Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-09

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chiche.jpg

El artista entregó su imagen para wikipedia y por eso la usamos en esta artículo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nubecol (talk • contribs) August 29, 2020 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chiche.jpg. @Nubecol: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:12, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done as per Nat: waiting for OTRS permission from the photographer. Ankry (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hotel del charro la jolla general arangement - jagrafx.jpg

The subject file is an original graphic performed first in SketchUp 3d software and then polished in Keynote; and Photoshop. We are having trouble understanding exactly what is at issue here. Perhaps you can help at your end. First publication was on the ART JAGRAF/X blog page. The graphic came to be noticed by the individual responsible for the WIKI page on the HOTEL DEL CHARRO of La Jolla historical fame. Upon that person's request; we went through the steps to upload the file to the HOTEL DEL CHARRO Wikipedia page. Please let us know how we can be of help. We are published and in the clear anyway so we are JAGRAF/X -- Heather and Ron <email redacted> 114 Lakeview Avenue Spring Vally CA. The best of everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.127.156.28 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 30 August 2020‎ (UTC)

Oppose The image was deleted as duplicate of File:Hotel del charro la jolla jagrafx.jpg. We do not host multiple instance of the same image. Ankry (talk) 09:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Image is duplicate per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Астрономическая обсерватория Кастельгранде.jpg

The image was deleted by an absolutely wrong assumption that it is not my own work and that I took it from a Facebook page. First, I WORK at the observatory. Second, I am the only ADMINISTRATOR of the referred Facebook page. Third, this is MY photo. And finally, I really wonder that the guy who deleted the image didnt even bother to ask me on my discussion page BEFORE deleting it. First get informed, then act! Otherwise it is simply disrespectful behavior and disturbance to the author, because now I am forced to waste my time writing all these explanations! Sergei Schmalz (talk) 01:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@Sergei Schmalz: You were informed per this. Deletion was carried out in accordance with policy. Works previously published elsewhere first require permission and a specific release from the copyright holder using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: So, according to you logic, I need my permission from myself, huh? Once again: I AM THE AUTHOR! Sergei Schmalz (talk) 02:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Sergei Schmalz: Per policy, works previously published elsewhere first require permission and a specific release from the copyright holder using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  - @Nat: You dont understand me, do you? I AM THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER! THIS IS MY PHOTO! Do you get it now, or still need more? Sergei Schmalz (talk) 02:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  - @Sergei Schmalz: Per policy, works previously published elsewhere first require permission and a specific release from the copyright holder using OTRS. There is no way here we can assess the veracity of your claims here. For the possibility of undeletion, please use the OTRS process. Using all-caps will not help undelete the file. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
    - @Nat: I am NOT gonna do any further requests or whatsoever and waste my time. This was my very last drop of patience here on Wikipedia. This is so much absurd, that Wikipedia offers authors to upload their own work, but then someone deletes it by his own will without even trying to get informed first. Enough of that! Will never ever again write/improve/update anything else on Wikipedia anymore! This case is simply insulting me to the ultimate level. Stupidity and stubbornness rule here, as I've learned during the years spent on Wikipedia. Bye! Sergei Schmalz (talk) 02:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Submitter has been informed that the OTRS process is the venue for the possibility of undeletion. If they are the copyright holder, they should send permission and a specific release to permission-commonswikimedia.org using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sadoc Vazkez.jpg

Hello

I would like to recover this file in Wikimedia since the file of a Mexican artist and it is not a personal file, this image has public domain, the artist is a musician you can find many images of him, in the description it is described a little that the ago, we can find information about Sadoc Vazkez in google, just do a Google search as Sadoc Vazkez.

The file was created so that the information of this artist can be searched more easily, and to know a little more about what he does.

a greeting --Steven Ibannovix (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose The author is a living person and photos become PD in Mexico 100 years after the author death. @Steven Ibannovix: "Freely available", or even "free to use", is not the same as PD. Ankry (talk) 09:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done no free license. Ankry (talk) 20:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Af marca-assinatura.png

Doesn't this image enters on {{PD-textlogo}}? Also, as the image is supposed to be used on Celepar article, replacing it's old logo (File:Logo horizontal Celepar.png) in the infobox Jose8122 (talk) 01:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Jose8122: IMO, it is PD-textlogo, so copyright free. But the deletion was due to COM:SCOPE issues. Where do you intend to use this logo? Ankry (talk) 09:15, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: in pt:Celepar Article (replacing the old past-2019 logo) Jose8122 (talk) 01:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Done per above. @Jose8122: Please, fix the info about authorship / source. {{Own}} logos are out of COM:SCOPE (as unofficial). Ankry (talk) 20:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PRK Productions.jpg

Its inspire from Orginal and create myself logo with changed colour — Preceding unsigned comment added by Needforname (talk • contribs)

@Needforname:

inspired work means a new work made from scratch bazing on the idea of the original work (but not on the work itself); this is not the case, clear COM:DW (eg. the same photo used)
own logos are out of COM:SCOPE.

Ankry (talk) 18:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done Per Ankry. Also, may not be in scope since the only article about this company that I can find is a draft. Thuresson (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Franz Beyerle, geb. 30.1.1885 , Wikiped.jpg

My photo shows Franz Beyerle (* 30. Januar 1885 in Konstanz; † 22. Oktober 1977) The photo is my property and I grant all rights to the public. Please, register my photo in Wikimedia Commons. I will insert it into the site concerning Franz Beyerle in Wikipedia.Pankratius (talk) 22:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Pankratius: Question Please elaborate what you mean by The photo is my property. Who is the photographer and by which reason you became the holder of the full and exclusive copyright? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response, The photo is my property is insufficient. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Konrad Beyerle (1872 - 1933), Deutscher Rechtswissenschaftler und Politiker .jpg

My photo shows Konrad Beyerle (* 14. September 1872 in Waldshut; † 26. April 1933 ) The photo is my property and I grant all rights to the public. Please, register my photo in Wikimedia Commons. I will insert it into the site concerning Konrad Beyerle in Wikipedia.Pankratius (talk) 22:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Pankratius: Question Please elaborate what you mean by The photo is my property. Who is the photographer and by which reason you became the holder of the full and exclusive copyright? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response, The photo is my property is insufficient. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:24, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DJ Parisa.jpg

Bonjour Veuillez je vous prie m'envoyer le lien où je puisse vous envoyer l'autorisation par mail de la part de la personne qui a pris la photo ci-dessus svp? Il s'agit de Mehdi DJ professeur à l'école de DJ network Paris Ile-de-France. Dès que je reçois votre réponse je vais le contacter sur Facebook pour lui faire de vous envoyer l'autorisation des droits d'auteur du photographe. Si possible à ne pas supprimer la photo en attendant la réponse de Mehdi DJ. Merci d'avance AmireeParis (talk) 01:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. File has not been deleted as of 01:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC). Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Reopenning: file deleted.

@AmireeParis: The procedure concerning permissions is described on COM:OTRS/fr. After a permission is received and verified, the image can be undeleted. Ankry (talk) 19:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Reclosing, nothing else to do here until OTRS is received. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grimesmagazinelogo54654.jpg

i am requesting file undeletion. that file belongs to me. i am the owner of the Grimes Magazine Logo. here is my file link: https://www.instagram.com/p/CDO8J4QMMzu/

(Rel46 (talk) 01:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC))

Done This is below COM:TOO anyways. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: Is the magazine notable? Unused logos are out of COM:SCOPE. Ankry (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Well, someone can nominate it for COM:DR if they want. It does not meet COM:CSD#F10, meaning that deletion without a DR is procedurally incorrect. The magazine has a reasonable online presence, suggesting that discussion is necessary to sort it out. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@Rel46: I nominated the logo for deletion as unused. If you wish it to be used in Wikimedia, please provide the information in the Deletion Request. Ankry (talk) 20:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

--Rodfal (talk) 10:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC) La imagen borrada es de mi total autoría, el enlace que aduce el Administrador como violación de derechos es una página que no menciona los autores, por tanto no puede comprobar con esa mínima prueba que no soy el autor original, además en el ángulo inferior izquierdo está mi nombre "Rodolfo Fernández Alvarez" DECLARO SER EL AUTOR DE DERECHO DE ESTE POSTER,--Rodfal (talk) 10:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC) considero injusto su borrado y denuncia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodfal (talk • contribs) 10:14, 31 August 2020‎ (UTC)

Info Google translates this request as follows: "The deleted image is my total authorship, the link that the Administrator claims as a violation of rights is a page that does not mention the authors, therefore it cannot verify with that minimal proof that I am not the original author, also in the lower left corner My name is "Rodolfo Fernández Alvarez" I DECLARE TO BE THE AUTHOR OF RIGHT OF THIS POSTER, I consider its deletion and complaint unfair." - I'm not sure what image this is about, certainly not Example.jpg, but this user has four different deleted image uploads. It is, however, indeed the case that his uploads such as File:ICO_World_Graphic_Day.jpg have a "Rodolfo Fernández Alvarez" watermark, and he claims to be him, which at least plausibly corresponds to the user name "Rodfal". But maybe OTRS is needed, see below. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Procedural close: No file mentioned, duplicate of request below. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket:2020080610005182

An image for this OTRS ticket needs review before verification. Please undelete File:الأستاذ الدكتور محمد ناجى المحلاوى.png. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 08:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: @Ww2censor: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Illustratrice Roseline d'Oreye.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Illustratrice Roseline d'Oreye.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: OTRS provided kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 17:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Kvardek du: ticket no.? Ankry (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: per Ticket:2020072210006385. @Kvardek du: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Affiche Festival de Contis - 1996.jpg

J'ai retrouvé la propriétaire des droits d'auteur de cette image et de toutes les image fournies par julienpitet--Maral33190 (talk) 22:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Maral33190: Well, this is the first stem. What is now needed, it is an evidence of free license granted by the author: either on an official webpage, or following COM:OTRS/fr. Ankry (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Nothing to do here until OTRS has deemed it has received sufficient permission. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:080423 rodolfofernandzalvarez2,gif.gif

Ver enlaces y leer en el poster mi autoría aunque la página no mencione el nombre de ninguno de los autores que publica en todo caso quien está en infracción CC es la página que cita el administrador https://www.themarkethink.com/creatividad/27-carteles-que-con-su-creatividad-celebran-el-dia-mundial-del-disenador-grafico/ Tengo pruebas irrefutables de mi autoría como el nombre y la fotografía de los archivos originales ver ángulo inferior izquierdo http://xignica.com/index.php?/newprojects/new-projects/#.X0zTYdMzYck thumb|Ver firma de mi autoría https://www.pinterest.es/rodfal/cartelespostersafiches/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodfal (talk • contribs) 10:48, 31 August 2020‎ (UTC)

Uploader claims to be Rodolfo Fernando Alvarez himself, so he could give a free license, of course. Google translates "Tengo pruebas irrefutables de mi autoría como el nombre y la fotografía de los archivos originales ver ángulo inferior izquierdo" as "I have irrefutable proof of my authorship such as the name and the photograph of the original files, see lower left corner." But probably this would need identification via COM:OTRS? @Rodfal: (Translated into Spanish by Google) Puede enviar una declaración de permiso a través del sistema OTRS para recuperarla, consulte Commons:OTRS/es. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

--Rodfal 13:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC) http://www.xignica.com/index.php?/newprojects/new-projects/#.X0z0m9MzYck

http://www.icograda.org/events/arch 
27 April World Graphics Day 2008

@Rodfal: If this is your website, please grant a free licence for this image at your page, and also for other such images you would like to have restored at Commons. A brief note and link like "CC by SA 4.0" right after the copyright notice below the images "Rodolfo Fernandez Alvarez 2007 ©" would be sufficient. This is the easiest way to verify your identy and authorship of the posters. De728631 (talk) 18:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fidget spinner search popularity 7d rolling mean.svg

I literally created the image and own all of the copyright. I said so on my talk page and it said so on the file page, but apparently it didn't go through.

Thanks, ArniDagur (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Done @BevinKacon: Why did you believe that evidence of permission was necessary for this file? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: No permission from Google, which is where it's from, as shown in the code provided in the SVG development field.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:50, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Mere data is not copyrightable. There is no evidence that Google exerted any creative influence on the results. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The image was generated using the Google Trends service, such use is under their terms which state "You may not copy, modify, distribute, sell, or lease any part of our services or software."--BevinKacon (talk) 14:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

What Google claims is irrelevant. The data is simply not copyrightable. If any non-copyright restrictions apply (and I don't think any are applicable in this case anyways), we don't care. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: by KoH. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IloveDesign Milton Glaser Tribute.jpg

--Rodfal 21:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)https://foroalfa.org/articulos/el-fin-de-i-love-new-york

Oppose No rationale for undeletion and linked webpage includes a copyright notice with no evidence of a free licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

MogokLake.JPG

Sincerely,

I own this MogokLake.JPG photo. That's why I Just like to get this photo back.

Many Thanks, Jimmy Win

@JimmyWinMGK: The photo has previous appeared on Facebook Are you U Thi Han Win? If so, please update the Facebook image to indicate that it is available under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: FWIW I wouldn't include a boilerplate message about OTRS when it's not the best solution to the problem. Here we have a Facebook account which is not publicly connected to an email address, so pretty much the only correct approach is to indicate on their Facebook account either the license or their Wikimedia username; private email does no good here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:World Graphic Day.gif

Please restore the following pages:

File:World Graphic Day.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: http://www.xignica.com/files/gimgs/6_worldgraphicday.jpg Rodfal 22:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose No rationale for undeletion and file in the link includes a copyright notice with no evidence of a free licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two PHL church photos

File was deleted in 2013, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manila Cathedral wts.jpg "no-FOp in the Philippines." Nevertheless, per @Ymblanter: , the present cathedral (although built in the 1950s) is "apparently a derivative of the previous edition of the cathedral" (in other words, the construction in 1950 was actually a reconstruction of the old cathedral in the pre-war era). And according to @Thincat: , the façade survived (per File:Manila_Cathedral_after.jpg). Should this basis is invalid, another basis is the successful undeletion of File:Philippines National Museum.jpg and File:Supreme Court of the Philippines.jpg. Quoting from @Clindberg: 's statement:

At the time, the Philippines' copyright law was based on the U.S. Copyright Act 1909, which did not protect architecture. In 1951, the Philippines joined the Berne Convention, which eliminated the formalities and should have mandated architecture protection, but I'm not sure they passed any explicit laws on the matter. The law was replaced in 1972, which did explicitly protect architecture, but it also explicitly said that copyright protection was only granted for works still under protection of the previous law (i.e. non-retroactive). The non-retroactive part is still in their newer law today. It is *possible* that no copyright protection exists for works which predate 1972, or maybe 1951. Protection would have needed to have been retroactively restored, and not sure any law actually ever did that, unless the provisions of the Berne Convention effectively did, and not sure that is required. For example, the U.S. still does not protect buildings constructed before 1990 (when they added protection mandated by the Berne Convention); there was no retroactive copyright for those. It's a bit murky, but you would expect any retroactive law to exempt certain existing uses, and things like that, and not sure any such law was ever passed, so architectural rights probably were not retroactively restored.

Using Clindberg's statement, it can be interpreted that all architectural works in the Philippines that were completed from 1971 backwards were (and are still) unprotected, since the copyright protection for architecture which was added in 1972 is "not retroactive." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:42, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Also adding: File:Cathedral side.jpg. Also deleted under same reason per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cathedral side.jpg, but @Sven Manguard: says it was completed in 1936. Not sure what is this cathedral (since the file name is itself ambiguous), but judging from Sven Manguard's statement on the year, it can be considered as PD if using Clindberg's statement, which again said that the US Copyright Act of 1909, from which the Philippine copyright law emerged, didn't explicitly mentioned architecture as one of the protected works. Despite the Philippines joining the convention in 1951, no law replaced the American-era law of 1900s until the 1972 law was formed, which explicitly protected architecture but also explicitly retained copyright on works that were still in copyright, i.e., excluding architecture completed from 1900s to 1971. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:58, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

With the updated Commons:FOP Philippines, I can assume that both subjects are OK at Commons. Manila Cathedral's current incarnation is from 1958 (nevertheless it is still behind 1972 in which formal copyright protection to architecture was implemented, although non-retroactive because of the lack of actual judicial cases). It might be 50-60% OK, or in practice 80-100% OK. For the "unnamed" cathedral, 1936, so 100% OK at Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Update from the requestor: after extensive research which involves browsing public logs under the filename on Commons and on Wikipedia, this File:Cathedral side.jpg is actually w:Baguio Cathedral, and evidenced by this edit of the original uploader at enwiki. Since this cathedral dates from 1936, it is now clear that it is 100% safe for Commons. 07:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above and updated COM:FOP Philippines. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ultraman Overseas Dispute Contract of 1976.jpg

The premise of copyright is the work, and this is a contract about of Ultraman and Tsuburaya Productions. The contract is not a work, so there is no copyright. Therefore, I apply for restoration.wanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 08:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@黄琬琦: The above declaration contradicts your claim that this is copyrighted and the copyright holder has granted CC0 license. How would you like to fix this? Ankry (talk) 10:42, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: I don't know, because I'm not aware of any precedent for contract documents on Wikimedia Commons,So I don't know what to do with itwanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 11:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

In fact, I chose CC0 because I didn't find the right option and assumed that CC0 was copyright-free,I'm sorry that I chose CC license without knowing whether there are similar contract documents, but I did not find any relevant contract documents.wanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 12:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@黄琬琦: CC0 means "the copyright holder granted Creative Commons - Public Domain Declaration license" and this requires an evidence. If there is no appropriate copyright template, then we cannot undelete the file without creating the template, providing there PD rationale based on copyright law and accepting the template by community in COM:VPC discussion. Frankly, I am unsure if the contract is indeed not copyrighted. Ankry (talk) 16:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: creative work according to the definition of Copyright law in Japan :"思想又は感情を創作的に表現したものであって、文芸、学術、美術又は音楽の範囲に属するもの". i.e., Something that creatively expresses thoughts or feelings, which belonging to the range of literary arts, academics, art, or music.and

Japanese copyright laws :

第二章　著作者の権利第一節　著作物（著作物の例示）第十条　この法律にいう著作物を例示すると、おおむね次のとおりである。一　小説、脚本、論文、講演その他の言語の著作物二　音楽の著作物三　舞踊又は無言劇の著作物四　絵画、版画、彫刻その他の美術の著作物五　建築の著作物六　地図又は学術的な性質を有する図面、図表、模型その他の図形の著作物七　映画の著作物八　写真の著作物九　プログラムの著作物

i.e.,Chapter II Rights of the author Section 1 Works (Examples of works) For example article 10 the works referred to in this law are roughly as follows. 1.A novel, play, essay, lecture, and other work written in other languages 2. Musical Works 3.Dancing or silent drama 4.Paintings, prints, sculptures and other works of fine arts 5. Architectural Works 6. diagrams or academic schemata, diagrams, models or other graphic works 7.A book of films 8.A book of photographs 9.The works of programs ^[1]

The US Copyright Office also said protects original works of authorship including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, such as poetry, novels, movies, songs, computer software, and architecture.^[2]

So you know contracts not are works and creative works, and you know it that no copyrighted.wanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 05:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Anybody suggests a copyright template that can be used here? Otherwise we have to close this as not done. Ankry (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Why not done? Those "contracts" are {{PD-ineligible}} at least in Japan, or are you asking that such can be copyrighted in the United States (if yes, why? and I'm afraid that this need COM:VP discussions). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Question Other than the potential copyright issues, @黄琬琦: could you tell us why this file would be in scope? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:36, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: zh:奥特曼海外版权争议? ja:チャイヨー・プロダクション#ウルトラマン訴訟? PS: Someone may oppose me because "the 黄琬琦 can't identify them (singular them) as S.Sands, one of the potential authors of that contract", in this case I would however support appling {{PD-Thailand}} if okay. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

So I think the currently key question is, Is @黄琬琦: = Sompote Sands? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: Because I want it to be used by Wikipedia in all kinds of languages,It is helpful for items that deal with this aspect.As for Everyone's proposal, I support PDwanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 03:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Then I would

Oppose because you can't be able to identify yourself as S.Sands, only the actual copyright holder, the S.Sands, has right to license their works as CC-0 or other CC licenses, you can't do so for other peoples' works. And you didn't provide evidences why this is Public Domain in Thailand. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: I added Sompote Sands because this is an Ultraman overseas copyright dispute contract between Sompote Sands and Tsuburaya Productions is the contract between them, but because I didn't find any other contract documents, I don't know how to fill in the author.wanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 03:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) @黄琬琦 and Liuxinyu970226: The answers provided still do not answer my query about scope. The existence of Wikipedia articles does not mean that such a document is in scope on Wikimedia Commons. So I will repeat the question: could you tell us why this file would be in scope? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: Because Commons is a place where documents can be included in the public domain, and the documents (contracts) belong there

It's in the link you gave:

Wikimedia Commons accepts only free content, in other words files that are either freely licensed or which are in the public domain. A file is considered public domain if either all copyright has expired or if the copyright owner(s) has voluntarily placed the content of the file into the public domain by irrevocably renouncing all copyright. A file which is ineligible for copyright protection is also considered public domain.

Any file hosted here must normally be freely licensed or public domain according to both the law of the United States and according to the law of the source country, if different.wanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 03:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: มาตรา ๖ งานอันมีลิขสิทธิ์ตามพระราชบัญญัตินีได้แก่ งานสร้างสรรค์ประเภทวรรณกรรม นาฏกรรม ศิลปกรรม. ดนตรีกรรม โสตทัศนวัสดุภาพยนตร์สิ่ง บันทึกเสียง（Section 6 Copyrighted works under this Act are Creative works of literature, drama, fine arts, music, music, audiovisual, cinematic, sound recordings）^[3]wanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 03:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@黄琬琦: That is an answer to a question I did not ask. My query above concerns itself with COM:SCOPE rather than COM:L. Again: The existence of Wikipedia articles does not mean that such a document is in scope on Wikimedia Commons. And once again: Why do you believe that the file in question in in scope? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: Because it conforms to scope: First of all, it's a media file

and .jpg is also a free file format that is allowable

And by the ^[1] ^[2] ^[3] We can conclude that public domain

This document can let people know the specific content of the contract mentioned in the incident, which has a realistically useful for an educational purpose.

And this file is obviously more than just plain text，And that's what it says"Also allowed are files which embody something of value over and above raw text."So it's not only excluded educational content.

So it is compliant scope.wanqi|Huang|！ (talk) 06:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose. Although I was convinced for a micro-second, the file is in essence only text and not a media file, even if it is in a media file format. Not in scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done per discussion: out of scope. Ankry (talk) 05:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:H.R. Selbstportrait.jpg

Hello. This foto was taken by Hanns Reich himself, who was my father, in the mirror of the entrance hall of our house the day of my birth, 1961-11-09. As his heiress I am sure to possess all rights to publish this foto at wikipedia. Many thanks for undeleting and for your dedication Katharina Reich-OldenNina Brujita (talk) 09:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Hanns Reich had four children, do all copyright owners agree to this? Thuresson (talk) 10:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

@Thuresson: A similar issue is actually being discussed at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Multiple copyright holders; one person grants CC license. My opinion, as stated there, is that we should be relatively lenient when familial matters are concerned. I don't remember the last time an OTRS agent actually requested a copy of a will to prove the inheritance; generally we just accept such claims per COM:AGF. That said, we generally do want some kind of confirmation that a relative of a notable person is actually who they claim to be, but here I don't see a good way of doing so without demanding ID (which is now officially discouraged in OTRS procedures). Any ideas? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose OP's copyright claim requires a detailed legal investigation that can not be done through OTRS volunteers. Thuresson (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Well, if OTRS is not the right procedure here, I think we should apply COM:AGF unless another procedure is suggested. So

Support undeletion per above. Ankry (talk) 10:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Uncertainty of the identity of the UDR submitter Nina Brujita who claims to be Katharina Reich-Olden. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Afable Building

Per COM:FOP Philippines. According to en:Afable Building, the building's facade, which was the subject of these photos, were constructed between 1931 to 1932. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:10, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Support. The 1956 renovation should not be an issue because as agreed upon at Village pump before that updated COM:FOP Philippines, buildings completed between August 1951 and November 1972 are possibly fine because of no actual case law during that time. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Info the deleted files are:

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: per updated COM:FOP Philippines. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UP-OuezonHall-1.jpg

Deleted due to "no FOP in PHL" (Commons:Deletion requests/File:UP-OuezonHall-1.jpg). Nevertheless, the updated Commons:FOP Philippines now recognizes Philippine buildings before November 1972 as PD (no copyright protection). Quezon Hall, being completed in 1950, is among these buildings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Support the architecture falls under Commons:FOP Philippines now, and the sculpture is COM:DM. Ankry (talk) 06:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per updated COM:FOP Philippines. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:PD MacaoGov

I read Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:PD_MacaoGov and noted that in this discussion they may have misunderstood s:Decree-Law_n.o_43/99/M. While the English version (which is an unofficial translation) states that "Official works are in particular the texts", the Chinese version actually states it as "Official works are especially referring to the texts", which, in Chinese, means it is not limited to texts. Therefore, some files in this Category is in PD (as I cannot guarantee all files in Category are actually official works). Hereby I request a review to all files in this Category to see if they are truly official works and should be undeleted.

Itcfangye (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

~~Support~~ per above. --SCP-2000 10:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Per Decree-Law No. 43/99 / M, Art 6 §2: 官方作品尤其指協約文本、法律及規章之文本、各當局所作之報告或決定之文本，以及該等文本之譯本。 (Official works especially refer to the text of the agreement, the text of laws and regulations, the text of reports or decisions made by various authorities, and the translations of these texts.) or São obras oficiais, entre outras, os textos de convenções, de leis, de regulamentos e de relatórios ou de decisões de quaisquer autoridades, bem como as respectivas traduções. (Official works, among others, are the texts of conventions, laws, regulations and reports or decisions of any authorities, as well as the respective translations.). The clear intent is that official works refers to texts (treaties, legislations, regulations, reports, decisions, and translation of such). Images, other media, and other types of works are not enumerated. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:06, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Comment From my understanding of the Chinese text, the enumerated cases are certainly examples of official works, but it doesn't necessarily imply that those are the only types of official works. @Jusjih, Shizhao, DarwIn, and Érico: Pinging our Chinese- and Portuguese-speaking admins for additional opinions. Can you please look at s:zh:第43/99/M號法令#第一章受保護作品 (第六條官方作品) or s:pt:Decreto-Lei de Macau 43 de 1999#CAPÍTULO I Obras protegidas (Artigo 6.º Obras oficiais) and explain how you would interpret the law? Are "official works" restricted to the list in the second line, or is that just a list of examples? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Per Nat--shizhao (talk) 01:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per above. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
@Shizhao: Do you mean "尤其指" implies that it is limited to? Chinese is my first language, yet I never used "尤其" to put a limit to something. Itcfangye (talk) 07:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Record from Wiktionary affirms that the term of "尤其" do means "especially; particularly", and the Revised Chinese Dictionary by Taiwanese Ministry of Education affirms the meaning on Wiktionary (sorry that I can't bring the exact link, but feel free to search for the term then).廣九直通車 (talk) 03:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
OpposeAs far as I know, these files published by Macau Government, but are not included in any "official works" listed in Article 6(2) of Decree-Law 43/99/M. Totally not in public domain then.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:54, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:013 - 16 - CZE - 02R 0061 - Tomáš Kostka - CZE.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:013 - 16 - CZE - 02R 0061 - Tomáš Kostka - CZE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:A lovely slinky 1940's nightie.... (22498026659).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:AbnerVicentini.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Audi S1 E2.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Bene Barbosa Câmara Municipal do Rio de Janeiro 2015.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Dark Horse Flyer performing in 2014.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Per updated COM:PDM A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

In order:

Oppose The Flickr user is called "Andreas", but the photo is credited to "Przemysław Jakubowski". No evidence that the copyright holder agreed to the license.
Neutral Unfortunately, the Flickr account is down, so we'll have to make a decision about whether the uploader is the photographer based on what we know.
Oppose Old photo, no evidence of own work.
Neutral Unfortunately, the Flickr user has made everything private, so we'll have to make a decision about whether the uploader is the photographer based on what we know.
Weak Support Is this is an official account of Bolsanaro? I don't see it officially linked from any government website, but if you google "fotosbolsonaro" you'll find lots of reusers so maybe it is?
Oppose Says it's from a music video, no evidence of own work.

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: File:Audi S1 E2.jpg -- Safe to assume that uploader = flickr user. Not done: File:Bene Barbosa Câmara Municipal do Rio de Janeiro 2015.jpg -- Even if this was the flickr page of President Bolsonaro or his family, they are pictured. Copyright transfer/assignment in Brazil must be in writing and might not be complete or absolute; File:A lovely slinky 1940's nightie.... (22498026659).jpg is by an "Emma at DreamDate from United Kingdom", uploader is a "David from Egypt"; "File:AbnerVicentini.png, File:013 - 16 - CZE - 02R 0061 - Tomáš Kostka - CZE.jpg, File:Dark Horse Flyer performing in 2014.jpg per KoH. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

PHL plaque photos - August 29, 2020 undeletion request

~~[[:File:Jaime Cardinal Sin historical marker in Manila.jpg]] (DR: [[Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Monument to Jaime Sin]])~~ ^{Done as it is a plaque with the seal of the Lungsod ng Maynilà. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)}
File:A Marker in Plaza Mexico, Intramuros.jpg (DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:400th Anniversary Memorial of the Maritime Expedition of Legazpi and Urdaneta from Mexico to the Philippines)

possibly some other photos within Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:400th Anniversary Memorial of the Maritime Expedition of Legazpi and Urdaneta from Mexico to the Philippines, since Hariboneagle927 used plural "plaques" instead of singular "plaque" in the said DR.

Files deleted because "no FOP in PHL." Nevertheless, Seav has said before that plaques from NHCP or its predecessors fall under {{PD-PhilippineGov}} as works created and commissioned by the Philippine government. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Also: some files under Commons:Deletion requests/Soul Waves in Rizal Park (Hariboneagle927 once again mentioned "plaques"), and File:RizalParkjf8173 21.JPG (at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hermano Pule) in which he also indicated TOO (a plaque?) 08:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Done File:Jaime Cardinal Sin historical marker in Manila.jpg as it is a plaque with the seal of the Lungsod ng Maynilà. However, the second one I'm not so certain of as it isn't a plaque, but an element of the work assumed to be copyrighted. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: File:Jaime Cardinal Sin historical marker in Manila.jpg. Not done: File:A Marker in Plaza Mexico, Intramuros.jpg -- Not a NHCP plaque, but an integral part of the copyrighted work. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rolando Bautista (cropped).jpg

Cropped version of File:Adopted Son of Shakba Ko Lawaisig.jpg. Was deleted because of the claim that PNA "disallows commercial use." But since this is a photo from a news agency that is under the direct control and administration of the Philippine governent, it automatically falls PD, and like Sky Harbor said before, claims on non-commercial use is unenforceable. Please also see my prior undeletion attempt for reference: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-08#Two files by Hariboneagle927 and one file sourced from Batanes provincial government. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:اینفوگرافی کمک معیشتی کرنا۰۱.jpg

This file was tagged for copyright by someone who i think is doing this in bad faith There is no law in iran for copyright.also this work was made by Iranian government it's public domain.

Baratiiman (talk) 13:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Of corse there is: See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iran. --Ju Ta 13:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

But it is iranian government website JuTa Baratiiman (talk) 13:15, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

@Baratiiman: Works by the Iranian government aren't (necessarily) in the public domain. Iran does have copyright rules; Please see COM:IRAN. Ahmad^talk 13:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose. @Baratiiman: (1) You claimed own work and to hold the copyright under the licensing heading when it is now clear that it was neither your work nor your right to issue a licence. (2) Government of Iran websites, such as the one you listed above, asserts copyright (e.g. the one above has the notice "Copyright © ۲۰۱۶ Dolat.ir All rights reserved."). (3) Your assertion that "There is no law in iran for copyright.also this work was made by Iranian government it's public domain." is incorrect. Iran has 4 different laws that deal with copyright. While government works are not explicitly mentioned in these laws, these laws do not exempt such works from protection. As such, works by employees of the Government of Iran should be assumed to be protected by copyright in Iran. While such works would not enjoy protection in the United States, it is Commons policy to consider the copyright status of a work in both the United States (where the Wikimedia servers are located) and the country of origin (in this case, Iran). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. Work neither in public domain as claim or by the UDR summitter as previously claimed. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Restaurante Solar Moinho de Vento.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Restaurante Solar Moinho de Vento.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: The photo was provided by me by the restaurant owner. He was the one that took that photo. I asked for his permission to use an official photo on my article and I got his approval. Ricardojsbarbosa (talk) 08:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose The copyright holder must send in a release under a free license via COM:OTRS. The copyright holder is generally the person who took the photo (which may or may not be the restaurant owner), unless they transferred the copyright in writing to someone else. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per KoH. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2019 Renault Kwid RXT Facelift.png

The file is derived from a video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eXVm6IG6xk) that is specifically marked as "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". According to Template:YouTube CC-BY and Commons:Where is the license on various sites?#YouTube, as long at it is marked as such, it is allowed to be uploaded to Wikimedia.

From Commons:Where is the license on various sites?#YouTube: "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed), which means Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 - acceptable for our purposes"

Andra Febrian (talk) 08:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Done and LR'd. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dalyboy Belgason at Trumpet Award.jpg

A permission email has been sent to this effect. Kindly confirm and undelete the file. Thank you. PhaithS (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Cynthia Shalom’s birthday photoshoot.jpg

A permission email in this regard had be sent. Please see that the file is undeleted. Thank you PhaithS (talk) 14:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

The image(s) will be undeleted after the permission is verified and accepted by an OTRS volunteer. Ankry (talk) 23:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Nothing to process until OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:12, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RatkoTankosicMickoMarkovic2020.jpg

File:RatkoTankosicMickoMarkovic2020.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MickoMarkovicNedaArneric2019.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Hello dear Wikipedia, I m Jovka Ras (Jovana Matovic) (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9862757/) serbian producer and director. I m owner od "Tetreb Film" (movie production). Please undelete photos who i upload. all images are the property of my production and my projects.

For more info contact me: Jovka Ras (Redacted) or email (Redacted)

About Tetreb Film: https://search.bisnode.rs/rs/1219076/tetreb-film/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JovkaRas (talk • contribs) 15:47, 2 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Hello dear Wikipedia, I m Jovka Ras (Jovana Matovic) (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm9862757/) serbian producer and director. I m owner od "Tetreb Film" (movie production). Please undelete photos who i upload. all images are the property of my production and my projects.

Image: MickoMarkovicNedaArneric2019 is from my movie "Nije sve kao sto izgleda". Owner is me.

For more info contact me: Jovka Ras (Redacted) or email (Redacted)

About Tetreb Film: https://search.bisnode.rs/rs/1219076/tetreb-film/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JovkaRas (talk • contribs) 15:48, 2 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

We require a formal release via the COM:OTRS process. To generate this release, please follow the instructions at COM:RELGEN and email the generated form to us. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kemna Lokomotiven.jpg

-it is my own picture. Thus, I cannot give copyright for it. --Streethistorian1 (talk) 16:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Streethistorian1: Did you paint the painting? If so, what sources did you rely on for inspiration? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

This painting seems to be used as a cover of a 1915 book.

Support undeletion as {{PD-anon-expired}}. Ankry (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment The book was published in Breslau (modern day Wrocław) and Berlin so {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} may also be used. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zain Naghmi SSC2017.jpg

I read the warning that came up when I entered the copyright tag so was aware that this would likely happen; however, I'd like to say that I entered this tag under the specific instruction of the owner of the image. I was writing a Wikipedia article on the subject of the image (Zain Naghmi, an American competitive Super Smash Bros. Melee player) and was struggling to find a copyright-free image of him to use.

I saw that this same image was used on a fandom wiki (https://liquipedia.net/smash/Zain) and noted that the uploader had requested the usage from the creator, Preston Kwan. I was able to find Kwan through their Twitter (linked on the file's page - https://liquipedia.net/smash/File:Zain_SSC_2017.jpg) and sent them a DM asking if I could use the file. They agreed, under the conditions that I a) link the original source, b) give them credit and c) upload it under the CC BY-NC-ND license (proof of this conversation here - https://imgur.com/a/3NP0H9n). I understand why the file was deleted, but I have express permission of the creator and was acting under their specific instructions. As such, I don't believe the file should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OliverEastwood (talk • contribs) 19:28, 2 September 2020‎ (UTC)

@OliverEastwood: Commons do not accept licenses that do not allow commercial use or to make derivative works, as is explained at Commons:Licensing. Thuresson (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Thuresson: So how should I license this so that it complies with the wishes of the owner while still being usable on Wikipedia? OliverEastwood (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

He would need to agree to change the license on the Flickr image to "Attribution" (CC-BY) or "Attribution-ShareAlike" (CC-BY-SA). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:57, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Olamilekan "Laycon" Agbeleshe.jpg

The file was shared by the subject in the image on social media for public domain use with no copyright. A link to the social media post was added when I originally uploaded the file.

The image has been used on multiple websites, blogs and by newspaper houses online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinemerem Nworisa (talk • contribs) 22:59, 2 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

What do you mean by "no copyright"? Copyright protection is automatically granted by law and independent on author's or subject's will unless there is an explicit exception in law. Fair use images are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons. Ankry (talk) 23:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response to Ankry's query and no evidence of free licence, or of expiration of protection or exemption from it. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AuraTop screenshot.jpg

Субъект с изображения поделился файлом для использования в общественном достоянии без авторских прав. File:AuraTop screenshot.jpg является скриншотом сайта Ауры (aura.top) до закрытия сайта. Скриншоты сайта находится в свободном доступе и подлежат свободному доступу с ознакомительным характером. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AntinetAdm2000 (talk • contribs) 07:12, 3 September 2020‎ (UTC)

@AntinetAdm2000: If the author of the webpage & the photographers of the images presented there declared their work to be public domain and local copyright law recognizes such declaration to be valid, then please, provide link to it. Note, that most European legal systems do not recognize "public domain declaration" as a legal act that grants any right to anybody. And we cannot host Fair Use images. Ankry (talk) 12:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: Согласно законодательства Российской Федерации, отдельного запрета на публикацию скриншотов не существует. Однако, если на скриншоте есть некая информация, нарушающая законодательство, за него можно привлечь к ответственности. Если вы публикуете скриншот чего-либо, показывая ее интерфейс или особенности, это не является нарушением. Если же вы публикуете закрытые данные из чужого аккаунта, разглашающие информацию о человеке (например, его номер телефона, адрес проживания и т.п.), за это уже можно привлекать. Однако скриншот показывает только интерфейс сайта. А также сами правила сайта не запрещают публиковать скриншоты своего интерфейса https://help.aura.top/hc/ru/sections/360001299378-%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B5-%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D1%8B .

@AntinetAdm2000: Please, read COM:L and COM:DW.

The screenshot is a DW of photos. The photos are copyrighted. I see no clause that allows anybody to extract the photos from the screenshot and use tham commercially (just an example) neither under the abovementioned link nor in RF copyright law. And this needs to be also allowed under US copyright law. The photos are copyrighted (as I do not think the photographer(s) died more than 70 years ago), the screenshot is a DW of the photos, so also copyrighted by the photo copyright holder(s). We cannot accept Fair Use images. Ankry (talk) 18:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

PS. Ping does not work if you do not sign messages.

Not done: no evidence that images are in public domain per the law or under an acceptable free licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:প্রধান শিক্ষক.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:প্রধান শিক্ষক.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: please do not delet this photo. He is an honourable Head Teacher of দেবীনগর দ্বি-মূখী মাধ্যমিক বিদ্যালয় । You can check this photo on school website. Please visit our website "www.dblss.edu.bd" and confirm it. Sakib-SKF (talk) 09:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose No free license on this webpage. (

Copyright © 2017 by দেবীনগর দ্বি-মূখী মাধ্যমিক বিদ্যালয়

is not a free license declaration.) We cannot host Fair Use images. Ankry (talk) 12:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GFN-Country-Overshoot-Day-2020.png

Please restore the following pages:

File:2020 Past Overshoot-Days-French-768x475.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:GFN-Country-Overshoot-Day-2020.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: the files were deleted because the site I took the pictures from as a general 'c- all rights reserved' statement. But the Download page for the info graphics has this specific copy right statement: "We welcome the use of the infographics and Earth Overshoot Day logos below with the credit “Global Footprint Network www.footprintnetwork.org.”" (see: https://www.overshootday.org/newsroom/infographics/) If this makes the license compatible with Wikimedia, I would appreciate the files to be undeleted. Thanks Christian Pietzsch (talk) 14:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Unfortunately that is not compatible with Commons. Per COM:L#Acceptable licenses, we require adaptation/modification to be allowed, and the page does not say anything about that. However, it seems like they may be willing to relicense under a Creative Commons license if you ask. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per KoH. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted under Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Enchanted Kingdom

Various files under Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Enchanted Kingdom were deleted due to "no-FOP in the Philippines." After obtaining some opinion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Are ferris wheels in the Philippines OK for Commons?, it can be considered that some (if not all) of the photos here shouldn't have been deleted. For the following reasons (I'm going to base the reasons according to the exact meaning of the file names):

Ferris wheels (The Wheel of Fate)

- Per Bluerasberry, ferris wheels are structures of machine-type, with no architectural or artistic qualities, hence utilitarian-type. Jeff G. cited COM:UA.

Space shuttle roller coaster

- Interpreting the inputs brought forth in the discussion there, files of this subject should have no problem. The ride can be utilitarian also, although it might have been inspired from NASA (but nevertheless can fall {{PD-USGov-NASA}}). The logo on the cylindrical can (should it appear) is simple, similar to File:Coca-Cola Zero logo.svg. Coke Zero logo was mentioned at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aer Arann Islands logo.png, in which Jameslwoodward said that it only consists of typefaces and is of a U.S. company, therefore no copyright restriction. Other structures might qualify COM:DM.

Other rides

- I can assume these are also for utilitarian purposes. Per my visit there in October 2019, they appear to be machines for the sole purpose of amusement (theme park)

I'm not sure for the other three, but it appears that File:Enchanted kingdom.jpg is the Enchanted kingdom entrance.jpg of enwiki (per the latter's history and the upload log of TheCoffee) and doesn't qualify the above-mentioned conditions. I don't know for the other two — File:Enchanted Kingdom (01-03-2015).jpg and File:Enchanted Kingdom.JPG — but should they depict the entrance, they are not qualified since the EK entrance is an architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Additional photo: File:Me at e.k.jpg (Found at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Me at e.k.jpg). However, I can't be sure if this just depicts the component rides there or the gate, which might be a copyrighted architecture. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

I agree with what JWilz12345 is saying. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: except File:Enchanted Kingdom.JPG and File:Me at e.k.jpg which depict copyrighted architecture. The buildings in File:Enchanted Kingdom (01-03-2015).jpg are probably de minimus -- however, if one disagrees, feel free to renominate for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two RFVelasquez pics with LRT name

I assume the files above depict LRT stations. Deleted due to no FOP (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ramon FVelasquez), but railway stations (even elevated ones) have low COM:TOO, proven by the similarities of the design of most of the LRT and MRT stations. In effect they are not eligible for copyright. Philippine stations were discussed at w:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 June 18, in which despite marking the photos as FoP-USonly, Magog the Ogre remarked that Philippine station buildings might not be eligible for architectural copyright ("not enough building as artwork in the photos"). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: per {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. Photos are by works of the LRTA in Manila which is a GOCC, and therefore in PD in the Philippines. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tamil Announcer Rt Rana Announcing maha shivaratri Day at the India in Sri Lanka, Consulate General of India, Jaffna.jpg

please other admin note this image , this is a good image and free licence because the photo upload India in Sri Lanka, Consulate General of India, Jaffna facebook and when i upload i mention author of this image India in Sri Lanka, Consulate General of India. as well as this is a Indian government work so please recover this image and other admin Jdx Jdx protected this image till sep 23 so please recover this image Sjrahem (talk) 13:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC) thanks

@Sjrahem: Where is the cc-by-sa-4.0 license declaration for this image? (link or OTRS ticket number) Ticket#2020072410000645 is invalid and unresponded. Ankry (talk) 18:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Support per {{GODL-India}}, however. Ankry (talk) 19:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: at the moment i couldn't see this photo because photo is deleted. so accept my kindly request plz restore this photo thanks Sjrahem (talk) 00:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

You can see it here. Remember that providing incorrect information (eg. about licensing) makes other information provided by you unreliable. Ankry (talk) 12:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Support Per Ankry, {{GODL-India}} applies. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per discusion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Asiel Babastro.jpg

Greetings, I am the owner of the file in question. I am appealing because this file was deleted and I could not respond in time. I would like to help me restore it. Thanks in advance.

--Codyas (talk) 17:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

@Codyas: You can respond here to the doubts raised in the DR. Ankry (talk) 17:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: The problem is that the debate has already closed on that page: This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyas (talk • contribs) 19:01, 3 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Question @Codyas: Please elaborate what you mean by "I am the owner of the file in question". Are you just in possession of the image? Are you the photographer? Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: Indeed, I am the photographer of this photo and 5 others that I will also claim in due course. I take the photos with my cell phone and I am a personal friend of each of the personalities for whom I take the photos. By posting the photos here I am assigning all rights to Wikipedia. It's a pleasure for me to do it. Codyas (talk) 03:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

@Codyas: If this is the case, as Ankry had asked you earlier, could you address/respond here at UDR the concerns and doubts raised in the now-closed DR? Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Or you can upload the original, full resolution image from your camera, with complete camera info in EXIF. Ankry (talk) 13:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: no further response to queries. @Codyas: per Ankry -- you can upload the original, full resolution image from your camera, with complete camera info in EXIF. However, we caution you against reuploading the version missing its full EXIF metadata, as it will be deleted. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mother's Child Movie.jpg

This image is not copyrighted and is the poster used is a promotional poster used for the movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MelanieMovieVaughn (talk • contribs) 18:30, 3 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
False assumption, IMO: the logos are above COM:TOO and the photo-based image is definitely copyrighted. Ankry (talk) 18:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Oppose per Ankry. Furthermore, the file is out of project scope as the draft was immediately rejected by an EN-WP AFC reviewer. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Brawler (logo).jpg

The file isn't protected by any copyrights.

09/03/2020 --Samarinhadopoco (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

@Samarinhadopoco: Please elaborate your statement that "The file isn't protected by any copyrights.". Unless exempted by the law or by jurisprudence, works are automatically protected by copyright. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: no response, no evidence that the copyright has expired, or that the work has been freely licensed or exempted from protection. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fahrenheit By MAKOTO SAKAMOTO, photo by Kei Sugimoto.jpg

The photo of Makoto Sakamoto may have been deleted without permission. --ARI MATSUOKA (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Ari Matsuoka,05,September,2020

@ARI MATSUOKA: It was deleted due to lack of free license permission from Kei Sugimoto (or lack of evidence of the permission if it exists and is hidden somewhere). Per Wikimedia Commons policy, providing such an evidence is up to you. Ankry (talk) 13:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The kidd2.jpg

I want to use this image again. File:The kidd2.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiteshjay (talk • contribs) 18:41, 4 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Oppose Image was deleted per CSD F10 (Personal photo of non-contributor) and is also out of scope as it was used in a now-twice deleted draft (en:Draft:The Kidd) --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Info Hiteshjay had just recreated this file out-of-process as File:The Kidd.jpg (now deleted). They was just blocked on English Wikipedia for trying to circumvent a block there (The Kidd1 had been previously blocked there for advertising/self-promotion) and both The Kidd1 and Hiteshjay have just been blocked for abusing multiple accounts here on Commons. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done the requester is blocked. Ankry (talk) 22:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Julius Kemna real.jpg

- it does not have a copyright -it is downloaded from a website stating it has no copyright; and openly usable --Streethistorian1 (talk) 16:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Streethistorian1: Which web site? Who is the photographer? Who is on this photo? Thuresson (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Streethistorian1: we need an evidence for this. Claiming initially that you are the author of this painting does not make your other words reliable. Ankry (talk) 23:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment If the subject is Julius Kemna, then the photo would have been taken prior to his death in 1898. However, the question is: when was the photo colourised and by whom? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

May I suggest uploading a non-colourized image, if this cannot be resolved? This one should be {{PD-old-assumed}} Ankry (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Pinging @Streethistorian1. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response from UDR submitter. @Streethistorian1: Feel free to upload a non-colourised version of this work with the approriate licensing/copyright status tags, and the appropriate atrributions. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Earl Williams (politician).jpg

Could this file please be restored: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Earl_Williams_(politician).jpg

Reasoning: The deletion was rationalized by stating it is a copyright violation and the proof was its use in an news article from 2011. see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Earl_Williams_(politician).jpg

However, I was the original uploader of this image in 2007 and the news organization took the photo from the wikipedia page for use in 2011. My original upload was high in quality and the news article very low suggesting that they just copied the image from the wikipedia page four years after I posted it. I have the original print photo that I scanned to upload in 2007.

Supporting evidence: The original upload in 2007: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=&user=&page=File%3AEarl+Williams%28politician%29.jpg&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype= My original edits to the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Earl_Williams_(politician)&diff=prev&oldid=177147602&diffmode=source

The user Patrick Rogel mistakenly ignored this evidence presented in the original request and wrongly stated the upload was in 2012 after the news article.

Given this, I am asking that the photo be reinstated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChartedMemories23 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 4 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Question @ChartedMemories23: While you have the original print photo -- which makes you the owner or possessor of a "copy" of the photo (i.e. the tangible embodiment of the work), but who is the photographer? Ownership or possession of a photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Info Per the log on English Wikipedia, I can confirm that the image was originally uploaded as en:File:Earl Williams(politician).jpg 04:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC). Comment But this is irrelevant if we cannot determine the work's copyright status. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response. No evidence was presented that uploader is copyright holder, only that they are the possessor of a copy of the work. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tareq Hawasli.png

Hello,

I took this photo and LISH at Harvard requested it from me so there is no copyright issue.

Thank you, Natalie Dryden — Preceding unsigned comment added by NDTH2020 (talk • contribs) 20:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@NDTH2020: We have no way to confirm or verify your assertions and claims here, esp. as (1) the photo is not credited, and (2) the deleted file is missing its full exif metadata. You can either re-upload the image with its full exif metadata or, if for some reason you do not wish it to be public, please send a release under an acceptable free licence and evidence that you are indeed the photographer using our OTRS process. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kukuan Hydropower Plant01.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Kukuan Hydropower Plant01.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Per the deletion discussion, it seem that this image is licensed under the Taiwan Government Website Open Information Announcement. Therefore I want to request temporary undeletion, so that I can make sure this image license whether meet COM:L or not and for requesting regular Undeletion requests. Thank you.

Request temporary undeletion SCP-2000 02:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Done @SCP-2000: Please ping using {{ping|Nat}} when review is done. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:08, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: The review is done. Thank you.
- I tried to reverse search those images, however couldn't find those images in Taiwan government website. cc@Matt8830: . --SCP-2000 12:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No evidence of photos being published by ROC government online and might not fall under {{GWOIA}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ajay Kumar Photo 2017.jpg

The picture is my profile picture and I have sole rights to use my picture anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajay Kumar Journalist (talk • contribs)

Oppose Out of scope. --Minorax^talk 12:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Per Minorax. Commons is not a webhost, and user pages are primarily meant to reflect one's work at Commons or other Wikimedia projects. Therefore our policy does not allow profile images for users with no substantial contributions to any Wikimedia project. De728631 (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Los Shain's junto a Erwin Flores.jpg

La imagen subida por mí hace ya un tiempo fue eliminada por no contar con licencia, etc. Al subir fue un ERROR MÍO al no poder añadir la plantilla correspondiente: {{PD-Peru-photo}} Solicito la restauración ya que el ususario que lo eliminó ya no es activo, gracias de antemano. (Rolo Mai (talk) 16:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC))

Oppose UDR for this file already rejected in July (Please see: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-07#File:Los Shain's junto a Erwin Flores.jpg). No new evidence was presented in this request nor does it answer queries as to publication date (note, in this case, creation date is irrelevant). Pinging @Rolo Mai, Ankry --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Addendum Additionally, the work in question does not qualify for {{PD-Peru-photo}} as the author is unknown. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: This new request does not address the concerns brought up in the rejected one in July. User may resubmit if and only if they can answer queries concerning publication date (and again "Creation date is irrelevant if we do not know the publication date"). Per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-07#File:Los Shain's junto a Erwin Flores.jpg: As the publication date is unknown, image may be copyrighted in the United States per COM:URAA. Additional does not qualify for {{PD-Peru-photo}} as author is unknown. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marina Bondarko model Cute Smile.png

This artwork belongs to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shelikesme (talk • contribs) 18:22, 5 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Shelikesme: Hi, it looks like the photograph was previously published on Instagram. Images that have appeared elsewhere before require permission statements from the copyright owners. Please follow the steps described at COM:OTRS Ytoyoda (talk) 19:13, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
It is also unclear whether the photo is in COM:SCOPE. It may be considered as promotional photo of a non-notable person. Ankry (talk) 19:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per discussion above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AnaMargaridadeCarvalho.jpg

The permission to use the image was granted, via OTRS, from the ticket 11380670.Leon saudanha (talk) 15:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Done @Leon saudanha: FYI. Ankry (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:David Tan.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:David Tan.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: This image was deleted for potential copyright infringement. However, the copyright holder has agreed to license this image. Please let me know how I can prove this. Yqwong.benjamin (talk) 17:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

@Yqwong.benjamin: Where can we find the copyright holder's free license permission? It needs to be verified. Ankry (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: @Yqwong.benjamin: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Iskenderun fk.png‬

File:Iskenderun fk.png‬ The logo is the official logo of the club. The Club is also a Joint Stock Company. Turkey has sent the necessary documents to the Football Association, the name of the club in the first meeting will be published on the official web site. A self-ignorant person named "Sakhalinio" interfered with our writing, although she had no knowledge. İskenderun FK A.Ş. All the information we have written is correct and official. Below are the official social media accounts of the club. https://twitter.com/iskenderunfk https://www.instagram.com/iskenderunfk/ --Sezgincevik (talk) 18:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done image not deleted yet. But it should be deleted as Fair use images are not allowed in Commons. Logos uploaded here must be under a free license from the actual copyright holder. Ankry (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Beata Maria Szydlowska.jpg

Please undelete this file. The image is available under the Creative Commons License.

Fedaykin7c2 (talk) 18:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

@Fedaykin7c2: An evidence, please: link to the license declaration by the photographer or an COM:OTRS ticket No. with a free license permission from the actual copyright holder. Ankry (talk) 22:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Magdalenapinkwart.jpg

I request undeleting photo File:Magdalenapinkwart.jpg. This is the photo I have taken and I am one and only person who have copyright to use it. I'm sharing it with Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia as a free source. --Stowarzyszeniedt (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Stowarzyszeniedt

If you are copyright holder and not the photorapher, we need an evidence of copyright transfer. Please, provide appropriate evidence together with a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 22:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grzegorz Micula.jpg

I request undeleting photo File:Grzegorz Micula.jpg. This is the photo I have taken and I am one and only person who have copyright to use it. I'm sharing it with Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia as a free source. --Stowarzyszeniedt (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Stowarzyszeniedt

The FB photo cited by deleting editor as a supposed source for this has a banner over it, and is lower-resolution, so it is hard to see why anyone thought the FB image would be a source for this rather than vice versa.
On the other hand: the posting of it to FB, apparently by the subject of the photo, years before you uploaded it here does create a problem. Can you either (1) get Grzegorz Micuła to post at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1927414827285755&set=pb.100000517698281.-2207520000..&type=3&theater that you took the photo, or can you please (2) go through the COM:OTRS process.
I didn't look at the other images here, but I'm guessing similar considerations will apply. - Jmabel ! talk 21:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sergiusz-pinkwart.jpg

I request undeleting photo File:Sergiusz-pinkwart.jpg. This is the photo I have taken and I am one and only person who have copyright to use it. I'm sharing it with Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia as a free source. --Stowarzyszeniedt (talk) 19:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Stowarzyszeniedt

As the photo was published elsewhere, we cannot rely on uploader's license declaration and we need a free license evidence: either at the initial photo poblication site or following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 22:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SergiuszPinkwart.jpg

I request undeleting photo File:SergiuszPinkwart.jpg. This is the photo I have taken and I am one and only person who have copyright to use it. I'm sharing it with Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia as a free source. --Stowarzyszeniedt (talk) 19:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Stowarzyszeniedt

Question Is the map in the background under a CC-BY-SA 4.0 compatible license? How can we verify this? Ankry (talk) 22:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sabinapoulsen.jpg

I request undeleting photo File:Sabinapoulsen.jpg. This is the photo that I have copyrights for, from the person on the photo and the photographer. The argument that it was found on the web elsewhere does not mean that I don't have copyright for it. I put it on my fanpage on Facebook and on my blog owcze.com. These are places I own and I'm responsible for all the copyrights. I have all the documents needed to prove it. I'm sharing this photo with Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia as a free source. --Stowarzyszeniedt (talk) 19:30, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Stowarzyszeniedt

@Stowarzyszeniedt: are you the photograpger as you claimed at upload? The permission from the subject is unrelated to copyright (it concerns personality rights only). As the photo was published elsewhere, we cannot rely on uploader's license declaration and we need a free license evidence: either at the initial photo poblication site or following COM:OTRS instructions. Note, that CC-BY-SA licenses require information who is the author, even if the author no longer is the copyright holder. Ankry (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Valentines band.jpg

This photo File:The Valentines band.jpg has been deleted, but it is a photo of my own band. Please undelete it, because i need it for our Wikipeda page. Thanx... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolezal98 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Dolezal98: Are you the photographer as you claimed? As the photo was published elsewhere, we cannot rely on uploader's license declaration and we need a free license evidence: either at the initial photo publication site or following COM:OTRS instructions. Note, that CC-BY-SA licenses require information who is the author, even if the author no longer is the copyright holder. Ankry (talk) 22:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jessé Lopes em 04 de agosto de 2020.png

Esta foto foi batida pelos fotógrafos oficiais da Assembleia Legislativa do Estado de Santa Catarina. A utilização das mesmas ficam a critério dos deputados. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ricardolima.sc (talk • contribs)

The right "to use" a photo is not the same as the right to license it.

We need an evidence that the photo is under cc-by-sa-4.0 compatible license, either as official information on the web site or by email from the actual copyright holder following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 22:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Blue Lagoon Resources Inc. - Company Logo.png

Reasons for request:

I incorrectly uploaded the file to Wikimedia without providing adequate reasoning. I then reached out to Wikimedia to get clarification.

Article that will be using this image: Blue Lagoon Resources, Inc. Use of the image: This will be used as the main image in the sidebar for the article. It's purpose is to showcase the brand of Blue Lagoon Resources, it adds legitimacy to the company's image on Wikipedia.

1. Image is owned by Rana Vig, CEO and Director of Blue Lagoon Resources, Inc. 2. Source of the image: https://bluelagoonresources.com 3. The image is taken from the Blue Lagoon Resources website.

"Fair Use Rationale" Used for – the logo simply writes Blue Lagoon Resources, it's used for showcasing the brand of the company. Owner – Rana Vig, CEO & Director of Blue Lagoon Resources, Inc. owns this image. Website – https://bluelagoonresources.com Commentary – The logo was designed by and for Blue Lagoon Resources, Inc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranavig (talk • contribs) 00:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose @Ranavig: Fair use is not permitted on Wikipedia Commons. Content neither under an acceptable free licence nor in public domain per the law and uploaded under a fair use rationale is subject to immediate deletion. Some Wikimedia projects do allow non-free content under a fair use ration, however, Wikimedia Commons is not one of them (please see Meta:Non-free content for a list of projects that allow such content). Thank you for your understanding. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Fair use is not permitted on Commons. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PLL-phase-model-01.jpg

The deletion request was a mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milich64 (talk • contribs)

@Milich64: I've closed the DR. --Minorax^talk 12:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: procedural close. File not deleted nor under consideration for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:50, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Qamar Raza Markazi Profile pic.jpg

File:File:Qamar Raza Markazi.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:File:Qamar Raza Markazi Profile pic.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

I want undelete file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qamarkhan92 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 7 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose Out of scope. --Minorax^talk 12:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Question @Qamarkhan92: and why do you believe that we should undelete the file? Could you provide us with a rationale? Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Minorax. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Haishen on Sep. 06, 2020.png

Well: 1) I thought that all sathelites were free, so I made olny a print from the image; 2) If the sath pertains to NOAA, the work is free. In general, NOOA has a free licence, as is marked in other photos of Wikemedia Com. Marcia Beatriz Einsfeld (talk) 13:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose © 2020 Neave Interactive Ltd. Terms of service: "Permission is granted to temporarily download one copy of the materials (information or software) on this Website for personal, non-commercial transitory viewing only." Thuresson (talk) 14:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Liam_lewis_on_building.jpg

Hello. This is a picture of the Artist that should be on his biography. The reason I am requesting un-deletion is because the author/Photographer of the picture has signed and sent the release form.

(Resteven520 (talk) 16:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC))

Not done: @Resteven520: Per Ticket:2020073010008644, permission was insufficient according to OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion of the file. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Harald Hanisch 2018.jpg

This foto shows Prof. Harald Hanisch an is creat. commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walter Reicher (talk • contribs) 16:16, 7 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Walter Reicher: Please elaborate. And do you have any presentable evidence that the work is under an acceptable free licence? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Info: Re-uploaded as File:Prof. Harald Hanisch 2018.jpg. --Achim (talk) 16:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural closure. The same photograph is undergoing an OTRS process, so there is no need to restore this duplicate. --De728631 (talk) 23:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MojtabaPourmohsen.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020072610006707 regarding File:MojtabaPourmohsen.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per ticket:2020072610006707. Please update the file description page when you have processed the ticket. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tanisha rolexx 0630181463.jpg

Hi -

My name is Illiana and am on the team for Tanisha Scott.

The image that has been deleted is owned in full by Tanisha and she requested that this image be used for her Wiki page.

She can email licensing permission for use of this photo across wikipedia if necessary.

We are looking to upload her new Wikipedia page to the public this week and need the image to be undeleted to complete the page.

Thank you!--Illi.bee (talk) 17:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose @Illi.bee: (1) Under Canadian law (and the law of most other jurisdictions), the copyright holder is the person who took the photo, rather than the person who appears in it, unless the copyright was transferred by operation of law or by copyright -- the latter being in effect only if in writing and signed by the first copyright holder as defined by the law. In any case, as it previously published elsewhere, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence using the Open-source Ticket Request System process . (2) While Wikimedia Commons has no such policy, other projects, such as English Wikipedia, frown upon conflicts of interests and paid contributions, and require disclosure and the ceasing of all attempts to edit. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Walther Witting ca 1936.png

For some unknown reason, the e-mail with the release by the copyright holder/owner of the picture was not processed within the OTRS. I requested a new release by the owner of the picture, it should be forthcoming within the next few days. --Wribln (talk) 22:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Processing OTRS emails may take several weeks, and the file will be deleted in the meantime for safety reasons. This is not something extraordinary but a burden that comes with a limited number of OTRS volunteers. Once the permission has been checked, the image will be restored automatically but I'm afraid you will still have to wait unless an OTRS agent speeds up this particular case. De728631 (talk) 23:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Info This seems to be related to Ticket:2019030510009049. Unfortunately, it appears that OTRS received an email not from the copyright holder but from an individual related to the subject. Unfortunately, under German law, whether it be the 1876 law on photography, the 1907 copyright law or the 1965 copyright law, the copyright (Urheberrecht) rests with the author and cannot be transferred except by operation of law (i.e. inheritance) -- the author or their heirs can grant a right-of-use (Nutzungrecht) but that is a licence and not compatible with Commons' licensing policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion of the file. Thank you for your understanding. @Wribln: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

10153341981787539.jpg

Please undelete

Support File:Received 10153341981787539.jpg qualifies for {{PD-RO-exempt}}. De728631 (talk) 23:15, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jacob Drachenberg.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020081810007649 regarding File:Jacob Drachenberg.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Done per ticket:2020081810007649. Please update the file description page when you have processed the ticket. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AN BBM-TULSA-NAT (28733094472).jpg per COM:PDM

Per the recent consensus to accept COM:PDM as a license, I don't see any reason not to undelete this file. --Denniscabrams (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per COM:PDM. File retagged with {{PDMark-owner}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2D vector field pointing outward.svg

This file have been deleted on my global lock which was done mistakenly, but I need this file now. Please undelete it. ~ A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 04:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Atomium photos

Belgium has FOP since 2016, per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Belgium. For some reasons, these files were not deleted. I didn't include another one, "File:Bruxell-atomo.jpg," because it was listed as having no source. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: these files were not restored because they are either corrupted or missing the image file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (26).jpg

This one is requested to deletion because that one is duplicate of mine but mistakenly admin deleted my original file too. Please undelete it. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: issue here was that the file was already redirected before the DR was closed. And deleting a redirect through the DR actually deletes the target file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (13).jpg

This one is requested to deletion because that one is duplicate of mine but mistakenly admin deleted my original file too. Please undelete it.-- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 10:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

@P199: as the admin being referred to, could you examine this please? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 10:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: issue here was that the file was already redirected before the DR was closed. And deleting a redirect through the DR actually deletes the target file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lauren Daigle leading at NPM TLR, 2015.png

This file is a 2015 image so it will be undeleted. Fartface2007 (talk) 01:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lauren Daigle leading at NPM TLR, 2015.png -- "Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work". Question @Fartface2007: Can you respond here to some of the concerns raised at the deletion discussion and provide us with a valid rationale per policy why we should undelete the file? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: no response and no rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AL badminton player.jpg

Bonjour,

Un "gardien de la vérité" a jugé bon de supprimer mes photos ! File:AL Badminton Player.jpg Pourtant il s'agissait bien de "mes propres oeuvres" pour lesquelles j'avais donné les autorisations et licences conformément au règles de Common. Pourquoi ce censeur a-t-il décidé que ce n'était pas MES PHOTOS ? , au nom de quoi ? de quelles règles ?

Je certifie qu'il s'agit bien de ma propre photo, prise avec mon appareil, recadrée afin de la rendre davantage présentable, puis transférée demon appareil vers mon ordinateur avec la fonction partager. Bien sur, toutes ces manipulations modifient ou supprimment les métadonnées, il n'en demeure pas moins que cela reste MA PHOTO

Je vous demande de bien vouloir restaurer cette photo --De Reinal (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour, bonsoir @De Reinal: J'ai examiné le fichier : les métadonnées EXIF sont manquantes (comme vous l'avez déjà dit) et l'image est de basse résolution. Il y'a deux solutions possibles : (1) vous pouvez téléverser une version du fichier qui contient ses métadonnées EXIF complètes ou (2) vous pouvez envoyer un courriel en utilisant le processus OTRS. Bien cordialement. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tatiana-Laurence Delarue.jpg

== Tatiana Laurence Delarue Picture ==

The picture was deleted and considered as a copyright violation. This picture is a selfie, (easy to see) taken by Tatiana herself and used by Purepeople. You can also find it on her Instagram TL_DELARUE--Justfree1958 (talk) 13:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

We would also like to know how to modify the first title with Tatiana Laurens which is not welle written . Should be Laurence --Justfree1958 (talk) 13:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

@Justfree1958: Oppose Works previously published elsewhere first require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence using the OTRS process. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded permissions or proxy statements for legal reasons. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@Justfree1958: Moreover, you claimed at upload that you are the author of this selfie. We have no evidence that you are Tatiana Laurens. For images which authors are identifiable, we need OTRS permissions as well. Ankry (talk) 20:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Godfrey Thomson - 2014.jpg

Ticket #: 2020072910011008

Hi, On July 29th the correct permission email was sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org by photographer Nicholas Karlin and copyright holder of this photo thumb| However it has recently been deleted by user:JuTa for the reason being that it was "not confirmed by Commons:OTRS after a month". I did not receive a notice or reason why it was not confirmed or if something was missing or holding up this photo from being cleared. Kindly let me know if something is missing to be able to clear it. If this is a simple error I kindly request it be undeleted. Thank you.2pennyworth (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose OTRS has a backlog. The image will be undeleted when it has been successfully processed by an OTRS volunteer. Thuresson (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Done It seems that OTRS permission had not been added here by mistake. @Tulsi Bhagat: please, verify. Ankry (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg This file belongs to us and is not breaking any licensing requirements or trademark issues

I have no idea why this GSL factory aerial photo was flagged for deletion but this photo belongs to GSL and is able to be reproduced for our wiki page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:1:813::76 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
The file name would be really helpful, or, if you don't know that, the uploader's name. --rimshot^talk 21:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: no response, no file name, no rationale. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:sergiusz-pinkwart.jpg

I request undeletation, because I am a photographer who made this photo. I am an author of this photo. I am the only copyright owner of this photo. I want to share this photo on Wikipedia.--Stowarzyszeniedt (talk) 09:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

We need a written free license permission from the actual copyright holder following COM:OTRS procedure as for any photo that has already been published without clear evidence of free license. Facebook is not a freely licensed service. Ankry (talk) 13:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:National Brand of Ukraine.pdf

Good day! Please restore the following files:

I provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information^ http://monograph.route.ee/rout/catalog/book/11 http://monograph.route.ee/rout/catalog/book/7 http://monograph.route.ee/rout/catalog/book/9 http://monograph.route.ee/rout/catalog/book/12 http://monograph.route.ee/rout/catalog/book/13 http://monograph.route.ee/rout/catalog/book/14

Thank you in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scientific Route OÜ (talk • contribs) 09:25, 9 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Oppose "All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the authors". Please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS to have the copyright owners submit such a permission in writing. Thuresson (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marten-Bunnemann-CEO-AvaconAG.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Marten-Bunnemann-CEO-AvaconAG.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Hello everybody,

the picture is to be uploaded on behalf of our CEO.

The picture was taken by a photographer, but was bought by us (Avacon) Therefore it is not a violation of the copyright.

Many greetings 2A02:8108:8B00:34D0:20BC:7B3B:4FFA:F4A4 11:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

We need an evidence of apropriate contract with André Walther concerning this photo copyright and a written free license permission from the actual copyright holder. See COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 13:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Liam Lewis on building.jpg

The owner/subject in the picture has recently sent the release form through email. Please verify. Thank you

(Resteven520 (talk) 15:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC))

@Resteven520: We need a free license permission from the actual copyright holder, who in most cases is the photographer, not from the subject. After the permission is received, verified and accepted, the image will be undeleted. Ankry (talk) 20:17, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS.. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Candu 2020.jpg

File:Candu 2020.jpg to undelete

This photo belongs to me and I gave my consent for its free use

Therefore, please undelete it and set it in Mr Andrian Candu's infobox — Preceding unsigned comment added by I.timcu (talk • contribs) 18:04, 9 September 2020‎ (UTC)

@I.timcu: As the author of the image is known, we need a free license permission from ROMAN KANTIR (a real person), not from User:I.timcu (anonymous Wikimedia user). This can be done using OTRS. Ankry (talk) 19:59, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jan Van Den Abbeel, Yonk Magnetic Torus 99 VI ,1976-1979, Constructivisme 1980.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Jan Van Den Abbeel, Untitled, 1970.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Jan Van Den Abbeel, Yonk Magnetic Torus 99 VI ,1976-1979, Constructivisme 1980.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Dear,

These pictures are taken by me and cut in the right angle. These works serve to offer more visibility regarding this artist and to show his working method. I also own these artworks since 2018 and I agree to publish these works on wikipedia. The artist died in february 2018 and there is no foundation or lawyer to contact for further information; but it was known that the artist was willing to publish his artworks. The file Jan Van Den Abbeel, Yonk Magnetic Torus 99 VI ,1976-1979, Constructivisme 1980.jpg is also cited by citation nr. 25.

Kind regards,

Dries Driesoghini (talk) 21:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Ownership or possession of the tangible embodiment of the work does not equate holding the copyright or owning the intangible intellectual property. The copyright holder is the person who created the work, unless transferred by operation of law or by contract. If the artist is deceased, has no heirs, and their estates has no trustees, then there is no one that could license the works and they cannot be hosted on Commons until the works entered into public domain. As Jan Van den Abbeel was of Belgian nationality, on Wikimedia Commons, Belgian copyright law and U.S. copyright law would apply. Per COM:Belgium, the works would enter into public domain on 1 January 2089. The date the works would enter into public domain in the United States will depend on the date of publication (note: not the date of creation). Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bradley James by Amanda Peixoto-Elkins.jpg

Hello There.

This file was previously removed because the photographer had checked the wrong usage and did not fill out the form in time that was emailed to her. She has since uploaded to Flickr at https://www.flickr.com/photos/148213538@N05/50326082722/in/dateposted-public/ and made it a public domain photo/media for any usage. Would like to restore the photo to the wikimedia commons. Currently, editors keep placing photos on the Wiki page for actor Bradley James that include photos taken at Comic-con which contain people/subjects who have expressed they did not give permission for their photos to be taken. Appreciate your help in the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayncg (talk • contribs) 07:04, 10 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Oppose This free Flickr account from 2019 (not pro) only has two photos by different photographers and there is no evidence that Amanda Peixoto-Elkins administers the account. This matter should be resolved through COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 08:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chevrolet Captiva 2020 (Colombia) interior.png

The file is derived from a video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQFvMhJFxB0) that is specifically marked as "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". According to Template:YouTube CC-BY and Commons:Where is the license on various sites?#YouTube, as long at it is marked as such, it is allowed to be uploaded to Wikimedia. Andra Febrian (talk) 09:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: and licence reviewed. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UP Diliman Oblation Plaza in 2011.JPG and File:UPD Oblation Plaza.jpg

Dleted because of "no FOP in the Philippines." But as a 1950 building, it can now be undeleted. Apparently the local copy on enwiki shows the copyrighted Oblation statue on de minimis basis. The second one has the file name bearing "Oblation Plaza," so I assume it is also DM. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: Per updated COM:FOP Philippines. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:49, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Астрономическая обсерватория Кастельгранде.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020083110000602 regarding File:Астрономическая обсерватория Кастельгранде.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ganímedes:

Done. --Minorax^talk 12:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: OTRS verified. --Minorax^talk 14:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Some photographs by TheCoffee

I hereby request the undeletion of the following photographs that were deleted because of "no FOP in the Philippines":

For their FOP case page: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TheCoffee

For the record, my first attempt to undelete the Cebu capitol building failed because of URAA copyright provision (Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-06#File:National Museum of the Filipino People.jpg). But after some discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Philippine buildings before 1972 and updated COM:FOP Philippines, older architecture in the Philippines are now considered as PD. To quote the updated passage: "Buildings completed prior to August 1, 1951. Philippine copyright law previously followed U.S. copyright law, which did not protect buildings until 1990." This is also in precedent with Clindberg's insight at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-01#File:Philippines National Museum.jpg and File:Supreme Court of the Philippines.jpg.

For the first photo, Cebu Provincial Capitol was finished and inaugurated on June 14, 1938 (last surviving person here was Juan Arellano, 1888–1960) [enwiki article]
For the second photo, the user uploaded it in 2009, during the time Department of Tourism (DOT) was headquartered at the Manila building which is now the en:National Museum of Natural History (Manila), completed in 1941 (designed by Antonio Toledo, who died in 1972). [building details per enwiki, date of death of Toledo per the aforementioned undeletion requests for both Philippines National Museum.jpg and Supreme Court of the Philippines.jpg]

As of this writing (when the files were temporarily undeleted): yes, it is indeed the same subject as the 1941 building which is now the en:National Museum of Natural History (Manila) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:37, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Since both were built before ~~1950~~August 1951, photos of these buildings are 100% safe at Wikimedia Commons.

Also to request undeletion of the following photos by the same user:

File:Smith Museum stained glass.jpg. This is because according to his upload log, this is the photo of an object in the United States, where no FOP restrictions to buildings apply. To quote the description on the upload log: "Stained glass displays at the Smith Museum of Stained Glass Windows in Navy Pier, Chicago, Illinois."
File:Asiatown IT Park.jpg - upload log reveals the description as "Mid-rise office buildings in Asiatown IT Park, Cebu City, Philippines." I might assume it can fall COM:DM as general view of a business district, not confined to a single building or two or twin buildings (pls. also see the existing photos of Makati CBD, Ortigas, San Lazaro, et cetera here), but I cannot exactly confirm this since deleted files are virtually "invisible" to non-admins. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

- Support the first two. There should never be any URAA issues with photos of buildings, since the U.S. does not consider photos of buildings to be derivative works, so any URAA restoration of architecture is irrelevant for a photo of them -- FoP for buildings is purely an issue for the country of origin. I can't see the other two, though if the first was of a U.S. building, sounds like it should not have been part of the original DR. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Paging @Clindberg: the files are now visible (albeit temporarily) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:58, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

For "File:Asiatown IT Park.jpg," it might qualify Commons:DM if its scene is much akin to File:Ortigas Center Manila.JPG or File:San Lazaro Manila.jpg (as the description claims, as per upload log "Mid-rise office buildings in Asiatown IT Park, Cebu City, Philippines"). Again, non-admins like me cannot see deleted photos. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Provisionally restored to facilitate discussion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

{{ Temporarily undeleted | year = 2020 | month = 08 | day = 17 }} added. @King of Hearts: FYI. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

For the stained-glass windows, I find no problems in hosting it on Commons since it is similar to others in the Category:Stained-glass windows in Illinois. It is also on US soil, not on Philippine soil.

New comment This photo refers to the w:Smith Museum of Stained Glass Windows (Category:Smith Museum of Stained Glass Windows) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

For File:Asiatown IT Park.jpg, I might use some foreign examples.

French example/s: File:La Défense de nuit, Paris, France 2.jpg. File was bundled at the DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg, but was nonetheless kept because of being a "general view." Another might be: File:92400 Courbevoie, France - panoramio (1).jpg (DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:92400 Courbevoie, France - panoramio (1).jpg). I'll try to find some other examples from those nations with more restrictive or non-commercial FOP's. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

UAE example (I don't know if this can apply): File:The Dubai Fountain & Burj Khalifa Pixabay.jpg - kept as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Dubai Fountain & Burj Khalifa Pixabay.jpg JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

New comment from the requester during the temporary undeletion period: for the Asiatown photo, another factor to be considered might be the low COM:TOO for the building at the center (and possibly the two buildings to the left). (possible reference might be the DR of a mall photo: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sm megamall.jpg). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

New cmt also to use is the DR of another mall photo which ended up being kept: (possible reference might be the DR of a mall photo: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smmarilaojf.JPG). Although in my opinion (and my observation to this photo while temp undeleted) the three Asiatown buildings in focus seem to be less elaborate than SM Marilao's, and such style is usually replicated in most other buildings in the Philippines, usually made or designed by different architectural firms. So I think these three Asiatown buildings have low COM:TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: except File:Smith Museum stained glass.jpg and File:Asiatown IT Park.jpg which will seperated into another discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Freudenberg-LouisJulius 05.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Freudenberg-LouisJulius 05.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: The image was deleted as part of Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Anton Julius Winblad II and others, with the rationale "Outside of project scope". The image was, however, being used here: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Badebekleidung&diff=36641353&oldid=36321011. A file that is in use is by definition in scope. PaterMcFly (talk) 07:27, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Oppose That was 13 years ago. Let sleeping dogs lie. Thuresson (talk) 08:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Why exactly is this a reason not to restore an image that is potentially useful? (Note: I haven't seen the image, I only saw that it had been used). --PaterMcFly (talk) 09:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

@PaterMcFly: Do you find this image to be still needed on this page? Ankry (talk) 20:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

If the description I have is right, it shows people wearing 1930's swimwear, which could be useful, yes. I do not know the image though, nor do I know its quality, it might be inferior to other images. Bad quality is not a reason to delete images though (except in very obvious cases). --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Temporarily undeleted for discussion. The photo is definitely before 1918, so it cannot present 1930s suits. But there is another problem: at the moment I see no reason why is might be free. The cc license is clearly false as it cannot be by the photographer. And no evidence tor early publication. delete and undelete in 2038? Ankry (talk) 20:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Is a bit different from what I expected, but still useful IMHO. According to the discussion here (almost at the end), the uploader is the heir of the original photographer, so from a copyright standpoint, everything should be fine. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:57, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Done: @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): FYI. Please add the name of the photographer to the {{Information}} template. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fabrice Desvignes en 2015.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Fabrice Desvignes en 2015.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: per OTRS 2020090310002705 kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

@Kvardek du: undeleted; however copyright of the statuette needs to be resolved, IMO. Ankry (talk) 20:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: thanks! Do you know any help page or previous discussion about such a statuette? kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: by Ankry. @Kvardek du: There are no discussion as far as I know of, but one will need to determine if the statuette is de minimus according to French law. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

I helped improve Wikipedia but it was removed quickly, no problem, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbiorg (talk • contribs) 21:08, 9 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose Both files were deleted in accordance with CSD F10 (Personal photos of or by non-contributors), and the gallery page was deleted under the following rationales: CSD GA1 (Gallery page without at least two images or other media files; see Commons:Galleries); CSD GA2 (Commons gallery pages are for collections of images, not encyclopedic content; see Commons:Project scope); CSD G10 (Content created as advertisement). User was blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and also self-promotion, and has been warned on multiple occasions for sockpuppetry and self-promotion on Farsi Wikipedia. The deletions were justified. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alexander_von_Pfuhlstein.jpg

I have the copyright for this foto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maureru (talk • contribs) 08:17, 10 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Maureru: Please advise by which reason you are the copyright holder of this work. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

I am the grandson and heir of Alexander von Pfuhlstein — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1715:4e2e:4340:89c1:dcb6:57f0:c5ed (talk • contribs) 06:54, 11 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose @Maureru and 2001:1715:4e2e:4340:89c1:dcb6:57f0:c5ed: Being the grandson and the heir of the subject does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder, under German copyright law (regardless of whether it be the 1876 law, the 1907 law, or the 1965 law), is the photographer and the copyright cannot be transferred except by operation of law. As Alexander von Pfuhlstein is not the photographer, he cannot be the copyright holder, and, as such, even we can accept your assertions and claims that you are the descendant and heir of the subject (which, as a technical matter, we cannot), you cannot be the copyright holder. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 07:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hôtel Prudhomme de la Boussinière, quai Louis-Blanc.jpg

Hello, my file was deleted but I have a written message from the owner of the copyrights allowing me to use the picture on wikipedia. Can you please put it back ? Thanks a lot, best regards,

PS : The message from the owner is "C'est avec plaisir que je vous donne l'autorisation d'utiliser l'article et les photos de notre revue pour votre rticle wikipedia, sous réserve de citer vos sources." (It is with pleasure that i give you the authorisation to use the article and the pictures of our magazine for your wikipedia article, as long as you mention us in the sources.) --DelPacis (talk) 10:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose @DelPacis: Files hosted on Wikimedia Commons must be under an acceptable free licence. « J'autorise Wikipédia à utiliser mes photos » or « Je vous autorise à utiliser mes photos » or any statement to that effect is insufficient for the purposes of Commons, as it does not allow the work(s) in question to be used for any purpose, including commercial use. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Qamar Raza Markazi Profile pic.jpg

File:Qamar Raza Markazi Profile pic.jpg It's important pic of writer and scholar Qamar Raza Markazi this was deleted by mistake. Plz restore this file is very important — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qamarkhan92 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 10 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Oppose - That this "was deleted by mistake" is nonsense. You've already requested undeletion of this file twice [2][3], and its deletion in the first place was your request (!!!) You've yet to explain substantively why this file is in scope in any venue, including here now and in direct questions to you. Tellingly, you've instead only repeatedly recreated the image, including immediately after filing this UDR (!!!). Эlcobbola _talk 20:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: This is the third request with no valid rationale for undeletion. User has been blocked. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

PD-Iran

These are in the pubic domain (more than 30 years from the publication date):

File:01-haleh nazari 05.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:01-haleh nazari 01.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Rad-saeed.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Hanooz 21:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per {{PD-Iran}}. @Hanooz: FYI. Please confim date for File:Rad-saeed.jpg as its currently marked as "2012". --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:19, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Dirk-Franz

I received credible OTRS permission for the following files:

I will be undeleating them. --Jarekt (talk) 00:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: by Jarekt. @Jarekt: OTRS agents with admin rights on Commons have no need to inform UDR about an undeletion. Thank you for your work. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:41, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Help:Gadget-Restore-a-lot tool only works on DR and Commons:Undeletion requests pages, so I needed a list of the files to undelete on one of them. :) --Jarekt (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

photograph of American politician Srilekha Palle

This image should be under Attribution-NonCommercial. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.K.Alberto9 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 11 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose @M.K.Alberto9: Not possible per Commons' licensing policy: Non-commercial licences are not permitted and files of works licenced under such are subject to immediate deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hadiyah-Nicole Green.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Hadiyah-Nicole Green.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: OTRS permission has arrived, please restore the file! Thanks, Bencemac (talk) 14:39, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per Ticket:2020090910008485. @Bencemac: FYI. The email, however, does not appear to come from the copyright holder. Please verify. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kosarkaski klub Stoja logo.png

Please restore the following pages:

File:Kosarkaski klub Stoja logo.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Hi,

I would kindly request the un-deletion of the mentioned file. The logo I've uploaded has been created especially for the basketball club Stoja. You may find it on Stoja's website (www.kk-stoja.hr). We as a club have all the rights to freely use it.

Thank you for understanding and we are looking forward to receiving your feedback soon. MaliSantiago (talk) 06:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

@MaliSantiago: Fair use logos are not compatible with Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements, see COM:L. No free license evidence has been provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankry (talk • contribs) 21:33, 11 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DSC 9258 (39759420983).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:DSC 9258 (39759420983).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Initially it was license as COM:PDM 1.0 before it was changed to NC-ND and now COM:PDM was accepted on Commons. Admins may look at the file history to see the license review by User:FlickreviewR 2 A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose current NC-ND license suggests that allowing commercial use of the image was not the author's intention. PDM is not an irrevokable CC license. Ankry (talk) 21:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Thepssaini.jpg

Undeletion requests — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.41.24.201 (talk • contribs) 12:26, 11 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Question @Parkashjit Singh: Rationale? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Info Draft rejected at en:Draft:Thepssaini. Thuresson (talk) 16:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No rationale as to why the image is in scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ModlitePLHV2.jpg

I am employed by the owner of this material and was given explicit permission to use it.

My email signature related to said employment reads:

Thanks, Austin Miller Modlite Systems - Customer Engagement Director (Redacted) (Redacted) http://modlite.com

--Austinjoemiller (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose @Austinjoemiller: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
@Austinjoemiller: The permission "to use" is not tha same as the permission to grant a free license. Ankry (talk) 21:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: @Austinjoemiller: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Spirited Away - Train Scene.jpg

I found the photo from https://www.instagram.com/kuzeykoremezli/ It was posted by it's creator.

Thanks, Marsel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skmarsel (talk • contribs) 16:08, 11 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose @Skmarsel: Previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/B_vy3fJF9vp/ with no evidence of a free licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Nat. --clpo13_(talk) 23:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FormalizedMathematics-8-1.jpg

Your deletion is violating MY right to this work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.201.212.11 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 11 September 2020‎ (UTC)

@Organellum: Nobody has granted you right to host any image here. You were only allowed to upload free images of educational value. The {{Own}} license declaration is an exception in the Commons policy that requires to provide an evidence of free license. If you claim that the cover design is copyrighted, than (as it has been published) you are required to provide evidence that (1) you are the author of its design, and (2) that the free license to the cover (including the logo) has already been granted. Ankry (talk) 21:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

I am the author. Do you have a different opinion? Why?! -- Organellum (talk) 22:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

The author of the University logo? Did you grant a license to the university to use it? Where can we find the information that User:Organellum is the author? Your declaration is not enough. An evidence is needed. Ankry (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment Putting aside the question of authorship, the majority of the cover is simply non-creative text and therefore too simple for copyright; {{PD-text}} or {{PD-ineligible}} would apply. The university crest is complex enough to be copyrighted, but it could either be blanked out or claimed to be de minimis since it's such a small part of the cover. clpo13_(talk) 23:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
@Clpo13: While I would generally agree with you, COM:TOO Poland states "Polish copyright law has quite a long tradition of setting the threshold rather low", which means that something that should be too simple for copyright in most jurisdictions might not be in Poland. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
@Organellum: You have recreated File:FormalizedMathematics-8-1.jpg after it was deleted; please do not do this. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

I do not understand. You are wrong. Sorry. EOT. -- Organellum (talk) 02:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

@Organellum: Let me explain. You uploaded File:FormalizedMathematics-8-1.jpg at 10:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC). It was deleted by Masur in accordance with CSD F1 (Copyright violation). You then proceeded to reupload the file at 00:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC) -- 4 hours after submitting a request here at 20:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC). Whether the original deletion was justified is being discussed here and irrelevant to why the reupload was deleted -- The reupload was out-of-process and against Commons policy and, therefore, deleted as such. If you choose to ignore our warnings here and reupload the content again, you may lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

I do not need any editing pivilege any more. You understand me? -- Organellum (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
@Organellum: If you chose not to not to participate or contribute any further, that is your choice. But if you choose to do so in the future, please understand that any participation and contributions must be in accordance to policy. Participating and contributing on Wikimedia Commons is a privilege, not a right. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Talk to me is a privilege, not a right. Please (again) stop this. I'm clear? -- Organellum (talk) 03:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment And all this would have been completely unneccessary, if the uploader had remembered to properly describe the file. It comes from here: [4], which is the official site of the journal, and it is tagged as CC-BY-SA 3.0. However, it doesn't state that "Organellum" is an author, nor that it is under cc-by-sa-4.0 license - and this was the main reason why the file was being deleted - ascribing the authorship! I restored and properly described the file now. Masur (talk) 05:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

DoneMasur (talk) 05:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: by Masur. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Notable Student from Chiles High School.png

== [[File:Notable Student from Chiles High School.png|thumb|This student is very notable]] ==

Identify Files: thumb|This student is very notable

"CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)"

The file deleted is not a personal photo. Danny is the school's best Valedictorian (from the class of 2019) since the school opened back in 1998. I understand the photo is low quality but it was the photo we have submitted. Sorry for any confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DannyNX (talk • contribs) 01:53, 12 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Not done: Procedural close. @DannyNX: Please address your concerns here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Notable Student from Chiles High School.png. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Logo VIVA!.jpg

Buen día, El articulo referido al "Partido político VIVA!" fue redactado por mandato del propietario de todos los contenidos allí expuestos, incluida la imagen o logotipo, el Sr Miguel Goicoechea, quien funge como presidente de la organización. En tal sentido, no existe ninguna violación a los derechos de autor,ya que fue el mismo autor el que suministro y autorizo el articulo. En vista de lo expuesto, solicito se me indique en cual infracción he incurrido como redactor, para proceder a subsanar lo que corresponda de manera inmediata. También me pude percatar que este es el tercer intento de publicación de este articulo, esta información era desconocida para mi hasta el momento en que se me notifico de la infracción. Les reitero mi entera disposición a corregir lo que sea necesario en el referido articulo, para su posterior publicación. Agradezco su respuesta. Saludos cordiales

Usuario: MATIASMATEO Articulo: VIVA! partido político español --MATIASMATEO (talk) 04:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. File:Logo viva!.jpg has not been deleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 06:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:คัมภีร์_คัมภีรญาณนนท์.jpg

Copyright Holder approved — Preceding unsigned comment added by ณ ราชสีมา (talk • contribs) 04:27, 12 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Not done: File has been recreated on multiple occasions. User has been blocked after multiple copyvio warnings and has been previously informed at COM:DR about using the OTRS process to send copyright permission. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ณ ราชสีมา.jpg

Copyright holder approved — Preceding unsigned comment added by ณ ราชสีมา (talk • contribs) 04:28, 12 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Not done: File has been recreated on multiple occasions. User has been blocked after multiple copyvio warnings and has been previously informed at COM:DR about using the OTRS process to send copyright permission. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sinclair Logo.png

In response to File:Sinclair Logo.png was recently deleted by Minorax for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

No reasons where provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.162.2 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 11 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose It was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:SinclairLogo.jpg: Unused personal logo, out of project scope --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
We noted your opinion that you disagree, but without referring to arguments in the abovementioned deletion request (1. why the logo is in COM:SCOPE? 2. where a free license for the logo has been granted?) it cannot be undeleted. Ankry (talk) 21:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done per Nat and per lack of explanation. Ankry (talk) 21:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Solar Eclipse - March 2015.webm

Please restore the following pages:

File:Solar Eclipse - March 2015.webm (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Per {{EUMETSAT}} 219.78.190.139 08:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose The source link states it originates from YT, not from www.eumetsat.int. Ankry (talk) 21:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Burj Khalifa Dubai from south east-2010.jpg

Deleted this file just now as no FOP but upon looking at Robert Carl-Leopold Mehl, it seems that this account is OTRS-verified to be the artist himself. Since the file is the artist impression of the building, it can probably be undeleted unless I’m missing something. --Minorax^talk 16:17, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The artist of what exactly? According to the image description page this is a photo taken by the uploader. Thuresson (talk) 18:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose No evidence that the uploader is the Burj Khalifa arcitect. Ankry (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Never mind, read it wrongly. Withdrawing this. Minorax^talk 21:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: UDR withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Isfahani tie given to swiss foreign minister21.jpg

the site says copying is permitted if the source is named. i have seen a lot of photos from this site uploaded to wikiBaratiiman (talk) 18:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Procedural close, image has never been deleted. Thuresson (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gazipur-city-corporation.jpg.png

I didn't quit understand why this was deleted. I think I didn't violate any copyright rules. Please consider undeleting this file. Sincerely Rsakib188 (talk) 15:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Are you personally the author and the copyright holder of the logo? Otherwise, your attempt to grant a license was blatant copyright violation. Ankry (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done, no response from OP. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bangladesh has been considered. Thuresson (talk) 22:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:francesokeke.jpeg.jpg

kindly help restore the image francesokeke.jpeg that was earlier deleted from the biography, Frances Okeke.

the reason for the this request is that the biography frances okeke is without an image because the image was deleted. --Iceone2000 (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

@Iceone2000: The image has been published on IMDb before you uploaded it to Commons. In such cases it is uploader's duty to provide an evidence that a free license has been granted by the photographer. Note also, that IMDb does not declare you as the photographer (you claimed this at upload). Ankry (talk) 20:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done per above. The copyright holder needs to follow COM:OTRS in order to undelete this file. Ankry (talk) 22:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (8).jpg

File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (8).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (7).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (5).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (4).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (3).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (2).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

This file and others (File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (7).jpg, File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (5).jpg, File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (4).jpg, File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (3).jpg en File:ArtZuid 2019, Couzijn, Afrika ontwaakt (2).jpg.) was removed. It was the opinion (also mine) that the sculpture was part of an exibition. This year I visited the place again, and all the sculptures of that exibition are gone. However; this sculpture is still standing on Emmaplein, Amsterdam. Reading back it was placed there in 2016 (see Here] and was only an addition to ArtZuid-exibition; there was no description of it in the guide p.e.) . It will stay there for a long period; de "sokkel" is grounded. Please restore the pictures,Ceescamel (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Support per above. Ankry (talk) 21:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Illumination soheila eskandari.jpg

سلام وقت بخیر فایل حذف شده با موافقت صاحب اثر و به درخواست ایشان بر روی اینترنت قرار گرفته و هیچگونه منعی برای انتشار ندارد.

ممنون میشم برای بازگرداندنش اقدام فرمائید. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emami mahdi (talk • contribs) 06:49, 13 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Info Google Translate: "Hello good time

The deleted file is placed on the Internet with the consent of the owner of the work and at his request and there is no ban on publishing it. Thank you for returning it." Translation added by Thuresson (talk)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gholhak.jpg

Gholhak article talks about the neighborhood from beginning to end, and to determine where and what area is needed, it is necessary to have a clear picture of the area. The deleted image did not violate any of the rules. Is.Because of this request, I have image recovery.Moh14 (talk) 11:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@Moh14: Where did https://www.tehran.ir grant CC-BY-SA 4.0 license as you declared? If they did not, your upload is blatant copyright violation. If the image is free for another reason, you need to provide appropriate copyright template and rationale. Ankry (talk) 22:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GPAF Emblem updated 2018.png

--Nurshod (talk) 19:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC) File:GPAF Emblem updated 2018.png

I created the emblem myself and legally own it. It belongs to the student organization

Info Likely about File:GPAF Emblem 2018.png

@Nurshod: Unused emblems are aut of COM:SCOPE. The image does not seem to be deleted, yet. Or, do you mean another image? Ankry (talk) 22:06, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. File not yet deleted. Please address concerns at Commons:Deletion requests/File:GPAF Emblem 2018.png. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The images are free and permitted to use.

File:LUIS FERNANDO CAMACHO.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MARIA DE LA CRUZ.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:LUIS ARCE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:CHI HYUN CHUNG.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:FELICIANO MAMANI.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:JORGE QUIROGA.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:CARLOS MESA.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:JEANINE AÑEZ.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

The images mentioned would not be copyright infringement, since the images are of political candidates who usually know how to use their photographs everywhere, either digitally or in print. I accompany links to the pages where the same images are used freely and varied, where their use is national (Bolivia), international, and also through social networks where the content is free, in addition to the images previously They have been edited by meː

P Cesar Maldonado (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. Images have not been deleted. Please address concerns at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by P Cesar Maldonado. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Global Perspective Analytical Forum.png

I am the author of this file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nurshod (talk • contribs) 05:42, 14 September 2020‎ (UTC)

@Minorax: can you explain what's going on here? You tagged this with {{No permission since}}, but it had {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}. - Jmabel ! talk 15:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: The logo is above TOO and would require permission. Minorax^talk 02:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Info The image was reuploaded as File:GPAF Emblem 2017.png. IMO, "own" images of this kind are out of COM:SCOPE unless used. Ankry (talk) 17:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 21:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Not_a_persona.jpg

I need to change the licencing type to I am not sure since I am the maintainer of Ms Voogs website and have rightful access to her work as granted by her, but it still lacks a common licencing scheme. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fairefils (talk • contribs) 14:38, 14 September 2020‎ (UTC)

If you maintain Ms. Voog's website, then please indicate the relevant license on that website, and then link from here to where you've indicated that. - Jmabel ! talk 15:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done Free license at the initial publication website or following COM:OTRS is needed. Ankry (talk) 21:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

WTC Sphere photos

Said photos were deleted because no FoP in the United States (ref. Commons:Deletion requests/File:WTC.sphere.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:TheSphere.jpg). But it has been agreed at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2011-02#File:Battery Park Sphere.JPG that since it was installed in 1969 at that time it had no apparent copyright, {{PD-US-no notice}} applies. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Support. And I suggest adding a clear note in the image description about {{PD-US-no notice}} for the sphere. Ankry (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Smoking in Iran 05.jpg

File:Smoking in Iran 05.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

This has been published in the photographer's Pixabay account. Now they uploaded their photo to Wikimedia Commons. There is no copyright violation here. Hanooz 20:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

@Hanooz: We need an evidence that they are the same person as the pixabay license is not compatible with Commons. Ankry (talk) 21:10, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Well,

Support as their Commons account is from 2017 and pixabay image seems to be from May 2020. Ankry (talk) 21:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

There is a link to their Instagram account on their Pixaby account. And this is the evidence that they participated in WLM 2017 (+). Hanooz 21:20, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: @Hanooz: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lloyd Cadena (December 2018).jpg

This image is probably a based selfie and not on a biased sided slanted photographed taken from another person that it appears that the image was taken by a Staff of the restro last December 21, 2018 a and posted to Instagram.

As a matter of fact, I believe that this photo should be recycled in despited that permission to reuse is that any photography posted on that social media app, and taken responsible for permission itself and take credit before uploading.

Bryant2000 (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose @Bryant2000: (1) Not a selfie -- It's a cropped version of the image found on instagram. (2) The copyright holder is the person who took the photo, rather than the person who appear in it, unless the copyright was transferred by operation of law or by contract. (3) Instagram's term of use is incompatible with Commons' licensing policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Teddy Stadium 2020.jpg

If this website could use the picture (with relevant credit) so I am sure that also Wikipedia can: [21] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eshtaga (talk • contribs) 09:33, 15 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose @Eshtaga: No. For images to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons, they must be under a free license (such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0), which allows anyone to use them for any purpose, including commercial usage and derivative works. Please see Commons:Licensing. Fair use is not permitted on Commons, and is subject to immediate deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kiss-2.jpg

@Túrelio: The author of the photo is written on the photo. And a newspaper clipping cannot be considered a copyright infringement, whoever takes a picture of it. Gnosandes (talk) 13:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

А. Бочинина is not User:Gnosandes, who you required to be attributted as the author of the photo. Providing false or incorrect information about copyright or authorship is a serious violation of Wikimedia Commons rules. You may be blocked if you continue to do so. Ankry (talk) 20:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:37, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cosmonaut mosaic.jpg

@Túrelio: A photographed mosaic from any foreshortening cannot be considered a violation of copyright. Even if it matches exactly other similar photographs. Gnosandes (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

@Gnosandes: Per COM:DW you need to prove that the mosaic copyright expired or the mosaic is freely licewnsed. In this particular case, there is no copyright to the photo; only copyright to the mosaic applies. We do not believe that User:Gnosandes is the official pseudo of the author of the mosaic (as you claimed at upload), you need to provide evidence for this. Ankry (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:StalinkaL.jpg

@Túrelio: A photographed street from any foreshortening cannot be considered a violation of copyright. Even if it matches exactly other similar photographs. Gnosandes (talk) 14:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The photo published here is the same photo, not just similar. {{Own}} declaration works here for unpublished photos only. Ankry (talk) 20:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chi Muoi Lo Mary Alice Paul Winfield 6x4 B.jpg.jpg File:LA Casting 1.jpg.jpg File:Chi Muoi Lo Mary Alice 6x4 B.jpg.jpg

I represent the copyright holder of these images and have been given authority to release their rights. I can have the copyright holder email you himself to release the rights of the images. Thank you.

--Dafdl6 (talk) 23:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose @Dafdl6: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Canadian Armenians protesting in front of the Peace Tower of the Canadian Parliament.jpg

I've contacted personally with the author of this photo who agreed to published it in Wikipedia. If you still have doubts you can contact him in person. See the discussion page. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 11:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Procedural close. @Գարիկ Ավագյան: Please address comments and concern at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canadian Armenians protesting in front of the Peace Tower of the Canadian Parliament.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Franz-Gehrels.ca.1990.0.jpg

== Undelete File:Franz-Gehrels.ca.1990.0.jpg ==

The file has been deleted because of deletion request by EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC), probably because of copyright issues. The file had been uploaded by me because of the request of my cousine, Barbara Gehrels (e-mail: (Redacted)), the daughter of late Franz Gehrels, on whom I wrote an article on wikipedia.de. The foto is meant to illustrate the article. Barbara Gehrels explicitly authorized me to upload the file on wikimedia.commons.

I hereby affirm that I, Dirk Kohnert, representative of the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the file listed below, which have been deleted on 5 August 2020, that I have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Dr. Dirk Kohnert

representative of the copyright holder --Dirk-Franz (talk) 09:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment from non-admin @Dirk-Franz: it is more advisable if the above email was sent at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose @Dirk-Franz: (1) For the image to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons, they require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence using the OTRS process. (2) OTRS is unable to accepted forwarded permissions and proxy statement for legal reasons. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Soni Sumarsono.jpg

I've found the file from here, and apart from other files, the file above is quite interesting to investigate, and the DR process is quite quick. Could someone temporarily undelete the file? Regards, Jeromi Mikhael ^(marhata) 15:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Question @Jeromi Mikhael: Could you provide us with a rationale as to why we should temporarily undelete the file? The nomination was sound and the deletion request stayed open 2 weeks -- 9 days longer than the minimum 7 days required by policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: Does the person in the picture is in an "official pose"? (wearing white suit, a flag behind the person, etc) I can't see the image. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael ^(marhata) 01:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jeromi Mikhael: The photo does not appear to be an official photo -- It appears to be more of a press photo. The subject is in a white uniform saluting, but there's another person standing somewhat behind him and the background appears to blue and white lights out of focus (i.e. Bokeh effect). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  - @Nat: this? Regards, Jeromi Mikhael ^(marhata) 02:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  - @Jeromi Mikhael: Yes --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
    - @Nat: Well then. I repeal my request. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael ^(marhata) 03:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Undeletion request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Man or Astro-man Promo Photo.jpg

I hereby affirm that I choose one: Mike White (deadlydesigns), the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of choose one: the media workas shown here: Man or Astro-man Promo Photo.jpg, and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

Proof I own the photo can be found here - https://www.deadlydesigns.com/portrait-portfolio/

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Mike White Copyright holder September 16, 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadlydesigns (talk • contribs) 15:36, 16 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose @Deadlydesigns: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jordan-Kane Lewis filming.jpg

The image was flagged for being potentially used for copyright infringement however I am the sole owner of the image, therefore, I have the right to choose how the image would be used. Even if you go to the source image on IMDb where I've used it before there isn't any copyright tagged or used.

Proof I own the photo can be found here - https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11144286/mediaviewer/rm3997282817

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JKLMedia (talk • contribs) 17:54, 16 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Oppose @JKLMedia: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Willy_Clipper_Cahill.jpg

Please undelete File:Willy_Clipper_Cahill.jpg and File:Willy_Cahill,_Quote.jpg since I have already sent the Declaration of Consent to: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons, permissions-commons@wikimedia.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bestinshow1917 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 17 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

Not done: Procedural close. Files have not been deleted as of 04:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC). @Bestinshow1917: Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will either add the permission to the file, or, if deleted, will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:London School of Economics Coat of Arms.svg

Please restore the following pages:

File:London School of Economics Coat of Arms.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: OTRS permission has arrived, please restore it. Thanks! Bencemac (talk) 06:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: @Bencemac: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DWHC-AM Studio.jpg

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:DWHC-AM Studio.jpg, no FOP in the Philippines. But I think this has low COM:TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

I agree that there is really nothing on the photo that looks copyrightable. --MGA73 (talk) 09:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Pinging @Taivo, Gbawden for comment. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps I applied FOP too literally but it is a poor quality photo, not sure if there is any EDUSE Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose. In my opinion the building is enough creative for copyright protection. In addition I agree with Gbawden in that this is not a good photo and educational value is not big. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per discussion above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:20, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paolo Sassone-Corsi.jpg

File:Paolo Sassone-Corsi.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

The reason for the deletion of this file was advertisement (G10) The image from a symposium that I attended with Drm Paolo Corsi. I am one of his colleagues. I have cleaned the photo using software and illustration because the image was in bad shape. I am not advertising anything. --Audioboss (talk) 05:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

@Audioboss: Question Could you tell us how this image is in project scope? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Additionally, as this is clearly a derivative of the original photograph, who is the photographer of the original image? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:00, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

This is derivative from my own photograph. I was an associate Microbiologist at UCI for a brief period. He was in his late 30s in this photo. I took his photo during a symposium-lecture. The scope of the image is such that it depicts the subject- Dr. Sassone-Corsi. --Audioboss (talk) 05:30, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

A photo of Dr. Sassone-Corsi would be in scope. But why this partiicular DW of his photo is in scope? Ankry (talk) 07:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Pinging @Audioboss --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Oppose if no scope evidence is provided. Ankry (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Original photos are low and blurred quality. I have to enhance them to present derivative composition. If better photos exist for contribution. Please update for the scope of the project. --Audioboss (talk) 04:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Poonch Medical College Rawalkot logo.png

I am requesting this undeletion due to some authentic reasons 1- this is Official recognized logo of institution 2- the previous one which was being used wasn't Official one. Template:Kumail1293(Kumail1293 (talk) 21:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC))

Info It was recreated as the now-deleted File:PMCR logo.png. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
@Kumail1293: We will require that an authorised official of the higher education institution to send permission using the OTRS process. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:New College Portraits by John Cairns 18.10.17-151 jpg.jpg

I can provide copyright details and authorise use of the file under the correct license, with all appropriate permissions from copyright holder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jllightfoot (talk • contribs) 08:02, 17 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Not done: @Jllightfoot: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File with unknown location

Hello! Please help me to find and restore a video file named “Katherine Odia birthday 3 July 2018”. We have received a permission for the file. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 09:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

@Bencemac: It would be hard to locate without more information. Perhaps you can inquire about the username used to upload the file? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, working on it... Bencemac (talk) 17:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: You can close my request, the file can be found here. Thanks for your help! Bencemac (talk) 13:04, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Headshot II.jpg

the file File:Headshot II.jpg. is in reference to the American instrumentalist 9 (Patrick di Santo) it is approved for use Lilbitograffiti (talk) 12:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Question @Lilbitograffiti: Who is the photographer? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tatiana elfie smiling.jpg

== Picture modified - new selfie not published by Purepeople == File:Tatiana selfie smiling.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justfree1958 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 17 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Justfree1958: even if the new photograph wasn't published by Purepeople, we need evidence that Tatiana-Laurens Delarue gave permission for the photo to be published under a free license. That permission can be submitted via COM:OTRS. clpo13_(talk) 16:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Info A UD request regarding this photo was already rejected earlier this month. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: @Justfree1958: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:3° Euforia Lopez 2015.jpg

La foto la saqué yo con la cámara de mi madre, por eso figura su nombre. Pero la imagen es de mi autoría. --Juanblas09 (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Previously published on Facebook @Juanblas09: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat Yes, the foto was uploaded on Facebook by myself, i'm one of the organizers of the party.

Not done: As stated above: the copyright must send permission using the OTRS process. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pvhb-Pouzauges-Vendee-HandBall-logo.png

C'est le logo du club de hand de Pouzauges dont je suis bénévole. J'ai créé cette page avec ces visuels qui sont la propriété du club. Les 12 photos et logos ont été supprimés aujourd'hui. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twice021 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 17 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Twice021: For images that have been already published, policy requires that a free license evidence is provided on the image publication site or the actual copyright holder needs to follow COM:OTRS instruction sending a free license permission via email. Your online declaration is not enough, especially as we cannot verify whether you are authorized to grant a free license concerning the club property. Ankry (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Some files that wrongly deleted based on "no FOP in Sweden"

@LPfi, Esquilo, Yuraily Lic, and Fitindia:

As explaned by Esquilo on Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Sweden, the de facto COM:FOP Sweden section is really confusing in the wordings, it looks like Sweden does have a buildings-only FOP, just if they are not permitted to publish on a structured database of public art, I think the FOP Sweden section need to be re-written by this discussion. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Liuxinyu970226: COM:VPC is the proper venue for such discussion. Here, we can base on established policies only. Ankry (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. This is not the venue to discuss rewriting of policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DSF5372.jpg - COCHAE's work (Origami)

The file was deleted by User:Túrelio due to copyright violation. However, this file was uploaded by the author himself as per my request via Twitter on September 16. As you see, there are three Twitter accounts involved in the conversation: COCHAE (@COCHAE), w:ja:User:漱石の猫 (@souneko), and myself Wind Rose (@rosy_wind_jawp, w:en:User:ProfessorPine). I can ask COCHAE to officially tweet whether the person who uploaded the file is COCHAE or not if this procedure meets the licensing permission requirements.

Below is the quick translation of conversation on Twitter:

Wind Rose (ProfessorPine) on Sept 16: "漱石の猫 (@souneko0304) wrote up the article about w:ja:COCHAE, but there are no photos. Would you kindly provide any photos of COCHAE's work under CC-BY-SA license? This license allows commercial uses and is required for all Wikipedia articles and files."

COCHAE on Sept 17: "Thank you for letting me know. I will keep you updated."

Wind Rose on Sept 17: "Should you have any question about the licensing, please feel free to contact me via Twitter Direct Message. For your information, I give you another example of 漱石の猫's contribution article w:ja: 有松・鳴海絞り. Inserting photos would make an article more attractive. Any photos of your creative works, exhibitions, or portraits of COCHAE would be appreciated."

漱石の猫 on Sept 17: "I am the primary writer of the article. Thank you everything for your cooperation. I have just found an photo file uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and inserted it into the Wikipedia article. Again, thank you for your kindness and quick response."

Then, COCHAE (@COCHAE) liked both Wind Rose and 漱石の猫's twitter messages.

I assume the conversation is casual but can be regarded as an official permission. Please advise. --ProfessorPine (talk) 03:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@ProfessorPine: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is not able to accept forwarded permissions or proxy statements for legal reasons. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

I guess Commons:OTRS#When contacting OTRS is unnecessary can be applied to this case - particularly "The image was first published on my website, or on my own space of a shared website." @Túrelio: mentioned the deletion reason that Copyright violation: https://cochae.com/ https://cochae.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/DSF5372.jpg. Thus, the only thing we should do is to prove the person who uploaded is COCHAE himself. And I believe the abovementioned Twitter threads are the evidence.--ProfessorPine (talk) 00:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

@ProfessorPine: Liking a post on twitter is insufficient permission. Please have the copyright holder send permission to OTRS. Thank you. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Man or Astro-man?.jpg

I'd like to request this image be undeleted. I am the owner and copyright holder of the image. The image can be found on my online portfolio here: https://www.deadlydesigns.com/portrait-portfolio/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.39.196.213 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 18 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Oppose Per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-09#File:Man or Astro-man Promo Photo.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 21:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

As was said in the previous request, we need clear evidence of permission from the copyright holder that this can be distributed under a free license. An appropriate permission statement can be posted on the linked portfolio page (fastest option) or sent to COM:OTRS. clpo13_(talk) 22:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Restauración de imágenes borradas

Quisiera que haga una revisión y estudio de estas imágenes que fueron borradas el 28 de abril de 2020, bajo la siguiente consignaː

Los logotipos de empresas y organizaciones no son ninguna excepción, y poseen también derechos de autor. Sólo los logotipos con licencia libre o en dominio público son aceptables en Wikipedia. La excepción son aquellos logotipos que consisten sólo en formas geométricas simples y en texto. Este tipo de logotipos no alcanza el umbral de originalidad necesario para que esté protegido por copyright y están, por lo tanto, en dominio público. [22].

Si corresponde con las imagenes borradas previamente y se deba cambiar la licencia a PD-textlogo, pido que se restuaren. Las imagenes son las siguientesː

P Cesar Maldonado (talk) 19:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

@P Cesar Maldonado: The files were deleted as you claimed that they are copyrighted and that you are the exclusive copyright holder. Now you claim something else. But it is also not true that 'all the abovementioned files qualify as {{PD-textlogo}}: the ear of grain in File:JESUCA BOLIVIA.png is not text nor the hand in File:LOGO MTS BOLIVIA.png is. If you wish the images to be undeleted, you need to be precise about their copyright status: it is up to the uploader to provide this information, not up to admins working here to search for it. And such a massive request clearly without a common reason is also not helpful. Ankry (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done No response from the requester. @P Cesar Maldonado: please, split the request to smaller ones with clear and valid rationale(s) if you still wish the images to be undeleted. Ankry (talk) 10:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Maude Morissette Humoriste La Dump Hashtag puppet marionnette réalisatrice productrice comédienne The Dump auteure autrice Belle.jpg

This is a legit photo of Maude Morrisette File:Maude Morissette Humoriste La Dump Hashtag puppet marionnette réalisatrice productrice comédienne The Dump auteure autrice Belle.jpg The credit for the photo is attributed to : PJ Dufort

This is the official link https://www.agencegenevievechampagne.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/M.Morissette_credits-PJDufort_GChampagneAgenceAertistque-5.jpg

Where did you get the idea that this file is licensed {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}? I can't see anything like that on the source site, where it only says "© Genevieve Champagne Agence Artistique". A credit line is not a license. Your other claim is that this is your own work, which is obviously untrue, unless you are PJ Dufort. Please see COM:NETCOPYRIGHT about images found on the Web, in short: they are only rarely freely licensed to the degree that we require. If you indeed are PJ Dufort, please use COM:OTRS to confirm the free license or get the source site to include the license information in the credit line. --rimshot^talk 22:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Rimshot. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:39, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:COOK-SCHOOL ARCHIVE.pdf and File:COOK RESUME.pdf

These are the messages I received.

File:COOK-SCHOOL ARCHIVE.pdf was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

File:COOK RESUME.pdf was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days

Both these files were listed in the owner's request for OTRS Permissions, which was sent to Wikimedia Commons on 10 June 2020 (I was cc'ed on the email):

I hereby affirm that I am Jeannine Cook the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media works as shown here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COOK_RESUME.pdf https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RASHARASHA_CROPS_AND_ACCOUNTS.pdf https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FRANK_ANDERSON_PHOTOGRAPHER.pdf https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RASHARASHA_PURCHASE.pdf https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:COOK-SCHOOL_ARCHIVE.pdf and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of these works. The files are photographs of documents held in my family archives, of which I am the sole owner. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Further, I have authorised Michelle Anderson to act as my representative in the use of these images, and have also extended permissions for their use to Emma Ellis, researcher and author. Jeannine Cook Copyright holder 9 June 2020

Jeannine Cook (Redacted) y Andrea Doria 49 (Redacted) http://www.jeanninecook.com

Thank you for telling me what else may be done.

--Michedomi (talk) 16:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

It seems that ticket:2020061010004535 is still being processed: neither accepted nor rejected. Ankry (talk) 09:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: by Ankry. OTRS is processing the ticket. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Saleh mirza aghaei 06.jpg

{{Mehr}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Molla nasreddin (talk • contribs) 03:53, 19 September 2020‎ (UTC)

@Molla nasreddin: Why? This seems to be a film stick. It is unlikely that Tasnim or Mehr are copyright holders of the film (or we need an evidence for this). Ankry (talk) 09:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done No evidence of free license provided. Ankry (talk) 09:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KAPATADHAARI FINAL POSTER.jpg

This is an original image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhananjayangovind (talk • contribs) 08:40, 19 September 2020‎ (UTC)

@Dhananjayangovind: No, this is not. This poster is a COM:DW of few photos and other graphics. Making a copy of it does not grant any copyright. COM:OTRS permission fron the poster author and from the authors of all the original works used is needed here. Ankry (talk) 09:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kira Narayanan 2.jpg

The photo is not owned by Times Talent but the artist herself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KippaYan (talk • contribs) 07:40, 20 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Oppose Previously published at [23]. Pleas follow the instructions at COM:OTRS to verify that you are the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 09:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JONY на выступлении.jpg

Здравствуйте! Загруженный мной файл был удален по непонятной мне причине. Чуть больше недели назад он был номинирован на удаление. Мне предложили предоставить разрешение на его использование. Но этот файл моя собственная работа. Это было указано в описании. Какую лицензию или разрешение мне нужно было предоставить Викискладу? Не мог ли бы кто-то из модераторов объяснить, что мне делать в данной ситуации. В часто задаваемых вопросах я не нашел решения моей проблемы.

Hello! The file I uploaded was deleted for a reason I don't understand. A little over a week ago, it was nominated for delete. I was asked to grant permission to use it. But this file is my own work. It was wrote in the description. What licence or permission did I need to grant for Wikimedia? Could one of the moderators explain what to do in this situation. In FAQ I don't find solution to the my problem. Sebersky (talk) 11:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The image has been published in few social media services. We need an evidence that it was published there by you. You were notified on your talk page about the COM:OTRS procedure that you need to follow in such cases. Ankry (talk) 12:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Interpreting for Ban Ki Moon.jpg

--HamdiSon (talk) 12:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@HamdiSon: any reason to undelete? Ankry (talk) 12:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Interpreting.jpg

== Pay attention to copyright File:Interpreting.jpg ==

--HamdiSon (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose This photo has previously been published here on January 18, 2020. Also, since this has also been used at fr:Utilisateur:HamdiSon it may be out of scope. Thuresson (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Nuevo sección

Not done: procedural close. no request made. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lockscreen screenshot by user.jpg

This is to verify that the screenshots in concern of the open source software was originally taken by myself to show the user interface to users of the wiki and is too my knowledge, NOT a copyright violation as per the Wikipedia policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivansu M (talk • contribs) 21:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment It looks like this is a screenshot of Apache-licensed software (POSP, a fork of AOSP). Screenshots of freely-licensed software are okay on Commons, assuming COM:SCOPE is satisfied. However, I'm not sure if the artwork is included with the software or covered by that license. clpo13_(talk) 22:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response. While software, per clpo13, is freely licensed, the copyright status of the artwork is in question. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete File:Salcombe_Cannon_Wreck_and_Moor_Sands_Sites.jpg

Hi,

File:Salcombe_Cannon_Wreck_and_Moor_Sands_Sites.jpg

This image is a photograph I took. I uploaded it and added it to a page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salcombe_Cannon_Wreck) but it was shortly flagged for deletion due to a lack of "source". I emailed in the relevant form but the image has still been deleted. I've no idea why it didn't have a source as I uploaded it using the usual upload wizard and filled in the form as I have with the rest of the photos I've uploaded.

Please undelete it.

Regards,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Natritmeyer

@Natritmeyer: "No source" means here that the file is not the original version from your camera. You can either upload the original image here or provide it to OTRS together with a free license permission if you do not want to publish it for some reason. See COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 17:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Akshit bisht.jpg

Indian film actor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshit singh bisht (talk • contribs) 06:21, 21 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Which page in Wikimedia the image is intended to be used in?
As the image has already been published elsewhere, we need evidence of free license.

Ankry (talk) 12:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Passion of the Passion Fruit (Maraca Plantations, Kerala)

This is an original photo taken by the company i am working for and is not a copy of any sorts. Please undelete this and make it avaliable again.

Thanking in Advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daralnoble (talk • contribs) 07:07, 21 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose We need evidence of free license grated by the copyright holder. You were notified of COM:OTRS procedure. After the appropriate permission is received and accepted, the image will be undeleted. Ankry (talk) 12:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Page-01.png

Please restore the following pages:

File:Page-01.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: this person is very popular in Sri Lanka don't delete this Miyuru Bhashitha (talk) 09:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@Miyuru Bhashitha: Can you point out a page in Wikimedia services where this image is intended to be used? Ankry (talk) 12:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

And, for {{Own}} images it is preferred to upload the original image from your camera. Ankry (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

undeletion request for Tasha Layton wikipedia page: File:Tasha Layton Pictured With Her Husband and Producer Keith Everett Smith.png

please undelete the following image as BEC Recordings nor Tasha Layton owns the rights to it (the image in question is owned by Ghetty Images)

Tasha Layton Pictured With Her Husband and Producer Keith Everett Smith.png

Like you say, the image is owned by Getty Images, who will sell limited rights for a few dollars, and somewhat less limited rights for a few more dollars. Now, where's your reason for undeletion? --rimshot^talk 21:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No evidence of free licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The person I am writing about appears in the picture and that it is not subject to copyrights.

The person I am writing about appears in the picture. As a file it's not subject to any copyright. It has been sent to me by the photographer (the owner). Best regards --Meaning Translated (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Likely you are relating to File:Interpreting for world leaders.jpg, right? Apart from the fact that every photography is subject to copyright, the image, which you had uploaded claiming "Shared by Email from a friend", carries an expressed statement "Copyright: Rudy Nakache, Shotting Studio". So, Mr. Nakache needs to send an email from his businesse address to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org confirming the release of said image under a free license, such as CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA. --Túrelio (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Túrelio. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SPORTIVOHURACANAREQUIPA.png

Escudo del Club Huracán de la Pampilla Arequipa Perú — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bertinedu (talk • contribs) 21:01, 21 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose Own, personally created logos are out of COM:SCOPE. For official logos, we need either a free license evidence or expired copyright evidence. Ankry (talk) 00:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Geanloureiro.jpg

Peço que a exclusão seja cancelada, para que possa ser incluída essa foto do Gean Loureiro, prefeito de Florianópolis. Ela é mais recente, está melhor posicionada. Agradeço desde já,

--Alessandra Pereira de Azevedo Souza (talk) 21:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@Alessandra Pereira de Azevedo Souza: While declaring a photo as Own work you need to provide the original photo, diectly from your camera. Ankry (talk) 23:54, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. If and only if the original with full EXIF metadata can be provided, then it can be uploaded. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grieves-V2.jpg

This image was provided directly from the owner with all permissions for use directly from the Greives website: http://grievesmusic.com/ to the Grieves Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grieves --Does44 (talk) 22:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@Does44: This contradicts your earlier declaration that you are the author and copyright holder of this photo. Providing false or incorrect information about copyright or authorship makes your other declarations unreliable. Moreover, for any image that was published elsewhere we need a free license declaration either through its initial publication site, or following COM:OTRS. Ankry (talk) 23:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michael Altfield in 2006 at the City of Kennesaw IT Server Room.jpg

As noted in the original upload, I emailed the publisher and received explicit permission to publish this under CC-BY-SA license on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maltfield (talk • contribs) 02:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose @Maltfield: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is unable to accept forwarded permissions or proxy statements for legal reasons. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michael Altfield in 2006 at the City of Kennesaw IT Server Room Switch.jpg

As noted in the original upload, I emailed the publisher and received explicit permission to publish this under CC-BY-SA license on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maltfield (talk • contribs) 02:14, 22 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
Oppose @Maltfield: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Please note that OTRS is unable to accept forwarded permissions or proxy statements for legal reasons. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Tournage de la saison 1.jpg

Cette photo a été prise par un membre de mon équipe de tournage. J’ai son autorisation. Le photographe a céder l’ensemble de ses droits de diffusion à ma production.

Not done The photo is not deleted, so nothing to undelete. Please discuss the issues in the Deletion Request. Ankry (talk) 14:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Heniko_sakka_profil.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020091910006173 regarding File:Heniko_sakka_profil.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Done @Ganímedes: FYI. Ankry (talk) 13:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

--BatistaDi (talk) 08:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

@BatistaDi: Which file you wish to undelete and why it is in COM:SCOPE? Your contribution here seems to be self-promotion. Ankry (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: procedural close. no request for undeletion made. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pugad Lawin 002.jpg

Found this entry while reading Commons:Village pump/Archive/2012/07#File:Mlqmark2jf.JPG and Philippine Public Domain law. Deleted under Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cry of Pugad Lawin (no FoP in the Philippines). But assuming the inputs by Obsidian_Soul, this photo might pass Commons as {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} (a plaque of NHCP / its predecessor). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: per {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DaveLeducTunTunMin.jpg

Hi, this is an undeletetion request for the File:DaveLeducTunTunMin.jpg.

Prior to deletion, all the authors of the pictures on the file had sent their OTRS permissions for the pictures and graphic designs.

As for the Facebook post concern [24], the Burmese page was allowed to publish the poster, but clearly forgot to appropriately credit ONE8IGHT. If you look carefully at the file used in the post, it has the Lethwei World square logo on the top right corner, the sports media authority. This shows it was taken and reposted from Lethwei World's original post, the caption is also the same as on the initial post (Posted on November 27th 2018) https://www.instagram.com/p/BqsTCSIgIHe/?igshid=q8va4p36gvuf.

ONE8IGHT gave permission to Lethwei World (LW) to post and use its file, and LW did credit them correctly.

WikiCommons admins were waiting on one last explanation for the Pagoda picture used at the top of the poster, but it ultimately took too long and the file was wrongfully deleted.

I was told today that ONE8IGHT, the creator of the file, sent the permission for the pagoda via email. Therefore, all the pictures have now been addressed.

Once the file is restored, I am planning to reduce the size of the image.

Thank you for your help.

Best regards, Lethweimaster (talk)

Not done: Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission for the files, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BOB CMYK logo.png

== [[File:BOB CMYK logo.png|thumb|The official logo of Bank of Baroda]] ==

the logo displayed on Bank of Baroda page is outdated this logo is the current one. WebmasterBankofBaroda (talk) 04:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Copyright © 2017 Bank of Baroda. All rights reserved is not CC-BY-SA 4.0 license declaration. Fair use logos can be uploaded to some Wikipedias that allow Fair Use in their oolicies, but cannot be hosted in Commons. Ankry (talk) 06:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Außenansicht Wetscher Wohngalerien.jpg

This picture was deleted with the reason "probable copyright violation". However, even in the lengthy discussion, no one has ever claimed this picture to be a copyright violation. The reason given was "out of scope for Commons" - which, as the discussion showed, is definitely wrong. So please present a valid proof that this picture is a copyright violation, otherwise restore it. --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Published first elsewhere with no evidence of a free licence. The OTRS process is required for both the image and the username. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

OK, this is indeed proof that it was a copyright violation. This should have been mentioned in the discussion or at least when deleting it! It would have saved me a lot of time. --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 13:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edwin11.JPG

No copyright issue. Please restore it. --116.49.139.203 10:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Published first elsewhere with no evidence of an acceptable free licence. Facebook terms of service are incompatible with Common licensing policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Queen Hangbe.png

We have received permission for this file at ticket:2020090110007133. Please undelete. (I am an OTRS agent.) Jon Harald Søby (talk) 12:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: @Jon Harald Søby: FYI. Please check the note I left on the ticket. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Suite.01.png

As for this file, the form for the confirmation of the title to use as a titleholder representative [Ticket#: 2020092310005059].

--DenGlad (talk) 12:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission for the files, an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grieves-V2.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020092110013875 regarding File:Grieves-V2.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 16:50, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: Restored as per request. --rimshot^talk 21:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Archana kavi.jpg

The reason for deletion is that, the file is available on http://stillsbay.blogspot.com/2010/12/archana-kavi-hot-and-spicy-pics.html since 2010-12-13. The file was originally uploaded to ml Wikipedia on February 15 2010. So definitely the blogger copied the image from mlwiki to their blog. Temporarily undeleted the file in ml wiki for the proof. The photo was taken during an event in 2010 Jan held at Ernakulam, the uploader upload many other photos from the event and uploaded.--Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 20:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Done: As per nom., this was first uploaded to Commons, by a wide margin. Maybe mixed up with File:Archana Kavi.tif, which was indeed uploaded later. --rimshot^talk 21:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AfricaMap2.jpg

This file, deleted in 2017 per Commons:Deletion requests/File:AfricaMap2.jpg is one of a series of military history maps produced by the US Military Academy at West Point. Other maps of this particular series, documenting parts of the WW2 Western Desert Campaign, are in Category:Maps of World War II in Libya. Although the source links have by and large expired as the West Point website has gone through a couple of redesign iterations since, they can all be found here on archive.org. The present map is under 34b, with the url and the info on the bottom of the page, as well as the information on one of the referring pages, confirming their provenance as products of the US military. It'd be ideal to update all these maps with their vector versions which West Point has in the meantime produced. However, given the magnitude of this task and the public interest in not removing public domain content from Wikimedia Commons, I request that the present map be reinstated. Thank you! Miranche (talk) 17:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Support Other maps from USMA are available at Category:World War II maps of the United States Military Academy. "History Department USMA" has published an updated and much higher quality version of this map as 34 B at westpoint.edu. Thuresson (talk) 18:20, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jcb and Hedwig in Washington: pinging users working on the DR, if they wish to comment. Ankry (talk) 09:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Done per above. Nobody opposes. Ankry (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grafite no ônibus.jpg

At Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grafite no ônibus.jpg three Commons admins, none of them fluent in Portuguese, decided that this photo, showing Portuguese-language graffiti, is outside of our scope — against the opinion of two Portuguese-speaking users. (A copyright concern was also raised, but quickly dismissed.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:42, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: It was deleted, because nobody elaborated why it is in scope. Please, do so. Ankry (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: The burden of proof lies on the party asking for deletion. Yet nowhere in the DR it was explained why it is not in scope — and how could it be, since none of the delete-voters understands the language? Anyway, it suffices to read the DR to see that Tm did offer a translation, even though if COM:AGF was to be respected by these three admins that would not be necessary. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: P199's nomination statement of Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope clearly makes a sufficient case for its deletion. The burden of proof is on those arguing for the file to be retained -- in this case, why this file is in scope needs to be made clear. It was not made clear in the deletion discussion. Context is everything. But context was not explained at all. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: The burden of proof lies on the party asking for deletion, as said before and as policy requires, and as you should know, past all the deletionist gaslighting. Obviously, if one cannot understand the language something it’s written in, one cannot ascertain the meaning of that text — let alone its scope value for Commons. The nomination was a free-form excercise in pointless deletionism, something that happens unopposed thousands of times each week in Commons. You say that the value of this photo was made clear, yet Tm’s translation was not even addressed — neither in the DR, not here now. (Bear in mind that, unlike the four of you, neither me nor Tm nor most of us can take a look again at the deleted photo.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 04:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: Temporarily undeleted for the period of the discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
@Tuvalkin: Tm’s translation brought no context to the discussion. As I've stated, P199's nomination statement of Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope clearly made a sufficient case for its deletion. Whether other users speak Portuguese or not is not the core issue. The core issue here is why the image is in scope, why it would be educationally useful, what can we learn from it. No context was given, either by the uploader or those arguing for its retention. I would be in favour of full undeletion if such context could actually be provided. It is as simple as that. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Again another proof that whether other users speak Portuguese or not is the core issue. First there was the confusion that this graffiti was made in Portugal, when a native speaker of portuguese would understand that this was made in Brazil. As the translation was not taken into account and gave context, also the context was given in the original description in portuguese "A sociedade nos impõem normas de como devemos falar, vestir e, até mesmo, a visão maniqueísta do certo e errado. Neste processo, a liberdade de expressão foi substituída pela reprodução de valor pré-definidos." ("Society enforces rules on how we should speak, dress and even the manicheanist view of right and wrong. In this process, the freedom of expression has been replaced by the reproduction of predefined values.") that shows the why and what is in scope in this feminist graffiti, in particular on a time that there is several attacks women rights in Brazil, specially by the brazilian president, the far-right and some religious extremistes. Tm (talk) 09:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Tuvalkin: Unused is enough for deletion when no clear evidence that the photo can be used educationally. Commons is not intended to be a collection of all possible graffitis in the world. Ankry (talk) 06:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Unused is not a reason to delete a feminist graffiti. Or do we are going to delete the tens of millions of files not in use? Tm (talk) 09:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Tm: You made no such point in the deletion discussion. The educational value is/was not evident here, especially because those in favour of the file's retention refused to provide any rationale in the DR. Per policy, Unused is enough for deletion when no clear evidence that the photo can be used educationally. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Given translation is not a rationale in the DR? And, seen what you have written, you deleted the file it seems without reading the description in portuguese or the categories? And what rationale was given in the DR for deletion? "Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope", unused is not a reason to delete and this is not a personal photo (where is the person or personal object depicted)? And where was the rationale for this photo to be out of scope and so of no educational value? No reason was provided for this file to be out of scope and yet several reasons were present in the file description and given for this file to be in scope (political graffiti in brasil, feminist graffiti, graffiti of feminist symbols, text about femnism) and yet this file was deleted. Tm (talk) 12:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Tm: No, a translation of the text is not sufficient, nor is the text in Portuguese. Both texts do not give a clear reason why it is in scope. All it does is proclaim a grand statement, which is then explain with another one. But no description is given of why and how it is in scope -- which could be as simple as providing that in the description in any language. Again, context is everything, and it should be provided. One can not assume that everyone will understand it otherwise. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Did you at least made an effort to see from where this text was quoted? Albeit i did a mistraslation when i added "better" in "for a [better world] ..." , the correct translation is “For a world where we are socially equal, humanly different and totally free”. Did you know to whom this text is attributed? A quick search would show that this is a quote from the Spartacist Rosa Luxembourg. Tm (talk) 19:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Done per discussion: in scope. Ankry (talk) 19:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Применение химического оружия в Европе.png

My name is Alexander Pavlenko. I am the one who posted the deleted image on the site tjournal.ru. I specified a link to my contacts in the description of the deleted file. Please cancel the deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lobotras (talk • contribs)

You claim so, but we need an evidence for this. I do not think that this can be proven on-wiki (unless Alexander Pavlenko declares publicly on his webpage that User:Lobotras is his Wikimedia account and you provide a link to this declaration on your homepage here. Preferred way is to do so via email to OTRS. Ankry (talk) 23:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done No response, no permission. Ankry (talk) 05:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sayef_Turan.jpg

This is not a personal photo please check it I hope it can be on the platform — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErrorShadow6969 (talk • contribs)

Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Ankry (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wendy Wintersteen.jpg

There was some confusion in the OTRS ticket for this file. The rights holder erroneously gave permission for another picture file rather than for this one. Then an empty file with that title was created, obviously against the warning that appears in such cases. Now we received a correction at OTRS. It is the above named file for which permission is given. See Ticket#2020091610000031 Can someone please delete the empty file and restore the original file with the picture? I will then put the OTRS permission tag into it. – Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 10:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fc Juárez logo.png File:México fc (1).svg File:México fc.png, File:Club Santos Laguna logo.png

The reason why these images must be restored is that the users @EugeneZelenko: and @ManFromNord: deleted the images of the shields of soccer teams in Mexico for believing that they are not free. It is an error, because the PD-Coa-Mexico license allows uploading this type of images, because the license says: "it belongs to a" recognized "organization (which in that case a sports organization), so it is not protected by copyright, in addition they must take into account that this image Escudo del Cruz Azul AC.svg, was going to be eliminated for the same reason If it is not a free image, but if you see the file discussion a user says: "If you even know the Federal Copyright Law of Mexico, this logo of a recognized organization (football club) is not protected according to the Art 14 subparagraph VII and indicated in PD-Coa-Mexico ", in addition to the laws of https: //commons.wikim edia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Mexico/es Commons: Copyright rules by territory / Mexico / es says in the section Not protected article VII states: "Reproductions or imitations, without authorization, of shields, flags or emblems of any country, state, municipality or equivalent political division, or denominations, acronyms, symbols or emblems of international governmental, non-governmental organizations, or of any other officially recognized organization ", therefore they can be uploaded with or without the permission of the author, so they must be restored because it is a mistake that anyone could have made, unfortunately in other Wikipedia pages in other languages these images are wrongly uploaded as non-free, ignoring that the laws of Mexico allow uploading these images, examples:

https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File: Tigres_UANL_logo_ (crest) .svg
https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File: Mazatl% C3% A1n_FC_crest.png
https: //fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title = Fichier: Club_Le% C3% B3n_ (logo) .svg & lang = fr
https: //zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/File: Pachuca_Tuzos_logo.svg
That's it, I await your answers.

--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 16:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

This seems reasonable. But pinging the deleting admin @EugeneZelenko: for comments. Ankry (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't think that status of national sport organization assumes government ownership. It might be NGO created by regular folks, and I know such case personally. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Read please https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federaci%C3%B3n_Mexicana_de_F%C3%BAtbol_Asociaci%C3%B3n (in spanish) this way you will know that it is an organization that belongs to the government.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 14:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
@Aurelio de Sandoval: Is there any evidence that the FMF is a governmental agency? It does not appear to be so, even according to the article you pointed us to. While it is the governing body of association football in Mexico, government involvement in the organisation, if any, is not apparent nor is it evident. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No evidence that FMF is a government entity. Additionally, teams, while the league they play in is governed by the FMF, have private owners. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Relisted: per Special:PermaLink/462755559#PD-Coa-Mexico_2 --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

@Aurelio de Sandoval: Do you have legislated or regulatory evidence that the FMF is a officially recognized organization (i.e. a law or official government decree that enumerates that fact)? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: I have found the evidence you need, the FMF is affiliated with Confederación Deportiva Mexicana o in english Mexican Sports Confederation a civil association in Mexico and has the support of SEP, Secretaría de Educación pública o in english Secretary of Education Public--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 15:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: Here is a page of the government of Mexico and that is from the Mexican Sports Confederation, in which you can see that it is an association affiliated with the government of Mexico http://www.codeme.com.mx/codeme/quienesomos, here is other evidence regulatory that the Mexican Sports Confederation is a recognized organization here lists that fact http://www.codeme.com.mx/descargas/Estatuto%20y%20Regdamientos%20de%20CODEME % 202016% 20VIGENTE.pdf
If the Confederación Deportiva Mexicana is an organization recognized by the government of Mexico then the FMF is also recognized and therefore it can upload your sports shields with the PD-Coa-Mexico license.--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: and to conclude here is a document on the first page of this PDF that is an official government decree that lists that fact http://www.codeme.com.mx/descargas/pdf_historia/03_fundacion.pdf --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 16:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: As a curious fact, this document was signed by the then President of Mexico Abelardo L. Rodríguez. With all that I have sent in evidence, it should be enough to restore the images that were deleted.Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
There's a lot of assumption and supposition in your statements above. And those documents do not concern the FMF. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: Of course they concern the FMF because it is the government organization to which it is affiliated.Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: If the FMF were not affiliated with that organization, it would be illegal and would not exist, therefore the FMF is a well-known organization that operates within Mexico.Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: For the FMF to have the recognition of Civil Association, it had to be approved by the Mexican Sports Confederation and by the President of Mexico, which in this case was Abelardo L. Rodríguez--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:36, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No concrete evidence that the FMF is an officially recognized organization as defined by the law. Just because one sports organization has such status, does not mean that we can assume that another organization received such recognition. Furthermore, as previously stated in previous close, teams are privately owned. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Girl in Shalwar Kamez.png

its my own picture and I dont want it to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aadilashahid94 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 23 September 2020‎ (UTC)

And who are you? Is this your Facebook page? If you are a model, actress etc we can keep your image; as long as you can show that with some reliable indication. OTOH (On the other hand) you upload pictures which clearly are not selfies as "own work" and "myself". This is another problem, FYI. --E4024 (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Info Deleted by request from uploader at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Girl in Shalwar Kamez.png. Thuresson (talk) 17:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Aadilashahid94: Why did you change your mind? Ankry (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done. OP has a history of uploading own photos then nominating them for deletion. This photo has been converted to PNG for no apparent reason. The shalwar kameez in the photo is blurry. Thuresson (talk) 22:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Assad Al Hanini at Brave CF event.jpg

Checks all conditions and do not violate any clause — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.32.126.35 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 23 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Two doubts were raised at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Assad Al Hanini at Brave CF event.jpg (COM:SCOPE and COM:EVID) and not addressed. I would also suggest that this is a COM:DW of the image in the background. Ankry (talk) 23:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ramongonsalis123: reuploading an image is not helpful here. You may be blocked if you do this again. Ankry (talk) 19:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC) Ankry (talk) 19:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done Deletion rationale still not addressed. Ankry (talk) 19:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Allcos2.jpg

Dear Nathan2055

The file:Allcos2, under reference has no form of copyright anywhere and it can be used anywhere as the subject of this page is a public servant and also in the knowledge of this.

I request the file mentioned above should be UNDELETED and same be used for the profile picture.

Yours sincerely

--Shadrachlaw (talk) 08:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC) 24 September, 2020

Info According to deletion log it was deleted because Google found this photo on Wikicommons. From deletion log: "found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/63/Allcos2.jpg google search". @Túrelio: , would you like to comment? Thuresson (talk) 11:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Strike above comment, since this was a Google Image Search. Thuresson (talk) 11:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

@Shadrachlaw: It can be used in the way that the photographer grants a permission to. And according to copyright law a written form is required for such a permission and we need evidence that the permission compatible with COM:L has been granted. Any evidence for this? We cannot upload images under Fair Use as this is limited too much. Copyright applies to any photo regardless whether its author wants this or not. Ankry (talk) 19:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done No evidence provided that the image is free (freely licensed or not copyrighted). Ankry (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hatim and Dokey.jpg

Good day, The Image File:Hatim and Dokey.jpg was deleted from Wikimedia for Copyright Violation. This is an original image taken by Me for Hatim and Dokey, A Ugandan Music Duo currently managed by Subwami Empire, the company I work for and represent.

Please assist to undelete the file and restore it. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amandlaofficial (talk • contribs) 20:21, 25 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Oppose Published before upload at [25] without crediting any Commons user and without a free license. Thuresson (talk) 21:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Κωτσόβολος Samsung Hub.jpg

This file is not against Wikimedia Commons rules. It show the inside of a Retail Shop, that shows an innovative shop set up. No people are shown. The image is taken by an HR employee of this specific retail shop, and is free for use in Wikipedia and any other use. We are sorry if we misunderstood the rules. Please let us know what the problem is so we can provide new images. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by VickyMajnl (talk • contribs)

As the declared image copyright holder is different to User:VickyMajnl, you cannot grant a license at upload. Per policy, a free license evidence is needed in such case.

BTW, who are "we"? Per policy, Wikimedia accounts are personal and cannot be shared. Ankry (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: no response to query, no evidence of an acceptable free licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JONY_на_выступлении.jpg

Hello! A few days ago, I nominated for undeletion this file, but I didn't say about some things. Firstly, I published this file at Russian social media service (https://vk.com/photo-173961601_457241297) before I published its at Wikimedia. Secondly, I don't know how prove, what it's my own work because I will refer to the rules of this Russian social network by which I can freely use this file(https://vk.com/terms (look rule №7.1.3)) Sebersky (talk) 11:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@Sebersky: Non-commercial permission is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements, see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 19:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Please, undelete this file, I am attaching a license... {{Cc-by-sa-4.0|JONY_на_выступлении.jpg}} Sebersky (talk) 11:00, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

@Sebersky: You need to provide a link to this license in vk.com, or the photographer needs to follow COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 12:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No evidence of free licence at source. Published by subject but copyright holder is the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by contract. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jetta si Watak Utama.png

this file is an official information regarding the informations about the company , i plead to BOTS to make this file stay on Wikipedia Common Page . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meandkancil2020 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 25 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
@Meandkancil2020: How can we confirm, basing on public record, that YOU are (personally) the author and exclusive copyright holder of the image? Note, that providing false or incorrect information makes your other statements not reliable. Ankry (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rodolfo Guevara Dato.jpg

requesting undeletion for rodolfo guevara dato picture. He was my great uncle. The picture has been with our family since the 1950s. thank you. C (talk) 16:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@Stephentalla: In order to undelete the photo we need either: a free license permission from the photographer or photographer heirs, or an evidence that copyright expired in country of origin. When the photo was made? What is its country of origin? Was it ever published, and when and where, if so. A 2020 photo copyright cannot expire, yet. You claimed that you are the photographer who made this photo of your family member: how old were you when the photo was made? Ownership of a photo print is irrelevant for copyright. And providing false or incorrect information makes your other statements not reliable. Ankry (talk) 19:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: no response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coloana Fidelității Timișoara.jpg

My photo has been marked as a possible copyright violation and, therefore, was deleted. I own the rights of this photo, it is my own photo. The EXIF shows Sorin Pintea as copyright holder because I have borrowed the DSLR camera to take this photo from my son-in-law. Actually, you can see Sorin's Facebook profile here, which shows I am on his friends list: https://www.facebook.com/sorin.pintea.9809/friends Please undelete this files, it really does not represent any copyright violation. Thanks! Radu Simionoff--Simionoff (talk) 06:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

@Simionoff: We need some evidence for this, eg. a confirmation from Sorin Pintea. This cannot be made on-wiki, so COM:OTRS procedure is the right way. Ankry (talk) 09:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alexandr Jucov.jpg

Picture is taken by me, and if you see more attentively you’ll see that in Forbes India picture the hands are on different position than on this picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vovagig (talk • contribs)

Well, this does not qualify it for speedy, but for requesting a permission. Both images seem to originate from a professional session and for professional images COM:OTRS permission from copyright holder is still needed. Ankry (talk) 09:14, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Another image of the obviously same shooting is found here and is credited to "World Lab Technologies", the company of the depicted person. --Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Man Playing A Guitar.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

File:Man Playing A Guitar.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: It is my personal photo. It's not a copyrighted material. I can provide documents to prove ownership of the file. Acnologia08 (talk) 14:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose That is not necessary. Oppose per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Man Playing A Guitar.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 10:00, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SubwaySurfersIcon.png

Please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guh7 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 26 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. Not deleted, nor has the file been requested for deletion. Thuresson (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Portrait of Florian Anderer.jpg

Please find below the information requested: The Affirmation of Copyright holder of the media work. Sent by URBAN RUTHS PHOTOGRAPHY

PORTRAIT#WERBUNG#MODE

(Redacted) WWW.URBANRUTHS.DE the 6th august 2020

Kind regards Florian Anderer 27/09/2020 --Slapstick685 (talk) 10:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC) ____________________

I hereby affirm that I, Urban Ruths, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work as shown here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portrait_of_Florian_Anderer.jpg

URB_6981 2.jpeg

and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Not done: @Slapstick685: Permission statements cannot be processed here. They need to sent to OTRS (permissions-commonswikimedia.org). Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tous les chemins 1960.jpg [Ticket#: 2020081910006862]

Bonjour,

Suite au courriel de Jeanne Person, j'ai supprimé la clause NC (Pas d'utilisation commerciale) sur Flickr des six clichés dont je suis l'auteur :

   File:Tous les chemins 1960.jpg
   File:Soleil d'hiver.jpg
   File:Scène de vie parisienne.jpg
   File:Les pêcheurs 1974.jpg
   File:L'accordéoniste.jpg
   File:Café du matin.jpg

Ils sont donc libres de droits et devraient être compatibles avec wikipedia. Pouvez vous SVP annuler les six suppressions. Merci.

Par ailleurs et comme expimé dans ma demande Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> le mer. 19 août à 16:46, je rappelle que je possède les droits de représenter et signer en mon nom tous les documents nécessaires à la présentation ou exposition de tableaux de mon neveu Pierre Deschodt.

Enfin, les tableaux de mon neveu ont fait l'objet d'exposition citée dans la description et dans mon email.

La dernière exposition a été faite en aout 2020 : https://www.lavoixdunord.fr/856432/article/2020-08-27/pour-la-premiere-fois-les-tableaux-du-douaisien-pierre-deschodt-sont-visibles

https://www.lobservateur.fr/douaisis/2020/09/04/douai-pierre-deschodt-enfin-expose-en-ville/

Aussi, je vous remercie de bien vouloir autoriser la publication d' article sur mon neveu avec toutes les illustrations.

Je me tiens à votre disposition pour toutes demandes complémentaires et nécessaires à l'aboutissement de ce dossier.

En vous remerciant par avance.

Très cordialement,

Hubert Denis du Péage — Preceding unsigned comment added by PDeschodt (talk • contribs)

@Kvardek du: pinging for opinion. I do not see any -NC- license anywhere around (the deleted images are declared Own work, with no source link). Ankry (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

@PDeschodt: When the permission in the OTRS ticket is verified and accepted, the images will be restored by the OTRS volunteer or on their request. It you have questions about OTRS ticket processing, you can ask at COM:OTRS. Unfortunately, it seems that we have backlog in the French OTRS queue, so ticket processing may be delayed. Ankry (talk) 10:29, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: thanks for the ping. The Flickr links are in the ticket, example https://www.flickr.com/photos/189781842@N07/50243650683/ but there is still a ND clause so I explained the choice.

(yes we do have a huge backlog, we need help...) kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 22:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

The files hereafter are right now free (not NC, not ND):

   File:Tous les chemins 1960.jpg
   File:Soleil d'hiver.jpg
   File:Scène de vie parisienne.jpg
   File:Les pêcheurs 1974.jpg
   File:L'accordéoniste.jpg
   File:Café du matin.jpg

@Ankry: it is fine on Flickr now (PD), do you prefer to undelete, or that I do some fancy Flickr import? kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@PDeschodt and Kvardek du: Undeleted. However, somebody needs to provide appropriate source / author info before cleaning the templates. Ankry (talk) 17:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: thanks ! I'm on it. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 17:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@Ankry: that's done. You may have undeleted too many versions in the case of File:Soleil d'hiver.jpg, could you check please? Thanks again. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 17:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Done Ankry (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Remember The Plankinton.webm

The following video was deleted even though it is the same video I created and uploaded to YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdBFIqn0OPY) under a Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed) license.

I'm not sure why it was deleted when there are other videos on the Commons, such as the following example that have the YouTube link as the source - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:NEFFEX_-_Make_It_(Official_Video)_Fight_Back_The_Collection_OUT_NOW!_-_YouTube.webm

Can the source just be changed to the YouTube link as in the above example to placate the editors. If not, what else do you need to reverse the deletion decision? --Volkswriter (talk) 16:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The film makes use of some stock footage as well as a number of photographs and drawings, making it a derivative work of those. You would need to provide some proof that all of these are out of copyright or that you have the rights to publish them under a free license. --rimshot^talk 21:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done Per above. No evidence provided. Ankry (talk) 18:06, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Tous_les_chemins_1960.jpg ticket:2020081910006862

Request for Undeletion

   OTRS There is an OTRS email received for “File:Tous_les_chemins_1960.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020081910006862. --kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
   OTRS There is an OTRS email received for “File:Soleil_d'hiver.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020081910006862. --kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
   OTRS There is an OTRS email received for “File:Scène_de_vie_parisienne.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020081910006862. --kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
   OTRS There is an OTRS email received for “File:Les_pêcheurs_1974.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020081910006862. --kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
   OTRS There is an OTRS email received for “File:L'accordéoniste.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020081910006862. --kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
   OTRS There is an OTRS email received for “File:Café_du_matin.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020081910006862. --kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.64.236.200 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 27 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Making multiple requests instead of following discussion in the first one is not helpful. Such request has to be done by an OTRS agent, not by an anonymous user. Ankry (talk) 17:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Closing request since this has been dealt with elsewhere. Thuresson (talk) 08:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Saeid3.jpg

--Molla nasreddin (talk) 03:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Procedural close, file is not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Smbaliuagjf243.JPG and photos of several Philippine malls

File was deleted in 2012, according to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smbaliuagjf243.JPG, the file was deleted because of no-FOP (freedom of panorama) in the Philippines. However, the deletion request for another mall of the same mall chain – Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sm megamall.jpg – ended up as "kept" because, according to @King of Hearts: , the SM Megamall lacks characteristics that makes it copyrightable. Quoting from King of Hearts' statement:

I just found the following in Sec. 186: "Copyright in a work of architecture shall include the right to control the erection of any building which reproduces the whole or a substantial part of the work either in its original form or in any form recognizably derived from the original: Provided, That the copyright in any such work shall not include the right to control the reconstruction or rehabilitation in the same style as the original of a building to which that copyright relates." While not directly related, I think this implies some sort of threshold. Think about it: Suppose someone built a building shaped like a grey cube, with no features, nothing at all. If someone else came along and built a grey cube-shaped featureless building (which is almost identical to the first by necessity of the description), is that a copyright violation? You could say, well, it's almost identical, and hence "recognizably derived from the original." But an idea that can be expressed in a short phrase like "grey cube-shaped featureless building" is merely a style, and so we have a contradiction. So we conclude that there ought to be some threshold of originality, only above which is an idea separable from its expression.

Using this statement by King of Hearts, it can be interpreted that SM Malls like SM Megamall have little copyrightable elements present. It can also be interpreted that all other malls belonging to SM can be considered as having little threshhold of originality, as evidenced by the successful defense in the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smmarilaojf.JPG (for SM City Marilao). Then SM City Baliwag (and possibly other malls by SM Supermalls) also fall under the low or little TOO as said by King of Hearts for both SM Megamall and SM City Marilao. However, I might need the insights of some other Filipino Wikipedians regarding this. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Support I believe that also applies to the deleted image here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: I'm not sure if this TOO rationale can be safely be considered for other photos of SM malls deleted, such as ~~:File:SM_Aura_in_Bonifacio_Global_City.jpg~~ found at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shopping malls in the Philippines. But I can assume that this low or little TOO can be applied to other malls, judging from the case of SM City Marilao. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, that one looks pretty complex. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: here is a (partial) list of deleted photos depicting malls by SM Supermalls. Since I'm not an admin, I can't identify whether they can be undeleted just like the case of SM Megamall pic and of SM City Marilao or they do not pass low TOO.

File:Front facade of SM Lanang Premier, December 2012.jpg
~~:File:SM Aura mall.jpg]]~~ (though this is the same subject as the one that you mentioned as "complex" and might be failing low TOO)
File:SM City Cebu Northwing ext.jpg
File:SM City Cebu Northwing.jpg
File:SM City Cebu Southwing.jpg
File:Sm mall of asia.jpg
File:WTMP PhotoPhilia C9 SM City Sta Mesa.JPG
File:WTMP Vega C9.JPG (added to here by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC))

Deleted files under Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SM Mall of Asia: (listing added by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC))

File:BayCityjf0446 01.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 21.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 22.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 26.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 27.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 28.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 29.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 30.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 35.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0446 42.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0491 07.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0491 11.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0491 12.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0491 16.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0491 37.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0491 38.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:BayCityjf0491 39.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Mall of Asia.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MetroManilajf0040 13.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MetroManilajf0040 14.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 003.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 007.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 008.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 009.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 012.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 013.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 015.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 017.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 020.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 178.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 180.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 192.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:MoA 214.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Pasayjf0300 12.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Pasayjf0300 15.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Pasayjf0300 18.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Pasayjf0300 20.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Pasayjf0300 21.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Pasayjf0300 23.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Pasayjf0300 24.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SM MoA iMax.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0399 06.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0399 07.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0399 08.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0399 09.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0399 10.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 01.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 03.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 13.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 14.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 15.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 16.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 17.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 18.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 19.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 20.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 21.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 22.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 23.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 24.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 26.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 27.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 28.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 29.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 30.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 32.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 33.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 34.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 37.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf0565 38.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf9219 02.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf9219 04.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf9219 05.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf9219 06.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf9219 07.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:SMMallofAsiajf9219 10.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
File:Tomorrow, the World..jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

I don't know if other Philippine malls (e.g. Robinson's, Gaisano, and others) may have the same treatment as that of SM Malls. Comments and insights to be placed beside the aboveventries are very much welcome. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Support Cyrus noto3at bulaga (Talk to me) 06:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Comment @Cyrus noto3at bulaga: For future reference, please note that UDR discussions are not a vote. A support or oppose generally requires a rationale as to why such a position has been taken. Thank you for your understanding. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Update @King of Hearts and Nat: per updated COM:FOP Philippines (using low COM:TOO standard in our country, proven by similarities of architectural styles in various common buildings in our country, usually by different architectural firms or people), I might also request the undeletion of the following two Robinsons Mall photos:

Unfortunately, casual searches on Google may find File:Robinsons Place Bacolod.jpg and File:Robinsons Place Manila Pedro Gil.jpg not passing the low TOO. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Another update Crossed out SM Aura, which seems to be too complex as King of Hearts said before. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Just visited here. in my opinion, OPPOSE ALL. No matter how plain a bldg is, it is still copyrighted. pls see the deletion request about banks in the phils in which your senior moderator Jim said bldgs and structures, no matter how plain, deserves copyright protection. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Files temporarily undeleted. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Photos of subjects probably OK using the low COM:TOO:

No copyrightable elements found or COM:DM:

No comment (some interiors or the Globe of SM MOA; pls help @King of Hearts:

The rest: probably not OK / unknown as of now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Additional undeletion requests from the requester

Some files that were deleted under Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Shopping malls in the Philippines. Since I'm familiar with the subjects of the said photos, I might not need provisional undeletion.

- Per low COM:TOO

File:Waltermartjf22.JPG
File:Waltermartjf224.JPG
File:Walterplarideljf.JPG
File:Robinsons Angeles.jpg
File:Greenhills2jf.JPG (I assume it's Greenhills Shopping Center)
File:Greenhills8jf.JPG (I assume it's Greenhills Shopping Center)
File:Mallcabiaojf.JPG

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

I withdraw my nomination. I'm now withdrawing my undeletion request. I'm too exhausted and a bit stressed to conduct checks and researches on the "eligibility" of Philippine mall buildings to Commons. And it seems majority have medium to relatively high level of architectural arts. I will instead watch out on developments at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Quezon memorial.jpg

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Quezon memorial.jpg, file was deleted because of "no FoP in the Philippines," deletion was made in 2012. However, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Circle (dated 2019), QMC (esp. the monument) was designer by Federico Ilustre who "was working for the Bureau of Public Works when he did this design." (per User:Jameslwoodward) Added basis is from @Seav: , quoted by @Markoolio97: :

The architect was an employee of the government and the shrine is owned and maintained by the government. As such the shrine is considered a work of the government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed.

As such, QMC is PD (a work of and owned by the government) and photos of it are permissible at Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Comment Hmmm. While I'm not opposed to undeletion, the statement that Federico Ilustre "was working for the Bureau of Public Works when he did this design." overlooks the fact that per the English Wikipedia article: His most notable work would be his design of the Quezon Memorial Shrine monument, a design he made for a national design competition held in 1951 for the then-planned monument for late President Manuel L. Quezon, where he won the grand prize, which indicates that he may not have been working on this design in his capacity as a government employee, but as a private citizen competing in a national design competition. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:45, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: in this case, I might mention again the two users — @Seav: and @Markoolio97: — who interpreted this "commissioning of works by the government as equivalent to PD-PH government" and were active in the prior undeletion attempts at QMC (which somehow were 98% successful). I also passed by this previous undeletion request of 98% of the deleted pictures of QMC - Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-02#Photographs of Quezon Memorial. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: found an insight at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Shrine, by @TagaSanPedroAko: "The FOP issue is a gray area of Philippine copyright law that affects images of many modern architectural works in the Philippines posted here on Commons (but not elsewhere on the Web), and I agree with the two this should not be deleted as Seav states is clearly a government-commissioned work. It's just time not to step too far regarding lack of FOP in the Philippines, but I agree US copyright law prevails (the work needs to be both free in the US and the Philippines) and the nominator just did it right. As far as I know, Filipino architects don't mind any pictures of their works, even where posted on the Net; it's just the existing law (from the 1990s) that doesn't reflect reality."

I somehow agree with TagaSanPedroAko, and also with @Sky Harbor: in his futile attempt to "save" a pic that was eventually deleted. Despite vagueness of our copyright law, with incompatible fair use guidelines, and the non-mention of a FOP-like provision, it can be said that there is "status quo" situation for photography prevailing in the Philippines, since no case lawsuit against Filipino photographers has ever been filed by the architectural community, at least for those photographing structures that were built or designed by the now-deceased people. This might be against the 5 precautionary measures, but that is the reality in our country. I might also quote a so-called general principle in our laws that was uttered by to Hon. Alfredo Garbin Jr. of the w:Ako Bicol party list during the June 8 hearing for the ABS-CBN's franchise (link to the w:Philippine Star video - [26]). At point 1:47:50, he said that "the basic principle in law, and that principle is that what is not prohibited is allowed." Although this might only apply to the station's franchise woes, it can be interpreted that his statement is for all Philippine laws, whether network franchise or copyright or even photographic restrictions. I previously posted this insight on King of Hearts' enwiki talkpage.

If there are some restrictions in photography, these are usually non-copyright restrictions such as needing an access permit to visit a landmark or asking permission from the management or the security officers. @Judgefloro: once responded Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Shrine that upon asking permission from the officers, he was told that it is permissible to take pictures for purposes of Wikimedia Commons since such purposes are for "public learning" (i.e. educational purposes). So I can assume that pictures of QMC and its monument are allowable here in accordance with Commons' aims JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Response to @Nat: If the 5 statements at "Project scope/Precautionary principle are to be followed, then you're implying that photos of Quezon Memorial monument is not allowed on Commons? Then how come the statements of defense put forward by @Seav, TagaSanPedroAko, and Markoolio97: at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Shrine were accepted and files kept? And per this precedent the restorations of pictures of QMC were made with 90% success? It means it is clear that this monument is a government-commissioned work whose architect Federico Ilustre was working for the DPWH's predecessor, Bureau of Public Works, during the time the monument was made. I hate repeating sir Seav's insight again...

The architect was an employee of the government and the shrine is owned and maintained by the government. As such the shrine is considered a work of the government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed.

The most suitable tag to be used for this case is {{3-D in PD}} with embedded {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}.

And I stand with Hon. Garbin's (of Ako-Bikol party list) statement about the basic principle in Philippine laws (although some might argue it as only relevant to citizenship and franchise laws, not copyright law, and others might say "please see 5 precautionary principles!"): "What is not prohibited is allowed." (a mere application of common sense) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:26, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

No. My point is that the argument of there are no lawsuits of photographic reproductions of architectural works is irrelevant. COM:FOP Philippines clearly notes that restrictions here are clearly copyright restrictions. The only question that should be considered here is whether Federico Ilustre acted in the capacity of a government employee or a private citizen when he participated in the national design competition for the monument (in which a prize was awarded). Everything else is irrelevant at the moment. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

To quote from the source cited on Ilustre's enwiki article, although the original link is down (https://web.archive.org/web/20141017040422/http://nhcp.gov.ph/the-restoration-of-quezon-memorial-shrine/) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

The Quezon Memorial Shrine was designed by Architect Federico Ilustre, who won a design contest for the Quezon Memorial Project in 1951. The Bureau of Public Works began the construction of the memorial in 1952 but failed to finish due to insufficient funding. Later on, the memorial was turned over to the National Historical Commission of the Philippines (formerly NHI) by virtue of Presidential Decree No. 1 issued by Pres. Ferdinand Marcos on September 21, 1972.[1] The Commission took the responsibility to finish the structure.[2]
[1] Historical Markers Metroplitan Manila. Manila: National Historical Insitute, 1993, p. 106.

[2] Ramos-De Leon, Lilia. The Quezon Memorial Shrine. Kasaysayan Vol. III N.1-4, Manila: National Historical Institute, 1978, p. 9-10.

Also found a passage on enwiki article itself, @Nat:

He first joined the Bureau of Public Works in 1936 as a draftsman, staying in that position until the outbreak of World War II in the country in 1941. He was then promoted to the position of consulting architect iduring the Japanese Occupation. After the war, he briefly left the bureau to join the AFWESPAC of the US Army as supervising architect and assist them in the postwar infrastructure rehabilitation. In 1947, he became the supervising architect of the National Housing Commission, a position he held for two years until he returned to the Bureau of Public Works in 1949 also as supervising architect. He would remain with the public works office until the 1970s.[1] _ Lico, Gerard (2008). Arkitekturang Filipino: A History of Architecture and Urbanism in the Philippines. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

Accordingly, Ilustre was working (actually returned) as a supervising architect to the Bureau of Public Works in 1949. This means that he was part of the Bureau of Public Works (as a supervising architect) when he did the design in 1951 (or maybe 1950, but it is improbable that he made the design before 1950). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Does not matter if he was a government employee at the time. The question is whether the design was done as part of his duties as a government employee or just as a participant in a national contest. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:46, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: A quote from the Philippine Star article concerning the construction of the now-demolished terminal building of the Manila International Airport (precursor of NAIA):

In 1954 Magsaysay gave the Bureau of Public Works the orders to implement designs prepared by noted government architect Federico Ilustre. Ilustre had apprenticed with Juan Nakpil before the war. After Liberation, he won the competition for the Quezon Memorial. He became the chief architect of the Bureau of Public Works, the precursor of today’s DPWH.

It seems to contradict various claims by several sites that he designed the monument as a Bureau of Public Works employee. His public works position wasn't also mentioned in the following:

https://www.theurbanroamer.com/the-soul-of-quezon-city-the-quezon-memorial-circle-and-its-shrine-part-1/

World War II and the destruction it brought to the metropolis, not to mention the death of the newborn capitol city’s founder during that period, dashed the hopes for those grand plans....Until the government decided to dedicate this field instead as a memorial to the man whose vision made Quezon City possible, with a shrine instead of the planned capitol to be its landmark. A contest was soon held for the design of the planned Quezon Memorial Shrine that was to rise in the elliptical field. The prize was eventually given to the design of Filipino architect Federico Ilustre, which incorporated contemporary design with some classical and symbolic inspirations. Although the planning of the memorial began way back after the war in 1945, it would take more than 30 years before the vision of the Quezon memorial was finally realized due to long-winding issues with funding and materials....

https://www.triposo.com/poi/T__7e73b8b336b2 (a portion of the history of the shrine)

The Quezon Memorial Committee which was tasked to organize a nationwide fund-raising campaign for the building of a monument dedicated to former President Manuel Quezon, was established by the virtue of Executive Order, No. 79 signed by then President Sergio Osmeña on December 17, 1945. Then President Elpidio Quirino proposed the relocation of the monument away from its original planned site but such plans were not pushed through. The Bureau of Public Works commenced the construction of the monument in 1952.

If this is true then does that mean all other pictures of this monument are also affected (in particular all pictures undeleted at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-02#Photographs of Quezon Memorial)? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Comment Hi, I just want to add that according to page 161 of this report issued by the Quezon Memorial Committee in 1952, I quote:
In order to secure an appropriate plan of this Memorial a contest was opened some time ago by the Committee to all architects and civil engineers for the selection of the best design for the proposed Memorial. The prize of P10,000 was offered for the plan adjudged the best. This prize was won by Architect Federico Ilustre. The winning plan together with all its details, is on display in the Office of the Committee in the City Hall.

Judging by this, I would assume that Ilustre's design was made in his capacity as a private architect rather than as the chief architect of the government. However, in page 163, there is an illustration of Ilustre's plan for the memorial with his name written at the bottom and a logo at the bottom right corner. If anyone can identity that logo which to me looks like a government office seal, maybe it could confirm that this was made in his capacity as a government architect. Just my 2 cents -Howhontanozaz (talk)

@Howhontanozaz: is there a higher resolution version of the copy of this page that can be seen on the Internet? Paging @Seav, Markoolio97, and Sky Harbor: for confirmation of this seal. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps paging @Jeff G., Yann, Ankry, Jameslwoodward, and TagaSanPedroAko: too, for inputs regarding the logo mentiones by Howhontanozaz (paging those who participated in Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2019-02#Photographs of Quezon Memorial and in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Shrine, hoping to bring this month-long undeletion discussion to a close) 10:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: I would try contacting the National Archives and the Presidential Museum and Library for a higher resolution copy of this specific page and if possible, a copy of the plans. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: So both offices replied and they were both unhelpful, to be honest. The Presidential Museum replied with the zoomed in version of the page of the same online book found in the Internet Archive while the National Archives said they don't have the book nor the building plans available in their collections. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 07:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

You can find the images the Malacanang Museum sent me here. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 07:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

~~BIG OPPOSE. Again, i just visited here. the fact that evidence presented above is compelling to accepr that QMC's creator was NOT a government employee. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)~~

@Nat: according to Jsnueva1022 at User talk:Mrcl lxmna#Nomination to delete the Quezon Memorial Shrine photo, this monument "was built by the Philippine government, local government unit of Quezon City in specific, in honor to the late President Manuel Quezon." So I think this should now rest the case. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Correction JWilz12345, it was actually built by the now-defunct Quezon Memorial Committee using funds obtained through a fund-raising campaign. But that is somewhat irrelevant since the crux of this discussion concerns the design of the monument. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 04:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nat: Per Liuxinyu970226 at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Shrine, {{PD-PhilippineGov}} might apply here. So QMC monument can be a work from the government. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

@JWilz12345: I don't agree. That position clearly ignores the long discussion we've been having here. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

I hereby I withdraw my nomination. I'm exhausted unfortunately, and despite repeated Googling I can't find the exact logo of the Bureau of Public Works, which if identical to the seal/logo thing Howhontanozaz mentioned before would validate Ilustre's QMC as a government commissioned work. More sources also state that Ilustre just participated in the national design competition. I shall leave this discussion and even the deletion request targeting all of QMC shrine photos to other editors and admins. I will no longer involve on this section and in that DR against QMC Shrine photos. I will wait for the developments at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, whether affirmative or negative, instead of wasting my power and time doing extensive researching. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: Request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SSC Water Tank.jpg

Deleted because: Commons:Deletion requests/File:SSC Water Tank.jpg (no FoP in the Philippines). But I think it is highly absurd to say that water tanks are copyrighted despite the fact that these don't possess artistic qualities (simplicity threshold). Low originality and more utilitarian than made for the so-called "artistic architectural/sculptural impressions". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hmmm. I would argue that there's a certain artistic nature to this water tower and a certain level of originality. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
@JWilz12345: Is it a common design, used in multiple locations or an original one? In the latter case, I also suggest thet it is copyrighted. Ankry (talk) 20:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

No response. Not done per Nat. Ankry (talk) 00:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:陳柏宇圖片.jpg

Jason Chan (陳柏宇) is a famous Hong Kong singer, no way to remove it. --116.49.139.203 10:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Question Who was the photographer? What is the source of this image? --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- User:Colby2583's own work. --116.48.196.60 03:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Well, I'd prefer to see the version with EXIF, or at least an explanation why the EXIF has been removed. The image has been published eg. her and here, but these versions are newer and watermarked. Weak support for undeletion or at least starting a DR if there are scope or copyright doubts. Ankry (talk) 19:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- EXIF data sometimes may involve some personal data, the user doesn't want to disclose. Also, image was uploaded here in 2012. The sources that Ankry provides is in 2016. --116.48.254.90 03:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
  - In such cases the original image can be emailed to OTRS. Was this indeed the case? Ankry (talk) 05:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send an email using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:44, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:רועי לבס - הופעה.jpg

Hi. this photo is owned by me (as I stated when uploading it) and therefore it can be used broadly. Please re-delete it. thank you ! Pika2020 (talk)

File:סוד - רועי לבס.png

Hi! this photo is designed and owned by me and as I stated when I uploaded it, approve using it broadly. Please re-delete it. thank you! Pika2020 (talk)

@Pika2020: You were requested to provide a free license evidence or a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions. This is required for any previously published image or for preprocessed, not original images (like these two), that lack camera setting info in EXIF. Did you that? Ankry (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Joanne Camilleri.jpg

I am the owner of the photo which is being considered for deletion. I don't know why a message is being displayed stating that it is not copyrighted. I can provide documents to prove ownership of the file. Please refrain from deleting the photo and let me know what I need to do to avoid similar issues in the near future.

Thanks and regards,

   Joanne

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Scamosa (talk • contribs) 20:40, 26 September 2020‎ (UTC)

@Scamosa: An evidence of free license from the copyright holder is always required if the photo has already been published elsewhere. See COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Barrackpore Railway Station.jpg we need this image for that as the view was changed in 2020

Please undelete this picture as the view was changed in this year. 2401:4900:3145:4D53:0:5D:D46C:8501 08:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

And we need a free license from the image copyright holder (who is the photographer in most cases) in order to undelete the image. Ankry (talk) 16:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

orvinocoelhodeavila.jpg

a imagem foi tirada da internet, sob domínio público, sem nome do autor, onde eu explicitei isso no registro da imagem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessandra Pereira de Azevedo Souza (talk • contribs) 12:40, 27 September 2020‎ (UTC)

Google Translate: "the image was taken from the internet, under public domain, without the author's name, where I explained this in the image registration." Thuresson (talk) 16:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@Alessandra Pereira de Azevedo Souza: Please add the exact file name of the image you wish to have undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 16:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Oppose No response from OP. If this is about File:OrvinoCoelho.jpg OP must explain how a 2019 photo can be public domain. Thuresson (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:HELEN OBIAGELI.jpg

The image file is still in use in the Edit mode. Thanks --Akintunde2020 (talk) 14:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@Akintunde2020: Why is it in COM:SCOPE? Reuploading or ignoring the Commons policies is not helpful when requesting here. Ankry (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: No response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Josh Grisetti publicity photo 2020.png

RE: File:Josh Grisetti publicity photo 2020.png

I am the owner of this photo. There is no copyright violation. Any report to the contrary is invalid.

--Stagehand007 (talk) 01:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Stagehand007: Josh Grisetti from Facebook claimed there that he owns copyright to the photo. Unfortunately, we have no evidence that you and him are the same person... You can prove that following COM:OTRS procedure. Ankry (talk) 16:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Not done: per Ankry. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:43, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Moamel Ahmed Shaker

سوف يتم استخدام صوره ارجو عدم الحذف

Not done Procedural closure: The image is not deleted. You can discuss scope issues in the DR. Ankry (talk) 15:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

[1] ttps://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail?lawId=345AC0000000048#E

[2] ttps://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html#what_protect

[3] ttp://www.music.msu.ac.th/seninar-music-copyright.pdf

[4] ttps://elaws.e-gov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail?lawId=345AC0000000048#E

[5] ttps://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-protect.html#what_protect

[6] ttp://www.music.msu.ac.th/seninar-music-copyright.pdf

[1]

[2]

[3]

[1]

[2]

[3]