User talk:Mateus2019

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mateus2019!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Mateus2019,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Mateus2019,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Category:User:Mattes/Contributions/Mottos, proverbs, etc.[edit]

User:Category:User:Mattes/Contributions/Mottos, proverbs, etc. is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD U2 (user page of a non-existent user)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

I have not marked it to allow you to save it. Please mark with {{SD|U2}} once fixed. Thank you.BevinKacon (talk) 18:39, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Tölz[edit]

Bitte keine Bilder in dieser minderwertigen Qualität in die Denkmallisten einfügen, Danke.--Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 16:09, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Irgendwie war damals „Tag des Gegenlichtes“. Schöne Osterfeiertage + Grüße aus Giesing --Mateus2019 (talk) 18:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dieser Champion ist kein Rennwagen[edit]

Hallo Mateus, der ist zwar rot und weiß, aber kein Rennwagen. Das ist ein Kleinstwagen von 1949-1950. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ok, danke -- hab's korrigiert. --Mateus2019 (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:GER — BY — München — Hansastraße 19 (ADAC-Zentrale) 2020.JPG[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−

Hello Mateus2019, it appears that the version of File:GER — BY — München — Hansastraße 19 (ADAC-Zentrale) 2020.JPG which you uploaded 2020-05-01T14:03:56Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interior of Wieskirche[edit]

Hallo @Mateus2019, dir sind etliche Fehler beim verschieben passiert, da sind viele Bilder dabei, die keine keine Ausstattungsstücke bzw. Innenraumbereiche der Wieskirche bei Steingaden zeigen, unter anderem in Südttirol. Bitte korrigiere das! Gruß --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 20:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hab' mir nicht jede Datei angeschaut. Anscheinend waren die von vornherein schon falsch einsortiert; einige sind wahrscheinlich auf die schlechte Kategroiennamen reingefallen (es gibt mind. 3 Kirchen dieses Namens). Ich kümmere mich aber trotzdem darum. VG aus München --Mateus2019 (talk) 05:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Viele Grüße aus München zurück 😊, könntest für mich einen gefallen tun, ich habe vor ein paar Tagen zwei neue Skulpturen-Kats erstellt (Category:Manerism sculptures in Munich, Category:Manerism sculptures in Bavaria), jetzt müssten alle entsprechenden Dateien mit der neuen Kat bestückt werden. Falls es in deinem Ermessen, freien Zeit und Willen liegt dies umzusetzen wäre ich dir dankbar, Gruß Ricarda --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 10:18, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Postkarten[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019, danke für das Hochladen von Postkarten nach Commons. Vielleicht interessiert dich das Projekt COM:WPPC. Beste Grüße --sk (talk) 04:21, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of the University of Santo Tomas.png[edit]

File:Seal of the University of Santo Tomas.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

McVahl (talk) 08:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of the University of Santo Tomas.png[edit]

File:Seal of the University of Santo Tomas.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OGG audio files[edit]

Don't use category:OGG audio files, if file is already in some category related to Audio files, eg see example of obvious overcategorization. Explanation also here: {{Catsbyfiletype}}--Estopedist1 (talk) 05:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

not ogg specific, e.g. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Audio_files_of_Baroque_period_classical_music contains no ogg related item. --Mateus2019 (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

what do you mean? Cat:Audio_files_of_Baroque_period_classical_music contains ogg-related items, but it is not important what is the the file format--Estopedist1 (talk) 04:25, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, "there will be no topical categorization by file format." was not part of my current knowledge and now I will end adding file type categories to audio files. There should be a note in the cat. description of all such file type categories -- how should people know that ... Next time, make your statement a bit more cleary please. Regarding the example you are still wrong (you are probably mixing hierarchy cats [parents] and assigned cats [children]), but what the heck. --14:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Schack / Stuck[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019, Sammlung Schack und Villa Stuck liegen zwar beide in der Prinzregentenstraße, sollten aber nicht verwechselt werden. Prinzregentenstraße 9 ist die Sammlung Schack. Deine Photos sind aber von der Villa Stuck. Die liegt in der Prinzregentenstraße 60 auf dem Isarhochufer. Ich werde deine Bilder mal umkategorisieren und eine Umbenennung beantragen. Grüße --Bjs (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK danke! --Mateus2019 (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Old categories[edit]

Hi. With categories that were created a long while ago and they have been renamed, we would generally keep them where the name is significantly different and use {{Category redirect}} directing to the new target. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both ways work just fine. Greetings from Germany, --Mateus2019 (talk) 11:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Mateus2019,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Germa-language_signs_in_Austria[edit]

Category:Germa-language_signs_in_Austria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Iketsi (talk) 00:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:BStMI-Gebäude.JPG[edit]

Copyright status: File:BStMI-Gebäude.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:BStMI-Gebäude.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indianapolis Museum of Art[edit]

Indianapolis Museum of Art has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

overruled in the meantime. No more silly stuff ok or I will get angry. --Mateus2019 (talk) 06:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Badly replicated sum of all paintings lists[edit]

What is the point in creating galleries like Paintings by Jacob van Ruisdael which seems to badly copied lists from Wikidata? Multichill (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of pages already crated by bots in this manner, also some at fr.wp und en.wp. There is no manual to my knowledge which explains the correct way. I am open for suggestions. e.g. the last part

{{Wikidata list/Gallery}}

which displays:

{{{p18}}}

{{{label}}}

Overall, it doesn't look "badly". These are the most useful tables I have ever seen @ WM. Greetz, --Mateus2019 (talk) 03:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder[edit]

Hi Mateus2019. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a file by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 23:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

no, it wasn't me ([1]). --Mateus2019 (talk) 04:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And this? — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 10:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've had used {{Delete}}. BTW, you are silly to send my a sd notific. which is my own rq. --Mateus2019 (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you malform another deletion request like this, I will report you. Just use {{G7}} instead. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 13:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And this without followthrough? Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. You should use the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests and see the Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy and the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 04:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mautstraße Jachenau[edit]

Servus Matteus, die Bezeichnung mit Datei:Mautstraße Jachenau (Staatsstraße 2072) - Verlauf.png ist nicht korrekt. Ab Abzweigung Zwerchweg bis Einsiedl ist die Mautstraße ein private Forststraße. Die 2072 führt über Sachenbach und Ostufer bis Urfeld. Der Name der Datei müsste geändert werden - das solltest Du selber machen. Gruß --Jost (talk) 17:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

jetzt müßte es passsen. VG + schönes WE --Mateus2019 (talk)

"Paintings in the Israel Museum, Jerusalem"[edit]

Thank you for creating the page "Paintings in the Israel Museum, Jerusalem". I would be happy to work with you this project. Can you please let me know your time zone and if you would meet on zoom? Drkup(IMJ) (talk) 16:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it's UTC+1 in the winter and UTC+2 in the summer. Shalom, --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong categorization[edit]

There are specific categories for categories and for galleries. Symbolist painters from France and Painters (from France) by name belong to Category:Odilon Redon, not to the gallery page, where it is currently under Gallery pages of painters of France. Synthwave.94 (talk) 15:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... awaiting your explanation. --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:06, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's already explained above. If you're unable to understand that there are specific categories for both gallery pages and categories then I don't have any other choice to revert you. Synthwave.94 (talk) 16:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not able to express the motivation. Just tell me straight on. You are acting weird. --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As it is clearly stated on Painters by name, "this category should only contain other categories. Galleries should be in the corresponding categories instead." As Category:Odilon Redon is already categorized under Symbolist painters from France and Painters (from France) by name, it's unecessary to add these same categories to the corresponding gallery, where Gallery pages of painters of France is, on the other hand, perfectly appropriate. Synthwave.94 (talk) 17:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again stop restoring inappropriate categories. Auntof6 confirmed that these categories should only contain other categories, and not gallery pages. Synthwave.94 (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed that this same user reverted you before for the same reasons. Synthwave.94 (talk) 19:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Object history, Exhibition history, References[edit]

Hi Mateus, Why are you deleting these parameters in some files? Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 16:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, some wre gone because I thought, they are in the WD dataset. I will just leave all the entries, nevertheless if there's a Widiata inclusion or not. Easter greetings from Germany, --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, wann du wollst, bitte, gern. Ich hab mich für diese drei items viel Mühe getrostet. Siehe z.B. Category:Multilingual tags: Exhibitions in Germany. Vorlagen wie diese sind, so weit ich weiss, durch Wikidata nicht möglich. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2021[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger WLE 2020
Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover granted[edit]

Renaming 15 year old uploads[edit]

Hi Mateus2019, files like File:Canaletto (II) 026.jpg follow a clear naming convention in Category:PD-Art (Yorck Project) and have had the same stable filenames for over 15 years so renaming these is not in line with Commons:File renaming. Please stop doing these renames and undo your recent edits. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 15:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are you kdding me? "026" is unacceptable as the title reads otherwise. --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not and the fact that you think I do indicates that you don't understand Commons:File renaming. File names are supposed to be stable, renaming is the exception. Please stick to the policy. Multichill (talk) 19:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What a poor discussion. At least, you could have replied to my issue (missing title). You (a) don't understand the policy or (b) are silly or (c) stupid. The policy FNC rationale #2 reads: "To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image particularly displays"[2] Your expression "renaming is the exception" (quote) is not part of COM:FR. It is boring and dumb to continue this discussion. Intellectually, we are operatiing on very different levels. Learn the basic principles about discussing with other persons. Lern to bring up substantial material. Don't make stuff up and sell it as a fact. Stop bothering me furthermore. You are allowed to think, that I am stupid; the Kingdom of Netherlands is a free country. I accept but do not share it. No greetings, --Mateus2019 (talk) 06:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC) over and out[reply]

You really had to resort to personal attacks? I removed the filemover right and won't bother you anymore. Multichill (talk) 09:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it serves your ego (show of force), be that way. May be it is a childish behavoir instead. Let the issue unanswered, too. Overall, worst performance I have seen here. --Mateus2019 (talk) 09:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kupka, František — Beginn des Lebens oder Die Seerosen — c. 1900.jpg

Yours sincerely, Gumruch (talk) 11:36, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Malerlisten[edit]

Mateus2019, kannst Du bei der Kategorieübersicht der Malerlisten auch die Ausstellungen, Werkverzeichnisse anführen. Toll fände ich, wenn Ausstellungen, Werkverzeichnisse bei den Listen aufgeführt würden und man sehen könnte, welches Bild wobei war.--Oursana (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo liebe Oursana! Bin jetzt schon am Limit. Habe mehr Zeit, wenn ich im Ruhestand bin (noch 12 Jahre). LG, Matthias

Bonjour Mateus[edit]

Vous avez ajouté l'image

qui est magnifique, et donc, un grand merci. Mais pourquoi pensez-vous qu'il sagit de Église Sainte-Geneviève d'Asnières-sur-Seine ? Merci et bonne journee. Rc1959 (talk) 09:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oui volontiers ! L'information était dans l'URL mentionnée. Bon week-end de repos --Mateus2019 (talk) 09:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Vouet (Lucretia And Tarquin) vs Eustache Le Sueur (The Rape of Tamar)[edit]

I have contacted the Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team, who have directed me to this Talk page.

All I'm trying to do is point out what looks like an inconsistency of some sort in Wikimedia Commons. Probably also in Wikipedia and other Wiki projects. If you look up the following two links:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rape_of_Tamar_-_Le_Seur.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vouet,_Simon_-_Lucretia_And_Tarquin.jpg

You should come up with the same image, only by different artists. On the face of it, it seems like an error, but there might be some logical explanation. In fact, if you do a general search outside Wikimedia, you will also find occurrences of both artists for the same image. One particular hit caught my attention:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/08/arts/met-art-nazi-loot.html

That is all. If this post is of some use, I am glad. If not, I apologise for taking your time.

2.137.179.213 20:14, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input! --Mateus2019 (talk) 03:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback![edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Piz Mundaun GR (Liftkarte) mid-1980s.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Piz Mundaun GR (Liftkarte) mid-1980s.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Piz Mundaun GR (Liftkarte) mid-1980s.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portionssticks (Kaffee und Zucker) 2021.jpg[edit]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Portionssticks (Kaffee und Zucker) 2021.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GER — Bayern — Gem. Feldkirchen-Westerham — Feldkirchen — Münchener Str. 2 (Friedensglocke) 2021.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:GER — Bayern — Gem. Feldkirchen-Westerham — Feldkirchen — Münchener Str. 2 (Friedensglocke) 2021.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GER — Bayern — Gem. Feldkirchen-Westerham — Feldkirchen — Münchener Str. 2 (Friedensglocke) 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Koordinaten für Kärnten[edit]

findest du auf: https://gis.ktn.gv.at/webgisviewer/atlas-mobile/map/Basiskarten/0rientierung%20u.%20Kataster, etwa für die Geokoordinaten von File:AUT — Kärnten — Malta — Malta-Hochalmstraße (Entrance) 2021.jpg. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Für Tirol hilft dir https://maps.tirol.gv.at beim Bestimmen der Koordinaten, etwa wegen File:AUT — Tirol — Bezirk Kufstein — Gemeinde Ellmau am Wilden Kaiser — Weißachgraben 5 (Apfelstrudel) 2021.jpg lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:58, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Die meisten meiner Fotos enthalten Geodaten im EXIF. Daher sollte ein Bot drüberlaufen und die Geodaten einpflegen, was aber kaum passiert. Deine Links nutzen mir nicht viel, weil die Geodaten nicht für die Commons-Vorlage passen. Früher konnte man bei "location possible", das bei einer Datei eingebunden war, auf einer Karte den Standort auswählen und fertig. Nun weiß ich nicht mehr, wie das geht (und ob überhaupt). --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{Object location}} mit {{Object location|<breitengrad dec>|<längengrad dec>}} und Breiten- und Längengrad kriegst du einfach aus den GIS Diensten. Oder du nimmst deine Exif-Daten und es geht auch {{Location|g|m|s|N|g|m|s|E}}. Der Baustein {{Location possible}} hilft jedenfalls dafür nicht, der richtet sich an menschliche Benutzer wie dich und mich. Wenn der Bot nicht tut, dann den Bot ansprechen. Meines Erachtens tut er. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:44, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lieben Dank + schönes WE ! --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sprechende Namen für Medien?[edit]

Hallo, du gibst deinen Fotos Namen wie 2021 — Erste Julireise Mateus2019 — Batch (380).jpg. Solche Namen sind für dich wahrscheinlich nützlich, allen anderen Benutzer sagen sie aber nichts. Commons macht zwar bei Dateinamen keine Vorschriften zur Sprache, möchte aber gerne, dass die Namen ein bisschen aussagekräftig sind:

Commons:Dateibenennung

Ich kann deine Bilder natürlich in Category:Files with bad file names eintragen, aber da es so viele sind, wird das eine Zeit dauern.

Grüße -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 07:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mein Beitrag mittels Batch-Uploads mitsamt korrekten Kategorien, reicht aus. Manchmal gibt es noch eine schöne Dateibeschreibung extra. Anpassungen der Dateinamen, die vorher Teil von Batches waren, ist bei mir der Ofen aus, zumal ich mittleile hinsichtlich der Verschieberechte "kastriert" wurde (Filemover), statt dessen müßte ich Anträge für viele tausend meiner Dateien erstellen. Janee, lass' mal. Schon morgen geht es wieder auf die Reise, diesmal mit hoffentlich weniger Fotos. Die letzten drei Reisen im Juli haben mich geschätzt 30 Stunden Aufwand für Commonsdaten gekostet (~ 1000 Bilder aus 4 Ländern). Daneben gibt es noch viele andere Batches, z.B. Israel, Nürnberg usw. Aussagekräftige Dateinamen sind so ziemlich das letztnötigste, was bei Commons notwendig ist. Man findet Dateien über Suchbegriffe in der Dateibeschreibung und vor allem durch Kategorienzuordnungen. --Mateus2019 (talk) 09:49, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, @Mateus2019. Ja, wenn du meinst, dass man zum Beispiel 2021 — Erste Julireise Mateus2019 — Batch (381).jpg über die Beschreibung „Bruneck“ und die Kategorie Bruneck finden kann, muss ich dir wohl Recht geben. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:AUT — Land Kärnten — Bezirk Spittal an der Drau — Gemeinde Rennweg am Katschberg — Katschberghöhe (Steigung 15 %) 2021.jpg[edit]

Der hier vorgeschlagene neue Name hat zweimal "(" und einmal ")". Ändere es gern, wie es gewünscht ist, und pinge, dann verschiebe ich gern. Beste Grüße, --Marsupium (talk) 16:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Craffonara, Giuseppe — Hebe tränkt den Adler Jupiters (Gemälde).PDF[edit]

File:Craffonara, Giuseppe — Hebe tränkt den Adler Jupiters (Gemälde).PDF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ras67 (talk) 11:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:GRC — Korfu — Agios Gordios (Mayor La Grotta Verde Grand Resort Desserts) Mattes 2021.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:GRC — Korfu — Agios Gordios (Mayor La Grotta Verde Grand Resort Desserts) Mattes 2021.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GRC — Korfu — Agios Gordios (Mayor La Grotta Verde Grand Resort Desserts) Mattes 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diff 606855203[edit]

Hi, would you please care to explain why you reverted this? --HyperGaruda (talk) 16:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have added a self-refenced category. The "Views-of category" is a sub-cat. (entity) of the church. The world is still turning^^, Shalom --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I completely understood that. What do you mean by "self-refe[re?]nced category"? Is it another way of saying that two categories are subcategories of each other and thus causing a kind of loop? Because that was not the case here. --HyperGaruda (talk) 17:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

solved case --Mateus2019 (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Actively moving jellyfish at Sydney Aquarium with crimson lighting (animated).gif[edit]

File:Actively moving jellyfish at Sydney Aquarium with crimson lighting (animated).gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

23.127.188.95 06:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Guillemets[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019, kleine Frage: wo sind die Guillemets, oder übersehe ich da etwas (Category:Arrow signs in Germany)? Thanks. :-) Lotje (talk) 07:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, jetzt besser? LG --Mateus2019 (talk) 17:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Sound Logo project[edit]

Wikimedia Sound Logo project

The Wikimedia Sound Logo project

Hello, the Wikimedia sound logo project is in an early development phase -- this stage is for asking all kinds of questions, developing and fielding ideas, finding themes and shaping the direction of the project. Here is a link to the meta page for the project: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Sound_Logo

Your input is welcome. Thank you.

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getreidekästen Nantesbuch[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019! Ich habe jetzt mal die Getreidekästen in Nantesbuch ein bißchen umgeschichtet. Da hat bei Dir leider nicht alles gepaßt. Vergleichst Du eigentlich Deine Baudenkmäler nicht mit dem DenkmalAtlas2.0? Leider gab es in diesem Fall dort keine Fotos, aber dafür kann man damit die Positionen der Häuser besser finden, und außerdem deren Gestalt besser zuordnen. Ich durfte dort freundlicherweise auf die Wiese des Nachbarhauses gehen, und hatte damit einen besseren Überblick. Viele Grüße Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 13:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Servus, da freue ich mich. Ich sag' merci! Schönes Rest-WE wünscht --Mateus2019 (talk) 13:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename[edit]

Hi Mateus2019! You're ok with renaming this here?. I hope you will see this before someone-else renames it, I ask it first, because it's only about the distance and you were a file mover yourself. ;) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yea

OK BTW: The moving right was granted during the time as I acted as User:Mattes. Addionally during a short time as User:Mattes. Now, not anymore (a fellow national of yours, Multichill) has downgraded me because of a "PA". Greetz, --Mateus2019 (talk)

Ok, yes I know, we talked about it by mail :-) - I will rename it, if it's not done already! Thanx. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:12, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos Mozarts Geburtshaus[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019, danke für deine vielen Fotos aus dem Haus. Wollte dich nur aufmerksam machen, dass in der Benennung der Bilder das "SL" insofern falsch ist, weil SL nicht das Land Salzburg meint, sondern das Kennzeichen für den Bezirk Salzburg-Umbegung, also für den Flachgau ist. Alle, die das wissen, verwirrt das. Und wenn's dir nicht zu viel Mühe ist, kannst du in Zukunft gern die Bilder auch gleich in die entsprechende Monatskategorie geben (hier also November 2021 in Salzburg), dann erspar ich mir das Nacharbeiten :-). Lg --Eweht (talk) 09:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Eweht! Oh, das verwirrend. Nun weiss ich Bescheid. Ich verwende künftig die Langform. Das mit dem Aufnahmemonat und -Jahr werde ich auch berücksichtigen. Als ich zurückkam, habe ich mit Entsetzen festgestellt, dass von Mozarts Geburtshaus nicht einmal 1 % bei Commons vertreten ist. Also muss ich nochmal hingehen und mehr knipsen (eine Etage pro Tag), ist ja nur 90 Minuten Fahrt mit dem Zug von München. LG, --Mateus2019 (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gallery_page_of_sovereign_countries[edit]

Gallery page of sovereign countries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JopkeB (talk) 04:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

	Merry Christmas Mateus2019
	Hi Mateus2019, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, Lotje (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lotje, thank you! Happy holidays for you, too. Stay helthy and have joy with your gifts. Best wishes from Germany, --Mateus2019 (talk) 08:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alte Pinakothek[edit]

Please check Alte Pinakothek/Rooms 16 to 23 (ground floor) - your edits broke the page, and left it in inappropriate categories, so I have reverted them. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:29, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:GER — BY — München — Dokumentation Drei Impfungen gegen COVID-19 Anno 2021 Mattes.jpg[edit]

File:GER — BY — München — Dokumentation Drei Impfungen gegen COVID-19 Anno 2021 Mattes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lämpel ^Disk. 15:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fotos von Museums-Infotafeln[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019,

Aufnahmen von Erklär/Infotafeln in Museen, wie in Category:Information boards in the Germanisches Nationalmuseum, sind urheberrechtlich etwas grenzwertig, weil sie üblicherweise in Innenräumen stehen, weshalb die Panoramafreiheit nicht greift. Allerdings ist das ganze nur dann relevant, wenn man dem Inhalt der jeweiligen Infotafel Schöpfungshöhe zumessen (Commons:Threshold of originality#Germany) muss. Da dieses Problem aufgrund der Museumsprojekte häufiger auftritt (und ich einzelnen Benutzern schon vom Hochladen solcher Infotafelfotos abgeraten habe; siehe: User talk:Túrelio#Information boards in Innenräumen), andererseits die Beurteilung ob Schöpfungshöhe Ja/Nein nicht immer so einfach ist, möchte ich anhand eines Muster-LAs versuchen, ob sich — zumindest für den D-A-CH-Raum — handhabbare Beispiele/Kriterien erarbeiten lassen, die einerseits den Benutzern helfen, welche Art von Infotafelfotos sie hochladen können, andererseits Admins oder Uploadpatrolern eine Grundlage für halbwegs konsistente Lösch/Nichtlösch-Entscheidungen bieten. Für den Muster-LA würde ich ein paar unterschiedliche Fotos aus der o.g. Kategorie nehmen. Für den Fall, dass der Muster-LA so entschieden wird, dass einige der Aufnahmen als "hat Schöpfungshöhe" und damit als geschützt erachtet werden, könntest du dann versuchen, dafür (oder gleich für alle Infotafeln) vom Germanischen Nationalmuseum im nachhinein eine Genehmigung zu erhalten? --Túrelio (talk) 12:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, die Vorgehensweise ist gut. Von Museen, deren Hinweistafeln eine SH aufweisen und deren Fotos bei Commons gehostet werden, müsste jeweils eine Einverständniserklärung eingeholt werden. Die müssten auch verwaltet werden (OTRS-Ticket erstellen, Digitalisat anhängen). Im Falle des Germ. Nationalm. nehme ich das mal in Angriff. VG, --Mateus2019 (talk) 13:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hier wäre mein Entwurf:

“Grüss Gott, ich bin ehrenamtlicher Mitarbeiter bei Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hauptseite). Dies ist ein Grafik-Repositorium der Wikimedia Foundation mit > 82 Millionen Dateien. Hauptsächlich dient es zur Illustration von Wikipedia-Ausgaben. Mein Benutzername ist Mateus2019(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Mateus2019) Ich habe eine Anfrage bezüglich Ihrer Erläuterungstafeln bei Kunstwerken, siehe https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Information_boards_in_the_Germanisches_Nationalmuseum. Begrüssen Sie so eine Dokumentation und unter welchen Voraussetzungen? Die wichtigste Frage wäre, ob sie in der Ablichtung ein Problem urheberrechtlicher Art sehen. Der zentrale Punkt ist, ob es sich hierbei bei den Texten um eine Schöpfungshöhe gem. §2 UrhG handelt. Bei Texten, die aus Stichworten bestehen, ist sicher kein Problem gegeben. Allerdings möglicherweise bei Texten, die aus kompletten Sätzen bestehen: Bezüglich der Ergänzung der Lichtbilder von Exponaten, die bei Wikimedia Commons vorhanden sind, sind die mit abgebildeten Erläuterungstafeln eine gute und sinnvolle Ergänzung. Es wird um eine kurze Stellungnahme in Schriftform gebeten (E-Mail reicht aus), damit in Zukunft eine Handlungssicherheit besteht. Auf Ihren Websites habe ich dazu keine Informationen gefunden. Abschliessend bitte ich noch um Erlaubnis, dass Ihre Antwort mit Zitatangabe und Tagesdatum bei Wikimedia Commons veröffentlicht werden darf (E-Mail wird weggelassen).” —— Ich bitte um kurze Kommentierung und um ein "go" (für https://www.gnm.de/services/kontakt/) Danke und Grüße aus München, --Mateus2019 (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Mateus2019,

wow, das geht ja ganz schön in die Tiefe. Ich bin mir aber nicht sicher, ob es klug ist, gegenüber dem vermuteten Rechteinhaber das Thema Schöpfungshöhe anzusprechen. Das könnte eventuell hinderlich wirken, wenn die dann denken, dafür müsste erst ein juristisches Gutachten erstellt werden. Im Prinzip wollen wir ja nur eine pauschale Genehmigung, dass deine (oder anderer Benutzer) Fotos von deren Infotafeln unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht werden dürfen. Die Antwort- bzw. Genehmigungsmail sollte übrigens nicht primär an dich (gerne aber CC), sondern direkt an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org geschickt werden, VRTS verlangt das so. --Túrelio (talk) 07:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Halllo Mateus2019, würdest du bitte weitermachen in dem Sinne, wie es Turelio vorschlägt. Vielen Dank Schubbay (talk) 08:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Servus, habe die Angelegenheit nicht vergessen. Vielleicht fasse ich das etwas allgemeiner, d.h. ob generell Einverständnis mit der Veröffentlichtung a) aller Erläuterungstafeln unter CC-0 besteht oder b) nur solche mit Stichworten unter CC-0. Leider gibt es keinen Vorlagentext. Ende der Woche meld' ich mich nochmal hier. --Mateus2019 (talk) 09:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2. Entwurf:

“Grüss Gott, ich bin ehrenamtlicher Mitarbeiter bei Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Hauptseite). Dies ist ein Grafik-Repositorium der Wikimedia Foundation mit > 82 Millionen Dateien. Hauptsächlich dient es zur Illustration von Wikipedia-Ausgaben. Mein Benutzername ist Mateus2019. Ich habe eine Anfrage bezüglich Ihrer Erläuterungstafeln zu Exponaten, siehe https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Information_boards_in_the_Germanisches_Nationalmuseum. Ich bitte darum, die Fotos der Erläuterungstafeln lizenzrechtlich freizugeben (es geht um die kleinformatigen Texttafeln). Bitte senden Sie ggfs. eine E-Mail an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org mit etwa folgendem Inhalt:

Hiermit erklären wir in Bezug auf unsere Erläuterungstafeln zu Exponaten, dass wir der Urheber (Textautor) sind. Wir erlauben die Weiternutzung der von Privatpersonen aufgenommene Bilder dieser Tafeln unter freie Lizenzen: Creative Commons Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.de), Public Domain und anderer. Dies bezieht sich auf Lichtbilder, die vor dem Tag der Erklärung gefertigt wurden sowie auf die zukünftigen. Uns ist bekannt, dass damit in urheberrechtlicher Hinsicht Dritte das Recht haben, das Bild zu nutzen und zu verändern. Dies schließt auch eine gewerbliche Nutzung ein. Uns ist bekannt, dass wir diese Einwilligung üblicherweise nicht widerrufen können und kein Anspruch darauf besteht, dass die Bilder dauernd auf Wikimedia-Seiten eingestellt sind. Uns ist bekannt, dass sich die Unterstellung unter eine freie Lizenz nur auf das Urheberrecht bezieht und es daher unbenommen ist, aufgrund anderer Gesetze (Persönlichkeitsrecht, Markenrecht usw.) gegen Dritte vorzugehen, die das Bild im Rahmen der freien Lizenz rechtmäßig, auf Grund der anderen Gesetze aber unrechtmäßig nutzen.

[DATUM] [NAME DES BEAUFTRAGTEN]

Einzelheiten können dieser Seite entnommen werden: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Textvorlagen#Einverst%C3%A4ndniserkl%C3%A4rung_f%C3%BCr_Bild/Foto-Freigaben. Sie können den Text frei ändern, z.B. mit Bedingungen versehen wie "Die Erklärung bezieht sich nicht auf Tafeln mit Fließtext". Es ist kein Digitalisat eines Papierbriefes notwendig, normaler Text reicht aus. Besten Dank! Mit sehr freundlichen Grüßen”

Ich bin sehr unzufrieden mit dem Text, da müsste sich eigentlich jemand von Helpdesk d'rum kümmern oder zumindest jemand mit Fachlichkeit. Ich warte mal, ab was die Leutz hier sagen. --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Washington (state)[edit]

[3]: How is this not Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Washington (state)? Clearly, that is the implicit subject of this photo shoot. - Jmabel ! talk 21:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know what the purpose of the plague mask photo shoot was. Plague masks existed during the Middle Ages to prevent healty people getting infected by Black death. At least the wearers thought it would help. The idea of it was to breathe no the plain air but air with strong herbs and other stuff which was integrated in the mask. In my understanding, just wearing any mask does not help to prevent a COVID-19 infection. The COVID-19 pandemic in Washington coining is your interpretation. No word is written about it in the file descr. The Plague masks in this shoot shall transport a weird look to frighten the girl. --Mateus2019 (talk) 04:00, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The "girl" is a photographer, who was in that position to get the angle she wanted. And, yes, I do know what was going on, though I didn't choose to recount my conversation with them. The picture is part of a series documenting the shoot. - Jmabel ! talk 15:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021 — Zweite Julireise Mateus2019 Batch (207).jpg[edit]

File:2021 — Zweite Julireise Mateus2019 Batch (207).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Schubbay (talk) 14:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soups_in_art[edit]

Soups in art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Maler - Portrait of Wolfgang Ronner - detail letter.JPG[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019, im Oktober 2008 hattest Du angekündigt, dass Du hierzu noch ein besseres Bild nachliefern wolltest, bist aber wohl nicht mehr dazu gekommen. Mittlerweile liegt eine scharfe, recht hoch auflösende Abbildung des gesamten Gemäldes vor. Wäre es sinnvoll, hieraus die Detailansicht des Briefes einfach auszuschneiden und als Version unter demselben Namen in commons einzustellen? Gegebenenfalls würdest Du das am besten selbst machen, damit ich mich nicht verdächtig mache, Deine Bilder einfach zu überschreiben. Du kennst ja vielleicht die deutlichen Warnhinweise beim Hochladen von Versionen. VG --W. B. Jaeger (talk) 09:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC) mini[reply]

Gott zum Gruße, das hatte ich nicht mehr auf dem Schirm. Nun mit IrfanView extrahiert, vergrößert und eine neue Datei angelegt (rechts). Schönen Sonntag, --Mateus2019 (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, sehr schön!

Dir auch einen schönen Sonntag! --W. B. Jaeger (talk) 15:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK Mateus2019 (talk) 10:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:GER — BY — Schwaben — Augsburg — St.-Anna-Hof (ev. Kirche St. Anna · Posaunenengel als Wetterfahne) Mattes 2022-11-05.jpg[edit]

Hello, @Mateus2019: , could you please geocode your image with the correct template? Thank you, Matr1x-101 (talk) 22:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what do you mean? Greez, --Mateus2019 (talk) 22:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see Commons:Geocoding. Thanks, Matr1x-101 (talk) 14:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spijkenisse is not a city[edit]

Dear Mateus2019, I saw that you changed a category for the gallery page Spijkenisse, from Category:Gallery pages of populated places in the Netherlands to Category:Gallery pages of cities in the Netherlands. But Spijkenisse is formally not a city, it had never city rights. What are your criteria to change it this way? In your opinion: When should a populated place be called a city? JopkeB (talk) 03:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have read de:Spijkenisse (“ist eine Stadt in den Niederlanden.”) and no further. Greetz, --Mateus2019 (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for your answer, clear. Even in the Dutch Wikipedia it is called a "stad", so I rest my case. --JopkeB (talk) 12:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock rq. 168.119.0.0/16[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "168.119.0.0/16 -- I am using another computer"

Decline reason: "Technically, you weren't blocked, your IP Address was. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 14:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)"[reply]

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Mateus2019 (talk) 11:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A better idea is to ask for IPBE (IP Block Exempt) right, I did so at COM:AN#Mateus2019. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 12:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And it was granted. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 14:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! I don't understand why this initally happened. I was logged in at work so an IP range block does not make sense. Greetings from Germany, --Mateus2019 (talk) 15:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the 32,768 IPV4 addresses in range 168.119.0.0/16 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RBL • abusefilter • tools • guc • stalktoy • block user • block log) maintained by Hetzner Online GmbH in Germany are still being used as open proxies or VPNs to abuse other networks on the Internet. That range is blocked on Commons for two years until 25 May 2024, and is blocked globally by the WMF through 17 December 2025 at 08:35 (UTC). One of the reports I saw was here. Perhaps you can help that company to mitigate the damage. http://www.fr1.documents.cyberabuse.org/docs/fixop.htm provides links to help fix the following open and misconfigured proxy servers: Wingate, winroute, socks, squid, http proxy... — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata Infobox on gallery pages[edit]

Hi, Mateus. Please stop adding {{Wikidata infobox}} to gallery pages, at least for those with packed thumbnails:

If you read the documentation for {{Wikidata infobox}}, you see it was intended for categories, not galleries
When galleries have packed thumbnails, the infobox causes the rows of the sub-gallery to sometimes have incorrect heights

Also: the edit summaries you are using to add infoboxes to galleries are misleading. They only mention adding categories, not that you're adding infoboxes. Please mention that you are adding an infobox, also. — hike395 (talk) 13:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello -- OK WD IB is not forbidden for gallery pages. seasonal greetz, --Mateus2019 (talk) 08:28, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Mateus2019: Infoboxes are not forbidden on gallery pages. I use them often in gallery pages, they offer a lot of information in a nutshell and in many languages. They are used almost by default in many gallery pages, anyway in Category:Gallery pages of populated places. I have not noticed any problems with incorrect heights of rows. JopkeB (talk) 16:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say it was forbidden (verboten), I said it was not intended (nicht beabsichtigt) for galleries. The documentation states:

Includes a Wikidata-enabled infobox on category pages. See Commons:Wikidata infobox help for the FAQ.

and the FAQ states:

Over 4 million Commons categories have an infobox on the right-hand side of the page added by the template {{Wikidata Infobox}}.

If JopkeB is implying that there is consensus for placing these infoboxes on gallery pages, I disagree with that. Doing a random sample from Category:Gallery pages of populated places (per Jopke):

Plauen has no infobox
Hainburg an der Donau has no infobox
Bischofshofen has an infobox, placed by Mateus in March 2022, without mentioning infobox in the edit summary
Göttingen has an infobox, placed by Mateus in October 2022 (good edit summary)
Algeciras has no infobox
Pamplona-Iruña has an infobox, placed by Mateus in October 2022 (upon gallery creation)
Миколаїв / Николаев has an infobox. placed by Mateus in November 2022, without mentioning infobox in the edit summary

This isn't "almost by default". Infoboxes on galleries appear to be a unilateral, undiscussed effort by Mateus, largely without adequate edit summaries notifying others that the addition is occurring. Mateus is being BOLD, which is perfectly fine. However, it is the right of any editor to object to unilateral and undiscussed large-scale edits. I am doing so here --- I object to some (but not all) of these edits.

Gallery layout is not the same as category layout. A category page always has a fixed layout defined by MediaWiki. {{Wikidata Infobox}} is designed to work with that layout. However, gallery pages use <gallery>. When <gallery mode="packed"> is used, MediaWiki computes the heights of the images so that they are uniform across a row and the row fills the entire page. When an editor adds {{Wikidata Infobox}} for pages with <gallery mode="packed">, it disrupts the layout and causes uneven heights and unwanted whitespace. See, for example, the following (you may need to grow/shrink the horizontal size of your window, and look below the infobox to see the effects):

Now, the Infobox FAQ says

{{Wikidata Infobox}} doesn't play well with other templates that want to use the whole page width. Move it down below those, and everything should be fine.

If we follow the advice of the FAQ, then we would put the infobox below the entire gallery (at the end). Can we agree that putting the infobox at the end of the gallery is not a good idea?

Given this, I asked Mateus to not add {{Wikidata Infobox}} to gallery pages that use <gallery mode="packed">. I also asked for better edit summaries (when adding infoboxes to any other gallery). Over in en:WP, the use of infoboxes is determined per-page -- I think we should follow that here, and not always put infoboxes on every gallery by default. It truly depends on the layout.

Since my request, Mateus has been very nice and has avoided adding infoboxes to galleries with packed thumbnails. Thank you, Mateus! — hike395 (talk) 18:26, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, again thanks for being nice and polite. I understand, that there were a few issues with blank spaces which are caused by adding the IB. Now I take care of the problem since I'm aware that this could happen. You make such a big issue out of a small cause. Better edit summaries: I'll try harder (pl. consider the amount of hundreds of edits per day). The edit summary is not soooo important, if it does not reflect all changes in text form. I wish you decent remaining days of 2022 and later on, a great year of 2023! Greetz, --Mateus2019 (talk) 18:36, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Hike395, thanks for your research and your explanation.

I guess we have a different frame of reference; mine is the Netherlands for gallery pages about populated places and there are a lot of infoboxes.
On my screen the gallery pages you mention (starting with Yosemite National Park) show perfectly well, without any ajustments. But apparently on others they don't and we have to take into account all kinds of screens.
I agree that putting an infobox at the bottom of a gallery page is not a good idea.
To get consensus and implement a Commons policy about infoboxes on gallery pages, I suggest to take this discussion to a next level, so more people can participate. (It was only by accident that I saw this.)

JopkeB (talk) 03:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mateus: I thought you were going to stop adding infoboxes to galleries with packed thumbnails? [4] Although I see you didn't add it to others [5], so perhaps it was an oversight. — hike395 (talk) 20:28, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mateus. Now I see you're removing the packing and adding infoboxes, without describing either in the edit summary? here, here You're also leaving some pages broken here. Please don't replace mode=packed with an Infobox --- I don't support this edit (as I explained above). You may be editing too rapidly, I would suggest slowing down. — hike395 (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no preference for your formatting. The WD-IB is more important. Hold ALT and "+" to have a greater display of the img. --Mateus2019 (talk)

I respectfully disagree. As I said before, the infobox was intended for use in categories, and the consensus was to put them on categories. Packed thumbnails in galleries is documented and are used by many editors. There isn't any consensus to put infoboxes on galleries, let alone ones with packed thumbnails.

The use of packed thumbnails on Donner Lake has been stable for 3 years. In that case, the packed thumbnail shows the Featured panorama well (because the panorama is displayed up to 460px wide, instead of being forced to be only 120px wide). I object to adding the infobox and removing the packed gallery at Donner Lake. If you are objecting to the heights=144px, we can use the default height, no problem. I'm happy to see if any other editor wants to discuss at Talk:Donner Lake. — hike395 (talk) 07:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:SLO — Ljubljana — Kolodvorska ulica 2 (Radiotelevizija Slovenija) 2020.JPG

Yours sincerely, TadejM ^(t/p) 09:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AUT — Bundesland Salzburg — Salzburg — Museumspl. 5 (Haus der Natur · Homo floresiensis) Mattes 2022-10-30.jpg[edit]

File:AUT — Bundesland Salzburg — Salzburg — Museumspl. 5 (Haus der Natur · Homo floresiensis) Mattes 2022-10-30.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diözesanmuseum Augsburg[edit]

Habe mir gerade die Bilder vom Diözesanmuseum in Augsburg angschaut und festgestellt, daß du bei mehreren Aufnahmen neue Categorien von Künstlern erstellt hast.Diese leuchten aber noch rot auf, weil du vergessen hast sie zu verlinken, z.B. Thomas Maurer (painter) usw. Gruß Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK (angelegt), waren nur 2. --Mateus2019 (talk) 03:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Mateus2019,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

How to create?[edit]

Such page [6]? How to start? Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 06:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

start with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/WHATEVER and then "create" --Mateus2019 (talk) 06:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very, very thanks! --Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 09:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Wasa Kawasaker: More about gallery pages: see Commons:Galleries. JopkeB (talk) 09:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Verry thanks! --Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 09:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Creature Cases[edit]

Hi, Mateus. I accidentally created the "The Creature Cases" upload here in Wikimedia Commons when it should have been a "non-free file" to begin with. Do I need to wait for its deletion here in Commons before I can repost the poster again on Wikipedia as a "non-free file"? -Prince Silversaddle (talk) 04:28, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, at first you must prove the licsense which you state. Then the DR will be revoked. If you cannot prove it, the re-upload will be part of the Deletion process, too. --Mateus2019 (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ankauf von Devisen (Beleg) — 2022 — scanned by Mattes.jpg[edit]

File:Ankauf von Devisen (Beleg) — 2022 — scanned by Mattes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Krd 07:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added 2 license templates afterwards (and before deletion). Did anyone noticed these? --Mateus2019 (talk) 10:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:SLO — Ljubljana — Miklošičeva cesta 8 2020.JPG[edit]

File:SLO — Ljubljana — Miklošičeva cesta 8 2020.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TadejM ^(t/p) 14:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing sources with cryptic edit summary[edit]

I noticed quite a few paintings in Category:Images without source. These files were properly source by user:Anagoria and user:Wmpearl, but you seem to have removed it. Some examples [7] [8] [9] [10]. Why are you removing sources and why are you doing it with such a cryptic edit summary? Multichill (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is useless to set the name of a gallery when a source is asked. So I have removed the silly item. Or do you think it is smart to set a value "museum XY" as a source? One could also say "some book" or "a page in the internet or "a file from a neighbour" >> unprecise. BTW the edit summary states the main topic of the edit not everything. I trust the automatic edit summary. I do not produce cryptic edit summaries (these are done automatically). Thanks for your understanding. --Mateus2019 (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not useless or silly, it's one of the essential things we want for each file. A link is better, but for PD-art files the name of the museum is fine. You deliberately removing it borders vandalism, please don't ever do that again. Multichill (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I understand. No more such edits. Have a nice day! --Mateus2019 (talk) 17:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Optical illusion and Category:Gallery pages[edit]

I know that Optical illusion is a gallery page and not a category. Category:Gallery pages is a category, but it is not for individual gallery pages. If it were, it would contain an unmanageable number of gallery pages. So Optical illusion does not belong in that category, even though it seems logical that it would. Please don't add that category again. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 22:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it ... --Mateus2019 (talk) 10:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mateus2019: Galerieseiten sollen wohl nicht direkt in der Hauptkategorie einsortiert sein. Sondern in passenden Themenkategorien (by topic; Unterkategorien), etwa:

Die Category:Gallery pages enthält demnach keine einzelnen Einträge. Für Optical illusion habe ich nicht direkt etwas passendes bestehendes gefunden. Vielleicht Gallery pages "about art"/"about science"?

Gruß -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 07:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:2021 — Erste Julireise Mateus2019 — Batch (226).jpg[edit]

File:2021 — Erste Julireise Mateus2019 — Batch (226).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danke![edit]

@Mateus2019: Vielen herzlichen Dank für die vielen von dir erstellten "Galery pages". Ich sehe deine neuen Galerieseiten regelmäßig auf meiner Beobachtungsliste, da ich schon in fast jeder Gemeinde editiert habe.

Soeben ist mir beispielsweise Hagnau am Bodensee aufgefallen.

Ich wollte dich diesbezüglich auf die Möglichkeit von Navigationsleisten aufmerksam machen. Ich bin seit längerem dabei, Navigationsleisten für die Gemeinden aller Landkreise in Baden-Württemberg zu erstellen. Ohne Die Angabe "Category" funktionieren diese auch für Galerieseiten.

In diesem Fall etwa mit der Navigationsleiste Template:Municipalities in Bodenseekreis.

Für die Galerieseite von Hagnau am Bodensee würde das wie folgt aussehen:

Bodenseekreis: Friedrichshafen · Hagnau am Bodensee · Immenstaad am Bodensee · Kressbronn am Bodensee · Langenargen · Markdorf · Meckenbeuren · Meersburg · Tettnang · Überlingen · Uhldingen-Mühlhofen

So sieht man, dass es bereis für 11 Gemeinden des Bodenseekreises Navigationsleisten gibt. Nutzer können so zu Nachbargemeinden navigieren. Oder sie werden angeregt, fehlende Navigationsleisten für die weiteren Gemeinden zu erstellen.

Als Seitenersteller kann man sich in der Navigationsleiste mit "|all=1" die noch fehlenden Kategorien (in diesem Fall Galerieseiten) als Rotlinks anzeigen lassen. Das sieht dann so aus:

Bodenseekreis: Bermatingen · Daisendorf · Deggenhausertal · Eriskirch · Frickingen · Friedrichshafen · Hagnau am Bodensee · Heiligenberg · Immenstaad am Bodensee · Kressbronn am Bodensee · Langenargen · Markdorf · Meckenbeuren · Meersburg · Neukirch · Oberteuringen · Owingen · Salem · Sipplingen · Stetten · Tettnang · Überlingen · Uhldingen-Mühlhofen

Wenn ich mal mit der Template-Erstellung fertig bin (dafür führe ich noch Lemma-Abgleiche zwischen Wikipedia/Commons/Wikidata durch), kann man sich das bald für alle Kreise in Baden-Württemberg anzeigen lassen, siehe:

Category navigational templates for municipalities of districts in Baden-Württemberg

User:Triplec85/Vorlage:Template:Municipalities in LandkreisXYZ

Viele Grüße -- Triple C 85 ^{| User talk |} 09:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo nach BaWü! Zur Abwechslung wird man mal nicht angebellt :-P Deine Leisten sind zwar praktisch, aber ich hab das erstmal zurück gestellt. Zuviel anderer Krams derzeit ... Schöne Restwoche gewünscht + VG --Mateus2019 (talk) 10:30, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Mateus2019,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map

Upload your photos for the special price

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rename[edit]

Hi Matteus, someone did a request, it's one of your uploads. What do you think about it. I'm not sure renaming this. See: here, Grtz. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 09:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I renamed it accidently now, I forgot to take it out of my rename list, haha. (if it's not good, I will revert it). - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 09:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello --- Thanks Richard, the reason was that I have visited two cities but the batch name contains only Brescia. --Mateus2019 (talk) 10:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, I thought someone else did the request. :-) But, never mind. Have a good one! (have a nice day) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Denkmal-ID[edit]

Hallo, ich verstehe diesen Edit nicht. Die Denkmal-ID ist zwar in Wikidata hinterlegt, scheint aber eben nicht in der auf Commons eingebundenen Infobox auf. Grüße, Mai-Sachme (talk) 06:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G.M., stimmt. Man sollte es auch in der IB sichtbar machen... --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:06, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:2021 — Erste Julireise Mateus2019 — Batch (208).jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What did you intend to do here?[edit]

You have edited the RfA by Gnom and deleted half the page. I reverted you and maybe you try it once again? Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Was a firefox problem after restart. Sorry+thanks --Mateus2019 (talk) 23:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I restored your !vote as "*

Oppose per Omphalographer --Mateus2019 (talk) 23:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)". — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me}🇺🇦 23:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image:File:ESP — Islas Baleares — Mallorca — Alcúdia (Lighthouse) — Mattes 2023-04-26.JPG[edit]

Hi Matteus, I have recategorized this image as I recognised it as the lighthouse in Ciutadella, something that was confirmed by the geocoding. You may want to rename the file to match the location etc. Thanks Jokulhlaup (talk) 15:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! rename rq. done. Greetings, --Mateus2019 (talk) 18:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rename has been done, thanks for sorting this out so quickly. Jokulhlaup (talk) 09:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image:File:Artificial produce at the Big E, West Springfield MA.jpg[edit]

Hi Matteus, this produce is actually artificial, but it's so good, it's hard to tell the difference. I actually had this discussion with a non-WP friend who came across the image, and couldn't believe it was artificial. He's still not convinced. But if you zoom in, you can see seams on 3-4 of the red peppers and 1 of the apples. Faolin42 (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello + thanks. Have put the Category:Artificial fruit. back in. --Mateus2019 (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paintings by Gustave Courbet[edit]

Hello, not sure to understand the purpose of gallery : Paintings by Gustave Courbet. This is full of mistakes. I spent many mounths on this topic. This is not good datas at all. Marc-AntoineV (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose is an overview (when it got perfect: a listing) of his paintings with some details, and images. I have just created it. Listera and his (ro)bot had done many changes afterwards.[11] The data comes from Wikidata datasets. So the right person to bring up issues is seen in the dataset history. --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a very bad idea. More than 1000 paintings are known. --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 22:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mignon, Abraham - Uferlandschaft mit Blumenstilleben.JPG[edit]

Hallo Mateus, bei der Einordnung von Bildern der Category:Staatsgalerie Bamberg bin ich auf das oben erwähnte Bild gestolpert, hochgeladen von Dir bereits 2009. Bis jetzt habe ich alle Bilder in der Bayerischen Staatsgemäldesammlung gefunden, um diese korrekt zu kategorisieren. Nur das von Dir hochgeladene nicht. Siehe hierzu https://www.sammlung.pinakothek.de/de/artist/Pdxz03EGw5/abraham-mignon

Nun die Frage: Kannst Du Dich an die Quelle / Herkunft noch erinnern? Nemracc (talk) 22:47, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Folgendes gefunden: https://www.sammlung.pinakothek.de/en/artwork/QKGBjb9GBb, jedoch Maler JAN DAVIDSZ, auch Inventarnr. stimmt nicht überein. Ich denke, dass Deine damalige Beschreibung zu einem anderen Gemälde gehört? Nemracc (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Du hast recht! Ich kümmere mich gleich um die Umbenennung und Umkategorisierung der Datei. Danke für den Hinweis und schönen Sonntag! VG--Mateus2019 (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Identite-EliMedeiros-1977-Sacem.jpg[edit]

Hello Mateus2019,

Please note that a simple mention of copyright contradicts the very clear regulations regarding identity photographs in France (PD-ID-France).

We could list a very large number of royalty-free photos published for instance by Getty Images which claims or pretend to commercialize their reproduction. Eg.: https://www.gettyimages.fr/detail/photo-d%27actualit%C3%A9/meeting-of-the-dada-group-in-paris-louis-aragon-photo-dactualit%C3%A9/542359729

Best regards. Tisourcier (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind words and your overall input! Have a good evening + greetings from Southern Germany :-) --Mateus2019 (talk) 17:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gallery_page_of_sovereign_countries[edit]

Gallery page of sovereign countries has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

186.175.220.6 12:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Mateus2019, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Bedivere (talk) 03:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Mateus2019 (talk) 03:25, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correction[edit]

Bonjour Mateus2019,

Vous avez réalisé récemment (à ma demande) le renommage du fichier File:Blason de la famille Bauduin (Belgique).svg en File:Blason famille de Bauduin.svg.

Merci beaucoup.

Toutefois , j'attire votre attention sur le fait que j'avais demandé : File:Blason famille be Bauduin.svg.

Je comprends votre changement de "be" en "de" (plus logique) mais il se trouve que la codification indique que les armoiries sont belges (be). Avec "de", la codification donne : allemand.

S'il vous est possible de corriger en "be", je suis preneur pour respecter la logique des autres fichiers.

Bonjour cher collègue, j'ai eu 2 ans de scolarité en français mais jamais le coeur du "be". Je pensais que c'était une faute de frappe signifiant "de". Bien sûr, vous obtenez votre «be» parce que cela vous semble important. Bonne soirée -- salutations du sud de l'Allemagne --Mateus2019 (talk) 18:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L'erreur était tout à fait logique, un grand merci pour votre aide et votre investissement. Bonne continuation. Jpgibert (talk) 21:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spostamento ingiustificato e insensato[edit]

Ti rendi conto del casino che hai combinato grazie a questo spostamento?
Adesso grazie a questa pensata geniale non sarà più possibile aggiornare il file ogni volta che la rete della metropolitana verrà ampliata!
Complimenti! Grazie a te adesso si dovrà fare un lavoro enorme per una cosa che prima era automatica! Genio! Arbalete (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

è stata una sua idea. Le ridenominazioni non scadono automaticamente. --Mateus2019 (talk) 04:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rename works[edit]

Hi Mateus, can you interest my other uploaded photos that need the rename, too? Thanks al lot. Bjelica (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, no problem. --Mateus2019 (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2 Galerieseiten Gemäldegalerie Berlin[edit]

Hi Mateus2019,

brauchen wir beide Seiten

Paintings in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin
Paintings in the Gemäldegalerie der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin
und worin unterscheiden sie sich

Grüße Oursana (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Servus liebe Kollegin,

wie geht's Dir so? Es ist dieselbe Institution, daher ist die Koexistenz der beiden Galerieseiten sinnfrei. Die Seite Paintings in the Gemäldegalerie, Berlin kann man zum Löschen vorschlagen (mit Weiterleitung), weil das nicht die offizielle Bezeichnung ist. Heute komme ich nicht mehr dazu... Alles Gute und LG aus München, --Mateus2019 (talk) 19:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moved file[edit]

Hi Mateus2019,

You have moved this file to "Flag of the Danish West Indies from american tabacco card.svg".

It is not optimal to have any reference to a "Flag of the Danish West Indies". The flag is bogus; the islands never had a flag of their own, and any unofficial flags had nothing to do with the fantasy flag that has been created by a user who has misunderstood the situation. Unfortunately, the file has been used as illustration in many articles in Wikis as users have thought that is was a genuine representation of a flag used by the islands. So please move it back or move it to something that has not reference to the Danish West Indies. --Pugilist (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you've got to contact the person who suggested the new name. Have a nice day and greetings from Southern Bavaria. --Mateus2019 (talk) 15:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

falsche Verlinkung über Annunciation (Q29648480)[edit]

File:Rogier Lamp.jpg, kannst Du hier helfen, Grüße Oursana (talk) 12:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, sieht ja komisch aus ..., ich schau gleich mal. Schönen Rest-Sonntag meine liebe VG, --Mateus2019 (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Royal-asiatic-society-logo.png[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Royal-asiatic-society-logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 12:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siegesdenkmal Bozen Bolzano.jpg[edit]

This photograph of yours was undeleted as part of a undeletion request relating to the monument, which was commissioned by the Italian government, and so the monument is PD-ItalyGov and PD-1996. Abzeronow (talk) 01:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Forsthaus Valepp[edit]

Hallo @Mateus2019 kannst du mir sagen warum du das im Weiler Valepp gelegene Forsthaus aus der Ortkategorie Valepp rausnimmst? Und für das einsortieren in die Kategorie für ehemalige Restaurants ist für mich unschlüssig, es ist doch mittlerweile eröffnet worden (oder ist auf dem Weg dahin), oder habe ich rückläufige Entwicklungen zur endgültigen Schließung nicht mitgekriegt? Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 06:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Servus, Du hast Recht (Ortsteil Valepp). Die Gaststätte soll im Jahr 2025 wieder öffnen. Beste Grüße, --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Methods of file renaming (File:Jingiella dongxingensis skeletal graphic.svg)[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you recently renamed one of my uploaded files following a request I made. While I appreciate you taking the time to look at it, I want to point out that your methodology was inappropriate. The original file name, "Jingia Skeletal.svg", succinctly covers to subject while maintaining my established format for these illustrations. Thus, I requested a rename (per "original uploader's request") to "Jingiella Skeletal.svg", following a recently published taxonomic correction. I presume your unilaterally chosen adjusted name was picked to be more descriptive, but such changes should not be made without prior discussion with the uploader/requester (which, in this case, is me). I trust that you understand the importance of honoring the reasonable requests of original uploaders in such matters. I await your prompt rectification of this issue. Thank you, -SlvrHwk (talk) 16:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, didnt realize r. 1. Mateus2019 (talk) 17:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you for fixing that. -SlvrHwk (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]