User talk:PierreSelim/Archives/2

; Archives
(2009/05 - 2011/07); (2012/05 - 2012/11); (2013/04 - 2014/06); (2015/09 - 2016/02); (2016/07 - 2016/11); (2017/05 - 2017/??);	(2011/07 - 2012/05); (2012/11 - 2013/04); (2014/06 - 2015/09); (2016/02 - 2016/07); (2016/11 - 2017/05); ;

I will often respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.
If I wrote on your page, I am watching it, so replying there is probably best.

QI[edit]

Bonjour Pierre, Désolé de prendre ainsi contact avec toi, mais nous aurons j'espère que nous aurons d'autres occasions de nous rencontrer. Tu as placé en QI "une abeille sur une chardon". Sa ne devrait pas passer car il faut le nom de l'abeille et celui du chardon... Bien cordialement --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopital de la Grave et Pont Saint-Pierre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I am not entirely convinced about the composition but I think the quality is sufficient for Qi. --Ankara 15:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
CommentGeolocation would be welcome --Archaeodontosaurus 08:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC) Comment it's Done --PierreSelim 17:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clocher Basilique Saint Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice --Taxiarchos228 08:03, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balcony salle des illustres on Cour Henri IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit underexposed, but good enough for QI. Much better than previous.--Jebulon 13:47, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pediment of Capitole de Toulouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me, bat a bit of perspective distortion--Lmbuga 08:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hop[edit]

	The Fabulous Facing Left barnstar
	Because you Get It™. Jean-Fred (talk) 18:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Projet Phoebus[edit]

Pierre, as-tu l’envie de faire un peu de nature morte ? Œuf, papillons, silex taillés etc… --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

J'en ai pas encore faite mais cela peut-être très sympa. Si il faut aller prendre des photos pour le projet Phoebus, je suis partant à fond, j'apprendrais à faire des natures mortes pour l'occasion (donc c'est cool). PierreSelim (talk) 08:31, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Félicitation pour ta promotion COMMONS. Tu es aussi promû dans le projet Phoebus. Je ferai un Email pour de donner quelques explications. Mais le mieux serait que je te retrouve au Muséum (visite, et rencontre des conservateurs)… Tu peux déjà regarder ce qui est en cours sur la page Muséum de Toulouse de COMMONS. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Jérôme in Toulouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

image renaming[edit]

Hello! Thank you so much for renaming File:UChicago pole vault.jpg. :) Cheers, Ragettho (talk) 23:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue sur le fronton du Capitole de Toulouse (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good AleXXw 19:00, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robertville - Château de Reinhardstein.jpg[edit]

Pierre,

Merci pour le renommage rapide du fichier susmentionné

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue sur le fronton du Capitole de Toulouse (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes. Somme categories added.--Jebulon 00:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statues sur le fronton du Capitole de Toulouse 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice sharpness and light. However, the description is not complete enough in the file page. I've added some categories, then this pretty picture is more valued in "Commons".--Jebulon 17:00, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justice de trois quart face sur le fronton du Capitole de Toulouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes!--Jebulon 23:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

.

File:CafeExcelsior.JPG[edit]

File:CafeExcelsior.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Léna (talk) 21:21, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:L'Excelsior_à_Nancy.JPG[edit]

File:L'Excelsior_à_Nancy.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Léna (talk) 21:22, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, PierreSelim/Archives!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:27, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pompiers pour une alerte au gaz rue Saint-Rome 01.jpg was uncategorized on 13 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:27, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Pont-Neuf de Toulouse vue du quai Lombard.jpg was uncategorized on 22 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:36, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Eglise Saint-Pierre des Chartreux - Coupole 02.jpg was uncategorized on 25 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Eglise Saint-Pierre des Chartreux - Coupole 01.jpg was uncategorized on 25 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:42, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ecluse Saint-Pierre à Toulouse.jpg was uncategorized on 26 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:53, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alice castello municipio.jpg[edit]

Tanks a lot for renaming! --F Ceragioli (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File identification Viola kitaibeliana EnfoqueFlor 2011-4-02 CampodeCalatrava.jpg[edit]

Hi, I didn't renamed the file, because I have a doubt on identification are you sure it's a Viola arvensis and I would have said it's a Viola_tricolor but I'm not good for identification of flowers. If you are confident, I'll rename the file as you asked. PierreSelim (talk) 06:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In order to confirm the species of Viola, in this URL you can find photos of species of the genus Viola, among them of Viola arvensis Viola arvensis

Thanks. Javier martin (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I renamed it as File:Viola arvensis EnfoqueFlor 2011-4-02 CampodeCalatrava.jpg based on the original filenamed you had chosen only changing the identification (the file name you had chosen for renaming was already in use). PierreSelim (talk) 13:12, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:QuetzalcoatlRueStRome.jpg[edit]

File:QuetzalcoatlRueStRome.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

OxIxO (talk) 12:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Va voter, cette histoire sera ce que nous en ferons : aux armes! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci![edit]

That was quick! :) Thanks & kind regards, -- Deadstar (msg) 08:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, have a nice day. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:53, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Bababababa !

Fabrice Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carnegie[edit]

Concerning the Carnegie Library, the whole category should deleted as all the images are copyrighted. No discussion.

Strictly speaking, some of your images on your talk page should be considered for deletion too: -view of the jardin japonais of Compans-Caffareli (and the corresponding category)

Reason built in the 1980s, I am sure the garden designer may have some copyright left on his creation. It is not a natural landscape.

- view of the Saint Pierre Bridge

Reasons: night illumination of notable buildings may be considered as copyrighted in France see en:Eiffel Tower#Image copyright claims. See also remark on Help:Copyright#France.

The bridge was build in 1927 and rebuilt in the 1980s. Is it 100% copyright free?

- The lampadaire du Collège de l'Esquile

Reason: do not look to be an antique lamp designed by an artist who died more than 70 years. According Régie Municipale de Toulouse [1] electricity started to be distributed in 1922, this lamp was built after that time by a designer that almost certainly died less than 70 years ago. Same rule that the one for the Carnegie should apply.

Don't worry I won't start a deletion request war. I am just very sad I cannot upload any picture of French modern architecture to Commons and that there is no political will to change this law in France. Take care. --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 13:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je voudrais ton avis[edit]

Salut PierreSelim !

Etant un nouveau filemover, je voudrais que tu me dises en toute franchise si ma position sur File talk:Coat of arms of the Seimas of Lithuania.png était raisonnable ou excessive.

Tu peux bien sûr nuancer ton avis. Merci d'avance ! Papatt (talk) 07:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ta position était raisonnable, tu avais un doute, faut pas se sentir obligé de faire quelque chose si tu n'es pas certain que ce soit la bonne chose à faire. Il y a d'autres personnes sur le projet qui peuvent le faire. Et puis, tu es resté cordiale et ouvert lors de la discussion, tu affirmes ton point de vue sans aller dans la désorganisation, bref vraiment rien à redire. PierreSelim (talk) 07:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah bin j'étais bon alors. Merci ! Papatt (talk) 09:51, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. : File:Lithuania coa.gif n'est qu'une copie conforme du cas précédent avec PdD et tout.

Aller de ce que j'ai compris:

Armoiries de la Lituanie
Armoiries du président de la Lituanie (voir ici
Armoirie du Parlement (Seimis)

Je pense que l'utilisateur a raison, en tout cas c'est ce que semble indiquer les sites web officiels de ces institutions. Faut quand même avouer que c'est un joli bordel! Bonne journée PierreSelim (talk) 10:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Dear PierreSelim/Archives,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:29, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hôpital Saint-Joseph de la Grave[edit]

Please, review the reference PA00094573 at Category:Hôpital Saint-Joseph de la Grave. The database says "Hôtel, 44 rue des Couteliers" and at fr:Liste des monuments historiques de la Haute-Garonne the reference for "Hospice de la Grave" is PA00094529. I have identified the following files with reference PA00094573 that should be reviewed: File:Dome de la Grave 2.jpg, File:Dome de la Grave au couché de soleil 01.jpg, File:Dome de la Grave au couché de soleil 02.jpg, File:Dome de la Grave au couché de soleil 03.jpg, File:Dome de la Grave au couché de soleil 04.jpg, File:Dome de la Grave au couché de soleil 05.jpg, File:Dome de la Grave à Toulouse.jpg, File:Hôtel 44 rue des Couteliers, Toulouse.jpg, File:Panorama Pont-Saint Pierre Dome de la Grave.jpg. --V.Riullop (talk) 12:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check, thanks. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:05, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, it's an honnest mistake from me, I took the wrong line in the list of monuments. PierreSelim (talk) 07:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST-UBB - Clément Poitrenaud (essai).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:00, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation Phoebus[edit]

Bonjour,

Nous nous réunissons samedi prochain dans le cadre du projet Phoebus, ta participation est la bienvenue.


	Date	Samedi 29 octobre 2011 à 10h
	Lieu	Carré du Muséum de Toulouse
	Objet	Au programme: Fonctionnement du projet: Qualité des images, date des prises de vues, matériel, etc. Présentation technique spécifique pour Phoebus (Combine Zp, etc.) Faire quelques photos

Cordialement, PierreSelim (talk) 09:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Try.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Phoebus 5 novembre[edit]

Le programme de samedi (pour s'inscrire aller sur la page Commons:Projet Phoebus/Meetings/2011/November 5):


	Date	Samedi 5 novembre 2011 à 10h
	Lieu	Carré du Muséum de Toulouse
	Objet	Au programme: Photos au labo Nous ne pouvons être que 3 (4 avec Archaeodontosaurus)

, PierreSelim (talk) 07:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grand merci[edit]

Merci Pierre pour le renommage rapide des mes fichiers et pour tes encouragement sur ma contribution aux projets Wiki. Effectivement j'ai soumis quelques de mes images dans le QIC mais je n'ai pas vraiment pensé aux images de valeur. Il faudra que je regarde les démarches si tu trouves qu'il sera intéressant de les présenter.

Bon après-midi --Moonik (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oeuvre inachevée[edit]

Bonjour,

Concernant les photos du stade des Alpes que vous avez supprimées, je me demande dans quelle mesure la loi s'applique lors de la prise de photo d'un chantier, alors que l'oeuvre est encore inachevée. Avez-vous des précisions là-dessus. Milky (talk) 22:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dôme des invalides[edit]

Tes photos du dôme des invalides sont superbes. Pour les passer en QI par contre je passerai un coup de correction de perspective, je ai testé sur Paris - Les invalides - Le Dôme - 123-1.jpg et je trouve que cela rend mieux, après c'est toi qui voit ^_^. En tout cas merci encore pour ces jolies photos, ça fait longtemps que j'ai pas été à Paris et ça fait plaisir à regarder. PierreSelim (talk) 11:09, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

N'hésite pas à le faire si tu estimes que c'est mieux, je n'ai pas le temps de m'en occuper (et je te fais confiance sur ce sujet). --Thesupermat (talk) 11:36, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs Gloucester - Warm-up - 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This one is good, althought it's a bit tightly cropped as well. Mvg, Basvb 22:32, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs Gloucester - Match 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Do you have a wider crop at the top and the right? Mvg, Basvb 15:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Good action shot, good quality, and good composition (we do not need more grass here IMO).--ArildV 17:20, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feuille de chêne[edit]

J'ai bien aimé tes Feuilles de chêne. Tu aurai pu débruiter juste le ciel, s'est facile et sa donne un bonne image. Des nouvelles pour Phoebus? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cadran solaire[edit]

Pierre,

Merci pour la promotion de ma photo. J'apprécie, car je suis pasionné par les cadrans solaires. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Sundials_in_Belgium

J'en ai d'ailleurs aussi photographié de très beaux l'année passée en Savoie mais il ne sont pas encore insérés dans Commons.

Amicalement.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compans lake - Anas platyrhynchos 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Holleday 13:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compans lake - Anas platyrhynchos 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs Gloucester - Match - 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you upload a wider crop? the crop on the left and top seems a bit tight. And what is the story between those two (non-ruby) shoes on top? Mvg, Basvb 22:32, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Comment Done removed medic's shoes and wider crop (slightly wider) PierreSelim 22:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Composition is good now, I leave it open so that somebody can decide on the white reflecting parts. Mvg, Basvb 23:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted. Mvg, Basvb 23:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compans lake - Anas platyrhynchos 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment A bit dark, IMHO, especially for a common and non-shy animal. Nice and sharp otherwise. --V-wolf 21:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Comment Increased brightness Done. PierreSelim 09:30, 20 November 2011 (UTC) -- QI for me now -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 11:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MHNT - Whiteia woodwardi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MHNT - Niobella cf. fourneti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Les catégories[edit]

Bravo pour ces deux photos promues : tu peux rajouter : Category: Quality images supported by Wikimedia France et Category: Quality images of Muséum de Toulouse.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:27, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Qercus leaves - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Ctenolepsisisisismatinae[edit]

Bonjour Pierre,

Desolé: j'ai fait du mal (et tu es trop vite ;o) Merci pour la renommage de Ctenolepsimatinae5703.jpg, mais je l'ai mal orthographié :-( le nom correcte serait Ctenolepismatinae5703.jpg - 1000 excuses Pudding4brains (talk) 12:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Pierre

Pudding4brains (talk) 14:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs Harlequins - Warm-up Harlequins-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs Gloucester - Match - 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annecy's Lake - 20111229 - Larus ridibundus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Chroicocephalus ridibundus seems to be the good (synonym) current name, now (my science is new, I had the same problem, and there is an automatic re-categorization...). And the picture is good for QI.--Jebulon 22:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alberto Vernet Basulado - Entrainement du stade toulousain le 18 juillet 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good colors, good light, good scenery, and the sharpness is just right. --Haeferl 00:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annecy - Corvus Corone - 20111230 - 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting and QI for me--Holleday 22:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 6009667c1dbdb85ea54f8e3544fdbe0c[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuselage of Embraer 190 - Air France by Regional.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby[edit]

Pourquoi ne mets-tu pas le nom des personnes photographiées sur la légende de la photo? Ceci dis l'autre soir j'étais au stade et je ne t'ai pas vu...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

En fait je trie les photos sous Adobe Photoshop Lightroom qui permet de travailler sur un grand nombre de photos, le but étant de rajouter le nom des joueurs dans les catégories avec l'aide de Cat-a-lot (on fait une catégorie par joueur avec Caroline).
Avec Caroline on est en virage entre les portes 16 et 17 (sous le huit - un des gros clubs de supporters)
J'essaye aussi de regrouper les illustrations sur User:PierreSelim/Rugby, le but serait de faire un WikiBook illustrée sur les lois et les actions classiques du rugby à XV.

--PierreSelim (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bon parfait, mais si tu mets le nom sur la photo sa serait utile... J'ai vu le Stade contre Bayonne, s'était la première fois que je voyais un match de rugby, et même un match tout cours. Ce n'était pas désagréable, je reviendrai...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Image et le Pouvoir - Etude d'après un buste romain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Re : Fossiles[edit]

Salut, tes images de fossiles en focus stack sont impressionnantes je trouve. Je pense que ce genre d'image gagnerait à avoir une petite échelle sur le côté. En tout cas j'espère que tu t'amuses bien à faire du focus stack parce que c'est magnifique que ce soit sur des fleurs ou sur des fossiles. PierreSelim (talk) 13:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir. La mise en place d'une échelle est problématique car des droits d'auteur peuvent s'appliquer à l'objet permettant de définir l'échelle. À part cela, merci pour vos compliments au sujet de mes photos en focus stacking. Vous aussi, vous devriez essayer, notamment sur les fossiles. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs LOU - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 13:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs LOU - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 18:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Former players[edit]

Salut PierreSelim,

J'ai engagé une discussion à ce sujet chez Léna. Tu es le bienvenu vu que tu es concerné. Udufruduhu (talk) 09:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. PierreSelim (talk) 09:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of église des cordeliers in Toulouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow - Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:26, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Image et le Pouvoir - Buste d'un homme cuirassé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful QI. --Selbymay 15:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs LOU - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good. --Mattbuck 14:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grégory Lamboley - 2011-08-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough. --Mattbuck 14:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Liège-Guillemins train station[edit]

I selected 9 pictures in the list "Deletion requests" wich dont qualify for the delete action.Smiley.toerist (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the notification. PierreSelim (talk) 17:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs LOU - 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Dr.Haus 21:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Stanislas - Lumière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments One spot close to lattern, but good quality. --Sfu 10:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Image et le Pouvoir - Buste cuirassé de Marc Aurèle agé - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes. Both are good --Jebulon 16:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Image et le Pouvoir - Buste cuirassé de Marc Aurèle agé - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes. Both are good--Jebulon 16:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images remarquables[edit]

Salut PierreSelim ! Merci pour tes précisions. J'ai vu trop tard la limite de deux propositions (mais ça c'est pas gravissime, je recommencerai un autre jour). Par contre, pour la verrière, si tu penses qu'elle ne passera pas l'examen, je ne la reproposerai pas. Je finirais bien par faire des photos qui correspondent aux critères de qualité...--Sammyday (talk) 11:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Columba livia walking on Capitole - 2011-10-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me! --NorbertNagel 18:13, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embraer 190 - Wing and winglet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me --Carschten 19:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Nerón y Agripina.jpg on QIC[edit]

Hi! Don't worry, your comment wasn't harsh, but I was a little bit surprised, I didn't expect that kind of question (I hope my answer wasn't harsh either!). I wanted to know your opinion about the use of wide angle in the picture. I must admit I had to fix a little distortion, but I think it's ok now. I was standing quite close to the relief so nobody came between me and the relief, that was the main reason to use wide angle. Next time, and if there's nobody near me, I'll try to stand a bit further to avoid any distortion, it's a good advice. Do you think the picture is distorted? --Kadellar (talk) 12:56, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Stanislas - Porte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:L'Image et le Pouvoir - Buste d'homme cuirassé-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:L'Image et le Pouvoir - Buste d'un homme cuirassé.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embraer 190 - Wing and winglet at sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality IMO. (I improved the description page a little bit) --MLWatts 11:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protest against ACTA - 2012-01-28 - Toulouse - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments For me, this photo meets the criteria. --ANGELUS 20:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Banc public - 2012-01-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protest against ACTA - 2012-01-28 - Toulouse - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality, nice DOF.--ArildV 22:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Du poisson![edit]

J'ai 500 poissons naturalisés qui nous attendent au Muséum; peux-tu venir m'aider mercredi après midi? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardin japonais - Palais des thés - 2012-02-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 20:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Whiteia woodwardi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Congratulations, Dear Administrator![edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

PierreSelim, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin ^webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

Congratulation, welcome to the team--Morning Sunshine (talk) 05:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Couverture Séries Max n°8.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

Vous avez effacé la photo de la couverture du n°8 (et dernier numéro) du magazine Séries Max que j'ai inséré ce matin. Vous avez indiqué qu'elle violait les droits d'auteur. Séries Max était un magazine que j'ai créé et chaque couverture était une composition personnelle. Aussi, je détiens tous les droits sur cette création.

Dans le cas où il y aurait un soucis avec les photos de séries, je ne comprends pas pourquoi alors des photos promotionnelles sont affichées et acceptées sur beaucoup de fiches de séries sur Wikipedia.

L'utilisation de ces photos par la presse est très réglementée et autorisaient la publication sur couverture ainsi que la promotion sur tout support du magazine. De ce fait, les photos ayant autorisation de publication en magazine, une couverture (utilisant une ou plusieurs images avec autorisation) est donc une création originale dont je détiens les droits.

Je trouve donc dommage que pour la postérité cette photo ne puisse pas rester.

Bien cordialement,

Florent SIVRY

Demande au SIRPA Air[edit]

Concernant les images de l'Armée de l'Air, le mieux est simplement de contacter le Sirpa Air pour demander le statut légal précis de l'autorisation d'origine et quel est leur postion sur le sujet : http://www.defense.gouv.fr/air/media/notes-aux-redactions/notes-aux-redactions L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:딱풀추락사.jpg[edit]

Please take care about rest of user uploads. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image Confprensa4.png[edit]

In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Confprensa4.png. I'm a journalist. I took that picture. So obviously I have the copyright of that image, why I can not upload? RonsonPeru2 (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you took that picture, I suggest that:

You upload it has a jpeg
In a higher resolution
with the EXIF data

The upload would look less dubious if you respect thoses suggestions. If you publish on Commons pictures that you have already published somewhere else, you might be interested to look at this page COM:OTRS. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious why?. How I can do that? Simply i took the picture with the camera, handed it to a laptop, then my usb, and I got here. RonsonPeru2 (talk) 18:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We tend to have doubt when files are in low resolution, without the EXIF data (camera information). Moreover, picture taken with a digital camera are more likely to be a jpeg file (either jpeg from the camera or RAW developped to a jpeg file). When all this are not respected we are very likely to have doubts in the validity of the upload. This file was your first upload with a very low res 233x366 px (85k when digital camera usually provides pictures with millions of pixels). PierreSelim (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand, then; What should I do to re-upload?--RonsonPeru2 (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Musée du Louvre, Ma 1180 (bust of Roman Imperator Antonius Pius).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Rue Étroite - 2012-01-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice mood. Could you please correct the aberration of perspective of the right walls ? they look leaning and it is unnatural.--Jebulon 17:43, 31 January 2012 (UTC) Info walls are not straight in such streets in Toulouse. PierreSelim 08:33, 1 February 2012 (UTC) Done thanks for the suggestion :D --PierreSelim 07:26, 2 February 2012 (UTC).Good now.--Jebulon 23:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:France FOP cases[edit]

When you add a category to a DR, you must use the following form:

<noinclude>[[Category:Undelete in 2019]]</noinclude>

If you not use the noinclude pair, then the category will be transcluded onto the daily and monthly logs and archives as well as the DR itself. This triples the size of the category and, if done widely, could have an effect on performance.

This is true for all DR categories:

and so forth. This means that you cannot use HotCat, but must edit the DR directly.
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jim, thank you for the advice (they are all welcomed). I know I did this mistake in the past. I know try to keep the category clean I even wrote a small documentation for thoses interested [2]. --PierreSelim (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Pierre. I should have said that I saw this

User_talk:Lophotrochozoa#Category:France_FOP_cases

and thought that if you were going to thank others for adding the DR cats, that you might want to teach them to do the whole thing at the same time. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, your message is very clear, and is a good counterpart to mine. I'll try to give complete information next time! (that's also why I wrote it in the category). PierreSelim (talk) 15:35, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compans Cafarelli - Banc public - 2012-02-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 17:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Comment Nice and well chosen DoF! Is it possible to provide more inforation about the location? --NorbertNagel 10:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protest ACTA 2012-02-11 - Toulouse - 18 - Protester with megaphone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 11:46, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard duck eating bread.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compans Cafarelli - Sturnus vulgaris - 2012-02-11 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 18:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sysop[edit]

Ah ben mince alors, j'ai loupé un épisode ! t'aurais du me prévenir... Bon en tout cas maintenant je sais qui je vais venir emmerder avec mes demandes de suppression . Udufruduhu (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

N'hésite pas ^_^ :-) --PierreSelim (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bon ben c'est parti ! Voilà deux bô copyvio : File:RCM 2010.jpg et File:RCM 2011.jpg. Udufruduhu (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Et une autre pour la route. Udufruduhu (talk) 11:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Cour Henri IV - Plaque duc de Montmorency.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted--Jebulon 14:44, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough. Mattbuck 11:02, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Mallard duck and its reflection - 2012-02-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really nice. --Kadellar 18:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compans Caffarelli - Turdus merula - 2012-2-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --ArildV 11:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs UBB 2011 - Yves Donguy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tilted ( letters in the background must be vertical ) otherwise good action shot. --Vassil 20:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC) Done uploaded a fix (I wonder if I should fix the perspective distortion in the text). --PierreSelim 17:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)It's ok for me now. --Vassil 18:10, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fontaine-les-Grès (1).jpg[edit]

Hello PierreSelim,

you closed this deletion request as “Deleted: Tranfert to french wikipedia”. But the file here on Commons is neither deleted nor was it, as far as I can determine, transferred to the French wikipedia. Could you please have a look at it again? Regards --Rosenzweig τ 09:57, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rouge gorge familier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 11:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs SUA - 2012-02-18 - Warm up - 12 - Line out training.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, illustrates the subject well. --ArildV 10:36, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs SUA - 2012-02-18 - Match - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good action.--ArildV 00:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protest ACTA 2012-02-11 - Toulouse - 11 - Anonymous couple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would be better without the sign, but still good. --Mattbuck 02:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

100% d'accord avec toi. D'autre part, si les parents se plaindrent ce serais mieux qu'il vont surveiller leurs enfants. A propos, comme ancien joueur, j'aime tes photos de rugby à XV ... :) J'ai lu que tu viens de Toulouse donc je suppose tu est un supporteur du Stade? -- Blackcat (talk) 01:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Garonne Skyline at Sunset - 2012-02-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs SUA - 2012-02-18 - Match - 29 - Giraud tackles Poux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent ! --M0tty 21:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - European robin - 2012-02-18 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Kadellar 19:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Japanese tea house - 2012-02-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Too dark left part of a photo - I think, so it will be slightly better (a file is updated) --Aleks G 23:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I promote, though the noise is borderline for QI. --NorbertNagel 21:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compans Cafarelli - Columba livia - 2012-02-11 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you brighten it please? Mattbuck 13:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Done --PierreSelim 07:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Mattbuck 11:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Rouge gorge familier - crop (WB correction).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rouge gorge familier - crop.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Couple of mallard ducks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Véronique PAGNIER 06:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Sturnus vulgaris - 2012-02-26 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Sturnus vulgaris - 2012-02-26 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Chroicocephalus ridibundus in flight - 2012-02-26 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice effect. --Vassil 22:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Compans Cafarelli - Turdus merula - 2012-02-11 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Rather hard to see it - could you alter the curves to make the bird a bit brighter? Mattbuck 13:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Has tried to "extend" a little a birdie from darkness Support --Aleks G 00:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio à purger[edit]

Salut,

Voici une image sous copyright tirée du site officiel des Ospreys. Un petit coup de balais ? Udufruduhu (talk) 10:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci

Udufruduhu (talk) 15:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Kayak - 2012-02-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Chroicocephalus ridibundus in flight - 2012-02-26 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Question Nice panning, but is it a crop or downsampling? Maybe we could have a slightly bigger version. --Kadellar 18:59, 28 February 2012 (UTC) It's a crop, the subject is the bird, there's nothing really interesting croped. --PierreSelim 07:31, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, just in case we could have a bigger version. --Kadellar 12:00, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Turdus Merula - 2012-02-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 07:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Sturnus vulgaris - 2012-02-26 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File tagging File:Wikimedia Foundation SOPA Boiler Room Meeting.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wikimedia Foundation SOPA Boiler Room Meeting.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Saibo (Δ) 16:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:France FOP cases/pending[edit]

Coucou, quand tu ajoutes cette catégorie, il faut le faire à la main à l'intérieur de <noinclude></noinclude>, sinon ça pose des problèmes de transclusion. Je me suis fait avoir moi aussi. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:20, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protest ACTA 2012-02-11 - Toulouse - 15 - Anonymous guy with a black and white scarf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

File:Wikimedia Foundation SOPA Boiler Room Meeting.jpg[edit]

File:Wikimedia Foundation SOPA Boiler Room Meeting.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 00:16, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Clock of Capitole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs SUA - 2012-02-18 - Warm up - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok with me. --Iifar 13:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Triodon macropterus.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard duck diving.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 19:48, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! European robin in japanese garden in Toulouse - facing right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! European robin in japanese garden in Toulouse - facing left.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow, great. --Herzi Pinki 23:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs CO 2012-03-10 - 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice sho(o)t.--Jebulon 01:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Mallard ducks - 2012-03-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and OK for QI, I think. --NorbertNagel 20:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs LOU - Timoci Matanavu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 14:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs LOU - Timoci Matanavu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments a "portrait" version should be better IMO, but good.--Jebulon 14:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs SUA - 2012-02-18 - Match - 32bis - Nyanga avoiding tackle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes--Jebulon 14:46, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs SUA - 2012-02-18 - Match - 06 - Donguy offload.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good action shot, IMO.--Jebulon 14:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SB petite.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, Vous avez clôturé la discussion Commons:Deletion requests/File:SB petite.jpg à peine 10 minutes après qu'elle ait été initiée, ne laissant ainsi aucunement le temps à quelque discussion que ce soit. Pourriez-vous révoquer cette clôture, restaurer l'image et laisser la discussion suivre son cours normalement? Merci. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done --PierreSelim (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euroleague - LE Roma vs Toulouse IC-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MHNT - Triodon bourse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euroleague L.E. Roma vs Toulouse I.C. - Jump ball.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs CO 2012-03-10 - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 22:00, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Euroleague - LE Roma vs Toulouse IC-27.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Euroleague - LE Roma vs Toulouse IC-27.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

What requests are you talking about exactly that I have ignored? I have not uploaded anything since January. Also, all the alleged copyright violations against me were usage of stock images that I have acquired and used (modified and manipulated) in the context they should be used in. so I do not take for granted that the violations are legitimate. Anyways, as I have said, I have not uploaded anything since January and I don't see myself uploading anything in the near future. thanks for the warning though. Bakkouz (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No microstock images are not usable here unless you have an authorization to distribute the image for any purpose even granting possibility to modify the image and use it or the modifications for commercial use. Please read COM:L, as it was told you on deletion requests, you have to prove the files you are uploading are free. If you have permissions, thoses permissions should be sent according to the procedure on this page COM:OTRS. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs CO 2012-03-10 - 42 - Conversion kick by Luke McAlister.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:54, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs CO 2012-03-10 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, action, QI to me--Lmbuga 22:29, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick heads up[edit]

Just a quick heads up that I have suggested an amendment to the editing restriction on FtO, and have made a note of it here. I am advising you as you have provided an opinion in that thread, and may wish to take this into account if any concerns you may have raised are addressed with it. russavia (talk) 13:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Final Trophee Monal 2012 n08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Final Trophee Monal 2012 n08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote[edit]

Thank you for your voice of support here. However, if what you mean by your comment is that it's picture two that should be promoted, not picture one, I believe you should write your vote under picture two, and not under picture one. Best regards, Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Both are good, I just prefer the second but really I don't want the first version not to have my voice too. (not really sure I can vote for both alternative but I'll check it)--PierreSelim (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Fire hydrant in Compans Caffarelli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Carschten 09:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:BSicon_KRZSTRlg.svg[edit]

You wrote that the image should be kept because «No reason stated, the link you gave is really not helping to understand.». Seems to me that, assuming good faith (and all that cozy fuzzy talk that is tossed around even in the face of the crudest cases of vandalism) on the part of the deletion proponent (me), you should rather have wrote that you dont understand the reason stated so therefore you leave the decision to an admin who actually knows about this icon family and why this icon should, very obviously, be deleted. -- Tuválkin ✉ 16:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have anything against you, just it's hard to judge a DR without having a summary of the situation please just look at our DR backlog to see that summary really helps. If you can explain me clearly what is the situation for this file I can look into it again. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yes, I can see how, for someone who had no prior contact with the railroad diagram icon family , the discussions about naming, topology, and geometry of specific icons may be baffling. What I cannot undertand is why, on face of that, you didn’t just move along — leaving my DR untouched wiating for someone’s more enlighted opinion. As it is there’s at least one Commons Admin (User:Axpde) who is (very) well versed in the matter of these icons. Meanwhile he took care of this specific DR and instructed me on the procedure to promptly file such DRs in the future. -- Tuválkin ✉ 10:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As User:Axpde proposed you a nice solution on his talk page, I think the situation is going to be handled correctly from now on. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - 2012-03-26 - Dome Hospital de la Grave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very good --Taxiarchos228 13:39, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - 2012-03-26 - Bazacle - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 22:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs Gloucester - Match - 43.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 15:59, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs CO 2012-03-10 - 34 - Try by Florian Fritz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 15:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs CO 2012-03-10 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments PierreSelim, I'll support, but I find the lines at the left very disturbing, IMHO they should be cropped out. --Kadellar 15:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Better now, thanks. --Kadellar 11:43, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poissons d'avril ![edit]

Super pour les images de poissons ! … qu'on attend avec impatience ! TE D 22:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Riquet[edit]

Salut Pierre Selim.

Tu n'éclaircirais pas un peu ton Paul Riquet pour leur faire plaisir?

Un petit coup de la machine à contraste serait satisfaisant pour les contenter.

Je trouve, moi, que c'est suffisant, je fais ce que je peux, mais je me sens un peu seul, et ça risque de bloquer...

Bien à toi, et Allez le Stade (Rochelais, bien sûr) !--Jebulon (talk) 23:06, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

En effet, mais en fait j'ai honte j'ai bidouillé le RAW dans tous les sens et c'est de pire en pire. Donc j'ai été reprendre la photo un autre jour, sauf que là j'ai raté la mise au point! :( --PierreSelim (talk) 07:12, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: No FOP statues in the USA[edit]

Thanks for closing them. I've gotten everything moved over with the appropriate FUR on en.wiki. We should be good! ТимофейЛееСуда (talk) 17:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flèche de la basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:26, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulouse - Red fire hydrant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 09:17, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs SF - Sergio Parisse 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shirt maybe a bit noisy, but good capture.--Jebulon 15:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard duck - Toulouse - 2012-04-09 - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard duck - Toulouse - 2012-04-09 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:57, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poisson?[edit]

Salut Pierre, Je venais prendre des nouvelles des poissons... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coucou, j'essaye d'avancer un peu. J'ai crée les catégories suivantes:

Collections of ichthyology of the Muséum de Toulouse les poissons identifiés
Unidentified items of the collections of ichthyology of the Muséum de Toulouse les poissons non-identifiés que je dois envoyé à Henri :-) (je peux renommer une fois que l'identification est faite).

--PierreSelim (talk) 06:34, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Très bien, place les si tu peux le premier fait déjà le tour du monde. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Euroleague - LE Roma vs Toulouse IC-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Duchesse de Berry[edit]

Bonjour, Je voudrais connaître la localisation des peintures troubadour que vous avez publiées sur la page de la duchesse de Berry, car je prépare une expo sur ce thème. je crois que j'ai fait une mauvaise manipulation au sujet d'une photo en cliquant sur "deleting", c'est bien sûr une erreur de débutante sur Wiki, excusez-moi... Merci beaucoup par avance de votre réponse (je suis contactable par mail). cordialement, Palmyra

Bonjour, ces photos ont été prises aux Musées des Augustins de Toulouse lors de l'exposition temporaire Petits théâtres de l'intime. Les tableaux de la duchesse de Berry appartiennent à des collections privées. Il faudrait probablement contacté le musée des Augustins si vous voulez plus d'informations. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:29, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup!

Bot block[edit]

I have replied to you at AN. You could have also contacted me on IRC. :) -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 16:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

I'll try talk with you on IRC when I'll get home. --PierreSelim (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Pierre. I don't feel strongly either way, but, what did you intend here? Closed as deleted, citing me, but I was on the other side and the image is still there. Regards, Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:14, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I'm tired, I've messed up on this one ... I'm reoponeing it. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lepisosteus osseus - MHNT - ICHT.1995.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vermeer[edit]

Merci pour la restauration des détails de La Laitière. L'article pourra davantage respirer. Cordialement --Ferdine75 (talk) 20:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meeting NPA - Toulouse - 2012-04-17 - 21h53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meeting NPA - Toulouse - 2012-04-17 - 21h31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good--Jebulon 23:49, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scorpaena porcus - MHNT - ICHT.1995.79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good qualityfor me. --Jkadavoor 08:04, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of comments[edit]

Sorry, but I was just taking my cue from User:Russavia, who regularly deletes comments made by others, if he disagrees with them. I won't do it again -- I thought it was allowed. -- Thekohser (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hospice de la Grave - 2012-03-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but a bit of noise on the sky and a big (but clear, not dark) dust spot (see note)--Lmbuga 19:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs CAB - 15h00.38-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me--Lmbuga 21:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

modele[edit]

J'ai vu que l’ichtyologie avance, mais j'ai vu que les titres étaient plus gros. J'ai ouvert et j'ai trouvé le modèle que tu as fais. Excellent! Je l'ai essayé rétrospectivement sur quelques spécimens et je l'adopte définitivement... Bravo. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meeting NPA - Toulouse - 2012-04-17 - 21h17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me. --LC-de 12:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Médallions[edit]

Bonjour Pierre,

J'aime bien tes photos de médaillons, mais je pense qu'elles ont besoin d'un ajustement de la couleur (trop bleu). J'ai fait un essai sur l'une d'elles : File:Medallion 2 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tu as raison à y regarder, c'est un peu bleuté, ma balance des blancs semble un peu trop froide. J'ai refait du coup le tympan pour tester un peu les couleurs. --PierreSelim (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis d'accord avec Yann. Diploria labyrinthiformis - MHNT - 2012 water exhibition.jpg pourrait être Phoebus...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

En fait je suis plus ou moins d'accord aussi, par contre il faut faire attention le médaillon numéro 6 est vraiment plus bleuté que les autres (il est fait dans une matière différente, peut-être un peu de marbre je ne sais plus). J'ai refait une passe chez moi sur les couleurs, mais cela ne me plait pas, donc je vais repartir des RAW et regarder ce qui va ou ne va pas. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deux anges - Porte Miégeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It is a bit dark with low contrast. Could you improve that? Yann 06:42, 27 April 2012 (UTC), yes I think it's possible, I'll try tonight, thanks for the review. --PierreSelim 07:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Good quality. --Yann 11:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diploria labyrinthiformis - MHNT - 2012 water exhibition.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:43, 25 April 2012 (UTC)...In spite of some masking errors (the brush is not soft enough, IMO.)--Jebulon 14:33, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs CAB - 15h55.07 - Ronnie Cooke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (better than Messi's :D)---Who spoke ?--Jebulon 22:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It was me, sorry. --Kadellar 23:53, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Aaaaaah... Sorry in advance for Real, tonight...Maybe...--Jebulon 15:40, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:ST vs SF - Sergio Parisse 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ST vs SF - Sergio Parisse 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tympan - Porte Miégeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medallion 1 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me --LC-de 17:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medallion 2 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me --LC-de 17:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medallion 3 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me --LC-de 17:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medallion 4 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me --LC-de 17:48, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb of Saint Saturnin - Basilique Saint-Sernin - Exposures blending.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tree of Life[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu avais créé un modèle {{Specimen}}, tu seras peut-être intéressé par la discussion sur Commons_talk:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life#Proposal. --Zolo (talk) 07:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nycticorax nycticorax - 2012-04-26 - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me --Lmbuga 16:11, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:15 Integrity.jpg[edit]

Please take care about rest of user uploads. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

<3

Léna (talk) 17:31, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Saint Saturnin of Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ambulatory ceiling - Cathedral Saint-Etienne in Toulouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful QI. Even the keystones seems great. --Selbymay 22:02, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MHNT - Hemipneustes pyrenaicus - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nycticorax nycticorax - 2012-04-26 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice but a bit too dark Poco a poco 07:05, 29 April 2012 (UTC) I slightly increased the light, is it better now? --Vassil 10:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go Poco a poco 20:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
thanks both of you, the review and the fix are good. --PierreSelim 21:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your absurd deletions of Syrian postcard[edit]

Do you actually read comments in deletion requests? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests --PierreSelim (talk) 16:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repåeating my question: do you bother to read comments in deletion requests? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:47, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do, kind regards. --PierreSelim (talk) 18:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Expo aeropostale Toulouse 2011 (3).jpg[edit]

File:Expo aeropostale Toulouse 2011 (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs MHR - 2012-05-12-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 21:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pavo cristatus - Jardin botanique - Toulouse - 2012-05-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ambulatory ceiling - Cathedral Saint-Etienne in Toulouse.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ambulatory ceiling - Cathedral Saint-Etienne in Toulouse.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grande roue à Toulouse (coupée).jpg[edit]

File:Grande roue à Toulouse (coupée).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dama dama - Lunéville - 2012-05-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 06:20, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Renommée - Porte Héré - Nancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice --Ralf Roletschek 12:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs MHR - 2012-05-12-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:La foire d'Impruneta - d'après Jacques Callot.jpg[edit]

Hello,

Effectivement, c'est une chouette surprise. Il est amusant de constater que de nos jours, pareille copie serait considéré comme du plagiat et tout le monde s'en offusquerait. Alors qu'à l'époque, cela paraissait complètement normal et cela participait de l'émulation et de la créativité.

Merci pour cette découverte ! Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 21:14, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition[edit]

Bonjour,

J'espère que tu ne m'en voudras pas si cette tentative échoue...--Jebulon (talk) 09:27, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pas du tout, pour moi c'est pour le fun et j'avoue que je m'amuse bien avec mon grand angle :) --PierreSelim (talk) 09:38, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On tient le bon bout !... tu devrais archiver ta page de discussion, si je peux me permettre...--Jebulon (talk) 08:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]