User talk:Túrelio/Archive1

Archives of older messages from my talkpage

The first ever message

Hi Túrelio; may I ask your souce for poisonous plants? You added that category to Thuja plicata and I was not able to verify that information. Best wishes, Wsiegmund 18:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Wsiegmund, my primary source was this website: [1] (search for: Lebensbaum). While this site may not be of the highest standard, I assumed toxicity for T. plicata because the other species T. orientalis and T. occidentalis are without doubt toxic, were even used for abortions in former times.[2], [3], [4]. Sorry, but all pages are in German; but with your name you might have German ancestry ;-) . Well, after your hint, I looked for T. plicata in the USDA database and found "toxicity none". So if you prefer to remove the cat, that's fully okay for me. Thanks for your attention. --Túrelio 21:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear Túrelio; thank you for your kind reply. It is a common species in my area and Pojar and McKinnon said that its wood was used for drying fish by our indigenous peoples. I removed the cat. It is generous of you to think that I might know German, but while I can read a little French and Spanish, I never studied German. But it is true that my great grandparents' first language was German. Best wishes on adding the poisonous plant categories to the species pages. It sounds like a worthwhile project. --Wsiegmund 21:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

from 2007

see: User talk:Túrelio/Archive2

from 2008

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive3

from 2009

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive4

from 2010

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive5

from 2011

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive6

from 2012

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive7

from 2013

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive8

from 2014

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive9

from 2015

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive10

from 2016

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive11

from 2017

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive12

from 2018

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive13

from 2019

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive14

from 2020

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive15

from 2021

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive16

from 2022

see User talk:Túrelio/Archive17

from 2023

Possible cross-wiki copyvios

Hi Túrelio. You just deleted File:The-Gibraltar-Magazine-Christian-Santos-11-of-12.jpg and File:Karmen Gomez.jpg that I tagged as copyvios. The same uploader has uploaded a number of other files under questionable claims of "own work" that probably also are copyvios too. The uploader's user talk page is also filled with notifications about file licensing stuff. Anyway, would you mind (if you've got the time) taking a quick look at Special:Contributions/Akis Papadopoulos to see if any of this user's other uploads might possibly be OK to keep, or be at least something that should be discussed per in a DR. I've just gone and asked about File:Kapodistrias2.jpg at COM:VPC#PD-Art for File:Kapodistrias2.jpg?, but that's not one of this user's uploads per se. It's the other cross-wiki uploads that seem to be copyvios. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, indeed, quite a number of his older uploads seem to be copyvios, at least not own work. I've speedy-tagged them. For the few remaining I couldn't find any hits. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look at these. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Slmah

Many of these files were nominated for deletion by MarchEnd, who claimed they were uploaded without the subject’s consent. You deleted some of these. I have two questions:

1. Why did you delete some after just 3 days, while apparently ignoring others?
2. Does this require further action (at least a warning to the uploader)?

Brianjd (talk) 12:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

1) I don't remember precisely. In general, as such image are often also copyvios, these will be deleted immediately (for being copyvios). For others of these kind of images, it depends a bit. If there are aggravating factors, such as minor age or hints that it might be revenge-porn, these will also be deleted fast. Those without such additional factors might need to go through a regular DR, as the rationale will likely be OOS. Of course, the user-profile, i.e. upload-pattern/history, also plays a role.

2) The copyvio-notifications are implicit warnings. Feel free to add a OOS-warning. --Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

I checked again, and I saw that two were deleted as copyvios. Another two were deleted ‘per nomination’, suggesting that they were deleted because of the privacy issue. I didn’t see them before deletion, but the ones I can see are mostly intimate images that likely share the same privacy issue. Plus, there is another set of images nominated with a similar rationale, but different wording and by an anonymous user.

For these reasons, we should consider deleting the whole lot and giving the user a warning (at least) about privacy. We don’t have a standard warning for that, as far as I know, and Commons normally does not do a good job of dealing with this issue. Brianjd (talk) 13:49, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Метротой орнууд.png

Hi, Following up on your revert of flagging this file as a duplicate. File:Метротой орнууд.png is not a perfect duplicate of File:World Metro systems.png, but it is out of date and an orphan. (The original Mongolian-language file it was ported to Commons from is no longer used even in the mn:Метро; that article was switched first to File:World Metro systems.png then to the SVG version of the file.) If not as a duplicate, how would you handle File:Метротой орнууд.png? Should it be flagged for deletion? Or can be it a redirect to File:World Metro systems.png (which is being actively maintained)? Thanks, —Tcr25 (talk) 16:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

HI, ok, I've reverted myself and dupe-processed it to create a redirect. --Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! — Tcr25 (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For the thankless task of manning the deletion barricades and taking out the trash 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Bello

Can you check if File:TitaConnieDy.jpg falls as a derivative work? Thank you. NewManila2000 (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Likely. Tagged accordingly. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. NewManila2000 (talk) 12:32, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Persistent disruptive editing

I just wanted to thank you for protecting File:Barbary lion.jpg and to let you know the disruptive editors found a new way to continue their vandalism (one of them uploaded a copy of the image under a new name). Best, M.Bitton (talk) 11:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Deleted and redirected. --Túrelio (talk) 12:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 15:56, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Astounding Stories 1936-02.pdf when in use at enWS ...

Hi. Please would you contact Wikisource admins prior to simply deleting a work that is transcribed and transcluded at a WS. It causes problems with deletions here first to how the work is visible and makes clean up/removal difficult. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Ok. I will try to keep in mind. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Help for html bug

In Category:Pietro Bussolo there are two cats that if you click on them they are already deleted or moved away... but they still appear there because the still is, apparently, same categories with this simbol at the end (;) that cannot be deleted or moved due to html conflict. Is there a way to fix this? Thank you Sailko (talk) 11:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Indeed strange. Sorry, I have no idea what is happening here. When I manually added Category:Pietro Bussolo to Category:San Cristoforo (Pietro Bussolo) the latter apeared twice (!) in the former. Absolutely strange. --Túrelio (talk) 12:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

undeletion request

Hi Túrelio, Hope you're well, Could you undelete File:Toyota Camry 2.0 E (Taiwan).jpg please as redirects shouldn't be deleted, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy new year!  Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks Túrelio, Happy New Year, I hope you and yours have a happy and healthy new year, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 18:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi and happy new year, Turelio, I have patrolled around the project for a while and tagged a lot of copyvios, reverted and reported some vandals, could I get rollback to help more? For example, batch revert if needed? Lemonaka (talk) 14:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Lemonaka,

after looking through :en, :meta and Commons, I think that you are eligible for this tool and have granted it. Please study Commons:Rollback and especially Commons:Rollback#When to use rollback (it's rather short anyway). Happy editing. --Túrelio (talk) 16:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Zwei verschiedene Fotos

Hallo Túrelio,

kannst du dir das hier mal ansehen bitte? Da hat ein Nutzer anscheinend ein Foto durch ein gänzlich anderes ersetzt. Das hattest du revertiert, und es wurde von dem Nutzer praktisch umgehend wieder zurück-revertiert. Das scheint mir nicht sinnvoll. Sofern es zwei legitim hochgeladene Fotos sind, kann man ja sicher beide auf Commons haben, aber doch nicht so. Danke & Gruß, --217.239.0.124 13:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Er wurde inzwischen von meinem Kollegen Achim55 wieder revertiert. Bei der 2. Version ist ja das Problem, dass wir keine Quellen/Autorenangaben dazu haben und sämtliche anderen Uploads dieses Nutzers waren copyvios. --Túrelio (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Ah, danke. Das überrascht mich nur begrenzt, dass der Nutzer es mit den Spielregeln nicht so genau nimmt. Seine übrige Tätigkeit scheint hart ans Cross-Wiki-Spamming zu grenzen. Wieviele von den sechs Sprachen, in denen er publiziert, mag er tatsächlich beherrschen? Deutsch und Englisch jedenfalls nicht.

Über Copyvio hatte ich mir bei dem gelöschten Bild noch am wenigsten Sorgen gemacht: Das sah dermaßen nach Bahnhofs-Knips-Kabine aus, dass da wohl kein Fotograf uns was anhängen würde. Das verbliebene Bild ist wenigstens scharf. Insofern kein Verlust. Den Schlafzimmerblick brauchen wir für die Bebilderung eines enzyklopädischen Artikels auch nicht unbedingt. :D Gruß, --217.239.0.124 23:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Im sorry

Im sorry for the male body part emoji vandalism. it was immature. 104.235.37.46 05:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Also, if I accidentally tripped the filter, it was because I was trying to specify what vandalism I was doing. 104.235.37.46 05:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Profile picture

Hello, I am new to wikipedia and wanted to create a page for my idol. He gave me permission to use the picture on his website but i uploaded it incorrectly. Can you please help me to comply with the regulations so we can use this picture ? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emile_Verstraeten_Profile_Picture.jpg Bibinneke (talk) 10:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bibinneke,

by "permission to use the picture on his website" you propbably meant that you can use this photo in the Wikipedia-article about Emile Verstraeten, right? If yes, you need to know that a permission just for Wikipedia is not accepted here. Media uploaded to Commons need to be under a free license, which allows anybody to use them, even commercially; for details see COM:L. So, you need to talk again with Mr. Verstraeten and ask him specifically if he is willing and (legally) able to release said portrait-image (by Frank Lambrechts) under the choosen CC-license[5] (give him also this link). He will likely need to check it with the photographer. If he is able and willing, then he (or the photographer) should send a confirmation per email directly to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), where the filename of the image and the name of the license should be mentioned. --Túrelio (talk) 10:37, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Howard Finn.jpg

Hey again, is this image able to be hosted on Commons? I uploaded it a while back using PD-US no notice since it was around the 1940s, but I don't think it was published until 2017 when it was uploaded (most likely by a family member since he had the surname "Volk" and Finn's wife's maiden name was "Volk"). If it isn't, would it be okay for you to delete it? If not I can go through copyvio/deletion nomination. Thanks. reppop^talk 23:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar

Hi Túrelio. I just want to thank you because of your efforts for deleting the my uploads from Pexels.com. Due to a misunderstanding, I have transferred many files from this site. As nobody warned me about this mistake until A. Savin wrote me, I was also not aware of the incorrect licensing. It seems that you spent a serious time to delete this files. I am grateful to you.. Gargarapalvin (talk) 12:14, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Bilder von der Demo (30.8.19) im Raum Pirnaischer Platz/Hauptbahnhof

Moin, moin. Danke für die Hinweise:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Exerzitien_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_30._August_2019-86.jpg&diff=724830162&oldid=724818456

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Exerzitien_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_30._August_2019-87.jpg&diff=724825677&oldid=724818926

Klar habe ich auch viele klare Photos davon, bei mir DSCN4057 bis 4077, außer den beiden Hochgeladenen als noch 19 Stück. Die Verschwommenen habe ich gegen Ende der Veranstaltung absichtlich aufgenommen (DSCN4074 und 4076), es war schwierig, von den paar tausend Leuten Einverständniserklärungen einzuholen. Außerdem finde ich die Photographien künstlerisch sehr gelungen, sie holen die Atmosphäre recht gut ein. Und dann brauche ich die unbedingt, die gehören zu einer Geschichte, die sich dabei und infolge ereignet hat, mit den bunten Mützen am Hauptbahnhof (Polizeifasching: blaue, grüne, rote, weiße ... Mützen ...) und mal wieder den Sanitötern dort, das übliche volle Programm (die wollten verständlicherweise nicht abgelichtet werden LOL).

Habe die empfohlene Kat. eingetragen:

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Exerzitien_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_30._August_2019-86.jpg&diff=724894549&oldid=724892699

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Exerzitien_auf_der_Stra%C3%9Fe_30._August_2019-87.jpg&diff=724897851&oldid=724892702

Hoffe damit, alle Klarheiten über die unklaren Bilder beseitigt zu haben. ;-)

Grüße

--Methodios (talk) 17:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

P.S. Hätt ich doch bloß nichts getan. Wo gehobelt wird, fallen Späne.

--Methodios (talk) 17:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Bei Massenaufnahmen von Massenveranstaltungen ist m.W. kein Einverständnis der Fotografierten erforderlich. Hab den Blurry-Baustein mal entfernt. Das garantiert aber nicht dass kein Anderer später einen LA stellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Peter181

Please No Delete the Files Peter181 (talk) 11:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you uploaded these copyrighted images without providing evidence of permission. --Túrelio (talk) 11:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

What to do for copyright permission. Peter181 (talk) 11:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

You can either look for other images that are evidently under a free license, for example on Flickr. Or, if you prefer the uploaded images, you could try to identify the true photographer or copyright-holder and then ask them whether they would be willing to release it under a free license. If they agree, they need to send a confirmation directly (no forwarding!) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

On deletion of File:Queen Morta of Lithuania.jpg

Permission for this file was received by the author herself! SeriousThinker 16:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Now, that's funny. My deletion was based on your own edit of adding {{Non-free|year=2023|month=January|day=14}}. In addition, as I did not understand your "Limited permission granted"-statement, I checked http://www.lina-kalinauskaite.lt, but found the website "all rights reserved". So, where is said permission? --Túrelio (talk) 16:59, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

On deletion of File:Johan Sebastiaan Ploem lowRes 80dpi.png

Hello, I see that File:Johan Sebastiaan Ploem lowRes 80dpi.png was deleted. Can you tell me the reasoning for deletion? The Non-free use rationale of the upload was

{{Non-free use rationale | Description = Photograph of Johan Sebastiaan Ploem. Info on copyright holder at link http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/cdroms/cyto10a/copyright.html | Source = http://www.cyto.purdue.edu/cdroms/cyto10a/cytometryhistory/individualhistories/ploem.html | Article = [[Johan Sebastiaan Ploem]] | Portion = One image from the source | Low resolution = Yes | Purpose = To depict the subject of the article | Replaceability = Ploem is 95 years old at the time of upload, and no CC photo is available | Other information = Reduction of resolution was done in Inkscape by imposing 80 dpi in the PNG export. The resulting image visibly contains less fine details compared with the original image. }}

As you can see the resolution of the image was reduced, and also no CC image is available of Ploem and he is 95 years old at the time of writing. This rationale seems similar to for example this image uploaded by Materialscientist which has a similar rationale and is approved for use on the WP page of the subject shown in the image.

Perhaps it would allowed in the WP namespace through the Wikipedia:File upload wizard? Or is the problem that the resolution should be reduced further? - Blue.painting (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

In short: Commons:Fair use. Fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. It can only be hosted on the project where the material is directly used, provided the project has an exemption-policy, such as :en. en:File:John Albrechtson.jpg is hosted on :en.--Túrelio (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Ok I see, thank you for your reply Túrelio. Best, - Blue.painting (talk) 10:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Gaetano Calabrò File/Photo

Hi Turelio, thanks for the message on Prof Calabrò, but that photo was given to me by the daughter of G. Calabrò who wanted me to insert it, photo at the University of Rome, previously Prof Sasso had been placed on her page, which clearly does not correspond at all to that of Prof . Enrico corradini (talk) 12:59, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Enrico,

I had tagged it because to me it looked like a real photography that had been run through a paint-filter. Anyway, we need to put it through the OTRS-permission process, which is rather easy. Please ask said daughter whether she is able (is it her own work?) and willing to formally release this image under a free license. If she agrees, please prepare a permission-text for her by copying the boxed text at Commons:Modello_richiesta_di_permesso#Pubblicazione_con_licenza_libera, enter the filename (or full URL) and the choosen license. Then send her the completed permission-text and ask her to read it and then sign and date it, and to send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Her email will not be made public. --Túrelio (talk) 21:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

One question...

Is this logo fake? I've checked that both the Nokia default website and the Nokia phones website dosen't use that logo. WaterExplorer (talk) 21:49, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Hard to say. I checked Nokia website for a collection of their logos, but found only one[6]. Anyway, the immediate source-page[7] states "tentative" for this logo. So, yes we can assume it's not really a Nokia-logo. --Túrelio (talk) 08:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

I am The copyright Owner of this File:Segun Nabi.jpg

I am The copyright Owner of this File:Segun Nabi.jpg.jpg why will some body say they own it i snap it with camera myself please help me get my file back Realdbeat (talk) 07:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

The metadata of this image contains the statement "copyright: O.J-Dipson-Productions". So, are you acting on behalf of said O.J-Dipson-Productions? --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

no i upload the file myself without any metadata Realdbeat (talk) 09:33, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

It doesn't help to hide the evidence. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

how do i drop evidence Realdbeat (talk) 20:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

I need some help…

Hey, Túrelio. I’ve accidently found this category. A lot of its images are uploaded from the Flickr account “Coletivo Resistência”. This account has been uploading photos from Ricardo Stuckert, the official photographer of the president of Brazil, Lula. As far as I’m concerned, he doesn’t license his photos under any license accepted by Commons. So it should be a case to delete them due to copyvio, but I still don’t know how to nominate that many pictures. I would also like your opinion on the matter, if possible. Sorry for anything… RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:28, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi RodRabelo7,

in such case I would recommend to open a regular DR for 1 image out of this series and then copy the DR-template that has been created for the pilot-image onto all other files. If the latter sounds too much work, you could also put the above mentioned category into the DR-discussion with a statement like "This also applies to all files in category ...", provided the copyright-status is identical for all files in the category. Did you check whether there is an official Flickr-account of the president of Brazil, where these image might also be hosted under a different license? --Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Nimrat Khaira.jpg

I have taken copyright di permission before uploading the file. What incomplete permission are you talking about? Bermuda9999 (talk) 10:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

No idea what you want to say. In general: content on Facebook is not automatically under a free license. Only the creator/copyright-holder can release his/her work under a free license. You need to provide evidence for the claimed free license. Aso, photographer i not the depicted lady, but Ravan Khosa (per watermark).--Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Mypictures.jpg

How is this in scope? Uhai (talk) 23:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

It's a church building and we have even a few more images of that church. Of course, the filename is nonsense and should be changed. Also, a number of uploads from the same user had nonsense-descriptions, though the images are usable. --Túrelio (talk) 08:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Interesting you see a church. I am seeing this (a selfie of a guy outdoors), even after clearing my browser cache. Not sure what's going on. Uhai (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Strange. It's the same church as File:Our beloved church.jpg. By the way: do you have any idea about what this "campaign" is: Category:Uploaded via Campaign:Brent through your heart? --Túrelio (talk) 10:10, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

I have no idea, sorry! Uhai (talk) 10:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Professor E. Tendayi Achiume SPEAKING.webp

Hello Túrelio. Would you please undelete c:File:Professor E. Tendayi Achiume SPEAKING.webp on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Tendayi_Achiume? The picture is used under fair use with appropriate credit. I have checked with Professor Achiume, the subject of the article. 169.159.177.221 06:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Humphreytheodorek (if that is you), the problem is that Commons is (legally) not allowed to host fair-use material; see Commons:Fair use. Fair-use images need to be uploaded locally, i.e. on the project where they are to be used, provided that project has an exemption-policy, such as :en-Wikipedia (en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline). --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Duplicates of DOCUMERICA photographs

Hey Túrelio. As you must have noticed by now, I have started tagging duplicates of the DOCUMERICA files. My estimate is that there are hundreds if not thousands of duplicate files (Commons search). Is there anything I can do to make your and other contributors' work easier? Should I limit myself to a number of duplicates per day? Cheers. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Cryptic-waveform,

1st question: I don't really think so. For quite a number of the target-files, I found that they had a empty line on top of the description-template, which I manually deleted before the final go-click. But, if you are not actually editing the target-files, it wouldn't make sense to perform a separate editing-process only for that.

2nd question: that is not necessary, as duplicates are in a separate speedy-queue and thereby do hinder the speedy deletion of more urgent files, such as copyvios. If there are too many of them, it might only take some time until they are all processed.

--Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your input. I'll go for it and find as many duplicates as I can. I apologize in advance for any false positives that may slip in. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 02:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Duplicates

Hi I'm not sure if that was an exact duplicate. I see version differences between kept and probably deleted. Also the tint of the paper differs. The description mentions 3 versions, Search on commons results in 2 versions now. But it could have been their mistake, possibly corrected later on. IDK. MfG Peli (talk) 18:55, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, actually I waited for several days before performing this request. I even checked the serial# of the original drawing, which were identical (58), as I had the same impression. It's no problem to undelete. --Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi thanks for temp undeleting so i could compare. I made a comparision gallery on the file page. The manuscript lines show differences: "1e staat" vs. "2e staat" bottom right. And tint of paper differs clearly. Plus the deleted file was from a different donation to the museum. Can it be permanently undeleted please? Obvious error (by very new nominator). I don't understand their persistence to nominate this file again. Thousands of very similar but absolutely different versions wouid have to go. In cat pugs in art we might not need 3 samples. But we keep these to document art history - collections of art works by museum. I know you understand this. Thanks. Peli (talk) 00:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Ultima cancellazione

Ciao, scusa, io avevo messo la tabella dei diritti, l'unico problema è che non riuscivo a farla funzionare. Credevo che un amministratore l'avrebbe aggiustato, al posto di cancellarlo, e infatti avevo scritto a @Ruthven. Che motivo c'era di cancellarlo? Beaest (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, are you talking about File:Beatrice d'Este accoglie il messo pontificio, dalla pellicola "Lucrezia Borgia" di Lorenzo Onorati.png? If yes, you had tagged it by yourself as non-free content (fair use). However, fair-use material is not allowed on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Pensavo fosse possibile perché ho visto alcune foto simili, ma forse è possibile caricarle solo nella Wikipedia nazionale, ossia italiana nel mio caso, così: File:Schulmädchen-Report 7.png - Wikipedia

Correggimi se sbaglio. Beaest (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

No, see Commons:Fair use. Of course, it happens every now and then that users copy such kind of images from local (Wikipedia) to Commons, though they are warned not to do so, and it may then take some time until these images are detected and deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Ho capito, grazie mille per l'aiuto. Beaest (talk) 22:16, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

An unusual DR, possibly

Please have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Murexia xenochromus specimen.jpg, which is very early in its life. I would just like to know is this is the correct way to flag a possible hoax. I have no competence to judge whether it is or is not a hoax. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 23:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Let's wait for the :en-discussion. However, after another user found from where this image was "photoshopped" it's more likely a hoax. For now, I've tagged the file with an additional "fact"-warning-template. --Túrelio (talk) 09:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

I think waiting is wise. I nominated it "procedurally" rather than from any position of knowledge. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

This has been quite a voyage of discovery. Thank you for all of your help. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Edit request

Can you please briefly undelete File:Николай Николаевич Боголюбов (портрет).jpg and edit the author section to note that the photo is by Mark Redkin (1908-1987) then re-delete it? Thank you!--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Baudenkmäler

Hallo Turelio! Wie ist das eigentlich bei Baudenkmälern? Ich habe bis jetzt immer nur eine neue Categorie angelegt, wenn ich mind. 2 Fotos hatte, und auch buildings in..........., und cultural heritage monuments in ............. darunter geschrieben. Aber jetzt hat das ein Wikipedianer gelöscht, für 1 Foto eine neue Categorie angelegt, die nur die Adresse beinhaltet. Grüße Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 11:12, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, ich schaue später mal darauf. Gibst du mir noch das Link für die gelöschte cat durch. --Túrelio (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Turelio, Kiensee 2.jpg ist die Überschrift. Da hat ein Wikipedianer schon zum 2. Mal, nachdem ich es gelöscht hatte, das Buildings in Bad Heilbrunn und das CHM in Bad Heilbrunn wieder gelöscht, und Bauernhaus Kiensee 2 als Categorie darunter geschrieben. Ich habe aber gesehen, daß das Foto trotzdem noch in beiden Categorien vorhanden ist. Stattdessen gibt es jetzt eine globale Dateiverwendung mit diesem Namen. Das hat mich total irritiert! Außerdem noch die Tatsache, daß das bei nur 1 Foto gemacht wird. Aber wahrscheinlich wollte dieser fleißige Wikipedianer dieses Bauernhaus besonders in den Fokus rücken. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 09:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

@Edelmauswaldgeist, sorry dass es so lange gedauert hat. Ich habe heute etwas ähnliches bei einem Foto von Prof. Loogen erlebt, File:Loogen1984OleBreithardtfecit.jpg. Ich hatte dafür keine eigene Kategorie angelegt, nach der "alten Regel". Nun hat jemand doch eine eigene Kategorie Category:Franz Loogen angelegt und die ganzen Detailkategorien, in denen bislang das Bild einsortiert war, dorthin verschoben. Das geht für mich aber in Ordnung, weil der Effekt ja derselbe ist, ob in den Detailkategorien nun direkt das Foto oder halt die Namenskategorie des Abgebildeten steckt. Möglicherweise ist diese Strategie eine Auswirkung der zunehmenden Übernahme von Strukturen von WikiData nach Commons.

Was dein Bild File:Kiensee 2.jpg angeht, sind diese Kategorie-Änderungen ja von einem langjährigen deutschsprachigen Benutzer, User:Reinhardhauke, vorgenommen worden. Den kannst du problemlos auch direkt ansprechen, dass er dir kurz erklärt warum er das so gemacht hat. --Túrelio (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Image

Hi,

I noticed you deleted the file File:AndrewTateSextape.webp. Thanks for doing so, for an obvious reason, but I noticed in your edit summary you said "delete and salt". The page is currently not protected. Please do so.

Thanks! Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 21:48, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

hmm. Apart from the fact that "salting" isn't fail-proof, I prefer to leave the filename as sort of honey-pot. I've it on my watch-list and will be notified, when the file is recreated. --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Non-responsive user to send permissions to VRT

Hi. I've asked a user to send permissions for images, they've attached a link to non-accessible Google Drive share and removed the No-permission-since tags. What are the next steps here? User talk:Chennai Super Kings Lover#Permissions. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I've re-tagged them and left a note on his talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

About yhe Photo

Here Then how to upload the public figures photo for biography? as if the photo is necessary for Article. Nrshaown (talk) 08:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

You need to find a photo that was evidently released under a Commons-compatible free license (COM:L) by its photographer. Being on Facebook or other social medial does NOT mean it's freely licensed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Vanessa 1.jpg

Looking over the license history on Flickr it appears that the uploader marked it as both both CC BY 2.0 and all rights reserved at the same time multiple times. Then they eventually just changed it to all rights reserved. Which makes me think they didn't know what they doing. Whatever the bot says I don't think you can justify it being CC BY 2.0 if that's clearly not the term the person intended it to be licensed under. IMO the bot doesn't override common sense or the facts either. In this case the person clearly didn't know what they doing and landed on all rights reserved once they figured it out. So I'd appreciated it if you just deleted the file. At least per the precautionary principle if nothing else. Obviously no one is going to win a copyright case if it ever goes there by basing their defense on the judgements of a bot. Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 08:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Well, so far, what I did is our current practise. And simply tracelessly deleting an image that was on Commons since 2010 is a good solution. However, as uploads from this Flickr-account have been reviewed in 3 different ways (bot, admin, reviewer), I will put this up as a question to the community in this moment. I suggest you to wait with the file at hand until this is discussed, and then put it up again in a regular DR, so that, in case it gets deleted, there remains a trace, which shows that it wasn't a plain copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

OK. That's fine. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:35, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

See Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#legal_question. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Not to beat a dead horse, but I'm kind of interested now. Say I accidently click CC BY 2.0 or whatever CC license when I upload a file and then I change it to something else later once I realize the mistake. Am I then stuck with it being licensed under the terms of the CC since me using that license for the image is permanently in the files edit history? --Adamant1 (talk) 08:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Not exactly. When you upload your own work to Flickr erroneously under a free license, which you realize only shortly after it has been transferred to Commons (with record of the then free license), per the nonrevokable doctrine of CC, you cannot prevent others to use your image from Commons. When you realize your wrong licensing on Flickr immediately/soon and change it accordingly, then it's highly unlikely that it has already been transferred to Commons, so the problem wouldn't occur. I mean, it's important to remember that publishing a work under a free license is a legal act.--Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

That sounds reasonable, I guess. Although it seems a little weird to predicate the whole thing on if it's been transferred to Commons yet since the legalities of the licensing terms have nothing to do with where the file is or isn't being hosted at the time. Like if the person wrongly uploaded the image to Flickr as public domain, it was transferred to Commons under that license and then it turned not to be PD, you can't just be like "to bad. It was transferred to Commons as public domain so it's public domain." --Adamant1 (talk) 09:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Of course, as there is Flickr-washing, one needs to be rather sure that the account-holder was legally entitled (i.e., own work, not even a derivative) to release it under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Liste

Hilfeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Habe gestern auf die Liste der jüdischen Friedhöfe in Deutschland mühsam Bilder von bayrischen jüdischen Friedhöfen hochgeladen. Jetzt sind die aber alle in der Rubrik "Bemerkungen" gelandet. Es gibt aber auch keine Rubrik für Bilder! Da wollte ich etwas produktives machen, und habe alles durcheinander gebracht. Wie mache ich das jetzt? Viele Grüße Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Bitte mal mind. eins der betroffenen Bilder hier verlinken. --Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@Edelmauswaldgeist, kann es sein, dass du dich hier auf die Wikipedia beziehst (und nicht auf Commons). --Túrelio (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Ganz richtig! z.b. File:AmbergJüdischerFriedhof 06.JPG. File:Jüdischer Friedhof Ansbach10.jpg. Du mußt nur mal "Liste der jüdischen Friedhöfe in Deutschland Wikipedia" eintippen, dann findest du bei der bayerischen Liste das gesammte Schlamassel, aus dem ich jetzt nicht mehr herausfinde. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Oh je. Tabellenprogrammierung in MediaWiki ist eine mittlere Katastrophe. Da kann ich nicht wirklich helfen. Was mich nur wundert: bei den anderen Bundesländern gibt es in der Liste überhaupt keine Fotos. Gehören die Bayern-Friedhof-Fotos vielleicht einfach nicht in die Liste? Falls das so sein sollte, könntest du doch einfach deine Edits, mit denen du die Fotos eingefügt hattest, wieder rückgängig machen. --Túrelio (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Es wäre sehr schade, wenn durch das Löschen meine ganze Arbeit umsonst gewesen wäre. Außerdem gibt es wie in der Liste beschrieben viele Friedhöfe in Bayern. Mir ist auch schon aufgefallen, daß nirgends Fotos sind. Deshalb wollte ich mir da die Arbeit machen. Jetzt versuche ich es mal über das Forum, vielleicht finde ich da Hilfe. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 17:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Selbstversorgung im Garten

Ich verstehe nicht, warum Túrelio den Löschantrag gestellt hat. Diese Fotografie ist von mir und ich widerspreche dem Löschansinnen. KUGerhardt (talk) 10:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@KUGerhardt, dann kommentiere im LA Commons:Deletion requests/File:Selbstversorgung im Garten.jpg, wo übrigens auch die Begründung steht. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your deletion of the image I uploaded

You have deleted an image that I have uploaded.

deleted page File:20220827 B.I 1st Fan Meeting in Manila 3.jpg (Copyright violation: No indication that image is licensed freely on tweet nor on the author's profile description https://twitter.com/dearLynnne/status/1566822341409026048)

The author of the picture has already sent the email with the permission. I have added subst:op to the file to let the VRT team know that permission is on the way, but another editor has reverted my changes saying, "refrain from adding any templates, as it's not permissible, given you are not a member of the VRT". They were clearly wrong.

I'm very unhappy that I wasn't notified before you deleted this file. What's the resolution here now? Bostonite01310 (talk) 14:33, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

I now realize that I have been notified by a different editor. But it was the middle of the night for me and I did not get a chance to respond before it got deleted. Two of my files have now been deleted, even though the copyright holder sent an email with written permission to VRT as soon as I uploaded the images.

File:20220827 B.I 1st Fan Meeting in Manila 15.jpg

File:20220827 B.I 1st Fan Meeting in Manila 3.jpg

Bostonite01310 (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

@Bostonite01310, I hadn't seen the "permission-pending-template", as it had been removed, which I think was a bit excessive. Anyway, the images can easily be restored, when the volunteer (OTRS) who deals with the permission, says it's o.k. They can either notify me or put it on an admin-board. So, do not re-upload the images, the originals will be restored, if permission is ok. --Túrelio (talk) 17:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio: If I'm being honest this whole process has been quite excruciating for me. An editor (a VRT team member no less) with insufficient knowledge got into an incorrect argument with me in the middle of my night for hours. I thought I had it settled but when I woke up in the morning my files got deleted. I'm not on Wikipedia round the clock. I go to work or sleep like a normal person. I do edits on Wikipedia for fun. This experience has been the opposite of it. Bostonite01310 ^talk 20:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry about that. But remember, we are all volunteers here, Admins (as me) as well as the OTRS/VRT-people. Besides, you are not obliged to immediately reply to a mail from OTRS, as people here live in different time-zones all over the world. If you are new here, a deleted image may look as a desaster, but it is not. It takes an admin 2 clicks to restore it. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

St Peris' Church

Please reverse your deletion of the redirect at Category:St Peris' Church, Llanberis.

A number of images exist, such as File:St. Peris Church Llanberis Wales.jpg, which refer to the church by that name, as do external sources.

The redirect should be to Category:St Peris's Church, Nantperis. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Ok. The redir-target was wrong and thereby red. --Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Sigh. The target was moved, without leaving a redirect. All good now. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Removal of image Z1151 and copyrighting Z1152

I just found out that you removed the image Z1151.JPG i uploaded and copyright marked Z1152.JPG, I’ve allready emailed the volunteers but would like to ask why they were marked at all as I was given the images from the archive with the express permission of using them for Wikipedia and marked them as such as was requested from me. with regards ThatArmyDude (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

I am not aware of any file with such a name. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Ah, you probably meant File:WAGR Z1151.jpg and File:WAGR Z1152.jpg. Next time please provide proper filenames. You were in advance notified about the problems on your talkpage: User talk:ThatArmyDude.

The 1st one was sourced from https://www.railheritagewa.org.au/ and credited to some K. Raynes; no evidence of a free license.

The 2nd one is sourced from https://www.railheritagewa.org.au/ and credited to WAGR; no evidence of a free license. In addition, your 2 source-links don't lead to the image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Any file to do with Hamis Kiggundu needs scrutiny

Thank you for your measured approach on a couple of the latest uploads. These enwiki SPIs will interest you, because they show an ever increasing sock farm surrounding the gentleman. I've been tracking edits in this area for more than a couple of years now, and find that they always need scrutiny. I've responded to the D you created for one of the two recent ones. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 10:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

OMG, this is really a long SP-list.:-( --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Global rollbacker

Hello, can I patrol edits and new file on Commons via the Global rollback tool? Thanks! Tryvix1509 (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi, honestly, I don't know. However, exactly 1 month ago Kadı gave you rollbacker-right on Commons. If you want to patrol edits and/or new uploads, which is a very welcome task, please request it at Commons:Requests for rights#Patroller. --Túrelio (talk) 14:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, Kadı gave me rollbacker right for revert vandalism purpose, but now I have the global rollbacker tool, which have the global patrolmarks and autopatrol right. So I just want to ask again to confirm if it is legal for me to use this patrol tool on Commons. Tryvix1509 (talk) 14:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

I assume, if somebody obtained the technical right to do something, this should automatically include the "permission" to use it. By the way, to patrol files, if not done in an intentionally bad manner, is always good in itself and is an important task. Rollback should be used with more caution, according to the rules. --Túrelio (talk) 14:14, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Please help delete my image,thank you

Hi,I have appeared on camera as of 2022. There is a racy picture that I intended to be for study purposes only but it appears when I google in the google picture bar the name Arijana Neskovic. Can you go to my page and delete it,its a girl with black hair and breasts in a trenchoat. I also do not want the picture to appear with my name during google picture search.Thank you,Ariana You can go to my page and see the picture. ArijanaNeskovicBrajic (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Can you check it?

Hey, Túrelio. Sorry for disturbing you, but would you mind checking if this image is a copyright violation? The filename, the Exif… everything gives me that feeling. There’s also a personal photo in the file’s history. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Opened a DR. --Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Pál Esterházy (1843–1898)

Thank you for the very quick deletion! :-)) Bizottmány (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright of photos

Hey Túrelio. I've uploaded a couple of photos (including File:Jack P Crowther.jpg, File:Joe E. Hollingsworth, 1961.jpg, and File:Donald D. Lorenzen, 1958.jpg, for example) and seen some photos uploaded by other users (for example, File:Roy Lawrence Donley family portrait circa 1923.jpg, File:Andrew Boyle Workman-c1925.jpg, and File:Francisco Miranda, Billy Sweeney, and Councilman Edward R. Roybal.jpg, for example) that aren't immediately clear if they're been published. From what I understand now, they have to be published for them to use templates like PD-US-expired, PD-US-no notice, and PD-US-not renewed. If I can't find anything that points to them being previously published, should they be deleted? Thanks. reppop^talk 22:34, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi Reppop,

I don't have special expertise wrt U.S. copyright terms. For images claimed to be published between 1928 and 1977, such as File:Jack P Crowther.jpg, they have to be published without a copyright-note. The "publication" at TESSA can hardly count to fulfil this requirement, as existet hardly before 1978 and also mentions the photographer, which probably counts as "copyright note", though I am ot sure about the latter. So, if your own search doesn't yield proof of publication, fulfilling the mentioned requirements, you might open a regular DR, eventually a collective one including images in an identical situation (for example, shot in the 1950/60s), and ask for comment. Eventually other contributors may find evidence of publication (w/o copyright-note). --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Seed Catalog..

Thanks - I was going through all the items I had tagged, and updating the licenses. User_talk:Fæ#File:Summer_and_fall,_1948_(IA_summerfall194819jste).pdf

Any chance you could assist in reviewing these as well? (see also my contributions from this morning.)... 09:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi ShakespeareFan00,

I stumbled on these files when working on the speedy-queues. Currently I have not enough time to work on the complete batch of these files, as it requires to scroll through all pages of each pdf. As they are not urgent, you could just leave them in the queue. In some time they will be processed by my admin-colleagues. --Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

No worries, I estimate I should clear my reviews later this afternoon. Do you mind if I take a look at other PDF tagged as copyvio, as I have some spare time? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

As I assume you know what you are doing, just go on. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

dupliate undeletion request

Hi Túrelio, Hope you're well, Could you undelete File:1995 Ford Liata (49679009402).jpg please as it wasn't a duplicate - the live file was a crop of the original file that you deleted, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. On first view the images look identical, on second view I've detected the difference in the upper part. --Túrelio (talk) 14:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Hey Túrelio, Great minds think alike - I noticed this too when declining their first request, I'll rename the file to say it's cropped to avoid confusement, Thank you for undeleting this, Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 15:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Image

Túrelio why did you delete my image? LatosTheFifth (talk) 14:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, as you had re-uploaded an image, which had been deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bela Lugosi as Count Dracula 1931.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 15:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

I found and downloaded that image from dvdbeaver.com and decided to make it full screen. LatosTheFifth (talk) 15:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

That an image is somewhere in the web does not mean it's under a free license, which is a requirement for any upload to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Can't you upload it? LatosTheFifth (talk) 15:08, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

You did not understand what I wrote or what it means. Any upload to Commons has to be as free as required per COM:L. Only the original author/creator can release an image under a free license or if an image is old enough it may fall into the public domain. It has nothing to do with who uploads it. --Túrelio (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

So my favorite images can't exist can they? LatosTheFifth (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Noting Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#User:LatosTheFifth. Belbury (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Please ignore that. LatosTheFifth (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

File:New Goa International Airport's Logo.jpg

Hi Túrelio. I'm wondering if the coloring of the shape in the logo https://www.newgoaairport.com/images/goa-logo.svg is under TOO. Seem normal color gradients but I don't know if gradients are covered by TOO. If so, replacing that jpg with svg is better. Do we delete the jpg and upload svg separately or upload svg as a new version to this one? -- DaxServer (talk) 09:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

uui, that's a difficult question. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India#Threshold of originality one might assume that it's below TOO. But, that's just a layman's interpretation. You might put that question on COM:VP.

Wrt your 2nd question: as the jpeg-file looks rather bad, compared to the original, I would request it for deletion, once the svg is there. And, no, as the file-format is different, one cannot upload the svg as a new version of the jpeg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

I see thanks. BTW, What's "uui" ? -- DaxServer (talk) 10:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Might be replaced by . --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

LD_1 -> LD_01

Can you do this redirect in reverse? There are 48 other files in the set with the exact form of 'LD_##.pdf'. Thanks. Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 16:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. That one file was definitely my mess. Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 23:20, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Bath City images

Hi mate, a lot of the Bath City files that I have requested to be deleted are not in use. They are poorly cropped/edited duplicates of the original image, which I did myself. If possible, please could you delete the images that are no in use? That would be great, thanks. Joseph1891 (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Sure. But, File:Bath City squad in 1913 taken at the Belvoir Castle Ground.jpg is in use. One other I've duplicate-deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 17:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Oh yeah you’re right! Sorry I thought I changed that one for the clearer one! Thanks for letting me no, feel free to delete this one, I’ll replace it with the clearer one :) Thanks. 👍Joseph1891 (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

I’ll put the speedy deletion template for all the images that need to be deleted if that’s okay. Joseph1891 (talk) 17:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Most have been processed now. File:Bath City F.C. Squad 1913.png should be kept for historic purposes, as it's the "original" report. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Temporary undeletion

Howdy! I'm BusterD, and en.wiki admin and I'd like to view the File:Menē Inc. certificate of authenticity offered with all jewelry.jpg. I am researching a user I believe has violated policy as it regards connected (perhaps paid) editing. Would you allow me to see it for 24 hours? Thanks! BusterD (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

@BusterD, there you are. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

As it turns out the uploader has been blocked for sockpuppetry and possible UPE. Thank you for your kind assistance. If I can ever help you, please ask. BusterD (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Another revision to hide

Hi Túrelio. Thanks for deleting the picture change revision on File:Marcial Gómez Balsera.jpg. There is another one to do here: File:Mer av Svegs centrum.jpg. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello!

I think I marked an empty file for deletion and you deleted it. I now however saw in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abhandlung von den Zähnen (Pfaff) 227.jpg that the file page was intentionally left blank so to not destroy the link chain. So you can undelete the file. Jonteemil (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. You can probably undelete the talk page as well so it won't be nominated again.Jonteemil (talk) 00:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Nicht Copyvio, sondern Dublett

Guten Tag, bei dem Bild File:Conventia PD-L 2013 - Monica Macovei 1-scaled.jpg und den TinEye-Ergebnissen handelt es sich um Kopien von File:Conventia PD-L 2013 - Monica Macovei (1).jpg. Viele Grüße, --Micha (talk) 12:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

@Dan Mihai Pitea, Danke für den Hinweis. Letztlich ist es aber auch eine copyvio, weil Ninhursag3 das Foto als "own work" deklariert und damit die CC-Lizenz des Originalfotos ungültig gemacht hat. --Túrelio (talk) 13:09, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag removal

Regarding File:Barco_SRL_foto_wiki2.jpg, the original uploader appears to be a spam account, who was blocked on EN Wikipedia for making self-promotional edits on the same day they made the upload. With this in mind, would the image still fall under G10 even if it remains in use? Loafiewa (talk) 14:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Loafiewa,

on Commons we have the practise that an image, which we consider a bit questionable or out of COM:SCOPE, but which is used in the mainspace of an WMF-project, is kept (as long as it's used), provided it does not violate copyright or personality/privacy-rights. So, the proper way here would be to talk to the users on :es, where the image is used, about the problem and/or offer them a comparable picture. --Túrelio (talk) 15:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Bigg Boss Malayalam 5 Poster.jpg

Hi Túrelio. You tagged File:Bigg Boss Malayalam 5 Poster.jpg with {{Npd}}, but the uploader subsequently added a YouTube link as the source. The link they added doesn't work, but I think they were trying to add this. There's nothing on that YouTube page to indicate the file uploaded has been released as licensed. The uploader also is mucking around with the date of the npd template. This could be just a misunderstanding of how the template works or it could an attempt to game the process. Either way, it seem unlikely that they're going to be able to get anyone's consent for this file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly,

thanks for notifying. File deleted as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for checking on this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Isreal

hey. I am from Iran and I am very glad that you visited Isreal. Unfortunately I can't because our country are not Friends. Isreal is so awesome. Have you visited Iran yet?! Nsiamrahadi (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sorry no, as of yet I had no opportunity to visit Iran. --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Review

Hi @Túrelio good day, can you please review my uploads.Thanks Pp01902 (talk) 15:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. However, your last upload has no permission at the source. So, if the depicted lady is willing to release it under a free license, she should either put a note on Instagram or send an email from her official email-address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), confirming the choosen free license. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Kindly check the insta source again and you can find the permission info, File:Sonu Chandrapal.jpg. Hope this helps. Thanks Pp01902 (talk) 07:14, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Cabot Logo.png

Hi Túrelio. File:Cabot Logo.png is a reupload of File:CabotCreamery.jpg, but this time the uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder. I posted this on their English Wikipedia user talk page and tagged the latest upload with {{Npd}}, but I'll leave it to your discretion as to whether the latest upload should be deleted as a copyvio as well as a precaution until CONSENT can be VRT verified. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Marchjuly, IMO, they are are probably related to the company. So, I've directed them per email to your advise on the talkpage and I'll let the npd-process run regularly. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for looking at this. For reference, there account has been blocked on English Wikipedia, but that shouldn't stop them from emailing their consent to VRT if they want to do so. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Frédéric de Roos

Hello @Turelio. You have deleted File:Scan-brochure-20-ans-jazz-crb.jpg from our page because there would be a "Copyright infringement: non-free illustrations: record, CD cover". However, we are not only the author of the creation of the document but also the author of the scan. Could you please remove this so-called copyright violation so that we can put this document back into use ? Thank you in advance. Bib-crb (talk) 13:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Bib-crb,

the brochure has 2 possibly copyrightable elements, the text portion and the graphic to the left. The copyright remains usually with the creator of the work. Making a scan of a work does not change that, i.e. the copyright is not transferred to the "scanner". Now, assuming that you might be a representative of the "Conservatoire royal de Bruxelles", the text of the brochure is likely in the copyright of the Conservatoire. But, who created the graphic? --Túrelio (talk) 14:53, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Turelio. I understand. Indeed, the text is the property of the Conservatoire royal de Bruxelles. The design was created by Jean-Claude Salemi. Bib-crb (talk) 09:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Ok. So, as Jean-Claude Salemi seems to be alive, you need to ask his permission to release said brochure/cover with his work under the choosen free license. If you want to do this, I can temporarily restore the image-file on Commons. The confirmation should be sent directly from Mr. Salemi to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). It can also be in French, however, the specific image and the license need to be mentioned in it. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio. Jean-Claude Salemi's image was one that the Conservatory had commissioned. In 2007, we already had the rights to Jean-Claude Salemi to distribute posters, programmes and flyers. Why should it not be possible to reproduce the image since the rights were already requested and authorised at the time ? Bib-crb (talk) 12:32, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Uploads to Commons (policy COM:L) need to be under a free license that allows anybody to use it for any purpose, including commercial re-use. So, if your image is licensed under a CC-BY or CC-BY-SA license, anybody could crop the Salemi-graphic, print it on postcards or a coffee-cups and sell them. Please take this information to the legal department/counsel of the Conservatory and ask them/him/her whether such a release would be legitimate based on the terms of their contract with Jean-Claude Salemi. If they are sure it's yes, then the legal dep. should send said confirmation to OTRS, as explained above. --Túrelio (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of oldest upload djvu

Hello, Turélio.The File:Langevin - L’Aspect général de la théorie de la relativité, 1922.djvu at first upload (dated sept) missed 1 page. This has been corrected with a second upload (dated march). We notice at wikisource an irregularity. So, if you can delete the first upload of sept, 27, 2022, the index page will become correct at wikisource, I hope. --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Havang(nl),  Done. Hope it helped. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Ahmed El-Sakka 2020.png

Hi, this file is licensed under YouTube Audio Library. Should it be deleted? --Karim talk to me :)..! 11:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

What's "YouTube Audio Library"? At the YT-URL I see no evidence of a free license. However, as it was uploaded in 2021, the license on YT might have been changed. Now I've checked on archive.org; even in 2021 there was no free license[8]. --Túrelio (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Löschantrag

Hallo Turelio!Bei: File:Untermberg 5 Arzbach.jpg, Wackersberg Wiki, Buildings in Wackersberg, den Rest habe ich schon einmal gelöscht, haben sich die Hausbewohner beschwert, weil sie im Hintergrund zu sehen sind. Sie drohen mir auch mit rechtlichen Schritten, wennn das Bild nicht innerhalb von 3 Tagen verschwunden ist. Anleitungen zum Programm "Quick delete" habe ich nicht gefunden, also versuchte ich es mit "Löschantrag vorschlagen", was natürlich viel zu lange dauert. Da fiel mir ein, daß sich schon einmal jemand beschwert hat, weil sie ganz schwach im Hintergrund zu sehen war. Damals hat mir jemand damit geholfen, indem er die Person aus dem Foto gelöscht hat. Vielleicht könntest du das ja in diesem Bild mit den 3 Personen machen. Ich habe den Hausbewohnern schon mitgeteilt, daß ich einen Löschantrag gestellt habe. Wenn das aber alles zu schwierig ist, lösche einfach das ganze Bild, dann fahre ich wieder in diese Gegend wo noch einige Baudenkmäler zum fotografieren sind, und nehme das Haus ohne Personen nochmal auf. Vielen Dank Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 08:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Edelmauswaldgeist,

eine Retouche wäre hier m.E. zu aufwendig. Ich habe es deshalb direkt gelöscht, zumal ich keine externen Nachnutzungen gefunden habe. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Vielen Dank Turelio! Jetzt bin ich richtig erleichtert!!!!!!!! Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 08:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Bitte

Guten Tag Túrelio,
darf ich heute mal wieder mit einer persönlichen Bitte an Dich herantreten.
Da ich sehr viele Seiten und Bilder öffne, werde ich besonders in letzter Zeit mit einer Unmenge von Wikipedia-Bannern und -Infos, ich sage es offen, genervt.
Meine Frage: Kann man diese Banner global ausschalten? und wäre es möglich, dass Du mir diese Funktion in mein Userkonto eingibst?
Ich wäre Dir sehr dankbar. Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 12:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC) P.S. ...offensichtlich ist mein Antiwerbebanner nicht o.k.

Hallo Orchi,

war seit Vormittag unterwegs. Mich nerven die Banner auch etwas; normalerweise reicht es für eine Sitzung, wenn man das Banner durch Klick auf das x schließt. Wie man das global oder zumindest projektweise ganz abschaltet, weiß ich leider nicht. Da müsste ich mich auch erst schlaumachen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Guten Tag Túrelio,

vielen Dank und hoffentlich Erfolg bei Deinem Mühen. Grüße Orchi (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Islatravir structure.svg

Hallo Túrelio,

warum hast du meine hochgeladene Sturkturformel (File:Islatravir structure.svg) gelöscht mit dem Hinweis, dass es ein Duplikat auf File:Test.svg wäre - Test.svg ist aber eine universelle Anlaufstelle, um svgs vorab zu testen (temporary file for testing whether SVG files will correctly render when uploaded on Commons.). Nachdem ich zufrieden war, habe ich dann unter korrektem Name die Strukturformel hochgeladen. Mittlerweile gibt es duztende andere test.svg-Versionen.

Daher bitte Islatravir structure.svg wiederherstellen. --Julius Senegal (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Julius, ein Duplikat-Bot hatte sie als Duplikat markiert. Hab sie wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Wunderbar, dankeschön. --Julius Senegal (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

File deletion (Michelle Akers entry)

Hello Túrelio, I saw your request for the deletion of said file, included in the Michelle Ankers entry here on wikipedia. Since I saw you were very keen to help check that the image is suitable for this site, I ask you if you would like to help me find a picture of her to put on her profile. It is very important for me that women in soccer are given recognizion and a picture on her Wikipedia entry would mean that. Sorry about the non-technical language, I am new on Wikipedia. Saludos! SANDIACELESTIAL (talk) 07:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi SANDIACELESTIAL,

as Commons accepts only uploads that are verifiable freely licensed (per COM:L) by its creator, you need to search for such images. A fertile place for that might be flickr.com. If even a thorough search doesn't yield any usable image, you might either try to contact Michelle Ankers and ask her whether she would be able to provide a freely licensed image of herself, or, if you want to use the image only on :en-Wikipedia, you may claim a not freely licensed image under the fair-use exception. The latter cannot be uploaded to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Disney characters

Disney frequently sues for their copyright, so... shouldn't all of those in the Category:Disney characters on stamps and subcategories (perhaps even some of the parent categories) be looked at? TherasTaneel (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for notifying. However, I am not a specialist for the intricacies of U.S. copyright. I recommend to put that question at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Antalya waterfalls

Greetings. The file you falsely accused me for copyrights violation, comes from my device. Please, restore the file. Thank you. GreatBernard (talk) 21:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you are correct. The patroler, who had tagged the image as copyvio-suspected, wrongly thought that the images were identical, which is not the case. Sorry.  Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Deleted Category

Hello @Túrelio, I wanted to create a category for an entity, but I realized that it had been deleted by you before.

The category is "Category:Mina Luna". I am a new here and I don't seems to know the reason for the deletion, so i would like to know all that concern the category and if I can recreate it Dcraigo (talk) 13:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Dcraigo,

the cat had been deleted as it had been tagged by another user as "duplicate" of Category:Mina Luna Vincent. However, the latter doesn't exist. So, you may decide by yourself whether cat:Mina Luna Vincent or cat:Mina Luna would be more appropriate and then (re-)create it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Túrelio

I have checked both cat:Mina Luna Vincent and cat:Mina Luna, both have been deleted, and I am not sure if any of them can be restored or i can just go ahead and recreate it. If they can't be restored, can you provide me with an article that can guide me on category creation?

Thanks Dcraigo (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Dcraigo,

see Commons:Categories#Creating a new category. If you tell, which one you want to (re-)create, I can do it for you. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I don't know if I will be able to create it all by myself. Can you help me to create it instead? The category is for Mina Luna Dcraigo (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Just like Guilldermo del toro category Dcraigo (talk) 11:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

I think Category:Mina Luna Vincent would the appropriate name. However, as it had formerly been deleted for being empty, is the any Commons-compliant content? --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Okay no problem

But what is Commons-compliant content Dcraigo (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Content that is validly under a free license, compliant to our license-policy. Problem with restoration of this cat is that currently there seem to be no Mina-Luna-related images on Commons. So, if I undelete or recreate said category, it will be deleted again soon as being empty. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, do you copyright for the category and images of her? Dcraigo (talk) 12:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I do not really understand your question "do you copyright ?". What do you mean by that? --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

i mean is it copyright for the category Dcraigo (talk) 17:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

That does not make any sense. I get the impression that you do not unterstand what I wrote on April 25th and 26th. The category about which we are talking since 2 months, was deleted several times because it was empty. There were no images of said Mina Luna Vincent available. If that is still the case, then it makes no sense to recreate said category, because it will again be empty. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Ohh okay I get

there is image of Mina Luna on wikicommon now which has been used on different languages of Wikipedia and other wiki sisters. And if more image is needed, there are available that I can upload with upload wizard Dcraigo (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

What is the filename of said image? --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jazmin_Yvette_Gonzalez_Luna.jpg Dcraigo (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Well, this file has already been requested for deletion by someone else. So, as I assumed earlier, there seems to be no legitimate content for the discussed category. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

ohhhhhh Dcraigo (talk) 07:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Lotta Svärd badge.svg

How do you do? Could you please explain why this file got deleted? Sincerely, Kwasura (talk) 12:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Kwasure, it had been tagged for deletion by somebody else as "Derivative work of the badge designed by sv: Eric Vasström in 1922 who died in 1958." I had tagged it as "deletion error", as it could technically not be deleted (unknown reason) for some time. But, finally it was deleted by a colleague of mine. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Regarding the "Most handsome boy in the world"

You may need to just Special:Nuke Falakhussain786's uploads. They're all just personal snapshots amd selfies, mostly with filenames of some permutation of "Most handsome boy in the world". Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

local maps by year category

Good day, thanks for your work. I notice you deleted Category:1855 maps of New Orleans with the comment "incorrectly named) duplicate, content moved to Category:1850s maps of New Orleans" - not strictly true, as it is an intersection of 1855 maps, 1855 in New Orleans, and 1850s maps of New Orleans. That being so, I'm wondering about the reason for deletion. Why was this category not appropriate to exist? Wondering, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Infrogmation,

I found the cat empty and speedy-tagged[9]. The cited comment is the default of the C2-speedy script. Please, feel absolutely free to undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I'll have to check, sounds like someone else emptied it out first. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Bild Wegekreuz in Hergenrath

Hallo Túrelio

heute habe ich bei einer Radtour ein Wegekreuz hinter der Kirche in Hergenrath aufgenommen, aber beim Hochladen ist mir ein Missgeschick passiert, wobei ich nicht weiß welches. Das Bild wird auf jeden Fall nicht angezeigt, obwohl es ordnungsgemäß wie immer hochgeladen wurde. Ich vesuchte es mal mit einer neuen Version, doch irgendwie klappt das nicht. Was ist zu tun???

Vielen Dank im Voraus, ArthurMcGill (talk) 16:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hat sich erledigt, jetzt ist es da (wie von Geisterhand), Gruß --ArthurMcGill (talk) 16:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Prima. Ich hatte am Nachmittag im Garten gearbeitet. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Open access journals confirmation

Hey Túrelio. I'm confident that I understood it right that these journal articles are indeed at the tagged license:

• File:A Bayesian phylogenetic study of the Dravidian language family.pdf - CC-BY-4.0
• File:Movies that Actually Get History - The Case and a Half of Kashmir Files - A Study in Social Blogging.pdf CC-BY-2.0

Could you be kind and confirm the same? There're a ton of these articles which would be benefited uploading here [unless they're already on Internet Archive?] Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi DaxServer,

 Done. The 2nd one has conflicting statements wrt the license-version; website says 4.0, pdf says 2.0. But doesn't matter much. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you very much:) DaxServerOnMobile (talk) 07:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey. I'm wondering if I could semi-automate the uploads. It seems most of it can be. I'm wondering if it is regarded as bot editing. If so, I'd have to get the Bot approved? -- DaxServer (talk) 18:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Silvio-Scaglia.jpg

Hi Turelio, about the image of Silvio Scaglia you have deleted (File:Silvio-Scaglia.jpg) dec 2022, Mr Scaglia have send at that time an email, as request, with the autorization. Let me know why the image was deleted and please let me know what to do to upload again. Ciao --Abyssadventurer (talk) 09:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Abyssadventurer,

there wasn't any hint of a permission in the file-description. Had the said permission been sent to OTRS/VRT? --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Question Copywriting

Hello Túrelio, An image I uploaded last week has been deleted for "Copywrite violation". I have the permission from Qwant to use this image in the french page of "Qwant Junior". How can I proceed to submit it with the permission attached? Thanks! Drai000 17/04/23 Drai000 (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

in the description (was it File:HP Qwant Junior.png?)) there wasn't any mention of a permission. Did they sent it to OTRS? See Commons:Email templates for the process and a template for such a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Astounding service

I have no idea how you have the patience nor the energy to delete all that requires deletion. Thank you for your hard work 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Well, someone has to do it. You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Neilson

All locomotives in this category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Neilson_Reid_locomotives need changing to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Neilson_locomotives 89.240.14.140 10:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi 89.240.14.140,

that's an issue of :en-Wikipedia, not Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Missing permission of copyvio

When it comes to album covers and film posters with no evidence of permission is it better to mark them as copyvio or to mark them as missing permission? Trade (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, well, both would be ok. A possibly more specific strategy might be to tag those, which are simply claimed "own work", as copyvio, and those, which are (more or less properly) sourced, though without compliant license, as no-perm. That might have an educatice effect on uploaders. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Amb. Konstanty Radziwiłł.jpg

Hi, why did you delete this file? It was published under Creative Commons 3.0 PL, not Cc-by-nc-nd-3.0? Niegodzisie (talk) 21:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't check before deletion. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Charles Stanley 2020 (QS2dw7EzUk0).jpg

This file I uploaded (File:Charles Stanley 2020 (QS2dw7EzUk0).jpg) was deleted due being tagged as a copyright violation. However, the video this file came from came straight from the official channel (In Touch Ministries) and was uploaded initially with a CC-BY mark, as evidenced by this Archive link of the video when you click the Show more tab: https://web.archive.org/web/20200810013925/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS2dw7EzUk0

With this, and because CC licenses cannot be revoked, may this file be undeleted please?

Thanks for your time. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

You are correct. However, as the deletion was performed by my colleague Polarlys, I would recommend to ask him directly. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Alrighty, thanks for telling me. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 10:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Dear Turelio

I'm using your image of a knight in my book for grade 3s AcerBS (talk) 20:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying, though I have no idea to which of my images you are refering. --Túrelio (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Jeronimo Rodrigues

Dear Túrelio. About File:FOTO-OFICIAL-JERONIMO-RODRIGUESjpg.jpg, could you please send me the link to the page from where the copyrighted image was extracted? A.WagnerC (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Sure: https://www.bahia.ba.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/FOTO-OFICIAL-JERONIMO-RODRIGUES.jpeg . --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! A.WagnerC (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Does this image of Jerônimo Rodrigues meet the Commons requirements? I ended up uploading one of restricted content in the Wikis projects, but if this one works, I will replace them. A.WagnerC (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sure. It is under a free license of a credible Flickr-account. --Túrelio (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:How to pronounce k6ka.ogg

Hi Turelio, I just noticed that this sound file was deleted for "username pronouncation of banned user created in violation of ban". I'm a bit confused by this, since I was the one who recorded the sound file, and as far as I'm aware, I'm not banned from Commons or any other Wikimedia project. I did notice some IP users (88.237.3.193 and 88.252.99.51) that have been tagging my files for deletion, and also causing trouble on IRC. Per this edit, it's evidently an enwiki LTA. Could the sound file be undeleted, since this is clearly a mistake? Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, sorry that I didn't notice that. File restored and IP-protected. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Review

Hi. If you are available, could you confirm that File:Alyssa Sutterland 2023 02.jpg's license is valid? Have a nice day. Nyxaros (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Duplicate redirects and deletions process question

Here- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Secretary_Blinken_Meets_with_Mayors.jpg&action=history you created a redirect to the duplicate file and deleted my upload.

My three uploads from the U.S. Department of State had the same source, same file size, same date and exact time, but were deleted. I understand that the second User to upload the "duplicate" file, as determined by the date/time stamp, gets deleted. How did you determine that all three of my uploads were to be deleted? I also noticed that 2 of my 3 deleted uploads were listed on the duplicate template page as "1." and the two kept files were "2." What criteria determines which file will be listed as #1 and #2? In addition, my files were more thoroughly categorized than the current files. Why did you not merge my valid categories unto the kept files?

I appreciate your ongoing effort on duplicate file clean up and thank you for helping me better understand this process. -- Ooligan (talk) 22:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio. ,Please, respond to my questions above. Thank you -- Ooligan (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Oops, sorry for the delay. A while ago I was ill for a week and then obviously forgot your request.

I rarely tag files for duplicate-deletion by myself. Sometimes, I correct the syntax of a duplicate-deletion-request by somebody else, which makes it look like I requested the duplicate-deletion. In the vast majority of cases I perform duplicate-deletions requested by other users. In case the files are in different image-format, for example TIFF and JPEG, I either reject the deletion-request or convert it to a regular deletion-discussion. In rare cases, when I think the tagged image should remain and the other should be deleted, I may reverse the deletion-"direction". If files are totally identical, usually the older upload shall remain. Usually, I visually compare the description and categories between the to-be-deleted and the to-remain image, though every now and then it may happen that I overlook something. As duplicate-deletion is something completely different then copyvio-deletion, I have no problem to revise/revert my action. So, if you want one of your files/images undeleted, just tell me. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

1st uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265407

2nd uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265408

I believe that these my two uploaded files above were listed in the duplicate tag as "1." (to-remain) and should have been "kept." Please, "revise/revert" my two uploaded files above.

This file below with same date and time, my uploaded file was listed in the duplicate tag as "2." (to-be-deleted). So, no action needed.

3rd uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265409

Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

I've undeleted the 2 above mentioned files, though they had the identical upload-date/time as their duplicates (now processed). However, yours were a bit more thoroughly categorized. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Mel B Image

Hello, you recently undid my speedy delete request at File:Mel B New York 2017.jpg. However, the linked file that I listed as a copyvio is the original version of the uploaded file. In order to avoid copyright detection, the uploader changed her hair, clothing, and flipped the photo at an attempt to avoid copyright detection. Flipping the images show that they are clearly from the same source. The same thing also happened with File: Geri Halliwell attends New Year's Eve Party.jpg, however, the image I linked is not an exact match like the former, and I have not been able to find a perfectly exact match as of yet. The linked photo is the closest I've been able to find. Given that the photo has been clearly doctored in a way that has been done to the former, its copyright status is at least highly questionable. Breaktheicees (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, ok. I've put it into regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Is that necessary? That one is clearly a dupe. Compare the images when flipped, please; see: [10] Breaktheicees (talk) 16:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Maalimalar.jpg

Could you look at this file and give me a proper citation for the paper it's a scan of? The file is cited (with no other bibliographic information) at w:Vizhithelu, and I'd prefer to improve that rather than just deleting the citation or tagging it with {{Dead link}}. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, no, I can't, as I didn't tag it. However, per its appearance it's clearly a scan (a finger of the scanning person is even included) of a newspaper, though the newspaper-header was cut. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Microsoft Edge logo (2019).svg

This media file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. 89.40.24.1 01:44, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I don't think so. It had already been discussed twice, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Microsoft Edge logo (2019).svg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

File:QUEEN CAMILA (2023).png

Thank you for closing the deletion discussion of the above file, but please note that the file itself is not deleted. Thanks. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Oh, there were more than the one 1 had already deleted. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

I found a photo from the same source as the deleted photo.

Possibly this photo also lacks proper authorization (?

File:CharlesIII.png 2401:E180:8883:9AFC:56A2:FF1:2493:1592 14:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Rome-1945033.jpg

FYI, I restored the above file a moment after you deleted it (I was already working on this user's uploads) because Pixabay was actually CC0 before 9 January 2019, so this file was OK (it just needed proper COM:EI, which I added). See {{Pixabay}} for more information. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Great, thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Same thing for File:Pexels-skitterphoto-615344.jpg and File:LeiFerAlcivarez--Sao Paulo de día.jpg :). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2022/06: Memorial Hall

Hallo Túrelio, schon öfter hast Du als Admin einen Wunsch von mir als einfachem User ausgeführt, wofür ich Dir endlich mal danken möchte! Und bei dieser Gelegenheit gleich eine Frage: ich habe versucht, die im Betreff genannte Diskussion zu schließen und war der Meinung, dass jetzt ein Bot das Thema ins Archiv verschiebt, was aber bisher nicht der Fall ist. Habe ich etwas falsch gemacht? Dass ich als Eröffner der Diskussion diese schließe, ist sicher suboptimal, aber ewig offen bleiben sollte sie auch nicht. Tatsächlich wurmt es mich etwas, dass ich nicht gleich auf die Lösung mit der Kategorien-Weiterleitung gekommen bin. Telford (talk) 09:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Telford, ich denke dass das eine vernünftige Lösung ist, sowohl hinsichtlich des redir als auch der (üblichen) Plural-Kategorie. Da Commons irgendwie eine "lebendes" System ist, das sich über die Zeit entwickelt und nicht von vornherein bis ins letzte durchgeplant war, passiert es immer wieder, dass eine ursprünglich angelegte Kategorie/Gallerie/usw. sich irgendwann als unpassend erweist und ersetzt werden muss. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, danke für Deine Zweite Meinung! Eine Frage ist aber noch offen: warum bleibt die Diskussion auf Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2022/06 und wird nicht automatisch ins Archiv verschoben? Ich hatte angenommen, das dies nach ein paar Tagen von einem Bot erledigt wird, auch wenn ich dazu keinen Hinweis finden konnte. --Telford (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

@Túrelio, darf ich Dich noch mal an diese Frage erinnern? Ich vermute stark, dass Du als Admin weißt, wie man das richtig macht, und meine Frage nur untergegangen ist. Vermutlich steht die Antwort auf irgendeiner Hilfe-Seite, aber ich finde Commons in dieser Hinsicht etwas unübersichtlich, weshalb ich mir erlaubt habe, Dich persönlich anzusprechen. --Telford (talk) 07:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, nein, da kann ich dir leider nicht helfen. Auf Commons habe ich mich nie mit automatischer Archivierung beschäftigt, weshalb ich dazu keine Kenntnisse habe. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Suppression d'une photo non artistique prise sur la voie publique en Italie (reportage / tournage de film)

Bonjour, Comme j'ai pu en débattre longtemps avec plusieurs administrateurs de Commons (notamment le regretté Patrick Rogel et plus récemment Racconish), la suppression du fichier suivant est non conforme, selon le PD-Italy. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DeFunes-Dynam-1965-Italie.jpg

Dès lors qu'une photo non artistique (reportage ou photo de promotion, notamment) est prise sur le sol italien avant 1976, que ce soit pour le tournage d'un film italien, français ou d'une autre origine, la conséquence reste valable. L'origine du photographe n'entre pas non plus en compte. La seule exception concerne les photographies dont le caractère est manifestement artistique. Le débat a été tranché depuis bien longtemps et le cas de certaines photos comme celle-ci, par exemple, est comparable : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_de_Funès-L'Homme_orchestre_(1970)_(recadré).jpg Cordialement. Tisourcier (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

(sorry for my poor english) :

Hello, As I have been debating for a long time with several administrators of Commons (in particular the late Patrick Rogel and more recently Racconish), the deletion of the following file is not in conformity, according to PD-Italy. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DeFunes-Dynam-1965-Italy.jpg

As soon as a non-artistic photo (reportage or promotional photo, in particular) is taken on Italian soil before 1976, whether for the shooting of an Italian, French or other film, the consequence remains valid . The origin of the photographer is not taken into account either. The only exception concerns photographs whose character is manifestly artistic. The debate was settled a long time ago and the case of certain photos like this one, for example, is comparable.

Best regards. Tisourcier (talk) 15:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi, the second linked file/image is dead. Anyway, I can undelete and put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk)

Same problem with the same IP

The same IP is attempting to ask for a speed deletion of this item : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trint-couple.jpg

Could-you prevent this before Racconish answer these problems ? Thank's. Tisourcier (talk) 17:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

My colleague Yann has already keep-closed the related DR. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Template:PD-IsraelGov/layout

Rename:

• Coat of arms of Israel.svg → Emblem of Israel.svg

Rkt2312 (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

No idea what you are telling me. It was renamed already in 2011. --Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

The Lockdown Sessions Cover

I never claimed to be the copyright owner on my upload of the album cover, the source I linked (https://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/sonybmg/images/roger-waters-the-lockdown-sessions-cover-2660638) is from the official Sony Music Entertainment Sweden website which has the cover licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Miklogfeather (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Sure, that was the rationale by the tagger. Anyway, I've undeleted the file and put it into a regular DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roger Waters - The Lockdown Sessions - Cover.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Faustão 2015.png

Greetings. Thanks for the warning about this image. I edit from the phone and the Vimeo license does not appear for me. I have to use the "computer version" on the phone, there it shows. Pgnm (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Yeah. It's really not nice that they hide the license on a second page. --Túrelio (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Wrong files deleted

• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230503AS-1419.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903144274/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504AS-0693.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902411112/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230503AS-1689.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903144279/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504AS-0840.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902983916/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504AS-0925.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902983911/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504CS-0149.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903144129/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230504CS-0313.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902983901/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-0190.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903123819/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508CS-0071.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903349960/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-0615-2.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902963786/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-0728.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902963791/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-1210.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902390762/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508AS-1126.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903349905/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230508CS-0690.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52902963771/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-0537.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903699890/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-0867.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903699870/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-0929.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903472679/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-1737.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903761773/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr
• 21:46, 17 May 2023 Ooligan talk contribs uploaded File:P20230509AS-0950.jpg (Uploaded a work by The White House from https://www.flickr.com/photos/191819781@N02/52903761778/ with UploadWizard)  Tag: Flickr

These twenty (19) files were tagged as exact "duplicates" and were deleted. My uploaded Flickr files were deleted, yet they were all uploaded about four (4) hours before the ones that were kept. They had been tagged with a Duplicate tag, but my uploaded files should not have been deleted.

Please, revert or undelete these twenty (19) files at your earliest convenience. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 03:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Avis demandé

Cher Túrelio, auriez-vous la gentillesse de vous pencher pour un avis sur cette page de discussion : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Françoise Huguier par Claude Truong-Ngoc Août 2022.jpg .

Avec mes remerciements, Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Mynewsdesk

Could you please verify the license of File:Daft Punk - Random Access Memories.jpg and File:Random Access Memories 10th Anniversary Edition.jpg? The fact that the two images comes from Mynewsdesk should be cause for serious scrutiny Trade (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Also File:Daft Punk in 2013.jpg--Trade (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

The first 2 image were already licensed-review by my colleague Yann. I did it now for the third one. As the subdomaine, where these images are offered, has "sonybmg" in its name and as contacts to Sony company are presented on that page, I think we can assume it to be legitimate. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Deletion log 10:32 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:Thomas Mundy Peterson by William R. Tobias - Original.tif ‎(Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:Thomas Mundy Peterson (1824-1904) NMAAHC-2015 190 003.tif)

I get the point, but given the one I uploaded was y'know, actually documented - size, printing technique, text written on the back of the image, and the one remaining lists the author as anonymous when he's listed on the source page, I do wish documentation was considered a bit more in deletions. Especially given I'm mid restoration on it so this also ruins a set of files. I know you do a million of these, and in most cases going with the oldest is the right choice, but in this case... Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok. I've reverted the process-direction. --Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. As I said, I get it: in most cases, what you did is exactly what should be done. I wish I had caught things during upload, but uploading filesizes above the 100MB limit hides some things if you don't do it the one way that flags things up. (If you don't know, you can either upload from a whitelisted libbrary or archive, or use a script to do a chunked upload. I wasn't sure if the site was whitelisted so chose the script)

I thought I did check the category, but either missed it or categorisation was another issue with that version of the file. Thanks! Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Stanhopea tolimensis.png

Guten Tag Túrelio, könntest Du bitte das oben genannte Bild auf copyright überprüfen. Dank und Grüße. Orchi (talk) 15:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Fast alle seine Uploads sind URVs bzw. unter unzulässiger Lizenz. --Túrelio (talk) 06:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

…vielen Dank und Gruß. Orchi (talk) 06:49, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Sengol Photo Andhra Patrika Telugu.jpg

Hi Túrelio. Would you be able to clarify if the published newspaper - 17 August 1947 - is a candidate for {{PD-1996}}? The publication was en:Andhra Patrika and sieged publishing in 1991. Thanks for your help! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:22, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Uh, I've no special knowledge about Indian copyright. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India {{PD-India}} or {{PD-India-photo-1958}} might be appropriate, depending on what you want to focus on. Assuming that it wasn't published within 30 days also in the US, then {{PD-1996}} might be ok. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Charles I execution, and execution of regicides.jpg

Hey, I agree with you that the image on the printed artifact is old enough to be in the public domain which predates any digital version. The problem is the digital scan has its own copyright which British Museum owns. BM is in the business of commercially licensing their images. BM limits physical access to the only extant PD version which allows capture the market for the digital images. In theory BM could replace the current file with a new scan before copyright expires which would extend their copyright control indefinitely, of this image, and other unique PD images, as well as images of stuff stolen from other countries in their collection. Commons licensing policy forbids use of digital images marked NC to avoid litigation. That's just the sad facts. So not wanting to start a revert war, I encourage you to revert your own revert. 104.246.130.239 10:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi,

ok. I've converted your speedy into a regular DR, in order to allow for discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Charles I execution, and execution of regicides.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. What is needed to combat copyfraud by institutions is not miniscule monetary penalties, but legal injunctions and undertakings imposed on them regarding public domain works in their catalogs, and arbitration for individual items in dispute with the loser to pay arbitration costs. 104.246.130.239 01:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

(talk page stalker): This is a rather interesting article called "The Public Domain vs. the Museum: The Limits of Copyright and Reproductions of Two-dimensional Works of Art", about this topic of claiming copyright on digital images of what is in the public domain. Section 2.7, the conclusion, specifically mentions UK and EU law. Enjoy. Ww2censor (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, really helpful. --Túrelio (talk) 18:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

File:China Kawamoto Shizuoka city 202208.pngについて

こんにちは、あなたが削除したファイルについて質問です。あなたは、File:China Kawamoto Shizuoka city 202208.pngを削除しました。このファイルは、河本千奈の顔写真です。あなたは、このファイルに意味があるのに、削除しました。このような行為を繰り返すと、最悪投稿ブロックの対象になるのでご注意ください。あなたのウィキコモンズライフが充実したものでありますように。 クラフトサイダー (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, this was not deleted for reasons of scope, but because it was a copyright-violation. It was taken from https://www.at-s.com/sp/news/article/shizuoka/1203376.html?lbl=10398, which states (at the bottom) "Copyright The Shizuoka Shimbun and Shizuoka Broadcasting System., All rights reserved.". --Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Rent-a-Car-Professional-Web-Banner-Design-scaled.jpg

Thanks for deleting this obvious advertisement poster. Please review all uploads by that user (and consider a warning). They all have the same problem. Thanks. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Pastor Chuck Smith (142342758).jpg

The file I uploaded of Chuck Smith has been tagged as needing OTRS permission. However, as the Vimeo upload shows under the More tab, it is under the CC-BY 3.0 license. Also, this is an official video that was put together and published by its original uploader, Calvary Curriculum. Because of this, may the missing permission tag be removed please? Many thanks. JamesTheLaptop (talk) 01:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! JamesTheLaptop (talk) 11:14, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Font Awesome 5 brands xbox.svg

Hey, I saw you deleted File:Font Awesome 5 brands xbox.svg and replaced it with a redirect. I think this file should be undeleted, as it has some whitespace around it and is not identical. All of Font Awesome's icons have appropriate whitespace around them to allow them to all have the same visual weight when displayed at the same resolution, making it easy to use them interchangeably in templates. If the redirected Xbox logo is used in a template designed around Font Awesome icons, it will appear too large. Could you undelete it? Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 04:37, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. Sorry, I wasn't aware of the difference. --Túrelio (talk) 07:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

λήμμα Βαρόσι

λήμμα Βαρόσι, φωτογαρφία πανοραμική Θέα. δεν με αφήνει να ανεβάσω δική μου φωτογραφία που μοιάζει με αυτή που διαγράψατε. τι να κάνω; VasiliadouMps (talk) 16:50, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I have no idea to which file/image you are refering. Per our policy COM:L, only images can be uploaded, which have been released by its legitimate author under a free license. --Túrelio (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Would this be PD-textlogo?

Hi @Túrelio, I'm wondering if you could determine if this logo could be Template:PD-textlogo. Danke! -- DaxServer (talk) 16:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, difficult question. It seems to belong to an US-based company, so Commons:Threshold of originality#United States would apply. Personally, I think it's too creative for PD-textlogo, because the logo uses 3 different elements: text, cup-icon and Korean (?) letter/sign (?). Nevertheless, you might upload it and let it be publicly discussed in a DR. --Túrelio (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:NIR Class 104

Please restore this category. I have no idea why you would delete it, and your edit No longer needed as we have a category for them. summary makes no sense (We did have a category for them. You just deleted it). Andy Dingley (talk) 21:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Restored. However, when I had deleted it, it was empty. The edit-summary has automatically been taken from the deletion-rationale of the tagger. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Thankyou.

Our policy for this is at Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Category

If a category is empty and is obviously unusable, unlikely to be ever meaningfully used, How would those apply?

Don't apply if [...] the deletion can be controversial, the category was recently unconsensually emptied, etc. This category was filled, but had just had all of its content removed by a drive-by IP, who then tagged it for deletion.

This keeps happening. There's nothing useful about "speedy deletion" as a means of doing things too fast and badly, when they don't need to be done at all. It just makes more work to unroll it all afterwards. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:32, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

And now Category:NIR Class 111 Why are you so keen to support edit-warring drive-by IPs and socks of multi-banned editors like HelpfulHens ? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

This is an unjustified accusation. The same IP, which tagged the cat for deletion, had made an apparently meaningful edit previously. Anyway, cat restored now. --Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Request removal of my photo

I am kindly requesting removal of the photo of me. It's not linked any Wikipedia page and Wikimedia using it without my consent. I have tried several times without success.

I wonder why you want to keep this photo on your server. Any reasonable answer?

I really followed all the steps for deletion request maybe you have other suggestions that I should try? Thanks...

Url of the image

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Remzi_G%C3%B6kda%C4%9F.jpg

Url of the image 176.55.31.223 14:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

You seem to have misunderstood my edit. As this image already has been subject of 2 deletion-requests, which were keep-closed, a speedy-deletion is not appropriate. So, I converted your speedy-request into a regular deletion-request, which allows discussion and input of others. I did not take any position to keep or delete the image. --Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Removal of File:ESWD tornado reports from the year of 2022 as of June 16, 2023.png

If File:ESWD tornado reports from the year of 2022 as of June 16, 2023.png was a copyright violation, then I think File:Tornadoes june 12 2022 europe.png is one as well. Zupaz (talk) 13:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Tagged accordingly. Thanks for notification. --Túrelio (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

1 page to delete

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:GCR_Class_11F 81.101.7.190 18:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done already by my colleague Gbawden. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

logo

Hi, Kindly provide me following two logo (via email on aftabuzzamanullah at gmail.com): File:Kcc-01.svg & File:Dhakacitycollege-01.svg. A user uploaded those two here but it should be on wikipedia under non-free criteria. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 03:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

file deletion question

hi Túrelio! thanks for flagging a potential copyright violation for "File:Picture of Pakistani singer and music producer Shuja Haider.jpg" Is the issue that this picture is on the artist's own Facebook page? Please help me understand how this violates copyright if it was uploaded as "own work"? I am obviously missing something. What would need to be done for this image to satisfy copyright requirements and be re-uploaded and used? thanks so much for your help! Priyanka2330 (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Priyanka2330,

you had uploaded this image as "own work". But it was found to be published on Facebook already in 2019, which makes your own-work-claim unlikely. As material published on facebook is not free, it is considered to be a copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Túrelio, and thanks so much for your clarification so I can better understand this matter. The image is my own work from a few years ago and was used by the artist on his own Facebook page in 2019. Would it help if the image was deleted from FB and I reuploaded the image to Wikimedia? Or would it help if the artist (or I) was to send a permission email to 'permissions-commons'? Please advise on the best path forward so that I can also keep this in mind for future images I add to Wikimedia. Definitely not intending to violate copyright and happy to follow whatever steps you outline so the picture can added back to Wikimedia and used on Wikipedia. Thanks so much for your help. :) Priyanka2330 (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Fishy building at khatib.jpg

Would like to ask if this image satisfies COM:FOP Singapore, or the painted fish is not de minimis enough? Robertsky (talk) 04:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, hard to say. De minimis unlikely. However, for now I would confirm FoP, as it might be considered part of the building. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! What defines 2d work as part of the building? the size? or that the painted shape is simple enough not to have be in consideration for copyright? Robertsky (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Much less rational, just sort of impression. It's obviously permanently "attached" to the building, not just (bill)board or alike. Depending on the local jurisprudence, it might also be below COM:Threshold of originality. --Túrelio (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting File:Regis Hotel Marriot.jpg Perhaps you can now delete its uploader who has now taken up throwing personal attacks and insults at User talk:NicolasRTucker‎? 10mmsocket (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Email

Hallo @Túrelio: , ich habe Dir soeben ein für mich wichtiges Mail privat geschickt und bräuchte Deinen Rat, vielen Dank im Voraus, Gruß, ArthurMcGill (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Fishy building at khatib.jpg

Would like to ask if this image satisfies COM:FOP Singapore, or the painted fish is not de minimis enough? Robertsky (talk) 04:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, hard to say. De minimis unlikely. However, for now I would confirm FoP, as it might be considered part of the building. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! What defines 2d work as part of the building? the size? or that the painted shape is simple enough not to have be in consideration for copyright? Robertsky (talk) 14:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Much less rational, just sort of impression. It's obviously permanently "attached" to the building, not just (bill)board or alike. Depending on the local jurisprudence, it might also be below COM:Threshold of originality. --Túrelio (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting File:Regis Hotel Marriot.jpg Perhaps you can now delete its uploader who has now taken up throwing personal attacks and insults at User talk:NicolasRTucker‎? 10mmsocket (talk) 10:32, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Email

Hallo @Túrelio: , ich habe Dir soeben ein für mich wichtiges Mail privat geschickt und bräuchte Deinen Rat, vielen Dank im Voraus, Gruß, ArthurMcGill (talk) 13:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Alianza Senadores por la Patria & Alianza Encuentro Nacional

Hi, today I uploaded two logos of political coalitions to Commons, they were immediately deleted. The problem was that I marked the as "fair use" without know that is not permitted. I shoul've done it differentely, I know, but political party logos are still allowed on Commons, so they should be reinstated as soon as possible. Guyermou (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you are likely talking about File:Alianza Encuentro Nacional.jpg and File:Alianza senadores por la patria.jpg, right? The problem is not that you labelled them as fair-use, but that they were not released under a free license, [11] and [12]. --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Andorra is De Facto Schengen

This image needs updating. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_the_Schengen_Area.svg This link proves this. https://andorraguides.com/visa/schengen/ HelpfulHens (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Propose it on the image-talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

I spoke to an admin and they said yes! You can change it!HelpfulHens (talk) 20:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:The Centurion's Story (1910).pdf

I didn't realize initially that there was a Fæ uploaded file, and if I had I would've just used that one. But, just so you know, moving the file required a good amount of work on both Wikisource and Wikidata, so I ask that if this happens again in the future, please be mindful of the fact that it's not so straightforward to clean up on other projects. Thanks. PseudoSkull (talk) 15:17, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

As it had been dupe-tagged by the OptimusPrimeBot, the files need to have been totally identical. I wonder why at your recent upload no warning popped-up. Or did it? --Túrelio (talk) 16:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

I was semi-automatedly using Pywikibot, with ignore warnings. Do you use Pywikibot? And, if you do, do you know if there is a way that I can check to see if there's a duplicate file in Python? PseudoSkull (talk) 17:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, no, I don't use Pywikibot and have no knowledge about it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Lucy Letby.jpg

Why have you deleted the file Lucy Letby.jpg used in the Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countess_of_Chester_Hospital_baby_deaths ? Which picture of Lucy Letby did you delete? There are numerous, all over internet and in the British news media. The wikimedia page says that reasons are explained, but I see no explanation. Thanks. Gill110951 (talk) 05:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Wow, this deletion was nearly 9 months ago. As visible from the deletion log, File:Lucy Letby.jpg was deleted as it was "fair use"-material, which is not allowed on Commons (see Commons:Fair use). --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting File:Seal of Leland Stanford Junior University.svg due to copyright violations. Please see File:Logo of Stanford University.png for the same reason. Cheers, -- QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 21:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Same photo but edited

Hi, what do we do with photos that are obviously the same, but touched up? Files: File:Acai's Singaporean Tradition.jpg and File:Acai'sSingaporeanTradition 12.jpg Robertsky (talk) 22:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, normally they could stay both, though the retouched one should be labeled as "retouched" and in both file-descriptions the other one might be mentioned in the section "Other version". Alternatively, if the retouched version is clearly deviating from the true colors (of the object), the uploader should be asked whether he/she agrees to G7-deletion. However, due to the kind of description of this and (all ?) his/her other uploads, one could suspect these are promotional uploads. --Túrelio (talk) 05:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Bitte um Hilfe

Guten Tag, ich habe diese Datei hochgeladen: File:Molitor & Kuzmin Lichtinstallation "Container" 1997.jpg -und ich möchte den Titel ändern, geht das noch? Das Bild soll heißen "Lichtinstallation "Brauchen wir Licht?"" - nun ist die Permission schon von beiden Rechteinhabern mit dem bisherigen Titel erfolgt. Wie könnte ich das also richtig hinbekommen? Wäre für Hilfe dankbar. Naomi Hennig (talk) 13:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Naomi, m.E. sollte eine Unbenennung in diesem Fall zulässig sein, weil du die Hochladerin bist und kein Ausschlußkriterium vorliegt. Allerdings steht in der Beschreibung des Fotos auch "Container". Da das Werk ja anscheinend von 1997 stammt, frage ich mich wie denn nun der tatsächlich Name des Werkes lautet, "Container" oder "Brauchen wir Licht?" --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Ja, das hatte ich mich auch gefragt und deshalb es falsch betitelt, es heißt tatsächlich "Brauchen wir Licht?" und ich würde dann die Datei so benennen wollen: Molitor & Kuzmin Lichtinstallation: "Brauchen wir Licht?" - der Container ist nur das Medium, in dem die Installation stattfindet, ich hatte das falsch verstanden gehabt.--Naomi Hennig (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Ok. Warten wir noch die Antwort von Krd ab, da er OTRS-Volunteer ist. Du kannst die Beschreibung aber schon einmal ändern, weil das ja vom Dateinnamen unabhängig gilt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

So, erledigt. --Túrelio (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Vielen lieben Dank, das hilft sehr :-). Schönes Wochenende! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naomi Hennig (talk • contribs)

Deletion request made today

Hello, Túrelio! Could you help me, please? I have made a massdeletion request today, but cannot find out how to make a subpage before tagging each file. You can find them here: Files uploaded by User:Ingeborga-r https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2023/08/03 Best wishes Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 16:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

When I make such DRs, I create a regular (single) DR for one the affected files and then copy the resulting code from the 1st file manually onto the other affected files, and, as the 2nd step, list the "other" files on the created DR-page.

You have done it the other way round. However, you need to notify the uploader by copying the relevant script-code from zthe second line in the box in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Ingeborga-r to their usertalk-page. In addition, you need to do the same as I did to the remaining files.--Túrelio (talk) 16:14, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Hope it`s OK now. --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 06:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Are .pdf and .djvu files of the same book considered duplicates?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=342272372

The Internet Archive uploader https://ia-upload.wmcloud.org/ encourages both .pdf as well as .djvu files of the same title. I thought these two file formats are used on different Wikimedia Foundation projects. Is that not correct? Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 17:29, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Ooligan, not generally. In the mentioned case, which was nominated by third party, both files were uploaded by the same user and the djvu-file, if I remember correctly, was unused. So, it depends from the circumstances. --Túrelio (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Seven Cross Flag

08:50, 4 August 2023 Túrelio talk contribs deleted page File:SyroMalabar Seven Cross Flag.png (Copyright violation: Re-upload of image deleted for copyvio. See deletion log here) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)

Hi Turelio - I am new to Wikicommons ans accidentally put only one source. Actually that image is in public domain and is not copy righted or anything. Can I reupload it? Nasrani131 (talk) 14:14, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Nasrani131,

I will temporarily undelete this image and put it into a regular deletion-discussion, where you can provided you rationale and evidence why it might be in the public domain. --Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

See at Commons:Deletion requests/File:SyroMalabar Seven Cross Flag.png. --Túrelio (talk) 08:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Duplicate

Hi @Túrelio Could you kindly remove this duplicate image, please? Best regards Riad Salih (talk) 16:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Could you temporarily undelete this "duplicate" file, please.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:03_Blinken-Marquez.jpg&oldid=694068735

@Túrelio, I would like to see the details of the duplicate file. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done, see File:03 Blinken-Marquez.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 18:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Chelsea Crest 1987-1995.png

I am confused, why was the historic crest deleted exactly? Govvy (talk) 09:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, because it was considered to be above threshold of originality, thereby copyrightable, and hardly the own work of the uploader, as they claimed. --Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

File Undeleted

hi Túrelio.

I would like to introduce you to this file, which is currently deleted. the fact is that the information it contains is in line with the license that was entered, here I would like to ask you if you could restore this portrait?? 71.19.252.28 14:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Unknown,

as per the edit-summary, this file was not deleted for copyright problems, but because it had been uploaded by a globally (Wikimedia) blocked account. Therefore, I cannot undelete that file. --Túrelio (talk) 15:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Egelsee(Königsbronn).jpg

Hey Túrelio, why did you reverted that in my opinion better picture? Thx, Harjawalski (talk) 18:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, hadn't you read my comment on your talkpage? --Túrelio (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Yes now - just a minute too late ;-) Harjawalski (talk) 18:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

File:FwBoJtNWwAADFJC.jpg

Hi Túrelio, I wanted to message about the above image, which I see has been deleted due to a copyright violation which links to a tweet (https://twitter.com/cricketcelt/status/1657439225510342656). This is my Twitter account and I took the photo. Is there anything I need to do to get it reuploaded (uploading onto Commons isn't something I've done regularly so apologies if I've got something wrong)? Eric Idle's Cat, 20.42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Eric,

if you took the original photography, I wonder why did you upload to Commons not the camera-file with a proper filename, but instead uploaded directly the file from Twitter and adopted even Twitter's random filename. Likely you did the same with File:FotZQOUXwAADWpZ.jpg. Both files are without any camera-metadata, making them a prime-suspect for copyvio. Wrt File:FwBoJtNWwAADFJC.jpg, I can temporarily undelete the file and add a no-permission-tag. You then should send directly from your said Twitter-account a confirmation-email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS), in which you should state your authorship for said image, linking both the filename here and on Twitter. An OTRS-agent will then evaluate this permission and, if o.k., add a permission-tag to the file. --Túrelio (talk) 06:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, thank you for your swift I reply. I have done as requested and will bear in mind your advice in future: I took the photos with my phone, but then downloaded the files on my laptop when I was working on an article and remembered I'd posted them on Twitter. I will download directly from my phone in future. Eric Idle's Cat (talk) 07:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hello. Five months ago, you deleted File:Alma-Tadema - The Roses of Heliogabalus.jpg for being an exact duplicate of File:The Roses of Heliogabalus.jpg. However, that was only the case because someone else ignored the policies on overwriting FP images and overwrote the latter file without discussion and I just reverted it to the FP version. Could you please undelete File:Alma-Tadema - The Roses of Heliogabalus.jpg? StellarHalo (talk) 20:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 06:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Redirect Category:Staatse vloot

Hello Túrelio, I saw that you deleted this Category:Staatse vloot . You wrote the reason "unuseful empty category", but it redirected to the gallery Staatse Vloot. If that is the case, why is there a redirect category called Category:Armada Española? That also redirects to a gallery page. -Artanisen (talk) 04:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Artanisen, the words "unuseful ..." are not individually created, but simply result automatically from speedy-rationale C2 (=cat is empty) script. As I had overlooked your previous appeal, I will restore this cat and eventually put it into a cfd. --Túrelio (talk) 06:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Undeletion request

Hi, the file File:Olivia Salomon WK.jpg is from my personal photo book, i provide this photo for the note that you put as copyright violation, so, please undelete this please UserOliS (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, but you are not the uploader. The image was uploaded by User:Olivia Salomón Vivaldo. If User:UserOliS is a second account to User:Olivia Salomón Vivaldo, this should be declared on your userpage.

Now, let's assume both accounts belong to the same person. You wrote "from my personal photo book". I don't know what you meant by that. What is relevant here: who holds the copyright for this photography? Per the Berne Convention, the photographer owns/holds the copyright for the photos he/she has shot. If you have shot the image by yourself (which seems a bit unlikely to me), you would own the copyright. If you asked a photographer to shoot the image, he/she owns the copyright, but he/she may sell/give it to you. However, in the latter case, the photographer should be mentioned as author.

As the image had been prepublished elsewhere, the copyright-holder needs to send a confirmation for the choosen cc-by-sa license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Any update? UserOliS (talk) 16:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

I am not a member of the OTRS-group. So, in case the copyright-holder has sent-in a permission to OTRS, as asked for above, I wouldn't know. However, if OTRS accepts the permission, they will either restore the file themselves or ask an admin to restore it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

HEY

Why did you delete category:hey there enemy’s i am ready to probate you lol? 80.47.149.26 23:04, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Blocked. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Cover der WRB auf Wikimedia Commons

Hi Túrelio, du hast den Cover der WRB gelöscht, den ich im Dezember 2022 auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen habe. Die Veröffentlichung ist hier: https://wrb.isric.org/files/WRB_fourth_edition_2022-12-18.pdf. Auf Seite 2 steht: "This is an open access document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited." Mit dem Hochladen auf Wikimedia Commons habe ich daher kein Copyright verletzt. Aber es gibt ein Problem: Die WRB homepage, wo die WRB veröffentlicht wurde, lag bis Juni 2023 bei der Technischen Universität München. Ich habe im Dezember den damals korrekten Link angegeben: https://www3.ls.tum.de/boku/?id=1419. Im Juni wurde die WRB homepage aber zum ISRIC (Wageningen, Niederlande) verlegt. Seither führt der Link ins Leere. Tut mir leid, ich habe nicht daran gedacht, dass ich bei Wikimedia Commons den neuen Link setzen muss. Deshalb nun meine Bitte: Könntest du den Cover mit dem neuen Link wiederherstellen. Danke. Eleutheropodic (talk) 13:14, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Eleutheropodic, sorry. Habs wieder hergestellt und das Link eingefügt. --Túrelio (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Danke!Eleutheropodic (talk) 04:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Túrelio, es gibt neue Probleme. Schau mal bitte hier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WRB,_4th_edition,_Cover.jpg. Ich habe den Cover auf den WRB-Einträgen in allen 17 Sprachen wiederhergestellt. Nun hat sich Maxinvestigator aus Russland gemeldet, der die Creative Commons Attribution License nicht anerkennt. Ich habe ihm natürlich geantwortet, aber ich weiß nicht, wie es nun weitergeht. Kannst du mir bitte helfen? Vielen Dank. Eleutheropodic (talk) 07:50, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Firstly, the work initially has a copyright sign. Secondly, there is no specific license for Creative Commons. Because of this contradiction, you cannot upload this file as free. Maxinvestigator (talk) 08:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

1) A (C)-sign per se has little meaning, as today nearly everything is considered to be under copyright. Even freely licensed works are usually still under the copyright of their creator, though they offer them under a free license.

2) On page 2 of the (above linked) pdf-file, of which the discussed image is the cover-page, states: "This is an open access document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."
"Creative Commons Attribution License" is the CC-BY license. So, there is no doubt about the licensing. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Fine. But I'll ask one of the authors of the photos. Maxinvestigator (talk) 08:56, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

They are mentioned in the same section on page 2 of the pdf. --Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks to everybody. Just an additional request. From the same document, I uploaded this to Wikimedia Commons: File:Soil Texture Flow Chart of the 4th edition of the WRB.png. Can you please remove the warning there as well. Thanks. Eleutheropodic (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done, though I would prefer to an information about the source of the 2 photographies on that page. --Túrelio (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I added the authors of the photographs. Eleutheropodic (talk) 19:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

And for more information see Acknowledgements (page 11) Eleutheropodic (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Unnecessary image

Hello, I came here to ask you to delete the image "File:Entrevista_Diniz_e_Nino.png", as it is just a clone that I accidentally created. KakuLogia+ (talk) 22:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

 Done. --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)