User talk:Ermell

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geisfeld (Strullendorf) Kirche Luftbild-20240512-RM-160939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scheßlitz St. Kilian Luftbild-20240413-RM-111528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohengüßbach Kirche Altar HRS-20240406-RM-175725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohengüßbach Kirche Orgel HRS-20240406-RM-175810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tiefenpölz Luftbild-20240512-RM-162900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Würgau Nebelstein Panoroma Luftbild-20240331-RM-180328.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geisfeld (Strullendorf) Kirche Luftbild-20240512-RM-160851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Remontees 22:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geisfeld (Strullendorf) Kirche Luftbild-20240512-RM-160905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Remontees 22:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seigelstein Luftbild-20240512-RM-163822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschletten Kirche St.Wendelin HRS-20240406-RM-172305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschletten Kirche Tabernakel HRS-20240406-RM-172105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschletten Kirche Taufstein HRS-20240406-RM-172003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschletten Kirche Tür HRS-20240406-RM-172549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg St. Markus Luftbild-20240414-RM-110523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschletten Kirche Kanzel HRS-20240406-RM-172044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buger Brücke Neubau-20240518-RM-171042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buger Brücke Neubau-20240518-RM-171113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buger Brücke Neubau-20240518-RM-171249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg St. Markus Luftbild-20240414-RM-110601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaustadt St. Josef Luftbild-20240414-RM-104720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heiligenstadt Evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche Luftbild -20240406-RM-160204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heiligenstadt Evangelisch-lutherische Pfarrkirche Luftbild -20240406-RM-160605.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschletten Kirche Luftbild-20240406-RM-173420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschletten Kirche Luftbild-20240406-RM-173600.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschletten Kirche Luftbild-20240406-RM-173619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof-20240520-RM-155209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof-20240520-RM-154823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof Luftbild-20240520-RM-161046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof Agilis-20240520-RM-154646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof Agilis-20240520-RM-154641.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt LSG Katzogel-20240520-RM-163535.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 05:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt LSG Katzogel-20240520-RM-163432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt LSG Katzogel Luftbild-20240520-RM-164215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 06:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt LSG Katzogel Luftbild-20240520-RM-164126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 05:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt LSG Katzogel Luftbild-20240520-RM-164112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bischberg St. Markus Luftbild-20240414-RM-110546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruderwald Baumstumpf-20240514-RM-162621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruderwald Baumstumpf-20240525-RM-172126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof Luftbild-20240520-RM-161752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof-20240520-RM-154941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof-20240520-RM-155222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof-20240520-RM-155552.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof-20240520-RM-155604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof Orthophoto-20240520-RM-160223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:03, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochstadt-Marktzeuln Bahnhof DBAG Class 442-20240520-RM-154453.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]