User talk:Sammyday

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Sammyday!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

SieBot 00:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Sammyday!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images remarquables[edit]

Salut Sammyday, j'ai vu que tu as nominé pas mal de photos en tant qu'images remarquables. La règle veut que l'on ne puisse en nominer que 2 simultanément. Les deux dernières nominations vont donc être retiré automatiquement.

Concernant ta photo File:Passage Brady verriere.jpg je pense qu'elle ne serait pas passée car certaines parties sont surexposées on ne peut plus distinguer les détails de cette partie de la photo. En fait, c'est compliqué à régler comme problème, soit il faut trouver une exposition qui permettent de développer l'image en retouchant les tons clairs/tons foncés pour que toute l'image soit correctement exposée, soit on se rabat sur des techniques d'images HDR. En tout cas bonne journée, --PierreSelim (talk) 08:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Immeuble Odorico[edit]

Bonjour cher coéquipier ! Merci d'avoir ajouté tes photos :) Mais tu me vois désolé de devoir demander la suppression des photos de l'immeuble émaillé avenue Janvier : Odorico fils est mort en 1945, ses œuvres sont encore protégées jusqu'au premier janvier 2016. Là, on pourra se faire plaisir et chasser le moindre carreau de mosaïque ! --EdouardHue (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

1814 Meissonier[edit]

Juste corrigé une petite erreur dans les notes judicieusement ajoutées sur l'image. Cdlt.--Albergrin007 (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Campagne de France[edit]

Bonjour Albergrin007.

J'avais fait ces modifications dans deux fichiers.

.

Je m'étais basé sur une source ([1]) qui précisait différentes choses sur le tableau :

  • Ney est immédiatement derrière Napoléon, affiche sa maîtrise, « opposant à la mauvaise fortune un courage presque souriant ». L’homme est droit en selle. Le peintre, au cours d’un voyage en chemin de fer, avait rencontré un officier de santé, qui avait appartenu au corps du maréchal Ney à la bataille de Leipzig. Selon ce récit, Ney avait l’habitude de ne jamais enfiler les manches de sa capote. Ce geste servit à animer le portrait.
  • À ses côtés, le maréchal Berthier, prince de Wagram. Il est plus enfoncé dans sa selle, déjà « morfondu de froid et de honte ».
  • Le troisième est le général comte de Flahaut, aide de camp de Napoléon. Homme jeune, de 29 ans, il était réputé pour sa beauté et son élégance. Le contraste est marqué avec la désinvolture de Ney.
  • Derrière Ney se trouve le général Drouot. Celui qui dort de fatigue sur son cheval, homme sans visage, n’est pas un portrait défini : l’inconnu reflète l’état d’esprit général des officiers.
  • Le dernier personnage, derrière Flahaut pourrait être le colonel Gourgaud, même s’il n’est pas nommément cité par Meissonier.

J'ai donc l'impression que ta modification est erronée : d'une part, celui qui dort est un "inconnu", et Drouot est derrière Ney (et son visage est proche de Antoine Drouot). D'autre part, en mettant Gourgaud à gauche, on ne suit pas la source qui précise "derrière Flahaut".--Sammyday (talk) 09:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour Sammyday

Au temps pour moi, dans "Jean Louis Ernest Meissonier. Ses Souvenirs - Ses Entretiens, précédés d'une étude sur sa vie et son œuvre, par M. O. Gréard. Librairie Hachette et cie - Paris, 1897, Meissonier" précise lui-même que celui qui dort n'est pas un portrait. Par contre l'auteur évoque la présence de Gourgaud dans un commentaire de la peinture en appendice, sans préciser sa place. J'ai pourtant lu quelque part ce que j'ai écrit mais je ne sais plus où ! Je corrige. Dites-moi si cela convient. Par contre bis, sauf erreur, Gourgaud est général et non colonel en 1814.Cordialement. --Albergrin007 (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Effectivement, c'est parfait (et merci pour la source). Je fais la modification pour Gourgaud.--Sammyday (talk) 20:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Il n'était bien que colonel en 14. Merci. J'avais encore faux.--Albergrin007 (talk) 21:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Laurent (fronton).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes--Jebulon 15:10, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Sammyday,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 07:22, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neuville défense de la porte de Longboyau.jpg[edit]

When you're asking for a rename because of the wrong identification => you should change the description, too...
Have a nice day ;-) Wieralee (talk) 14:43, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wieralee : when the description is wrong, of course, but this is not the case here. The title of the painting is "Défense de la porte de Longboyau", but this is a part of the battle of Buzenval. So the file had a wrong name, but a right description... Sammyday (talk) 16:16, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. The previous name wasn't the name of the painting. It's the difference between title and description. Sammyday (talk) 18:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gatling battery gun (camel) - Scientific American - 1872.png[edit]

Hi. In your recent edit of this file you have removed some of the description with the words "and your opinion is useless". You are quite right assuming that the last part of the description is indeed opinion, but to label it as "useless" seems a bit harsh, and in my view not consistent with the way colleagues in this project should address each other. Anyway, you also removed information about the article where the illustration appeared, which makes your edit even less understandable. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 14:29, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was maybe a bit harsh, i apologize about that. But this digression was a bit inappropriate, obviously. And i didn't remove information about the article : i removed a lack of informations... "No mentions of test results of this configuration", why do you precise that ? A single drawing doesn't mean this configuration was tested. Sammyday (talk) 15:12, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, it was a disgression - and will probably not be missed by anybody else - but I do believe attempts at humour are ok once in a while. Anyway, the information about "missing information" was meant as a help for those searching for specifications in the Scientific American article mentioned. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What a holy sh...[edit]

Was it absolutely necessary to delete these maps, such these Map15century.png? That's too bad. The encyclopedia is losing a lot of information.--92.77.28.174 11:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tell about the authors' rights ? You don't seem to understand what "losing" is. Sammyday (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Sammyday,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

m'enfin ![edit]

flou involontaire ? m'enfin ! il est très beau ce flou ! il ajoute du tragique aux personnages et au caractère romantique de la scène ! et puis c'est pas un motif de suppression : il n'y a aucun problème de licence ! ! ! fiche-lui la paix à mon adélaïde ! tout le monde était bien content de la voir quand j'ai rédigé l'article sur fr:Comminges et Adélaïde au couvent de la Trappe ! et puis je suis allée à lyon exprès ! non c'est pas vrai pas exprès mais l'expo était très belle ! maintenant rien ne t'interdit de la remplacer par la lumineuse photo prise par benoît si celle-ci n'est pas à ton goût ! mais celle-ci restera dans l'historique et sur commons ! nonméééh ! Mandariine (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Packard[edit]

@Sammyday: Please would you explain your unhelpful edits at Packard Eddaido (talk) 10:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(moved from my talk page) Category[edit]
Please read Commons:Categories : to "associate a single subject with a given category", you can add "some extra text [which] can be useful to precisely define it" - but not add a text unrelated to the category. If you want to define a single subject, and select some files, like this, please create a gallery, not a category. Sammyday (talk) 10:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC) Eddaido (talk) 22:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you believe the text you persist in removing is unrelated to the category? Eddaido (talk) 22:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Because it's not. Four photos, a link to "The Most Comprehensive Free Online Reference for Packard Owners" (a forum, not a reliable reference), list of models, engine, chassis... this is good for an article on Wikipedia, not for a category which contains every file related to the 1940, 1939... packard automobiles. Files, not informations. Sammyday (talk) 07:22, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But it is! The link simply gives the source of the data. You seem to be misunderstanding what is on the page! Something lost in translation? I'm very puzzled. Please just revert your edits. Eddaido (talk) 04:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You read Commons:Categories. There's no need data on this sort of pages. And, more important, this is not the good place to do so. So I will not revert my edits. If you want add some data to pages about Packard, see Wikipedia or Wikidata. Not Commons. Sammyday (talk) 07:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So I take it you do not like the notes placed there. I'll do the revert for you. Eddaido (talk) 09:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes sur le tableau : File:Edouard Dubufe Congrès de Paris.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, je m'aperçois que les notes que vous avez mises sur cette images ne fonctionnent pas (ça marche our moi avec d'autres images). En y regardant de lus près je vois qu'il y a 27 notes et seulement 15 personnes dans le tableau ! Manifestement il y a une erreur. Merci de me tenir au courant. On peut récupérer les données sur File:Congress of Paris 1856.jpg. Cordialement. - Siren-Com (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Siren-Com. Effectivement, il y a l'air d'avoir un souci. Je vais voir si je peux arranger le problème. Sammyday (talk) 17:41, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Siren-Com : je crois que le souci est que les notes ne pouvaient plus s'afficher, je les ai supprimées et recréées (je pense que j'avais voulu tester la possibilité qu'une note s'affiche en fonction de la langue, ce qui semble impossible - du coup j'ai remplacé par des liens vers les versions linguistiques correspondant à la "nationalité" du personnage, s'il n'avait pas de page sur Commons). J'en ai profité pour supprimer Nesselrode de Data, puisqu'il n'est pas là. Sammyday (talk) 18:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok ça fonctionne. Mais je ne crois pas que ce soit efficace de mettre des liens en cyrillique vers des pages en cyrillique, sur Commons on est en anglais par défaut. Tous les autres lecteurs (hors russes) vont galérer pour utiliser ces liens. - Siren-Com (talk) 18:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Siren-Com je suis justement contre le fait qu'on renvoie sur un projet unique par défaut. Les noms sont présents dans l'infobox en alphabet latin, et le choix des différents projets pour les notes permet de renvoyer à la langue la plus logique. C'est évidemment uniquement un avis et pas une interdiction (je préfère carrément renvoyer sur la page Commons quand elle existe, comme pour 3 d'entre eux) mais utiliser :en d'entrée de jeu, c'est pour moi un biais culturel trop gênant. Sammyday (talk) 22:36, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 14:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sammyday&oldid=863377180"