User talk:Haeferl

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Haeferl!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Dear Haeferl,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpen-Strauchschrecke III - Pholidoptera aptera ♀.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Holleday 13:44, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kemna Breslau Nr 2305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 10:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Laudon mit Teich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Danke. Hab es neu gestitcht und bearbeitet - besser als jetzt krieg ich es nicht hin. --Haeferl 00:36, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough for me. --Slaunger 20:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurpark Oberlaa - Staudengarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evisa - Aïtone JPG1.jpg[edit]

Hello Haeferl,

Thank you for your support and your nice comment. Regarding the file above, the picture was taken in 2008 with a Canon G2 camera. So for this type of device the size of the file is normal. In any case the size required for QI is 2 MP.

Best regards.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jean-Pol!

But now it is no longer in the candidate list for quality pictures, I found it in the archive. If you nominate it for the next time, tell me please and I will promote it.

Nice greetings, --Haeferl (talk) 17:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinplastik Eber im Lainzer Tiergarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:35, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelische Pfarrkirche AB in Mitterbach - Fenster I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Difficult subject. --Herzi Pinki 13:18, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelische Pfarrkirche AB in Mitterbach - Fenster II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, difficult subject. --Herzi Pinki 13:18, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßenwalze Kemna Breslau im Dorf Veitsch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Catagorization missing[edit]

File:Naturpark Ötscher-Tormäuer - Erlaufsee.jpg[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Haeferl!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

Cheers. Trace (talk) 14:03, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Your comments[edit]

(My english is too bad) Sorry, nothing has been personal (es: "no ha sido nada personal"). It is not habitual to be against four images of the same user and I will try that it does not return to happen.

Your commentaries are now visible. Sorry and greetings--Miguel Bugallo 02:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New review of your images. Sorry--Miguel Bugallo 03:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötscher-Tormäuer - Erlaufsee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Llez 13:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötscher-Tormäuer - Trefflingfall III - Wasser gräbt eine Höhle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Not QI to me, bad light and bad crop... but I'm not sure~~--Lmbuga 20:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There are dark, wet rocks - lighter it would be unnatural. And it is not cropped (the other version is an other picture, look at the position of the flower on both pictures. --Haeferl 02:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok --Lmbuga 03:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötscher-Tormäuer - Bank beim Erlauf-Stausee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:42, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Underexposed to me--Lmbuga 20:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to expel me, you do your job well. --Haeferl 02:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can respect your words and interpret them because it is not habitual to be against four images of the same user and I will try that it does not return to happen. Sorry--Lmbuga 02:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Good image. To me the seat is underesposed, but perhaps QI--Lmbuga 03:06, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötscher-Tormäuer - Renovierte Wassermühle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments gut --Carschten 11:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QI File:Ceva-TorreGuelfa.jpg[edit]

I fixed the image according to your comment, it's ok? --Marco 19:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps an error of Mediawiki, or the old image is still in your cache, because i see the correct image! --Marco 21:11, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araneus diadematus - Kreuzspinne von oben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality in spite of f/4--Lmbuga 10:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötscher-Tormäuer - Erlaufstausee Überlauf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötscher-Tormäuer - Talsperre Erlauf-Stausee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aster laevis - Glatte Aster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice and good quality to me--Lmbuga 16:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötscher-Tormäuer - Ötscherblick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 23:23, 05 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Araneus diadematus - Kreuzspinne von unten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo, but I would raise contrast of a spider and, probably, would clean a branch from the right top corner. --Aleks G 23:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Aleks. I tried to do more contrast, but than the background gets too noisy. And the "branch" is a wire from the fence on which hung the spiderweb, I cannot do it away, there are too different colors and the threads of the spiderweb, it is too difficult for me. ;-) --Haeferl 17:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Then good luck in development of the graphic editor. ;) --Aleks G 21:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leptophyes punctatissima - Punktierte Zartschrecke II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Iifar 06:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus - Hainschwebfliege I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Iifar 06:35, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien-Penzing - Mosaik "Die Zeiserlwagen" von Johanna Schidlo-Riedl - 1956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment QI for me (the wire only slightly disturbs). --Aleks G 23:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leptophyes punctatissima - Punktierte Zartschrecke III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 22:55, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochlandrinder im Mühlviertel, Oberösterreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me but...--Lmbuga 23:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heidelbeerschmarrn mit Hollerröster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Did you use a tripod? --NorbertNagel 22:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for promoting! No, for this I did not need a tripod. (And if I would need a tripod, it is at home.) ;-) --Haeferl 23:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The photo really looks good for me --Katarighe 22:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leptophyes punctatissima - Punktierte Zartschrecke I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Hello Häferl - A star for you and your photos! HeinzLW (talk) 08:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bescheidene Frage am Rande :)[edit]

Moin! Nur mal aus reinem Wissensdurst: Warum heisst die Kategorie Harbachsiedlung 2. Teil? Gibt es einen ersten Teil? Bin leider nie in Linz gewesen. LG --Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 20:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hedwig! Ja, es gibt zwei Teile, die sind auch in den Denkmallisten so bezeichnet. Linz ist aber eine schöne Stadt, die Du Dir nicht entgehen lassen solltest. ;-) Liebe Grüße, --Haeferl (talk) 20:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, soeben eine Heftzwecke in meine Europakarte gesteckt. Damit ist Linz jetzt auf der Liste. :) --Hedwig in Washington ^(MAIL?) 20:20, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

überlagertes Foto[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, wolltest du die erste Version verstecken oder war das ein Versehen und du wolltest eigentlich beide Bilder hochladen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC) Hallo Herzi Pinki! Ursprünglich war das nicht Absicht, nachdem ich es aber gesehen hab, fand ich es ganz gut so. Es wollte so sein und drum bleibt es so - wer weiß, wofürs gut ist. ;-) Danke trotzdem der Nachfrage, liebe Grüße! --Häferl (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Bet-at-home-Plakat.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bet-at-home-Plakat.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bet-at-home-Plakat.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 06:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden - Kurpark - Undinebrunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Very good quality.--JLPC 07:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof Oberdöbling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments it may be, that it is a little bit tilt. But the picture is QI in my opinion. --Ralf Roletschek 11:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Majolikahaus - Fassade und Dachgesims.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You are welcome to nominate pictures from other users, but it should be fair to credit the author User:Haeferl, Thanks.--Jebulon 22:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)The chosen point of view is "special", but no problem to me for QI.--Jebulon 15:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speisesaal[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, dies und 3 weitere Bilder betrifft nicht den Speisesaal sondern die Sakristei. Schlage vor, dass du eine Verschiebung machst/beantragst. Gruß Bwag (talk) 09:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's a Wiki. Solche Verschiebungen kann jeder beantragen, der einen offensichtlichen Fehler findet. -- Smial (talk) 09:21, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für Deine Mitteilung, Bwag! Ich war mir eh nicht sicher, hatte dort ja vor lauter Fotografieren kaum Zeit zum Zuhören. Allerdings hab ich für sowas erst wieder nach dem 30. Zeit, da ich sowieso schon nicht mehr alle Fotos bearbeiten kann, die ich zum Wettbewerb hochladen will, und im Moment hab ich auch noch Grippe. Sollte es sich inzwischen "von selbst" erledigen, hab ich auch nichts dagegen. ;-) Liebe Grüße an Euch beide, --Häferl (talk) 10:41, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Haeferl, wenn der Uploader die Verschiebung beantragt, so geht das relativ schnell und formlos. Nimmt auch nich viel Zeit in Anspruch: Oben im Reiter auf "move" klicken. Fenster geht auf und dort links unten ein Häkchen setzen, anschließend grünes Fenster anklicken. Anschließend klick "Select a reason" (vorletztes Feld unten) an und wähle "Uploader requested" aus. Jetzt musst Du noch im drittletzten Feld von Unten noch den neuen File-Namen eingeben und das war es. Bei ein wenig Übung ist das zukünftig nur eine Angelegenheit von ein paar Sekunden - glaub's mir ;-) Bwag (talk) 19:28, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Erklärung, aber ich weiß eh, wie das geht. Hab nur grad gar keinen Kopf dafür, weil es mich wirklich ziemlich erwischt hat. Jeder, der mich sieht, sagt, ich gehöre ins Bett, aber da ist es zu langweilig und ein Buch zu lesen ist mir auch zu anstrengend. Deshalb bin ich zwar da, aber ohne jede Konzentrationsfähigkeit - die reicht gerade zum Bilderbearbeiten. Und da es schon seit August falsch betitelt ist, hat es auch noch bis nächste Woche Zeit. ;-) Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 21:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 17:32, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Hochstrahlbrunnen bei Nacht - blau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done and beautiful. --Selbymay 06:52, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Haeferl,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:15, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:58, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar

hallo, haeferl,

danke für die info! vielleicht kannst du mir auch bei folgendem helfen? manche meiner uploads erscheinen nicht bei den listen, bzw. und/oder auf commons, zb: mariahilf; naschmarktkapelle oder 4 figuren beim apollokino. mfg und danke im voraus,

ah, und wie kann ich normal antworten bzw kommunizieren? klaus oberndorfer Klaus oberndorfer (talk) 15:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Klaus! Ich kopiere Deine Antwort auf Deine Seite und antworte Dir dort. --Häferl (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WLPA und File:Linz-StMagdalena - Brunnen Bildungszentrum - von Nakajima Osamu - I.jpg[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, hast du das Bild absichtlich wieder aus wlpa herausgenommen oder was das ein Irrtum? --Ruben Demus (talk) 11:17, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ruben! Das war natürlich ein Irrtum. Ich hoffe, das ist nicht bei mehr Bildern passiert ... Wie hast Du das denn entdeckt? Danke und liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gern. Ist soweit ich gesehen hab ist es nur das eine Bild gewesen. Als Nebenprodukt für die Statistiken hab ich auch ein paar Fehlerlisten produziert. --Ruben Demus (talk) 19:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Links! Sehr hübsch! Warum ist denn der Labetrunkbrunnen in der Fehlerliste? --Häferl (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Das Foto wurde umbenannt von File:Wien-Landstraße - Stadtpark - Labetrunkbrunnen - April 2010.jpg zu File:Wien-Landstraße - Stadtpark - Labetrunkbrunnen - März 2010.jpg und die commons api hat folge dessen unter der alten Adresse rückgemeldet, dass das File nicht existiert. Keine Sorge er wird unter der neuen Adresse mitgezählt. --Ruben Demus (talk) 23:40, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Erklärung, Ruben! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 01:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013!

Dear Haeferl,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Your feedback will help us improve future contests!

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Public Art team

Copyright status: File:Wien-Ottakring - Kapellenbildstock Johann-Staud-Straße.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wien-Ottakring - Kapellenbildstock Johann-Staud-Straße.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wien - Team Stronach-Auto.jpg[edit]

File:Wien - Team Stronach-Auto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

darkweasel94 09:07, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke[edit]

dafür lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:23, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christoph und Lollo - "Diese Stadt".OGG[edit]

File:Christoph und Lollo - "Diese Stadt".OGG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

darkweasel94 21:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Haeferl,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien-Hietzing - Schönbrunn - Brunnen vor dem Palmenhaus - Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Nein, ich hab das nicht bei den QIs vorgestellt. Habe dort schon mindestens ein halbes Jahr nichts mehr gepostet. --Häferl (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stimmt, du hast es nicht nominiert, sondern User:Anna reg. Siehe Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 30 2013. Du bekommst aber trotzdem die Benachrichtigung, weil es dein Foto ist. ;) darkweasel94 17:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Aufklärung! Wäre hübsch, wenn in den Benachrichtigungen auch angemerkt werden würde, wer das Bild promotet hat, damit da kein falscher Eindruck entsteht. Bei den anderen Benachrichtigungen oben habe ich ja auch einen Link zu den Kommentaren, hier aber nicht. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 17:50, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Das sagst du am besten User:Dschwen, der den Bot betreibt. ;) Ich denke, dass es in dem Fall aber eher daran liegt, dass das Bild erst durch "consensual review" gegangen ist statt über die Standardoberfläche. darkweasel94 18:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab leider keine Zeit, mich hier auf irgendwelche Diskussionen einzulassen, verfolge auch die Beo nur sporadisch. Es wäre ja nicht mit dem Bot getan, ebenso wäre ja eine Benachrichtigung an die jeweiligen Fotografen sinnvoll, sobald jemand anderer deren Bilder vorstellt (und man sollte sie in dem Fall auch zurückziehen können, ohne daß das Bild dadurch irgendeinen Vermerk bekommt). Aber es wäre lieb, wenn Du einen Link für mich hättest, wo ich die Bilddiskussion zu diesem Bild nachlesen kann, leider ist ja auf der QI-Seite auch kein Link zum Archiv, so finde ich das nicht. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 19:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bilddiskussion findest du unter Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_November_30_2013#File:Wien-Hietzing_-_Sch.C3.B6nbrunn_-_Brunnen_vor_dem_Palmenhaus_-_Pano.jpg. Eigentlich solltest du dank "Echo" benachrichtigt worden sein, als deine Benutzerseite dort verlinkt wurde. Überprüfe einmal, ob unter Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-echo eingeschaltet ist, dass du bei "Mention"/"Erwähnung" benachrichtigt wirst. Wenn nicht, schalte das einmal ein, wenn doch, dann ist das möglicherweise ein Bug, wenn du unter Special:Notifications wirklich nichts hast. darkweasel94 19:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also bei "Erwähnung" war schon ein Häkchen, bei "Seitenverlinkung" allerdings nicht, da hab ich es jetzt gesetzt; vielleicht hilft das ja, daß ich beim nächsten Mal benachrichtigt werde. Danke jedenfalls für den Link zum Archiv! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 20:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Häferl,

auch wenn sich mittlerweile wohl alles geklärt hat, wollt ich noch kurz bestätigen, dass ich dein Bild nominiert hab. Tut mir leid, dass ich diesmal vergessen habe, dich als Photographen zu benachrichtigen. Bis jetzt habe ich das eigentlich immer gemacht - auch wenn ich nicht unbedingt vorher fragen würde, ob's dem Photographen recht ist, dass ich's nominiere... wäre wahrscheinlich korrekter (wenn auch aufwendiger)...

Ganz liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 13:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Haeferl,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

Thank-you for participating in Commons:Photo challenge! Come to the talk page to discuss and help organise this new project.

The December 2013 themes will close for submissions this weekend and be ready for voting from Monday 6th January: Coloured light and Silhouette.

For January 2014 there are two themes: A bunch of stuff and January. I hope you are keen to participate. Please read the theme descriptions for full submission rules on each theme. -- Colin (talk)

Hühner[edit]

Vielen herzlichen Dank, für diese wunderschönen Bilder

Könntest du die Rasse noch drunter schreiben? Dann wären die Bilder auch in der WP nutzbar.

Dankeschön, PigeonIP (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo PigeonIP! Freut mich, daß Dir die Bilder gefallen, danke für das Lob! Wegen der Rasse muß ich mich erst erkundigen, danach werde ich die Bilder natürlich besser kategorisieren und umbenennen. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, wär klasse! --PigeonIP (talk) 17:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frage zum Entstehungsjahr.[edit]

Hallo Häferl, vielleicht kannst du mir bei File:Wien-Penzing - Mosaik "Die Zeiserlwagen" von Johanna Schidlo-Riedl - 1956.jpg helfen, in der Beschreibung und auf Wiener Wohnen heißt es 1954, im Filenamen 1956. Ich würde mal vermuten, im Filenamen ist der Hund gegraben und 1954 stimmt. Hast du Gründe für 1956? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki! Das Buch, aus dem ich die Angabe hab ("Spurensuche Kunst am& Bau Region 14. Bezirk Wien" von Susanne Kompast), steht in der Bücherei. Werde nächste Woche einmal nachschauen gehen, ob ich mich verlesen/vertippt hab oder ob die Angaben wirklich widersprüchlich sind. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki! In besagtem Buch steht wirklich 1956, hatte mich also weder verlesen noch vertippt. ;-) Nachdem ich mich aber neulich gewundert hatte, daß nebenstehendes Mosaik zwei, drei Jahre bis zur Fertigstellung gebraucht hat, vermute ich bei den Zeiserlwagen, daß die Zahlen nicht durch ein oder zu trennen sondern durch ein bis zu verbinden sind. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 20:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC) PS.: Was kann man hier auf Commons statt "hochkant" verwenden, damit derartige Bilder nicht so groß dargestellt werden?[reply]

danke Häferl, jetzt bin ich so schlau wie zuvor. Ich vermute mal, dass das Mosaik 1954 geschaffen wurde, aber erst später angebracht oder der Bau erst später fertiggestellt wurde. Oder dass deine Buchquelle einfach das Fertigstellungsdatum des Gebäudes hergenommen hat. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Letzteres glaub ich jedenfalls nicht, da mir das Buch sehr gut recherchiert erscheint (von insgesamt 83 Seiten allein 2 Seiten nur Literaturangaben). Ich behalt's im Auge, vielleicht schaff ich es ja einmal zu den Öffnungszeiten ins Bezirksmuseum und erfahre da was Genaueres. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 21:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2013-02-16 - Wien - Demo Gleiche Rechte für alle (Refugee-Solidaritätsdemo) - Demo Gleiche Rechte für alle - Plakat.jpg[edit]

File:2013-02-16 - Wien - Demo Gleiche Rechte für alle (Refugee-Solidaritätsdemo) - Demo Gleiche Rechte für alle - Plakat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FDMS 4 03:38, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012-05-15 - Demo Free Topoke - Tafel.jpg[edit]

File:2012-05-15 - Demo Free Topoke - Tafel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FDMS 4 04:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stop Acta - Tödliche Bedrohung.jpg[edit]

File:Stop Acta - Tödliche Bedrohung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FDMS 4 04:12, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich werd Dir nicht mehr reinpfuschen.[edit]

ganz sicher nicht. Auch sonst nicht.--Hubertl (talk) 04:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Du hast keinen Grund, den Beleidigten zu spielen, da wir das Thema bereits einmal hatten und ich Dich damals gebeten habe, meine Fotos nicht einfach zu bearbeiten, sondern es mir zu sagen, wenn Dir etwas nicht gefällt, da ich sie selbst und dann vom Original her bearbeite, was wesentlich sinnvoller ist als ein bereits bearbeitetes Foto noch einmal zu bearbeiten. Bei meinen alten, mit der P90 gemachten Fotos zahlt sich die Mühe aber grundsätzlich nicht aus - besonders ein Aufhellen bringt nur noch mehr Rauschen ins Bild. Ich kann diese grauslichen Bilder nicht mehr sehen und es ärgert mich, wenn Du sie dann hervorziehst und so tust, als wären sie die Arbeit dran noch wert. Sie sind schiach, vergiß sie. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 10:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons talk:Photo challenge#Flowers AND insects - invalid nom[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,
du hast natürlich Recht, dass es nicht ganz fair ist, das Bild erst während der Abstimmphase rauszunehmen. Ich werde deinen Punkt auf der Diskussionsseite noch einmal auf Englisch anbringen. Nachdem du aber auch angesprochen hast, dass du dir mit den englischen Beschreibungen schwer tust, habe ich mich als erstes mal bemüht, die laufenden Wettbewerbe zu übersetzen (beim 'Wiki loves Pride' hab ich allerdings ein bisschen rumgemurkst - ich werde versuchen, jemanden zum Korrekturlesen zu finden). Ich hoffe das hilft weiter...
Liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 21:25, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Anna! Danke, das ist lieb von Dir! Wir könnten übrigens noch Teilnehmer an der Vorjury für Wiki Loves Earth (Österreich) brauchen, kann ich Dich vielleicht dazu überreden? ;-) Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 21:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ich fühl mich beim Photos bewerten immer etwas unsicher, aber ich kann schon helfen. Wenn ich's richtig sehe, werden alle Bilder von mehreren Leuten bewertet? --Anna reg (talk) 21:57, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, jedes Bild wird mehrmals bewertet, und je mehr Leute mitmachen, desto besser wird das Ergebnis. Es geht dabei auch nicht ums Finden des Siegers, sondern um eine Vorauswahl der besten 500. Würd mich freuen, wenn Du ein bisserl Zeit dafür aufbringen könntest. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photowettbewerb Insekten und Blumen[edit]

Hallo Häferl,
dass ich gleich für zwei von deinen Bildern gestimmt hab, ist mir auch erst jetzt aufgefallen! (Beim einen hab ich's während dem Eintragen gemerkt und lustig gefunden... ;->). Ganz liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 22:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12. September[edit]

Hallo Häferl, ich nehme an, es geht um den 12. September 2014? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:33, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, Herzi Pinki, das hatte ich vergessen. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 12:05, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Anti-AKW-Pickerl - Es hat sich nix geändert.pdf

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mahnmal für die Kinder am Spiegelgrund[edit]

hallo haeferl, ich habe heuer eine arbeit über die euthanasieopfer der ehemaligen caritasanstalt st. anton in bruck an der großglocknerstraße fertig gestellt, die im kommenden jahr in geraffter form (minus die allzu persönlichen geschichten) veröffentlicht werden wird ("Opfer der Zeit" - Über das Schicksal ehemaliger BewohnerInnen der Caritasanstalt St. Anton in der Zeit des Nationalsozialismus). da unter den opfern auch spiegelgrund-opfer sind, möchte ich gerne ev. das von dir gemachte mahnmal-foto verwenden, wenn du damit einverstanden bist. lg UserːWald1siedel Wald1siedel (talk) 17:35, 12 November 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Hallo Wald1siedel! Natürlich darfst Du das Foto verwenden! Unabhängig davon hätte ich aber auch Interesse an Deinem Werk, da ich auf Wikipedia auch an dem Themenbereich arbeite. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

nachdem ich endlich deine diskussionsseite wieder gefunden habe, die verspätete antwort: wenn die publikation fertig ist - hängt nicht von mir ab, sondern von der leitung der caritas salzburg - bekommst du selbstverständlich ein exemplar, verspricht Wald1siedel (talk) 21:37, 26 December 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Herzliches Dankeschön für Deine Fotos zum Jahreswechsel[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,

Danke für Deinen Beitrag zum Weihnachts-Fotowettbewerb zum Thema Weinachtszeit, Winterzeit, Wendezeit''!

Mit Deiner Hilfe wurden commons um über 1500 Bilder zu Winter- & Weihnachtsthemen bereichert - mit einer großen Motivvielfalt, die von Weihnachtsmärkten und -dekorationen über Weihnachtsmänner, verschneite Landschaften und Schlössern zu typischen Speisen und Getränken reicht.

Wie Du vielleicht unserem Bericht im Kurier schon entnommen hast, haben wir die Community nun zu Abstimmungen in der Endrunde aufgerufen. Zur Wahl stehen die 14 eingereichten Artikel und 100 Bilder, die bis zum 20. Januar durch die Vorrunde und die Einbindung in Artikel ausgewählt wurden. Für die Gewinner, die bis zum 31. Jänner/Januar mit Eurer Hilfe ermittelt werden, stehen durch Unterstützung seitens von WMDE und WMAT insgesamt 12 Bild- und 4 Artikelpreise zur Verfügung. Da in jeder Kategorie – Bild oder Artikel – nur maximal ein Preis pro Teilnehmer möglich ist, sind die Preischancen groß.

Wir freuen uns, wenn Du Zeit findest, dich an der Wahl zu beteiligen. Du hast beliebig viele gereihte Stimmen, wobei erste Stimmen mehr zählen als nachfolgende (zur Reihung setzt Du einfach eine Zahl vor deine Unterschrift).

Um eine genüssliche Betrachtung der Bilder zu ermöglichen, sind die Finalisten nicht nur auf der Abstimmungsseite, sondern auch in einer Galerie zu finden.

Liebe Grüße und viel Spaß beim Bilder und Artikel bewerten!

Anna reg, Dr. Bernd Gross (talk) 08:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich[edit]

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an infowikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über vereinwikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC) > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen fest[edit]

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, sind 45 Deiner Bilder: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wien - Demo Mensch sein in Österreich - 18.jpg[edit]

File:Wien - Demo Mensch sein in Österreich - 18.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

217.50.122.165 20:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wien - Demo Mensch sein in Österreich - 9.jpg[edit]

File:Wien - Demo Mensch sein in Österreich - 9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

217.50.122.165 20:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016[edit]

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mist[edit]

weil wir darüber gesprochen habe, der Hinweis auf Category:Text:Du hast es in der Hand. Bau keinen Mist.
File:Schwendau - Burgstallschrofen - Dem Mesner sei Hüttl.jpg als Denkmal zu bezeichnen, ist doch auch …

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki! Danke für den Link! Da fehlen noch mindestens "Ich bin für jeden Dreck zu haben", "Ganz Wien bleibt clean" und "Mist für mich, Lob für Dich". Hab die schon zu Zeiten, als ich noch mit der Coolpix fotografiert hab, alle mal aufgenommen und dann nicht hochgeladen, weil ich dachte, die würden eh sicher gelöscht. Aber jetzt lad ich keine Coolpix-Fotos mehr hoch, lieber mach ich sie neu. - Zum Mesner sein Hüttl: Es ist genausoviel oder -wenig Denkmal wie dieses Kreuz, allerdings hab ich es nicht zu WLM hochgeladen, sondern erst danach. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bei "Ich bin für jeden Dreck zu haben" habe ich noch eins mit einem Aufkleber von H.C. drauf. Das Kreuz und das Hüttl schmeiß ich dann raus, ist ja nicht von Manfred Erjautz. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:41, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Finde nirgends beim Kreuz einen Hinweis auf Manfred Erjautz, wie kommst Du denn auf den? Arbeitest Du vielleicht schon wieder an einer Liste mit Kunstwerken? ;-) Mit Deiner Aufnahme von "Ich bin für jeden Dreck zu haben" solltest Du die Sammlung unbedingt erweitern! :-) Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 21:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hat man die Lösung, dann ist ein Nachweis einfach zu finden, z.B. [1], Suche. Auf den Erjautz bin ich wegen Lego und Playmobil gekommen. Das andere Kreuz hat den Titel „Vater, vergib ihnen, denn sie wissen nicht, was sie tun!“ und stammt von Schülern der HTL Jenbach. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 10:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wie ich sehe, hast Du ja gleich nachgelegt - und sogar einen der ganz neuen Sprüche (kannte ich noch nicht)! Wobei sich "Beifall für Abfall" im Wienerischen ein bissl sperrig anhört. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Franz West[edit]

Gut dass mehr als eine aufpasst. merci --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ich war ja wieder mal erstaunt, was Dir so alles auffällt! Danke ebenfalls! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 20:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gratulation![edit]

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich - und herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Foto File:Imst - Bundesrealgymnasium - II.jpg hat Platz 6 im Hauptwettbewerb gewonnen und deine Fotos File:Erzbergbahn auf dem Rötzgrabenviadukt in Vordernberg - I.jpg und File:Erzbergbahn - abgestellte Waggons neben dem Ringlokschuppen in Vordernberg.jpg belegen in der Sonderkategorie zu Bahninfrastruktur Platz 1. Insgesamt wurden dieses Jahr 7757 Fotos eingereicht. Die Liste der Preisträger findest du hier: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/category/news/.

Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn du persönlich an der Preisverleihung teilnehmen kannst, die am 9. Dezember 2015 um 17 Uhr in der Wiener Hofburg stattfindet. Wir werden dich diesbezüglich noch per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Edit 2015[edit]

Schon gesehen? Im Wikipedia-2015-Jahresrückblick-Video ist auch ein Foto von dir. Liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien-Innere Stadt - ehem bürgerliches Zeughaus - Feuerwehrzentrale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Türnitz mit Blick auf die kath Pfarrkirche hl Martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp enough, not too noisy, good perspective a Q1one --Michielverbeek 00:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brunnen Hanselmayergasse 9-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Gedenkkundgebung Gemeinsam gegen den Terror - Je Suis Charlie - I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but the description in English missing. --F. Riedelio 11:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dankeschön und Bitte um Mithilfe[edit]

Danke für Dein Dankeschön, manchmal macht es auch mir Freude, wenn frisch gemachte Fotos, zumal wenn sie auf Wikinews eine Fotostrecke bekommen haben, auch von Commons her (+ Wikipedia!) leichter gefunden werden können. Eigentlich hab' ich dafür keine Zeit und Kraft, doch ist es vielleicht wie früher vor etwa 30 Jahren, als ich noch gemalt hatte: Etwas verrückt, mit soviel Aufwand etwas zur (Mit-)Gestaltung dieser Welt ein kleinwenig beigetragen zu haben. In unserer virtuellen Bilderwelt bräuchte es freilich noch mehr globale Zusammenarbeit (auch wenn es schwierig ist, Leute mit sehr gutem, oft auch noch sehr speziellem Fach-Englich verstehen zu wollen), gerade deswegen finde ich die Kommunikation über die Bilder hier, über Sprachgrenzen hinweg, so wichtig: Die von mir mitgestalteten Seiten zu den Monaten sind nur ein Anfang (jedenfalls sind mehrere gestartet), January 2016, February 2016 sind so einigermassen gelungen, doch Mithilfe wäre dringend nötig! Schön wäre es freilich, wenn die Seiten schon bald zu Monatsanfang gestartet werden könnten, damit sie (wie im dann noch kurzen de:Februar 2016 schon ab 2. 2.) von der Wikipedia-Welt her aufgesucht werden könnten. Für den März 2016 (Commons: March 2016) hab' ich es bisher nicht geschafft: Humor ist, wenn mann trotz der kaputten Füsse trotzdem durch Marburg spazieren geht, wenn die globalen Tage zusammengebastelt sind (gestern ... mit Rotlink zur "März-Seite"). Magst Du mich unterstützen? Teamwork? --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 16:18, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2016[edit]

Servus Haeferl,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen. Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Zusätzlich wollen wir dich dazu einladen, als Mitglied der Vorjury die diesjährigen Beiträge zu begutachten: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2016/Österreich/Jury. Du kannst bei der Vorjury auch mitmachen, wenn du selbst am Fotowettbewerb teilnimmst. Deine eigenen Fotos werden dir dann nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt.
Bitte melde dich zur Vorjury an. Der Bewertungszeitraum liegt zwischen 15. Mai und 15. Juni 2016. Jede Stimme ist willkommen. Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Agruwie^Disk 15:07, 5 May 2016 (CET)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Haeferl,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in Österreich[edit]

WLE logo

Die Jury bewertet nun alle eingereichten Fotos. Die Preisträger geben wir am 31. Juli 2016 auf der Website wikilovesearth.at bekannt.

Bei dieser Gelegenheit möchte ich dich an die WikiCon 2016 Mitte September erinnern, für die noch bis 30. Juni Programmvorschläge eingereicht werden können. Wikimedia Österreich wird wieder Stipendien für die Teilnahme zur Verfügung stellen, genauere Infos veröffentlichen wir Ende Juni. Bei Fragen dazu kannst du dich gerne an uns wenden: verein@wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Letzte Fehler[edit]

Servus Häferl.

Ich habe einige Fehler auf der Seite https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:%C3%96sterreich/Denkmallisten/Fehler ausgemerzt. Fehlen nur noch zwei aus Paldau von dir. Kannst du Licht ins Dunkel bringen, welches Objekt zu welcher Denkmalid gehört?

lg, --Thomas Ledl (talk) 11:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Dank[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, danke für den Dank z.B. für das da. Mehr würde ich mich freuen, wenn du daraus was für deine nächsten Bilder lernen wolltest. Signatur erkennen (geht leichter vor Ort als durch ein Gitter hindurch geraten), bearbeiten, markieren, Künstler kategorisieren (in Tirol hilft der TKK), Entstehungsjahr, das kannst du auch. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover[edit]

You can move your own files now if you want. INeverCry 00:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland![edit]

Hallo Haeferl!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breitenstein - Semmeringbahn - Krausel-Klause-Viadukt - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steyr - Steyrtalbahn - Ausfahrt aus dem Bahnhof Steyr-Lokalbahn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldneukirchen - Steyrtalbahn - Ausfahrt aus der Waldneukirchner Brücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]

Haeferl

belegte mit diesem Bild den

30. Platz

im Wettbewerb

Wiki Loves Monuments
2016 in Deutschland

Hallo,

hiermit möchte ich Dir im Namen der Jury zu Deiner erfolgreichen Teilnahme am diesjährigen Denkmal-Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments in Deutschland ganz herzlich gratulieren.

Insgesamt wurden in diesem Jahr rund 39.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen hochgeladen und für die Bebilderung von Artikeln und Listen in der Wikipedia zur Verfügung gestellt. Gern kannst Du Dich hier auch weiterhin beteiligen! Aus dieser großen Zahl heraus erreichte Dein nebenstehendes tolles Foto einen Platz unter den Top 100 – ein Erfolg, der dementsprechend hoch einzuschätzen ist.

Als Preis erhältst Du einen Foto- oder Buchgutschein im Wert von 20 Euro. Daher bitten wir Dich, eine E-Mail an communitywikimedia.de zu schicken, in der Du Deinen Benutzernamen und Deinen Klarnamen angibst. Gibt dort bitte auch an, ob du lieber einen Foto- oder lieber einen Buchgutschein per E-Mail zugeschickt bekommen möchtest.

Die 100 Bilder aller Preisträgerinnen und Preisträger kannst Du Dir hier anschauen.

Ich hoffe, dass der Wettbewerb Dir mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet hat wie uns. Auf ein Wiedersehen im Jahr 2017!

i. A. --Nicola (talk) 07:44, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrbach-Berg - Maria Hilf-Kapelle - Statue heiliger Florian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrbach-Berg - Kreuzweg von Osten zur Wallfahrtskirche Maria Trost - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrbach-Berg - Lourdeskapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrbach-Berg - Wallfahrtskirche Maria Trost - Marienaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Veitshöchheim - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 27 - Blick in einen Ausstellungsraum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 23 - Scheren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Amazing those old scissors. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinbach - Waldneukirchen - Steyrtalbahn - Zug fährt über Waldneukirchner Brücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldneukirchen - Steyrtalbahn - Waldneukirchner Brücke mit einfahrendem Zug - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldneukirchen - Steyrtalbahn - abgestellter Waggon - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldneukirchen - Steyrtalbahn - abgestellter Waggon - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reith bei Seefeld - Pfarrkirche hl Nikolaus - Deckengemälde - Rudolf Margreiter 1910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reith bei Seefeld - Zirl - Schlossbachgrabenbrücke mit S5 Richtung Scharnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 20 - Bandwebstuhl mit Loch-Schlitz-Blatt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:03, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Scharnitz - Mittenwaldbahn - Isarbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchberg an der Donau - Pfarrkirche hl Othmar - Kanzel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchberg an der Donau - Pfarrkirche hl Othmar - Hochaltar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchberg an der Donau - Pfarrkirche hl Othmar - Grabplatte des Kirchengründers Gundacker von Tannberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 30 - verschiedene Handwebstühle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 26 - Garnrollen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 01:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 25 - Schärbretter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 19 - Modell eines Gewichtswebstuhls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:13, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchberg ob der Donau - Ortsbildmesse - 06 - Holzfahrräder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 21 - Weberschiffchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 22 - Zunftzeichen aus 1473 mit Mariendarstellung und Weberschiffchen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oepping - ND422 - Kapellen-Linde beim Ruckerhof - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrbach-Berg - Kreuzweg von Osten zur Wallfahrtskirche Maria Trost - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrbach-Berg - Wallfahrtskirche Maria Trost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nikhilb239 02:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 24 - Spindeln für Kett- und Schussspulräder.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrbach-Berg - Maria-Hilf-Kapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 06 - Webautomat Saurer 1958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldneukirchen - Steyrtalbahn - Waldneukirchner Brücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Anti-Akademikerball-Demo der Offensive gegen rechts - III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty special photograph `n` good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Anti-Akademikerball-Demo der Offensive gegen rechts - IIIb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very special image `n` good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zirl - Mittenwaldbahn - Kaiserstandviadukt mit S5 Richtung Scharnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Amazing series of the Mittewald railway line! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zirl - Mittenwaldbahn - Endportal Vorbergtunnel 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zirl - Mittenwaldbahn - S5 Richtung Scharnitz verschwindet im Vorbergtunnel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrbach-Berg - Maria Hilf-Kapelle - Altar mit Gnadenbild Maria Hilf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Kroton 07:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aschach an der Steyr - Steyrtalbahn - Haltestelle Sommerhubermühle mit namengebender Sommerhubermühle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry and ooops![edit]

Sorry for nominating an already chosen QI. Perhaps it is the early morning, that my brain was still sleeping and I was not attentive enough. I nominated another one. Hopefully you don`t mind. Thank you anyway for promoting some of my images. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Johann! Brauchst Dich nicht entschuldigen (auch nicht für jedes Pro bedanken ;-)), hab mir eh gedacht, daß es ein Versehen war. Aber wennst deutsch mit mir redest, versteh ich Dich leichter. ;-) Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 03:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perspective[edit]

Hi, I am just trying to help. It is probably not perfect, certainly better than before, and IMO good enough for QI. Now if you can correct the perspective from RAW files, it is even better. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yann! It is nice that you are so helpful, but I looked up from below and find the perspective so okay. I do not want it so straight. Nice greetings, --Häferl (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Rock-ola tempo 200 HI-FI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Amazing. The "Rock-Ola" reminds me of the days of my youth. Thank you for this image of good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Kreuzweg bei der Grubberg-Kapelle - Station 11 - Jesus wird ans Kreuz genagelt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 32 C - Grab von Barbara Prammer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thank you for this series of graves of honor. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 Opfergräber - Grab von Friedrich Zawrel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 33 G - Grab von Erika Weinzierl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 33 G - Grab von Hedy Lamarr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 32 C - Grab von Julius Wagner-Jauregg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Well done! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien-Hütteldorf - Allianz-Stadion - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wann Rapid nur endlich wieder g`winnan tat. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imst - Landesreisebüro - 08 - Sgraffito Milch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imst - Landesreisebüro - 07 - Sgraffito Obst und Blumen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imst - Landesreisebüro - 06 - Sgraffito Reisebüro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick aus Imst ins Gurgltal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I am yearnig for the year`s longest days. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imst - Wegkapelle hl Dreifaltigkeit - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:49, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imst - Rosengartenschlucht - 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imst - Rosengartenschlucht - 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wildromantisch! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imst - Rosengartenschlucht - 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:49, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großraming - nd100 - Buchstein - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großraming - nd100 - Buchstein - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ternberg - OÖ-Naturdenkmal nd413 - Fallerbach - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finkenberg - Spanferkel am Spieß im Gasthof Hochsteg - II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imst - Wegkapelle hl Dreifaltigkeit - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems a little too sharp, but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:39, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Grablaterne vom Grab Rößler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I really don't like the very blurry bokeh, but that doesn't figure in judging that this picture is clearly a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 02:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 41B - Grab von Josef Feil - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Grabsteinfigur am Grab Breschtiak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, -- Ikan Kekek 02:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 52A - Grab von Theodor Lieben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:45, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 35B - Babyfriedhof - Laternen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:38, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Gleichenberg-Dorf - Bildstock Schlossstraße (ID 72763).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It touches my romantic soul. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riegersburg - Bauernhaus Huberhof - IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Enjoyable the corresponding color of the sky in the door and the shutters. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traunkirchen - Pfarrkirche Krönung Mariens - Friedhof - Grablaterne - I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments All perfect, everything fits. And good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gmunden - evangelische Auferstehungskirche - Fenster Taufkapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gmunden - evangelische Auferstehungskirche - Fenster der Orgelempore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sehr schön und perfekt. Very good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umhausen - Blick auf den Farster Kopf (1992 m) mit der Ortschaft Farst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umhausen-Farst - Ortsansicht mit Kapelle - mW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötztal - Landschaftsschutzgebiet Achstürze-Piburger See - 16 - Naturdenkmal ND 2 2 Piburger See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umhausen - Tumpen - Acherbachbrücke - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umhausen-Tumpen - Acherbachbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 33 G - Grab von Leon Askin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 32 C - Grab von Josef Reiter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 32C - Grab von Franz Schmidt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 6 - Arthur und Julius und Heinrich Schnitzler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 6 - Grab von Friedrich Torberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Heinz Leinfellner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Eduard und Anna Gärtner - II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Falco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von György Sebestyen - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zell am Ziller - Pfarrkirche hl Veit - II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötztal - Landschaftsschutzgebiet Achstürze-Piburger See - 13 - Naturdenkmal ND 2 2 Piburger See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naturpark Ötztal - Landschaftsschutzgebiet Achstürze-Piburger See - 25 - Wasserfall beim Habicher See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verabschiedung von Friedrich Zawrel in der Feuerhalle Simmering.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:59, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brandberg - Pfarrkirche hl Kreuz - I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien-Innere Stadt - Verfassungsgerichtshof und Kunstforum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 82 - Grab von Karl Eugen Neumann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 33 G - Grab von Hans Kann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 6 - Grab von Harry Weber.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Friedrich Schächter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 32A - Josef Lanner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Umhausen-Tumpen - Pfarrkirche hl Martin - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oetz-Ebene - Teufelsbrücke über den Stuibenbach - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oetz-Ebene - Teufelsbrücke über den Stuibenbach - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oetz-Oetzerau - Filialkirche hl Antonius von Padua - 11 - Friedhofskreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sehr schön die ganze Serie! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oetz - Haidachkapelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Siegfried Charoux - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 04:42, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Erich Sokol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Hugo Hoegel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Gräber hingerichteter Opfer der NS-Justiz - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Opfer der NS-Justiz - Leopoldine Kovarik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Marcel Rubin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Adalbert von Mikulicz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Franz Stoß.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Franz Endler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:34, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Friedrich Langer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Rudolf Moratti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Wilhelm Matejka - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Peter Minich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Robert Schollum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Grab von Rudolf Heinz und Margarethe Keppel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Haeferl,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Category talk:Zentralfriedhof, Vienna[edit]

Thanks for guiding us tomorrow. :-) I'm wondering whether it's worth taking photos even with my bad camera or whether it would just be an annoyance. See talk. Cheers, Nemo 08:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Haeferl, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich verstehe leider nur Bahnhof und kann nur hoffen, dass mir einer von den netten und technisch versierten Benutzern, wie z.B. @Herzi Pinki: oder @Thomas Ledl: , hilft. Ansonsten kann ich nichts machen, dann ist es eben kaputt. --Häferl (talk) 18:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin auch nicht sicher hab das gemacht https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Thomas_Ledl/common.js&curid=36253909&diff=245060818&oldid=204466318 stellt sich dann raus was das war... lg --Thomas Ledl (talk) 19:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

du musst die 3 Zeilen

 /*jshint scripturl:true*/
mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
/*jshint scripturl:false*/

aus deinem common.js entfernen und über den Link das VFC gadget aktivieren. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:44, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Danke Euch beiden! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 00:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zum Mitmachen bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017[edit]

Hallo Haeferl!

Vielleicht hast du es schon mitbekommen: Im Moment läuft – noch bis zum 30. September 2017 – der internationale Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos von Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen! Wie du mitmachen kannst erfährst du auf unserer Mitmach-Seite, bei Fragen und Problemen kannst du dich auf unserer Support-Seite melden.

(Martin Kraft im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 12:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Category:Heinz Conrad-Tor[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, wenn es keine triftigen Grund gibt, dann würde ich das alles (Kategorie & Files) einheitlich auf Heinz Conrads umbenennen. Auch extern heißt es Conrads. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki! Das war ein Versehen, nachdem ich mich von dieser Karte verwirren ließ. Ist schon verschoben. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 16:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe die Files auch noch umbenannt. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:*Bitte löschen.jpg[edit]

Du musst einen LA (DR auf commons: Löschung vorschlagen links im Menü) stellen, deutsche Begründung wird auch funktionieren. So aber wird das nix. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Haeferl, bezugnehmend auf deine Behauptungen in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:*Bitte_löschen.jpg habe ich nochmals nachgeprüft: Sowohl im Schritt 2 (Hochladen) wie auch im Schritt 4 (Beschreiben) ist ein Entfernen einzelner Dateien im UW möglich. Mistkübelsymbol. Die Beschreibung im UW ist deutsch: Entfernen. Explizit hinweisen möchte ich darauf, dass du es in diesen beiden Schritten explizit in der Hand hast, das Bild nicht hochzuladen. Danach wird eine Löschung nur kulanzmäßig durchgeführt, du machst dich also abhängig vom abarbeitenden Admin. Einen Löschantrag auf Commons stellst du über Löschung vorschlagen links im Menü, es ist eine Maske auszufüllen und die ist deutsch. Deinen Antrag kannst du auch auf Deutsch formulieren, es findet sich ein Admin der das versteht. Ich sehe jetzt nicht, wo du dich durch Englische Beschreibungen quälen müsstest. Wie du sagst, hier hat es nicht funktioniert, abzuwarten, dass sich jemand anderer um das Problem kümmert. Hilfe zur Selbsthilfe kannst du gerne haben, aber ich erwarte mir im Gegenzug dein Bemühen. Ich bin sogar bereit dafür eine Stunde zu spendieren (um das oben herauszubekommen), statt den LA in 30 Sekunden abzufahren. Das rentiert sich für mich eher erst viel später. Trotzdem. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:12, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki! Meine "Behauptungen"? Daß bei mir das Entfernen nicht funktioniert hat, darfst Du mir schon glauben, ohne mir eine Lüge zu unterstellen. Warum sollte ich sonst eine Datei mit dem Titel "Bitte löschen" hochladen? Das hab ich natürlich gemacht, eben weil das Entfernen nicht funktioniert hat. Vielleicht funktioniert es ja nur unter bestimmten Voraussetzungen nicht, z.B. ab einer bestimmten Anzahl an Bildern, keine Ahnung, warum es bei Dir geht und bei mir nicht, aber Lüge lass ich mir sicher keine unterstellen. Trotzdem liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 22:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, finde ich ja auch seltsam. Ich wollte dir keine Lüge unterstellen, sorry, wenn das so angekommen ist. Sondern fehlendes Bemühen (File:Bitte löschen2.jpg). Es würde mich schon interessieren, warum das Löschen beim Hochladen bei dir nicht funktionieren sollte. Kannst du bitte beim nächsten Upload mit 5 Bildern probieren, damit habe ich getestet und das letzte Bild im Schritt 2 und das erste Bild im Schritt 4 entfernt. Wenn das unter bestimmten Umständen nicht geht, dann sollten wir das doch im Sinne aller einer Behebung zuführen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:*Bitte löschen.jpg[edit]

File:*Bitte löschen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Braveheart (talk) 12:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland![edit]

Hallo Haeferl!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »

Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich![edit]

Hallo Haeferl!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.

Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheimwikimedia.at wenden.

(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))

Danke für das schöne Elfriede Hartmann-Foto[edit]

Es macht den Artikel so richtig rund. Herzlichen Dank. Mir geht's übrigens sehr sehr gut. Du hast keine Ahnung, welche Erleichterung es darstellt, nicht mehr in irgendwelche Diskussionen reingezogen werden zu können. Schreibe still und leise meine italienischen Biografien (und bin zufrieden). Dort herrscht ein ganz anderes Arbeitsklima und Respekt vor der Arbeit des anderen.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Otto-Wagner-Kirche am Steinhof - Innenverkleidung der Kuppel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 22:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otto-Wagner-Kirche - Altarbild Die Verheißung des Himmels.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 22:58, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterzeiring - Schloss Hanfelden - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Otto-Wagner-Kirche am Steinhof - Fenster Die geistigen Tugenden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 08:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weichselboden - die Salza an der Einmündung des Radmerbachs - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breitenstein - Ortsansicht mit Kalte-Rinne-Viadukt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Syed07 10:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pöls - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Braveheart, it's nice of you to nominate someone else's photo, but the way you've nominated it suggests it's by you. Look at how Isiwal correctly attributed one of Haeferl's photos above and please do that from now on. As for the photo: The portion under the bridge is so dark as to be sort of valueless, but that's not so important. In general, the photo is solidly good and nice. -- Ikan Kekek 09:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've rectified it here too. Braveheart 11:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And I added the html code for a line break (br with angle brackets on either end), which is needed for good formatting. -- Ikan Kekek 11:59, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Na das ging ja einfach :-) Grad das Bild von der Kuppel in der Otto-Wagner-Kirche finde ich besonders gelungen! LG, Braveheart (talk) 13:49, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gußwerk - Gemeindeamt und ehem Volksschule.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Syed07 16:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Annaberg - Ortsansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 09:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrendorf bei Krems - Lindobelgasse - Maria im Weingarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. -- Ikan Kekek 07:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weichselboden - Pfarrkirche hl Johannes in der Wüste - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presceny-Klause - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Nice.--Famberhorst 09:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Furth bei Göttweig - Pfarrkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Syed07 16:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Otto-Wagner-Kirche am Steinhof - Kanzel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josefsberg - Pfarrkirche - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Syed07 13:41, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gußwerk - Brunnen am Kirchplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Otto-Wagner-Kirche am Steinhof - Fenster Die leiblichen Tugenden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality and nice.--Famberhorst 08:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienerbruck - Ötscherbär.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josefsberg - Gasthof-Pension Sabath.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reichenau an der Rax - Betreuungszentrum Süd des Innenministeriums - ehemaliges ÖGB-Erholungsheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems an der Donau - Hellerschmid Marillenlikör.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems - Denkmal am jüdischen Friedhof Krems.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschlag - Gemeindeamt und Musikheim - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchschlag - Bushaltestelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariazell - bürgeralpe - Erzherzog-Johann-Warte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rohrendorf bei Krems - Lindobelgasse - Keller 33 - Format 4x3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reichenau an der Rax - Schwarza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josefsberg - Pfarrkirche - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality, meets QI creteria for me. --J. Lunau 13:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Furth bei Göttweig - Bildstock Fünfkreuz - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Payerbach - Semmeringbahn - Bahnwärterhäuschen WH 132 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitterbach am Erlaufsee - evangelischer Friedhof - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mautern an der Donau - Kirche und römische Mauer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 31 B - Alfred und Barbara Hrdlicka - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josefsberg - Pfarrkirche - 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reichenau an der Rax - Schneebergweg - Freiwillige Feuerwehr Filiale Schneedörfl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. I would remove two minor spots in the sky. --Basotxerri 16:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mitterbach am Erlaufsee - Gipfelkreuz Gemeindealpe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:08, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterzeiring - Schloss Hanfelden - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weichselboden - Haltestelle Weichselboden Postamt an der alten Hochschwabstraße.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Processing tracks visible on the clouds on the right. This should be corrected --Ermell 16:57, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done by the author Haeferl --Isiwal 14:57, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:18, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40 - Heinz Reincke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 31 B - Emmerich Kálmán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Furth bei Göttweig - Ortsansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:13, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke![edit]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 17:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weichselboden - Betriebsgebäude Kläfferquelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 14:49, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2018 – Gratulation![edit]

Hallo Haeferl!
nachdem nun auch die Jury des Bundesdenkmalamtes ihre Preisträger für mehrere Themenkategorien gewählt hat haben wir die Freude, Dir zum 1. Platz für File:Unterzeiring - Schloss Hanfelden - 04 - Hinterladerkachelofen.jpg zum Tag des Denkmals zu gratulieren! Deinen Preis, eine kleine Anerkennung, würden wir Dir wenn möglich gerne persönlich überreichen. Du erhältst von mir in Kürze ein E-Mail mit Details zur Preisvergabe.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wien - Otto-Wagner-Kirche am Steinhof - Altar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:34, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request & Invitation for Wiki Loves Love 2019 Jury[edit]

Hello @Haeferl and Haeferl: , Hope you are enjoying the holidays! I am co-ordinator of [Wiki Loves Love 2019], an international Commons Contest aimed at documenting love in different cultures and the theme of 2019 is festivals, ceremonies and rituals of love. We would be honored to have you on Jury for the contest, which will happen from February 1- February 28 2019. Please let us know if it is agreeable, our team would be excited and thrilled to have you on board. With lots of love and regards! Wikilover90 (talk) 13:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Foto-)Termine Wikimedia Österreich[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,
wie schon angesprochen haben wir am 5. Juni die Gelegenheit ausgewählte, sonst nicht öffentlich zugängliche Objekte im Depot des Volkskundemuseums im Wiener Hafen zu fotografieren, zu denen wir auch Erläuterungen vor Ort sowie Beschreibungstexte bekommen. Wenn du Zeit und Interesse hast mitzumachen findest Du genauere Infos und die Möglichkeit der Anmeldung auf Commons:GLAM/Volkskundemuseum Depot 2019; Rückfragen gerne auch direkt an mich.

Außerdem schon jetzt der Hinweis, dass für den 7. September ein größeres (Foto-)Projekt rund um immaterielles Weltkulturerbe im oberösterreichischen Tal der Feitelmacher in Vorbereitung ist, solltest du dir den Termin freihalten wollen (genauere Infos werden wir erst später veröffentlichen).

Liebe Grüße, --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Verbindung commonscat und wikidata[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, es wäre schön, wenn du am Beispiel Category:Lodenstampfe (Innervillgraten) die Verbindung zwischen der Commonscategory und dem entsprechenden Eintrag in wikidata herstellen könntest. Dazu muss in Wikidata die (ev. neu angelegte) commonscat im entsprechenden Objekt verlinkt werden. In etwa: Bitte in Commonscats immer den Baustein {{Wikidata Infobox}} einbauen und durch Eintrag beim Sitelink Andere Websites (nicht Commons category (P373)!) auf Wikidata Commonscat- und Wikidata-Einträge verbinden. Dies dann, wenn ein Wikidata-Eintrag für das Objekt existiert, was bei denkmalgeschützten Objekten bis 2017 meist der Fall ist (du findest den Wikidata-Eintrag mit selber id über den wikidata-link im Baustein Denkmalgeschütztes Objekt Österreich / doo). Bei der Gelegenheit bitte den Wikidata-Eintrag überprüfen und ergänzen.

Das Ausfüllen der Infobox geschieht dann automatisch auf Basis der Informationen im WD-Item. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Anleitung, aber einen "Sitelink Andere Websites" finde ich nicht. Wird mir dann langsam auch zu kompliziert, ich hab schon genug Probleme mit dem Anlegen der Cats. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für das Anlegen der Cats. Bitte, wenn du auf Lodenstampfe (Q37946936) nach Andere Websites suchst, findest du es (ganz unten). Inzwischen hat das jemand schon eingetragen. Es ist jetzt nicht Raketenwissenschaft. Wenn du meinen Algorithmus zur Optimierung der Vorjury so weit verstehst, dass du nachvollziehen kann, wo er nicht funktioniert, glaube ich nicht, dass es noch was gibt, was du nicht verstehen kannst. lg--Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki! Ja, "Andere Websites" hab ich dann auf Wikidata gefunden, für mich las sich Deine Anleitung, als sollte sich das auf der Commons-Seite finden. Aber ich bin schon wieder am Verzweifeln. hier wollte ich den Wikidata-Eintrag mit der Commons-Cat verbinden, funktioniert aber nicht, weil die Commons-Cat bereits hier verwendet wird - dort krieg ich sie aber nicht raus. Und da wollte ich die Koordinaten korrigieren, was auch nicht funktionierte - weder ließ es mich die vom NÖ-Atlas kopierten Koordinaten einfügen, noch ließ sich der Ballon auf der Karte verschieben (hab sie dann gelöscht, in der Hoffnung, dass es sie neu aus dem Wikipedia-Artikel ausliest, wo ich sie schon gestern korrigiert hab). Ich wollte Wikidata von Anfang an nicht, warum soll ich mich jetzt damit herumärgern? Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 23:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Das mit Artikel / Kategorie ist ein Jammer, weil es ein nicht sauber gelöst ist und von bots erzwungen wird. Die Koordinaten für die Arche Noah habe ich eingetragen. Koordinaten lassen sich nur ändern, wenn sie unterschiedliche Werte repräsentieren in der angegebenen Genauigkeit. Wenn du WD nicht magst, dann solltest du dich auch nicht damit herumärgern. Aber vielleicht könntest du es mögen? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiltern - Gartenpavillon von Schloss Schiltern - Arche Noah - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innervillgraten - Blick auf den Ort - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:28, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donau-Universität Krems - ID 549 - Installation für den Campus Krems von den Peanutz Architekten - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:29, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innervillgraten-Kamelisenalm - Fatimakapelle - 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innervillgraten-Kamelisenalm - Bildsäule - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bildnutzung Kartause Mauerbach Mönchszelle[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, leider konnte ich keine E-Mail-Adresse finden um einen direkten Kontakt herzustellen. Wir würden gerne die oben genannte Abbildung für eine kommende Ausstellung nutzen. Über eine Kontaktaufnahme über info@dommuseum-mainz.de würden wir uns freuen. Freundliche Grüße Das Team des Dommuseum Mainz --Bischöfliches Dom- und Diözesanmuseum (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innervillgraten - Unterstalleralm - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innervillgraten - Villgratenbach bei der Oberstalleralm - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schinkenrollen - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Short DoF but good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Außervillgraten - Bodenharpfe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:53, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fehlende Bilder in Ternberg[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, so als Anfang: [2] (den blauen Pfeil links anklicken für das Aktualisieren) das sind meist Gebäude in Ternberg, wo Bilder fehlen. Vielleicht hast du ja auf einem deiner Bilder das passende Haus zum Freistellen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2019: Gratulation zum Sonderpreis![edit]

Hallo Haeferl! Danke für deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim 2019. Die erste der beiden Jurys hat schon getagt und ich freue mich dir mitteilen können, dass dein Foto Schiltern - Gartenpavillon von Schloss Schiltern - Arche Noah - 1.jpg in der Kategorie für denkmalgeschützte Objekte Platz 7 erreicht hat. Das bedeutet auch, dass dieses Bild nun der internationalen Jury von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 vorgelegt wird und damit die Chance auf eine weitere Auszeichnung hat. Alle ausgezeichneten Fotos findest du auf Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Österreich. Die Preisverleihung von WikiDaheim findet 30. Jänner 2020 im Bundesdenkmalamt in der Wiener Hofburg statt. Dazu bekommst du zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt noch eine eigene Einladung. Für Fragen bis dahin erreichst du das WikiDaheim-Team unter wikidaheim[at]wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 11:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Außervillgraten - Friedhof - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- Spurzem 23:17, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Innervillgraten-Kamelisenalm - Fatimakapelle - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panzendorf - Bunbrugge - 3 - Franzosenkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strassen - Wegkreuz nahe der Pfarrkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abfaltersbach - Pfarrkirche hl Andreas - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krems - Burgruine Rehberg - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trattenbach - Im Tal der Feitelmacher - 44 - Rameishammer - zwei Hämmer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:30, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2019 – Gratulation![edit]

Hallo Haeferl!
Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2019! In diesem Jahr freuen wir uns über mehr als 8000 Bilder, mit denen viele Orte oder Sehenswertes in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen oder besseren Bildern versehen werden können.

Aus den von der Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat die Hauptjury nun die Preisträger dieses Jahres gewählt und so haben wir die Freude, Dir zum 9. Platz zu gratulieren!

Eine Einladung mit den Details zur Preisvergabe erhältst Du demnächst noch via E-Mail.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 15:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2019[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--21:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2020 in Österreich![edit]

Hallo Haeferl, danke für dein Bild File:Loiben - Ortsansicht von Rossatz aus.jpg. Ein Bilderwunsch ist erst erfüllt, wenn das Bild an der Bilderwunschstelle eingebunden ist oder der explizite Bilderwunsch in der WP:de entfernt wurde. Sonst bleibt der Bilderwunsch in der Karte / in WikiDaheim und andere Menschen machen sich vielleicht unnötig auf den Weg. Darf ich dich nach dem Verursacherprinzip bitten das abzuschließen. Die Menge der Bilder von WikiDaheim überfordert mich.

BTW:

die Kategorie Dürnstein an dem Bild verstehe ich nicht, vermutlich ist das COM:OVERCAT.
Ansichten von Ortschaften tragen üblicherweise die Kategorie Category:Views of villages in Lower Austria (oder so ähnlich).

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 12:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki, ja, die Cat Dürnstein war wirklich zuviel, da die beiden KGs ja ohnehin dort verlinkt sind. Erfüllung eines Bilderwunsches sehe ich nicht, da ja die beiden Ortschaften/KGs jeweils getrennt gewünscht sind (Oberloiben, Unterloiben) und dafür gibt es bestimmt bessere Aussichtspunkte. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 14:19, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiener Zentralfriedhof - Gruppe 40[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, sag eine Frage, du hast dam Zentralfriedhof in der Gruppe 40 - Opfer der NS-Justiz viele Fotos gemacht. Hast du da alle Grabsteine drauf, da.h. sind dort nicht aslle Steine da oder gibts da noch weitere, ich suche im speziellen einen Grabstein von Camilla Estermann - wenn du alle fotografiert hat, braucht man da net weitersuchen. danke und schönes Wochenende --lg -- K@rl (Discus) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 19:48, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Karl, nein, da hab ich noch nicht alle fotografiert, werde ich aber noch. Es stehen allerdings auch nicht bei allen Namen drauf (aber bei den meisten), hoffentlich finde ich sie. Dir auch ein schönes Wochenende! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 21:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, drängt net, denkst halt an mich. danke dir im Voraus --lg -- K@rl (Discus) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 05:38, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bitte bleibt aufrecht, auch wenn ich jetzt von wem anderen die Mitt. bekam, dass sich wahrscheinlich nichts finden lässt. also trotzdem danke -- K@rl (Discus) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 06:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[3] liefert einen Fehler. Ich denke, da solltet ihr euch an die Friedhofsverwaltung / Webadministration wenden. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dass sie dort "verscharrt" wurde ist sicher, nur ob es einen Stein gibt, ist laut einem Führer, der 10 Jahre auch am Friedhof führte war nicht sicher. --lg -- K@rl (Discus) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 20:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS: aber anfragen kostet nix, danke -- K@rl (Discus) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 20:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Auch @Herzi Pinki: Hallo miteinander vielen dank - Friedhöfe haben zwar den Fehler net behoben aber geantwortet, dass das Grab auf Gruppe 40 Reihe 16 Nummer 4 liegt, aber kein Stein vorhanden ist. Also die Bitte an euch ist daher zu vergessen. lg -- K@rl (Discus) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 11:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bahnhof Oberdöbling.jpg[edit]

Abgesehen davon, dass ich mich hier erst schön langsam einarbeite und wahrscheinlich deswegen auch noch den einen oder anderen Fehler mache, wofür ich mich selbstverständlich in diesem Fall entschuldigen möchte, wird beim Hochladen meiner Bilder, wenn ein anderes Bild den gleichen Namen hat, sofort darauf hingewiesen und ich ändere meinen Namen entsprechend. Normalerweise sollte es da zu keiner Überschreibung kommen. Warum ich in diesem Fall keine diesbezügliche Meldung bekommen habe, ist mir nicht klar. Dein Bild ist auch wesentlich besser als meines! Ich entschuldige mich in aller Form dafür! Liebe Grüße -- User:arquus (User talk:arquus) 00:43, 02 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Arquus: , passt schon, es ist ja wieder zurückgesetzt. Damit Du aber Dein Bild unter einem anderen Titel hochladen kannst, musst Du zuvor eine Kleinigkeit dran verändern - es genügt, wenn Du an einer Kante zwei Pixel wegschneidest -, sonst erkennt das System das Bild als bereits hochgeladen. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 16:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @Haeferl: Da ich nur ein Handy dabei gehabt habe, als ich dieses Foto machte, ist es von der Qualität wesentlich schlechter als Deines! Hätte ich Deines gesehen, hätte ich meines nicht hochgeladen!Liebe Grüße -- User:arquus (User talk:arquus) 00:05, 03 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Naja, ich hatte damals auch keine gute Kamera. Welches Bild da wirklich besser ist, ist sicher subjektiv, manchen wird Deines besser gefallen, manchen meines. Also tu Dir nix an und lad es einfach hoch. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 22:59, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demo für eine menschliche Asylpolitik - 89 - Eva Zar (Train of Hope).jpg[edit]

File:Demo für eine menschliche Asylpolitik - 89 - Eva Zar (Train of Hope).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

108.6.20.221 00:00, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wir wollen uns doch nicht gegenseitig das Leben schwer machen.[edit]

Darf ich das so lesen, dass du mich beim nächsten Wettbewerb ganz massiv unterstützen wirst, die Anzahl der Bilder je Uploader*in deutlich einzuschränken. Wegzukommen von den glitzernden Augen, wenn 9260 Fotos in einem Wettbewerb hochgeladen werden? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Haeferl,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification[edit]

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Bond beim Ausparken.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langenlois - Käferberg - Skulptur für den Käferberg - 2005 von Heimo Zobernig - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lackenhof am Ötscher - Freiwillige Feuerwehr - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunz am See - Bildstock auf dem Durchlass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunz am See - Friedhof - 2 - Grab von Wilhelm Mathes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaming-Altenreith - Grabner-Hammer - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Close above the bar; I like the name of the village :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2021[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2021 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Deutschland ist zum achten Mal dabei. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger WLE 2020
Südliche Mosaikjungfer (Aeshna affinis) am Westufer des Gülper Sees
Bienenfresser im FFH-Gebiet Kaiserstuhl
Röhrling mit Fliege im Bruderwald in Bamberg
Strand im Nationalpark Boddenlandschaft
Neuntöter im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald

Wie du bei den Top 5 des vergangenen Jahres siehst, sind vor allem Tiere unter den Siegerbildern. Aus diesem Grund setzen wir den Fokus dieses Jahr stärker auf Landschaftsaufnahmen. Aber natürlich haben auch Tierbilder eine Chance zu gewinnen.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen. Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2021 - Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung. Falls du im Moment nicht wie sonst in die Natur fahren kannst, findest du vielleicht in den Tiefen deiner Festplatte oder auf dem Smartphone noch interessante Fotos.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 11:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Preiner Gscheid - Tafel bei der Mariensäule.jpg

Yours sincerely, Tokfo (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Regionalkrone Burgenland Mai 2013 mit meinem Bild.jpg[edit]

File:Regionalkrone Burgenland Mai 2013 mit meinem Bild.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 18:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dein common.js[edit]

ist irgendwie in die Kategorie Category:Media_from_WikiDaheim_2021_in_Austria/all gerutscht. Dort gehört es nicht hin. Bitte korrigieren. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki, ja, wenn Du mir sagst, was ich falsch gemacht habe, reparier ich das gern, aber eigentlich kenne ich mich damit überhaupt nicht aus. Hab nur nach dem Muster von Thomas Fadinger versucht, das so zu machen, dass es mir das Wiki-Takes-Südburgenland-Bapperl automatisch einfügt und dass es mir die Cat "Taken with Nikon D5300" auch automatisch beim Hochladen einfügt. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wahrscheinlich ist das Problem einfach, dass in Zeile 13 die Vorlagensyntax verwendet wird für {{Wiki Takes Südburgenland}} und das wirklich dazu führt, dass diese Kategorien, die diese Vorlage hinzufügen soll, auch auf die JS-Seite kommen. Probier, den String in zwei aufzuspalten, z.B. so:

			 autoAdd.wikitext += "{{" + "Wiki Takes Südburgenland}}";

Tokfo (talk) 05:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe das Problem anscheinend ja auch und nun wie angegeben das autoAdd gesplittet. Dann zwei Dateien hochgeladen. Eine über Denkmalliste und eine direkt über Kategorie.

Für beide ist die Kategorie Category:Media_from_WikiDaheim_2021_in_Austria/all nach wie vor gesetzt. Das geschieht offenbar über das {{Wiki Takes Südburgenland}} Bapperl, ist ja wohl aber auch erwünscht?

Was ist eigentlich das Problem mit dieser Kategorie? Dort gehört es nicht hin ??? --Stefan Fadinger (talk) 05:52, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Auf den hochgeladenen Dateien soll es ja auch sein, nur ned auf der common.js-Seite! Schau dir auf dieser Version dieser Seite einmal die Kategorien an, dann siehst du, was Herzi Pinki meinte. Tokfo (talk) 05:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Achso, es geht darum, dass die common.js in der Kategorie angezeigt wird... Mein Gott. Dieses Problem ist ein vorübergehendes. Die Dateien werden bald alle hochgeladen sein, dann kommt es eh wieder aus dem common.js raus... --Stefan Fadinger (talk) 06:06, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Haeferl Der workaround mit dem Plus von oben hilft dagegen übrigens tatsächlich. Siehe meine common.js --Stefan Fadinger (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

was auch hilft, ist das js-Zeugs in

//<nowiki>
//</nowiki>

einzubetten, siehe mein User:Herzi Pinki/common.js. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:00, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Herzi Pinki: , bei Deinem common.js kann einem nur vom Hinschauen schwindlig werden. ;-) Hab das Problem jetzt mit der +-Lösung erledigt und hoffe es funktioniert, wenn ich morgen die nächsten Bilder hochlade. Danke für Eure Hilfe, liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 00:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--00:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2021 - Gratulation![edit]

Hallo Haeferl,
danke für all deine erstklassigen Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast damit einige Platzierungen erreicht und wir gratulieren also

zum 1. Platz beim Burgenland-Sonderpreis mit File:Rechnitz - Kreuzstadl - Skulptur Der Wächter - Ulrike Truger 2019.jpg und auch
zum 1. Platz bei den Naturaufnahmen (landscape) mit File:Apetlon - Teich des Apetloner Dorfangers.jpg sowie
zum 4. Platz bei den Naturaufnahmen (closeup) mit File:Nationalpark Neusiedler See-Seewinkel - 54 - Steppensalbei mit Taubenschwänzchen.jpg und
zum 6. Platz bei den Denkmalen/Wiki Loves Monuments mit File:Rechnitz - Kreuzstadl - 7.jpg

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu den Preisen. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 16:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rechnitz - Kreuzstadl - 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Sky is just a tad noisy in places, but overall, really solid quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Venezianergatter Wurzerhof kurz.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wo ist die Regel?[edit]

die die Teilnahme von Beschriftungstafeln am Wettbewerb nicht erlaubt? Die Kat ist für den Uploader, um etwas nicht am Wettbewerb teilnehmen zu lassen. Nicht für die Vorjury zur Optimierung der Vorjuryarbeit. Ich bin der Meinung, dass die Anzahl der Bilder je User im Wettbewerb insgesamt zu beschränken ist. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, weiß auch nicht, wieso das nirgends (mehr) steht. Jedenfalls meinten ja bei Einführung der Nfp-Cat einige (und da warst Du selbst glaub ich auch darunter), dass die Cat überhaupt nur für solche Bilder sei. Beschriftungstafeln waren auch das stärkste Argument für die Einführung der Cat, wieso die jetzt nirgends mehr erwähnt werden, keine Ahung, wo/wann die verlorengegangen sind.

Aber die Nfp-Cat zu boykottieren, nur weil Du beweisen willst, dass man das Problem der vielen Bilder mit Zwang regeln muss statt es mit Freiwilligkeit zu versuchen, ist auch nicht nett der Vorjury gegenüber. Du willst zwar, dass mehr Leute Zeit für das Nachbearbeiten der Bilder haben, boykottierst aber einen gutgemeinten Versuch, der dorthin führen würde. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ist nie irgendwo gestanden (wenn, dann müsstest du es aus der Versionsgeschichte ausgraben). War immer eine Möglichkeit für die Uploader*in. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2022[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2022 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Matthias Süßen mit einer Drohnenaufnahme von Schloss Langenburg im Morgennebel gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf wird dieses Jahr sein Nachfolger?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Cloppenburg oder in Oldenburg.

Wir haben dieses Jahr unter dem Motto „Klein aber Oho“ drei Sonderpreise für Kleindenkmale ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die die unterschätzten Kleindenkmale wie Grenzsteine oder Bildstöcke zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2022 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 06:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterweißenbach - schmiedeeisernes Rokoko-Grabkreuz bei der Pfarrkirche - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Drow male 10:36, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klaffer am Hochficht - Pfaffetschlaghäuseln - 4 - Steinbloß-Haus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 07:29, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paudorf - Pfarrkirche hl Altmann - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aigen-Schlägl - Stiftergarten - Gartenhaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Margarethen im Burgenland - Skulptur Drei Steine von Barna von Sartory 1963 - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Margarethen im Burgenland - Skulptur Steinwelle von Anna Maria Kupper 1971 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mötlas - Marienkapelle - 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:43, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterweißenbach - schmiedeeisernes Rokoko-Grabkreuz bei der Pfarrkirche - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Patzmannsdorf_-_Kürbisfeld_mit_Pfarrkirche_und_Raiffeisen-Silo_in_Stronsdorf.jpg[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, wäre da nicht besser: Lagerhaus-Silo? (Oder hat sich Raiffeisen schon so viel bei Dagobert Duck abgeschaut ...? ;-) TheRunnerUp (talk) 18:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo @TheRunnerUp: , naja, Raiffeisen gehört ja auch das Raiffeisen-Lagerhaus und es ist am Silo auch das Raiffeisen-Zeichen drauf (siehe Bild vom Silo). Ist also nicht falsch, sondern eher Geschmacksache, und ich tu mir schwer damit, ein Silo als Haus zu bezeichnen. Und während der Vorjury sollte man ja auch möglichst nix umbenennen, weil sonst die bisherigen Bewertungen verlorengehen. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 15:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

<einmisch> ist so korrekt siehe https://lagerhaus.at/standort/1243 --lg -- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 12:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, alles klar TheRunnerUp (talk) 06:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim: Gratulation[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,
danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast damit zwei Platzierungen erreicht und wir gratulieren also

zum Sonderpreis Öffentliche Kunst mit File:St Margarethen im Burgenland - Skulptur von Minoru Niizuma 1969 - 2.jpg sowie
zum 9. Platz in der Hauptkategorie mit File:Patzmannsdorf - Kürbisfeld mit Pfarrkirche und Raiffeisen-Silo in Stronsdorf.jpg!

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu den Preisen. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, –Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 10:42, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Patzmannsdorf - Kürbisfeld mit Pfarrkirche und Raiffeisen-Silo in Stronsdorf.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Patzmannsdorf - Kürbisfeld mit Pfarrkirche und Raiffeisen-Silo in Stronsdorf.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entstellende Verwendung eines deiner Fotos[edit]

Hallo Haeferl, es wird dich sicherlich interessieren, dass ein von dir stammendes Foto des Freibades Bad Tatzmannsdorf von der Website heimat-kurier.at verwendet wird, und zwar in entstellender Art und Weise: Vor das Bild des Schwimmbeckens ist das Gesicht eines dunkelhäutigen Mannes mit bedrohlicher Miene montiert. https://www.heimat-kurier.at/2023/05/30/bayern-sexualdelikte-in-freibaedern-erreichen-rekord-taeter-mehrheitlich-migranten/ Unter dem Bild stehst (nur) du als Urheber, obwohl die Creative-Commons-Lizenz verlangt, dass Änderungen als solche gekennzeichnet werden. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 13:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Robert Weemeyer, späten Dank für Deinen Hinweis! Irgendwann hatte ich schon eine Antwort getippt, aber mir dann offenbar nur die Vorschau angeschaut ... ;-) Ja, das haben die heftig entstellend gemacht, und es ärgert mich. Ich habe schon aufgehört, Fotos von Demos hochzuladen, weil die immer wieder von Rechtsextremen missbräuchlich wurden. Aber wenn ich denen schreibe, haben sie auch noch meine E-Mail-Adresse, und eigentlich will ich jeglichen Kontakt mit denen vermeiden. Frustrierend, ja, aber ich sehe keine andere Möglichkeit, als mich damit zu trösten, dass die Seiten ohnehin im Archiv verschwinden und keiner sie mehr anschaut. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 23:00, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Haeferl,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map

Upload your photos for the special price

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rumplmayrreith[edit]

Du hast geschrieben, dass die Fotos der Rumplmayrreith aus der Kategorie Category:Nationalpark Kalkalpen photographs taken on 2022-08-04 entfernt werden sollen. Die Kategorie hatte ich nicht hinzugefügt, ob man Fotos deren Hintergrund den Nationalpark zweigt, dort einsortieren sollte, könnte man diskutieren. Du hast aber auch die WikiDaheim Kategorie geändert. Das ist auf jeden Fall nicht nötig, da die Alm zwar nicht im Nationalpark selbst, aber im Europaschutzgebiet Nationalpark Kalkalpen und Umgebung liegt. GPSLeo (talk) 12:07, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Und noch etwas: In der Topografischen Karte steht Haslersgatter. [4] GPSLeo (talk) 12:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, ob die Rumpelmayrreith auf andere Weise geschützt ist, hab ich nicht geschaut, mir fiel nur Dein Kommentar auf, dass es nicht im Nationalpark liegt. Am besten wäre, wenn Du das auch in der Bildbeschreibung erwähnst (nicht nur, dass es nicht Teil des NP ist). Und natürlich kann es in den Nationalpark, wenn dieser auf dem Bild zu sehen ist und bloß der Standpunkt nicht darin liegt. - Zum Haslersgatter: Normalerweise schaue ich ja nie auf Google-Maps, kaum mache ich das ausnahmsweise einmal, schon spielt es mir einen Streich. Nachgeschaut hab ich ja nur deshalb, weil dieses Fugen-S in Österreich ja eher unüblich ist und ich mich fragte, ob das so gehört. Da die OÖ-Karte keinen Direktlink auf die Koordinaten bietet, hab ich erst auf OpenStreetMap geschaut, es aber nicht gleich gefunden und hab deshalb auf Google-Maps mein Glück versucht, wo eben Haselgatter steht. Das passte besser zu meinem Sprachgefühl, deshalb hab ich nicht weiter nachrecherchiert, tut mir leid! Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 14:00, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Problem. Das Thema um die Category:Nationalpark Kalkalpen photographs taken on 2022-08-04, wurde jetzt ja ohne unser Zutun auf andere Weise erledigt. Die Lage im Schutzgebiet ist über die Kategorien abgebildet. Das lasse ich genauso wie Angaben zur Gemeinde oder Ähnliches in der Beschreibung dann aus Bequemlichkeit weg. GPSLeo (talk) 14:53, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Du kannst das natürlich machen, wie Du willst, es wäre nur wegen dem Vorjury-Tool praktischer, weil dort bekommt man die Beschreibung eingeblendet. Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 16:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--17:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]