User talk:PierreSelim/Archives/8

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
I will often respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.
If I wrote on your page, I am watching it, so replying there is probably best.
Archive
Archives

18:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

QI Jean-Luc Mélenchon[edit]

bonjour, je souhaiterais comprendre pourquoi vous avez supprimé les modifications d'images que j'ai apporté aux deux images suivantes : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Melenchon,_6%C3%A8me_R%C3%A9publique_-_MG_6549.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Melenchon,_6%C3%A8me_R%C3%A9publique_-_MG_6513.jpg

Est-ce simplement votre volonté de ne pas voir ces images modifiées ou est-il interdit d'éditer ces QI pour en améliorer certains aspects même si il ne s'agit pas d'anciennes images rares au caractère historique ? Si ces images ne doivent pas être éditées dans ce cas je m'en excuse mais pourquoi la fonction pour importer une nouvelle version y est-elle présente ?

Est-il possible de trouver un terrain d'entente, d'importer pour l'usage de certains articles de wikipédia une autre version sans remplacer ces fichiers originaux si c'est cela qui pose problème ?

En effet pour des images ayant reçu un label il faut réimporter une nouvelle image en tant que travail dérivé de la première. --PierreSelim (talk) 12:25, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour, Nous sommes un petit éditeur toulousain. Est-il possible d'utiliser votre superbe photo de l'église de St Papoul ou de St Sernin à Toulouse pour un usage commercial : magnet, carte postale, ou petit calendrier régional. Si oui, à quelles conditions ? (diagramedition.com) Cordialement, Jehanobellianne (obellianne.diagram@wanadoo.fr)

20:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Repentir ![edit]

Bonjour Pierre, Peux tu supprimer la première version de cette photo remplacée à la demande de l‘intéressée. Merci beaucoup, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:28, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Désolé pour ma réactivité assez faible sur ce sujet, je suis en déplacement à New York en ce moment, et hier je prenais l'avion donc pas simple de contribuer sur Commons. Du coup c'est fait normalement. --PierreSelim (talk) 23:18, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merci beaucoup ! --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:14, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Masquage[edit]

Bonjour Pierre Selim,

Pourrais-tu supprimer les deux premières versions de cette image, suite au masquages de patronymes des personnes photographiées. Merci beaucoup. Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --PierreSelim (talk) 18:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Wikimania 2014 Day 1 (14912136731).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 12:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petit tigre on the top of Manhattan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 15:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

20:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

21:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Capitole du libre 2012 - I IZ ON Wikimedia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 09:51, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

23:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

16:01, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

18:40, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

20:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Rome[edit]

Tu es venu ici à Rome et m'a dit rien? :) :) :) -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

19:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

15:42, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

19:45, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portofino - 2016-06-02 - Harbor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me, even when the dark areas could have more light. --Hubertl 06:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Prométhée and PierreSelim: Bonjour, je l'avais nominée car avec moi c'est la version anglaise qui s'affiche par défaut, et sur laquelle n'est pas précisée de dates de validité. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:46, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Christian Ferrer: : pas de soucis, je préfère améliorer que supprimer. Des fois, on peut pas faire autrement, le droit d'auteur étant bien chiant, mais bon :) --PierreSelim (talk) 15:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Je suis parfaitement d'accord sur le fait d'améliorer plutôt que supprimer, si seulement j'avais remarqué qu'il y a dates et explication sur la version française, je n'aurai bien sur pas demandé sa suppression...je vais modifier la version anglaise, n'en parlons plus. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
super, donc en plus à la fin on améliore la qualité du modèle \o/ --PierreSelim (talk) 17:09, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
top, merci pour vos actions Clin. Je n'avais pas vu non plus que la version anglais n'avait pas été mise à jour. Prométhée (talk) 15:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]