User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 19:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Buidhe 03:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 19:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria Park, Macclesfield 2018 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:45, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 329.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but please add geo-location --Michielverbeek 07:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 333.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Silesian Park 2024 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 10:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, reworked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good picture, filename should be more specific though. --Plozessor 04:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:02, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Ruislip Lido 2024 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 17:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 14:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Geneva 2024 252.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brighton, East Sussex 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:35, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 318.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 19:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A narrower framing would be better I think, cropping out the signs at the bottom left and a large part of this diagonal object. --Benjism89 19:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. Cropped as suggested, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok now --Benjism89 09:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 311.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A little noise reduction would be useful IMO. --Benjism89 13:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, I've increased the noise reduction, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:15, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better now. --Benjism89 09:43, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]