Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-11

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Topless on cruise ship.jpg

Deleted as out of scope, with no discussion, based on a mass deletion request. This happened even though a specific discussion gave specific reasons that the file is in scope and was closed as "keep". There are no images currently available on Commons that claim to depict pregnancy stretch marks. Brianjd (talk) 15:23, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Category:Stretch marks has plenty of photos, including a photo of Travis Walls. Thuresson (talk) 16:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Obviously my initial search was not very good. There are four images in that category, which I categorised. Not having seen the nominated image, I cannot compare them. Brianjd (talk) 11:24, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

The photo shows a woman sunbathing topless (her face is not visible). There is nothing in the image description that says her stretch marks comes from a pregnancy. Thuresson (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 17:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paddy Roy Bates.jpg

File was in use on many languages of Wikipedia (log). The file needs to be re-uploaded to those that will accept it. Senator2029 09:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

@Senator2029: Which wiki do you want to upload the image to? Ankry (talk) 13:15, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Primarily enwiki, but the file was used on many (as shown in the delinker log) so will try to do some of those also. Senator2029 14:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

enwiki already has the same photo, en:File:Paddy Roy Bates.png. Thuresson (talk) 15:27, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Not done not needed to undelete. Ankry (talk) 17:25, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Gruene-bt-fraktion

In January 2020, a mass deletion request concerning uploads by Gruene-bt-fraktion was rejected for the following reasons, quoting from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gruene-bt-fraktion:

"The user is already authorized by the OTRS team --> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Gruene-bt-fraktion. The account is an official account of the GRUENE faction in the german Bundestag, the author of the pictures has authorized the publication by the faction _and_ is working for the faction himself. There is no need to delete these pictures. Bernd Fiedler (WMDE) (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2020 (UTC)"
"Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the situation here is very clear. OTRS is set. Stefan Kaminski is part of "Gruene-bt-fraktion". --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)"

Seemingly ignoring this decision, the above three files were deleted anyway a week later. Perhaps the deleting admin was not aware of the situation. I am requesting an undeletion of the listed three files for the quoted reasons above. Thank you. --Fippe 18:50, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Pinging @Arthur Crbz and Minorax: for comments. Noting, that the files were not marked as kept in the DR by closing admin. Was this the deletion reason? Ankry (talk) 21:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Restored per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gruene-bt-fraktion as no objection. Ankry (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Done undeleted and marked as kept in the UDR. Ankry (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rfc wiki.png

Ese diseño NO OFICIAL, es total y absolutamente mi creación. No se de que manera se prueba que un dibujo es propio, pero claramente no lo van a ver en ningun otro lugar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sendoh 777 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Sendoh 777: Please, explain why this personal art is in COM:SCOPE? Ankry (talk) 17:22, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Not done No response. Ankry (talk) 10:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Генерал-лейтенант Олександр Іванович Рижов. 1945.jpg

This is my foto. I have copyright. Олександр Петрик-Петровський (talk) 09:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Oppose @Олександр Петрик-Петровський: You were notified on your talk page that this could be resolved via OTRS. You need to send there a free license permission and prove that you are the copyright holder, i.e. that you are the photographer who made this photo in 1945 or you are tha photographer's heir or that you have a signed copyright transfer contract with the photographer. We cannot undelete the photo prior that this procedure uis finished. Ankry (talk) 10:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Not done, no response. Fair use at Файл:Рыжов Александр Иванович.jpg. Subject is Red Army general Alexander Ryzhov. Thuresson (talk) 15:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paco_Montesinos_2019.jpg

VRT agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021102010010026 regarding File:Paco_Montesinos_2019.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 09:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 10:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WH40K Corvus Space Marine.png

Check the author's page, he has a note saying he has released it under Creative Commons.

http://www.coolminiornot.com/422889

Oppose It's still Games Workshop Space Marine figurine, even if the coloring is released under a free license.--Prosfilaes (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

@Prosfilaes: Games Workshop's lawyers have explicitly stated that they do not claim copyright over third-party photos of their minis. Kurzon (talk) 15:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC) Template:GamesWorkshop Oppose See Commons:Deletion requests/Template:GamesWorkshop . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Info The DR is still open. Ankry (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Not done No need to keep this open indefinitely. If the template is kept at DR, then all images subject to that template may be summarily undeleted. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Forma squadrata con taglio

The category was emptied after a short discussion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prato-01,02,2012-Monumento di Henry Moore con neve.jpg, by Infrogmation of New Orleans. Nor the authors were notified, nor the files were listed for a discussion with the possibility of adding the tag "Undelete in 2057". Most of all, Wikimedia Italia had received a specific OTRS authorization for uploading images of this monument during the last 3 editions of Wiki Loves Monuments. Therefore most of those images had to be kept.

Affected files are:

Files should be restored first, than divided between the WLM uploads and the non-WLM uploads: the seconds can be then deleted.

The following files were also cancelled without listing or informing the authors. As far as I know, they are not authorized, so in a regular cancellation procedure they will be probably deleted. They should be restored, listed in a deletion discussion, and then listed for 2057 undeletion.

More information about Wiki Loves Monuments in Italy authorizations can be asked to users Alexmar983, Sannita and Marta Arosio (WMIT)

Thank you --Sailko (talk) 15:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Forma squadrata con taglio. Many of these were deleted without having been tagged, so they were effectively speedily deleted. This is prohibited by COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:seleclogo.png

The owner has granted permission to use the logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Preshitkale (talk • contribs) 08:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC) --Preshitkale (talk) 08:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Where is said permission? Did the owner send it to OTRS? --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done unresponded crucial question. Ankry (talk) 14:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jose Maria Benito Serra - Misionero.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Jose Maria Benito Serra - Misionero.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: This file is requested to be undeleted by the user Raderich on JuTa's talkpage by the rationale This is a copy of a photo of the 1870s (!). It's not a derivative work and it has no copyright. The source should be specified, but that's no reason to delete it. I'll look for source but could you please restore it?

I think this is the correct forum for discussing this. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here} 10:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

You should have provided a source, which you didn't. Instead you claimed it as own work and gave your username as the author/photographer. Also, the self-CC license is wrong, as it's not your work. So, there is some work for you to do. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Túrelio, I didn't upload it to begin with. It was a newcomer who did it. I just liked this uncopyrighted photo and I would like it back. Please restore it and I'll make the license right.--Raderich (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok, as my colleague JuTa wasn't online since 9 days, I'll do it conditionally. I thought to answer/address the uploader, as they are usually requesting, but as I see now, none of you was the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

@Contributers2020, Raderich, and Elena Magariños: Please note, that the photo may be redeleted soon if noone provides correct authorship/date/source/copyright info. We cannot host photos with false copyright claims. Ankry (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, Ankry!--Raderich (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Done by Túrelio. Ankry (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gera Mihály.jpg to undelete

This photo was used with the permission of the photographer. He also sent an e-mail to the permission-hu@wikimedia.org e-mail address on 25th of October with the requested letter (please find it below), that it's his photo and that he agrees that Wikimedia uses it. So please undelete this photo. The page was made on the 90th anniversary of Mihály Gera's (Hungarian photo historian) birthday with the permission of his widower.

Kijelentem, hogy az alábbi kép(ek) szerzői jogainak tulajdonosaként jogosult vagyok a képek szerzői jogairól nyilatkozni:

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gera_Mih%C3%A1ly#/media/F%C3%A1jl:Gera_Mih%C3%A1ly.jpg Beleegyezem, hogy a képek a Wikimédia-projektek oldalain a „Nevezd meg! – Így add tovább! 4.0” (CC-BY-SA 4.0) licenc alatt kerüljenek közzétételre.

A hozzájárulás nem korlátozódik a Wikipédiára, vagy az ahhoz kapcsolódó oldalakra. Elfogadom, hogy biztosítom a jogot a képek terjesztésére, kereskedelmi vagy nemkereskedelmi célból történő felhasználására, vagy igény szerinti módosítására, amennyiben betartják ezen licenc és a törvények szabta feltételeket.

Kérem, hogy engem mint szerzőt az alábbi módon jelöljenek meg:

Gaál Zoltán Jelen engedélyemmel szerzői jogaimról nem mondok le, de a mások által végzett módosítások nem lesznek nekem tulajdonítva.

Elfogadom, hogy ezt a beleegyezésemet nem vonhatom vissza. Tudomásul veszem, hogy a képeket a Wikimédia-projektek nem biztos, hogy örökké megőrzik.

2021 October 25 Gaál Zoltán — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertCapaCenter (talk • contribs) 12:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Then why was said permission not mentioned on the file-page? Instead, you, User:RobertCapaCenter, claimed it as own work. --Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose If a VRT permission is required per policy, we should not undelete the image until the permission is verified and accepted. If you have doubts or questions concerning this permission processing, you can ask a question inb COM:ON. Seven days is not long time in permission processing. Ankry (talk) 16:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Done Ticket:2021102510007816. @Ankry: That's not correct. Anything with a ticket gets a 30-day grace period, and we shouldn't punish the uploader for getting an extremely convoluted upload form wrong. It is extremely non-obvious that they should use a {{subst:OP}} tag when uploading to prevent the image from being tagged for deletion. I have loudly complained about this problem, but since much of the Upload Wizard interface lives on TranslateWiki it's not so simple for a Commoner to fix. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Apple_Pay_Availability.svg

Hi! This is regarding the MAP for availability of ApplePay. The current map is not interact-able as the map that used to be used before. The previous map can be interacted by hovering over the map and check the countries name. I have given the link to the original Map link below. Do check it out and compare with the current version. Hope this is taken into consideration and the map is reverted back to the original map. Thank you!

old Map link: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Apple_Pay_Availability.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maimulhk (talk • contribs) 08:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done Not an undeletion request: nothing to do here. Ankry (talk) 14:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Raïga Clémenceau - Pétition en faveur de la renaissance de la bactériophagie thérapeutique.jpg

We have permission per Ticket:2021101910009166. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 14:48, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AntonioGanRet.jpg

The picture of the file belongs to my family; Antonio Gan was my uncle. We allow all the permissions to make the picture public. Mjimenezale (talk) 12:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

@Mjimenezale: Copyright by default belongs to the photographer unless transferred in a contract or by oparation of law until expired. If you own copyright, please, provide evidence for this through VRT process together with a written free license permission. Ankry (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Ankry. Please see COM:VRT. --Yann (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Juwel Chowdhury.jpg

Please restore this file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juwel khan Abir (talk • contribs) 19:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC+8)

Comment this is likely the same request as Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-09#File:Juwel Chowdhury.jpg. The user seems to have created a new account (likely forgotten the password?). But at any case, Oppose as there is no compelling reason to restore. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
The uploader is blocked for sockpuppetry and both photos uploaded under this name are out of COM:SCOPE. Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juwel Chowdhury.jpg Ankry (talk) 16:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Le 2 generazioni di Lancia Ypsilon a confronto.jpeg

I ask for the cancellation of the deletion of the file in question as the photo is entirely my work and consequently I do not understand why the photo has been deleted for copyright infringement if the author is me .. Furthermore, being a wikipedia user only a few months ago, I would like to receive a clarification on the error that caused the deletion of the photo in such a way as not to commit it anymore to post the photo without problems. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lancia Dude (talk • contribs) 15:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Lancia Dude: The image has been deleted as no license was declared at upload nor any other licensing info was provided. Per policy, we cannot host images without a free license. ~In order to undelete the photo, Andrea Ciolli, who was declared as the author, needs to provide a free license following COM:VRT procedure. Ankry (talk) 16:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per above. Ankry (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Photos by Dominique Suisse

Please restore

We have permission per Ticket:2021102510005827. The artist's and photographer's attribution in those files is probably not correct. I will correct them once the files have been restored.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 20:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:François Jonquet (2).jpg

Please restore. We have permission per Ticket:2021102710010059. --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:50, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Y-blokka.jpg

It was a mistake because I am owner of Windriver AS and have all rights for publishing this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elifir (talk • contribs) 21:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close. From the instructions: "Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted". Please discuss this file at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Elifir. Thuresson (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Seal of the ASMLA.png

It is the official seal of the ASMLA and it is available at the official website @ https://www.ahwazna.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alirwez061 (talk • contribs) 16:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose Fair use at en:File:Arab Struggle Movement for the Liberation of Ahwaz logo.png. Thuresson (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per © The Arab Struggle Movement For The Liberation Of Al Ahwaz 2021 and lack of free license declaration on the abovementioned source page. Ankry (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per COM:Fair Use. Ankry (talk) 20:37, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Armenian place names renamed in Turkey.png

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Armenian place names renamed in Turkey.png is a mistake, as explained at this better-attended deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Armenian places renamed.svg. The crux of the matter is that while the original map is subject to copyright for its creative elements, the data displayed on the map (the list of places renamed and their locations) is not subject to copyright. Buidhe (talk) 18:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Notifying @Randam and Ellywa: the deletion nominator and the deleting admin about this discussion. Ankry (talk) 20:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Done and reopened the DR. Ankry (talk) 06:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Structure of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy.png

This file was not copied from the above source. But from 7. Száray Miklós: Történelem III. a középiskolák számára. Budapest, NTK, 2012. The figures in which are under Creative Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belomaad (talk • contribs) 20:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Where is evidence tahat it is under CC-BY-SA 4.0 license and that Belomaad is required to be attributed as its author? Incorrect attribution in CC licenses is copyright violation. Ankry (talk) 20:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done No response to the crucial question. Ankry (talk) 06:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Luke Skywalker - Welcome Banner.jpg

Hello !

File:Luke Skywalker - Welcome Banner.jpg was published under a free license by the official Star Wars account on Flickr : [1].

Best regards --Cody escouade delta (d) 08:40, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

@Di (they-them) and NahidSultan: notifying the deletion nominator and the deleting admin. Ankry (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: Restored. Thanks. ~ Nahid ^Talk 05:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andrzej Bułat.jpg

A proper agreement from copyright owner representative has just been received at VTRS, so please undelete. See ticket:2021102810006473. Polimerek (talk) 13:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Done by Julo. Ankry (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sir John Woodroffe.jpg

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Sir_John_Woodroffe.jpg This photo of Sir John Woodroffe was taken in 1928. See https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw173985/Sir-John-George-Woodroffe {{PD-UK-unknown}} --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 22:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

@Rédacteur Tibet: But when it was published? Do you suggest that it was uploaded to Wikimedia prior to NPG publication, ot that NPG exhibited that photo more than 70 years ago (while they own it since 1989)? US copyright is another issue. Also ruwiki claim that this book has been published before 1951 seems dubious. Ankry (talk) 06:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

There is no reason to think that it was not published in 1928. However it will only be in the public domain in USA in 1928 + 95 = 2023 (December 31st). Regards, Yann (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done as per Yann: not PD in US. Ankry (talk) 09:09, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Amber Richards.png

Reason for request: I am the source of the work and did not provide source information before deletion. The picture was taken by me and is part of my personal collection. Please undelete the photo. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirlance86 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Sirlance86: As somebody declared that your own work declaration here is dubious you need either provide a public evidence of your authorship in public or contact VRT and convince that that you were indeed the photographer in 1990s. Ankry (talk) 06:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 09:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tyler Menezes CodeDay.jpg

I tried to upload this file but it says it was deleted for no permission. The file is linked on the page https://www.codeday.org/press which says: "The assets on this page are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" I think this is the same license that Wikipedia uses itself so I don't see why it would be a problem. I am just learning to edit Wikipedia so sorry if I am wrong.

--Dreamedofpie (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Didym: for any comment. Thuresson (talk) 17:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment The declared source of the photo was https://codeday.org/atlanta/photos, which no longer exist so we cannot verify whether there was a CC license declaration there or not. However, as the photo is among other photos on https://www.codeday.org/press I

Support undeletion. Ankry (talk) 19:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Done per above. Ankry (talk) 09:05, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Justo Ulloa.jpg

== [[File:Justo Ulloa.jpg|thumb|Fotografía de don Justo Ulloa Acuña.]] ==

Hola,

la fotografía corresponde a una imagen familiar, pero que es de autoría propia. Tuve problemas con especificar lo anterior por que la familia desconocía como darme los derechos de imagen. Ahora los subí como autoría propia por deseo de estos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by McRabbity (talk • contribs) 16:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Info The article es:Justo Ulloa has been tagged for speedy deletion. Thuresson (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

In order to resolve copyright issues, the actual photographer (or their heirs) need to send a free license permission to VRT.
In ortes to resolve scope issues, the Wikipedia article needs to be accepted.

Oppose until both are resolved. Ankry (talk) 19:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, per Ankry. Thuresson (talk) 05:51, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rarepepess_-_the_1st_Sports_NFT_in_history.png

the file is my own creation and I can prove it through bitcoin wallet digital signature, and i didn't enter in any subsequent contract that forbid me to use it, neither in whole, nor in parts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohmannomma (talk • contribs) 00:56, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Pepe the frog illustration; you are not Matt Furie. Thuresson (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Purchasing the right to create a Rarepepe does not mean that you can relicence it for free use to anybody else. Such creations are usually for personal use only and uploading them here would still require consent from Matt Furie. Please see COM:Derivative works. De728631 (talk) 21:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per above: no free license from Matt Furie. Ankry (talk) 15:47, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nccproductionplant17.png

Please undelete this file. File owner already confirmed via Ticket:2021102810010191. Thanks —MdsShakil (talk) 08:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Done @MdsShakil: FYI. Ankry (talk) 09:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: Valid VRT ticket has been applied. --De728631 (talk) 13:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Keyshia Cole USO Show at Vogelweh Air Base in Germany.jpg

This is Alan image of American singer Keyshia Cole performing in 2013. A deletion request has been made for the image because it seems to be a copyright violation. I do not think that it is because if you go to the Flickr link you can check the rights that were added to the photo and it is under CC BY 2.0 license. I made sure I followed the rules listed under the license which means that I could share it but also make sure I give rightful credit to the owners in which I did hence why the author and copyright holder of the photo are listed in the information box and the metadata box. Fullmoon211 (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose The licence at Flickr is a no-derivatives and non-commercial one, which is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons. All uploads here need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose including commercial reuse and adapting the original work. De728631 (talk) 13:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose As stated above, the licence is CC BY-NC-ND 2.0, which is not the same as CC BY 2.0. Also, you created the undeletion request before the file was actually deleted: you should not do that. Brianjd (talk) 13:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done Non-acceptable license. Ankry (talk) 15:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kophilp.jpg

Deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kophilp.jpg. The only contributors to the discussion were the uploader and a sockpuppet of the uploader.

The DR, considered in isolation, seems valid. But note that similar DRs by this uploader and their sockpuppets, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yabbies.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Butchers Shop.jpg, were closed as "keep". Regarding the first of these, also see User talk:Jameslwoodward#Deletion 2. It would seem that all these DRs should be closed in the same manner, ie either undelete this file or delete the others. Brianjd (talk) 11:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose It was a cropped version of this image so it may well have been a copyright infringement. Unless we can determine that the original is out of copyright, this file should not be undeleted. De728631 (talk) 13:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done copyvio. Ankry (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/First versions of files uploaded by User:Gikü

Posting these here only to use Restore a lot.

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: done per my own request -- see my talk page for discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lea Birringer.jpg und File:Violinist Lea Birringer crop.jpg

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

hiermit beantrage ich die Wiederherstellung des Bildes Lea Birringer.jpg und Violinist Lea Birringer crop.jpg. Die Lizenzfreigabe wurde an permission-de@wikimedia.org übersendet (Vorgangs-Nummer: 4328-ee8563711c062753 und 4329-cd0400c986a6a9cf).

Danke und viele Grüße Benedikt Dultmeier (AlfonsoSB) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlfonsoSB (talk • contribs) 11:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose When the request is reviewed and approved, the files will be restored automatically. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Which has happened this moment. OTRS was very fast this time.--Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Done by Krd per VRTS ticket.

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:banikokddoubrava-1000x1000.png

Logo jest dostępne do pobrania na stronach internetowych klubu i nie jest objęte żadnymi prawami autorskimi. Chodzi o logo, które jest wolnie dostępne. Dziękuję — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dušan Kolouch (talk • contribs) 12:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose That is not how copyright works. Being available online does not mean that something is not copyrighted and can by used by anyone. Almost any recent images are automatically copyrighted and non-free once they get created. This logo is creative enough to be copyrighted, so we cannot keep it without permission. De728631 (talk) 13:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
@Dušan Kolouch: Dostępność logo nie oznacza nieodwołalnej swobody jego wykorzystywania przez kogokolwiek w dowolnym celu. Taką swobodę zapewnia jedynie wolna licencja udzielona przez właściciela wyłącznych majątkowych praw autorskich do logotypu. Wszystkie logotypy zamieszczane na Commons, które nie są na tyle trywialne by nie podlegać ochronie oraz do których prawa autorskie jeszcze nie wygasły, wymagają licencji zgodnej z wymaganiami Commons. Oppose bez wskazania takiej licencji lub przesłania jej przez właściciela praw do VRT. Ankry (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

donation assignment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ealonsocruz99 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Ealonsocruz99: File:Example.jpg is not deleted and you have no deleted contribution. So which deleted file do you wish to be undeleted? (and then, why; referring to the deletion reason) Ankry (talk) 15:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: No file name given. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tekhelet ties.jpg

This was deleted stating that it does not comply with the licensing of the picture. However from my understanding this picture was allowed under the free common use laws.Zackdu (talk) 16:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zackdu (talk • contribs) 15:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose This comes from Flickr with the license CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0. This is not a free license, as derivative works and commercial uses are not allowed. We need a formal written permission from the copyright holder for a free license. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

... or license change on Flickr. Ankry (talk) 11:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done for now: commons-incompatible license. Ankry (talk) 11:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ikuska Dokumentalak digitalean.png

Please restore. We have permission per Ticket:2021110410010162. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Mussklprozz: Please insert the final VRT template. --De728631 (talk) 21:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UnionBank Plaza.jpg

There is no FOP in the Philippines, therefore the image could only be hosted in the English Wikipedia mainspace. Requesting temporary undeletion.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

@Hariboneagle927: There is no upload record here for a file named File:UnionBank Plaza.jpg. Are you sure that is the correct file name? De728631 (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No file name given. --Yann (talk) 08:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Niederhorn Sessellift AK Gabler.jpg

The file was deleted because of missing permission information. I had not been able to find the code needed for this image (Swiss postcard published c. 1946/47). After searching some more, I found the Creative Commons License Deed CC0 1.0. There is no copyright note for the publisher on the back of the card, so I assume this permission will allow the file to be published now. --Freely44 (talk) 16:37, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@JuTa: notifying the deleting admin. Ankry (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Freely44: To be valid, the CC0 license must be granted by the postcard copyright holder who is either the photographer or the publisher. If there is no authorship mentioned on the postcard, it can likely be cosidered {{PD-anon-70}} in Switzerland. However, we probably have US copyright problem. Per URAA, if the postcard was not PD in the country of origin (assuming Switzerland) on 1.1.1996, it is copyrighted in US 95 years since publication (assuming till 1.1.2042). Ankry (talk) 19:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Support Qualifies for {{PD-Switzerland-photo-non-individual-50-years}} and just meets the URAA cutoff date to be {{PD-1996}}. De728631 (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment If published in 1946, then it is off one year to qualify: for a 1946 anonymous publication 50-year copyright expired on 1.1.1997. Ankry (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Agreed. At least one year off. The URAA date is 1.1.1996. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward)

(talk to me) 15:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC) The publisher died 1961, photographer unknown. So what should I write?--Freely44 (talk) 15:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Well, that may make it even more complicated. Under Swiss law, copyright may actually be transferred from the original author to others. So if there was a publisher they might have purchased the copyright for themselves or for their company. The former option would mean that the photo is still copyrighted since copyright notes are not required in Switzerland. De728631 (talk) 13:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

I really do not know what to do. Maybe I should give up on this file and use another postcard, maybe from the 1930's, for the end of my article on the Gabler publishers [2].--Freely44 (talk) 15:52, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Freely44, Probably the page de:Wikipedia:Bildrechte in the German Wikipedia clarifies the issue a bit more to you. Under German/Swiss/Austrian law the Urheberrecht (which is not exactly the same as "copyright" in the Anglo-American law system) is not transferrable, transferrable are only the rights of use. Not knowing the copyright holder does not imply there is none. If you see a bike in the road, not knowing the owner does not mean the bike is ownerless and you can just take it. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice. I have come to the conclusion that the file is not in the public domain and the deletion is justified. --Freely44 (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No valid reason given. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BlackholeBluebackground.jpg

Io sono nuovo di vikipedia debbo solo mettere il mio avatar alla mia pagina utente non chiedo la luna quando ho tentato di metterlo e rimetterlo , non essendo pratico , lo avevo inavvertitamente cancellato debbo annullare il cancellamento di modo che possa rimettere questo file come MIO AVATAR la mia pagina e'

volevo rettificare ho messo un altro avatar (altro mio disegno) con altro nome non riesco ora a farlo funzionare come avatar MA NON FA NIENTE ! MEGLIO NON TOCVCARE NIENTE !! QUESTA FINE DI MESSAGGIO ANNULLA GIURIDICAMENTE i precedenti

poi staro' sereno e questo avatar nuovo

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Buconeroelucealgebrica.jpg

cerchero' di metterlo nella pagina mia del mio account : — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessio Amoretti (talk • contribs) 11:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Alessio_Amoretti

grande richiesta

LASCIAMO TUTTO COME E' MEGLIO DI PRIMA .. POI SI VEDRA'

distinti saluti alessio amoretti

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessio Amoretti (talk • contribs) 11:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose Commons allows a limited number of personal images for user pages of active contributors, that applies only to those users who are, in fact, active contributors to the project. So far you have added nothing useful to Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment We also support this way users who contribute actively to other Wikimedia projects, but this is also not the case. Ankry (talk) 15:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FCM logo3.png

I'm asking to undelete the file 'cause we made the file by ourselves. I'm a player of the club Floorball Club Milano and the logo doesn't have a license. I made it for the club. --AG751001 (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2021 (UTC)8th november 2021

Oppose This is a complex logo, and therefore has a copyright by default. We need a formal written permission from the copyright holder. See COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 08:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

this photo of mine has been deleted for an unknown reason,please check — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirarsalankzm (talk • contribs) 07:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The only file you have uploaded is File:Amir arsalan kzm4.jpg, and it has not been deleted yet. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: No file name given. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC) The file was deleted and then uploaded again. I have deleted it and warned the user. The image is claimed to be "own work" of the subject, but it does not look like a selfie, so it would require a license from the actual photographer. Also, it is a personal photo that is the only contribution of the user, so it is out of scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Port City International University Logo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Port City International University Logo.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: This logo did not violate copy right issue. Prijusraju (talk) 09:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

And why? It is clearly not covered by de minimis and there is no permission given. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Attempting to grant a licence while not authorized to do so is blatant copyright violation. @Prijusraju: Can you provide a public evidence that Nipoon07 is indded the author and exclusive copyright holder of the university logo? Ankry (talk) 11:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Ankry (talk) 11:25, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done copyrighted logo; no evidence of free license. Ankry (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lenka Helena Koenigsmark.jpg

Hello, we would like to undelete the photo of Lenka Helena Koenigsmark. We did confirmed copywrite ownership as it was recommended to us in this Undeletion requests section at 26 October 2021 . The photographer Michal Ures send an email to photosubmission@wikimedia.org with copyrights at 3. 11. 2021.

It is this one photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lenka_Helena_Koenigsmark.jpg We use it for this site: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenka_Helena_Koenigsmark

If there is something more needed or correct, please let us know. Thank you very much, appreciete it. --Lenka Koe (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

@Lenka Koe: We cannot undelete tha photo without OTRS/VRT action. Note, that photosubmission is not the right address where a photographer's permission needs to be sent. See VRT for instructions. Ankry (talk) 15:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Will be restored automatically when and if VRT approves the submission. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tuscaloosa_County_School_System_Board_of_Education.png

This image should be restored as this image does not contain any copyrighted materials but just a building in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwlowe 4 (talk • contribs) 16:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Nonsense request. This is an image you stole from Google Street View, which is plain from the numerous "©2020 Google" watermarks, not to mention visual characteristics, low res, and lack of EXIF. Эlcobbola _talk 16:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Obviously not. --Yann (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Adetomyrma aureocuprea.jpg

The file is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license as indicated by the original page I pulled the file from. --Bruno44101 (talk) 23:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 08:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Maria Kim.jpg

The statue belongs to my high school and it was uploaded by school project. It's been so long since I graduated and I should prove that it is by school work? -- CYAN (talk)

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maria Kim.jpg for background. There is nothing to prove, IMO. The statue is a recent creative work of art (Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Art_(copies_of)). Its copyright belongs to the sculptor. This includes any depicting of the statue. As there is no usable freedom-of-panorama exception in South Korea, a permission by the sculptor is required. --Túrelio (talk) 11:38, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) @CYAN: per COM:FOP SK we need either a cc-by-sa-4.0 license permission from the sculptor or from another sculpture copyright holder if the copyright has been transferred in a contract, or an evidence that the sculptor died before 1946 (for copyright expiration and no problems with URAA). Ankry (talk) 11:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done No evidence of a permission from the sculptor provided. Ankry (talk) 13:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BailingIMG-20211106-WA0001.jpg

This photo was removed for ALLEGED copyright violation saying it was found elsewhere on the web. Please show where it appears elsewhere on the web. It does appear on IMDB uploaded by the subject Bai Ling. When a photo is taken at the request of the subject, it is a work for hire and thus copyright is in the subject. So where does it appear on the internet other than used by the subject on IMDB? If an editor claims it appears elsewhere on the web, that link must be provided. Is the editor who delted it a copyright attorney or otherwise qualified to determine copyright violations? --Colbfi (talk) 09:37, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

@Colbfi: It is up to the uploader to prove that the image is under a free license. There are indeed many copies on the Internet prior to its uploads here, so deletion is justified. Yann (talk) 10:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

And FWIW - this image was sent via Whatsapp then downloaded Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

OpposeAlso please note that "When a photo is taken at the request of the subject, it is a work for hire and thus copyright is in the subject" is not the case in most countries. The copyright remains with the photographer unless there is an explicit written work for hire agreement. In order to restore the image, the copyright holder must provide a free license via VRT. If that person is not the actual photographer, then they must provide a copy of the copyright license from the photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Utter nonsense request: 1) the image is here; here; here; here; here; and many other places--all before upload here; 2) the image is a selfie, so that "it is a work for hire" is patently false; even if the subject were not the photographer, a "work made for hire" is a defined term of art that does not simply mean, as you apparently conflate, "a work someone was hired to produce"; it has specific categories (to which this image does not belong) and in all cases still requires a written document, evidence of which you've not provided (verily, you merely lied and claimed yourself to be the author); and 3) per COM:EVID, it is incumbent on you to provide evidence of claims, not for us to disprove them. This request is not merely ridiculous, it is catastrophically so. Эlcobbola _talk 16:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Jim and Эlcobbola above. --Yann (talk) 18:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Claudia Plöckl at Berlinale 2020

please don t delete this foto. it is a picture for my wikipedia Schauspielerin/ Actress Claudia Plöckl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandrella 23 (talk • contribs) 12:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose The file above never existed on Commons. You appear to use at least three different user names. As a general rule that is a bad idea and often is a violation of Commons rules. I found the user name Sannah2323 with the deleted file File:Claudia Ploeckl at the Max Ophüls Award Ceremony, Berlinale 2020.jpg. I assume that is the file you want restored. That file was deleted because you did not provide a license. However, it is small, has no EXIF, and appears at IMDB, so it seems unlikely that you actually are the photographer as you claimed.

If you are the actual photographer, please upload the file again using the same file name at full camera resolution with full EXIF and provide a license. If you are not the actual photographer, then in order for the file to be restored, the actual photographer must provide a free license using VRT.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - To the extent you refer to File:Claudia Ploeckl at the Max Ophüls Award Ceremony, Berlinale 2020.jpg, per Jim, the image appeared here and here in higher resolution, more complete (less cropped) form, and before upload to Commons. Эlcobbola _talk 16:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, per Jim and elcobbola. Thuresson (talk) 18:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Northwards migration of Basal East Asian lineage (model A and B).jpg

The picture was deleted because the admin claimed it is copyrighted, but in reality it is published under:Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

See:https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-020-01162-2

More images are affected and I do not understand why they suddenly got deleted. Thank you for help.Mev Shreb (talk) 18:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - This image does not appear at that nature.com article you've indicated here. Indeed, you yourself credited the author as "Jeong et al. 2016", whereas that article is Gakuhari, T., Nakagome, S., Rasmussen, S. et al., published 2020. This image does appear here where it is "Copyright © 2015, Oxford University Press". Эlcobbola _talk 18:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Эlcobbola. --Yann (talk) 18:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Artwork by Will Torger

Please restore

We have heirs' permission per Ticket:2021111010005961. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: undeleted. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Etnografiska museet Thai mask Vanadis 1884.jpg ‎

I supposed there is some misunderstanding on copyrights and license type for the file. The specified reason for deletion, which is ”Copyright ©2021 Etnografiska Museet”, is the webpage's copyright, not the photo's copyright. The license for the photo is marked on the corner as "CC BY" which is properly allowed by Wikimedia. Also, in the deleted page, all the information is properly given including photographer, date of publishing, reference to original source and license.

The request for undeletion includes:
1.) File:Etnografiska museet Brass Vanadis 1884.jpg
2.) File:Etnografiska museet Thai mask Vanadis 1884.jpg
3.) File:Etnografiska museet Thai Textile Vanadis 1884.jpg ‎

--Mevarath (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC) 11 November 2021

Done. You are right. I had overlooked the small CC-icon near the images. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Done, undeleted by Túrelio. Thuresson (talk) 18:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WABC TV New 2021.svg

The image was deleted by the closing adming as having a "false license", but that was not the issue. The accusation was that the image was being used for vandalism. As I pointed out, the image was identical to a version on the English Wikipedia which is in use on its related article (which contradicts the vandalism claim), and is below the threshold of originality in the United States. Therefore it should have been kept. The related images ([3], [4], [5], [6]) were closed under similar claims but were not properly discussed. Fry1989 ^eh? 13:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Info Deletion request at Commons:Deletion requests/File:WABC TV New 2021.svg. Thuresson (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Info Claiming the logo to be user's own work if false, so the declared license was invalid. And the enwiki image is declared to be copyrighted and used under Fair Use policy, not due to being below ToO. Ankry (talk) 19:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Yes, but if the image is under DR for other reasons, and someone mentions TOO in the DR, that should be taken into consideration before deletion. Images can be re-licensed, and just because someone selected a copyrighted license doesn't always mean they chose the correct one. Fry1989 ^eh? 13:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Support This is certainly below the ToO in USA, and as it is in use in en:WABC-TV, it is in scope. Yann (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 10:25, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roger Billings with Hydrogen Engine.jpg

Thank you for catching my mistake. I didn't intend to put in contradictory information. This is an image from the 70s that I found on the Internet. I think it would improve the article. SweetYPeach (talk) 17:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

@SweetYPeach: The problem is that you found the image on the Internet, and you don't have the permission from the copyright holder. The copyright usually lasts until 70 years after their death. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Clear copyright violation. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michel Rochon, 2020.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Michel Rochon, 2020.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: The photograph was uploaded by the author of the photograph and my role in its publication was simply to add a tag, after the author requested my help. Would it please be possible to confirm what the author shall do in order to fulfill *all* requirements? Would it be sufficient for him to send an email such as this one [7] to [permissions-commons@wikimedia.org] to have his work undeleted or are there other issues to solve?

Many thanks for your help! Dp96X (talk) 02:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Please ask the author to send a permission by email as you suggested above. Once this mail has been processed and approved by our volunteer response team, the image will be undeleted automatically. Due to some backlog this may take some days though. De728631 (talk) 13:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per De728631 above. --Yann (talk) 14:55, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Czesław Słanias 1000e Frimärke - 2000.jpg

This stamp is a derivative work of a 17th century public domain painting by , a version of which is File:Ehrenstrahl plafond 1690.jpg and another version is File:Allegori över svenska konungars berömliga bedrifter (David Klöcker Ehrenstrahl) - Nationalmuseum - 174873.tif, so the stamp should also be in the public domain. The additional text is not copyrightable. This image shows the stamp in a sheetlet but I think, but don't recall exactly, the previously uploaded stamp showed just the stamp like this. Ww2censor (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Info While the presented work is PD, its engraving may be copyrighted per separate copyright of the engraver. Ankry (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

That's a topic for discussion. It's not a blatant copyvio, so IMO it should be restored, cropped to just the stamp (since the outline of the building at the bottom is copyrighted), and run through regular DR. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

No objection from me. But it may be simpler to upload another image instead of cropping. Ankry (talk) 08:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Anybody willing to crop the image or to upload a cropped inmage? Ankry (talk) 13:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done Nobody interested in making this image compliant with copyright. Ankry (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Instituto Buena Bista, Curaçao 2.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Instituto Buena Bista, Curaçao 1.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Instituto Buena Bista, Curaçao 2.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: This files were deleted as the required permission was not received. The photographer has sent the permission now (available in VRT Ticket#2021111210008114). Daniuu (talk) 21:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

@De728631: ticket templates have been added. Thanks for handling the request. --Daniuu (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: @Daniuu: Please add the VRT ticket templates. --De728631 (talk) 23:00, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chelsea2008.jpg

大诺史 (now Minorax) nominated this file for deletion as part of a mass request. Then Alexis Jazz used this file (along with two others) as an example to condemn the mass request:

File:Chelsea2008.jpg: it's w:Chelsea Manning with a license review. ... Honestly, this makes no sense whatsoever.

So it was a real shock to see Fitindia delete this file as F10.

It seems like someone was far out of line here. Does VFC warn deleting admins if files have previously been kept at DRs? Brianjd (talk) 05:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC) edited 10:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Brianjd: This file was nominated by me when I was relatively new to commons and trying to find my way around this wiki. While this isn't an excuse, I've apologised for my actions, and I don't think saying "is this a test, incredible incompetence, just plain vandalism or are you drunk?" is necessary in this case. As seen from the logs, it was @A1Cafel: who nominated the file (F10) for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Minorax: I was only quoting Alexis Jazz; for all I knew, they were the one out of line. Brianjd (talk) 10:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Brianjd: My bad. Sorry. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 10:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: Clearly an error. File renamed, to avoid further problems. --Yann (talk) 13:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Watch View Edit

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Polsat logo 2003-2006.jpg

The image was under DR with two keeps and no deletes, but was deleted outside of the DR process with no closing rationale. Fry1989 ^eh? 14:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Polsat logo 2003-2006.jpg. Yann (talk) 14:57, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose It was speedy deleted by Ruthven for lack of permission from the copyright holder. The Polish ToO is "rather low" so it probably has a copyright. Also, it is not the current logo, see Polsat. As for the two keeps in the DR, one was by Fry with no reason given and the other stated that it is below the ToO which, as noted above, is debatable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Lack of permission is irrelevant if the image is below the threshold of originality. If an image is under DR and that is currently being debated, speedily deleting the image is utterly inappropriate. As far as I'm concerned, TOO is a reason in and of itself, and I shouldn't need to elaborate. Of course that's debatable, that's the point of a DR. Also, what does it matter whether this is the current logo of Polsat or not? We host lots of historical logos. Your comments add very little of value other than to criticise how I chose to participate in DRs and to attempt to validate the bypassing of the DR process. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

But Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Poland#Threshold_of_originality states that TOO is low, and so this logo is rather above TOO. If you have further arguments concerning Polish TOO, please elaborate. Even if the deletion was out-of-process, the undeletion would require us to verify image compliance with Commons policies. Ankry (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Most probably above ToO in Poland. --Yann (talk) 19:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nina Olegovna Sadykova.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Nina Olegovna Sadykova.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: late VRT (OTRS) permission received Template:OTRS ticket Niklitov (talk) 05:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Done But

Question Shouldn't the permission be verified by another VRT agent? Ankry (talk) 07:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment Thanks a lot, Ankry! Right, the permission may be verified by another agent (please attn: Carn). — Niklitov (talk) 07:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Зал героев Советского Союза битвы под Москвой в Музейном комплексе «Зоя».jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Церковь Святого Михаила Архангела (село Архангельское), вики-экспедиция.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Зал героев Советского Союза битвы под Москвой в Музейном комплексе «Зоя».jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Template:OTRS ticket (sorry, I missed — I had to put the VRT/OTRS number) — Niklitov (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Done as above. Ankry (talk) 07:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Soul Passage game

File:Soul Passage Cover OCT2021.jpg

We are the product owner and these images are open to use for representing the Soul Passage game. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emrahozbay (talk • contribs) 20:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Early game.jpg

We are the product owner and these images are open to use for representing the Soul Passage game — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emrahozbay (talk • contribs) 20:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

Oppose Where a file has been published before without a free licence, we need a permission by email from the copyright holder. This is required because we cannot verify your identy through your Wikimedia account. Please see COM:VRT for more instructions. De728631 (talk) 20:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per De728631 above. --Yann (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bi Ghanoon poster.jpg

Hello, good morning, I saved a poster of an illegal movie on Wikimedia, but it has been removed due to copyright infringement. Publishing this poster is free for everyone because the publisher of this series has the right to use the poster below this poster. Please see the link below and read the text at the bottom of the page. This is a legal and governmental platform for broadcasting Iranian serials and movies, and it has released the right to use and publish this postner.

http://sarshenasan.com/%d9%81%db%8c%d9%84%d9%85-%d9%88-%d8%b3%d8%b1%db%8c%d8%a7%d9%84-%d9%87%d8%a7%db%8c-%d8%a7%db%8c%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%86%db%8c/%d8%a8%db%8c-%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-ali-tajdary-bi-ghanoon/

--Iranianbio (talk) 09:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Iranianbio: It seems to me that at least two required permissions lack there: (1) the permission to create derivative works of the poster and (2) the permission for commercial reuse. I can't see how one is allowed to sell T-shirts with the poster image basing on the permission you pointed out. This permission is far from the declared cc-by-sa-4.0 license. Moreover, claiming authorship while not being the poster original author is blatant copyright violation. Ankry (talk) 16:22, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose I could argue that "The right to copy and publish this poster and information related to the film is open to the public" is a satisfactory license. "Publish", in copyright law, is a very broad term and would include making tee shirts. However the question is moot, because the declaration is not explicitly irrevocable, which we require. From Commons policy on licensing:

"the license must meet the following conditions:

The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable."

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:24, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

The policy doesn't say that revocability must be explicitly mentioned, just that the license can't be revocable. Apparently in the U.S., a license is only revocable if there was no consideration involved. A court case apparently decided there is consideration involved with open source licenses, so the default is often irrevocable.[8] And indeed, there are some very well-known free licenses that we accept which makes no mention of revocability. On this one though, it's a bit cloudier, but I'd be inclined to accept it on the revocability condition. And the commercial use as well, as if that is not restricted by the terms, it's generally allowed. However, I would tend to read "copy and publish" as more the right to make copies, and not necessarily derivative works, so I'm leaning no on that aspect of the licensing requirements. It feels closer to a press photo type of declaration (see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Press_photos), which we typically don't allow. It's not limited to journalists obviously, but otherwise it feels more in that vein. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Bi Ghanoon pster.jpg

Hi, I once gave a full description in the context of this file, but I think it has not been noticed, I copied this poster from the official platform that owns this film, this platform is the producer and legal owner of some films, and In the description of that movie, copyright is free for everyone, please see the link below and read the description of the site below, me and everyone have the right to copy this poster. In the description of this site, it is said that copyright and copying is legal

http://sarshenasan.com/فیلم-و-سریال-های-ایرانی/بی-قانون-ali-tajdary-bi-ghanoon/

see the copyright description at the bottom of the article

this description is given on the site, this site is the legal owner and producer of this film: (the Sarshenasan platform owns the rights to this film and allows everyone to copy and duplicate the film and poster)--Iranianbio (talk) 11:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@Iranianbio: Please, do not open new discussions concerning the same image while the previous one is not closed. This is counterproductive. Ankry (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: As noted above, the license on the source site is not irrevocable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Quan Hongchan medal.jpg

Media got deleted because copyright holder is the China News Service (this link was used to justify deletion). But CNS uploads there works under Creative Commons to Youtube regulary, where it was taken from as mentioned under licensing.--Bugz000 (talk) 13:23, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose It is quite clear that the image was included in the video from another source. Yann (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Yann, what makes you say that? The deleted image and the cited video at 1:32 look identical. The foreground background lineup says it was from the same camera and the subject's expression is the same. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

The news channel showed a static image taken from elsewhere. They didn't take the picture, otherwise they would obviously show a video of the event. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Aha, thanks.

Oppose Per Yann. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:12, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Sono il titolare del logo e del marchio

SONO IL TITOLARE DEL MARCHIO CHE è STATO CANCELLATO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hope Running (talk • contribs) 17:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

@Hope Running: Please add the name of the file you wish to have undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 20:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done unclear request. Ankry (talk) 20:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Picture of Olga Miler

The picture's use was permitted by Olga and Branca (I just forgot to change the document's name). No copyright infriction! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilikechocolate1976 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Ilikechocolate1976: How did it happen that you claim authorrsgip on image ©BronacMcNeill?
Permission "to use" only is not compatible with COM:L. We need a free license from BronacMcNeill; see VRT for details. Ankry (talk) 20:08, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per above: VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JasonEbeyer.jpg

The image that has been deleted is a photograph of myself which I had taken for media releases. I have ownership of the image and would like to have it on WikiCommons so it may be attached to the wikipedia article about myself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Ebeyer

--Jason Ebeyer (talk) 02:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@JasonEbeyer: First, we cannot verify who you are on-wiki, so such declarations are meaningless. Second, the photo does not look like a selfie; if it is we may need some evidence of this. And third, only original, non-preprocessed photos can be uploaded as {{Own}}. As this one is preprocessed and somebody reaised doubts concerning authorship, we need a written free license permission via email from the actual photographer as described in VRT. Ankry (talk) 07:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: As explained by Ankry. --De728631 (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WPRB Princeton Logo.png

Logo is official WPRB logo, as per WPRB.com (scroll down to see it) and WPRB's social media: instagram.com/wprb and Facebook.com/wprbfm. I created it - as the station manager of WPRB — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantesuidlov (talk • contribs)

@Dantesuidlov: As the logo was deleted due to copyright issues, plese elaborate, where did you find CC-BY-SA 4.0 license declaration by WPRB that applies to their logo? Ankry (talk) 07:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done no explanation. VRT permission may be needed. Ankry (talk) 13:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mapa genético o cariograma.jpeg

The file was deleted in this DR with the rationale "Recent artworks without permission", but this photo isn't of an artwork, is a human karyotype. From what I can see on the Internet Archive [9], the mother of the baby consented publishing it under a GDFL license. Also, the file was in use in the Spanish Wikipedia. -sasha- (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

I think the only question here is whether a Karyotype has a copyright. From the variety shown at Category:Human karyotypes I would guess that it does -- the person creating it clearly has choices. If it does, then this is a copyvio -- the mother released it as a GFDL, but the mother isn't the copyright holder. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: OOPS. I restarted the DR, so that we can have a meaningful discussion. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Claude François dessiné par Michel Bourdais en 1963.jpg

Please restore. We have permission per Ticket:2021111410004721. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Club seventeen logo.jpg

Hey Team,

As a representative of Club Seventeen, I have all rights to use this Logo on Wikpedia and All Social Media Platforms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magusxx (talk • contribs) 12:11, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@Magusxx: We need the formal written permission from the copyright holder. Please note that the permission should be for a free license, including commercial uses for everyone. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: See Yann's comment about verifying a licence. --De728631 (talk) 21:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Current Coat of Arms of Spain (Eagle of St John Proposal).svg

File:Current Coat of Arms of Spain (Eagle of St John Proposal).svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.65.232.36 (talk • contribs) 17:05, 15 November 2021‎ (UTC)

Question Where is/was it used? Ankry (talk) 19:36, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose This was thoroughly discussed (6500 words) at the DR cited above by Yann. Unless it can be proven that this should have been in the small group of files that was kept there, I see no reason to restore it or any of the other 300 plus files there. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: No compelling reason has been presented why the file should be restored. --De728631 (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fred Scarf.jpg

Fred Scarf is a notable individual with success on business and art. He has been covered on CNN/The advocate Magazine and even modeled for Vogue He has release music He is the CEO of Earigami app as well as Stop Guessing Kyemedora (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@Kyemedora: We need the formal written permission from the photographer. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Furthermore, his article is being considered for deletion at en.wp, so he is not so notable after all. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Per discussion above. --De728631 (talk) 21:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kellogg's Super Mario Cereal.png

Reuploaded picture, this time the picture is from using my own camera, taking a photo of my own copy of the cereal box.

Oppose Please see COM:Packaging. Even if you took the photo yourself, the Kellogg's box design and the Mario character are copyrighted and may not be reproduced without permission from the respective copyright holder. De728631 (talk) 21:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done as per De728631. Ankry (talk) 06:15, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hiddenfigures.jpg

I own the rights to this image we also work under the name Leah Lash Photography also through Little Ant Productions LLC.

{{Permission pending|year=2021|month=November|day=16}} Members of the community are saying that I stole the image, and that i violated copyright laws. In no way have I violated these guidelines. I am allowing public use of this image to Wkimedia Commons. We are sending email to the proper evaluation team to further confirm our ownership. We also give permission for Little Ant Productions LLC. to use our image. [[or company to use the image in ways that does not harm the artist or sabotage her work or our work. This image was through 20th Century Fox 2016 for the movie [https://www.google.com/search?q=20th+century+fox+hidden+figure&rlz=1C1CHNY_enUS643US643&ei=YiaUYfiZF_-Xr7wPxO-CwAc&oq=20th+century+fox+hidden+figure&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBggAEBYQHjoHCAAQRxCwAzoNCC4QxwEQ0QMQsAMQQzoQCC4QxwEQowIQyAMQsAMQQzoQCC4QxwEQ0QMQyAM Hidden Figures featuring author and producer, Emunah La-Paz. in no way was the image altered to misleading to anyone. The reason for the request is that our article page and company is being accused of copyright violation. We are the owners. We also feel that we are being subjected to prejudice being that there are only 21 African American Female Producers in the U.S.. Ongoing harassment to tear down articles and images is a continue to be a problem. A better way needs to be protected to those that try to provide evergreen articles. Providing years of information only to have the image and page torn down is a violation to writers within itself. Vhubbard (Vhubbard (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC))

Oppose All photos contributed by Vhubbard should go through OTRS/VRT. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hiddenfigures.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - No permission provided by Vhubbard/Little Ant Productions LLC would address that this is a blatant COM:DW of the movie poster; permission would also need to come from 20th Century Fox. Even cropping the image to include only Emunah La-Paz would not assist restoration, as this is a COM:NOTHOST issue (deletion of the related article is imminent - w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emunah La-Paz (2nd nomination)). Эlcobbola _talk 16:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 06:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Die Siedler IV Logo.png

It was classified as non-trivial logo. However, it consists solely of letters, so I would like a second opinion. Matt (talk) 08:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

The letters are not plain. There is a texture, so probably not OK. Yann (talk) 08:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

In that case File:Settlers IV logo.png has to be removed as well as it is the localized version. Matt (talk) 14:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Done Tagged. Yann (talk) 17:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment The status depends on the country of origin. Both logo are likely PD in US as below US ToO. Ankry (talk) 17:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

@Ankry: Are you sure? The texture is really non trivial. Yann (talk) 18:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Sure? No. But I do not think that it is much more creative than this. Ankry (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Done Bundled into Commons:Deletion requests/File:Settlers IV logo.png. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CryptoDragons.jpg

Please Undelete this file per Ticket:2021111710006296, thanks —MdsShakil (talk) 15:44, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Done @MdsShakil: FYI. Ankry (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sitelen sitelen.png, File:Sitelen sitelen ale li jo e tenpo.jpg, File:Sitelen sitelen mi weka e ike jan, la mi weka e ike mi.jpg

I proposed the deletion of the following images, because they were only available under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, an incompatible license. But now they are available under CC BY 4.0, so they should be be restored. Robin van der Vliet (talk) 22:12, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Support Spenĉjo (talk) 22:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Done per changed license. Ankry (talk) 06:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:World_CleanUp_Day_USA_School_Kids_2018.jpg

Requesting undeletion. Photo is accurate for World CleanUp Day and is my my own work. Ready to now use on the World CleanUp Day wiki page. November 15, 2021 By Steve Jewett — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevejewett (talk • contribs) 15:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@Stevejewett: I assume you are referring to "File:World_CleanUp_Day_USA_School_Kids_2018.jpg". I have fixed the heading. Brianjd (talk) 16:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Correct and thanks. My first time on undeletions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevejewett (talk • contribs) 16:06, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@Stevejewett: Please sign your posts. And I cannot speak for the administrators, but judging from the deletion request, this undeletion request is not likely to succeed. Brianjd (talk) 16:08, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Each parent filed a photo consent for each person in this image. Those who did not have a consent form on file with the school are not in the image. Steve Jewett. --Stevejewett (talk) 16:55, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Pinging @Ellin Beltz and P199: the nominator and the deleting admin.

Support Not low resolution, and in scope. Ankry (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Just a group photo of kids. This does not illustrate World CleanUp Day at all. Looks promotional, so COM:WEBHOST applies IMO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose It has a group of small children holding up signs or banners with logo. It is more of a promotional image than anything illustrating the concept. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done no consensus to undelete and unresponded doubts. Ankry (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AC Oulu.svg

Please restore the following pages:

File:AC Oulu.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: As simple as other logos at COM:TOO Finland that the Finnish copyright council have ruled to be below the TOO, especially File:Soikeapallo logo.jpg which the council resonates as such: its central elements and the way in which they have been combined are commonly used in logos and are thus ordinary. I think the same applies to the Oulu logo. Jonteemil (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Support OK for me. Yann (talk) 08:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ArashDarvishi00.jpg

I request to cancel the removal of this photo

This photo belongs to me (Arash Darvishi) and I need it for my panel so that those who are looking for me know.

Comment I deleted some others uploaded by this user as out of scope - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Arash Darvishi. Uploader needs to explain how any of his files are in scope Gbawden (talk) 06:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose All contributions of User:Arash Darvishi seem to be self-promotion. Ankry (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Page wikipedia Laurent Quintreau

Bonjour

Merci de restaurer l'image précédente car elle est libre de droit

Winch 2

Le 17/11/2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winch 2 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 17 November 2021‎ (UTC)

Info This request may be related to File:Laurent Quintreau.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:12, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Photos are copyrighted by default. No applicable copyright law exceprion pointed out here. Ankry (talk) 06:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Photo appears at https://www.lanouvellerepublique.fr/niort/vous-allez-lire-un-article-sur-laurent-quintreau with "Toute reproduction, même partielle, du contenu (textes, photos, graphiques, illustrations, dessins...) du site par quelque procédé que ce soit sans l'autorisation écrite de NR Multimedia est rigoureusement interdite."

EXIF shows:

Author: Greg.MACHET
Copyright holder: latelierdelaphoto.com

Neither of those appears to have any relationship to the uploader. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 13:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Electromagnetic waves are bad 4 you.png

Please restore the following pages:

File:Electromagnetic waves are bad 4 you.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: ITS ART AND ISNT MEANT TO BE WITHIN COM SCOPE Jawico666 (talk) 23:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/Art created by Jawico666 Andy Dingley (talk) 23:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Oppose per COM:NOTHOST. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
YOU DARE DO THAT I WILL DO IT TO YOU! Jawico666 (talk) 23:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

HAHHAHA Jawico666 (talk) 23:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

YOU FOOL I HAVE 21 ALTERNATE ACCOUNTS! Jawico666 (talk) 23:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done per requester's out of scope declaration. Ankry (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bi Ghanoon poster.jpg

Hi, the site from which I extracted this poster is the owner and producer of this movie and hundreds of other movies. The name of the site " https://sarshenasan.com " In this site, in the description section of the films made by this platform, it has given the public the right to copy and publish the poster for free.

Please read the description at the bottom of the poster and return the file

Enter this link " http://sarshenasan.com/%d9%81%db%8c%d9%84%d9%85-%d9%88-%d8%b3%d8%b1%db%8c%d8%a7%d9%84-%d9%87%d8%a7%db%8c-%d8%a7%db%8c%d8%b1%d8%a7%d9%86%db%8c/%d8%a8%db%8c-%d9%82%d8%a7%d9%86%d9%88%d9%86-ali-tajdary-bi-ghanoon/ " and read the description at the bottom of the page, this site is the owner and producer of this movie--Iranianbio (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Iranianbio: It is still unclear whather the permission is irrevokable and whether it allows derivative workse. These are among minimal Wikimedia Commons requirements. Ankry (talk) 13:37, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Decided recently -- there is nothing new here. Please don't open this discussion again. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lihie.webp

Sent a permission from the copyright holder, for free license release via COM:VRT. Cheers. LihieRaz (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Please review this page's instructions ("please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here." (underline added)) This image is the work of ניר סלקמן (Nir Salkman), see here, and permission will need to come from them. Эlcobbola _talk 18:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, this photo will be undeleted if and when it is successfully processed by a VRT volunteer. Thuresson (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stmaryscollegelogo.png

This file is the main logo for St Mary's College, Melbourne (school). It is not trademarked or copyrighted in Australia as of yet. It is only on Wikipedia to show the logo of the school. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Mary%27s_College,_Melbourne_(school))

I believe it should not be deleted because it is just the logo of the school that is shown on all of the school's platforms, including it's website. It is purely so people can identify the school. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thepeoplesman21 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 20 November 2021‎ (UTC)

Oppose Please upload it locally to the English Wikipedia. SHB2000 (talk) 08:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose second in motion to SHB2000. @Thepeoplesman21: , files here must be freely-reusable by anyone including commercial reuses. Fair use files are perpetually not welcome here. The fact that there is no copyright notice on the design of the logo does not mean it is in public domain. Please upload the file locally on English Wikipedia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, no formal procedure is required in Australia to have works copyrighted, see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Australia. Thuresson (talk) 08:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nêrekoendama zaûzê ku.png

Hello,

I have recently uploaded an image file titled 'File:Nêrekoendama zaûzê ku.png' and it has been flagged for possible copyright infringement, the reasoning being the image copyrighted by Scientific Animations Inc. Although most of the images provided by this company are indeed under the protection of copyright, the image that I decided to use is under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license as it is stated on the website which can be accessed via the following linkː [10]. I am hopeful that this matter will be resolved in a timely manner. Do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions/concerns.

Best regards, --Biyolojiya Bi Kurdî 11:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Pinging @Túrelio: the deleting admin and

Support per the CC-BY-SA 4.0 license on-site. The image annoations are different, but they are informative, not copyrighted. Ankry (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

For me the above mentioned source site is completely empty, shows neither text nor images. I found a similar, but not annotated imaged here, but all I see at the bottom is "©2019 Scientific Animations Inc. All rights reserved". @Ankry, if you have seen a CC tag, feel free to restore the file, please. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Done per above. Ankry (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Young happy adult woman receiving an influenza vaccine, wearing a face mask.jpg Undelete request

Hello. This file was deleted for the stated reason "Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)" This is my facebook image. It was taken by me, posted by me, and features only me. I gave my permission. AdaMcVean (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@AdaMcVean: I have provisionally undeleted the image. To retain it permanently, you will need to prove that it is your image by uploading the original file from your phone or camera with full EXIF metadata. Please go to File:Young happy adult woman receiving an influenza vaccine, wearing a face mask.jpg and click "Upload a new version of this file". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done redeleted: no response, no reupload as requested. The user can still upload a not-Facebook version. Ankry (talk) 21:52, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Commons logo mosaic 19x35.jpg

On a closer look, this deletion looks unjustified: https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/ShareAlike_compatibility:_FAL --Reseletti (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I did some digging. It seems better to reupload a slightly modified version instead of restoring the old one: FAL looks compatible. But I found one file in there that’s GFDL-only, which on the other hand actually seems to be incompatible. So it seems like the better idea to upload a new version instead of restoring one with a (separate, known) copyright problem. Still: Can someone confirm my findings, please?--Reseletti (talk) 19:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Per this page FAL 1.3 seems indeed compatible with CC-BY-SA 4.0. Notifying @Ralf Roletschek and Missvain: For more caution in future. And closing as withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

History restored by KoH after uploading of another image. Ankry (talk) 11:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Empowering special moms with financial tools.png

Hi,

Please undelete the file File:Empowering special moms with financial tools.png

Ours is an NGO, helping special children in Chennai, India, through online coaching programs for parents.

Thank you,

Prajha acadamey 20.11.2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prajhaacademy (talk • contribs) 13:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC) (UTC)

@Prajhaacademy: For previously published content, we need a formal written permission from the copyright holder. Also please note that advertising like this is not suitable for Commons. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 17:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Haroldomil.jpg

User:JuTa erased maliciously a photo from me. (Haroldomil (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2021 (UTC))

Oppose OP has not presented any evidence that the image was deleted out of malice. Thuresson (talk) 23:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Aside from the silly accusation of malice, there are one or two problems with the image. The first is that the image includes both a photograph and an art work. There is no evidence of a free license for the art work. Also, although the uploader claims to be the photographer, he is also apparently the subject and this does not look like a selfie. If it is not a selfie, then Haroldmil's claim of "own work" is incorrect. The image cannot be restored without correction or clarification of both of these issues. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done no valid reason for undeletion. Ankry (talk) 08:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:48-89 logo soutez.png

Hello, please undelete File:48-89 logo soutez.png: this file actually _is_ used, in a previously deployed CentralNotice campaign which I just needed to show to someone. I'm unable to do so, because the banner uses a now-deleted image. Thanks! --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: per above. --AntiCompositeNumber talk 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FSUU Swimming Pool inside (Original Work).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:FSUU Swimming Pool inside (Original Work).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Deleted due to purported no permission. However, the later uploads by FSUUpedia Restore Division (talk · contribs) (all containing "original work" in the file names) are decent to be trusted as own works (in my opinion). All of the last uploads have metadata and single camera model. Plus the user themself responded to old claims at their talk page (their response was mirrored at ANU thread). Their user page explicitly indicated what tool did they used. So for me there is no doubts over User:FSUUpedia Restore Division's last uploads. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose The uploader is User:FSUUpedia Restore Division, which is not an individual. Therefore whether or not the person using that account is the actual photographer, we need a free license from an authorized representative of Father Saturnino Urios University. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:39, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done As per Jim: VRT permission needed. Ankry (talk) 18:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hanafuda Earth Tane.svg

Also:

Keep vote was not seen Commons:Deletion_requests/Copyrighted_Hanafuda_Trace Flicky1984 (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose In the first place, these were deleted at Commons:Deletion requests/Copyright hanafuda and there were no comments there after the nomination. Also, at the cited DR, the Keep comment did not address the issue that these are clearly derivative works and infringe on the copyright of their original creator. It argues that we can keep these as Fair Use, which we do not accept. It also argues that their creation as SVG digital works somehow makes them different from the physical cards and therefore they do not infringe. Finally, in the Keep comment, Flicky1984 says,

"Finally, I'd like to state that in my many years experience on Wikipedia, requests for deletion by new users with little history of editing seem to always have a personal angle. I'd like to know if that's the case here, and call for the user who filed the request to identify themselves in a meaningful way."

That's a little strange, since the "new user[s] with little history" has more than twice as many edits on Commons as Flicky (to be sure, it's 124 to 52, so neither of them is at all experienced) and neither has bothered to create a User Page. It is true that Flicky joined the WP:EN in 2006, but they have made fewer than 1500 edits on all projects. All in all, not a good base from which to be making ad hominem comments.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done As per Jim. Ankry (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wendy Starland for Sima Collezione.jpg

I am the photographer and sole copyright holder of the image File:Wendy Starland for Sima Collezione.jpg.

--Albertliggins (talk) 03:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Albert Liggins

@Albertliggins: Maybe. But it was published elsewhere, so an evidence of free license is needed. See VRT for details. Ankry (talk) 08:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Getty credits this image to Ilya S. Savenok. Ilya S. Savenok ≠ Albert Liggins. Эlcobbola _talk 17:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Obviously not, as per Эlcobbola above. Legal threats can lead to a block. --Yann (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wendy Starland 1.jpg

I am the sole copyright holder of the image File:Wendy Starland 1.jpg which I have previously licensed to Thumprecords.com.

The false claim below that it belongs to Thump Records is a violation of my rights as the sole owner and copyright holder under law:

A tag has been placed on File:Wendy Starland 1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://thumprecords.com/artist/wendy-starland/#1624069938874-e19f28c3-4a72.

This FALSE statement above is punishable by law. Kindly restore the image File:Wendy Starland 1.jpg to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy_Starland immediately.

--Albertliggins (talk) 04:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Albert Liggins

@Albertliggins: legal threats are unacceptable in on-wiki discussions. You failed to provide an EVIDENCE of free license. Per policy, Own work declarations can only be accepted for never published images. See VRT for details. Ankry (talk) 08:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose - Previously published here and clearly from the same shoot as this and this, where the photographer is credited as Antoine Reekmans). Эlcobbola _talk 17:16, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: Obviously not, as per Эlcobbola above. Legal threats can lead to a block. --Yann (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Clouds in the morning.jpg

I want to request undeletion of this file because i didn't meant to request it, i meant to fix the license. Vitaium (talk) 22:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tiangong Space Station Rendering 2021.10.png

The administrator claimed "This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.163.com/dy/article/GKUM7OQ005322ICO.html"

But the image used in the 163.com URL offered by the admin is completely different with the deleted by the admin here! 163.com used Tiangong Space Station Rendering 2021.08.png, which I uploaded on September 16, 2021. The one you deleted was Tiangong Space Station Rendering 2021.10.png, which I uploaded in October. Note the differences between 2021.08 and 2021.10 and compare the objects depicted by the two images.

The administrator must have mistaken the two images to each other. Please undelete the image created solely by myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shujianyang (talk • contribs) 06:20, 18 November 2021‎ (UTC)

Ping @Túrelio: for any comment. Thuresson (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Support: the wrong file was deleted and by the dates, the Chinese language article probably copied the image from Commons. I found this article using the deleted image and attributing it to Commons. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment Image is here for comparaison. Yann (talk) 19:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: as per above. No opposition. --Yann (talk) 13:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marc_Vincent.jpg

We have a permission note per Ticket:2021111810006123 which looks plausible to me. The presumed author's name is Olivier Froment. Can someone please check whether this corresponds with the file description an metadata (if there are any), and restore if nothing speaks against it? Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

@Mussklprozz: The image has no authorship metadata and the uploader's author declaration is Joël Le Quellec. Ankry (talk) 01:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Ankry: Thanks. Please keep the case open for a while. I will ask the client about the discrepancy. --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done please, request again, if needed. Ankry (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Scans for Goblin Market

I asked that they be deleted because I was unable to prove that the book had been released (in the USA) within a month of the UK release; or, I could not verify its {{PD-US-no notice}} status.

Since the deletion, another person has verified the PD-US-no notice status as mentioned at s:en:Wikisource:Copyright_discussions#USA_publication,_no_copyright_notice

File:Goblin_Market_001.tif
File:Goblin_Market_002.tif
File:Goblin_Market_003.tif And more like this:

Extended content

Thank you.--RaboKarbakian (talk) 15:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

~~Oppose~~ The text of the poem was written in 1859, so it is long PD. I think this is the 1933 London edition with illustrations by Arthur Rackham who died in 1939. If that is the case, lack of notice makes the illustrations subject to the URAA. The work had a UK copyright until 1/1/2010 (70 years after Rackham's death), which is after the URAA date, so it will be PD 95 years after publication, January 1, 2029. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Support In fact, this is the Lippincott edition published in Philadelphia in 1933. If there were notice, it would appear on the reverse of the title page, which is File:Goblin Market 004.tif. All that is there is the printer's name, so it is PD No Notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: as per Jim above. --Yann (talk) 13:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Admiral Horton - with JASHP plaque.jpg

Image file was deleted. It is an important interpretive image of the supplementary historical interpretive marker to the Admiral Horton wiki page. DK reason for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrryjude (talk • contribs) 15:58, 21 November 2021‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose The statue is from 2019, so it is under copyright, but it is in Wales, where FoP applies, so that is not a problem. The file was deleted because it does not have a license. The relevant portion of the file description is:

source=Photograph of work commissioned by the Jewish American Society for Historic Preservation

author=Justin Kellet

permission=

If Justin Kellet is User:Jrryjude we can restore it with a license of his choice. If he is not User:Jrryjude, then we cannot restore it without a free license from Justin Kellet via VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done as per Jim: no license, no permission. Ankry (talk) 07:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

hi thnks for notice to me for the photos but im rapper and these photos are mine please dont delet them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akafi23 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 22 November 2021‎ (UTC)

@Akafi23: Please include the file names of the photos you wish to have undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 18:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose In the requester's deleted contributions, I see several images, all apparently photos of the uploader/requester. They do not appear to be selfies, so the claim of "own work" is not valid. In addition, they are all personal photos of a non-contributor, so they are outside of policy on both copyright and scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, no response. Thuresson (talk) 14:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wali Kota Mesakh Amalo.jpg

The Photo is in Public Domain because it is published by Government of Kota Kupang and managed by Provincial Archive and Library Beurau of NTT which is part of Indonesian Government

Jordan Diwi (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Support as {{PD-IDGov}}. Ankry (talk) 18:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The source of the image is not the Government of Indonesia, but the archive of a province, Nusa Tenggara Timur. It is not clear to me whether {{PD-IDGov}} is applicable to a province. Link to the source website: https://nttprov.sikn.go.id/index.php/drs-m-amalo-walikota-i-kotip-kupang-masa-bhakti-18-09-1978-s-d-26-05-1986 . Ellywa (talk) 12:35, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: DR created instead. --Yann (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:NELSONTANURE JCC15041.jpg

Olá! Venho por meio dessa mensagem questionar a remoção do arquivo File:NELSONTANURE JCC15041.jpg da minha autoria. Peço que essa minha obra seja restaurado!--Marco Antonio Lima Santos (talk) 14:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Metadata shows different author name, not Marco Antonio Lima Santos. Writen permission via email coming directly from the photographer mentioned in metadata is needed. Ankry (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Ankry above. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

REQUEST FOR UNDELETION PLEASE: "Andrea3_original.jpg"

Hi, for some unknown reason a request was made to delete the image which is an original image of a person who is the person the page was built for. Please "undelete". Thank you.

I think they are referring to File:Andrea Pregoni.jpg Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Unless they can show that this is in scope (and own work). So far only used for self promo and Uploader claims to be in the photo Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Gbawden above. --Yann (talk) 10:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

This is a popular public place in at district of Kurigram in Bangladesh. So, Please Don't DELETE this. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Md Julfekar Ali Nayon (talk • contribs)

Which image do you wish to be undeleted? Do you mean File:তিস্তা বেরীবাঁধ, নাগড়াকুড়া, উলিপুর, কুড়িগ্রাম। 04.jpg? This is your only deleted contribution ond there is nothing interesting on this autopromotional image. Ankry (talk) 07:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done: as per Ankry above. --Yann (talk) 14:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Zeitz Museum

Photographs of a 1920s building were deleted by @Jameslwoodward: saying that "THe recent work is obvious and certainly copyrighted". It's hard to see how the structure of a 1920s building would still be copyrighted, even with the recent changes, and this wasn't addressed in the closure. This needs to be reviewed. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: there are doubts concerning modern architecture which is present in the photos and the deleting admin decided that they cannot be ignored. Do you want to reopen the DR? What would you like to add to the discussion that was not expressed there, yet? Ankry (talk) 22:04, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Ankry: I was photographing a historic building that had subsequently been modified. Re-opening the deletion debate would be OK for me. I already explained myself in the debate, but the closing admin did not take any of the comments into consideration, and instead closed it assuming that everything was copyrighted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment Deleting everything here seems a bit extreme. I would at least follow Carl Lindberg's opinion in the DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Yann: Do you suggest reopenning the DR or something else? It is unclear to be which exactly images mentioned by Clindberg associated with variuos conditions and doubts you mean. Ankry (talk) 09:24, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

@Ankry: Carl says he would keep everything except 3 or 4 images. So I suggest to undelete them all, except these 3 or 4 images. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:32, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Oppose I looked at all of the images in the DR and all of them have the modern windows. The windows are not the usual plate glass -- I have not seen anything like them anywhere, so it is extremely likely -- almost certain -- that they create a new copyright for the building. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: On some images the windows may fall under COM:DM. Ankry (talk) 15:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

My suggestion is to reopen the DR for review by an uninvolved admin. Ankry (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm fine with restoring them all and then reopening the DR. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Support Temporary restoring, really need to check if some (perhaps not all) of them meet DM or not. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:35, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Info Supposedly, it was only one area of the building which was renovated more recently, with the rest of the building old enough to be PD (South Africa is a 50pma country). So to me, a photo of the entire building is a photo of a wider subject than the copyrighted material, with the newer parts being "incidental". Much like, per s:Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc., a photo of a bottle with a copyrighted label is not a derivative work; it's only a problem if the photo is focusing on the label itself (and our other example, a photo of the entire Louvre square is not derivative of the pyramid). So I think I was only recommending deletion of the ones which could be argued were focusing on the recent additions, and not the building as a whole. To me, it shouldn't matter if the newer windows are fairly prominent, as long as the photo is of a wider subject (e.g. the entire building). Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Carl, I think you're stretching here. This was a grain silo -- walls of blank concrete with no windows. The renovation added windows, so even if they were not themselves very creative, the renovation was a transformation of the building. It seems to me that that creates a new copyright in the whole building. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: Oh, goodness no. The only new copyright is in the added expression, just like any other derivative work. You don't get to extend the copyright on anything already existing. As the Copyright Office says, The copyright in a derivative work covers only the additions, changes, or other new material appearing for the first time in the work. Protection does not extend to any preexisting material, that is, previously published or previously registered works or works in the public domain or owned by a third party. As a result, it is not possible to extend the length of protection for a copyrighted work by creating a derivative work. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Hmm. I think you're working off the wrong analogy. If I publish a new book version of Alice in Wonderland with a new preface, then, as you say, only the new preface gets a copyright. However, when the changes fundamentally change the character of the work it's not so clear. If a book is made into a movie or stageplay, or vice versa, then the whole new work has a copyright. It may be that dialog that is identical in the two works does not get a new copyright. It is well established that colorizing a b&w movie gives rise to a new copyright, but colorization is a less fundamental change that we have here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Question Has anyone else an opinion about these files? Yann (talk) 17:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann: It doesn't look like anyone else wants to comment on this here. Given that @Jameslwoodward, who was also the deleting admin, is the only one opposing, perhaps the files can be temporarily undeleted and we can move this back to the deletion requests process (perhaps copying James's comments into that discussion) to see if others want to comment there to reach a consensus? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Done Reopened DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

با سلام و احترام عکس مورد نظر از آلبوم شخصی و توسط خودمان گرفته شده است لطفا احیا نمایید — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babakheidari1989 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 24 November 2021‎ (UTC)

Google Translate: "Greetings and Regards. The photo in question was taken from a personal album by ourselves" Thuresson (talk) 18:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

@Babakheidari1989: What is the name of the file you want undeleted? Who is the photographer? Where is the evidence of a free license? Yann (talk) 10:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done o answer to the crucial questions. Ankry (talk) 15:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

I would like to request undeletion of the pictures i posted for Farah ALHASHEM page and please let me know what did i do to avoid any misunderstanding, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.51.199.233 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 24 November 2021‎ (UTC)

What is the name of the file you want undeleted? Who is the photographer? Where is the evidence of a free license? Yann (talk) 10:23, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done unclear request. Ankry (talk) 15:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antonio_Rosetti_1783.jpg

In diesem Löschbegehren wurden keine validen Löschgründe angegeben, die Quelle war klar und wurde von mir geliefert, warum das gelöscht wurde entzieht sich meiner Vorstellungskraft. Bitte wiederherstellen. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 14:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Undeleted to allow for a discussion. The file appears a handwritten entry, it looks suffiently old to me. Ellywa (talk) 15:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

@Sänger: perhaps you can add a more precise description on the file page, describing what the source of the image is. For instance, where is this Stammbuch kept?

Translated with Google translate: Vielleicht können Sie auf der Dateiseite eine genauere Beschreibung hinzufügen, die die Quelle des Bildes beschreibt. Wo wird zum Beispiel dieses Stammbuch aufbewahrt? Ellywa (talk) 15:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Was sollte da zugefügt werden? Das ist eine Schrift von 1783, da gibt es kein Urheberrecht mehr, mehr Public Domain geht kaum. Wie auf der Disk des Hochladers nachgelesen werden kann und natürlich vom Löscher gelesen worden ist (oder wird hier einfach ohne Nachdenken stumpf gelöscht?), stammt das allesamt aus dem Wiener Archiv, also aus eindeutig gemeinfreier Quelle.

What should be added? It's a page from 1783, there is no copyvio possible, more public domain is impossible. As you can see here, which I assume the deleter at least must have seen (or are files here being dumb deleted without any thinking?), all those pages were from the Viennese Archives, thus as public domain as public domain can be.

- Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 15:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

If I am considering a deletion request I do not read such user talk pages. I only consider what is written on the deletion request page, look at the image and the mentioned source. That's why the uploader was requested to add comments there. Please add the origin of the file to the file page. For instance that they scanned it in a Viennese archive, preferably also which archive. Like a historian or scientist would do. Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 22:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

I thought you would be the uploader, but you are not. The uploader should give a proof that the file is in PD, per COM:EVID. Someone else would not be able to do this. Ellywa (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Support By its description, it's an entry in a family register. So the source is named. The uploader claims to have scanned it themselves. It's probably PD-ineligible in the first place, as formulaic text (though a transcription would be nice), but copyright would have expired if it existed -- put PD-old-100 on it. I really can't see a reason to delete. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:46, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Done: as per Carl. --Yann (talk) 16:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eklu Shaka Mawuli.jpg

Foto di personaggio pubblico in luogo pubblico,non capisco il motivo dell'eliminazione --El francoh (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Google Translate: "Photo of a public figure in a public place, I don't understand the reason for the elimination".

This image has been published elsewhere on September 7, 2020 without an acceptable free license.

Procedural close, not a request for undeletion. Thuresson (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Thailand road sign ต-53 (blue).svg

Could you undelete the blue "GO" version of Thailand road sign ต-53? It was suddenly deleted on purpose as requested by Fry1989 thinking that he needs the source for this. Thanks.

Not done Uploaded by a blocked sock. Reupload by another user is OK in such cases. No need to undelete and nothing to do. Ankry (talk) 15:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Peter Voss, der Millionendieb (1932 film).jpg

The file is currently on the English page by uncountable years, where no one dared to consider its copyrights, given that it is already 90 years old. The user who deleted it has a problem with the proves that the real title of the film is not 'Voß' (as he insisted to not admit) but 'Voss', as in the film itself and its advertising. This is not the only case on a German page where the proven reality that a movie title name was ending in 'ss' and not in 'ß'. The reason? Well… I would not be able to 'prove' that the one I guess to be is real and, for sure, not 'proper', so… let us not talk about which reason could move some German people to 'revert' whatever some 'not German ones' DARES to correct ;-) (talk) 19:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GianMarco Tavazzani (talk • contribs) 19:38, 24 November 2021‎ (UTC)

@GianMarco Tavazzani: What is the name of the author who died more than 70 years ago? Thuresson (talk) 20:02, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

I'm not sure on who from a film crew is relevant for the copyright expiry of the entire film, but the director of said film passed away only in 1956, the camera operator even only in 1989. So I see no reason to believe the film is no longer protected. --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done DW of copyrighted film. Ankry (talk) 04:07, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ghafari1.png

The image was taken during the Iran Revolution, so it meets PD-Iran: "In the following cases works fall into the public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation (Article 16): Photographic or cinematographic works." Ypatch (talk) 04:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

When was the date of first publication? Thuresson (talk) 12:10, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done no evidence of PD-Iran status provided. Ankry (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-11

Files uploaded by Gruene-bt-fraktion

File:Paco_Montesinos_2019.jpg

File:Gera Mihály.jpg to undelete

Photos by Dominique Suisse

Commons:Deletion requests/First versions of files uploaded by User:Gikü

File:Lea Birringer.jpg und File:Violinist Lea Birringer crop.jpg

Artwork by Will Torger

Soul Passage game

Discussion

Sono il titolare del logo e del marchio

File:Example.jpg Picture of Olga Miler

File:Sitelen sitelen.png, File:Sitelen sitelen ale li jo e tenpo.jpg, File:Sitelen sitelen mi weka e ike jan, la mi weka e ike mi.jpg

Page wikipedia Laurent Quintreau

File:Young happy adult woman receiving an influenza vaccine, wearing a face mask.jpg Undelete request

Empowering special moms with financial tools.png

Scans for Goblin Market

REQUEST FOR UNDELETION PLEASE: "Andrea3_original.jpg"

Navigation menu

Search