Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-08
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files uploaded by Tanka222
In Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tanka222 regarding files uploaded by Tanka222, the files…
…were requested deleted by EugeneZelenko for failing to include appropriate license tags, and the request was actioned by Krd (courtesy pings to those involved).
The files in question are an international treaty between Japan and South Korea. As such they are exempt from copyright under {{PD-EdictGov}} in the US. In Korea they are covered by {{PD-KoreaGov}}, and in Japan by {{PD-Japan-exempt}}. I therefore request that they be undeleted. --Xover (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Info English version available at wikisource:en:File:Japan-Korea GSOMIA (English Text).pdf. Thuresson (talk) 18:43, 21 July 2020 (UTC)- @Xover: It is not clear from {{PD-Japan-exempt}} that international treaties are covered by this exception. Any comments? Ankry (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: I would presume that international treaties are laws (either directly if they are self-executing, or by way of being enacted in national law) for copyright purposes, so it should be covered by Art. 13 (i). Anything that obligates and binds the nation, as such, has force of law (which is why the legislative assembly has to ratify all treaties in many jurisdictions, rather than let the executive accede alone). Art. 13 is expansive (it's similar to PD-USGov, unlike some national copyright legislation) so I see no particular reason to assume it would not cover a treaty. In any case, the creative work (the text of the treaty) is authored by the two involved governments and as such are exempt from copyright for that reason, even if it would not be exempt by virtue of being a treaty. Or put another way, even if PD-EdictGov did not exist, a treaty authored by the US government would still be PD under PD-USGov as a government work. --Xover (talk) 19:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Done per request. Ankry (talk) 11:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Je demande la restauration — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 90.43.83.172 (talk) 20:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Comment Another reminder to Anglophones that "demand" means something different in Romance languages and not to misinterpret their comments as being aggressive. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)- Commentaire Bonjour @HENRI2020 and 90.43.83.172: Malheureusement, sans raison valable, nous ne pouvons pas donner suite à votre demande. Merci de votre compréhension. (@King of Hearts: Some of us are native Romance language speakers
) --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:41, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Demande incomplète (Incomplete request). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1718598138.jpg, File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1204744193.jpg, File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1132164277.jpg & File:XV Rodowy Wiec Słowian 1734514550.jpg
@JuTa: those four files was recently deleted for "No OTRS permission for 30 days", but I have permission from author and I send it to permissions-pl@wikimedia.org three times: on 21.08.2018, 21.09.2018 and 7.10.2018. I still have this messages on my mailbox archive and I can send it again, so please restore them and put given permission. --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 08:34, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- I also ping Polish permissions admins: @Jarekt: , @Masti: , @Pawel Niemczuk: --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 08:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- They had not been confirmed by OTRS stuff since end of January. I'm curently working on the "OTRS received" backlog". --JuTa 09:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Wojsław Brożyna, I looked at the ticket:2018110410002829 mentioned in the deleted image. First of all, I am surprised that nobody answered it, someone should have. Maybe the issue is that such emails are supposed to be from the copyright holders and in that ticket the correspondence was not. So the OTRS ticket is not relevant here. As for files, they all come from https://rodzimawiara.org.pl website where the only copyright statement I can find is "1996-2020 (C) Rodzima Wiara" Your deleted files used {{GFDL}}{{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} and I did not see any evidence that the photographer released those photographs under stated license. --Jarekt (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose OTRS cannot accept forwarded permissions or proxy statements for legal reasons. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done A proper OTRS permission is needed. Ankry (talk) 11:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File is published under CC by-sa license -> http://plastyka.art.pl/ijankowski — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jantom~plwiki (talk • contribs) 19:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per COM:LL; this is a scan of an older photograph with no evidence the webmaster of plastyka.art.pl is the original photographer or otherwise has the authority to license the image. Indeed, site appears to belong Ireneusz Jankowski. Jankowski is the subject of this photograph, whereas copyright initially vests with the author (photographer). Jankowski would hold copyright only if transferred by a formal written conveyance. Эlcobbola talk 20:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done Unlikely that the plastyka.art.pl website owner is the photo copyright holder (if so, an evidence is needed). The declared license probably applies to the text only. Ankry (talk) 08:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hola a todos,
Solicito no eliminar este escudo ya que fue cedido por el Burgos Club de Fútbol para su libre uso en Wikipedia por parte de su presidente, Franco Caselli, y su gerente de Marketing, Carlos Javier Cuenca.
Muchísimas gracias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pschatzky (talk • contribs) 15:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi all,
I request not to remove this image since it was given by the Burgos Club de Fútbol for free use on Wikipedia by its president, Franco Caselli, and its Marketing manager, Carlos Javier Cuenca.
Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pschatzky (talk • contribs) 15:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done procedural close: not an undeletion request. Ankry (talk) 16:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Privacidad, Legal y Autor Aviso de Privacidad
- Advertencia – cualquier persona y / o institución y / o agentes y / o Agencia de cualquier estructura gubernamental, incluyendo pero no limitado a, el Gobierno de la República Argentina, o cualquier otro gobierno también está usando o un control / uso de este sitio web o cualquiera de sus sitios web asociados, usted no tiene mi permiso para utilizar cualquiera de mi información de perfil ni de los contenidos incluidos en este documento, incluyendo pero no limitado a, mis fotos, y / o los comentarios sobre mi foto o cualquier otra información publicada en mi perfil. Se le notifica que está estrictamente prohibido divulgar, copiar, distribuir, difundir, o tomar cualquier otra acción en mi contra con respecto a este perfil y el contenido de este documento. Las prohibiciones anteriores se aplican también a su empleado (s), agente (s), estudiante (s) o cualquier otro personal bajo su dirección o control. El contenido de este perfil es cuestión de Estado, público, privado y privilegiado legal y la información confidencial, y la violación de mi privacidad personal está penado por la ley .*******
- Se recomienda que publique un aviso similar de este tipo en su perfil / página. Este es un aviso legal obligatorio – SI EL GOBIERNO / GRAN HERMANO MENOR QUE SIGNIFICA EL AVISO anterior se aplica a usted también! Gracias*******
«Any UNAUTHORIZED use of my profile, video, pictures, or audio in any form or in a forum now or in the future is NOT permissible without my expressed written consent. Any act to promote or gain profit in any manner (e.g. either monetarily or socially) from the use of my profile, video, pictures, or audio in any form my profile is a violation of my privacy and subject to legal action. BY WATCHING THIS: You acknowledge and agree that you shall not post, upload, publish, transmit, or make available in any way content of this page including images and recording streamed live video available for download. This is intended as, and presented as a one time, live, one view presentation only. Penalties of Copyright Infringement: By reproducing, republishing, or redistributing the work of a copyright holder without permission, you may be violating or infringing on his or her rights under the Copyright Act. The copyright holder may sue for compensation cost from u$s 250,150,000.00 to u$s 970,250,150,000,000.00 or ten year in jail.»
Protocolizamos en Escritura Publica Nacional Nº 74 el 05 de setiembre de 2014; otorgamos los Principios de AUTENTICIDAD, LEGALIDAD Y EJECUTORIEDAD. –
Boletín Oficial de Titulo, Autor y demás Recaudos por la LEY 11.723 el 12/01/2018 de NACION ARGENTINA
«…Mira, Yo envío un ángel ante ti para protegerte en el camino y para llevarte al sitio que tengo preparado. Sé prudente delante de él y obedece su voz; no seas rebelde contra él, pues no perdonará vuestra rebelión, porque en él está mi nombre…»
(Shemot/Éxodo 23:20-21)
FUENTE: Metatrón: ¡El Ángel de Dios!
IMPORTANTE: VA SIN ENMIENDA thumb|SELLO Y DIRECCION DE MESA ENTRADA CENTRAL DEL ESTADO MUNDIAL --Libcamp (talk) 00:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)--Libcamp (talk) 00:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)--Libcamp (talk) 00:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)--Libcamp (talk) 00:03, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose File was out of project scope and not legitimately in use. Furthermore, there is no rationale for undeletion, and is therefore an incomplete request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close. Not an undeletion request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
l am a leaner and l deleted the wrong picture while l was editing my wikipedia page.
l am still looking for ways to delete specific picture
Please do not delete this picture
--Gideon Keter (talk) 07:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Procedural close. Image not deleted. You can respond in the deletion request. Ankry (talk) 08:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
We now have an OTRS ticket for this image Ticket:2020073110000337. Please restore so it can be reviewed for licence verification. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 15:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File is published under CC by-sa license -> http://plastyka.art.pl/kzielinski — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jantom~plwiki (talk • contribs) 19:45, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Per COM:LL; this is a scan of an older photograph with no evidence the webmaster of plastyka.art.pl is the original photographer or otherwise has the authority to license the image. Эlcobbola talk 19:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: LL accusation seems to be not justified here: the photo seems to be from 1970s so not copyrighted in Poland per {{PD-Poland}} as a pre-1994 photo without copyright notice, and likely the web publisher was granted 25-year first publication right per using it on this webpage. However, unsure about US copyright here. Ankry (talk) 22:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- A PD status and CC license are mutually exclusive. Your supposition alone demonstrates the COM:LL concern valid and the CC license bogus. Эlcobbola talk 22:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- This is a strange case in Polish copyright law that grants the publisher rigths to a previously unpublished "work" that was non-copyrightable or that copyright has expired. And the rights belong to the publisher, not to the author. Unsure how the "first publication right" is handled in other EU countries law. So the PD status was prior to the publication only. Note that "PD status" here is lack of copyright protection only, not a legal term. However, the US copyright status may be the clue here. Ankry (talk) 10:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- A PD status and CC license are mutually exclusive. Your supposition alone demonstrates the COM:LL concern valid and the CC license bogus. Эlcobbola talk 22:59, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: LL accusation seems to be not justified here: the photo seems to be from 1970s so not copyrighted in Poland per {{PD-Poland}} as a pre-1994 photo without copyright notice, and likely the web publisher was granted 25-year first publication right per using it on this webpage. However, unsure about US copyright here. Ankry (talk) 22:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
A fénykép Botskor Lórántról készült 1935. körül. A fénykép tulajdonosa Száva István, aki Botskor Lóránt unokája. E-mail címe info.axz@gmail.com Száva István szülei Botskor Judit és id. Száva István. Száva István, mint a fénykép tulajdonosa, örököse az engedélyezési kérelmét elküldte 2020-06-06 -án a permissions-hu@wikimedia.org e-mail címre. Kérem, hogy engedélyezzék a fénykép használatát Botskor Lóránt wikipédia cikkében. A fénykép közlésre került https://macse.hu/matrikula/Matrikula-2015-1.pdf http://intezet.nori.gov.hu/nemzeti-sirkert/budapest/farkasreti-temeto/botskor-lorant/ Üdvözlettel --SiposBéla1945 (talk) 06:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Likely about File:Ba34784efd3c25b0c12e71c246ebfb20d16e8019.jpg Botskor Lóránt fényképe.jpg.
- Ownership of the photo is irrelevant here. And we need a free license permission not from the subject heirs, but from the photographer heirs. Ankry (talk) 10:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello,
I am on the Spike Cohen campaign team and have permission to use and share this image from his podcast. I am updating his page now and trying to get this image into his Career portion of the page. Is there any way to confirm this with you and keep this image for his page?
Thank you, Derek Britton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostonliberty (talk • contribs) 18:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Bostonliberty: This does not mean that you are allowed to violate copyright. The source video is claimed to be copyrighted by Muddied Waters Media, published under non-free standard YouTube license, and we have no evidence that you are Muddied Waters Media (as you claimed to be personally the exclusive copyright holder of this image). We generally believe the earlier copyright claim. Ankry (talk) 19:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Free license permission from the actual copuright holder following COM:OTRS is needed. Ankry (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I would like to post undeletion request for Sumathi Rao.png file, because the owner gave the permission to use it.Akhan22 (talk) 22:37, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose @Akhan22: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The file is no OTRS Permission, I forgot to send the OTRS Permission, I thought when a file is upload through Video2commons will automatically possess the OTR Permission just like WizardUpload, so give me a chance to send it via e-mail. Best Regards.--Anass-kokoTalk 05:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The ticket:2020021510005551 is still awaiting a response. The image will be restored after the OTRS permission is accepted. Ankry (talk) 08:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:37, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Ismar_Volić.jpg
OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020071810002726 regarding File:Ismar_Volić.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 17:28, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This picture is on the English Wikipedia and is marked as "a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia Commons". When I tried that I received a message saying: A file identical to this file ($1) has previously been deleted. You should check that file's deletion history. If you disagree with the reason for deletion, please make an undeletion request instead of re-uploading.
So now I make this request. I don't know the reason why it was deleted last time. The artist Isaac Grünewald died in 1946, so it should not be any copyright problems.--Gotogo (talk) 19:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Done: File:Isaac-lyftkranen 1.jpg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:56, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Reason: Out-of-order deletion by User:Achim55.--RZuo (talk) 15:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: No longer empty. --Achim (talk) 15:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Photograph supplied by the person in it: Photo for undeletion
HI,
File:Mike L Whaley.png The photo was flagged as a possible copyright issue, but this was supplied by the person Mike L Whaley for upload. He has given permission for publication. Regards --Dreamskygirlsa (talk) 05:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose No evidence of free license, see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 08:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Copyright is usually held by the photographer and not by the person depicted. So we need a permission from the photographer or a copy of the written contract that transferred the copyright to Mr. Whaley. De728631 (talk) 21:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This image was deleted because of no OTRS permission but unknown to the user it already gotten OTRS permission.
The image I uploaded of File:Nana Kwasi Wiafe.jpg has an OTRS permission and you can kindly refer to Ticket:2020011110004186 for the OTRS permission filled by the Author of the photo Boma A. Eric. I would be happy if you can undelete this image since your reason for deletion is dealt with by this submission of mine.
Thanks.
--Owula kpakpo (talk) 15:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Owula kpakpo: The permission has not been accepted yet, and it is awaiting a response from the sender. When (and if) the permission is accepted, the image will be undeleted. Ankry (talk) 20:16, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request or performed the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The material submitted and posted was done by the family of Sylvanus Ulasi.
To whom ever it may concern. Anything you have found under Sylvanus Ulasi, the family wrote and put inside a program. I will enclose the powerpoint created by my family. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:1700:860:A500:E1BC:FB93:D611:16BB (talk) 21:06, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- You were not logged in when you wrote this and you did not mention any file names. So how are we supposed which files you meant? Please log in to your user account and provide some more information about this request. De728631 (talk) 21:48, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close. Incomplete request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:18, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello,
This was waiting in my drafts, and got deleted? I have already written about this to someone; I said I was going to add the references. I've just been busy because I'm in the middle of my MSc thesis. Please can I have it back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yazza4891 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Apparently this was taken from Facebook where it has been published without a free licence. In such cases we require a permission from the copyright holder by email. Please see COM:OTRS for details. Please note also that your draft has been written at the English Wikipedia and the references you referred to have nothing to do with the copyright of the file over here at Commons. De728631 (talk) 21:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
--Soami mehta (talk) 22:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)when u want to debate about life but its just a fantasy.
- Oppose Personal photo of non-contributor to the Wikimedia wikis. COM:NOTHOST. Thuresson (talk) 13:33, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:Boris Johnson speaking at Henry Jackson Society IPU Room Palace of Westminster 11 February 2019 - seated behind l-r James Rogers Bob Seely MP and Alan Mendoza.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: This image was uploaded by the approved protocols. Legal authority was given by the copyright owner for the image to be published under Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International, via email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on 25 June 2020. The Little Platoon (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- @The Little Platoon: Oppose When OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: I'm new-ish at this, and have made some silly errors, though I do think this one has been uploaded with all the right permissions given in all the right ways. Do you mind me asking, how will OTRS be notified of this issue?The Little Platoon (talk) 09:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. @The Little Platoon: OTRS (i.e. permission-commons
wikimedia.org) has no need to be notified. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:27, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The statement of this file is correct and have no violation infact i have proof that the photo i uploaded is my own files because its me! No one can request for deletion this file even you chevvin — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarCruelty17 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This file has not been deleted yet, so this is not a platform for the discussion. You can change it to the regular deletion request. However, you will need to provide the information about the photographer, and how you know that the photographer has licenced this photo under a free licence. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close. File has not been deleted as of 1 August 2020. N.B. : Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please ask the copyright holder to email us directly using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
--World-Evants-24 (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The file has not been deleted. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close: Image has not been deleted and has not been nominated for deletion as of 2 August 2020. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2020070610006996 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:11, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This image was taken by us, it appears on the barrowman foundation website because we gave permission and have since added it to flikr with CC license. It's not flickerwashing, I can assure you and happy to put this in writing. The image has also been approved by the subject in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.12.142 (talk • contribs)
- Info Flickr URL here. Thuresson (talk) 14:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Can you add a line somewhere on the domain https://barrowmanfoundation.com/ indicating that the Flickr account is authentic? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The image owner has approved the use of the image. พัชรรัตน์ (talk) 05:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose This file will be undeleted when its OTRS ticket has been successfully processed. Thuresson (talk) 13:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done As per Thuresson. Please, be patient. Ankry (talk) 16:54, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
A Novela A Filha do Silêncio da Rede Bandeirantes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henrique Gouveia da Silva (talk • contribs) 07:53, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- And what do you wish to undelete and why? This page was just a test. Ankry (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural Close. No file for UDR to consider. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This map relates to an educational establishment that ceased to exist in 1994, and can therefore be declared an orphan work. --Laurajwilkinson (talk) 14:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Not listed in the Orphan Works Register, maintained by the British Intellectual Property Office. Thuresson (talk) 15:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Сальма Хайек Золотые глобусы 2020.jpg
--World-Evants-24 (talk) 18:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Seems to refer to File:Salma hayek golden globes 2020.jpg which is this one. --Achim (talk) 18:06, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose First published at Salma Hayek's Instagram here. Thuresson (talk) 05:33, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:49, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Helpme Hi. I want to know why the picture File:Şəkil:Pedaqoq alim.jpgin the Azerbaijani and Russian templates of this wikipedia was deleted. Please help me restore the picture. This image is the only color image of the academician on Wikipedia and was posted on the Azerbaijani and Russian Wikipedia templates. I am also preparing an English version of this wikipedia. I posted this picture there as well. Please restore it. Wikipedia, which is now bilingual, has a blank image in the template. Please help.--Gülnar82 (talk) 15:17, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gülnar82: No such file. If you mean File:Pedaqoq alim.jpg, it was deleted due to unresolved doubts that the uploader is the original author of this painting. And whether it was painted from the model of from a photo. Ankry (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Can't restore it at all? The wikipedia I created is without a picture. There is no portrait of Mehdi Mehdizadeh that I can put another one in. How can you help me?--Gülnar82 (talk) 20:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Gülnar82: In order to restore the image, the abovementioned doubts need to be resolved. So more information is needed. Ankry (talk) 22:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Bonjour,
cette image a était supprimée. Hors nous avons fourni à plusieurs reprises des justificatifs et lettre attestant qu elle nous appartenait et que nous avions pleins droits d'utilisation.
Merci de restaurer cette image
Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.184.108.124 (talk) 12:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC) --92.184.108.124 12:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020061910004082 is still unresponded. There is about 8 weeks backlog in the French OTRS queue. So please, be patient. OTRS is served by volunteers and this is holiday period. Ankry (talk) 16:53, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Ticket currently being processed by OTRS and will be undeleted once they determine to have received sufficient permission. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Bonjour,
cette image a était supprimée. Hors nous avons fourni à plusieurs reprises des justificatifs et lettre attestant qu elle nous appartenait et que nous avions pleins droits d'utilisation.
Merci de restaurer cette image
Cordialement --92.184.108.124 12:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020061910004082 is still unresponded. There is about 8 weeks backlog in the French OTRS queue. So please, be patient. OTRS is served by volunteers and this is holiday period. Ankry (talk) 16:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Ticket currently being processed by OTRS and will be undeleted once they determine to have received sufficient permission. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Bonjour,
cette image a était supprimée. Hors nous avons fourni à plusieurs reprises des justificatifs et lettre attestant qu elle nous appartenait et que nous avions pleins droits d'utilisation.
Merci de restaurer cette image
Cordialement --92.184.108.124 12:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020061810004619 is still unresponded. There is about 8 weeks backlog in the French OTRS queue. So please, be patient. OTRS is served by volunteers and this is holiday period. Ankry (talk) 16:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Ticket currently being processed by OTRS and will be undeleted once they determine to have received sufficient permission. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Bonjour
cette image à était supprimée. Hors nous avons à plusieurs reprises justifier et prouver qu elle nous appartenait et que nous avions les plein droits d'utilisations.
Pouvez vous restaurer cette image ?
d 'avance merci
cordialement --92.184.108.124 12:55, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ticket:2020061910004082 is still unresponded. There is about 8 weeks backlog in the French OTRS queue. So please, be patient. OTRS is served by volunteers and this is holiday period. Ankry (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Ticket currently being processed by OTRS and will be undeleted once they determine to have received sufficient permission. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich habe den Wikipediaartikel über den Maler Reinhold Heller geschrieben. Von der Familie des verstorbenen Künstlers habe ich ein privates Photo des Künstlers bekommen, um es auf Wikipedia zusammen mit dem Artikel zu veröffentlichen. Ich bin also nicht der Urheber, ich kenne nicht den Photographen, habe das Photo aber von den Erben und damit von den Rechteinhabern am Bild zur Veröffentlichung erhalten. Da ich die Fragen nach dem Urheberrecht wahrheitsgemäß beantwortet habe, wurde das Bild jetzt wegen unklarer Urheberrechtslage gelöscht. Die Familie des Künstlers hat sich sehr über die Veröffentlichung des Photos gefreut und auch für die Nutzer sind Photos aus meiner Sicht immer ein Gewinn. Ich hoffe also auf diesem Wege das Bild für den Artikel zurückgewinnen zu können. Herzlichen dank für Ihre Bemühungen!Yorick19 (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Yorick19: Images with unclear copyright status cannot be hosted in Wikimedia Commons unless they are at least 120 years old. Ankry (talk) 15:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:33, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Someone asked to show proof of written permission regarding copyright. The copyright permission (as I stated) is in the image itself and can also be found at the associated webpage themimu.info https://web.archive.org/web/20190303184623/http://themimu.info/sites/themimu.info/files/documents/Region_Map_District_Yangon_MIMU764v03_23Oct2017_MMR_A4.pdf
The permission (as written) is as "မူပိုင်ကွင့် Myanmar Information Management Unit 2017. MIMU၏ မူပိုင်ခွင့်ကို အသိအမှတ်ပြု၍ အခမဲ့သုံးပြုနိုင်ပါသည်။" — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmeraldRange (talk • contribs) 17:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose This seems to be a permission "to use" only. While we need a free license that allows:
- derivative work creation
- commercial use
- is irrevikable.
- All of them seems missing. See COM:L for details. Ankry (talk) 15:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done No free license. Ankry (talk) 22:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The reason I am requesting undeletion, is that the cover art for the single Salvation by Manu, does not have a copyright owner, despite being the official artwork for the single. Whitewitchdrags (talk) 18:44, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- So who is Franjo Matkovic who allegedly has licensed this photograph under a Creative Commons license? Thuresson (talk) 19:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Question What do you mean "does not have a copyright owner"? Has the copyright owner died? Is it an uncreative work? Is there an exception in the copyright law that you are talking about? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The work is not an uncreative work and is most likely protected by 2 or 3 copyrights: (1) the photo itself, (2) the drawing in the foreground, and (3) the composition of the two together. Unless expressly exempted by law or protection has expired, all works are generally copyrighted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Nonsense. Uploader themself (!!!) created this with the comment "a work by Franjo Matkovic from https://www.instagram.com/p/CAU7DQdD3Ql/" That Instagram link indeed credits Franjo Matkovic. Evidence of permission from Matkovic is needed. Эlcobbola talk 18:17, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Per Nat and elcobbola. Thuresson (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The reason is not clear how it was a personal picture of Adnan Javid Khan. There is no proof to state it personal, as it was a social media profile picture used by Adnan as well! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 117.204.240.42 (talk) 11:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC) 117.204.240.42 11:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Probably because it is described as a photo of "Adnan Javid Khan", uploaded by User:Adnanjavidkhan1 who also claims to be the author. Thuresson (talk) 13:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done COM:OTRS permission from the actual copyright holder is needed. Ankry (talk) 22:42, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
)),_Host_Spike_Cohen.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
)),_Host_Spike_Cohen.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)),_Host_Spike_Cohen.png){kind=link}
)),_Host_Spike_Cohen.png){kind=link}
The file was authorized by form resp. letter sent to you by the person representing the copyright rights of the late artist Siegfried Rischar. This person is Ms. Margaret Peters representing the Siegfried Rischar Stiftung, Aschaffenburg (Germany). I request that things not be made by you more complicated than they are! Any questions? --138.232.171.27 13:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose This file will be undeleted when it has been successfully processed by an OTRS volunteer. Thuresson (talk) 13:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done as per Thuresson: waiting for OTRS. Ankry (talk) 22:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello Admin,
The mentioned picture was deleted without proper explanation. I can assure that the website link (https://www.klapboardpost.com/exclusive-meet-advocate-turned-actor-jayasri-rachakonda/) mentioned in the reason, is again from the same source I recieved it from, i.e. Ms. Jayasri Rachakonda. Though the picture used on The Said Website is same with their own watermark on it. I Assure wikipedia/Administrators that they do not own the picture.
SAMillYOU (talk) 14:15, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Image was published elsewhere prior to be uploaded here. We need an evidence that its author has granted a free license. If no such evidence in public, following COM:OTRS is the only way. "Own" declaration is an exception that allows uploaders to grant a free license at upload for their new, unpublished images only. Ankry (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done OTRS permission or another evidence for the above statements is needed. Ankry (talk) 22:47, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
.png){kind=link}
Fili:Cristian Cerón o 크리스티안 세론 (coreano).png File:Cristian Cerón o Κρίστιαν Σέρνον (griego).png File:Cristian Cerón oكريستيان سيرون (árabe).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Motivos
son traducciones de la portada de Cristian Cerón
--POeeurdjds (talk) 16:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Template:POeeurdjds
- Oppose Unused personal files are out of COM:SCOPE. And I do not see any page in Wikimedia where the file(s) can be used. Note also, that watermarked images are discouraged. Ankry (talk) 17:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tina_Torhamn,_Helena,_betong,_1976,_foto_Tina_Torhamn.jpg
Jag är enda upphovsrättsinnehavare till all konst och alla fotografier som framlidne skulptören Tina Torhamn har producerat. Jag är registrerad vid Bildupphovsrätt i Sverige. https://bildupphovsratt.se Jag har sänt licensmedgivande till permissions-sv@wikimedia.org från min egen e-postadress den 30 juli 2020.
I am the sole copyright holder for all art and all photographs that the deceased sculptor Tina Torhamn has produced. I am registered with Copyright Society in Sweden. https://bildupphovsratt.se/en I have sent license permission to permissions-sv@wikimedia.org from my own email address on July 30, 2020.
Best regards
Helena Johansson --Gjutare (talk) 19:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose ticket:2020073010008653. We need to wait until the permission is processed by an OTRS volunteer and accepted. During holidays processing may be slower. Ankry (talk) 07:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Done to avoid the inevitable second request we'll get here if the handling OTRS agent is not an admin. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The photograph of the church dates from 1905. The author is unknown but deceased. The original image is the property of St Paul's Anglican Church Vancouver and is regarded as being in the public domain. Leslie Buck. 3 August 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elljaybee1929 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Support per {{PD-Canada}} Ankry (talk) 21:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The photograph dates 1945. The author is unknown but deceased. The original image is the property of St Paul's Anglican Church Vancouver and is regarded as being in the public domain. Leslie Buck. 3 August 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elljaybee1929 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
@Elljaybee1929: The photo may be PD if it was published in Canada before 1.1.1946 (an evidence is needed). Otherwise, it is not possible that its copyright expired before 1996 (50 years since publication or 75 years since creation if author is anonymous). Ergo, it is copyrighted in US 95 years since initial publication or 120 years since creation. COM:OTRS free license permission from the actual copyright holder is needed in order to host the image. The copyright holder is likely the owner of the negative. Ankry (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2020 (UTC)- Support per {{PD-Canada}} Ankry (talk) 21:50, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hi,
This photo was taken by me. I've collected this photo through WhatsApp from the person who is in this photo. If you need any proof, let me know. I can provide all screenshots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nalbarian (talk • contribs) 18:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nalbarian: Please, read Commons:OTRS#Licensing_images:_when_do_I_contact_OTRS?. As the photo has already been published elsewhere, we need to verify that you are indeed the photographer. Ankry (talk) 07:17, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The photograph dates 1959. The author is unknown but probably deceased. The original image is the property of St Paul's Anglican Church Vancouver and is regarded as being in the public domain. Leslie Buck. 3 August 202. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elljaybee1929 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The photo was created in 1959 so it is not possible that its copyright expired before 1996 (50 years since publication or 75 years since creation if author is anonymous). Ergo, it is copyrighted in US 95 years since initial publication or 120 years since creation. COM:OTRS free license permission from the actual copyright holder is needed in order to host the image. The copyright holder is likely the owner of the negative. Ankry (talk) 21:33, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Good morning,
The image file George ellis conducting 2016.jpg has been deleted, but I believe we have taken all required steps to authorise the use of this file including getting the explicit consent of the photographer.
I am hoping to reinstate the image or determine what steps we need to take to reinstate the image.
Regards,
Huw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Blue Wrasse (talk • contribs) 22:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- No response has been received to the simple verification email send by an OTRS volunteer at 10 Jun 2020 15:44:54 +0000. Ankry (talk) 22:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
We've received documentation for the intended license via ticket:2018041910011019. Could you please undelete the image so I can add the desired license and the ticket#? Thank you! -- O.Koslowski (talk) 16:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Question @O.Koslowski: According to user rights log you were an OTRS member between July and September 2014, but not now? Thuresson (talk) 20:24, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info The ticket is not in a permission queue. Ankry (talk) 22:42, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- I am an OTRS member at the moment, as can be seen in the global user groups, such as here And the ticket is in the info-de queue, not in a permissions queue. -- O.Koslowski (talk) 02:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Done per on OTRS agent request. Ankry (talk) 06:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
OTRS permission has arrived, please restore the file. Thanks in advance! Bencemac (talk) 16:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: @Bencemac: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:08, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
We need to clarify COM:COSPLAY, because right now we have a direct conflict between the recent slew of nominations by User:Yuraily Lic, such as this one, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cosplay of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and I have no doubt many others, and older decisions such as Commons:Deletion requests/Images of costumes tagged as copyvios by AnimeFan and the very explicit statement by Wikimedia Counsel Mike Godwin: "Suppose someone dresses up as, say, Spider-Man, and has a photo taken. The photo is neither a copyright violation nor a trademark violation."
We either delete 99%+ of Category:Cosplay, which are almost all cosplay of copyrighted characters, or we don't, but we can't have the current situation, which seems to be "delete some, keep others, based on which admin closes". --GRuban (talk) 18:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Procedural Oppose - This does not present a reason to restore but is, rather, explicitly a request "to clarify COM:COSPLAY." That is not the function of UDR and this is thus not the appropriate venue for such a discussion. Commons:Village pump/Copyright is that way. Эlcobbola talk 18:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close: UDR is not the appropriate venue for such discussions. @GRuban: Commons:Village pump/Copyright is the appropriate venue. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:36, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello,
Kindly process my request to undelete the above mentioned image file. This picture was authored by myself and is of a prominent film cinematographer from India.
Thanking you,
Filmassoc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmassoc (talk • contribs) 18:18, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose The image was uploaded here by User:Paintitkid who also claims authorship. In order to keep the image we must resolve who the actual author is. Ankry (talk) 22:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Paintitkid is a confirmed sockpuppet of Filmassoc and that image (uploaded 18:48, 4 August 2020) was a recreation of the subject image (deleted 17:18, 4 August 2020). Эlcobbola talk 22:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - In addition to the questionable copyright status, this subject does not appear notable. The draft has been declined multiple times and the main space version was created (less than a day after the most recent draft decline (!!!)--implying subterfuge consistent with the socking) by the uploader/requester. It appears to continue to exist merely because it has not been noticed. Эlcobbola talk 22:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. @Elcobbola: FYI, article has been nominated for deletion and draft reviewer/en.wp checkuser DGG has been notified by ping. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Olá! A categoria não mais está vazia. Há item categorizado nela, portanto é necessária. --Luan (talk) 00:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: not empty anymore. --JuTa 02:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hey there, thanks for stopping by my photography. I am a agent of said company and I have the rights/permissions to have the logo on Wikipedia, therefore, I am not infringing any copyright.--Ftjw (talk) 02:43, 5 August 2020 (UTC) The logo corresponds to VLN Radio and the link that is alluded to as the reason for the template is the website of that business. --Ftjw (talk) 02:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose @Ftjw: (1) We have absolutely no way of confirm your claims and assertions here. (2) The file has yet to be deleted as of 03:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC) so this is not the right venue to challenge a request for speedy deletion. You can challenge it by nominating it for deletion by clicking on "⇓ Challenge speedy deletion start a regular deletion request/discussion instead" on the file page or by following the instructions at Commons:Deletion requests. (3) Files previously published elsewhere need permission from the copyright holder using the OTRS process. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:04, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done Procedural close: not deleted. You can discuss the deletion reason in the deledion request. Ankry (talk) 06:22, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Source URL request
- File:KF Austrolestes colensonis 1.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/32412296
- File:KF Austrolestes colensonis 2.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/32412363
- File:Anolis concolor head and throat detail.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/10550772
- File:Lepidoblepharis festae.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/61332737
- File:Lepidoblepharis sanctaemartae.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/61332799
- File:Lygophis lineatus.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/61332738
- File:Metriophasma diocles.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/10559731
- File:Osteocephalus planiceps.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/10559670
- File:Hypselonotus linea 55939245.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/55939245
- File:Corymbium enerve Flemming 1.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/28180890
- File:Corymbium enerve Flemming 2.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/28180883
- File:Felicia oleosa vBerkel 3.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/12409356
- File:Felicia oleosa vBerkel 4.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/12409360
- File:Emydocephalus annulatus.jpg https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/30249715
I suppose I am not requesting undeletion per se, but could an admin please provide the source urls (something like https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/xxxxxxx or https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/xxxxxxx) for the above inaturalist files? I'd like to make sure there were no archives. Thanks, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 21:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: There ya go, from the bot's logs (
/data/project/inaturalistreviewer/logs/inrbot.logon Toolforge). If pywikibot/requests-oauth weren't so cavalier about putting OAUTH creds in debug logs, I'd throw the logs in a webservice, but I don't want to chance messing up the logging config accidentally. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 04:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)- Thank you, User:AntiCompositeNumber. Could an admin please undelete the following:
- AntiCompositeNumber: May I suggest not automatically nominating for deletion for old files? Although useful for new files, where a license change is unlikely, IMO putting older files with failed reviews into a queue/category of some sort for human review before nomination could be useful.
- Also, may I recommend to deleting admins the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine extensions (Chrome Firefox Safari)? Opening up the source url and clicking "First Version" should be an easy addition to admins' workflow before deleting (if no valid archive is found) or declining (if there is one). Best, --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 13:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Mdaniels5757: iNaturalistBot will now try to check for an archive before nominating a file for deletion, and I've set the age for iNB to treat a file as old down to 90 days. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
@Mdaniels5757: I have undeleted the 4 you mention. Do you need more? --MGA73 (talk) 15:53, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: Nope, that's all. --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: Okay undeleted those that could be saved. The rest stays deleted. --MGA73 (talk) 18:47, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The photograph was taken by me on 20 November 2009. I wish to place it in the public domain. Leslie Buck. 3 August 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elljaybee1929 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Elljaybee1929: Why did you not declare this at upload time? At upload you stated: Permission received from parish. What exactly permission did you mean, who is the copyright holder and why? Ankry (talk) 21:39, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per lack of explanation. Ankry (talk) 22:47, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Am 26. 4. hat die Siegfried Rischar-Stiftung als Inhaberin des Urheberrechts nach dem verstorbenen Siegfried Rischar gegenüber permissions-de@wikimedia.org für das o. g. Bild die Lizenz gemäß CC-by-sa 3.0/de erteilt. Was um Himmels willen wollen Sie eigentlich noch mehr?? Können Sie sich überhaupt vorstellen, welche Mühe ein Verfasser sich mit dem Hochladen lizensierter Bilder macht, und sind Sie sich bewusst, wie minderwertig ein Artikel zur bildenden Kunst ohne Bebilderung ist? --TitusMax (talk) 19:20, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- @TitusMax: If a permission is send on behalf of legal entity (a company or an organization), OTRS policy requires that it is send using an official address that is trackable through public records. Otherwise, the permission cannot be accepted. The address used to send the permission in ticket:2020042610002672 was not the official one or not trackable. Or its verifying requires further information that was not provided. Pinging @Mussklprozz: for further information, if I misread the ticket. Ankry (talk) 22:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Am 26. 4. hat die Siegfried Rischar-Stiftung als Inhaberin des Urheberrechts nach dem verstorbenen Siegfried Rischar gegenüber permissions-de@wikimedia.org für das o. g. Bild die Lizenz gemäß CC-by-sa 3.0/de erteilt. Was um Himmels willen wollen Sie eigentlich noch mehr?? Können Sie sich überhaupt vorstellen, welche Mühe ein Verfasser sich mit dem Hochladen lizensierter Bilder macht, und sind Sie sich bewusst, wie minderwertig ein Artikel zur bildenden Kunst ohne Bebilderung ist? Wir können es auch sein lassen; ich verliere wirklich allmählich die Lust. --TitusMax (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- See above. Ankry (talk) 22:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:49, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Am 26. 4. hat die Siegfried Rischar-Stiftung als Inhaberin des Urheberrechts nach dem verstorbenen Siegfried Rischar gegenüber permissions-de@wikimedia.org für das o. g. Bild die Lizenz gemäß CC-by-sa 3.0/de erteilt. Was um Himmels willen wollen Sie eigentlich noch mehr?? Können Sie sich überhaupt vorstellen, welche Mühe ein Verfasser sich mit dem Hochladen lizensierter Bilder macht, und sind Sie sich bewusst, wie minderwertig ein Artikel zur bildenden Kunst ohne Bebilderung ist? --TitusMax (talk) 19:28, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- See above. Ankry (talk) 22:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:49, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
저작권을 가진 cmcio에서 올린 이미지(사진)입니다 무엇이 문제인지요? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmcbio (talk • contribs) 01:07, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Info The request may be concerning File:삼기환-04.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose @Cmcbio: Files previously published elsewhere needs permission via OTRS. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
President George W Bush portrait.jpg
I believe the painting of George W. Bush by John Howard Sanden is in the public domain, I emailed him a while back and inquired whether he claims copyright over this painting. He told me it is in the property of the White House Historical Association, and his website corroborates this, where his paintings of Lincoln, T. Roosevelt, F.D. Roosevelt, Reagan, and Trump are in his own private copyright, whilst George W. Bush is listed within the copyright of said-organization. MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Why would any of this make the painting public domain? Notwithstanding the contradiction of "I believe the painting [...] is in the public domain" and "[the painting is] within the copyright of said-organization," the w:White House Historical Association is a private NPO, not a federal entity (even if it were, the United States Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it.) The WHHA, further, does not appear inclined towards freeness; their website says, for example "All copyright rights to the Sites, including rights to the work and designs provided by the WHHA are owned by the WHHA, © 2000-2018, The White House Historical Association. All rights reserved. You cannot re-transmit, print or photocopy the materials on this Site for re-distribution in any medium without the written permission of the WHHA." (Which is also a notice one would not find on a federal site.) If WHHA holds the copyright ("within the copyright of said-organization"), it will need to provide permission using the COM:OTRS process. Эlcobbola talk 18:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done This was deleted after discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:President George W Bush portrait.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Also:
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Iamhasanansari, these files were deleted as "unused personal selfies" however both en:Chris Christie and en:Joaquin Castro are notable politicians so they're well within Commons' scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 20:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose We have here and here a lot of images of these people. We do not need extra ones with poor quality or being self-promotional. Or, if you think that we need, please elaborate why. Ankry (talk) 22:37, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This image had and EXIF Copyright tag from my wife's camera, forgot to delete tag before uploading, please undelete newest version without said tag.
Vestlenning (talk) 21:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Vestlenning: Can you affirm that both of these images, as well as all of your uploads, were taken by you and not your wife? Or if some of them were indeed created by her, then let me know and I'll give you instructions on how to proceed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: All good now, this request can be deleted. Vestlenning (talk) 10:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Vestlenning: I see that File:Diana 35.jpg and File:Feinwerkbau diopter sight.jpg were deleted for the same reason. Would you like those restored? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:02, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Cheers but I'm fine. Vestlenning (talk) 18:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Done Completed to the petitioner's satisfaction. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This is photo of famous play writer from Maharashtra India. Do not delete it from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2402:8100:30A8:CCC:C3A3:7A1F:6009:2FE6 (talk) 13:44, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close: This file has not been deleted. You may enter comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prakash Tribhuvan.jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 15:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Prakash Tribhuvan page is created by me. Prakash Tribhuvan is Famous Marathi Play Writer from Maharashtra India. I am daughter of Prakash Tribhuvan. I have click this photograph. I am the owner of this. So don't delete this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrapaliprakash (talk • contribs) 13:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close: This file has not been deleted. You may enter comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prakash Tribhuvan.jpg. --Эlcobbola talk 15:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Tallukh film poster.jpg
I am the owner of this file ANURAGJHA CREATIONS. I HAVENT PUT A COPYRIGHT ON IT AND I ALLOW IT TO BE FULLY DISTRIBUTED. PLEASE UNDELETE IT. Thanks. Also i would love to prove this fact http://www.anuragjhacreations.in/ here is the official website at the bottom you will find the email id feel free to mail me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSantashines (talk • contribs) 13:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - This has been previously published and thus requires permission to be submited using the process at COM:OTRS. Note also that "I HAVENT PUT A COPYRIGHT ON IT" is contradicted by your application/purport of a cc-by 4.0 license and "I am the owner of this file" is contradicted by your caption "The poster art copyright is believed to belong to the distributor of the Film, the publisher of the Film or the graphic artist" (!!!) It is incumbent on you to provide appropriate evidence, not for us to seek it. ("feel free to mail me") Эlcobbola talk 13:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- There is a little more background here, for info, including the fact it was uploaded from IMDb, for some reason, and did carry an explicit © tag. Crep171166 (talk) 13:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Both files were deleted due to no FOP (pls. see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Church of the holy sacrifice historical marker 1.jpg for reference). However, a glance at Category:Church of the Holy Sacrifice historical marker proves that deletion is invalid. Using Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paco Park - Gomburza Memorare NHCP historical marker.jpg, markers such as these are commissioned by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines or NHCP (for the markers of the old era, by the predecessors of NHCP). According to @Seav: , such works are works of the Philippine government and owned by the state. He even introduced this enwiki article as an evidence: w:Historical_markers_of_the_Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Done per above. The 2nd image cropped slightly. Ankry (talk) 09:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File involved: File:Churchbaler2jf.jpg JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Churchbaler2jf.jpg, it depicts a plaque (I feel that it is the same as File:Baler Church in Aurora province historical marker.jpg, the NHCP marker or Baler Church). If it is indeed the same as that, then it falls PD as the subject is a work (and owned by) the government per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paco Park - Gomburza Memorare NHCP historical marker.jpg, in which Seav said that such markers are commissioned by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines or NHCP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:01, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Addition: I'm not sure if these two other files — File:Bayanbalerjf.jpg and File:Baler400jf.JPG — are the same subject (or are differenr subjects). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Also addition: File:Aurorahouse2jf.JPG (I dunno if this plaque is from NHCP, since I'm no admin and all deleted files are absolutely "invisible" to me. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:04, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Done File:Churchbaler2jf.jpg, File:Bayanbalerjf.jpg and File:Aurorahouse2jf.JPG as the presented plaques are NHCP plaques. Not done for File:Baler400jf.JPG as it does not seem to be so. Ankry (talk) 09:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:IE LOGO Colour.pdf this is the logo of the company IE Abroad - www.ieabroad.com. It is created and owned by the company that is spoken about in the Wiki page
File:IE LOGO Colour.pdf this is the logo of the company IE Abroad - www.ieabroad.com. It is created and owned by the company that is spoken about in the Wiki page
--Brentwiliammorris (talk) 08:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Non-free logos cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, see COM:L. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: We need a permission from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for information. Also, PDF is not a suitable file format for a logo. This would have to be uploaded in a common graphics format, preferably SVG. --De728631 (talk) 23:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This file was deleted because of wrong license. But recently, I found it licensed under GWOIA. Here are the copyright declaration [1] and source file [2].--Larryasou (talk) 03:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: per above @Larryasou: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:19, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
I own the copyright to this picture. This is an image that I own. I am not using anyone else's image. Please undelete this. Thank you. --Dallasryanactor (talk) 04:15, 6 August 2020 (UTC) I own the rights to this picture. I am the person who made this image and that is me in the image. It is my image. Please undelete this. Thank you. --Dallasryanactor (talk) 04:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Oppose @Dallasryanactor: We have no way of confirming or verifying your assertions here. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:16, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose 1) This has been previously published and thus requires permission to be submitted using the process at COM:OTRS; 2) Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the subject ("that is me in the image"); and 3) The foregoing seems moot as this is a COM:SCOPE/COM:NOTHOST issue. The en.wiki draft has already been declined twice and has no reasonable expectation of making main space. (This is a hobby film, with a $7,000 budget no less, that has apparently received no coverage, let alone the required "significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time" (w:WP:N)). Эlcobbola talk 14:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Per above. --De728631 (talk) 23:27, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The photographer - Kate Mount - gave free license release for Gheeki to add the image Stephen Montague.jpg to Wikimedia Commons and use on the Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Montague and elsewhere. She emailed this permission on 19 May 2020 - Ticket#2020051910003763 concerning Ticket No. 2020042510003155.
--Gheeki (talk) 13:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose as premature. The OTRS member who processes the ticket will restore, or arrange for the restoration of, the image if everything is in order. There is currently nothing to be accomplished at UDR. Эlcobbola talk 15:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Isais Tree Waterford CT.jpg
Hi, this image was initially deleted because it was claimed that it was not my own work due to unreliable EFIX data. I updated the image, and it is still being deleted. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidd101 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close. @Davidd101: The image is only still under consideration for deletion, but has not been deleted nor does it seem that it will be. Deletion discussions remain open for 7 days or more from the nomination date and will be closed only when an administrator closes the discussion once the minimum of 7 days is up. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
No copyright violation.permission to me,to share the image. TintuArunav (talk) 09:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: No evidence of permission. The copyright holder must send in a release under a free license following the instructions at COM:OTRS. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- King of Hearts how to send OTRS request.TintuArunav (talk) 09:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- TintuArunav The copyright holder should follow the instructions and fill out the form at Commons:Wikimedia OTRS release generator. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- King of Hearts how to send OTRS request.TintuArunav (talk) 09:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File was deleted because of "no FOP" (ref. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sta. Ana Church.jpg). However per enwiki article w:Santa Ana Church, this church dates to 1725 and it is a clear PD for a very, very long time. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:33, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info This is a photo of a sign, not the church. Thuresson (talk) 08:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done The sign includes a stylized graphic which is above COM:TOO. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:58, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Mail sent for permission,via Wikimedia OTRS release generator.What is the next step.TintuArunav (talk) 09:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Procedural close, please do not post the same request over and over. The photo will be undeleted only when it has been successfully processed by an unpaid OTRS volunteer. Thuresson (talk) 12:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
== Yogesh Sharma jpg. I request please don't delete my page from Wikimedia. Information that u given is appropriate fir this log page. ==
I request the Wikimedia common please don't delete my page. Its a humble request to James G. Howes. I know that the information given by me is not sufficient. But very soon I provide all source information regarding my log files. Yours sincerely Thanku
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yogesh Sharma Pritmas (talk • contribs) 14:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Procedural close. Please discuss this at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Yogesh Sharma Pritmas. Thuresson (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This work is not made for the promotion of an individual. It is purely retracing political movement which is actually taking place in the said country. This act of Cryptic is an act of pure vandalism.--Robmillersalomon (talk) 19:06, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose File:EspritAGC - Esprit Amadou Gon Coulibaly.jpg contains links to Flickr, Facebook etc. Usually this is considered promotional according to our rules and guidelines. If the image can be used to document political activism and advertising as such, it would be in our project scope though and could be restored. However, there is no evidence that the copyright holder released it under a free licence as you claimed the file page. Whenever a work has been published before without a free licence, we require a permission from the copyright holder which has to come directly from them by email. Please see COM:OTRS. 19:17, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done per above. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Do not delete this image. This is photograph of Prakash Tribhuvan a famous play writer from Maharashtra India. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2402:8100:302A:608D:4741:1921:2136:4F9C (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Procedural close, photo is not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 15:12, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:Imagine logo.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: This is a non free logo which is used in the wikipedia page that contains information about the business in question. I believe that the image in question is being used with fair use as it is used in the infobox. Additionally upon reading Wikipedia:Logos I believe that the logo may actually fall under copyright free logos as it is only made up of simple geometric shapes (circles) and text. Nathanielcwm (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Non-free logos cannot be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 06:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Could the file be moved to the english wikipedia then? Nathanielcwm (talk) 05:20, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- IMO, there is no problem hosting the logo in English Wikipedia. However I see no obvious reason why this needs undeletion. The logo can by uploaded there from the original source. Ankry (talk) 23:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- It wouldn't let me upload when I tried and it told me to submit an undelete request here.Nathanielcwm (talk) 06:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nathanielcwm: This suggests that you attempted reupload to Commons. Did you use this upload page? Ankry (talk) 09:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, no I did not I just clicked the image upload button in the editor.Nathanielcwm (talk) 19:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nathanielcwm: This suggests that you attempted reupload to Commons. Did you use this upload page? Ankry (talk) 09:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- It wouldn't let me upload when I tried and it told me to submit an undelete request here.Nathanielcwm (talk) 06:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- IMO, there is no problem hosting the logo in English Wikipedia. However I see no obvious reason why this needs undeletion. The logo can by uploaded there from the original source. Ankry (talk) 23:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- I checked out the logo and to me it looks rather simple. Text and a few dots may not exceed COM:TOO. --MGA73 (talk) 18:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- @MGA73: Commons:Brunei unfortunately provides no guidance on ToO in that country. As a former British protected state, Brunei, perhaps, was influenced by British law--if this is the case, COM:TOO UK may provide some insight on how to proceed, and the file cannot be restored as a logo as simple as en:File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg was found to be protected. Per COM:EVID, it will be incumbent on Nathanielcwm or others actively seeking undeletion for this file to provide us here with evidence in Brunei law or case law that the file would fall below their threshold of originality. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Here is the relevant law: http://www.agc.gov.bn/AGC%20Images/LAWS/Gazette_PDF/2013/EN/S092.pdf I was unable to find any results for 'originality' in the document. Nathanielcwm (talk) 15:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oh sorry here's the 1999 copyright act the previous document was just amendments. http://www.agc.gov.bn/AGC%20Images/LAWS/Gazette_PDF/2000/EN/s014.pdf Nathanielcwm (talk) 15:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Done: PD-textlogo. @Nathanielcwm: Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 12:57, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2020080410006578 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:Land-of-chaos-online-ii-revolution.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: Please temporarily restore and tag with
{{OTRS received |id=2020080910002894|reason=1|user=Alex Noble}}with for processing of OTRS ticket:2020080910002894 ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 16:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Usama Ishtay LA FW2018.jpg
OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020063010010606 regarding File:Usama Ishtay LA FW2018.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
According to the user who deleted these, they were under the impression that the copyrights for the issues (that the images came from) were renewed on the basis that the Brooklyn Eagle renewed an issue as early as January 6, 1933. This is not evidence that any issue after after 1940 or 1950 was renewed. (The only specific info in the database is the text "see 1961 January-June", but the periodical renewals for that period have no listing for the Brooklyn Eagle.) If any relevant renewal occurred, it would need to be pointed out to justify deletion. UpdateNerd (talk) 01:23, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: Better discussed at an actual DR than here, so I've opened up Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Fred Trump. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:Solar eclipse of December 26, 2019 Kollam 16.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Solar eclipse of December 26, 2019 Kollam 17.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: The photographs were taken by the uploader User:Fotokannan himself. I do not think we need to ask for OTRS permission. Also, the paper/film they are holding qualifies to be De minimis. Please undelete. Sreejith K (talk) 17:36, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info They were deleted as they lack EXIF metadata. Ankry (talk) 22:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support Lack of EXIF is not, in and of itself, a reason to delete. His other uploads (e.g. File:Solar eclipse of December 26, 2019 Kollam 8.resized.jpg) establish that he did in fact attend the event. I see no reason to doubt that he is telling the truth that the first photo is his son. It seems the FB determination was based solely on the metadata; Tineye turns up blank, so he probably didn't upload them to Facebook publicly. So currently we don't have an email address for OTRS to confirm, and it is an unreasonable intrusion of privacy to ask someone to make a private Facebook photo public just so we can verify the copyright (they might be content to share the photo itself, but not necessarily the Facebook comments on it). So in these cases we have to assume good faith. I agree with the COM:DM assessment as well. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree with KoH above. The images were clearly previously published elsewhere, albeit not publically. This is not about AFG but clear policy--Files previously published elsewhere require permission using the OTRS process. If Fotokannan is the photographer, they can supply OTRS with the original images including metadata as evidence. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: Then what we would need is not OTRS, but original EXIF, which the uploader can supply here on-wiki as well. OTRS serves no purpose when we have no idea what email address might be tied to the place of alternate publication; in such cases it is a judgment call based on heuristics rather than a strict policy requirement. Additionally, he uploaded an event from December 26, 2019 on December 27, 2019, so it was uploaded to Commons almost immediately. He seems to use two cameras, a Canon 750D and a Samsung SM-J700F, and the pixel-level quality and compression artefacts match that of his other mobile uploads, e.g. File:Villupattu at kollam.jpg, so I don't view even the original file as necessary here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- If User:Fotokannan reuploads the photos with original EXIF, they would be OK. But this has nothing to do with this UDR request. Ankry (talk) 09:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: Then what we would need is not OTRS, but original EXIF, which the uploader can supply here on-wiki as well. OTRS serves no purpose when we have no idea what email address might be tied to the place of alternate publication; in such cases it is a judgment call based on heuristics rather than a strict policy requirement. Additionally, he uploaded an event from December 26, 2019 on December 27, 2019, so it was uploaded to Commons almost immediately. He seems to use two cameras, a Canon 750D and a Samsung SM-J700F, and the pixel-level quality and compression artefacts match that of his other mobile uploads, e.g. File:Villupattu at kollam.jpg, so I don't view even the original file as necessary here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
- What do we need here for the the undeletion? OTRS or EXIF? Or both? --Sreejith K (talk) 20:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Sreejithk2000: There is definitely no need for OTRS, because he would simply be asked to do the same thing that he can do on-wiki. Uploading the original, unedited photo will clear up all doubt. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- What do we need here for the the undeletion? OTRS or EXIF? Or both? --Sreejith K (talk) 20:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: Per Ticket:2020081010003452. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
La foto del archivo "Lápida de Santiago de Larraín y Vicuña.jpg" la saqué yo con el celular. No puedo decir nada respecto de la fotografía que está en la página agustino.cl; pero la del archivo que subí a Wikimedia, la saqué yo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by G15a (talk • contribs) 02:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Unlikely. The photo you uploaded has no cell phone camera info in EXIF and is identical to the image on the mentioned webpage. Photos made using different cameras, in different lightning conditions or with different camera positions never look like the same. Note also, that making a photo of another photo does not grant you any copyright. Ankry (talk) 09:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Please restore the following pages:
- File:HRH The Prince of Wales visits Ulster University (42756761901).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Reason: Permission here ticket:2020032810004703 and Twitter's DM 219.78.191.251 09:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Oppose The permission in the ticket has not been accepted as it seems to be a forwarded permission. We need the permissions to come to OTRS directly from the copyright holders or their authorized representatives. Ankry (talk) 10:02, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done This must be resolved through OTRS. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:HRH The Prince of Wales visits Ulster University (42756761901).jpg. Thuresson (talk) 21:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This photo of my maternal grandfather I have confirmed from the identity of the photographer The Photographer was actually my grandmother she give me the photo (of my grandfather) to upload it on my grandfather wiki page please undelete it File:الأستاذ الدكتور محمد ناجى المحلاوى.png --Nagui elnakadi (talk) 11:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Permission for Wikipedia only is not enough. Please use COM:OTRS to submit evidence of who the current copyright owners are and if they/she/he would like to license the image under an acceptable license. Thuresson (talk) 21:36, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: File already being handled by OTRS. and permission has not yet accepted. An OTRS agent will request or perform undeletion once sufficient permission has been processed and accepted. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:44, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This image is from a single CD of the song Alô, by the duo Chitãozinho & Xororó. I added the photo myself and assumed the image was from another source and left the credits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guest4409 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Guest4409: Claiming that you are the only and exclusive author and copyright holder of this image you claim also that you are the author and copyright holder of the album cover. Are you? Ankry (talk) 12:40, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: Yes. It's me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guest4409 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Sock nonsense - see File:Imagem Capa do CD single de Alô.jpg, et al. --Эlcobbola talk 16:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
JuTa's deletions
I have asked the admin mentioned to restore File:DIARIO-FINANCIERO.gif and File:Logoqsc1.png as they are both {{PD-textlogo}} images but they have refused, so I'm bringing this here for review based on their response. 1989talk 22:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: While COM:TOO Chile is not totally clear, this is certainly not a speedy candidate. Anyone may file a regular COM:DR if they wish to dispute the claim of {{PD-textlogo}}. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
FOIA and Freedom Of Press and Sunshine Open records laws
The page is a compilation of Florida source funded by taxpayers and therefore is covered under FOIA and was garnished legally from clerks, comptrollers, city permits and property appraisers websites and the compilation therefor of such work is my property, such is the same with Westlaw who gathers public court case law records and charges for access to the repository. It is not private, confidential or personal. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.238.26.57 (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose While the information may be obtainable via FOIA, I don't think the residential addresses of individuals falls within COM:SCOPE. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done A page called FOIA and Freedom Of Press and Sunshine Open records laws has not been deleted. Thuresson (talk) 10:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File 7 FOIA Information.jpg
If anyone should know its that Florida content that was logged with Florida tax dollars is covered under Florida sunshine laws and FOIA and is FREE since its taxpayer funded and therefore any compilations are my property of work.
File:File 7 FOIA Information.jpg File:File 6 FOIA Information.jpg File:File 5 FOIA Information.jpg File:File 4 FOIA Information.jpg File:File 3 FOIA Information.jpg File:File 1 FOIA Information.jpg File:File 2 FOIA Information.jpg File:9th Judges List 6-28-19 Page 3.jpg File:9th Judges List 6-28-19 Page 1.jpg File:9th Judges List 6-28-19 Page 2.jpg File:Drone Addresses-Print Size 6-28-19 Page 3.jpg File:Drone Addresses-Print Size 6-28-19 Page 2.jpg File:Drone Addresses-Print Size 6-28-19 Page 1.jpg
— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.238.26.57 (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- See JudicialPurge (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth). --Achim (talk) 14:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done Inappropriate personal information. Ankry (talk) 08:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Thomas Wangsmo.jpg Why are you deleting images that I myself have created and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons?
I am Thomas Wangsmo, the person in and creator of this photo, something I clearly stated when uploading it. What else do you require? This truly is some Kafkaesque behaviour on your part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomaswangsmo (talk • contribs) 14:41, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - As you no doubt noticed, you were not required to provide any verification whatsoever to register the name Thomaswangsmo. Because anyone can register any name (rather the opposite of Kafkaesque oppression), and because fans and the like not uncommonly do register names of their intended subjects, we require out of fairness and pragmatism that additional evidence of permission be provided for previously published works. As this image was previously published here with no indication of the purported cc-by-sa-3.0 license, you will need to provide that additional evidence--either adding that license to that site or using the process at COM:OTRS. As a "screenwriter and director," you presumably understand the importance of intellectual properties and might appreciate our efforts to ensure yours are protected. Failing that, accusing us ("your part") of oppressive, nightmarish behaviour is both ridiculous and contrary to the assumption of good faith and maintenance of a collegial atmosphere. Эlcobbola talk 15:37, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: OTRS 2020081110009445 received. --Эlcobbola talk 19:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Inn i mørket filmplakat.jpg Why are you deleting images that I myself have created and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons?
I am Thomas Wangsmo, the creator of this photo/poster and of the feature film it is promoting, something I clearly stated when uploading it. What else do you require? This truly is some Kafkaesque behaviour on your part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomaswangsmo (talk • contribs) 14:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - In addition to being previously published and thus requiring COM:OTRS evidence of permission, being the director of a film (e.g,, per poster: "En Film Av Thomas Wangsmo") does not inherently relate to the possession of copyrights (e.g., Spielberg does not hold the copyright to Jaws). As the poster appears to be predominately a still from the film, its creation would be the creation of a derivative work (alternatively, cinematography, for example, is Patrik Säfström.) Accordingly, the aforementioned permission would optimally be provided by the film's production companies (apparently Star Media Entertainment and Vidvinkel Film.) Эlcobbola talk 15:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
{{OTRS received}}
Not done: Please have the actual copyright holder email a permission as outlined in COM:OTRS. Once this permision has been approved by our volunteer email team, the file will be restored. --De728631 (talk) 15:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Thomas Wangsmo 2.jpg Why are you deleting images that I myself have created and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons?
I am Thomas Wangsmo, the person in and owner of this photo, something I clearly stated when uploading it. What else do you require? This truly is some Kafkaesque behaviour on your part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomaswangsmo (talk • contribs) 14:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the subject ("I am Thomas Wangsmo, the person in [...] this photo.") Indeed, the image's metadata indicates the author to be "Frank Skaren." Copyright would be held by Wangsmo only if transferred by Skaren through a formal written conveyance. Either a copy of that conveyance or direct contact from Skaren needs to be provided using the process at COM:OTRS. Эlcobbola talk 15:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Per Elcobbola. --De728631 (talk) 15:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This image was taken by me, Leslie Buck, on 20 November 2009. I wish to place it in the public domain. Elljaybee1929 (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Elljaybee1929: This contradicts your earlier claims ("author=Unknown", "Permission received from parish"). Could you elaborate? Ankry (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: This is identical to your previous request related to this file, which was closed as not done on 6. August. This is not a venue in which you repeat requests until you get the answer you want. As you've not bothered to provide addition information (indeed, Ankry previously asked for elaboration), there will not be a different outcome. --Эlcobbola talk 17:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Requesting that the follow photo be undeleted as the New England Patriots own this photo and run the "realpatriots" Wikipedia account. We have released the rights to the photo and would like to be able to update a page with this photo. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realpatriots (talk • contribs) 19:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Previously published images require evidence of permission to be submitted using the process at COM:OTRS. As this photo's metadata say "Author David Silverman" and "Copyright David Silverman Photography," that permission must come directly from Silverman, or be in the form of both a) the document through which Silverman transferred copyright to the New England Patriots and b) communication from an authorised agent (e.g, executive/officer/director - however styled in the organisation) that this account is authorised to license intellectual property on behalf of the New England Patriots. Эlcobbola talk 19:51, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Per Elcobbola. --De728631 (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
La imagen cuenta con autorización. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kieselguhr K (talk • contribs) 21:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Ankry (talk) 12:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Begründung zu finden unter Commons:Forum#mögliche_Urheberrechtsverletzung_klären. Danke! --Gerhardbeck (talk) 18:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This is not an obvious case IMO. While, if the map is jest cropped version of an existing OSM map, it would be {{ODbL OpenStreetMap}}, but if it is a modified map (as the provided "author" info suggests) it may be under another license (or even without a license - if unpublished or copyvio itself). However, as the source link seems to be dead (directs to a login page) and no OSM source was provided, I am unable to verify whether the map is under ODbL or under another license. And we cannot restore an image without a license. Proper licensing information needs to be provided prior to undeletion. Ankry (talk) 21:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: by MB-one. @MB-one: For future reference, please check UDR before restoring files. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Request undeletion File:LIYANN SEET.jpg
Request for file undeletion as this file has an OTRS permission. This file will be link to the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liyann_Seet
File for undeletion:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LIYANN_SEET.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatianajames (talk • contribs) 16:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Request undeletion. File has OTRS permission. File was deleted because there is no page linked to it. It will be linked to the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liyann_Seet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatianajames (talk • contribs) 16:18, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info Neither File:LIYANN SEET.jpg nor File:LIYANN AARIANNA SEET.png (the same photo) has no accepted OTRS permission. They both have only {{OTRS pending}} templates. @Ganímedes: do you wish to comment? Ankry (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- I can't see the file and I don't have the ticket number. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- The register of the file says "10:15, 24 June 2020 Thuresson (A) talk contribs deleted page File:LIYANN AARIANNA SEET.png (File page without a file, only OTRS template) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)" --Ganímedes (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: The ticket is 2020062410004591. Note also that one of the emailed images has metadata "Copyright RONNIELEE" (presumably Ronnie Lee), which, of course, does not match the sender. Extra scrutiny seems needed. Эlcobbola talk 20:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- The register of the file says "10:15, 24 June 2020 Thuresson (A) talk contribs deleted page File:LIYANN AARIANNA SEET.png (File page without a file, only OTRS template) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)" --Ganímedes (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- I can't see the file and I don't have the ticket number. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:58, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: an OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion once they have determined to have receive sufficient permission. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Source Own work
Licence: {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlenge (talk • contribs) 13:38, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Done Obvious own work with full metadata. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
){kind=link}
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The YouTube account was closed. It was not terminated for TOC violation. CC is not revocable. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- @De728631: Actually, you can clearly see the CC license on the archive.org link. The question is whether the channel was authorized to release the copyright to the video, which appears to be self-shot by Kaia Gerber. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right. It seems I missed the archived links. De728631 (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Does that change your view though? --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, it does. Considering the archived source, I now support undeleting this file. De728631 (talk) 14:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Does that change your view though? --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:49, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right. It seems I missed the archived links. De728631 (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- @De728631: Actually, you can clearly see the CC license on the archive.org link. The question is whether the channel was authorized to release the copyright to the video, which appears to be self-shot by Kaia Gerber. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose @De728631, King of Hearts, and Emir of Wikipedia: I think KoH raised a good point about if the channel was authorised to relicense the video as it appears to be the work of Kaia Gerber and not LOVE Magazine. And so the copyright status of the video itself is unclear. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:18, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: I guess whatever we decide, we should be consistent. First of all, do we know if the account was terminated or the account owner simply took it down? If it's the first case, then we can just call it a bad account, end of story. The former channel seems legitimate on the face of it, though I'm not sure why they'd take it down to immediately start putting stuff on a new channel. Secondly, assuming it is legitimate, should we question every Youtube CC release not by the author, even when coming from the channel of a notable publication? This has also come up with respect to official corporate accounts on Flickr releasing press images. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: The issue may be that they licensed all their videos under a CC YouTube licence, and I think, like many things, should be on a case-by-case basis. In any case, the onus is on the uploader to prove that the file is under a free licence and that the source had the right to place the content under such. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:48, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- For consistency you can check Category:LOVE (magazine), as I believe some of those are also from the old channel. If I recall correctly almost everyone of the videos on the old channel was listed as CC. For what it is worth Love is a professional magazine company owned by Condé Nast. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Emir of Wikipedia: Here's the issue: The work was clearly not by LOVE or Condé Nast, but by Kaia Gerber and it is pretty evident. We would need evidence (typically via OTRS) that either LOVE or Condé Nast would have the appropriate rights to relicense the work or that Gerber licensed the work herself under the stated licence. The absence of such means that the content cannot be hosted here and should remain deleted per COM:PCP. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- It is only clear or evident to those who can see the file, am not an admin so I can't see it, just working from memory. Could we be worth someone looking at Category:LOVE (magazine) to see if anything else needs deleting, although it looks lik those are more obviously not taken by the person in the video clips. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Emir of Wikipedia: While there are some I might bring into question, all the current files do appear to be the works of LOVE and Condé Nast or work product which LOVE or CN could claim to be the copyright holder. Although the file in question does appear to be for a LOVE marketing campaign of sorts, the video description clearly indicates that Gerber is the one recording, and had sent in the video. There is no indication that Gerber was an employee, and the norm is to assume that such a video remains her intellectual property. And while there is without a doubt that the video was used with permission from the copyright holder, there is also no indication that Gerber released the work under the licence stated on the video page. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:54, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Why are we assuming that any CC release would have been done by Love or Condé Nast? Perhaps they were merely reporting that the photographer had already taken this action. Thincat (talk) 08:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Thincat: Not an assumption. Not mere reporting. Videos on the former LOVE account all included a Youtube CC-BY licence. But in this case, this was a video, and was not the work of LOVE or Condé Nast, but is the work of Kaia Gerber. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:18, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- That's what I was trying to say. But clearly didn't say it very well. If a website places a CC licence it doesn't necessarily mean the site operator or uploader is issuing a licence. It may be they are reporting what licence has previously been issued by the creator or their licensee. Thincat (talk) 11:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Like I said, the former channel (in YT lingo, the "creator"), i.e. that of LOVE, has a pattern of having attached a CC-BY licence to all content it publishes on YouTube. Channels on that site rarely report what licence has previously been issued by the creator or their licensee. They are not reporting. This is a clear example of a channel attempting to license something that may not be theirs to license. That's it. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- I can't go on their old channel, but if I recall correctly not every video was marked as CC-BY only a large majority. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Closing as not done as there is no clear or definitive evidence that the author of the work, Kaia Gerber, released it under the CC licence as claimed by the former YouTube channel. The submitter of this UDR or others may submit a new request if they have definitive evidence that Gerber has licensed the work herself under an acceptable free licence. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Abarkouh-in-Iran-map.gif
Hi there, I would appreciate if you undelete the picture as I have referenced the picture to valid sources with name.
Name of the picture: File:Abarkouh-in-Iran-map.gif
Kind Regards, Sincerely Mohsen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohsen.Arzani (talk • contribs) 13:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Where at the source page is it written that this map has been published under a Creative Commons cc-by-sa-4.0 licence? Also, the tree and globe logo of Motel Organic is copyrighted and non-free on its own. Moreover, the logo may be seen as promotional, which is not allowed at Wikimedia Commons. De728631 (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done as per De728631: no free license evidence provided. Ankry (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I took this photo of Jonathan Krane myself. This is my photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrionexfleckeri1350 (talk • contribs)
- Oppose - 1) Previously published images require evidence of permission to be submitted using the process at COM:OTRS and 2) the image's metadata say "Author photographer, Franck Camhi" and "Copyright holder Franck Camhi." This is in contrast to your other upload of this subject (File:Jonathan krane amsterdamn edit.jpg), which you also claim to be your own work (!!!), which has metadata "Author Anko Stoffels" and "Copyright holder Foto Anko Stoffels." Did you lie about the being the author of the latter, then? Эlcobbola talk 18:49, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
.jpg){kind=link}
A valid OTRS release was received by TicketID=11472116.
--Mussklprozz (talk) 12:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Done: OTRS permission. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Extremely famous singer in Brazil --Raphael Figueira (talk) 13:24, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close, not sure what you are referring to, the category has never been deleted. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:23, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
A valid OTRS release was received by TicketID=11472211. --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: OTRS permission. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The photo shooting took place in a press conference for the charity back in August 25, 2019. You will notice none of the similar photos you googled online have the exact same angle bar one. If you take a good look, the one that is almost identical is still different because the tv station name on the microphone was purposefully blurred. I personally did that before giving it to Cheryl Hsieh as a fan for her IG post. The one you deleted is the original one. You will not find one online without the tv station name on the microphone being blurred. I appreciate your dedication to copyright protection, but I don't see any violation in this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NepotismTW (talk • contribs) 03:04, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- The other photo available on the net (eg. here or here seems to be indeed slightly different (eg. the microphone on the right is out of focus). However, this might be just photoshopped; the photographer position seems to be the same. Incomplete EXIF data is also not helpful here.
Inconclusive IMO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankry (talk • contribs) 10:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC) - @NepotismTW: Do you still have the original, unedited photo on your phone/camera? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:48, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: I unfortunately can no longer find the original due to passing on the copy carelessly between phones and computers in the past. If someone wants to suggest I can "photoshop" a photo I got online with blurred tv station logo on the microphone and then make it clear again, I honestly don't know how to do it and I find that offensive. If it helps with my case and you are willing to take a look, I still have the uncropped copy of that photo. Logically there should be no way I can get a cropped photo online and magically "photoshop" it into an uncropped version, correct? I'm new to the wiki community and not too sure how I can show you my photo. Please let me know. Thanks.NepotismTW (talk) 14:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @NepotismTW: I have restored the image so you can just reupload without having to fill out the file description again. Steps to upload the uncropped version:
- Go to Special:Upload.
- Click "Browse..."
- Select the file on your computer.
- Type "Cheryl0825.jpg" in "Destination filename".
- You should see that most of the fields are greyed out. Do not fill out anything else. Just click "Upload file" at the bottom.
- Your new upload should appear over the old one. You can revert it again to the cropped version if you want. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @NepotismTW: I have restored the image so you can just reupload without having to fill out the file description again. Steps to upload the uncropped version:
- @King of Hearts: Thank you so much. You will notice with the uncropped version, the microphone is shown basically in whole with the reporter’s watch visible as well. The tv station logo on the microphone is also very clear. I later blurred or cropped the logo to avoid associating her with any specific tv station.NepotismTW (talk) 06:42, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I didn't mean to have this photo deleted from WikiCommons, just from the page I was working on. I had mistakenly uploaded it as an image on the page, instead of using it for an Infobox. I need the image restored so I can insert it in the Infobox.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jediwriter1975 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- @Jediwriter1975: In order to restore it we still need an evidence that this is your personal work. You can upload the original photo from your camera (with complete camera info in EXIF) or provide an evidence following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 17:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done no response - no evidence provided. Ankry (talk) 22:20, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files uploaded by Niloy N Roy
These photographs were taken by me only and therefore how can anyone challenge the authenticity! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niloy N Roy (talk • contribs) 18:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Info Files related to this request are listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Niloy N Roy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:19, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose for now as P199's query here to Niloy N Roy has remained unanswered. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:25, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. As I explained at the DR, 3 out of 4 photos clearly show questionable source: EXIF codes reveal one has transmission code, another taken from FB, and most telling, one credits a certain Papan Ghosh (and the 4th file had no EXIF at all). AFAIC, proof is needed by providing these images in the full original (uncropped) versions with complete EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:02, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Niloy N Roy has had multiple occasion to respond to concerns: (1) at the DR when it was open; (2) on P199's talk page where P199 had asked them a question; (3) on this UDR -- no response was provided. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:38, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Ni Jinbin Declaration.pdf, File:Royal Thai Police statement regarding Wang Bingzhang.pdf, File:Statement by the National Security Bureau (Taiwan).pdf
I am the creator of two of the files (the Ni Jinbin declaration and the Royal Thai Police statement) and I relinquish any copyright rights I might have over them.
The statement by the National Security Bureau is a publicly available document issued by the government of Taiwan, and it has been published before in various news articles. Thus, it's not clear why it shouldn't be considered to be in the public domain already.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
--Dixakud (talk) 14:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. All are text-only images, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment @P199: Actually, scans of text aren't necessarily out of scope. However, @Dixakud: you will need to explain which article on a Wikimedia project you intend to use these files, because their use case is not apparent. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:54, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done No response in 24h; no evidence provided that the documents are in scope. Ankry (talk) 17:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Undelete of File:Sunita Bhuyan.jpg
Hello,
I have got the file File:Sunita Bhuyan.jpg from the person who is in the photo herself. i.e Sunita Bhuyan. So would kindly request for undeletion.
--Exist2015 (talk) 10:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Previously published at subject's Facebook page; obviously not a selfie by the subject. Thuresson (talk) 11:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Per Thuresson. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:34, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:U8jsGjxE.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: Investigation and processing of OTRS ticket 2020080810003921. Please tag with {{OTRS received|id=2020080810003921|reason=1}}
Thanks, ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 15:56, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Done per OTRS agent request. @Alex Noble: FYI. Ankry (talk) 17:08, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ramesh_lalwani/3238592477/in/photolist-5WbCHk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramesh lalwani (talk • contribs) 01:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Question @Ramesh lalwani: Could you provide us with a rationale as to why this file should be undeleted? Flickr's Public Domain Mark is not a valid licence and not generally not accepted here. Please see COM:L. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:56, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Done @Nat: Ramesh lalwani is a very old and established account here, so they are almost certainly not an imposter (I rate the chances of that being lower than the chance of a pre-1900 work being still in copyright because the author died after 1950, a risk we're willing to take). Additionally, even if they are not the same person, the proposal to accept PDM has essentially passed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Good Evening Ankry
I am replying to the following:
- And why do you wish to restore the empty Category:Media missing permission as of 6 August 2020 ? Ankry (talk) 22:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
I was one of the editors for the Charlie Talbert page and contacted the photographer, Lawrence Turner, who is also the copyright holder of the image ( File: Charles Talbert - Tan Coat.jpg ) and was under the impression he, Lawrence Turner, had contacted permissions-commons@wikimedia.org to prove that he, Lawrence Turner, is the copyright holder and photographer of the image & has given his permission to use said photo. Initially, I worked with, Lawrence Turner, and thought we (KosherKathy & Lawrence Turner) had followed instructions. Larence Turner chose how he wanted the image to be shared and I sent in the correspondence to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I am still confused on why it was not approved and asked him to resubmit directly from his personal email. At this time I was under the impression he had and everything was fine.
What is the best avenue to move forward?
Thank you for your time, KosherKathy
Not done: Procedural close. @KosherKathy: Please do not submit a new request to respond to a query in another request. Additionally, please do not list or mention the email address of an identifiable person in the future. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Also:
- File:Life Theater Art Deco.jpg
- File:Life Theater Exterior.jpg
- File:Life Theater Ground Level.jpg
- File:Life Theater Windows.jpg
No FOP per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Life Theater (Manila), as its architect died in 1975, so 1975+50=2025 (+1=2026). Nevertheless, w:Life Theater states that it was completed in 1941, and rebuilt in 1946. Henceforth, it is not protected by copyright if using @Clindberg: 's statement at this successful undeletion request for File:Philippines National Museum.jpg (completed in 1921, rebuilt in 1946) and File:Supreme Court of the Philippines.jpg (the dates are confusing at w:Supreme Court of the Philippines, unfortunately). To summarize Clindberg's position: the American copyright law, in which the Philippine copyright law is based, was enacted in 1909 for the then-PHL Is., but didn't explicitly mentioned architecture. PHL joined the convention in 1951, though a new law that replaced the outdated American-era law was enacted in 1972. This new law only retained copyright for subjects that were in actual copyright, i.e. excluding architecture. As such the copyright protection for architecture is "non-retroactive" and buildings completed from 1971 backwards are considered PD. To add one reason to prove this, no case law has ever filed to prosecute any photographers in the Philippines taking pictures of older buildings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:34, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: Could answer to this please? Yann (talk) 12:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have started a discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Philippine buildings before 1972. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:56, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Done per the newly updated COM:FOP Philippines. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:13, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The file was deleted on 9 August 2020 by User:Regasterios stating "No permission since 30 July 2020". However, I don't see any reason for this:
- The coat of arms of LSE was adopted and published in 1922 (Source), hence it is public domain under PD-old.
- Since the LSE is a state entity, its coat of arms also falls under Crown copyright and is therefore once more public domain under PD-UKGov.
- And according to COM:COA, it is even public domain under PD-Coat of arms.
- Furthermore, the SVG-file itself was not created by LSE, but by User:Svgnickel and User:RaphaelQS, who uploaded it under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license on Commons.
For comparable cases, see eg. File:Coat of arms of the University of Oxford.svg and File:University of Cambridge coat of arms.svg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGlobetrotter (talk • contribs) 02:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Therefore, I request the undeletion of said file. Best, TheGlobetrotter (talk) 02:24, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
{{S}}, howevernot {{PD-old}} as we do not know the author's death date. Ankry (talk) 12:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC) Stroke per KoH below; we need this exact version publication date. Ankry (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)- The current version of the beaver does not match the 1922 version. Do we know how it came into being? Or is it original art by Svgnickel/RaphaelQS? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:29, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- @TheGlobetrotter: Any comment to this ^^^^ ?
- As far as I know, the coat of arms has never changed since 1922. This is the only picture of a different beaver; even on reliefs around campus (see also here), it always shows the version of the deleted file. I guess these were just different artistic interpretations of the same description. TheGlobetrotter (talk) 01:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Update: Here, you can in fact see the "Wikipedia version" of the coat of arms on an official LSE document from 1923 (Source). TheGlobetrotter (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well, this is also not. There are at least 3 different rendering of the CoA. Ankry (talk) 08:43, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Update: Here, you can in fact see the "Wikipedia version" of the coat of arms on an official LSE document from 1923 (Source). TheGlobetrotter (talk) 01:26, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- As far as I know, the coat of arms has never changed since 1922. This is the only picture of a different beaver; even on reliefs around campus (see also here), it always shows the version of the deleted file. I guess these were just different artistic interpretations of the same description. TheGlobetrotter (talk) 01:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- @TheGlobetrotter: Any comment to this ^^^^ ?
Not done per discussion. No evidence provided that this particular CoA rendering is PD. Ankry (talk) 18:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
There is no freedom of panorama needed because this is a banner reporting the village budget for the year 2017. Village is under the government of Indonesia. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- This might be {{PD-IDGov}}, but I don't know whether it counts as being published by the (national) government. --rimshottalk 22:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose. It is clearly not the work of the national government. Furthermore, exemptions for works of local governments are not enumerated under Articles 42 and 43 of the 2014 Copyright law. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Some correction. After seeing the picture again, there is a logo of the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, and Transmigration in the right top corner of the banner. Apparently the banner is published by funding from the ministry. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 03:52, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- And the law clearly states in the appendix of the law that "Any Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction executed by or on behalf of the government" also includes "results of research conducted at State expenses". As villages in Indonesia is under the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, then the village is clearly funded by the Ministry as part of the government of Indonesia. See the pdf attachment. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 04:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Many entities receive government funding, but it does not make them under the government. But to the point: Articles 43 through 48, in essence, governs what constitutes fair use and what is not a copyright infringement. But, what is clear is that, they do not exempt commercial uses and does make allowances for derivatives. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:31, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Weak support If the logo is of the Ministry, we can consider the banned to be a work of government. Ankry (talk) 15:37, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: Having a ministry emblem slapped on doesn't make it a work of the national government. The work depicted appears to be the work of the local government, which is not exempted. Furthermore, the law does not enumerate such works as having no copyright, but are rather exempted under a certain set of circumstances, making the usage, communication, reproduction, and distribution of such works fair use. At no point does the law allow for derivatives making the clause akin or similar in nature to a ND licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- That is why my support is weak. I consider the logo to be kind of signature. There is another logo there and I would like to know something about it also. Ankry (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- hmmm. It appears to be a variant of the emblem of the village government. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: Having a ministry emblem slapped on doesn't make it a work of the national government. The work depicted appears to be the work of the local government, which is not exempted. Furthermore, the law does not enumerate such works as having no copyright, but are rather exempted under a certain set of circumstances, making the usage, communication, reproduction, and distribution of such works fair use. At no point does the law allow for derivatives making the clause akin or similar in nature to a ND licence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: Check page 70 of this pdf and give your opinion. The village is funded by the Ministry of Villages, Development of Disadvantaged Regions, regardless of whether a banner with the ministry logo exists. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 23:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- There is no official statement of whether the government referred here is talking about national government only or also cover regional governments; please don't give your own interpretation unless you are an expert on Indonesian law. I myself wasn't sure about this matter, but it seems that the government (per appendix) refers to national government as State in the appendix. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 23:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: The Wikimedia Indonesia Telegram group has been notified about this matter.
- Again, the articles 43 through 48, does not exempt work from copyright protection, but defines what does not constitute a copyright infringement--The Indonesian version of fair use. The law only enumerates certain works that have no copyright under articles 41 and 42. Not all government works are exempted from protection under the law.
Furthermore, while the government may publish, distribute, communicate, and/or reproduce a work without infringing copyright, this does not mean that an individual may do the same.Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:28, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @Juxlos, Davidelit, and JarrahTree: for third-party opinion. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 01:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nominator. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 02:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Reopening request; Hilmanasdf from Wikimedia Indonesia telegram has prepared a statement for this purpose. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 11:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, there. I'm the one who made the templates for all new Indonesia's copyright law license tag in Wikimedia Commons as part of Creative Commons Indonesia activities (part of Wikimedia Indonesia project) two years ago. When you take a look at article number 43b's context, it's all referring to "works" as in "objects"/"things". That's why in this matter, the legal interpretation (law interpretation are essentials in legal studies) made by this article also fall into public domain related provisions of the Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright Protection (it's not literally put in the same section with copyright terms protection, because it mentioned certain clause about limitations and/or conditions). You can see in article number 43a, it refers to state emblems and state anthems as government's owned works which able to be used by the public without restriction (if only it follows Law No. 24 of 2009 on the National Flag, Language, Emblem and Anthem appropriateness). And the article number 43c refers to state officials which also a form of referral to objects (which also require appropriateness in it's usages). So, the appropriate interpretation of 43b’s are for every publication made by the government (you can see lists of government bodies related to this clause on article number 43c) are legally free to be used by anyone, in this matter: Public Domain. This is the reason why I'm sure to put this as one of our PD-ID license tag templates. Your interpretation of our law and your act of deletion to this file could be harmful to files uploaded in this website using this license tag. So, with all due respect, I ask you to accept this undeletion request and take my legal arguments as a precedent to this matter. Thank you Hilmanasdf (talk) 18:47, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Reopening request; Hilmanasdf from Wikimedia Indonesia telegram has prepared a statement for this purpose. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 11:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by nominator. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 02:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @Juxlos, Davidelit, and JarrahTree: for third-party opinion. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 01:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Hilmanasdf: I've re-read Article 43b and while it is clear that "Acts that are not considered as Copyright infringements include: [...] Any Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction executed by or on behalf of the government, unless stated to be protected by laws and regulations, a statement to such Works, or when Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction to such Works are made", the language (i.e. choice of words, syntax, etc) used in the text does not seem to place government works in public domain as you've asserted here and the authorisation to modify said works or the creation of derivatives do not seem to be enumerated in the text. The chapter title is notably named Copyright limitations and not Copyright exemptions. There is an assertion of copyright over government works. Only works enumerated under articles 41 and 42 are exempted from copyright protections or have no copyright, and the work depicted in the file is clearly not enumerated in those articles. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: I've re-read Article 41b on "Unprotected Works under Copyrights" and the article stated that "every idea, procedure, system, method, concept, principle, findings or data despite having been expressed, stated, described, explained, or incorporated in a Work". The budget is a data on village funds. Clear enough? Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- The data itself is not protected, but the work as a whole, incorporating other works by unknown authors (i.e. the images) is assumed to be copyrighted. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:31, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Put this request on hold. There's a discussion in the group to discuss this matter with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in order to liberate this image constitutionally and to prevent foreigners misinterpreting Indonesian law. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 00:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Please note: There are other questions. Who is/are the author(s) / creator(s) of the images used? Who took the photo of the government building? Who is the architect of the government building in the photo used in the depicted work? Are they still alive or they deceased? If deceased, when did they die? Who created/took the image/stock photo of the landscape? etc. etc. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- 1) Image taken by me, 2) The author of the image used in the banner is anonymous and worked for the village government. Seriously? If these kind of questions existed, then we would see banners superimposed by the names of the author (attribution ftw), and banners would lose its meaning. I don't know, but for me, these kind of questions felt like this is inclining to an interrogation rather than a discussion. We should conduct a mass deletion of Indonesian images if these kind of itty-bitty details must be asked.Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 06:16, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, the image of the poster was taken by you. We understand that and it is clear. The question was to the images that were used or depicted in the poster. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Thank you to user David Wadie Fisher-Freberg for improving Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Indonesia in light of this discussion. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 14:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- David Wadie Fisher-Freberg should have opened a discussion prior to changing the page. Other than orthographical errors, it has not been determined that Article 43 in fact places government works and other works enumerated under this article in public domain. The government's own translated text is akin to a somewhat free licence, but does not exclude the works from protection. As I've previously stated articles 43 through 48 define what is not a copyright infringement but does not exempted them from copyright all together. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:20, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- I will add this point which has to do with the editing of the page, and not specifically with the file in question -- @David Wadie Fisher-Freberg: While editing the page, you removed vital tags crucial to the translation work of that page. I would strongly suggest that you consider reverting the edits yourself and open a discussion on the talk page of Commons:Indonesia or on Commons:Village pump. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- So all Commons admin can show their expertise in the intricacies of Indonesian copyright law there? I would rather not. Just mark the new version for translation. dwf² (runding) 03:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- If you are refusing to revert your own edits, then I will. and I have. (1) Such significant changes should have been discussed. (2) Claiming that the works are in public domain does not make them public domain, as the language of the the legal text seems not to support this point. (public domain = no copyright or copyright has expired, clearly not what is written). If you wish to change the page, please open a discussion on COM:VP or Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Indonesia. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- You guys are truly amazing. Reminded me of why I stopped contributing to Commons. dwf² (runding) 04:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: If you check on the page 4 of the law, distribution means "the sale, circulation, and/or dissemination of Works and/or Related Rights products" So there is no copyright violation, even for the commercial use of the work. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 00:24, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is the funny thing: you think that the work is copyrighted, but the government allow usage even for "sale, circulation, and/or dissemination of works." We could tag the work with a Template:Copyrighted free use if you insisted that the work is copyrighted. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 00:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) @Jeromi Mikhael: Again, read what I am writing carefully. The issue isn't based on commercial use, but on allowance for derivatives. Article 43 does not seem to provide for that while, articles 44 and 45 do allow for derivatives albeit for scholarly, governmental, or non-profit purposes. And concerns now include the provenance of the images depicted in the banner. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- And no, please note that {{Copyrighted free use}} will not work. The text of that licence is The copyright holder of this work allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification., and I've stated, article 43 does not enumerate any allowance for modification. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: If you're gonna handle this undeletion request, don't just read the Template:PD-IDGov only. There's a list of definition in Article 1 of the law. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 01:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Again, read what I am writing carefully. The author is anonymous and who ever does the work it is "executed on behalf of the government". Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 01:20, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- If the author of the images used on the banner is anonymous, then how do we know if the works were "executed on behalf of the government"? We do not. The image of the building depicted on the banner: who is the author? You've asserted that they are anonymous. While the government is within it's right to use it, does not mean that that image is in public domain or freely licensed. The building. The village government may own the tangible embodiment of the work. But who was the architect (the assumed copyright holder and owner of the intangible intellectual property)? Were they an employee of the government or was it designed by a private firm? If the latter, are they still living or are they deceased? If the latter, when? The other images are clearly stock images. Where did they come from? And even if every part of the work and the works depicted in the work was "executed on behalf of the government", it's still clear, article 43 does not enumerate any allowances for derivative works and does not completely exempt works from copyright protections. To be clear, I'm basing my position on the text of the law, which you have pointed to on multiple occasions. And Article 43 is the part that concern the matter at hand. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @Hilmanasdf and David Wadie Fisher-Freberg: . Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 02:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- And the stock image etc is under Commons:De minimis. The focus is on the numbers and not the image. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 02:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Seriously, as an admin, at least read the contents of Template:Commons policies and guidelines. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 03:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) De minimis does not factor into this as the work is a collage, and therefore a derivative work. And as such, the constituent parts must be considered. But such argument are a side note to what I've now stated on multiple occasions: Even if every part of the work and the works depicted in the work was "executed on behalf of the government", article 43 does not enumerate any allowances for derivative works and does not completely exempt works from copyright protections. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Furthermore, accusing me of not reading policy will not sway me. DM in this case was considered and rejected because of what I wrote above. And I will repeat again, until my point is understood: Even if every part of the work and the works depicted in the work was "executed on behalf of the government", article 43 does not enumerate any allowances for derivative works and does not completely exempt works from copyright protections. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- It does. See the definition of "reproduction" under Art 1 (12). dwf² (runding) 03:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Reproduction is not modification. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- And before some claims that I have not read the text. I have. Modification is not considered nor enumerated in the definition in Art 1(12), nor in article 43. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: I've re-read Article 41b on "Unprotected Works under Copyrights" and the article stated that "every idea, procedure, system, method, concept, principle, findings or data despite having been expressed, stated, described, explained, or incorporated in a Work". The budget is a data on village funds. Clear enough? Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 14:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- To be clear, I will not be the deciding admin with regards to this request, as I am substantial involved in this discussion. If an uninvolved admin wishes to undelete this file, be my guest. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:44, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for Hilmanasdf, David Wadie Fisher-Freberg, Ankry and Nat for the assistance. Unfortunately, we can't find common ground. Regards Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Two files by Hariboneagle927 and one file sourced from Batanes provincial government
These three files were uploaded by @Hariboneagle927: , and were deleted on the basis of a "loophole" in the PD-status of government works:
- (addition) And the so-called "terms of use" of PNA website. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- File:Murad and Galvez MILF-AFP token of appreciation.jpg from PNA
- File:Adopted Son of Shakba Ko Lawaisig.jpg from PNA
- File:Itbayat Church 2019 earthquake.jpg from Batanes LGU
For references:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Murad and Galvez MILF-AFP token of appreciation.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adopted Son of Shakba Ko Lawaisig.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Itbayat Church 2019 earthquake.jpg
Nevertheless, majority of Filipino Wikipedians has repeatedly (yes, repeatedly) said and said that all Philippine government works (including photographs), from national government to attached agencies to local governments, fall under PD as works by the Philippine government, as evidenced in the following insights:
For the status of LGU-owned photographic works:
- "First off, local governments have no independent legal personality -- the Philippines, after all, is a unitary state. In the previous discussion way back when, it was confirmed by Anyo Niminus, a government lawyer, that local governments are considered part of the "Government of the Philippines", and all their works are considered part of that body. As such, they are also covered under PD per the provisions of the Intellectual Property Code." — It is true, as a unitary state, works made by provincial and even municipal are bound to the copyright law of the Philippines, stating that government works are automatically PD.
For the status of PNA photos:
- From @Seav: at Commons:Deletion requests/File:RJ Nieto during a Philippine Senate hearing on the Proliferation of Fake and or Misleading News and False Information.jpg (which honestly should have been long closed as it is evident from the insights and perspectives of Filipino Wikipedians regarding PD status of government works).
- "The "otherwise noted" is not actually in the text of the law: https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1997/06/06/republic-act-no-8293/. This "otherwise noted" is mainly for content whose copyright is owned by third parties and has been transferred to the government, but this sourcing should be explicitly indicated." — To interpret this, it may include citizens' report videos shared to PTV (similar to ABS-CBN New's Bayan Mo Ipatrol Mo and GMA News' YouScooper) or shared photos from private citizens to PNA or the like. To my understanding there's no indication that the two PNA photos are sourced from third-parties. In some cases PTV might also host copyrighted material from ABS-CBN, GMA and the like. (to interpret the statement of @Psiĥedelisto: from the template talk page).
With regards to the "...prior approval of the government agency or office...for exploitation of such work for profit. Such agency or office ... impose as a condition the payment of royalties...," Sky Harbor once said (also on template talk page): "Next, I continue to maintain the position that the provision on non-commercial use is unenforceable: there is no copyright on works of the government of the Philippines, so such permission can only exist outside of copyright. Yes, I think Marcos was generalizing when that provision was inserted in PD 49 when it was passed, and it frankly shouldn't have been inserted, as was the case in the law that it had preceded."
Again to repeat Seav's statement at w:Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Archive44#Copyright status of PTV4 content?: "As long as the content is clearly the work of PTV (e.g., no news reports showing viral citizen journalism videos), I think the video/media is kosher for Commons as a work of the government." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:16, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support undeletion for the work by the local government. However,
Neutral/
not so sure for the works of the PNA. The files were not deleted due to the so-called loophole mentioned above, but were deleted as a result of the PNA's terms of use and the PNA's assertion of copyright. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:47, 14 August 2020 (UTC) - Support undeletion of both. The PNA has no right to assert copyright, as JWilz12345 correctly surmises. The "unless otherwise noted" is entirely an invention of the executive branch and is null and void. Let the rule of law prevail, they have no right to modify the law, only the Philippine Congress can. The broader public has a right to freely use all works of the PNA, and Commons ought to recognize that. Psiĥedelisto (talk) 22:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Added comment by the requester: It has been accepted that PNA photos fall under PD-gov in the Philippines. Examples include these three photos from PNA that were uploaded way back 2018: File:Marawi chopper airstrike.jpg, File:Senate hearing Philippine Citizenship Aug 2018.jpg, and File:Philippine International Ice Hockey Tournament 2017 opening.jpg. Also to add is this vital photo being used in article covering the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines - File:Philippine Airlines grounded planes COVID19.jpg JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: Images from PNA and LGUs are in PD. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I "Sandy Tejada" am the OWNER of this image that was uploaded sandytejada.jpeg. This image can be published and I can only give consent to use this image of mine because I OWN ALL THE RIGHTS TO THIS IMAGE. I don't understand why the person who deleted my photo without knowing facts automatically deleted my image or falsely accuse me of using an image that doesn't belong to me? THIS IS MY IMAGE and I'm the sole owner of it. If you can please kindly undelete my file I would greatly appreciate it thank you!
--Svtejada (talk) 09:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC) August.15.2020
- Hello @Svtejada: , I speak while only seeing the name of the file, not its contents, but the name suggests that it is actually a photograph of you. That is because you say that you are Sandy Tejada and the file is named "SandyTejada.jpeg". The copyright law protects the rights of the author of any work, if I take a photograph of you, then I am an author and you are the subject. If I draw you then I am the author and you are the subject. In both cases I have the copyright. In fact even if you buy a painting or yourself or a photograph of you, the copyright is still with the person who has created the work. The exception to that is if we are talking about a selfie. Is the file in question a selfie? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment to @Svtejada: generally, but usually, copyright laws around the world follow U.S. jurisprudence. Pls see https://www.technologylawsource.com/2015/04/articles/intellectual-property-1/who-owns-the-photo/ To quote the very critical passage regarding this: "Under U.S. law, copyright in a photograph is the property of the person who presses the shutter on the camera — not the person who owns the camera, and not even the person in the photo. Unless a written agreement exists that makes the photo a work made for hire, any person you ask to take your picture with your camera owns the copyright in that photo — not you." This means that you may own "your photo," but you don't own the copyright of your photo, unless you can prove the transfer of copyright through a written agreement, or if this is a photo for hire. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose (1) The uploader declares themselves to be the author of the image. If they are also the subject, then this is violation of the photographer's moral rights as the image is not a selfie. (2) The image was published elsewhere prior to be uploaded to Commons, so the policy requires free license evidence to be provided. Pure uploader's declaration who as we know provided some incorrect information about authorship cannot be relied on in such cases. We have COM:OTRS procedure. Ankry (talk) 18:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
It's MY ORIGINAL FILE DONT DELETE IT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayurii Singh (talk • contribs) 01:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Oppose Per COM:SCOPE. Book cover of a self-published book by an author who apparently is not associated with any reputable publisher. Mayuri Singh does not seem to be established or have received any professional reviews in the trade press. This looks like Amazon's Kindle Direct Publishing. Thuresson (talk) 12:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
It's my User page file --J. Ansari Talk 16:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- @J ansari: It was deleted on your request. Did you change your mind? Ankry (talk) 18:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: Yes. I want it for use --J. Ansari Talk 05:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: Per user request, in scope as a Wikimedia event. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
لطفا قبل از حذف یا علامت گذاری آن به دلیلی که بخاطر آن دارید فایل رو حذف میکنید دقت کنید. اگر به لینکی که اون رو دلیل قرار دادید برید. در ابتدای صفحه نوشته شده که عکس ها دارای حق کپی رایت نمیباشد. این کار ادمین های ویکی پدیا که با بی دقتی انجام میشه، بیشتر شبیه به اذیته تا سختگیری کلا هر چیزی رو میبینید یا مشکوک به کپی رایته یا اثبات پذیر نیست. ادمینای عزیز ایرانی خودتون خوب میدونید اکثر محتوای تولید شده در ایران دارای حق کپی رایت نیستند. یا حق — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graphartmey (talk • contribs) 2020-08-16 17:00:58 (UTC)
- As I understand it the claim is that no photograph from Iran is under copyright. I am not an expert on Iran, but it sounds false, and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iran seems to agree with me. You are probably referring to the fact that Iran is not a member signatory to Berne convention. However, if the photogaph has not been published in Iran or if it was published outside of Iran within 30 days, then it is still copyrighted. So if you would need to show evidence that 1) It was published in Iran, 2) It was only published in Iran... and that would only get you to be able to use it as a public domain work. I am unsure if Commons allows such a public domain claim, since we usually respect local copyright laws even when only US laws would apply. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - 1) Merely saying "free to use" is not adequate (for example, per COM:L: "simply writing that 'the material may be used freely by anyone' or similar isn't sufficient"); 2) even it is were, this is license laundering. Per the watermark, the photographer is Hooman Faraji. We would not accept a statement by the subject (i.e., from www.djphellix.com related to a photo of djphellix) without evidence of permission or transfer from the photographer. This is especially the case when more complete versions of the image appear elsewhere, including on the record label's website (!!!), with an assertion of copyright; and 3) accusation of carelessness and harassment is a ridiculous failure of COM:AGF, to say nothing of tone-deaf irony per the foregoing. Эlcobbola talk 17:51, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Wikimedia Commons image: File:Adobe Sayspring Founder Mark Christopher Webster Presents At Entrepreneurs Roundtable Accelerator Demo Day in April 2017.png
I am the founder and CEO of Sayspring. This image was taken as a work-made-for-hire (aka "work made for hire" or "work for hire") by one of my Sayspring employees that I hired and I employed and whose assigned duties at Sayspring included taking still and moving images and audio at events that Sayspring participated in. I own this image. I have always owned this image.
I do not need a transfer agreement from my photographer employee, written or otherwise, to convey any or all copyrights to me. The image is a work-made-for-hire, and therefore was always the property of the employer (me).
For many years I have used this image as a thumbnail on my Sayspring YouTube channel.
Here is the thumbnail I stored on YouTube:
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gmBii8B21AM/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEZCPYBEIoBSFXyq4qpAwsIARUAAIhCGAFwAQ==&rs=AOn4CLDM4yMeJaSF4O5efVVrchGLAKHp2w
Here is the image being used as a my thumbnail in YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUze1CjLFDDwiQxRw1Yi0AA
On 21 April 2020, I uploaded this image into Wikimedia Commmons.
On 21 April 2020, I emailed the required template to release my copyright on this image. My email read:
from: Mark Webster (Redacted)
reply-to: Mark Webster (Redacted)
to: permissions-commons permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
date: Apr 21, 2020, 1:49 PM
subject: Image Permission
Hello Wikimedia,
I hereby affirm that I, Mark Christopher Webster, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following media work:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adobe_Sayspring_Founder_Mark_Christopher_Webster_Presents_At_Entrepreneurs_Roundtable_Accelerator_Demo_Day_in_April_2017.png
I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.
I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.
I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
Thank you,
Mark Christopher Webster
Founder and CEO of Sayspring, Inc.
April 21, 2020
The domain name sayspring.com is no longer used, except as a redirect to its acquirer. Thus I no longer send email from a sayspring.com SMTP address. The correct email address for me to send a copyright release from is from my personal email (Redacted).
I should not send this copyright release email from my current employer. My current employer does not own the image, nor its copyrights. They never did. I own the image and all its copyrights. The correct email address for me to send a copyright release from is from my personal email (Redacted).
On 30 July 2020, Wikipedia administrator JuTa (in good faith) deleted this image from Wikipedia Commons.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?page=File%3AAdobe_Sayspring_Founder_Mark_Christopher_Webster_Presents_At_Entrepreneurs_Roundtable_Accelerator_Demo_Day_in_April_2017.png&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype=
21:52, 30 July 2020 JuTa talk contribs deleted page File:Adobe Sayspring Founder Mark Christopher Webster Presents At Entrepreneurs Roundtable Accelerator Demo Day in April 2017.png (No OTRS permission for 30 days) (thank) (global usage; delinker log)
Please permanently undelete my Wikimedia Commons image.
Thank you kindly.
MarkChristopherWebster (talk) 22:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Done I have accepted Ticket:2020042110010092 based on your statement above. Note that we sent you an email on April 21 requesting more information but didn't receive a response. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:00, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
.jpg){kind=link}
A cropped version of File:Itbayat Church 2019 earthquake.jpg. File was deleted on the same manner as that of its mother file, but nevertheless it has been agreed that derivative works from LGU photos do not cause problems, as LGU works also fall under PD as Philippine government works. To quote from Sky Harbor's insight on the Template talk:PD-PhilippinesGov: "First off, local governments have no independent legal personality -- the Philippines, after all, is a unitary state. In the previous discussion way back when, it was confirmed by Anyo Niminus, a government lawyer, that local governments are considered part of the "Government of the Philippines", and all their works are considered part of that body. As such, they are also covered under PD per the provisions of the Intellectual Property Code." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:06, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello,
I am a representative of LimundoGrad doo, a company which is the owner of Limundo.com. We want to add our logo to Wikimedia and Wikipedia Limundo page and we are giving an approval to upload logo of our website, Limundo.com, on Wikimedia and Wikipedia Limundo page. Thank you.
Milan Nićetin, CMO LimundoGrad doo Vladmira Popovića 6, Novi Beograd, Serbia m.nicetin@limundograd.com
- @Mnicetin: The file has not been deleted, but you do want to follow COM:OTRS. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close. File has not been deleted, file was not under consideration for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File was deleted because, according to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nueva Ecija provincial capitol.jpg, works of the Philippine government are "unfree." This notion has been rejected as per relevant discussions on Template talk:PD-PhilippinesGov and on Tambayan Pilipinas. Works of the government automatically fall under PD. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: per {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files deleted by Regasterios
Please restore the following pages:
- File:AdityaMaanEarlyLIfe.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:5b460622d238f 1920.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Amarachi Okafor.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Abhi-logo (1).png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Alugha Logo 800px.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Arthur Philippe.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Astaanta DDS.pnj.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Beirut explosion - Moment blast hit BBC bureau - BBC News.webm (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BluebirdBroadcastCoverArt.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Benjamin boi.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:BluebirdTheatreCo Logo.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Bwi Logo neutral 1c 1.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Carriage-3.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CooperBarnes.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:CT-Scan eines Fahrrads mit Carbonbauteilen visualisiert in Vgstudio max Volume Graphics 4fps (2).gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Curro y los Bandoleros 1989.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Dali Deception Cover 2020.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Dejzi - Logo Personale e Stilistes.svg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Diamond Rainwear Pvt Ltd.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Dizasterpiece.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Diário de Pernambuco trazendo na capa um dos títulos do Tramways.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Dr. Elliston Rahming, Ph.D.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Equipe de Remo do Náutico no início do século XX.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:ERoBMd5WkAAwCZD-1024x767.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Exhibition View at Ascaso Gallery.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Factsheet1.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fadil Istrefi - Monografi " Shala e Bajgorës ".jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Fortminorms.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Frisco Bowl Logo.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Gabriel Martins diretor e produtor.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Geks Mx.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Gilava156.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Gwen Stefani Grammy Awards 2020.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Harta e Gjilanit.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Henning Fritz bei Handball EM 2006 in Basel.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Henning Fritz.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Het Torenven 2003 - Afbeelding Heemkring De Poemp.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Hof van Geetruyen - Afbeelding Lier Vroeger.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Intoodepptoosleep.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Itil framework powerpoint presentation slides Slide01.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Itil framework powerpoint presentation slides Slide03.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Itinerario Firenze La Verna.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:John h francis polytechnic high logo.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Josef Heinermann .jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:JTZeberio.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Judaslaw.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:KDB Puni (L-32).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Logo dell'Associazione I cammini di Francesco in Casentino.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Les Lois Cosmiques et l'Evolution Consciente.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Malik Ilhan.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:MarkColeman.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Mr & Mme Zeberio.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Project MANAS.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Queen Hangbe.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Ramnadir .jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Riele Downs.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Rkc.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Samantha jade logan.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Selmenchaouch.pd.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Shala e Bajgorës.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Shahabadi-about.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Trolley-treats-main.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:UsamnBuzdar.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Velekinca - panoramio.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Wudhu.gif (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Владимир Картамышев - съемка.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Владимир Картамышев.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Владимир Свердлов-Ашкенази.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Водопьянов Андрей Валентинович.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Картамышев Владимир.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Палаточный лагерь на Черемзе.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:אהוד שילו מארח את דר מוסטפא חליל ראש ממשלת מצרים בביח שיבא שנבנה עי סולל - בונה .1981.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:הקמת מפעל למדי מים מתקדמים של ארד ביוהן סין 1988.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:הקתדרלה בחוף השנהב במלא הדרה נובמבר 1985.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:חנוכת מחלף על האילון בתל - אביב במעמד ראש העיר שלמה להט וסגנו שיפמן 1988.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:חנוכת תחנת אוטובוסים מרכזית בדימונה 1976.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:יהונתן פרלמן .jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:מנכל משרד התחבורה. עם ראש הממשלה רבין ושר התחבורה יעקובי בנמל חיפה . 1966.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:מפגש עם דר יוסוף וואלי סגן ראש הממשלה ויור מפלגת השלטו במצרים בעניני פרויקטים של פיתוח.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:מפגש עם סלח נבהן נציג אל -על בקהיר בעקבות חתימת הסכם התעופה 1980.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:משנה למזכיר חברת העובדים ומנהל המחלקה הכלכלית.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:משנה למזכל ומנהל המחלקה הכלכלית חברת העובדים.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:עם נשיא המדינה ומזכיר ההסתדרות בתערוכת היובל למדינה 1973.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:תמונת פתיחה לערך בויקיפדיה.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Robert Maxwell.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- Category:Media missing permission as of 6 August 2020
- File:1980 עם האלוף מיל שלמה אראל יור איגוד חברות הספנות.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:2019 09 06 21 33 Office Lens.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:2019 09 06 21 53 Office Lens.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:2019 09 06 21 31 Office Lens.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:2019 09 06 21 55 Office Lens.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:2019 09 06 21 56 Office Lens.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:99 Hudson Street Jersey City.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Adam Edward Szczepanowski 2019.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Adam Edward Szczepanowski.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Algo discreto.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Amaia2018.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Arno zelf.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:AS photo 2017.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit){kind=link}
.png&diff=0){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
.png&action=watch){kind=link}
.png&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=purge){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.png&action=delete){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit){kind=link}
.gif&diff=0){kind=link}
.gif&action=history){kind=link}
.gif&action=watch){kind=link}
.gif&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif&action=purge){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.gif&action=delete){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Reason: To Whom It May Concern,
"No permission" is inaccurate. Multiple emails were submitted per wiki instructions.
Copyright Owner of image, Lawrence Turner submitted the following email and then was told he needed to resubmit it. He did as instructed from the email address - (Redacted) - and has been waiting for a reply since. Please see the attached email that was originally sent 07/05/2020 and then again 07/06/2020, 07/07/2020:
To Whom It May Concern ( permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ),
I hereby affirm that I, Lawrence Turner, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of Charles Talbert - Tan Coat : 106995181_281690743042377_41929680693484609_n.jpg which has been used on imdb.com and facebook.com, and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under "Creative Commons 0 Public Domain Dedication 1.0 (CC0)."
I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.
I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
Lawrence Turner
"Copyright holder"
Date: 07/05/2020
Email: (Redacted) KosherKathy (talk) 21:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- @KosherKathy: No permission seems to be verified and accepted up till now by OTRS agents (at least I see no mention about them in few images I have checked). Also, no permission link seems to be provided by you while uploading. For OTRS permissions we need to wait until they are verified on per file basis.
- The permission email that you are quoting above is ticket:2020071110004719, it has been responded a minute after it was received and the question asked then remain unresponded till now. The sender did not specify precisely which image the permission is about (note: the filename "Charles Talbert - Tan Coat : 106995181_281690743042377_41929680693484609_n.jpg" is not listed above). Ankry (talk) 22:40, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- And why do you wish to restore the empty Category:Media missing permission as of 6 August 2020 ? Ankry (talk) 22:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done A list of deleted files and a deleted category with nothing in common except deleted by the same administrator. This will never lead anywhere. Thuresson (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Neovaii is an electronic musician hailing from the USA. Finding his passion for music at a very young age, Neovaii has previously worked in genres spanning from Alternative Rock to Pop, until finding his calling in Electronic music. From there, his work with various electronic groups, ranging from Dubstep to Trap, has been featured on Billboard Heatseekers charts, Next Big Sound charts, and others.
Milestones:
• Over 50 million total streams on Spotify • Over 80 million total streams on YouTube • Over 70,000 subscribers on YouTube • Over 450,000 monthly listeners on Spotify • Over 40,000 followers on Spotify
— Preceding unsigned comment added by OfficialNeovaii (talk • contribs) 19:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- @OfficialNeovaii: Which page in Wikimedia services this image is intended to be used on? Ankry (talk) 23:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: no response to query. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Mamolidophoto2.jpg
Hello Dear wiki commons team ,
Please keep this file on the site cause it's not just a Personal photo , This is a Picture of Famous Persian Developer and cause there is no much or community for Persian contributors of information technology so just me uploaded it .
Thank you for keeping this file on your media ,
Best Regards Mamolido Manager
--Mhmdalimsi (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Mhmdali msi August 17 , 2020
Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted as of 20:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC). @Mhmdalimsi: Please see COM:DR on how to convert speedy deletion tag to a regular discussion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The image is my own personal work taken by own camera and have the full frame uncropped .and give it free license so why deletion?
- Comment @Raafat: File not yet deleted. The correct avenue to contest speedy deletion is by contacting فيصل who added the speedy deletion template.JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
I have removed the copyvio tag as it is clearly own work based on metadata and timestamp. For general discussion, I've opened a thread at Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Disallow copyvio speedy tagging for old images. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
There is a creative common license and free to use license in his website link. So I feel it must not be deleted on copyright issue. Thanks Jehowahyereh (talk) 09:29, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Jehowahyereh: Which Creative Commons license? I cannot find a link and not every CC license is compatible with Wikimedia Commons licensing requirements.
- We need an evidence that the license has been granted by the actual copyright holder who is presumably the photographer. This site seems to be operated by the subject, not by the photographer, so we need also an evidence of copyright transfer. Ankry (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Per Ankry. Without a link to a specific Creative Commons licence, we cannot assume that this image can be used freely for any purpose. --De728631 (talk) 17:29, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Dear Wiki Commons,
the photo rights of the file in regard are owned by me, Wolfgang Ritch. I am trying to upload it for my personal Wikipedia entry. I allow the photo to be freely used and shared and want to ask you therefore to undelete the photo.
Thank you and best regards, Wolfgang Ritsch --Marusart (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Marusart: Are you the photographer who made this photo as you claimed at upload? Providing incorrect information is against Commons policies and if you do so, AGF cannot be aplied to your claims. We need an evidence then.
- Moreover, for any photo that has been published elsewhere priore to its upload to Commons we need a written free license permission from the actual copyright holder: either in the initial publication or following COM:OTRS instructions. If the copyright owner is not the author, we also need an evidence of copyright transfer. Ankry (talk) 15:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per lack of explanation. Ankry (talk) 18:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello,
I request above file to be restored on the wiki page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ksar_Maghnia because the file is an extract from Google maps and the source of the file has been clearly mentionned as per copyright policy.
best regrads — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asso.maghnia (talk • contribs) 2020-08-17 12:59:57 (UTC)
- @Asso.maghnia: It is actually an interesting legal question whether it is ok to use correct Google maps on other sites. Current community concesus on this site is that these maps are copyrighted. My opinion is that only intentional errors are (and Google has been known to add them to find which sites use their maps without permission). However, even if the community were to accept my position, you would need to prove that the map is exactly correct, and by that time you would do sufficient work to actually have a map that you can actually use without the need of Google maps. Therefore, the file is unlikely to be restored. You can consider using freely licenced maps, for example Open Street Maps for your image, then everything will be ok. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Asso.maghnia: Are you a Google owner that copyright to this Google map belongs personally to you as you declared? Ankry (talk) 18:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Please do not make up a license for a Google product, when these are easily accessible here. In French Wikipedia you can use fr:Modèle:Carte avec géolocalisation to do what you want to do to have a map like this one. Thuresson (talk) 20:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The image is not copyrighted and with the permission it is been used. Its my own work so cancel deletion. --Nmudesk (talk) 16:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Procedural close. The image has not been deleted, please discuss at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nmudesk. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Three deleted files by User:Ryomaandres
Gud pm (from here in the w:Philippines). I am requesting the undeletion of the following photos by @Ryomaandres:
- File:UP historical marker.jpg
- File:KalyeMendiola HistoricalMarker Manila.jpg
- File:Quezon memorial marker.jpg
Files above were deleted because "no FOP in the PHL" — Commons:Deletion requests/File:UP historical marker.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chino Roces Freedom Bridge (Mendiola, Manila) (one affected file only), and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial (one affected file only). However, historical markers - those under NHCP or its predecessor/s, fall under PD-PHL gov't as works done by the agency attached to the Philippine government (per Seav at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Paco Park - Gomburza Memorare NHCP historical marker.jpg, using w:Historical markers of the Philippines as the evidence). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
- Existing pictures of two of the said markers here at Commons:
- Those under Category:Plaques at University of the Philippines Diliman - UP marker
- File:Mendiola Street historical marker.jpg - Mendiola Street historical marker JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- For QMC proof: File:09636jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Museumfvf 07.JPG. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: Works of the former NHI (now NHC of the Philippines) are {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files uploaded by מגזין יהלום
- File:לוגו של מגזין יהלום.png
- File:לוגו שלי.pdf
- File:Product (7).pdf
- File:תעודת הערכה.pdf
- File:מכתב להארי פוטר.png
- File:להארי פוטר 73.pdf
The files are my creation. מגזין יהלום (talk) 17:53, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose @מגזין יהלום: The watermarks on some of the files do not support your claims of {{Own}}. Furthermore, none of them seem to be in scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:33, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Why not?, My pictures, and I created them. מגזין יהלום (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Because (1) the images were previously published else per the watermark, and because (2) they were watermarked. Also, as I've stated, none of them seem to be in scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- My pictures and I will prove it. מגזין יהלום (talk) 10:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Other than that, you must explain how these files will be useful to Wikipedia or some other Wikimedia project. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- The watermark issue must be clarified (Nat can you specify which file contain watermark), but regarding to scope issue. It was not taken in the deletion consideration. For example: this file is a personal logo wich was in use in several pages. The second file is also anoter version of a personal logo. File:תעודת הערכה.pdf is appreciation page for helping also was in use, etc. -- Geagea (talk) 23:15, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Geagea: File:לוגו של מגזין יהלום.png and File:לוגו שלי.pdf have watermarks. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- OK. Do not restore them. But the rest yes. Thank you מגזין יהלום (talk) 14:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Left. I'll just upload it to Wikipedia. מגזין יהלום (talk) 20:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- מגזין יהלום, he.wiki have just the same copright standarts. If the files does not qualify to be her, they are not qualify to stay in he.wiki. -- Geagea (talk) 21:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Geagea: I need the pictures In wikipedia For Harry Potter 73. מגזין יהלום (talk) 08:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- You mean to appreciation page for user הארי פוטר 73. The problem is that also the File:להארי פוטר 73.pdf contain banner says it was created by ... (נוצר באמצעות ....). This is copyright violation.-- Geagea (talk) 08:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Geagea: I need the pictures In wikipedia For Harry Potter 73. מגזין יהלום (talk) 08:39, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- מגזין יהלום, he.wiki have just the same copright standarts. If the files does not qualify to be her, they are not qualify to stay in he.wiki. -- Geagea (talk) 21:53, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Left. I'll just upload it to Wikipedia. מגזין יהלום (talk) 20:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. -- Geagea (talk) 08:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I am an author of the file, which was marked as a copyright violation. Please explain the reasons of deletion.
- Apparently this image was found elsewhere online and your authorship could not be verified. Pinging Masur who deleted the file. De728631 (talk) 17:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- I cannot find this image on the web, so Weak support unless an evidence of earlier publication is provided. However, thia is a professional photo and so COM:OTRS permission is suggested. Ankry (talk) 17:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: OTRS serves absolutely no purpose unless: 1) there is an external image which is linked to an email address; or 2) there are private discussions that need to be had. Otherwise, it's just an anonymous person filling out an email form, no better than an anonymous person filling out the upload wizard. Let's give Masur an opportunity to respond if they have indeed found the file elsewhere on the web. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Just want to let you know, that I have chosen a file, which was not published before on the web. There are similar ones available (of which I am also an author), but not this one. I am also in possession of all evidence of my copyright ownership - agreement, invoice, bank transfer confirmations etc, which I can provide to Masur, or someone else, if necessary --FxUP (talk) 08:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done This is correct. I mistook similar files (the same photo session or something) for this one here. @FxUP: my apologies. The file was restored. Masur (talk) 13:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you @Masur --FxUP (talk) 14:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Just want to let you know, that I have chosen a file, which was not published before on the web. There are similar ones available (of which I am also an author), but not this one. I am also in possession of all evidence of my copyright ownership - agreement, invoice, bank transfer confirmations etc, which I can provide to Masur, or someone else, if necessary --FxUP (talk) 08:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: OTRS serves absolutely no purpose unless: 1) there is an external image which is linked to an email address; or 2) there are private discussions that need to be had. Otherwise, it's just an anonymous person filling out an email form, no better than an anonymous person filling out the upload wizard. Let's give Masur an opportunity to respond if they have indeed found the file elsewhere on the web. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Done by the deleting admin. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File was deleted because of no-FOP in UAE (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Dubai). But this rans contrary to an earlier decision at Commons:Deletion requests/File:South Ridge on 22 June 2007.jpg, in which the photo is treated as "safe" because it complies COM:DM (as a skyline pic, according to the admin who closed the earlier discussion). There was no thorough discussion at the newer deletion discussion. I think the mass deletion was done arbitrary. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: pinging the deleting admin for opinion. Ankry (talk) 17:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I deleted it because I'm not able to see a skyline (the rationale used to keep it in the first nomination). IMO this image is obviously focused on buildings therefore on architecture. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Question Are these part of one housing development? Then I would be inclined to oppose the request as it would be considered a single work. Five individual, unrelated buildings for me is good enough for DM, however. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Per Christian Ferrer. The image is not of a skyline but an image of a 6 tower project development, of which 5 of the 6 towers are visible. It does not comply with COM:DM. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
With the permission of the person in the picture it is been used and image is not copyrighted by anyone. --Nmudesk (talk) 17:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nmudesk: This contradicts your earlier claim that the photo is copyrighted by you as the photographer. Why do you think that there is no copyright? A permisiion of the subject is irrelevant to copyright. Ankry (talk) 17:12, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Image appeared here before your upload, which itself seems to have taken it from the subject's Instagram. Notwithstanding that previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission, you claimed yourself to be the author of the image, yet your phrasing of "with the permission of the person in the picture" and "is not copyrighted by anyone" (as opposed, for example, to "I have released my copyright") imply you now claim it to be someone else's work (i.e., your claim of self-authorship was untrue). Indeed, all of your uploads appear stolen from various news and social media. Эlcobbola talk 17:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:07, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
With the permissions from the person in the image this has been used here and also in the article published on stardesk.in. --Nmudesk (talk) 17:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC) (Editor - stardesk.in)
- Oppose Copyright is usually not held by the person depicted in a photograph, but by the original photographer. If an image has been published before without a free license, we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 17:13, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - Image appeared here before your upload. Notwithstanding that previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission, you claimed yourself to be the author of the image, yet your phrasing of "with the permissions from the person in the image" (which, per De728631 above, would not even be adequate) implies you now claim it to be someone else's work (i.e., your claim of self-authorship was untrue). Indeed, all of your uploads appear stolen from various news and social media. Эlcobbola talk 17:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:07, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I would like to undelete the picxture of Roman Mysliwiec.
The picture was taken by the camer of the original picture which is in my possesion, Roman Mysliwiec was my Grandfather and this is the picture from the family album, The copyright is i possesion of My family. --MysliwiecMaciek (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @MysliwiecMaciek: Making a photo of a photo or ownership of a photo print does not grant you any copyright. Copyright to the original photo applies, which likely belongs to the original photographer or their heirs. However, the photo may be {{PD-Poland}} if published pbefore March 1989 (evidence needed) or {{PD-PolishGov}} if used in an official document (evidence needed). Ankry (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: no response, no evidence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I would like to ask for undelete picture File:Stefan Michalik.jpg
The photograph has ben taken in the begining of the 1930's in Bielsko Biała. I have the only copy and it's in my possesion as I am a Grandson of Stefan Michalik. Its a picture in our family album and we have all the rights to this photograph. --MysliwiecMaciek (talk) 19:38, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- See above. Ankry (talk) 05:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: no response, no evidence. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:00, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File was deleted because "no FOP in the Philippines." (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Up main -- quezon hall.jpg). Nevertheless, through the updated Commons:FOP Philippines, this premier building of the nation's leading university is now Ok at Commons. Quezon Hall was completed in 1950. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: per updated COM:FOP Philippines. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File was deleted because "no FOP" (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Plaza Dilao, Manila). However, historical markers in the Philippines are commissioned by NHCP (or their predecessors), and it is accepted in our country that commemorative markers and plaques are government works, hence falling under {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Also to add: File:Mlqmark2jf.JPG (a probable plaque as per my interpretation of this DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mlqmark2jf.JPG). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Done per above. Ankry (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:V- Simon, Victor, Gaby.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: per OTRS 2020061810004619 kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 14:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Done@Kvardek du: FYI. Ankry (talk) 14:56, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
.jpg){kind=link}
The image has been deleted, although the permission was accepted by permissions-de@wikimedia.org in December 2019. The permission was part of a whole set of 30 images. The final approval mail was sent to me on 30.12.2019. I do not understand why this specific image suddenly should not have permission. DomenikaBo (talk) 17:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Pinging @Reinhard Kraasch --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging @Krd for information. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:23, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info This is about ticket:2019122610005184 which is not in the permission queue, so limited number of OTRS users can say anything about its status. Ankry (talk) 17:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Nothing we can do here. Discussion moved to COM:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Paul Klee Puppe Ohne Titel (Frau Tod).jpg @DomenikaBo, Reinhard Kraasch, Krd, and Ankry: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Per COM:FOP Philippines. According to en:White Cross Orphanage, the building was inaugurated on September 10, 1938 which was prior to the 1972 decree that copyrighted architectural works. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:08, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Per updated COM:FOP Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Info the deleted files are:
- File:White Cross Orphanage 1.JPG
- File:White Cross Orphanage 11.JPG
- File:White Cross Orphanage 5.JPG
- File:White Cross Orphanage 6.JPG
- File:White Cross Orphanage 8.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:Blason Lavernay.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: Per OTRS 2020070110007833 kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:34, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done @Kvardek du: Temporarily undeleted. One of the ugliest coat-of-arms I have seen here. Thuresson (talk) 22:15, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment irrelevant to undeletion @Thuresson: Super-moche. But it does appear to be the one used by the local commune authorities--at least on their website. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:V Pochette Album Là où les maux nous laissent.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:V Pochette Album Made In Silence.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:V Pochette Album 42.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: per OTRS 2020061910004082 kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: per OTRS request. @Kvardek du: FYI --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:59, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:Michel Coeuriot.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: per OTRS 2020061610002482 kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 13:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: @Kvardek du: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:36, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The image was licensed to flickr under the public domain license. I can re-license the image if it was potentially not licensed properly or the link was broken etc. --Cement4802 (talk) 02:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose We now accept PDM for Flickr images that are clearly the own work of the uploader (the discussion is not closed yet but the writing is on the wall). However, after reviewing the Flickr user's photostream they have many uploads which are not their own work, and no good way to distinguish what is actually their own work, so I do not have enough confidence to conclude that this is in fact their own work. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Also, it was a flickrwashed image: from the Daily Telegraph. Kind of a moot point though since Cement4802 re-uploaded the image as File:SYDNEY POLICEWOMAN.jpg. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well, while both seem flickrwashing, they are similar, but apparently not the same. Ankry (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. I thought it was the same image, so I thought it was weird that the user is requesting an undelete while uploading the same image. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:21, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Understood. Didn't realise the image wasn't even properly licensed on flickr. I reuploaded the image under the original name posted on flickr because i got a bit impatient with the whole process, it just appeared so obvious that it could be used on wikimedia given its public domain license on flickr (which now appears to be false) - Cement4802 (talk) 10:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying. I thought it was the same image, so I thought it was weird that the user is requesting an undelete while uploading the same image. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:21, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Well, while both seem flickrwashing, they are similar, but apparently not the same. Ankry (talk) 17:42, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done flickrwashing. Ankry (talk) 10:45, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Reza,jpg
Hi Dear, The photo I've upload to wikipedia page is already taken by photographer and I know it is unique. Please help me to undelete the image Thanks for your help Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rabdolahnam (talk • contribs) 17:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- File:Reza.jpg is not deleted. Ankry (talk) 18:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Rabdolahnam: If you mean File:Reza Abdolahnam.jpg, please explain why it is in COM:SCOPE? (eg. which page in Wikimedia is it intended to used on) Ankry (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC) Ankry (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 10:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Sorry, I don't understand why this file is being deleted. Could someone please explain̠? Thank you. Neuralia (talk) 06:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info @Neuralia: It was deleted the first time per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sdaluz, and the second time, because it was an out-of-process recreation. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done no valid reason for undeletion. Ankry (talk) 23:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
About the definition of copyright. Request to restore a file
- File:Ким Гван Сук.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:L6yEh73aWI4.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Kim Kwan Suk.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Солистка Почхонбо.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Обложка ансамбля Почхонбо.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:За работой Пхеньян.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:L6yEh73aWI4.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:F7fKeVUIBxA.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:2moe4uU5VcY.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:T8UMJG6nU8E.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:G213WEYCemI.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Ux3ahMOK Vg.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:2moe4uU5VcY.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:T8UMJG6nU8E.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:F7fKeVUIBxA.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Good Day, most likely this is a false operation of Your1 system, because there is one "BUT". This photo is from North Korea, and they also have laws aimed at protecting copyright, but the North Koreans have never banned or asked for their material to be removed.So this is a mistake. Either the person who asked You to delete it is deceiving You about the rights to this photo, because all media in North Korea is the property of the Korean people --Danil236 (talk) 08:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Under the Copyright Law of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (as amended by Decree No. 1532 of February 1, 2006), The property right to a copyrighted work shall be protected from the moment of its publication to the 50th year after the death of its author. The property right to a joint copyrighted work shall be protected from the moment of its publication to the 50th year after the death of the last survivor of the co-authors.[1532/2006 Article 23] --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Not done These are TV screenshots, album covers or news photos. There is no rule that only Commons administrators from North Korea can delete North Korean content. Thuresson (talk) 10:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Luxury cloth cushion cover 4. jpg, File:Pluri arc bis.jpg, File:Piano à pouce bis.jpg, File: File:Pluriarc1.jpg, File:Sifflets.jpg, File:Flûtes.jpg
Hello,
I found these images in Google Images, YouTube and Pinterest and I decided to put websites which originally posted them in source. If Pinterest and YouTube accept them Why not Wiki commons?
Thank you in advance!
Also:
- File:Tambour à fente2.jpg
- Tambour à fente3.jpg
- File:Tambour à fente1.jpg
- File:Luxury cloth cushion cover 1.jpg
- File:Luxury cloth cushion cover 4.jpg
- File:Luxury cloth cushion cover 5.jpg
- File:Luxury cloth 6.jpg
- File:Luxury cloth cushion cover.jpg
- File:Luxury cloth cushion cover 3.jpg
- File:Luxury cloth cushion cover 2.jpg
- File:Luxury cloth 7.jpg
Hello, I found these images on Google Images, YouTube, music.africamuseum.be and Pinterest and I decided to put websites which originally posted them in source. If Pinterest, YouTube and other websites accept them Why not Wiki commons? Thank you in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juuuuuuust08 (talk • contribs)
- Because you are lying about license. We do not accept this. Ankry (talk) 19:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done user blocked; they got a response already. Ankry (talk) 19:03, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hot Breast implants.jpg has no valid reason for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - 1) This is almost certainly a copyvio, as the user's m.o. is to crop a certain woman's face onto existing images (e.g., File:Hot bra.jpg to this) and 2) notwithstanding that the uploader (a vandalism only account) nominated the image for deletion themselves, how is this terrible quality, poorly photoshopped, image of a non-notable person in COM:SCOPE? Эlcobbola talk 21:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Uploader's request of a newly uuploaded image is definitely a valid reason. Even for speedy. It is not their fault that the DR processing was delayed. Ankry (talk) 23:41, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done, withdrawn, but a link to or email of the source (or the result, if the source is not available) would be nice. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The item should have had a {{PD-Art}} licence. It's a photo of a monumental brass, a 2-D flat item, exactly like an oil painting (the oil of which can be as thick as an engraved line can be deep), which is free from copyright after 100 years from the death of the creator of the art work. The file should not therefore have been deleted. "Photographs, taken either by yourself or someone else, that are faithful reproductions of 2D public domain works of art." See Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter . I should have used licence {{PD-Art}}, as monumental brass is essentially the same as "photograph of an old stained glass window or tapestry found on the Internet or in a book ✓OK. Although many materials such as stained glass and fabric possess some three-dimensional texture, at ordinary viewing distances this texture is essentially invisible. As long as the surface is not noticeably curved or tattered/broken, and the original work is old enough to have entered the public domain, it is considered a faithful reproduction of the original with no original contribution. {{PD-Art}} does not apply to 3D works of art such as sculptures, since the photographer was able to generate originality by virtue of a choice of viewpoints and lighting arrangements. Anything that could cast a shadow is excluded".(Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag) Monumental brasses are not sculptures, they are essentially flat, no shadows cast. Please retore file. Thanks.Lobsterthermidor (talk) 06:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Done per above. Ankry (talk) 10:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Renewed undeletion request for files relating to Wang Bingzhang (dissident)
The relevant files are: File:Ni Jinbin Declaration.pdf, File:Royal Thai Police statement regarding Wang Bingzhang.pdf, File:Statement by the National Security Bureau (Taiwan).pdf
I am the creator of two of the files (the Ni Jinbin declaration and the Royal Thai Police statement) and I relinquish any copyright rights I might have over them.
The statement by the National Security Bureau is a publicly available document issued by the government of Taiwan, and it has been published before in various news articles. Thus, it's not clear why it shouldn't be considered to be in the public domain already.
I previously submitted an undeletion request which was denied because I didn't respond to a question about use cases for the files. The use cases are to provide sources for updates to the Wikipedia page about Wang Bingzhang (dissident). Updates were recently made, but they have been rolled back for lack of sources, given the deletion of the above files. I'd like to undelete the above files in part so that the updates can be restored.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
--Dixakud (talk) 21:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I'll repeat what P199 stated in the last UDR: All are text-only images, out of scope. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Addendum While the Thai portion of File:Royal Thai Police statement regarding Wang Bingzhang.pdf is possibly {{PD-TH-exempt}} (The question becomes whether the Royal Thai Police qualifies under Article 7(3) or 7(4)), the translation is the work of "APTA Translation Services". Furthermore, as it was created in Taiwan, falls under Republic of China law and is protected as it is not "Translations or compilations by central or local government agencies of works [...]". --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Addendum #2 Regardless of who is the author of the declaration, the file contains a work by a third party (i.e. another person) as attested to in said declaration. The copyright of that particular work belongs to the person who created it and not the author of the declaration. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Support File:Royal Thai Police statement regarding Wang Bingzhang.pdf and File:Statement by the National Security Bureau (Taiwan).pdf on COM:SCOPE grounds: "The file is a scan of a document of historic or other external significance" and "The file is usable as a fixed, verifiable source document". However, we need to clarify the copyright status before we can proceed. Can you explain why you are the creator of the first two files? The first one was created by Ni Jinbin, while the second one was clearly not created by Ni Jinbin, so how can you be the creator of both? Third one appears to be clear per {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done File:Statement by the National Security Bureau (Taiwan).pdf temporarily undeleted. @Dixakud: you have 7 days to provide a proper source and a proper licence or the file will be re-deleted. Thank you for your understanding. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:52, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: I don't think a source is necessary when the reason for being PD is self-evident, e.g. a logo below COM:TOO, or a document which plainly states that it was created by the National Security Bureau, which appears to qualify it as "... other documents prepared by civil servants in the course of carrying out their duties". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- A source is always necessary. "Person who obtained the statement" is clearly insufficient, as evidenced by the decision to tag the file by two different admins. {{Cc0}} is also the incorrect licence. I don't disagree that the image is in PD. But there needs to be sufficient information (i.e. could be one of these, could be just a repetition of the author line), and the correct tag is necessary under the licensing heading. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, it's necessary for a properly formatted file description - but the file shouldn't be deleted if it isn't provided. See Commons:Essential information: "Each media file ... [should] have enough information (source and/or creator data) to verify the claimed copyright status." So the source is simply a tool to verify that the license is correct as stated, and it is not necessary if the license can be verified some other way. The source might be scanned by the recipient, scanned by the uploader, or scanned by the NSB. But we don't care, all of that falls under {{PD-scan}}. Files should not be deleted for deficiencies in the file description that can be corrected by users other than the uploader. We'll give time for the uploader to respond since the information on exactly who scanned it would be nice to have, but is not necessary, so if the 7 days are up then the correct course of action is not to delete the file, but to fix the file description with the best information we have available. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- A source is always necessary. "Person who obtained the statement" is clearly insufficient, as evidenced by the decision to tag the file by two different admins. {{Cc0}} is also the incorrect licence. I don't disagree that the image is in PD. But there needs to be sufficient information (i.e. could be one of these, could be just a repetition of the author line), and the correct tag is necessary under the licensing heading. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:56, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: I don't think a source is necessary when the reason for being PD is self-evident, e.g. a logo below COM:TOO, or a document which plainly states that it was created by the National Security Bureau, which appears to qualify it as "... other documents prepared by civil servants in the course of carrying out their duties". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: There are outstanding copyright questions concerning File:Ni Jinbin Declaration.pdf and File:Royal Thai Police statement regarding Wang Bingzhang.pdf. No response was given to KoH's questions. Done: File:Statement by the National Security Bureau (Taiwan).pdf per {{PD-ROC-exempt}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:11, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Copenhagen - Modern Architecture - BA Pillmore.tif
File:Copenhagen - Axel Towers - BA Pillmore.tif File:Copenhagen - Frederik's Church - BA Pillmore.tif File:Copenhagen - City Hall - BA Pillmore.tif File:Amsterdam - Keizersgracht - Sunset.png File:Copenhagen - Modern Architecture - BA Pillmore.tif File:Amsterdam - Keizersgracht Sunset - BA Pillmore.tif File:Copenhagen - Nyhavn - BA Pillmore.tif
Reason for Un-deletion request: I am BA Pillmore (and hence own the copyright) and I am uploading this content.
Enjoy!
--History corrections (talk) 13:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- @History corrections: To confirm your identity, please edit your profile on Instagram to state that your Wikimedia username is "History corrections". You can revert the change once we confirm seeing it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:41, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello, I'm a beginner in wikipedia and I tried to upload my own logo made by me but it gave me a error message. And I am actually trying to change the title "Utilisateurs/Chris Koz" .
I really need your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Koz (talk • contribs)
- Oppose Fair Use images, including logos cannot be hosted in Wikimedia Commons. We need an evidence that the logo copyright holder has granted a free license for this logo. See COM:L and COM:OTRS for details. Ankry (talk) 23:32, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Requesting undeletion as I am the owner of this image. I have the rights and permissions to upload the file to Wikipedia and Wikipedia Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puddingandpuff (talk • contribs) 23:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- @Puddingandpuff: Question Please clarify your statement that you are "the owner of this image". Are the owner of a "copy" of the photograph (i.e. the tangible embodiment of the work), or you the owner (i.e. the copyright holder) of the work (i.e. the intangible intellectual property)? Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Puddingandpuff: As this is a low resolution image without EXIF, you were asked to provide an evidence that you are the author following COM:OTRS. And this procedure is still possible in order to undelete the photo. Ankry (talk) 10:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Max Mazin Profile Pic.jpg
OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020071910004535 regarding File:Max Mazin Profile Pic.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes: Temporarily undeleted. Thuresson (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Done by Thuresson. Ankry (talk) 14:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Uploads by User:Fcleetus
We have received an OTRS ticket Ticket:2020082310005113 for 11 of the 12 deleted files in this deletion nomination Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fcleetus. There is no permission for File:Francis+Masthead.jpg. Please restore so I can review them before verification. Ww2censor (talk) 21:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Done @Ww2censor: FYI. Ankry (talk) 21:52, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Harry Mattick ACI 2019.jpg
OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2020082310005079 regarding File:Harry Mattick ACI 2019.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I believe this DR (closed by Jameslwoodward) was wrongly decided, as I doubt those !voting to delete even looked at all the images. Many of them are general cityscapes that we routinely allow per COM:DM France, like File:La Défense as seen from Neuilly-sur-Seine, France - 20111015.jpg. I think bundling so many unrelated images was a poor choice for the nomination, and the entire batch should be undeleted and rerun at COM:DR with individual nominations. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: if I can remember correctly one of those deleted photos was used as the representative view of the commune/city of Courbevoie at w:List of communes in France with over 20,000 inhabitants, way back mid-2014 (when I was still a vistor not involved on Wikipedia/Commons, or in other words not yet an editor, whether IP or with an account like today). I believe that photo also passes COM:DM. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:16, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- It appears that was File:Esplanade-de-la-defense.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts and JWilz12345: FYI, it would need to pass not COM:DM but COM:DM France. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:13, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts and JWilz12345: I fear that some may not pass COM:DM France. The question is now whether the copyright works depicted are just an "accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject" or was it "intentionally included as an element of the setting". Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:21, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- I accessed the screenshot of the article "List of communes in France with over 20,000 inhabitants" (2014 edition) on my device, and looked at the affected image (that was used as representative of Courbevoie). Judging it, in the foreground is what appears to be an elevated walkway. The potentially copyrighted buildings are in background. I assume it is an urban scene that should pass COM:DM France, as the buildings appear to be an accessory to this urban scenery of La Defense. This should have been more compliant than the cropped image - File:La-Defense.jpg - that still exists tiday. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:44, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- The issue I believe is that the elevated walkway may also be considered one of the protected elements, in addition to the buildings. The problem is that this multi-commune district is relatively recent. Unlike the Louvre image, where there is a protected work (which is DM) in the foreground and PD work (the palace itself) in the background, the architectural works in the foreground and the background may be protected under French law. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Those are all fine arguments to make in a DR, but I think there is enough doubt about the way the original case was handled procedurally (i.e. the bundling of very different photos that really ought to be evaluated individually into one nomination) that we ought to just rerun the whole thing. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- If you want to re-run the DR, I have no objections. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:58, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: Being rerun at Commons:Deletion requests/2020/08/25. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:46, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The Picture of the Individual is light , May i know the reason for Deletion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinaysingh.Dallas (talk • contribs)
- Oppose File probably used for self promo on en.wp and wikidata. --Minoraxtalk 16:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Image was corrected deleted per CSD F10 (Personal photo of a non-contributor). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I request undeletion of the said file as it appeared in a copyrighted book, whose image was not copyrighted thus 25 years after the death of his author should fall into Public Domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StEvUgnIn (talk • contribs) 16:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- @StEvUgnIn: Which country was the book published in? For recent US publication, copyright expires 70, not 25 years after the photographer death. Ankry (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done No response, cannot proceed. Ankry (talk) 06:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I upload this file twice and it was deleted. I made CLEAR this work is entirely mine, made by me and by no other person in December, 28th 2018. All figures ( militarys patens ) inside art are of my own, too. Frankly, I can only think in political bias or persecution, since it is a simple Military Rank of Forças Armadas de Cabinda. ALL patents inside this art are of MY work. Each and every one. So, please be clear and tell EXACLTY why this image is being deleted. I stated it can be freely used, copied, etc etc. So I see no reason to this image being deleted time after time. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmeirellles (talk • contribs) 16:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info Previously deleted as File:Military ranks of Cabinda.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Hmeirellles: What exactly did you make clear and where? Fantazy military patterns, unrelated to ones ever used by any army are out of scope. Images based on original military patterns are derivative works of the original and you need to provide an evidence that the originals are declared free by law, or that they are freely licensed (an dthe license is compatible with yours), or that you are the author of the original military patterns as used by this army. So?
- Moreover, reupload a deleted image is not acceptable and you may be blocked if you do this again. Ankry (talk) 21:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
There is no "fantasy patterns" here. President of Republic of Cabinda order to sumarize military ranks, and I did it for him. You are talking about something you don´t know, simply. And your conduct is clearly dictatorial. This isn´t acceptable. So please fell free to be a dictator and a lesser person and block everything you want, even me and my account. Your threats are ridiculous. This stupid conduct don´t "erase" military ranks of Cabinda on internet. Please feel fre to do anything you want. And get a life too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmeirellles (talk • contribs) 21:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- This is policy, not me, that requires an evidence for a DW that the original work is free. If you do not want to follow policy, then you have a problem, not me. You need to prove that the military patterns are copyright free (or freely licensed by their copyright holder) basing on local & US copyright law. Ankry (talk) 20:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: The file is a derivative of works published elsewhere, such as at cabinda.org. Whether or not you created the file, it is based on the work of others. Per policy, the uploader or those supporting its inclusion or undeletion on Commons are required to provide evidence that the work(s) are under a free licence, or that they have entered public domain per the law (either by exemption from protection or by virtue of the expiration of the work's copyright protections). Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
We send the following confirmation e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the decleration of the file owner: I hereby affirm that I, Prof. Barbara Ehring, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of both the work depicted and the following media:
- File:Heinrich_Ehring_Undine.jpg
- File:Heinrich_Ehring_Don_Quijote.jpg
- File:Heinrich_Ehring_Kommunikation.jpg
- File:Heinrich_Ehring_70er_Jahre.jpg
- File:Heinrich_Ehring_Orbis_Leuchte.pdf
- File:Heinrich_Ehring.jpg
I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
Prof. Barbara Ehring 2020-08-02
--SHORT CUTS Berlin (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- @SHORT CUTS Berlin: The permission should be emailed to OTRS, see instructions. The image will be undeleted after the permission send there is verified and accepted. Ankry (talk) 20:25, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Only File:Heinrich Ehring.jpg has been deleted. Undeletion will only occur when OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission. An OTRS agent will request or perform the undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Suprapubic Catheter.png just my mind please delete thank you
- Procedural close. This page is for requesting undeletion of already deleted photos and images. Thuresson (talk) 17:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hello, the File:AOM INTEGRATED LOGO.png is designed by me and I don't see a reason why it has been marked as a possible copyright violation. I',m fully aware that Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. I will also like to know if anyone ever reports the design(Image) for this to have happened?
Thank you and I will be hoping to read from you soon.
--Olayemi aom (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Olayemi aom: We need a written free license permission from the actual copyright holder of this logo; they need to follow COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 20:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done per above. OTRS needed. Ankry (talk) 21:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This image is the property of Lamont Lilly, of whom the article is written on — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarcanes (talk • contribs) 02:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Please ask Shannon Kelly to submit a release by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 06:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done but reuploaded by another user. Waiting for OTRS (otherwise the image will be deleted again). Ankry (talk) 21:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This photo was taken by me two weeks ago and i want to release to public use. Cindymts (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Cindymts: Please upload the original image with complete camera info in EXIF or follow COM:OTRS procedure and provide the original info there if you do not want it to be published for some reason. Ankry (talk) 20:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done user adviced. Ankry (talk) 20:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I have uploaded the film poster in representation of the Director and Writer of the film, Alberte Mera. You can find the moovie poster here, at his web. https://reboiras.gal/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/REB_A3_web.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anxolencias (talk • contribs)
- Where did the poster copyright holder(s) grant the declared CC-BY-SA 4.0 license? Ankry (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info User has recreated this file as File:Reboiras. Acción e corazón.jpg. Crep171166 (talk) 11:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done per lack of response. Out-of-process action is also not helpful. Ankry (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Photo found on http://ohiohouse.gov/bill-reineke, public domain as per Ohio House website — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senecacountyohia (talk • contribs) 00:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Oppose @Senecacountyohia: Ohio House of Representatives website clear states "Copyright © 2020 The Ohio House of Representatives. All Rights Reserved." Public domain status largely only applies to works of the Federal Government in the United States--Works of U.S. State Governments are mostly protected by copyright. Please read w:Copyright status of works by subnational governments of the United States. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The story of this photo is as follows. The photo was taken in a domestic context. Myrna is friend of Moira's. She just took an ordinary friend by friend photo. As the photographer, she is naturally and automatically the copyright owner in Australian law as I understand it. (Moira Rayner is top lawyer and can easily confirm this.) I uploaded the photo in the usual manner. At the same time Myrna at my request sent the following to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org .
I hereby affirm that I , Myrna Bull, and the photographer and the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work as shown here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moira_Rayner.jpg ,[4] and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Myrna Bull Copyright Holder [Date]
--- OTRS agent of Permissions wrote to Myrna as follows: On 26 Jul 2020, at 8:58 pm, Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> wrote: ([Ticket#2020072110000721] Re Moira Rayner’s photo)
Dear Myrna Bull,
It's difficult for me to determine who the author of this picture. We need to verify authorship as you are using an email address that is not traceable through public records.
Can you provide evidence that you are the author of this picture or the copyright holder (i.e. context, the original picture including metadata, other pictures taken at the same time, etc)?
Yours sincerely, <redacted>
Myrna Bull then wrote back to <redacted> (From her own email - <email redacted>) as follows I am unable to provide copyright for this photo as it is the only photo I have of this occasion. I did not take out copyright on it as it is in my personal collection and I freely share my photos.
My email address is unlikely to be in the public domain.
If you have further concerns please contact me.
Regards
Myrna Bull
What Myrna Bull is saying is that she does not have a copyright claim because it is just an ordinary family photograph taken by a very ordinary friend. On Moira's website is the following about Myrna taken from BING.
-- www.moirarayner.com.au/content_about.html --Myrna Bull has a wealth of experience in management and human rights. As the Northern Territory's Regional Director of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission she contributed to a range of policy initiatives that had a significant effect on the quality of life of the community.
In the light of the foregoing very genuine circumstances could you please restore the photo to the Moira Rayner site.Gladiator-Citizen (talk) 07:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info A new query to the sender has been just been sent OTRS. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: OTRS is current processing the ticket. Once an OTRS agent has determined that they have received sufficient permission, they will perform or request undeletion of the file. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
why was it deleted
this file is my own work Ilovegod112 (talk) 09:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- See COM:Scope. Images of non-notable persons (i.e. selfies) are out of scope and can be deleted. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: File deleted per CSD F10 (Personal photo of non-contributor). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Violation of speedy deletion F8
User User:Андрей Романенко speedy deleted several NOT Exact or scaled-down duplicate, which actually are cropped versions of existing files and were uploaded earlier than them. So I ask to restore the following files, because they are not exact or scaled-down duplicate and could not be deleted using F8 criterion:
- File:Kobryń, Gubernijalnaja, Pietrapaŭłaŭskaja. Кобрынь, Губэрніяльная, Петрапаўлаўская (I. Atkinson, 1899).jpg
- File:Kobryń, Gubernijalnaja, Pietrapaŭłaŭskaja. Кобрынь, Губэрніяльная, Петрапаўлаўская (I. Atkinson, 1899) (4).jpg
- File:Kobryń, Gubernijalnaja, Pietrapaŭłaŭskaja. Кобрынь, Губэрніяльная, Петрапаўлаўская (I. Atkinson, 1899) (5).jpg
- File:Krupčycy, Uładzimierskaja. Крупчыцы, Уладзімерская (I. Atkinson, 1899).jpg
- File:Stałavičy, Mirskaja. Сталавічы, Мірская (I. Atkinson, 1899).jpg
- File:Dobryń. Добрынь (I. Atkinson, 1899).jpg
- File:Karoščyn. Карошчын (I. Atkinson, 1899).jpg (the user left a broken redirect)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(4).jpg){kind=link}
_(5).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- My reason was that it is much more useful to have all the works from that book collected together. I can restore them if for some reason you need them cropped (but why?). In this case please get rid of the surname "Atkinson" in the names and descriptions (Atkinson was the author of the portrait painting used for the front page of the book, he has nothing to do with the photographs). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 09:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- OK. I will remove the name (actually I took the author name from here, but after checking this information looks doubtful). Maybe full versions of these images are good for article about the album, but cropped photos suit much better for articles about the illustrated places. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 10:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- My reason was that it is much more useful to have all the works from that book collected together. I can restore them if for some reason you need them cropped (but why?). In this case please get rid of the surname "Atkinson" in the names and descriptions (Atkinson was the author of the portrait painting used for the front page of the book, he has nothing to do with the photographs). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 09:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. And I also need to restore File:Koroszczyn (The Album of Suvorov's battlefields) 01.jpg (initially File:Karoščyn. Карошчын (I. Atkinson, 1899).jpg) to return the removed illustration in be-tarask:Карошчын. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 10:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Done: by Andrei Romanenko. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Pr. Béatrice Galinon-Mélénec. L'Homme-trace, Unitwin Systèmes complexes UNESCO, Le Havre, 2014 - 1.jpg. Cette photographie illustre la Biographie de Béatrice Galinon-Mélénec dans le Who's who in France (catégorie : universitaire) depuis 2017. N.B. Le Who's Who in France est le dictionnaire des personnalités françaises ou étrangères résidant en France in France. Il est disponible en version papier et en ligne sur : https://api.whoswho.fr/bio/beatrice-galinon-melenec_79549 Signé : COVD, le 25/08/2020
- @COVD: I see no CC-BY-SA 4.0 license on the abovementioned page (only "© WHO'S WHO IN France" declaration that is not a free license). And you were notified that you need to ask the photographer to email the free license permission to OTRS. Ankry (talk) 19:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC) Ankry (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hallo, ich bin Urheber und Fotograf des Gelöschten Portraits von Jossi Wieler und wurde von Ihm gefragt ob ich dieses hochladen kann. Wäre schön wenn dies klappen würde. Liebe Grüße Martin Sigmund --Martin Sigmund (talk) 10:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Martin Sigmund: As the image was published here before upload to Commons, we cannot accept license declaration at upload. We need either CC-BY-SA 4.0 license declaration on this page, or a free license permission send from your official email following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This is my own work. This is my picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hussanahmadks (talk • contribs) 10:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hussanahmadks. Thuresson (talk) 14:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: File was deleted for being out of project scope, not copyright issues. Commons is not a personal photo album. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The photo was taken by Don Mears - https://www.donmearsphotography.com/ This is an official photo of Speaker Kirk Cox taken 1/5/2019 in front of the Virginia Capitol, Richmond, VA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commonsensecitizen (talk • contribs) 14:35, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Delegate-Kirk-Cox-2019.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 14:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files uploaded by Palaangelino
Please restore the following pages:
- File:AYDEED 2020 PRESS PHOTO 2 (Cropped).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:AYDEED 2020 PRESS PHOTO.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:AYDEED 2020 PRESS PHOTO 2.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:AYDEED 2020 PRESS PHOTO 3.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=0){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
.jpg&action=watch){kind=link}
.jpg&action=unwatch){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=purge){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&preload=Commons:Deletion_requests/preload){kind=link}
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Reason: Hey, I'm Toprak, artist's manager. The owner of the works mailed a permission email to permissions-commons but somehow a user deleted the files because of no OTRS permission. Mail sent by cenanvideo@gmail[dot]com at 2020-07-21. Please check it out and let me know if more needed. Best... Palaangelino (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Palaangelino: This is ticket:2020072110007261. OTRS agents are awaiting response to the email sent at 26 Jul 2020 00:24:11 +0000. Without the response they cannot go on processiong the permission. Ankry (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: OTRS is currently processing ticket. Query sent, awaiting response. Nothing we can proceed with here at the moment. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
We now have an OTRS permission Ticket:2020072710007062 for this image. Please undelete for OTRS review. Ww2censor (talk) 10:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: @Ww2censor: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Request for undeletion - Content is in the academic area...
Hello, my content was deleted a few months ago and I don't understand why that is. The content I believe is of educational and academic value. Various works of original art were uploaded as well as WAV files of contemporary classical original music. I would ask you please to review and see that the works may be undeleted. Looking forward to your reply Thank you
Mrepoulis
Hello, example articles where my work can be included are articles of any of the institutions mentioned in the Mrepoulis biographical sketch. Thank you.
Hello, an example article that my work could be included in, would be 'Academic Music' or 'Contemporary Music', 'Harmony and Counterpoint'. My art work could be included in fantasy, fiction, poetry or novel literature. Also, it can be included in galleries containing illustrations. Please review.
Thank you
Mrepoulis
Files:
- String Quartet No. 15 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 15 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 15 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 14 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 14 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 14 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 13 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 13 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 13 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 12 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 12 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 12 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 11 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 11 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 11 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 10 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 10 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 10 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 9 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 9 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 9 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 8 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 8 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 8 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 7 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 7 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 7 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 6 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 6 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 6 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 5 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 5 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 5 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 4 - Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 4 - Piano A Synth 2nd Movt P.wav
- String Quartet No. 4 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 3 Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 3 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 3 - First Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 2 Third Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 2 - Second Movement.wav
- String Quartet No. 2 - First Movement - Allegretto.wav
- String Quartet No. 1 - Third Movement - Allgretto.wav
- String Quartet No. 1 - Second Movement - Andantino.wav
- String Quartet No.1 - First Movement - Allegro.wav
- Spirals.wav
- Sibyl's Visit.wav
- Pindar's Echo.wav
- Piano Trio.wav
- Epicurus.wav
- Perpetual Calls.wav
- Metamorphosis.wav
- Hecate's Dance.wav
- Discovery.wav
- Diotima's Dance.wav
- Dancers on Canvas.wav
- Robyn H.jpg
- Violinist at Night.jpg
- Guitar Girl at Night.jpg
- Girl with Umbrella.jpg
- Elaine.jpg
- By the Beach.jpg
- The Piper.jpg
- Dancing in the Dark.jpg
- Arion.jpg
- Meditation in the Dark.jpg
- Arion on the Dolphin.jpg
- Ballet in the Purple.jpg
- Broadway Dancer.jpg
- On a Swing.jpg
- Ballerina in Green.jpg
- Dancing in the Sky.jpg
- Adonis Resting.jpg
- Muse Dancing.jpg
- Zoe with Fan.jpg
- Violinist under the Tree.jpg
- Violinist by the Lamp.jpg
- The Wizard 3.jpg
- ;The Princes 3.jpg
- The Nymph.jpg
- The Mirror.jpg
- The Mime.jpg
- The Flutist.jpg
- The Clown by the Lamp.jpg
- The Cellist.jpg
- Penelope Waiting.jpg
- Modern Dancer.jpg
- Lady Walking.jpg
- Gymnast Dancer 3.jpg
- Guitar Girl.jpg:
- Girl playing the Violin.jpg
- Gentleman walking down the Street.jpg
- Gentleman Walking.jpg
- Cleopatra Reflection.jpg
- String Quartet No3.pdf
- Catherine 3.jpg
- Broadway Dancer 2 C.jpg
- Broadway Dancer 1 C.jpg
- Ballerina in Purple.jpg
- Ballerina in Green.jpg
- Adonis with Grapes.jpg
- String Quartet No2.pdf
- String Quartet No1.pdf
- Morning Dance.pdf
- Reflections of Dali.pdf
- Fantasy in A Minor.pdf
- Dancing Witch.pdf
- A Dionysian Dance.pdf
- A Song to Euridice.pdf
- Dance of a Nymph.pdf
- Prelude No.1.pdf
- Metamorphosis.pdf
- Hecates Dance(1).pdf
- Epicurus.pdf
- Diotimas Dance.pdf
- Dancers on Canvas.pdf
- Dance of the Dolphins.pdf
- Sybils Visit.pdf
- Pindars Echo.pdf
{{Mrepoulis (talk) 02:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)|17:39, 25 August 2020|Mrepoulis}}
- Info See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mrepoulis and Commons:Deletion requests/Files by User:Mrepoulis. Thuresson (talk) 20:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Mrepoulis: Your works were deleted for falling outside of COM:SCOPE. Can you give an example of an article on a Wikimedia project where your content might be of use? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done no example nor another response. Ankry (talk) 23:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Das ist mein Bild und auf diesem Bild bin ich zu sehen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Heiner Mauser (talk • contribs) 13:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is a reason to delete the photo, not to keep it. See COM:SCOPE amd COM:NOTHOST. Ankry (talk) 22:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Ankry hat recht. Commons ist kein Webhost, daher sind Selfies von Nutzern ohne nennenswerte Beiträge zu Wikimedia-Projekten nicht gestattet. Auch Eigenwerbung (siehe Wikipedia) ist hier nicht erwünscht. --De728631 (talk) 23:03, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Keith Fowler as Prospero.jpg Selfie, taken by Keith Fowler
KFFOWLER (talk) 21:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- No such image. However, for a selfie of an identified person, we need an evidence of free license granted by this identified person, not by an anonymous Wikimedia user. Ankry (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedual close. No such image was uploaded to Commons. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
要求取消刪除 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARIE tw (talk • contribs)
Not done image not deleted, yet. But it will be deleted if neither a link to a page where a free license is granted nor free license via email from the copyright holder following COM:OTRS is provided. Ankry (talk) 22:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Hungry Horse Dam under construction 1 - 9-15-1951.jpg and File:Hungry Horse Dam under construction 2 - 9-15-1951.jpg to undelete
I recently just read these responses. Yes, I am extremely novice in this. I just wanted to contribute something I thought was of interest for the page. I will gladly give up any rights to the photos and contribute them to the public domain. I just tried putting them up here again and found I could not put a file with the same name up. Do you want these two photos or not? (I don't even really know how to respond to your notes from May 2019. You can email me at scottjmcallister@gmail.com if you like.
Done: It seems like the user doesn't have the technical know-how to edit the file description page, so I will be reaching out to them via OTRS. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:13, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
No FOP in the Philippines according to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Palma Hall.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melchor Hall.JPG. But with updated Commons:FOP Philippines, all Philippine architecture (most esp. buildings) completed before August 1951 are confirmed to be 100% free, and buildings completed from the latter part of 1951 to before November 1972 are at least 50-60% OK (or in practice, 80-100% OK) at Commons. Per https://iskwiki.upd.edu.ph/index.php/Palma_Hall - Palma Hall was completed in 1951. For Melchor Hall, it was seen to be nearing completion in 1951 (https://upca.upd.edu.ph/history.html) and was completed in 1952. (https://www.deiville.com/lakad-gunita-2019-historical-buildings-in-up-diliman/) JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info Please note that the current File:Palma_Hall.jpg is not the one deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Palma Hall.jpg (completely different image--the deleted one is of the building, the current one is of a sign) --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:40, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Nat: in that case the deleted file (to be restored) must be renamed to File:UP Palma Hall.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Or the current is to be renamed File:Palma Hall sign.jpg. I'm going to put a rebame request there. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:30, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: per updated COM:FOP Philippines. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This photo was taken by me at the temporary museum for the archaeological site currently being excavated, at Madurai. It was deleted previously stating many other similar photos are found in the internet. Every news site were able to take only from there, since it is on display there. That is the reason they are similar. --Parotta36 (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Parotta36: We need some evidence for this, eg. the original image from your camera with complete camera settings info. Ankry (talk) 22:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: No response. @Parotta36: Please send evidence using the OTRS process. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Files removed uploaded by Broadmoor
I was accused of violating copyrights laws for pictures below with no evidence by BevinKacon. All the pictures I uploaded should be protected under fair use laws. The person attempted to justify the deletions using examples several years ago of where I was unaware that I couldn't use pictures from online Google searches and websites which I stopped doing. He said he kept my pictures that were uploaded seemingly captured by my Samsung phone but I see pictures deleted below I took. On top of that, none of the pictures are watermarked or clearly copyrighted intellectual property (can't find via online searches). The pictures should be reinstated for the reasons mentioned. My goal is to increase the integrity and appeal of Wikipedia by adding applicable photos (by following the rules).Broadmoor
Below are the images deleted.
- File:SHC2016AOB.jpg
- File:TSUReal.jpg
- File:69031538 1327323304093559 523608738171541020 n(1).jpg
- File:TSUDowntown.jpg
- File:AlcornCampjpg.jpg
- File:Shec.jpg
- File:TheMarchingWolverines.jpg
- File:SCWD.jpg
- File:Lgbt j-setting.jpg
- File:Jsettes2018.jpg
- File:86Jsettes.jpg
- File:IssacGreggs.jpg
- File:CardiBDBP.jpg
- File:DCBP.jpg
- File:ABP2017.jpg
- File:ASU A.jpg
- File:SpelmanMusuem.jpg
- File:JSUDM.png
- File:Ocean of Soul.png
- File:Studentcenter.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- @Broadmoor: uploading an image previously published elsewhere and claiming different license than that at the initial publication is considered copyright violation. See COM:OTRS for what to do in such cases. Oppose undeletion without clear free license evidence. Ankry (talk) 22:17, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: There are many images I see I know for fact are not uploaded by the user and yet remain which I thought was because of the fair use act. How is historical content uploaded? Deletion without clear free license violations is not fair.Broadmoor2 (talk) 22:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC) (Broadmoor2=Broadmoor User, I can't seem to log into my original account)
- Fair Use is not accepted on Commons. We need evidence of free license by the copyright holder or an evidence that copyright already expired. What do you mean by "historical content"? Images made more that 120 years ago can be uploaded as {{PD-old-assumed}}. Ankry (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Historical content does not begin 120 years ago. The photos on the 9/11 Wikipedia page I've seen elsewhere. I'm just saying Wikipedia's appeal and use will suffer due to such stringent standards for photos that I know satisfy fair use clauses. And I used other cell phones for photos deleted which I no longer have and pulled them from my instagram accounts.Broadmoor2 (talk) 23:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Fair Use is not accepted on Commons. We need evidence of free license by the copyright holder or an evidence that copyright already expired. What do you mean by "historical content"? Images made more that 120 years ago can be uploaded as {{PD-old-assumed}}. Ankry (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Ankry: There are many images I see I know for fact are not uploaded by the user and yet remain which I thought was because of the fair use act. How is historical content uploaded? Deletion without clear free license violations is not fair.Broadmoor2 (talk) 22:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC) (Broadmoor2=Broadmoor User, I can't seem to log into my original account)
- @Broadmoor2: Fair use media files are not allowed on Commons. "Fair use" media files uploaded to Commons will be deleted on sight, without warning. Please also note that Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons are connected but separate projects, and there are differences in policies. Media files (such as images, video, audio, etc) must be freely licenced or in the public domain in accordance with applicable laws. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Broadmoor2: You may find this explanation here useful as there is a common confusion when it comes to Fair Use - permitted on Wikipedia but not on Commons. Hope that helps. Crep171166 (talk) 07:42, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks everyone, I hate to see these pictures deleted. If anyone can help make me make them officially legitimate more quickly please let me know.Broadmoor2 (talk) 13:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Fair use media files are not allowed on Commons. "Fair use" media files uploaded to Wikimedia Commons will be deleted on sight, without warning. They can, in some case, be locally uploaded (Please see en:Wikipedia:Non-free content). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Dr. Majumder directly provided the file to me to upload to her Wikipedia page.
--HookedOnXenophonics (talk) 22:50, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Jibran Malek 8/26/2020
- @HookedOnXenophonics: Why do you suggest that this is a selfie and where the declared license has been granted? We need anybody to be able to verify this. Ankry (talk) 22:57, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Please restore the following pages:
- File:South-park-main-characters.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Reason: I recreated the assets used in the show and made this image. The original image is inaccurate to the show's art. Daorapy (talk) 00:49, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks exactly like the fair use image en:File:South Park main characters.png. Please read Commons:First steps before submitting more images. Thuresson (talk) 02:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose: @Daorapy: pictures of characters from copyrighted TV shows (animated or real) are, in most cases, not allowed on Commons. Pls. see Commons:Fair use#"Fair use" not allowed on Commons. This old deletion request from 2008 sets the precedent that of all 10 pictures depicting TV characters, 9.5 are not permitted on Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Clarification I also mean TV and movie characters. Commons never accepts photos and/or pictures of characters from many TV, cartoon, and movie shows as per Commons' prohibition of fair use content. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per COM:Fair use. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I've got this message on my talk page, "COM:CSD#F10, Personal photos of or by non-contributors". This is not a personal photo, this is a logo of an artist named as K-Luxuriant who is into Hip-Hop/Rap genre. This was released with the consent that it can be used by other bloggers on their blogs. I think that it should be undeleted because as per me, this image is not violating any rights of Wikimedia Commons. Please look into this matter. --Kunalrkadamofficial (talk) 10:28, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Kunal Kudam aka K-Luxuriant is you, isn't it? No need to speak about yourself in the third person. Strictly speaking, only text is not a logo. Unknown in which way any Wikimedia project will have any educational use of this PD-text image only consisting of the the text "K-Luxuriant". Thuresson (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Добрый день! Права на данную фотографию принадлежат нам - лейблу Pancher. Артист Владимир Свердлов-Ашкенази является артистом Pancher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirill pancher (talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- This request probably relates to File:Владимир Свердлов-Ашкенази.jpg. ticket:2020080610004987 was received regarding that file, but is not sufficient to confirm permission for it. The file will be restored when permission is received. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per ACN. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hi, anybody hanging around who would consider undeleting in order to categorize the file? Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 15:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Vysotsky (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Resolved
Not done: Procedural close. Not an undeletion request as file was not deleted per log. Under consideration for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tatyana Velikanova.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:30, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Hi, My image was deleted saying self-promotion. But I am on Wikipedia for any self-promotion. I am writer, I have published my book and been into many publications. Also, a Single Image won't receive much traffic unless people know my name and search for it. People should know my name to search for it and that' show they can know about me.
Thanks for your time.
- (comment from a non-admin) @Realprosingh: please address your concerns or respond at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prosingh.jpg. This page is intended for undeletion of files that have already been deleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:13, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
One remaining file on ticket:2020082510008723 needs restoring at your convenience. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: @Ww2censor: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:12, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
this is my page this is me only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayurii Singh (talk • contribs) 10:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info Presumably about File:Mayuri Singh.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per COM:SCOPE. All the uploads are either personal photos of a non-contributor or media files uploaded for the purposes of self-promotion. @Thuresson: It is definitely about File:Mayuri Singh.jpg and others that were deleted or under consideration for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: File was not identified by the UDR submitter, and no rationale as to why any of their deleted contributions should be undeleted per COM:SCOPE. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This was photo I took from the event I attended — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srinath66 (talk • contribs) 04:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- @Srinath66: @Srinath66: Could you, please, respond here to the doubts raised in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prakash Javadekar02.jpg? Ankry (talk) 16:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: No response. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
I request the undeletion of the portrait "Thomas Bschleipfer.jpg", since explicit permission was given by the photographer Thomas Wolfzettel (20.08.2020) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Platinyx (talk • contribs) 10:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- @Platinyx: We need to verify this. Please provide link to the free license permission or ask the photographer to email the permission following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 16:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File:Maria-Carmen Guisan, Professor of Economics.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation.
Answer: copyright is mine. The photo is at my personal Webiste at my institution but it does not belong to the institution. You may accept or not accept the inclusion but in any case you should not tell that it is a violation of copyright becuase the copyright is mine.(MCG2020 (talk) 18:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC))
- Oppose @MCG2020: Unfortunately, there is no way we can determine that here. And the image was published elsewhere first without being under a free licence. If you are indeed Maria-Carmen Guisan, you appear to be the subject of the photo and it does not appear to be self-photographed. Please note that ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law or by contract (written and signed by the first copyright holder as defined by the law, and explicitly transfers the copyright). For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Why has this image been removed? It was a perfect illustration on the Wikipedia article on Islamophobia for many years. In fact the whole article would've been deleted, had this image not been uploaded as a proof, that Islamophobia actually exists. (Yes, after 9/11 there were tons of editors fighting for the article to get deleted.) --19:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raphael1 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Info @Raphael1: According to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gathering of eagles.jpg, the image was nominated for deletion as a derivative of copyright work. Pinging @Christian Ferrer as deleting admin and @A1Cafel and Liftarn: as participants in the DR discussion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment one of the main subject of this image is clearly a drawing that is neither De minimis nor below the Threshold of originality. The photo is a derivative work of this drawing, and the author of this drawing therefore may have some rights in the photo. Hence I Oppose a potential undeletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done: per Christian Ferrer. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
For transfer to en.wp as fair use. Conifer (talk) 08:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: @Conifer: FYI. File will be redeleted after a max of 2 days. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Porque la eliminaron?
la imagen es una fotografia mia , cumple con los requisitos de autor. mi pagina oficial es www.fabiogarces.com no entiendo porque la imagen fue eliminada.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabio garces (talk • contribs) 22:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- Info This is probably in reference to File:Fabio garces.jpg, deleted in accordance with CSD F10 (Personal photo of or by non-contributors). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- With a grand total of 4 edits and only on Commons, the speedy deletion of File:Fabio garces.jpg appears to be justified. Question @Fabio garces: how is this image in project scope? (You may respond in Spanish) --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 09:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
File was deleted because "no FOP in PHL" (Commons:Deletion requests/File:National Museum, Philippines.JPG). However, it now falls under the exemptions as said in the Commons:FOP Philippines. Using the title, it can be considered as the lead building of the National Museum of the Philippines, in which one of its deleted photos here was successfully undeleted. Last person involved was Toledo, who died in 1972, but the building dates from 1921 as per enwiki article. It falls within the exemption - before November 1972. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Done: per updated COM:FOP Philippines (Completed before 1951). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
