User talk:Aréat

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Aréat!

state names are black and cannot be read well[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brazilian_presidential_election_second_round_map.png

Hi, in the map above, state names are black on darkblue background so they cannot be read well. Can you fix it please? thanks.--31.202.25.100 14:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will make them white asap. --Aréat (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. ;) --Aréat (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary en 2018.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Titlutin (talk) 04:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alternative Flag of Mauritania.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:46, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Needs more info[edit]

I like your map

. This is only for Popular referendums though. Would you please help me source some information to create a World map for initiatives? Thank you--Wyn.junior (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I would advise beginning with the help of https://www.direct-democracy-navigator.org/democratic_instruments/agenda-setting-initiative. Please don't hesitate telling me if you are to complete such a map. I would be very interested in seeing the result. Cordially. --Aréat (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Parliament diagrams[edit]

After creating the diagrams could you refine the default category Category:Election apportionment diagrams to one of the country specific categories from Category:Election apportionment diagrams by country. Thank you, Cabayi (talk) 15:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not so good at this. How would I do that, exactly? --Aréat (talk) 15:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen your name popping up so often lately that I never thought you wouldn't know. Sorry.
For each diagram the text
[[:Category:Election apportionment diagrams]]
needs to change to
[[:Category:Election apportionment diagrams of France]]
or whichever country is relevant.
The bottom of the file's page will have the text
Category (++): Election apportionment diagrams (−) (±) (↓) (↑)(+)
click (±), start to add " of Fr" and you'll get all the relevant categories suggested to you. Help:Gadget-HotCat explains the tool better than I can.
Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 16:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I will start adding it for now on. I guess you often see my name because I'm creating and updating many elections pages. --Aréat (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz avec le Drapeau mauritanien, mars 2019.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

jdx Re: 07:57, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kassym-Jomart Tokayev photoshopped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Hanooz 13:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sièges au parlement[edit]

Salut

Vous préférez que les partis soient classifiés selon le nombre de sièges qu'ils remportent ou selon leur positionnement sur l'échiquier politique ? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autant que possible, selon leur positionnement politique. Vous avez un cas en tête ? --Aréat (talk) 15:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
D'une manière générale. Parfois c'est difficile de juger qui est à droite et qui est à gauche d'autant que le clivage droite/gauche n'existe pas hors Europe de l'Ouest. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:00, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
D'ou le "autant que possible". Quand on a des partis avec des idéologies définies Je suis bien d'accord que ce n'est souvent pas le cas dans les pays où les partis ne sont que des structures de soutien à un chef.--Aréat (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sinon, en Ukraine c'est un mélange de social et de conservatisme voire de nationalisme, et bonne chance pour classer chacun selon cette grille de lecture. En Turquie, tous les partis sauf le HDP sont nationalistes (par ailleurs, par expérience personnelle, un Turc est souvent nationaliste quoi, idem pour les Maghrébins), les mesures sociales sont aussi proposées par des partis capitalistes et tous font du capitalisme car c'est la réalité du monde. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Et en Tunisie, Nidaa Tounes n'est pas vraiment un parti capitaliste ni social. C'est le néant idéologique. Du côté des islamistes, ils ont lissé leur discours, et si ils sont pour l'économie de marché, ils prônent des mesures sociales pour se faire élire. Néant idéologique aussi. Y a presque plus de différence entre les 2. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:23, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nabil Karoui en 2019 cropped.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nabil Karoui en 2019 cropped.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:55, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Les sièges au Canada[edit]

Bonjour/soir,

J'ai vu que vous avez fait un diagramme pour les nouveaux sièges du gouvernement fédéral canadien. Dans un soucis de continuité, j'aimerais vous suggérer d'utiliser le même modèle que celui utilisé pour les précédents sièges.

--Myloufa (talk) 00:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, mais je préfère la version stylisée d'un hemicycle aux version cherchant à reproduire la position des sièges dans chaque parlement de par le monde, ce qui souvent donne des diagrammes trop fouillis, et qui ne livre pas de manière intuitive la répartition gauche/droite de la chambre. --Aréat (talk) 01:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Congress Electoral Assessment Mission in the Republic of Moldova, first round of local election, 20 October 2019.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assemblée des représentants du peuple (Tunisie)[edit]

Les résultats définitifs des élections législatives tunisiennes ont été annoncés, y'a un changement au niveau de sièges: le parti Errahma regagne son siège à Ben Arous et le mouvement du Peuple perds son siège du coup, en conséquence, on a 4 sièges pour Errahma et 15 pour le mouvement du Peuple. Auriez-vous la gentillesse de modifier ce fichier s'il vous plait? Merci.--Mohatatou (talk) 15:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bien sûr. Par contre c'est fastidieux avec autant de partis : est ce que c'est vraiment le résultat définitif, et est ce qu'il y a eu d'autres changements des résultats entre temps ? --Aréat (talk) 16:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oui c'est les résultats définitifs (voir ici). Les seuls changements concernent le Parti Errahma (de 3 à 4) et le Mouvement du Peuple (de 16 à 15), merci d'avance pour vos efforts.--Mohatatou (talk) 06:37, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Congreso Perú 2020.svg[edit]

Hola Aréat:

Restauré la versión anterior del archivo, debido a que el verde oscuro es el color representativo del partido Frente Amplio, mismo color que ha sido utilizado desde el anterior Congreso. Recomiendo revisar las p{aginascorrespondientes a las elecciones parlamentarias peruanas de 2016 y 2020, además de la del propio partido.

Atentamente.

--Luisedwin2105 (talk) 17:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:La planète des singes - couverture.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:La planète des singes - couverture.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kiribati[edit]

Bonjour. La nouvelle Maneaba ni Maungatabu s’est réunie suite aux élections législatives d’avril 2020. Lors de la séance inaugurale, les 44 députés élus se sont également répartis entre les deux seuls partis existants (22 à 22), ce qui dans le système de Westminster empêche de considérer qu’il y a une majorité et une opposition. La nouvelle Speaker (qui n’est pas députée mais est une ancienne députée de l’opposition) a été élue à cette occasion avec une plus forte majorité que le Speaker sortant, un élu de la majorité. Cependant en juin, c’est l’ancien président qui a été élu face au candidat de l’opposition Banuera Berina. Il a forme son cabinet le 2 juillet. Le camembert du Parlement comporte encore les anciens (3) partis et ne tient pas compte de la fusion des deux partis d’opposition, intervenue en mai (mais déjà affichée pendant la campagne). Je me permets de rappeler que les candidats ne se présentent pas aux élections sous l’étiquette d’un parti, mais le choisissent au moment de la première session du Parlement en choisissant de quel côté s’asseoir au sein du Parlement. Pouvez-vous mettre à jour le nombre de députés de chaque parti ? Merci !-2A01:CB01:1008:9AC7:85FA:D25B:EB60:FEF4 13:22, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13 not 11 seats[edit]

Please change to 13 seats not 11 thanks Krazie680 (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What page are you talking about?--Aréat (talk) 21:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madarchod[edit]

Madarchod behen ke lavde teri maa ki chut randi ki aulaad jyada sansad ke chitra banane aare kya tujhe? Teri maa ko kothe pe bithake nanga krke mujra karvayunga. --223.236.210.104 05:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bulletin référendum Liberia 2020.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bulletin référendum Liberia 2020.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Xavier Dang.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Xavier Dang.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affiche du comité de récolte de signatures pour le référendum d'initiative populaire slovène de 2021.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yerpo Eh? 06:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scottish-parliament.svg[edit]

Can you please update the file "Scottish-parliament.svg" to show the Scottish Greens now have 7 seats instead of 8? Helper201 (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Helper201: I'm a bit busy right now. Would you like to learn how to do it? It's not difficult. --Aréat (talk) 13:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:2021 Taliban Offensive - Situation on 25 July.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Geoprofi Lars (talk) 15:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hi can you please add distinct colors for Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan because this map is used on their pages, it very hard to understand what their respective territory, you already did this for Ladakh and Jammu and Kashmir.

Ytpks896 (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did the previous one while drunk several months ago and I don't recall how to do it again.--Aréat (talk) 09:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Bloc républicain.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo Bloc républicain.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 17:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Union progressiste.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo Union progressiste.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:13, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aréat Reader Award[edit]

Wikipedia is yours, and I trust you
Bienvenue. J'ai créé ce site Wikipédia modifiable pour pouvoir accéder en lisant tout type d'information qui a été officiellement écrite par Encyclopedia, et pour échanger toute information avec d'autres lecteurs. Il est à noter qu'il ne s'agit pas d'argent/rang/points. Tout est question de savoir et de technologie R&D Merci à vous. Unmaaned (talk) 13:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aréat, I have undo your rename of File:Besuch des Ministerpräsidenten von Armenien, Nikol Pashinyan, im Kölner Rathaus-2162.jpg, because the image is part of a series, see Category:Besuch des Ministerpräsidenten von Armenien, Nikol Pashinyan, im Kölner Rathaus. Therefore you rename was not necessary, the file name was in no way wrong or misleading. Thanks for understanding. Raymond 06:33, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jammu and Kashmir[edit]

Please do not change the colours of the areas on the Jammu and Kashmir map without obtaining consensus on the talk page. This affects numerous pages across Wikimedia. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iles Cook Parlement 2022.svg[edit]

Could you update this please? The full results show the One Cook Islands Movement winning a seat (at the expense of the Democrats) IdiotSavant (talk) 03:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure!--Aréat (talk) 03:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update request[edit]

Hello.

Can you remove in File:2021 Kosovo elections.svg, the Serb List? On 5 November 2022, all the Serbian members (who are all nembers of the Serb List political party) resigned and withdrew from the Kosovo Assembly. The 10 seats are now vacant and need to be colored accordingly.

Yours sincerely, 31.200.20.43 11:39, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, and the file shouldn't be modified that way, as it it used on the 2021 election page to show the result of the election. The latter change to the assembly in 2022 doesn't retroactively change how the assembly was on 2021. A separate new file should be made for the current composition and used on the assembly own page, no longer using this election result file. Cordially. --Aréat (talk) 12:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you create an updated map reflecting the recent change? For instance another user created File:Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo (2022 updated).svg. 31.200.19.239 21:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be simpler if you just asked this user to update the file he created.--Aréat (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I wrote to the user. However this user has uploaded in Wikimedia Commons only three times and does not seem to be active. If the user does not become active and respond, could you update that file? The current makeup of the Kosovo Assembly, after the departure of the Serb MPs, looks more or less static. 31.200.19.239 06:26, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why not learn how to do it? It's very simple, really. On the page you have the link to the tool used. On it, disregrad the "select country" list and just click on "Add a party". Each one will be added on the diagram, with the first ones being on the left side. On the file in use, click to modify the description to have access to the color, like VV being #CC0033. On the tool, add the parties with the number of seat, correct color (please always use the existing ones on the wiki) and the party name, until you have all of them. Then click on "Make my diagram". If you're making a new file, fill in the country and year then "Generate upload link". If you wan't to modify an existing one, though, please don't make a new one. Click on "download your SVG diagram" and upload that file on the already existing wikimedia page. That's it.--Aréat (talk) 20:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Great blue hole of Belize cross section.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Alfie↑↓© 20:26, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

You said there was a loss of quality to File:2023 New Zealand House of Representatives.svg. But that's not true. The pixel count is lower, but that is because the unnecessary border has been removed. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 03:46, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The bottom end of the circles on the left side are cut, as well as the top one.--Aréat (talk) 03:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. There are not though. Move your mouse around and you'll see it's perfect, no cuts. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 04:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You said there is visibly cut dots on bottom left and upper side. If that is the case then the right bottom side would be like that too, as I exported only the file. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 04:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what to say except that I can see it. Can you see it on high resolution? Right side is also cut but it's less visible because of the color. Also, do note that there is thousands of such diagram files. None before have needed to be cut. Please let's just keep it this way.--Aréat (talk) 04:33, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That link is in png format so I don't see how we can compare that. The svg is the exact template as File:NZ House 2020.svg used in the 2020 election article. This gives rid of the borders that take up unnecessary space. Please leave my version. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's the same file seen in bigger format. Please go on the page and select "2 560 × 1 280 pixels". You do see it's cut, right? Please don't replace these diagrams with cut ones.--Aréat (talk) 05:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not cut and it's good on the article. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 05:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weird that we don't see the same thing. Well, better ask third opinions, then. Not that it is extremely important but I would prefer the diagram to look as good as usual. Let's ask other contributors on the election talk page.--Aréat (talk) 05:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 06:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Nixinova: , since you were the last to modify the 2020 diagram. What's your opinion?--Aréat (talk) 20:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
2020 2023 I see the 2023 is slightly cut at the bottom by a handful of pixels. The 2020 one is maybe too padded however. Nixinova (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the third opinion. So, there's indeed a slight cut. @Kiwiz1338: , could you please make a different version, cutting the empty space around as you said, but leaving the dots whole?--Aréat (talk) 03:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a very small border around the image to stop the clipping. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 04:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Can you do so for the 2020 file as well?--Aréat (talk) 04:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Allgood. Yes. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 01:42, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.--Aréat (talk) 01:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Abhay Kumar et Andry Rajoelina en mars 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 18:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autant pour moi, j'avais en tête que les photos du gouvernement indien étaient similaires à celles du gouvernement américain en termes de droits. Cordialement.--Aréat (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Abhay Kumar et Andry Rajoelina en juillet 2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abhay Kumar et Andry Rajoelina en mai 2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andry Rajoelina en mai 2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Panama National Assembly 2024.svg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Panama National Assembly 2024.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Taichi (talk) 19:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]