Commons:Đề cử hình ảnh chọn lọc

COM:FPC

This project page in other languages:

Đi đến đề cử hiện tại

Bạn có thể đề cử hình ảnh chọn lọc ở đây. Để biết thêm thông tin và cách đề cử hình ảnh của bạn lên, vui lòng xem Commons:Featured picture candidates#Formal things.

Mục lục

Làm mới trang này: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates

File:Katsuo ji temple waterfall Osaka Japan by Don Ramey Logan.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 06:48:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
Info created by WPPilot - uploaded by WPPilot - nominated by [[User:{{subst:WPPilot}}|]] -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Don (talk) 06:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paesens. Dobbe, 17-09-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2024 at 05:32:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
Info Paesens. For me soothing horizontal play of lines behind the sea wall at Paesens with a view of the Wadden, a unique tidal area (UNESCO World Heritage)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2024-11-04 02 PACIFIC SCOUT - MMSI 316013431 – Ogden Point, Victoria BC CAN.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 22:48:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info It’s not a good day for sailors. Pilot boat, Pacific Scout, in lashing rain and gale force winds (70 - 90 km/hour, with gusts to 110), comes in off the Salish Sea into the protection of the breakwater at Ogden Point Light, Victoria, BC Canada. The container ships keep coming up from Seattle or Tacoma and if the Pacific Scout can’t take off the pilot, then it will be some days before the pilot will land. c/u/n by GRDN711 -- GRDN711 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support spectacular to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – nice composition (fixed gallery category) —Bruce1ee^talk 06:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:023 Glossy ibis fishing in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2024 at 13:46:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Plegadis
Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good catch! --GRDN711 (talk) 19:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Open beak, weightless prey and trickle of water make this photo special -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very good image of a Plegadis falcinellus. --Zzzs (talk) 04:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mwanza flat-headed rock agama

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 20:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Full body view
Detail front view

Set following the criteria #3 A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Agamidae_(Dragon_Lizards)
Info Mwanza flat-headed rock agama (Agama mwanzae), Masai Mara, Kenya. The species has become a fashionable pet due to the male's coloration, which resembles the comic-book superhero Spider-Man. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Front view is really amazing. --Rbrechko (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both amazing to me. Another very good set. Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharpness and focus very good in both. Striking colors, yes, with a cape, it could inspire a new superhero called "agama-man" :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 06:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peatäi muna (ting).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:36:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very noisy and too dark in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree with the critic about the noise - it is indeed visible in the image - I cannot agree that the photo is underexposed. The directional light from above excellently reveals the object's texture and creates an interesting three-dimensional effect. This lighting is clearly an artistic choice, not a technical error. In photography, there is no 'right' or 'wrong' lighting, but rather different artistic choices that support the image's idea and mood. In this case, this directed lighting gives the photo its intended dramatic effect. Janeklass (talk) 04:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Compare with the FP of the same gallery, from 2010, much better light, almost no noise, and higher level of detail at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:14, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's the head louse itself, not the egg. :) Janeklass (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to distinguish :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My picture has an egg and the link you provided has a head lice. :D Janeklass (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but I would like to see it also :-) And it's from 2024 -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inimese peatäi.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 18:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Pediculidae (Lice)
Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps a bit dark? Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Underexposed Yes, though the picture looks interesting -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed. This is clearly proven by the excellent visibility of every detail on the head louse's body - its tiny hairs, complex body texture, and even various color shades. The dark, almost black background is not an exposure error, but rather serves to highlight the main subject more clearly. The image's tonality is well balanced - we can clearly see details in both lighter and darker areas, confirming that the exposure is not incorrect. This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect. If the picture were truly underexposed, we wouldn't be able to see such fine details and color tones that are now clearly visible. Janeklass (talk) 04:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. You will see more details if the photo is better exposed. Currently the contrasts are very hard to distinguish, especially at thumbnail size.

Note that you can also see a lot of details here, although the photo is underexposed too. And that one was properly fixed.

Hard to hear that "it's impossible to agree with the claim that this image is underexposed" while the two first reviewers here both find the image too dark :-) Then above you write "This lighting choice is intentional here, designed to give the image a slightly dramatic effect" (by the way, I don't understand this dramatic intention. It's just a close-up of an animal, no special background / context). Sorry, clear light problem for me, in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to the criticism and want the evaluators to know that the lighting choice here is clearly intentional. How you choose to evaluate it is up to you. Janeklass (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. Please fix the light as you did here -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The subjects are different and unfortunately the same approach cannot be applied here. Increasing the light would also amplify surface reflections and this would ruin the image completely Janeklass (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but the same was said here. At least one stop could be easily gained in that case IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think this would cause more issues for the image. Unfortunately, I can't make those changes to this photo. This image stays as is. If there's no support... no worries, I'll try with another photo in the future (maybe) :D Janeklass (talk) 05:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It is too dark for my eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a very fascinating image. The darkness is not a problem, as the object is clearly seen, and that seems more like a creative choice on this dark creature. I am thinking that maybe a square format would be better for this image... but I'm not sure. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:RUS-2016-Aerial-SPB-Grand Menshikov Palace.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:32:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Russia
Info Grand Menshikov Palace, Saint Petersburg created by Godot13 - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fascinating and maybe valued image but to me an obviously non-centered image where there is no clear compositional reason or limitation preventing from getting it centered is not outstanding enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Петергоф, Нижний парк, Львиный каскад. Фонтанная статуя «Нимфа, льющая воду из кувшина» 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 17:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Fountains
Info Lion Cascade, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg created by Игорь Гордеев - uploaded and nominated by -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FBilula (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 18:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting place, good composition + light Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Link-Lee House (HDR).jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 15:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Euthman - uploaded by Euthman - nominated by DragonflySixtyseven. We have other images of the Link-Lee House, but this is the only one that combines high resolution, interesting angle (it would not look anywhere near as interesting seen head-on), and interesting light (File:Link-Lee House at an Angle.jpg was taken on an overcast day). -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DS (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that the angle and composition is great. I do think the shadows have been lifted too much, though, or else the HDR has gone a bit far. The tree branches particularly on the right don't IMO look natural. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ghost leaves at the right. No metadata but I would doubt this is a long exposure shot. Thus, more a problem of processing or Photoshopping in my opinion. We can see sorts of diffuse clear halos behind the trees. (Probably same impression as Cmao20, evoking "lifted shadows" / "branches don't look natural") -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Constancy - Julius Klinger.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 14:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Posters_and_advertisements
Info created by Julius Klinger - uploaded by Balkanique - nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 14:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Air Force Falcons Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:59:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Others
Info Royal Air Force Falcons parachute display team. C/u/n by me. — Julian H.^✈ 12:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 12:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support They are so close to each other, I hope their strings don't get tangled :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great scene and composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viljandi linnusepargi rippsild 2024 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:53:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 12:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Striking composition + cool rainbow just about outweighs very mediocre image quality Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality mobile phone picture and only 3,732 × 2,488 pixels. Moreover, I'm not a fan of the extreme distorsions created by the extremely wide (13 mm equivalent) focal length (like here). Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:17, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narva Hermanni linnus 2020 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 12:52:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours + composition. Cmao20 (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the management of the space in this composition, and the special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20 and Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Basile Morin. --ArildV (talk) 21:21, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flat-billed kingfisher (Todiramphus recurvirostris) Upolu.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 09:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Alcedinidae (Kingfishers)
Info A Samoan endemic with one other photo on Commons. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I prefer this one to the other :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:27, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty bird, great composition + quality Cmao20 (talk) 01:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Münster, Schlossplatz, Herbstsend, Kettenkarussell -- 2024 -- 6459.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 09:16:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 09:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good to see your 30-vote barbed wire photo again on the Main Page. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:32, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 10:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small stained glass window from Sainte-Chapelle (King). Paris.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 07:55:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info created by Ввласенко - uploaded by Ввласенко - nominated by Ввласенко -- Ввласенко (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good reproduction of a beautiful exemplary stained-glass window. Now we just need to figure out which biblical or historic scene is depicted here; this should be added to the description and reflected by the categories. Can somebody help? – Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Vitraux de la Sainte-Chapelle du Palais, the stained glass windows were built on the order of Louis IX of France. Anyway, this is one of the kings of France, as shown by his sceptre. Yann (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I am not a fan of stained glass photographed like this. The contrast and saturation has been pumped up too high so that the colours of the glass are exaggerated, and the details around the window are completely black. It doesn't look natural. I agree that many of the stained glass photos in the gallery have similar processing, but I don't think they should be FP either. This to me is an example of it being done right. Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately an old image (2012) taken from an old camera (2008) with low resolution, no tripod, high ISO, and narrow DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Dear Basile Morin, you have rated when, by what and under what conditions the photo was taken, but not any word about the image itself. Having read "Featured picture", I assumed that the pictures are rated here. Am I wrong? -- Ввласенко (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong, but comments are allowed too, as part of this "rating process" -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Many colorful flowerpots in front of Bulguksa temple in Gyeongju South Korea.jpg

Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2024 at 05:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the juxtaposition of the old roof truss with its beautiful paintings in muted colours and the vivid colours of the flowers and their pots. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Lovely photo. The different colours of the pots is the cherry on top of the cake. Cmao20 (talk) 01:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:201 Dome Mosque 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 21:45:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
Info Created by Azimronnie - uploaded by Azimronnie - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate scaffolding, and because the camera was not on the axis, as a result the towers at the right are leaning more than those at the left (unbalanced aspect) -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. The subject is great and I personally don't mind the scaffolding but this kind of photo really should be centred. Cmao20 (talk) 01:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Granulated sea star

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 20:45:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Top view
Side view

Set following the criteria #3 A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Asteroidea
Info Granulated sea star (Choriaster granulatus), Zanzibar, Tanzania. It's a large sea star of a maximum radius of about 27 centimetres (11 in) with a convex body and five short and rounded arms. Note: we have yet no FPs of the whole family Oreasteridae. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent set Cmao20 (talk) 01:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a comfy bed cushion to me :-) Good quality for underwater photos -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:6 pl du Gen Leclerc in Mont-de-Marsan (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 19:57:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info We already have this 3 photos (1, 2, 3) as FP taken at the same place and time. -- Tournasol7 (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good architectural photography under nice light Cmao20 (talk) 01:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain Nice blue hour but very common architecture for France (and Europe?) Standard police station like many others in different cities. Maybe a front view would have worked better with this symmetrical building? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Abstaining because leaning between {{Weak o}} and {{N}}, in favor of the nominator's vote that could be a {{S}}) -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:48, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --EUPBR (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CH.ZG.Zug Altstadt 02 16x9+R 16384x9216.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 15:58:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
Info Super high resolution photo of an historic Swiss town at blue hour, lovely composition and light, v good quality even at 151 megapixel full size. created by Roy Egloff - uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator —Bruce1ee^talk 17:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:17, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood and background. The composition works for me with the appealing lines of the footbridge -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely blue hour mood, excellent quality. – Aristeas (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Val Montanaia.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 08:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy (section 'Friuli-Venezia Giulia' doesn't exist yet)
Info created by Scosse - uploaded by Scosse - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Civvì (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are lens flares in the sky and in the rocks (in the middle). Also a dust spot in the sky. There's no source for this resolution, that seems slightly higher than the camera sensor -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just a nerdy note regarding the resolution: Some camera sensors deliver some more pixels than officially supported by the manufacturer. These extra pixels at the margins of the sensor are cut off by the cameras when creating a JPEG image, but they are saved into the raw image files; normally we still do not seem them because most raw converters just cut them off, too, probably because some of these extra pixels are often faulty. If one opens a raw image file from the camera used here (α7R IV) with RawTherapee, some of the extra pixels are retained and we get an image of 9,560 × 6,368 pixels. This means that all pixels in this photo (9,557 × 6,336 pixels) could indeed come straight from a simple single shot. Of course the Exif data state that the photo was developed with “Adobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)”, i.e. probably with Adobe Camera RAW (ACR), and ACR cuts the raw images from the α7R IV always to the nominal 9504 × 6336 pixels. But it is possible that the raw image was first developed with another raw converter (like RawTherapee) and only then edited with Photoshop … That’s the theory. Of course it seems more likely that the photographer made some kind of projection/perspective correction and streched the image slightly during that process; this would also explain the extra pixels and the image would still be authentic. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting. Thank you for this information regarding this camera body -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies also to other camera bodies, with a varying amount of extra pixels. Checking e.g. a CR2 file from the Canon EOS 5D IV, RawTherapee shows me 6732 × 4492 pixels – a little bit more than the official 6720 × 4480 pixels. So if one ever finds oneself in the situation that “just a few pixels” are missing at a border to complete the composition, it’s worth to give it a try and to open the raw image with RawTherapee … ;–) End of digression, sorry. – Aristeas (talk) 11:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question The nomination indicates the name Scosse as uploader, but according to the file page, the uploader is Civvì. And because this last version is significantly different from the original one, with heavy processing, lifted shadows and oversaturated colors, I wonder if these modifications have been approved by the photographer. This message suggests that Scosse is not at the initiative of the FP nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin, and also wonder where the high resolution version of the image came from. If it was not uploaded by or with the consent of the original photographer then this is a copyright violation - if the photographer has chosen only to release the 6megapixel version then we don't have the right to upload a larger version that wasn't explicitly released under a Creative Commons license over the top Cmao20 (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, during the first candidature as QI the original version of the picture was considered too small so I asked the author if they were willing to upload a larger version of the picture, instead of uploading it they sent it me via email and I uploaded it. Maybe I should forward this email exchange to VRTS? --Civvì (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Update, I just forwarded the emails to VRTS. --Civvì (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vote and comment struck on that basis. I will have a think about whether the lens flare bothers me too much to support. The dust spot should be fixed though. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support very well --Msb (talk) 21:27, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the clarification about the image source. The lens flares and dust spot are still a problem in my view, but more importantly, which person did manage the post-treatment here, Scosse or Civvì? Scosse could have sent the same image in larger size as requested, and Civvì handled the processing before uploading it? In any case the correct name of the uploader should be updated on this nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask the author to re-upload the image. --Civvì (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author uploaded a new version with reduced flares. --Civvì (talk) 17:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the notification and attempt to improve, but sorry to say the correction is not well handled in my opinion. First, the dust spot and lens flares are still there (I will add image notes to specify the exact locations), then the dark spot added to reduce the white spot in the center creates artificial shadows on the rocks. Moreover, in this last version, the contrasts have been reduced, or the clarity increased, compared to the original, it's really blueish in the background and at the top of the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domesticated farm pig lying in the mud head covered in dry earth under the sun in Don Det Laos.jpg

Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2024 at 05:21:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Suidae (Pigs)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something different, very interesting document of behaviour. – Aristeas (talk) 17:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikride (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:21, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some people pay a lot of money for mud baths like that :) Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, the owners should rent their land and sell their wealth to mask manufacturers :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Euro Camping Emirates Tourist Center Azrou Ifrane 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 18:42:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 18:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 18:42, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting photo, but unfortunately the image needs a perspective correction. I took the liberty of creating an example. If you are satisfied with the result, feel free to use it for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I just saw that the image was supported on QIC after tilt correction. But in my opinion it needs the perspective correction mentioned above to at least become a QI. But it's still not enough for an FP, imo. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Boring lighting and subject, centered,...why would this picture be one of our finest? Poco a poco (talk) 19:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Definitely needs a perspective correction. Radomianin's change would move me to neutral but with the grey light I don't think I can get to support. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a QI, perspective problem. Flat light and the building is not spectacular -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To my defence I promoted it as QI because I though that the building is not cylindrical but rather conical Poco a poco (talk) 11:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amanita caesarea mushroom.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 15:00:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Amanitaceae
Info All by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Interesting subject + good composition. But detail/sharpness is a little low. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good mobile phone but visible artifacts at full resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dark-eyed junco (21840).jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:30:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passerellidae_(New_world_sparrows)
Info contre-jour dark-eyed junco. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:13, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful backlight which adds a nice little glow to the bird’s shape, at the same time good details and quality in the plumage. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open wing position of Vindula erota (Fabricius, 1793) - Cruiser butterfly sucking sweat from human socks ANK6537.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 14:23:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by Ankit0908 - uploaded by Ankit0908 - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atudu (talk) 14:23, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 14:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A different take, I like it --Kritzolina (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a beautiful capture but the background doesn't appeal to me. I know you can see it as a fresh take on this kind of photo, but it just isn't for me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Cmao20. In this case, the cropped shoes ruin the composition in my view. Please do bring more space around if you can. Although the full resolution of the camera has been reached here, perhaps a different shot as alternative? I will be happy to review again and perhaps change my vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin. -- Karelj (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely sorry, actually this species gave me only 10 sec for clicking photographs. Suddenly it came and sit on my shoes and this moment I clicked only one photograph after clicking it move to land then I clicked another one and after clicking it was gone. I am using Tamron 90mm prime that why I am failed to click more wide image, I was standing for search another species suddenly it came and at that moment I was clicked photograph from where I was stand before. This species not give to me more time for clicking more images. Ankit0908 (talk) 02:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks for the notification. Try the same smell next time, if they like it, they may visit again? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samoan myzomela (Myzomela nigriventris) Upolu.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 13:22:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Meliphagidae (Honeyeaters)
Info A species endemic to Samoa. Only image on Commons. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and high quality Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Terragio67 (talk) 15:18, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:80-391-9014 Kyiv Sofia 2 RB 24.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 09:28:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 09:28, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive church in beautiful winter scenery, good composition. The side light nicely emphasizes the shapes of the building. Large parts of the foreground are in the shadow, but IMHO this works well here because it gives a nice contrast to the bright walls and the golden domes (if everything on the photo was in the sun, it would probably look flat and boring). – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 19:53, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and pleasant light. Possibly slightly tilted at the right, and presence of minor chromatic aberrations in the tree branches, though -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas —Bruce1ee^talk 06:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikride (talk) 08:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The buildings is nice and the weather a plus but those trees spoil the composition IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chara Sands before it rains - Kalarsky District, Zabaykalsky Krai, Siberia.jpg

Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2024 at 08:47:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
Info created and uploaded by Ellebedeva, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 08:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful subject. But at the lower left of the dune edge there is an abrupt transition to a blurred area that ends suddenly. There is also a blurred area at the top of the second dune edge (please see annotations). This could be an indication of unlabeled retouching. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral This is an intriguing scenery and I wanted to support it, but Radomianin’s annotations (thank you very much!) have given me a pause. These glitches are indeed irritating and the photo also seems to need a {{Retouched}} template. @Ellebedeva: Any chance that you could have a look at these issues? – Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain per Radomianin and Aristeas. Unfortunately the photographer / uploader has been inactive since 2022 -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice. I'll check the photo and get back. Ellebedeva (talk) 14:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellebedeva: Many thanks for your reply and thank you in advance for your help in solving technical issues with your great photo. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for coming back, Ellebedeva, after 2 years absence. Please also try to fix these glitches before the FP is (speedy) promoted, because the file cannot be changed after. The photo is worth extra supports IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:29, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veste Coburg Luftbild-20240811-RM-162430.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 22:01:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info Veste Coburg, aerial view. All by -- Ermell (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent viewpoint and special building -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:10, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:22, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 09:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect perspective, good light and very good quality for a drone shot. – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:49, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above... --Terragio67 (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:30, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to have an FPC right around the corner :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hard to understand why it only came 51st. Looks Top 10 to me. Much better than the one in 3rd place... Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--UltimoGrimm (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:38, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burg Raueneck Orthophoto-20240922-RM-164730.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info Raueneck Castle ruins, orthophoto. All by -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This one is not working for me, the profile is not really standing out and the right side in shadow isn't helping, either IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I enjoy to stroll along the paths through the ruins. Indeed the larger shadow areas are a bit unfortunate, but as they are shed by the high trees around the ruins it’s probably impossible to avoid them – if the photo was taken when the sky was overcast the whole image would look dull. Near the corners the quality deteriorates quickly, but that’s a typical problem with drone shots and has no impact on the main subject at all. – Aristeas (talk) 11:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beilstein - Billensbach - Stocksberger Str. 14 - Werkstatt - Fenster mit Hopfenranken (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 09:32:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info Window in a former joinery workshop in Billensbach, Beilstein, Württemberg, Germany. Hop has grown through another, broken window into the workshop and has draped its tendrils before this window. All by -- Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is certainly a matter of taste. I liked the little confusion created by the plants growing inside of the window while we are looking out, I love the contrast between the pretty curves of the hop vines and the (almost) rectangular window, and the image gives a friendly, but consistent impression of rural decay. -- Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Excellent idea. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 18:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support In addition to its composition, the scene captivates through nice backlighting, highlighting the beauty of transience. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benji 22:37, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as suggested here, per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Basile, thank you very much for your suggestion to nominate this photo! (I didn’t mention you right in my nomination because I didn’t want to give the impression that you were responsible – if the picture hadn’t met with approval, that would be only my problem. ;–) Now that we know that more people like the picture, I can thank you properly.) – Aristeas (talk) 09:45, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see the shared enthusiasm. And I would support the other pictures too! Basile Morin (talk) 12:05, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 15:27, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 23:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandelbox mit farbigem Nebel und Licht 20241111 (color).png

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 08:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info Mandelbox variant covered by fog illuminated by three different colored light sources, motif and settings by Krzysztof Marczak, tweaks by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 08:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would make a great cover image for a textbook about mathematics for advanced learners. Who dares to say that math is boring … ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this image helps to render mathematics more interesting, it's the way to go :D --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something different. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 10:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:36, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spondylus imperialis

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 07:24:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Spondylidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:24, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive shell, impressive and very educative representation. – Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 13:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Different sizes? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Info No, the diameter of the valves themselves is the same (height 3.3 cm (without spines) in both, see description), but the spines have different lengths. --Llez (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Better if the images make them look the same size. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing and educative, as always with your beautiful shell pictures. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special shape -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 10:04, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:50, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The pictures are excellent, but I agree with Charlesjsharp on the necessity that the two frames show the shell in the same scale. For two reasons: because it will have a major informative value, and because the pictures have been candidate as a set. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- - Comment But in this case, the second one would have a lot of black, empty space. That's why I didn't do that and only added a narrow, identical frame to both pictures (as I did with all my 4,500 other shell photos). It is clear from the description that both valves are the same size. --Llez (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yes, that would be the unavoidable drawback. I understand that the choice is between the characteristic style of your works, and the necessity of allow a visual comparison between the right and left valves. The same problem happens also for the Arcinella arcinella pictures (1, 2), but in that case it is less pronounced. According to me, the realistic representation of the dimensions of the valves should prevail. In other words, the two "black boxes" should have the same dimensions, when encircling the left and right valve of the same species. Of course, the mine is just an opinion, and it no way detracks from the excellence of your work. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      - They look slightly different colours with the left one having faintly orange spikes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        Info Yes, you are right. The right valve has faintlty orange spikes, the left one pure white. The colours are different in reality. --Llez (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:57, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Arcos de Mismaloya.jpg

Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2024 at 02:40:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
Info: the Mismaloya Arches, Puerto Vallarta; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, not enough "wow" for FP in my opinion, and the picture isn't really sharp. --Benji 22:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 17:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Euro Camping Emirates Tourist Center Azrou Ifrane 3.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 21:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Morocco
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the photo needs perspective correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not outstanding enough for me for FP, sorry --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:20, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs perspective correction but, sorry, although the building is nice, I don't think the light or composition are FP even after perspective correction. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree, there is nothing featurable here. Strong tilt, lacks of perspective cotrrection, detail level not the best,...Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Please could you read Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:مستشفى بن صميم من الداخل.jpg and stop nominating pictures that fail at QIC? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:01, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a policy that requires an image to have a "QI" in order to be nominated here?

If so, please share it with me, as I didn't notice it.

Thanks Mounir Neddi (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no strict rule, but it is generally unlikely that a picture that does not pass QI will succeed at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And COM:I is mentioned both at QIC and FPC. Read COM:FPC: "Please read the complete guidelines before nominating." It's written in bold at the top of the page -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ).jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 16:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
Info Ksar of Taourirt, Ouarzazate, Morocco (قصبة تاوريرت, ⵜⴰⵡⵔⵉⵔⵜ). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support איז「Ysa」 23:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Aristeas, for me a dealbreaker. I'd support when fixed. Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, perspective correction necessary (see pole and walls at the compared with the walls at the right). --Llez (talk) 12:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Mile (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gythio Port, Greece - Diliff.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:08:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great photo and good light. But maybe slightly tilted? Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, the light is nice in a part of it but the shadowed area, which is more than half of the image sp,oils it. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:08, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tilisuna Schwarzhorn.jpg

Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 15:11:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Vorarlberg
Info created by Böhringer Friedrich - uploaded by Böhringer Friedrich - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tupungato (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing mood and good composition but IMO oversharpening and JPEG artefacts preclude it from FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I concur Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-naped monarch (33331083292).jpg

Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 13:42:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Monarchidae (Monarch Flycatchers)
Info created by Tareq Uddin Ahmed - uploaded by ImamAnik - nominated by ImamAnik -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ImamAnik (talk) 13:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beautiful bird but we have seen sharper ones presented at FPC recently. However, I think it has a good claim to be our best photo of this species. JJ Harrison has a photo of the same bird but it would need a bit of work to become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Harrison's image from 11 years ago is better, even without the benefits of today's processing software. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp, yes this is the picture I meant, I think it's very good but I think it needs some work around the beak to really be suitable for FP, it looks like some selective denoising has taken place but it has left a rough transition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All I was suggesting is that we shouldn't promote an inferior image if there is a much better one around... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 16:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice species but the level of detail is not what I expect here Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mycena haematopus, Burgundydrop Bonnet.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 19:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Mycenaceae
Info created by Stu's Images - uploaded by Stu's Images - nominated by Stu's Images -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Stu's Images (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:25, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 06:55, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amphitheatre (Alba Fucens).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 15:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info created by PaestumPaestum - uploaded by PaestumPaestum - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Straight, but interesting composition; looks a bit boring as thumbnail, but works much better in full size. – Aristeas (talk) 17:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:07, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Of historical significance but IMO not enought wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geocoding would be helpful --Llez (talk) 13:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Llez, done. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I amended the camera location because it was on the other side of the arena. Terragio67 (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:54, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Val Sinestra. 11-10-2024. (d.j.b.) 03.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 05:26:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.18 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also like the evening light very much Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Funny enough I like (besides the special evening light) exactly that silhouette of a tree at the right; somehow it makes the composition special to me. The dark areas are rather noisy, yes, but because they have rightly been kept dark this does not degrade the overall impression too much. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:31, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fields Yugar Tsarap Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00581.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 04:49:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info Green fields below Yugar (elevation 3,850 m (12,630 ft)), on the left bank of the Tsarap (elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft)), are a refreshing contrast in this stark, tree-less terrain. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Crop at the left and right not working for me, it also looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 09:36, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Poco a poco: I've uploaded a version with more fields at the bottom. Do you think this is worth nominating as an alternative? --Tagooty (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but not really, my problem is the crop of the river and of the house, not really the bottom. Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: Those are at the edges of the frame, cannot be fixed now. Thanks for the review. Tagooty (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Left crop (and maybe also the right one) could be more satisfying, but the composition still works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 16:45, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The disturbing dust spots should be removed.--Ermell (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Ermell: Thanks for pointing this out. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 09:37, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:23, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support.–Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:55, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 08:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:23, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#India

File:Bigorski Monastery, N. Macedonia (2).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit small, but great composition and mood Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The compo is good but the subject isn't charming, the burnt areas and the modern look of the building doesn't make it an FP to me, and yes, the resolution is rather low. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Đề cử hình ảnh chọn lọc

Mục lục

Featured picture candidates

Mwanza flat-headed rock agama

Granulated sea star

Spondylus imperialis

File:Euro Camping Emirates Tourist Center Azrou Ifrane 3.jpg, not featured

File:Fields Yugar Tsarap Zanskar Jun24 A7CR 00581.jpg, featured

File:Bigorski Monastery, N. Macedonia (2).jpg, not featured

Navigation menu

Search