User talk:PierreSelim/Archives/3

; Archives
(2009/05 - 2011/07); (2012/05 - 2012/11); (2013/04 - 2014/06); (2015/09 - 2016/02); (2016/07 - 2016/11); (2017/05 - 2017/??);	(2011/07 - 2012/05); (2012/11 - 2013/04); (2014/06 - 2015/09); (2016/02 - 2016/07); (2016/11 - 2017/05); ;

I will often respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.
If I wrote on your page, I am watching it, so replying there is probably best.

Proposition[edit]

Bonjour,

J'espère que tu ne m'en voudras pas si cette tentative échoue...--Jebulon (talk) 09:27, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pas du tout, pour moi c'est pour le fun et j'avoue que je m'amuse bien avec mon grand angle :) --PierreSelim (talk) 09:38, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On tient le bon bout !... tu devrais archiver ta page de discussion, si je peux me permettre...--Jebulon (talk) 08:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done

et hop, si j'ose dire.--Jebulon (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci et archivage fait (plus ou moins bien :-)) --PierreSelim (talk) 09:16, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C'est décidé je m’achète un grand angle, j'ai trop souffert à Venise. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

^_^ --PierreSelim (talk) 20:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, peut-être, mais moi ça va être un zoom, j'en ai marre de découper autour de mes statues du Louvre. (70-200 Sony ?)--Jebulon (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Le 70-200 de Canon est bijou en tout cas ^_^, j'ai fait deux trois photos pas loin du Louvre hier :-).--PierreSelim (talk) 12:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Traitement des DR FoP[edit]

Bonjour,

Lorsque tu clos une requête de suppression concernant un cas de liberté de panorama, en conservation ou en suppression, tu peux ranger la page dans l'une des catégories suivantes :

Pour la France :
- Category:France FOP cases/pending‎, pour les discussions en cours ;
- Category:France FOP cases/deleted‎ et Category:France FOP cases/kept‎ lorsqu'une décision est prise
Pour les autres pays :
- Category:Belgian FOP cases‎, Category:Russian FOP cases‎, etc.
- Category:FOP-related deletion requests pour tous les autre pays

Merci. --Dereckson (talk) 09:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour les infos pour les autres pays. Pour la France, généralement j'essaye de le faire, j'avais même mis un peu d'explication dans la Category:France_FOP_cases. Dans les cas où je connais la date d'entrée dans le domaine public je rajoute la catégorie Undelete in XXXX avec l'espoir de perdre le moins d'images possibles. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Annonciation de Nancy - Dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 07:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Annonciation de Nancy - Nave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 07:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ST vs MHR - 2012-05-12-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 15:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Annonciation de Nancy - Dome.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Annonciation de Nancy - Dome.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

J'avais ça qui traînait chez moi, je crois que ça t'appartient !

Je te félicite et suis content d'avoir eu cette idée de proposition: c'est donc bien une "Image Remarquable" !--Jebulon (talk) 23:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bien vue pour la proposition :-) --PierreSelim (talk) 08:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fabrice_Dury[edit]

Hi Pierre, could you — as a fr-native speaker — take care of User:Fabrice_Dury resp. of his uploads, as a number of them are at least wrongly licensed; mostly claiming authorship over PD originals and self-licensing them either PD-self or even CC-BY. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vote douteux[edit]

Mes respects Monsieur l'administrateur. VespaVicenza qui a voté en FP pour Pygmy Scrub-hopper Aeromachus pygmaeus.jpget Vespa + Canal Grande.JPG a un compte ouvert seulement depuis aujourd’hui… je ne pense pas qu’il puisse voter. Quelle est la procédure ? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne sais pas si c'est prévu pour de vrai ce genre de truc, mais j'ai barré les votes et expliqué pourquoi. --PierreSelim (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Projet Phoebus[edit]

Bonjour,

Mon nom est Nathalie Casemajor (alias Seeris ou Siris sur le Wiki).

Je participe à l'écriture d'un ouvrage académique intitulé "Les visiteurs photographes : un outil pour penser le musée" pour lequel j'ai proposé un chapitre au sujet du Muséum de Toulouse et du projet Phoebus.

Je n'ai pas pu rencontrer tous les protagonistes de ce projet, mais j'ai mis en ligne une version préparatoire (lien ci-dessous) pour récolter des commentaires additionnels.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nsKT286QDP-6KCwSADeEUKPgbML9aSvxDA8y2Vo9m1U/edit

Bien cordialement,

Nathalie Casemajor Loustau, PhD Postdoctoral Fellow Dpt. of Art History and Communication Studies McGill University, Montreal ncasemajor<at>gmail.com

Bonjour, votre document semble déjà bien avancé. Si vous avez des questions précises auxquelles je peux répondre je me ferais un plaisir de le faire. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:11, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome of Panthéon de Paris - 2012-05-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peace riding in a triumphal chariot Bosio Carrousel - 2012-05-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent ! I added the name of the sculptor. --Vassil 06:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If I were you, I'd go to FPC. --Kadellar 19:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was to nominate it there, but I have already two active noms...--Jebulon 10:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC) :-) --PierreSelim 15:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:CNEC.jpg[edit]

À propos de la procedure d'élimination de ce fichier, quel est l'état juridique des écussons militaires en France? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 16:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wild Hyacinth.jpg - wrong name[edit]

Looks more like Forget-me-not. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:28, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably right, I may have taken the name from the wrong legend, Thank you for the message. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:35, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passer domesticus - Jardins du Carrousel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good crop and quality. --Selbymay 20:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nordost-dubrovka.jpg[edit]

Just let you know that I've reopened the DR. If you want to hear my opinion, I generally find it a nuisance to "censor" images in some way. Either delete it completely (what is the most logical consequence here according to the Commons' copyright policy; hereby, "widely used in several wikis" is a null and void argument), or keep completely provided that you have a proper rationale for. Any other solution is a rather helpless attempt to keep the project's quality by respecting its policies. - A.Savin 06:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, this case puzzeled me a lot, with another where we proposed to censor the image and keep the last version. I don't like the solution either, however as it seems this trick prevent from having a copyvio, I kept this file because it was still in use. I do really see your point. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. - A.Savin 07:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wild Hyacinth.jpg[edit]

File:Wild Hyacinth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper part of Arc de triomphe du Carrousel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I can't see it : I'm too old. Anyway, I trust you : QI ! --JLPC 08:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olivier Quadrige[edit]

Bonjour Pierre-Selim!

Merci de ton message, tu me devances, j'avais l'intention de te passer un petit mot un de ces quatre à propos de cette fameuse tentative en VI...

Mille pardons pour mon intervention un peu "casse-pattes", je le reconnais, sur ta proposition. Ta photo est, techniquement et esthétiquement, la meilleure sur le sujet, et de loin. Je l'ai soutenue évidemment en FP, "sans commentaire". J'aime beaucoup sa beauté pure, sa netteté, le "lissé" de son grain, bref, c'est le top, c'est la classe.

Je ne crois pourtant pas m'être trompé dans mon commentaire ni dans mon opposition, j'y ai dit ce que je pensais et j'espère que tu ne m'en voudras pas trop, enfin, pas trop longtemps !

ça a mis un peu d'animation, et ça a aussi, je crois, recadré un peu le rôle des "VI" dans l'ensemble du projet des labels de "Commons". Celui-ci est vraiment différent, et c'était peut-être une bonne occasion de le rappeler. Je regrette que ce soit tombé sur ton œuvre, une nouvelle fois parfaitement réussie.

Pour une VI de ce quadrige, je suis naturellement ouvert à toutes les suggestions, la tienne me parait adéquate en effet.

Je vois que tu te débats dans un conflit avec Pieter Kuiper, je ne connais pas ce type et ne veux suuuuurtout pas le connaître, mais je ne comprends pas pourquoi on continue à s'embarrasser de tels emm...deurs qui auraient dû être satellisés depuis jolie lurette. Enfin bon, tu as naturellement tout mon soutien.

Abonné à la "liste", je lis aussi vos échanges, notamment ceux portant actuellement sur les licences. J'y trouve de l'intérêt.

Me rendras-tu le service de passer un amical bonjour à notre ami "dD...", ton compatriote toulousain ?

Bien cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 14:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je crois que tu as bien fait en VI, c'est un très bon exemple de ce que n'est pas une VI. Une VI doit être la meilleure illustration pour moi, cette photo illustre moins bien la Paix que celle que tu as lié dans l'argumentation. Et pour moi les VI/QI/FP ça reste pour le fun (et pour m'améliorer). --PierreSelim (talk) 13:37, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Les VI/QI/FP, c'est pour le fun et pour m'améliorer", me redis-tu. Ben oui, quoi d'autre ? Pour moi aussi !!--Jebulon (talk) 15:00, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Genius of Liberty - July Column - 2012-05-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 14:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Peace riding in a triumphal chariot Bosio Carrousel - 2012-05-28.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Peace riding in a triumphal chariot Bosio Carrousel - 2012-05-28.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidentified plant mai 2011.jpg[edit]

Hi PierreSelim, I would like to research which species this could be. We have for the identification of species a quite well working service at de-wp. But to open a question, I would need to know where this flower has been photographed. And in which environment. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 06:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the question, it was taken in May 2011 in the Hortus Botanicus of Amsterdam. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've opened an identification quest for it. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 08:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pieter Kuiper just took part in that thread, added Anchusa as another possible candidate and wondered how large this flower is. Could you tell something about the flower's size? Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 09:36, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PierreSelim, do you know where within the Hortus Botanicus this has been photographed? See this plan of the garden. Thanks, AFBorchert (talk) 07:09, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My memory fails me on this, I think it's in the herb garden part of the map but I can't assure you this. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keller[edit]

No soucy :) Anthere (talk) 09:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong decision on template[edit]

Since when does assumed "humour" trump CIVIL? This is not a vote – it is the strength of arguments that count. There may be a consensus that this template is "humorous", but in keeping this template, what message does that give to those guided by policy NPA? The keep of this template is the only "joke" here. We are talking about human sensitivities, not the indifference to obscene and generally unacceptable language by a light-hearted majority. Chesdovi (talk) 10:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I do agree with you on the strength of arguments that counts. However after reading your arguments and other users arguments I do think that the strongest argument (which is also a reflect of the consensus) is the one brought by Dcoetzee here. If you do not agree, you can nominate the template again for deletion (however it was kept twice, with the same arguments being brought I don't think the closure will change). Best regards --PierreSelim (talk) 12:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Census Johnston - 2012-06-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:26, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jean-Marc Doussain - 2012-06-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good portray. --ArildV 17:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passer domesticus - ESC Toulouse - 2012-06-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:39, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Patricio Albacete - Brennus - 2012-06-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:31, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CHpass10.jpg[edit]

Hi Pierre

You've deleted the above file and some others due to incorrect copyright owner given, it seems. However I guess that it could be kept by fixing the license. Either {{PD-Switzerland-official}} or {{PD-ineligible}} (even portrait pictures are not protected in switzerland) should apply. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind notification, I'm going to check (after work), If I have doubts I'll start an undeletion request to have more comments. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --PaterMcFly (talk) 11:39, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand how this image could be {{PD-Switzerland-official}} as it's not a type of document listed by the template, and I think it's more complex than just a portrait which might be {{PD-ineligible}}. I'll open a thread on the undeletion request to get more opinions. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo rugby[edit]

Salut PierreSelim,

J'attire ton attention sur les contributions de Ligue_nationale_de_rugby qui a importé toute une série de logo sous copyright. Un petit coup de balais ? Udufruduhu (talk) 09:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci

Udufruduhu (talk) 10:07, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medallion 5 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 08:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medallion 6 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 08:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Occupy Toulouse 2011-11-11 03.JPG[edit]

File:Occupy Toulouse 2011-11-11 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capital of the massacre of innocents - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yes.--Jebulon 23:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capital of the lions - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capital of Original sin - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 20:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capital of Annunciation and Visitation - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good series.--Jebulon 23:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You asked[edit]

Hi PierreSelim. You asked where I took solar eclipse image. The image was taken in Red Bluff, California. I cannot add this info to the image now because it is protected. Best wishes.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hopital de la Grave - Toulouse - 2012-06-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. -- JLPC 08:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fin de la demoiselle[edit]

Elle nous aura fait travailler. J'ai donné la photo à Philippe Annoyer (le conservateur en entomologie) qui a confirmé; je l'ai mis dans la discussion en QI. Si tu as un doute demande lui pour les prochaines photos. J'avais versé l'image dans Wikipédia; j'ai corrigé aussi. Ce sont des situations que je connais bien pour m'y mettre moi-même de temps en temps. :)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DSC04474.JPG - File:DSC04471.JPG[edit]

Restore photos. These files are from my camera. Photos I did in Russia. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 12:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for deletion were explained by Jim in the DRs and by me in the closure, it's not about the fact you are the photographer or not, it's about the object you have shot are copyrighted. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How do you set a copyright in Russia if you're not in Russia?? If I go every year (where my family). This is a photo I did. And the fact that I photographed - did the hand of rural residents (picture on picture), without copyright (without filing legally). You do not understand the specifics of this in Russia (the USSR). Go away you are from my photos. Give me administrator who knows the history and legal situation in the Soviet Union and contemporary Russia. You're doing vandalism! --Krupski Oleg (talk) 12:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's our rules on freedom of panorama. We take into account the law of the country where the picture were taken (i.e. the objects you took in pictures are in Russia they are copyrighted in Russia). Now if you don't believe me, you can try a request in Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests (I may have done a mistake but I don't think so). --PierreSelim (talk) 12:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No! It is located in the province of Russia. This is not the panorama. This plaque. On a photograph of soldiers of the USSR and agricultural workers. They their own photos put there. No lawyers, no law. Board made of wood. I photographed it in 2011. Krupski Oleg (talk) 12:34, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is the Article 1276 of Part IV of Civil Code of the Russian Federation, as said in COM:FOP#Russia.

“ Free Use of Work Permanently Situated in Place of Public Resort

Reproduction, broadcasting to the air or via cable shall be allowed, without the author's or other copyrightholder consent or payment of royalties, of photographic work, work of architecture or visual art, that permanently standed in places of public resort, except where portrayal of the work by such method is the basic object of that reproduction, broadcasting to the air or via cable or where portrayal of the work is used in commercial purposes. ”. Léna (talk) 12:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you read - what panorama? There's trees grow ... :) How old are you? What is your education? I do not do commercial! These pictures of contemporary life in a provincial en:Arkadak for Russian Wikipedia. You "User:PierreSelim", In which country do you live? Why did you make stupid interpretations of the laws??? --Krupski Oleg (talk) 12:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm old enough not to be talked like that, regarding my education I hold a Ph.D, a Master Degree, engineering degree, I've been doing talk and workshops about copyrights and the wikimedia projects so you can please calm down :

Licensing on Commons MUST authorize Commercial work and derviative work, it's one of the most important goal of this project, please see COM:L

Freedom of panorama is not about panoramic picture but about picture of object, building placed in public place, please read COM:FOP and the paragraph about Russia.

Best regards, --PierreSelim (talk) 13:14, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please, calm down. We are not against you.

"Panorama" is a bad name. It is about taking pictures of "copyrighted work", such as buildings, sculptures... Usually, you don't have the right to publish pictures of buildings or sculptures on the internet. In some countries, you have an explicit exception, called "freedom of panorama", which says that you can publish pictures of buildings if you took the pictures from the street. I love this exception, because it makes sens to me. But this exception does exist in Russia only for "non commercial use".

I know, you say that you do not do commercial. That is right. But you published your pictures under a "free licence" (cc-by-sa I guess), which means you give the authorization for anyone to use this picture for commercial purposes. And thus, the "freedom of panorama" doesn't apply.

I know, the law is stupid and hurtful. But please, don't be angry at Commons administrators. Be angry at the people who makes stupid and hurtful laws. Léna (talk) 13:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights of works, which I made - no. This is not architecture, it's not panorama. Where did you get - it has a copyright. This board - which did Agrobusiness residents, with their hands. To hang pictures Agrobusiness laborers (who works well), for all to see. Please, you do show me the document that it owns the copyright about Arkadak's board, which I photographed! I was come in Arkadak every years. They have asked me all about it. They complained to you. They want publish an article in the Russian Wikipedia, with photos of their province, but you did delete files. --Krupski Oleg (talk) 13:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered you, if you still disagrees you should try to get this at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try again. In almost all countries, including Russia, any creative work, including pieces like this structure and the sculpture next to it, has a copyright. There is nothing to show you about the copyright -- it exists immediately after the work is created, without anyone taking any action beyond creating the sculpture. Therefore, in order to keep an image of this on Commons, we must have the permission of the person or persons who designed it.

Although Pierre has suggested that you might take this to Commons:Undeletion requests, that will almost certainly not succeed. Both Pierre and I are experienced Administrators. We have, between us, almost 120,000 edits and Administrative actions. The law and Commons rules are very clear and we have not made a mistake here. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is an article de:Tafel der Besten - It is distinct from your "en:Panorama (disambiguation)" --Krupski Oleg (talk) 15:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass - Basilica Notre-Dame de la Daurade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erythromma lindenii - MHNT - 2012-06-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Location?[edit]

Hi Pierre - could you add a photo location to this pic, please: File:Sturnus vulgaris eating a worm.jpg. Same for any other bird pics without locations ;-) - Thanks! MPF (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll try to do that ASAP, do not hesitate to bug me again if I forget to do it. --PierreSelim (talk) 16:52, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done for few birds, I'll have to check my User:PierreSelim/Birds in Toulouse. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup! - MPF (talk) 10:01, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rugby union in 1993[edit]

Salut,

C'est une erreur de création. La bonne cat est Category:1993 in rugby union. Un chti coup de balais ? Udufruduhu (talk) 10:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci. Udufruduhu (talk) 10:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triodon macropterus - MHNT ICHT.1995.332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 07:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blason d'Antoine de Lorraine - Eglise des Cordeliers de Nancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good ! Obvious QI ...if not copyrighted, because it looks modern...I'll check.--Jebulon 17:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
CommentI believe it was renewed between 17th and 18th century.--PierreSelim 18:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)I can't find any source to back that except frwiki :(, you might be right --PierreSelim 22:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medallion 7 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 20:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medallion 8 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 19:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Justicia carnea - MHNT Borderouge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. -- JLPC 07:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Species is already specified; then no need of sp. here and in file description. Jkadavoor 09:43, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Patricio Albacete - 2012-06-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:07, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo copyrighted[edit]

Salut !

Bon c'est comment Washington ? T'auras bien trois secondes pour un coup de balais ? File:Logo-BSCR 2012.jpg Udufruduhu (talk) 08:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ca se passe bien, j'ai mis quelques photos en ligne sur flickr pour le moment [1] ;) --PierreSelim (talk) 10:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci !

Ah ouai vous avez pris un 380 pour faire la traversée. J'en ai pris un l'année dernière. C'est impressionnant comme il bouge quasiment pas ce gros truc ! Et puis les caméras embarquées c'est pas mal non plus

. Profitez bien ! On se verra à la rentrée. Udufruduhu (talk) 13:02, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vives félicitations[edit]

Tu es passé OTRS!

je ne sais pas ce que c'est mais çà a l'air redoutable, raison de plus pour t'en féliciter. Si tu es là en août j'ai commencé à faire des graines au Musée, si le coeur t'en dis...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS, ce notre système qui nous permet de gérer les emails d'utilisateurs (par exemple accepter des autorisations pour des fichiers). Pour les graines, oui ça serait sympa ^_^ --PierreSelim (talk) 15:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:RawBot[edit]

Please go to the recent Bot uploads from Flickr and change your review tag (placed by the bot) to the standard review tag for a proper review by Flickrreview. All these uploads have been reported as problem here. After changing the tag, please remove the images from the list. --Denniss (talk) 17:29, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the message. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Renommages[edit]

Ah ah ! Je te fais bosser hein ? Udufruduhu (talk) 07:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, un peu :-) --PierreSelim (talk) 08:01, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ha ha je t'ai fait craquer : tu n'en peux plus de passer derrière moi pour répondre mes demandes de renommages

!!

Merci pour la demande. Udufruduhu (talk) 14:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BBG - Citrus x limonia - Informal upright.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Very good quality. -- JLPC 21:02, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo stade français[edit]

Salut PierreSelim,

Est-ce que tu voudrais bien donner ton avis ici ? Merci Udufruduhu (talk) 14:46, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mulino Stucky (Venice)[edit]

J'ai besoin d'un haut gradé (toi) pour enlever cette category. Elle avait été faite avec une faute d’orthographe. J'ai transférer et fais ce que je pouvais mais il faudrait l'enlever. Merci de ce que tu pourra faire. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:17, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BBG - Psidium littorale var. longipes - Informal upright.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments SupportGood quality. --JLPC 06:35, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BBG - Ficus benjamina - Forrest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 15:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression sauvage d'une photo Olivier Giroud (en tenue du club d'Arsenal).[edit]

Bonjour, je ne comprend pas ce qui se passe avec cette photo (j'ai vu que c'était toi qui avait programmé le bot)...

Soit le fichier est sous licence Commons, soit il ne l'est pas... Or, on est attente de vérification d'un mail (d'après le texte accompagnant cette photo Olivier Giroud, qui est toujours présente sur Wikimedia Commons). Il faudrait arrêter de faire n'importe quoi... Logiquement, en étant cohérent, on supprime d'abord le fichier sur Commons et ensuite sur les pages Wikipédia, ou alors simultanément... Ensuite, pourquoi envoyer un bot seulement sur les pages françaises de Wikipédia et par sur les pages des autres langues ? Cette suppression est donc complètement injustifiée dans la mesure ou la photo est toujours présente sur Commons et sur d'autres pages en d'autres langues (exemple : page Olivier Giroud en catalan)... Cdlt. --34 super héros (talk) 20:07, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La photo a été supprimée de Commons pour violation de droits d'auteurs File:Olivier_Giroud_Arsenal.jpg. Celle que tu peux voir sur l'article en catalan est probablement dans le même cas. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Whitehall building windows - 2012-07-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 09:54, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Muséum[edit]

Quel jour t'arrange? Lundi mardi mercredi? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Monkey Puzzle[edit]

Hi PierreSelim:

Thank you for your involvement to select the alt to be promoted for Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monkey Puzzle Rathinda amor by kadavoor.JPG; but unfortunately the bot selected the original file. Can you fix it? -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 14:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tomer T fixed that issue; thanks. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 10:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! --PierreSelim (talk) 12:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mes bêtises…[edit]

Merci cher Pierre pour ce renommage. Bien cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Very good quality. --JLPC 05:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capital of Annunciation and Visitation 2 - Porte Miègeville - Basilique Saint-Sernin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sciurus carolinensis - 2012-07-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Iifar 15:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turdus migratorius - Washington - 2012-07-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

	Hello, PierreSelim/Archives. You have new messages at Ramesh Ramaiah's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Ramesh Ramaiah (talk) 01:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Godavari Bridge issue[edit]

Hi Pierre. Can you respond to this? Have a good day, Tomer T (talk) 04:02, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:2008 Summer Paralympics Gold Medal.jpg[edit]

Could you change the "kept" to "deleted", for posterity? As is the closing statement reads rather... illogical.Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pointing out that mistake. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capsicum annuum var. Fiesta - MHNT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:30, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For info[edit]

I would review the unblock request but I think my comments already would not make me the best person to do that. Best --Herby ^{talk thyme} 07:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My last comment on the AN/U was purely informative, as I really have no doubts the block is grounded on a long history of non collaborative work and copyvios (1/4 of his edits have been deleted on Commons). --PierreSelim (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wire service photos[edit]

While looking for content to upload yesterday, I ran into the following which you might find interesting.

Anyone searching for copyright information for the photo using AP would probably find nothing, as the holder is Columbia. It gave me a lot of insight re: the LOC legal department's comments about UPI photos. Unsure if the links would be helpful elsewhere here re: copyright issues, but have made them permanent in case someone else wants to use them. We hope (talk) 21:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs Castres olympique - 2012-08-18 - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moon bridge - Toulouse - 2012-08-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Danrok 14:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete images[edit]

Hello PierreSelim

you can not help me to delete 2 images from wikipedia Commons they are called: File:Hadsund vandtårn.JPG and File:Mast i.jpg hope you can delete it from wikipedia. - Sincerely User:Søren1997 22 August 2012 20:32

Is there any reason ? --PierreSelim (talk) 08:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crooked Beak of Heaven Mask.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI too IMO. --JLPC 20:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave of Basilica Saint-Sernin - 2012-08-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 06:53, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs Castres olympique - 2012-08-18 - 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposition (bis)[edit]

Bonjour PierreSelim.

Je me suis offert cette petite fantaisie admirative, j'espère que tu ne m'en voudras pas. Tous mes voeux de succès !--Jebulon (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, je viens de me rendre compte d'un leger problème sur les 2 premiers lustres de gauches ... pouvaient pas rester immobile! --PierreSelim (talk) 15:11, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'avais pas vu non plus. C'est dingue, les courants d'air... Mais ça a l'air bien parti...--Jebulon (talk) 16:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salut[edit]

Je t'en prie! Et la photo Panorama from pont Saint-Pierre in Toulouse est vraiment belle. Congratulations!--Paris 16 (talk) 12:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Commons Barnstar
		For your work as an admin and for all your uploads of quality, valued, and featured images. INeverCry 22:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci! --PierreSelim (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Henry G. Marquand House Conservatory Stained Glass Window.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kwakwaka'wakw masks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

photographers workshop[edit]

Hello, thank you very much for your Words in Washington! I was very happy about it.

We have in Germany every year 2 meetings/workshops for photographers. The next is from 12 to 14 october 2012. In the last years there where also guests from Senegal, England, Sweden,... its not only for german photographer. The Workshop is in Nuremberg.

I knew Toulouse :-) I lived 1991-94 in Barcelona, at weekends we often where at the wall of Garonne to relax, we lived there at friends. --Ralf Roleček 21:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios[edit]

Salut salut,

Un petit coup de balais ?

Merci Udufruduhu (talk) 09:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok j'ai déplacé le copyvio sur fr. --PierreSelim (talk) 11:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Nave of Basilica Saint-Sernin - 2012-08-24.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nave of Basilica Saint-Sernin - 2012-08-24.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, en faisant mon ménage, j'ai vu ça qui traînait chez moi, je pense que c'est à toi !!

Félicitations ! Me voici bien content d'avoir pris cette initiative !

A plus tard, pour de nouvelles aventures.--Jebulon (talk) 09:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comme quoi on retrouve toujours ses petits sur Commons (il y a toujours une âme bienveillante pour nous les ramener!), merci pour ton initiative. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Panorama from pont Saint-Pierre in Toulouse - 2012-08-31.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama from pont Saint-Pierre in Toulouse - 2012-08-31.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute over filename[edit]

Hi Pierre. Can you take a look at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:AnonMoos? I don't have much experience with conflict resolution, and I know sensitive political topics like this can be touchy. Thanks. INeverCry 05:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like I got this resolved. INeverCry 17:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick comment, first of all sorry for not answering, I'm quite busy lately (WLM, life, etc.), However I want to say I did well IMO. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Pierre. I had thought at the time that I might need help on this, but it seems to have died down a bit sooner than I expected. INeverCry 20:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-14 - Statue of Stanislas Leszczyński on Place Stanislas in Nancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 13:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs SU Agen - 2012-09-08 - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.-ArildV 20:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs SU Agen - 2012-09-08 - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.-ArildV 20:01, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs SU Agen - 2012-09-08 - 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 02:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abel Fabre - Sciences et Arts - Musée des Augustins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:19, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 in Switzerland[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu étais dans Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 in Switzerland, alors je viens te parler de 2011 parce que ça me parait un peu mort de parler sur la page du projet (de 2011). Je ne sais pas si à l'époque il y a eu des problème avec l'outil d'upload mais sur File:Naturhistorisches Museum.JPG, un contributeur a écrasé la porte du musée avec le musée. Si tu pouvais voir avec qui de droit pour corriger cela. Cordialement. - Drongou (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci. Cordialement - Drongou (talk) 21:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Committee model of Liberty enlightening the world.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:39, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stade toulousain vs SU Agen - 2012-09-08 - 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the sharpest but good enough for sports. --King of Hearts 00:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikiwatcher1[edit]

I still don't believe that he has learned his lesson. Look at his comments in his talkpage and en:WP:MCQ. What are your thoughts? --George Ho (talk) 08:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica Saint-Sernin - Stained glass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I wish I could see the whole arch, but QI. --Kadellar 13:24, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

French Wikipedia article on Air France[edit]

Hi, Pierre. It seems like an automated process accidentally removed the WikiProject listings from the page... WhisperToMe (talk) 21:26, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification and for correcting my mistake. --PierreSelim (talk) 21:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime :) WhisperToMe (talk) 23:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Urgence[edit]

Salut Pierre Appele moi sur mon portable que je t'ai laissé sur ton Email! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucius Verus - MET - L.2007.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 05:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marble bust of a priest - MET - L.2007.8.5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herakles the Archer - MET - 24.232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Erreurs page Monuments Historiques du Haut-Rhin[edit]

Bonsoir, j'ai relevé quelques erreurs sur la page Monuments Historiques du Haut-Rhin: - sur l'élément PA00085335 Pierres Tombales à Beblenheim, une photo de la fontaine PA00085336 a été mise. J'ai transmis quelques images des pierres tombales. - sur l'élément PA00085593 Maison 2 place de l'Ancien Hopital à Ribeauvillé figure une photo de l'ancien Hopital PA00085591. Cette photo est dupliquée pour les 2 monuments. - sur la page Monuments Historiques de Riquewihr figure une photo de l'intérieur du Temple Protestant qui 'est ni classé ni inscrit. En réalité le monument PA00085601 Ancienne Eglise Notre-Dame est aujourd'hui une maison d'habitation située aux numéros 16 et 17 de la Place des Trois Eglises. J'ai également transmis quelques photos de ce monument. Avec mes remerciements pour la nomination d'une de mes photos au Coup de coeur du jour. Cordiales salutations

psu973

Non, c'est faux. La photo qui figure sur l'élément "PA00085593 Maison 2 place de l'Ancien Hopital à Ribeauvillé" ne représente pas "l'ancien Hopital PA00085591". Une recherche sur Google "Le Goupil Ribeauvillé" indique clairement qu'il s'agit d'un bâtiment entièrement différent. Voir aussi : http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ARibeauville-0184.jpg&diff=78704606&oldid=78704248. Cordialement, --Edelseider (talk) 16:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Il reste quand même que la même photo représente 2 monuments différents. Pour être natif de Ribeauviilé et y avoir vécu pas mal d'année, la photo représente l'ancien hopital. Ce qui est attesté par la plaque en pierre qui figure sur la façade. Cette plaque est lisible sur la photo, elle indique clairement qu'il s'agit de l'ancien hopital. La maison qui porte le n°2 sur la place est aujourd'hui un restaurant. En espérant ne pas vous avoir froissé!!!

File:Ribeauville-0184.jpg La photo en question ne représente qu'un seul monument : la maison du 2, place de l'Ancien-Hôpital à Ribeauvillé, qui abrite aujourd'hui le bar à vin Le Goupil (http://goupilbaravin.wordpress.com/photos/). Je ne comprends pas cette histoire de "double". Le monument PA00085591 se trouve au 41, Grand'Rue, autrement dit ailleurs. Cordialement--Edelseider (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emile N'Tamack.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Crooked Beak of Heaven Mask.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crooked Beak of Heaven Mask.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timoci Matanavu - 2012-10-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:55, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau d'eau du Peyrou - 2012-08-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good ;)--Jebulon 14:40, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emile Ntamack - 2012-09-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --JLPC 08:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Katanga[edit]

Hey there! Notably you've recently unlocked Category:Katanga Province, please do the same also with Category:Katanga, which is still in its vandalized mode. Thanx, good job. Orrlingtalk 15:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image Fonds Trutat sujet inconnu[edit]

Salut, Je te contacte au sujet de File:MHNT_-_Trutat_-_inconnue.jpg. Au vu de File:Musée_Augustins_-_Cour_intérieure.jpg, on peut raisonnablement penser qu'il s'agit bien du musée des Augustins, non ? --vip (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Très probablement (mais j'ai jamais eu de confirmation autres que mon impression) --PierreSelim (talk) 07:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Je vote pour aussi, c'est le cloître des Augustins...tu es d'une prudence de Sioux

--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci à tous les deux, j'ai modifié la description et renommé en File:MHNT - Trutat - Cloître des Augustins.jpg --PierreSelim (talk) 17:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Super ! Je l'ai classée dans la sous-catégorie du Cloître :) --vip (talk) 21:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:3MBit[edit]

I think that this page could not be removed. This is the only user contributions without copyvio :) --Art-top (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arg that's the problem when using a nuclear bomb to kill a fly, there is collateral damages. I'll restore the page. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reliefs from The palace of Ashurnasirpal II - MET.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 10:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Gudea - MET - 59.2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 09:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panther seizing a Stag - MET - 1981.241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 09:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tête d'Auguste - MSR - Inv. Ra 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caligula - MET - 14.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden gathering - MET - 03.9c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe a little CCW tilt but very good quality. --Selbymay 09:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear PierreSelim/Archives,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 03:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

OTRS[edit]

Hello ;

Juste au cas où : normalement il y a un nouveau formulaire OTRS de Georges Biard qui est arrivé, avec notamment des photos liées à Skyfall (qui vient de sortir) et à Frankenweenie (qui sort en France mercredi) donc à l'actualité immédiate. Merci d'avance ! JJ Georges (talk) 10:52, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done et merci :-) --PierreSelim (talk) 11:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

J'en ai remis une petite fournée (dont à nouveau des photos de Skyfall, et notamment une de Javier Bardem à l'avp). Je ne sais pas s'il a déjà envoyé le formulaire, mais sinon à surveiller. cordialement JJ Georges (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Il me dit qu'il a envoyé le second formulaire. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 12:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello; comme j'ai uploadé aujourd'hui une grosse vingtaine de nouvelles photos, je lui ai fait renvoyer un nouveau formulaire, dans lequel j'ai inclus toutes celles qui ne sont pas encore validées (je me suis dit que ça facilitait peut-être le travail d'avoir une seule autorisation). Il m'a dit qu'il avait envoyé le truc. cordialement, JJ Georges (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Lesbounit[edit]

Je vois que vous avez supprimé la photo du minotaure de Robert Lesbounit alors qu'il y avait eu une discussion préalable. Il s'agit d'un oeuvre qui est sur ma maison est visible de la rue.

Pourquoi ne pas supprimer sur le site du louvres la pyramide de Paie qui n'est pas encore décédé alors que la pyramide est données sur commons comme l'exemple du site qu'il ne faut pas prendre en photo.

Pourquoi y a t il deux poids et deux mesures ?

très cordialement

--François (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]