निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।
यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।
प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।
सभी एकल फाइलें:
पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
Set nominations ONLY
Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.
द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।
वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।
आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:
{{Support}} (Support),
{{Oppose}} (Oppose),
{{Neutral}} (Neutral),
{{Comment}} (Comment),
{{Info}} (Info),
{{Question}} (Question),
{{Request}} (Request).
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 10:35:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Beaune.- Vitrail de la chapelle de l'Hôtel-Dieu aux armoiries de Nicolas Rolin,.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beaune.- Vitrail de la chapelle de l'Hôtel-Dieu aux armoiries de Nicolas Rolin,.jpg
Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2024 at 08:09:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:The Blind leading the Blind by Pieter Bruegel the Elder Google Art.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Blind leading the Blind by Pieter Bruegel the Elder Google Art.jpg
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2024 at 16:04:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Mating pair of Pseudozizeeria maha (Kollar, 1844) - Pale Grass Blue (4) WLB.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mating pair of Pseudozizeeria maha (Kollar, 1844) - Pale Grass Blue (4) WLB.jpg
Info I tried to upload a sharper version, but I didn't succeed, for the sharper version has 130MB and the maximum for upload is 100 MB (like this version). Has anyone an idea how to replace this file by the sharper 130MB version? You find the sharper version here --Llez (talk) 15:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2024 at 01:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Myocastor coypus on a branch in Oise River Compiègne France.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Myocastor coypus on a branch in Oise River Compiègne France.jpg
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 21:56:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Die Tote von Niederpöring, Museum Quintana.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Die Tote von Niederpöring, Museum Quintana.jpg
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 21:42:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Böttgersäule in Pavlův Studenec (CZ).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Böttgersäule in Pavlův Studenec (CZ).jpg
Support Impressive building, nice composition and well-handled daytime light. The level of detail at full resolution is maybe slightly lacking but at most sizes it's pretty good. I've made a suggestion for cropping a little off the left and bottom to get rid of the cut-off window and help with the symmetry a bit, which I think could make this very good image even better. BigDom (talk) 07:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are a large number of images of this building. I find nothing exceptional about this one. BTW, the image page lacks a caption and description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tagooty (talk • contribs) 11:09, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, caption now added. This is a busy venue, so getting a view without people, and with this light and weather, is not so common. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Glass anemone shrimp (Periclimenes brevicarpalis), Zanzibar, Tanzania. It's usually between 0.5 to 1 inch (1.3 to 2.5 cm) long and can be found in the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans, including Australia. This species lives symbiotically with sea anemones, corals and jelly fish. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support You certainly captured why the species is so named. At full resolution you can really appreciate the species adaptations. But when zoomed out you really don't know what you are looking at. Its got an exponential wow factor. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Monsoon rain clouds over the Kaveri River, looking upstream towards the evening sun. Doddegaudana Koppalu, Mandya district, Karnataka, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image with its contrasting tones epitomises the monsoon as the source of fresh life and cooler weather after the searing dry summer, and simultaneously a source of havoc due to flooding rivers. -- Tagooty (talk) 15:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The head is in good focus, but the body is partly blurred. The legs are obscured by grass. This is a common slow moving species with a large number of images in Commons. --Tagooty (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image is deceptive at first glance. It looks noisy, but that is the pattern of the butterfly itself and the image allows that to be appreciated at full resolution. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Detail of the cloister of D. João I, Monastery of Batalha, Portugal. An attempt at capturing beauty under difficult dynamic range and focus conditions. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Lonely harbor crane on the site of the former Götaverken City Shipyards in Gothenburg a beautiful winter day. During the 1930s it was the world's biggest shipyard by launched gross registered tonnage. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2024 at 07:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:037 Cheetah close-up in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:037 Cheetah close-up in the Serengeti National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Nothing is attached, the cheetah is completely wild and free, it's just a piece of dry grass standing on its head, something common with big cats as they like to lay on the ground -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive detail of the animal's face, although better post-processing is possibly necessary (too much noise reduction and sharpening filter) --Wilfredor (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good point, thanks for the research, Yann. Regarding the different coloration, I found the following information in the Russian language WP article: In the late 1960s and early 1970s, the color of the lake changed to turquoise, and in 2008 to azure gray. The coloration of the lake is caused by tiny sulfur particles floating in the water column and carried by underwater fumaroles. This information might help to explain this one point. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:30, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A nice picture, but I wouldn't call it extraordinary. This bird is very common, ligthing fine, but not outstanding and the level of detail (12 MPx) normal. Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral My expectation when looking at the category of dragonflies is pretty high. This is a common species, the level of detail is lower than most of the pictures (at least the last FPs). The compo here is though fine that's why I stay neutral. Poco a poco (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 11:25:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Црква светог Саве, Београд (Church of Saint Sava, 2023).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Црква светог Саве, Београд (Church of Saint Sava, 2023).jpg
Support For a small drone camera it is simply impressive. I don't know if it is possible or valid to correct the verticals in a wide angle photo, the exposure time is quite long too, I guess there was no wind and somehow it is a very stable drone. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2024 at 07:23:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:NASA astronaut Leland D. Melvin with his dogs Jake and Scout.jpg/2Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NASA astronaut Leland D. Melvin with his dogs Jake and Scout.jpg/2
Support - Unique, which excuses (for me) the technical shortcomings. The image has its own stand-alone importance given its virality a few years ago, which gives it some extra oomph. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Dracaena cinnabari or the Dragonblood tree of Socotra in the Dixam plateau. Created and uploaded by Alex38 - nominated by ★ -- ★20:53, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well exposed, great colors with the rusty branches, green "leaves" and the deep blue of the sky. The image also depicts the unique terrain that the dragonblood tree has adapted to growing in. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Maybe a little underexposed in the foreground, but I like being able to look around and see these strange trees dot the landscape at full resolution. — Rhododendritestalk | 15:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree that the foreground is a little underexposed, but overall I think the lighting is handled well. I do think a +10 to shadows would help this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 16:28:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:069 Waterbuck at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:069 Waterbuck at Queen Elizabeth National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2024 at 01:27:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bird sex - Two copulating ducks showing a corkscrew penis inserted in a cloaca in Don Det Laos.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bird sex - Two copulating ducks showing a corkscrew penis inserted in a cloaca in Don Det Laos.jpg
Weak support The main downside is the heads of both animals are out of focus. The visible reproductive organs mostly make up for the downside IMO. Now to scrub this off of my search history... --Zzzs (talk) 01:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your review. Aperture F/10 and time 1 /250 s is the maximum combination I could get here, and only 100 mm focal length. Going closer would have scared the birds. Focus was of course intentional -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have told people about the corkscrew fallus, this image offers proof. As I understand it, the mallard's has barbs on it. It not a pretty picture, so to speak, but it documents something rarely observed, and the image brings into clear and sharp detail the evolution of a duck's fallus. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, having browsed through the categories, I noticed we have incredibly few images of this type, and even fewer quality images. I totally agree this one will never make a poster for a living room :-) But it's also original and perhaps more educational than a bunch of solitary ducks walking or swimming on a pond. Thank you very much -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting and good documentation but I don't believe this is one of our finest images (in terms of subject, ligthing, detail, compo), sorry, Basile, Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty rare capture. The focused area is very sharp etc. The light is not thrilling, but it is favourable insofar as it avoids harsh shadows (which would obscure the, hem, private parts). And it’s unavoidable that the subjects look away. We have promoted misc. bird photos etc. of rather mediocre quality because of the rarity of the species; hence we should promote this rare scene, too. – Aristeas (talk) 13:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info I know there are several FP of this castle, but this one offers more detail and higher resolution. It’s not necessarily better, just different, and none of the others are from this time of year. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 15:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
InfoChah, a small village nestled at the base of a barren mountain range in Zanskar in the Indian Himalayas. Population 465 (2011), elevation 3,920 m (12,860 ft). The large extent of newly-sown green fields in this arid high-altitude semi-desert is a tribute to the ingenuity and perseverance of the farmers. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Outstanding scene. But the sky shows colour banding and I am not happy with the fact that this nomination is giving no EXIF data about the camera used and is only provided at 9.8 megapixels. --August (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Thank you for editing! The image was improved slightly. It has some more detail and proper EXIF data now. But the colour banding is still visible in the form a pixelated parts at the sky. Additionally it is cropped intensively from 21 megapixels down to 11.6 megapixels. So all in all I really love the scene with its composition and light, but technicaly this image might have trouble even becoming Quality Image so I can sadly not consider it FP.
Oppose It's disconcerting to merge the background with the silhouette of the bird, it's not something we should be electing. Although the dynamics of the flight is perfectly conveyed, but the quality of the photo is not very good. JukoFF (talk) 00:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 13:41:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (2).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cité administrative - tour en déconstruction (Colmar) (2).jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Aug 2024 at 10:24:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Oppose I really appreciate the straightforward composition and the atmosphere created by the lighting. However, the absence of any direct light results in a very low contrast between the foreground and the building. Just a touch of direct light on the water fountains would have helped to create separation and add depth. Additionally, I find the tightly cropped building on the far left somewhat distracting. --August (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this shows the reality of major landmarks. You capture the fountain, the sculptures and bas reliefs and the crowds in a well composed and well exposed image. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]