User talk:AnRo0002/2009

Archiv: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Roma per distretto

Ciao ho visto che stai spezzettando per rione le architetture romane. Ora, siccome i rioni al di fuori di Roma non li conosce nessuno, sarebbe utile che tu preparassi sulla pagina almeno un indice alfabetico con l'indicazione del rione per ogni monumento, in modo da sapere dove lo si può trovare. La gente conosce i monumenti per nome, non per rione di collocazione geografica. Lo puoi fare? Grazie. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC) PS: o se non hai voglia di farlo, almeno prevedi anche la categoria "-... of Rome by alphabetical order"...

Ciao Giovanni,

I do not speak Italian but as far as I have understood you are wondering about my categorization of buildings in Rome outside of the city walls by "rione". O.K. I agree we schould just use one single main category for this, without more subdivisions by rione. --Kurpfalzbilder.de (talk) 21:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Windmills

moved to Category talk:Windmills

Zypern vs. Griechenland

Grundsätzlich freue ich mich ja, wenn noch weiter Ordnung in die antiken Keramikformen gebracht wird, aber: zypriotische Kunst ist zypriotische Kunst. Nicht griechische. Bitte nicht Äpfel und Birnen in einen Topf werfen, nur weil beides Obst ist. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

aso, ich hatte alle Askoi als griechisch bezeichnet, die nicht etruskisch sind, weil die Kategorie Askoi ursprünglich unter "Ancient Greek pottery" kategorisiert war. Mir gings eigentlich um die etruskischen, damit diese nicht unter "griechische Kunst" fallen. Also müsste in Zukunft auch mal eine Kategorie "Cypriotic pottery" erstellt werden. --Kurpfalzbilder.de (talk) 17:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

ich habe jetzt die kategorie Cypriotic askoi selber erstellt. dein Bild File:NAMA - Askos in the shape of a beast.JPG stellt aber doch eine attische, also griechische und nicht Zypriotische Keramik dar? --Kurpfalzbilder.de (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Antwort bei mir - und was den Rest angeht - wir müßten unsere Sortierungen hier mal wieder weiter fort setzen. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Category:Ancient Near East bronze statuettes

Hi! Do you mind if I rename this category into Category:Ancient Near Eastern bronze statuettes? I feel the adjectival form would be more appropriate. Kudos for the category work, btw. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, no problem, feel free to rename it --Kurpfalzbilder.de (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Requesting undeletion

Hi AnRo0002! If you delete or wants to delete images please warn/inform the uploader. For your information I requested 3 images undeleted Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Alter_ego_she_dreams_1987b.jpg.2C_File:Alter_ego_summertime_1986b.jpg_and_File:Alter_ego_time_1988b.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi i'll try to do it in future but these files I've deleted where obvious copyright violations. There are tons of deletion requests and I wonder if it's necessary to address the uploaders vor each copyvio image --anro (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I belive you should always tell the uploader. That way he/she will be told what not to do and hopefully not do it again and others can se that the user has been warned and we can block if the uploads continue. Or in the few cases where he/she really have made the work or has a permission he/she could tell.

The original uploader on dawiki has added info about the former band members and what happend to them after. Info not easy for the public to find. So thats why I found the uploader trustworthy and transfered the images to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 07:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Me and my Chucks.jpg

Hi, could you please explain how this was a copyright violation? It was a photo from Klashorst's flickr stream, and was flickrreviewed. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi I have restored the image thought I am still not shure about copyvio, because its an image by a living artist and the license cant be realized because the image does not exist anymore on flickr. --anro (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

For this we have Flickr reviews by trusted users. Once they have confirmed that, we trust them even if the associated images are deleted on Flickr or their license changes at Flickr. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 18:05, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

That is why we have flickrreview and PDreview. It's a proof that a trustet user have checked license and source etc. You should be careful to delete images without debate just because they look like a copyvio. And if you are sure they are copyvios you should not restore images just because someone asks. Then wait for a undeletion request and argue why the images should not be restored. --MGA73 (talk) 18:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Category:Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol

Your act is not correct! In Category talk:South Tyrol we are full in the debate which have to be the correct name! Please revert your redirect !!! --DenghiùComm (talk) 05:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Settlements established in...

Hi! I noticed that you have categorized places by their date of establishment. I would like to ask you, how you define the date of establishment. Looking at some of the categories you have added to Finnish municipalities, I find the historicall quite... odd. But if you have a definite criteria for establishment, then it might be easier to understa. Best, Samulili (talk) 07:36, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, my criteria for the categorization is the English wikipedia categorization scheme. I do not follow, when I see that the date of establishment is definitively wrong (e,g Sélestat, which is told 13th century establishment but in fact its Carolingian, or older). Sometimes the date of establishment is chosen from the date of first mentioning while its obvious that the settlement is much older (most of the villages in Germany for example are first mentioned in the Carolingian era, when the king tried to record his properties). So it is just an approximation. But when you see definitive wrong dates, let me know, please --anro (talk) 09:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Railway stations by date of establishment

Hello. I am contacting you because you seem to be the one who created the great templates organizing railway stations by date of completion. However, I am not sure the categorization works. As buildings, railway stations belong in the Category:Buildings by year of completion category tree, rather than the Category:Establishments by year tree. I would have thought that the establishment categories are for entities such as municipalities, organizations, etc., but buildings and structures belong in their own category tree. One doesn't really think of railway stations as being "established", but rather built, constructed, completed, etc.--skeezix1000 (talk) 15:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, i have created the templates but not the categorization itself. But I prefer railway stations in the establishment category because many where partially or totally rebuilt much later, for example Euston station in london... --anro (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

But that's true of all buildings. - I'm not sure why railway stations would be a special exception.--skeezix1000 (talk) 17:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Given the point you have brought up, I have raised the issue over at the Village Pump. --skeezix1000 (talk) 19:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

The Netherlands

Hello AnRo0002, don't forget it's the Netherlands, like you say the United Kingdom, etc. Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

o.k. i will change the category names very soon --anro (talk) 20:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, apparently on commons it's not. See for example Category:Netherlands. So you were right in the first place. Good luck with your project! Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

btw: Danke für hinterherräumen in THE Hague, hatte Category:Chinatown, Den Haag‎ ganz vergessen. --Martin H. (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Kategorisierung Buildings Berlin-Mitte

Es ist generell eine gute Idee, Unterkategorien für diese umfangreiche Kategorie zu entwickeln, aber "Houses in Berlin-Mitte" ist m.E. eine viel zu unspezifische Einordnung. Darunter könnte man im Grunde fast alles einordnen, was auch unter "Buildings" fällt. Die Eigenbezeichnung als "Haus" ist dabei ein wenig hilfreicher Maßstab, wenn darunter so unterschiedliche Gebäude wie das bürgerliche Ermelerhaus und der riesige Komplex des Bundesfinanzministerium fallen. Grüße, Beek100 (talk) 12:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Category:Railway stations by year of establishment

Category discussion notification

Category:Railway stations by year of establishment has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--skeezix1000 (talk) 17:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Category:Castle (Gorizia)

Category discussion notification

Category:Castle (Gorizia) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Teofilo (talk) 07:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Thumbnail

Hallo AnRo0002!

Wir kennen uns seit Samstag vom Stammtisch. Und weil ich doch von daher weiß, dass Du hier Admin bist, frage ich Dich gleich mal was: Ich habe gestern drei Bilder hochgeladen, am besten zu sehen in Category:Golf shoes. Eines davon (File:Golfschuhe 1 fcm.jpg) ist aber nie als thumbnail zu sehen, auch nicht in Category:Green shoes. Beim Hochladen gab's Störungen durch Server-Ausfälle. Ich weiß jetzt nicht, ob sich der Mangel mit der Zeit selbst rüttelt, z.B. weil irgendein Thumbnails-Server noch Arbeit nachholen muss, oder ob ich selbst nochmal was machen muss, oder jemand Anderes. Kennst Du Dich da aus?

gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 11:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Frank, commons ruckelt die ganze letzte Zeit ein wenig. Die Thumbnais sollten sich aber irgendwann von selber einstellen. Erneutes Hochladen bringd da nicht viel. Gruss --anro (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Hallo AnRo! Einer der Thumbnails kommt immer noch nicht, und jetzt sind's schon über zwei Wochen. gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Frank, in dem Fall würde ich das Bild einfach nochmal neu hochladen und zwar mit diesem Tool. Dann sollte es mit dem Thumnail klappen. Gruss --anro (talk) 13:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

---

Ok, mach ich. Danke. Übrigens, ich hab Dir auch ne E-Mail geschickt zu einem anderen Thema. gruß, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 14:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Excuse me

But what is the lincensing you put on a pic that says it was on google for example? Abce2 (talk) 20:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Google graps images from everywhere - as well as from commons this does not touch the license given at commons --anro (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't know much about this stuff. Can you explain?Abce2 (talk) 20:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

But images yo have found at google are not allowed to be uploaded to Commons with some few exceptions. You may only upload your own pictures in general, or images which are very old (author died bevore 70 years). --anro (talk) 20:19, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Innenaufname

Ahoj, kannst Du bitte das Original löschen es kippt ein wenig nach links. Lad bitte die verbesserte Version drüber. In der Versionsgeschichte steht jetzt dein zutragen zum Bild. Bitte ergänze, dass Du es nachbearbeitet hast. --Paddy (talk) 22:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

User Philkon

Hi AnRo!

Yet I told it to you. User Philkon newly reverted my Actresses to Actors: [1]

Look also on my talk page under Please stop changing the categories of my photos.

Please help!

regards, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Bacharach 2009-08-01 05.jpg

irgendwie wurde die erste Version des Bildes nicht vollständig hochgeladen. Kannst Du sie bitte löschen. --Paddy (talk) 01:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Stop!!!!

What are you doing? Please stop removing valid information from templates like you did here. Multichill (talk) 19:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Your contributions make me very very sad. You removed information on hundreds of images. You got to have a damn good explanation for this behavior. Multichill (talk) 19:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Multichill, I try to empty the tons of "temporary categories" of Deutsche Fotothek in the following way: I delete "| 5202 =xxx" after the image is in the category "Building xxx", then "| 5230 =" after the Building is in the category "typ of building" and then "| 5108_1" after the location is fixed. No image will be "lost" by removing this templates, the contrary is the case: somewtimes the templates have wrong location or building or type of building what I correct by creating the correct categories. I think all the temporary categories schould be emptied once by this way. dor example this Category:Images from the Deutsche Fotothek, building 1. Meißner Mühle categorie will be emptied in favour of Category:1. Meißner Mühle. I talked with another commons admin (Mbdortmund) about and he thought it is godd work what I do there. My big mistake was just not to inform you about this. greets --anro. (talk) 20:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Multichill greetings from Germany. I would be delighted if you would not fall into any panic. The process of anything that would disturb you has been stopped (even though unnecessarily). anro is a sysop here on WM commons and I have been one too. I think it is time to talk and talk reasonable. Until then there will be no further actions of this kind. Since you come to the IRC I would suggest tomorrow at 10pm #wikimedia-commons with anro. I am not sure if I can be there but I think you two can handle the discussion. --Paddy (talk) 23:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Oh dear. I called them temporary categories for a reason. At the point that these categories are no longer useful on edit at {{Fotothek-Description}} will remove these temporary categories from all images. When you're done with a temp category you can just deleted it, it will become empty after a while. Could you please stop removing this information and restore all the information you removed? Multichill (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

It's end of upload for me. I removed the temp categories. Almost all of the categories here will become empty and can be deleted.

It's a shame this misunderstanding happened. I understand you spend a lot of time on getting these images categorized. I already knew adding categories using a template trick is bad. Over the last couple of months I learned that we shouldn't even use it for temporary categories. This only confirms this. For future uploads temporary categories are a good system, but these categories should be added to the images directly, not using a template.

But shit happens and let's see if we can get this fixed again. I would really appreciate it if you help could restore the descriptions you removed. I think I can have a bot do this. If I would take the current categories, revert to the last version by my bot and restore the categories, would I loose some information? Multichill (talk) 13:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I will restore the deleted templates step by step but i will not delete the temporary cats befor I'm shure that all images have their correct categories. --anro (talk) 13:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

If you come to irc we can discus it so you don't have to do too much manual work. I'll promise I'll be nice ;-) (sorry, had to run last friday, I was really late for a meeting). Multichill (talk) 13:44, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:States of Germany (fixed)

Hallo AnRo0002. Auch dieses template ist überflüssig. Eine doppelte Kategorisierung ohne eine Grundsatzentscheidung auf commons ist definitiv unmöglich. Ich nehme die Kategorisierungen auf dieses template ebenfalls heraus. Die templates waren und sind nur für commons-Artikel gedacht, da es dort keine anderweitige Zusammenfassung von Artikeln eines abgegrenzten Bereiches gibt. gruss Rauenstein (talk) 01:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Question about recreating Category:Castles in Trentino-South Tyrol

Hi, I have been on Commons for a few months, and I'm trying to sorting out categories for Category:Buildings in Italy. Specifically, I saw that someone (perhaps you?) requested a speedy deletion of Category:Castles in Trentino-South Tyrol on Sept. 8 2008, because it was empty, and to see Category:Castles in Trentino and Category:Castles in South Tyrol instead.

I recognize that categories "xxx in Trentino-South Tyrol" would ideally be always empty, but "Trentino-South Tyrol" is the name of the italian region (being Trentino and South Tyrol two autonomous provinces, an "anomaly" in Italy), and serves the purpose of being listed in the "xxx in Italy by region" categories. Since I created quite a number of "xxx in province of YYY" and "xxx in YYY" categories for towers and other type of buildings in Italy, most of which do not contain files but only more specific categories, I was wondering if there was a policy on Commons about geographical categories ideally containing just other categories.

Please note that Category:Castles in Trentino-South Tyrol currently exists as Category:Castles in Trentino-Alto Adige (the italian name of the region), and I was about to migrate everything in it to the former and put a redirect in the latter (or just request a speedy delete for bad category name), but I saw it has been deleted in the past for reasons that are not completely clear to me, and I'd like your opinion on that before proceeding.

Thanks in advance for you time. --Ianezz (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Ianezz. I have started the category and requested the deletion at the same day following a discussion I cannot find again. For me it makes as well more sense to use the english spelling as it is used for all Italian provinces (e.g. Tuscany, Sicily and not Toscana or Sicilia) and I can not tell you any reason why the castles in Trentino-South Tyrol schould be handeled differet. --anro (talk) 20:54, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thank you very much. --Ianezz (talk) 07:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Unter den Linden in 1949

Just a question: Why has the Category Unter den Linden in 1949 been deleted? --Gamgee (talk) 09:51, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi there where too less images in this category, see Category:Unter den Linden in the 1940s --anro (talk) 10:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Built...

[2], etc.: Thanks for your effort on these. - Jmabel ! talk 21:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Steinbogenbrücken

Hallo AnRo0002! Du hast ja die drei Bilder Brücke alte Wahnbachtalstraße.JPG, IMG 0107.JPG und Wahnbachtalsperre Bruecke 20080928.jpg in die Kategorie Stone arch bridges in Rhein-Sieg-Kreis einsortiert. Ich kann zwar nicht so gut Englisch, aber ich vermute, dass der Kategoriename gemauerte Steinbogenbrücken bezeichnet. Wenn dem so ist, würde mich brennend interessieren, woher Du weißt, dass die Brücken gemauerte Brücken sind. Ich kann mir sonst eben so gut vorstellen, dass es sich um Betonbrücken handelt, die einfach nur mit Steinen verkleidet sind. Die Seite http://wahnbach.de/Historie.153.0.html legt mit der Beschriftung „Eine der vielen Brücken über den Wahnbach in der typischen Bauweise mit Verkleidung aus Naturstein (Grauwacke, Tonschiefer)“ unter einem Bild einer dieser Brücken ebenfalls nahe, dass die sichtbaren Steine nur Verkleidung sind. Ob die eigentliche Brückensubstanz nun Mauerwerk aus Backsteinen oder Beton oder irgendwas anderes ist, wüsste ich wirklich gerne. MfG Stefan Knauf (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Stefan, Den vermeintlichen Fehler habe ich nur "weitertransportiert" (von "Steinbogenbrücke in NRW" nach "Steinbogenbrücke im Rhein-Sieg-Kreis") Zumindest eines der Bilder war zuvor bereits als "Steinbogenbrücke" kategorisiert. Wenn du sicher weisst, dass es alles Beton-Brücken sind, kannst du meine Änderungen gerne revertieren. Gruss --anro (talk) 00:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Hallo AnRo! Leider weiß ich nicht, wie die Substanz der Brücken aussieht. Ich kann mir sowohl Backsteine als auch Beton vorstellen. Ich werde mal versuchen, den Wikipedianer zu fragen, der das Bild schon vorher so sortiert hat. MfG Stefan Knauf (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Request

Hello! I am MacedonianBoy and I want to upload a new version of the File:Coat of arms of the Republic of Macedonia.svg, but there is a problem. Can you please rename this existing COA into File:Coat of arms of the Republic of Macedonia 1991-2009.svg so I can upload the new file? The new COA should be named with the same name of the existing COA. Thanks. --MacedonianBoy (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi it is not possible to rename files, so I have uploaded the coat as File:Coat of arms of the Republic of Macedonia 1991-2009.svg. Now you can upload the new coat by overwriting the old file. --anro (talk) 16:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello again. I still cannot overwrite the picture since I got the message that this picture already exist. If you delete the file:Coat of arms of the Republic of Macedonia.svg I will upload it again. Here I have uploaded the new COA that I have created. --MacedonianBoy (talk) 16:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, you could overwrite the Image by using "Upload a new version of this file" at the bottom of the image but now it is deleted anyway. grets --anro (talk) 17:29, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

USA

Why are you creating "1740s in the United States". The USA didn't exist before 1776. It's like talking about East Germany today, in 2009. Do like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1770_in_the_Thirteen_Colonies, talk about the Thirteen Colonies, French Louisiana and what they all were called. J 1982 (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

hi, ok I will revert this conforming to the categories at en.wikipedia --anro (talk) 15:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

hi again, it is now fixed as Category:1740 in the Thirteen Colonies --anro (talk) 16:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

But Missouri was not in the Thirteen Colonies. J 1982 (talk) 16:14, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

There was already the cat Category:United States by decade beginning in the 17th century edited by User:A. Balet so how shall I deal with it? --anro (talk) 16:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Take it up on a discussion page so more can say their opinion. J 1982 (talk) 16:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

for the moment I have emptied and deleted the cats and the referring template. A discussion about the cats "United States in the (before 1770s)" should be done by US people --anro (talk) 16:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

OK. I'm Swedish. J 1982 (talk) 16:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

And the same with Germany before 1871 and Italy before 1861. J 1982 (talk) 17:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

But this is impossible to handle: dozens of little states changing each decade... The states didnt exist yet but the terms Germany and Italy since the early middle ages. And when you go in prehistory what's then? --anro (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

States didn't exist when man was just a hunter, but when he became a farmer. J 1982 (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

In my mind, it makes sense to classify by the current location: "1740s in the United States" could reasonably mean "topics related to the 1740s in what is now the United States". It's much simpler than trying to go by political divisions at past times. Nyttend (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

You missed some

Hi, you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bambi-karlsruhe.jpg and deleted the file in the header of the DR, but you left the one that I also proposed and the one that smial added. Can you delete those ones too? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

o.k, done. thanks vor the notice --anro (talk) 10:33, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Apartment buildings vs. Apartment blocks

Could you please see Commons:Categories for discussion/2009/10/Apartment buildings vs. Apartment blocks and weigh in? Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 20:38, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Why interference Category:Gastronomy?

See also Why interference Category:Gastronomy? (Category:Gastronomy --> Category talk:Gastronomy)--Tom778 (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Excessive categorisation?

I'd like to question the creation of Category:Houses on the National Register of Historic Places in Henry County, Ohio — do we really need a category with only one possible member? There are only four buildings on the Register in Henry County: one courthouse, two churches, and one house, and there's no reason to expect that any more will be listed anytime soon. Nyttend (talk) 21:50, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi I have emptied the cat and revertet the image File:Henry County Sheriff's Residence and Jail.jpg --anro (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser

You should get this tool, it'd make what you do here so much easier. I know it has for me. More info on it can be found here. Keep up the good work! :) --Ebyabe (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

thanks tor the tip i will kook for it soon --anro (talk) 18:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

leuchtturm

Ich bitte kurz um info, wozu eine Kategorie für einzelne Leuchttürme sinnvoll sein könnte. Ggf würde ich dann in Zukunft entsprechende Kategorien selbst vergeben. Mit Dank und Gruss Hannes Grobe (talk)

User_talk:Foroa#Single_Image_Categories might clarify. --Foroa (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Eine einzelne Leuchtturmkategorie macht Sinn, wenn es viele Kategorie gibt, dem er Zugeordnet werden kann (so wie ich es versuche: möglichst bauzeit, material, funktion usw.) Gruss --anro (talk) 14:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:Churches

Hallo, frage: warum gibt es eigentlich Category:Churches by age wenn es doch Category:Churches by century gibt? Blick da nicht ganz durch. Gruß --++gardenfriend++ (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Hallo, die hat mal jemand eingeführt, bevor es die präziseren "by century" kategorien gab und sie sollten nach und nach geleert werden. --anro (talk) 14:49, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Ah, Ok. Vielen Dank! --++gardenfriend++ (talk) 16:19, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi

hi. please tell me if I chose a good license at this painting of a painter dead in 1907 (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portrait_of_Sofronie_Miclescu.jpg). Thanks. Cezarika1 (talk) 15:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

no problem with the license of this image, the author died more than 70 years ago --anro (talk) 15:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. You're the uploader of my photos -romanian churches- from roWiki to Commons? Cezarika1 (talk) 15:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes I have copied many images of Romanian churches to commons --anro (talk) 15:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Then thank you again. You helped me much. Cezarika1 (talk) 15:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Template:Us states

I've created Category:Wooden buildings in Indiana and Category:Wooden houses in Indiana and applied the proper {{Us states}} template, but Indiana doesn't display in the template. What do I have to do to get it to appear? Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 14:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

ni Nytted, it is just a question of time, at me it does appear. --anro (talk) 14:57, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Are you an admin here?

Could you delete a picture that I uploaded? I need to reload it. Cheers and thanks, Abce2 (talk) 22:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes I may, give me the url of the image, please --anro (talk) 22:30, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Darkus.svgAbce2 (talk) 22:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

done --anro (talk) 22:33, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. And thankfully, it finally worked. So again, thanks.Abce2 (talk) 22:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Category

Hi, möchte dir keine Arbeit machen, aber mir ist die aufgefallen. Da fehlt noch die Oberkat. Gruß --++gardenfriend++ (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:Tunisia in the 1990s

Hallo, es will mir nicht gelingen, Tunisia in Template:Facts/Countries bzw. in Category:Tunisia in the 1990s einzubauen. Für die Category:Turkey in the 2000s gilt dasselbe. Kannst Du mir helfen? --R. Engelhardt (talk) 15:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hallo R. Engelhardt, die Vorlage ist vollständig, du musst sie nur ausklappen. Gruss --anro (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Hallo, evtl. habe ich mich nicht deutlich genug ausgedrückt: Ich meinte: "Tunisia" in der Navigationsleiste "Navigating the 1990s" unter "Countries, 1990s". Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 15:53, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Ahso, du musst hier die Länder noch eintragen damit sie in der Vorlage erscheinen, und zwar je zwei mal, wenn du auf "bearbeiten" gehst siehst du dann wohl schon wo genau. --anro (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe das schon x-mal versucht und jetzt erneut (und diesmal auch so abgespeichert). Aber es klappt trotzdem nicht. Kann das daran liegen, dass die Kategorien Category:Tunisia in the 1930s und Category:Turkey in the 1930s noch nicht existieren? Ich glaube, ich gebe auf. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Das Template hat nur eine Verzögerung, um die zu überspringen speichere die betreffenden Seiten erneut ohne sie zu ändern, ich habs schon für Category:Tunisia in the 1990s gemacht. Gruss --anro (talk) 16:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Gewusst wie! Eigentlich kannte ich diesen Trick schon, aber mit dieser Verzögerung habe ich nicht gerechnet. Danke und Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Collegium Liborianum

Hallo AnRo0002, nicht alle Abbildungen aus dieser Category sind einer Kirche zuzuordnen. Das Liborianum hat auch einen "weltlichen" Teil. Ich werde das entsprechend korrigieren. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 18:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Built in North Rhine-Westphalia in 1906

Hallo AnRo0002, ich habe gesehen dass Du die Category:Built in North Rhine-Westphalia in 1906 und vielleicht auch vergleichbare für andere Jahre eingeführt hast. Eine solche Unterteilung ist eigentlich in keinem Land üblich. Ich habe in den vergangenen Tagen für Altenbeken und Paderborn diese zeitbestimmten Kategorien eingeführt und ich meine es sind gerade schon genug Kategorien, wenn man bedenkt, dass für jeden Ort (teilweise sogar Ortsteil (siehe Berlin)) und für jedes Jahr eine eigene Kategorie geschaffen werden muss. Aber wenn es so sein soll, dann muss jeder aufpassen, dass die Kategorien korrekt eingerichtet werden, was gar nicht so einfach ist, wenn ich an meine Erfahrungen der letzten Tage denke. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 14:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Hallo R. Engelhardt. Momentan ist es wohl noch nicht zwingend nötig nach ländern zu sortieren, aber da ich gerade v.a. Kirchengebäude in NRW kategorisiere hab ich mir gedacht, für was die ganze Arbeit zweimal machen und gleich nach bundesland zu kategorisieren. Früher oder später würden die Kategorien "built in Germany in 19xx" überfüllt sein, zumindest ab dem 19. Jahrhundert. Wenn es noch mehr bilder werden wird es irgendwannmal sogar sinn machen derartige Kategorien für die wichtigsten Grosstädte aufzumachen. Gruß --anro (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Hallo AnRo0002, ok, ich werde dann so verfahren, zumindest ab dem 19. oder 20. Jahrjundert. Gruß und schöne Feiertage (mit oder ohne Wikipedia), --R. Engelhardt (talk) 16:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:By decade

Hallo AnRo0002, kann es sein, dass mit der Vorlage "{_{Places by decade | |1990}_}" etwas nicht stimmt? Ich komme damit nicht klar. bei Category:1990s ist keine Anschlusskategorie gegeben. Ebenso wohl bei Category:Cities in the 2000s. Oder habe ich da etwas "hineingemogelt"? Kannst Du Dir das bitte mal ansehen? Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 15:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Hallo R. Engelhardt, das template, das ich selber übrigens ungern verwende ist wohl nicht auf metacats ausgerichtet und funktioniert nur bei Kategorien wie "Germany in the 2000s" oder "Cologne in the 2000s". Deswegen ist auch direkt unter der vorlage ein "previous" und "next" link eingebaut. Da ich aber nicht der Ersteller dieses templates bin (ich benutze wie du siehst wesentlich primitivere vorlagen) will ich da nichts wesentliches ändern. Gruss --anro (talk) 15:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

So weit so gut! Kannst Du mir eben noch verraten, welche templates ich nehmen soll. Dann brauche ich nicht so lange zu suchen. Ich bin nicht so ein "Fuchs" wie Du und leider auch kein gelernter Programmierer. Am besten verweist Du mich wohl auf ein Beispiel. Gruß, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Alternative templates müssten noch erstellt werden. Ich bastle mal schnell eins für cities (ob ich dass für die dekaden hinkriege muss ich noch schauen - da ohne prä- und suffix) --anro (talk) 16:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Und schon steht das Template: Template:CitiesDecade, angewendet z.b. in Category:Cities in the 1700s --anro (talk) 16:35, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

So das decade template hat auch geklappt, siehe Template:Decade und Category:1700s --anro (talk) 16:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Ich hab doch gesagt, Du bist ein "alter Fuchs". Da haben wir uns zeitweilig wohl ein kleines Wettrennen geliefert! Bis zum nächsten Mal. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 19:23, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Altenbeken in the 2000s und andere

Hallo AnRo0002, darf ich Dich noch einmal bemühen? Bei der NaviBox in dieser Kategorie (auch bei allen anderen Orten) führt der Link bei "About Altenbeken" immer auf diese USA-Seite. Kannst Du das ändern? Vielen Dank im Voraus, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Wo da der Fehler liegt, habe ich auch nicht herausfinden können. Frage am besten User:J JMesserly, den Autor dieses templates.Gruss --anro (talk) 20:42, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Ich hab das jetzt zwar gemacht, aber User:J JMesserly hat seit dem 14. September 2009 wohl keinen einzigen Beitrag mehr geleistet. Mal sehen, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 21:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Ähm, was soll denn dieser Kategorienmüll? Da wird es wohl jede Menge Löschanträge geben. Entsetzten Gruß Rauenstein (talk) 23:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe jetzt dieses Template erst einmal aus allen Kategorien, in die ich es hineingeschrieben hatte, entfernt. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Doppelte Kategorien

Hallo AnRo0002, Du bist doch Admin, oder? Kannst Du doppelte Kategorien zusammenführen? Da wäre zum einen Category:Bergbahn Königstuhl und Category:Heidelberger Bergbahn und zum zweiten Category:Feuerwehr Mannheim und Category:Firefighting in Mannheim. Inhaltlich meinen beide Fälle momentan jeweils dasselbe. Wie die neue Zielkategorie heißt, ist mir egal (bei den Feuerwehren gibt es bei anderen Städten manchmal die deutsche und manchmal die englische Form). Grüße --Frank (talk) 11:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Ich habe das jetzt selber gemacht aber bei nur drei Bildern wäre ein zusammenlegen auch durch nichtadmins kein Problem, einfach die Bilder umkatergorisieren und die nun leere kategorie durch ein {{Category redirect|neuer Kategoriename}} template versehen. Gruss --anro (talk) 20:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Danke, beim nächsten Mal weiß ich Bescheid. Die Lösch-/Rename-Formalia hier sind mir nicht wirklich geläufig :-) Grüße Frank