User talk:Pierre André Leclercq/Archive 9

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Pierre André Leclercq! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq Asnapio Les carolingiens (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool. Just so you know, in English, animation is only in the form of drawn or computer-produced cartoons and such. This kind of scene is a historical reenactment or role-playing or some such. -- Ikan Kekek 02:38, 22 December 2020 (UTC)* Thank you. for your advice. --Pierre André Leclercq 10:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Pierre André Leclercq! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- Tournasol7 (talk) 08:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2021!

		* Happy New Year 2021! Pierre André Leclercq! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    --Pierre André (talk) 10:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadenabbia Lac de Côme en2018 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bellaggio le port en 2018.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 09:49, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Camp de Boulogne - La poudrière.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Very good image, but the scope is too wide. It must be focused on what has risen; in the event: the powder. Here is a scope that could be admitted : {{c|Camp de Boulogne|Camp de Boulogne - ''La poudrière''}}--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Thank you for this clarification, I refined the scop by specifying that it was the powder keg. Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergues Estaminet Le Bruegel en 2020 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 17:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taverne 'Vauban' à Bergues (Nord) en 2020.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 17:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergues - Remparts et Fortifications en 2020 (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 22:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq Asnapio Les carolingiens (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 22:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New year 2021

Salut Pierre André et merci pour tes voeux, je te souhaite également, à te et à ta famille, le meilleur en 2021! Poco a poco (talk) 11:32, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eglise Saint Pierre de Tourmignies - Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment You have to reduce the scope to Facade, because only that is shown. We must correct the aberrations of perspective. Too bad for the cock who paid for the framing a little short. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for the review, aberrations of perspective reduced. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ok with corrections --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fromelles Australian Mémorial Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Uomini d'arme - Donato Bramante - Brera Pinakothek.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too wide. It is a work of art and it has its place in VI. It is necessary to correct the abherations of perspective and to remove the frame (except if it has a historical interest this is not the case). You have to find a scope that gives: the title of the table, the name of the author, and the place of exhibition. A geocoding is requested for the legend. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Correction the abherations of perspective and frame removed, geocoding edited, best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cimitero Monumentale (Milan) - Monumento funebre a Isabella Airoldi Casati by Enrico Butti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  CommentThe monument is not seen in its entirety, the scope must be reduced to what is shown: bronze. You must give the title, but also the name of the author of the bronze. The legend is a little weak, maybe you could try the ART Photo model like here (Ingres-Bourdelle Museum - Séléné lying, 1917 - Bourdelle - Joconde06070001193.jpg). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Done (Fr): Merci pour vos précisions, j'ai recadré l'image de manière à ce que la portée soit réduite uniquement au bronze. J'ai donné un titre, et ajouté le nom de l'auteur du bronze. La légende a été rectifiée conformément au modèle ART Photo. Bien cordialement
  (En): Thank you for your details, I have cropped the image so that the range is reduced only to bronze. I gave a title, and added the name of the author of the bronze. The legend has been rectified according to the ART Photo template. Best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Regardes les modification du scope et de la légende... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

 Comment merci pour les modifications apportées dans le scope et pour l'ajout du nom du sculpteur. Bonne soirée.--Pierre André ^(talk) 23:01, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare d'Eau, de Courcelles-lès-Lens (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergues -porte de Dunkerque (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fat dust spot --Poco a poco 12:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)* Done Removal of dust spots left in the sky. Thank you vor your advice. It wasn't completely removed and there are other dust spots in the area --Poco a poco 12:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)*  Done Thanks for the review, removal dust spots above the roof of the door.--Pierre André Leclercq 14:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC) Sorry but the dust spots or blurry dust spots on the left (in the are where the original fat one was) are still there --Poco a poco 20:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)*  Done Thanks for the review. I haven't seen those blurry dust spots on the left. I hope I got them out. Merry Xmas!--Pierre André Leclercq 22:01, 25 December 2020 (UTC) They are still there, I added a note. I am about to give up here --Poco a poco 12:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, I had not noticed this speck of dust on my screen, best regards.--Pierre André Leclercq 17:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)  Support Ok, not perfect but close enough --Poco a poco 22:46, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Grand Canyon du Colorado panorama en 2016.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA at the top left should be removed. --Ermell 20:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)* Done thank you for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 10:05, 23 December 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Corrections et voeux

Tous mes vœux pour toi et ta famille, et bienvenu dans VI. Nous avons quelques problème avec le robot des résultat, qui maintenant est réparé. Tu avais bénéficié par erreur de ce bug ceci est rentré dans l'ordre. Les débuts sont un peu difficile mais nous y sommes tous passé et tu trouvera toujours de l'aide, bonne journée...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: merci pour tes encouragements, et c'est avec plaisir que je partagerai mes photos, en suivant les conseils qui me seront donnés. Bien cordialement,--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colonne de la Grande Armée à Wimille (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Probably best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Beaurieux (Nord) Armes du seigneur de Hun dans la chapelle seigneuriale St Christophe (Hauts-de-France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Beaurieux (Nord) Dalle mortuaire de la comtesse de la Cour Bramish dans la chapelle seigneuriale St Christophe.- (Hauts-de-France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Beaurieux (Nord) Dalle mortuaire du comte Hhenri Charles de Robaulx dans la chapelle seigneuriale St Christophe.- (Hauts-de-France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:50, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Beaurieux (Nord) Mosaïque aux armes des comtes de Robaulx dans la chapelle seigneuriale St Christophe (Hauts-de-France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cross of Sacrifice in Aubers Ridge British Cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope if the fact that the cropped version doesn't contain the entire monument is the deciding factor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Beaurieux (Nord) dalle mortuaire du Comte Auguste de Robaulx dans la chapelle seigneuriale St Christophe (Hauts-de-France)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Godewaersvelde British Cemetery.- Cross of sacrifice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bellaggio embarcadère.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy new year

My best wishes to you as well, and lots of health in 2021! All the best --Llez (talk) 15:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
GCN n°42 Plaques de cocher in Nord Solre-le-Château (Hauts-de-France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Both photos in scope look useful (the other one being File:Solre-le-Château. Plaque de cocher (1).JPG. I think it would be good to nominate both in scopes that include the number at the top of the signs and/or the lettering - however the signs are best identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Done Thanks for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:39, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarcophagus Apollo Marsyas (Louvre, Ma 2347) Exposition Musiques! Échos de l'Antiquité (2018).- Musée du Louvre-Lens.- Hauts-de-France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colonia Claudia Ara Agrippinensium Autel de la déesse "VAGDAVERCVSTI" Louvre-Lens, Musiques! Échos de l'Antiquité .- Hauts-de-France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 22:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment The width of the piece does not correspond to original dimensions: the image should be stretched. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le seul Culs-de-lampe in Nord (France) repeint de l'ancienne maison commune à Villeneuve d'Ascq.- France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I have no idea how I would pick between the different photos; is the scope too broad? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:27, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

   Comment Thanks for the review, I added that it's the only painted architectural element in the tavern.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Question How is this one colored? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your advice. This architectural element is painted with glazed colors. The tavern has recently changed owners and I don't think the new buyer can say more. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 23:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Support OK, thanks. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New year 2021

Merci, mes meilleurs vœux aussi pour cette nouvelle année 2021 ! --Velvet (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Morning of streltsy's beheading - Vassili Sourikov - Tretyakov Gallery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There is a problem of proportion. The dimensions of the table are published. Just make a rule of three to adjust the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

 Done Correction problem of proportion. Thanks for the review,--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:57, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Juvenile Oryctolagus cuniculus (Flemish Giant rabbit).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Too small for a giant rabbit: it is a juvenile. formally in our rules it is necessary: the Latin name of the species in italics followed by the vernacular name of the variety in parentheses. It cannot be used as a reference for Wikidata. On the other hand, if you add "juvenile" to the scope it is acceptable. The place has no influence, it must not appear in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

 Done thank you for the clarification. best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Regardes les modifications du scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

•  Thank you., Ok j'ai compris. --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Louvre RF 4742 Louis XIV, roi de France (1641-1715), terrassant une figure allégorique de la Fronde by Gilles Guérin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Venusgrotte Château de Linderhof Germany.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 13:18, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Keki-A 41 Louvre-Lens.- Hauts-de-France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
RDN°5 Plaques de cocher in Nord Solre-le-Château (Hauts-de-France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:42, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milan cimetière monumentale 2018 (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:40, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergues.- porte aux boules rn 2020 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare d'Eau, de Courcelles-lès-Lens (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Bellignies encore appelé, Maison Evrard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bunker de l'Abbiette (Fromelles) Casemate à mitrailleuse n°28.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 3: Jesus falls the first time, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope should refer to the specific category: Stations of the Cross in Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done Correction of the scope which refers to the specific category: Stations of the Cross in Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 1: Jesus is condemned to death, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope should refer to the specific category: Stations of the Cross in Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done Correction of the scope which refers to the specific category: Stations of the Cross in Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 2: Jesus is given his cross, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose The scope should refer to the specific category: Stations of the Cross in Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done Correction of the scope which refers to the specific category: Stations of the Cross in Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isola dei Pescatori l'une des trois îles Borromée (Italie) (8bis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise reduction required. --Ermell 16:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review,reducing CCD Noise, --Pierre André Leclercq 10:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 5: Simon of Cyrene carries the cross, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 4: Jesus meets His Mother Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 6: Veronica wipes the face of Jesus, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fromelles le bunker de l'Abbiette IA59004858 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 15:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergues - Remparts et Fortifications en 2020 (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 7: Jesus falls the second time, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 8: Jesus meets the daughters of Jerusalem, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 10: Jesus is stripped of His garments, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I was here in 2019! But I only saw the stations outside of the church, didn't see any of the ones inside... —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 9: Jesus falls the third time, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cap Blanc-Nez.- Le mont d'hubert (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. -- Liberaler Humanist 23:59, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fampoux, l'ancienne brasserie Fampoux ; 10 rue Verlaine (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 14: Jesus is laid in the tomb and covered in incense, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 13: Jesus' body is removed from the cross, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:11, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 11: Crucifixion: Jesus is nailed to the cross, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station 12: Jesus dies on the cross, Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré in Québec.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxelaëre léglise extérieur,, relief Ste Cécile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ambleteuse.- le Fort Vauban (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue de Sainte Barbe, Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tabernacle Église Saint-Sauveur (Ham-en-Artois).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Retable de la Flagellation, Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dalle funéraire d'Antoinette de Molin, Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altarpiece, Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Virgen de las Penas, Cathedral N.D. Arequipa (Peru).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Unique in scope, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

 Comment Indeed I think that the scope is unique, --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Jean l'Évangéliste (altarpiece), Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done Category changed to Ham-en-Artois Saint-Sauveur (altarpiece), best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Marc (altarpiece), Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Luc (altarpiece), Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Résurrection de Jésus (altarpiece), Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done Category changed to Ham-en-Artois Saint-Sauveur (altarpiece), best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Matthieu (altarpiece), Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Pending Most valued review candidates

Pending Most valued review candidates, ne s'utilise que dans la cas où les votes sont terminés et proclamés. Les avoir lancer trop tôt va rendre cette voie très délicate. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:54, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus:  Thank you. pour la précision, je ne savais comment donner suite aux photos plus représentatives que les miennes dans les catégories proposées. Faut-il que je retire les miennes, comme je l'avais fait précédemment, ce qui, évitera de passer par la case "Pending Most valued review candidates". Bien cordialement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:50, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Le processus fonctionne sur les dates, tout est déjà enregistré. Laisse les choses en l'état mais il y a peu de chance que Pending Most valued review candidates marche par la suite car les dates seront différentes. Ceci dit après quelques années mon taux d'erreur est de une pour 5 nominations. VI est complexe. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue de Saint Nicolas (Statue of Saint Nicholas), du XVIIe siècle.- Église Saint-Sauveur d'Ham-en-Artois.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Do you know the name of the sculptor or the year or approximate year of composition? Those would be good things to add. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done The statue is dated from the 17th century and is made of wood: carved, painted (polychrome) is included in the movable heritage database (Palissy). Its author is not specified.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Do this for each scope of an artwork, and add an English translation of the scope in parentheses. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Statue de Saint Nicolas (Statue of Saint Nicholas) du XVIIe.--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Bon, merci. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gisant d'Enguerrand de Lillers (Historical Tomb effigy of Enguerrand de Lillers) XVIe century..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Useful, but I'm unsure for now. The right side is blurry at thumbnail size, but that's not really a bar to promotion. The thing is, my French is pretty good for a native English-speaker, and I'm not familiar with the word "Gisant". The normal practice I think we've agreed on is to use the title in the original language (in this case, French) and put an English translation in parentheses. According to Google Translate, gisant = lying, which I think for a statue would be "reclining", so "Reclining statue of...". -- talk) 01:23, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

 Comment An effigie (gisant) is a funerary sculpture of Christian art depicting a character lying (as opposed to praying or praying) generally lying down, living or dead in a blissful or smiling attitude (as opposed to transfixed). There is a category Effigies of dead people in Hauts-de-France, is it more suitable? --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:07, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I wasn't looking at categories as an issue. I recognize the word "effigy" in English, but I didn't realize funerary sculptures could be called effigies. My point is that as I understand, the scope should be in French with an English translation of the scope in parentheses. Also, if you know the name of the sculptor and when or about when the sculpture was made, that should also be in the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment The effigy of Enguerrand de Lillers († 1100), in blue stone, 16th century. Its author is not specified M.H. 01/02/1911. --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:18, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Good. And the English translation in parentheses? Do you see how User:Archaeodontosaurus composes his scopes for works of art? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Small modification of the scope. For me the image is too blurry ... but not enough for an opposition.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done change of scop to "Objets monuments historiques in Nord (recumbent effigies)". Is it better? --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Peut-être il faut expliquer en français. J'ai dit que le problème avec le scope etait que la norme que nous avons accepté ici est d'utiliser la langue originelle (en ce cas, français) et ajouter la traduction anglais entre parenthèses. C'est clair? Sinon, on peut essayer d'expliquer de plus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Did I understand correctly by modifying the scope in this way?  Thank you..--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Non. Il faut traduire tout le scope. Regarde comme Archaeo fait ses scopes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Done J'ai bien étudié le scopes d'Archaeodontosaurus.- Ai-je bien coompris  Thank you. --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK, good for me now. Merci. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diospyros atrata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I don't see how the botanical garden is relevant to the scope. Is this the best photo of this species of tree on Commons? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment It seems that Diospyros atrata is one of the few pictures of the Ebenaceae family on Commons. Besides, I can't find it anywhere other than in this botanical garden - --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment OK, but we can't recognize the garden here, so please restrict your scope to this species of tree, and then we can make a decision about whether it's best in that scope. The agreed-upon format is the Latin name with the English vernacular name (if any) in parentheses. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I'm not that happy with any of the photos in this scope, but this seems clearest as a view of a single tree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Aspara Carvings and Wood Work at Embekka Devalaya (14th century).- Sri Lanka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Upper part is blurry, but still useful. Opposition to designating it a VI would be reasonable, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Nurse Carvings and Wood Work at Embekka Devalaya (14th century).- Sri Lanka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I would like to support. I assume the name of the artist(s) is not known, but do we know approximately when the work was done? If so, please add that information to each in this series of nominations. I could surely ask this of you in French, too, but it's late and it would take longer. Just ask, though, and I'll be glad to explain in French tomorrow if that would help. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC).

•  Comment These wooden sculptures are dated to the 14th century and have been recognized by UNESCO as the best and most detailed fabrications in the world. They are the work of a team of craftsmen led by the master craftsman Delmada Mulacari, under the authority of King Wickramabahu lll in the ancient kingdom of Gampola (1357-1374 AD), best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Useful, but please add that information to your file descriptions (it's totally fine to add it in French; I or someone else could add an English translation later). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Another helpful thing to do after this nomination passes is change the filename to be more instructive in the way that your filename for the Gajah Singa carving is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Peacock Carvings and Wood Work at Embekka Devalaya (14th century).- Sri Lanka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Gaja Sinha Carvings and Wood Work at Embekka Devalaya (14th century).- Sri Lanka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mark preaching in Alexandria by Gentile and Giovanni Bellini Pinacoteca di Brera (Milan).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment But the scope is not according to the format we've agreed to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:13, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mirador Cruz del Cóndor Caňon del Colca (Peru).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cimitero Monumentale (Milan) - Monumento Morgagni - context.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Too strong distortion: the monument does not conform to reality (Correction possible) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Correcting too much distortion and bringing it into line with reality. Thanks for the review,--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:53, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support It's better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Funeral vehicles in Milan Auto funebre elettrica Rognini e Balbo MI 2080 (1927).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 22:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Façade of Toscanini chapel - Cimitero Monumentale (Milan).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment this one Arturo Toscanini grave Milan 2015.jpg is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Question Should I leave or withdrawn my version, in order to offer the better one? Thank you. --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment No, your scope is not suited to what you are showing. Context has no interest, and what you show is the facade of the chapel. Modify the scope and everything becomes simple. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done scope modified, Thanks for the review, --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment There are two problems: the scope does not indicate the correct category, and for this scope as it is Arturo Toscanini grave Milan 2015.jpg is still the best image. We can reduce the scope to facade which would allow to consider a label. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done I reduced the scop to facade. best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

*  Support OK now--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cimitero Monumentale (Milan) - Ediculae Chapel of the Knights of the Holy Sepulcher.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Barelization (Correction possible) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done Left side stripe removal. Thanks for the review,.--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milan cimetière monumentale 2018 (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 19:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadenabbia panorama sur le Lac de Côme (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments @Pierre André Leclercq: Good quality. For the 10 MP resolution, the file size seems small. Is this panorama saved at highest JPG quality? If available, please upload a larger file. --Tagooty 04:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC) @Tagooty: Thank you for your comment. I added the original file to "Other versions" I had already downloaded it, best regards.--Pierre André Leclercq 11:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC) The clarity, colour, detail of "other version" "other version" is much superior to this panorama. It seems that while stitching the panorama, the result was saved at lower quality? --Tagooty 03:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)  Comment In fact the candidate photo is derived from this one "other version" for which the dust grains have been removed as well as the annoying details of the foreground.Best regards.--Pierre André Leclercq 16:11, 17 January 2021 (UTC)  SupportGood quality. I misunderstood "panoramic" to mean an image stitched from several other images. :-) --Tagooty 09:03, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frescos in San Francesco (Bergamo) miracles of San Francesco (14th century) - Est view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment the scope is too wide. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Frescoes on the walls of the 14th century cloister, renovated in the 18th century by others representing the miracles of San Francesco.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now; It is necessary to make good captions it is registered in the rules. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:47, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cimitero Monumentale (Milan) - Monumento Brentini - context.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 18:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco (Bergamo) - reliefs Nativity (presumed from the 14th century).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment No information on this object. Is it an original or a plaster cast. Who is the author, when does he date? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I do not think it is a plaster which remains exposed in the open air. When I took the photo this relief was visible on the left of this file , it would be the remains of the cloister the 14th used as a cemetery, it was called the arches because it contained sepulchral arches of families of the nobility of the city. This convent was decorated by artists whose personal details are not known but to whom scholars have attributed works recognized as belonging to one hand for the uniformity of characteristics and styles. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capital with the effigy of Saint Luke in Christ Church (Montreal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support -- Spurzem (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capital with the effigy of Saint Saint John in Christ church (Montreal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 17:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capital with the effigy of Saint Matthew in Christ church (Montreal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support -- Spurzem (talk) 17:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Capital with the effigy of Saint Mark in Christ church (Montreal).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Very good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coats of arms of Niagara-on-the-Lake (Ontario).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Only in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pietà in Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 17:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Your most memorable shot 2020

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

Over the course of the past two years, we've been sharing pictures that have a special meaning with each other at the start of the new year. Today, I'm inviting you add your most memorable shot of 2020 to this page:

• Your most memorable shot 2020

I hope you, your familiy, and your friends are well during these difficult times. I wish you all the best for 2021 and I can't wait to see what your most memorable shot of 2020 looks like.

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reproduction of Pietà by Michelangelo in Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I'm seeing the faces much more clearly in this photo, although it may be darker than optimal and doesn't include all of the sculpture (but then again, neither does the nominee, because of the railing). I'd be interested to hear if others, viewing on different monitors, also find the other photo better in scope, overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Agree with Ikan Kekek. The alternate photo could do with WB correction. --Tagooty (talk) 13:57, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek and Tagooty: thanks for your feedback, I downloaded the full version with WB correction.--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination I agree, thanks for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mosaic of the choir vault in Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment File:CNB0877 Voute Ste-Anne-de-Beaupré 20120921.JPG is an interesting comparison, but it can't be best in scope because of the watermark. However, I'm confused by the differences in color. Also, are you cutting off parts of the choir vault on the right, left and top? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done removal of parts of the vault of the choir on the right, left and top. Thanks for the review.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I was asking whether you had cut off parts of the choir vault, not recommending you cut off more of it! This can't be a VI of the choir vault if you cut off parts of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Thanks for your advice, I did not understand the question. I had indeed cut parts of the vault of the choir. I downloaded the original version with a little light correction. --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Je demande si un photo peut representer suffisement le scope si toute de la voûte n'est pas compris dans l'image. Que dites-vous? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Je suis assez d'accord, c'est la raison pour laquelle j'avais précisé que le scop portait sur "mosaïque de la voûte" qui est située en son centre . J'ai téléchargé la voûte dans son intégralité File:Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré - la voûte du chœur.JPG. Bien cordialement--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support J'ai compris: le mosaïque est seulement au centre. Donc c'est une bonne representation du scope. Merci pour l'explication. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue de Ste Anne de la basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment A little blurry but useful. But what does "20th" refer to? Also, do you know the name of the sculptor? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment the reference the "20th" is due to the fact that on March 29, 1922, a fire devastated the basilica, and monastery of the Redemptorists. The current basilica dates from 1923. It was officially inaugurated in 1976. It is one of its ex-voto treasures. The memorial chapel, built in 1878, contains the works, of which I do not know the names of the sculptors, recovered during the demolition of the old church which had been rebuilt in 1788. his link gives a lot of information " À la gloire de sainte Anne ". Best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you, but why 20th? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I thought it was useful to specify the reconstruction of the cathedral in the twentieth century. I cross out this reference. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Just writing "20th" by itself doesn't specify anything; it's unclear. Moreover, in this case, it's downright misleading, as you mentioned above that the sculpture was recovered from the old church and it therefore predates the 20th century, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Anyway, I'll support the nomination as useful, although if you ever find out the name of the sculptor, please add it to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

•  OpposeT he crossed out 20 has nothing to do in the scope, it must be removed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

* Done 20th erasure, best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue miraculeuse de Ste Anne de la basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I still don't understand what "20th" means in this context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done 20th erasure , best regards--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christ de la Chapelle de l'Immaculée Conception in Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Pretty dark at review size but better if you click on it and in any case, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:43, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reproduction de la Pietà de Michel-Ange dans la Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• File:Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré - Intérieur 10.jpg is still best in scope, for the reasons I explained above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination I agree, thanks for your advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of Mary - Joachim and Ste Anne in the Chapel of the Immaculate Conception by Frédéric Doyon in Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 06:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of saints Ignace d'Antioche and Irénée de Lyon by Frédéric Doyon in Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 06:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresque Cyrille d'Alexandrie et Jean de Damas par Frédéric Doyon dans la crypte de la basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment OK, we've discussed this before, but in nominations of artworks, the format we've come up with is to use the original language and then an English translation. However, if you just want to use English, OK, but then it would be a Fresco of St. Cyril of Alexandria and St. John of Damascus. Or just put the English in parentheses. And again, it would be great if you could find out who the painter is. Is there anyone reachable at some kind of provincial or local office of culture or tourism during this time of pandemic who could answer these kinds of questions? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

• English and French being the languages of Canada, I opted for English, which is the most used. The official language of the province of Quebec being French, it is therefore logical to leave the title in French. Regarding the decoration of the chapel, during this pandemic period the site is closed until mid-February. However, I saw on this cultural site Patrimoine-culturel details on the artists who contributed to it; Marie-Anne Robineau de Bécancour (ex-voto) and Marius Dubois (arcades of the crypt), the groups of the workshops are those of Auguste Labouret, and the Fabrico house.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Great! Could you add the name of the sculptor to the scope and also to the description line on the file page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: This is a mural painting, whose name of the artist at the bottom left, at the enlargement we can read Frédéric. Perhaps it is Frédéric Doyon, who produced some large-format paintings for the Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré basilica, with Marius Dubois. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Question Is there a way to be sure? That sounds logical. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Indeed, this is Frédéric Doyon, painter from Canada, mentioned on the site Art, by the painter Frédéric. Located in Ste-Anne de Beaupré, Quebec "The Adoration of the Three Wise Men". I also downloaded my own photo of the fresco taken in the crypt File:Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré - Frédéric. adoration des rois mages.JPG, we find the artist's signature on those paintings. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:51, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support as useful, thanks. This does deviate from the format Archaeo has followed, but I don't feel like pushing things because I'm good with French. If anyone else wants to pursue this, they can. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The choir vault in Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good labeling, but strangely uncentered. File:Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Canada).jpg seems like the most accurate reflection of the actual shape of the view, but your style of perspective is the best way to show the choir vault, so if you carefully center the photo, it will be clearly best in scope and will have my support. Pour dire simplement, je dis que le perspectif que vouz utilisez est utile pour presenter ce scope, alors maintenez-le s'il vous plaît, mais je voudrais que vouz centriez le photo. Est-ce que c'est clair qu'est-ce que je demande? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:50, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Merci pour votre avis, j'ai recentré la photo et corrigé les erreurs de perspective. Cordialement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Merci pour vos efforts. Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nylanderia pygmaea .- Musée-galerie de l'Ambre (Vilnius).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

blurry image unusable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination I agree, IMO difficult to repare. Thanks for the advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amber pendant with fossilized insects.- Musée-galerie de l'Ambre (Vilnius).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose blurry image unusable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination I agree, IMO difficult to repare. Thanks for the advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:22, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orgue Casavant de la crypte dans la Basilique Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:57, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fresco of Sainte Famille (Holy family) by Marius Dubois, in Basilica of Sainte-Anne-de-Beaupré (Quebec).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support as useful, but it's probably good to mention the name of the chapel in the scope and definitely the name of the painter if you can find that information. (Also, small edit to the scope: "Virgin Mary" is capitalized in English.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Some problem: Image barelization which can be easily repaired and problems in the scope. Catholic iconography is normative: the exact term is sainte famille which appears in French, the rest of the scope must be in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Correction of the barization of the image and addition of the exact term `` Sainte Famille . Thanks for the advice.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on!

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaliningrad Amber Museum Amber cigarette holder "Pugdog" (1989)" , in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Scop issues corrected, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaliningrad Amber Museum "Amber jewelry box" , in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are two problems. The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. The framing of the image must be corrected, always remember that this image can be used in an article ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 Done Framing of the image and scop issues corrected, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaliningrad Amber Museum "Box an apple" , in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Useful. Amber and some kind of metal, right? Can the metal be specified? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: I downloaded this files which indicates the composition and the author of the box: bronze, amber, velvet, manual molding, inlay, author O. Badmayevs:

• 
• 

Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks. Maybe try an English description in addition to your French description on the file page, and add to the scope of the nomination that this was in a temporary exhibition, and then I'll be glad to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek:  Done an English description in addition to my French description on the file page, and add to the scope of the nomination that this was in a temporary exhibition, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 22:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you. Useful, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Scop issues corrected, best regards.----Pierre André ^(talk) 10:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaliningrad Amber Museum Amber cigarette holder (2002), in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Scop issues corrected, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaliningrad Amber Museum "Amber box, Konigsberg" by Reshetniak (1999), in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and valuable -- Spurzem (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Pierre André Leclercq, I guess an English-language scope should call this a Konigsberg box, not box Konigsberg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:25, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: I took the title of this work from this showcase  Done correction  Thank you. Objets en ambre des Mines de Kaliningrad --Pierre André ^(talk) 11:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Well, "Amber box, Konigsberg" with a comma would work because it would mean "amber box from Konigsberg" - the problem being that the city is now called Kaliningrad. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Scop issues corrected, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaliningrad Amber Museum Amber cigarette holder "Dragon" (1970) , in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The Wikipedia articles about this church in English and French don't mention the amber. Where are these objects kept? Are they displayed in the Sacristy, perhaps? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

* @Ikan Kekek: Wikipedia articles on this church do not mention amber, probably because it was a temporary exhibit that it was extended when I visited on June 10, 2015. There is only one mine of open-air amber in the eastern Baltic Sea located in the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad, at Iantarny. The exhibits came from this location, hence the subject of my photos. I found a source relating to this exhibition, Unique amber collection in exhibition Baltic Gold ”in Riga St. Peter's Church, should it be mentioned in the Wikipedia article in French. Best regards. Best regards..--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

• Understood. I'll look through this series soon, probably tomorrow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm thinking maybe "on temporary exhibit" should be added to the scope. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Clarification on the scope "temporary exhibition".  Thank you.. --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and a really nice piece. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose There are two problems. The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. The framing of the image must be corrected, always remember that this image can be used in an article ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done framing of the image and scop issues corrected, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaliningrad Amber Museum "Inlay" , in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It looks like this contains some materials other than amber. If I'm correct, it would be great if all the materials could be specified, if possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: This is a marquetry made with different minerals and amber which I have not noted the descriptions. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Understood, and I'm saying it would be nice to include the names of the other materials in the file description (not necessarily the nomination scope). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Judging by the photos of Photographs by Viktor Guseinov this marquetry is made with amber of different colors from the Kaliningrad Amber Combine Amber. I did not notice during the tempory exhibition the description of this surprising fish. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 23:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK, thanks for checking into that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Scop issues corrected, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kaliningrad Amber Museum "Amber Salt shaker" , in a temporary exhibit in Saint Peter church of Riga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. I don't know if we can call this a salt shaker, since it requires a spoon instead of being shaken, but I don't know what else it could be called ("salt container" is too general). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:21, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose The temporary exhibition site must not be within the scope which must, on the other hand, give the reference museum where the pieces can be seen; here Kaliningrad Amber Museum . The citation of the temporary exhibition must be mentioned only in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Scop issues corrected, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial to Soviet soldiers of the Great Patriotic War, Antakalnis Cemetery in Vilnius, by Juozas Burneika.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This is complicated, because there are three possible scopes here: (1) the entire monument, for which this photo is best in scope; (2) the statues plus the eternal flame, for which we have this; (3) the statues, for which File:Lithuania Vilnius Antakalnis Cemetery Red Army Heroes.jpg is best in scope. Also, I'd call this "Memorial to Soviet soldiers of the Great Patriotic War, Antakalnis Cemetery in Vilnius", which is close to the Google translation of the Russian title of the article about this memorial. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done OK for the precision of the scop in "Memorial to the Soviet soldiers of the Great Patriotic War, Antakalnis cemetery in Vilnius", in which I added the name of the sculptor Juozas Burneika. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. So I think I'm understanding correctly that including the "1941" sign, this is the entire monument and therefore useful as a depiction of the whole. We should also nominate File:Lithuania Vilnius Antakalnis Cemetery Red Army Heroes.jpg in the subscope of the statues of this monument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 Comment Thanks. Addition of the mention in the subscope of the statues of this monument. Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 23:01, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Pierre André Leclercq, what did you do to the scope? It's in poor English grammar now and doesn't really explain what we're looking at. You didn't like my advice? It's great to add the sculptor's name, but what was wrong with the scope I suggested? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

User:Ikan KekekI'm sorry I made a bad copy / paste! I have restored the scop you had formulated. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Now it's redundant. Should I fix it for you or can you get rid of the redundancy? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Comment I've temporarily withdrawn my supporting vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Comment To tell the truth, I do not understand the problem if you can get rid of the redundancy, I would probably understand better . Thank you best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Bonsoir @Ikan Kekek: , je maitrise mal l'angalis aussi je me permets de m'exprimer dans ma langue maternelle. Pour dire la vérité, je n'avais pas bien compris le problème qui subsistais dans le scop et le subscop. J'avais bien apprécié (et donc je l'ai rétablie) la version que vous m'aviez proposée, et je vous en remercie. Si vous estimez que des erreurs subsistent, c'est avec plaisir que j'accepterais leurs corrections afin de mieux les comprendre. Merci, bien cordialement à vous.--Pierre André ^(talk) 22:23, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support C'est bon maintenant et c'est vraiment une image utile. Merci, Pierre. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 10: Emperor Othon leaves his army, as he is followed by Guillaume des Barres by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment  Thank you. I added the details relating to the referent title of the stained glass window, and the names of the authors in the scope and date in the legend.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose Well but, it remains to correct the proportions only the ° 3 is correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done new image imported with corrected proportions, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Non, regarde les modifications pour celle-ci qui est maintenant corrigée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus:  Thank you., pour cette mise au point de la photo, je répare les autres photos proposées. Bien cordialement--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monument stained glass 1: Council of war between the allied armies against Philippe-Auguste before the battle of Bouvines by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment "Coalised" is not an English word. The word would be "coalesced", but the sentence doesn't make sense even then. Does this mean France is divided between armies allied against it or France is divided between different French armies? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: In fact, this stained-glass window represents the Council of War which was held in Valenciennes between the allies who shared the kingdom of Philippe-Auguste before the battle of Bouvines of 1214. The united coalition against the king Philippe Auguste of France, was composed Otto IV, King John of England, Count Ferrand of Flanders, Count Renaud of Boulogne, Duke Henry I of Brabant, Count William I of Holland, Duke Theobald I of Lorraine and Duke Henry III of Limburg. His goal was to overthrow the conquests made by Philip earlier in his reign. I have mondified the under scope to explain this. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks  Support best in scope, and please fix my attempt at a file description on the file page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done  Thank you. I added the details relating to the referent title of the stained glass window, and the names of the authors in the scope and date in the legend.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose Well but, it remains to correct the proportions only the ° 3 is correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done new image imported with corrected proportions, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

• C'est pire! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done effectivement, j'ai donc adapté l'image du vitrail 10 que tu as corrigée. bien cordialement --Pierre André ^(talk) 11:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 2 window: Mrg Garin, bishop of Senlis, alerts the king of the arrival of ennemies by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The stained-glass windows of St Pierre de Bouvines are classified as historical monuments. It should be pointed out, and give the referent title of the stained glass window, the name of the author in the scope and the date in the legend. There is a problem of proportion; the top circle must be round and the squares: squares. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done correction of proportions and details given: referent title of the stained glass, name of authors in the scope and the date in the legend. best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

• Well but, it remains to correct the proportions only the ° 3 is correct. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done new image imported with corrected proportions, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 11:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 3 window: Knights swear their fidelity to the king Philippe Auguste by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The stained-glass windows of St Pierre de Bouvines are classified as historical monuments. It should be pointed out, and give the referent title of the stained glass window, the name of the author in the scope and the date in the legend. There is a problem of proportion; the top circle must be round and the squares: squares. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done correction of proportions and details given: referent title of the stained glass, name of authors in the scope and the date in the legend. best regards.---Pierre André ^(talk) 10:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Next Commons Photographers meeting featuring large format photographer Ben Horne

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, March 20, at the usual time. As I mentioned during our last get-together, I'd like to invite external guests every now and then, given that it seems good to expand our view and learn something from someone outside our community.

Our first external guest, Ben Horne, will talk about large format wilderness photography, followed by a question-and-answer session. Ben is maybe one of best known contemporary large format photographers in the United States. On his excursions to national parks, he shoots 8×10 film and talks about his adventures on his YouTube channel which has attracted more than 48,000 followers so far. He is YouTube's first, and longest active landscape photography vlogger and I'm thrilled that he has agreed to join our next meeting and talk about his experiences.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

• Virtual Meeting on March 20, 2020

Also, don't forget to post your question(s) prior to the meeting on the following page in order to ensure a good and fruitful question-and-answer session:

• Questions for Ben

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 9: Saint-Pol endangers the Flemish army by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Proportion problem --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Corrections proportion and tilt, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 14 window: "capture of Ferrand, count of Flanders" by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 12 window: Stained glass inside St.Peter's church, in Bouvines, Nord, France: Saint-Pol endangers the Flemish army by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monument Stained glass 8 The Bishop of Beauvais Philippe de Dreux delivers the Count of Salisbury to Jean de Nivelles, lord of Bruges by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Ok with new correction --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 19 window:King Philippe Auguste frees his prisoners except Ferrand and Renaud by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment tilt left --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done correction tilt left.--Pierre André ^(talk) 16:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel (5).jpg

And also:

• File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel en2014 (10).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 11 window: St.Valéry comes to help Guillaume des Barres by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment dilated image: problem of proportion --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Done dilated image correction.--Pierre André ^(talk) 22:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

* Support Ok with good corrections --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historical monuments stained glass 20 window: The victorious army roams the countryside, Ferrand is the laughing stock of the peasants by Champigneulle Charles; Champigneulle Emmanuel; Fritel Pierre (1889, 1906) in Saint Pierre Church, Bouvines..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Saint-Firmin-le-Martyr, in Notre-Dame d'Amiens cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose This is not the right statue. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks for the review, I rectified the scop, it is indeed the statue which is in the chapel of Saint-Firmin-le-Martyr. Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maisons historiques du 17e siècle 55 à 57, Rue Motte (Amiens), quartier Saint-Leu Amiens.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment For the same house group this image is much better : Amiens France Buildings-in-Rue-Motte-01a.jpg. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree, although the background of this picture is slightly disturbing.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Since we're all agreed, perhaps it's time to withdraw the nomination? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination We all agree, so I withdraw my nomination. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose =>
declined. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aéroplane fictif dans la Maison de Jules Verne (Amiens).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 11:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tourelle de la Maison de Jules Verne Amiens (view from the south).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is the cylindrical tower a building unto itself, or is it part of one of the adjacent buildings? -- Jim Evans (talk) 23:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Jim Evans: Situated at the southwest corner of the courtyard facade, the cylindrical tower is a building unto itself, which originally serving all the floors of the main body. This photo shows the exterior view of Jules Verne's house arond 1894 File:La maison de Jules Verne vers 1894, vue extérieure.jpg. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope Nice -- Jim Evans (talk) 12:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

@Jim Evans: you have to sign your vote because the Bot every other time does not close the promotion well. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Africa 2021 Winners !

Dear Pierre André Leclercq

In the past, you contributed to the Wiki Loves Africa competition. You have another opportunity to create and submit beautiful photographs on the theme of "Health and Wellness" that could change how the world understands people and culture in your part of Africa. As with previous years, there are also many exciting national and international prizes.

For rules and information about how to participate, theme, or prizes click on Contribute to the Wiki Loves Africa photo contest or directly add picture from the button !

Warmest, Anthere, for the Wiki Loves Africa Team

Cher ou chère Pierre André Leclercq,
Au cours des années passées, vous avez participé au concours photographique Wiki Loves Africa. Vous avez à nouveau l'opportunité de proposer de fabuleuses illustrations sur le thème de "la santé et le bien-être", qui pourraient profondément modifier la façon dont le reste du monde voit l’Afrique et comprend ses habitants et ses coutumes. Bonus, comme lors des années précédentes, il y a plusieurs prix à la clé !

Pour plus d'informations, règles de participation, le thème ou les prix, cliquez sur Participer au concours Wiki Loves Africa ou téléversez des photos en cliquant sur le bouton !

Bien à vous, Anthere, pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouvaux Chapelle Notre-Dame des Malades PA00107761.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument historique Chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Malades de Mouvaux (view from S.E).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope as I said over at this other nomination, I think there's a good case to be made for either this one or File:Mouvaux, chapelle Notre-Dame-des-Malades en2019 (3).jpg. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  17:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Nicolas de Sainghin-en-Mélantois (view from S.O).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support it's better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille le Pont Napoléon en Janv 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:45, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument historique Tumulus à Sainghin-en-Mélantois (Nord) (North view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very helpful documentation and best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moulin d'Halluin et maison du Meunier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Scope is badly done: Historic monument does not have to be in the scope any more than the address, on the other hand the direction of the shot would be useful. But this image is too little different from the previous one: the advertised house is not clearly visible --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination I agree, Thanks for the advice. --Pierre André ^(talk) 11:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moulin d'Halluin Seen from N.W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Scope is badly done: Historic monument does not have to be in the scope any more than the address, on the other hand the direction of the shot would be useful. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Done scop corrected, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Hilaire d'Halluin facade from west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The base doesn't look rectilinear. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Done tilt correction, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 10:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Still clearly tilting on the right, and probably a bit on the left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Inclination correction on the right, and a bit on the left.Thanks for the review,--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I'm still not convinced the entire photo is rectilinear, but it's useful and best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musician Ndébéle at horn, Botshabelo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question I'm struggling with this one. Does the location matter and create a distinct scope? We have a bunch of these images, some better than others. The guy to the rear isn't using such an instrument. What makes this one more valued than say, File:Yanshantu traditional music group used as town announcers in Rimi Gado LGA in Kano state.jpg which is well-photographed, for the wider scope? Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment @Rodhullandemu: I think the location is important for this type of instrument, it creates a distinct staff. The decoration is typical of the artist Esther Mahlangu known for her contemporary, large-scale paintings in a geometric style referring to this Ndebele heritage. Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 11:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment The instrument is portable and could be played anywhere. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: While the instrument is portable although it is bulky. In addition, it can be played anywhere just like most musical instruments, but there remains a specific instrument for the music in South Africa and Zimbawe. Which explains why I offered it as a Valued image candidates. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 22:13, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment OK, I'm beginning to get it here. The musicians and the location together make this arguably valued. Fine. But the linked scope is not to either. There's a case to be made for creating a subcategory of both, Category:Musiciennes Ndebele, of which some could be Musical instruments made of horn, and that makes the scope defensible. That leaves whether the image of two standing musicians in portrait mode is more valuable than this nominated landscape mode, and I'll leave that with you to consider. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Done OK, I created the subcategory: Musicians Ndebele, hoping that makes the range defensible. Thank you for your details, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:42, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope I can accept the landscape view since the scope includes the horn. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Problème en VI

Kadriorg Palace, Plafond dans le grand hall.JPG

Cette nomination perturbe le fonctionnement du concours, je l'ai retirée matin. Si tu trouve la panne tu pourra la remettre en jeu. Cordialement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:51, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: merci pour ton information. Je vais tenter de reposter la photo, sous une nouvelle appellation. Bien cordialement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frescoed ceiling of Kadriorg Palace, Tallinn (Estonia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Unfortunate cut at the right but  Best in Scope, good colors and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Buidhe (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Armentières L'ancienne brasserie Motte Cordonnier (4).JPG

File:Armentières L'ancienne brasserie Motte Cordonnier (4).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside cross (1356) Croix en grés de Gruson (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful -- Spurzem (talk) 16:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancienne brasserie Motte-Cordonnier, Armentières.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
• Preliminary  Oppose because the scope doesn't make sense to me. A comma and then "France" in parentheses? The location is Armentières, Nord. I think that either the city name or the city and department should be in the scope, not the country in parentheses (it can be included without parentheses if you like). Also, what does "outside of the facade" mean? The facade is only an exterior, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:43, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Done @Ikan Kekek: changing the scope, thanks for your advice.- Best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support, useful. I felt it was missing a comma. Good nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Road bicycle racing Paris–Roubaix.- Carrefour de l'Arbre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancienne brasserie Motte-Cordonnier, Armentières.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
• Preliminary  Oppose because the scope doesn't make sense to me. A comma and then "France" in parentheses? The location is Armentières, Nord. I think that either the city name or the city and department should be in the scope, not the country in parentheses (it can be included without parentheses if you like). Also, what does "outside of the facade" mean? The facade is only an exterior, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:43, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Done @Ikan Kekek: changing the scope, thanks for your advice.- Best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support, useful. I felt it was missing a comma. Good nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Road bicycle racing Paris–Roubaix.- Carrefour de l'Arbre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Remains of religious statues charred in the fire in 1976 - Esquelbecq.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, once you fix the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I'll wait for you to fix the scope. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Done I hadn't noticed your comment. I think I corrected the scope. Thank you.--Pierre André ^(talk) 14:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Question You forget? "Category" shouldn't be visible. I corrected some of those for you; now you do it, please. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Done I modified the scop. Is this the right solution? Thank you. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

• This is OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Église Saint-Folquin d'Esquelbecq: Baptismal font.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This image would have more value if it were used in the church article dedicated to him .... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Done I've added this image in the church article dedicated to him. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
D.O.M. à la mémoire de Valentin de Pardieu, Esquelbecq.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and looks notable to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Table football, musée du jouet, Loon-Plage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Fun picture, could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cense de la Courte, Bouvines, façade from East side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Large square yard of Cense de la Courte, Bouvines.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Billard Nicolas, musée du jouet, Loon-Plage.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. It would be great to have an English description. If someone would like to work on one, have a look at this definition if you aren't sure what this game is (I wasn't). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:06, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree, Puff Billiards seems to be a French game (called Billard Nicolas), it has been around for many decades in Britain and Europe, too. By February of 1906, the Indianapolis Newswas noting that Margaret Carnegie Miller "was playing puff billiards successfully. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:09, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Board and pieces of Tiddlywinks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I'd support, but I'm wondering whether the scope should include "board and pieces"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree that the scope is more readable by including "board and pieces". Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deutscher Soldatenfriedhof Wambrechies.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brasserie Catry (Wambrechies) driveway and facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Good, but I think the format should be "driveway and facade", not just "front". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek:  Done format correction in "driveway and facade". Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 14:43, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:29, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Vosne-Romanée, East facade and bell tower, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
East facade of the Castel Domaine du Comte Liger-Belair, Vosne-Romanée, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose: Should this chateau be listed under monuments historiques de la France? If so, how can I find out about it? I would expect the to find this information either in its description, its Commons category or links to a relevant Wikipedia article (any language). Since none of the above give any information about the chateau apart from its location, this submission, IMO, fails the criteria "Is fully described on the image page". Martinvl (talk) 14:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC) Martinvl (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment @Martinvl: Why should this castle be a historical monument? The Vosne-Romanée winegrowers grow some of the most famous wines in Burgundy, this domain is mentioned on this English site: La Romanée. Regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:32, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Info @Pierre André Leclercq: Why is this a valued image? Is it because of the architectural importance the building depicted? Is it because of the quality of the wine produced in this domaine? What role does the building play in the domaine? The description does not give me any clues. May I point out that when I wrote my comments, this image was not linked to the site that you mentioned and at the moment I have to visit the sites where it is used to find out about it.

If you visit this image you will see the sort of description that I expected to see.

Objection removed after revision of description. Martinvl (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vendangeoir des moines de saint-Vivanti (Vosne-Romanée), (West side), France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Commarin, context of the portal, view from northeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is your scope in French or English? Maybe pick one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Done I translate the entire scope into English. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 20:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment OK, I think "17th-century building" is background that might belong in the file description and not part of the scope. The scope would be "Portal of Château de Commarin, view from northeast". We use the word château in English, by the way, and castle (note spelling) is not at all an exact translation, but names of buildings normally don't need translation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Done  Thank you. I added your correct remarks, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment this is close enough to the same view, isn't it? Please compare your photo to that one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment this only shows the portal, my photo situates it as a whole, moreover it is in color, and much more recent. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:27, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't think recency matters nor do I think black & white is much of an issue for this motif, but it seems like you don't really mean to nominate this in the scope of just the portal. So edit your scope to what you mean to show, perhaps by adding "context". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Done this gives a better readability of the photo, thanks, --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)--

•  Support in this scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View from North Toueur électrique de Pouilly-en-Auxois, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Interesting but difficult to understand at first glance. It would be necessary to give the direction of the shot and straighten the photo which leans.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Tilt correction, best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope and could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Oulan-Bator, The Blue Sky Hotel and Tower .- Sukhbaatar Square.jpg

File:Oulan-Bator, The Blue Sky Hotel and Tower .- Sukhbaatar Square.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ox1997cow (talk) 17:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
View from East La maison éclusière d'Escommes, Maconge, France..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spring of the fountain Saint-Chrysole, view from southeast, Verlinghem, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Île d'Aix.- Hôtel de ville ( Piso17).jpg

File:Île d'Aix.- Hôtel de ville ( Piso17).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portal of the Ferme des Templiers (Verlinghem), view from north-west, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:29, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:21, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southeast view of Maison Decanter de Steenwerck.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eeast view of Office du tourisme de Steenwerck.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Gargantuan user gallery

Hi Pierre - please either delete User:Pierre André Leclercq/gallery or split it into about 100 more normal-sized galleries, so that files in it can be viewed and edited without crashing computers. It is grossly over-sized at the moment. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi MPF, I'have delete my User:Pierre André Leclercq/gallery, but it seems to come back. I have divided it into full sized galleries by continent, and by themes. can you tell me the exact procedure? Thank you, Best regards- --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! Odd! I found it when it came up as a page included in Category:Colibri coruscans. I see it is no longer in that category, so something must have worked :-) MPF (talk) 21:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you MPF, I hope so, because this gallery has slowed down my pc for a long time.Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 21:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup! - MPF (talk) 21:54, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Farmhouse built in "L", view from south, Cassel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Beautiful image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 19:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferme du Mont des Récollets (Wouwenberghof) (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps tilted to the left? The roofs are not horizontal. --Nefronus 11:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the advice, correcting tilt to the left.--Pierre André Leclercq 14:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:15, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferme du Mont des Récollets (Wouwenberghof) (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 11:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
0-8-0T Henschel No.15968 (Brigadelok), in Brugelette, Belgique.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used. The picture was slightly tilted. I turned it about 12 degrees to the right. Do you agree? -- Spurzem (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Käthe Wohlfahrt Weihnachtsdorf in Rothenburg ob der Tauber, Auto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Fretin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Wayne's Cabin sign, Utah.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose That doesn't show the whole cabin (which needs to be identified as his cabin in his role in the movie, "She Wore a Yellow Ribbon"), and File:Nathan Brittles house.jpg is best in scope. "Door of the cabin" and "John Wayne's Cabin sign", which are possible scopes for this photo, don't seem like useful scopes to me, but someone might support a nomination in either of those scopes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

  @Ikan Kekek:  Done Thanks for your advice, I modified the scope, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I said I didn't think it would be a useful scope, though. But maybe. I'll cross out my opposing vote. Make an argument for why this shack deserves two scopes - for the shack and for the sign. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: This cabin deserves two scopes because this is the only photo that clearly shows John Wayne's name. In addition it is used by wikidata. Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I'll give this the benefit of the doubt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northside aspect of the Holy Trinity Monastery (Strâmba), Romania.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Westside aspect of the Iași Palace of Culture, Romania.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. I wish it were larger and cleaner, but at review size it is fine. it is used on many pages and is best in scope.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorax (talk • contribs) 01:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Again, this should be described as western exposure or view from the west. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:09, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A Symphony (1852), painting by Moritz von Schwind, in Neue Pinakothek, Munich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Barelisation, error of proportion; Moritz von Schwind - A Symphony - WGA21076.jpg is better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination @Archaeodontosaurus: Thanks for your advice, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:48, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stammtisch in Hofbräuhaus am Platzl, Munich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you for your opinion. Maybe Stammtisch is more suitable ? --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontaine de Guchen, illuminated at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I stand to be corrected, but I don't think we use "aspect" that way in English. I'd suggest a scope like "Fontaine de Guchen, viewed from the east", but maybe someone else will have a different suggestion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek:  Done Thanks for your advice. You're right, I didn't know how to define the scope.--Pierre André ^(talk) 20:46, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Great. Now, please help us: Which of the photos of the fountain are viewed from the east? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: The photos were taken from the small car park on the "Route de l'Arbizon" perpendicular to the "Route de la Vallée d'Aure" heading west towards Arbizon mount. In this photo File:Village de Guchen (3).jpg the statue looks East at sunrise, so it's viewed from the east, unless I'm mistaken. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks. That would seem to be a clearer view of the fountain inasmuch as details are easier to see in that light. Therefore, I recommend adding "night illumination" to your scope for this picture (maybe something like this: "Fontaine de Guchen, illuminated at night" and include "eastern view" if you believe a western view of the night illumination should be reserved as a future scope; otherwise, leave out the direction of view, since there's only one photo taken at night on Commons). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek:  Done Thanks for your advices. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 18:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

• There's a formatting problem, and I can't figure out right away how to fix it. Whenever it's fixed, I'll support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

• Fixed, so  Support useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:42, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 14:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison du Procureur (Guchen), façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 01:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hess, Peter von – The Entry of King Othon of Greece into Nauplia, (1835), in Neue Pinakothek, Munich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 14:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait de Catherine Dashkova, painting by Ludwig Philipp Tishbeyn in Kadriorg Art Museum, (18th-century).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apollo and the Muses (1826), by Heinrich Maria von Hess, in Neue Pinakothek, Munich.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful, best image of this painting with fram -- Spurzem (talk) 09:58, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 14:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port de Tallinn, painting by Alexey Bogolybov in Kadriorg Art Museum, 1853.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lintels in Ancizan, maison Modraia-Durant (1617).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Seems useful to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carrière de marbre Campan-Payolle view from D918.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pic Mailh d'Aulon, view from barns of Lurgues.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Courtaou de l'Auloueilh, view from barns of Lurgues.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:50, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Décours, Marchiennes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and in use. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Peugeot 403 Break, front and right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Jeanne-Henri (Wimereux), West side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château du Denacre (Wimille), view south east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope. I think a little perspective correction will improve the photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Done a small perspective correction. Thanks, best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 17:00, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa St Bernard (Wimereux), (view from Michel Hamiot dyke).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Seems useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vitrail de la licorne, collégiale Saint-Pierre d'Aire-sur-la-Lys.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose No information on this work in the caption. perspective aberration that is not corrected. Quality too low for VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination I agree, IMO difficult to repare. Thanks for the advice, best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:36, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa La Goélette (Wimereux), (view from Michel Hamiot dyke).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is only the bluish building the villa? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Indeed it is about this villa, I resized the photo for a better readability. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaque funéraire de Marguerite du Petit Rieu, Collégiale Saint-Pierre d'Aire-sur-la-Lys.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Can you say anything about Marguerite du Petit Rieu? Also, your English-language description is not sufficient, though I can help with that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Marguerite du Petit-Rieu à la Vierge, Damoiselle de Pascau, was the wife of one of the lords of Ohlain, in the 15th century. She would have been related to an old family of the French and Belgian nobility, attested by the coats of arms of Berghes-Saint-Winock family, located under the slab referenced to the French furniture heritage, Base Palissy (PM62000022). Description of the epigraph. Your help will be welcome,  Thank you.. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Thank you. I'll support on the basis of notability, but please add that description to the file page or at least add that link and say it contains information about the deceased. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:44, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:25, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Collégiale Saint-Pierre d'Aire-sur-la-Lys, 1ère Station du Chemin de Croix: Jésus est condamné à être crucifié, by Magnard (1851).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 15:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa La Malouine (Wimereux), rue du Capitaine-Ferber.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose A good part of it is missing. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination I agree, thanks for the advice. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Riga.-SwedBank Tower and vanšu bridge (1).JPG

File:Riga.-SwedBank Tower and vanšu bridge (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Riga.-SwedBank Tower and vanšu bridge (2).JPG

File:Riga.-SwedBank Tower and vanšu bridge (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Collégiale Saint-Pierre d'Aire-sur-la-Lys, 2ème Station du Chemin de Croix: Jésus est chargé de sa croix, by Magnard (1851).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment No information on this work in the caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done I added some information in the caption, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:56, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

 Comment The material, the author, the year? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Bishop Scott, who was parish priest of Saint-Pierre from 1829 to 1887, had the entire church painted and decorated between 1832 and 1868, under the authority of the architect Magnard, the Stations of the Cross was installed in 1851. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope Dommage que ce chemin de croix ne soit pas utilisé dans l'article de la Collégiale --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Thank you. j'ai donc rajouté quelques lignes dans l'article de la Collégiale. Bien cordialement --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:16, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jacques-le-Majeur-et-Saint-Ignace d'Aire-sur-la-Lys, West side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Collégiale Saint-Pierre d'Aire-sur-la-Lys, 5ème Station du Chemin de Croix: Simon de Cyrène aide Jésus à porter sa croix, by Magnard (1851).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Collégiale Saint-Pierre d'Aire-sur-la-Lys, 3ème Station du Chemin de Croix: Jésus tombe pour la première fois sous le poids de la croix, , by Magnard (1851).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1972–74 Dodge Challenger, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Unrealistic distortion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination thank you for your opinion, I have no luck with my photos taken from low angle . Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dodge Charger (B-body; 1971-1974), front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Unrealistic distortion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination thank you for your opinion, I have no luck with my photos taken from low angle . Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument de la Clairon (Condé-sur-l'Escaut), sculpture by Henri Gauquié (1904).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is missing: the caption in English and the name of the sculptor, in the captions or in {{creator}} form. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyramide de Fontenoy (Cysoing), sculpture by Nicolas Desmoulain (1750).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Villa Saint-Florent ( Bray-Dunes), view from Digue de Mer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, even without an angle of view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Géry de Damousies.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The century is part of the file description, not the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Done I thus remove the century which is in the description of the file. Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks. I guess it is most useful as a picture of the whole church, but I like this closer, more detailed view better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ferme d'Aigremont (Ennevelin), West side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of King David on the porch of Oxelaëre St Martin's church..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eglise Saint Martin d'Oxelaëre, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Relief of Ste Cecile on the porch of Oxelaëre St Martin's church..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moulin le Briez (Gravelines), East side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Willibrord de Gravelines, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 12:22, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aire-sur-la-Lys Collégiale Saint-Pierre chemin de croix (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The original has some blemishes. The photograph captures it faithfully. Good quality. --Tagooty 02:26, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moritz von Schwind - A Symphony.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Barge from 1950 Biloute Fondue, on Lys River..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:18, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Plan-relief d'Ypres

Salut,

Magnifique boulot pour les photos détaillées de plan-reliefs, ça m'aide énormément pour travailler sur les fortifications des anciens Pays-Bas. Est-ce que par hasard tu aurais des photos de celui d'Ypres ?

Amicalement, Arflhn (talk) 16:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

• @Arflhn: merci pour ton sympathique commentaire. J'ai effectivement pris quelques photos d'Ypres, qui ont été intégrées dans cette Category:Plans-relief of Ypres. Bon courage pour ton boulot relatif aux fortifications des Pays-Bas. Amicalement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:10, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jardin de la Liberté à Gravelines, Parterre circulaire.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and obviously useful image; but the CAs in the branches should be removed. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enclosure of free plantations in botanical garden of Tourcoing..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is impossible to reduce the botanical garden of Tourcoing to a simple photo. There are modern gardens; a French-style garden, a wood, greenhouses, free plantings ... we must reduce the scope to what is shown. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Info Scope reduced to what is shown on the photo, the enclosure of free plantations, in the botanical garden of Tourcoing. Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 21:09, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Becque de Neuville, in Halluin, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This looks like a ditch. Is it notable? Also, the category is a mess. No Wikidata ID found, red linked category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

• •  Info The Becque de Neuville (9,1 km), is a Franco-Belgian watercourse whose watershed, a tributary of the Lys and therefore a sub-tributary of the Scheldt, covers 3.1 km2. I made some corrections in the category and I've added Wikidata ID link. Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I read the fr.wikipedia article. I think the notability of this watercourse is a little tenuous, but because of the existence of that article, it's a useful photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxelaëre le porche en2018 l'église Saint-Martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction is needed (Barrel distortion). --F. Riedelio 15:28, 27 July 2021 (UTC)  Done correction distorsion ( - 0,01), Thanks for the advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 08:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aire-sur-la-Lys Collégiale Saint-Pierre chemin de croix (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus and exposure is good. Some of the vertical white lines appear to be JPG artefacts. Eg. along the chin of the seated person and in the soldier standing on the left. I am unable to judge. Other opinions? --Tagooty 02:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Some blurred areas but I don't know if its the object or done afterwards. Consider always save and upload as png. Set your camera (if possible) to save in 100% jpg or png (not many can). Save to png direct from the "first" jpg, this limits the destruction of an image as much as possible. --Goran tek-en 19:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle funéraire des Comtes d'Hespel, Salomé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oxelaëre.- Porche de l église Saint-Martin, relief Roi David.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs on the top are quite noticeable, could they be removed? --Nefronus 18:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)  Done a better crop. Thanks for the advice. --Pierre André Leclercq 22:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 21:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blockhaus de Villeneuve d'Ascq, East side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fort de Mons, Mons-en-Barœul, West side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Léon Olivier looms, (1910), in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dewaele-Schotte looms, (1910), in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pinacol looms (1992) , in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ribbon looms (1884), in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of Sainte Hiltrude Liessies.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Sainte Hiltrude de Liessies, view from northwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ancet-Fayolle Looms, in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. But why is there no Wikidata ID for Category:Ancet-Fayolle Looms? Could you fix that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Lambert Time Recorder, in Manufacture des Flandres.- Roubaix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question You are calling this "ancient"; how old is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Question Can the perspective be corrected? The clock face in the picture is oval, but it should be circular. -- Spurzem (talk) 07:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: In 1907, Arthur Lambert, clockmaker and jeweler from Valenciennes in the North, patented a sheared card recorder. This factory time clock is dated about 1920. At the end of the great war, Arthur Lambert with his nephew M. Caron developed the mechanisms of time clocks. Best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment @Spurzem:  Done correction of perspective .The clock face in the picture is now circular.. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:22, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment 1907 may be "ancien" in French, but it's nowhere remotely close to "ancient" in English. Ancient would be maybe 1,500 years ago. We speak of ancient Greece, ancient Rome, ancient Egypt, ancient China and so forth, and most of the time, we're talking about times BC and maybe up to some point in the first millennium AD (like AD 500, maybe 600 or so). Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:29, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment I misspoke the appropriate term would be "Old Lambert Time Recorder", so I am correcting, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lijstermolen, Westouter, (1801), view from West side, Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Left tilt, the picture could be reset right. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done correction left tilt, picture reset right, (and better frame). Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:41, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbaye de Liessies, besogné des Albums de Croÿ (1598).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective correction necessary. In the table the perspective is correct.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done perspective correction. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:17, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Laurent de Merris, Front..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moulin à vent d'Hofland, post mill in Houtkerque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 15:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château Lambrecht, view from southeast, Montigny-en-Ostrevent.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and quite a nice building. Maybe "façade" is a sufficient description, unless you think different views merit their own scopes (maybe they do). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pigeonnier de Rieulay, view from east side, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful an used; but the perspective should be corrected. -- Spurzem (talk) 10:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done correction perspective 0,15,  Thank you., --Pierre André ^(talk) 20:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
École de Musique (Roncq), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Annexe-Mairie (Roncq), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Avec correction de la balance des blancs : tes images sont toutes vert-cyanosé, c'est facile à corriger. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Thank you. pour la correction de la balance des blancs. Bien cordialement.--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Saint-Jans-Cappel, South east east side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:30, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moulin de Vertain, view from north, Templeuve-en-Pévèle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ascq brasserie Lecocq Terrel, Torck, puis Minoterie Dubus, view from northwest, Villeneuve d'Ascq.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble portant enseigne Au Coq Estaminet (Steenvoorde).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Clearly best in scope, but I don't think the direction of view is needed for the scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:49, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done deleted direction. Best regards.--Pierre André ^(talk) 10:55, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support as useful, but perhaps the scope should be in English. What do you think, User:Archaeodontosaurus? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment For the short scope, it's easy; but for long scopes this can reach two lines of text. This is true for certain titles of tables which are excessively long. It is necessary that the scopes have an English translation, but I think it would be easy to require it at least in the caption. In this case, there is indeed an English translation which leaves no doubt about the scope. Generally speaking, we cannot vote favorably for a scope that we do not understand. It is up to the proponent to make the scope as clear as possible. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment Mais en tout cas, je comprends ce scope. Merci pour ta reponse! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Forges d'Hondschoote (Musée de plein air), view from east side, Villeneuve d'Ascq (France).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Ok with corrections --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chaumière de Killem (Musée de plein air), Villeneuve d'Ascq (XVIII e siècle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment A piece of the chimney is missing, there is a left tilt and the white balance is bad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done corrections follow up on the comments made. Perhaps this one File:Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air 2bis Chaumière de Killem.jpg is better? Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 15:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK now. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Menhir dit Le Gros Caillou ou Grès Montfort (Vendegies-sur-Écaillon), view from southeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Indeed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trouée d'Arenberg, Dréve des boules d'Herin, Wallers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mare à Goriaux, view from Terril n° 171, Fosse Arenberg, Wallers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jardin de la Comtesse, in Castle of Robersart's Park, Wambrechies.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There is a scope problem. The Parc du Château de Robersart is very extensive and cannot be reduced to a single image which shows part of the Jardin de la Comtesse which itself is included in the Parc du Château de Robersart. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done Fixed the range issue with the Robersart Castle Park by specifying that it is part of the Jardins de la Comtesse. It is disturbing that this name also designates the specialist in wicker picnic basket. This 17th century garden was the garden of the Countess of Robersart. Best regards,--Pierre André ^(talk) 09:46, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support The scope must be the expression of what is present in the image. Now it's good. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Distillerie Claeyssens, view from north-east, Wambrechies.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint Lambert, Wattignies, view from north-west,.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment geocoding problem --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done correction geocoding. Thanks for the advice, --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Croix de Fléquières (Wattignies), east side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old earthenware factory (Wandignies-Hamage), view from north side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-la-Salette du Doulieu, view from south side,.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mécanisme du moulin de Riele, 18th-century windmill in Wormhout.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Interesting and useful (but very red and yellow) -- Spurzem (talk) 17:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abbaye Saint-Sauveur de Ham, from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minoterie des Invalides (Aire-sur-la-Lys), view from North.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Immeuble, 42 Grand'Place (Arras), view from east side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
‎Portal of the house, 9 place de Ancien Rivage d'Arras., western exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment It is the part registered with the historical monuments which is put in swallower very well, but it lacks the English caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Done I added the English caption: "Portal of the..." , best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Comines sur le grand Perne (3).jpg

File:Comines sur le grand Perne (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjp24 (talk) 02:15, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Quesnoy-sur-Deûle - le grand Perne (19).jpg

File:Quesnoy-sur-Deûle - le grand Perne (19).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjp24 (talk) 02:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Saint-Nicolas, Information sur l'armistice.jpg

File:Saint-Nicolas, Information sur l'armistice.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cjp24 (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
‎Feudal moat of Ochtezeele, from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The English word you're looking for in these nominations is "moat". "Mound" is very different. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Thank you. thank you for this clarification, I changed the word. Best regards, --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
‎Building n° 35 Grand'Place (Arras), western exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful image. But the building should be brightened. Spurzem (talk) 11:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lime kilns in Antoing, from the west, Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old lime kilns Ratiau (Antoing), Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Tilt gauche à corriger --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Done correction tilt, best regards. --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Support OK now. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Soufflet-Leblond lime kilns office (Antoing), Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port de plaisance d’Haverskerque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steenbakkerssite (Ploegsteert), Belgium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cadensia (ship, 1915).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Africa 2021 Winners !

The Wiki Loves Africa 2021 photographic contest is officially closed. Thank you all for your participation !

This year, the photographic competition has resulted in an amazing 8,319 image uploads to Commons around the theme Health and Wellness.
International winners have been announced !!! Check it out on c:Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2021/Winners. Congratulations to winners and all those who participated and organized events. Please follow us on Facebook to know more and stay informed next year.

Warmest,

Anthere for the Wiki Loves Africa Team

Le concours Wiki Loves Africa 2021 est officiellement fermé. Merci d'avoir participé !
Cette année, le concours photo Wiki Loves Africa 2021 a permis l'ajout de 8319 photos à Wikimedia Commons sur le thème Santé et Bien-être, une participation en très forte augmentation par rapport aux années précédentes.
Les gagnants ont été annoncés !!! Voir tous les résultats sur c:Commons:Wiki Loves Africa 2021/Winners. Félicitations aux gagnants mais aussi à tous les participants ainsi qu'aux organisateurs d'évènements.
Suivez nos actualités sur Facebook pour en savoir plus et être informés du prochain concours.

Anthere pour l'équipe Wiki Loves Africa.

لقد تم رسميا إختتام مسابقة التصوير الفوتوغرافي ويكي تهوى إفريقيا 2021. شكرا لكم على مشاركتكم !

في هذا العام ، أسفرت مسابقة التصوير الفوتوغرافي عن تحميلات مذهلة للصور إلى كومنز بلغ عددها 8319 حول موضوع الصحة و العافية.

تم الإعلان عن الفائزين الدوليين !!! شاهد ذلك على كومنز: ويكي تهوى إفريقيا 2021 / الفائزين. تهانينا للفائزين و لجميع من شاركوا في الفعاليات و أسهموا في تنظيمها. يرجى متابعتنا على فيسبوك لمعرفة المزيد من الأخبار و للبقاء على اطلاع للسنة المقبلة.

تحياتنا،

أنتير من فريق ويكي تهوى إفريقيا

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le Tréport.-église Saint-Jacques PA00101069 en2021 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Notre-Dame-et-Saint-Laurent d'Eu en2021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Notre-Dame-et-Saint-Laurent d'Eu en2021 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Man praying", anonymous 17th-century sculpture, Collegiate Church of Notre-Dame and Saint-Laurent, Eu, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think you mean 17th-century of man praying, but wouldn't the usual format be something like "Man praying, anonymous 17th-century sculpture, in..."? And I'm presuming the statue is anonymous because you didn't mention the artist. If you know the name of the artist, include that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

• Correction  Done This is a 17th century statue of a "Man praying", an anonymous 17th century sculpture, made by an artist, not listed in the Mérimée database of historical monuments. --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Support I'll call this useful, but it's definitely not a closeup of that statue alone, so I'm not sure about the scope. I made some small edits to your scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Thank you. for the small changes to the scope,--Pierre André ^(talk) 08:28, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reliquary of St Laurence O'Toole, Eu, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Small error in the scope: it is a reliquary and not a relic, as we can see the reliquary is empty. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Done correction, thanks for the review, --Pierre André ^(talk) 09:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Ault Casino municipal 4, actuellement salle des fêtes.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ault Casino municipal 4, actuellement salle des fêtes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some dust spots. --Poco a poco 18:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)  Done removal of dust specks.--Pierre André Leclercq 21:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Ok, btw, the detail is just over the bar IMHO --Poco a poco 06:44, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ault Chalet Marie Pierre et maison des lutins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO disturbing elements in the foreground. And technical: CAs and improvable sharpness. --XRay 04:52, 21 September 2021 (UTC)  Done Removed disturbing elements in the foreground and improvable sharpness. Thanks for your advice--Pierre André Leclercq 08:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Now the resolution is low, but I think, it's acceptable. --XRay 18:07, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ault Eglise Saint-Pierre PA00116084 (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Vertical perspective correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 07:39, 17 September 2021 (UTC)  Done Vertical perspective correction, thanks for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 22:19, 22 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base de lancement de V1 du bois des Huit-Rues en2021 (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morbecque.- L'église saint Firmin PA00107758 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morbecque.- L'église saint Firmin PA00107758 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are several dust spots that should be removed. --Carsten Steger 05:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)  Done Removal some several dust spots.Thanks for your advice.--Pierre André Leclercq 09:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 11:01, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base de lancement de V1 du bois des Huit-Rues en2021 (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Base de lancement de V1 du bois des Huit-Rues en2021 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 15:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Ault Casino municipal 4, actuellement salle des fêtes.jpg

File:Ault Casino municipal 4, actuellement salle des fêtes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ArkéoTopia (talk) 11:20, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Ault, Maison dite L'Atelier.jpg

File:Ault, Maison dite L'Atelier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ArkéoTopia (talk) 17:16, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers meeting on October 30th

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm happy to invite you to our next virtual meeting next Saturday,  October 30. This time, our colleagues User:Dey.sandip from India and User:Ermell from Germany will talk about their work.

If you're interested in joining this meeting, please sign up on the page below:

• 5th virtual meeting of the Commons Photographers User Group

I'm very much looking forward to this event and I hope you'll be able to join.

All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers User Group: first board election

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

In preparation of the first board election of our group, I invite you to take a look at the following page:

• Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2021

and provide feedback. I've listed a number of positions for our first board and I've also outlined a possible timeline for the elections. The current plan is to open the self-nomination process up on November 15 and then have the election start on December 1.

I'm super excited to get this going and I'm very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.

I hope you're safe and well, and I wish you all the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bailleul sur le vieux chemin de Lille.jpg

Copyright status: File:Bailleul sur le vieux chemin de Lille.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bailleul sur le vieux chemin de Lille.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons Photographers elections: self-nomination phase is open

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The self-nomination phase for the first board election of our group is open as of today. If you'd like to take on a more active role and take our user group to the next level, please consider running for one of the open positions. Please check out the Board Election 2021 page for more details.

I hope you, your family, and your friends are doing well. All the best! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@Frank Schulenburg: Hi, It is with pleasure that I would like to have a more active role in our user group. However, do not have sufficient command of English, and it would be difficult for me to play an effective role on the Board of Directors. However, it is with pleasure that I would participate in local initiatives that could be driven by the group. Hope you are in good health, as well as your family and friends. Best regards --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:49, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Board election: voting is open!

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

The voting phase for our group's board election starts today. Please consider casting your vote. Voting ends on December 17.

I wish you all the best for the rest of the year 2021. Stay safe and healthy! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:03, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Pierre André Leclercq! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)