User talk:ArkéoTopia

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ArkéoTopia!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Edit-a-thons relating to Archaeology, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Motopark (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Motopark. Merci pour cette suppression. Il ne s'agissait pas de créer une galerie, mais une catégorie. Vous m'avez évité d'avoir à effectuer la suppression moi-même. J'ai pu créer la catégorie adéquate et je continue à l'aménager. Bonne journée, ArkéoTopia (talk) 18:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's now empty gallery, not gatecory--Motopark (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TIFF to pdf duplicates[edit]

Hi, your speedy-deletion requests for the TIFF version in favour of the pdf version does not comply with our Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates. Please open a regular deletion-request instead, if you must. To make it easier, you might put them all together into one DR. Before doing that, you should consider that pdf format is rather unsuitable, if re-users want to create derivaties of these images. --Túrelio (talk) 12:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Túrelio, Commons is the platform for all Wikimedia projects so, to be able to work with WikiSource, we are oblige to follow the architecture as you can see on s:fr:Spécial:Téléverser. We don't see the interest to let those images except to create understanding problem for people who want to use this material. If pdf is not listed in Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates, it is maybe because there were no relation with Wikisource at the begining as well as it is not question in this article about webm format or about any video format because those format didn't exist before. So, before deletion of our demand, it would be kind of to give us precisely what is the code to use with a precise url (Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates does not help because it is not about what we need) and ask us to modify our first demand. Thank you ArkéoTopia (talk) 13:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ArkéoTopia,
I don't fully understand the first part of your reply.
What I understand is that you would like to have more practical information how to file the regular deletion-request (DR), which is required when an image does not qualify for speedy-deletion.
When you go to the page of an image, you see in the column to the left a box called "toolbox" (or the equivalent in your language). In the middle of the list in this box you see an entry like "Nominate for deletion" (or the equivalent in your language). When you click on that entry, a window opens, asking "Why should this file be deleted?". There you should enter your deletion-rationale (as you had done with the speedy-requests). Then click on "Proceed" etc.
After doing this for your first file/image, you have 2 options. 1) You may simply repeat this process for every image/file, you want to have deleted. 2) Or, you may put them all together into 1 deletion-request. To achieve this, just go to the page "Commons:Deletion requests/File:....", which was created when nominating your first file/image. Click on Edit and enter the file-names of all your other deletion-candidates, in the manner as it was done in this Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Rehgina request.
For further information see Commons:Deletion_policy#Regular_deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 21:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The given source for the files was (quote): xxxxx --JuTa 21:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JuTa, thank you for your feedback. It was a mistake from one of our contributor because, as said, the source should be : source = Ce document a été placé sur Wikimedia Commons par [[:fr:ArkéoTopia, une autre voie pour l'archéologie|ArkéoTopia, une autre voie pour l'archéologie]] dans le cadre du [[:fr:Projet:WikiTopia_party|projet WikiTopia party - Archive]]. - ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:51, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, (non existent) wikipedia pages cannot be valid sources for images. What exactly what scanned by whom? --JuTa 21:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dear JuTa, indeed, ArkéoTopia entry is non existant for the moment. Nevertheless, it is our team who are working on this program. If you need a presentation page, may be the best way is to create a general signature for the file in order to make the contents evolve easily. Sadly, we do not know how to do this. If you have got a link, we will be please to do that. ArkéoTopia (talk) 12:57, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rejoignez le jury WLM de l’édition 2021[edit]

Bonjour Chatsam

La nouvelle édition de WLM est en cours de préparation comme vous pouvez le voir sur rétro-planning Wiki_Loves_Monuments - 2021
La composition du jury est en cours de constitution.
En tant que lauréat de l'édition précédente, accepteriez-vous de participer cette année ?

Votre rôle consistera principalement à sélectionner les lauréats de l'édition 2021 selon ce qui expliqué sur le fonctionnement du jury et, si vous avez le temps, de participer à l'animation du concours durant le mois de septembre avec la photo du jour.

Il consistera également à accompagner le/la président/e du jury pour la rédaction du discours comme dans l'exemple de 2018

Au plaisir de vous lire,
Pour le concours français de WLM, ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cher Chatsam, plusieurs réponses favorables nous ont été retournées. Le groupe est donc complet. Toutefois, pourriez-vous nous indiquer si vous accepteriez de rejoindre le jury pour l'édition 2022. Au plaisir de vous lire ArkéoTopia (talk) 10:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Coucou, si vous avez besoin d'aide pas de pb je suis votre bénévole. bonne journée. --Chatsam (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]