Commons talk:Structured data/Modeling/Quality
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
These earlier notes and resources may be inspiring:
- Notes from first data modelling discussion at Wikimania 2019 - quality assessment modelling was discussed here, and the discussion is recorded in the notes.
- Notes from second data modelling discussion at Wikimania 2019
- Properties table - already contains some first ideas on quality assessment modelling
- Interesting Wikimedia Commons files collected because of their structured data modelling challenges
– SandraF (WMF) (talk) 16:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Quality from Wikimania 2019[edit]
Copy here for future reference
- Commons quality assesment (Valued Image, Quality Image, Featured Picture). The assessment - Commons quality assessment (P6731)
- commons quality assement (Commons quality assessment (P6731))
- point in time
- wikimedia project (for FP on enwiki)
- nomination page
- commons quality assement (Commons quality assessment (P6731))
- Also use for (winners of) competitions like WLM?
- award received (award received (P166)) →Item for Winner of Wiki Loves Monuments
- point in time (point in time (P585)) → year (e.g. 2016)
- ranking (ranking (P1352))
- edition could probably be a qualifier for each national using country (P17)
- actually some contest can have their own item (WLM Italy = Wiki Loves Monuments Italia (Q19960422)) / Yes the probably it's easier to have an item "Winner of Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy" and then just ranking and year (no, it's better not)
- Problem to solve group of country editions ?
- award received (award received (P166)) →Item for Winner of Wiki Loves Monuments
End of copy Multichill (talk) 18:28, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
It may be relevant to model something, e.g.:
- point in time
- ranking
- result page (e.g. Commons:Photo challenge/2017 - January - Drone photography/Winners