User:Ymblanter/Arxiv2017-9

Dave leduc

Dear Ymblanter. Thank you for the recent modification on Dave Leduc. I would like enquire about the recent deletation of my photographs. If possible I would like to request the undeletation of my work, or the possible re-upload, as it rely suits the article I beleive. I have taken many photos of Dave and his wife over the pas few years, along with almost all Myanmar Lethwei fighters Too Too, Saw Nga Man, Tun Tun Min ect. as I travel to most major Lethwei events around the world. If there was confusion on one of my last pictures taken on August 19th in Yangon Myanmar, I can understand as it was posted on Dave's Facebook page as well. I have given his team access to my coverage of the event, that would explain why it was posted on his Facebook as well.

Thank you for your time! Lethweimaster (talk)

Hi @Lethweimaster: . The file you uploaded was clearly taken from FB. The easiest in this situation for you is to contact Commons:OTRS, they could advise you and, if they are convinced you are the author of the photo, they will undelete the file. They are currently backlogged, and it might take some time before they look at your message, but they never lose anything.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Вопрос

Я бы хотел потребовать (попросить) удалить некоторые из загруженных мной фотографий. Можно их удалить? Очень нужно. --Akhemen (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Если они подходят под критерии быстрого удаления, я могу удалить.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

1,3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12, и это — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akhemen (talk • contribs) 13:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC) 13, 14, а также все анимационные и простые флаги. Может быть не все они попадают под критерии БУ, но нужно их удалить. Для моего же блага. Пожалуйста. Потом я Вам напишу в ФБ причину. --Akhemen (talk) 12:52, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Удалил три неиспользуемых файла, используемые выносите на удаление. По второй ссылке не понял - вообще Ваш весь вклад удалять? Анимационных флагов не вижу.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Флаги можете оставить. Не можете удалить все приведённые фото в ссылках выше? Многие же не используются. Используемые сейчас удалю со статей. --Akhemen (talk) 13:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Всё удалил, кроме въездного штампа, он используется.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Большое спасибо. Akhemen (talk) 16:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Aphrodite Ping Pong.jpg

Hello,

You have deleted the File:Aphrodite Ping Pong.jpg an illustration of the work of artist Silvie Defraoui, that was generously provided by the artist herself, in the frame of a Wikimedia CH event.

It has already been deleted twice by users Túrelio and Lomita, and restored after discussion and providing proof of authorship.

Do we really need to go through the hassle a third time? Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1904.CC (talk • contribs) 23:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

We have Commons:OTRS. To avoid the deletion of this file for the third, fourth, and so onth time, please follow the procedure once, and the file will be safe from deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok, will try, but it's hard to achieve this with an elderly person not using email. --1904.CC (talk) 23:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Ignacio Zuloaga

You are referring to a law of 10 January 1879. I can only assume that 1978 is a typo and should be 1879. Why would a law from 1879 say something about an event 101 years in the future? The English list mentions 1879–87, which is 1879-1887, not 1879–1987. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

My reading is that the 1879 law established 80+ years, and the 1996 law reduced it to the 70+ years (possibly because of the European regulations) and established that 70+ refers to those who died after 1987. I had a Zuloaga upload speedy deleted recently: It was nominated by a user who apparent,ly was only interested in my upload and not in other files in the category, without telling me anything, and deleted (again, without telling me anything) by an admin I had long-standing issues with. I would nominate other files for deletion, but since recently I do not care a shit what happens in this sick project and try to avoid editing the :Commons namespace.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Well, join the club, I have been harassed by people and administrators over something many other contributors do. Won't go into detail. They even blocked me for that. Now, you would expect them to follow up and address other users as well, but no. Like George Orwell said in Animal Farm: All are equal, but some are more equal than others. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

OTRS

This is saddening to hear that user ban in a project can be considered in OTRS. I generally agree that local wiki should have a voice regarding to volunteers that taking care files in their language. The relationship between local wiki and OTRS is not very clear. If you need my help in that matter please let me know. -- Geagea (talk) 13:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I stopped editing the Russian Wikipedia 5 years ago, and I do not care what happens to the Russian segment of Wikimedia with the only exception of the Russian Wikivoyage, but things like this happen.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

МЦК в нидерландской вики

Здравствуйте. Так как вы знаете нидерландский язык, решил обратиться. В НЛ-вики полный бардак со статьями о станциях МЦК (nl:Categorie:Station van de MZD), многие статьи носят неверные (проектные?) названия станций (Севастопольская вместо Крымской, Черкизовская вместо Локомотива и т.д.). Если вы знаете, как действующие названия верно транслитерировать, не могли бы вы переименовать то, что нужно, и немного навести порядок. Спасибо! --A.Savin 16:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Хорошо, я посмотрю. Будет не очень быстро, но постараюсь всё сделать.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Tosini Holy Family.jpg

hi, nice upload. i would suggest using artwork template, using either the old uploader [1] or commons:pattypan. cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 14:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I will have a look. I upload indeed a lot of artwork now.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:17, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

I agree with your comments

I hate to say it but my attitude towards Commons has taken a turn for the worse as well. I completely agree with your comments here. We're not just losing admins either but editors as well. Reguyla 2601:5CC:101:2EF2:4944:FA1D:A2B6:CA2A 23:46, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Deleted revisions on VP

When removing such material, you need to make sure to not only to delete the edit where the comment was made, but also the revision 'content' of the edit where you removed it... otherwise, it's still visible in a diff. When it's something like that, though, you should really have us oversight it (I've done so). - Revent^talk 23:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@Revent: , immediately after revision-deleting it I sent an e-mail to the Commons oversight team, but never got any reaction. Could you please check that the e-mail arrived? I do it on a regular basis on Wikipedia, and it always works (though they have an interface for the mail, and here I had to go back to my e-mail client). In any case, thanks for oversighting.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: I have not seen your email, but the list is moderated for non-members, so the mails tend to not show up until 'daytime' in Europe. I just happened to notice it in the deletion log. - Revent^talk 06:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

It was day before yesterday, so that one daytime in Europe has already passed, and now it is another one. What would you recommend me to do if I run into the same problem next time? E-mail individual oversighters?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

I can't really speak as too how quickly other OS respond to their email, if contacted directly.... we mostly talk through the list, but it's not moderated for us. I do try to watch my email on a regular basis (my phone pings at me if I get an email). I'm also pretty much always on IRC unless asleep, and I use an IRCbot to watch edits to my talk page, so most of the time I end up responding to things fairly quickly.

The difference with enwiki, really, is that they use the OTRS system for handling email, while Commons uses a mailing list. Personally, I'd prefer that we used OTRS, as a much more robust system, but I'm the 'new guy', lol. 09:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I will have that in mind.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:15, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Просьба

Ярослав, о глубокоуважаемый и уважаемый! Не поможете мне? У меня есть такой подопечный, он как бы юзер, но в лицензиях и всем остальном не разбирается. А вклад у него хороший, потому что он архитектор, и из семьи художников -- и грузит отличное свое и предков. Сейчас в очередной раз все выпилили Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hitrovka. Я ему оформила страницу User:Hitrovka и написала, что он с наследием своей семьи часть нашего наследия GLAM (а также написала подсказок, как оформлять загруженное впредь). Может быть, вы восстановите все его удаленные файлы (у него еще и в предыдущие года удаляли), а я это все оформлю как надо шаблонами и лицензиями? Спасибо большое.

еще вопрос - легко админом коммонс стать? сильно придираются на голосовании? Shakko (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

А почему он отказался передавать права? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

кому передавать? где передавать? если ему объяснить, он все согласится. Он просто нефига не понимает, грузит например сканы книг дореволюционных как own-work -- их вот кстати совсем зря удалили, надо было просто переоформить. Shakko (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Админом стать относительно легко, можете выставляться. Надо только уметь отвечать на вопрос, зачем вам это нужно. С файлами сложнее - их удалил не кто-нибудь, а Jcb, над которым висит десисоп именно за такого рода деятельность. Давайте сделаем так. Если вы реально будете выставляться на администратора в ближайшее время - сначала выставляйтесь, потом, когда голосование закончится, пойдём на восстановление. Интерференция тут не нужна. Если это риторический вопрос, я могу вынести на восстановление сейчас, но мне потребуется время, чтобы посмотреть вклад и написать что-то разумное, и, вероятно, мне потребуется ваша поддержка (в смысле, что Вы поставите лицензии и т.п.).--Ymblanter (talk) 15:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

ну вот последняя страница удаления -- она лично мне не нравится. 6 дней всего обсуждение, удалены сканы с книги 19 века, по которым видно было, что они старые, файл File:Певческий переулок. Мичуринский план Москвы.1739.jpg тоже подозреваю выглядел не свежачком, файл Павел Михайлович Аввакумов. 1912-1939.JPG вероятно подпадал под PD-Old, т.е. надо было просто их было просмотреть и оставить многие, переставив лицензию. Так что заявку на этого админа можно было бы обогатить.

может, выставить на восстановление пока очевидные PD-RusEmpire и PD-Old, а с гламовскими вещами я буду отдельно возится? (У Хитровки тут просто нервный приступ был, он даже вот ко мне приезжал, я его успокаивала).

если легко, то наверно надо бы повыставляться. Только подумаю вот, реально ли у меня будет время на админство. Shakko (talk) 15:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Хорошо, я посмотрю, что там легко восстановить, и напишу запрос. Наверное, на выходные, завтра совсем нет времени, а с пятницы, наоборот, должно быть.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Мне показалось, что сам он не хочет разбираться в юридическом вопросе, потому что не хочет передавать права. Если он согласен, тогда подпишите с ним договор, а дальше действуйте уже с опорой на этот договор. Однако если в договоре не будет списка произведений, то российские суды не примут этот договор всерьёз. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

он не то что не хочет, он просто вообще не разбирается. Зачем договор, если он собственноручно всё грузит? Какие российские суды, это вы какой гипотетический случай представляете? Shakko (talk) 12:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

То есть человек «грузит», однако не разбирается в том, что он делает, и не понимает смысла своих поступков. Отсюда будут многие проблемы. А суды это не гипотетический, а совершенно обычный случай. Вот фирма возьмёт его «загрузку» и поставит в одну книгу, а другая фирма заключит с ним договор на конкретное произведение и поставит в другую книгу. Они будут судиться, другая фирма положит на стол договор, а первая фирма не положит ничего, потому что это самое «грузит» ничем подтвердить будет уже и нельзя. Человека привлекут как третье лицо, и он скажет, что не разбирается в вопросе.

Вот такую бомбу вы можете неосторожно устроить. Потому что мы здесь с вами обсуждаем не файлы и не сайт. Мы обсуждаем договорные отношения, которые возникают между физическими и юридическими лицами, и при которых меняется режим хозяйственного использования интеллектуальной собственности. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Шесть файлов выставил: Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Public domain files deleted by Jcb--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Есть ещё ряд файлов, которые, наверное, относительно легко можно восстановить, но с ними надо по отдельности разбираться:

• File:Khitrovskaja ploshad.jpg - 1924, если автор неизвестен, то перешло в общественное достояние
• File:Купец Клавдий Афанасьевич Кирьяков.jpg - видимо, фотография дореволюционной картины, но нужно знать хоть что-то про картину (например, неизвестный художний 19 века).
• File:Купец Афанасий Абрамович Кирьяков.jpg - то же, что выше
• File:Павел Иванович Харитоненко.jpg - вероятно, дореволюционная фотография, но надо знать, когда примерно снято
• File:Купец Дмитрий Иванович Расторгуев.jpg - то же, что выше
• File:Купец Алексей Дмитриевич Расторгуев.jpg - то же, что выше
• File:Купец Дмитрий Алексеевич Расторгуев.jpg - то же, что выше
• File:Дом Ярошенко. 1904.jpg - то же самое
• File:План галерей. 1888. А.А.Никифоров.jpg - на плане дата 1877, но для восстановления нужна информация о том, что это (плюс могут потребовать доказательство, что было опубликовано до 1817)
• File:Проект галерей. 1888. А.А.Никифоров.jpg - то же, что выше

С остальными, боюсь, только OTRS, и не факт, что примут.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

спасибо огромное, сейчас займусь. Shakko (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Шаблон Creator

Заметил странное поведение шаблона {{Creator}}. При открытии Creator:Yakov Perelman вместо шаблона я вижу красную надпись The ID entered is unknown to the system. Please use a valid entity ID. Ковыряние в коде выявило причину проблемы: строку | Wikidata = Q559531 (если её удалить, всё работает нормально). При этом с синтаксисом всё в порядке и сам ID корректен — Перельман действительно проходит в викиданных под номером Q559531. Но движок почему-то считает его ошибочным. Подобная проблема есть и у других подобных шаблонов, например у Антона Носика. Не подскажете в чём может быть дело? --Kaidor (talk) 11:12, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Нет, к сожалению, тут я мало что понимаю. Попробуйте спросить на общем форуме.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:12, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Anticom American Eagle Deo Et Patriae logo.png

You have deleted File:Anticom American Eagle Deo Et Patriae logo.png which was another official logo of the Anti-Communist Action, also called Anticom, which was made by their members. I have permission to upload them to Wikipedia as I have made artwork for them and I have asked the owner. You gave me no time to explain myself and you just removed them. I am a Artwork Minister, a staff position in Anticom, who makes logos and artwork for the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrahamHughey (talk • contribs) 19:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@GrahamHughey: , please send the permission for this and other files via Commons:OTRS--Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Фотоконкурсът „Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва – очакваме те!

„Уики обича Земята“ 2017 започва!

Здравей, Ymblanter/Arxiv2017-9

получаваш това писмо, тъй като миналата година си участвал/а в изданията на „Уики обича Земята“ през 2015 или 2016 г. или „Уики обича паметниците“ 2015 или 2016. До края на този месец юни, те каним отново да участваш в тазгодишното фотосъстезание „Уики обича Земята 2017“.

Отново търсим твоите снимки от защитените природни обекти на България – национални и природни паркове, резервати, защитени местности и природни забележителности и отново това могат да са както пейзажи, така и снимани в близък план животни и растения. Специален акцент тази година поставяме на снимките на балканските и българските еднемични растителни видове. Отново няма ограничения за броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса и можеш да използваш същата регистрация в Общомедия като миналогодишната. Не е нужно и снимките да са правени през този един месец – можеш да разгледаш архивите си и да споделиш снимки и от минали години и сезони. Единственото условие на конкурса е да отдадеш снимките си под свободен лиценз и без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях.

Авторите на първите 10 класирани снимки ще продължат в международния кръг на „Уики обича Земята“ и ще представят страната ни. Някои от партньорите ни в конкурса ще предоставят награди – книги по география и екология. Междувременно, ако качиш над 25, 50 и 100 снимки, ще получиш съответно виртуална бронзова, сребърна и златна УОЗ-значка  ;)

Но най-важното за „Уики обича Земята“ е, че с дарените от теб снимки енциклопедичното знание, достъпно на български език, се разраства и подобрява, тъй като използваме снимките за илюстриране на съществуващи и създаване на нови статии в Уикипедия! Затова не се колебай, а участвай! :)

УОЗдрави,

Екипът на „Уики обича Земята“! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Схемы

Ярослав, добрый день. Вы еще активны? Вы как-то говорили что можете помочь с опросом на Викискладе на предмет копивио в файлах подобных

схемы походного ордера Хиппера в Ютланде

. Вы еще можете помочь с этим вопросом? --Sas1975kr (talk) 19:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

А в чём там проблема с файлом?--Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

То что он находится в "серой зоне". [общий запрос на весь мой вклад] с условно четырьмя категориями файлов - 1) схема как эта, которые можно построить и по текстовому описанию и которые в теории тривиальны, но это нужно доказывать. 2) Карты; 3) простые схемы-чертежи; 4) "чертежи". Запрос волевым решением закрыли. Но де-факто по каждому отдельному файлу он опять может быть создан. Так как у Jameslwoodward очень жесткие критерии. по сути сводящиеся к тому "что отличается от источника, то ОРИСС. Что совпадает с источником, то копивио". Мы с вами этот вопрос обсуждали и вы рекомендовали отложить этот вопрос по ка страсти не улягутся. А потом каждую категорию файлов обсудить отдельно. --Sas1975kr (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Да, я помню, и, по-моему, с этим файлом проблем нет. Если Вы хотите открыть опрос, то надо просто это сделать, открыв новую тему на Commons:Village pump/Copyright.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

К сожалению не все так считают. Jameslwoodward как минимум нет. Поэтому хотелось бы понять это его личное мнение или оно все таки более распространено. А потом уже перейти к картам.

Да, мы про Commons:Village pump/Copyright в свое время и говорили. Но мне нужна помощь как с английским (знания у меня средние), так и формулировками вопросов. Поможете? --Sas1975kr (talk) 07:51, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

С английским без проблем, с формулировками - начните, посмотрим, что я смогу сделать.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Boychuk milkgirl.jpg

В разных источниках указаны противоречивые данные о времени опубликования: по одним - это работа 1921-1922 года (т.е. охраняется, поскольку автора реаблидитировали посмертно), по другим 1910-е годы. Alex Spade (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Science-related tasks

Hello. When time permitted, could you review this, please? I would like to see your comment on the associated talk page. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Nikolaev commune 2008 stairs 01.jpg

File:Nikolaev commune 2008 stairs 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Пусть удаляют, не связывайся ты с этим. Слишком много неприятностей из-за этой лестницы. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Да я как-то не вижу, зачем удалять фотографию, которая явно находится в общественном достоянии. Тем более по такой номинации.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Причину-то я не посмотрела и что ты уже ввязался тоже не проверила. Оно, конечно, как знаешь, но, по мне, лучше поберечь нервы. Твои. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 15:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Да нет, у меня в понедельник утром самолёт в Торонто и там две недели почти без интернета. Не успеют.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Request for deletion

Hi, Ymblanter. If you have time, please kindly delete my js page. I won't need this anymore. Thanks in advance! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:10, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the tip about changing pages to show my uploaded pictures. I really appreciate it. Regards, Kirk Kirk McDougall (talk) 00:54, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen!

Beste Ymblanter,

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is vorige week begonnen! Aan deze fotowedstrijd nemen dit jaar 54 landen deel, waaronder bijvoorbeeld Nederland, Groot Brittannië, Thailand, Rusland, Oekraïne, maar ook de eilanden Aruba, Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius en Sint Maarten in de Nederlandse Caribean. Je wordt dus van harte uitgenodigd om te kijken tussen de deelnemende landen of jouw vakantieland er ook bij zit dit jaar en je foto's uit die landen ook te delen!

Net als voorgaande jaren hebben we prijzen voor de mooiste foto en de meeste foto's en een keus gemaakt voor een speciale categorie. Heb jij een foto gemaakt van een monument waarvan voor 1 september 2017 nog geen afbeelding op Wikimedia Commons bestond? Dan doet de afbeelding mee in de speciale categorie! Heeft een monument nog geen foto in de monumentenlijst op Wikipedia, dan is het aannemelijk dat we er nog geen foto van hadden. Om het zoeken naar monumenten zonder afbeelding wat makkelijker te maken, kun je op Wikipedia lijsten en een kaart van Nederland vinden.

Tot slot nodigen we je nog van harte uit om volgende week met ons op pad te gaan. Op zaterdag 16 september wandelen we tijdens een Wiki Takes rond in Hoorn: op zondag 17 september doen we hetzelfde in Leiden. Onder ervaren gidsen wandelen we langs monumenten in de stad en nemen we ruimschoots de tijd om de monumenten goed op de foto te zetten. Aanmelden verplicht en plaatsen gelimiteerd!
Tot en met 30 september heb je de tijd om je foto's up te loaden: de top 10 gaat door naar de internationale wedstrijd, waar de hoofdprijs de nieuwste Canon EOS 5D camera is!

Veel succes gewenst,
het Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments team 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Форум#Ваши фотографии никому здесь не нужны

Привет, если у тебя будет время, загляни пожалуйста. Что-то я в шоке от хамства. --Shakko (talk) 19:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Ох, Соня, не зря я стараюсь проводить тут (и тем более на русскоязычном форуме) как можно меньше времени.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

да, это просто ужас какой-то. --Shakko (talk) 07:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Хамство в том, что человека просят дать наилучшие изображения, а он даёт испорченные копии. Конечно, другим это не понравится. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Bigot

Yes very good :) [2] See "Autore"="Author" and "attribuzioni precedenti"="old attributions". Official page of Barberini Gallery in the Official State office for cultural heritage website.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 20:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC) --Pierpao.lo (listening) 20:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. But it is used in the articles about Bigot in a dozen of projects, we probably need to take them out.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

I'll help you.--Pierpao.lo (listening) 11:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Checked and fixed both File:Unknown French Master - Allegory of the Vanity of Earthly Things - 2.jpg and File:Unknown French Master - Allegory of the Vanity of Earthly Things.JPG usage. I wrote "Anonimus painter" in the relative language in pages that were not about Bigot--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Are here other versions of the picture?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Not that I know of.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Запрос на АПАТ

Доброго времени, коллега. Что-то запрос повис и на "да" ни "нет". Рассмотрите, будьте добры. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 02:03, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Я боюсь, после блокировки на месяц за нарушение авторских прав Вам всё-таки надо привести какие-то аргументы, а не просто написать, что Вам нужен флаг.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Особенно учитывая, что эти фотографии ничего не нарушали, прекрасно. Можете проверить тикет OTRS в конце концов. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Я не могу проверить тикет, у меня нет доступа. Хорошо, если Вы считаете, что фотографии ничего не нарушали, так и напишите - считаю, что был заблокирован неверно, мои файлы были удалены в нарушение правил. Вряд ли Вы получите флаг в этой ситуации, но, по крайней мере, будет честно.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Ну, то бишь вы считаете, что проще отозвать запрос? Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Скажем так, я думаю, что без убедительного объяснения, что произошло, и достаточных аргументов, почему это не должно произойти ещё раз, шансов немного.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

А, ну тогда при условии, что я до сих пор несколько зол на выдвинутые мне тогда обвинения в т.ч. и в "краже" этих фотографий, и не хочу поднимать опять эту историю (т.к. от меня собственно требуется признать вину и всё такое), заявку можете закрыть. Спасибо за рекомендации. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 23:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Мастер-класс в Вышей школе кулинарного мастерства СПбГЭУ.jpeg

1. Ты удалил фото без обсужения почему?
2. на сайте пишут. Там поня лрасовая неприязнь.
3. http://unecon.ru/info/master-klass-v-vyshey-shkole-kulinarnogo-masterstva-spbgeu
4. Санкт-Петербургский государственный экономический университет. Все права защищены.

При использовании материалов сайта ссылка на www.unecon.ru обязательна.

1. Поставил ссылочку на ресурс при использование.. Зачем Вы вмешался.. ?
2. Проговор мысль? --Zelio007 (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Я ни слова ни понял. Пишите, пожалуйста, на каком-то понятном языке. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

: : Что ты понял там написано на сайте указывать источник я указал. будишь удалять тебя админстрация удалит --Zelio007 (talk) 12:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Я в таком тоне разговаривать не буду.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Студенческая экскурсия на Объединение «Светлана».jpeg

1. † Сразу удали что хотел. Не надо частями искать славу. Зарплату. Что тебе нам --Zelio007 (talk) 14:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
2. † Мне сказали король Ниедреландо в тебе премию как админ дал.. --Zelio007 (talk) 14:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

1. Удали поставь сразу все фото. мы с учасниками обсудим. не такай по одной сиги --Zelio007 (talk) 14:23, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Kolomiytsev monument

Hi, Ymblanter, can you take a look at this category where I added to more images? Just wante~d to know if that is correct. Thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 14:04, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, this is definitely correct, but the category must be generated automatically by the template. I will have a look and see whether it needs fixing.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

File:View from Belvedere Pienza.jpg

Hello Ymblanter, i removed the category because the Belvedere is outside the walls of Pienza, so it is not included to the historical center. Greetings, LigaDue (talk) 22:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

sorry, you're right, i missed the place and mixed it with the square on Santa Catarina church, i'm sorry bothering you and please parden my mistake. LigaDue (talk) 22:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

No problem, and best wishes for the New Year.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Fields of expertise

Hello again. Haven’t an expertise in side effects of deletion of a Q number – you, a bureaucrat on Wikidata and a sysop here, on Commons. For problems of diagrams and graphs you, a physics professor from Delft, have it neither. What is your expertise then: to restrain militant PoV pushers in wikipedias? Or to clean up excretions of copyright infringers?

Mild trolling aside, why do you behave with such a pattern, Yaroslav? Why do you avoid interaction with people needing your intellect and prefer to mix with the silly and mean? May it be some deeply entrenched personal problem? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

I thought you were asking a technical question about how a lua template can be modified to avoid redlinks.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

I asked opinions on whether should this now-ubiquitous template be modified to remove the corroding red stuff in such a condition. It is pointless to ask how to do before agreement on merits of such a modification. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I think it is better to modify it if at all possible.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Просьба N2

Здравствуйте. Эту фотографию наверно надо удалить [3]. Наверно какой-то скриншот без источника. Плюс к этому Zaruhimar - эта скрытая провокация. В феврале 2017 года она вышла из партии Наследие и уже в марте из разных Вики проектов удалили совместную фотографию с лидером Наследие и ставили эту фотографию. А himar на армянском означает дура.---Hayordi (talk) 11:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Вынес на удаление--Ymblanter (talk) 11:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Большое спасибо.---Hayordi (talk) 11:31, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Freedom of Panorama in UZ

My understanding is that UZ allows the Freedom of Panorama. Please see paragraph 2 point 8. http://narodnoeslovo.uz/index.php/uzhzhatlar/item/11899-9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armenius vambery (talk • contribs) 07:09, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

The link does not have paragraph 2 point 8.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

kulturnoe-nasledie.ru ID (P1483)

• https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#kulturnoe-nasledie.ru_ID_(P1483)

is this something you do fix ?50.254.21.213 03:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

As I said, I am unable to understand what you want. I gave all my reasoning there a couple of days ago.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

i did not know that was you this is wikimedia, the point is it is off why do you keep it as an identifier and it's web sites pages. 50.254.21.213 12:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Because it is apparently in use in Wikipedia (this was not me who added it as identioficator), and all the data have been saved and are accessible even if the Ministry of Culture website is down. If you want to delete this property, you should return to Wikidata and propose it for deletion at the Properties for deletion page.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

i think the point was if, it is turned off how can you use it, you can't.50.254.21.213 13:43, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, it is used in the items.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

so can an item get a different and or new identifier ? 50.254.21.213 14:24, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes, any item can have multiple identifiers. They typically correspond to different properties.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

• https://ru.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Обсуждение:Культурное_наследие_России/Новый_реестр

it is in use the form is asking for the Geo Names ID.

this says that you are in charge

This template and pages using it are maintained by the Russian WLM team.

• https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Monuments_database_in_Russia#Contacts — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.254.21.213 (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

50.254.21.213 04:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

you are on this, it is still open,so what is the new identifier ?

• https://ru.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Обсуждение:Культурное_наследие_России/Новый_реестр — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 50.254.21.213 (talk) 17:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Livorno Piazza Matteotti skyscraper 01 @chesi.JPG

The file was uploaded three years ago and you discovered it only yesterday ? Too late.Chesipiero (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

I am not patrolling new uploads.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Фотографии Виктора Буллы

Здравствуйте! Не хотелось Вас отвлекать, но мне посоветовали обратиться именно к Вам как наиболее опытному русскоязычному администратору, поскольку другими языками я, к сожалению, не владею. Много раз читал в архиве форума по авторским правам, что факт репрессий и реабилитации запускает отсчет срока охраны авторских прав с года реабилитации. Как же тогда быть с категорией фоторабот Виктора Буллы https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_by_Viktor_Bulla , который был реабилитирован в 1958 году? Спасибо заранее за Ваш ответ и извините за беспокойство. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Всё, что после 1917 года и не было опубликовано непосредственно правительством, можно выставлять на удаление.--Ymblanter (talk) 00:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Вынес на Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Viktor Bulla. Если Вас не затруднит, выскажите свое мнение, пожалуйста. Я не очень понимаю, как реагировать на возражение, что неуказание известного автора в каком-то источнике может быть важнее, чем то, что он документально установлен. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 07:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Delete all files by TeddyMStudio

Hi, I have made a grave mistake it seems by uploading photographs to Wikimedia Commons. Other users tell me my photos are free to be sold and used by others, I did not realise this at the time of upload, I thought my photos were to be available for use but, not resale as this will have a detrimental effect on my business.

Given I do not really understand the processes of Wikimedia, I would be much happier if you could just delete all my uploaded images from this account please.

I welcome your consideration and I apologise for my confusion and misunderstanding.

Kind Regards Teddy. Teddymstudio (talk) 06:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

I have deleted all of your uploads and also closed the two deletion requests which were started last week.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Russian Wikivoyage and Commons Deletion Notification Bot

Hi there,

Thanks for volunteering the Russian Wikivoyage. I have two questions. Is there a bot approval process to go through there, and will yourself or someone else be willing to "own" the bot through the community process and be a person to contact about the bot? There will not be any running of the bot for the person to actually do. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

For the second question, I will probably be the person responsible for the bot; Atsirlin who is doing this task now may be willing to help since I understand very little in bots, but even if not I can still do it. Usually when the task is clear we just ask our crat to approve the bot, we do not need a special process for that. But obviously we should understand more or less in detail what the bot is doing.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Okay. The bot is just about complete, I will let you know when it's ready. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I am around and ready to help, if needed. --Alexander (talk) 21:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Retaliatory nomination

Hi, any chance you could take a look at this deletion nomination? I am convinced it is a retaliatory nomination from someone who has a lot of problems understanding copyright/attribution. I'd usually let it run its course but the discussion will hold up closing a Good Article nomination on English Wikipedia. I'm a bit miffed by it but no worries if you'd rather let it run. - Sitush (talk) 08:57, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 09:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks very much. - Sitush (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Здание городской почтовой конторы (ТЮМЕНЬ).jpg

(Good time of the day, I know Russian, if you wish you can reply in either language.) The image was uploaded in 2013 and marked as a heritage number 7200029000, as far as I can see this number does not correspond with anything. It is possible that a person made a mistake, but I do not know what to do to fix it. Gone Postal (talk) 06:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, I updated the number.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Great. What about Category:WLM/7210012000. Do I create an empty category? What is the correct way? Gone Postal (talk) 06:56, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

No, do not create it. It is for our internal purposes and normally must be hidden. We have a real category for the building.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks for explaining everything. Best of luck! Gone Postal (talk) 07:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Copying the code to the category

Hello again. I have another question. I have created this category and noticed that one of the images I found to put there has {{Cultural Heritage Russia|3630025000}} in it, so I copied this code into the category page without removing it inside the file. If this is incorrect approach please let me know. Thank you and be well. Gone Postal (talk) 18:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

This is perfectly fine, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Главпочтамт.JPG

This is the Main Post Office building in Yakutsk. The uploader claims that it is a cultural monument. I thought that you may be interested in it. Be well. Gone Postal (talk) 05:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:20031125123522.jpg

According to Template:FoP-China, ‘The reproduction of this artistic, architectural, or applied artwork, is covered under the Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China (《中华人民共和国著作权法》), which allows reproduction of works in a public place if the author and the name of the original work is attributed.’ Njzjz (talk) 07:55, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

I believe it is not, and the author was not attributed in any case. Please take it to Commons:Village Pump/Copyright.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

User talk:Incnis Mrsi

Hello.
The protection IMHO has little merit. Sonia_Sevilla’s blackmail possibly has to be reported to <emergencywikimedia.org> in continuation of my report from June 5 – but she is not an ignorable person to me. I currently have a poor workplace to do all this stuff. The vandal always got RBI and will get RBI, and he can indeed be easily spotted on my user_talks alongside other honeypot pages. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

No problem, I will unprotect now. If at any point you change your mind pls let me know.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

No hard feelings

I noticed your last comment personalized some things I'd said when you tried to characterize my argument: I just wanted to assure you that nothing I said was directed at you personally. I found your argument to be very poor; that's not to say that you yourself are a poor arguer, or even that the next issue we cross paths on won't find us in lockstep agreement. MjolnirPants (talk) 21:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Well, you did say verbatim "so I certainly believe you are completely unwilling to be convinced of anything". You do not expect me to be willing to convinced that this was not directed at me, do you?--Ymblanter (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Fair enough, but as I was agreeing with a statement you made, I hardly consider that to be beyond the pale, or even "personal commentary" the way the term is usually used around here or at en.wp. You said something about yourself, I said I believed you. Were I trying to attack you personally, I certainly would not be here trying to extend an olive branch. MjolnirPants (talk) 21:15, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

I do not think you were trying to offend me personally, but you do not expect me to be happy with what you have written. And I obviously disagree with your premises, that it is perfectly ok that there is a community with functioning (possibly badly functioning) norms, policies, regulations, and practices, and suddenly hundred users could be canvassed out of nowhere to break anything without actually willing to take responsibility for these policies and practices.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:47, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Look, I came here to state that no matter how little I thought of your argument (and to be honest: I think your argument there -continued here- is utter crap), I am not upset by you making it, and I would prefer that you not to be upset by my disagreement with it. I did not come here to continue the argument. If you insist upon personalizing the argument and holding a grudge, then I can't stop you, I can only be disappointed. But I won't be holding a grudge. MjolnirPants (talk) 12:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Fine with me. To be honest, I think your argument is utter crap as well, but I usually do not have issues with editors who think my argument is crap, only with those who start harassment.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

You think I'm harassing you? Oh for fuck's sake... Whatever. Have a nice life. MjolnirPants (talk) 14:35, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

No, not at all. Other users did. What I meant to say is that despite finding your argument crap I still think you are a user in good standing, and whereas you are clearly not going to become a friend of mine, I have no issues with your behavior in this episode.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Text

You said "racist accusations from all sides". I'm not clear where the "from all sides" comes from, as I only see text by Rowan that is problematic here. But I don't think anyone is making "racist accusations", but rather "accusations of racism", which is quite different. At the very least it is "accusations of repeatedly making racist remarks" (because I accept that one may not be habitually racist for such remarks to be made, and regretted). Could you clarify your text please. -- Colin (talk) 14:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I believe all topics related to (real or imaginary) racism in this episode have been exhausted and should not be revived.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

My point is your language. There have been no "racist accusations". Not one. The correct language is "accusations of racism". It is a simple matter, and your text is confusing/misleading. -- Colin (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I will write "all topics mentioning racism", Would that be more clear?--Ymblanter (talk) 14:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I'd certainly prefer that, because I've been making accusations, and I wouldn't want anyone to think that you were implying some of my accusations where racist. I'm not planning to add anything further tonight, and the discussion seems to be accumulating healthy comments, so don't see any reason to formally "close" any part of the discussion. We all agree certain points don't need repeating further. -- Colin (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 17:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Pronoun

Hi, when referring to me on-wiki, I would prefer you stick to gender neutral terms please. See User:Fæ#pronoun. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 20:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. My apologies. I will try to remember this.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights

Hello Ymblanter, can I be an autopatrolled? I saw at Commons:Requests for rights the require to make 500 edits, but I have experience on other projects and here. Also, no need to patrol by others. Marshmallych 08:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Администрация Президента Российской Федерации

Скажите пожалуйста, вы действительно уверены, что Администрация Президента Российской Федерации нарушает законы РФ и международные договора? Для нас, жителей России, такое отношение к высшей власти недоступно и удивительно. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:11, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Вы меня ни с кем не путаете? У меня есть мнение о том, нарушает ли президент РФ, а вместе с ним и администрация, законы и международные договора, но я не помню, чтобы я его высказывал в проектах Викимедиа.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Вы недавно предложили к удалению фотоснимок, все права на который (в том числе права на свободное воспроизведение награды ФИФА) принадлежат Администрации Президента РФ. Очевидно, что АП выполняет международные договора, поэтому сначала обратилась в ФИФА и получила все права, которые нужны для лицензирования фотокопии этой награды. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Это производное произведение. Не вижу никаких причин считать, что АП РФ имеет авторские права на оригинал.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Причина известна: тот договор, который заключён между АП и ФИФА. Однако, если вам показывают договор, вы всегда утверждаете, что договор поддельный? И в данном случае, когда АП показывает вам лицензионный договор, вы сразу уверены, что это фальшивый договор? И следовательно, по вашему мнению, Администрация Президента и Президент Путин нарушают международные соглашения об охране авторских прав? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Мне бы хотелось увидеть договор, по которому права авторы скульптуры переданы им в общественное достояние (разрешено рапространение изображений под лицензией CC-BY-SA). Проще всего отправить этот договор в OTRS.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Автор скульптуры не имеет ни малейших прав на неё. Все права принадлежат ФИФА. Администрация Президента получила от ФИФА права на воспроизведение этой скульптуры в свободных изображениях. Пользуясь этими правами, Администрация Президента передала все права на свои изображения вам по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution.

Упомянутая вами лицензия CC-BY-SA здесь вообще ни при чём. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:19, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Изложите, пожалуйста, эти соображения в обсуждении удаления.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Да-да, уже сделано! --PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Да, я потом уже увидел, спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

deletion of image: wrong application of copyright regulation

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Clevedon Pier, Song of the Helix.JPG < Commons:Deletion requests

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted. File:Clevedon Pier, Song of the Helix.JPGEdit

The text is copyrightable. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:04, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: copyrighted Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Deleting that image (above) under the regulations quoted means all photos of all sculptures and artworks on Wikimedia and Wikipedia must also be deleted because they are all copyright of the authors of their respective works. photos of every statue must also be deleted u ever the same application of Wikipedia/media regulations as applied to the above work. Ashattock (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Yes, indeed.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Rdsgp2018 01.jpg - File:Rdsgp2018 21.jpg

Один из активных участников Викисклада и постоянных журналистов Викиновостей аккредитовался на этапы РДС Гран При 2018 в Сочи (гонки). Условием фото-аккредитации было размещение на фотографиях текстового логотипа организатора. Он отработал на жаре все гонки, обработал и загрузил под свободной лицензией на Викисклад фотографии (File:Rdsgp2018 01.jpg - File:Rdsgp2018 21.jpg) и создал в Викиновостях фоторепортаж: n:ru:Огненный дрифт в Сочи. Однако практически сразу фотографии были выставлены на быстрое удаление с приблизительно такой аргументацией "нарушение авторских прав (присутствует логотип и нет EXIF файла)". Тут же эти фотографии были удалены Ellin Beltz. Я обратился к Эллин и у нас состоялось следующее обсуждение: User talk:Ellin Beltz#File:Rdsgp2018 01.jpg - File:Rdsgp2018 20.jpg. В двух словах, участник сразу на странице новости пояснил, что размещение логотипов - это требование организаторов (я обратился к нему ещё до удаления для собственного успокоения). Затем связался с ним приватно и ещё раз аккуратно всё переспросил и, чтобы быть окончательно уверенным, попросил прислать оригинал какого-то фото, что он и сделал, прямо в RAW формате. Ссылку на этот файл дал в обсуждении у Эллин. Мы работаем с этим журналистом давно, он загрузил на Викисклад море файлов и создал множество фоторепортажей. Я даже сам делал ему аккредитацию, например, на ЧМ-2018. Он очень ценный и добросовестный участник и у меня не было оснований ему не доверять с самого начала. Тем не менее, я предпринял все известные мне меры предосторожности, чтобы убедиться, что эти файлы действительно являются его работой. Однако Эллин мои аргументы не убедили и она направила меня за принятием решения напрямую к любому русскоговорящему администратору. Что и делаю. Если есть возможность, предлагая вникнуть в ситуацию и восстановить эти файлы. Если нужно что-то уточнить, можно обратиться к участнику напрямую на русском языке или сказать мне. Постараюсь решить все оставшиеся вопросы. --sasha (krassotkin) 19:15, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Я могу восстановить (предварительно договорившись с Эллин), но, мне кажется, проще отправить письмо в ОТРС на русском. Если агент примет, то они же файл и восстановят.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

• Ну вот я тот самый агент ОТРС. Что я ещё могу выяснить у нашего многолетнего участника, который уже и публично и приватно сообщил, что это его работы. Не говоря о том, что это вообще не формат ОТРС: добросовестный участник много лет загружает свои собственные файлы, и тут его вдруг заставляют написать официальное письмо, что несколько типичных для него работ сделаны именно им. А что он делает, когда эти файлы загружает и своими руками ставит на них своё авторство. Какие сомнения агенты ОТРС должны ещё развеивать, если у нас в руках RAW оригинал. Проблем тут нет, если участник должен выполнять какие-то бессмысленные манипуляции, я постараюсь ему это мягко пояснить. Кто бы мне объяснил кому и для чего это нужно. И ещё, среди активных русскоязычных агентов ОТРС нет ни одного администратора Викисклада. Нам в любом случае придётся оставлять запрос на восстановление на Commons:Undeletion requests. Где уже просто доверятся моим или чьим-то другим словам что всё хорошо и можно восстанавливать. В чём смысл такого кривого пути? И это благо, что в российских очередях есть другие активные агенты. В украинской вообще всё остановилось, прямо сейчас просят что-то там посмотреть и обработать, но даже дойти до их просьбы времени не остаётся. Там вообще больше не к кому обратиться случись такое же. Сорри, пошёл пояснять ему про ОТРС. Если появятся предложения что ещё мы можем у него спросить, кроме уже сделанного, буду благодарен. --sasha (krassotkin) 20:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

  Хорошо, я завтра ещё посмотрю.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

  Не успеваю, я всё-таки в отпуске до 13-го, и компьютер вижу иногда час в день. Посмотрю сразу, как будет время.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Уважаемый Ymblanter! В OTRS поступило разрешение на свободные лицензии от данного участника Викискада, Ticket#2018080210003392. Нами подтверждено, что удаленные выше файлы сделаны лично на собственный фотоаппарат данным участником, авторские права эти фото принадлежат только ему. Просьба, восстановить удаленные файлы. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 13:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

    Спасибо, восстановлю, как только окажусь у компьютера долше, чем на пять минут.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

    Уважаемый Ymblanter! Спасибо! С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

     Done--Ymblanter (talk) 05:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Mexican Federal Highway 15.png

Yours sincerely, Rschen7754 18:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ezhov268

Maybe you are interested (per Commons:Monuments_database_in_Russia#Contacts). Wikisaurus (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, but at this point there is very little we can do other than transfer the files to the Wikivoyage.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Vasyugan Swamp.jpg

Hi Ymblanter!

Can you undelete the above file for a brief period so that I can import it to Wikiversity for fair use? Thank you in advance for your kind consideration! --Marshallsumter (talk) 00:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

 Done, please let me know when the transfer has been completed--Ymblanter (talk) 06:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: Transfer process complete! Thank you! --Marshallsumter (talk) 09:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Great, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Улучшить MediaWiki:Gadget-HotCat.js

Поступило предложение добавить в гаджет код, вычищающий невидимые символы нулевой ширины, в частности LTR mark (E2 80 8E), который регулярно откуда-то попадает в конец названия категории (перед закрывающими ]]), мешает ботам (в частности АВБ - боты не находят категорию для замены, если она оканчивается этим символом, я даже писал таск на фабрикатор, пофиксить отказались) и самому хоткату, как пишут мне на СО. Я смотрю, вы отписывались на СО гаджета и вносили правки в него, поэтому обращаюсь к вам. Рувичный гаджет представляет собой включение здешнего. MBH (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

• Напишите на странице обсуждения гаджета (и, если можно, более точно - какой конкретно код куда добавить), если не будет возражений, скажем, за неделю, я внесу.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Код, к сожалению, не приведу (я больше по C#, а не по JS), но попрошу его написать технических спецов рувики. Я сюда написал потому, что писать на русском мне заметно проще, чем на английском, может вы сами откроете там тему "нет ли возражений против того, что гаджет будет автоматически вычищать LTR marks после конца имени категории"? MBH (talk) 17:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
• Он не откуда-то попадает. Он записан сразу после названия категории в листе над-категории. То есть коли уж вы открыли страницу категории и скопировали оттуда название под-категории, то это название вы, скорее всего, скопируете вместе с символом LTR. Истинно, истинно говорю вам, потому что нашёл это место в коде медиавики, и не понимаю, зачем надо ставить LTR символ в этом месте. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
  • То есть, везде вот здесь стоят лтр-марки? Мда, сколько вреда от двух с половиной лтр-языков... MBH (talk) 17:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
    • Так и есть! Чтобы ответить вам наверняка, скопировал я строчку из страницы с категориями и вижу:
    • </a>? <span
    • Знак вопроса и есть LTR mark. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kuchino platform.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kuchino platform.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:37, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: I do not quite see what the problem is. The source field has a link, and the author of the photo (prompted by me) stated there (the last comment of the FB thread) that he shares this photo under CC-BY-SA 4.0. In this case, OTRS is not required. Or am I missing smth?--Ymblanter (talk) 06:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry missed that done in the thread. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 16:09, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

No problem, thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Image restored

Hi Ymblanter, I restored File:Reinhard Heydrich colourised wiki.png by adding a valid license, and correcting the source. I am actually revising some DR because of this ongoing discussion: the user apparently removes files from wikis and proposes them for deletion here in some sort of political agenda. If you feel that I did a mistake, feel free to delete the file again (in case, do not forget to add it in [[Category:Undelete in 2062]]), but I strongly feel that those files can be kept and fall in scope. Cheers! --Ruthven (msg) 06:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

No, I am fine as soon as the user has been properly informed and knows how to appeal the decision if needed. I personally do not have strong feelings about this file.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Serial copyright offender

Please take a look. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 06:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I nominated all of them except for three for deletion as obvious copyright violations; if they get deleted we can nominate also these three--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Brazil nazi flag

How I can download the nazi flag of Brazil? --81.172.44.113 23:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

There is no Nazi flag of Brazil.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Tiananmen east2st.jpg

File:Tiananmen east2st.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tyg728 (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Tiananmen east2st.jpg

File:Tiananmen east2st.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tyg728 (talk) 13:57, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Planetshakers_band_en_concierto_en_vivo.jpg

Hola Ymblanter no estoy de acuerdo que me haigas borrado esa imagen, puesto que lo tengo desde hace dos años desde el 2016 que yo lo subi esa foto y no tuve problemas porque fue por creación propia no viole los derechos de autor porque esa imagen nunca fue subida al facebook como lo afirma el usuario que lo nomino para el borrado. Considere mi petición de poder restaurarla mi imagen. Por favor considera mi petición. Bendiciones. Chico sensación (talk) 21:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Chico sensación: Por favor abrir una petition aqui: Commons:Deletion requests/2018/11/08. Gracias.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Gold award Maxx Get-A-Way.jpg

File:Gold award Maxx Get-A-Way.jpg

Hello! This file was deleted from wikimedia commons due to it being a dervative work! I am the photographer who took the picture of the award plaque.

Whatever additional copyright licenses that must be provided to wikimedia commons can be supplied. Please explain what must be done.

for this reason, the file should be undeleted

Hansgruber1967 (talk) 14:05, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

The objects which you photographed are protected by copyright, and therefore we can not undelete the file. If you own copyright on these objects as well and are willing to release them under a free license, please contact Commons:OTRS, they will take care of the issue.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

i took the photo myself in 1994. it belongs to me. The German record label which owns the album cover art displayed in the photo is no longer in existence. if needed i can provide proof of this. also the photo is a fair use image that is in the public domain. it can be easily found online just by searching and is already apart of wikipedia.

look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Get-A-Way#/media/File:Maxx-get-a-way_single.jpg

look here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Get-A-Way

do the same rules apply to this article on Michael Jackson where his platinum award is shown along with the album cover of his hit album 'thriller' clearly displayed on the award plaque in the photo?

Michael Jackson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson#Honors_and_awards

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jackson#/media/File:Thriller_platinum_record,_Hard_Rock_Cafe_Hollywood.JPG Hansgruber1967 (talk) 11:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, the same policy applies to photos of all copyrighted material. You can nominate these photos for deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Piacenza-Stemma.png

Hello, I saw that you requested "Piacenza-Stemma.png" to be deleted. I do not need an explanation about copyright issues, I just need to know - as I try to build, improve and make my Wiki Ligure better - why other people from other Wikis do not share my positive attitude and my wish to make things better. Cordially, Luenséin (talk) 09:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

No, I did not request it to be deleted, I just closed this discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Piacenza-Stemma.png and deleted the file.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Aroonandmegan.jpg

Should File:Aroonandmegan.jpg be deleted pursuant to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paintinglive.jpg? Sam Sailor 09:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 11:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Again

Hi! See. --Микола Василечко (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Birthplace of Endre Ady 2017-12 07.jpg

Hi Ymblanter! Why is 2050 the year of undeletion? According to the Corneille the works published abroad before 1978 will be in PD 95 years after publication date. This bust was erected in 1977. If it would be 1978 work then would be in PD in 1950 (death + 70 years). --Regasterios (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

I think you are citing the US copyright policy. Are you sure this is the 95 years publication rule in Romania? I do not think so. We can of course have URAA issues, when the monument is already free in Romania but not free in the US, but I think they will sort them out by 2050 (when I likely have been dead anyway).--Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes I am citing the US copyright policy. PD in Romania in 2050 it is true. Okay, it was only a question. Thank you. --Regasterios (talk) 16:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Sure, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Photo hasn't been deleted

Hello, just so you know the deletion request which you closed and deleted the picture. The image is still on there.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Symbol_2014.jpg --Vauxford (talk) 22:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done now, thanks for letting me know. --Ymblanter (talk) 22:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Question to my deletion request

Hello Ymblanter, can you delete this graphic? I have opened this deletion request 8 days ago and two persons support it! I think it´s time to delete it! ;-) 🔸 Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

 Done--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello Ymblanter, can you als delete this graphic? The deletion request is quite old now! 🔸 Thanks in advance, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

It is not quite old. Quite old would for example be this one: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nklorety 5.jpg. And in the request you mention there are objections, so that it clearly can benefit from staying open a bit longer.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Okay, I have understand this! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello Ymblanter, today I replaced this graphic with a new one! Can you delete the old one for me? Thanks in advance! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

The request has to be open for 7 days, and there is no need to constantly ask me here. Any administrator can close the request after 7 days.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Because it is my own old graphic, there is no need to wait seven days! 🔸 Best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Publication found for File:Alice Sheldon aka James Tiptree, Jr. with Kikuyu people.jpg

You deleted this file yesterday, but Leserättin has now found a 1922 publication of it. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alice Sheldon aka James Tiptree, Jr. with Kikuyu people (cropped).jpg. I think that makes it {{PD-US-expired}}. Would you mind undeleting it, please? --bjh21 (talk) 22:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

PS: I hadn't realised that you nominated the crop for deletion in the first place, so you're probably aware of the finding. Sorry for the noise! --bjh21 (talk) 23:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but the situation is too complicated, and I am afraid someone else would need to have a look. Would you mind listing it at Commons:Undeletion requests? Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Happy to do so. Thanks for your help. --bjh21 (talk) 11:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:HUP 50 1926 obverse.jpg

Hi Ymblanter! You forgot to delete this file: File:HUP 50 1926 obverse.jpg. --Regasterios (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, deleted now.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Can you take a look?

Hello Ymblanter, can you take a look at those deletion requests? Commons:Deletion requests/File:2,5-dimetil-2,5-hexanodiol.tif and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aldol (1).png. I think they can get deleted now! Thanks and best regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

DRs

Hi. There was an issue at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Feminist-wiki-v1-1024px.png. I tried to fix it (separating 2 DRs) but probably could not. Please have a look. --E4024 (talk) 18:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

I have noticed this when I closed the request, and I also do not know how to separate it. In any case, I closed the second request as keep because the file has never been nominated for deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Lott-Sylvester Stallone-Tommy Morrison.jpg

It looks like Merlin2203 (talk · contribs) edited Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Lott-Sylvester Stallone-Tommy Morrison.jpg after your closing and pointed out that the source page, https://boxinghalloffame.com/steve-lott-coo-boxing-hall-of-fame-las-vegas/, says "These photos are is distributed under the license of Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0"; it's almost at the bottom of the page, under "Photos © 2018 Steve Lott" rather than "under contacts", but it is there. --GRuban (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

I strongly doubt they (Steve Lott) own photos (which do not seem to be taken by one person). We probably need an undeletion request here.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Artwork in Dongsi Shitiao station, Line 2.jpg

And also:

• File:Artwork in Line 2 platform, Xizhimen station.jpg

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 12:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Artwork in Dongsi Shitiao station, Line 2.jpg

And also:

• File:Artwork in Line 2 platform, Xizhimen station.jpg

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 12:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juma Mosque Qala Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 05:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

noinclude

Hello, I saw that you added a usufull category to this DR, thanks you. However it will be great if you could add such category inside the tags <noinclude></noinclude>, indeed, a deletion request is transcluded and such tag will help to categorize only the right DR and not all the pages where this DR is transcluded. See Commons:Deletion policy#Regular deletion. Regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Are you basically saying that HotCat (which I used for this purpose for approximately a million times) does it wrong?--Ymblanter (talk) 11:00, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Yes and no, basically, as far I know it is not possible to includes tag with HotCat. The issue is that when put a category on a page that is transcluded then the result is that all the pages where this pages is transcluded are also categorized. Example see Category:Ukrainian FOP cases/deleted, you will see that a lot af DR archives are categorized, this is just wrong and that is useless, those archives are not "Ukrainian FOP cases/deleted" but contains DRs that are "Ukrainian FOP cases/deleted", but where there is no the <noinclude></noinclude> tags. This is of course not a major issue, and the project will not stop for that, however the tags exist for that reason, feel free to use it or not, this is just an info. Regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:16, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, I will try to not forget using the two-step addition (HotCat and then manually adding tags).--Ymblanter (talk) 11:18, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

A problematical new user

Hello.
Please, look here – at very least, inappropriate claim of authority. Moreover, removal of {{Information}}. From the Netherlands you could better deal with it. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:49, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, added to the watchlist. I am not sure they will show up again, but if they do I should be able to handle them.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

File:LOGO mmtc.png

Thanks for deleting this file. Would you mind also deleting Commons:Deletion requests/File:LOGO mmtc.png? I accidentally filed a regular deletion request instead of a speedy at first, and the deletion request should probably be deleted per CSD COM1. Thanks. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:37, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Sure,  Done--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

просьба

Ярослав, не могли бы вы восстановить перенесенное из рувики и быстро стертое здесь? Бот при переносе съел источник, а я не отследила, что тут теперича и за это выметают.

File:Иванов книга Cor Ardens 1907.jpg

File:День Белого цветка-1913 Плакат.jpg

File:Алексей Фёдорович Пушкин.jpg

File:Pered grosoy.jpg

--Shakko (talk) 10:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Без проблем, но будет удобнее, если я сразу и поставлю источники. Они где-то есть, чтобы мне не искать?--Ymblanter (talk) 12:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

он их жует, как я вижу, и прячет вниз в таблицу "Исходный журнал загрузок". Но вообще вроде transfered from ruwiki может сойти? Нормальных музеев там не было в источниках изначально. --Shakko (talk) 14:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Да нет, сами файлы же откуда-то берутся? Я попробую поискать.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:05, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Всё сделал.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Freedom of panorama in Russia

Hi. Following Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Екатерина Борисова there's no Freedom of panorama in Russia for artwork, including sculptures according to {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Yes, you are right. I unclosed the request, but please make sure that you specifically refer to the absence of FoP for atrwork.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:22, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

So wikimedia commons MUST delete nearly 250,000 files see here:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=russia+monument&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go&ns0=1&ns6=1&ns12=1&ns14=1&ns100=1&ns106=1

Why when there are approximately 250,000 files of Russian Monuments on Wikimedia Commons do you specifically target 2 of my files?

I worked Russia for 13.5 years as a Contract Manager. I know that much of Russian law is still in its infancy and is unclear after the collapse of the USSR. For freedom of panorama to be enforceable there has to be a definition in Russian law of "Art work". Since no one can define art I very much doubt that there is such a definition.

Yes, in principle all of them should be nominated for deletion. I doubt though that we have 250k files eligible for deletion, the actual number must be much lower.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:54, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Viki Yeri Sevir 2019 başlayır!

Salam! Viki Yeri Sevir 2019 müsabiqəsi artıq başlayıb! Sizin iştirakınız Azərbaycanın təbii sərvətlərini sənədləşdirməkdə və digər Vikipediya layihələrində yaymaqda kömək edəcək.

Xahiş edirik müsabiqənin səhifəsinə daxil olub qaydalarla tanış olasınız: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Azerbaijan. Siz burada həmçinin müsabiqədə necə iştirak etməyi də öyrənə bilərsiniz. Hər hansısa bir sualınız olarsa mənimlə əlaqə saxlayın: User_talk:Interfase.

Təşəkkürlər,
Interfase,
Azərbaycanda Viki Yeri Sevir 2019 müsabiqəsinin təşkilatçısı

Hello! We are happy to announce that Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Azerbaijan is now open. Your participation will help us to document the nature of Azerbaijan and show it to the world through Wikipedia and other projects.

Please go to the page of the contest to read the rules: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Azerbaijan. There you can also find out how to take part in the contest. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us: User_talk:Interfase.

Thanks,
Interfase,
the organiser of Wiki Loves Earth 2019 in Azerbaijan
19:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

AWB request

Hi Ymblanter. Would you be willing to grant me access to AWB here on commons? I haven't yet made 200 edits here, but I'd like to simply some repetitive editing. I have AWB access on enwiki, and have read the commons guidelines. Thans, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Danny. I am now on a long weekend until Monday, and will not be able to look at the issue (I have no experience with Awb, this is why I can not give an answer right now). Would you mind pinging me on Monday if it has not been resolved by then?--Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Sure, thanks --DannyS712 (talk) 19:18, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

 Done, and you are in the meanwhile above 200 edits--Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: thanks. The specific series of edits I wanted to do is already over, but this will probably be useful in the future too. Thanks again, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Sure, no problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

what?

Possible copyright violation, from copyrighted logo, see en:File:BIC logo.svg ???. this file File:Big logo.svg it's very different from this . logo on commons has only text. english wikipedia is full with the man pen. You delete . Possible copyright violation, from copyrighted logo, see en:File:BIC logo.svg.

now named File:Big logo.svg , is a wrong name, correct please.--EEIM (talk) 00:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I do not see your point. Do you mean that DiC logo is for whatever reason not copyrighted?--Ymblanter (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

I think he means that it is below COM:TOO or {{PD-text}} 大诺史 (talk) 05:54, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

I believe that the wordmark itself is a COM:DW of a copyrighted logo. So it may be a copyright too. Correct me if I am wrong. 大诺史 (talk) 05:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

I can undelete and send it to a full discussion, though I really do not see how it could not be copyrighted.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:56, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bic logo.svg--Ymblanter (talk) 05:59, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

This image consists only text -BIC- on 1 solid yellow square. Where is the Copyvio ? Full logo on English Wikipedia there's the advertising mascot BIC man. Logo on Commons is only text.

realy ? Where is the Copyvio ? .--EEIM (talk) 07:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Removal of deletion templates

Sorry for bothering you, but I don't really know many Commons admins. Special:Contributions/125.24.160.17 has gone on a blanking spree, removing deletion templates from a bunch of articles. On English Wikipedia, I'd revert, warn, and eventually block, but, honestly, I'm not sure if this is considered blockable behavior here. Also, it's too many articles to manually "undo" every edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, I blocked them for 24h and will be rolling edits back.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:32, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Marithé + François Girbaud

Bonjour,

Vous avez supprimé deux fichiers de la page Marithé + François Girbaud : MAILLAPARTY.jpg et CLOSED.jpg puisqu'ils copient le compte Instagram de Girbaud Officiel. Je travaille chez Marithé François Girbaud, je ne comprend donc pas pourquoi je ne peux pas utiliser ces photos alors qu'elles appartiennent à Marithé et François Girbaud. Je viens d'envoyer un mail à Commons:OTRS et je suis en attente d'une réponse, pouvez-vous en attendant remettre les photos? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marithé + François Girbaud (talk • contribs) 08:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour. Si l'OTRS accepte la permission, on va remettre les photos.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:45, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Nix01

Hello, I see that you are dealing with that user's uploads, so I come here to see if we could proceed a block on him. Thanks.--Hamish (talk) 16:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

They have not been properly warned. Someone must warn them, and if they continue uploading copyright violations, a block would be in order.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

However he did.Please kindly check.--Hamish (talk) 17:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

I only see a warning after my reply, but they have been already indefblocked anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment

Hi! Please comment. --Микола Василечко (talk) 13:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Myrotvorets_logo-300x300.png

Dear Ymblanter, can you please proceed to the page https://psb4ukr.org/about/ (link was given previously in file description), read once again the line "Materials of this website can be used under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License", and then explain in more details, why did you delete the site logo from Commons? With kindest regards --Ostaltsov (talk) 12:42, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

The page says copyright at the bottom. If they remove the copyright sign, I can restore the logo. Right now, what they do is copyright prostitution.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:51, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

OK, I can request them. In a meantime, can you give an official definition of "copyright prostitution"? Link to corresponding paragraph of Wikipedia code of rules would be highly appreciated. --Ostaltsov (talk) 12:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

One can not issue content under two different licences at the same time at the same place for the same use.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Once again: please, give a link to corresponding Wiki rule.--Ostaltsov (talk) 13:18, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki policy on what? That we do not accept copyrighted material?--Ymblanter (talk) 13:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki policy on "why CC-4 license becomes invalid if other license is mentioned at the same page".--Ostaltsov (talk) 13:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

No, I am sorry. It is obvious to me. If someone says all materials on the site are copyrighted, they are copyrighted. If later on they change their mind, fine, they can relicense them or republish in a different place under another license, but the copyright sign then has to go. If you do not believe me, try Commons:Undeletion requests.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:28, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

В карте объекта культурного наследия перепутаны фотографии (город Феодосия).

Здравствуйте!

Прошу обратить Ваше внимание на фотографии объекта культурного наследия. Армянская Апостольская церковь Сурб Геворк (Святого Георгия) - фотографии данного объекта не соответствуют действительности, фотографии относятся к церкви Сурб Саркис (Св. Сергия). Номер объекта: 8231385008. Необходимо переместить фотографии под Номер объекта: 8231385006. Последняя фотография в этом описании - Феодосия. Церковь Св. Георгия фотография относится к церкви Сурб Геворк (Св. Георгия) ул. Нахимова, 32. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Феодосия._Церковь_Георгия.jpg

Церковь Св. Георгия по ул. Рабочий городок 1-а, фотография объекта находится здесь https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Феодосия._Церковь_Св._Георгия.jpg - нужно переместить под Номер объекта: 8231387005.

Армянская церковь Святого Иоанна Богослова. Номер объекта: 8231387003. Фотографии объекта подписаны как церковь Св. Иоанна Богослова (фото и описание не соответствует действительности)и относятся к церкви Иоанна Предтечи. Номер объекта: 8231387004. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manikb20 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, no Sweden this year from me.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion request

Извини, я и тут еще влезу. Глянь, пожалуйста, этот файл --Ludvig14 (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Снял с удаления, если ты это имеешь в виду.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо, это. Там еще по вкладу участника есть такие же. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 19:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Спасибо, с этими тоже разобрался.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Shanghai Metro logo.svg

Don't you think that your again deletion, which the 2nd version of that is fairy different than it originally was, is really subject to m:WMF Global Ban Policy#General information which states:

“

Helping a globally banned user evade their ban may result in sanctions. Knowingly facilitating the contributions of a globally banned individual, acting as a proxy for such a person, or attempting to interfere with Foundation staff or volunteer administrators, bureaucrats or functionaries enforcing a global ban in line with relevant policies may result in sanctions, including loss of advanced user rights or suspension of contributing access to Wikimedia sites. Instances of enabling a globally banned user to evade a ban can be brought to the Foundation’s attention by notifying T&S at cawikimedia.org.

”

???

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

I am not sure what you are talking about. What globally banned individual? You seem to be suggesting that I myself should be globally banned for deleting a file which is a copyright violation? Then this is lunacy. Go and get some sleep. If you wanted to say smth else, please do it in a respectful manner.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

"What globally banned individual?" INeverCry (which was the original user that deleted (per its deletion log) the title linked file during their adminship life); "...I myself should be globally banned..." No, I won't; but "Then this is lunacy." violating WMF's official policy is or isn't "lunacy"?! "Go and get some sleep." I know when I should sleep, no need to mention by others; "If you wanted to say smth else, please do it in a respectful manner." This sentence is, by de facto contexts, what I originally want to tell you, I really don't know that why you reverse-asked this to me.

So under your comments, this site, Wikimedia Commons, can have its own policy to not carry out part of WMF office actions, if indeed yes, which term? I should have time to poke this to T&S when I have free time, to let em know that Commons is a nervous project, and their users are afraid of fully applying WMF Global Ban policies.

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I still do not get your point. I deleted a file which I believe is a copyright violation. Last time I checked the WMF policy was that copyright violations can not be stored on the projects. Irrespectively of who else could have deleted a file with the same name, do you have an argument that a logo of Shanghai Metro is not protected by copyright? If not, we are done here.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Well, I'm not intended to request restoring this file, as I also know the correct place to do so is COM:UR, but now you are the one who misinterpreted the reason I started this discussion, this is the actual, really actual, I mean: You have the right to delete any files, but can you please no more do so by citing global banned users' ravings? Such behaviors are clearly-than-god violating WMF policies, and can really result anyone, even administrators, stewards and/or WMF staffs, global bans, ecnomical sanctions and/or prosecutes. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:04, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

I decided to continue this discussion at Meta-Wiki: m:Wikimedia_Forum#Is_Wikimedia_Commons_a_project_that_can_make_exemptions_from_some_WMF_official_policies?. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment @Liuxinyu970226: The usual path for disagreeing with an administrator on their talk page would usually be to the broader Commons community, not complaining to a meta general discussion page.  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Looks like it has been resolved for the time being. If there are good, uncontroversial arguments that the logo has been licensed under free license I will of course restore the file, or indeed an undeletion request must be started.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Sadafras

Maybe these files should be deleted, after blocking the contributor... I let you judge of this, since I'm not familiar enough with Commons criteria - Thanks --Hsarrazin (talk) 20:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

I deleted some, but I will look at them again tomorrow.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

You are deleting all my images, which in all cases I own and in most cases created

My name is James D'Angelo and you are ruthlessly deleting all my images.

In each case I am the author or lead band member involved. ANd in each case the record label either had no rights to the images, or has released rights on these images. And in a couple cases there were no record companies involved at all.

What can I do to stop you from doing this! Please!

I wrote and directed The Orange Thief which is no longer controlled by Warner or any other company. I wrote, designed, produced and directed the artwork for the Goats And the same applies to Jimmy Luxury.

---

James D’Angelo CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CRI) www.congressionalresearch.org 202-368-6544 (USA) @jamesgdangelo

Had the deliberations been open while going on, the clamors of faction would have prevented any satisfactory result.

                                                       – Alexander Hamilton 1792

Here is a list of your deletions. And I would hope you would be willing to communicate instead of simply remove

File:The Goats at Khyber Pass.jpg Pay attention to copyright File:The Goats at Khyber Pass.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not "Own work". Album cover art is owned by the record company and not freely licensed. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:OrangeThiefDVDcover.jpg Pay attention to copyright File:OrangeThiefDVDcover.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not "Own work". Album cover art is owned by the record company and not freely licensed. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:The Goats Bio Picture Sony Records Ruffhouse Columbia.jpg беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/− Warning sign This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading File:The Goats Bio Picture Sony Records Ruffhouse Columbia.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:TheGoats1993PressImageInBrussels.jpg беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/− Warning sign This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading File:TheGoats1993PressImageInBrussels.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Jimmyluxuryalbumcover.jpg Pay attention to copyright File:Jimmyluxuryalbumcover.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Not "Own work". Album cover art is owned by the record company and not freely licensed. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VanSputknick (talk • contribs) 18:54, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

@VanSputknick: , please contact Commopns:OTRS, this page details what you need to do to prove your authorship.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Note

Just dropping this here since I happen to know you speak Russian. When you get a chance, could you look over these images with regard to scope. GMG^talk 19:55, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

The landscape are fine (I deleted the botched upload), but the last 6 uploaded images are out of scope and copyright violations. I do not have time right now, but tomorrow, if I do not forget, I will nominate them for deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Большая просьба

Ярослав, Вы не могли бы заглянуть сюда в тему «Фотосъёмка в аптеке» и удалить обсуждаемые файлы? -- S, AV 18:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Всё удалил.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Огромное. S, AV 17:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Re File:2015 DC Election Promotion in Aberdeen Main Road near SCB Aberdeen Branch.JPG

Hi Ymblanter. I noticed you have closed the DR as deleted but the file is somehow still not deleted. Could you please try deleting it again? Thanks. --Wcam (talk) 21:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

 Done, sometimes these scripts do not work properly--Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Adding new categories?

In the category pages of, for example Category:Waterfalls in the Republic of Karelia and Category:Paanajärvi National Park there was told that categories should not be created manually. However I alreaydy created two new categories: category:Mäntykoski and Category:Kivakkakoski. But was this wrong and should this have been discussed first? I am not able to discuss in russian (except for using google translator) so I wrote here.

The questions, of course, are: can such cartegories be created or not (maybe? or maybe not?) and are the names that were used correct (for example: I used the Finnish spelling of the place names because it was used in the categories already existing, like Category:Paanajärvi National Park; and: should for example the names contain definitions like "The Mäntykoski waterfalls" or "The Kivakka rapids" or something like that - as I am no native speaker of english neither)?

Such categories would be useful when articles are created of the topics of the categories. There are now articles in Finnish like fi:Kivakkatunturi (seems that articles in other languages are not yet created allthough there are lots of high quality phtographs) and fi:Mäntykoski (no articles by now in other Wikies, but some quite fine photoes). In these cases a link to the category in commons in the articles would be useful especially when there are a lot of high quality images. One article with interwiki also in russia is fi:Nuorunen, and there are some excellent photoes too for which a category in commons would be helpful in the articles.

But if there should happen to be be a policy that such categories should not be created (either without discussing first, or at all) it is of course possible, for there may of course be other good reasons for not to create new categories.

So, I will now ask, can such categories be created or not, if it happens that there should be reasons not to create them.

(And then there seem to be some overlapping categories, like: Category:Waterfalls in the Republic of Karelia and Category:Waterfalls in Karelia.) --Urjanhai (talk) 22:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

I am not sure why you are asking me, but obviously Category:Paanajärvi National Park is a legit category.--Ymblanter (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

In the page Category:Paanajärvi National Park in the second template from above it says: "This is the category of the protected area of Russia number 1000069. This template and pages using it are maintained by the Russian WLE team. Please read the guidelines before making any changes that can affect the database!"

In the page Commons:Monuments database in Russia at Commons:Monuments_database_in_Russia#Contacts it says: "This activity is coordinated on Russian Wikivoyage, where you can find exhaustive discussions about lists of monuments and the strategies of image categorization. If you know Russian, you should read these discussions first. If you can't read Russian, feel free to ask questions:" And this was followed by your user name and another users user name as contacts. - And, as I said, I am not able to read russian without google translator, so I came here to ask.

And the question was: Is it allowed (or recommended or not recommended) to create subcategories under, for example, Category:Paanajärvi National Park for Lakes, rivers, rapids, waterfalls, mountains etc if there happen to be several images of such sites (at least if the images happen to be of high quality and therefore useful)? Before I started there was an existing subcategory for a lake: Category:Lake Paanajärvi and then I created subcateories for a waterfall and a rapids (Category:Mäntykoski and Category:Kivakkakoski). But if, for example this will cause some confusion to the existing automatic procedures, this might not be a good idea.--Urjanhai (talk) 00:51, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Yes, please create subcategories if you feel they are needed. The note is about avoiding to create duplicate categories for natural (and cultural) monuments, but for big ones such as national parks the categories have been created already, and the subcategories can be organized in the usual way.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Rob Mohlmann 21st ORT poster 2019.jpg

Hi,

I noticed you deleted this image, because it was supposed a derivative work. Rob Mohlmann declares to be the owner and creator of the work, through OTRS. What should he have done differently?

Ciell (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

This is a poster, so that OTRS confirmation is needed. I guess if the OTRS ticket has been accepted any OTRS admin can undelete the file.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Ymblanter,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Why you deleted my file????

Are you asshole Resuu (talk) 08:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

No, I am not.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Ymblanter,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)