User talk:Guanaco/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Flag of Mauritania

Hello. There is currently a discussion on whether the Mauritanian flag should represent its crescent the same way as before the recent added red band change, or represent it as a modified, flatter one. It seem there is more users advocating the first, including me, so I would like to change File:Flag of Mauritania.svg by File:Drapeau de la Mauritanie.svg, as the constitutional change never mentioned any change to the crescent, and so we should use the same one as before. Could you unlock the page so I can do so? Cordially.--Aréat (talk) 20:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Guanaco. An an en.wiki admin, I'd like to back up Areat in their request here. There has been a significant amount of disruption caused by editors trying to deal with this in the wrong way (creating alternative files and socking to get that file added in various versions of Wikipedia). Correcting the main file would help put a stop to this. Cheers, Number 57 (talk) 22:34, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

@Guanaco: So, could you please unlock the page? --Aréat (talk) 19:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

You gave me Extended Uploader

Last August, you gave me Extended Uploader rights.

My parents taught me to share, so with some help I decided to share the wealth with 5,988 others. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 13:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - development update, March 2019

This text is also posted on the Structured Data hub talk page. You can reply there with questions, comments, or concerns.

A development update for the current work by the Structured Data on Commons team:

After the release of multilingual file captions, work began on getting depicts and other statements ready for release. These were originally scheduled for release in February and into March, however there are currently two major blockers to finishing this work (T215642, T217157). We will know more next week about when depicts and statements can likely be ready for testing and then release; until then I've tentatively updated the release schedule.

Once the depicts feature is ready for testing, it will take place in two stages on TestCommons. The first is checking the very basics; is the design comfortable, how does the simple workflow of adding/editing/removing statements work, and building up help and process pages from there. The second part is a more detailed test of depicts and other statements, checking the edge-case examples of using the features, bugs that did not come up during simple testing, etc. Additionally we'll be looking with the community for bugs in interaction with bots, gadgets, and other scripts once the features are live on Commons. Please let me know if you're interesting in helping test and fix these bugs if they show up upon release, it is really hard to find them in a test environment or, in some cases, bugs won't show up in a testing environment at all.

One new thing is definitely coming within the next few weeks, pending testing: the ability to search for captions. This is done using the inlabel keyword in search strings, and will be the first step in helping users find content that is specifically structured data. I'll post a notice when that feature is live and ready for use.

Thanks, let me know if you have questions about these plans. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - early depicts testing

The Structured Data on Commons development team has the very basic version of depicts statements available for early testing on Test-Commons. You can add very basic depicts statements to the file page by going into the new “Structured Data” tab located below the "Open in Media Viewer button." You can use the Latest Files link in the left side nav bar to select existing images, or use the UploadWizard to upload new ones to test with (although those images won’t actually show up on the site). The test site is not a fully functional replica of Commons, so there may be some overall problems in using the site, but you should be able to get a general idea of what using the feature is like.

Early next week I will call for broad, community-wide testing of the feature similar to what we did for Captions, with instructions for testing, known bugs, and a dedicated space to discuss the feature as well as a simple help page for using statements. Until then, you're welcome to post on the SDC talk page with what you might find while testing depicts.

Thanks in advance for trying it out, you'll be hearing more from me next week. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

File:FC Bayern München Logo 2017.png

Hi Guanaco, you deleted this file some months ago, but it was already kept after this deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:FC Bayern München Logo 2017.png. So please restore the file. Chaddy (talk) 12:51, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Guanaco is inactive for some four months. @Chaddy: proceed to Commons:Undeletion requests – you can obtain the desired outcome much quicker. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:57, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I did not know that Guanaco is inactive. Chaddy (talk) 13:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - testing qualifiers for depicts

As you might have seen, testing is underway for adding qualifiers to depicts statements. If you have not left feedback already, the Structured Data on Commons development team is very interested in hearing about your experience using qualifiers on the file page and in the UploadWizard. To get started you can visit Test-Commons and chose a random file to test out, or upload your own file to try out the UploadWizard. Questions, comments, and concerns can be left on the Structured data talk page and the team will address them as best as they can. Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Good job 𒁂TIM𒀱COMMONS𒀱On ja.wp𒁂 12:52, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Non-free photos

Hello.Please delete all images of Detlef Dauer (talk · contribs).Details here ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data on Commons - IRC office hours this week, 18 July

The Structured Data team is hosting an IRC office hour this week on Thursday, 18 July, from 17:00-18:00 UTC. Joining information as well as date and time conversion is available on Meta. Potential topics for discussion are the testing of "other statements", properties that may need to be created for Commons on Wikidata soon, plans for the rest of SDC development, or whatever you might want to discuss. The development team looks forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - testing other statements

You can now test using other statements for structured data on the file page on Test-Commons. Some datatypes are not yet available, such a coordinates, but further support will be extended soon. You can find more information about testing on the SDC talk page. The team looks forward to your feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

De-adminship warning (Aug 2019)

Dear Guanaco. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2019 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Please come back. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 07:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging

The development team is starting work on one of the last planned features for SDC v1.0, a lightweight tool to suggest depicts tags for images. I've published a project page for it, please have a look. I plan to share this page with everyone on Commons much more broadly in the coming days. The tool has been carefully designed to try to not increase any workload on Commons volunteers; for starters, it will be opt-in for auto-confirmed users only and will not generate any sort of backlog here on Commons. Additionally, the tool is highly privacy-minded for the contributors and publicly-minded for the third party being used, in this case Google. The implementation and usage notes contain more information about these and other potential concerns as a starting place. It's really important that the tool is implemented properly from the start, so feedback is welcome. Questions, comments, concerns are welcome on the talk page and I will get answers as quickly as possible as things come up. On the talk page you can also sign up to make sure you're a part of the feedback for designs and prototype testing. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - modeling data

As you may have seen, there are community discussions underway on how to best model structured data on Commons.

Direct links to pages created so far:

• Date (talk)
• Source (talk)
• Author (talk)
• Copyright (talk)
• Licensing (talk)
• Location (talk)
• Quality (talk)

Please visit and participate in topics you might be interested in when you get some time. Thanks. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging designs

I've published a design consultation for the computer-aided tagging tool. Please look over the page and participate on the talk page. If you haven't read over the project page, it might be helpful to do so first. The tool will hopefully be ready by the end of this month (October 2019), so timely feedback is important. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

editToken

Hello Guanaco. I just wanted to let you know that editToken is deprecated, and you still use it in one or more of your userspace scripts. If you want your user script(s) to work properly, please replace editToken with csrfToken in source code of the scripts. You'll need to change the following script(s):

• User:Guanaco/LicenseReview.js

Regards, Ahmad^talk 20:54, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Free Software Foundation Europe - Public Money, Public Code (de).webm

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Free Software Foundation Europe - Public Money, Public Code (de).webm, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish ^💬 16:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

special:abusefilter/205

I have just turned this filter off, it is getting enormous numbers of hits, and I am not seeing that anyone is doing anything with its output. Are you doing anything with this filter? Do you have plans to modify it to see what you think that you need to see? Please ping me if you respond. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

and special:abusefilter/207 is even worse, so I ahve turned it off too. If we need to tag files like that then it should be implemented at a tool level, and a phabricator ticket or github ticket should be requested of the programmer. The app writers have the ability and the skills to write tags into their apps, so we don't have to kill abusefilters.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

File:B&W Pepperoni Pizza (Noir) (28916629000).jpg

File:B&W Pepperoni Pizza (Noir) (28916629000).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amada44  ^{talk to me} 20:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Balloons-874841 640.jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 12:57, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Congratulations

This was the first time I ever saw you making an admin mistake in Commons. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

First, you got mad at P199, then you got mad at me, and now you're mad at Guanaco? Why? You posted this on Portuguese Wikipedia which (according to en:Google Translate) explains to another editor that the files which were deleted were improperly licensed (i.e. copyvios) that had just gone unnoticed until now. You also posted something similar here as well. You also seem to note here that anything that's too similar to the original files is likely also going to be considered a copyvio. So, it doesn't seem as if you're mad because the files were actually correctly licensed and deleted by mistake, but that you're mad because somebody finally noticed the files, correctly deemed their licensing to be unsuitable for Commons and then deleted the files.

You've got COM:LR rights to check file licensing which means you obviously you know about COM:L, etc., and Guanaco and PT199 just deleted files that they deemed to not be allowed per COM:L or needed to be taken care of per COM:OVERWRITE. I've already stated that my failure to refresh my browser caused me to mistake your version of the file as being the same as the one that was uploaded, but Guanaco caught that and took steps to fix the overwriting problem. So, again it's not clear why you're mad or what you think should have been done differently. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

• @Marchjuly: I only now noticed the drivel above. You’re still presuming too much, assuming too much, and feeling generally so smug of yourself. Let me tell again I have nothing against that behaviour — provided that one inerrant while doing so. And, once again, you are easily proven to not be. I am not “mad” at Guanaco, and surely I’m not mad at being “caught”: I didn’t upload any of these images and would rather do away with them in Wp articles — I merely try to go along with other users and accomodate their needs in a productive manner (which is something one cannot say about you, apparently). I rather expressed my disappointment at Guanaco’s very poor closure of the mentioned DR which includes a contradiction and a serious untruth (which was certainly written in good faith, but then again, I expected him to know better) — which contradiction and which untruth exactly, is something you will have to find out, or, better yet, give this matter a rest. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

• Guanaco, desculpa a confusão. De qq forma, gostaria de ouvir a tua opinião na matéria. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

File:MetroLisboa-linha-amarela.svg

Hi Guanaco.

Can you look at this file? It's appears to be an accidental overwriting of a free file. The original version was restored, but there's still a previously deleted older version in the file's history. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

There's also File:MetroLisboa-linha-amarela.png which looks like the same version deleted per the DR. How do you suggest dealing with that? -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Commons - Media Search

Greetings,

The Structured Data team is working on an alternative, image-focused prototype for media search on Commons. The prototype uses categories, structured data as well as wikitext from Commons, and Wikidata to find its results. The development team would like your feedback on the prototype, as they are looking to work to further enhance the search experience on Commons. If you have a moment, please look over the project page set up on Commons to find a link to the prototype and leave your feedback on the talk page. Thanks for your time, I'll be posting message similar to this one to other pages on Commons. The team is looking forward to reading what you think. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

De-adminship warning

Dear Guanaco. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2020 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you--A1Cafel (talk) 13:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round

Greetings,

I'm following up on a message from earlier in the year about the prototype development for Special:MediaSearch. Based on community feedback, the Structured Data team has developed some new features for Special:MediaSearch and are seeking another round of comments and discussions about the tool. Commons:Structured_data/Media_search is updated with details about the new features plus some other development information, and feedback is welcome on Commons talk:Structured_data/Media_search. Media Search works in any language, so the team would especially appreciate input around support for languages other than English. I look forward to reading about what you think. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Guanaco

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Guanaco,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Report

Hello, please take a look at this report: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Files named with meaningless/disruptive names (motivated renaming was reverted without any valid reason) as these are serious everyday violations of the Commons rules and protection of meaningless names (in this case, Kalumny which translates as Columns). User Kazimier Lachnovič with filemover rights constantly performs violations of the Commons rules, creates instability issues and protects meaningless names, thus creates confusion. His Commons admin rights previously were lifted, but it is clear that it is not enough. -- Pofka (talk) 17:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

File:Bandera de la Gran Colombia 1819-1820.svg

File:Bandera de la Gran Colombia 1819-1820.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: unused redirect) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Milenioscuro.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

De-adminship warning (Feb 2022)

Dear Guanaco. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your admin rights and also additional permissions (bureaucrat/oversighter/checkuser/interface-admin), if any, on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2022 before 11th March, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose their rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you! -- 4nn1l2 14:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

The same idea example the same change

The same idea example the same change your email address and phone number and email address and the idea that design makes and models for the idea is maa probeer om stasie6 you get home I will have a nice day baby shower for the same day and life sciences Pvt limited and licensors you and your team for people who were not available for remote work with you to be a little while ago and I have been a bit more time for the use and feel better soon I hope you have a great time and consideration I look forward the email and any files attached to it and the other hand the same as last pictures reveal a good time and consideration I look and let them know that we have been working good day please — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.114.145.182 (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Please help... AM I IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LICENSE???

Hi Guanaco,

IS THIS OKAY... too much or too little???

I copied the Michelangelo Pietà photo by Stanislav Traykov for use in an educational display about the Catholic Church and gift to a Priest. Underneath the photo, I wrote:

"Jesus willingly suffered death by crucifixion for the salvation of all mankind" Michelangelo's "Pieta" in St. Peter's Basilica, Vatican City.

On the reverse of the photo (which I framed), where my title "The Pietà" is located, I put the following credits/license and copyright info:

Edited version of (cloned object out of background) Image: Michelangelo’s Pieta 5450 cropncleaned.jpg.; Author/Photographer: Stanislav Traykov Copyright (c) Mark S. Kelly 2021 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled:

 "GNU Free Documentation License".
   Version 1.2, November 2002
       Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
       51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
       Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
       of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

Thank you and God bless in the name of Jesus,

Mark S. Kelly

— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:8806:7F06:200:894:C862:5618:DBF7 (talk) 05:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I come back years later,Why did you delete my file?

Hi, I come back years later ,Why did you delete my file?I take it by myself. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 103.157.251.2 (talk) 18:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Sound Logo

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)