Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aleksander Pociej 2023.jpg

Dzień dobry,

Posiadam prawa do zdjęcia, które zostało usunięte.

Pozdrawiam serdecznie Monter333 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monter333 (talk • contribs) 08:56, 29 August 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Since the image appears elsewhere on the Web without a free license, policy requires that either the actual photographer must send a free license or you may send a free license together with a copy of the writing giving you the license, in either case using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:第八屆立法委員謝國樑.jpg

I have reached out the authority, who responded that the purpose of the clause "The information on this website (excluding the pictures in the 'Congress Art Exhibition') may be reproduced for personal or family non-profit purposes"." in {{LYWOIA}} is to exclude the pictures in the "Congress Art Exhibition" column instead of applying additional restriction to the license itself. Please also see discussion COM:Deletion requests/Template:LYWOIA Larryasou (talk) 04:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose "personal or family non-profit purposes" is not sufficient for Commons. We need a free license. Please read COM:L. Yann (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AMJmafi2-20-23.jpg

Dear Wikimedia Administrator

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request the undeletion of a photo that was recently removed from Wikimedia. The photo in question is titled AMJmafi2-20-23.jpg and was previously uploaded to Wikimedia on 30th August 2023 The deletion occurred on 30th August 2023, and the deletion log cites the reason as File:1stSpeaker.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
 If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. . After carefully reviewing the Wikimedia guidelines and the reasons for the deletion, I believe there might have been a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the content. I would like to provide some additional context to support my request for the undeletion of the photo:

  • Content Accuracy: The photo accurately depicts the subject matter and adheres to all relevant guidelines for appropriate content. There are no violations of copyright or any other infringement.

  • Notability: The subject of the photo holds significance within its respective field and is relevant to the Wikimedia community. It contributes to the overall diversity and comprehensiveness of Wikimedia's content.

  • Permission: I can confirm that I am the original uploader of the photo and have the necessary rights to grant permission for its use on Wikimedia. If required, I am more than willing to provide any additional documentation to support this claim.

  • Educational Value: The photo serves an educational purpose by providing visual information that enriches the understanding of the topic

.


I kindly request that you reconsider the deletion of the photo and reinstate it on Wikimedia. If there are any specific modifications or steps I need to take to ensure compliance with Wikimedia's policies, please let me know, and I will be more than happy to address them promptly. I deeply value the Wikimedia community's dedication to accurate and comprehensive information sharing, and I believe that the reinstatement of this photo would contribute positively to this goal.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to your response. Best regards,

Amani Username: Amani Mafigi Joel — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMANI MAFIGI Joel (talk • contribs) 07:53, 31 August 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose. The photo should not be undeleted imho, for two reasons:
  1. The photo depicts yourself and is obviously not a selfie. Permission from the photographer would be needed to publish the photo on Commons with a free license per VRT.
  2. The photo is out of scope, perr COM:SCOPE because the person depicted is (not yet) notable. The photo was published on a draft article, created by yourself, en:User:AMANI MAFIGI Joel/sandbox.
If the article is accepted in the encyclopedia, you can request undeletion, after permission has been received on VRT from the photographer.
Regards, Ellywa (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ellywa. --Yann (talk) 09:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photos by photographer Katharina Gebauer

Please restore:

We have permission per Ticket:2023083110002533.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: , I've undeleted ones that show they exist on Commons, I'll look for the other ones and undelete those as soon as I find the correct file names. Abzeronow (talk) 15:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
EDIT. I've undeleted File:Innenansicht Heilige Dreifaltigkeit Güglingen.jpg. The other two appear to be File:St. Ulrich-Stockheim.jpg and File:Christus-König-Kirche in Brackenheim, 2022.jpg which appear not to be deleted. Abzeronow (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
@Abzeronow Thank you very much! I will proceed with that. Mussklprozz (talk) 19:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done I think that this request can be closed. --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:04, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Enveloppe premier jour d'émission - Gorges d'El Kantara - 1977.jpg

Hi, As previously explained to Adamant1 regarding his arbitrary nominations, this picture was taken in 1977, making it suitable for PD-Algeria. The image was taken from a paid Algerian platform that deals with old stamps. I will not include the link in the source, as it would be a commercial promotion. The Post of Algeria has been mentioned as the source, and that is sufficient for me. Regards

  •  Oppose As I've said on my talk page, the nominations weren't arbitrary. They were based on the fact that you left necessary information from the files when you uploaded them, which isn't on me. Also, it's perfectly fine to link to a commercial website if that's where you got the file from. Like I've said, we use eBay as a source all the time and no one cares. To the specifics of this image, it was published in 1977 and the license you added PD-Algeria file, which only applies to works published "published prior to 1973." So the image shouldn't be restored since it's clearly copyrighted. Really, the fact that your unwilling to acknowledge that just makes me question your judgement with the other files your claiming are in the public domain. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
@Adamant1 You certainly mean “the image shouldn't be restored”? Mussklprozz (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Lol, correct. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
@Adamant1 @Mussklprozz as I explained before, I don't understand why he keeps emphasizing my acknowledgment, which was detailed in our discussion. There is a PD-Algeria-photo-except that applies to the image, as it falls within the scope of prior work before 1987 and I kindly request @Reda Kerbouche to take some time to consider and possibly support my viewpoint. Riad Salih (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Two things. First of all, it was originally licensed with PD-Algeria-file, not PD-Algeria-photo-except like your claiming. Second, even if it licensed with PD-Algeria-photo-except, it's obviously not a photograph. So the license wouldn't be valid anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
@Adamant1 I never claimed that it was first published under PD-Algeria-photo-except. What I mentioned was that it falls within the scope of prior work before 1987. The license could easily be modified.
This license has indeed been used for numerous years here to cover a wide range of image types. The decree is available in both French and Arabic languages and can be easily accessed online. It explicitly indicates that it applies to all works created before 1987. Therefore, I kindly request you to reconsider your decision in light of this information.
Regards Riad Salih (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
It explicitly indicates that it applies to all works created before 1987. No it doesn't. What part of "this Algerian photograph, which was first published prior to January 1, 1987" makes you think it applies to all works created before 1987? Maybe the license can changed, but that's out of the scope of this conversation. Although if you want to start a conversation about it on Commons:Village pump/Copyright be my guest, but I doubt it will go anywhere and the image is probably going to stay deleted until then regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Converted to DR for further discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Enveloppe premier jour d'émission - Gorges d'El Kantara - 1977.jpg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GaismogsCover.jpg

I am representing the band, and this is our album cover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cheburaators (talk • contribs) 18:24, 31 August 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:GaismogsCover.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 18:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose @Cheburaators: , please contact COM:VRT if you designed the album cover. Abzeronow (talk) 18:52, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose Any content previously published elsewhere requires a formal written permission. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 09:50, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michał Grodzki.jpg

I own the rights to the photos that have been removed. Please restore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzikizgon (talk • contribs) 20:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC) (UTC)

@Dzikizgon:
  1. I own the rights to the photos is not the same as I am the author. And proper authorship information is required by the the CC license you declared at upload.
  2. If a photo was previously published we need either an evidence that it was published under the declared free license or a written free license permission coming via email directly from the copyright holder to VRT. The copyright holder is either the author (photographer) or a person who can provide a copyright transfer contract with the photographer.
Ankry (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chris Sharma Climbing in Yangshuo, China.jpg

I was going to upload this file until I saw it was already deleted by you in 2021, and when I asked the editor who deleted it, User:Fitindia, they directed me here. My understanding is that Boone Speed (climbing partner and photographer) of Chris Sharma donated this photo (which he took) to share alike status. For example in Climbing Magazine (the biggest climbing magazine), the photo is marked as CC-BY-SA-4.0 here and here. It also appears in Psychology Today, but that may be via Wikipedia. Was it possible that Boone Speed withdrew the free license and emailed Commons? Is that what happened? Otherwise, can it be reinstated? thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 17:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

In order to withdraw a license it needs to be granted first. The CC-BY-SA 4.0 publications that you pointed out are newer than upload to Commons, so the Commons photo may be their source. As the photographer is identifiable, we need a clear evidence that the free license has been granted by the photographer. In my opinion, in order to undelete the photo we need either an evidence of CC-BY-SA 4.0 publication that is earlier than July 1, 2015 or a written free license permission from the photographer via VRT. Ankry (talk) 00:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
That makes sense - much appreciated. Aszx5000 (talk) 18:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BY road sign 3.25.1.svg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I deleted this file temporarily to merge history with another file as per the request at Commons:History_merging_and_splitting/Requests#File:3.25.1_Belarus_(Road_sign).svg_→_File:BY_road_sign_3.25.1.svg. But now I am unable to undelete the file. Can someone please help? Sreejith K (talk) 13:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

I think, this should be reported to phabricator. This is a technical issue that administrators cannot resolve. Ankry (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Successfully undeleted a single file version and file page history. But the problem with remaining file versions should go to phabricator. Ankry (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. I have logged a bug https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T345460 --Sreejith K (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Nothing more can be done here. --Yann (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flag map of Katanga (1960–1963).svg

Deletion log states it's an "exact or scaled-down duplicate" of File:Flag map of Katanga, 1960–1963.svg. The file was based on File:Katanga in Democratic Republic of the Congo.svg with the red part replaced with the flag. The files are substantially different even if the file names are similar. ReneeWrites (talk) 21:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Flag map of Katanga 1960–1963.svg

File was based on File:Map of Katanga.svg, the deletion log states it's a scaled-down duplicate of File:Flag map of Katanga, 1960–1963.svg, which gets it the wrong way around. The file that was not deleted is technically the "scaled-down duplicate" (it's a derivative file I created without any of the original's bodies of water (no rivers/lakes), due to the map lacking these details, I simplified the design further - this is even mentioned in the file description). In the original file (the one that was deleted) all those details are still there. ReneeWrites (talk) 21:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: This is indeed a duplicate. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Igueben Royal Palace sign Edo State Nigeria.jpg

Hello,

This images is my own work and was photographed on site at the Igueben Royal Palace. My father was the Chief Ebenze of Igueben, a title my brother now holds. I have permission to photograph objects and items from the Royal Palaces for publication and other uses. I confirm that I hold the copyright for this image. Please kindly undelete it.

Thank you very much.

Imanluk.

Imanluk (talk) 12:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC) 2nd September 2023

✓ Done: Converted to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Igueben Royal Palace sign Edo State Nigeria.jpg. --Yann (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kemayoran Airport in 1979.jpg

this file is my own work someone might copyright it. Taken back in October 1979 while I was on my trip from Jakarta to Padang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasMukedi (talk • contribs) 13:22, 30 August 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose The image apparently once appeared at http://www.oldjets.net/jakarta---kemayoran.html, which has an explicit copyright notice. It no longer appears there, but I think we still need a free license from the actual photographer via VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 08:49, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lolito Go in his workspace.jpg A picture of Lolito Go while writing

I am requesting to undelete this file because I was the one who took the photo of Lolito Go. And Lolito Go is a notable composer in the Philippines.

--Padreburgos2020 (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC) September 01, 2023

@Padreburgos2020:
  1. Where do you want to use the photo in Wikimedia? Is there a Wikipedia article about him (in any language)?
  2. The photo is low resolution; in order to keep is here we would also need either a full-resolution original version with complite camera metadata in EXIF, or a free license via VRT.
Ankry (talk) 01:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose due to lack of explanation. Ankry (talk) 23:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer from the requestor. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JBP 8683.jpg

I the authorized manager of Ross Valory, licensor of this image. Image is Copyright Jerome Brunet.

Please let me know if anything else is required? We wish to update photo immediately. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilwiki99 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 1 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose @Lilwiki99: Ask Jérome Brunet to send a permission for a free license via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 14:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Yann. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paulo Muller e Rodrigo Siervo.png

File:Paulo Muller e Rodrigo Siervo.png, is a photo that I took. I would like to rewrite the information, to show that the photo is mine. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexramirezphoto (talk • contribs) 14:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC) (UTC)

 Support I would say assume good faith here. @Krd: as deleting admin. Yann (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: per request. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paulo Henrique Muller 01.jpg

Hello! I took this photo but it seems that I did not inform properly it. I would like to recover this file so I could inform that the work is mine. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexramirezphoto (talk • contribs) 14:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC) (UTC)

 Support I would say assume good faith here. @Krd: as deleting admin. Yann (talk) 14:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Done, per request. Thuresson (talk) 14:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sadegh.mokhtari.sharafi.jpg

درخواست لغو حذف تصویر شخصی خودم را دارم با تشکر --JasonYaser (talk) 17:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: User blocked for reuploading the same selfie after warning. No useful contribution. --Yann (talk) 18:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Бизюлька во время съёмок клипа «Занято», 2008 год.jpg, File:Бизюлька, Михаил Филимонов и Александр Бойков во время съёмок клипа «Серёня», 2004 год.jpg

Received and approved ticket:2023072310006305. Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done @Lvova: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 23:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Please, restore the second file too :) Анастасия Львоваru/en 04:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
@Lvova: ✓ Done Yann (talk) 08:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Бизюлька, part 2

ticket:2023072410001102 is received and approved. Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done @Lvova: please, continue. Ankry (talk) 23:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:kit body alahly2324h.jpg

I requested to delete it by mistake, please cancel the deletion request

✓ Done: @TAHA7199: Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 08:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SamHoskinsNTFC.jpg

This image was taken by the Northampton Town Football Club official photographer, Pete Norton. He gifted this image to me, via Samuel Hoskins (the image subject) specifically to be used for this purpose. It is similar to Butt not the same as other images of Sam Hoskins on the web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 19Shield66 (talk • contribs) 07:25, 2 September 2023‎ (UTC)

@19Shield66: Which purpose is that? You have already been informed that you can use Commons:VRT if you have a written permission. Is there any reason why this is not an option for you? Thuresson (talk) 09:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose OP do not respond to relevant questions. Thuresson (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson, needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Please undelete file File:Finding Nemo.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.172.241.184 (talk • contribs)

It's not under a free license.[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not. Commons doesn't accept fair use. --Yann (talk) 10:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Casa de los Leones, Paseo Colón.png

Hi, the file was deleted even tough it was established as PD since it was part of a book from 1916. The original photo is from “The Blue Book of Costa Rica” (1916), and it was taken by Manuel Gómez Miralles. The book in question is a Government-published book to advertise Costa Rica to foreign investors, you can look at it here on page 208. Being a Government publication, it has copyright protection for 25 years, therefore it has been in the public domain since 1941; and if we want to consider normal copyright of 70 years, it would also be in the public domain since 1986. Please reverse. Thanks in advance. --Mito0504 (talk) 06:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose As you say, the photographer was Manuel Gómez Miralles (1886-1965) (for dates, see https://sanjosevolando.com/cultura/manuel-gomez-miralles-uno-de-los-fotografos-profesionales-mas-importantes-de-costa-rica).

Costa Rica law provides for copyright for 70 years after the death of the creator. Therefore, while there is no URAA copyright, the Costa Rica copyright will be in force until 1/1/2036. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

As said before, the work is from a Goverment document, so the protection is of 25 years after the year of publication Mito0504 (talk) 22:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
The 25 year term is limited to economic rights; there are other rights that go with copyright, including, for example, the right to decide where a work is published. Also, while the image may have appeared in a government document, we have no proof that that was its first use and that Miralles had a work for hire agreement in place. Without a work for hire agreement, his copyright would have come into being when the image was created, before it was published by the government. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
 Question Is the author credited in the document? Is there a copyright claim for the picture? Yann (talk) 08:56, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 14:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shirley_Jones_red_hen_press.jpg

This file was uploaded from Shirley Jones' account redhen34, with my help (she's 88). The photograph is of her working c.1983. She entered it as her own work and then was told that it couldn't be because it was a photo of her. This is true and on discussion we established that the photograph was actually taken by her husband, Ken Jones (91), who is still living. On Shirley Jones' behalf (she's my mother), I subsequently tried to change the information to show that it was taken by Ken Jones. This was either overlooked, or was considered insufficient, since the file has now been deleted.

I would like to see the file restored, since it was being used on Shirley Jones' Wikipedia page. This is a page I initially created and have been helping to edit, having first declared a Conflict of Interest and submitted the draft article for review to ensure my actions were reasonable and appropriate.

In relation to the deleted image, my father is happy to provide an email confirming that he took the photograph, that it is his copyright and that he wishes the photograph to be made available on Wikimedia on a creative commons licence. He is not, however, up to creating an account himself and uploading the photograph himself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evan T Jones (talk • contribs) 17:06, 3 September 2023‎ (UTC)

@Evan T Jones: Yes, your father can send the email, with a reference to the filename and a precise license. Instructions can be found on the page C:VRT. The photo can be restored when the email is processed by a volunteer, which might take some time. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Permission OK now. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by Espace Patrimoine Safran

Please undelete

We have permission per Ticket:2023060510007359.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Please add tags etc. --Rosenzweig τ 10:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

ticket:2023082410005651

As far as the permission was granted, please, restore these files. Анастасия Львоваru/en 11:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Lvova: FYI. @AlbertHog: Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mohammad.png

this my work and I have the right to publish as my name please Undeletion request. I can write subjet in Farsi languages instead of English. --Rosebreakly (talk) 03:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC) 09/03/2023

Hmm, this collage has been found published at https://vom.ir/sarasari/posts/124766. --Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Also, the file description says that "Mohammad Mokhtari [the subject] is an Iranian fan of Argentina's football team". That may be unusual, but it's not notable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. Out of scope for commons. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads by Px820

These were all uploaded in May 2006:

Per COM:GOF, these uploads predate the creation of OTRS. While GOF deals primarily with uploading the works of others, I think the same principle applies to claims of "own work" where we would otherwise require verification in this day and age. Under GOF, we allow the uploader to simply insert a quote of the permission statement on the file description without the need for hard evidence. Likewise, I think we can assume that the uploader Px820 is the owner of the personal website http://px820.onmitsu.jp/ which is linked from almost all of their photos. There's no difference between these five photos and the others, so either they all stay up or they all get deleted. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Also, I just noticed that their personal website mentions Wikipedia. While it doesn't contain an explicit free license release, it lends additional credence to the Wikipedia account Px820 being legitimate, and therefore the free license granted by them during the upload process being valid. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 Support as per KoH. Yann (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Louis Sucheston in 1971.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: received a request because the photo is published under Creative Commons License Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Germany. According to the website, it is indeed the case. Bencemac (talk) 16:32, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done per license declaration at the source site Ankry (talk) 22:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Portada PLN2012.jpg

Please restore. We have permission per Ticket:2023090510008923. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 07:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done @Mussklprozz Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: by Gbawden. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gabriela de Bukele - Fotografía Oficial.jpg

Do we really think El Salvador would copyright an official government portrait that they also have on instagram? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thornfield Hall (talk • contribs) 07:53, 6 September 2023‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. Questions related to copyright can be posted at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Thuresson (talk) 15:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yash Gupta - 53125159452.jpg File:Yash Gupta - 53125164407.jpg File:Yash Gupta - 53126166515.jpg

It must be undelete. Because this photos of an artist who is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintri01 (talk • contribs)

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wintri01. --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
okay I have seen that data of this item only should be corrected not deleted so please undelete this to so I can correct that. Wintri01 (talk) 09:50, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Which Wikipedia article are the images related to? What makes the subject notable? Ankry (talk) 22:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: 1) Elsewhere before upload (e.g., here) and would thus require VRT evidence of permission anyway; 2) Request is by a sock, and master (i.e., same person) purports to be subject; File:Yash Gupta - 53125159452.jpg, as an example, is not a selfie and copyright would have initially vested in the author (photographer), not the mere subject; and 3) Related article by the master, w:Yash gupta, has been recreated and deleted at least 4 times (!!!). --Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CollageMaker 20210717 015814930.jpg /File:YashGupta.jpg

This image is also of a notable person it should be undelete too.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wintri01 (talk • contribs) @Wintru01, it`s not how Wikipedia works, just because someone is notable you can not upload any image from the web to Wikipedia. You must be the person who took that photo.

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:CollageMaker 20210717 015814930.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
I saw that firstly it's was kept. And lately It got deleted and person still notable so it should be undelete i think Wintri01 (talk) 09:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: 1) Elsehwere before upload and would thus require VRT evidence of permission anyway; 2) Request is by a sock, and related article by the master, w:Yash gupta, has been recreated and deleted at least 4 times (!!!). --Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:הרצי"ה והרב שפירא בכניסה לספרית מרכז הרב.png

The person who uploaded the file is now User:מרכז הרב1. I understood from him that the photographer gave him permission to publish the photo. According to him, the photographer is the son of one of the people in the photo, and the permission appears on the ticket. (ticket:2017022710013427, if I understand correctly). מביע עניין (talk) 21:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

@מביע עניין: requests based on VRT tickets should be made here by VRT volunteers, who you are not. Requests to VRT volunteers should be made in COM:VRTN, not here. Ankry (talk) 22:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

file:Blackseaturtle.jpg

https://twitter.com/umigamekouen/status/1698646446504042836?s=46&t=6ESAdButNjl6migvs08g-A

To replace the image in the tweet of the author of the link, which stated that the image in the article was incorrect and that this image should be used.

--凹ももっち凸 (talk) 08:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose The image was taken from Twitter and there is no free license there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IQD964.png

this picture it belongs to me the same person so I would love to keep it please

 Not done: per Infrogmation and COM:NOTHOST, Commons is not Facebook either. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MeatSpady.jpg

This file of a photo of MeatSpady from his billboard.com profile was said to be deleted because User:AntiCompositeBot noticed that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

However I responded stating that I have contacted the person who owns the copyright who is Tanisha Muse Photography and had them send an email with all the communication between myself and them. As well as them giving permission to license the photo under creative common attribution.

JoeSand717 (talk) 04:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 7 days. . .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:تیراندازی موفق قبضه های یگان عملیاتی ناوشکن جماران (4).jpg

I think this file was deleted incorrectly. It is a photograph licensed with Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (Template:Mehr), and the logo depicted (of Category:Iranian Navy's Factories) was made public +30 years ago and belongs to a legal entity, thus Template:PD-Iran applies. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

 Comment I suppose that 4nn1l2 wrote that it is a derivative work because of the logo on the shirt. At least it is how I interpreted that. Ruthven (msg) 19:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Right. But the logo is in the public domain, because it belongs to a legal entity established in 1976 and was made public more than 30 years ago. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 Support. @HeminKurdistan and Ruthven: 4nn1l2 added the {{Dw no source since}} template without precisions and since this user has been banned, we will never know what it actually meant. The source is clearly indicated and free, the logo is not an issue so I think we can and should undelete this file. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done per discussion; please, review the license again. Ankry (talk) 12:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:National Emblem of Algeria.svg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: As mentioned at the DR and on the deleting administrator's talk page, there is evidence of use of the emblem design from 1970, and until 1997 the copyright term of Algerian works was 25 years. Thus, its copyright would have expired by 1996, which is before the date of URAA restoration or the new Algerian copyright law of 1997, which non-retroactively extended protection periods to 50 years. Links to all the mentioned legislation can be found at COM:Algeria. Since this was such a highly-used image across projects, I think it is worth taking a second look. Felix QW (talk) 10:12, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

The question here is what law applies to a work produced around 1970 in Algeria. Algeria became independant in 1962 but the first copyright law was passed only in 1973. Should we apply the previous French law or the 1973 Algerian law? I would presume it's the later but clarification is needed here. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
The transition regulations of the 1973 law abrogate all previous regulations on the matter in its Article 80, and the 1997 law are clear in that they replace any previous legal regulations, but only for those works whose copyright term has not ended (Art. 159 there). This should necessarily lead to the situation in which its copyright expired before 1996 and was not revived thereafter. Felix QW (talk) 06:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
There 's a parallel discussion going on at Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:National Emblem of Algeria.svg. From 1973 law [2], the copyright for Algerian works ended 25 years after the author's death. Do we have information on the original author of the emblem? If the author is unknown, and we want to apply {{PD-old-assumed}}, I'm afraid that we must wait until 170 + 25 +50 years = 2045, without counting URAA. --Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
I do not have access to the deleted file, but from the information provided there, apparently the file was a recent vectorized rendering, not free. If so, then the file could have been deleted for that simple reason. However, the deletion discussion got sidetracked into other considerations, the Algerian law, the concept of the emblem and other renderings of it (actually an interesting topic, continued on the talk page, but it had the effect of a distraction in the discussion of this particular recent rendering). Thus, instead of judging specifically the recent rendering in the nominated file, the deletion discussion seemed to judge the concept of the emblem and/or another, old rendering of it, and applied to the latter the Algerian copyright law of 1997. In short, there may have been two problems in the deletion discussion, but they sort of canceled each other, so in the end the deletion can be ok, although it currently does not have the right rationale, IMHO. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
@Asclepias: agreed, I changed the rationale and close this UR. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Colchester United FC.png

This file should not have been deleted. It is the club crest and was made available for use on the club’s Wikipedia page.

--Magpie069 (talk) 11:41, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Probably about File:Colchester United FC.png yet again (archive, deletion request). Thuresson (talk) 15:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Please can we discuss this deletion. The deleted file is the latest version of the club crest (updated colour and font). Why can the crest not be used when all other professional football clubs have theirs uploaded and on their Wiki pages? Magpie069 (talk) 15:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
That is an inquiry best made at English Wikipedia, not here.  Oppose as deleting administrator, the logo is definitely above the Threshold of Originality in the UK. Abzeronow (talk) 15:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
In simple terms, what can be done to have this crest restored? Again, every other professional sports team has their crest on Wiki so why should this one be any different? Magpie069 (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
In simple terms, just download the logo from the link Thuresson provided in the link to the Archive of the previous undeletion request, and upload it to English Wikipedia locally as a non-free file. Read the w:Wikipedia:Non-free content policy first though. Abzeronow (talk) 16:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
The logo that Thuresson provided in the archive link is not the official club crest. The one that was uploaded under this now deleted file is the official latest version of the crest that needs to be used. Therefore can this file be undeleted so it can be used? Or do I need to upload it again by some means? Magpie069 (talk) 16:18, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
I'd support temporary undeletion for the purposes of transferring it to enwiki. Abzeronow (talk) 16:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
How can it be transferred? And is that something you can do? Forgive me for not knowing the difference between having it uploaded on here versus on enwiki. Magpie069 (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
English Wikipedia already has en:File:Colchester United crest.png. OP should use en:Talk:Colchester United F.C. to properly discuss with interested parties which club logo is the correct one. Thuresson (talk) 18:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
There is only one current club logo which is the one that has been deleted so there is no need for any discussion on the matter on the outdated file. This can be confirmed by looking at the club website etc. I don’t see why this image can’t be undeleted so it can be used? Magpie069 (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose You ask, "I don’t see why this image can’t be undeleted so it can be used?" It is a copyrighted logo and there is no evidence that the copyright holder has freely licensed it. Some clubs don't freely license their logos because that would mean that anyone could make and sell tee shirts and posters with the logo. In order for it to be restored to Commons, an authorized official of the club must send a free license using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done complex logo, no free license. No Fair Use in Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 12:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: US 10-Year Treasury Yield $TNX 2022 Monthly Price Pattern Coordinates System Spreadsheets.pdf

The reasons given for deletion are not true and complete fabrications for some unknown reason.

Reasons for removal in a request from Omphalographer were: "Out of scope: collection of awkwardly printed spreadsheets about the author's perceived "price patterns" in various stocks and commodities. Unused, no clear educational use".

Please look at the file to verify that it is clearly & obviously not "out of scope", the file is not "printed" at all so it cannot be "awkwardly printed". These datasets on the spreadsheet come directly from stock charts also contained in the file downloaded from StockCharts.com that clearly illustrate, confirm & verify all data contained in the spreadsheet. Many people are interested in studying & utilizing The Price Pattern Coordinates System, to understand price patterns better so therefore it certainly has great "educational use" and multiple applications for advanced research and analysis.

To address additional reasons:

"1. The sources of the data are missing. The uploader claims these files are his/her own work, but were did (s)he get is the data from?" Answer: The source of the data is StockCharts.com and "Price Pattern Coordinates" books on amazon.com.

"2. There is no explanation about the codes that are mentioned." Answer: The "codes" are actually Price Pattern Coordinates and the spreadsheets are meant for those who have some familiarity with The Price Pattern Coordinates System. The complaint was filed by someone who might be a bit ignorant and probably never heard of this relatively new advanced system of technical analysis.

"3. There is no clue about a timeline, not in the tables and not in the graphs (I do not see for instance months on the X-axis)."

Answer: A quick glance at the file will show that the stock ticker and exact date are listed in the first column of the spreadsheet. Ex. $TNX20220131 means $TNX (US 10-Yr Treasury Bond) & 20220131 means (January 31, 2022). I guess the person who complained didn't understand that although I believe I explained it it in the notes about the file. The "X-axis" is actually contained on the chart. Please look into this misunderstanding and thank you for considering my appeal.

 Oppose I agree with most of the comments in the DR. In the first item, there is a graph which is split between two pages. In all of them, columns of data are split between multiple pages. All of those without graphs would be better created in Wiki markup.

Also, a search on "The Price Pattern Coordinates System" yields only advertising for a consultancy that uses that name. Aside from the technical problems noted above, I think this looks very much like advertising for the consultancy..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose per Commons:Project_scope#PDF_and_DjVu_formats. Ankry (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim and Ankry. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Emblem of Algeria.svg

Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of an emblem that was created here as an amateur version that should be under a CC. It has been on the platform since 2008 or even earlier. This emblem is a remake of the original version, which is the coat of arms of Algeria since 1976. It seems that all emblems here follow a similar pattern, they are all a remake version. Even if we consider that it's an amateur work under a CC isn't enough. In the laws of the country, the image should be in the public domain according to the 10-year protection period for works prior to 1987. This template may lead to confusion as it only mentions photographs, while the full decree also mentions applied arts. I understand that the fact that an image has been present since 2008 or earlier isn't necessarily an argument, but since that time, the image has been used in numerous articles and places. It is obvious that if there were any issues, a user would have noticed it and nominated it for deletion. I will notify @Reda Kerbouche who is well-informed about the specific laws of Algeria. Thank you for taking the time and effort to read my request and analyze the context. I appreciate your attention to this matter. Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riad Salih (talk • contribs)

@Riad Salih: see also #File:National Emblem of Algeria.svg above. The 1973 law indeed create a 10-year protection of "photographs and applied art" (the second is not explicitely defined in the law) and a 25-year protection otherwise. In both case, the emblem would be in public domain both in Algeria and US. But (like the other DR and UR) does this emblem fall under the 1973 law? It essentially the same file in both case (one with colour, the other without) and the design was made sometime before 1970 (real date is unknown).
Even if we consider amateur work, it is still a derivative work of the original, so original protection still applies.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Rejected, the design is most likely PD but the file itself is a copyvio, see #File:National Emblem of Algeria.svg above (and other linked discussions). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bottomless sukumizu girl.jpg

This work has survived three DRs, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bottomless sukumizu girl.jpg. Deleting this work with the vague message of "Per COM:SPEEDY." is completely out of line.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

This is the text of the speedy "(This is a nudity/sex/porn related image. Please be aware.)
This has been up for deletion several times over the course of several years, with arguments for keeping it stating that it's a skin colored bikini bottom, some claiming that the depicted character is 'past puberty.' The categories that this image is in clearly suggest otherwise. And, for anyone who wants to nitpick the category of 'adolescent girls,' adolescent is still legally considered a child.
This image holds no educational or encyclopedic value. The art is poor quality as well, which is evidenced by the fact that there's any debate as to what she is wearing or not wearing. However, there's zero visual indication of any clothing on the lower half, not even basic clothing border lines. There's also the fact that someone saw fit to add it to the 'female bottomlessness in art' category, which proves that the 'skin colored bottom' argument is invalid. Anyone you show this to outside of the internet will definitively call this child porn. It reduces the quality and credibility of the entire site to keep things like this and to claim they have value."
I find the rationale completely bogus. I  Support restoration. Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Who applied the speedy delete?
Support restoration. Geo Swan (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
User:Yann.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Completely aside from the questions about the subject, it seems to me this is personal art from an unknown artist, which is something we rarely keep. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

The last DR mentioned that it was in use. Works that are in use are in scope.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment I don't see any particular in-scope value for this amateur digital drawing. That said, unilateral speedy deletion of an image that has repeatedly been kept in deletion requests (with no new legal developments requiring deletion) seems inappropriate to me. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Yes, I don't think artwork that was in use at the time should be unilaterally deleted when the DRs were decided to keep. The rationale also contains weasel words like "anyone you show to this outside of the internet" and WMF hadn't taken any office actions on it so there wasn't a compelling enough reason to speedy delete it. Abzeronow (talk) 21:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Neutral not sure but leaning towad  Weak support, the process is strange. We could open a new proper deletion request but the last one was only in June. Although this DR lasted only one day, maybe we can re-open it and make it more visible and last longer? PS: there is also a derivative file File:Sukumizu Girl recolored.jpg that my or may not be treated as the same time. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done Speedy deletion of a file that has survived DR (multiple times!) is not appropriate. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

 Comment I don't remember why I delete this, and I agree with undeletion. Yann (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:38 Spesh rapper.jpg

I personally know 38 Spesh and many other rappers from NY area, and live there myself. I took that photo of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikirapguru (talk • contribs) 18:47, 6 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/CkEVWn6OlIu/?hl=en. If you are the photographer, you need to contact COM:VRT with EXIF from the original photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 19:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
@Abzeronow: They don't need to contact VRT if they simply upload the original with EXIF. The original location of publication (i.e. 38 Spesh's Instagram account) has no ties to the photographer's email address so there's nothing that we can verify through VRT that we can't verify on-wiki. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:57, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Yes, I see the EXIF on the file, I guess we can just close this then. Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Photo reuploaded (with the EXIF), all is good now, I close this requestion. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Imambuchori.jpg

Revisi dan perbaikan 202.154.18.89 22:50, 6 September 2023 (UTC)batal hapus

 Oppose Deleted as a personal image. No reason for restoration given above. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer from requestor and no reason for undeletion given. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chilgok Weir at Night 칠곡보의 야경.jpg

Per COM:FOP SK, non-building structures are not copyrighted in South Korea. Chilgok Weir(칠곡보) is not building. --Ox1997cow (talk) 23:35, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Pinging the nominator at DR @Explicit: regarding this matter. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Yup, this seems fine. I nominated this for deletion in 2020, before COM:FOP SK was updated wtth the exceptions section. ✗plicit 03:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, It's not crescent moon shape. It's bull's horn shape. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: This seems OK. --Yann (talk) 17:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Daedalus; or, Science and the Future (1924, E.P. Dutton & Company).pdf

For export to enWS. I don’t have permissions for that, but I’ll ask there. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: @TE(æ)A,ea.: Temporarily undeleted for transfer to en.ws. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Guitar Player Magazine Page 2.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I filled in the wrong copyright license, and was too late to edit it. I want to release it in the public domain as it is a scan of the magazine that I made. I would therefore like to edit the license type and release it as my own work. Ingridach (talk) 18:17, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

@Ingridach: , unless you made the magazine yourself, we cannot accept the file here. If you did make the magazine (since it's unclear from what you wrote if you just did the scan or the magazine itself), please contact COM:VRT. Abzeronow (talk) 18:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: This is a blank file -- there is no image here, so there is nothing to restore. I think it is a simple copyvio, not something they made. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Théâtre D’opéra Spatial.jpg

Greetings.

Reason: This file was improperly deleted. In the past it was a soft grey area with the “manual edits” made by Mr. Allen, but recently the US Copyright Office has affirmed that said work is not copyrightable: https://www.wired.com/story/ai-art-copyright-matthew-allen/

Please do undelete this file in light of the new confirmation by the US Copyright Office.

Thanks.--ALittleLighter (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

 Support Notable artwork that is public domain in the US since it has no human author. Abzeronow (talk) 21:52, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done As per Abzeronow. Ankry (talk) 14:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I uploaded the wrong Nick Jr logo photo. I wanted to upload the new Nick Jr logo without the yellow background. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luise20661582 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 7 September 2023‎ (UTC)

✓ Done Close enough to discuss: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nick Jr. logos. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:33, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Updated New Nick Jr logo 2023.jpg

Please undelete this photo. The nickjr logo with the yellow background I uploaded by mistake. I wanted to reupload it with a white background around it.

✓ Done by KoH. Ankry (talk) 08:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Hoshiyoga

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: We have valid permission (ticket:2023090210003381). The accusation seemed to be that someone stole works from https://www.yusukehoshididgeridoo.com/ and https://twitter.com/YusukeHoshi1/ . The permission email we received comes from those websites. whym (talk) 11:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Whym: FYI. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:海昌大樓.jpg

來自https://www.president.gov.tw/Image?DeteailNo=325 政府網站資料開放宣告 https://www.president.gov.tw/Page/18 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 葉又嘉 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 8 September 2023‎ (UTC)

✓ Done: per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Guillermo Kenning Voss, de la falange boliviana.png

I believe the PD-Bolivia license was correct. Bolivia is a 50 years from creation jurisdiction for images. The deleter said it was needed to show when the image was "published for the first time", which is incorrect for jurisdiction which start the clock at creation. --RAN (talk) 03:16, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

 Info That is not what Template:PD-Bolivia says regarding duration of copyright. Thuresson (talk) 04:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 Comment If I understand article 19 of this (copyright law of Bolivia) correctly, there is a provision for certain collective works (among them collective photographic works and collective audiovisual works) to be protected for 50 years from first publication, or for 50 years from creation if unpublished within those 50 years. I don't see any evidence that this is a "collective work", nor anything about publication or it being anonymous. This page claims the photo is from the late 1930s, so the year to base any calculations on would be 1939. But in general, more information is needed to determine the copyright status (like: is a photographer known? When and where was it first published?) Without that information, undeletion would be ok in 2060 with PD-old-assumed. Also, 1939 means possible US copyright restoration by the URAA would need to be checked. --Rosenzweig τ 11:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
As long as we have evidence that it was anonymous and published before 1946 or the photographer died before 1946, it would be in the clear as far as copyright. It is possible this is the case, but we don't have enough evidence of this. Abzeronow (talk) 15:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD-Bolivia + PD-1996 is OK here. He is certainly less than 40 in this picture, so this from before 1955, and probably much earlier. And it was most probably, either published at the time, or unpublished, so 50 years from first publication, or for 50 years from creation if unpublished within those 50 years fits the case. --Yann (talk) 09:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

@Yann: reopened the DR: I do not think that this photo is a collective work. Ankry (talk) 16:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Photo of Harichand Thakur.jpg

Harichand Thakur is a historical figure in our region but unfortunately there is no depiction of his face without this one. Nobody didn't even know clearly that who drew this picture long before ago. So, it is really impossible to know about the author of this work. But this picture is widely used by everybody as the only surviving picture of Harichand Thakur. So, in this case, I want an undeletion of this photo from Wikimedia commons. If any additional data should be edited, you may edit but keep this picture.

In order to prove this image PD status, we need an evidence that it was published more than 95 years ago or that it was PD in Bangladesh at the URAA date (January 1, 1996) [eg. anonymous publication that was more than 50 years old at that date]. Otherwise, we need a {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license directly from the painter or painter's heirs. In Wikimedia Commons we do not host Fair Use images or images with unclear copyrights status. Ankry (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: This is not a picture, and it doesn't look so old. So as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Govt Bangabandhu College Logo.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This logo is widely used by students of Govt Bangabandhu College, though the author of this work is unknown. It is not possible to find out the author as this logo is being used from very opening time of the college. I am using for fair use and I have no business purpose. More importantly, which source Turelio has been cited is baseless because www.gbc.studentpay.net is never the owner or copyright holder of this work. AkashRoy27 (talk) 06:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Fair Use images are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. If the logo is PD, please provide an evidence that it was available to the public more than 95 years ago. [This is "old enough" in US copyright terms.] The webpage was provided to prove that you are not the original author of the logo as you claimed at upload. False authorship claims are violations of both: Commons policies [and cancels AGF for users who make such claims] and copyright law [plagiarism]. Ankry (talk) 14:08, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: We don't allow fair use on Commons. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two more photos by Mario Baronchelli

Please restore

I had missed the permission we have per Ticket:2023090410003653.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: please check if all tags etc. are in order. --Rosenzweig τ 11:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Team WR Chess.jpg Permission submitted

File:Team WR Chess.jpg The owner has confirmed his written permission via email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gseyid (talk • contribs)

So we are waiting for a VRT volunteer action. No reason to act here if you are not a VRT volunteer. Ankry (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done waiting for a VRT volunteer action. Ankry (talk) 12:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Justin Holcomb.jpg

This image, which was flagged for possible copyright issue, is owned by Justin Holcomb who makes available to others to use: https://justinholcomb.com/bio/

Anglican Ink used this image but it was used before Anglican Ink by others and Anglican Ink does not own the copyright: https://anglican.ink/2023/06/12/justin-holcomb-consecrated-fifth-bishop-of-central-florida/


Other sites posted this image elsewhere before Anglican Ink did:

-The Diocese of Central Florida uses this image for the staff page before Anglcian Ink): https://cfdiocese.org/diocesan-staff/

-The Livining Church uses it for his board profile: https://livingchurch.org/foundation/#[field%20id]

-The Orlando Sentinel posted this image and cited the image on June 4 (before Anglican Ink did): https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2023/06/04/you-can-offer-abuse-survivors-help-hope-and-healing-commentary/?fbclid=IwAR1rNwfWi6YktS6upptTwBn586MrNzev0lAuupb71maCoi8JQvNZX52hoE0

-Justin posted it on social media (months before Anglican Ink used this image):https://twitter.com/JustinHolcomb/status/1615326108714508290

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinholcomb (talk • contribs) 20:42, 9 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose "Copyright ©2023 Justin Holcomb . All rights reserved." at justinholcomb.com. Thuresson (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
@Justinholcomb: Our policy requires that for images previously published without evidence of free license we have to receive a free license permission from the actual copyright holder directly using VRT. On-wiki licensing is not possible for them. Ankry (talk) 12:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson and Ankry. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Civil Engineering — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandanpathak72 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 10 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Not done: None of this user's files have been deleted. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jan Verkolje - Portret damy s ditetem.jpg

Please undelete this file which is PD and was deleted for the wrong reason. Please see undeleted example for reference File:Jan de Bray kol.1627-1697 - Podobizna petileteho devcatka.jpg that was also deleted in the same set and for which I successfully requested undeletion already. I would like to use the file. Thanks in advance. Jane023 (talk) 08:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Unclear deletion rationale, so pinging @Gbawden: for possible explanation. Ankry (talk) 11:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
However, this is not a 2D work, so an evidence that the photo is under a free license would be needed here. PD-0ld-1923 does not apply to the photo of the frame and modern labels. So the authorship info was also incorrect. Ankry (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
This was part of Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by NGCZ Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose per the abovementioned DR as it is unlikely to receive a free license. Ankry (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Gbawden and Ankry. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Md. Robiul Azam.jpg

I request to undelete the subjected file which was deleted under deletion criteria G10, because the person stated in the article holds importance at the national level at Bangladesh, for which the credible citation was missing earlier. The necessary citations will be added provided the page is scheduled for undeletion.

Muhammad A. Saman (talk) 14:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Muhammad A. Saman

The issue was F10 not G10. How is this image in COM:SCOPE? Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose Personal image without educational use. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 13:34, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: web search doesn't turn up many results for the subject, also per Yann and Gbawden. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roar Tollefsen.jpg, The uploader and photographer are the same person (Wife of subject)

This file was created by the uploader which also was the photographer of this picture back in 1991 in Gjøvik, Norway. Uploader are wife of the person in the picture. Pinging the deleter RED-TAILED HAWK. The file missing licenses and possible other issues are being discussed at her home-wiki user-discussionpage no:Brukerdiskusjon:IreneHortman (for now in norwegian). Best regards Migrant (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

@Migrant: The uploader did not declare any license while uploading. We cannot host copyrighted images without a free license. Please, ask her to follow VRT instructions in order to undelete the photo. Ankry (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. Note that the file description is completely blank -- no date, no author, no license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:10, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:塩川のりふみ２.jpg の削除の取り消しリクエスト

File:塩川のりふみ２.jpg

は本人の許諾を受けて、直接本人からデータの提供をうけたものであり、公開がみとめらているデータであるため、削除取り消しのリクエストをさせていただきます。

"The file '塩川のりふみ２.jpg' has been provided directly from the individual with their permission, and since it's data that has been approved for public release, I would like to request the cancellation of its deletion."

--PoliLab Inc. (talk) 07:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose We need a formal written permission for a free license from the copyright holder. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 13:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

033_imp_hd.jpg

Could You undelete the picture because it took from the official web cite of Legrand Groupe https://www.legrandgroup.com/en/media-library — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexandreSoloviev (talk • contribs) 13:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose There is no file by that name, but I suppose this is about File:Legrand headquarters Limoges.jpg, which is a copyright violation. Terms of use don't give any permission to upload this file under a free license. Yann (talk) 13:25, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Olaf Stapledon.jpg

This file is probably public domin, bt ws deleted here on Commons. Please restore it. 185.172.241.184 11:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Fair use from en:File:Olaf Stapledon.jpg. It is not enough to claim that Wikimedia user User:Gobonobo created this photo. Thuresson (talk) 11:48, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: There is no reason to believe this image is PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Diario Líbero.png

Estimado Equipo de Wikimedia,

Agradezco su pronta atención al asunto. Quiero aclarar que el archivo que subí a Wikipedia, el logo de Diario Líbero, se encuentra alojado en el sitio web oficial del medio y está disponible bajo una licencia que permite su uso libre.

Pueden encontrar el logo y su licencia en el siguiente enlace: https://libero.pe/static/images/logo_libero.png y https://libero.pe/terminos-de-uso

Agradezco su comprensión y quedo a disposición para cualquier consulta adicional.



English:

Dear Wikimedia Team,

I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. I would like to clarify that the file I uploaded to Wikipedia, the Diario Líbero logo, is hosted on the official website of the publication and is available under a license that allows for its free use.

You can find the logo and its license at the following link: https://libero.pe/static/images/logo_libero.png and https://libero.pe/terminos-de-uso


I thank you for your understanding and remain available for any further inquiries.

 Not done: Not currently deleted. --Yann (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IEEE CiSE Cover.pdf to undelete

File: (File:IEEE CiSE Cover.pdf)

This file was deleted.

I've received permission from the IEEE publications and legal team to use this image (File:IEEE CiSE Cover.pdf) on Wikipedia and upload in Wikimedia commons as requested.

Please undelete the image.


CSmtubb (talk) 18:40, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Have you contacted COM:VRT? We cannot verify permissions on-wiki and if the permission is approved, a VRT member will undelete it or request undeletion here. Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose Per Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Thuresson (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Thuresson. PDF is not an acceptable format for images. Use jpg for this. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:イタリアのブルースミュージックフェスティバルにて音楽生演奏。.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I don't think this is much of a promotional material by itself. This depicts the audience and the stage more than the musician. In fact, the musician is hardly recognizable. The picture can be used in context unrelated to the particular musician. (I intended to post this opinion when the file was a speedy deletion candidate, converting it to a regular DR. I failed to actually do that in time.) whym (talk) 23:12, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Commons:Deletion requests/File:イタリアのブルースミュージックフェスティバルにて音楽生演奏。.jpg. An image that has gone through VRT should not be speedily deleted. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Guto-zacarias.jpg

Prezado(a) administrador(a),

Estou entrando em contato para contestar a exclusão recente da imagem "Guto-Zacarias.jpg" devido a alegações de violação de direitos autorais. Gostaria de fornecer evidências claras de que a imagem em questão está sob uma licença que permite sua utilização no Wikimedia Commons.

Detalhes da Imagem:


Licença:

Com base na informação fornecida, solicito gentilmente que a exclusão da imagem seja reconsiderada e revertida.

Com a mudança do nnome do arquivo de Guto-Zacarias.jpg para Guto-Zacarias-Alesp.jpg

Agradeço pela sua atenção e consideração.

Atenciosamente,


    • Inglês:**

---

Dear Administrator,

I am writing to contest the recent deletion of the image "Guto-Zacarias.jpg" due to copyright infringement allegations. I would like to provide clear evidence that the image in question is under a license that allows its use on Wikimedia Commons.

Image Details:

License:

Based on the information provided, I kindly request that the deletion of the image be reconsidered and reversed.

With the name change of the file from Guto-Zacarias.jpg to Guto-Zacarias-Alesp.jpg.

Thank you for your attention and consideration.

Sincerely,

---

    • Espanhol:**

---

Estimado(a) Administrador(a),

Estoy escribiendo para impugnar la reciente eliminación de la imagen "Guto-Zacarias.jpg" debido a alegaciones de violación de derechos de autor. Me gustaría proporcionar evidencia clara de que la imagen en cuestión está bajo una licencia que permite su uso en Wikimedia Commons.

Detalles de la Imagen:

Licencia:

Basado en la información proporcionada, solicito amablemente que se reconsidere y revierta la eliminación de la imagen.

Con el cambio de nombre del archivo de Guto-Zacarias.jpg a Guto-Zacarias-Alesp.jpg.

Gracias por su atención y consideración.

Atentamente,


Speiron (talk) Speiron (talk)

 Info The abovementioned licensing information clearly states that reuse is possible if the proper attribution is provided in the form "Name of the photographer/Alesp" (Todas as imagens são protegidas pelas leis de direitos autorais e podem ser livremente utilizadas, sem custo e sem necessidade de autorização, de acordo com a licença Creative Commons BY, que apenas exige que seja dado o crédito no formato 'Nome do Fotógrafo/Alesp'.). Only "alesp" is not enough. If the name of the photographer is provided, I will  Support undeletion of the photo. Ankry (talk) 17:31, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Karl Tõnisson—Karlis Tenisson—Brother Vahindra.jpg

Request of undeletion for: File:Karl Tõnisson – Kārlis Tennisons – Vend Vahindra.jpg

User Belbury only flagged it becouse it did not have correct source and question about copy right but all of 3 photos of monks in question are discussed here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Karl_T%C3%B5nisson%E2%80%94Karlis_Tennison%E2%80%94Brother_Vahindra.png Sources: 1. https://www.dharmakirjastus.ee/pildid/

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorq35 (talk • contribs) 14:36, 13 September 2023‎ (UTC)

@Editorq35: Jānis Rieksts died in 1970 so how did it came about that the photo is licensed under a Creative Commons license?. See also open deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karl Tõnisson—Karlis Tennison—Brother Vahindra.png. Thuresson (talk) 17:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
It is not clear that the photographer was Jānis Rieksts 100%. Some bureaucracy license should work for this. It has immense educational value for the public. It was made outside of America. Editorq35 (talk) 20:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Please read Commons:Licensing. --Polarlys (talk) 21:38, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
@Polarlys A few extra things to consider: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karl Tõnisson—Karlis Tennison—Brother Vahindra.png Editorq35 (talk) 23:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Although the file probably should be deleted, it has not been deleted yet, so there is nothing to do here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Elektra-Trainer.jpg

Dear All,

I am the Testpilot of the Elektra-Trainer D-MYET and member of the company Elektra Solar GmbH. The company made the Foto during air to air shooting of the first flight and published it on its website as News: https://www.elektra-solar.com/maiden-flight-of-elektra-trainer/ in June 2022. The foto may be used under {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Please undelete the file again or accept new upload. Best regards --Elektro-Pilot (talk) 15:34, 13 September 2023 (UTC) Dipl.Ing. Uwe Nortmann Testpilot, Head of Sales Elektra Solar GmbH

 Not done: Not currently deleted. @Elektro-Pilot: Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission for a free license. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:It's me!.jpg

AI-generated images are ineligible for copyright therefor the image does not violate copyright. --Trade (talk) 01:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Per KoH -- out of scope. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Karl Tõnisson—Karlis Tennison—Brother Vahindra.png

File:Karl Tõnisson—Karlis Tennison—Brother Vahindra.png should be kept on Wikipedia becouse Should be kept on Wikipedia becouse https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Karl_T%C3%B5nisson%E2%80%94Karlis_Tennison%E2%80%94Brother_Vahindra.png

[Estonia, works created before 1992 are in the public domain if the author died more than 70 years ago, or if the work was published anonymously or pseudonymously and the author died more than 70 years ago.] In Latvia, works created before 1945 are in the public domain if the author died more than 50 years ago, or if the work was published anonymously or pseudonymously and the author died more than 50 years ago. Therefore, if a work was created in Estonia before 1992 or in Latvia before 1945 and meets the aforementioned criteria, it is in the public domain.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorq35 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC) (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorq35 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 14 September 2023‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. Ongoing DR. Kindly read the instructions to this page: "Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.". Thuresson (talk) 06:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Friedrich Voldemar Lustig – Ashin Ananda and Karl Tõnisson – Kārlis Tennisons – Vend Vahindra in Thailand.jpg

This should stay on Wikipedia. Licence changed to Template:PD-Thailand. The nomination page discussion for details: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Friedrich_Voldemar_Lustig_%E2%80%93_Ashin_Ananda_and_Karl_T%C3%B5nisson_%E2%80%93_K%C4%81rlis_Tennisons_%E2%80%93_Vend_Vahindra_in_Thailand.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorq35 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 14 September 2023‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. Ongoing DR. Kindly read the instructions to this page: "Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.". Thuresson (talk) 06:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:0b77a14.jpg

The file was created by a graphic designer for my website developed years ago with "Macromedia Flash". (https://web.archive.org/web/20160620140310/http://www.bitart.it/marcomeloni/index.html)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bainzu (talk • contribs) 08:02, 14 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose If that is the case, then why did you claim that you created it when you uploaded it? False claims of authorship are a serious violation of Commons rules and may lead to your being blocked from editing here.

We do not keep personal images of non-contributors. You have made only two contributions to Commons -- one has a Deletion Request and this is the other. It is also unlikely that you have the right to freely license it. Most designers would give you a license to use the image yourself, but not the right to freely license it to others. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Senti, io ho caricato quel file, di cui posso disporre a mio piacimento e non mi importa se lo avete cancellato. Ho richiesto il ripristino perché ritengo di non avere violato alcunché.
Però, già che ci sei cancella pure l'altra immagine che ho caricato. Non mi importa, stavo solo provando a capire il funzionamento.
Io provvederò ad annullare il mio account.
Buona giornata Bainzu (talk) 05:11, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per JIm. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ArabidInContext.png

AI-generated images are inelligible for copyright. Therefore no VRT should have been needed to prevent the image from being deleted. --Trade (talk) 15:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

 Comment The file description said To cover historical phenomenon. Besides copyright considerations, User:Pi.1415926535 (who deleted the file) seemed to have doubts if the file is in project scope: In addition I am not entirely sure how what appears to be a modern fetish picture can be used to illustrate a historic article. --Rosenzweig τ 20:58, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose As in my deletion rationale, this was someone's personal fetish art. It was created to illustrate an enwiki draft that was quickly deleted as a hoax. It was not based in any actual historical evidence, and is out of scope as lacking historical or educational value. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:38, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not, as per Pi.1415926535. --Yann (talk) 13:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Itagakitaisuke sensei dozo yuraihi.jpg

「著作権侵害理由：http://itagakitaisuke.link/2021/07/16/itagaki-103kaiki/」となっておりますが、そもそも左記のサイトにupしたのは私自身ですし、私の撮影したものです。なおかつ「http://itagakitaisuke.link/anniversary_slug/20230101-2/」ページで、著作権をフリーにすることを宣言しております。ですので、著作権侵害には該当しませんので削除の撤回と画像の復帰をお願いします。Photo memories 1868 (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

 Support http://itagakitaisuke.link/anniversary_slug/20230101-2/ "著作権フリー(public domain)にて御利用可能です。" Lemonaka (talk) 06:07, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. @Photo memories 1868 and Lemonaka: Please check the license, author, etc. --Yann (talk) 18:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PSE 17.svg

I reckon the image should be called a delete query just like it was called in the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Movimiento revolucion ciudadana.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reto ecuador.png we consider it to be {{PD-textlogo}}. David C.S

It did have such a query already Commons:Deletion requests/File:Partido Socialista Ecuatoriano.png. Previous UDR ruled the other version as out of scope. Abzeronow (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
 Neutral The image may be useful even if it is not an exact copy of the logo but unsure. Ankry (talk) 12:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion, This is not the logo. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ariadbblack.png

This picture designed totally by me and copyright flag is completely wrong! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogueok (talk • contribs) 20:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC) (UTC)

 Not done: No response to KoH. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hyakuninisshu 062.jpg

The copyright state should be the same as the other files in Category:Ogura_Hyakunin_Isshu_(complete_set). --Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 04:51, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done I've restored the file. The reason it was deleted is peculiar: on September 11, User:Hopefully999 added a tag {{No permission since|month=September|day=6|year=2023}}, which promptly led to deletion on September 13. @Hopefully999: Is that your idea of a joke? Your account was already blocked once. Should we make that block permanent? --Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
So anyone (not only admin) can add a tag «No permission» to any file and delete it?? Wow. Ratte (talk) 09:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Ratte, No. Anyone can add the {{No permission since}} tag, but only an Admin can delete the file. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: License and date fixed. --Yann (talk) 13:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Per Ticket VRT 2023081010000048

[3]

and

[4]

must be undelete ASAP, the VRT agent forgot to complete the process and didn't change the template, Regards!! Ezarateesteban 20:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

 Support as a main promoter of the upload I confirm that the upload was managed properly. Thanks, Christian Cerón (WM-MX)
I've looked into two (File:Parroquia de la Concepcion de María, Otumba, Pueblo Mágico 01.jpg and File:Parroquia de la Concepcion de María, Otumba, Pueblo Mágico 04.jpg) and saw that Mussklprozz had added a template and then later changed it back to permission received with a commentary like problem found with permission notice. So let's wait if he can clarify the situation? --Rosenzweig τ 20:39, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
@Ezarate @Christian Cerón @Rosenzweig The institution which holds the copyright wrote a restriction in their permission statement which contradicts Wikipedia's free licencing requirements. I wrote back to them on 2023-08-10 (in Spanish), but never received an answer. – La institución que posee los derechos de autor incluyó una restricción en su declaración de autorización que contradice los términos de licencia libre de Wikipedia. Les contesté el 2023-08-10 (en español), pero nunca recibí respuesta. – Un saludo, Mussklprozz (talk) 07:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Mussklprozz. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fifa world cup final 1978.jpg

Nominator alleged "Derivative work of a copyrighted trophy", but the trophy is not the main subject of the image. As I stated on the DR, "Commons:De minimis" would apply in this case. Fma12 (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Apart from the de minimis or not question, a 1978 photograph from Argentina was still protected there on the URAA date in 1996. So the photo is still protected in the USA for either 70 years pma if an author can be found, or if the author is actually unknown, for "the earlier of 95 years after first publication or 120 years after creation". Until the end of 2073 then, assuming this was published in 1978. --Rosenzweig τ 07:42, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Silly claim -- of course the cup is the central focus of the photo. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ritratto del Cardinal Flavio Chigi della Rovere in Vestaglia.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: this file is portrait of work by Ferdinand Voet and private colletion of Roman Family Prince of Chigi and the Trustworthy Source of this file is the book Petrucci, Francesco (2007) (in Italian) Il principe romano. Ritratti dell'aristocrazia pontificia nell'età Barocca, Gangemi Editore ISBN: 978-88-492-1328-7. OCLC: 117926133. Miskin33 (talk) 09:07, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Request related to A3cb1. OP is not a well-established Wikimedia user in good standing. Thuresson (talk) 15:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
don't look at who uploaded it but I think of the file which has a reliable source and the author of the painting has been dead for more than a hundred years, so it is possible to restore it Miskin33 (talk) 16:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

but this file in particular I saw done using the template artwork and that the license is right, of course if you don't want to restore it just for this commons it won't have many contributors, at least analyze the ifle before speaking --Miskin33 (talk) 15:19, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: A3cb1 is a very difficult and persistent nuisance. We routinely refuse to restore any of their work as it can only encourage them. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mahishasuramardhini in Mahabalipuram.jpg

This is my own work i did take that photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narayanan Iyengar (talk • contribs) 11:02, 15 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose This does not add anything to the 29 photos of this panel available at Commons (Category). Thuresson (talk) 13:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Screenshot of Plap Home When Logged In 2023-09-15 at 14.13.16.png

1) I own the website in the deleted screenshot. 2) I own the deleted screenshot.

--Doyin Dimeji (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Эlcobbola. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Takaoka koutaro 1.jpg

  • 「著作権侵害理由：[5] となっておりますが、そもそも[6] のページにおいて著作権フリーにされているものであり、著作権侵害にあたらないため、削除を撤回して画像の復帰をお願いします。Photo memories 1868 (talk) 15:00, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
    • Google translate of the text at http://itagakitaisuke.link/anniversary_slug/20230101-2/ "The images posted on this page were taken and created by our association, but are copyright free (unless they are used for malicious purposes such as defaming the imaged person or any person or group related to the image). (Copyright Free). (* Photographer "Photo memories 1868")" Original Japanese text is "こちらのページに貼っております画像は弊会撮影・作成のものですが、（※被像者、画像に関連する一切の人物・団体の名誉を毀損するなどの悪用目的でない限り）著作権フリー(Copyright Free)にて御利用可能です。(※撮影者「Photo memories 1868」)
There is also additional text that says "新聞・TV・雑誌・研究書籍・webサイト・百科事典(Encyclopedia, Wikipedia)などに必要とする場合。（ご自由にご利用可能です）
●弊会理事長などが行う講演会・勉強会などのチラシ作製などに必要とする場合。
（上記の場合、弊会にご一報なくご利用いただきまして構いません）
※画像をクリックすると、高解像度の画像に切替わる場合があります（ならない場合もあります）" which translates to "When required for newspapers, TV, ::magazines, research books, websites, encyclopedias (Encyclopedia, Wikipedia), etc. (Free to use)
●When it is necessary to create flyers for lectures, study sessions, etc. held by the president of our association.
(In the above case, you may use the service without notifying us.)
  • If you click on the image, it may switch to a high-resolution image (or not)." I think the uploader has shown an intent towards a free license here, but practically I don't know if it is one. @Yasu: Abzeronow (talk) 19:01, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 Info Discussion is underway at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Photo_memories_1868. Yasu (talk) 15:06, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
 SupportSame as File:Itagakitaisuke sensei dozo yuraihi.jpg Lemonaka (talk) 12:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Images on Commons must be free for any use. The restriction:

"unless they are used for malicious purposes such as defaming the imaged person or any person or group related to the image)."

is unacceptable here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward isn't that COM:Non-copyright restrictions like cultural heritage works of Italy tagged with {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}}? Or part of copyright restrictions? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
I don't think so. A non copyright restriction usually applies only to the poster -- for example, a museum's prohibition against photographing its PD works. The Italian rule you mention would apply only to use in Italy. This language explicitly prohibits certain uses and is explicitly included in the copyright license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 Support At this time, any restrictions placed on the photos have been removed and they are licensed for complete freedom of use. Please check again http://itagakitaisuke.link/anniversary_slug/20230101-2/ Misato Kano (talk) 23:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done LicenseReviewed; restrictive text was removed from source. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Takaoka koutaro 2.jpg

「著作権侵害理由：http://itagakitaisuke.link/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/H290910_1.jpg」となっておりますが、そもそも「http://itagakitaisuke.link/anniversary_slug/20230101-2/」のページにおいて、著作権フリーで提供しているものであり、著作権侵害には該当しないため、削除を撤回し、画像の復帰をお願いします。Photo memories 1868 (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

@Yann Same as File:Itagakitaisuke sensei dozo yuraihi.jpg Lemonaka (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose The comment by Lemonaka is incorrect -- this is not at all the same image. However, the source page has an explicit copyright notice:

"Copyright (C) 2017 板垣退助先生顕彰会 Corporation. All Rights Reserved"

and no evidence of a free license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

 Comment "Copyright (C) 2017 板垣退助先生顕彰会 Corporation. All Rights Reserved" in the footer of the page is a copyright notice for the entire the website.
But exceptionally, the images on http://itagakitaisuke.link/anniversary_slug/20230101-2/ are declared to be copyright disclaimed (please check the page body). Misato Kano (talk) 23:55, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done LicenseReviewed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:03, 17 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Itagakitaisukesensei kenshohi.jpg

「著作権侵害理由：https://senseki-kikou.net/?p=31876」となっておりますが、「Itagakitaisukesensei kenshohi.jpg」の画像は、「https://senseki-kikou.net/?p=31876」からのものではなく、私自身の撮影によるものです。なおかつ「http://itagakitaisuke.link/anniversary_slug/20230101-2/」においてupロードし、著作権を放棄し、フリーで使用可能であることを宣言しております。そのため、著作権侵害にはあたりません。もし、必要であるならば、当日、別の角度から撮影した同じ写真も多数ありますので、mailでお送りしても構いません。私自身の撮影によるものですので、著作権侵害には該当しないため、削除を撤回し、画像の復帰を求めます。Photo memories 1868 (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Same as File:Itagakitaisuke sensei dozo yuraihi.jpg Lemonaka (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

 Support This is not the same as the image cited above. It is also not the same photograph as the one cited in the deletion (https://senseki-kikou.net/?p=31876) -- the camera angle here is square on, where that in the other image is tilted up a bit. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done LicenseReviewed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FSUU Swimming Pool inside (Original Work).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: requesting again the undeletion of this file. See the decision at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by FSUUpedia Restore Division (ended in kept). Several files of the user have confirmed VRT tickets. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

 Info It appears that this particular file failed OTRS processing (ticket #2017050910011056). Thuresson (talk) 01:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: per @King of Hearts: . --Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr. Amelia Levinson Gates and family.jpg

A 1914 image was deleted because someone demanded permission from the creator. To be eligible for a copyright, it would have to have been registered and renewed. US copyright case law has sided with images being "made public" when they leave the custody of the photographer. We also have a crop from this image, still in use. --RAN (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

 Comment This file is still subject of the (not yet decided) DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr. Amelia Levinson Gates and family.jpg.The immediate cause for deletion, on September 11, was "No ticket permission since 11 August 2023". Per the DR, a permission mail had been received for this file on August 11, but a month later there was still no VRT tag. Someone with access should look into Ticket:2023081110008271. --Rosenzweig τ 07:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done since DR is not yet closed. In this case the VRT ticket does not provide evidence of a valid copyright release, but may provide useful information to determine whether the image is PD. The discussion should be allowed to continue. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:中原地產灣仔尚翹峰分行 Centaline Property Wanchai The Zenith Branch.jpg

This image is just a branch of the agency; there are more than ten thousands shopfront images in the commons. This photo should not delete.--Wpcpey (talk) 00:45, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Is the agency notable? If the photo is intended to illustrate just a branch of an agency, choose one without advertising elements (webpage address, phone number). Ankry (talk) 13:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
{{O}} as no notability evidence provided. Ankry (talk) 12:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
  • see in here, it is the largest property agency in Hong Kong. But most of the Property Agency companies in Hong Kong, even in China and Taiwan, it is very common to show the phone number for the shop. Commons should not have censorship to this kind of issue. --Wpcpey (talk) 14:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
@Wpcpey: The description is an advertisement. So will you provide a proper description if the file is undeleted? Yann (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
@Yann: :::Changed to: Centalie Property branch in Wan Chai, is it OK now? Wpcpey (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: No opposition. Please provide a proper description and categories. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LOGO PELNI (Tagline).png

Dear wikicommons team, We from PT PELNI (Persero) ensure that the logo is correct and we will make it the logo that appears on the PT Pelayaran Nasional Indonesia (Persero) page, please display it again.

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuad Hsn (talk • contribs)

User accounts in Wikimedia are personal. The user operating "Fuad Hsn" account declared that they are the original AUTHOR of the logo, that they are (personally!) the COPYRIGHT HOLDER of the logo and that they grant anybody a free license for the logo. Such declarations for images already published elsewhere needs to be verified basing on public records. Declarations by users who made false statements cannot be relied on. Can you elaborate where can we found an evidence that the Wikimedia user "Fuad Hsn" is the original author of the logo?
For images already published without clear evidence of free license our policy requires that the image copyright holder sends a free license following VRT instructions. We cannot host copyrighted images without a free license. Ankry (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Ankry. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Spice Girls live West MacLaren 1997.jpg

The file stood on several major articles for over six years but was speedy deleted in May, with the reason given simply being COM:SPEEDY. I asked the deleting admin for the reasoning and was told due to "photo manipulation of:https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.rQWqM-8mXmyPjPdcAa9oEwHaFC?pid=ImgDet&rs=1". As the link is not showing anything on my end, I requested further explanation but have yet to receive a response. Request temporary undeletion as I'm not the uploader and don't remember the licensing info, but I believe the image should be reevaluated given that the rationale for its deletion is unclear. QuestFour (talk) 11:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - Yes, it's a photomanipulation of this. Эlcobbola talk 12:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
  • This image is based on [7], but altered in various ways (removed background, mirrored, changed band members sequence) suggesting that the rationale was avoiding copyright violation detection. The declared license template is valid for original photos only, not for DWs. I agree with Yann's deletion decision and  Oppose undeletion unless we have evidence that the uploader is the same person as the photographer (through VRT) or that the original photo is also under CC BY-SA 4.0 (or compatible) license. Upload by SPA is not helpful here. Ankry (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as deleting admin, and per Эlcobbola and Ankry. Yann (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done Undeleted and redeleted with a more informative rationale. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:56, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:G-Dragon on Infinite ChallengeYeongdong Expressway Music Festival - 8.jpg

The photo was possibly released under a CC-BY License because the archive page shows that the source page had a cc-by icon at the bottom right corner. Even though the photo collection is unable to display, but one of which had passed the license review. We can speculate this one was under the same license. Larryasou (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 08:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:isak-von-haartman.jpg

This image was originally uploaded to twitter/X by Isak von Haartman himself. Then later the swedish online magazine Dopest.se used it in a article they wrote about him. Therefore the image was wrongfully deleted. This picture is also the most up to date and most relevant image used in any articles written about the person in question. I will link the sources here.


https://twitter.com/von haartman/status/1169993776032563201?lang=bg

https://dopest.se/artists/isak-von-haartman/

--Satanaperkele96 (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

We cannot accept photographs from Twitter unless they're the type that automatically enters the public domain (U.S. Government works) or explicitly licensed under Creative Commons. We assume Twitter images to be copyrighted unless given evidence that they're not. Abzeronow (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose There has never been a file with that title on Commons. I checked several combinations of capitalization and the only thing that comes up is File:Isak von Haartman, 2018.jpg. Satanaperkele96 has made only one contribution of any kind here -- this UnDR.

Note that if von Haartman uploaded the file himself to Twitter/X, the copyright will be a question unless it is an obvious selfie. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, E. I should have thought of leaving out the dashes. As I noted, there's a copyright problem -- this is not a selfie, so von Haartman does not have the right to freely license it -- that right belongs to the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Эlcobbola and Jim. --Yann (talk) 08:33, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ichiro.sumple230918.jpg

この画像が何度か削除されています。 しかし著作権上、問題ないと思われます。 （最初に著作権的に問題とされた部分は、こちらの誤りだとわかり、変更しました）

commonsの削除歴を見た人によって、問題ない画像が消されるのは理解できません。 特に、消される理由がわかりません。

できれば理由を説明してほしい。こちらも問題ないことを説明させて頂きたく、お願いに伺いました。よろしくお願いします。 --Assa146 (talk) 00:56, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Obviously not, as per Эlcobbola. --Yann (talk) 08:31, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Android 4.4.2 Home screen.png

We should recover it given that the background image "File:Sierra Sunset.jpg" had been re-licensed CC0. Larryasou (talk) 02:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done obviously (see also this post for confirmation of authorship). @Larryasou: license and other information of the file page need to be checked tho. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pawel Kobierzewski.jpg

I’m kindly asking to undelete the file stated in the subject due to the fact that it is a possesion of the company I’m working for therefore I have rights to publish it on the internet. There was a misunderstading from my side on how to upload and describe the photos but now I’m aware of how to do that. Please, consider my request positively. --Justynakrzyszkowska (talk) 13:29, 19 September 2023 (UTC)19.09.2023 Justyna Krzyszkowska

 Oppose As you say, your claim of being the actual photographer was not correct. Please don’t make that mistake again.

The fact that your company has a paper or digital copy of the photograph says nothing about whether your company has the right to freely license it. That right is almost always held by the actual photographer. In order to restore the image here, either (a) the actual photographer must send a free license using VRT or (b) an authorized representative of your company must send a free license together with a copy of the written agreement with the actual photographer which gives your company the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

@Justynakrzyszkowska: Only the author (photographer) or another copyright holder can grant a license. Ask the photographer or the person who acquired copyright from the photographer (they would need to prove this) to follow VRT procedure. Ankry (talk) 15:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dideye Dito Snake.jpg

just undelete it. its not copyrighted, i litteraly made the comic — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.169.96.153 (talk • contribs)

  • False statement: it ‘’’is’’’ copyrighted; however it may be copyrighted by the uploader. But its deletion reason was unrelated to copyright. The image was deleted as out of scope. Ankry (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose the undeletion request and  Support Agreed with Ankry. For the IP, if you are indeed the author, 1. tell us on which Wikimedia page you intend to use this file. 2. please connect with your account, so we know it’s actually you.
PS: I see on User talk:ThatCheeseGuy that this account upladed other photo from internet, like Depositphotos or Shutterstock, it may me question the good faith of the claims here.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:12, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose VIGNERON, I’m confused. You say {{Pour}} which is the same as  Support, but you agree with Ankry, who didn’t explicitly say it but clearly opposes restoration, as do I. This image is a very crude copy of a comic which appears at https://dideyedito.wordpress.com/ – (Jump Rope – page down). There is no free license there. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Yes, I do support what Ankry said (and not supporting the request, obviously but I made it clearer, sorry about that). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Haus in Hohenwart 02.jpg

Bin aus Versehen selber auf die DELETE Taste gekommen! Chrisi1964 (talk) 17:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

 Info This was deleted by User:Ymblanter because the uploader filed a deletion request saying they uploaded it by mistake. It looks like the uploader later tried to remove the DR from the file. Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
I restored the file. Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: as above. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Minister Amr Talaat.jpg

This photo is of my own work and I want it to be reuploaded to wikipedia… it should be open access under a creative commons license: <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" /></a>
This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.

Riri2023 (talk) September 17,2023

 Support @Krd: Why was this speedy deleted when it was uploaded with a license and source? Thuresson (talk) 08:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 Info the source is {{Own}} and the image is “of outstanding or professional quality”. A written free license permision following VRT may always be requsted for such images. Ankry (talk) 12:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 Comment This (and other files by this user) was taken with a PhaseOne, so obviously a professional shot. Yann (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
@Ankry and Yann: Hmm, do we have evidence of prior publication? If not, then there’s no email address that this work can be provably associated with. Currently, we have a high-res photo with EXIF claimed to be own work by a random internet identity. If we get an email from VRT, we will still have a high-res photo with EXIF claimed to be own work by a random internet identity. We shouldn’t ask for VRT unless we have a clear idea of what specific kind of evidence we are seeking and why it cannot be obtained on-wiki. – King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Yes, I agree with that in this case, VRT won’t bring any more information. I would be more comfortable with a real name though. Yann (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Professional quality photos are generally made by professional photographers who are in most cases identifiable. Ankry (talk) 09:46, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: AGF. I added a word to uploader about professional photography. --Yann (talk) 08:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Гимн Приднестровской Молдавской Республики (на трёх языках).ogg

Under the license {{PD-PMR-exempt}}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.187.245.166 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 20 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose The composer was Boris Alexandrov 1905-1994. There is no reason to believe that he gave up his copyright under Moldavan law. Also, the performance recording has a copyright that has the same status. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TKHoldinglogo.jpg

I’m kindly asking to undelete the file stated in the subject due to the fact that it is a possesion of the company I’m working for therefore I have rights to publish it on the internet. It was designed in the office and I created this very file reconstructing the logo of the company. There was a misunderstading from my side on how to upload and describe the photos but now I’m aware of how to do that. Please, consider my request positively --Justynakrzyszkowska (talk) 08:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Justyna Krzyszkowska 20.09.2023

 Oppose Apart from the question of copyright and licensing, files should be useful for an educational purpose. It appears that this file is uploaded for the purpose of a vanity page, pl:Wikipedysta:Justynakrzyszkowska/TKHolding. Thuresson (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A man using a urinal.jpg

My name is Amin. Yesterday I received a message from a Wiki administrator, claiming that I had uploaded a photo to Wikipedia “primarily for the purpose of insulting, demeaning, or defaming a person..”.. The administrator deleted the photo without giving me a opportunity to discuss it.

The administrator deleted the photo based on assumptions that were incorrect. I had uploaded that photo with the full permission of my friend, and it was intended to inform, and not to insult or defame anyone. My friend who was in the picture and I both had a laugh about it. By now you must be curious about the photo. As it has been deleted by the administrator, you can still see a screenshot here, on a tweet that happened to go a bit viral, and my reply-tweet here.

I feel the administrator was wrong to delete the photo without any discussion. I would like to restore it. What would be my next step to do that? I welcome any help.

And if the administrator was right to delete it, I could accept that too. But I’d like to understand his arguments better. Because right now I feel they’re based on false assumptions and accusations. Small things like this slowly suck the fun out of reading and editing Wikipedia.

(I also posted about this in the Commons Teahouse which you can read here)

Thanks, Amin (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

 Support restoration (as mentioned in the other thread). It appears to me that the subject is in on the joke. Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Restored. See Special:Diff/803170228. Wutsje 17:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 08:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gmim logo.png

File:Gmim logo.png

Dibatalkan penghapusan karena dibutuhkan dalam beberapa artikel wikipedia dan telah sesuai dengan gambar resmi organisasi

(Crusade Ju (talk) 07:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC))

 Not done: Complex logo, no free license, no permission. Requester blocked for 3 months (third time) for uploading copyright violations. --Yann (talk) 08:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Else Hagen mural Hva skal jeg bli.jpg

We have VRT permission at ticket:2023082110009573 (I am a VRT agent for that queue).

✓ Done: @Jon Harald Søby: FYI. Please sign your requests. --Yann (talk) 09:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CathyJKT48.jpg

Maybe the image contains copyright from JKT48 but the image belongs to the person concerned or belongs to Cathy herself which I took via her Twitter, I will attach a link to the photo

https://twitter.com/N_CathyJKT48/status/1619982962845704192?t=4gFtogwBF-gYtgHnjq32hA&s=19

If the photo still cannot be returned, I don’t mind having the photo deleted, and I give permission to upload other photos so that they can be posted on Cathleen Nixie or Cathy JKT48’s page. There is a photo in question --DecaOnes (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: No permission. --Yann (talk) 17:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Museum Herisau AR Textilindustrie.jpg

There is a request for review per Ticket:2023090410003653. I need to see the image to assess whether there is a valid argument to use it. Can it be temporarily undeleted please? Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: , temporarily undeleted. Abzeronow (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: OK now. --Yann (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Android_Q_Logo.svg

Reason: this file has a different color but was removed as a duplicate. By the way, I marked this as a duplicate. Артём 13327 (talk) 14:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:29, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Arslan Ash wins EVO 2023.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Stephanie Lindgren allows Liquipedia to use her images so long she is credited as "Stephanie Lindgren - Esports Photographer (see:

https://liquipedia.net/fighters/File:Arslan_Ash_wins_EVO_2023.jpg)
Ash king100 (talk) 18:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose Sorry, but we need a free license. Please ask her to send a permission via COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:52, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Yann. The license quoted is for Liquipedia only and is not irrevocvable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:G-Dragon on M' Countdown - 4.jpg

These files seem to be deleted by accident according to the dialogue on User talk:KLIFE88. Given that some which had passed the license review, please consider recovering the rest.

--Larryasou (talk) 11:16, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 15:10, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Can 1972 (Heinrich Klaffs Collection 102).jpg

The file was licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.0 and then relicensed to CC-BY-SA-NC-2.0 on Flickr accroding the "License History" (seemingly a new feature). Since CC licenses are non-revocable, we should recover it. Larryasou (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

I don't see "License History" at https://www.flickr.com/photos/heiner1947/4409494480/sizes/l/in/set-72157623560321196/. Where do I find it? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
You should delete all characters starting from "/sizes". Larryasou (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Yes, should be o.k. Change to non-compliant license happened March 25, 2011, clearly after upload to Commons (2010). --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

ditto：

Larryasou (talk) 14:07, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: The license history link is at the bottom right of the main Flickr image page, in the Additional info section. It was introduced several months ago. --Rosenzweig τ 14:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 Support Thank you. I looked at five of these, picked at random, and they have the same licensing. One has to wonder why Flickr doesn't simply tell their users that a change from CC-BY to CC-BY-NC is meaningless and therefore not permitted since the CC-BY is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Two of them even had license reviews, which Jcb shouldn't have deleted in 2016. Added {{Flickr-change-of-license}} to all. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Azemat e bazyafteh - entesharat e universal cover book.jpg

This work is in the public domain in Iran (the country of origin) because its copyright holder was a legal entity and it was published more than 30 years ago (in 1976). w:Dino Attanasio had illustrated the comic book to fulfill a requisition by an Iranian company, Universal Publishers, so this counts as w:work for hire. On the rear cover of the book, it is explicitly mentioned:

حق چاپ، ترجمه، تقلید، اقتباس و عکسبرداری مخصوص و محفوظ و منحصر به شرکت انتشارات یونیورسال میباشد

— [The rights to print, translate, imitate, adapt and photographing are reserved and exclusive to Universal Publishing Company]

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 19:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:InfomediaLogo_blue_wide_RGB.svg

Our logo is wrong. We want to update it with this: https://infomedia.dk/wp-content/uploads/logo.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyOttey (talk • contribs) 14:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC) (UTC)

✓ Done as per Yann. Ankry (talk) 15:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:praveenpratapsingh.jpg

Its real person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40e5:3:4f9a:4554:94a5:b795:912e (talk • contribs) 17:37, 22 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Not done: No file by that name. Please log in, and provide a file name. --Yann (talk) 19:05, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Homepage of HAPPIEST BABY Website magnified on logo with magnifying glass (53146373502).jpg

Nothing copyrightable here. The logo is below the threshold of originality and the rest is sufficiently de minimis. The company seems to be located in the U.S. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KentSoul.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: khôi phục cho tao KentSoull (talk) 06:20, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Personal photos by non-contributors. Yann (talk) 09:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Saeed Zarei karyani.jpg

Eh3anzarei (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose Subject Q122160733 deleted at Wikidata for not being notable. Thuresson (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: COM:NOTHOST. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lanka 01.jpg.jpg

I confirm that this is my original work and I upolad it with the permision of Lanka Bandaranayake. --Eleithya (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

@Eleithya: No file with this name has been uploaded and you have not uploaded any files, please clarify. Thuresson (talk) 06:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:44, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tradition short film (2016).jpg File:Tlb2016.png File:Lanka.bandaranayake.jpg

I hereby affirm that I am Lanka Bandaranayake, the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the media[3] as shown here:

1 File tagging File:Tradition short film (2016).jpg 2 File tagging File:Tlb2016.png 3 File:Lanka.bandaranayake.jpg 4 File:Profile of Lanka Bandaranayake in 2020.jpg 5 File tagging File:Lanka 01.jpg 6 File tagging File:Tradition (2016).png 7 File tagging File:Tradition Presentation1.png 8 File tagging File:Lanka Bandaranayake1.jpg

, and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5]

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Lanka Bandaranayake [Sender's authority: Copyright holder] 24/09/2023 --Eleithya (talk) 07:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose For such documents, permission has to be verified via COM:VRT, with a proof that you are the copyright holder. For example, File:Lanka 01.jpg was copied from [8] which has a "All rights reserved" notice. Is Gabriel2954 (talk · contribs) you? If yes, do not create several accounts. Yann (talk) 09:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 10:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Heinrich Klaff Collection

Please recover the remainder as per COM:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-09#File:Can_1972_(Heinrich_Klaffs_Collection_102).jpg. Thank you.

--Larryasou (talk) 12:07, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

 Support they all were under CC-BY-SA 2.0 in Flickr while uploaded to Commons in October 2010 (non-commercial licensing is from March 2011). Ankry (talk) 19:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Update:

✓ Done: Added Flickr-change-of-license, clearly visible on the Flickr-Website of the files. --Emha (talk) 09:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Мажи на коњ во носија од Горна река.png

this is one of the many post that have been tagged as not having permission from the author

the author is unknown (as I found it off a facebook post), and the image has been made on 16th of july, 1939. Researched macedonian copyright laws, saw it takes 70 years after the author's death, and calculated 2023-70=1953. This image was taken WAY before 1953, so that's the main reason I believe that it should be undeleted.

Sincerely, Big ooga booga mf (talk) 15:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

 Support OK with {{PD-North Macedonia}} + {{PD-1996}}. Yann (talk) 16:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose If the photographer is anonymous, then a 1939 image would have been PD in North Macedonia in 2009. If the photographer is not anonymous, then the PD date would be later. In either case it is after the URAA date, so the image has a US copyright until at 1/1/2035. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: Please read the template I mentioned above. Prior to 1978, copyright duration was 25 years for pictures, so this attained the public domain in 1965, before the URAA date. Yann (talk) 18:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) @Yann: but it was 50 years since publication not 50 years since creation. If the publication on FB was the first publication of a photo from private collection, it may be still copyrighted in North Macedonia till 1.1.2091. I see no reason to assume that this personal photo was published soon after creation. Ankry (talk) 18:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
We usually assume it was published at the time of creation. If it left the custody of the photographer, we consider it published. Any publication between 1939 and 1970 would be fine. This is a typical case for COM:L#Old orphan works. Yann (talk) 20:46, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 Support Thank you, Yann. Although I don't agree that a photographer handing a single copy to a client constitutes publication, the date on the face of the image suggests to me that it was published soon after creation. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: per discussion. Public domain in country of origin and the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:51, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Maree Menzel self portrait.jpg

The photographer, Diane Micich, has given permission for this file to be uploaded. It is a self portrait of her late sister inherited by Diane. --Hartnell-young (talk) 05:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

@Hartnell-young: Please ask Diane Micich to send a permission for a free license via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 08:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 7 days. . .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Plakat Mermaids.jpg

File:Plakat Mermaids.jpg Filmplakat von unserem Film wurde gelöscht

Unser Filmplakat zum Film MERMAIDS DON'T CRY wurde anscheinend wegen einer Copyrightproblematik gelöscht. ABER: Wir als PRISMAFILM sind die Produzenten dieses Films und haben auch das Copyright inne.

Daher bitte um Wiederherstellung.

DANKE--Prismafilm (talk) 08:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Hallo @Prismafilm, auf Deiner Benutzerdiskussionsseite wurdest Du darauf hingewiesen, dass das Plakat eine mögliche Urheberrechtsverletzung darstellt und auf auf Commons:Deletion requests/File:Plakat Mermaids.jpg hättest Du das darstellen können. Aber das ist kein Beinbruch: bitte rufe https://wmts.dabpunkt.eu/freigabe3/ auf. Unser interaktiver Assistent wird Dich durch den Freigabeprozess leiten. Sobald die Freigabe eingetroffen ist, können wir die Datei wiederherstellen, sie ist nur temporär gelöscht. Falls Du Hilfe brauchst, sag' gerne hier Bescheid! Viele Grüße, Emha (talk) 09:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 7 days. . .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Flags of municipalities of Slovenia

Can you undelete the following flags? The flags are actually the public domain by the law. These includes coat of arms (that are PD) on these images.

Template:PD-Slovenia-exempt

  1. File:Flag of Ajdovščina.gif based off File:Coat of arms of municipality of Ajdovščina.png
  2. File:Flag of Brežice.gif based off File:BreziceGRB.png
  3. File:Flag of Črna na Koroškem.gif based off File:Črna na Koroškem.png
  4. File:Flag of Divača.gif based off File:Wappen Divaca.jpg
  5. File:Flag of Dobje.gif based off File:DobjeGrb.png
  6. File:Flag of Dobrovnik.gif based off File:Coat of arms of Dobrovnik.png
  7. File:Flag of Hodoš.gif based off File:Hodoš grb.png
  8. File:Flag of Jezersko.gif based off File:Coat of arms of Jezersko.png
  9. File:Flag of Kostanjevica na Krki.gif based off File:Coat of arm of Kostanjevica na Krki.png
  10. File:Flag of Kostel.gif based off File:Kostel.png
  11. File:Flag of Pivka.gif based off File:Pivka.Grb.png
  12. File:Flag of Radeče.gif based off File:Wappen Radeče.png
  13. File:Flag of Razkrižje.gif based off File:Coat of arms of Razkrižje.png
  14. File:Flag of Ribnica na Pohorju.gif based off File:Ribnica na Pohorju.png
  15. File:Flag of Rogašovci.gif based off File:Rogašovci.png
  16. File:Flag of Sveti Andraž v Slovenskih goricah.gif based off File:Sveti Andraž v Slovenskih goricah.png
  17. File:Flag of Sveti Jurij ob Ščavnici.gif based off File:Sveti Jurij.png
  18. File:Flag of Trnovska vas.gif based off File:Trnovska vas.png
  19. File:Flag of Veržej.gif based off File:Coat of arms of Veržej.png
  20. File:Flag of Vransko.gif based off File:Vransko.png
  21. File:Flag of Vuzenica.gif based off File:Vuzenica.png
  22. File:Flag of Žetale.gif based off File:COA-Žetale.gif

Alexphangia Talk 16:16, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

{{PD-Slovenia-exempt}} (which the files were marked with) does indeed mention ‘’municipal flags and coats of arms’’. The files were speedied by User:Yann after User:Εὐθυμένης had marked them with the {{Logo}} template, noting in the edit commentary “This logo exceeds the threshold of originality and therefore is subject to copyright.” Any comments? --Rosenzweig ‘’’’’τ’’’’’ 17:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
I don’t believe that the flags are calling my uploaded images as “logos”. Alexphangia Talk 17:20, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
The original designs are OK, but these are copied from crwflags.com. Not sure this is fine. I won’t oppose undeletion, but other opinions are welcome. Yann (talk) 18:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Well, for example the flag of the Netherlands is way to simple and it belongs to PD-shape, striking this image from crwflags is useless. Alexphangia Talk 08:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
And is the flags are public domain, Slovenian crw flag images should also be public domain by the law. Alexphangia Talk 08:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 Oppose Unless they are too simple to have a copyright, all of these have copyrights owned by the CRW creator. That is a general rule for works containing a coat of arms – individual renditions of the COA have a copyright belonging to the creator. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
@Rosenzweig and Jameslwoodward: the general rule don’t seem to apply here. And if it does, we should change {{PD-Slovenia-exempt}}. BTW, this request is about the flag, not the CoA (who have been - inconsistently - kept…). Also, more importantly, it seems that it’s indeed CRW that copied Wikimedia Commons in the first place… (https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/si-001.html#emb says the CoA is from 2010 but File:Coat of arms of municipality of Ajdovščina.png is from 2009 and has Croatian Academic and Research Network has source) If I’m not mistaken and if there is no objection, then I’ll undelete these flags. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

I object. The only element of the flags that has a copyright is the COAs and, as I said, individual realizations of COAs always have a copyright unless below the ToO. You say “the general rule doesn’t seem to apply here.” Why not? What evidence do you have for this assertion? Also, I note that the home page of the Croatian Academic and Research Network has an explicit copyright notice, so if that is the ultimate source of one or more of these flags, they are probably not copyright free. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: my “evidence” is that law applies beore general principle, and especially that the local law applies. I’m also assuming that {{PD-Slovenia-exempt}} is correct (especailly the point 2 and its comment, which is not unusual, PD-GOV is sometime extended to other official documents, including but not limited to the CoA).
If we follow your reasoning, then you should ask the CoA for deletion as well as {{PD-Slovenia-exempt}}.
For the CoA, either CRW copied Wikimedia or w:CARNET (the source of Wikimedia files themselves) but in both case, for the flags, « all of these have copyrights owned by the CRW creator. » is false as - as you said yourself - « The only element of the flags that has a copyright is the COAs ».
Finally, Željko Heimer website (previously on CARNET) is just gathering CoA (and creating flags out of it?) from the official website. These websites are following the local law, making the CoA free.
An example to make it more clear: File:Coat of arms of municipality of Ajdovščina.png has for source http://public.carnet.hr/fame/hrvat/si-obc01.html#si-aj wich is now https://zeljko-heimer-fame.from.hr/descr/si-obc01.html#si-aj90 where the CoA is just a 2005 copy from http://www.ajdovscina.si and from a 1990 official decree. I didn’t checked all files but most seems to be in the same situation.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
https://zeljko-heimer-fame.from.hr/descr/si-obc01.html#si-aj90 has:
”Copyright © 1996-2017 by Zeljko Heimer. All rights reserved.”
Yes, I think {{PD-Slovenia-exempt}} is incorrect in that while the blazons of CoAs are copyright exempt, individual representations require interpretation of the blazon and such interpretations have copyrights which belong to the creator. It is certainly possible that the creator of these has released them under CC-0 or that the creator was a government employee which might make them free, but so far the trail leads to an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: but Zeljko Heimer is not the creator of the CoA, so it’s copyfraud and the copyright claim doesn’t mean anything. The source is the city (which give very detail instruction - including the exact Pantone colour - it’s more a logo than a CoA, which may or mya not make a legal difference).
Do you have proof of your interpretation of the Slovenian law? Maybe @TadejM: (who wrote this sentence in the template) could give more details.
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 20:17, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
As I have been pinged: I don’t object to the undeletion of those CoAs that are either too simple or meet the {{PD-Slovenia}} criteria (i.e. they were published under state/municipal jurisdiction as part of the official text, its annex or independently). The study referenced in the template explicitly states that under the said article a work qualifies as free if published ‘v okviru uradnih pristojnosti’ (p. 28), which means that a CoA should be considered free if published ‘in the context of official competences’. However, if a CoA has only been published on CRW, in the absence of proof to the contrary, it should be considered copyrighted to CRW. Here, it doesn’t matter whether the site owner created it from a blazon or derived it from an image published by the municipality as long as it meets the criteria for an author’s work. --TadejM (t/p) 21:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
@Alexphangia: you indicated CRW as the source but CRW is a secondary database so it can be the real source here. Could you *for each file* indicate the true source? It would help a lot.
@TadejM: does a municipal website count as an exception under the Slovenian law? Or does it have to be explicitely an official municipal law? (I think it’s also the case, but see my previous point).
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
I don't think all content published on municipal websites should be considered free. There was no copyright-related case in Slovenia regarding municipal coats of arms, but there was a case in Slovenian High Court regarding questionnaires for final exams in Slovenian grammar schools. They were considered public domain as they had been prepared and published under an official procedure with official conclusions (please see the footnotes on p. 31). Per analogy, this would lead me to consider municipal coats of arms public domain if they had been published following an official procedure, for example as a part of the municipal charter (example). In any case, please note again that the case law is lacking and the court could finally decide differently. --TadejM (t/p) 18:15, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: Stalled. No consensus to undelete. --Yann (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pita Limjaroenrat, May 2023 press conference (1).png

Assuming this was an accident, for some reason a screenshot I uploaded from a Voice of America (VOA) video was removed. The content produced by VOA is under a public domain license, as the official broadcaster of the Federal government. The screenshot was apparently removed along with a swath of other media that was in fact produced by the Thai Government (which does not produce public domain media) that was uploaded by User:Kohptrp2023. What’s weird is I cannot find the screenshot in the list (the file’s deletion entry) of other deleted media that it was apparently included with. The media uploaded was from VOA only and not other sources, and is thus licensed under the public domain. Bobertrobert0709 (talk) 03:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC) {{PD-USGov-VOA}}

@Bobertrobert0709 Do you have a link to the source in VOA? Notice that only the content produced by VOA is public domain and some of their articles and videos have third party content with a different licensing. This is made clear in their T&C. For example, the images in this article are from Reuters. Günther Frager (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 Info the source provided at upload is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBaFgyPv1OE Ankry (talk) 19:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
 Support I checked the link provided by Ankdry and there is no mention to other news agencies like Reuters or AP. The YT video has no CC-BY mark and it is understandable if VOA release their content to the pubic domain. One can also find the same video here where VOA terms and conditions apply. The reporter is Vijitra Duangdee and seems to be a freelance journalist. VOA has an office in Bangkok [9], so the footage is more than likely to belong to VOA. Günther Frager (talk) 20:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Günther Frager. --Yann (talk) 10:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Locust-logo.png

Hi,

The file could be find in the Locust's github code repository at the address:https://github.com/locustio/locust/blob/master/locust/static/img/logo.png The whole project is release under The MIT license (https://github.com/locustio/locust/blob/master/LICENSE) so I guess the logo is covered by it, no? Is this licence is not compatible with wikicommons? I pretty sure I could ask the original creator more info if needed.

I upload another image from this repository: File:Locust-screenshot 2.13.1.png, should I add more details so it won't be deleted ?

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teenage (talk • contribs)

 Support undeletion as {{MIT}}. Ankry (talk) 14:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 10:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pallabi_Dutta_Baruah.jpg

User Pallabi Dutta.Baruah is an active editor in Assamese Wikimedia projects. This photo is valuable to the Assamese wm community for her identity. In addition, There are only a few women working in the Assamese wm community, so we should encourage their work rather than disappoint them. The reason this photo has been deleted is F10 "Personal photos by non-contributors" doesn't fit here, as she has made more than 5,000 contributions so far. Please check CA here. দিব্য দত্ত (talk) 19:52, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:32, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EFLAHAUT.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2023092710002291. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:49, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. Please add the license. --Yann (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:National Anthem of the DR Congo.ogg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The file does not come with copyright Dyla-t-c (talk) 03:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose The source is a Youtube video, and it doesn't specify if the recording has a free license. The anthem itself maybe be on the public domain (I'm not sure as it is a composition from 1960), but recordings (i.e. derivative works) have their own copyright. Günther Frager (talk) 11:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Günther Frager. --Yann (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo-stacked-yellow-grey.png

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo-stacked-yellow-grey.png. Since it was below COM:TOO US and COM:INUSE, the license could have easily been fixed by using the company's website as the source and using the PD-textlogo template. I can't see why undeletion isn't the right decision, but if it isn't, you'll explain why. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Original image uploaded. @Ikan Kekek: Could you please add categories? --Yann (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rotonde Lac-Édouard ph-014383.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2023092310003635. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Statue of Bo'orchu in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.jpg

To transfer to en.wiki under it's fair use content criteria. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: Temporarily undeleted for transfer to en.wp; please transfer within two days. --Rosenzweig τ 14:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Jacques_Maire_en_2023

Tha authorization has been granted and sent by the author to Wikimedia. We have received the following email :--Pluto112 (talk) 13:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Bonsoir Églantine Volker,

Merci pour votre courriel.

Nous avons bien reçu l'autorisation pour cette image et nous avons fait les modifications nécessaires sur la page de description.

Merci d'avoir mis à disposition cette illustration et pour votre contribution à Wikimedia Commons.

Cordialement,

Otto Ottensen

-- Wikimedia Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/

✓ Done: Ok now. --Yann (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Unauthorised Access to Credit Data in the TE Credit Reference System.pdf

This file was deleted and redirected to File:Hacker’s Intrusion into the Email System of Nikkei China (Hong Kong) Limited.pdf, which had the wrong, File:Unauthorised Access to Credit Data in the TE Credit Reference System.pdf uploaded instead. However, the redirect was in the wrong direction. "Hacker's Intrusion" should have been redirected to "Unauthorised access" instead. I have now uploaded the correct version for "Hacker's intrusion" and File:Unauthorised Access to Credit Data in the TE Credit Reference System.pdf should be undeleted. Kanwenjian (talk) 09:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

 Question These are essentially plain text PDF files (with the single exception of a simple logo on the title page). Are they even in project scope? See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. --Rosenzweig τ 14:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
The file is being transcribed on English Wikisource as a government document of value, which makes it in scope on Commons according to Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. The deletion and redirection of the file made the transcription unable to continue. Kanwenjian (talk) 18:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gael Rakotondrabe Piano wiki.jpg

Hello,

This picture has never been diffused anywhere as I am the rightholder for it. I even double checked with a google image reverse search, and there is no match, it has never been uploaded online by someone else.

Is it possible to put it back on Gael Rakotondrabe's French wikipedia page please?

Thank you for your help.

Sincerely Yours,

--ALTWIKI23 (talk) 13:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Oppose if you are the right holder, then follow the instructions on COM:VRT. The image was deleted because it had no explicit permission. Günther Frager (talk) 13:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
@ALTWIKI23: Could you please clarify why you are the rightholder? Are you the photographer or were the rights assigned to you by contract? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Abzeronow. --Yann (talk) 20:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bänz Friedli (2022).jpg

You have deleted the file Bänz Friedli (2022) from the wiki page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A4nz_Friedli. But it is an official photo of him and we have the rights to publish and use the photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aplusvier (talk • contribs) 18:24, 27 September 2023‎ (UTC)

 Oppose As stated in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bänz Friedli (2022).jpg, we require confirmation from COM:VRT. The photograph will be restored if and when permission is approved Abzeronow (talk) 19:04, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Abzeronow. --Yann (talk) 20:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The sun1.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Bizarre deletion for lack of permission, see w:Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 September 23 * Pppery * it has begun... 01:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

 Question This file was originally transferred here from en:File:The sun1.jpg (the file was restored there today). Are we sure this is the own work of the original uploader en:User:Lykaestria? It was originally uploaded with just a GFDL license tag, without any authorship information or claim of "own work" etc. Which may have been the norm at en.wp in 2005, just checking. The 2017 "no permission" tags may have been because of that, or because of some other later file versions (seen as potential copyvios, uploaded by others) overwriting the original file. --Rosenzweig τ 14:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
@Rosenzweig: Standards were definitely more lax then. In fact, prior to 2007 we didn't even require COM:VRT for files not claimed to be own work, for the obvious reason that VRT didn't exist (see COM:GOF). I think we can assume that any file from that era lacking an explicit authorship claim, which is reasonably likely to have been own work (based on a combination of factors such as the subject matter and the uploader's track record), is in fact own work. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
OK, then I  Support the undeletion (of the originally transferred file). --Rosenzweig τ 09:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: following the disussion of the Undeletion request. --Emha (talk) 13:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:What We Bring Album Cover.jpg

I am requesting the undeletion of the What We Bring Album Cover to be used on the What We Bring Wikipedia existing page.

according to this link, https://www.discogs.com/release/11871040-Ben-Wendel-What-We-Bring , Motéma Music LLC has the permission for the file to be used on wiki commons.

I have checked with both the artist, Ben Wendel, and his team at Motema Music to confirm that we can use this file. Please let me know if you can recover this file.

--Saxofun200 (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

@Saxofun200 The link says nothing about Commos / Wikipedia / Wikimedia and it would not be relevant as anyone can edit Discogs. If you contacted the musician and they are willing to license the cover album under a free license, please tell them to send an explicit permission to COM:VRT. Günther Frager (talk) 20:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Günther Frager. --Yann (talk) 11:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Yo mismo realicé la vectorización y uní todos los objetos

Estoy realizando la vectorización y puesta en público de los escudos y logos de las instituciones educativas municipales de Pitalito. Lo hago en Inkscape. --138.117.87.172 10:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: No file name provided. Please log in, and provide a file name. --Yann (talk) 11:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FernandoCornejo2.png

VRT agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2023081910000308 regarding File:FernandoCornejo2.png. Please restore in order to verify the veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Yann (talk) 13:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2023-09&oldid=806434776"