Jump to content

Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcut: COM:CID Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文（中国大陆） | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades

[edit]

Nominación

[edit]

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación

[edit]

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.


Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar

[edit]

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas

[edit]
  • Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
  • Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
  • Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
  • Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

  • estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
  • que haya un mínimo de siete votos a favor
  • que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)
  • si a partir del quinto día, la candidatura tiene al menos diez votos a favor y ninguno en contra, automáticamente será destacada (regla del quinto día)


Recarga para nuevas nominaciones: purge this page's cache

Propuestas

[edit]
Shortcut
[edit]

File:Tropical Milkweed and Large Milkweed Bug - Oncopeltus fasciatus, Arthur Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Boynton Beach, Florida, February 7, 2022 (53498119215).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 20:48:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tropical Milkweed and Large Milkweed Bug - Oncopeltus fasciatus, Arthur Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge, Boynton Beach, Florida, February 7, 2022

File:Lindli. Rheinuferpark Schaffhausen.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 17:00:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:নীল-গলা বসন্তবৌরি, নওগাঁ.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 16:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue-throated barbet (Psilopogon asiaticus), Naogaon, Bangladesh.

File:Cornelis Troost 001.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 14:11:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexander the Great at the Battle of the Granicus against the Persians

File:Mangoes for sale in Kerala (2).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 08:31:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Euphorbia griffithii (wolfsmelk) 22-03-2025 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2025 at 04:46:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Bertice Redding 2 Allan Warren.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 22:18:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bertice Redding by Allan Warren

File:Osprey Fish Eye.png

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 21:26:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Osprey Fish Eye.png

File:-Portrait of unknown man- (48753728902)-restored.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 20:18:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

[Portrait of unknown man]

File:Gurudongmar Lake Sikkim, India (edit).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 19:54:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Semi-frozen Gurudongmar lake in the Himalaya of Sikkim, India.

File:Vodno Telecommunication Tower.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 12:08:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vodno Telecommunication Tower under construction, Skopje, North Macedonia

A kestrel prepares to swoop down on its next meal.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 08:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Pez anémona ensillado (Amphiprion polymnus) en una anémona alfombra de Mertens (Stichodactyla mertensii), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 108.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 08:08:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saddleback clownfish (Amphiprion polymnus) in a Mertens' carpet sea anemone (Stichodactyla mertensii), Anilao, Philippines

File:Tinnen maatbekers 18-02-2025. (actm.) 02.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2025 at 04:39:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Boats on the Ros river near Khreshchatyk.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2025 at 20:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Before thunderstorm on the Ros river near village of Khreshchatyk, Ukraine.

File:Path through orchards, Kamru, Himachal Pradesh, India.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2025 at 13:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Path though orchards during a snowstorm in Kamru, Himachal Pradesh, India
If you think that something has an almost monochromatic mood, it's sometimes worth a try to edit it in black & white. Just keep in mind that B&W requires a bit different editing than color. You are welcome to use my attempt as an 'Alternative' if you like. --Cart (talk) 16:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ñu común (Connochaetes taurinus), parque nacional de Amboseli, Kenia, 2024-05-23, DD 16.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2025 at 06:16:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), Amboseli National Park, Kenya

File:Halle(Saale) Tram beim Steintor asv2024-04 img1.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 20:30:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tram in Halle

File:Blick über Krötenbruck zur goldenen Stunde 20250305 HOF5013 RAW-Export cens.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 18:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View over Krötenbruck to the Kornberg at the golden hour in a special mood

File:Receding Fog over Lake Altaussee.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 18:02:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Mosquée du Shah, Téhéran, mosaïques (2).jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 17:50:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mosaics of the Shah Mosque in Tehran, Iran.

File:Teide - Pico Viejo 3.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 15:39:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Crater of Pico Viejo

File:Dark rain clouds departing over Brofjorden.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 12:10:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dark rain clouds departing over Brofjorden from the shore between Govik and Lahälla, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden.

File:Portrait of a Cardinal, by Raffael, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 10:20:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a Cardinal
Gallery fixed. It's a portrait painting of man, so it's pretty straight forward. --Cart (talk) 10:31, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My bad. Thank you for fixing it. Mahan (talk) 11:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Golden-Crowned Kinglet EBFNWR.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2025 at 03:02:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Golden-crowned Kinglet at the Edwin B Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge.

Daphnis hypothous hypothous

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2025 at 16:26:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

  • Female dorsal
    Female dorsal
  • Female ventral
    Female ventral
  • Male dorsal
    Male dorsal
  • Male ventral
    Male ventral

@W.carter: Je te remercie. That's an excellent question! In vivo images are very beautiful, but they are not normative. For science, there are reference positions for different species (including Homo sapiens). For Homo sapiens, it is not necessary to insert a needle, but for insects, it is the norm for specimens. "In vivo" and "specimens" are not in competition; they are complementary. Descriptions of species and subspecies are often made on millimetric details. To answer your second question, you're not mistaken; what you say is correct. If you look at the specimens, you'll see that they're old, often very old. They're museum specimens, and they're recorded as such with references. It's up to museums to fulfill this role. You should also know that the specimens on display deteriorate over time, and we also have to replace them. As you can see, it's a bit complicated.

If you ever attend a specimen photography session in a museum, you'll be surprised by the methodology. Everything must be prepared with the greatest care, and opening a box is a great responsibility, especially if it's a collection of our prestigious elders. The Holy Grail is the red label with the word TYPE on it! It's the reference butterfly for the species. There, no mistakes are allowed. This is how, at the back of the museum, in a dark room, we can experience great emotion.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand that this is scientific and legal and made with great care at the museum, but the internet is full of idiots who will carelessly copy every behavior they think they can do better. Perhaps these photos of old museum collections should have a template stating that, and caution others to not trap and kill Lepidoptera unless they are supervised by a scientific institution. Might not do much good, but at least we can try to conserve the species we still have left. --Cart (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: ::You have excellent convictions that I fully share. But you said a very true word: they are idiots! They don't care about warning banners at all. I'm old and I've had time to think. I try to show them beautiful images of Nature and make them love it. I believe more in love than in coercion.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wieskirche 12.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2025 at 07:44:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Abbot's box, Wieskirche, Steingaden, Bavaria, Germany.

File:Roger Fenton by the Photographic Society Club, 1856.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2025 at 01:22:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Roger Fenton

File:Le chamelier.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2025 at 23:13:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Camel driver from Algeria
[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2025 at 13:40:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION


Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Northwest Crown Fire Experiment.png (delist)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 22:45:06
Wildfire experiment, PNG version JPEG version

nomination page
  • Thank you Yann. This is much better and means that this nomination is no longer destructive to the potential of this image. I don't think FPC should waste time replacing existing png images with jpeg alternatives, though - there would be dozens to get through and it'd be a big waste of effort - so I'll keep my vote. Cmao20 (talk) 12:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks to Yann for the improved Jpg file! However, I feel compelled to add my perspective on Delist and replace nominations. Based on my modest experience, the maintenance work that follows a successful nomination is one of the most labor-intensive tasks, requiring about ten separate steps. Among other things, this includes creating a redirect page to ensure the correct functionality of the four-pointed star of the former FP ({{Assessments|featured=2}}). Unfortunately, the com-nom parameter reaches its limits here, as it redirects to the wrong page. For this reason, Delist and replace nominations should be chosen with great care - only when absolutely necessary. The first time I did this kind of maintenance, it took me a full hour. Given the minimal difference between the two versions of this nomination, I do not believe the effort is justified. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:58, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yep, this is totally true. And to add to what Radomianin wrote, these delists can per the rules only be closed using the 5-days rule if no one agrees with the nominator. This means that in some cases the nom has to be kept open manually while the FPCBot is trying to close it based on counting the votes like in a normal nomination. When the 'Delists' were first added as a feature in the FPC, it was as a separate system. Later the 'Delists' were incorporated with the normal FPC nomination. However, the voting system here maintained by the FPCBot is not sophisticated enough to deal with delists, let alone delist & replaces, and it fell on the the users who frequent the FPC to handle this manually. This was not a problem then since most voters also did maintenance. But in recent years the numbers of maintainers has dropped drastically. People love to nominate and vote, but not so much taking care of all the "boring" work that follows. So please do not create delists for minor things, leave that to the things that really matters since they are a P.I.T.A. Or even better: Learn how to take care of this kind of nominations and help out. --Cart (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I completely agree with you, and I also appreciate the historical background you provided on Delist and replace nominations. The lack of active maintainers is indeed a challenge, and I too wish we had more people handling the background work. Just thinking about the galleries - without your and Aristeas' help, they probably wouldn't be as organized as they are now. But that's just my personal opinion. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The difference in quality is barely noticeable, and I whole-heartedly support Cmao20's comment about not wasting FPC's energy with such minor replacements. For me, the 'Other versions' placed on the file is enough. --Cart (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The reason JPG is better than PNG is subjective and not sufficient for deselection. --XRay 💬 07:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep for two reasons. 1) The general claim that “JPG photos are superior to PNGs” is nonsense. JPEG images are more practical for many reasons, but they are not superior; on the contrary, for archival purposes PNG images are superior because they provide a lossless compression. 2) If we accept this as a reason to delist-and-replace FPs, we may get many more pointless or even questionable delist-and-replace nominations; nobody would profit from the additional amount of work needed to process these nominations. – Aristeas (talk) 08:12, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Partial solar eclipse with some clouds in Tuntorp 43.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2025 at 14:15:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Partial solar eclipse with some clouds in Tuntorp, Sweden.
  • I'm sorry, but I had to turn your example gallery into a list. You can't display other images on a nom since the FPCBot will read them as 'Alternatives' made by the nominator. And to answer your question: I think that this photo has a more aesthetically pleasing composition with the position of the second cloud, the little starbursts and the faint crepuscular rays, than the photos you mention as well as many other on this site. That's why I dared nominate it. --Cart (talk) 09:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:05 Laal Kach Festival In Bangladesh Kazi Salahuddin Razu.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2025 at 11:17:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hindu devotee in Lal Kach Festival, Bangladesh
Everything in its own time :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adams Synchronological Chart, 1881.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 21:27:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Adams Synchronological Chart. Twenty three foot long chart showing 5,885 years of history according to the Bible, from 4004 B.C. to 1881 A.D.

File:Weichersbach.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Looking from Schwarzenberg castle northward to Weichersbach in the valley of the Schmale Sinn. At the bottom left is the south portal of the Landrücken Tunnel and an ICE train.

File:Le statue dei Re Magi su una barca storica nel Canale Leonardesco, Cesenatico, Italia.jpg

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 07:13:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The statues of the three Wise Men on a historic boat.
 Comment It might be beneficial to crop 1100–1200 pixels from the bottom (and the same amount of empty sky). This would minimize the already incomplete reflection. --Milseburg (talk) 13:52, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment. Editing this photo is not possible, because the reflections of the subject collide with another boat next to me. I thought it would be better to upload a new alternative image from a different angle. Terragio67 (talk) 14:18, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm really Sorry, I misunderstood your suggestion because I read it hastily. I liked the result proposed updating the image, thanks. Terragio67 (talk) 04:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative new version

[edit]

File:Bill Thompson (Tasmanian convict) grey.jpg (delist)

[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2025 at 01:28:22
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info First of all, it's a black and white mangling of a sepia original, second, the sepia version says it's cropped from the original, and I don't know if it could be cropped better - the failure to get it at the time has meant link rot has lost us the chance - but it's a pretty bad crop. Absolutely no foot room. (Original nomination)
  •  Delist -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist I'm not sure about the customs of the 2006 vote. It seemed to be only a question of which of the pictures would be FP, not whether any would be. I also think there isn't one. Possibly VI. --Milseburg (talk) 11:37, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 12:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist The standard for FP is way higher now. --Yann (talk) 14:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delist The customs were different in 2006, but the original nomination is still a bad joke. Five people voted on the sepia version (4 pro, 1 contra). Then somebody (not the original nominator) jumped in and added the b&w version, saying they would support that one. No one of the previous voters commented on the b&w version. Then the votes were counted in a completely arbitrary manner, claiming that 5 voters supported the b&w version – well, we only know that a single voter supported it, the one who had added it … Even if this was the greatest photo ever, we cannot say that it has been promoted correctly. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I thought that looked odd, didn't realise it was THAT odd. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Candidatas_a_imágenes_destacadas&oldid=810622495"