User talk:Wolfgang Pehlemann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Permission to use your photo[edit]

Hi Wolfgang, I would like to use your photo at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dresden_aerial_photo_City_Augustus_bridge_across_river_Elbe_cathedrale_Church_of_Our_Lady_photo_2008_Wolfgang_Pehlemann_Wiesbaden_Germany_HSBD4389.jpg in a textbook. Please email me at mcispl@yahoo.com so I can give you more details. Thank you!

Hello Wolfgang - I am a portrait artist, and I would like to use your panorama Photo fra Grenen, in Black and White, as a background for several painted portraits of the painters from Skagen. The painting will be exhibited at the gallery of Grenen next summer. I will of course give credit to you for this great Photo. Is it posible to print the Photo from a file? Best regards from Gitte Degnemark, Denmark Gitte Degnemark (talk) 12:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gitte Degnemark, your request from wikimedia I found in my spam's.
Your post on my user page is incomprehensible.
First part is a request for my aerial photograph from Dresden with given data with ref. to the file name.
Second part is a request for use of an unknown panorama photo from Grenen, it could be one of my photos, without file name it's questioned...
I start my vacation this weekend up to approx. 2 month. So use it for exhibition as background photo at the gallery of Grenen 2023 only, please with credit of my name.
Sucess!
W. Pehlemann --Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression[edit]

Hello,

I have propose this picture to suppression, becouse his architect is not dead, so this station is under copyright ! Bye ! --M0tty (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Wolfgang, die Diskussion um deine Lizenz-"Zusatzbedingungen" ist jetzt von :de nach Commons herübergeschwappt. Nur hat man wohl vergessen, dich selbst zu informieren. Siehe: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#License_problems_with_images_from_Wolfgang_Pehlemann.
Wenngleich ich den Wunsch nach Credit-unterm-Bild gut verstehen kann, ist das auch hier auf Commons eigentlich immer als unzulässig angesehen worden, wenn es fest verlangt wird. Akzeptiert wird dagegen, wenn darum gebeten wird (siehe z.B. File:MotherTeresa 090.jpg). Überlegs dir doch nochmal. --Túrelio (talk) 22:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kristiansand_Gamle_Varoddbrua_1956_auf_der_Varodd-Brücke_L_618_m_Spannweite_337_Foto_2010_Wolfgang_Pehlemann_DSCN1547.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

/人 ‿‿ 人\ 苦情処理係 08:09, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:Bayreuth_Eremitage_das_neue_Schloss_mit_dem_Eingang_-_Foto_2011_Wolfgang_Pehlemann_DSCN7042.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

NeoUrfahraner (talk) 04:32, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


@Wolfgang, die folgenden Bilder könntest du lokal auf :de hochladen, weil dort das Problem der mangelnden Panoramafreiheit in Frankreich ignoriert wird, da in D-A-CH Panoramafreiheit besteht. --Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:50_Jahre_Europäische_Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft_EWG_1958_bis_2008_in_Strasbourg_France_-_Foto_2008_Wolfgang_Pehlemann_IMG_0105.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:43, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:European_Parliament_Europäisches_Parlament_Parlement_européen_Strasbourg_France_Louise_Weiss_building_Frankreich_-_Foto_2008_Wolfgang_Pehlemann_IMG_0096.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I requested by official OTRS Mail a permission from the architects (see ticket 2011060210017591)

Groetjes --Neozoon (talk) 23:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea. --Túrelio (talk) 06:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Zur Kenntnis: http://iphla.de/presse-bilder/Mainz_Luftbild_MainzerDom_WPehlemann0085.jpg genutzt auf http://iphla.de/index.asp?topic=62&l=d. Hab das Original aber nicht finden können. --Túrelio (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zusätze zu den Lizenzen[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang, es gibt eine weitere Möglichkeit, die Probleme mit den Lizenzen zu reduzieren: in dem man bei den gängigen Lizenzen bleibt ohne zusätzliche Erweiterungen mit Auflagen zu machen. Herzliche Grüsse, Eynbein (talk) 15:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by NeoUrfahraner (talk • contribs) 24. Juni 2011, 17:38 Uhr (UTC)


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kristiansand Nye & gamle Varoddbrua alte & neue Varodd-Brücke Foto 2010 Wolfgang Pehlemann DSCN1592.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kristiansand Nye & gamle Varoddbrua alte & neue Varodd-Brücke Foto 2010 Wolfgang Pehlemann DSCN1592.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

77.184.143.205 06:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang Pehlemann, bitte kategorisiere Deine Bilder sinnvoll. Bedenke bitte, dass nur sinnvoll kategorisierte Bilder von anderen Benutzern gefunden werden können. Und nur dadurch ergibt das Hochladen der Bilder hier überhaupt einen Sinn. Bevor Du noch mehr falsch machst, lese Dir bitte erste einmal Commons:Categories gründlich durch. Dort steht auch, dass deutsche Kategoriebezeichnungen (wie Category:Ort im Kreis Nordfriesland, Category:Renaissancebauwerk in Schleswig-Holstein, Category:Backsteinrenaissance und Category:Liste der Kulturdenkmale in Friedrichstadt bei File:Friedrichstadt alle 9 Häuser Am Markt Westseite - zT Kulturdenkmale - Foto 2012 Wolfgang Pehlemann IMG 2717u.jpg) hier nicht zulässig sind. Dass sie nicht funktionieren, erkennst Du ja schon an den roten Links. Ein Tipp: Schaue Dich bitte VOR dem Hochladen nach den passenden Kategorien für Deine Bilder um. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ies, Du hast ja Recht, nur dass
* hier ein Probl der Mehrsprachlichkeit liegt
* manche der Categories noch nicht existieren
* manche erst erzeugt werden müssen
weniger wird dann wohl mehr sein :-)
MfG -- Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 19:33, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen![edit]

Du bist Gewinner im Fotowettbewerb
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Liebe_r Wolfgang Pehlemann,

Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Bild ist eines der besten hundert Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Deutschland!

Wir freuen uns Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 20. Oktober 2012 auf der WLM-Jury-Sitzung in Nürnberg als Preisträger ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Anlässlich der Preisverleihung und der Abschlussveranstaltung des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs für Deutschland lädt Dich die WMDE herzlich zur Europäischen Denkmal-Messe am 22. November 2012 in Leipzig ein (Weitere Informationen findest Du hier). Wir würden uns freuen, Dich dort begrüßen zu können und Dir Deinen Preis persönlich zu überreichen. Für einen Reisekostenzuschuss und weitere Informationen kannst du dich (bitte möglichst bald) bei community@wikimedia.de melden.

Im Namen der WLM-Deutschland-Jury --Atamari (talk) 20:53, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Wolfgang Pehlemann,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Einladung zur WLM-Fototour Erfurt 29. - 31. August 2014[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang Pehlemann

mit dem Hochladen von Fotos zu Thüringen hast du dich am Fotowettbewerb "Wiki Love Monuments" in den letzten Jahren beteiligt. Im September wird dieser Wettbewerb zum vierten Mal in Deutschland stattfinden. Seit kurzem sind nun auch die Denkmallisten zu Erfurt mit rund 3700 Einträgen fertiggestellt. Vielleicht hast du Lust, Deine Foto dort einzubinden.

Besonders wollte ich dich aber auf eine Fototour durch die Altstadt von Erfurt hinweisen, die am Wochenende vom 29. - 31. August stattfindet. Da es sich um eine von WMDE geförderte Veranstaltung handelt, können auf vorherigen Antrag auch die Reisekosten der Einzelnen gefördert werden. Weitere Informationen gibt es auf der Projektseite, wo auch die Registrierung erfolgt. Es würde mich freuen, wenn du wieder bei WLM dabei wärst.

Liebe Grüße von Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 05:52, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Na, hallo Bernd! Die Antwort von mir nicht auf Deiner Platte sondern hier, damit sich Negatives nicht zu sehr verbreitet. Und Respekt, dass Du Dich wirklich toll um Aktivisten bemühst!
Vielen Dank für die Nachfrage, aber nachdem doch wieder mal ein WP-Ärgernis-Fass übergelaufen war (belogen vom ADMIN H-stt !!), hatte ich ja bereits WP-Auszeit erklärt. Im Übrigen hatte ich doch schon gesagt, dass ich nunmehr im Ruhestand nahe Flensburg lebe mit viel Zeit für meine Foto-Reisen, und die beruflich bedingten 20 Jahre Hessen & Thüringen damit vorüber sind.
Dennoch wünsche ich für WLM 2014 gutes Gelingen und viel Erfolg, derweil ich auf dreimonatiger Balkan- und Italien-Tour andere Monument-Fotos für meine Sites einsammle. Viele Grüße Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Schade. Laß dich nicht ärgern. Alles Gute, und bis später mal wieder. Gruss -- Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 07:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang Pehlemann,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]

Hallo Wolfgang Pehlemann,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Steinberghaff an der Geltinger Bucht - Luftbild Steinberg Ostsee - Foto 2012 Wolfgang Pehlemann IMG 6323.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Steinberghaff an der Geltinger Bucht - Luftbild Steinberg Ostsee - Foto 2012 Wolfgang Pehlemann IMG 6323.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast vergessen, deinen Lizenzbaustein einzusetzen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, vielen Dank für Hinweis auf fehlenden Lizenzbaustein - Anm.; bin ganz im Norden gelandet. Dir frohes Schaffen, Moin und Gruß Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 09:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Lindesnes Fyr von Osten 50 m hoher Leuchtturm Gusseisen 1915 Linse 1854 Rw 19 sm Foto Wolfgang Pehlemann IMG 9564.jpg[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:08, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overcategorization[edit]

Hi. As regard this your edit, please try to read and understand Commons:Categories#Over-categorization. If the file is categorized in the category of the specific church, it should be not category paralelly to its parent categories. --ŠJů (talk) 21:23, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Luftbild Hamburg - auch Gerichte am Sievekingplatz Amtsgericht Landgericht Oberlandesgricht - Foto Wolfgang Pehlemann DSC08146.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Luftbild Hamburg - auch Gerichte am Sievekingplatz Amtsgericht Landgericht Oberlandesgricht - Foto Wolfgang Pehlemann DSC08146.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thxs a lot - licensing done! --Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Monument aux Morts 4 korinth Säulen Marmor-Sarkophag Croix de Guerre weibl Siegesskulptur Foto Wolfgang Pehlemann DSC05995.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Monument aux Morts 4 korinth Säulen Marmor-Sarkophag Croix de Guerre weibl Siegesskulptur Foto Wolfgang Pehlemann DSC05995.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama Viadukt von Millau 2004 A75 Viaduc Viaduct 2460 m lang max 343 m Dep Aveyron Frankreich France - Foto Wolfgang Pehlemann DSC08281.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]