten vorkommt, kann man z.B. mit der Freeware IrfanView solchen "Fremdcode" einfach verlustlos beseitigen, d.h. ohne dass das Bild nochmal komprimiert werden muss. Ich habe keine Ahnung woher dieser Code stammt, es könnte sowohl die Kamera/Handy sein also auch darin oft ohne Benutzereinfluss ablaufende Prozesse. Vielleicht findest du auf COM:Forum jemanden, der dir mehr dazu sagen kann. --Túrelio (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Vielen Dank. Werde mir mal IrfanView besorgen. Mal sehen ob ich das hinbekomme LG --Starkiller3010 (talk) 19:56, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In case you get flooded with notices[edit]

If you now get flooded with notices whenever someone uses {{PD-1996}}, delete File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a.pdf and move File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a 2.pdf in its place.

That's actually not a bad idea anyway. I had to tack on the "2" just to upload it. The new file was uploaded by my sock, so my sock will be flooded with the useless notices. See phab:T46787 for details. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ähem. Just to understand what you are saying. I shall delete the redir of File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a.pdf to File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a 2.pdf, right. And then File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a 2.pdf shall be renamed to File:U.S. Copyright Office circular 38a.pdf? --Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That is correct. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 22:46, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

QI feature[edit]

Does the QI feature at the top of the image page work? I clicked on it for :File:Pacific Feather Duster Sabellastarte sp.jpg back around 15 Oct or so but can't find it on the QI list. Atsme✍🏻📧 22:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are referring to the "QI nominator", right? Well, I didn't even know of its existence and have activated it only now in my settings. So, I have no experience with it. Better ask at COM:VP. --Túrelio (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Messages about photos without permissions that might be deleted[edit]

Dear Turelio,

I just tried sending this message earlier, but it doesn't seem to have registered, so I'm trying again. I'm a new Wikipedia editor, so I'm having trouble understanding the system.

I just now saw that I had received messages from you about photo permissions. One message concerned the page "Chiiori" and a photo of the Floorhearth. I own the copyright for this but don't know how to validate that.

The other messages concerned photos I had uploaded for a new page for "Ronnarong Khampha," (the page is still in "sandbox" stage). The people who took the photos have given verbal permission, but that's all I have. If this is a problem, please delete those photos and I'll upload others later with no copyright problems.

Also - while I was able a few minutes ago to see your messages, now I can't find them anymore. Where do I go on the Wikipedia menu (the alerts, the notices?) to see them again.

I'm sorry that I'm baffled by the Wikipedia system, since I'm just beginning.

October 28, 2018 Xinqizi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xinqizi (talk • contribs)

Hi Xinqizi,
messages about problems with or questions about your uploads to Commons will be posted to your talkpage User talk:Xinqizi. In the settings for your account on Commons, under the paragraph "notifcations", you can ask to get an automatic email when something is posted to your talkpage. Now to your uploads:
--Túrelio (talk) 11:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Turelio,

Thank you for your quick reply. Concerning the photos: 

* File:Ronnarong - photo 1.jpg , it will take time to get the permission from Pandit Watanakasivish, so for the time being, please delete this. I already deleted all the photos from the draft of the Ronnarong Khampha page I had created, which is still, I believe, in my "sandbox." But I don't know if they really were deleted. Please take care of that for me. Later, when I get the proper permissions, I'll start over with these photos.
  • File:Chiiori irori floor hearths.jpg, the photo is credited to Alex Kerr, <censored>. I took the picture and I have selectively let certain publications use it to illustrate articles about the house Chiiori in Iya Valley (which belongs to me). I never gave permission to anyone else to use this photo on Wikipedia before, so I can't imagine how it appeared in the "Irori: Jantung Rumah Tradisional Jepang" article earlier. How can I prove this photo is mine and clear it for permission on Wikipedia?
File:"Civilize" 2016.jpg, I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that I had claimed it as my "own work"; that must be one of the mistakes I made in uploading, due to lack of experience with the Wikipedia system. It really was taken by Pravich; I wasn't aware that it had been earlier uploaded to Facebook. It might take some time to get permission from Pravich for this, so please delete for the time being.

Thank you very much, Xinqizi (talk) 16:08, 28 October 2018 (UTC) (Alex Kerr)[reply]

Hi Xinqizi,
I've deleted the 1st and 3rd image listed above. I've also "censored" your realname, assuming that you want to retain your pseudonymity in the userspace. WRT your question: if you have a stable email address which is associated with your name, you may simply send an email from it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) stating that you are the author and/or rights holder of File:Chiiori irori floor hearths.jpg and want to release it under the choosen free license. The OTRS-volunteers, who treat your email confidentially, will check your email (and eventually ask for more information or not) and after some time will put a so-called OTRS ticket on the image page, and everything is fine. --Túrelio (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Turelio,

I'm still getting used to working with the Wikipedia messaging format. I wrote earlier to answer you, but twice my reply seems to have disappeared when I published the changes, so I'm trying again.

Thank you for removing the 2 photos on the Ronnarong Khampha page. I'll upload those later when I get permissions from the photographers. Also thank you for censoring my realname, as I do wish to retain pseudonymity in the userspace. I've sent an email from my personal email address, using the Wikipedia provided email template, granting permission for the use of File:Chiiori irori floor hearths.jpg.

Xinqizi (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2018 (UTC) October 29, 2018[reply]

File:Ladina Heimgartner, Direktorin RTR.jpg[edit]

Ticket #2018100210003253 has arrived for the image, so please restore it so I can close the ticket. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 23:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpg[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:MK_Shaked(1)_2.jpg

this was photo i have the copy right to it, i took this photo. the photo that ayelet shaked tweeted is a different photo look at the difference, my photo has an israeli flag in the photo the photo ayelete shaked tweeted has NO israeli flag in it as u can see its a different photo taken from a different camera see link: https://twitter.com/Ayelet__Shaked/status/993113948676345856

please restore my photo, because i own the copyrights to it thanks

just because someone tweeted a similar photo, does not mean that my photo is the same photo, look at both photos, you can clearly see, its taken from 2 different cameras.

also notice my photo was taken "Horizontal" the photo that shaked tweeted was taken "Vertical" clearly 2 different photos.

--Joecento (talk) 07:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I am not really convinced, as all the depicted persons show the same facial features/expressions in both images. Anyway, I'll undelete the image and put it in a regular deletion-request, which gives you time to defend your position and doesn't base the final decision on my personal opinion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So, here you are: Commons:Deletion requests/File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


I can show you another photo i took with my camera, they were all smiling for 1 minute so all photos taken look the same, but my photos that i took, where taken from my camera. there were a few people in the room with cameras.

you can clearly see its taken from a different angle from the photo that alyelet shaked tweeted see this link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mk_shaked3(1).jpg

where is the form to defend my photo ? --Joecento (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At the above posted link: Commons:Deletion requests/File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio when does the deletion request expire ? it's already 30 days since the photo was uploaded. --Joecento (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Joecento, as I opened this DR, it wouldn't be good to decide it by myself. However, I've now suggested keep-closure. May still take some time, as the deciding admin has to go through the whole discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chris_Tonietto.jpg[edit]

This photo was deleted and was not copyrighted, it belongs to a friend of mine (the person on the photo).

If you think it has copyright, so YOU have to PROVE it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyuuzakiL5 (talk • contribs)

Hi RyuuzakiL5,
sorry, but you are in error. You, the uploader, has to prove that his uploads are under the claimed free license.
By your above statement you have confirmed that this image is not your work, contrary to your statement at upload, when you claimed it as own work.
Today every work of art is copyrighted. Only the author/photographer or the rightsholder can release it under a free license (which does not mean it's not copyrighted).
So, if you received the image by Chris Tonietto, who has it also on her Facebook page[51], you need to ask her to send a statement of permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which she needs to confirm that she is the rights holder and that she agrees to release this image under the choosen cc-by-sa license. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 image[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review this image when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:12, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You, Turelio--Leoboudv (talk) 21:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have a good night in Germany Turelio, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Have you seen this? (not fungi, but nice dog-shots from home). --Túrelio (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Professeur Nathalie Ros.jpg; you have deleted this image I have uploaded as an illustration in my project of contribution "Nathalie Ros" because you have found it on a website (Koufa Foundation) and thought there was a copyright violation. I have taken this picture myself and I offered it to Nathalie Ros in order for her to use it in her CV; I am the autor and not Koufa Foundation that has no copyright on this image.[edit]

Professeur Nathalie Ros.jpg; you have deleted this image I have uploaded as an illustration in my project of contribution "Nathalie Ros" because you have found it on a website (Koufa Foundation) and thought there was a copyright violation. I have taken this picture myself and I offered it to Nathalie Ros in order for her to use it in her CV; I am the autor and not Koufa Foundation that has no copyright on this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagrimardière (talk • contribs) 10:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turelio, please, I am a beginner, so could you be so kind to explain me how I could proof that the picture is mine?--Lagrimardière (talk) 09:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lagrimardière: , as this image has now been deleted twice by different admins, you need to request its undeletion at COM:UDR.
How to proof your authorship: one way would be to ask Prof. Nathalie Ros to confirm it from her official email address towards permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). If that doesn't seem possible, you might upload the native image file (as it came out of your digital camera). This one can later be deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File: Peggy-Sue in Zuid-Afrika[edit]

Dear Túrelio, you marked this picture as a copyright violation referring to an instagram account. That is my instagram account and the picture is made with my camera. Therefor I'm entitled to the photograph and I'm free to use it. Thanks, P. --Psfv2018 (talk) 09:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Psfv2018,
ok. Anyway, as it has been found on Instagram, you should send an email from your Instagram-Account to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org just confirming that it is your work and you uploaded it by yourself or agreed to have it uploaded to Commons under the choosen free license. However, I should warn you that this image might be considered promotional and nominated for deletion, especially if it's not used in a Wikipedia article. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Revdel requests[edit]

Can you please revdel the intermediate versions on File:IMI Kolkata view.png as they are copyright, see e.g. https://imi-k.edu.in/index.php/result-notification. I see you warned the uploader multiple times, but they keep overwriting files and uploading copyright protected images. They were already indef blocked on enwiki for similar behaviour. --Muhandes (talk) 14:44, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio deleted. User:Santanu99 blocked for 1 week. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. There is another revision under File:IMI Kolkata view.png with the same issue. There are also revisions under File:Flagofraw.JPG, File:India-Kolkata-locator-map.PNG, File:Flag of Central Industrial Security Force.jpg which I suspect are copyvio due to sophisticated logo. Since all other uploads are copyvio I also suspect File:Kazi Nazrul University Asansol.jpg. --Muhandes (talk) 14:59, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Muhandes (talk) 17:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of your Flock of Sheep in Cologne image[edit]

First of all, I love this photo!

We are using this image for a non-profit blog guest post by Joseph Frankovic on Faith and Forests, link will be live on 3 November 2018 at 9 am EDT - https://www.dogwoodalliance.org/2018/11/the-kingdom-of-heaven-where-benefactors-and-beneficiaries-are-one/

Thank you!!! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 97.89.182.2 (talk) 18:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gymnopus foetidus (Sowerby) P.M. Kirk 953174.jpg[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review this single image when you can. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schokinag-Schokolade-Industrie[edit]

Hello Túrelio,

I see you deleted the updated logo File:Schokinag Logo.jpg that I had uploaded for it to be included in the following article. I am working on the article on behalf of the company itself, since the current article is highly outdated. The company gave permission to use the logo in the article. Of course the logo is, as any company logo, under copyright. However, Wikipedia is full of company logos and even though I did read the guidelines on this topic, I cannot understand what it takes for the logo picture to be allowed in a Wikipedia article. Could you please explain this to us? I read in some previous talks that you told someone that a confirmation of the rightsholdership needs to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? Would that solve the problem? We would really like to include the logo and I will be looking forward to receiving your indications about this.

Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards, Alesschoki (talk) 13:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)Alesschoki[reply]

Hallo Alesschoki,
du schreibst ja anscheinend auf deutsch. Also, Logos sind generell eine schwierige Angelegenheit. Auf :de (lokal) wurden sie lange irgendwie toleriert, obwohl die rechtliche Lage eher klar dagegen sprach. Bei dem nun gelöschten Logo File:Schokinag Logo.jpg könnte man diskutieren, ob das überhaupt ausreichend Schöpfungshöhe aufweist, um urheberrechtlich geschützt zu sein. Das ist meist eine schwierige Frage, wenn man kein entsprechendes Gerichtsurteil dazu hat. Du schreibst, dass du die Genehmigung der Firma für "use the logo in the article" hast. Solche "Wikipedia-only"-Genehmigungen werden auf Commons aber grundsätzlich nicht zugelassen. D.h., du brauchst eine allgemeine Freigabe unter einer freien Lizenz (siehe COM:L), die eine Firma natürlich ungern geben wird. Wir setzen auf Logo-Bilder zwar immer auch den Trademark-Baustein; ob das in einem Rechtsstreit um mißbräuchliche Nutzung ausreicht, ist aber nicht klar. Am einfachsten wäre es noch, wenn du das Logo irgendwo im Freien angebracht findest; dann kannst es nämlich via Panoramafreiheit aufnehmen und hochladen. --Túrelio (talk) 16:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:IncubusJ.jpg[edit]

Please undelete as we have now got a ticket for this image. Please ping me, Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 23:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: , ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1567 in Champagne-Ardenne[edit]

Bonjour Túrelio, pourquoi supprimer Category:1940 in Champagne-Ardenne ? C'est une catégorie qui existe pour les siècles précédents, pour les régions voisines, BOurgogne, Alsace...Lors de la création en 2016 de Grand est les régions existantes précédentes, comme Chamapgne-ardenne y sont renvoyées comme histoire du Grand est et référencées aussi par Champagne-ardenne par année. Si c'est une question de respect des régions administratives existantes à cette époque alors ce serait plutôt la Généralité de Chaalons qui était pertinentes pour l'ancien régime et les coutumes de Vitry et XXX pour le juridique. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Garitan: , sorry, but I have do write in english. I've just deleted empty categories that had been tagged for speedy deletion. There are many more of these in Category:Other speedy deletions. It seems most or all of them had been nominated by User:Olybrius. May be you should talk to him about whether his category-edits make sense or should be reverted. In the latter case, I can undelete all recently deleted categories of that type. --Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1308 in Marne[edit]

Bonjour Túrelio, pourquoi supprimer Category:1308 in Marne ? Bad name ? En 1308 la Marne n'est qu'un fleuve, pas une région. C'est une catégorie qui existe pour les siècles précédents, pour les régions voisines, BOurgogne, Alsace...Lors de la création en 2016 de Grand est les régions existantes précédentes, comme Champagne-ardenne y sont renvoyées comme histoire du Grand est et référencées aussi par Champagne-ardenne par année. Si c'est une question de respect des régions administratives existantes à cette époque alors ce serait plutôt la Généralité de Chaalons qui était pertinentes pour l'ancien régime et les coutumes de Vitry et Reims pour le juridique. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Túrelio, pourquoi modifier Category:1435 in Reims ? Bad name ? En 1435 la Marne n'est qu'un fleuve, pas une région. C'est une catégorie qui existe pour les siècles précédents, pour les régions voisines comme Alsace by year le respect de 1435 in Alsace existe, alors ?...Lors de la création en 2016 de Grand est les régions existantes précédentes, comme Champagne-ardenne y sont renvoyées comme histoire du Grand est et référencées aussi par Champagne-ardenne par année. Si c'est une question de respect des régions administratives existantes à cette époque alors ce serait plutôt la Généralité de Chaalons qui était pertinentes pour l'ancien régime et les coutumes de Vitry et Reims pour le juridique. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 14:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Valentina Lombardo.png[edit]

Another undelete request. Ticket#2018110610004074 has been submitted. Please ping me when done. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: , ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 10:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Jean-Marc Martel (Professeur).[edit]

Hello Túrelio,

Yesterday, you removed the image Jeanmarcmartel.jpg from the page i am currently developping. I actually have an email sent by the author of that picture authorizing it's edition on Wiki. This man is Marc Robitaille, a professionnal photographer, actually retired. So, I don't know how I could resubmit that picture in accordance with the rules. Michel Dubois, mcmichel, duboismic@videotron.ca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcmichel (talk • contribs) 19:43, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mcmichel,
has the photographer Marc Robitaille put the image under a free license or just permitted to use it on Wikipedia? The latter is not accepted. It needs to be released under a free license, see COM:L. If he has done that, please forward (or ask him to send it directly) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amal Fathy.jpg[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Could you please undo the deleting action of Amal Fathy.jpg on Amal Fathy page. My apology for not having reacted on time. This photo is a property of her family that I am editing this page on their behalf: her husband Mohamed Lotfy.

Thank you and my best regards,

Egyptian Libertarian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Egyptian Libertarian (talk • contribs) 15:06, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Athanasio Celia - Photo[edit]

Cher Turelio, je suis le propriétaire légitime des droits d'auteur de cette photo... s'il vous plaît ajouter la photo à nouveau.(Copyright © 2006-2018 by ArtSlant, Inc. All images and content remain the © of their rightful owners.)... "All images and content remain the 'copyright' of their rightful owners". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyriaki Verrou (talk • contribs) 01:33, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kyriaki Verrou: , sorry, I need to reply in english. Do I understand you correctly, that you shot the original photo File:A. Celia & Verticalismus.jpg by yourself? If yes, there is still the problem, that the photo shows (in its middle[52]) a copyrighted artwork of a living artist. So, you need to provide to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org a statement of permission by Athanasio Celia that he agrees that you put your photo showing his work of art under a free license that allows other to use it. --Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

-- Lieber Turelio (ich gehe davon aus dass Sie ein Herr sind), ich habe gelesen dass Ihre Muttersprache Deutsch ist, also fühle ich mich frei Ihnen auf Deutsch zu antworten... Ja, das Foto habe ich selbst mit meiner eigenen Kamera aufgenommen, als langjährige Mitarbeiterin von Herrn Celia. Ich füge Ihnen durch den folgenden veröffentlichen Link ( https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1hhlv5Z3qZ9UjM-AjHBG4WJ1-tf-HRst9?usp=sharing ) auch die Erlaubnis von Athanasio Celia bei, damit das bestimmte Foto frei genutzt werden darf. Ich hoffe Sie fügen dieses den biografischen Daten bei. Mit Bestem Dank im Voraus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyriaki Verrou (talk • contribs) 17:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Kyriaki,
ich habe die o.g. Erlaubnis von Herrn Celia an die OTRS-Abteilung weitergeleitet, die sich um Genehmigungen kümmert. Die Arbeit wird auch dort ausschließlich von Freiwilligen gemacht, weshalb es etwas dauern kann. Das Foto habe ich wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo @Kyriaki Verrou:
ich habe soeben eine erste Antwort von OTRS erhalten, in der sie die Genehmigung leider als unzureichend bewerten. Am besten machst du eine neue, unter Benutzug folgender Vorlage Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber) und mit Bezug auf die Ticket# 2018111210010144 und schickst sie an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org. Herr Celia muss eigentlich nur bestätigen, dass er damit einverstanden ist, dass dein Foto von ihm mit seinen Gemälden im Hintergrund unter der von dir gewählten freien Lizenz verbreitet werden darf. --Túrelio (talk) 11:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguesa de Desportos[edit]

Hi, I uploaded a picture called "Escudo da Portuguesa de Desportos" which was deleted. The picture refers to a brazilian football club logo, so I think that should be considered a public image. I am going to upload it again and embed it into the club page at Wikipedia, since the old logo, which is defuncted since 2014, is still there and needs to be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio J. Evangelista (talk • contribs) 13:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fabio J. Evangelista,
"public" has no relevance with regard to copyright. The page, from wich you took this logo, is not under a free license.[53] How old is this logo? --Túrelio (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply Turélio, this logo is from 1994 and was readopted in 2014. I found another source, this time from the oficial club site [54]. Can I upload it? Is there something I need to write in the upload form? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio J. Evangelista (talk • contribs) 13:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I fear, no. This site clearly states "Associação Portuguesa de Desportos © 2018 – Todos os direitos reservado". So, the only possibility seems to be, that you ask them directly for a permission. See here for a template. Important: the permission has to be avlid for everybody, not only for Wikipedia. --Túrelio (talk) 14:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Turélio, I looked for the old image page in Commons [55] and it refers to the same link I posted before [56]. Since the logo was updated, the link refers to a different picture now. The following notes were added to the picture page:

"This image, or text, is presented, is made only of simple geometric shapes or text. Are not limited to the originality necessary for the protection of rights. It must be open to restrictive restrictions. See WP: PD # PD-textlogo fonts or discussion for more information."

"This image of simple geometry is ineligible in copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and does not contain any original authorship."

"This work contains materials in which you may be subject to trademark laws in one or more jurisdictions. Before using this content, please make sure that you have the rights to use it under the circumstances that you intend to use. You are solely responsible for ensuring that no rights in this trademark are disregarded. See our general warning. The use of this trademark does not indicate the holder's endorsement by Wikimedia Commons or the Wikimedia Foundation, nor vice versa."

Can I upload the new logo adding the same notes in the upload form? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio J. Evangelista (talk • contribs) 14:28, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
IMO not, as the new logo looks less conventional to me than the old one File:Portuguesa de Desportos.png. However, guessing whether something shows enough creativity to be copyrightable, i.e. above the threshold of originality, is often a judgement call. If you simply upload it instead of asking the owner for a permission, you are risking that someone else will nominate it for deletion. So, it's your decision. The {{Trademark}} should always be added to logo uploads, but it doesn't refer to the copyright-question. --Túrelio (talk) 14:42, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno Henrique SEP[edit]

Baixei a foto diretamente do Site da Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras, e creditei o autor como Cesar Greco, conforme consta no site, coloquei o link da foto, mas não vi que tinha no Flick, quanto as outras fotos da pagina da cidade de Antonio Carlos SC, são fotos de dominio publico, distriubuidads em calendarios, apenas foram escaneadas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulitharlis (talk • contribs) 14:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Turelio, I downloaded the image of Bruno Henrique directly from the site of the Sociedade Esportiva Palmeiras, and I credited the author as Cesar Greco, Why this is a violation of rights, if it is on the site and can be downloaded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulitharlis (talk • contribs) 15:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the mere fact that an image can be found/seen on a website, has no meaning for its copyright. The link which you provided for File:Bruno Henrique SEP.jpg leads actually to the Flickr page https://www.flickr.com/photos/114709658@N06/31068751408, where the image is labeled as "All rights reserved". I do not say/think that you did intentionally link to a copyrighted image. However, you claimed that this image is without copyright (CC-0). For images, which are not truly your own work, you cannot do this if you are not absolutely sure. --Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duplikate[edit]

Hallo Túrelio,
kannst Du mir bitte bei folgenden Fragen helfen:
Gibt es einen Bot, der Duplikate findet?
Kann man ganze Kategorien mit Duplikaten löschen (z.B. hier: Category:Wild Flowers - Pratt (duplicates) oder ist nur der Weg über Einzelbilder mit "dupe" möglich?
Dank und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 16:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Orchi,
also, ich weiß zwar vom duplicate detector, der zielt aber auf Textvergleich. Sonst ist mir zumindest kein Dupe-Finder bekannt. Frag vielleicht mal auf dem Forum oder der VP.
Das gilt analog für Datei-Mengen in einer Kategorie. Das Massen-Löschtool setzt allein beim Hochlader an, d.h. es kann massenweise Dateien eines Hochladers löschen, aber nicht Dateien, die nur eine Kategorie als Gemeinsamkeit haben. --Túrelio (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
...vielen Dank für Deine schnelle Antwort. Dann wird man wohl noch eine zeitlang mit den endlosen Doppel- und Mehrfachhochladungen von Automaten zurecht kommen müssen. :- ( Orchi (talk) 17:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Novo Logo CCR[edit]

Olá Turélio,

Somos da empresa de marketing que cuida da conta do Grupo CCR.

Nos solicitaram a troca do logo que se encontra nessa página https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grupo_CCR pois na busca via Google é uma das primeiras que aparece.

A empresa sofreu uma alteração no seu logo, pequena, mas precisa ser alterada. Caso necessite confirmar essa alteração verá o mesmo em uso aqui... http://www.grupoccr.com.br/

Fiz a inclusao do novo logo no dia 12/10/2018 e inicialmente pareceu que um bot tinha feito a retirada por infringir direitos de marca, mas procurando melhor verifiquei que você excluiu o mesmo (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_CCR.jpg).

Caso não possa reverter isso para que possamos trocar por favor nos oriente a melhor forma de fazer essa alteração.

Muito obrigado

Junior Heads Proapganda — Preceding unsigned comment added by MKTCCR (talk • contribs) 17:56, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MKTCCR,
I reply in english as I don't talk portuguese.
The problem with File:Logo CCR.jpg was that you hadn't added any license template and that the source says "© COPYRIGHT 2018 - CCR - GRUPO - TODOS OS DIREITOS RESERVADOS."
So, you need to provide a statement of permission from Grupo CCR to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which they need to state that they are either the creator or the rightsholder of that logo and that they give permission to have it uploaded to Commons under a free license, such as cc-by-sa-4.0 . --Túrelio (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these 3 images when you can.

Thank You for your time, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waltzing Tilda - Theatrical release poster.jpg[edit]

Hey, I'm dealing with Ticket#2018111310012122 regarding the mentioned file. Can you undelete it so that I can address the request? Regards. --Mhhossein talk 12:46, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Mhhossein: , ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:58, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 16:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Cohen Scali photo[edit]

Dear Túrelio,

Two days ago you deleted the picture Sarah_Cohen-Scali.jpg, uploaded with the account 3Cpasteur because of a copywright violation. Thank you for taking care, but in this case the accusation is wrong. I am the owner of the picture and I uploaded it for free use. I took the picture of a public people, in a public place, my school as Sarah Cohen-Scali was talking to my pupils. She knew I was taking pictures, and the first occurrence of this picture was on our school website at this address : http://college.montbard.free.fr/2013/Cohen-scali.html. Other occurrences are copies of my work.

Thanks

Christine Sobota Collège Louis-Pasteur 21506 Montbard France — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3Cpasteur (talk • contribs) 17:14, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @3Cpasteur: ,
ok, this seems credible to me. However, you should not simply have re-uploaded this image, as it had been deleted as (assumed) copyvio. The correct way would have been to file the image at Commons:Undeletion requests. (Just for the next time this happens.) In case my admin-colleague, who had tagged this image as suspected copyvio, asks you about the re-upload, you may direct him to this discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 19:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I saw that you deleted some of the images of which I have requested the deletion with criterion G7. I want to thank you very much for your work and also to apologise to have give you a lost of time because of my big mistake in uploading images from Flickr. Greetings, --Civitas13 (talk) 09:23, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

request for undelete file[edit]

Dear Túrelio, you have deleted one of my file on commons can you tell me why you delete it ? and Have you contact me before delete it ? all images taken by me from my camera and i own the copyrights of it so please recover the files and let me know when it will be done. thank you and appreciate it hope next time before you delete anyone image you sshould contact them wait for them to response and this way we can contribute all good work and make community more friendly and stay.

Thank youTris T7 08:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tris T7 (talk • contribs)

Hi @Tris T7: ,
as I see from your talkpage, you had been notified about the speedy-deletion request for File:King Power Group กลุ่มบริษัท คิง เพาเวอร์ Photographed by Trisorn Triboon 03.jpg. Speedy-deletion requests do not require to wait for feedback from the uploader. Anyway, the problem was not that anybody doubted that you shot the photo by yourself. The copyright problem consists in that you made a photo of a copyrighted work, i.e. a derivative. Except in cases that fall under the local freedom-of-panorama exception, this requires a permission from the original copyright-holder. You will find a practical instruction at COM:CB. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So Meaning If i have got permission in writing from Walt Disney Thailand i would allow to upload them ? One thing i do not understand as Thai Law we allow to use them because Event for public especially i am press for the events that mean they allow me to contribution it ? what about if i change license as this file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apple_Power_Macintosh_G5_Late_2005_02.jpg ? will it be ok ? hope you can explain for me to understand about it.. thank you in advance. Tris T7 10:20, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

There are 2 important principles to obey here:
1) Wikipedia and Wikimedia-Commons are NOT "press". So, laws "for press/media" do not apply. In addition, our licensing policy COM:L requires that all uploads to Commons can legally be used by everybody, who complies with the license terms, for any kind of use, including commercial use. The use of typical "press photos" is usually restricted to reporting about the related item or event and are thereby not allowed on Commons/Wikipedia.
2) Only the copyright owner/holder can give a license/permission. So, you need to ask the legal department of Walt Disney Thailand to give you the permission to release your own photo, showing their content, under the choosen free license, which has to be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Important: do not ask a "permission for Wikipedia", we will not accept this. --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images review[edit]

Dear Turelio,

If you have time, please check if you can review these 2 images please?

Regarding the second Bebe image, youtube blocks me from viewing it in Canada. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done; never done this before. --Túrelio (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


File Deletion: DWCSJlogo.png[edit]

Hi! I notice you deleted my file uploaded to Wikimedia Commons with filename: DWCSJlogo.png on ground of licensing I was just wondering, what license tag should I use? I found the logo at http://dwcsj.edu.ph/pages/about/dwcsj_seal.php I tried to contact the website administrators regarding copyright owner of the image, but no response yet. I was wondering if I could use the tag {{Fairuse}} or {{Non-free logo}} since the image is in lower resolution in just under 150px (approx)? Can I also use the tag {{PD-Philippines}}? I am new to licensing policies so any info would be appreciated. Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonrivers (talk • contribs) 10:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Moonrivers: , your upload came from the website http://dwcsj.edu.ph, which is clearly labeled as "Copyright © 2018 Divine Word College of San Jose. All Rights Reserved". So, if we consider the seal/logo as copyrightable, you need a permission from its creator or copyright-holder. Fair-use is not an option, as Commons does/cannot allow fair-use material. Also, I doubt that PD-Philippines is applicable here. --Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Túrelio: thanks for this info! If I mention the full name of the copyright owner on source or author section then use copyright tag Creative Commons Attribution 2.0, would it be possible to reconsider deletion of the file? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonrivers (talk • contribs) 17:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. The copyright-holder needs to release the work under a free license. This has to be credibly proven by a statement from the author either to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org) or on a website under his/her control. --Túrelio (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Benutzername "klandrea"[edit]

Hallo Túrelio,

danke für Dein ausführliches Feedback zu den gelöschten Bildern. Macht es demnach Sinn meinen Nickname "klandrea" in "Klaus Hellmerich" umzuändern, oder langt diese Bestätigungsmail aus (in der Wikipedia-Hilfe wird ja explizit genannt, dass man entweder den Nickname in einen Realnamen oder umgekehrt, ändern kann)? Muss ich die Bilder (nach meiner Bestätigungsmail) nochmals hochladen oder werden diese dann durch einen Kollegen wieder sichtbar gemacht?

Danke für die "Nachhilfe" und viele Grüße :-)

Klaus Hellmerich

Klandrea (talk) 07:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Klandrea: ,
nein, du musst das nicht ändern und du musst die Identität auch nicht öffentlich darlegen oder erklären. Es reicht, diese gegenüber OTRS zu bestätigen. Allerdings wäre es hilfreich, wenn du dir überlegst, ob du hier nur eigene Fotos hochladen willst oder auch fremde (unter freier Lizenz versteht sich). Im ersteren Fall wäre es gut, wenn du das in deiner Bestätigungsmail an OTRS so schreibst, damit nach zukünftigen Uploads der OTRS-Prozess nicht wieder neu angestoßen werden muss. Die gelöschten Bilder musst du nicht neu hochladen. Ich kann sie mit wenigen Klicks ent-löschen, sobald ich von OTRS ein Zeichen bekommen. --Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Latin lambda[edit]

Hi, Túrelio! Was there a prior discussion about this? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning, don't think so. This cat had been created and SD-requested the same day by User:1234qwer1234qwer4. I can recreate it, if required. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Must be a trick there, then. I recategorized this users’ (mostly fanciful) latin lambda images a few months ago, creating categories that cover the confusion between "ʎ" and "ƛ" (and "λ", of course) that included the word "misdrawn". This user made some changes later but I had to postpone further analysis and discussion for a leter time because I was busy with other stuff. The matter seemed to be forgotten (by both sides, I confess), but now this. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

4 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANEFO images duplicates[edit]

~~I geuss you was not aware but when you redirect a file that was uploaded from pkiwiki like this one File:PikiWiki Israel 51557 a street in the south of tel aviv.jpg And you change the name to something else like File:Jaffa Een aanTel Aviv grenzende straat met winkels en winkelend publiek, Bestanddeelnr 255-1304.jpg The file is lost to pikiwiki And you get an empty file https://www.pikiwiki.org.il/gallery/?sort=&s=&method=exact&tags=&topic=&image-id=51557&from-year=&to-year=&author=&contributor=&organization= — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaula (talk • contribs) 09:58, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shaula,
quite a number of images, which had previously been uploaded from PikiWiki, were tagged as duplicates (not by me), as a batch of images from the Dutch ANEFO collection, sometimes in higher resolution, had been uploaded. When processed as a duplicate, a redirect from the now deleted image to the remaining one is created, so that neither internally nor externally a 404 should result when the old filename is called. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~ where can I find all the knesset pictures that you removed?????????????

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaula (talk • contribs) 10:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read my above coment?
You could just follow the redirect. Go to File:Jaffa Een aanTel Aviv grenzende straat met winkels en winkelend publiek, Bestanddeelnr 255-1304.jpg, scroll to the bottom of the page, where you see in the last line the redirect to File:PikiWiki Israel 51557 a street in the south of tel aviv.jpg.
If this is a systematic problem, I would recommend you to talk to User:Vysotsky, who identifies all duplicates of the ANEFO images and tags them for duplicate-deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both. Túrelio is correct. To give an example: this file now includes the data of the PikiWiki image, incl. English and Hebrew description, and PikiWiki reference and number. I chose this method because the ANEFO updates contain more and better information, such as a link to the original file at the Dutch National Archives, current license and the correct name of the photographer. Vysotsky (talk) 10:48, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I now see the problem, and will stop "duplicating" the PikiWiki files until I have found a solution for the linking problem. I will fix the old cases. Vysotsky (talk) 13:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. That would be great. --Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion continued at talk page of User:Shaula. Vysotsky (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Bella y las Bestias - Isabela sufre un atentado que casi la mata.webm[edit]

The video that you deleted has a Creative Commons Attribution License (allowed reuse). So what is the reason to erase it?--Philip J Fry (talk) 10:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Philip J Fry: seems you are correct. I've restored the image. --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are deleting content without realizing the templates. An IP is placing massive templates to destroy for annoying. For example, File:Y mañana será otro día.png, File:LaMamádel10.png ‎, File:Sharon la Hechicera.png, File:Laqueridadelcentauro.png and more. Then, you should see in detail the templates of those files that you deleted. Or at least open a delete query before deleting files massively.--Philip J Fry (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but here you are wrong. I considered all these logos and found them clearly not to be mere text logos, as opposed to File:La reina del flow logotipo.png for example. I can put them in a regular DR, but I have no doubt about the outcome. --Túrelio (talk) 11:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've edited them so they look simpler.--Philip J Fry (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - fehl.Lizenz Luftbild Steinberghaff[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, vielen Dank für Hinweis auf fehlenden Lizenzbaustein - Anm.; bin ganz im Norden gelandet. Dir frohes Schaffen, Moin und Gruß Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 09:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

9 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images if you can.

Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS ticket for File:Leslie Jackson Chihuly Boathouse 10-15-2018.jpg[edit]

Please restore this file because it now has Ticket#2018112110010707. BTW, I responded to your post on my talk page. Ww2censor (talk) 11:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:56, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gymnopus subsulphureus (Peck) Murrill 336894.jpg[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review this single image when you can. Thank You for your time. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) ✓ Done C(_) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:56, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr washing by User:Susangrigg1[edit]

Many of these uploads https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Susangrigg1 are sourced from https://www.flickr.com/photos/140640840@N07/ when the rights are obviously invalid. I find some for Lorin Morgan-Richards here https://www.facebook.com/aravenabovepress/photos?lst=100005131140990%3A1454485726%3A1543448628&source_ref=pb_friends_tl on Facebook. I just don't have the time to hunt them all down. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Thiotrix,

If you have 1 minute, please kindly review these images. They are of a species that Commons has no images of.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Crying[edit]

How did you delete my photo? I'm crying right now. 14.232.48.206 09:43, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As an IP you cannot upload anything to Commons; so, I cannot have deleted it. Otherwise, log-in and state clearly about what you are talking. --Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of image taken from a scientific journal with proper citation[edit]

Hi Turelio,

You recently deleted an image from a wikipage that I am editing, citing that it was missing a license. However, considering that it is an image of chemical structures of a figure from a paper, I am under the impression that there are no potential copyright violations here, particularly since I provided the proper citation for its use. If you could clarify for me what the issue is here that would be much appreciated!

Best,

Jenglish18 (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2018 (UTC) Justin[reply]

(talk page stalker) Crediting the source and authors is not sufficient. Any upload here must either be out of copyright due to old age or being much too simple, or it needs to have a free licence from the original authors. This article in the Journal of Clinical Investigation does not seem to come with free licence, so you're not allowed to republish its content. De728631 (talk) 23:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 image[edit]

Dear Thiotrix, Please review this single image when you can.

Thank You for your time. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:37, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. BTW: Have you translated my Quenya username into Gaulish language? --Túrelio (talk) 07:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:CWSF Best Project (Downscaled).jpg[edit]

Hi, can you figure out what happened with this deletion request? It's not in the article history any more... Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 22:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Randykitty,
the nominated one was duplicate-processed (aka deleted) to the current higher-resolution version, which will also be deleted due to copyvio-suspicion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use image of File:MotherTeresa_090.jpg in a video empowering womens voices for internet usage[edit]

Hi Túrelio,

I would love to use your image of Mother Teresa in a video to empower women's voices for web and social media usage.

Please let me know if this is okay?

Kind regards, Ceri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceriannejones (talk • contribs) 23:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceri,
sure. Feel free to do so. Just try to credit me in the video. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 image[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review this image when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uncategorized images of temples was emptied out by pushing everything back into the main category[edit]

The category had a template {{empty category}}. It was also quite full. User:Tm came along and pushed all the media back into the main Category:Temples. He also reverted my re-addition of {{empty category}}. There are many such "uncategorized" categories in Wikimedia Commons. User:Tm seems to have a problem with it without ever telling anyone why, after having been asked about it several times. I would like this category to be undeleted and the media restored.

Reasons why to have "uncategorized images of...." categories
The reasons why I suggest having these "uncategorized images of...." categories is because: 1. Having main categories that are "clean" encourages many uploaders to actually categorise their uploads into more correct categories themselves instead of just piling them onto the multitudes that are already there, 2. Uncategorized images can now be found via the category system so people who enjoy categorizing media can find them easier, 3. Having vast amounts of uncategorized media in main categories can bring problems for computers that are slow or for people who have slow internetbconnections, 4. Having many uncategorised images in the main category can be confusing for new users who try to search for media via the category system, 5. Uploaders who upload media to main categories tend to to be new and often, the categories that they place their media in tend to often be incorrect (as in needing much further categorisation). - Takeaway (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Takeaway: Then categorize them properly, instead of burying away the problem and if you identify what or where the image depicts, move them to unidentified categories, instead of creating a parallel category, just to "show" and clean the main room, but bury the "garbage" to a backroom. Tm (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I categorise many images as my stats will show. I have hardly ever had any problems with my categorisations unlike User:Tm as his talk page shows, and also counting the numerous times people complained about him on the Admin boards. - Takeaway (talk) 20:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If someone seems highly concerned about getting a high edit count, it would be user:Tm. My style is quite different and much slower because I actually care about (most) of the media that I categorise and want to do them justice. - Takeaway (talk) 21:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just to recap what this is actually all about: I am asking to have Category:Uncategorized images of ...., and not have them deleted whenever user:Tm comes around. They do that by either pushing the media back to the main category, or, as they often did, push them into "unidentified images of..." category, or they go on a frenzied categorising spree as they are doing now with Category:Uncategorized images of Bangkok to empty it out as quickly as possible and request it to be deleted just to prove the point . - Takeaway (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) You might want to make this a wider discussion. I have been part of several discussions where the consensus was to leave uncategorized or unidentified things in a main category. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntof6: Where would be the best place to start a discussion on this subject? At the Village Pump? - Takeaway (talk) 23:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
First, I'd decide what categories you want to include: uncategorized, unidentified, or both. If both, I'd use the Village pump. If only one, I'd use the highest-level category for that (maybe Category:Media needing categories by subject or Category:Unidentified subjects) but publicize it at the Village pump. --Auntof6 (talk) 01:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Takeaway, I have no problem to restore needed categories. But, I agree with the users here that more general questions should be discussed at VP. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both. I will suggest keeping both categories as they are each very different (at least they are for me): "uncategorized" for those needing further categorization, and "unidentified" for those files that can not be identified from the available information, thus hoping for someone who just knows what it is. Regards, - Takeaway (talk) 09:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tm: , please stop emptying out these "uncategorized" categories until after the discussion at VP which I will start soon. - Takeaway (talk) 09:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket#2018120110004509[edit]

Please restore as we now have a permission on this ticket. Ww2censor (talk) 23:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ww2censor: , as I have no access to OTRS, what file are you refering to? --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry I assumed, without checking your rights, that you were an OTRS agent too. Here is the image link: File:Rendering Supernova Remnant Cassiopeia A into Virtual Reality.jpg Ww2censor (talk) 11:21, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Londa Toloraia.jpg[edit]

I'm dealing with ticket#2018120310004845 regarding the file you've deleted recently. Can you restore it so that I can address if the ticket is valid? Thanks.--Mhhossein talk 11:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 16:56, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore[edit]

We now have Ticket#2018120410009741 for File:CNHOLMBERG FD.jpg. Please restore so I can close this up and ping me when done. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, this is the same person but the wrong photo, so please delete again. Ww2censor (talk) 23:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aldo BUSI.jpg[edit]

Hello,

Thank you, I did not see the OTRS tag...

Br,

--AntonierCH (d) 20:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raju Bhavsar photo[edit]

Hi why you have deleted the picture ...he is my uncle and I have to upload the picture as I am creating his Wikipedia ,I have the full right to add that Vishalttplayer (talk) 10:43, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You had the answer already on your talkpage. You claimed this image to be your own work from October 2017. However, Maharash Times published it already in April 2017. --Túrelio (talk) 19:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright objections: Bob Jones[edit]

Hi, Turelio

I noticed you just flagged a couple of photos I uploaded on the page about Bob Jones. I can see you regarding the first photo. The photo of the book is one I took myself, but the photo in the photo is not and I understand how there could be some confusion.

Regarding the second photo, I don't think it's quite right to say that it's a book cover. Really, the photo is of a book. All books have covers and, unless it's going to be impermissible to upload photos of books at all, photos of books will necessarily show their covers. In my opinion, a photo of a book is materially different to an electronic file of the cover itself.

Please let me know what you think.

Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by MurdochNewman (talk • contribs) 23:22, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed generally impermissible to upload photos of books at all, unless you own the license to the book itself (or the book is so old as for its license to have expired). It's the same as for any creative work. DMacks (talk) 05:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clitocybula azurea Singer 577334.jpg & File:Cortinarius sphaerosporus Peck 962213.jpg[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these 2 images when you can. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files from Brazilian Army[edit]

Good morning, Túrelio! Please, wait some time before deleting the files that were uploaded by me and marked as copyright violation by Patrick Rogel. I'm talking with the site owner to prove that they are in public domain, acording to Licensing Creative Commons CC-Zero (This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.)

Thank you very much! Luiz265 (talk) 13:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ok. --Túrelio (talk) 13:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The site of the 2nd Field Artillery Group specified that the photos of its former commanders are in public domain, as you can see here, in the top of the page: http://www.2gacl.eb.mil.br/index.php/comando/ex-comandantes

I would thank you, if you can remove the deletion tag of the files: File:SáFreire1.jpg; File:FranciscoAlbuquerque1.jpg; File:JoãoSoares1.jpg; File:EdisonPinto1.jpg; File:PauloAndrade1.jpg; File:GilbertoTeixeira1.jpg; File:LuizGonzaga1.jpg; File:GenMinati.jpg; File:GenBeraldo.jpg; File:CarlosVicente1.jpg; File:FernandoSantos1.jpg; File:Castilho1.jpg; File:CarlosSaú1.jpg; File:Freibergue1.jpg; File:BartholomeuFernandes1.jpg; File:MaturanaLopes1.jpg; File:ErbLeal1.jpg.

Best regards! Luiz265 (talk) 19:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. However, you need to add the true photo-date (at least the year) to the description, not the date of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your help. I'm putting the dates now! Luiz265 (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki commons pictures .[edit]

hi Turelio ,

I saw all my pictures were nog approved , these are in fact all my pictures and ik took them from my facebook page https://www.facebook.com/urbain.servranckx.5 .

Some of them were made smaller so they fitted in better , I put several original pictures on my Wiki Common page . They were alle made by my mother and father and I have negatives and positives from the elder pictures .

Some of them were made with my smartphone , the pic with the English police officers was made with my smartphone . I think I'm not so special a professional woul'd take pictures of me . I took him from my FB and put him on my computer , like all the others .

I not only took my pictures with me on it because I'm narcisstic but also so I could prove they're mine and no money or rights can be involved . Because I was not that special as racer nor person .

Please reconsider , can you give me some advice ?

I contributed several pages and pieces on pages not with my account but some without logging in at first .

greetz Ivo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivo Van Damme (talk • contribs) 19:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ivo,
as I can reply in detail only tomorrow, I've changed the speedy-tag to a no-perm tag to give more time for "clean-up". --Túrelio (talk) 20:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Валентин Коновалов.jpg[edit]

Hello! Sorry, my English isn't so good, but I'll try say. Yesterday you deleted this file. You say: "Copyright violation: https://regnum.ru/news/2493714.html !". But regnum.ru refer to the kirill fursov. Kirill fursov published the file on the Wikimedia Commons. He used Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). In this connection, file can be restored. --Ремеш (talk) 11:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are correct. Undeleted. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Ремеш (talk) 21:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted pictures for copyright violation[edit]

Hi @Túrelio. I´ve seen that you have recently deleted this image. I think that there is a mistake because even though the image is present on google it was first published on wikimedia commons by the author Teresa Marenzi that has granted the permission for everyone to copy , reuse and modify it .If I am correct , Can you please restore the file ? Many thanks --Doratig --(talk) 15:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Doratig: as the account Teresa.marenzi (talk · contribs) had only 1 upload, how sure can we be that the true Teresa Marenzi is really behind it? Anyway, now I've emailed Mrs. Marenzi at her business address. --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Túrelio, That´s good . You are right we can never be sure . Let´s see what she says .Best --Doratig (talk) 16:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are lucky. She's replied already and I've restored. --Túrelio (talk) 17:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Túrelio. That´s great . Thanks for double checking . Best --Doratig (talk) 17:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restore another one[edit]

We now have a ticket for File:EVP of Frontier Communications, Mark Nielsen.jpg, so please restore, then please ping me. Thanks in advance. Ww2censor (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: , ✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Micro-Cap circuits[edit]

I made an error in my misunderstanding of what, appears to me, to be clever strategy on the part of @Andy Dingley: for ....

The one claim which cannot be a criticism, "eponymous", has been made into a criticism just by making it a claim. Yet, items are supposed to fit inside of categories which are eponymous with themselves! And now, by default, because I let it pass (through a clumsy misunderstanding on my part), the one category, Category:Micro-Cap circuits, which does belong to my items (without equivocation), no longer exists.

Please overlook my error and re-establish Category:Micro-Cap circuits.Vinyasi (talk) 05:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.Vinyasi (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Institute1.jpg[edit]

копиво с этого сайта (фото времён начала 20 века) https://pastvu.com/p/236650 Панн (talk) 07:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my personal work for copyright violation[edit]

Hello Túrelio,

I noticed that my file "File:المخطط_العمراني_لقصر_آيت_بن_حدو.jpg " has been deleted for copyright violation : https://ar.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D9%82%D8%B5%D8%A8%D8%A9_%D8%A3%D9%8A%D8%AA_%D8%A8%D9%86_%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%88&action=history

However, it is my own work ( the drawing is mine ).

Could you undelete it please.

Thank you,

Have a good day ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nassima Chahboun (talk • contribs) 09:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nassima: ,
problem is that you used a professional map. I assume that the colored lines/arrows and the text is yours. You need to provide a source for the map and evidence that is under a free license or in the public domain. --Túrelio (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these images when you can.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request help with copyright of image[edit]

Hello there thanks for deleting that arguably non commons image.

The image when posted here https://www.flickr.com/photos/rmatthendrick/16074881544 is a little more clearly under commons, in my opinion. This is a "pro" flickr user, it was used by sciencewa.net.au and they have not allowed derivatives, it has stood that way for a number of years. Do you agree and if not how do we go about getting the evidence? E.3 (talk) 20:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi E3, regrettably the Flickr user put it under Commons-noncompliante CC-ND license.
But apart from this practical problem, there is a general problem here: the right portion of the Flickr image is identical to the version en:File:The_Dress_(viral_phenomenon).png, which is under fair-use on :en and is credited to a "Cecilia Bleasdale", which suggest that she may be the original photographer. As long as we don't know know under what circumstances the Flickr image has been shot, we have to assume, it's just a copy of the original image and thereby likely copvvio. Of course, you may ask the Flickr user for an explaination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two Mayors of Nizhny Novgorod Oleg Sorokin and Aleksandr Kondrashov congratulate citizens on The Day of the city (2011).jpg[edit]

удали неверный редирект!!!! Панн (talk) 08:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So, File:Two Mayors of Nizhny Novgorod Oleg Sorokin and Oleg Kondrashov congratulate citizens on The Day of the city (2011).jpg shall remain and File:Two Mayors of Nizhny Novgorod Oleg Sorokin and Aleksandr Kondrashov congratulate citizens on The Day of the city (2011).jpg shall go, right? --Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Александр Кондрашов это ошибка Панн (talk) 09:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unsigned[edit]

Thank you for using it, but please ensure there is a timestamp.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

Please review these 2 images if you can. Commons does not have this species at all.

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DR[edit]

Hi Túrelio,

Could you please take time from your schedule and close the DR of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Postal Stamp on Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and the Constitution of India (2015).jpg as you have already deleted and redirected the duplicate image. :) Thanking you. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:54, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2 images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

This is my final request for 2018. Please review these 2 images if you have the time.

Secondly, May I wish you and your family a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2019, Túrelio! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

перенаправление и дублирующий файл[edit]

удали пожалуйста это некорректное перенаправление!!! Панн (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGLU.jpg также вот этот файл, так как он дублирует существующий Панн (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grüße[edit]

Guten Tag Túrelio,
ich wünsche Dir festliche Feiertage und für das Jahr 2019 alles erdenklich Gute.
Möge das neue Jahr uns allen ein friedliches Miteinander bringen, hier und überall.
Vielen Dank für Deine stets hilfreiche Unterstützung bei Fragen und Lösungen.
Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 17:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Manisha Koirala image deletion[edit]

Hi, you recently deleted an image uploaded by me (File:Manisha Koirala promoting Sanju.jpg), but it was covered by this OTRS ticket. Also used at File:Yuvan Shankar Raja exclusive HQ Photos Silverscreen.jpg, File:Thambi Ramaiah Exclusive Photos for Silverscreen.jpg and possibly others. Please look into it? DeluxeVegan (talk) 08:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DeluxeVegan, but why wasn't there any hint to a permission? As I am not an OTRS volunteer, I can't look into the ticket. --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I tried entering the number, but was stopped from submitting the edit since I wasn't having the required permission. What do you suggest be done next? Can the image possibly be restored? DeluxeVegan (talk) 08:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You should try to contact the OTRS volunteer, who worked previously on the ticket with the other image, and ask him/her to drop me a note that the deleted image is also covered. --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FoP[edit]

Moin! Du hattest bei File:Aachen, Brunnen -Fischpüddelchen- -- 2016 -- 2740.jpg das FoP-Template entfernt, da der Urheber des Brunnens bereits mehr als 70 Jahre verstorben ist. Das hat mich doch etwas rätseln lassen. Der Brunnen ist damit nicht mehr urheberrechtlich geschützt. Das stimmt. Aber FoP gilt meiner Meinung nach trotzdem noch. Aus meiner Sicht sind das zwei verschiedene paar Schuhe. Sicherlich hat FoP einen herausragenden Einfluss auf Objekte, deren Urheberin oder Urheber eben nicht unter die 70-Jahre-Regel fällt. Irgendwie verwirrt mich dieser juristische Kram immer wieder. Das FoP-Template habe ich erst einmal wieder hereingenommen, bin aber eher verwirrt, ob du nicht doch recht hast. Meiner Meinung nach ist es auf jeden Fall nicht falsch, vielleicht aber unnötig. --XRay talk 07:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi XRay,
der FoP-Baustein ist erforderlich, 1) um zu dokumentieren, dass das Foto überhaupt rechtmäßig aufgenommen bzw. hier hochgeladen wurde, und 2) informiert er Nachnutzer, dass bei der Nutzung einiges zu beachten ist, was wiederum von Land zu Land variieren kann. All dies zusätzlich zu den Lizenzbedingungen des Fotografen für das Foto an sich.
Mit dem Erlöschen des Urheberrechts am abgebildeten Kunstwerk fallen alle aus dem notwendigen Rückgriff auf FoP resultierenden Einschränkungen weg. Es gelten nur noch die Lizenzbedingungen des Fotografen. Deshalb ist der FoP-Baustein nach Erlöschen des Urheberrechts im Ursprungsland nicht mehr angebracht bzw. sogar irreführend, da er juristische Hürden aufbaut, die garnicht mehr bestehen. Intern kommt da noch hinzu, dass es nicht absolut ausgeschlossen ist, dass irgendwann einmal der FoP-Rückgriff für Fotos von Werken, die in den USA (Server-Standort) nicht unter FoP fallen (alle nicht-Gebäude), untersagt werden könnte. Dann wäre ein unnötiger FoP-Baustein ein Löschrisiko.
Ich werde jetzt keinen Editwar über den FoP-Baustein mit dir anfangen, hoffe aber, dich überzeugt zu haben. Andernfalls kannst du gerne eine Diskussion darüber auf dem Forum starten. --Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Info. Du hast ja sicherlich gemerkt, dass mir die Verwendung nicht ganz klar ist. Im Hinterkopf habe ich, dass mir die einzelne Korrektur nicht hilft. Wenn's irgendwie möglich ist, würde ich dann eher versuchen, den FoP-Baustein bei allen meinen Bildern zu entfernen, bei denen er unnötig erscheint. Ich denke oft weniger an das einzelne Bild, sondern mehr an alle meine hochgeladenen Bilder. Ich werde es mir mal durch den Kopf gehen lassen und ggf. eine passende Lösung schaffen. --XRay talk 08:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ich wollte mich nur noch einmal kurz melden. Du hast meinen Gedankengang durchaus angeregt. Mittlerweile entsteht ein Algorithmus, der überflüssige FoP-Templates bei meinen Bildern wieder entfernt. Es fehlen noch ein paar Parameter, aber es geht schon ganz gut. Das wird zwar alles noch dauern, aber es stimmt, das Template muss nur dort stehen, wo auch etwas (noch) schutzwürdiges abgebildet ist. Vielen Dank noch einmal für deine Erläuterungen! Mir ist schon daran gelegen, dass so etwas stimmig ist. -- Und wenn ich schon schreibe: Ich wünsche dir einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr! --XRay talk 10:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haus am Checkpoint Charlie 01.jpg[edit]

No objection here, just trying to understand: why any need for {{FoP-Germany}} on File:Haus am Checkpoint Charlie 01.jpg? What is the "work" in question? The building? Or something else? - Jmabel ! talk 08:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jmabel, per its outer appearance I consider this building above above threshold of originality and thereby copyrightable. Architect Peter Eisenman is still alive. So, he might still claim copyright. As we have FoP exception in Germany, the FoP template is required 1) to document that taking & uploading this image was legitimate, and 2) to warn re-users that they have to check a bit more than just the photographer's license-terms. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Concertina tesseract with blue faces.png[edit]

Could you undo the speedy deletion of this image? The request referred to a template, that I forgot to remove from this page. Watchduck (quack) 19:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:FoulardBianchi.svg[edit]

Hallo, Túrelio, you have just written that my image of Foulard Bianchi Logo has been marked as a possible copyright violation. But it is my image, i created, i put it on the foulard bianchi web site. How can i fix it? I dont mind if it belongs to me, i want to set it free to be downloaded and used, free of licence, how can i do? Please, help me... Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alxms (talk • contribs) 07:54, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alxms,
it might help if you ask foulardbianchi.it to send a confirmation from their official emil address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in which they should confirm that you are the creator/designer of that logo (not just the actual file) and that they agree with releasing it under the choosen free license.
My additional recommendation: in order to prevent others using this logo in a way that might be detrimental to Foulard Bianchi, they should register it as "trademark" or alike. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind help Túrelio! Very kind. I have written them and crossed my fingers... --Alxms (talk) 09:17, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Two Mayors of Nizhny Novgorod Oleg Sorokin congratulate citizens on The Day of the city (2011) (cropped).jpg[edit]

неверное перенаправление.Просьба удалить!!! Панн (talk) 19:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Túrelio/Archive13&oldid=353777974"