User talk:Pppery

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pppery!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:33, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatroller[edit]

You have made a lot of good work in Commons and your edits do not need to be patrolled anymore. So I just made you autopatroller. Thank you for your work! Taivo (talk) 10:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mayur-Paul.webp. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:58, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SL Photo-License[edit]

SL has a liberal permission of photography. Its is allowed generally. Could you revoke your attempt to delete those pics please? 1 https://secondlife.com/app/tos/tos.php Peli (talk) 02:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of that? You claim the images are entirely your own work, which is clearly false. If nothing else you should link to the aforementioned permission. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's also the entirely separate issue of Ballet Pixelle's copyright in their dance moves. I won't be revoking my attempt, and we'll see what whichever admin handles the request after a week thinks. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:25, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These pics dont show 'moves' , they show stills. So where are they listed now? Where will the 'discours' be held? Why would these pics not be my own work? Peli (talk) 02:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little concerned about RblxFunkyGamer. Their contributions appear to be in good faith, but they don't seem to understand how to properly license their work (i.e. what belongs here) or what the scope of Wikimedia Commons is. Some of their replies to deletion requests and other licensing matters on their talk page seem to show a lack of understanding. Could someone deal properly with this user? 118.148.82.57 02:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to take your concerns to COM:ANU. Their recent uploads seem harmless and in-scope (albeit not particularly valuable) to me. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]