User talk:Панн

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Панн!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Serbelov 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 08:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:8fhH-Y2y0Qg- --1-2014-.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

INeverCry 19:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Wpid-vesti-v-subbotu1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

INeverCry 19:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:7f2651745 9210319.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cap1000 (talk) 19:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Анатаолий Казерадский.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cap1000 (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Маз Каната.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello Панн.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yann (talk) 18:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:SorokinO.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Drakosh (talk) 09:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Эlcobbola talk 17:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Дмитрий Барыкин.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: See source: © Городская Дума Нижнего Новгорода
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Эlcobbola talk 17:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Евгений Лебедев.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Mitte27 (talk) 09:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Келли Мэри Трэн.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Келли Мэри Трэн.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 17:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Евгений Люлин.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Евгений Люлин.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Евгений Люлин.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

廣九直通車 (talk) 13:39, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Я же указал источник (НТА-ПРИВОЛЖЬЕ) Панн (talk) 14:16, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


Hello Панн, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Евгений Люлин.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 15:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Эlcobbola talk 15:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Эlcobbola talk 15:09, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Barsukov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No CC license at source; to the contrary: © 2018. © Федеральная служба безопасности Российской Федерации. 1999 - 2018 г.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Эlcobbola talk 15:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CropTool[edit]

Есть специальная кнопка для обрезки изображений [1]. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les Kaïra (affiche Film sur la banlieue française).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Havang(nl) (talk) 16:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

а как его загрузить во французскую википедию? Панн (talk) 16:19, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Дмитрий Пристансков.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: license laundering: copyrighted by 1tv.ru
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 21:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Spierig Brothers Compiled (cropped).jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Spierig Brothers Compiled (cropped).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaruhi Postanjyan (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beko (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Филлип Бледный.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Sealle (talk) 21:51, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Я изучил правила, в будущем постараюсь не повторять ошибок! Панн (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Загружал несвободные файлы с шаблона adm.mnnov.ru, не зная, что там значок копирайта!!!"
Decline reason: "Ну да, это уже третья блокировка. Не странно, если третья блокировка бесконечная, но вы получили только 3 месяца и даже из них больше двух прошли. Не вижу глубокого смысла вас деблокировать, нужно только чуть-чуть подождать и с нового года вы снова имеете право работать с нами. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Панн (talk) 15:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

Ну три недели ещё очень долго для меня, я просто уже осознал, к тому же тот участник Alexterft сам создал этот неправильный шаблон копирайщенный!!! Панн (talk) 16:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Сократил срок блокировки. Sealle (talk) 16:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, коллега!!!! Панн (talk) 16:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Если Вы не прекратите загружать новые кадрированные файлы и не займётесь правильной категоризаций уже загруженных — отправлю обратно. Sealle (talk) 16:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Понял, коллега!!! Панн (talk) 16:26, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Светлана Петренко.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Панн, при загрузках видео и скриншотов с YouTube обязательно помещайте на страницу описания файла шаблон {{LicenseReview}}. Sealle (talk) 20:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Понял, коллега!!!! Панн (talk) 07:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio-tags[edit]

Hi Панн, you had tagged a number of images of buildings in Russia as copyvio, but did not provide any rationale for your suspicion. That doesn't really help. We need at least to know why you tagged these images. --Túrelio (talk) 21:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Of course Панн is doing {{Copyvio}} wrong. But Prostokvashino (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) is a user with bad reputation demonstrated not only by the upload log but also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mikhail Gorbachev in 2015.jpg. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Привет.

Ещё раз замечу что-нибудь вроде File:Nizhny Novgorod (5969665311).jpg (histlogsabuse log), и у тебя появятся все шансы отправиться вслед за участником Solomon203.

Кривые новые имена в полуграмотном транслите — ещё полбеды, но возню с перенаправлениями рекомендую прекратить с настоящего момента.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC) Понял, больше не буду этого делать!!! Панн (talk) 18:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Екатерина Губарева на выставке картин молодых художников "Дерзай" (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Екатерина Губарева на выставке картин молодых художников "Дерзай" (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

BevinKacon (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Екатерина Губарева на первом фестивале «Здорового образа жизни» в Донецке (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Екатерина Губарева на первом фестивале «Здорового образа жизни» в Донецке (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

BevinKacon (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Категории[edit]

Прекратите создавать категории на Викискладе. Вы всё делаете неверно. Придётся все ваши "категории" удалить. --A.Savin 17:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC) И не надо приставать ко мне по поводу патрулирования неких статей. Обратитесь к кому-нибудь из русской википедии --A.Savin 17:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ещё раз: прекратите создавать изолированные категории. Последний раз прошу, в следующий раз -- блокировка --A.Savin 23:22, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ок, больше не повторится!!! Панн (talk) 07:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked for a duration of 7 days[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 7 days for the following reason: Vandalism: creating orphaned and/or falsely categorized categories after warnings.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

--A.Savin 13:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @A.Savin: which “orphaned” categories were created during the last six hours? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:51, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kamo Areyan --A.Savin 14:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@A.Savin: attempting to push it into Politics in the 2010s was poor, but better anyway than orphaned categories, or no by-people categorization at all. Is this inept action worth a seven-days block? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure that Панн has to be blocked? Your advice to ask ru.Wikipedians for categories IMHO has little sense – they were unable to teach Панн in their wiki, could they do it here? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ignores warnings = has to be blocked. Not sure why you pinging me (I'm watchlisting anyway) & what do you suggest. --A.Savin 20:15, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that the warning wasn’t actually ignored. A poor and clueless categorization, but neither orphaned nor a wrecker’s categorization. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:34, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, now see a red link for the supercategory – bad syntax. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Панн: после создания категории находим статью (о том, о чём категория) в Википедии — не важно, в русской или ещё какой — переходим по ссылке «Элемент данных» на Викиданные, там:
  1. Проверить, что вошли в систему (не критично, но желательно);
  2. «добавить утверждение»;
  3. в поле «свойство» вбиваем P373 (появляется подсказка «Commons category»);
  4. в поле значения вбиваем имя категории (без префикса Category:) и жмём Enter.
Категория к этому моменту уже должна существовать и быть категоризованной хоть минимально разумно. О дальнейшей категоризации позаботятся. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Понял, обдумаю. Панн (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Что я просил делать? Добавлять P373, а не убирать image (P18)!! Ей-богу, уже не о радио «Эхо Москвы» думаешь, а об анекдотическом армянском радио. Нельзя в вечном состоянии рассеянности править даже такие терпимые к косякам вещи, как вики. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. наши фанаты Wikidata что-то переделали — P373 больше не работает так, как надо ☹ — вреда от P373 конечно не будет, но чтобы подхватился {{Wikidata Infobox}}, надо добавлять ссылку на категорию Склада другим способом (site links). Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Активность[edit]

Привет.

Был (ну, формально, и есть ещё) один участник. Лепил шаблон {{Copyvio}} куда не попадя; пытался удалять свободные видео, некоторые даже по два раза. Преследовал участника Dogad75 и фактически удалил уже два фото, хотя было нетрудно убедиться в том, что сторонние сайты разместили изображение после его появления даже на Викискладе, не говоря уже о загрузке в руВикипедию в 2007-м или около того. Что с ним стало потом? В англоВикипедии у него было право «красного» переименования страниц, он им злоупотреблял будто на своём сайте правит; я пожаловался — флажок сняли, ну и пропал участник от обиды… или, возможно, учётку сделал другую.

Не надо ставить {{Copyvio}} куда попало. Когда есть сомнения, кто откуда взял изображение, начинай регулярное удаление. И ещё… маленькую буковку менять на прописную — стыд. Когда файл хоть нигде не используется, то накладные расходы на переименование малы, и можно им крутить-вертеть без вреда для окружающих; но для каждого включения (на каждой вики) CommonsDelinker делает после смены имени правку, отвлекая участников, мешая сохранять правки, а также просто забивая историю ненужной хренью. Я, чтоб запрос не отменять, хоть транскрипцию фамилии сделал нормальную вместо того убожества, что было; но вообще старайся к переименованию ставить лишь то, где реально либо ошибка, либо текущее имя ну совсем плохое.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Понял, коллега!!! Панн (talk) 13:41, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Кстати, мне ошибочно показалось, что поставлен «опасный» шаблон {{copyvio}}, хотя стоял-то безобидный {{Delete}} – т.е. да, как раз регулярное удаление. Я настолько задёрган упомянутыми вчера безобразиями со стороны отдельных участников Склада, что мне мерещится то, чего не было, и я сам начинаю косячить. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Айк Марутян.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Хоббит (talk) 22:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Сергей Бурунов.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: license laundering
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 22:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Как не всегда за забором находится то, о чём на нём написано, так не всегда при указании свободной лицензии на YouTube загрузивший имел право её указывать. Допустим, лично Вы не понимаете, как отличать одно от другого, но в каждом таком случае Вам надлежит рядом с шаблоном лицензии устанавливать шаблон её проверки: {{LicenseReview}}. Sealle (talk) 22:07, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Только намедни...[edit]

...я вас просил не беспокоить других участников (к тому же не понимающих по-русски) с вашими удалениями, а вы продолжаете в том же духе? Что это вообще такое? Как бы то ни было, если ещё раз это поведение увижу -- заблокирую ваш аккаунт на значительно более длительный срок, чем было последний раз. --A.Savin 04:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked for a duration of 1 month[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 month for the following reason: Vandalism: creating orphaned and/or falsely categorized categories after warnings.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

См. Category:Chairman of the city Duma Nizhny Novgorod, Category:Mayor of Nizhny Novgorod, Category:Vladimir Platonov. Никакого вы урока не извлекли из предыдущей блокировки, так что теперь 1 месяц. Оставляю за собой опцию бессрочного бана, если по истечении будете продолжать в том же духе. --A.Savin 12:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Обработал целую серию запросов на удаление, созданных под предлогом нарушений авторских прав, при этом дата по внешней ссылке была от полугода до трёх лет позже, чем дата загрузки к нам. Думаю, бессрочка не за горами. Sealle (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    (talk page stalker) Может быть, ограничения помогут? Пока накладных расходов многовато на этого участника; слишком часто дёргает за то, что надо дёргать лишь при наличии повода (user_talk и бестолковые удаления по якобы copyvio). Надежда на превращение в эффективного участника Склада по-моему слабая, но превращать блокировки (по образцу руВикипедии) в наказание всё же нехорошо.Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Это не наказание, а приостановление вреда, наносимого проекту данным участником. --A.Savin 19:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Сократите срок блокировки пожалуйста, я изучил те рекомендации Панн (talk) 16:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "COM:BLOCK requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. As blocks are not punitive, no purpose is served by shortening a block if the foregoing is absent. That you studied the instructions ("я внимательно изучил инструкцию категории") does not tell us that you understand why those edits were counter-productive (e.g., How were your edits contrary to the instructions? Why did you disregard warnings to discontinue?) and does not state how you plan to conduct yourself going forward. As this is your fifth block in seven months, it should probably be apparent to you that rather more thought and effort than "Сократите срок блокировки пожалуйста, я изучил те рекомендации" is necessary here. Эlcobbola talk 17:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Сократите мне срок блокировки, я внимательно изучил инструкцию категории!!! Панн (talk) 17:03, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Сократите пожалуйста срок блокировки, просто мне ещё ждать неделю. Я осмыслил свои ошибки, к тому же я хотел загрузить одно свое новое собственное изображение. Панн (talk) 12:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "This is not a process in which you post unresponsive requests until you get the answer you want. I explained deficiencies above; if you are not prepared to engage COM:BLOCK and the questions I posed, you should be prepared to serve the length of your block, and indeed be grateful it is not indefinite. Эlcobbola talk 23:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

Pay attention to copyright
File:Король Малайзии.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: license laundering
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 10:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Самое что ни на есть последнее предупреждение[edit]

Если я ещё ХОТЬ ОДИН РАЗ увижу, как вы

  • добавляете ненужные категории типа "Politics" [2]
  • и/или портите страницу описания файлов [3]
  • и/или загружаете копивио [4]
  • и/или, наоборот, маркируете файлы, к которым претензий нет, как копивио [5]

Если я ещё ХОТЬ ОДИН РАЗ что-либо из этого или иные нарушения правил Викисклада с вашей стороны увижу -- заблокирую вас бессрочно. Вы здесь нежелательны. --A.Savin 13:45, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Принял к сведению. Панн (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Не говорите теперь, что я вас не предупреждал. --A.Savin 17:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @A.Savin and Sealle: File:Юрий Швыткин1.jpg has no Exif. Why are you sure that it’s an own work by the uploader? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not positive and I shouldn't be, while there is no room for significant doubt. Sealle (talk) 18:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating a JPEG photo without Exif for deletion is a legitimate action, anyway. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google images added reverse search in or about June 2011. COM:PRP has been a policy since September 2008; accordingly, that the existence of a reverse image hit is required for "significant doubt," the implication of Sealle's comment, is utter nonsense. This is a high resolution, professionally-staged image of a notable person, lacking EXIF data and uploaded by a user for use in ru:Швыткин, Юрий Николаевич which they created with copyvio text, where they first tried to direct link a copyvio image, and then substituted "this image" when they saw the direct link didn't work. (I say "this image" because File:Юрий Швыткин1.jpg is merely an out-of-process recreation of File:Юрий Швыткин.jpg and thus actually speediable (!!!) as a result). All of this, especially in the aggregate, is the definition of significant doubt. This was an abusive closure and an abusive block. Эlcobbola talk 19:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Elcobbola: IMHO best to undo the closure and let the deletion request go forth in a regular way for the remaining six days. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(ec)Please avoid personal attacks. It's not "abusive" block, it's good faith block of a user who is by far overchallenged with various Commons policies. There were numerous warnings the user simply ignored. Latest edit = repeatedly adding wrong category, which I also warned them not to do the day before.
Regarding the RfD, the rationale is wrong and it's pretty much the same Панн did before -- careless copyvio tagging or RfD nominations. The file has a high resolution and, contrary to Панн's claim, all appearances of this photo on external websites have timestamps later than its upload on Commons and nowhere near as high resolution. There is simply no need to play a detective any further -- we still have COM:AGF, Commons and WMF are on the secure side whatever may happen. --A.Savin 20:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Calling a block abusive is not a personal attack. I've not commented on you as a person; I've commented on your (abusive) block. I would expect an admin to know that. We can see whether others agree - Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Block_Review. Эlcobbola talk 20:29, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it's a personal attack, since you are disregarding COM:AGF and alleging me of applying a block in an abusive way, i.e. in bad faith for own's benefit. And you are wrongly stating that the indef block would have been just because of this RfD, whereas the RfD was just the last straw after several warnings and shorter blocks. --A.Savin 20:54, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Abusive means "wrongly used [...] misapplied; unjust" (Wikionary#6). That you contort that into "for own's (sic) benefit" is a failure of good faith on your part, not mine. Alternatively, if your English is not adequate to understand the nuance of my language, AGF would nevertheless still compel you to assume a charitable intepretation. In much the same way, I don't see that anyone has called for you to be blocked ("It is not me who should be blocked but Elcobbola" [6]). One wonders whether you're even reading comments. I'm however quite sure I won't continue to waste my efforts either way. Эlcobbola talk 21:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think that my English is too poor and that I don't read comments, why are you then defending a user who can say not a single word in English (and nonetheless believes to have necessary competence to do maintenance work on Commons) and doesn't read any comments on their talk page? Kind of double standards? --A.Savin 22:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

разблокировка[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "Я осмыслил свои ошибки"
Decline reason: "After block evasion, no way anymore to process it, I guess --A.Savin 03:58, 13 March 2019 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

.

извините меня пожалуйста. Я больше буду стараться заниматься тут правильным вкладом. Панн (talk) 07:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose, blocks are not punishment but to prevent damage from Commons. The user is clearly missing knowledge of several Commons policies. Unblocking them = let them continue to damage Commons. --A.Savin 18:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Я буду внимателен при помечении фото к удалению. Панн (talk) 10:38, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ну просто те фото, которые я помечал к удалению, удалялись нормально, но это фото вызвало большие споры. Панн (talk) 18:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • У вас 4 блокировки здесь за копивио и 3 - за вандализм. Про блокировки в рувики я молчу. Просто надо учиться на своих ошибках. Я тоже когда-то ошибался, но мне хватило и одной блокировки. После неё больше копивио не грузил. Робионек Д. С 18:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Но в том фото была указана лицензия же. Панн (talk) 18:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://redsearch.org/images/p/минина_4#images-8 ищется фотка. Панн (talk) 12:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Вас нельзя допускать к проекту. Эта фотка на том сайте взята как раз отсюда (просто надо открыть её в новой вкладке, и ссылка будет на Викисклад). Если фото сначала загружено сюда, а потом ещё куда-то, то это не наши проблемы. На разрешение тоже надо внимание обращать, если у нас больше, то скорее всего файл загружен легально. Робионек Д. С 12:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Но внизу не указано,и дата и производитель камеры:( Панн (talk) 12:51, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://need4study.com/colleges/56490 всё же ищется с другого ракурса. Этот сайт закопирайщен.Панн (talk) 13:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Владимир Путин на встрече с Владимиром Лимаренко (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.126.9.12 07:12, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Direct Line Валерия Королёва (cropped).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.126.9.12 10:20, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion[edit]

This user has engaged in block evasion as of April 2019. --VKras (talk) 18:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They still do this. --VKras (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexey Gromov 18 June 2008-1 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.184.108.37 18:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Василий Грицак (cropped).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jackie 1Star (talk) 09:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artur Chilingarov, November 2011 (cropped).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 12:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]