User talk:GT1976/archive/2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


categorizaton mismatch[edit]

You moved category Margarete Koppers to men, and category Kamasutra Ninja to women. It is the other way around. I havent looked, if other categories have the same? --C.Suthorn (talk) 20:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I thank you for your information. I think this mistake was an individual mistake and I corrected it. Best regards from Austria: - GT1976 (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (131) Vinca major (Greater Periwinkle) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-09-19 (118) Intermittent train control systems (500 Hz PZB) at Bahnhof Ybbs an der Donau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Everyday_objects[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Everyday_objects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Josh (talk) 22:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-07-15 (116) Umbal falls at Prägraten am Großvenediger, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:34, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-07-15 (082) Johannishütte in Prägraten am Großvenediger, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miscategorization by Cat-a-lot[edit]

For your information: I may have reverted some of your miscategorizing edits of bus photos in 2018: putting Chinese photographs into Philippine photographs (like Special:Diff/396155188). I guess it may have been caused by misusing Cat-a-lot, and it had nothing to do with sovereignty issues. --N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 17:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello N509FZ! thank you for these corrections! --GT1976 (talk) 08:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1928 Ansichtskarte Frankenfels.jpg[edit]

Hallo GT1976, du weißt schon dass Fotos, bei denen der Fotograf unbekannt ist, mindestens 100 Jahre alt sein müssen. Bei Ansichtskarten ist es noch gefährlicher, da der Verlag in vielen Fällen die rechte hat. --K@rl (talk) 10:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Karl! Danke für die Erinnerung. Ich habe damals offenbar dieses und ein anderes Foto hochgeladen, ohne diese urheberrechtliche Kenntnisse zu haben. Ich habe einen Löschantrag gesetzt. Beste Grüße: --GT1976 (talk) 11:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:April_2017_February_photographs[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:April_2017_February_photographs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 12:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (124) Way from Schwabeck-Kreuz to Schwabeck-Kogel, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 20:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (121) Schwabeck-Kreuz, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (116) Way from Jägerlacke to Schwabeck-Kreuz, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (149) Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (145) View from way from Schwabeck-Kreuz to Bichlberg to south, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:31, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (118) Memorial cross at Schwabeck-Kreuz, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (134) Small cave next to Schwabeck's former castle, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (136) View from Schwabeck-Kogel to Frankenfels, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (126) Asplenium trichomanes (maidenhair spleenwort) at small cave next to Schwabeck's former castle, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (125) Small cave next to Schwabeck's former castle, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (144) Way from Schwabeck-Kreuz to Bichlberg, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (141) Way from Schwabeck-Kreuz to Bichlberg, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (109) Way at Grüntalkogel to Grüntalkogelhütte, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017-02-12 (29) Rotable fingerpost in Bichlberg at Kirchberg an der Pielach.jpg[edit]

Hallo, nach Verschiebung sind die Weiterleitungen nicht zu löschen oder zu leeren. Die sind sowohl innerhalb als auch außerhalb der Wikimedia im Gebrauch. Bitte die Weiterleitung wieder herstellen. Danke •2003:DE:738:60C6:157D:8252:D66C:9B26 12:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. --Achim (talk) 13:10, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (115) View from Grüntalkogel to north east, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (189) View from Bichlberg to Ober-Brandgraben, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (157) Fingerposts at Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (163) Fingerposts at Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (166) View from Bichlberg to south east, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (170) View from Bichlberg to north west, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (166) View from Bichlberg to south east, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (151) Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (161) Fingerposts at Yetisteig, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (168) Meadow at Bichlberg, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-10-22 (965) 33 80 7848 945-1 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-08-29 (183) Marker stone at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 08:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (202) Old dilapidated farmhouse Bichlberg, Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-01 (187) Finterposts to Kirchberg an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (169) Fingerposts at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2016-07-23 (90) Kecskemét[edit]

Hi! Please can you looking for this file? Th exif date is different as the title. Wrong exif date? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for the info, I corrected it. --GT1976 (talk) 17:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-07-21 (202) Agricultural building in Zell am See, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support May be a photograph for discussion. It's acceptable, but not the best. Resolution could be better, sharpness too. It's a little bit soft. --XRay 04:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019-10-20 (100) Unidentified Agaricomycetes (division of higher fungi) at Haltgraben, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-27 (110) Rescue of a person in an alpine terrain in Schroffengegend, Loich, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2020-03-27 (112) Airbus H 135 Christophorus 15 (OE-XVA) from Christophorus Flugrettungsverein at rescue of a person in a alpine terrain in Schroffengegend, Loich, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Portrait[edit]

Hallo GT1976, habe jetzt gesehen, dass du sozusagen Wald und Wiesen unter Portrait einordnest. Wie wäre es, wenn du dir den Google als Vorbild hernehmen tätest: [1]. Gruß -Bwag (talk) 17:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Bwag! Unter "Wald und Wiesen" verstehe ich was anderes, siehe z. B. en:Portrait, de:Porträt, Portrait oder Category:Portraits. Ich finde, diese Definitionen sind maßgeblicher, als die Bildersuche bei Google. --GT1976 (talk) 18:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Antwort. Habe jetzt mal bei de:Porträt nachgesehen. Du ich sehe dort eher keine Bilder a la [2]. Gruß Bwag (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ich schon. Du darfst diese aus Deiner Sicht grenzwertigen Portraits aber gerne entfernen und ich lege diese bei den österreichischen Politikern nicht mehr an. In der Category:Portraits samt Unterkategorien müssten demnach hunderttausende entfernt oder verschoben werden. Gruß aus dem Lande: --GT1976 (talk) 18:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hier wäre noch eine genauere Unterscheidung: Category:Portraits by view of subject z. B. Category:Portraits at bust length. Alternativ gibt es auch z. B. Michael Ludwig, wo eine Übersicht über die brauchbarsten und schnell zu findenden Dateien machen kann. --GT1976 (talk) 18:36, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Passt schon! War ja nur ausnahmsweise, dass ich mich in die Verwaltung eingemischt habe. Normalerweise gehöre ich ja zum operativen Personal. Bwag (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Operativ ist gut gesagt. Deine Bilder sind wirklich perfekt im Bezug auf Optik, Perspektive, Schärfe, Beschreibung, etc. Leider kennen dir Deine Zeit, Dein Wissen und Deine Kosten in der de.wp wenig an bzw. gibt es wahrscheinlich mehr stille Verwunderer, als dir helfende intern vernetzte Verwalter. --GT1976 (talk) 18:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für das Lob - ist Balsam für meine geschundene Seele ;-) Gruß Bwag (talk) 19:10, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:14, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-09-08 (142) Bridgestone R168 385-65 R 22,5 tires at Wieselburg Railway Station's park and ride, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geolocation would be nice, though (even though you stated the location in text). --Domob 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2017-09-08 (144) Bridgestone R168 385-65 R 22,5 tires at Wieselburg Railway Station's park and ride, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Geolocation would be nice, though (even though you stated the location in text). --Domob 10:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bilder "Urlaub Virgental und Zell am See" in der Cat Matrei in Osttirol[edit]

Hallo GT1976, Du hast die Category:Matrei in Osttirol mit Deinen Bildern vom "Urlaub Virgental und Zell am See" befüllt. Weder das Virgental noch Zell am See liegen in Matrei. Könntest Du diese bitte jeweils in die richtigen Cats einsortieren? Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 12:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Häferl! Danke für die Infos. Die Bilder sollten in Matrei sein. Leider war ich bei meinen ersten Uploads mit den Bildüberschriften und Beschreibungen sehr schlampig. Ich werde es prüfen und gegebenenfalls ändern. Beste Grüße: --GT1976 (talk) 01:58, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miscategorization[edit]

Hi GT1976! Some kind of miscategorization happened here. Thanks for looking into this.--Jetam2 (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you fo you informations, it was an error, sorry. --GT1976 (talk) 17:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the correction!--Jetam2 (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing as photographs[edit]

Hi GT. I've been noticing some odd categorisations being made, for examples these diffs: [3], [4], [5], etc. Why are you moving non-photographic images to a category specifically for photographs? Thanks. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Huntster! Thank you for your information. Unfortunately there were some mistakes, thanks for your changes. --GT1976 (talk) 17:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GT1976/archive/2020&oldid=606031721"