Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas
Shortcut: COM:CID Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文(中国大陆) | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−
Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas
Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.
Formalidades
[edit]Nominación
[edit]Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.
Crear una nueva nominación
[edit]Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.
Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.
Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list:
Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}
Para votar
[edit]Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:
- {{Support}} ( Support),
- {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
- {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
- {{Comment}} ( Comment),
- {{Info}} ( Info),
- {{Question}} ( Question).
Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.
Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.
Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.
Reglas
[edit]- Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
- Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
- Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
- Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
- Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.
La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:
- estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
- que haya un mínimo de siete votos a favor
- que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)
- si a partir del quinto día, la candidatura tiene al menos diez votos a favor y ninguno en contra, automáticamente será destacada (regla del quinto día)
Propuestas
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]File:View towards Mount Fuji from Arakurayama Sengen Park in Fujiyoshida, Yamanashi, Japan, 2024 May - 2.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 21:52:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Japan
- Info Mount Fuji from an angle I'd never seen before. I love what the wide angle lens and the sweeping clouds do to this picture. Shockingly there are actually no FPs of Fuji yet. created by Ximonic – uploaded by Ximonic – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 18:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Perissodactyla_(Odd-toed_ungulates)
- Info Baird's tapir mother and baby (Tapirus bairdii). This is an endangered species, with only about 5,000 left in the world. They are furthermore famously secretive and primarily nocturnal. As a result, we have very few photos of this species at all outside of zoos. In fact, a google image search of a mother and baby returned almost exclusively zoo images. This was a stroke of luck: We went on a hike and found most of the park closed due to flooding. We explored where we could, seeing almost nothing outside of wet plants. Just when we were hiking back out and writing off the day as an "authentic rainforest weather experience" we saw these tapirs foraging in the distance. Apparently sometimes on especially rainy days they're seen during daytime hours. After a short while of standing still and watching these two, they decided to cross the path right in front of us. For the rest of the trip, we'd mention this experience to guides/locals, and none had ever seen a baby in the wild before (and adults only a handful of times). Extraordinarily lucky, memorable experience. Anyway, this is all to say "I know it's dark and rainy, but I think it's worth the feature anyway". :) all by — Rhododendrites talk | 18:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 18:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support A little noisy but we are lucky to have a high quality photo of this endangered and reclusive species. Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 16:01:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info Harry Warnecke and Gus Schoenbaechler / restored by Wcamp9 (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC) – nominated by Wcamp9 -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 16:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Cool photo of an iconic man but I can see a few scratches and flaws in this image Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 15:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Canada
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by IrksomeBuccaneer2635. Aerial view of the Saint-Patrice Parish Church in Rivière-du-Loup, Quebec, Canada, January 2025. -- IrksomeBuccaneer2635 (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Well composed aerial photo. I like the wall of cloud that seems to be rolling in from the distance. Quality is adequate considering high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 10:30:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info Two green wooden doors in the historical centre of Arona, Tenerife. The photo has already been nominated before, but was {{FPD}}ed. Created and uploaded by Tuxyso, (re-)nominated by – Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like the discreet charm of decay in this image. The two wooden doors, similar but distinct, with their peeling paint and varying shades of green; the wall with its damaged plaster that reveals the irregular stonework inside it; and that casually installed cable join together to a little painting with beautiful colours. -- Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:28, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Prachtig! per Aristeas.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I love the colors, the atmosphere, the composition ... I love the picture! --Kritzolina (talk) 19:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 19:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Kritzolina. I love the contrast between the decay and the bright colours. Excellent composition, creative and unusual Cmao20 (talk) 21:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Colorful sky with pink and blue clouds reflecting in the water of a paddy field at dusk in Don Det Laos.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2025 at 05:15:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Dramatic sky, beautiful reflection and great atmosphere. I also really like how the little plants in the paddy field blend with the reflection. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful sunset scenery with high level of details. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support For me a very special, beautiful photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 20:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I can see why you live in this country. The light in your Laotian landscapes is like nothing I've ever seen. Cmao20 (talk) 21:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 20:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Cingulata_(Armadillos)
- Info Nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Eye in focus, nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, nice posture and composition. – Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Basile Morin and Aristeas. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:59, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Great Poco a poco (talk) 21:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Basile Morin. Cmao20 (talk) 21:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 16:37:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created and uploaded by Fuzheado, nominated by Yann
- Support Another great portrait. -- Yann (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus and depth of field. Useful picture of a famous woman -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:12, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 08:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 15:42, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful, sharp, well composed, good colours Cmao20 (talk) 21:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 12:46:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Comets
- Info created by Jim Vajda, uploaded by C messier, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 12:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong support Excellent quality and composition Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 21:49, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Indeed a very beautiful composition. The description also clearly explains that this is a montage of two exposures, one for the sky and one for the foreground; that’s very common with such photos, it helps to achieve good quality in both parts. The only tiny disadvantage is that some parts of the transition look a bit unclear, e.g. at the leaves of the tree at the right. – Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:11, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 15:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 09:34:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info View of the old town of Schwäbisch Hall, Germany from the islet Unterwöhrd in the river Kocher. The photo shows the central part of the so-called Kocherfront with many of the most precious timber-framed buildings. All by – Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 13:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:22, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic. Very pretty traditional houses, nice light and colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:45, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile Morin.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful light --Kritzolina (talk) 19:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 08:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- imehling (talk) 08:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Unusual composition but I really like it, with the mist over the hills, the choice to feature a lot of sky adding a real sense of openness and space - some parts of this panorama are sharper than others but overall I think it deserves the star Cmao20 (talk) 14:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Innovative composition yes, but too much sky, in my view, and unappealing light. Also cluttered content with branches obstructing the buildings at the right, and the water at the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Front exterior view of Beomeosa temple with three stairs and blue sky in Busan South Korea.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 28 Jan 2025 at 04:45:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#South Korea
- Info created – uploaded – nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support We have very few FPs from South Korea, and the number of Buddhist temples, compared to Western religious buildings, is extremely small. -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cool temple, high quality Cmao20 (talk) 14:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Good picture, little magic. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail resolution. I also like the few people in the scene, they add a scale and act like (are?) actual participants in a ceremony, not just strolling tourists. – Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment The roof point on the right is significantly higher than the roof point on the left. The staircase also appears to be crooked in front of the building.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed Thank you, Famberhorst, for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2025 at 16:04:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Finland
- Info: Pikku Mustasaari island viewed from Iso Mustasaari island, with Helsinki's central part faintly visible in the background; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Very good! Юрий Д.К 05:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Is the horizon straight? It doesn't look right to me, especially at the right hand side Cmao20 (talk) 14:15, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done: yep, it was off; corrected. Thanks for noticing! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support thank you! Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Too tight on top. Let the poor thing breathe! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Have to agree with Alvesgaspar, sorry. Any chance to get a more generous top crop, i.e. more sky? – Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar Poco a poco (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2025 at 10:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Trucks_and_buses
- Info created by Łukasz Bera – uploaded by Michozord – nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support We do not have enough of cool bus photos. -- EUPBR (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 05:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Yaqub Qomarudin Dibiazah (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Agree, very cool and artistic Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality, catching picture. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:53, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Is it a fake background? A fake reflection? A montage? Derivative photo with lights found here -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm also wondering... Poco a poco (talk) 21:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2025 at 08:31:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Singapore
- Info created by Mustang Joe, uploaded and nominated by me Юрий Д.К 08:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 08:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Amazing place and deserves an FP, quality is good although bottom right corner is blurry Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Very interesting place and landscape architecture, good perspective and quality. The dim light is a bit unfortunate though. - Aristeas (talk) 09:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose It needs a perspective correction, I'd support when done. Poco a poco (talk) 21:06, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2025 at 08:27:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info GES-2 cultural center at night. 6 seconds exposure. Created by me Юрий Д.К 08:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 08:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Impressive and beautiful night scene. Partially a little bit soft due to noise removal, but that’s typical for night scenes; maybe there are some tiny CAs, but IMHO not important. – Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, there is some CA at the far right, I added a note --Poco a poco (talk) 11:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Agree. New version ready. Юрий Д.К 11:51, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good composition and quality Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Good enough quality, boring composition, too tight crop. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:55, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --imehling (talk) 20:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2025 at 21:44:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Gastropoda
- Info Sea slug (Phyllidia coelestis), Anilao, Philippines. This species occurs in the tropical Indo/West-Pacific, can reach a length of up to 6 centimetres (2.4 in) and its diet based on sponges. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Another cool creature. – Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2025 at 17:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info The Belle Époque Rhône paddle steamer will be a centenary watercraft in 2027. Fast moving side view created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral can't say I'm fond of the sky. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your opinion. I would like and could lighten the sky, (and maybe I will try delicately later), but I risk ruining texture and details of the subject upper part: It is rare to be able to focus well on a moving boat... Terragio67 (talk) 06:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- I reprocessed the white-balance and brightened the sky a little. Maybe I could have dared more? I don't know, but the result is already visibly better. Thank you. Terragio67 (talk) 06:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Let the poor thing breathe! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose File:Bateau à vapeur Rhone à aubes Belle Époque Rhône sur le lac Leman en Suisse.jpg too similar. And crop very tight at the left, as part of the composition. See Lead room. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile - the bow of the ship needs more space in the frame and there is already another image of this same ship that is already FP/QI/VI. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 05:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, too tight, messing lead room Poco a poco (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2025 at 16:43:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info There are two other FPs of Florence Cathedral but none from this angle. Very high quality and interesting details. Has been on my list for a while but wasn't sure about the shadows, however, it is FP to me anyway. created by Rhododendrites – uploaded by Rhododendrites – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nom, Cmao20. — Rhododendrites talk | 17:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 05:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent quality, and it gives a good impression of the majesty of Brunelleschi’s dome which is a masterpiece both of architecture and engineering skills (see e.g. this article; if you are curious, I can recommend reading Ross King: Brunelleschi’s Dome: How a Renaissance Genius Reinvented Architecture, London: Chatto & Windus, 2000). – Aristeas (talk) 09:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support But I would remove the unsharp birds --Llez (talk) 10:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:10, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2025 at 21:25:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pinguipedidae_(Sandperch)
- Info Panning picture of a swimming sandperch (Parapercis pacifica), Anilao, Philippines. It is found in the western Pacific Ocean from southern Japan to Indonesia and it reaches a standard length of about 18.6 centimetres (7.3 in). c/u/b by Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Excellent sharpness and good focus for an underwater picture. But there is like chroma noise in the background. Is the blue fringe of the tail a natural feature or chromatic aberrations to be fixed? -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed, there is some chroma noise and CA, it will be fixed tomorrow. FYI, too. Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 07:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin and Cmao20: Done! Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Would appreciate it if (I think) the CA could be fixed, but FP for sure Cmao20 (talk) 03:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:50, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2025 at 14:27:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 14:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 14:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 05:10, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:39, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:58, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Image quality not good enough, lighting and colours look unnatural -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2025 at 15:20:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Atelidae_(Howler,_Spider_and_Woolly_Monkeys)
- Info Female golden mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata palliata) vocalizing with a baby. Males are the ones known for their "howling" but females vocalize, too, and are still pretty intimidating for little 15 lb. fuzzballs. Thought about nominating this one instead, but I think the vocalization + baby staring at the camera makes this one more special. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 15:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 15:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Indeed very impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 10:58, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 15:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 16:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Not the best detail but good capture and from a great POV Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Great composition Cmao20 (talk) 03:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Per Poco a poco. Terragio67 (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:05, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Jakubhal 07:55, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:57, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Jan 2025 at 08:54:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1880-1889
- Info created by Herbert Rose Barraud – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:54, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support characterful, impressive portrait of a famous poet Cmao20 (talk) 14:09, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20, and excellent restoration. – Aristeas (talk) 10:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas. Terragio67 (talk) 17:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:19, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:56, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2025 at 16:00:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
- Info Historical buildlings of Schwäbisch Hall, seen from the Sulfer Steg. All by me.
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 09:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Abstain An excellent photo. We have several takes on this beautiful view by misc. photographers (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... to mention only the most similar ones). The image nominated here is certainly either the best one or shares this title with one or two other ones which are equally good. I may be biased but personally I prefer my own version due to the more atmospheric sky, the absence of people, and the slightly richer colors. Ultimately, the difference comes down to personal taste, and both versions have their own strengths. – Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- I totally agree that this one is slightly better because the shadow at the left is less prominent, and because the tree at the right seems part of the composition, whereas here the branches seem to obstruct the houses of the background. The resolution is also higher. But unfortunately the other version was not nominated here, although it has been hosted here for more than a year now. If this one fails, we're not sure there will ever be one of both promoted -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sure, and this is why I did not vote with “oppose” etc. I just reserve the right to express my personal assessment and to abstain from voting here. – Aristeas (talk) 11:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support per Aristeas. Nice light but I will vote {{Delist and replace}} if the other version gets nominated in the future -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Neutral Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2025 at 15:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#British Columbia
- Info: winter storm at Shuswap Lake; very dynamic scene - with rain, snow, ominous clouds and the Sun trying to break through. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:24, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding panorama Cmao20 (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Not 100% sure about sharpness etc., but an impressive panorama with great ominous atmosphere. – Aristeas (talk) 10:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support by others. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 05:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Jan 2025 at 14:05:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France
- Info created & uploaded by PierreSelim – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 14:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:05, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the throwback down memory lane. Albi is a lovely city! --PierreSelim (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I'll make my mind up on this later, it's good but I am not sure it's as good as this image by Benh Lieu Song which I nominated in 2022. Cmao20 (talk) 23:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- To me, his picture is far more impressive than mine. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Even if the two pictures reproduce the same subject, they are quite different due to the very different light conditions. The shadow of the parabolic dish bother me a bit. Also because it is so big with respect to the antenna, that is not visible in the picture. I checked on Google Maps: it is still there! brown in color, at the base of the pole on the roof of the second building from the river. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 18:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I think it’s FP. It’s a different composition and mood from the one I linked. I hesitate because while the colours are nice, I’ve honestly seen dusk colours that were a lot richer and more interesting than this. But composition and motif makes up for it. Cmao20 (talk) 04:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose lighting overblown/suboptimal. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose as per SHB2000. Yann (talk) 09:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2025 at 22:57:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements
- Info created and uploaded by Alexandr frolov – nominated by AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Herding farm in the Altai Mountains AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support I suppose the salience on the town would've been nicer. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 14:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like such a settlement in this wild landscape.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Image quality could be better, but composition is outstanding Cmao20 (talk) 23:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Zquid (talk) 02:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 09:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:24, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose A nice compo but the processing / detail level is too por for FP, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 11:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Fully agree, image quality is quite poor. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Юрий Д.К 18:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2025 at 14:02:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Coraciidae_(Rollers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality --Berthold Werner (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Looking at the current FPs of this species I believe that we have already better images of this beautiful but common bird than this one: in terms of detail (here), compo (here) or with an addional element (like food, here). But also, this one of yours is much better, more detail, we see the tail and the bokeh is nice and clean. I came to the conclusion that this image is not one of our finest, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 22:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review but a featured picture is not about being the best out of all featured pictures, it's about being one amongst the finest out of all images from Wikimedia commons. And if you have a look at the pictures from the 6 countries it was photographed, I think it's one amongst them.
- Also comparing it to the images you linked:
- - I personally prefer this one over the one with the flat blue background as such backgrounds are common, boring and easy to get with bird photography in my opinion. The background from this current candidate gives more context about the bird's environment while also allowing to deliver smooth bokeh on the background, giving an element of depth to the picture which I prefer over flat single color;
- - regarding the picture with the food it's interesting but that picture has a lot of noise, the whites are overexposed, there are chromatic aberrations and the shadows are too harsh so I think this candidate is better in my opinion;
- - this one is a side view while the present candidate is a frontal view which I think is interesting to give a nice different perspective;
- - finally this one is very nice but also noisy and with whites a bit overexposed.
- Moreover I like the present candidate because I like the bird's posture, the soft colors, smooth bokeh and good quality. So I honestly think the present candidate is of FP level -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- When we have a lot of good pictures of a subject we do in fact raise the bar, that has been happening with butterflies, birds or wild life images. That's not just something normal but good and healthy for the project. I differ with your assessments about the other pictures but I don't think that it's the place to discuss that. Poco a poco (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Because of the chaos in the background. --Rbrechko (talk) 00:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Yes we have several FPs of this bird, however the colors of the plumage are really exceptional. Concerning the background, my personal taste is for a smooth bokeh (thus I understand and share Rbrechko's concern about the "chaos" behind). Still I find this picture FP-level due to the angle of view and excellent sharpness. The light is also compelling. I don't know if it's "the best of all FPs" but it's a FP in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 14:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 14:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support I agree we need to hit the brakes on FPs of this species, but this one is pretty good and has a new composition, and I think we can give it the star Cmao20 (talk) 23:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support of course Olivier LPB (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 08:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2025 at 16:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1800-1849
- Info created by unknown - restored by Wcamp9 – uploaded byWcamp9 – nominated by Wcamp9 -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support -- Wcamp9 (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Question Hi Wcamp9, could you please provide a link to the original? Also, the image description is lacking a lot of information (is this an eighth plate? which case are we talking about? do we know anything about in which decade this was taken?) --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Original image on wikipedia is Portrait of a Daguerreotypist, 1845.jpg. More details, which are not really helpful, are on https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/ZQHhWrdQbBxcuQ Wcamp9 (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
s--Yann (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)- Support --Llez (talk) 10:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Can one person vote if they support so this should be promoted Wcamp9 (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment With respect to the original, the latch of the left-hand side box and what seems a brooch on the
jacketwaistcoat have been removed. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)- Oppose Thinking about it, I'm going to express a manifest opposition. Some elements have been removed as if they were flaws, but they were instead part of the image that the man wanted to give of himself. The brooch, the little twine over the white shirt, etc. --Harlock81 (talk) 13:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Actually Harlock81 is right. Yann (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)