User talk:GT1976/archive/2019

• archive/2006, archive/2007, archive/2008, archive/2009, archive/2010, archive/2011, archive/2012, archive/2013, archive/2014, archive/2015, archive/2016, archive/2017, archive/2018, archive/2019, archive/2020

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 (404) Wayside chapel near Weinern, Groß-Siegharts, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-03-22 (605) 31 81 0838 344-5 at Bahnhof Stockerau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the lamppost is crooked. The post on the left is right. In that case good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:44, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Gender

As you know, I've repeatedly objected to your tendency to split categories by gender where gender is not relevant, but I find it even more objectionable when you misgender people. [1], [2]. I am reverting these. - Jmabel ! talk 09:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

I have to repeat myself. This category was not created by me and also not the parent system. There were already many articles in this gender categories of this country and many other countries and therefore also the parent gender categories sorted. A discussion should be global, not selective. How should many different users know which existing categories are subjectively desired by the various authors and which are required? - GT1976 (talk) 09:43, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Navigation bar

Fırın sütlaç from Turkey

Hi. Talking about gender, can you give me a helping hand to add "navigation bar"s to my Women of Turkey by year cats? Do you know how to do it? Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 20:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

I have createt it now. Please take a look of my contributions. --GT1976 (talk) 06:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Very very kind of you. I appreciate your help. Thank you very much. Have something from Turkey, "afiyet olsun"! (Bon appétit!) --E4024 (talk) 12:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

• Hallo. Thank you very much for all your help again. I think more or less I completed the people/time cats; although I have to polish them a bit. Today I have tried to make similar categorization on events, years and cities in Turkey, maybe also months too; however my little experience in this area (templates) left me on the road. Can you have a look at Category:2004 events in Turkey by city and around (for example Category:Events in Turkey by city by year) and perhaps add a "months" thingy? Making these categorizations I noticed that so many pics in my areas of interest exist, and are quite disorderly classified. Classification in "timeline" and "places" helps a lot. Thank you very much in advance. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Male painters from the United States

Bist du sicher, dass eine Barbara zur Category:Male painters from the United States) passt ;-) --K@rl (talk) 21:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Karl! Wenn Du mir berichten möchtest, dass ich einen Fehler gemacht habe, dann wäre es toll, wenn Du mir einen Link dazu geben könntest, damit ich es ändern kann. --GT1976 (talk) 04:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Habe es schon gesehen, das wurde oben schon behandelt. --GT1976 (talk) 06:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

sorry, aber nachdem du den Absatz getrennt hast, ist der Link natürlich jetzt weit oben, den mein zu dem Thema passenden Vorredner geschrieben hat. Deswegen hab eich da keinen als notwendig empfunden ;-) --K@rl (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-01-23 (200) 33 80 7969 645-0 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-01-23 (215) ÖBB 1116 187-6 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Österreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Weak supportThe main subject is of good quality. the quality of the pile on the left is much less.--Famberhorst 18:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Congrats! I travelled twice in these very comfortable trains. There was a plug socket for electricity and I planned to edit Commons on a lap top, but the beauty of the landscape in winter did not give me much time to troll... :) Gruesse! --E4024 (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Cities in timeline

If we have "cities" and "cities of certain countries" in the same cat, the latter one must be at the top of the cat. See the case of Laos (I played with it a bit :) and https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Cities_in_Iran_in_the_2010s&action=edit --E4024 (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

I think, you either have to change many templates, or you create the intermediate categories Category:Cities by country in the 2010s or Category:Cities in the 2010s by country. --GT1976 (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

I never made a template and am not ready to lose my virginity yet. I'm very thankful to you, though. --E4024 (talk) 19:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

My mistake?

House number 29; I uploaded this as a present to you. => Thank you! :-)

Hallo. I created Category:Women of Turkey in the 1950s using an existing template. I think this should be a subcat of Category:People of Turkey in the 1950s. However, I see that it is directly under Category:Turkey in the 1950s??? I must have made a mistake... --E4024 (talk) 14:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello E4024! Thank you for your information. I changed it, so it should fit. Greetings from Austria: --GT1976 (talk) 18:47, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Tyvm. However, when I open Category:People of Turkey in the 1950s I can see the "Men" cat but not the "Women" cat? --E4024 (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

I dont know about the reason. I think this and this are the same code. Can it be that it is a cache problem and it works a little later? --GT1976 (talk) 19:01, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Too difficult a question for me. As far as I can see there is also another issue. Please notice: " 20th-century peoplwomen e of Turkey "... --E4024 (talk) 19:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, now i think it is OK. --GT1976 (talk) 19:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry to disturb you again

Hi, my patient colleague. I was trying to make new cats for history/year/city in Turkey and I tossed the wall! Please look at: Category:History of Ankara. We have there: "Ankara by century", "Ankara by decade", and for some stupidity of mine "History of Ankara by year" as subcats!!! I tried to make parallel cats for Istanbul, Ankara, Manisa, Iğdır, Diyarbakır, Samsun... There was a certain template for Istanbul and another template which was not used much. I tried to use both, adapt, or add extra cats; but in the end only reached at a certain mess. BTW I also did not understand well where to add "categories of Turkey by year" etc and where not. Hilfe! Bitte. Danke... --E4024 (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Please be patient, I will look at it in the evening. Best regards: --GT1976 (talk) 05:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello E4024! Please take a look and inform me, if it is not ok or you have wishes. --GT1976 (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Different category-styles

I have a cat, Category:Cities in Turkey in the 1920s, which only has Istanbul in it. Ankara and other cities (see Konya, İzmir bitte) are under Category:Turkey in the 1920s by city; I understand this happens due to use of different templates for different cities or decades. Probably no-one thought that someone (me :) would dedicate so much time to categorizing cities of Turkey in time, going back up to the 1920s... Hilfe. Danke. --E4024 (talk) 21:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Hallo E4024! I have to take a closer look. Which is your desired form of Categorie-Style? Category:Cities in Turkey in the 1920s or Category:Turkey in the 1920s by city? --GT1976 (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Any of them is OK, do as you wish; many thanks! --E4024 (talk) 17:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

There are some different styles: Category:Cities in the 2010s. The same problem for example ist in Iran. --GT1976 (talk) 17:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Wrong order in category

Sorry to disturb you this much, really, but I confess I have no understanding of these templates. Please have a look at Category:Manisa by decade; Samsun cats are also in there. --E4024 (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Unfortunately, I do not know why that happens. I have edited and saved without changing. That sometimes hails. --GT1976 (talk) 20:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Date/decade

Hi again. I tried to add a "decade" factor to Category:People of the Ottoman Empire by date but to no avail. I give up... --E4024 (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi again! I have a question about that. How should the connections between Turkey and the Ottoman Empire be portrayed? Would not it make sense to see these as two separate countries, and not to nest these terms over categories? --GT1976 (talk) 17:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Not only Turkey but also some other countries should be "subcats" of the Empire in certain periods. That is what I believe. In the case of taking the two countries totally separate (which is also a respectable choice) there is a "transitional period" beginning with the Greek occupation of İzmir in 1919 and the subsequent start of the "National Struggle" which brought about the Turkish Republic in 1923. (Indeed even before the 1919 turning point or 1920s there was the "new Turkey" concept, at least since the 1908 Young Turks Revolution or the 1915 Victory at Çanakkale. The Dardanelles/Gallipoli adventure ignited the nationalism that brought about the independent nations of Australia, New Zealand and Turkey.) Thanks for all the help. --E4024 (talk) 17:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Servus :D

Wenn du magst, kannst du im Template, das unter anderem die Kategorie:July 1981 in Austria verwendet, folgenden Satz

“Fotos die in Österreich in diesem Monat von 1981 gemacht wurden”

umwandeln in:

“Fotos, die in Österreich in diesem Monat des Jahres 1981 gemacht wurden”

Das Template des vorliegenden Falls ist

{{Austriamonthyear|1981|July}}

Ich kann es nicht selber ändern, da ich mich mit Templates nicht auskenne.--Bluemel1 (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Servus Bluemel1! Ich danke für den Hinweis, ich habe es soeben geändert. Beste Grüße Richtung Norden: --GT1976 (talk) 19:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Unwise use of Cat-a-lot

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:Auntof6_vs_User:GT1976. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

(Photographs of) women

Hi, I don't know if you've seen this yet. I hadn't noticed that we were undoing each other's changes with respect to Category:Photographs of women.

One of the things I do regularly is look at Category:Categories requiring permanent diffusion to zero. That category contains categories that are not supposed to contain files. When I see any that do contain files, I move those files to appropriate categories. One of the categories where I often see files is Category:Photographs of women. That category is not supposed to contain files. The name might be confusing: that is why it has the templated message on it explaining how it is to be used. Most "Photographs of <foo>" categories are treated the same way.

So, what can we do to resolve this without leaving the files in Category:Photographs of women? --Auntof6 (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello Auntof6! Thank you for your information. Unfortunately, I also have not seen that we have since made mutual changes. I moved these files because I thought the category could be moved from there to a more accurate category. Is it not better to specify categories accurately as change them upwards? But I also can move away from this area to avoid any difficulties. Best regards from Austria: --GT1976 (talk) 16:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. Most of the time it is better to move files down to a more-specific category. However, the "Photographs of <foo>" categories are often different. That is because the great majority of files here are photographs, so it is a kind of default and it's not necessary to have all photographs in a category that says "photographs". Instead, the things that are not photographs (for example, videos and audio files) are in categories that say what kind of thing they are. The photographs categories are often used only to categorize photographs by different characteristics (for example, black and white photographs, portrait photographs, and other things).

Thanks again. --Auntof6 (talk) 20:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello Auntof6! Should we generally questions or delate the Category:Photographs, because the great majority of files here are photographs? --GT1976 (talk) 21:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

There is a discussion related to this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2015/11/Category:Photographs. The discussion is mostly about whether to rename the category. --Auntof6 (talk) 21:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-14 (134) Fantic Caballero 50 at Bahnhof Neulengbach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (146) Way from Jägerlacke to Grüntalkogelhütte between Frankenfels and Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (154) Fomes fomentarius (tinder fungus) at Haltgraben in Frankenfels near Schwabeck-Kreuz, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (155) Fomes fomentarius (tinder fungus) at Haltgraben in Frankenfels near Schwabeck-Kreuz, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 00:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (160) Way from Grüntalkogelhütte to Schwabeckkreuz at the boarder between Texingtal and Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Branch in the upper left corner somewhat disturbing. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (176) Natrix natrix (grass snake) with length about one meter at Haltgraben, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (150) Caltha palustris (marsh-marigold) at Jägerlacke, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (147) Caltha palustris (marsh-marigold) at Jägerlacke, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (159) Taraxacum officinale (common dandelion) at Haltgraben, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (117) Symphytum tuberosum (tuberous comfrey) at Haltgraben, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-04-25 (101) View from Bichlhäusl to north, Haltgraben, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:37, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (304) Garant-Tiernahrung in Pöchlarn, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good qualty. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (300) EuroVelo 6 in Leiben, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (316) Dadan in Klein-Pöchlarn, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit noisy but still QI to me --Poco a poco 08:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (318) Detail of Dadan in Leiben, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (310) EuroVelo 6 in Pöchlarn, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (307) Donaubrücke Pöchlarn, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 11:06, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (345) Lifebuoy at Kraftwerk Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:43, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (377) MS Maxima from Nicko Cruises before Melk Abbey, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (380) MS Maxima from Nicko Cruises in Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:47, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (369) Fingerposts in Emmersdorf an der Donau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (361) Rotary drive for gate valve from AUMA-Armaturenantriebe Ges.m.b.H. at Fischwanderhilfe Donaukraftwerk Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (360) Rotary drive for gate valve from AUMA-Armaturenantriebe Ges.m.b.H. at Fischwanderhilfe Donaukraftwerk Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (364) Emergency telephone at EuroVelo 6 in Emmersdorf an der Donau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (367) Reseda lutea (yellow mignonette) in Emmersdorf an der Donau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (365) Bunias orientalis (turkish wartycabbage) in Emmersdorf an der Donau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-04 (201) Massey-Ferguson 6613 in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-31 (910) Massey Ferguson 2640 in Melk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-04 (202) Massey-Ferguson 2685 in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Granfendorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-04 (206) Massey-Ferguson 3650 F in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-04 (207) Massey-Ferguson 3709 F in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-25 (105) Mitas tire of Caterpillar grader in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-04 (203) Brantner trailer in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-04 (204) Baler Krone R 10-16 in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:59, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-04 (200) Agrar vehicles in Wilhersdorf, Ober-Grafendorf, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-07 (100) Leucanthemum vulgare (ox-eye daisy) with insects at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Tragopogon Beetle

I identified this as cf Gastrophysa viridula Grüner Sauerampferkäfer for you (cf means I am almost certain since it's a photo id) Very good photo Best regards Notafly (talk) 13:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC) Das freut mich!

Thank you very much for your help! --GT1976 (talk) 14:00, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

My pleasure And on the second photo (File:2019-06-07 (104) Tragopogon pratensis (Jack-go-to-bed-at-noon) with insects at Bichlhäusl, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg) Oedemera sp. Do you know this website [3] with very many photos of common insects by various routes (taxon, month, habitat) Notafly (talk) 14:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Also File:2019-06-07 (100) Leucanthemum vulgare (ox-eye daisy) with insects at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg These are Thysanoptera not Meloe beetle larvae.Böhringer is, I think, wrong.I will ask him

Thank you very much for informations and your help! Unfortunataly i have much more in Category:Files by User:GT1976 Unidentified Flora and Category:Files by User:GT1976 Unidentified Fauna. :-). A help would be great if you have time and desire. --GT1976 (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

File:2018-03-19 (408) 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg

File:2018-03-19 (408) 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wanda Tiga (talk) 15:17, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-07 (112) Polistes (paper wasp) with nest at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:49, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-07 (116) Carterocephalus palaemon (chequered skipper) on Geranium macrorrhizum (rock Crane's-bill) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:13, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-07 (117) Carterocephalus palaemon (chequered skipper) on Geranium macrorrhizum (rock Crane's-bill) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:13, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-07 (105) Tragopogon pratensis (Jack-go-to-bed-at-noon) with insects at Bichlhäusl, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:13, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-07 (104) Tragopogon pratensis (Wiesen-Bocksbart) with insects at Bichlhäusl, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:55, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-07 (104) Tragopogon pratensis (Jack-go-to-bed-at-noon) with Gastrophysa viridula (De Geer, 1775) and Oedemera sp. det. R. Nash at Bichlhäusl, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (106) View from Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:17, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (334) MS Maxima from Nicko Cruises at Hafen Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (335) MS Maxima from Nicko Cruises at Hafen Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-05-13 (198) Airbus A380 of Emirates over Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Special.--Famberhorst 05:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-06-21 (108) Hydrangea (snowball hortensia) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:11, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (328) Fingerposts at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (202) Cows at Haltgraben in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-01 (110) Yellow Rosa cultivars (rose) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-22 (119) Three freight trains Bahnhof Herzogenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Small perspective correction would improve the photo. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-15 (110) ÖBB 5022 005-0 and ÖBB 5022 017-5 at Bahnhof St. Valentin, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:06, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 (966) 33 80 7848 945-1 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 (892) Zuklinbus Mercedes-Benz Citaro in Krems an der Donau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (326) Ships Granex 2 and Mateo at Danube in Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (110) View from Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:20, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-02 (311) Playground with zip-line near mountain station of Raxseilbahn at Rax, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (353) Liner radar Swiss Radar JFS 364 C from ship Kelheim at Kraftwerk Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 (975) Bogie of 37 84 7829 524-9 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 11:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 (972) Bogie of 33 54 7841 235-6 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 11:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-01-23 (219) Freight trains at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-01-23 (217) Freight trains at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 (962) 37 84 7838 327-6 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (351) Suzuki SX4 (2nd generation) on the ship Kelheim at Kraftwerk Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --SH6188 09:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-19 (327) Ships Granex 2 and Mateo at Danube in Melk, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

File:2018-03-19 (408) Gravel distribution and profiling system 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg

File:2018-03-19 (408) Gravel distribution and profiling system 99 81 9125 017-9 at Bahnhof Amstetten.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wanda Tiga (talk) 09:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-09 (106) Vinca minor (lesser periwinkle) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good centralization of subject, quality of surroundings adequate. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-18 (117) Coreopsis verticillata (whorled tickseed) at Bichlhäusl in Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:47, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

2019-07-01 (105) Argynnis paphia (silver-washed fritillary) on a Phedimus aizoon (aizoon stonecrop) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg

Argynnis paphia (silver-washed fritillary) on a Phedimus aizoon (aizoon stonecrop) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria

Superb. And so typically in groups. Notafly (talk) 20:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm glad that sometimes I have a coincidence and that you like the picture. --GT1976 (talk) 05:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-01 (100) Hanging leaves of Cucurbita pepo subsp. pepo Zucchini (zucchini) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-01 (101) Unidentified Sempervivum (houseleek) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-01 (113) Calopteryx virgo (beautiful demoiselle) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualty --Llez 06:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-01 (112) Calopteryx virgo (beautiful demoiselle) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-11-24 (147) Schwabeck-Kreuz, Texingtal, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 03:41, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-22 (432) 86-33 008-2 at Bahnhof Krems an der Donau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-04-17 (109) MTF Renault Master II of Freiwillige Feuerwehr Schwarzenbach at Niederösterreichische Landesfeuerwehrschule, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-01 (107) Hydrangea (snowball hortensia) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:22, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-17 (780) Steyr 40 in Kammerhof, Hofstetten-Grünau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Der Sand im Vordergrund ist zwar arg hell, aber ansonsten gefällt mir das Bild. -- Spurzem 15:07, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-01 (111) Calopteryx virgo (beautiful demoiselle) at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:41, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-01 (108) Calopteryx virgo (beautiful demoiselle) on a float switch at Bichlhäusl, Tiefgrabenrotte, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-06 (116) HLF 1-W Hagendorf at 47. Meeting of the Lower Austrian Fire Brigade Youth 2019 in Mank, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check the verticals in the background. --XRay 04:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-06 (105) WLA WC 3 from Lower Austria fire fighting and civil protection at 47. Meeting of the Lower Austrian Fire Brigade Youth 2019 in Mank, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-06 (159) MTF Mödling at 47. Meeting of the Lower Austrian Fire Brigade Youth 2019 in Mank, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:29, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-06 (120) Steyr 480 of Freiwillige Feuerwehr Hofstetten-Grünau at 47. Meeting of the Lower Austrian Fire Brigade Youth 2019 in Mank, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-07-06 (106) UL-West at 47. Meeting of the Lower Austrian Fire Brigade Youth 2019 in Mank, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (167) Nature at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:03, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-12-28 (119) Tauber-Brunn near street L 5226 between Tiefgrabenrotte and Weißenburggegend, Frankenfels, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-07 (225) Steyr 480 at opening ceremony of new fire station Hofstetten-Grünau, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quakity. --Manfred Kuzel 08:45, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-22 (985) Bogie of 37 84 7829 520-7 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quakity. --Manfred Kuzel 08:52, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Bilder vom Landesjugendtreffen auf Commons

Hallo GT, wäre es nihct günstiger die Cat mit dem Landejugentreffen deutsch zu benennen. Unter englisch sucht sie niemand und so findet sie auch niemand. Ich habe das in OÖ siehe Category:2018_events_in_Upper_Austria auch so gehalten. Erst das internationale wird englisch gesucht. Auch bei der Bildbenennung würde ich es so halten. Also ohne Hinweis von Braveheart auf Wikidaheim hätte ich sie gefunden. Und so gehts Otto Normalfeuerwehrmann ;-) --K@rl (talk) 10:48, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Servus Karl! Danke für den Hinweis! Ich habe früher die Kategorien in Deutsch angelegt und auch die Beschreibungen dazu in deutsch gemacht. In der Language policy steht aber, dass sie generell in Englisch sein sollten. Ich glaube, das ist, weil Commons nicht für Österreich, sondern weltweit gedacht ist. Ich weiß, dass die österreichischen Bilder für Österreicher wesentlich interessanter sind. Es gibt aber rund tausend mal so viele Menschen auf der Erde, darum habe ich mich entschlossen relativ international auf Commons zu arbeiten. Wenn ich mir z. B. einen chinesischen Feuerlöscher oder andere Bilder anschaue, dann habe ich auch keine Freude, wenn der Text und die Datei auf chinesisch ist. --GT1976 (talk) 12:17, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Du hast recht, aber es handelt sich da aber um offizielle Bezeichnungen. Die Internationalen würde ich auch nicht so bezeichnen. Feuerlöscher in China ist ein schlechtes Beispiel aber Süd Korea siehe Category:Fire extinguishers in South Korea - ich glaube diese Fotos würdest du so auch nicht finden ;-) --K@rl (talk) 12:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Ich habe mir soeben alle möglichen Wettbewerbe von vielen Staaten angesehen und es wird sehr unterschiedlich gehandhabt. Ich würde es in Zukfunt gerne richtig machen. Weißt Du, wo das steht, dass Kategorien im Eigennamen der jeweiligen Landessprache bzw. im Originalwortlaut gemacht werden sollen? --GT1976 (talk) 12:44, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Tatsächlich gibts kein richtig sondern nur ein zweckmäßig, denn festgeschrieben ist es nicht. Eine rein österreichische Veranstaltung hat keine englische Bezeichnung sondern nur eine mögliche Übersetzung. Die Diskussion ob Bahnhof xy oder train station in xy steht seite Jahren, nachdem einer alles auf englisch umstellen wollte - seitdem darfst du nix mehr dran ändern, ohne dass nicht einer von beiden Seiten schreit. Für mich hat der einzelne Bahnhof xy aber Vorrang gegenüber der train station in xy - allerdings stehen sie dann in der Überkat train stations in Bezirk oder whatever. Bei den den Feuerwehren seklbst habe ich es auch so durchgezogen ohne dass wer gemeckert hätte. Ich habe das nur mit Herzi Pinki vorher diskutiert. --K@rl (talk) 15:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Es steht unter Commons:Naming_categories gleich in der ersten Zeile unter Language ..For subjects of only local relevance, proper names in the original language are used generally. - so liege ich also nicht so falsch. --K@rl (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

detto drunter Names of organizations are translated only in some cases. Organization of international relevancy are generally named in English --K@rl (talk) 17:28, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Hast Du diese Kategorie so benannt, weil es keinen offiziellen Namen gab? --GT1976 (talk) 02:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

yep, auch die versch. Übungen in Oberösterreich habe ich englisch benannt, weil es da ja nix offizielles gibt. --K@rl (talk) 12:30, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

OK,ich habe die Kategorie geändert und werde auch die Datainamen noch ändern. In Zukunft werde ich das so machen. Beste Grüße: --GT1976 (talk) 05:59, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Unidentified men

Picture of Samuel Fayette Norton II

I wonder why you keep adding identified people into category:unidentified men, when they are identified in the caption and are in a category named for that person? RAN 19:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

this file was in the redundante categorie men, now it is ok. thank you and greetings from austria: --GT1976 (talk) 20:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

File:林耀文 2.jpg

I have noticed your edits to File:林耀文 2.jpg. Why add Category:Unidentified people?--Kai3952 (talk) 13:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello Kai3952! Thank you for your attention. There was no name in the categories. Also, the Category:People is redundant to others and therefore unnecessary. Do you know a name of this person in Latin script? Greeting from Austria to Taiwan?: --GT1976 (talk) 05:53, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Category:Weidezaun

Category:Weidezaun has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 05:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Frage

moin! woran kann man bei

erkennen, dass es ein Polizeifahrzeug war? lg, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Servus Hedwig in Washington! Da ist mir offenbar ein Irrtum passiert. Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe diese Datei und ein paar andere korrigiert. Beste Grüße: --GT1976 (talk) 06:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Oops, war so nicht gemeint. Ich hab das Web durchforstet und nicht einen Buggy im Polizeidienst gefunden. :)) LG, --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 20:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-27 (202) Summit cross at Gemeindealpe, Mitterbach am Erlaufsee, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-27 (203) Summit cross at Gemeindealpe, Mitterbach am Erlaufsee, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:26, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-27 (173) Bodenbauerexpress at ski resort Mitterbach am Erlaufsee, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-27 (198) View from Gemeindealpe, Mitterbach am Erlaufsee to Ötscher, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GT1976/archive/2019,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GT1976/archive/2019,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-09 (164) Burg Oberkapfenberg, Kapfenberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-22 (156) 33 80 7841 712-2 at Bahnhof Herzogenburg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:08, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi GT1976/archive/2019,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-02-08 (207) Buffer at Bahnhof Schwarzenbach an der Pielach, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Re: File:林耀文 2.jpg

Sorry, I missed your reply until now. If the Category:People is redundant to others and therefore unnecessary; but I see that you do the same thing. In fact, before you edited the file, someone has added "Category:politicians of Taiwan", which indicates that 林耀文 is "not" unidentified people. By the way, "林耀文" is Traditional Chinese script rather than Latin script.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

OK, thanks! --GT1976 (talk) 10:00, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Look at your edits. You still don't know what I am talking about, do you?--Kai3952 (talk) 01:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi! Category:Unidentified men is more specific than Category:Unidentified people. If you think Category:unidentified men is wrong, then Category:unidentified people is also wrong. Do you have a name in Latin script, then I could create a category of name and eliminate the other. --GT1976 (talk) 04:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

What I mean is that there is a contradiction between Category:Unidentified men and Category:Male politicians of Taiwan. Why do you need to create a category?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:36, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

These two categories do not contradict each other. If I knew a name, then we could create a category and categorize it neatly. --GT1976 (talk) 12:44, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Because 林耀文 is a "politician from Taiwan" rather than "unidentified people". I know that you are probably not familiar with Taiwan, but...currently, there is only ONE image of 林耀文 on Commons, why do you need to create a category?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

@GT1976: Hello, are you there? Even if you think these two categories do not contradict each other, you should remove Category:Unidentified people. Because "unidentified" meant that the individual could not be recognized. If you can't recognize who is 林耀文, I suggest you read the article "zh:林耀文". If there are no further questions, I'll remove Category:Unidentified people.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello Kai3952! I removed this categorie, OK? --GT1976 (talk) 06:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Flickr

Pack ma die da?- allein stemm ich sie net beim Nacharbeiten ;-) --K@rl (talk) 10:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC).

Beschreibung ist hier zu finden --K@rl (talk) 10:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Ich habe selber noch fast 2900 Bilder, die ich schon hochgeladen habe und noch beschreiben sowie kategorisieren muss. Zudem habe ich noch ein paar tausend Bilder, die ich gemacht habe und hochladen könnte. St. Georgen am Attergau steht derzeit nicht ganz oben auf meiner Prioritätenliste. --GT1976 (talk) 10:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-11 (163) Eupatorium (bonesets) at Tirolerkogel, Annaberg, Austria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:50, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Jaguar automobiles in Austria

Hallo GT1976 (Ich benutze einen Übersetzer für diese Nachricht)
Ich erlaube mir, Ihnen für Ihre Freundlichkeit für meinen Beitrag zu danken (Link)
Ich versuche, den Kategorien einen ergonomischen Ansatz zu geben, sie visuell, lehrreich und intuitiv darzustellen. Der Wunsch meines Ansatzes ist es, den Zugang für die Benutzer, die sich beraten, ebenso einfach, schnell und unterhaltsam zu gestalten wie für die Mitwirkenden, die wir sind.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, —— DePlusJean (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Hallo DePlusJean! Alles klar, besten Dank retour! --GT1976 (talk) 04:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Dateiverschiebungen

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Meine Meinung

Hallo, siehe: [4] oder doch nicht: [5]? - Bwag (talk) 11:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Servus Bwag! Das ist meiner Meinung abhängig davon, ob bei Wikidata Vor- und Nachnamen definiert sind. --GT1976 (talk) 11:59, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Aha, daher wird der Heinichen bei Givenname falsch eingeordnet! Daher habe ich es anfangs geändert, jedoch anschließend wieder deine Version eingesetzt, weil ich die Falscheinordnung auf "Serverzeitverzögerung" interpretiert habe. - Bwag (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Die "Serverzeitverzögerung" ist mir auch ein Rätsel. Manchmal merke ich dies gar nicht, manchmal aktualisiert es sich erst, wenn man weitere Bearbeitungen macht. Gruß aus Niederösterreich: --GT1976 (talk) 12:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Du, habt ihr schon einen Schnee auf dem Ötscher? Bwag (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Ich müsste ca. 1 km auf den Berg wandern, damit ich hinsehe., ich glaube aber schon. Heuer wollte ich unbedingt rauf übern Kamm, habs aber nicht geschafft und jetzt trau ich mich nicht mehr. In de:Puchenstuben war schon vor zwei Wochen Schnee im Ort. :-) --GT1976 (talk) 12:24, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Schaut aus, wie angezuckert, oben schauts dann anders aus... --GT1976 (talk) 12:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Date categories in Germany

Hello GT1976, I see that you are/was very active with adding German date categories. I think I found some errors. Maybe you would like to help to reduce the list a little [6]. If not then ignore this message. Rudolphous (talk) 19:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello @Rudolphous: ! Thank you for this information. I have already done some things. --GT1976 (talk) 09:32, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Nice, many thanks for this. I also did some - now only a few are left. Rudolphous (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Germany photographs

Hello GT1976, thanks for shifting my files from Category: Date in Germany to Category: Date Germany photographs. --Olga Ernst (talk) 12:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Folder, Innenseite.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Folder, Innenseite.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Folder, Innenseite.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Regasterios (talk) 18:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Plakat.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Plakat.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Plakat.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Regasterios (talk) 18:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Zugsägenbewerb.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Zugsägenbewerb.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2016-06-11 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2016, Zugsägenbewerb.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Regasterios (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:2019-06-15 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2019, Plakat.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2019-06-15 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2019, Plakat.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2019-06-15 Weißenbachler Feuerwehrfest 2019, Plakat.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Regasterios (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)