User talk:Buch-t

Welcome

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Buch-t!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

File:Alfa Romeo 1961.JPG

Hi, I think this is Alfa Romeo 2000 model, what do you think, it doesnt looks like 1900 model. I changed its category rgds --Typ932 (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

It is 2000 model. --Buch-t (talk) 08:47, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

File:De Tomaso 2011 schräg.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:De Tomaso 2011 Heck.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

File:--Phebus 1900.JPG

File:--Phebus 1900.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 16:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Wenn

wir Glück haben, wird die Störy-Sammlung in absehbarer Zeit in Einbeck zu sehen sein. Daruf freut sich - wenn's stimmt - --192.53.103.200 13:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Hoffen wir es. Es sollen allerdings immer nur einzelne Exemplare in Einbeck ausgestellt werden; und die Masse bleibt leider im Depot in Störy. --Buch-t (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Quadricycles

Hello. According to this video,[1] those vehicles have both engines and bicycle pedals to propel. They are just motorized four-wheel pedal cycles, aren't they? Such motorized quadricycles should be categorised to Mopeds and Quadricycles. Or I may make a new category Category:Motorized quadricycles instead. --丁 (talk) 13:40, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello 丁.

I have looked in the video. The car in the video had pedals. But not all cars in the Category:Quadricycle had pedals.

I found in de:Moped 1930s, and in en:Moped 1912 as the oldest year; not earlier. I found in both articles that there are a cc-limit, almost 50 cc or 100 cc. The cars in the Category:Quadricycle are older and had bigger engines. 3 reasons that this cars cannot be Mopeds.

The origin of this type of car is a motorized one-person-tricycle with the addition of a front axle and a front seat for one passenger. The origin is not a four-wheel pedal cycle with an additional engine. I don't know if there were four-wheel pedal cycles without engine in the time of 1900.

In Category:Quadricycles I found: English: A quadracycle is a four-wheeled human-powered vehicle.

I wrote the German article de:Quadricycle a few days ago. I found a great chaos with the use of the name of quadricycle in different wikis and I have made a clear separation. Look at my edit on nl:Quadricycle. I want a clear separation between den motorized Quadricycle and the unmotorized Quadricycles/Quadracycles in some wikis. It is not helpful for the clear separation when we put the Category:Quadricycle into the Category:Quadricycles. So I do not want this. --Buch-t (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Please don't be confusion, I've never put Category:Quadricycle into Category:Quadricycles. I had done only Category:De Dion-Bouton Quadricycle, File:Automoto 1899 schräg.JPG and File:Automoto 1899.JPG because all of them have cycle pedals. Now I have made Category:Motorized quadracycles. History is not the point, please don't hide the fact that they are a kind of pedal cycles. --丁 (talk) 13:21, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I am not happy with this. You put the category Motorized quadracycles in the category Quadricycles ignoring the description: English: A quadracycle is a four-wheeled human-powered vehicle. --Buch-t (talk) 15:30, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

I have a suggestion on renaming Category:Quadricycles. If you have any opinion, please write it on Commons:Categories for discussion/2012/07/Category:Quadricycles. --丁 (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Disk_vehicles

Category:Disk_vehicles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

RomanM82 (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

I do not care if the category name is "DISK" or "DISK VEHICLES" or "ZBROJOVKA DISK".

Zbrojovka was the manufacturer, I agree. The Category:Automobile manufacturers of the Czech Republic is incorrect for Disk.

Disk was the brand for the car. Found in several encyclopedias about automotive brands written by George Nick Georgano, Halwart Schrader, David Burgess Wise and Marián Šuman-Hreblay. Therefore I want to add the Category:Vehicles by brand for the Category:Zbrojovka Disk. --Buch-t (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Chorzow Jan 2014 049.JPG

Hi.

In the future please look at the other pictures in the category you're moving "unidentified" vehicles to. The vehicle on this picture is a ZSD Nysa 522 T, not an FSC Żuk. Visually Żuk and Nysa are very different.

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

OK, my fault. --Buch-t (talk) 16:46, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Buch-t, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Alan ^(talk) 19:21, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Edit summary

I have no problem with you moving File:Montesano, WA - unidentified open car.jpg to File:MG TD in Montesano, WA.jpg if you are confident of the identification, but how can you call the prior filename "completely meaningless"? It's not like it was "DSC4891" or some such. - Jmabel ! talk 01:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jmabel, OK, "completely meaningless" war not right. Next time I will use [[Commons:File renaming#reasons|File renaming criterion #5]]: Correct obvious errors in file names (e.g. wrong proper nouns or false historical dates) I think that unidentified open car is an error when the car is identified. --Buch-t (talk) 17:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

No question that once it was identified a name change was in order, but the name was not meaningless, and was certainly not "wrong" or "false" when I wrote it. Again, no problem with the change in content, just with the edit summary. The correct criterion would be #3, because once the identity is known saying it is unknown is misleading. - Jmabel ! talk 02:52, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok, #3. --Buch-t (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Continental Mark II

Okay, I get it. The Continental Mark II wasn't a Lincoln. As of now though, there's no "1956 Continental automobiles," or "1957 Continental automobiles" categories. I have been planning on 1956 and 1957 Continental Mark II categories, though. ----DanTD (talk) 14:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

You can create categories for "1956 Continental automobiles" up to "1960 Continental automobiles". --Buch-t (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Museums...

Front of Flipper I with 2 wheels

Back/rear of Flipper I with 2 wheels

Hi!

Sorry for those mistakes but where are the cars? Can't see no one on pics... Can't see any cat' looking like "Automobiles in the museum of Somewhere"...

Have a good Sunday. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 02:08, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello Llann.

1. It is necessary that we have car pictures on common for saying that a car museum is a car museum? Sandringham 1, Sandringham 2, Vestry House, Kezmarok. That are museums with cars.
2. Why do you think that the Category:Flipper I should be in category:Three-wheeled automobiles? I can see 4 wheels.
3. Yesterday I put Category:Craigievar vehicles, Category:Bramham vehicles, Category:Harper vehicles, Category:Rex (Sweden) vehicles, Category:Mascot 100 vehicles in Category:Three-wheeled automobiles and removed single pictures from that category. Why do you reverted? Now there are the Craigievar picture and the Craigievar category in Category:Three-wheeled automobiles.
4. I think that the Mini Outspan has 4 wheels, but it is in Category:Three-wheeled vehicles.
5. In Category:Citroën 2CV in museums are some pictures made at Detling Show, Bremen classic motorshow, Oldtimer Show. Shows are not museums. What do you think about?
6. In Category:Citroën 2CV in museums are some pictures of pedal cars. I think that pedal cars should not be in any car category.

Regards --Buch-t (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Buch-t. Thanks for corrections.

1. There's no pics of car so, for me, it is not and I'm not a soothsayer...
2. Flipper, 4 Wheels, my bad.
3. All vehicles made by Craigievar, Bramham, Harper, Rex and Mascot were 3-wheeled ? There's only one pic of each brand. Did they each made only one unique vehicle? Reverted...
4. Here I really can see 4 wheels, but it's not the same on the Commons pics...
5. I think : if you know where those 2CV's pics were taken feel free to move them in Category:Citroën 2CV in vehicle meetings
6. In the name pedal-car there's pedal but car too... And it's a 2CV pedal-car, so...

Have a good week. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 16:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

3. Craigievar: One-off, no German article. The other de:Bramham, de:Harper (Automarke), de:Mascot 100, de:Maskinfabriken Rex made more cars, all 3-wheeled. I have also created Category:Fram-King today and removed some single pictures from the category.

4. I have pictures of the Mini Outspan HOB 446 L: 4 wheels. --Buch-t (talk) 16:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

3. Thanks a lot for these informations.

4. I read the plate but no mention of the number of wheels but I agreed seeing the link above.

There's still a lot of work in all those cat's so fare well, we'll meet again! --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 20:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

@Llann Wé²: All vehicles in Category:Mochet vehicles and Category:Volugrafo vehicles have 4 wheels. --Buch-t (talk) 10:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

	All the best for 2016 !!!. --LW² \m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 18:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

IP vandal...

HI Butch.

I've got the same ptoblem with this IP who spoiled almost 100 pictures of cars (2CV, Dyane, ...) deleting years or cats...

I guess we can ask to block him, no?

--LW² \m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 15:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello Llann, I don't know. My main problem with the Simca-picture was the deleting of my user-category. --Buch-t (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

stoneleigh, more data and pictures for you

Dear Buch-t. I am very pleased to see a white stoneleigh chummy. I have been doing research on the stoneleigh. I own UM60nn the RED one when you search Google images "car stoneleigh siddeley"

we Neil Cooke and Frank Cooke thought there were only three left. you appear to have a picture of one we dont know about.

The ones we know of are: 1) the green car in http://www.collection.archivist.info/searchv13.php?searchstr=Osmaston+Rd+Rolls+Royce+open+day+PD which is kept at the RR museum Derby. 2) The Dutch earlier three seat version 1922, ask these chaps http://www.armstrongsiddeley.info/#/autos/fotos for a picture its is really different of the three seater stoneleigh. I have pictures of this too. 3) my red car. I can supply you with free use pictures, for mine and the green car. the dutch club can do the same for the three seater.

could you let us know were you found the white chummy in your picture. Thanks

Incidentally the 14/4 was a completely different car 14 = horse power, the stoneleigh chummy has only 9 horses under the bonnet. Very many thanks Neil

you can contact me via my facebook,or my father via the dutch club I have set up to watch the page. Neil Cooke and Frank Cooke

Hello Neil.

I made the picture 2004 at Rolls-Royce Heritage Trust in Derby. Registration PW-1818. It must be the green car. I think I was there during the restoration.

It will be fine when you load more pictures of all the Stoneleigh cars to wikipedia. Into the Category:Stoneleigh vehicles.

I do not use facebook. Regards --Buch-t (talk) 08:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Emblem Rolland-Pilain.JPG

File:Emblem Rolland-Pilain.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alfaveyron (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@Krd: Schaust Du Dir das bitte mal an? Erst Löschantrag, dann Eigenrevert. --Buch-t (talk) 16:18, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Hallo. Da hat wohl jemand nur einen Fehler gemacht. Ich hab den Löschantrag nun geschlossen, mehr sollte nicht nötig sein. --Krd 09:13, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Firestone Columbus

Moin moin! Vorab: Kein Gemecker, nur Wissensdurst. Warum hast Du dieses Foto File:1908 Firestone Columbus - 15565606239.jpg von Fs-Columbus zu nur Columbus kategorisiert? Ist das kein Firestone-Columbus? Umbenennen noetig? Danke fuer Deine Zeit! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Hedwig. Ich habe diese Woche de:New Columbus Buggy Company erstellt. Dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass das eigentlich kein Firestone-Columbus sein kann.

2 anerkannte Bücher schreiben, Highwheeler gab es nur von 1907-1908 unter der Marke Columbus. Marke Firestone-Columbus wurde erst 1909 für niedrige Fahrzeuge eingeführt.

Ich habe mich gestern noch rückversichert bei Benutzer:Chief tin cloud. Er bestätigt das mit einer dritten Buchquelle. Das Museum muss sich irren. Ich werde die Datei nun umbenennen.

Ich habe auch noch eine Frage zu dem Thema: Was machen wir mit https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q29875171? Es gab keinen Hersteller Firestone-Columbus, sondern nur eine Marke. Einen de-Artikel zur Marke wird es nicht geben. Was en macht, kann ich nicht vorhersagen. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 08:39, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Ich habe ein wenig auf WD rumgewuetet und die Eintraege zur New Columbus Buggy Company und Firstone-Columbus umgestrickt. So OK? --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Ich habe beim Eintrag zu New Columbus Buggy Company noch Auch bekannt als Columbus Buggy Company ergänzt, weil das die anfängliche Firmierung war.

Ich sehe allerdings Firestone-Columbus Automobiles nicht als Tochtergesellschaft, und umgekehrt New Columbus Buggy Company nicht als Dachgesellschaft beim Eintrag Firestone-Columbus Automobiles. Weil es nur ein Unternehmen war. Keine Tochtergesellschaft, keine Dachgesellschaft. Ich frage mich, ob es überhaupt einen Wikidata-Eintrag für Firestone-Columbus braucht. --Buch-t (talk) 12:25, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Hmmm, ich habe gerade die beiden Einträge nochmal überarbeitet. Sollte jetzt besser passen. Zu Deiner Frage: Ja, mMn sollte je ein Eintrag bestehen. Commons hat Kategorien fuer beide. LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 02:07, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Ja, so passt es besser. --Buch-t (talk) 09:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Abadal 1923.JPG

Servus Buch-t, nachdem Du der Ersteller des files bist möchte ich Dich in folgendes Vorhaben einbeziehen und um Deine Meinung bitten: Ich habe soeben eine eigene Kategorie für die "Doppel-Marke" Imperia-Abadal geschaffen, um sie sauber mit den an jener Kooperation beteiligten Marken Abadal und Imperia zu verknüpfen, und in diesem Zusammenhang auch gleich die gesamte belgische Marke Imperia neu kategorisiert, der Rubrik "Automobiles by brand" zugeordnet und zur gleichnamigen deutschen Motorrad-Marke abgegrenzt. Nun denke ich, es wäre konsequent und folgerichtig, auch eine Kategorie "Abadal-Buick" zu schaffen, um sie sauber mit den Marken "Abadal" und "Buick" zu verknüpfen. Begründung: Zum einen wurden die Wagen unter der "Doppel-Marke" Abadal-Buick vermarktet, was sich entsprechend in Commons niederschlagen sollte. Zum anderen handelte es sich de facto um Buicks (Fahrgestell, Motoren etc.), die in Katalonien von Abadal mit eigenen Karosserien versehen wurden, weshalb sie meines Erachtens unbedingt auch über die Kategorie Buick erschließbar sein sollten - andernfalls würde ein User, der unter "Buick" sucht, nicht auf diese exotische Nebenlinie des Marken-Stammbaums hingewiesen. Schöne Grüße aus Bayern, --Purzelbier (talk) 12:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Hallo Purzelbier, sehe ich auch so. Kein Einwand, wenn Du das umsetzt. Mein Foto habe ich umbenannt. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 08:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Freut mich. Ich werde das demnächst machen. Gruß --Purzelbier (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017

Liebe/r WIki-Mitarbeiter/in, in Deutschland und in der Schweiz läuft die Wiki Science Competition weiter. Der Einsendeschluss wurde für die europäischen Länder ohne eine eigene Jury bis zum 15 Dezember verlängert.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:48, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

9 Löschanträge Februar 2018

Kopie L'Elegante.

Kopie Phebus.

Kopie Winton.

Kopie Wolseley.

Kopie Star.

Kopie Sunbeam.

Kopie Swift.

Kopie Velox.

Kopie Vulcan. --Buch-t (talk) 07:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

File:--L'Elegante 1903.JPG

File:--L'Elegante 1903.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:--Phebus 1900.JPG

File:--Phebus 1900.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Winton 1904.JPG

File:Winton 1904.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Wolseley 1904.JPG

File:Wolseley 1904.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Star 1904.JPG

File:Star 1904.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Sunbeam 1904.JPG

File:Sunbeam 1904.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Swift 1904 on London to Brighton VCR 2011.jpg

File:Swift 1904 on London to Brighton VCR 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

File:--Velox 1903.JPG

File:--Velox 1903.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

File:--Vulcan 1904.JPG

File:--Vulcan 1904.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 15:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

1 Löschantrag April 2018

File:Emblem Farman.JPG

File:Emblem Farman.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 17:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Cadillac by Vanden Plas

Servus @Buch-t: , ich bin gerade auf die von Dir geschaffene Kategorie "Cadillac by Vanden Plas" gestoßen, die das Bild File:1930 Cadillac V16 Vanden Plas Limousine Landaulette de Luxe p1.JPG enthält. Laut [2] wurde der V16 aus dem Louwman Museum (bzw. ehemals dort? findet sich nicht mehr auf der aktuellen Bestandsliste des Museums...) allerdings nicht von Vanden Plas (England), sondern von der "Mutterfirma" Van den Plas (Belgien) karossiert. Aus dem Forum [3] geht hervor, dass das Louwman Museum den Wagen ursprünglich selbst fälschlich als von Vanden Plas (UK) karossiert ausgezeichnet hatte, dies aber dann später auf Belgien korrigierte (vgl. 4. und 12. Post von oben). Wie gesagt konnte ich den Wagen leider auf https://www.louwmanmuseum.nl/ nicht mehr finden, um das zu überprüfen, aber ich hab ehrlich gesagt keinen Zweifel an der Richtigkeit dieser Forums-Info - insbesondere da im Forum [4] der Besitzer des zweiten von Van den Plas (B) karossierten V16 überaus ausführliche Informationen zur Geschichte dieser Autos gibt und dabei dezidiert auch auf den Louwman-Wagen eingeht, der ursprünglich für das niederländische Königshaus gedacht war. Im Ergebnis muss m.E. das Bild nach Category:Van den Plas Belgium verschoben (und die von Dir geschaffene, aber faktisch falsch geschriebene Kategorie gelöscht) werden. Was meinst Du dazu? Gruß --Purzelbier (talk) 12:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Gerade habe ich den V16 Landaulet aus dem Louwman Museum auch in einem meiner Bücher gefunden. Er ist in "A-Z European Coachbuilders 1919-2000" von James Taylor (Herridge & Sons, 2017) auf S. 216 im Abschnitt "Van den Plas (B)" abgebildet; auf dem zeitgenössischen sw-Foto hatte er offenkundig noch eine andere Farbkombination, aber es ist eindeutig dasselbe Auto. Es besteht umso mehr kein Zweifel, dass es sich um eine belgische Van den Plas und nicht um eine britische Vanden Plas Kreation handelt.--Purzelbier (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Purzelbier, das klingt glaubhaft. Ich habe das Foto umkategorisiert und den Schnelllöschantrag auf die leere Kategorie gestellt.

Ich habe am früheren Standort der Louwman Collection einen Cadillac V16 notiert, aber leider kein Foto gemacht. Bei zwei Besuchen in Den Haag das Fahrzeug nicht gesehen. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Servus Buch-t, danke für die Antwort und die Korrektur. Ich denke, es wäre gut, auch noch den Dateinamen zur Klarstellung entsprechend umzubenennen ("Van den Plas" statt "Vanden Plas"). Ich selbst hab das gerade angestoßen (habe selbst kein filemover-Rechte...) für File:Cadillac 353 Vanden Plas Landaulette at Legendy 2018 in Prague.jpg; letzteres ist übrigens Ausfluss aus einer ganzen Reihe von "Vanden Plas <-> Van den Plas" Korrekturen, über denen ich momentan bin (siehe Diskussionsseite des files). Gruß --Purzelbier (talk) 06:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Habe ich verschoben. --Buch-t (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

2 Löschanträge Juli 2020

Category:Fuldamobil S-7 (first type)

Category:Fuldamobil S-7 (first type) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mighty Antar (talk) 01:22, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Fuldamobil S-7 (second type)

Category:Fuldamobil S-7 (second type) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mighty Antar (talk) 01:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

DS 5 (China) vs DS 5

Hello Buch-t ! I would like to know why did you creat the following categories : DS 5 (China), or DS 7 Crossback (China) ? What is the interest to do that ? Because these vehicles are strictly identical when they are/were produced in China or in Europe. To my opinion, creating categories specifically for Chinese market (= xxxxx xxxxx (China)) is interesting when they are some change between base vehicle and its China-made counterpart (new front, specific body, specific facelift, longer length or specific codename). This is my own opinion and I know you are not the lone person to do that on Wikimedia Commons. Have a wonderful day. Sincerely, Navigator84 Talk 12:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC+2).

Hello Navigator84, are you sure that there are no differents?

I created because I wanted to put them into own categories at Category:Chang'an PSA vehicles in the new category:Changan PSA Automobiles. --Buch-t (talk) 10:53, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Kategorie: Vintage vehicles

Hallo Bucht-t, du hast bei diesem Foto die Kategorie "Vintage vehicles" entfernt. Als Folge scheint dieses Foto in keiner einzigen "Oldtimer-Kategorie" mehr auf. Wäre es möglich, dass du doch eine hinzufügst? Gruß Bwag (talk) 22:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Dort vom 1923

Hallo Bwag, ich hatte die Kategorie entfernt, weil das Foto nicht (direkt) hinein gehört.

Aber ich muss weiter ausholen. Ich bin auf diese Kategorie aufmerksam geworden, weil mehrere neue Fotos von ganz alten Autos drin waren, die ansonsten gar nicht kategorisiert waren. Beispiel: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thor_6-8_HP_(1904).jpg . Solche Fotos findet man nur, wenn sie unter der Markenkategorie einsortiert sind. Niemand sucht Fotos von Dort- oder Thor-Fahrzeugen in Vintage vehicles.

Dann stellt sich die Frage. Was gehört in die Kategorie:Vintage vehicles? Buses, cars, motorcycles, tractors und trucks jedenfalls nicht direkt, weil es dafür eigene Unterkategorien gibt. Die Zeit für Vintage-Autos wird gewöhnlich mit 1919 bis 1930 angegeben, sodass viele Einträge der Kategorie falsch sind. (Der Dort von 1923 passt zeitlich.)

Außerdem: Wir haben sicherlich Zehntausende Fotos von Fahrzeugen aus dieser Zeit auf commons. Möchtest Du die alle direkt in diese Kategorie packen? Hoffentlich nicht. (Aktuell sind wieder 80 Fotos drin, die ich bei Gelegenheit anpasse.)

Ich habe mal weiter die Kategoriestruktur durchgesehen. Ich würde dem Foto die Category:1923 automobiles zuordnen. Die ist Unterkategorie von Category:1920s automobiles und die wiederum von Category:Vintage cars. Und durchgeführt. Gruß --Buch-t (talk) 06:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

OK, so ausführlich wollte ich es gar nicht wissen ;-))) Mir reicht dieser Edit: [5]. Gruß Bwag (talk) 14:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Wie denkst Du über das Verschieben der Datei mit der Begründung "Änderung von einem bedeutungslosen oder zweideutigen Namen zu einem sinnvollen, der beschreibt, was genau das Bild darstellt"? Ich denke, dass Dort und 1923 erscheinen sollten. --Buch-t (talk) 14:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Sehr wenig. Mein "Erkennungs/Markenzeichen" in Form von "JPG" würde dann verschwinden und großzügig ausgelegt ist ja der Bildtitel OK, denn immerhin werden (im Hintergrund) auch andere Fahrzeuge abgelichtet, die an den Classic Days teilnahmen (auch die Bildbeschreibung geht auf diese Classic Days ein) und "staunende Classic-Days-Zuschauer" wurden ebenfalls abgelichtet. Gruß Bwag (talk) 14:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Dann lassen wir die Bezeichnung unverändert. --Buch-t (talk) 15:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Thx! Gruß Bwag (talk) 15:11, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Category:Brilliance_China_Automotive_Holdings_(Bermuda)

Brilliance China Automotive Holdings (Bermuda) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Matthew hk (talk) 07:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

1915 Jeffery Car

Hello Buch-t, I was looking on the internet about this Jeffery car that I have just bought and apparently you are the only one on the internet to have ever seen this car before.

You have posted a picture of it a long ago, I was wondering if there is any chance you can remember where you have taken the picture and if you know more about the car or if you know someone where you took the picture in the first place that might know more.

Please I'm really looking into the history of this car, I hope you can help me.

Please feel free to contact me by email aswell at simonedc32@gmail.com , Thanks for your time spent on wikimedia I really appreciate that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimoneVP (talk • contribs) 18:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello Simone. The picture is in the Category:Museu do Automóvel Fafe. Search for "Museu Regional do Automóvel". https://www.cm-fafe.pt/conteudo?item=31301 and https://web.archive.org/web/20180513011352/http://www.geira.pt/mautomovel/ . I saw the car 2003 and 2009. Information from the museum: 4 cylinder, 3500 cc. Please make more pictures and load them to commons.wikimedia.org. --Buch-t (talk) 06:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Buch-T.

https://vandpcars.smugmug.com/1915-Jeffery-27HP-AA3435/ here is a gallery of the car. Please feel free, to click on the download button and use the pictures yourself for the wiki. I don't know where to load them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimoneVP (talk • contribs) 20:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I cannot use pictures which are made by other people. Please go to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard . If you have any questions: Commons:Help desk. --Buch-t (talk) 14:53, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Merci - Thank you

Bonjour et merci pour la parenthèse en trop ; ma vue n'est malheureusement plus aussi bonne. Cordialement. Hi and thank you for the extra parenthesis ; my eyesight is unfortunately not so good anymore. Cordially. Finoskov (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Renault C ou D

Bonjour. Aux pages 36 & 37 de Musée National de l'Automobile par Richard Keller & Pat Garnier aux éditions du Donon, la Renault tonneau rouge est un type C de 1900 et le phaéton jaune est un type D de 1901. Étant un grand habitué de la base Palissy, je peux vous dire que les erreurs y sont assez fréquentes surtout sur les fiches anciennes non réactualisées. Néanmoins, pour être complet, dans Wikipedia France, le type D apparu en 1901 (venant donc après le C) est donné pour être le premier modèle équipé d'un volant (ce qui est chronologiquement logique), alors peut-être que les photos ont été interverties dans le livre ? Cordialement.Finoskov (talk) 11:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Renault Type C or D?

Renault Type C or D?

(File talk:Renault Type D Tonneau 1901.JPG)

Hello Finoskov. First was the Type C (in 1900). The Type D with steering wheel got type approval on 2.2.1901. Found in "Dossiers Chronologiques Renault". Perhaps there is an error in your book. Regards --Buch-t (talk) 12:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Category:Hispano-Suiza 12-15 HP

Hi, I'm sorry for having forgotten to warn you! Yes, the category can be deleted, I have no other pictures... thank you very much and sorry again !!! --Luc106 (talk) 10:32, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

One car is in Gundelfingen/Donau, but I do not have pictures. PDF, page 8. Number 247 is the first car of this type, built in 1908. --Buch-t (talk) 08:27, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Langenburg Jul 2012 20 (Deutsches Automuseum - 1968 Goggomobil T 250).jpg

I must've tried to correct the category for a REAL Lamborghini, and this picture got caught in my edit by mistake. My stupid computer has been making me do a lot of things I don't want to do lately. --DanTD (talk) 11:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

No problem. --Buch-t (talk) 11:25, 9 December 2023 (UTC)