User talk:Selbymay/4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Novembre-Décembre 2012[edit]

Hello Selbymay, I saw that one of your images (this one: File:Maintenon - Chateau 03.jpg) has got the winner of WLM France. That's really an impressive image, and has good technical qualities as well, unlike some other local WLM winners. So, congratulations, and good luck for the international part of the contest! (I'm really wondering that no one complimented you on this great result so far.) Best regards - A.Savin 20:24, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo!, je suis content de voir des noms que je connais dans la liste des des lauréats ^_^. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de ton mot d'avant-hier, bien que ma participation ait davantage tenu au hasard qu'à une volonté délibérée de ma part. Peu importe : les neuf qui me précèdent l'ont bien mérité et si quelqu'un doit être particulièrement félicité, c'est bien toi puisque ta photo est excellente ! -- Très cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 10:19, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chartres - Horloge astro 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chartres - Horloge astro 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:09, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church interior of Real Monasterio de Santo Tomás (Ávila), choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toledo - Sinagoga El Transito int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Votre photo File:Maintenon_-_Chateau_03.jpg fait partie de la sélection du jury français pour participer au concours international et se classe 1re dans le concours en France.

Vous avez gagné un chèque cadeau d'une valeur de 500€ pour acheter du matériel photographique et vous êtes invité à la cérémonie de remise des prix qui aura lieu de 30 novembre 2012 à Paris. Pour plus d’information n’hésitez pas à contacter Wikimédia France par e-mail à l'adresse info@wikimedia.fr.


--PierreSelim (talk) 19:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montmirail 72 - Mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 18:31, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toledo - Monasterio de San Juan de los Reyes ext 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toledo - Monasterio de San Juan de los Reyes ext 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 20:17, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateaudun - Chateau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 17:51, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Une bonne nouvelle peut en cacher une autre[edit]

La Société française d'Archéologie (SFA) a choisi ta photo de Thouars (File:Thouars - Eglise St Medard 04.jpg) pour le prix de la Société française d'Archéologie « Portails sculptés ». Tu remportes donc un volume du congrés d'archéologie, et tu es donc 2 fois le bienvenu à la remise des récompenses du 30 novembre. Pour les contacts c'est comme pour le premier prix, au pire tu me contactes. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:18, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Mans - College des Oratoriens 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 06:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Sulpice-le-Verdon - Chateau de la Chabotterie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Except some focus problems on the right side, I think the picture is good and good composition for me --The Photographer 18:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateaudun - Chateau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a stitching error. I have set an annotation to it. --Berthold Werner 14:44, 5 November 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done You're right, corrected now, thanks. --Selbymay 11:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good now. --Berthold Werner 16:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Hello Selbymay, please consider to check the new version of File:Moscow 05-2012 Tsaritsyno 13.jpg. Thanks - A.Savin 11:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thouars - Eglise St Medard 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 16:43, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice pulpit 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:00, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice pulpit 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 04:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Sulpice-le-Verdon - Chateau de la Chabotterie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and useful. --JLPC 10:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

5 ans[edit]

Salut !
Un passage sur ta page m'apprend que c'est juste aujourd'hui ton wiki anniversaire sur "Commons".
5 ans ! Un bail ! Félicitations !
Bonne continuation.--Jebulon (talk) 12:56, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice chap AP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. - A.Savin 11:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice chap AP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support : good quality. --JLPC 09:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - Crauk combat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:09, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice SGW 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 17:27, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful colors --The Photographer 17:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice chap AP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pulpit of Église Saint-Sulpice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 -St Sulpice ext 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 10:08, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 -St Sulpice ext 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 10:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice chap V 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 21:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice G 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avila - Convento de Santo Tomas 03c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 -St Sulpice ext 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Jebulon 15:41, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 -St Sulpice ext 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 20:44, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madrid - Monum Cervantes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madrid - Monum Cervantes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tadoussac - Hotel (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tadoussac - Hotel (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avila - Iglesia San Pedro 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salamanca - Museo PBA 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Ferte Bernard - Eglise ND Marais 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:15, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de la Vierge de l'Église Saint-Sulpice, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Ferte Bernard - Eglise ND Marais 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --JDP90 18:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maillezais - Cathedrale Saint-Pierre 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Ferte Bernard - Eglise ND Marais 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Red CA on the shadow at the very right, easily fixable. - A.Savin 11:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for reviewing. --Selbymay 09:43, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me now. - A.Savin 19:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Segovia - Iglesia-catedral de Santa Maria 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame of the crane, but good.--Jebulon 21:47, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice G 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Ferte Bernard - Eglise ND Marais 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality in spite or because of shadow -- Lothar Spurzem 20:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salamanca - BC 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salamanca - BC 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Love it! --Moroder 21:18, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Le Mans - St Julien SGW (large version).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Le Mans - St Julien SGW (large version).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Selbymay,

I like your photos a lot, thank you for sharing them on Commons. I have for some time had a look at the photo in the subject, and I am thinking about nominating it at FPC, because I find the symmetries, colors and setting very eye-catcing and wow. Only one thing concerns me a little about nominating it, and that is the detail level, the red bricks of the bridge are perhaps a little soft for FPC, I don't know? What do you think? Would it be OK for me to nominate it? --Slaunger (talk) 20:47, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: 190 posts on your talk page! Time to archive? The page is slow to load on a old machine.

Hi again. Thanks for archiving. Much better now. You have an impressive number of high quality contributions, way beyond my own productivity and skills. I certainly do not think you should downsample. Maybe we should just leave it be. I have my eye on another photo of yours for FPC. No time right now, will get back.... --Slaunger (talk) 09:02, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This I like a lot. Unless you have some reservations, I will nominate it at FPC. --Slaunger (talk) 10:54, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated! --Slaunger (talk) 20:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avila - Convento de Santo Tomas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coueron - Tour 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Ferte Bernard - Eglise ND Marais 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Geotag is missing --Ximeg 20:36, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why should be geotag important for the quality of a photo? For me the shadow is a little lack but not geotac. -- Lothar Spurzem 20:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Comment Good shot, but unsharpness imo --Rjcastillo 02:27, 27 November 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Geotag added and new version uploaded, I tried to improve the sharpness and reduce the darkness of the shadow at left. Thanks for reviewing at the three of you :) --Selbymay 15:49, 27 November 2012 (UTC) Comment better, now QI. --Rjcastillo 17:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maillezais - Cathedrale Saint-Pierre 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Potencial for Featured Image. --W like wiki 19:21, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Colonne Louis-XVI 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice - A.Savin 11:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Mans - Abbaye St Vincent ext 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Mans - Abbaye St Vincent ext 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autun - Cathedrale St-Lazare 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good - A.Savin 22:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Félicitations![edit]

Hi Selbymay, Toutes mes félicitations pour la 4ème place au concours WLM 2012 au niveau mondial! Je suis d'accord avec le jury, ta photo de la grande gallery du château de Maintenon est vraiment très belle. --Moonik (talk) 14:50, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

+1, quel succès! --PierreSelim (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pareil, félicitations, ça fait plaisir de te voir renumeré! --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:06, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A great result, congrats!! --A.Savin 19:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Même chose :) Jean-Fred (talk) 13:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autun - Cathedrale St-Lazare 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 13:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien int 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Moonik 16:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien int 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:10, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Herbiers - Abbaye Notre-Dame de la Grainetière 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 12:00, 5 December 2012 (UT)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toledo - Catedral de Santa Maria int 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - St Sulpice chap V 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice composition --Rjcastillo 13:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toledo - San Ildefonso ext 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and good quality despite a little red CA at the left roof. --Moonik 12:05, 5 December 2012 (UTC) Thanks for reviewing, could you please add a note to tell me where? --Selbymay 16:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Note added --Moonik 16:50, 5 December 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Merci! --Selbymay 18:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Barcelona - Farola Avenida Gaudi.jpg, uploaded by Selbymay and nominated by Slaunger at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Barcelona - Farola Avenida Gaudi.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That went pretty smooth. --Slaunger (talk) 09:59, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Segovia - Alcazar ext 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madrid - Biblioteca Nacional 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Segovia - Alcazar ext 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 08 - Herboristerie 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 13:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toledo - Minorista 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting in touch[edit]

Hi Selbymay,

congratulations again with your prize both in Wiki Loves Monuments France and your fourth prize in the international finale! I have sent you an email requesting some details, but haven't heard back so far yet. Could you please confirm you received this email, and that you will be able to answer it before December 31? Thanks a lot!

Effeietsanders (talk) 10:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madrid - Palacio de comunicaciones 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:05, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madrid - Puerta Alcala 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yvre - Abbaye Epau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 09:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yvre - Abbaye Epau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 09:47, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yvre-l'Eveque - Croix Boesse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salamanca - BC 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Very well, but slightly unsharpness --Rjcastillo 00:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Beautiful colors and composition weight up slight unsharpness. If you diagreee, Rjcastillo, let's discuss and we ask for a third opinion. --Tuxyso 08:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC) Comment enough with your opinion. Picture Very good. I agree --Rjcastillo 14:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Toledo - Catedral de Santa Maria int 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Toledo - Catedral de Santa Maria int 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:08, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Segovia - Alcazar ext 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salamanca - CV Retablo San Miguel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks for reviewing. Yes, I apply perspective correction and you're right, it was a little too strong and we could see a pincushion distortion. I tried to correct both of these two flaws. Tell me if you find it better now. --Selbymay 15:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great now, thanx. --Smial 20:13, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Mans - Maison de la Tourelle 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 19:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Mans - Maison de la Tourelle 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --JDP90 18:22, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Segovia - Alcazar ext 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 22:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Mans - Aurelien Bellanger 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 14:59, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yvre-l'Eveque - Croix Boesse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not that sharp everywhere, but high resolution. QI--Jebulon 16:49, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very very happy new year. -- Joydeep Talk 18:00, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WLM Barnstar[edit]

I took one of the top 15 images of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arville - Commanderie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:22, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arville - Commanderie 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 16:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arville - Commanderie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arville - Commanderie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Poco a poco 09:55, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arville - Commanderie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:55, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arville - Commanderie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]