User talk:Augustgeyler

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:CH.VD.Yvonand 2021-08-29 Seaplane-Meeting 10869 16x9-R 9K.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CH.VD.Yvonand 2021-08-29 Seaplane-Meeting 10869 16x9-R 9K.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saint-Petersburg. Bolsheokhtinsky Bridge (Peter the Great Bridge). Rivets on the bridge support.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint-Petersburg. Bolsheokhtinsky Bridge (Peter the Great Bridge). Rivets on the bridge support.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otto-Neururer-Haus (Weimar).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cultural heritage monument: Wurzner Straße 117 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Detail is too low

Hello Augustgeyler, Greetings!
Regarding this: [1] could you plz give a brief about what is ‘Detail is too low’ ? I am asking you because I recently got a review on a Quality Image nomination, as the same ([2]).
--Gpkp (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello Gpkp,

"Detail is too low," or  Level of detail too low, refers to an issue that can arise for various reasons. Essentially, it indicates that despite having an adequate resolution, the image lacks sufficient surface structure or fine details. This can occur, for example, if an image has been heavily de-noised. De-noising reduces fine structures to eliminate sensor noise or film grain, but if overused, it can also erase important details such as fine grains of sand on a beach, delicate grass blades in a garden, or intricate textures on a façade.

If you're shooting with a DSLR and processing from RAW, you can easily correct this by manually adjusting the processing settings. Alternatively, shooting with a lower ISO will result in less noise, thereby reducing the need for de-noising. However, if you're using a smartphone, addressing this issue can be more challenging. Smartphones typically have very small lenses, which often require higher ISO settings. To create the impression of a high-quality camera, smartphones usually apply intense default processing, including strong de-noising. This is often combined with aggressive sharpening, which can further contribute to the loss of detail.

Determining whether the level of detail is too low or adequate is difficult because it must be evaluated in relation to the situation, lighting, resolution, and subject matter. This is why the criterion is often debated among different reviewers assessing the same image. August (talk) 19:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

• Augustgeyler, Thank you for all the details. --Gpkp (talk) 16:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaußiger Straße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rail tickets of Pommersche Landesbahnen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wurzner Straße 119 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:30, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sellerhäuser Straße 8 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:M019F001 Deckenlicht im Vulkan im Wörlitzer Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:M019F001 Deckenlicht im Vulkan im Wörlitzer Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herbartstraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Franckestraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blockheizkraftwerk Möckern (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schönbachstraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meet all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 21 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kino REX (Bern).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peilickestraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request What is special about this street (scope)? Visually, there is no architectural feature visible, it is just a street. Image not used in real wiki-articles to calrify value --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:53, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment Oh. I can only tell that all the buildings on the right are listed as cultural heritage monuments. --August (talk) 20:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Per comment above, meet all criteria -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theodor-Neubauer-Straße 62; 64; 66 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:29, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Postgasse (Bern).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kippenbergstraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:04, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Vielen Dank

Einfach mal vielen Dank für das Beachten und Wertschätzen meiner Bilder! --Harald Krichel (talk) 09:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Gerne! Ich finde Du leistest einen tollen Beitrag zu Commons mit Deinen Bildern, und ich möchte helfen, die fotografisch besten auszuzeichnen. August (talk) 11:10, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic office building of the former Karl-Krause machine factory (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 04:59, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Expressionist entrance of Cunnersdorfer Straße 3-7 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

English · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Inductive axle counter. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 22:46, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much! August (talk) 11:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wichernstraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herrnhuter Straße 3 (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bruhnsstraße (Leipzig).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC)