User talk:Selbymay/2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Avril - Juin 2012[edit]

Théâtre de Cholet[edit]

Bonjour Selbymay.
Merci de tes photos, étant originaire de La Rochelle, j'y retrouve une ambiance proche de celle de mon pays natal...
Note s'il te plaît qu'il y a un problème avec le ciel de ton théâtre de Cholet en QI. On y voit d'étranges marques à gauche, et des traces d'intervention au dessus. ça risque de ne pas passer. Dans ces cas-là, avec GIMP (mais c'est pareil avec Phtshp), je prélève un échantillon de la couleur (moyenne) du ciel avec la pipette, je sélectionne ce ciel en faisant bien attention à ne pas abîmer l'architecture en empiétant dessus (je choisis une sélection "douce" avec atténuation des bords), et je remplis la zone (toute la zone !) avec la couleur choisie. ça fait quelque chose d'un peu uniforme et plat, certes, mais c'est propre, et sans artefacts de compression, ni traces diverses, ou autres.
Cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 22:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rouans - Abbaye Buzay (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 05:50, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rouans - Abbaye Buzay (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 23:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Procé (sc 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for QI (Please, est-ce possible d'enlever le mégot à ses pieds? On dirait que la statue a fumé en cachette:)) --Moonik 08:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Non-smoking statue now. :) --Selbymay 18:30, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angers - Palais de justice (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slight perspective distorsion to be corrected, otherwise good.--Jebulon 23:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Distorsion corrected. --Selbymay 19:21, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --Yann 07:08, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paulx - Bantam rooster (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 22:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontenay le Comte - Tour Rivalland (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 22:45, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Clément, Nantes (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Michel-le-Cloucq - Eglise (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 21:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontenay le Comte - Tour Rivalland (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moulin à vent de Rairé, Vendée department (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Vincent abbey - Nieul-sur-Autise, Vendée department (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Michel-le-Cloucq - Calvaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontenay le Comte - Tour Rivalland (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Feels tittle. A litle clock-wise rotation ? Léna 06:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Not so simple but I did try to improve. Please tell me, thanx. --Selbymay 15:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cours Saint-André (Du Guesclin) - Nantes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:31, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cours Saint-André (Du Guesclin) - Nantes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, and nice composition. --Kadellar 12:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 1 - Fontaine du Palmier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tadoussac - Hotel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and a wonderful place (Tadoussac). --Taxiarchos228 19:07, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Presbytere (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:31, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Presbytere (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Lumine-de-Coutais - Mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbatiale de Saint-Philbert-de-Grand-Lieu (facade).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec - Jerome d'Aviau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Carschten 18:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Courthouse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! -- MJJR 12:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montreal - Chateau Ramezay fountain (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue - Mairie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Saint-Bartholomew (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me. --Iifar 18:15, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Étienne-de-Mer-Morte - Clocher & église.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks pretty good. Can you see very narrow white line on the upper-center part of the image? --Iifar 16:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Yes, corrected, thanks! --Selbymay 15:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec - Jerome d'Aviau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-Famille - Eglise (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-Famille - Eglise (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 18:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-Famille - Ferme (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me --Marianne Casamance 20:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tadoussac - Playground slide.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tadoussac - Swings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 08:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Hotel de Ville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --kallerna 14:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sallertaine - Moulin de Raire (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Fraser manor (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Fraser manor (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 9 - Printemps cupola (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 21:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 9 - Printemps cupola (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 21:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 9 - Printemps cupola (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Visually stunning. --Saffron Blaze 21:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec - Maison Tetu (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Montreal - McGill Physics.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:00, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cap Tourmente - Petite ferme (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments -- QI for me. JLPC 12:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tadoussac - Domaine des dunes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Bgag 12:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-Famille - Eglise (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments -- QI for me. JLPC 07:40, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tadoussac - Cemetery (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness maybe a bit disappointing at full resolution, but the size of the picture is high. So, it is a QI.--Jebulon 21:50, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Selbymay. You have new messages at Orikrin1998's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

+1 --Orikrin1998 10:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
+1 --Orikrin1998 11:11, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sainte-Famille - Maison de nos Aieux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Intresting house.--ArildV 11:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviere-du-Loup - Hotel de Ville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly tilted clockwise. - A.Savin 23:35, 10 May 2012 (UTC) Thanks for noticing, I tried to correct it, new version uploaded. --Selbymay 19:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC) Good. - A.Savin 09:56, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tadoussac - Eglise Sainte-Croix (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the half car on the left side is a bit disturbing, but nevertheless good image --Taxiarchos228 20:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC) Sorry for the car, I agree. Fortunately, the cross is complete :) --Selbymay 20:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good --Orikrin1998 09:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC) Orikrin; Why did you change from promotion to discuss?--ArildV 09:12, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tadoussac - Eglise Sainte-Croix (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice! Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok for me. --Orikrin1998 09:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Erik Zabel[edit]

Hello Selbymay,

I will renominate this picture File:Erik Zabel Tour 2006.jpg tomorrow again. It has more than 2 MP, you have absorbed and I didn't proof it ;-) Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to mix up 2 Megapixel (MP) with 2 Megabyte (MB) ;-) --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Villa Chantrerie (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- JLPC 21:06, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Villa Chantrerie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Villa Chantrerie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:04, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Villa Chantrerie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI now. --Cayambe 14:23, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Chapelle Chantrerie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Chapelle Chantrerie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel de ville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 05:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel de ville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Just a bit too bright IMO, but QI. -- JLPC 05:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Villa Chantrerie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO.--ArildV 12:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Villa Chantrerie 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good! --Keymeulen 07:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Porte Saint-Pierre 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel d'Aux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaretz - Chataignier Nonneries 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel Montaudoin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel Montaudoin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendrennes - Calvaire 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.-- JLPC 21:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendrennes - Calvaire 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Herbiers - Lavoirs 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 05:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sigournais - Chateau-Neuf 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 10:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Villa Chantrerie (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don't really like the angle. Mattbuck 15:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great quality. I love this image, despite angle --WhiteWriter 17:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendée - Falco tinnunculus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Herbiers - Mairie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 14:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendée - Falco tinnunculus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice--Holleday 20:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Selbymay, I did the correction (Its not easy because the building is several centureis old. I hope you like it now. Best regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendée - Falco tinnunculus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes.--Jebulon 17:22, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Selbymay,
Je me suis permis d'ajouter quelques infos dans la description et les catégories de l'image ci-dessus...
Félicitations renouvelées pour tes photos, leur qualité et la variété de leurs sujets.--Jebulon (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Salut, merci de ton message. Je ne sais pas si je vais continuer dans les "labels", compte tenu du comportement de certains (Taxiarchos228/Wladislaw) en l'occurrence. C'est insupportable, et je n'ai plus rien à prouver dans ces pages...--Jebulon (talk) 10:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rassure-toi, je n'ai pas dit que je quittais "Commons", je n'en ai pas l'intention ! Mais parfois, je me décourage de l'attitude de certains. Ils sont peu, mais suffisent à me pourrir le plaisir, c'est le cas en ce moment, ça va passer. Je vois que l'un d'entre eux te fait une grande offensive de charme actuellement (même si j'ai bien aimé ta série sur les Beaux-Arts), je ne peux qu'en appeler, sans plus me mêler de ce qui ne me regarde pas, à ta vigilance... Mais après tout tu verras bien !... Bien à toi,--Jebulon (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vendée - Falco tinnunculus 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 13:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 10 - Chapelle Hopital Lariboisiere 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --JLPC 21:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Blottereau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 6 - ENSBA 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 6 - ENSBA 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 6 - ENSBA 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Herbiers - Lavoirs 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though crop is a bit tight. --NorbertNagel 19:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel Montaudoin 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Beffroi Ste Croix 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Beffroi Ste Croix 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Colonne Louis-XVI 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:45, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Colonne Louis-XVI 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Colonne Louis-XVI 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre de la Roche-sur-Yon (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clère - Jeanne voix 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 09:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Monum morts 1870 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --JLPC 00:07, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Tour Haut-Pas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments NIce and interesting--Jebulon 14:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Colonne Louis-XVI 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bonne idée, mais il y a une fine ligne blanche le long de la structure de premier plan contre le ciel.--Jebulon 22:10, 14 June 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Merci pour la remarque. Difficile à corriger mais j'ai essayé... --Selbymay 18:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Good quality. --Moroder 19:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Correction parfaitement réussie !--Jebulon 14:40, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel d'Aux, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateaudun - Rat king.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 06:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Prouant - Prieure Grammont 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. Nice light and the cloudy sky gives extra bonus. --Iifar 16:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! David d'Angers - La Fayette bust.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 05:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin int 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good ! + high EV.--Jebulon 15:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC) Thanks, what is EV? :) --Selbymay 17:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC) "Educational Value", (sorry).--Jebulon 22:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC) Ok :) --Selbymay 23:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Immeuble Perraudeau 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and very funny !--Jebulon 15:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quebec - Terrasse Dufferin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good composition, but perhaps bad white balance? --Berthold Werner 06:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for reviewing, I tried to correct it. Better now? --Selbymay 12:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO ok now. --Berthold Werner 16:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Monum morts 1870 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please remove two dustspots in the sky at the left of the statue. --Cayambe 17:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for reviewing! --Selbymay 11:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte Saint-Pierre (Nantes), exterior, east facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Du Guesclin in Nantes, with pedestal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Immeuble Perraudeau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough imho.--V-wolf 07:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Immeuble Perraudeau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough imho.--V-wolf 07:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Immeuble Perraudeau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 5 - Cluny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Info Coat of arms of Jacques d'Amboise, Abbot of Cluny.--Jebulon 22:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Good.--Jebulon 08:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin int 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 08:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Théâtre Graslin[edit]

Bravo pour toutes ces superbes images de ce bâtiment !
Je me régale !--Jebulon (talk) 15:15, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin int 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent --Moonik 17:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin int 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. --Moonik 17:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin int 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments excellent. --Moonik 17:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel de ville 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 22:20, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel de ville 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Hotel de ville 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 22:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin int 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. -- JLPC 22:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! David d'Angers - Samuel Hahnemann bust.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI although the frame in the back disturbs, maybe it could be removed --Moroder 09:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! David d'Angers - Francois Arago bust.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barcelona - Desconsol 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - 72 rue de Rennes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting architecture and nice image composition. OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 21:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 06 - Faune 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nantes - Graslin int 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. JLPC 20:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cours Saint-André (Olivier de Clisson) - Nantes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- JLPC 20:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 6 - ENSBA 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 12:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris 6 - ENSBA 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontaine du Palmier, global view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paulx - Bantam rooster 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Biopics 20:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cours Saint-André (Olivier de Clisson) - Nantes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:48, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Herbiers - Eglise Notre-Dame 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrée rue Bonaparte de l'École Nationale Supérieure des Beaux-Arts.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.