User talk:Velvet

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Velvet!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix KFC bd gambetta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you perspective correct it please? --Mike Peel 08:48, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you for your review. Of course, I could. But the image really wouldn't work. In this particular case, it's meant to be seen as it is.--Velvet 18:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Velvet: In this case I think it's necessary, sorry, you have plenty of space in the photo to be able to do the perspective correction. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here it is. In my opinion, it would be worth discussing which version is better.--Velvet 10:43, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I prefer with perspective correction. --Sebring12Hrs 12:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine jardin des geants fontaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine jardin des geants allee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roubaix vue site OVHcloud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment A sort of bluish tint seems a bit awkward, especially in the shadow, on the road. Additionally, for remote buildings, it seems that the sharpening process does not work well. --Sebring12Hrs 12:45, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. New version, a bit warmer + no sharpening, uploaded. --Velvet 09:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's better now, thanks. --Sebring12Hrs 16:53, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 126 128 bd victor hugo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 54 56 bd JB Lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille cite pecqueur 18 rue arago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:59, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille brasserie des flandres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vue parc JB lebas ombre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille la malterie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:20, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Place Barthélemy Dorez houx.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille immeuble 104 108 bd de Metz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:11, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Comines maison patrimoine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 12:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Comines 210 chemin warneton bas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 22:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Place Barthélemy Dorez 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont brasseries houllieres face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont l'abreuvoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Parsa 2au 10:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont eglise saint symphorien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:33, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warneton blockhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont briqueterie Vandermersch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:57, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warneton mare route de quesnoy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont peniche jasi II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deulemont residence rue de l'hospice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 23:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warneton vue lys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq EMDE pave strategique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:13, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq americana rue du port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille Place Barthélemy Dorez 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq ferme rue albert bailly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq ferme aux oies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq sentier rue du fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq rond point molinel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:30, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 61 77 bd de strasbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux bat ind bd de la marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux restaurant rue de roubaix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 12:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux groupe scolaire aubrac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 08:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux chateau eau rue des ecoles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:28, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouvaux 77 rue franklin roosevelt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 31 av de flandre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Croix residence flandre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:37, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq rond point pave strategique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 21:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 35 33 av de flandre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 55 av de flandre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcq chemin prive rue albert bailly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres immeuble square JB lebas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres la laborieuse entree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres bouchees doubles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 16 8 rue colbert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:57, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal av de la marne voie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres rue marle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 41 43 av de flandre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys chemin rue freres mahieu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark, but Good quality. --Cayambe 09:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasquehal 35 av de la marne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys pont paul harris 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:12, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys parterre rue armentieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys fort mahieu 1319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:58, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys chemin bord de lys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:05, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres immeubles av paul harris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys pont voie ferree graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys pont paul harris 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys carrefour rue armentieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys rue des jardiniers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres rond point harris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erquinghem lys entrepot chem bas ducrocq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bat universite catholique de lille bd vauban.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 121 quai de l'ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 83 75 rue winston churchill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille portique ports de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille quai hegel peniche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laitche 08:34, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille pont leon jouhaux graffiti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 112 quai de l'ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille vestige pont de canteleu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille teinturerie montpellier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:51, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux 2 16 rue des ecoles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux rails pylone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)--
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chereng rue de Willems champ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 06:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)--
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille portique port de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 73 Quai de l'Ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:26, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 47 rue solferino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 1 5 rue hegel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chereng 33 rue de Willems.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tressin 7 route nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chereng chemin des ecluses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tressin 61 63 rue marechal leclerc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tressin 23 route nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tressin eglise saint pierre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux gare face.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Svetlov Artem 16:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lille cite administrative rue duez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lille vue cite administrative.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 187 189 rue des fusilles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 10:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tressin ancienne gare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --BigDom 06:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 9 13 rue de cambrai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chereng 8 rue de tressin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 12:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille centre telephone inter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille friche st sauveur rue maubeuge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem 28 rue de l'eglise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 12:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem 18 22 rue poincare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very good quality. --Nikride 12:55, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tressin rue du beausejour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 17:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem allee des saules.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem eglise st vaast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem 8 rue d'ennetieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem zone du grand but.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is this supposed to show the commercial area in the background (in that case you should crop a part of the field away) or the field? --Plozessor 06:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Plozessor, thank you for your review. The image is supposed to show both. One of the characteristics of the Grand But area is that it is an island of urbanisation in the middle of fields... --Velvet 07:58, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok! --Plozessor 11:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem rue poincare vente auto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem salle gesquiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capinghem la guinguette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 17:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ennetieres cite des broux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ennetieres 17 19 rue st martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 18 20 rue des fusilles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 19:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 2 6 rue alfred de musset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille eglise ND visitation lomme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 54 56 rue marcel henaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 34 40 rue marcel henaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 542 552 av de dunkerque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 08:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambersart 346 av de dunkerque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme cimetiere bourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 660 664 av de Dunkerque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 934 av dunkerque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 58 60 rue marcel henaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme winckelmans.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme maison des enfants.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille friche st sauveur av hoover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems oversharpened. --MB-one 16:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thank you for your review. New version uploaded. --Velvet 11:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better --MB-one 21:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme cour godart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hellemmes ecole jean jaures.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hellemmes 219 233 rue faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hellemmes 43 45 rue raspail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille piscine max dormoy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille lomme 690 700 av dunkerque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 58 chemin des chaumieres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 08:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 21 rue jules guesde concessions.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 237 243 rue jules guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 211 213 rue jules guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 09:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ennetieres echangeur M652 min.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 325 339 rue jules guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA 249 251 rue jules guesde.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA lac du chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --IM3847 07:56, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA chateau de flers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 7 19 rue de comines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA rampe av du pont de bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 17:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres place jules guesde maisons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 53 rue du bas chemin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres rue de l'avenir banc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres 29 rue abbe doudermy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres rue du bas chemin garde barriere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres rue de l'epargne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres 389 rte nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armentieres square victor hugo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:59, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres caserne douanes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres 393 397 rte nationale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:55, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres place birchington.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres cour constantine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 12:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres 2 12 rue matisse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 16:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres 26 34 rue duguay trouin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle armentieres poste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houplines rang 1 sentier de lille.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houpline chemin courtembut blockhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houplines sentier de lille pylone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chapelle armentieres 393 397 rte nationale.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chapelle armentieres 393 397 rte nationale.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes 5 rue faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes 11 13 rue faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes 23 rue faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes 17 19 rue faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes 61 rue pierre semard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes vue eglise st pierre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes 116 118 rue faidherbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houplines pont M945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes la pichotte bar tabac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes residence de maugre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes rue eugene wattel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 11:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 13 rue jean prouve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes 2 20 av de l'amitie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille av denis cordonnier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 11:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 32 rue de maubeuge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 12:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes 14 place JB Hennion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 84 rue de trevise usine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 08:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue de cambrai mur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille bd carnot arbre voyageur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 3 place richebe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille noble tour rue georges lefebvre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille rue nationale armee salut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes chemin voie ferree champ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux rue des chartreux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille hotel avelin twizy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes residence du cornet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA pavillon de chasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai ferme des chartreux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille friche st sauveur deboisee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes vue depuis rue pierre semard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santes train chemin voitou.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux allee st calixte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VdA blockhaus parc du heron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille ptit quinquin desrousseau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux imperator fumoir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux eglise saint martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux poilu place gen de gaulle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin 24 rue du quennelet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baisieux tissage baisieux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin 104 rue du moulin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin 43 grand rue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin 749 751 rue louis carette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 07:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin 130 grand rue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin chemin du quennelet pave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 09:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin eglise Saint-Amand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin cimetiere allee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 06:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin rue du moulin vue A27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 08:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camphin-en-pevele mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai rue de creplaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 06:49, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La madeleine 85 av joffre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 18:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai rue jambe de bois panneau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]