User talk:Selbymay

Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4

English: Welcome to the Commons, Selbymay!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

exif data?

Bonjour Selbymay, Je me permet de te tutoyer. Sur la page des QI candidates Tu me demandes (why there is no exif data?), tout simplement parce que si il y a une manipulation pour les faire apparaitre, je ne la connait pas. Amicalement.

--Christian Ferrer 08:59, 05 May 2013 (UTC)

Just a Question

Hello Selbmay, I like to use one of your fotos (La Reine Bérengère de Navarre - Abbaye de l'Épau - Yvré-l'Évêque, Sarthe) for a scientific publication on archaeological finds. Could you please contact me (Roth-Heege@bluewin.ch)? Sincerely yours

--Andreas Rupert (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochelle - Vitrail 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:28, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochelle - Lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:48, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien ext 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochelle - Vitrail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good. FP im(h)o... --JLPC 22:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC) Done, thanks. :) --Selbymay 16:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yvre - Abbaye Epau 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yvre - Abbaye Epau RB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Vassil 11:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:La Rochelle - Vitrail 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Rochelle - Vitrail 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochelle - Vitrail 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yvre - Abbaye Epau 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 03:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien CV 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orleans - Cathedral int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Musee 24h - Citroen SM 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Lakanal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 13:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orleans - Cathedral int 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice organ 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice organ 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:08, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Beranger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:58, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Canaris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:58, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Victor Hugo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Victor Hugo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid - Congreso de los Diputados 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid - Biblioteca Nacional 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ of Église Saint-Sulpice, Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 09:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Barra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:50, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Saint-Just.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 16:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Balzac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Galerie des bustes 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Orleans - Cathedral int 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orleans - Cathedral int 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Aimee Chartier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Carrel (bust).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Galerie des bustes 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality too. --JLPC 17:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien ext autumn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Fresnel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Poupard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochelle - Cathedrale St Louis org 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien D sgw 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:La Rochelle - Vitrail 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Rochelle - Vitrail 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:24, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Proust.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a bit blurred imo --Rjcastillo 14:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Adam Mickiewicz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Lamennais.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Mattbuck 00:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: File:Archeological Museum of Macedonia by night.jpg

Hi

thanks, your version is very good :) --Pudelek (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Changed Made

Hi- I made the change to File:Lenin Mausoleum at night (2007).jpg in Quality Image candidates (last in section). Could you have a look to see if it meets with your approval. Thanks - Godot13 (talk) 20:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ of Cathédrale Saint-Louis de La Rochelle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 11:03, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

 Support Useless support, but let my heart speaking...--Jebulon (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 19:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Couthon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice sharpness. --Julian Herzog 08:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Jussieu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Julian Herzog 08:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochelle - HdV statue 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochelle - HdV statue 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality - Godot13 07:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid - Andromaca estatua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Paganini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Volney.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sable-sur-Sarthe - ND sgw 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --A.Savin 11:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sable-sur-Sarthe - ND sgw 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:21, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sable-sur-Sarthe - ND sgw 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Aperture f/16

Hi, I see that you have a great success with your pictures of stained glass windows on FP and " I'm speechless" is a comment you deserve. As you have seen I also did some windows. Now, I notice you use the aperture f/16 for these pictures which are flat. What is your reasoning for using such a narrow aperture? I've been told that in digital fotography small apertures cause loss of sharpness that's why I am surprised. Best regards and congratulations --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:52, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Church window + interior -> Which technique despite HDR?

Hi! You (as can easily seen by your contributions) seem to be an expert with the photography of church's windows. On QIC you said that there are other techniques (despite) HDR to photograph the interior of a church including transparent windows with non-blown out parts. Do you have the use of large flashlights in mind? A few days ago I declined a photo by Moroder and do still not know how to photograph this motive without HDR. Such large lights / flashs are IMHO not effortable. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Since I'm involved with the question I try to give an answer. In my experience its better to photograph those windows on rainy days so you have less light contrast,--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

The challenge is to photograph windows AND interior. I am not convinced at all, even of this FP by Selbymay - has burnt out windows, or the quality could have been much better for this photo by using HDR technique. My point is that HDR could be a very good tool for interior photographs of churchs. For instance this photo by me had looked VERY bad without HDR. Note the extreme difference in brightness with the wooden seeds at the very right and the very bright windows. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Well, to begin I must admit it's very difficult to take good pictures in church or in dark areas. As the both of you, I do my best to find some solutions but, according to my personal taste, I don't use HDR which affects the whole picture and give an artificial texture. For the FP pic you mentioned, the windows on the sides were mostly a source of light, and the ones in the choir are too far and are just some stains of colours, I don't think we need more details. About the other one pic from the same place, I must admit my failure as I did only one take in a hurry. :-)

About the photo in QIC by Poco a poco, the window is more important for the whole composition and is barely visible. That's why I did disagree.

I have absolutely no problem with it - there are often different opionions, I wrote here because of your comment "there are other possibilites than HDR". I was interested in it to learn something from you.

About the photo by Moroder that you made me discover, it's the same issue, with bigger windows. But to be true, if we have to wait for rainy days, it could be long sometimes (even if we don't have that much sunny days this winter in France :-)

I don't use a flash neither as I don't have one (just the useless flash in my camera body). But, like in HDR technique, it's still possible to take several pics of same composition with different EV. As I said earlier, I don't like HDR result, so I just modify the windows with the cloning tool in Photoshop. To give an example, recently, I tried to take a picture of a very dark chapel : the interior is from the first take (long exposure to see something in the dark), the windows come from the second take (short exposure). It's not perfect yet and I'm sure we could find another way to improve this kind of images. As you said, it's a challenge and that's the beauty of it :-)

--Selbymay (talk) 20:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

OK, you use Photoshop - that's the trick. I am only familar with LR, Photomatix (HDR program) and basic understanding of Hugin. Thus for me the only possibility is to use HDR to manage such high dynamic situatons. With a reasonable HDR processing you can also increase sharpness and micro contrast of the overall image. I am not a great fan of massively increasing shadows (leads ofter to ugly noise). In summary, you use two techniques: cloning tool from PS and "cloudy weather tool" --Tuxyso (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

The "cloudy weather tool" is a proposition from Wolfgang Moroder, I'd prefer a sunnier weather to spend less time in long exposures... :-) --Selbymay (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Les Doors à Dinan

Merci pour la nomination de ma photo dinannaise en QI. Je crains être trop sensible à la couleur et à la composition de mes photos pour avoir une vision « QI-compliant » de mon travail. Surtout, j'ai tendance à favoriser une photo qui m'a demandé du boulot (du style, un HDR avec objectif à bascule décentrement dans une église frigorifiée) alors que je n'accorderai guère d'attention à une photo « facile » comme ces portes.

D'ailleurs, que penses-tu de cette photo dont EdouardHue me disait qu'elle pouvait mériter un label ?

À bientôt,

Pymouss Let’s talk - 15:55, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Lamartine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Pavie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 13:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sable-sur-Sarthe - ND sgw 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 10:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sable-sur-Sarthe - ND sgw 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--ArildV 10:21, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sable-sur-Sarthe - ND sgw 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Big file but good quality ! --JLPC 18:04, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances - Cathedral SGW 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 14:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yvre-l'Eveque - Eglise Saint-Germain 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Agil - Chateau 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --A.Savin 11:50, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

QI Candidates

I appreciate the feedback on my submission. I have fixed the rotation. Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 01:03, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orval - Lutrin 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orval - Relics 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orval - Relics 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Église Notre-Dame-du-Pré int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:01, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Abbaye de la Couture 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:22, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Daunou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualitiy Arcalino 10:30, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Chenier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Qualitiy Arcalino 10:30, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Collegiale Saint-Pierre-la-Cour 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe you can darken a bit the whiter parts of the clouds. But it's easy to fix : QI. --JLPC 17:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vivoin - Francois de Sales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:16, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orval - Tour-lanterne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and good qualitiy Arcalino 11:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Église Notre-Dame-du-Pré int 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:01, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances - St Pierre int 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:09, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances - St Pierre int 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:45, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alluyes - Eglise 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition --Rjcastillo 12:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alluyes - Chateau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:50, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alluyes - Chateau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments imho Good quality. --Steinsplitter 13:04, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

75px|center|

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Stained glass windows by Champigneulle in Notre-Dame de Sablé-sur-Sarthe, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Stained glass windows by Champigneulle in Notre-Dame de Sablé-sur-Sarthe has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:07, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segovia - Replica she-wolf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toledo - Puerta del Sol 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:05, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances - St Pierre int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you correct the perspective in a way that the panel becomes blank? Should be possible wihtout much quality loss. --Tuxyso 16:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I don't get your point. It's a ledger stone on a wall, I don't understand the aim of perspective correction in this case. --Selbymay 12:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Nonetheless the photo is tilted. --Tuxyso 14:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Not anymore, thanks for the hint. --Selbymay 13:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Better and QI now. --Tuxyso 19:24, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toledo - Sisebuto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The Photographer 12:29, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segovia - San Millan 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:18, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maillezais - Cathedrale Saint-Pierre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yvre-l'Eveque - Eglise Saint-Germain 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Should be tilt corrected on the tower, and sharpened. --A.Savin 10:52, 26 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks. --Selbymay 07:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 21:24, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Coutances - Cathedral SGW 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coutances - Cathedral SGW 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

==

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Église du Sacré-Cœur de Cholet. Désolé ... Ne sais pas trop comment faire pour te le signaler. Ai la même chose pour une photo d'une de ses chapelles que j'ai versée, sachant qu'il est mort en 1959. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 04:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Pour ne pas perdre ces fichiers, veux-tu les verser sur Wiki, ou dois-je le faire pour toi si tu n'as pas le temps avant la suppression ? --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 01:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Comme tu as pu le voir, je suis à l'origine de ces DR. Ce, n'est pas de gaieté de cœur. Mais en faisant quelques recherches sur Laurentin, je n'ai pu que constater ... Je ne sais pas si il est l'auteur d'autres bâtiments, ou s'il n'a fait que ces deux-là. Possible, vu qu'il n'avait pas que l'archi comme activité. Donc, je ne verserai que les principales. Je suppose que tu as les originales. Quand tu auras du temps, si tu le juges opportun, tu pourras faire le reste. Je te créditerai, il va de soi, en espérant faire la chose correctement. Je t'enverrai aussi un lien vers elles.

Effectivement, je suis assez nouveau dans la Wiki.

Bon week-end à venir. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 21:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Carte postale

Bonjour,

J'aimerai prendre quelqu'unes de vos photos pour faire des cartes postales. Est-ce que vous pouvez me contacter pour que nous en discutions. Merci Cordialement Marie-Pierre Rousseau mprousseau@infonie.fr

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thouars - Eglise St Medard 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good --Rjcastillo 17:06, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cite Plantagenet 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonnetable - Eglise Aulaines 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:09, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Sulpice-le-Verdon - Chateau de la Chabotterie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very nice composition but need rotation on the left. --Christian Ferrer 10:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC) You're right.  Done Thanks for reviewing. --Selbymay 12:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)  Support --Iifar 14:45, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duneau - Mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:06, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durtal - Chateau int 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coutances - Cathedral SGW 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:43, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Extra Space

Thanks for the breathing room added to the top of the Jaffa Clock Tower ;-) Is it difficult to do that?--Godot13 (talk) 22:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

COM:QIC#April_19,_2013

Hi. Please consider to re-review this one. Thanks --A.Savin 08:19, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courgenard - Eglise St Martin 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 11:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courgenard - St Martin SGW 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done I applied some NR on dark parts, please tell me if it's ok. Thanks for reviewing. --Selbymay 08:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courgenard - Eglise St Martin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)  Comment Amazing! But it needs a minimal tilt/perspective correction. May I ask what lens you used? --Moroder 12:50, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Done New version uploaded. Thanks for the hint. I use mostly this lens. --Selbymay 08:15, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien ext autumn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien ext autumn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - Cimetière du Montparnasse - Roland Moreno 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - Cimetière du Montparnasse - Roland Moreno 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments }Interesting and good quality. --Tuxyso 21:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Triangle

Je pense que j'ai vu le triangle je vais l'enlever. Mais je n'ai pas l'original et ma connexion G3 est misérable (je suis à Venise) J'essai de le charger par morceau. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - Cimetière du Montparnasse - Edgar Quinet 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - Cimetière du Montparnasse - Edgar Quinet 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Paris - Cimetière du Montparnasse - Henri Langlois.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - Cimetière du Montparnasse - Henri Langlois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:34, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - MNMA Vitrail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --~Pyb 13:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - MNMA Vitrail SC 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --~Pyb 13:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - MNMA Vitrail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Superior Quality. --Tuxyso 13:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien ext 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CAs (see note), shadows are very harsh but IMHO still OK, because main object well lightnened. --Tuxyso 12:47, 2 May 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks for reviewing, I tried to correct it. --Selbymay 06:51, 3 May 2013 (UTC) Looks better. --Tuxyso 06:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - MNMA Vitrail SC 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:40, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - MNMA Vitrail 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - MNMA Vitrail 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks a bit ackward from perspective point of view but ok --Poco a poco 17:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris - MNMA Vitrail 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saulges - Chapelle St Pierre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:10, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forges de la Jahotière (bâtiments vus du jardin) - Abbaretz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the centred composition with the tree. Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forges de la Jahotière (logis façade) - Abbaretz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit sharper for my personal taste, but still QI in this version. --Tuxyso 11:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herenguerville - Saint Gratien 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Christian Ferrer 11:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herenguerville - Cemetery cross 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Christian Ferrer 11:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herenguerville - Cemetery cross 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:58, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien ext 05b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Remarkable CAs on the reliefs. Sharpness of the relief could be better, but IMHO still OK for QI. --Tuxyso 12:53, 2 May 2013 (UTC) New version uploaded, please have another look. --Selbymay 13:18, 7 May 2013 (UTC) Much better. --Tuxyso 22:59, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forges de la Jahotière (four à pain) - Abbaretz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerences - Eglise ND 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Christian Ferrer 20:29, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Photo with halo

Hallo Selbymay, thanks a lot for the appreciation of the photo. I really don't know how to fix the 2 px halo on the building/sky interface. There is also some CA of the same size around the statues. Can I do it with hotoshop?. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Nantes - Hotel Duchesse Anne 01.jpg

File:Nantes - Hotel Duchesse Anne 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Remi Mathis (talk) 10:28, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Rochelle - Vitrail 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Moyland Castle

Hi! Thanks for your review on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss-Moyland-2013-01.jpg. I made a comment on your (possibly wrong) observeration of distortion. It would be nice if you read my comment and re-consider your vote. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 13 - Austerlitz station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:39, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

I wish you a very very happy and prosperous Diwali. --Joydeep _Talk 06:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review / Another look

Just a minute afer your review of File:Yosemite from Swinging Bridge with People 2013.jpg I've uploaded an imho slightly improved version. I've increased the brightness of shadows on the rocks at the very left and moderately changed the color temperature of this shadow area. Please be so kind and take another look if it is still QI for you. Thanks, --Tuxyso (talk) 08:49, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

I wish you and your family a very happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Joydeep _Talk 11:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Paris - Cimetière du Montparnasse - Henri Langlois.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 14:09, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Corneille ou Racin

Bon jour, je etê a Nantes au mois de août e je hai prise des fotos de les statues de Mahlknecht dans le theatre Graslin. On me á dit dans le theatre che le statue sont de Moliere a droit et Corneille a gauche mai dans le article de Wp on dit que il est Racine. Tu peut me dire la veritè svp. Salut --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:56, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

• Ooops, merci, je aimee bien Nantes --Wolfgang Moroder (talk)

File:Cholet - Hôtel de Ville (2).jpg

File:Cholet - Hôtel de Ville (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 03:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Cholet - Hôtel de Ville (3).jpg

File:Cholet - Hôtel de Ville (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 03:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Festival Angoulême

Salut, j'ai vu que tu avais mis une photo de la remise du Grand Prix, n'aurais-tu pas quelques autres photos afin d'illustrer un peu l'article consacré à l'édition 2016 ? Merci. --Milegue (talk) 10:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, j'ai de nombreuses photos destinées à illustrer l'article et les pages de certains auteurs présents mais je ne pourrai les mettre en ligne que dans quelques jours pour des raisons pratiques. Merci. Selbymay (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Salut Selbymay ! ça fait longtemps que je voulais te remercier pour tout le boulot que tu fais sur le projet bd. La classe pour la photo de Geoffroy Monde ! Bonne continuation, VKaeru (talk) 18:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Festival d'Angoulême

Bonjour Selbymay, Je remarque que tu a changé Category:44e festival international de la Bande Dessinée en Category:Angoulême International Comics Festival. J'avais utilisé ce nom car c'est, apparement le nom officel, de plus c'est une activité française dans le pays qui a pour langue officielle le français, si de plus l'anglais non littéraire pouvais être évité...Bref, je comprend que le plus rapide est de changer le dernier ajout de catégorie que de remettre les autres categories en français ou sous le nom officiel...En outre il y avait des liens qui utilisaient Category:44e festival international de la Bande Dessinée comme indexation ce que tu n'a pas modifié. Merci de rétablir le nom officiel. Bien cordialement Garitan (talk) 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour,

effectivement, j'ai renommé la catégorie car c'est la nomenclature utilisée depuis plusieurs années. De plus, Commons est une banque multimedia internationale, tout comme le Festival d'ailleurs. Au passage, merci pour les ajouts d'images, j'en rajouterai moi aussi, ayant "couvert" l'événement avec un microfinancement wikimédia. Cordialement, --Selbymay (talk) 10:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Cher Selbymay, j'avais vu que tu avais renommé et que le nom de catégorie anciennement utilisé était un choix discutable. Bien sûr que c'est une activité inernationale pour laquelle le choix a été fait par les organisatteurs de lui donner un nom en langue française 44e festival international de la Bande Dessinée. Bien sûr que Commons a des problemes et des conventions de creation de categories, si tu pouvais m'envoyer un lien qui impose l'usage de l'anglais dans les creations de categories, je me ferais un plaisir de le lire, ne l'ayant pas trouvé. Bien cordialement (talk) 10:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Garitan, nous sommes sur une encyclopédie collaborative, si tu souhaites remettre en cause les usages établis depuis plusieurs années (cf. Categories), libre à toi, mais je n'ai pas le temps pour ces querelles picrocholines qui ne font que décourager les bonnes volontés. Au plaisir, --Selbymay (talk) 11:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIBD2016Otomo01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough for QI. --Peulle 15:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIBD 2015 Asaf Hanuka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIBD2016MichelRabagliati.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 15:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FIBD2017Néjib.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

CroixVillaCavrois 01.jpg

Cette œuvre de Jean Prouvé, mort en 1984, ne peut être diffusée sous licence libre. En effet, la loi sur le droit d'auteur en France interdit toute diffusion de reproductions d'une œuvre sans le consentement de l'auteur ou de ses ayant-droits, et ce jusque 70 ans après le décès de l'auteur (pas de liberté de panorama). Sauf cas particulier, cette photo sera restaurée sur Wikimedia Commons en 2055. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 14:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

même problème pour toute la série, désolée. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 14:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Villa Cavrois

Bonjour Marianne, un peu surpris par tes messages relatifs à la Villa Cavrois. En effet, c'est une oeuvre de Robert Mallet-Stevens, mort en 1945, et non de Jean Prouvé. Il y a donc plus de 70 ans et la présence de nombreuses photos sur Commons le confirme. --Selbymay (talk) 15:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Robert Mallet-Stevens est bien l'un des deux architectes de cette villa, mais il n'est pas le seul intervenant. Si je m'en fie à la fiche de la base Mérimée, qui me sert de références pour le concours, Jean Prouvé (mort en 1984) et André Salomon (mort en 1944) y étaient ingénieurs, et Pierre Barbe (mort en 2004) également architecte. Par le fait, les 70 ans démarrent par le fait à la mort du dernier des 4, soit 2004, et tombe dans le domaine public en 2075 ! Sauf changement législatif avant cette date. Désolée. -- Marianne Casamance (talk) 15:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SaintLoEgliseND 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 12:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SaintLoEgliseND 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 09:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SaintLoEgliseNDSGW 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Might be a little sharper, but I think this is sufficient, and the file size is good. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SaintLoEgliseND 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good use of the contrast --Akela NDE 12:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ParisENSBA 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A little bit of lens distortion, the columns curving inwards. Correction?--Peulle 10:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Thanks for noticing, I've upload a new version from original file. Please check if it's better. --Selbymay 11:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Good work.--Peulle 15:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ParisENSBA 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A little bit of lens distortion, the columns curving inwards. Correction?--Peulle 10:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Thanks for noticing, I've upload a new version from original file. Please check if it's better. --Selbymay 11:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC) Good.--Peulle 15:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ParisENSBA 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 10:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SeesCathedraleND 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good. --~~~~

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LeMansAscension 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NantesChateau 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 09:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:LeMansAscension 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LeMansAscension 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass window of the Ascension in the Cathédrale Saint-Julien du Mans.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 18:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TourvilleStatue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TourvilleStatue 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TourvilleStatue 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --PetarM 20:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LeMansSaintJulien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TourvilleStatue 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Someone might be annoyed by the upper crop but as it's a detail photo, OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TourvilleStatue 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ArgelesDolmenCollets 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ArgelesDolmenCollets 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 12:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TourvilleStatue 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and temp --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OudonMenhir 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted . Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Khandoba temple Pune.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Khandoba temple Pune.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OudonMenhir 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Do you know what mineral is that? OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks for the review. It's white quartz. --Selbymay 09:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OrleansCathedrale 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OrleansCathedrale 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:বায়তুল মোকাররম.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:বায়তুল মোকাররম.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Jury à WLM 2018

Bonjour, j'espère que la sortie photo au Louvre fut agréable.

Suite à notre échange hier soir, je reviens vers toi pour t'indiquer que nous aurons une session de travail pour ré-organiser le fonctionnement du concours et préparer la nouvelle édition les 17 et 18 mars 2018 de 14h à 19h via des outils à distance.

En attendant, tu peux prendre connaissance de la page Groupes thématique Wiki Loves Monuments et t'inscrire à la liste de discussion wlm@lists.wikimedia.fr via https://lists.wikimedia.fr/info/wlm pour être au courant des échanges de la communauté. Si tu rencontres des difficultés d'inscription, n'hésite pas à contacter Sylvain sur son adresse pro Sylvain.Boissel@wikimedia.fr

Au plaisir de te retrouver prochainement, Jean-Olivier ArkéoTopia (talk) 13:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour Jean-Olivier ArkéoTopia,

merci pour les infos, je me suis inscrit sur la liste. On se tient donc au courant pour la suite.

Au plaisir ! --Selbymay (talk) 15:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Hellfest 2018...

Salut.

Vas-tu à l'édition 2018 pour faire de belles photos comme cette année ? Ce serait peut-être l'occasion d'y faire une rencontre du WikiType... LW² \m/ ^{(Lie ² me...)} 00:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Salut LW² \m/ ,

merci pour ton appréciation et ton message, je me suis aperçu après l'édition 2017 que tu y étais les années précédentes, tu n'as pas pu y aller cette année ?

Je ne sais pas encore si je pourrais le faire en 2018 mais j'espère bien. Il y a beaucoup de boulot donc on ne serait pas trop de deux pour couvrir le festival. On peut demander une accréditation pour deux.

Bon weekend !

--Selbymay (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Yoho ! Si, bien sûr que si, j'y étais, mais j'avais laissé mes appareils au vestiaire quelques heures afin de profiter en tant qu'acteur/spectateur plutôt qu'en tant que "reporter" et les OS de mes PC et laptop (XP et Vista) font que je ne peux verser mes photos comme je veux ; photos faites avec un EOS qui attend depuis au moins deux ans d'aller se faire pomponner...

J'y vais tous les ans depuis 2012, habitant à 15km, je ne suis pas trop gêné ; cette année, j'avais mis le camping-car à la première place au rd-pt de la Guitare et ai pu, ainsi, profiter, sans me soucier de rentrer tous les soirs, en bécane, avec un gramme dans chaque poche...

Pour les accréd's, si tu réussis à être plus persuasif que moi les années précédentes, je te couvre de bière(s) durant trois jours !!!

Pour '18, si tu as la chance de trouver un pass (ou un billet-jour), et si tu y penses à ce moment-là, fais-moi signe, au cas où...

Bon dimanche. LW² \m/ ^{(Lie ² me...)} 03:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Selbymay,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Please contact me

Hello Selbymay, please contact me via sven.mandel@wikipedia.de I have some questions concerning Hellfest 2019

BR Sven

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019PunishYourself 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:04, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Cholet - Monument aux morts (1).jpg

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 09:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:FIBD2015.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:FIBD2015.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice organ 01 (square version).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very nice. --Tournasol7 19:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019PunishYourself 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019PunishYourself 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019EaglesOfDeathMetal 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 10:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019EaglesOfDeathMetal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019EaglesOfDeathMetal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LesEscales2019Ceu 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:47, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LesEscales2019Ceu 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LesEscales2019Ceu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:56, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LesEscales2019MichelleDavid 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LesEscales2019JeanneAdded 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019PunishYourself 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P2N2019ClaraLuciani 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P2N2019ClaraLuciani 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P2N2019ClaraLuciani 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P2N2019ClaraLuciani 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P2N2019ClaraLuciani 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P2N2019Zazie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 21:43, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P2N2019ClaraLuciani 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019BohseOnkelz 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:43, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019BohseOnkelz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019BohseOnkelz 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019BohseOnkelz 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019BohseOnkelz 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escales2019LaYegros 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:11, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escales2019LaYegros 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:12, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escales2019LaYegros 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:12, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019Anthrax 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LesEscales2019FranzFerdinand 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:15, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019VenomInc 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019VenomInc 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019VenomInc 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 09:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019Anthrax 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 08:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019VenomInc 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019VenomInc 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019VenomInc 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019NoOneIsInnocent 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 09:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019NoOneIsInnocent 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hellfest2019NoOneIsInnocent 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:41, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

8^e prix Wiki Loves Monuments France 2021

Félicitations, Le jury français du concours Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 est heureux de vous remettre le 8e prix pour votre photo « PirouChateau 01.jpg ».

Cordialement,

Sarah, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France 2021 - Sarah Krichen WMFr (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Couture - Jeu FI 01.jpg

Bonjour Selbymay, jolie photographie de N. Stouflet, elle ressort bien, même en couleur sur le papier journal de l'Union du 21 novembre 2022, page 17 de l'édition de Reims. Cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! P2NFatoumataDiawara 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HF2022CroMags 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HF2022Mastodon 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Poser, but good image quality. --Smial 11:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tudeley church window.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Joyeux Noël!

✴ Happy Holidays, Selbymay ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 17:24, 22 December 2023 (UTC)