User talk:Einstein2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Budapest Sándor Palace Changing the Guard 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönöm[edit]

Thanks for the help with the names of Hungarian fencers. I try to find the correct orthography, but it's not always easy. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:33, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Einstein2,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
File:Czárán Gyula mellszobra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Einstein2,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Category discussion warning

Archduke Joseph Square has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 13:57, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Holy_Spirit_Square_(Budapest) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Einstein2,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Filenames[edit]

Hi. I notice you've been doing a lot of uploads today, many of which have meaningless names. Two years from now, how is anyone supposed to know what "BSS 4519 (10890073886).jpg" is? Or "BSS 4331 (10889932965).jpg", or "BSS 4286 (10889923405).jpg", or "BSS 4243 (10889609535).jpg"? Please give the images some sort of specific name so that they can be identified by humans. I realize that you're taking these images from Flickr, but if you don't know what the image is, then how could it possibly be useful? Even 'street in Budapest, 2013' or 'building in Budapest, 2013' would be better than 'BSS 4519 (10890073886)' or 'BSS 4612 (10890108645)'. DS (talk) 13:28, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling question[edit]

Hi! I've got a spelling question about wheelchair fencer en:Richard Osvath. Osvath was born in Satu Mare and belongs to the Hungarian minority in Romania, but he represents Hungary in international competitions. My question is: in your opinion, should we use the Hungarian spelling (Richárd Osváth apparently) or the Romanian spelling? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Einstein2,
I saw that you did the translation for the Commons:Photo challenge page to Hungarian and wanted to tell you that if you are interested there are a few texts for this project that would need translation. If you are, those texts would be: a) the page itself was just actualised, b) we started to translate the challenge descriptions themselves (so far only with langswitch), and c) I just posted translations to French and English for the watchlist notice (MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice - the last entry), where other languages could be added.
Best wishes, --Anna reg (talk) 12:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Einstein2,
The challenges for August are ready for translation - if you find the time, here are the links: Hair & Holidays (I created two templates for the general rules - Template:Photo challenge rules and Template:Photo challenge rules restricted and had to change the month in the Hungarian translation in the sentence The challenge will remain open for submissions throughout xxx UTC. to enter a flexible parameter - perhaps you can check that as well).
Best wishes, --Anna reg (talk) 13:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo challenge - September[edit]

Hello Einstein2
I just prepared the watchlist messages for September - could you check the hungarian translation (I copied the text from the challenge pages)? Here's the link: next watchlist messages.
Best wishes, --Anna reg (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for adding my pic to https://commons.wikimedia Category:Gold_people[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2014,_July_%27_a_street_performer_at_Puerta_del_Sol_in_Madrid,_Spain.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Gold_people

cheers

-David Adam Kess (talk) 11:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@David Adam Kess: you're welcome. ;) Regards, Einstein2 (talk) 16:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Nemek szerinti kategóriák[edit]

Szia!

1. Nem én találtam ki őket, láttam másoktól. Meg aztán vannak ugye olyan kategóriák, amelyek eleve ilyenek, pl. a színész/nő, király/nő stb.
2. Ezáltal csökkenteni lehet az olyan mammutkategóriákban lévő kategóriák számát, mint például Men/women of országnév, mert ezekben renszerint túl sokan vannak. Ezzel a fajta kategóriával be lehet tenni őket a ~by occupation kategóriába, ami szerintem sokkal arányosabb elosztást tesz lehetővé. Az amerikai színésznők kategórijában például még további szétbontást kérő üzenet is van, mert még így is túl sokan vannak, hogy nincs mindenki benne. Persze az kulturális okokból speciális eset, de akkor is. Például magyar politikusokból is túl sok van (az, hogy személy szerint erről mit gondolok, az most nem tartozik ide).

De ha gondolod, persze megváltoztatható a dolog. --Rakás (talk) 09:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Einstein2, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 19:47, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry: Thank you! Einstein2 (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo challenge - November[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
sorry that we are once again really late this month, but could you help with the new photo challenge translations? The themes are Smoke and Leaves. I also added one sentence to the rules at Colin's request (Please do not nominate lots of similar photos; instead choose just your best and most varied images.).
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 23:10, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo challenge - December[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
and once again at the end of the month... sorry - the themes were chosen yesterday, but I'd have liked a check of the English description before asking for translation. As nothing changed since yesterday evening, I think it's unfair to you to wait any longer...
well, here are the links

Best wishes and thanks for your help! Anna reg (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the descriptions definitely won't change, but feel free to shorten the one for Bad weather (e.g. ...featuring Bad weather in all its ugly glory - overcast skies are obligatory, no sunlight, lightning or rainbows allowed!) - I think a one sentence-explanation in addition to the title makes sense and is short enough that one can be expected to read it... ;-> --Anna reg (talk) 23:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Einstein2,
I have a one word change I forgot to do in Template:Photo challenge rules, as we decided to try to enter new images at the top of the gallery this month. That rule is explained in the third sentence of the checklist (*Submissions must be added to the bottom top of the Entries section below.)- could you please adjust the Hungarian? Thanks a lot for your help, --Anna reg (talk) 08:56, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo challenge translation[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
the January themes seem to be decided... we only have one new theme - Outlier, as Bad weather & Household items in use will be continued during January.
And perhaps you can check the watchlist message for January that will be prepared in Helen's sandbox.
Best wishes and a happy new year, --Anna reg (talk) 19:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo challenge - February translations[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
I just prepared the two February theme pages

and - as February has already begun and the pages are therefore already linked from the Photo challenge-main page, I put <!-- --> around every untranslated language - so if you find the time to do the translation, please don't forget to remove it!
The watchlist messages are once again in preparation in Helen's sandbox, but so far I have mainly actualized the links...
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 12:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo challenge translations - March[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
the photo challenge translations for March are ready! Here are the links:

Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 12:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April photo challenges ready for translation[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
the April challenges are hopefully ready for translation! Here are the links:

I'm preparing the new watchlist message in HelenOnline's sandbox - as always... Thanks for your help, Anna reg (talk) 07:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Taken with Canon PowerShot SD1000 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge translation - May[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
the challenge pages for May are ready for translation:

FRacco created some translation templates for the photo challenge and formulated a Translation Plan - perhaps you could have a look (e.g. the new watchlist message is using one - the translated theme names have to be added to Template:Photo challenge theme/i18n/Mother Nature Strikes Back and Template:Photo challenge theme/i18n/Panoramas).
Best wishes and thanks for your help!
--Anna reg (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge translation - June[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
we are really late this month (I didn't have much time), but the challenge pages for June are:

The new templates are therefore {{Photo challenge theme/i18n/Collections, Collecting and Collectables}} and {{Photo challenge theme/i18n/Eyes}}. Oh, and the challenges are both restricted to June and 4 pictures per user - the sentence is added after the {{Photo challenge rules}}-template.
Best wishes and once again thanks for helping!
--Anna reg (talk) 23:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not able to review to license on 500px.com: The source image is present but found no statement about the license. Could you add a more specific link to the license info, thanks--Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge translations - July[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
the pages for July are finally, finally ready for translation:

The title translations are therefore {{Photo challenge theme/i18n/Food production and processing}} and {{Photo challenge theme/i18n/Unfamiliar Vehicles}}.
I removed the time restriction from last months restriction (time and pictures per user) - please check that I didn't delete anything wrong...
Best wishes and once again thanks for helping!
--Anna reg (talk) 22:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Photo challenge translations - September[edit]

Hello Einstein2,
I didn't manage to do any notifications for August (I hardly participated in the challenge preparation), but I have some news for September:
The new challenges are

The title translations can be found under {{Photo challenge theme/i18n/Fossils}}, {{Photo challenge theme/i18n/Fountains and wells}} and {{Photo challenge theme/i18n/100 years later}}.
Oh, and we have a time restriction for September for Fountains and wells - please check the text!
Best wishes, --Anna reg (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aschaffenburg Schloss Johannisburg sign August 2015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Message re cropping of pictures[edit]

Hi Einstein2 and thank you for your message – and also for cleaning up after me. I'm very sorry about this, I didn't mean to tamper with original images or cause a mess. I'll be careful to create new files in future if I'm cropping and ask for advice if I get stuck. Many thanks. Libby norman (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Queen Elizabeth II August 2015 full.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

DrKiernan (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iskolák és múzeumok, épületek és intézmények[edit]

Szia! A kérdésem az lenne mikor épület egy iskola vagy egy múzeum? Pl. A Nemzeti múzeum és a Történeti múzeum is több egységből áll.

  1. Van-e annak értelme, hogy a 'Nemzeti múzeum épülete' (ha féltucatnyi ilyen van)?
  2. Aztán a "Várnegyed Történeti múzeum" 'alapból' lehet-e épület? És ha igen az épülethez tartozik-e a gyűteménye (alkategória-e?) avagy az az intézményhez tartozik? (szerintem az utóbbi). - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 18:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kamera helyzetek[edit]

Szia! Azt szeretném megtudni, hogy miért nem látom a váci (és pár ceglédi) képe(i)met az OSM-ben? Tudnál segíteni? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:30, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Új építésű templomról készült képek Erdélyben[edit]

Szia! Figyelmetlenségből áthoztam ma néhány képet a huwikiről egy új építésű gyergyószentmiklósi templomról, és mivel Romániában nincs panorámaszabadság, valószínűleg törölni kell őket. A templombelsőkről készült képek némelyike azonban talán mégis megmaradhat, ezért úgy gondoltam, nem töröltetem azonnalival, hanem kiírok egy törlési megbeszélést róluk. Sosem csináltam azonban még ilyet, az angolom is elég gyenge, és nem nagyon tudok kiigazodni ezen az lapon. Segítenél valami módon esetleg? Vagy az is jó, ha te magad kiírod a megbeszélést. Persze, ha szerinted biztosan mindegyiket törlik, akkor nem érdemes vesződni velük. A képek az alábbi linkeken vannak:

--Regasterios (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Labyrinth of the Buda Castle[edit]

Szia! Segítség kellene. Egy zoknibábbal küzdök egy ideje ezen az oldalon leszedi az objektum helyét és címét. Láttam a wikipédián a hozzá tartozó oldalt. Ott is vita dúl, de ettől még nem törölték az oldalt. Itt az illető protected trademarkra hivatkozva modositott. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fortepan[edit]

Hello, Tambo seems to have some difficulties in using the template you created. I tried to explain him on his talk page how to use it and the importance of respecting the terms of Fortepan's license, but we have a communication problem : I don't speak Hungarian and he does not speak English. Can you help ? Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 06:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely (talk) 18:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Einstein2/Budapest[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Einstein2/Budapest, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of 1000 files per page. After the new edit, the page would have reached approximately 1144 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad or because the galleries need to encompass a shorter timeframe. Please review your settings and request an appropriate change to your gallery. The logs are available here.

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your the bot owner will remove the gallery altogether.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre, via OgreBot (talk) 03:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theropod Attacking a Sauropod (106396537).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 16:48, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Model of Dinosaurs (106397237).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IJReid (talk) 18:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Einstein2!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info@wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

hi Einstein2, I saw that you put two images (File:הכיתוב שליד הפסל של טום לנטוס בנתניה.jpg and File:הפסל של טום לנטוס בנתניה.jpg) there. I want to tell you that this is not in Budapest. This is in Netanya, Israel. Thanks, BDaniel (talk) 07:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

labeling 1, labeling 2 BDaniel (talk) 11:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I tweaked the gallery parameters. Hopefully that fixes it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Magog the Ogre, thanks, I removed it BDaniel (talk) 07:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nagyvasútállomásnál. Tatai buszjáratok, térkép. - Komárom-Esztergom megye, Tata.JPG[edit]

Szia Einstein! Kérném a segítségedet 'Scan of copyrighted map' indokkal törölték a képemet. Miközben én nem töltöttem fel egyetlen szkennelt képet sem. Köszönettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Szia! :) Milyen forrásból származott a kép? Egy térképről készítettél fotót és azt töltötted fel? – Einstein2 (talk) 13:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Szia! Nem az utcán fotóztam egy tájékoztató táblát itt látható.

Nagyvasútállomásnál. Tata várostérkép. - Komárom-Esztergom megye, Tata majd ennek a táblának egy részletére zoomoltam (lásd a kép kijelőlését) és azt törölték le. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Értem, ez esetben elvileg egy jogvédett alkotás származékos művének számít, amire ugyanúgy érvényesek a szerzői jogok. Ezt azonban szerintem felülírja, hogy egy állandó jelleggel felállított információs tábláról van szó és Magyarországon panorámaszabadság van, tehát elvileg a teljes tábla fotójának és a kivágott részletnek is szabad licenc alatt feltölthetőnek kellene lennie. A törlő viszont ezt valószínűleg figyelmen kívül hagyta, lehetne szólni neki, hogy valószínűleg helyreállítható a fájl. – Einstein2 (talk) 14:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Én is így gondoltam. Tudnál szólni a nevemeben? Azt megköszönném! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Einstein2: Most kaptam egy üzenetet, hogy a másik képet a nagyot is törlésre jelőlték! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Einstein2: Bocs a zavarásért, csak szólni akartam, hogy mivel a 'nagy' képről levették a törlés kategóriát (erre hivatkozva) a kis képet megpróbálom helyreállítani itt. Köszönöm az eddigi segítséget! További jó munkát! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Globetrotter19: Szia, ezt örömmel hallom! :) Valószínűleg a kivágott kép is visszaállításra kerül hamarosan. Üdv, Einstein2 (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Ez a kép törölve lett, Véletlenül ugyanazon a néven töltöttem fel, így most duplikátum. Ha átneveztetem, akkor mindkettő átnevezésre kerül. Tudnál valamit segíteni? Üdv. Tambo (talk) 09:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tambo: Szia! Jól értem, hogy eredetileg a jelenlegitől eltérő képet töltöttél fel a művésznőről, ami a napló szerint jogsértő volta miatt törölve lett, majd ugyanezen a néven egy másik, jogtiszta képet töltöttél fel? Ha igen, akkor szerintem bátran átnevezheted, mert ha jól tudom, akkor az újból létrehozott lap átnevezésekor a korábban törölt lappal kapcsolatos naplóbejegyzések maradnak az eredeti helyükön. Egyébként szerintem az átnvevezés sem feltétlenül szükséges, valószínűleg gyakran előfordul, hogy korábban törölt kép helyett egy másik képet töltenek fel ugyanazon a néven. Üdv, Einstein2 (talk) 11:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Segítség kellene ismét[edit]

@Einstein2: Szia! Azért írok mert Davey2010 visszaállította szerkesztéseim (szerintem jogtalanul), majd fenyegető üzenete hagyott. Mondván ezek [1] és [File:Two-storey_residential_building._%27Chimera-Project_Gallery_%26_Tourism_Specialized_Library_from_East_-_Budapest_District_VII._Klauz%C3%A1l_Square_5.JPG] képek amik citroeneket ábrázolnak szerinte nem kell kategorizálni mindezt visszaállítással 'jelezte'. Szerintem nem volt jogos a visszaállítása. Ezért én vissza állítottam erre ő megvádolt vandalizmussal! Köszönettel - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 13:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ismét egy FoP[edit]

File:Gyömrő fitness, logo in Hungary.jpg fájlt ami egy fitnessterem utcai (FoP) képe törölték. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:16, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starbucks Unicorn (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Einstein2, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Védelem kellene néhány képemnek![edit]

A következő képeimet meg kellene védeni a rendszeres vandalizmustól: File:Budapest, I. Palota út. The Labyrinth inside..JPG File:Budapest, I. Palota út. The Labyrinth inside.JPG‎ File:Budapest, I. Palota út. The Labyrinth inside.JPG‎ . Kérlek segíts ha tudsz. Köszönettel! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 17:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pallerti: Úgy tudom, te jól átlátod a labirintust érintő ügyet. Esetleg tudnál ebben segíteni? A legutóbbi vandalizmusok(?) a Marksman-on (talk · contribs) fiókról érkeztek három napja, amelyeket visszavontam (kivéve a törlési eljáráson szereplő képeket). Talán érdemes lenne írni egy kérést az adminüzenőre a szerkesztők blokkolása érdekében. – Einstein2 (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MarMarksman-on: Mind a Budavári Labirintus, mind pedig a Labyrinth of Buda Castle szócikkek törölve lettek (Richard Keatinge), akitől kértük az egyéb adalékok törlését is, merthogy további visszaélésekre és csalásokra sarkall meghatározott szerkesztőket. Ha valami nem nevezetes, annak részei sem azok. Ráadásul számtalan kép idejét múlta, mert a térplasztikákat elbontották. Írják meg a Drakula bűnsegédei angolul a Budai Vár-barlang szócikket, s abba az írnak és tesznek, amit csak akarnak, de szálljanak le a Budavári Labirintus anyagának csaló felhasználásáról. Végezetül szüntessék meg a a Budavári Labirintus átirányítást a A Budai Vár-barlangra, mert ez is az algoritmusok szándékos manipulációjához vezet /Szente- Pallerti tengely/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marksman-on (talk • contribs) 13:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nem nyilvános repülőtér[edit]

Szia Einstein! Azt szeretném megtudni, hogy fel lehet-e tölteni képeket amiket a Budaörsi repülőtéren készítettem. ( a http://endreszrepuloklub.hu/repuloterunk/ honlap szerint a hely nem nyilvános. ) A képeket a repülőkről készítettem. Köszönettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Bowling Green massacre has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:12, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Visszavonták a feltöltésemet[edit]

Szia, @Einstein2: ! A File:Mártírok útja 21, 2017 Szolnok.jpg feltöltésemet visszavonták. Rá tudnál nézni. Köszönöm! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Szia, látom közben már törölték. Úgy tűnik, egy teljesen másik képet töltöttél fel ugyanazon a néven, új verzióként. A különböző fényképeket más-más néven lehet csak feltölteni (ld. Commons:Overwriting existing files). Az új fotót, amivel felülírtad, szerintem újra feltöltheted valami más néven. Üdv, – Einstein2 (talk) 09:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Einstein2: Szia csak azért csináltam, mert több helyen is láttam hogy teljesen más fotót töltöttek fel. Dehát ez van. Ha törölni kellett hát törölni kellett. Nekem úgy tünik mindenki szabályosan járt el, de egyedül én próbáltam menteni a helyzetet. Dehát a szabály az szabály! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 09:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Globetrotter19: Ha más helyen láttad, akkor ott is valamilyen gubanc van. ;) Ugyanazon a néven csak a fotónak egy javított/vágott változatát szokták feltölteni, ha egy másik fényképről van szó, azt célszerűbb egy másik fájlként feltölteni. Egyébként sajnos én is sokszor tapasztaltam, hogy (talán a projekt mérete miatt) a Commonson a legtöbb megbeszélés már-már gépiesen folyik le, és néha úgy tűnhet, hogy a résztvevők/eljárók konstruktív szándék nélkül tevékenykednek. Én azt tanácsolom, hogy töltsd fel újra a fényképed (egy más néven), azzal mindenki csak nyer! :) – Einstein2 (talk) 11:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Liú Xiǎobō (5891982994).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 00:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A magyaróvári Gazdasági Akadémia relief-panteonjának a képei feltölthetők?[edit]

Szia, Einstein! Azt szeretném megtudni, hogy https://www.kozterkep.hu/~/22587/Banvarth_Sandor_portredombormuve_Mosonmagyarovar_1969.html és https://www.kozterkep.hu/~/22676/Balas_Arpad_portredombormuve_Mosonmagyarovar.html és 'társaik' feltölthetők-e (persze FoP alatt)? Szerintem igen mert,-igaz ugyan hogy a Vár belső udvarában van, de- a szabadban van. Azért nagyon megnyugtatna, hogy ha visszajeleznél mert a kozterkep.hu feltöltője mind 'Nem köztéri'-nek minősítette. A válaszodat előre is köszönöm. (7 November 2017) - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bocsi most láttam lemaradt a szignó.
Szóval akkor elkezdem feltölteni a képeket. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A sávház kerámiaképei fop-ok?[edit]

Szia! Újra bizonytalan vagyok, hogy lehet-e az itt szereplő 2D-s kerámiaképeket fop alatt feltölteni? Mármint amiket én fotóztam. Köszönettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Szia! Ne haragudj a késői válaszokért, az utóbbi időben nem igazán jutott időm a wikizésre. A hely ismeretének hiányában sajnos nem tudom megítélni, hogy a fenti kerámiaképek "a szabadban, nyilvános helyen" készültek-e. Ha úgy gondolod, hogy megfelelnek ennek a feltételnek, akkor valószínűleg feltölthetőek {{FoP-Hungary}} sablonnal. - Einstein2 (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Einstein2: Szia! Már meg is történt. Úgy láttam ezt pl. File:Sávház 13-as lépcsőház, Vay Ádám körút, 2017 Nyíregyháza.jpg be is tetted a Budapest galériába. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:58, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ez nagyon jó hír! :) Azokat a galériákat nem manuálisan szerkesztem, egy bot állítja össze a Budapest kategóriába bekerülő új fájlokból. - Einstein2 (talk) 17:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fehérgyarmati kulturház plakátjai[edit]

Szia, Einstein2!

Érdeklődnék, hogy a fehérgyarmati kulturház szervezte események, rendezvények plakátjai feltölthetők-e? Nem fop, nem pd old kategóra az biztos. A plakátok mind 5 és 50 év közöttiek, egy részük csak szöveges, de van 'mintás' is (nem tudom ez számít-e). Ottjártamkor az épület földszinti csarnokában voltak kiálítva. Köszönettel! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, ezek a plakátok valószínűleg jogvédettek. Az egyetlen kivételt az jelentené, ha valamelyik poszter annyira egyszerű, hogy közkincsnek számít (csak egyszerű geometriai ábrákat, ill. hétköznapi betűtípussal írott szöveget tartalmaz). - Einstein2 (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected: File:2009 Benedek Elek miniature sheet.jpg Regasterios (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zoltán Nagy 1916-1987.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 13:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Király Street, Budapest has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 06:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, @Einstein2: ! Érdeklődnék, hogy ez vagy az összes hologram 'derivative work'? Pl. ez is File:Gábor Dénes FalkMiksau30.jpg, mert ezt Szenti Tamás a wikipédiáról vitte át gondoltam akkor 'okés' (ezért én is 'feltettem' File:Gábor Dénes, a holográfia feltalálója emléktábla (2000), Falk Miksa utca 30, 2017 Lipótváros.jpg). Ezen is van hologram (a felső részén, csak épp nincs ketegórizálva). Amúgy a 'derivative work'-ről eddig én úgy tudtam, hogy az ún. származtatott mű, pl egy kép részlete. Köszönettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adalék még, hogy másolat [2] és 2010 óta van a 'helyén' . - -Globetrotter19 (talk) 19:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Szia! Csak most vettem észre az üzeneted, de úgy látom, a jogi kocsmafalon már válaszoltak a felvetésedre, és nem értek annyira a területhez, hogy a leírtakhoz bármit is hozzátehessek. Üdv, Einstein2 (talk) 17:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, @Einstein2: ! Elősször is köszi a válaszért.

Szóval: Igen válaszoltak. De mit?

Az első szerint az állítás, hogy származékos mű az támadható!

A második szerint. Az a lényeges, hogy beltérben készült

A harmadik szerint. A hologram fotó. A nem lényeges, hogy beltérben készült. A hologram alapú műalkotás (vagyis az én képem) fotózásásával kapcsolatban egy kormányszerv (Szerzői Jogi Szakértői Testület) véleménye a mérvadó.

Nekem úgy tünik mintha ellentmondások vagy eltérőek lennének... legalábbis az adott képre vonatkoztatva. Vagy nem? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 19:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File renames[edit]

Azt szeretném megkérdezni, hogy lehet-e 'helyesen' elnevezett file-t átnevezni (szrintem) helytelenre pl. Sopron, Hungary (Unsplash t-3f5RS-JGI).jpg -t File:A B O V E (Unsplash).jpg -re. Úgy tudtam a nagybetű már önmagában kerülendő! Köszönettel! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Globetrotter19: Szia! Az új fájlnév a kép eredetijének címét tükrözi, amely az Unsplash nevű tárhelyen található meg: [3]. Számomra úgy tűnik, az átnevező szándéka az volt, hogy a commonsos fájlnevet egységesítse ugyaninnen származó többi kép nevével, amelyek hasonló rendszert követnek. A fájlátnevezési indokok közt szerepel az egy bizonyos gyűjteményen belüli fájlok nevének egységesítése is (4. pont), tehát elvileg nem megalapozatlan az átnevezés. A kérdés jelen esetben szerintem az, hogy az egységességnek vagy a kifejező jellegnek kell inkább fő szempontnak lennie a névadásnál. Üdv, Einstein2 (talk) 20:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Einstein2: Szia! Igen igen ezt én is értettem! A kérdés az mi a Te véleményed? - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A fájl átnevezője, Fæ, aki megegyezik a feltöltővel – és aki a több tízezres gyűjtemény legtöbb darabjának feltöltője is egyben – látszólag arra törekedett, hogy ugyanolyan címformátummal rendelkezzenek a kategóriában lévő képek. Ezt figyelembe véve szerintem nem jelent olyan nagy előnyt a korábbi cím a jelenlegivel szemben, hogy kardoskodjunk az átnevezés ellen. Ezenkívül az unsplashes címet valószínűleg a fotós adta, a kép pedig látszólag művészi igényű, emiatt is érdemes lehet az alkotás címét használni a fájlnévben. Einstein2 (talk) 20:46, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Rendben van. Elfogadom.
Köszönöm a választ. További jó munkát! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 21:25, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Szia a fennti két kategória részben fedi egymást. A véleményed szeretném hallani, hogy kellene kezelni? Átirányitami? Egymás alá rendezni?
Az igaz hogy lengyel iskolának épült, de az épület felirata 'Lengyel-Magyar Barátság Háza'...és gondolom vagy 70 éve kultúrház (értsd a világháború vége óta). Szóval a másik név szerintem kissé félrevezető.
Köszönettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 22:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Globetrotter19: Szia! :) Talán a legjobb megoldás, ha az iskola kategóriáját az épület alá soroljuk be. (Most nem találok jobb analógiát, de pl. a budai várban levő intézmények is a vár kategóriája alá vannak rendezve.) Üdv, Einstein2 (talk) 00:14, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Einstein2: Köszönöm. Nekem megfelel. Akkor így csinálom. - - --Globetrotter19 (talk) 06:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Szia! Kellemes ünnepeket! Elnézést a zavarásért! At szeretném kérdezni szabadban fényképeztem az alábbi képet. Szerintem egy sima közúti tájékoztató tábla (road sign). Ez illegális? Köszönettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Einstein2: Bocsi most láttam a törlést jelölő szerkesztő kiírta az oldalára, holnaptól szabadságon lesz...(ha jól értem). - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balogh Rudolf Boldogi menyasszony 1930.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 13:58, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Septembrie 2019: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Primiți acest mesaj deoarece ați participat anterior la concursul Wiki Loves Monuments România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 16:08, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Septembrie 2020: A început Wiki Loves Monuments în România![edit]

Deși trecem prin momente dificile în aceste vremuri imprevizibile generate de pandemia de COVID-19, competiția Wiki Loves Monuments are loc și anul acesta, implicit și în România.

Am fi încântați dacă ați participa și în acest an la documentarea fotografică a patrimoniului nostru cultural construit. Întrucât o carantină nu este programată în România, puteți să ieșiți în continuare să faceți fotografii - luând toate măsurile de siguranță recomandate de autoritățile locale de sănătate. Dacă preferați să evitați ieșirile, cu siguranță aveți fotografii cu monumente înregistrate pe calculator din ultima călătorie! Aceasta este o oportunitate excelentă de a le oferi o a doua viață prin concursului Wiki Loves Monuments. Pe lângă faptul că vor fi vizibile pentru toată lumea, fotografiile dumneavoastră ar putea reprezenta România în competiția internațională. De asemenea ele pot apărea în diverse articole la Wikipedia și pot contribui la conservarea online a patrimoniului cultural și istoric al României.

Pentru detalii și reguli de participare, puteți găsi mai multe informații pe pagina Wiki Loves Monuments România. Dacă aveți fotografii și din alte țări, puteți verifica aici țările participante.

Mulțumim și nu uitați, concursul se desfășoară până pe 30 septembrie! Mult succes vă dorim și să vă bucurați, în condiții de siguranță, de patrimoniul care vă înconjoară!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Áprily Lajos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 21:43, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romania-2480 - Really............... I didn't know... (7811453976).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rhododendrites talk19:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Einstein2/Budapest[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Einstein2/Budapest, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 48513 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Einstein2/Budapest[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Einstein2/Budapest, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 52818 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Einstein2/Budapest[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Einstein2/Budapest, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 53322 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Einstein2/Budapest[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Einstein2/Budapest, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 49006 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:41, 17 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:Einstein2/Budapest[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:Einstein2/Budapest, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 55942 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC))[reply]

File:Railyard for NYC -7 subway line (4810679850).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vcohen (talk) 07:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:35, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]