User talk:Selbymay/3

Juillet-Octobre 2012

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historial - De vita christi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mammoth sculpture at Parc de la Ciutadella.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Interesting but it lacks the geocoding of the caption of the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I geocoded using this picture but a confirmation could be a good thing. Totodu74 (talk) 09:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:20, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me, there is no sense of the scale of the work. I find File:Mamut en parque de barcelona.jpg better because there are enough people to make clear the size of the sculpture, but not so many that it is obscured (as in File:Mamut Barcelona.JPG). cmadler (talk) 14:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment Sorry, I forgot to geocode. Thanks to Totodu 74 but I did check it and make it more accurate. I understand the scale argument, but there is a pigeon on the left tusk (to have an idea) :) --Selbymay (talk) 15:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

  On the satellite view of Google maps, we can see the tusks with your geocoding: good! :) Totodu74 (talk) 16:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Trees (and the pigeon, yes) give a good scale, and people on File:Mamut en parque de barcelona.jpg are disturbing, the crop very (and too) tight, and the sculpture seems not horizontal. Totodu74 (talk) 16:59, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 09:10, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cours Saint-André (Olivier de Clisson) - Nantes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:38, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 12 - Hospice Saint Michel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 20:26, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Chapelle Oratoire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 20:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Colonne Louis-XVI 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but needs geocoding. --Moroder 19:29, 1 July 2012 (UTC) Geocode was already in the category but I added it if you say so. --Selbymay 20:02, 1 July 2012 (UTC) Thks, I appreciate! --Moroder 20:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardelay - Chateau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice sidelong light & nice sky too -- MJJR 09:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Historial - Charette mask.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 07:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel de ville 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Hospice Saint-Michel, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support for me too best in scope. Totodu74 (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Herbiers - Abbaye Notre-Dame de la Grainetière 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, if you get rid of a strange stain it is QI to me Poco a poco 20:47, 2 July 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks for reviewing. --Selbymay 23:12, 2 July 2012 (UTC) Good now Poco a poco 20:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel Villetreux (vue d'angle) - Nantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- JLPC 07:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blain - Chateau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Cours Cambronne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 19:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lebourg - Jeanne d'Arc 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Anne Bretagne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AzaToth 21:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Anne Bretagne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AzaToth 21:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blain - Chateau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Cours Cambronne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:34, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin int 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove the dark spot, which I marked. Apart from that, good quality. --NorbertNagel 16:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks for reviewing and noticing this. --Selbymay 16:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Very good to me.--Jebulon 15:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 6 - Hotel Monnaie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--Jebulon 10:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montreal - Notre-Dame-de-Bon-Secours Chapel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris 12 - Barriere du Trone 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 07:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tadoussac - Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 07:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Tourism house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. -- JLPC 18:12, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Wagon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some CA Poco a poco 18:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks for noticing, corrected. --Selbymay 19:48, 9 July 2012 (UTC) Better Poco a poco 22:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau - gargoyle (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de préfecture de la Loire-Atlantique (colonnes) - Nantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 04:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Maison Louis-Philippe-Lizotte (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Les Lucs sur Boulogne - Chapelle (Isaïe).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 19:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec - Terrasse Dufferin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 12:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Plafond Graslin en FPC

Ça semble bien parti ! ;) --Jebulon (talk) 19:26, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Bon, ce ne fut pas triomphal à proprement parler, mais c'est réussi. Félicitations !--Jebulon (talk) 08:59, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Chateau garg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:50, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Chateau garg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 13:35, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! David d'Angers - Bichat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AzaToth 19:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Chateau garg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --SanglierT 12:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardelay - Chateau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nantes - Graslin int 11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nantes - Graslin int 11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

J'avais ça qui traînait chez moi, ça t'appartient ! Félicitations renouvelées ! --Jebulon (talk) 08:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Catégorie

Hello parrain ! Do you remember me ?

Je me demandais si ceci devait plutôt être une hiddencat ou non ?

A+ ! --Orikrin1998 18:42, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lege - Chateau de Bois Chevalier 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--JLPC 09:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid - Palacio Real 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice photo -- Lothar Spurzem 21:46, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid - Palacio Real 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 09:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres - Cathedrale ND CS 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Iglesia de los Santos Mártires Vicente, Sabina y Cristeta 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice --Poco a poco 18:32, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Iglesia de los Santos Mártires Vicente, Sabina y Cristeta 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Iglesia de los Santos Mártires Vicente, Sabina y Cristeta 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:04, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Iglesia de los Santos Mártires Vicente, Sabina y Cristeta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, but there is some visible CA Poco a poco 18:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Thanks for reviewing but where please ? --Selbymay 19:38, 4 October 2012 (UTC) I added some notes Poco a poco 19:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Thanks, i removed some CA. Tell me if it's ok. --Selbymay 21:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Good now Poco a poco 21:56, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres - Hotel Postes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:47, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mondoubleau - Maison Patis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 15:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Abbaye de la Couture 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Rjcastillo 11:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Abbaye de la Couture 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 10:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

El aqueducto de Segovia

Merci, cher Selbymay, pour ton aimable message.

Ton image est très réussie, et me rappelle d'excellents souvenirs.

Tu vois le parasol sur la terrasse du toit en plein milieu ? C'est exactement de là que j'ai pris mes photos le soir tombant, avec mon trépied: c'est la terrasse de l'hôtel où nous avons passé la nuit.

Une seule nuit, hélas, car Ségovie ne fut qu'une étape. Depuis quelques années, nous avons des amis à Grenade, qui nous louent une maison, et nous faisons toujours, à l'aller et au retour, une étape dans une ville intéréssante.

Ainsi, ce fut cette année Ségovie à l'aller, et El Escorial au retour, ainsi que tu peux le voir sur mes photos.

Si un jour tu en as l'occasion, je te recommande vraiment l'Andalousie, et particulièrement Grenade, à mon avis tout à fait merveilleuse.

Merci aussi de tes indulgentes appréciations. J'ai vraiment du plaisir à tenter de faire partager ce que mon œil a pu capter, et qui m'a séduit. Je suis heureux si ça te plait.

Tu le sais, je suis très sensible à ton regard, à tes images, et à tes choix esthétiques, car je m'y retrouve un peu. Je suis tes présentations avec un grand intérêt.

Je sais que nous aurons l'occasion de nous re croiser, et je te souhaite à mon tour une bonne continuation.

À bientôt, --Jebulon (talk) 19:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Maison de redressement

J'ai l'œil sur quelques-unes des photos non promues et notamment sur tes deux photos de la porte Renaissance de Châteaudun que tu as proposées le 5 octobre. Depuis le début, je me demande si la porte est vraiment penchée ou non (et je crois que je ne suis pas le seul). Peut-être devrais-tu le préciser, ou redresser légèrement les lignes, notamment sur la seconde image (porte seule). -- Je n'attends qu'un mot de toi pour voter ! -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 21:20, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lormaye - Tour pilori 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a very slight tilt CW,but easy to fix : QI to me. --JLPC 07:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks for noticing. --Selbymay 09:08, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres - Horloge astro 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 08:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choue - Eglise St Clement 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choue - Eglise St Clement 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choue - Eglise St Clement 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Choue - Eglise St Clement 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Basilica SV 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality even despite a little bit of CA on both right and left --Sfu 14:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Basilica SV 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sfu 14:21, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin muses 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:15, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres - Hotel Postes 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done I tried to improve the buildings sharpness. Thanks. --Selbymay 09:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lege - Chateau de Bois Chevalier 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please make a note because I don't see the tilt, even if perspective correction may altered the columns of the portal. --Selbymay 11:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC) IMO the whole picture has to be rotated, look at the squares I have marked --QICbot (talk)  Done Thanks for noticing. --Selbymay 22:01, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateaudun - Ancien presbytere 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info New file uploaded, tilt correction. --Selbymay 09:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC) QI for me. --JLPC 11:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateaudun - Ancien presbytere 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info New file uploaded, tilt correction. --Selbymay 09:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC) QI for me. --JLPC 11:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Notre-Dame-de-Bon-Secours Chapel, Exterior, Vieux port side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 17:40, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Church dome interior of Basilica San Vicente, Ávila.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 17:36, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couture - Jeu FI 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 10:14, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Menhir SJ 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and interesting--Jebulon 14:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Tour du Pilori exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:38, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:17, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couture - Jeu FI 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 12:19, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haute-Goulaine - Chateau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment impressive chimney, but the image needs a distortion correction and the sharpness (which is a bit low due to f/3.5, I think) could be improved. --Carschten 12:21, 6 October 2012 (UTC) Thanks for reviewing, I did try to improve. Please tell me what you think. --Selbymay 08:39, 7 October 2012 (UTC)  Weak support I still miss the cripsness, but it's ok. Very difficult to find straight verticals (I tried by myself)... All in all, QI for me now. --Carschten 18:43, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Iglesia de los Santos Mártires Vicente, Sabina y Cristeta 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 10:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Ferte-Bernard - Halles 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Ferte-Bernard - Halles 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 20:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Croisic - Menhir de la Pierre Longue (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coulaines - Eglise 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Ferte-Bernard - Halles 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me, despite some noise. - A.Savin 09:49, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Convento de Santo Tomas 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. JLPC 20:48, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Agil - Chateau 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. - A.Savin 09:06, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Convento de Santo Tomas 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 12:57, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thouars - Eglise St Medard 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--JLPC 21:05, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durtal - Chateau ext 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 09:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin muses 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Agil - Chateau 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres - Hotel Postes 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Halles de La Ferté-Bernard, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• (Petite modification du scope pour le rendre plus chic)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateaudun - Champde 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:31, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateaudun - Champde 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 08:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durtal - Chateau ext 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 03:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thouars - Eglise St Laon int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Moroder 08:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC) chromatic aberration --Iifar 12:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)  Done CA removed, thanks for reviewing. --Selbymay 14:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Durtal - Chateau ext 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:20, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass window of Julian of Le Mans.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think geocoding is necessary for this image (COM:VICR criterion #5). --Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Info You're right, I forgot.  Done Precisely done now. --Selbymay (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Criteria satisfied. Thank you for adding {{Object location dec}}. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:03, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astronomical clock of Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartres, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:04, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pipe organ of Église Notre-Dame-des-Marais, La Ferté-Bernard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:07, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaupréau - Château (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 09:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chateaudun - Champde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks. --Selbymay 09:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)  Comment It's not well centered yet (nice pic btw!) --Moroder 18:42, 18 October 2012 (UTC)  Done Thanks again :) --Selbymay 07:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Good now, IMO.--Jebulon 10:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Serge Ernst 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:34, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Le Mans - Serge Ernst 2.jpg

File:Le Mans - Serge Ernst 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 23:41, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel Villetreux, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble, 13 allée de Turenne (Nantes), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful (Je croyais qu'on ne voyait des batiments aussi penchés qu'à Venise. Je suis fier qu'il y en ait aussi en France. ) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:42, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

 Info Le quartier a été construit sur des pilotis, pour combler la Loire. Les immeubles ont rapidement penché et ont été rénovés en fonction. Cf. la porte & les fenêtres droites. --Selbymay (talk) 19:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:45, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupre - Basilique ext 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI--Jebulon 09:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me--Lmbuga 21:53, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Cathedrale St Julien int 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --JLPC 21:18, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Le Mans - Serge Ernst 2.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Mans - Serge Ernst 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent photo, but dubious on copyright grounds. DRed, promoted. --Mattbuck 23:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancienne chapelle Notre-Dame du Champdé (Châteaudun).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:17, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Menhir de la Tonnelle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met imo. --JLPC (talk) 21:19, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:19, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de ville de Thouars, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maintenon - Chateau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Smial 11:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupre - Basilique int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 16:13, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupre - Basilique ext 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 09:55, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec - PR 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Ferte Bernard - Eglise ND Marais 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 01:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Selbymay, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:26, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec - Terrasse Dufferin 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:35, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupre - Basilique ext 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec - PC 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and funny.--Jebulon 14:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec - Terrasse Dufferin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this one, QI for me -- Achim Raschka 15:10, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Convento de Santo Tomas 03b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A good one !--Jebulon 09:53, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thouars - Hotel de Ville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:08, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quebec - PR 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I have uploaded a contrastier version. Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC) Very good--Jebulon 23:31, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupre - Basilique int 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wow, but could you not have moved the microphone? --Mattbuck 21:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avila - Convento de Santo Tomas 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Très spectaculaire. Je promouvrai avec plaisir, si tu peux corriger les blancs un peu "cramés" (nappe d'autel, fleurs), et l'aberration chromatique bleue, toujours sur l'autel ? Merci et bravo pour les légendes multilingues, très informatives !--Jebulon 09:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)  Done Merci pour cette critique bienveillante, j'ai essayé de corriger ça. A toi de voir. --Selbymay 07:24, 23 October 2012 (UTC)C'est mieux maintenant, OK pour QI (il y a encore des CA, voir baptistère, par exemple, et un poil de "bruit", mais inévitable je pense)--Jebulon 09:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres - Horloge astro 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Still ought to have used a smaller aperture, but OK, I'll give it to you. --King of Hearts 09:32, 28 October 2012 (UTC)