User talk:Ludvig14

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ludvig14!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Heia ludvig! gratulerer med døden!:D

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krutitsy Metochion1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI to me. --Iifar 08:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VysokopetrovskyMonastery StPeter.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment The balance white is a little inexact and is slightly darkish ;) (the file is updated) --Aleks G 23:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 17:32, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Ludvig14,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 18:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borovsk TransfigurationChurch2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad Samarskaya24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna ChurchRenewalTempleResurrection.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad International95a.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality. --NorbertNagel 16:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchAnnunciation Petrovsky Park8.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Kuskovo DryingHouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 09:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Kuskovo Palace5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SPb - Peter's Сurtain and Menshikov Bastion of Peter&Paul Fortress.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! YuP StGeorgeChurch4p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchAnnunciation Petrovsky Park7.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI of course. --Isiwal 22:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KolomnaKremlin MarinkinaT.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, bit dark. --Mattbuck 23:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam UpperGarden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment The church is tilted Poco a poco 19:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Support Fixed tilt. --Iifar 08:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam ResurectionSketeRefectory.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Iifar 08:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valaam GephsimanskiySketeChurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe SaviourGates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 10:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe AscensionChurch tim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support --Christian Ferrer 16:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe WoodenPalace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ChurchTheotokosIviron Vspolye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 13:27, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klyazma ChurchHolyMandylion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsarevo ChurchStNicholas4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kamenka(Nerl).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:31, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Категоризация[edit]

Когда ты памятники отправляешь в категорию типа Cultural heritage monuments in Xxx District, ты не могла бы к ним сразу добавлять и географические категории? Например, Xxx District, или по селу (если есть), в городе иногда бывает Buildings in xxx или Churches in xxx. Если они туда не попадут, их потом сложно будет найти.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ага, спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Я думала, опять все неправильно... Кстати, я еще в прошлом году обнаружила (на примере Александрова), что организация категорий типа Здания в XXX - Улицы XXX и до кучи еще и Культурное наследие XXX кажутся мне нелогичными и не понимаю их взаимную иерархию (кто кому подчиняется, а где они должны быть параллельными). И я подозреваю, что то, что я там накатегоризовала, было весьма неудачным решением. Так что, извини, но ошибки будут продолжаться - Ludvig14 (talk) 15:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

В моём понимании это три параллельные линии. То есть в идеале здание, если у него нет своей категории, должно быть категоризовано по улице, по типу (например, церковь) и как памятник культурного наследия. Проблема в том, что сейчас, кроме самых больших городов, так категоризовать не получится. Для культурного наследия категории всюду есть (где нет, я потом пройду и создам). А уже по зданиям в городе не всегда. Так что, действительно, отправлять здание одновременно в категорию Трубчевск и Культурное наследие Трубчевска нелогично, так как вторая включена в первую. Но если дом в категорию Трубчевск при этом не включить, то тот, кто когда-нибудь создаст категорию Здания в Трубчевске, может его просто не найти. Но это всё, в принципе, не смертельно, прошлый год нет смысла перерывать. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Здания и культурное наследие, да, параллельные. Но при большом числе памятников получается огромная категория и твой вариант, когда под каждое здание делается новая категория, мне удобным не кажется, ибо часто лучше видеть все сразу, а не бродить по подкатегориям в поисках нужного объекта (тут, кстати, очень помогают списки памятников). Вместо этого я в Александрове пыталась группировать дома хотя бы по улицам, но быстро поняла, что и это плохой вариант, потому что имеются изображения и рядовых зданий и это ничем не помогает с памятниками. Так там все осталось в неудовлетворительном состоянии и ничего с этим сделать я не смогла. - Ludvig14 (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Нет, я под каждое здание не делаю новую категорию, только когда там много файлов. Но, в общем, да - и так плохо, и так.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:35, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buildings_by_Alexey_Shchusev[edit]

Buildings by Alexey Shchusev has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jebulon (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Panoramic views of Peter & Paul Fortress[edit]

См. вопрос на User_talk:Ymblanter#Петропавловское. Kaluga.2012 (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Ludvig14,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Ludvig14,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov StCosmas&DamianChurchGremyachaya1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:44, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov HodegetriaChurch1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pskov StCosmas&DamianChurch sPrimostiya2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Buena composicion y prespectiva para mi--Ivan2010 18:17, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MoscowKremlin Senate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MoscowKremlin Armoury2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality but small size.--ArildV 13:02, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow StBasilCathedral d28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 11:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow StBarbaraChurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow UniversityChurch I38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dimitrovgrad GrainFactory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Grand Kremlin Palace3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Views fromCCS C12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Beklemishevskaya Tower V23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow BorovitskayaTower I50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ZachatyevskyConventCathedral C35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChurchAnna'sConceiving inUgol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow ViewOfKremlin V45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Views fromCCS C14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow NovayaSquare14 S63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:23, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovogorod ChurchInKozhevniki VN180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 15:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod DesyatinnyMonBellTower VN06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. maybe a 1/3 rule approach would be better. --C messier 14:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovogorod WhiteTower VN216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Nice sharpness and composition, but see note. --C messier 14:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Done[reply]
QI --C messier 12:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod PhilippAndStNicolasChurch VN109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:36, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod ElijahChurch Slavno VN112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:33, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovogorod Detinets VN13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Good quality IMO, but the tree of the left is disturbing and unnecessary. It could be cropped. I'm not sure about perspective correction: There is a bit of perspective distortion IMO--Lmbuga 19:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather prefer not to crop image and not to erase tree either. Sorry. --Ludvig14 23:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ok. It's a good picture, but I rather prefer not to vote. Sorry and thanks--Lmbuga 19:21, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Very good and sharp picture, without the the interfering tree it can be even a candidate for Feature image. Who don't like trees — can crop the photo, it's free project. :) --Brateevsky 07:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Panoramic images[edit]

Dear Ludvig14, I notice that you recategorise photos from Kraków. Now on commons a panoramic image is not just a nice view, but it actually means a wide angle view (see i.e. ru:Панорама or en:Panorama), beyond what a standard wide angle lense provides.

So for instance the photo on the left side typically is not classified as panoramic image. As a guideline, in most cases a single image file from camera does not qualify as a panoramic image.

a panoramic image

The image on the right side however does qualify. It is composed or "stitched" from several individual photos. It does span a wide angle range, about 180 degrees. It has a rather elongated aspect ratio. This is the meaning of panoramic image as is usual on wikimedia commons.

Best regards -- KlausFoehl (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I know quite well what does the "panorama" mean and I often do this kind of pictures myself. And I quite agree that the name General views of Wawel would be better than Panoramic views of Wawel. But it seems I am not the only one who classifies these general views as panoramas (look, for example, Category:Panoramic views of Kraków). And what do you want me to do? To rename the category "Panoramic views of Wawel"? - Ludvig14 (talk) 20:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being away from commons for a week. Looking at a number of "Panoramic views of XY" categories, the situation is diffuse. Maybe worth asking at the Village pump. My suggestion would be "Views of XY" with subcategories "Cityscapes of XY" and "Panoramics of XY". But whatever the hierarchy, "Panoramics" should be mostly stitched photos and similar. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure you can change this situation. Sometimes if an author did not specify how he/she produced his/her picture you have no chance to guess it correctly. If you do not believe it, you may try to guess with my pictures on this page. Many of them were really panoramas - Ludvig14 (talk) 09:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod AntonievMon Cathedral VN152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 22:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VNovgorod StsBorisGlebChurchPlotniki VN147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	С признательностью за весомый и качественный вклад в проект Викимедиа. Dom kobb (talk) 21:21, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vysokopetrovsky Monastery ChurchOfOurLadyOfBogolyubovo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 12:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вики любит Землю 2015[edit]

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит Землю 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваша фотография:

File:Kolomenskoe LimeAvenue KE.jpg

оказалась среди 435 из более чем 8300 загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошла в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью о природном объекте, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и российским природным объектам!

Организаторы российской части Вики любит Землю 2015

Your picture is in an app![edit]

Hello Ludvig14,

Your beautiful picture of St. Basil's Cathedral has been included in the Google Play app Wonders of the World. It has Russian-language support: Чудеса Cвета.

You are credited as "Photo: Ludvig14, [license type], [link to Wikimedia Commons photograph]". If you would like to change the attribution in a future version, please let us know.

Thank you very much for your contribution!

Zeuslab (talk) 18:24, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoe LimeAvenue KE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality now! Please give a hint, when you repair a picture. Assessors needs this information! --Hubertl 09:03, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Фотоснимки из Переславля[edit]

Здравствуйте. Мне хотелось бы обсудить ваши снимки из Переславля, потому что многое в них меня смущает. Может быть, вы полагаете снова приезжать в наш город? Может быть, вы согласитесь объяснить, почему и как были сделаны ваши снимки? Если да, то я спрошу подробнее. Спасибо. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Приезжать, вроде, пока не планировала, а ответить на вопросы готова попробовать. - Ludvig14 (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Далеко не всё мне понятно в вашем выборе времени и позиции.

Композиционные странности[edit]

заблокировано машинами
снято снизу, хотя можно подняться на галерею
закрыто деревом
закрыто всем подряд
закрыто деревьями и снято с теневой стороны
закрыто деревьями
закрыто кустами

Снято с теневой стороны[edit]

Тяжёлые тени[edit]

Пересвечено, хроматические аберрации[edit]

Вот такие сомнения у меня возникли. Пересвет же легко убрать в обработке рав-файлов? Вы приезжали на вручение премии? Или премиальный плакат просто остался на стене? --PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Вики любит памятники 2015[edit]

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

оказались среди 1083 из почти 24 тысяч загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2015

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Zvenigorod MonumentYury&Savva.JPG

Yours sincerely, Stolbovsky (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Правки по спискам WLE[edit]

Добрый день. Пожалуйста, не отменяйте мои правки по спискам СПб и Ленобласти, не вглядевшись в суть этих правок. Я там создала десяток новых категорий и все "зеленые" шапки Protected Areas перенесла вместе с файлами в эти категории, а служебные категории типа Protected areas of Russia/4710164 остались в этих случаях чисто служебными. Если в них появляются "зеленые" технические шапки, они начинают дублировать уже созданные категории на Викискладе, а это лишнее умножение сущностей. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 12:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Да, это беда. Как я понимаю, все такие "служебные" категории должны были быть переименованы ботом и даже внесены в соответствующий список на переименование. Но Вы не дождались "робота" и стали создавать категории вручную. Хорошо, СПб и область править не буду. - Ludvig14 (talk) 12:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Я дальше Питера и области вообще не планирую заниматься ВЛЕ-списками, природа - совсем не моя епархия)) Но нашу немного знаю, поэтому решила немного повозиться. Вручную создавать категории несложно, общий принцип их наименования мне понятен, английский знаю, поэтому я решила все-таки десяток категорий создать самостоятельно и, соответственно, перетащить в них соответствующие файлы. Мы с Сашей уже немного пообсуждали эту мою работу, он никаких претензий не выказал. А дальше уже пусть бот орудует, конечно.

Кстати, в списке по ссылке присутствуют в качестве планируемых к созданию и те категории, которые были созданы, судя по всему, давным-давно - тот же Приоратский парк, который не только ООПТ, но и ОКН. Как посоветуете, их стоит убрать из списка по ссылке? Я могу, если надо, потому что прекрасно помню, какие категории уже созданы, да и в списках их очень быстро найду, чтоб свериться, поскольку занималась всем этим буквально на днях. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 13:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Наверное, лучше убрать. Я тоже уже об этом задумалась. - Ludvig14 (talk) 13:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ОК, я тогда вотпрямщас схожу и уберу, чтобы не отсвечивало, да и чтоб не забыть. Оставлю только те, где Вики-категорий нет и не было.

И еще кстати: Питерские (78 регион то есть) ВЛЕ-категории все были до меня приведены в порядок, но я в сам список (опять же по сонгласованию с Сашей и с опорой на источники) добавила штук 15 новых объектов. Там служебные категории будут все пустые, да и Вики-категорий пока нет, само собой, как минимум до мая. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ага, спасибо! - Ludvig14 (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Фото по Царь-пушке Московского Кремля[edit]

Уважаемый Людвиг, добрый вечер!

Нет ли у Вас случаем хорошего фото Царь-пушки Московского Кремля, такое, как Ваше фото Архангельского собора? К сожалению, оно у меня не получилось из-за всё время крутящихся вокруг неё интуристов. Есть ли что-либо по фактуре и

плотности? В Кремле буду, но больше снимать ничего не буду.

P.S. Мне очень нравятся Ваши фото, стараюсь везде их ставить, где могу.

С уважением и наилучшими пожеланиями в Новом 2016 Году

C.caramba2010 (talk) 19:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо на добром слове. Царь-пушка есть и давно загружена на викисклад (File:MoscowKremlin TsarCannon.JPG), впрочем, она мне не очень удалась - Ludvig14 (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Поставил Вашу Царь-пушку с Вашего разрешения на страницу Московский Кремль. Если будет возможность сфотографировать её весной, чтобы дополнить коллекцию, будьте любезны, сделайте это. Ваш Архангельский собор там уже стоит, не мог его сфотографировать, поскольку всё время со всех сторон бил в объектив солнечный свет. Заранее благодарен Вашими трудами.

С уважением и наилучшими пожеланиями

потомок древних русских дворянских родов (в т.ч. Воробьёвых - Ваши любимые Воробьёвы горы!) C.caramba2010 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Людвиг, мало того, написал о своём видении фото Московского Кремля:

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Обсуждение:Московский_Кремль#.D0.9F.D0.BE_.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.B2.D0.BE.D0.B4.D1.83_.D1.84.D0.BE.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.B3.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.84.D0.B8.D0.B9

- - Вопрос второй. Сейчас верстаю книгу и мне нужны иллюстрации. Ваши иллюстрации мне очень подходят. Могу ли с Вашего разрешения использовать в книге нужные мне иллюстрации с Википедии и что для этого нужно? Если я буду писать, что все фото Людвига14, не будет ли это являться нарушением Вашего авторского права? Если Вам неудобно писать здесь, напишите мне в личку. C.caramba2010 (talk) 22:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Думаю, что использовать иллюстрации Вы можете без каких-либо ограничений, но на всякий случай надо еще посмотреть текст лицензии, под которой фотографии выложены на Commons (я не люблю читать такие тексты, но попробую продраться), тогда станет понятнее, что можно, а что нельзя. Что касается авторства - я подумаю еще денек. Меня не смущает и Ludvig14 (но именно латиницей), но, может быть, самое время "выйти из подполья". - Ludvig14 (talk) 07:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Вроде, текст лицензии (можете почитать эту или подобные) позволяет использовать файлы без ограничений. Авторство надо указывать, но ник вполне допустим. Как я понимаю, мое разрешение никому не нужно, раз файлы были загружены под такой лицензией. - Ludvig14 (talk) 18:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. C.caramba2010 (talk) 08:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Parks in Krasnodar[edit]

Do not put files in a redirected category, please. Nobody can see them there. Best regards, Wieralee (talk) 01:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Не помещать файлы в категорию перенаправлением, пожалуйста. Никто не может видеть их там. С уважением, Wieralee (talk) 01:10, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I do not quite understand how to organize right using of Template:Category Russia in this particular case. Please, give us time to untangle this problem and do not correct park categories for the time being. Thank you. - Ludvig14 (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerusalem DomeoftheRock J65.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Pudelek 11:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jerusalem DomeoftheRock J63.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl GoritskyMon Cathedral P92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Done New, fixed version uploaded. --Ludvig14 15:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now I think. QI for me --Halavar 16:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Ludvig14,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016[edit]

Hello Ludvig14,

In 2014 you participated in the photo contest Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. We organise this photo contest too in 2016.

Website of Wiki Loves Monuments in Belgium & Luxembourg
Website of Wiki Loves Monuments international (other countries)

We also organise 4 photo tours in Ghent, Mechelen, Antwerp and Liège. See: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016

We hope to see your photos of monuments! Romaine 18:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BorisoglebskyMon PresentationChurch 1488.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BorisoglebskyMon NWTower 1563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BorisoglebskyMon SETower 1580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BorisoglebskyMon StSergiusChurch R09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 04:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Вики любит памятники 2016[edit]

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2016! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

оказались среди 653 из 22580 загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2016

Category:Borshchov Manor, Kostroma[edit]

Здравствуйте, а почему вы при создании категорий не переносите соответствующие материнские категории из файлов? Вот например как-то так, при этом мне уже не первый раз приходится это за вас делать? --A.Savin 20:19, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Или вот тоже [1] --20:20, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Потому что у этих Ваших файлов не проставлен номер из реестра культурного наследия (не в упрек, просто констатация факта). У меня главной целью является категоризация загруженного в WLM разных лет и все необходимые действия (в том числе и перенос категорий из файлов) я делаю только для файлов с номером. Остальные я перемещаю походя, если такие вдруг подвернутся. Попробую запомнить, что с Вашими файлами надо быть особо аккуратной. Извините. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 23:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Название категорий[edit]

Добрый день, а почему вы всегда добавляете к названию категорий слово "Moscow"? Это, возможно, обосновано, в случаях с адресными категориями, потому что Тверских улиц в России наверное не одна, но в случае с теми же палатами в Кожевнической слободе это явно излишне ведь, как и во многих других случаях. --Stolbovsky (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Наверное, потому что такие категории должны попадать в общие для страны (вроде, палаты в России) и там, по мере накопления объектов, их рано или поздно надо будет отправлять в категорию для города (палаты в Москве или палаты в Нижнем Новгороде) и при этой процедуре будет значительно быстрее ориентироваться по названию, а не смотреть категории внутри каждой подкатегории. Ну, а в данном случае, Кожевенные слободы были не только в Москве, и я не обязана знать, что сохранились такие палаты только в Москве (впрочем, может, такие есть где-нибудь еще, не знаю). -- Ludvig14 (talk) 10:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ну, тогда вас понял:) (хотя все равно кажется, что иногда это излишне) --Stolbovsky (talk) 13:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Спасибо за фото! --Stolbovsky (talk) 08:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Каждый раз, как вижу ваши фотографии зданий Москвы, как бальзам на душу (ну или на глаза). --Stolbovsky (talk) 08:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо на добром слове и что пристраиваете фотографии в Википедию --Ludvig14 (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Business Center 5073-84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent composition and good quality. It might possibly be featurable, even with the shadow on the lower left and a degree of unsharpness near the right and left margins. Slight grain is no impediment to QI promotion. -- Ikan Kekek 13:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Сомнительный улучшайзинг[edit]

Коллега, исправления ярославских категорий, которые вы устроили (типа "Olovyanishnikov Factory, Yaroslavl" вместо "Подворье завода Оловянишниковых"), ни с кем не проконсультировавшись, мягко говоря, не оптимальны. Вместо точности мы получили сумбур. Бог вам судья. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Еще из той же оперы. Рядом с категорией Stalinist architecture in Yaroslavl вы проставляете родительскую Buildings in Yaroslavl. Вот это уже прямое нарушение правил категоризации. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 18:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recat[edit]

Please note this, if you haven't already. I'm not sure how that happened… - dcljr (talk) 02:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't really understand it myself. Anyway, thank you. --Ludvig14 (talk) 08:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Пожалуйста, перестаньте безобразить. В противном случае вынужден буду начать обсуждение ваших действий на форуме. --Ghirlandajo (talk) 20:08, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ну если это единственная проблема с категориями на Викискладе, то давайте будем это обсуждать. Правда, было бы очень любезно с Вашей стороны потерпеть с недельку - сейчас есть более неотложное дело. Как бы то ни было, мне кажется, что мой вариант вполне оправдан, так как рассчитан на создание в будущем категории для села Перевлес (создавать такие я пока просто физически не успеваю) и тогда церковь из географической категории района отправится в географическую категорию села без дополнительных поисков во всех вложенных категориях, коих может к тому времени стать немало. По-моему, именно такой дрейф файлов все время тут и происходит, пока они в конце концов не дойдут до какого-то "равновесного" состояния, которое всех устроит. Впрочем, на Викискладе почти в любой категории бардак редкостный и я не очень понимаю, почему Вы прицепились именно к этому. А по поводу сообщения выше, посмотрите к чему приводит использование родных языков (или языков известных участнику) в названии категорий на примере Калининграда Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Kaliningrad. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 21:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Поддерживаю действия Ludvig14 в обоих случаях, по-моему, участник Ghirlandajo не совсем понимает как здесь устроены категории. Точнее понимает, но как-то слишком узко и однобоко. Но при этом не раз замечал, что когда созданные им категории приводятся в более стандартному и удобному виду, он весьма не доволен и просит ничего не менять. Ну, как и со статьями в рувики собственно :) --Stolbovsky (talk) 11:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suzdal TheotokosSmolenskChurch 0184.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missing author[edit]

Hello! I've seen your creation of File:Norderney, Weststrand -- 2016 -- 5197 - 2 cut.jpg. The name of the author (your derivate) is not correct. Please respect the license rules. If you agree I'll modify the attribution. --XRay ^talk 11:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please. I was not even sure that we can use your great pictures but decided to show them to my collegues and after that sort out license rectrictions. --Ludvig14 (talk) 12:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll fix the license attribution and some other information. And thank you for choosing my photograph as banner. --XRay ^talk 14:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow Krasnokazarmennaya13 6634.jpg[edit]

Перегрузите, пожалуйста, если есть возможность. Часть файла "выпала". Retired electrician (talk) 04:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Хм, вроде, сделала, но результат на экране не поменялся. Наверное, надо немного подождать. Спасибо! --Ludvig14 (talk) 09:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:WLM/7735490016[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at wikivoyage:ru:Обсуждение:Культурное наследие России/WLM ‎#‎Category:WLM/… на Викискладе. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Да, и кстати — не было бы «глухого» удаления описания, то не было б и моей жалобы третьим лицам. Ещё раз замечу что-то похожее на Special:Diff/306825770 по нежеланию объяснять смысл своих действий, и заявка на снятие автопатрулируемого. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PalekhMuseum 001 8732.jpg[edit]

Я же говорил, нельзя это на Викисклад выкладывать. Авторы 1936 и 1937 гг. рождения, как подписано в правом нижнем углу. Сделайте, пожалуйста, локальную копию на ВГ, это надо удалить --A.Savin 08:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ага, сейчас сделаю --Ludvig14 (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. --A.Savin 09:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:KargopolFolkToys 192 2451.jpg and others[edit]

Пожалуйста, обратите внимание, что данная фотография является производной от трёхмерной авторской работы, и определять лицензионный статус такого произведения фотограф не вправе, несмотря на доступность оригинала для фотографирования. Спасибо, Sealle (talk) 12:57, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

А если это уже моя собственная игрушка, приобретенная у автора, я все равно не могу её фотографировать и делать с фотографией то, что считаю нужным? Разве автор не передал мне права на изделие, продав его? --Ludvig14 (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)',[reply]

Нет. ГК РФ не предусматривает автоматической передачи авторского права вместе с имущественным без оформления специального договора. Sealle (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Автор, надо сказать, анонимен, и я не уверена, что это не серийное изделие, хоть и кустарная работа. Но разбираться во всем этом я точно не имею ни малейшего желания. Так что остался один вопрос - что теперь с этим делать? Удалять фотографию? -- Ludvig14 (talk) 16:11, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Вроде, в Вашей ссылке сказано, что я могу "воспроизводить, публично показывать и распространять без цели извлечения прибыли копии произведения". Если я, конечно, правильно понимаю этот сложный текст. --Ludvig14 (talk) 16:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Запрет на коммерческое использование является одним из ключевых оснований невозможности загрузки авторских работ на Commons, см. COM:Лицензирование#Разрешённые лицензии. Sealle (talk) 16:25, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabili[edit]

Gentile Ludvig14, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:KargopolFolkToys 192 2442.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 17:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Две фотографии пристроены в Викигид и будут перенесены туда в ближайшее время. --Alexander (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Да пусть удаляют, я их к нам снова загружу, не тратьте время на это. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 19:15, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow RechnoyVokzaltMetroStation 1091.jpg[edit]

Добрый вечер! Нашёл одну вашу очень хорошую фотографию, решил номинировать в QI, но там сказали, что, на их взгляд, есть небольшие абберации (CA) и просят также убрать шум. Реально ли это сделать? Если реально, можете помочь. Фото представлено в галерее 21 декабря. На мой взгляд, оно достойно статуса QI. --Brateevsky {talk} 17:43, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, но думаю, что убрать это сложно, условия съемки были неудачными (это я просто игралась с взятым в прокат фотоаппаратом и, естественно, сделала кучу ошибок), проще попытаться снять заново, но пока меня на такие подвиги не тянет. Так что пусть остается без статуса. --Ludvig14 (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

На мой взгляд, хорошо получилось поиграться, фото вышло хорошим :) ОК, тогда сниму с номинации. --Brateevsky {talk} 12:15, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso![edit]

English | Italiano | +/−

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Azerbaijan[edit]

Здравствуйте. Приглашаю Вас принять участие в конкурсе Вики Любит Памятники в Азербайджане 2019 года. Если у Вас ещё остались фотографии памятников архитектуры и истории, сделанные в Азербайджане, можете загрузить их на Викисклад до конца месяца и принять участие в конкурсе. С уважением, --Interfase (talk) 09:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interfase, спасибо, в мои планы входит загрузка нескольких снимков. Только у меня есть сложности с идентификацией некоторых объектов или определением их ID (пока речь только об Ичери Шехер). Например, здание по адресу Boyuk Gala Street 10 имеет категорию Monuments of local value in Ichery Sheher, но найти его ID мне пока не удалось. А еще у меня есть снимок здания явно исторического вида, но там я знаю только, что оно снято в точке с определенными координатами, но направление камеры не помню и найти адрес не могу, равно как и не вижу этого дома в списках. Можете помочь? Если да, я загружу эту фотографию с минимумом атрибутов, а Вы, если опознаете, возьмете или не возьмете ее на конкурс. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 09:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

С радостью помогу в идентификации памятников. Списки памятников для конкурса составлял лично, для многих сам же добавлял и координаты и фотографии. Однако, должен сказать, что некоторых памятников в списке нет, то есть как исторические они государством не охраняются. но вы все равно можете их загрузить. Списки с ID только вспомогательные. Это не значит, что фотография для конкурса обязательно должна быть из этого списка. Но для оценки историческая значимость роли играет. Вы загрузите все что считаете нужным и добавтье ту информацию, которую знаете. Я же со своей стороны попытаюсь выяснить ID и добавить дополнительную информацию про сам памятник в описание (адрес, дату постройки и т. п.). --Interfase (talk) 07:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо! -- Ludvig14 (talk) 07:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ludvig14,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ludvig14,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ludvig14,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ludvig14,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ludvig14,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow MuzeonPark HH2.jpg[edit]

File:Moscow MuzeonPark HH2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

176.59.45.81 12:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Yaroslavl ElijahProphetChurchInterior 7302.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Я хоть и не робот, но тебя с этим поздравлю.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:22, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 09:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per te[edit]

Wikimedia Italia

Gentile Ludvig14,

oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Il tuo contributo è particolarmente apprezzato perché le tue foto sono usate in 5 o più voci di Wikipedia o altro progetto Wikimedia.

Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.

Il libro comprende anche un capitolo sul tuo lavoro! Si parla infatti di libertà di panorama, cioè la libertà di fare e diffondere foto come le tue, ma tutto l'anno e su tutti i monumenti d'Italia. Finché resta la legge attuale, per aumentare le foto caricabili puoi chiedere a un ente vicino a te di aderire a Wiki Loves Monuments. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.

Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.

Grazie ancora e a presto,

Lorenzo Losa (msg) 10:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:Svetogorsk MassGrave 007 0484.jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−

Hello Ludvig14, it appears that the version of File:Svetogorsk MassGrave 007 0484.jpg which you uploaded 2020-03-20T15:42:37Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 15:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tel-Aviv AzrielyTowers T36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 08:00, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Do I see a hint of magenta CA on the top of the cylindrical building, or is there actually magenta at the top of that building? I'm guessing it's CA and should be removed. -- Ikan Kekek 08:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Russia is open![edit]

Здравствуйте! с 1 по 30 июня проходит российская часть международного фотоконкурса "Вики любит Землю". Приглашаем вас принять участие в конкурсе, чтобы помочь нам лучше проиллюстрировать вики-статьи, пополнить крупнейшую в стране коллекцию изображений российских природных объектов и побороться за призы.

С правилами конкурса и списком охраняемых природных территорий России можно ознакомиться здесь. Мы также будем рады ответить на ваши вопросы.

С уважением,
организаторы конкурса. 14:55, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

(Вы получили это сообщение, поскольку участвовали в предыдущих конкурсах "Вики любит Землю")

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Podporozhye Church 008 7468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality assuming that the building is crooked --MB-one 13:09, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoye DJI 0048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:43, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Мемориальная доска[edit]

Приветствую! Думаю, что ответ будет отрицательный, но всё же: Вы когда-то фотографировали Особняк Рекк (File:Moscow_Pyatnitskaya64_S34.jpg). Там на фасаде до реставрации была мемориальная доска Землячке Р. С. (видна на этом кадре по центру здания в нижней части). Не фотографировали ли вы её крупнее, вблизи? А то доска после реставрации куда-то пропала, а фото нужно --Stolbovsky (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Нет, я не помню, чтобы я ее снимала, хотя дом пыталась фотографировать несколько раз и всегда безуспешно. Я живу в двух шагах от особняка, могу тоже поискать табличку, но, видимо, шансов найти ее мало. Ну, и заодно на днях пороюсь в "фотоархиве", хотя надежды мало. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 21:37, 26 June 2020

Ходить специально, думаю, не стоит — сегодня вот только был там сам, следов не обнаружил. Хотя часть здания за забором, может её зачем-то туда, ко входу перевесили --Stolbovsky (talk) 21:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Из моего архива следует, что в таблички не было уже после реставрации лета 2018 года. Надо сказать, что в последние пять-шесть лет дом реставрировали не меньше трех раз - гораздо чаще, чем это реально требовалось. Ну и саму доску я никогда не снимала, увы. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 11:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Зато других замечательных фотографий у вас много! А про доску свою у ДКН спросил, посмотрю, что ответят Stolbovsky (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ну да, ДКН подтвердил пропажу --Stolbovsky (talk) 17:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dmitrovskoye StDemetriusChurch DJI 0826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Not the sharpest, but IMHO OK. --Aristeas 10:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KizhiZakaznik 007 7228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoye GolosovRavine DJI 0335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoye DyakovoRavine DJI 0275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 18:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoye 009 2415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality, beautiful view. Due to very slow shutter, a star appears blurry as an unintended side effect. --Navinsingh133 20:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:RuskealaWaterfalls DJI 0270.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RuskealaWaterfalls DJI 0270.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomenskoye LindenAlley 003 9399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Celeda 08:17, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RuskealaWaterfalls DJI 0270.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ubory ChurchHolyMandylion DJI 0740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted and needs a perspective correction --Poco a poco 11:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But the picture was taken by a quadcopter, so it cannot be tilted. And the vertical lines are mostly vertical, however, the 17th century church itself is crooked --Ludvig14 19:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The church looks perfect to me and the horizon is good enough. --JiriMatejicek 23:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KizhiIsland 008 1125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support just ok --Poco a poco 11:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KizhiZakaznik 007 6845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ludvig14,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Vadimrazumov copter - Ferapontovo tim.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vadimrazumov copter - Ferapontovo tim.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vadimrazumov copter - Ferapontovo tim.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Комплекс Успенского Собора в Кеми сверху (1).jpg[edit]

Татьяна, здравствуйте! Заметил, что вы загрузили новую версию моего фото. Спасибо, но зачем такой вырвиглазный переконтраст? Красный ^{wanna talk?} 11:27, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Не нравится - отменяйте -- Ludvig14 (talk) 11:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Договорились. Ну, просто некрасиво было бы молча отменить, оттого и написал. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 11:51, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Собственно, одна из проблем этой картинки - сильный шум. Если бы Вы как-нибудь передали бы исходник, может, можно было бы что-то с ней сделать. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 11:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Проблема в том, что я оказался в Кеми на 3 дня именно тогда, когда не переставая шли дожди. Так что вот что есть, чесслово. Сам страдаю от результата. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 11:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Погода - это ерунда, можно снимать сносные фотографии и в плохих условиях, хотя в дождь, вроде, летать почти бесполезно, как минимум, капли на объективе все портят. А "исходника" в dng, как я понимаю, у Вас просто нет? Я думаю, что я просто загружу свою версию файла отдельно, а не поверх, а время нас рассудит. -- Ludvig14 (talk) 12:08, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Это был Mavic Air, ещё и чужой, он вместо исходников сохранял превьюшки. Ну и качество камеры там, конечно, так себе для 2020 года. Но радуемся, что и такое есть. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 12:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

map of the Sagrada Familia[edit]

Hello Ludvig 14

Using the idea of your map, I have created another one, File:SagradaFamiliaPlanView.jpg, thank you for the idea.

Best regards

--Io Herodotus (talk) 08:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you. --Ludvig14 (talk) 09:19, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Зима на Мамаевом Кургане.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:28, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021[edit]

Quest’anno partecipi al concorso Wiki Loves Monuments?

Da domani sarà possibile caricare di nuovo le foto, fino al 30 settembre!

Come ogni anno, e questo è il decimo anniversario, torna Wiki Loves Monuments, il concorso fotografico più grande al mondo che negli anni ha coinvolto quasi 50 nazioni e più di 15.000 persone e hanno prodotto un database di oltre 360.000 immagini di monumenti, patrimonio culturale dell’umanità intera a disposizione di tutti su Wikimedia Commons.

Con la tua partecipazione hai sostenuto lo sviluppo turistico del nostro Paese perché rende disponibili a tutti le sue bellezze. L’obiettivo è la valorizzazione dell’immenso patrimonio culturale italiano sul web. Le fotografie dei monumenti vengono condivise su Wikimedia Commons, il grande database di immagini di Wikipedia, con licenza libera CC-BY-SA. Wiki Loves Monuments contribuisce infatti a diffondere la filosofia di Wikimedia Italia e di tutti i progetti wiki, che si basano sulla libera condivisione della cultura.

L’Italia nelle sue prime 9 edizioni (dal 2012 al 2020) conta 145.000 immagini 15.000 monumenti, 2.000 fotografi, 2.000 enti. Uno dei 2.000 fotografi sei tu e quindi anche quest’anno non puoi mancare, partecipa!!!

Ti aspettiamo. Questo messaggio ti è stato consegnato perché hai partecipato al concorso italiano nel 2020

Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Дубликат[edit]

Татьяна, к сожалению, вы вчера загрузили дубликат: File:Sortavala BusStaion 1939.jpg, я выставил его на быстрое удаление. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 01:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Странно, дубликат обычно физически невозможно загрузить, система не даст.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вряд ли он был тождественен, я что-то снизу фотографии обрезала. Но вообще, организация по категориям типа "1940 in Sortavala" затрудняет отслеживание повторов, так что не удивлюсь, если были еще. - Ludvig14 (talk) 10:53, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

А, некстати, Слав, посмотри на этот файл, это точно фотография или уже "произведение искусства"? И заодно еще на такое. Второе я отправила в Sortavala in art, но опасаюсь, что это все же цветная фотография. --Ludvig14 (talk) 11:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вторая явно прорисована, то есть графическое произведение. Первое - вроде как фотография, но дотягивает ли она до произведения искусства - вопрос субъективный.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:30, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ага, спасибо! --Ludvig14 (talk) 13:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

В силу того, что pastvu.com добавляет снизу плашку, которую приходится обрезать, фото получились нетождественными из-за расхождения в метаданных, строка "программное обеспечение". Так вообще я по другим фото побегал — вроде дубликатов больше не находил. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 19:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:SP KazanskyCathedral 2370.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Афанасий и Анастасия[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:91_big.jpg&diff=213324389&oldid=201682206 Я тут, видимо, что-то не понимаю, поясните, пожалуйста. --Figure19 (talk) 16:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

А что не так? --Ludvig14 (talk) 17:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Там часовня Анастасии, а ты добавила категорию для Афанасия. Я сейчас исправлю.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ну да, заголовок темы я и не прочитала. Спасибо! --Ludvig14 (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italia è iniziato![edit]

Ciao! Siamo felici di annunciarti che Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italia è iniziato. La tua partecipazione ci aiuterà a valorizzare le aree naturali protette d'Italia e mostrarle al mondo grazie a Wikipedia e agli altri progetti Wikimedia.

Visita la pagina del concorso e scopri le regole: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italy. Qui potrai scoprire come partecipare. Per qualsiasi domanda, non esitare a scriverci al seguente indirizzo: infowikilovesearth.it.

Grazie,
il team organizzatore di Wiki Loves Earth 2022 in Italia 01:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Stai ricevendo questo messaggio perché hai già partecipato al concorso in passato

Ще 3 дні! Вікі любить пам'ятки 2022 в Україні триває до 31 жовтня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2022 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що ви та ваша родина у безпеці. Нагадуємо, що залишилося три дні до завершення конкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», і якщо у вас є можливість взяти участь у конкурсі цього року — долучайтеся!

Трохи статистики за результатами чотирьох тижнів конкурсу:

завантажено понад 11000 світлин, які зображують майже 3700 об’єктів культурної спадщини;
- з них фотографії 180 пам'яток — вперше подані на конкурс;
понад 500 світлин подано у спецномінації «Фотоплівка»;
вже більше 220 учасників та учасниць;
- з них більше 130 — зареєструвалися вже під час конкурсу.

Найменш представлені регіони — Севастополь (1 фото), Донецька (19), Миколаївська (20), Кіровоградська (58), Крим (72), Херсонська (74) та Луганська (80). Конкурсні списки за регіонами можна переглянути тут: списки пам'яток.

Переглядайте свої фото- та відеоархіви й приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 08:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікі любить пам'ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Lombardia 2022[edit]

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments - Lombardia. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: link. La cerimonia di premiazione si terrà martedi 13 dicembre a Como: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 21:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures to the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Lombardy. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winners will be chosen: link. The awards ceremony will be hold in Como on Tuesday December 13th: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 21:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)[reply]

Grazie per aver partecipato a WLM Italia 2022[edit]

Grazie per aver contribuito con le tue fotografie all'edizione 2022 di Wiki Loves Monuments. La pregiuria ha selezionato le foto finaliste tra cui saranno scelti i vincitori: Castelli, Monumenti. La cerimonia di premiazione si terrà sabato 3 dicembre a Formigine: se sei interessato a partecipare segui gli aggiornamenti sulla pagina dell'evento.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)[reply]

Thank you for having contributed with your pictures to the 2022 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments - Italy. The prejury has selected the finalist pictures among which the winners will be chosen: Fortifications, Tradional contest. The awards ceremony will be hold in Formigine on Saturday December 3rd: if you are keen to join, follow the updates on the page of the event.--Ysogo (talk) 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC) This message has been delivered through Global message delivery system)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Ludvig14,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Spb 06-2012 Chesme Church (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:05, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» 2023 в Україні проходить з 1 по 31 липня[edit]

Доброго дня!

Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — Вікі любить Землю повернувся! Цього року конкурс відбувається протягом липня.

Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.

Загальний формат конкурсу такий же, як у минулі роки. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Важливо! З міркувань національної безпеки та безпеки учасників і учасниць до участі у конкурсі допускаються тільки фото та відео, зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно!

Рекомендуємо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій. Цьогоріч мінімальна роздільна здатність фотографій, які приймаються на конкурс, становить 2 Мп.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь у липні!

File:Moscow TretyakovMonument H81.jpg[edit]

File:Moscow TretyakovMonument H81.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:B1FB:8C2E:61FB:A9E7 19:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Milan PirelliTower 016 4239.jpg

And also:

File:Milan PirelliTower 016 4297.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Ludvig14,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map

Upload your photos for the special price

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 è iniziato: partecipa anche tu![edit]

Buongiorno Ludvig14,

ricevi questo messaggio perché in passato hai partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia o Wiki Loves Earth Italia.

Anche quest’anno torna Wiki Loves Monuments: da oggi al 30 settembre puoi partecipare caricando le tue foto per contribuire a illustrare il patrimonio culturale italiano: vai sul sito wikilovesmonuments.it e scopri come fare!

Oltre ai 20.000 monumenti già in concorso, quest’anno si aggiungono più di 60.000 edifici religiosi, tema centrale di quest’edizione. Prendi la tua macchina fotografica, o il tuo smartphone, e individua i monumenti in concorso tramite la nuova web-app – disponibile sia da mobile che desktop – app.wikilovesmonuments.it, da cui potrai anche caricare direttamente i tuoi scatti. Sono ammesse anche foto scattate prima del concorso, purché siano inedite.

A livello nazionale verranno premiate le dieci migliori fotografie: cinque per gli edifici religiosi e cinque per le altre categorie di monumenti; queste immagini parteciperanno anche alla fase internazionale del concorso. Non sono ammesse immagini con watermark o cornici, né fotografie eccessivamente elaborate in postproduzione. Qui puoi consultare Il regolamento completo e per qualsiasi dubbio puoi scrivere a contatti@wikilovesmonuments.it.

In bocca al lupo e buon divertimento! --Ysogo(talk) 05:0, 1 September 2023 (UTC) (Questo messaggio è stato inviato tramite il sistema Global message delivery)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».10:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».

Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: у більшості випадків тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс.

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».10:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the contests of Wikimedia Ukraine or helped (for example, edited files from these contests). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: перший тиждень[edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс триває до 31 жовтня. За перший тиждень конкурсу в українській частині конкурсу завантажено понад 4000 фото, взяли участь майже 90 учасників.

Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс. Єдиний виняток — спецномінація «Інтер'єри» можна подавати світлини без обмежень за датою створення.

Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут (серед нових спецномінацій цього року: «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Інтер'єри» та «Німецька спадщина»).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 20:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні: ще тиждень залишився! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: last week of the contest![edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Нагадуємо, що конкурс ще триває трохи більше тижня, до 31 жовтня, тож у Вас є ще можливість приєднатися.

У конкурсі є серйозне обмеження за часом створення фото- та відеоматерілів — тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно приймаються. Однак, є виняток — спецномінація «Інтер'єри», де можна подавати файли, які зроблені й під час конкурсу. Також, якщо є, можна відсканувати світлини, зроблені плівковим фотоапаратом на спецномінацію «Фотоплівка». Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 17:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні: ще 4 дні завантажити фото чи відео! / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine: last 4 days to upload pictures or videos![edit]

Привіт! Сподіваємося, що у Вас та Ваших рідних усе максимально добре. Залишилося ще дні завантажити власні фото чи відео пам'яток України!

Зверніть увагу! Попри те, що в конкурсі беруть участь тільки роботи, зроблені до 30 червня 2023 року, фото та відео інтер'єрів пам'яток обмежень за датою не мають. Також можна відсканувати власні світлини, зроблені плівковим фотоапаратом, на спецномінацію «Фотоплівка». Усі номінації та спецномінації перелічено тут).

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут – з повагою від імені оргкомітету «Вікі любить пам'ятки» 14:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь у фотоконкурсі «Вікі любить пам’ятки» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з конкурсу). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the Wiki Loves Monuments in Ukraine editions or helped (for example, edited files from the contest). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

File:Serpukhov VladychnyMonastery 003 3994.jpg[edit]

File:Serpukhov VladychnyMonastery 003 3994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

PereslavlFoto (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Siracuse StThomasChurchPantheon 010 1651.jpg

And also:

File:Siracuse StThomasChurchPantheon 010 1714.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 02:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strochitsy2018 001 2108.jpg[edit]

File:Strochitsy2018 001 2108.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]