Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2015-08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The Image was property of Government of India and was released officially by Press Information Bureau of India and it provides free license to use that was media published by them .Please View the Copyright Policy Copyright policy of Press Information Bureau of India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • contribs) 05:48, 25 July 2015‎ (UTC)

 Oppose. There is absolutely no mention of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license on that page, contrary to what you claimed. And the terms that are listed on the page are not at all compatible with that license or any other free license. It's been established multiple times that those terms are non-free. LX (talk, contribs) 07:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 Comment I asked for more information at [1]. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
It's at least close to an acceptable license. The usual question is if the "reproduce accurately" parts strictly related to moral rights (the wording seems to indicate that), or do they really mean to prevent derivative works altogether. They may well be trying to follow the lead of some other governments (UK, Australia) recently to try to license stuff more freely, but that license is just vague enough to make it arguable that it's not "free", as the intent isn't entirely clear. If there was some explicit note that derivative works are allowed that would help, but without it, then it would seem it has not gotten enough consensus here as a free license. It pretty much rests on that issue. If we can get clarification (thanks Yann) that would be great. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 Comment I wrote to Wikimedia India about this. Yann (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
These files are uploaded to Flickr under Attribution-NonCommercial Creative Commons https://www.flickr.com/gp/krishnachaitanyavelaga/xn0dY1 Krishna Chaitanya Velaga Talk 15:03, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Well then, I think that's an indication as clear as any that they were never intended to be covered by a free license. LX (talk, contribs) 15:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC) I should have looked more closely at the account name. Obviously this was just a failed attempt at license laundering. LX (talk, contribs) 20:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done If any permission or more information comes from the Indian government, it will takes some time. However uploading government files in your own Flickr account is wrong, and Flickr washing is never acceptable. Yann (talk) 16:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

These work are created by the Indian Navy and it is present at http://indiannavy.nic.in/ and are licensed under {{Indian navy}}

 Comment ARR: http://indiannavy.nic.in/footer-links/website-policies-0 --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes, there is a ticket, but I have some doubt. The permission does not seem to come from an official from the Indian Navy. See also Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Template:Indian navy. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done If any permission or more information comes from the Indian government, it will takes some time. Yann (talk) 16:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file File:Nagano 2000 Yudanaka 20060531.jpg was speedy deleted as a claimed copyright violation with the comment that "the same picture was published in 2008, http://www.geocities.jp/fuji36fuji9/sub89.html". However, if my memory serves me correctly, the image I uploaded was transferred from this image on Japanese Wikipedia. While it is very similar, and appears to have been taken at the same location, it is pretty clear that it is not the same image (the position and colour of the banner to the left of the train is different), and was taken in 2006 - before the date (2008) the blog image was published. --DAJF (talk) 23:28, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

 Support - Clearly a different image (The blue sign, the roof of the house, etc.). Taketa (talk) 06:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done You're right, it's not the same picture. I have restored it and note that it still needs a source. "Japanese Wikipedia" is not sufficient. Would you be so kind as to find the proper source for the image, and put it in the template? The file was being looked at because of no source. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done. Source and author details have now been added. --DAJF (talk) 07:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done see above. Yann (talk) 16:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The Photo is of my grand father's and I have full rights on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • contribs) 05:59, 25 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Being related to a person depicted in a photograph does not make one the copyright holder of a photo. What makes you the copyright holder of these? LX (talk, contribs) 07:59, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I have Photographed himKrishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 12:38, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 Question Why is this person in project scope? Or better: why should we keep any of your uploads? Where is the educational value? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Can't get you Explain Krishna Chaitanya Velaga Talk 07:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Many copyvios before, own work claim doubtful. Not done per Com:PCP Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Current publisher OGPlanet has made the file to be used as game logo for Uncharted Waters Online. No copyright issue. Coolwindfm (talk) 06:43, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: OGPlanet as the copyright holder has to give permission Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please help me up to recover the picture I've uploaded; — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modant333 (talk • contribs) 15:24‎ and 15:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: No permissoin from copyright holder. Source = http://www.latribuna.hn/2015/07/13/marlon-tabora-avances-permiten-a-honduras-acceder-a-recursos-por-parte-de-ee-uu/ Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

En la imagen aparezco únicamente yo y mi bateria, por favor sugiero que no eliminen cosas sin saber su autenticidad, si requieren mi DNI, se lo mandare sin duda — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Pedro Marcos Volf (talk • contribs) 08:53, 1 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Google translation: In the image appear just me and my battery, please do not suggest you remove things without knowing its authenticity, if they require my ID, it is certainly so commands
 Oppose: That only confirms the reason it was deleted. It was uploaded solely for use in es:Pedro Marcos Volf/es:Mr.Pedro Marcos Volf, which has been deleted multiple times for being unencyclopædic self-promotion and because the subject does not meet Spanish Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Commons is not a place to advertise. LX (talk, contribs) 09:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Self promo. For advertising call a local advertising agency. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

this file should not be deleted because I full right to use this picture and I don't think I am going against the copyright rules. I have full right in using this picture. --Malikofori (talk) 02:46, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: You have no right to upload the picture unless you are the copyright holder. If you are, sent permission from an official, related, email account to OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

If the image is copy righted, Please remove the image, not the wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.88.244.50 (talk • contribs) 10:12, 30 July 2015‎ (UTC)

This is Wikimedia Commons, not Wikipedia. Wikimedia Commons does not host Wikipedia pages. Wikipedia pages are on Wikipedia. Also, no file by the name File:Urangarilla Wiki Image.jpg has ever existed on Commons. And since you're posting without being logged in and without signing or telling us who you are in any other way, there is no way to tell what files you may have uploaded to Commons. LX (talk, contribs) 13:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:41, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Solicito la restauración del archivo en representación del festival puesto que es una creación propia de nuestro equipo de imagen corporativa

I request the restoration of the file in representation of the festival since it is an own creation of our equipment of corporate image

--Johanesbc (talk) 12:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC) Cordialmente ; Director de Calidad FITMO


 Not done Copied from somewhere, no evidence of a free license. If you have a permission, see COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

EN→ I think the file should not have been deleted, because it was one of the most recent photo of Morena, and just didn't find any option from the given that correctly identified the non-copyright violation, it doesn't means there isn't one, so I request peacefully that you undelete my picture, thanks...

PT→ Eu acho que o ficheiro não deveria ter sido eliminado, porque era uma das fotos mais recentes da Morena, e lá porque eu não encontrei nenhuma opção das dadas que corretamente identificava a não violação dos direitos de autor, não significa que não há uma, portanto eu peço pacificamente que retornem a minha imagem, obrigado...

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Petnog (talk • contribs) 15:06, 30 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Multiple standards being followed. English Wiki page Yakub Memon still contains an image File:Yakub Memon.jpg having the same video snap origin since 2009 and the page is locked from editing. This evidence not enough for restoring the recent File:Yakub Memon.jpg ???? So restore the latest file File:Yakub Memon.jpg that was deleted. JBDVIJASDVI (talk) 15:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Copied from somewhere, no evidence of a free license. If you have a permission, see COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Sources added that they had not been identified photos [2]، [3] ، [4]،[5]،[6]،[7]--Amir a57 (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 15:59, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I uploaded this and I ticked the thing saying I took it, and I license it under GFDL or whatever.

Then I come back a few weeks later and it's been deleted with some garbage about not having permission. I TOOK IT! I TICKED THE BOX TO LICENSE IT! Are you people simple? Do you enjoy discouraging contribution? Fed up of this happening— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevekeiretsu (talk • contribs) 14:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

@Rodhullandemu: plese use the udel templat if you have closed a request. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Photo was provided to me by Mr. Phillip Rhee with express permission to use for Wikipedia. I can forward the email he sent me. If this is not allowed please advise what photo I can use. Bailong88 (talk) 00:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Please send the permission to COM:OTRS. The file can be restored once it is processed. Yann (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I made this. It is not copyrighted. AmericanEnki (talk) 04:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Copied from somewhere, no evidence of a free license. If you have a permission, see COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Its not copyrighted. I made this, please restore. AmericanEnki (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Copied from somewhere, no evidence of a free license. If you have a permission, see COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

At Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Zuckerberg.jpg, it looks like this image was deleted because the source page went dry. It seems to be up now at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30054436&id=4&l=ae012 and clearly says "Mark Zuckerberg this photo is released under the creative commons attribution 2.5 license." For obvious reasons, a personally released image of the founder of Facebook is a very valuable image for us to have. --GRuban (talk) 13:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

 Support I'm not sure what the original evidence had, but a source page going dry does not mean a work should be deleted (though it would be best to go through Commons:License review so that the license at the source is confirmed). The current link, if that is indeed the same photo, clearly shows a {{CC-BY-2.5}} license though. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 Comment We do have File:Zuckerberg cropped.jpg but we may as well have the original photo too (if that is what the file in question is). Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done as per above. Yann (talk) 16:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am requesting for undeletion of file Karamshi Jethabhai Somaiya.jpg,as it's a photograph of founder of institute were I'm studying and there's no rule/license stated for use of the image,it is a common licensed photograph,independent for anyone to use it for information/--Haxxorsid (talk) 06:39, 2 August 2015 (UTC)knowledge purpose./--Haxxorsid (talk) 06:39, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: So, you found the image and license it self/cc? You didn't create the photo, therefor you are not the copyright holder. Clear copyright violation. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file was free and should be restored. PuTTY is free and open-source.

If it's possible, CommonsDelinker's actions related to removal of this file should be reverted globally.

See also File:PuTTY icon 128px.png and Category:PuTTY. --XXN, 11:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: duplicates Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

--Misenig (talk) 15:37, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Screenshot, not own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UIT RGPV.png

File:UIT RGPV.png--Har$h (talk) 20:39, 2 August 2015 (UTC) Its just a screenshot from google maps, many articles are having it


 Not done: Clearly marked (c) Google maps 2015. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:13, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am trying to move this file from Arabic Wikipedia, to commons, as I would like to use it in the Al-Sanamayn-article. However, when I try to to that (with upload wizard) it fails, as I get link to this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:معبد_الآلهة_تيكة.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1: Copyright violation,

I checked tineye here, and they could not find it; cheers, Huldra (talk) 21:20, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks; explanation appreciated, Huldra (talk) 23:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done. The original speedy deletion request at Commons showed that the image was posted in a forum back in 2011 [8]. The disclaimer at the bottom of that forum page translates to "images and information transmitted from more than one location, including Daraa, Syria Net dot com and scattered sites." There is no proof that the uploader Wissam al Sharef at the Arabic Wikipedia who also appears to operate this Flickr account is the original photographer. Instead, the photo used at the Arabic Wikipedia may be a case of licence laundering and copyright infringement. De728631 (talk) 23:23, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It is just my picture. I'm NS1707, also NS Bodegraven and my official name is Matthijs Schreurs. I just want to keep my picture here.

Sincerely, Matthijs Schreurs — Preceding unsigned comment added by NS1707 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 2 August 2015‎ (UTC)

 Question Could you please change the license on Flickr and report back? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:14, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: [9] still is ARR Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Raid0-w00.png and 10 other identical requests

This image is a screenshosts. It is made by me from a virtual machine. --Toniperis (talk) 12:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: The software you depicted seems to be not free. Com:DW Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:10, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

My two files: File:Ibrahimia District - Alexandria Egypt 02.JPG and File:Ibrahimia District - Alexandria Egypt 01.jpg were deleted. I was given about 6 hours between the notice and the deletion, despite I wrote in the TALK page of the issuer User talk:EugeneZelenko#Ibrahimiah two Files, marked for deletion within 50 minutes from receiving the notice, after completing the missing requested information !!! I made these two files by myself drawing the borders of Ibrahimia district over a free Google image. Is there any problems with Google or is it a mistake? Let me know please, and if Google is not considered free then inform me. If it is a mistake, then 6 hours is not adequate to delete the file after informing the uploader. --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 20:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Google Earth / Google Maps both are not free sources. 6 hrs is inadequate indeed, copyright violations should be removed much faster. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I noticed that two files just have been deleted [10]. However, the permission to use these images is still valid. Please see it here. The permission explicitly states that the images can be used in Wikipedia ("Photos for free use by anyone on the Internet (blogs, social network sites, online media, Wikipedia pages") and provides them under appropriate license, including commercial use. My very best wishes (talk) 02:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: per Prosfilaes, everything said Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is own work Somditya (talk) 05:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Appears on research gate, not likely to be own work Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my picture. I took it. It's a selfie. My nick i Nick Saturday which stands for Mikolaj Sobocinski in Polish, my real name. Please undelete my picture and let me link it to my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick Saturday (talk • contribs) 11:35, 3 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Do you expect the response to this request to be different from the last one? If so, why? If not, why ask again? LX (talk, contribs) 18:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

@LX I didn't see the previous answer, so I couldn't react to it. I saw now this OTRS procedure and I submitted a proper request via e-mail. Hope this will sort out the problem. Nick Saturday (talk) 09:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: : Please send permission from an official email account. Instructions here: OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Umberto Boccioni arciere BS

Ich habe das Foto selbst aufgenommen. Die Rechte gehören mir. --Itabak (talk) 08:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

You didn't mention a filename. Are you talking about File:Umberto Boccioni arciere BS.JPG? When you uploaded it, you said you didn't know who created it, and that it was created around 1915. Now you're saying that you created this photo yourself, which would presumably make you significantly more than 100 years old. Please clarify. LX (talk, contribs) 18:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done No filename mentioned. No clear evicence for File:Umberto Boccioni arciere BS.JPG. Yann (talk) 09:25, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file is deleted as "Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing http://medical.ohmineya.com/national-hospital/?p=659 " but the image in [11] is linked to a thumbnail of File:SuzukaNH01.jpg. This is not copyvio. --KurodaSho (talk) 09:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

 Support unless there is other evidence that this was a copyright violation. Another site hotlinking to files on Commons doesn't make the Commons file a copyright violation of itself... LX (talk, contribs) 18:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done as above. Yann (talk) 09:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Regimental cap badge of Tayforth UOCT, a UOTC unit of the British Army. This logo is ineligible for copyright, alongside all other unit cap badges. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cottrill93 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 27 July 2015‎ (UTC)

What year has this badge been created? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done No answer. Yann (talk) 09:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I think this deletion is a mistake. There is a lot of files from Acrofan, and none of them were deleted. See:

From the same URL source:

More from "acrofan.com" here.

The file is from the same source, and it was the only deleted.

I hope you can fix it.

JewELFish (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

 Support per this: {{Acrofan.com}} --Puramyun31 (talk) 23:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

 Comment 2012 OTRS Ticket. No indication that this license will last for ever or which images are covered. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 Comment While the OTRS Ticket is old, but the age of the ticket has no relation whatever the ticket only covers 2012 or older images. --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:35, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Correct. The problem is: The ticket doesn't state anything. What I think I can disclose publicly is: the owner of the website confirms his/her identity and the donation of ONE single photo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:49, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
...the donation of ONE single photo? the template said, "The copyright holder and owner of the site granted permission to distribute his photo"s" under the following licence." --Puramyun31 (talk) 03:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
I think the problem that Hedwig in Washington has highlighted is that unfortunately the template {{Acrofan.com}} does not accurately reflect the contents of OTRS ticket 2012112610002772, as the ticket only authorizes a single photo to be CC-SA-3.0. If his summary of the ticket is accurate (and I have no reason to doubt him as he is highly reliable in these matters), then I think we might have to delete {{Acrofan.com}} and the files that rely upon that template (except for the one photo authorized, which can be changed to use {{cc-by-sa-3.0|attribution=ACROFAN}} and {{PermissionOTRS|2012112610002772}} directly). —RP88 (talk) 04:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Although I personally cannot access OTRS, I think that the "ONE single photo" seems to mean an example of the photos of acrofan.com.

p.s. May we talk about with user:King of Hearts? (per this revision history of the template)--Puramyun31 (talk) 04:13, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Since you've questioned this, I've posted a request at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Template:Acrofan.com asking an OTRS volunteer to look into whether or not {{Acrofan.com}} accurately reflects the ticket. If the template is accurate, I think we can keep this file. —RP88 (talk) 04:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
He first agreed to license one particular photo. He then expands it to the "Photo Archive of ACROFAN." -- King of 06:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
There are 1062(!) files with this license-template. Brrr, hope we can keep them. We should stop the discussion here and continue on the OTRS Noticeboard: Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Template:Acrofan.com --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:47, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Nothing more to do here. Yann (talk) 09:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please note this is my photo that has been deemed copywritten. It is not - it belongs to me. I am Jackson's mother and took the photograph. How hard can this be?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Bakker (talk • contribs) 06:53, 4 August 2015‎ (UTC)

The only deleted image from this user is File:Jackson - photo I took at game in March.PNG. This is from a professional photographer, and appeared in The Guardian. Yann (talk) 09:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

I need to know by what authority others are changing the user rights from creative commons to "copyrighted" of my image.

I am the author of this image and may release it under whatever license I choose. Others have no right to change this.

After the license was incorrectly altered, it was deleted.

Please explain. Scanf (talk) 14:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

This appears to have been a screenshot of proprietary, non-free software. Did you create the graphical user interface of this software yourself? LX (talk, contribs) 18:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
But AutoCAD is allowed to upload two screenshots under CC? - see
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.178.191 (talk • contribs)
Thanks for pointing those out, I've nominated them for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 07:00, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This Naft Tehran Logo was in Wikipedia before but the difference is the transparency.

--Hockeysoccertennis (talk) 18:30, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Complex logo, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo has been published through their facebook: https://www.facebook.com/wefxstudio?fref=ts.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shellyshih (talk • contribs)


✓ Done {{PD-textlogo}} Yann (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The poster has been publish through the movie's Facebook fan page: https://www.facebook.com/TheTenantsDownstairs/photos/pb.840210742735268.-2207520000.1438748876./902921209797554/?type=3&theater — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shellyshih (talk • contribs)

...and there is no mention of any free license there, so  oppose. Please read Commons:Project scope/Summary to understand what you can and cannot upload to Commons. LX (talk, contribs) 09:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as per LX. Yann (talk) 09:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i am not claiming to own the poster or trying to state that i am the copyright owner, i am simply including the poster on it's Wikipedia article for educational purposes , every other Wikipedia article about a film includes the film's poster, what makes this poster any different?!, plus the poster is already available for viewing on most movie websites like IMDB & Rotten Tomatoes. so i am not really causing any harm by publishing the poster on it's Wikipedia article , it's fair use. Albert.nashaat (talk) 15:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done as I said before you deleted my comment (don't do that again, please), Fair Use images are not permitted on Commons. The image is presumed to be copyright unless evidence is shown to the contrary. The fact that it's on other websites is irrelevant to Commons. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Fair use images must be directly uploaded to Wikipedia (or other) projects if they are allowed under their fair use guidelines; they are not allowed on Commons. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i am not claiming to own the poster or trying to state that i am the copyright owner, i am simply including the poster on it's Wikipedia article for educational purposes , every other Wikipedia article about a film includes the film's poster, what makes this poster any different?!, plus the poster is already available for viewing on most movie websites like IMDB & Rotten Tomatoes. so i am not really causing any harm by publishing the poster on it's Wikipedia article , it's fair use.
examples for other copyrighted posters on wikipedia pages that were not deleted can be found here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dark_Knight_(film)#/media/File:Dark_Knight.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Shawshank_Redemption#/media/File:ShawshankRedemptionMoviePoster.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fight_Club#/media/File:Fight_Club_poster.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Matrix#/media/File:The_Matrix_Poster.jpg
how come these posters were not deleted while the one i included in the article was ?! Albert.nashaat (talk) 16:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

(ec) Those are uploaded directly to the English Wikipedia, a separate project which allows fair use images in some circumstances. They are not uploaded here on Commons, a separate project. You can upload your image to the English Wikipedia, most likely, following their procedures (en:Wikipedia:Non-free content). Your image cannot be hosted on Wikimedia Commons however, as we are not permitted to host images with a fair use rationale. The image is an obvious deletion here. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. And dupl. request. Yann (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

FILE: BIRXY.JPG

MY NEW FILE NAME — Preceding unsigned comment added by Birxy Anyaegbu (talk • contribs)

All works are copyvios and out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done Yann (talk) 09:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Kindly undeleted this file because the owner has been sent her consent letter to OTRS yesterday.--RenRen070193 02:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Wait until OTRS is done with the process Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission has been received in ticket:2015072910010921 Mbch331 (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Mbch331: could you please add the OTRS-ticket? Natuur12 (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I think this deletion is a mistake. There is a lot of files from Acrofan, and none of them were deleted. See: 1 2 3

Thank you. JewELFish (talk) 22:50, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 19:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello, these pictures exist on the arabic commons website so they can't be used in English articles. I have searched on wikipedia about this problem and found that I can download them and re-upload them to English commons website, which I did. I was still in the process of attaching the source website link to the Arabic commons website when all the pictures were subject to speedy deletion. Please help me return them, they are all either licensed by a public domain or creative commons 3.0. Thank you

--Makeandtoss (talk) 22:53, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

  • @DJAF: I cannot add pictures from arabic site to the english wikipedia articles that is why i re uploaded them into english wikipedia. And I read that I can, please restore them. --Makeandtoss (talk) 13:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Per DAJF Natuur12 (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear Sir / Madam,

I request you to upload the photo and not to delete the photo, I assure there is no copyright violation in the neither in article nor in photo (en:K. Thirupathy) If you need any clarification please email at neethiarasu@outlook.com or contact in +91░░░░░░░░░░ without any hesitation.

Sincerely, (NEETHIARASU ARUNACHALAM (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC))


 Not done Obviously you didn't take this picture. A formal written permission from the photographer/copyright owner is needed. See COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 19:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

bu şəkili özüm çəkmişəm. niyə silirsiniz? I painted this picture. why delete this photo??? --Selcuqbay (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

I've added the image in question to this request. Please say if this is not the one you mean. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

The photos I've taken. But you have deleted. Why?--Selcuqbay (talk) 18:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Small size, copy on a blog. For all images previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Please send it via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: There was no copyright problem as the file was licensed properly as creative commons 3 bring this file back Tomersl (talk) 10:25, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done License OK at source, but already reuploaded as File:Album Cover Equator Avner Strauss.jpg. Yann (talk) 19:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wiki kimkwangjin.jpg does not violates the copyright

File:Wiki kimkwangjin.jpg does not violates the copyright.

- The file(photo) was created, uploaded and approved of use on the web by the creator itself. - The person in the photo(Kim, Kwangjin: a politician of Republic of korea) is the creator of the file.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Minju2030 (talk • contribs)

 Info Reuploaded via File:Kim, Kwangjin.jpg, tagged by @KurodaSho: with [copyvio] http://www.thisisgame.com/webzine/news/nboard/4/?n=58317 http://www.gokseong25.net/nm/atc/view.asp?P_INDEX=1074 same as [[:File:Wiki kimkwangjin.jpg. http://www.thisisgame.com is "Copyright (c) ThisisGame.com. All rights reserved." / http://www.gokseong25.net is "www.gokseong25.net. All rights reserved." Gunnex (talk) 08:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Blatant copyright violation Natuur12 (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It is own work of the uploader. There are freedom of panorama in Turkey and the statue is placed at a public place. There is no reason to delete the file.--Rapsar (talk) 09:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done But I think OTRS permission would be better. Please add a license, or it will be deleted again. Yann (talk) 20:53, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

El archivo File:Esparza Reconquista.png + File:Esparza.png es propiedad del autor y ha sido borrado sin razón justificada. Solicito restauración inmediata.Josejavieresparza (talk) 19:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Files File:Esparza Reconquista.png + File:Esparza.png are property of the author and has been deleted without justified reason. I request inmediate restoration. Josejavieresparza (talk) 19:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC) Free translation by Ganímedes

 Not done For all images previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Please send it via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: the file is properly licensed cc-by-sa 3 and an email to wikicommons has been sent by the author about it Tomersl (talk) 11:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file has been confirmed by the owner an email was sent about it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomersl (talk • contribs) 11:22, 6 August 2015‎ (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 20:50, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Orrganuz2.jpg please undelete this file an email from owner was sent about it

please undelete this file an email from owner was sent about it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomersl (talk • contribs) 11:24, 6 August 2015‎ (UTC)


✓ Done License OK at source. Yann (talk) 20:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I requested a public domain photograph from the CA Supreme Court's press office. They provided the full-size image from which this was cropped and confirmed that the image was in the public domain, as it was provided to the subject, Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, when he was at Stanford. I uploaded both to Commons with this understanding. -Sfmammamia (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Copyright owner needs to send a permission via COM:OTRS, then the file can be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:33, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I received explicit email permission to use the icon from Lenny Khazan, co-owner and co-creator of the icon and iOS app. I was not able to find a way to denote this when uploading. I can send proof of the granted permission upon request, if contact info is given. Sorry for the late reply, I didn't notice this until now. Indybones33 (talk) 17:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

The process is generally through COM:OTRS, with the email address mentioned there. The icon is probably PD-ineligible though, and it has not been deleted yet. The other question is if it is in scope -- I see the app's article on en-wiki is under scope discussion there; if that article fails then we may well decide the icon is not in Commons' scope either. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:02, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done Not currently deleted. Yann (talk) 21:15, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like to request the undeletion of the file "Marcelo-Cuervo-Direccio--n-te--cnica-610x350.jpg" because both, the person portrayed (Marcelo Cuervo) and the photographer (Nora Lezano) allowed me to use it for this specific purpose.

--Camilacuervo93 (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC) Camila Cuervo, 7 August, 2015.


 Not done Copy on the web. For all images previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Please send it via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image is self-made, so please recover it: File:Esculturas Palacio Real. MCyP.jpeg

It's under Commons License. Everebody can use it. Bonet 86 (talk) 14:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)Bonet_86


✓ Done Please ensure the Source is valid (it looks OK to me) and if you have a version without watermarks, please consider uploading it. The image would also benefit from having some categories. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

(Navid hameedi (talk) 04:26, 6 August 2015 (UTC))

No file by that name. Could you explain please? Yann (talk) 09:18, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done No answer. Yann (talk) 21:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

O'os u'e Te'M — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adérito skilleer (talk • contribs)

I can't see that you've uploaded file of that name; do you mean this one? Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:26, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done No answer. Yann (talk) 21:09, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

We paid photographer for ALL of our portfolio pictures. EAH Housing OWNS all these marketing assets.

We hire and paid a photographer to take ALL of our portfolio pictures. We (EAH Housing) rightfully own this marketing asset.

Wikipedia/ Wikimedia, Please do not automatically tag our uploads for deletion. EAH Housing is a long established non-profit organization which has paid and own this LOGO and other portfolio images. What type of proof are you seeking for?

Thank you!

Jiano Ma Vice President of IT EAH Housing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eahhousing (talk • contribs)

For all images previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Please send it via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 21:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am requesting for the screenshot Buddylistscreenshot.png to be undeleted. It is a public domain image and the owner of it gave it to me to use for his Wiki Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommy62702 (talk • contribs)


 Not done Absolutely not in the domain public. You need a permission to upload this here, and it is very unlikely to get one for that. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:04, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

これは私の写真です。 そのため、Wikipedia用にアップロード元のアカウント名を記載しました。 ただし、現在は名前が違います。— Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuyaun (talk • contribs) 11:12, 28 July 2015‎ (UTC)


 Not done: Nonsense, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:01, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bitte das Bild wiederherstellen. Es wurde im Auftrag des Abgeordnetenbüros von Heribert Blättgen hergestellt und der Fotograf hat seine Erlaubnis zur Verwendung auf Wikimedia gegeben.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Büro Heribert Blättgen (talk • contribs)


 Not done: Bitte die Freigabe an unser OTRS Team schicken. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:02, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello! This image has been published on various news sites, it is public domain and you can clearly use it on Wikipedia.

 Oppose. Please read COM:L. -- Geagea (talk) 13:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Nonsense Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:07, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my own work. I am Federico Ágreda, I wear the mask, I had friends do me the favor of taking the pictures for me during my live shows or in the studio.

--Gorepriestwikimedia (talk) 01:47, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Please send permission to ORTS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This Logo is entirely my own work. Please undelete.

--Gorepriestwikimedia (talk) 01:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Same as above Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:18, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image was deleted because there was "No license since 29 July 2015." The image was uploaded with the license permission from the copyright holder, to wit: "All photos on the website are copyrighted to the 12th Armored Division Memorial Museum Historical Collection. Feel free to use them as long as you credit the Museum Collection." This information was included with the file upload, noting the copyright holder allowed free use with accreditation to the copyright holder, i.e. CC-BY and was forwarded to OTRS per protocol. The copyright information and permission may not have been in the Wikipedia template, but the legal use under prevailing copyright law and license permission was clearly explicated and included with the image file. The copyright holder clearly permitted its use on Wikipedia. N0TABENE (talk) 07:44, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

At the very least, it should not have been speedy deletion. The permission as quoted above may not be sufficient -- we generally prefer something more explicit about commercial use and derivative works (note the wording of the suggested permission form on the COM:OTRS page). But it at least should be the subject of discussion. Secondly, a large number of the photographs on that site would apparently be PD-USGov to begin with. If I see it right in Google Cache, I think the source image is in this gallery (page 20). It does not mention it was supplied by a particular contributor as some of the others do (which might indicate a private photo). Seems fairly likely it was PD-USGov. This is another photo on the site of the same subject; that is undoubtedly PD-USGov. Carl Lindberg (talk) 17:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your prompt and helpful response. The source you indicated is indeed the provenance of uploaded image. I think you are right that most of the images would be PD-USGov, but when I queried the curator of the Museum Collection, he responded as above, that the Museum held the copyright on all images but free use with attribution was permitted. Even if an image was from a private collection, it wold have been taken by an active duty combat soldier. Nonetheless, the statement from the Museum Curator indicates they are permitting free use as long as they receive credit, which is what is covered by the CC-BY copyright license. I tried to find the original source o f the image you found [12] on the NARA website to show that it was indeed in the public domain, but was unable to find the image online. The Museum image is from the Armored Division historian, Lise Pommois' self-published collection which itself is not copyrighted. What do you suggest in order to make these images available? Thanks for your help. N0TABENE (talk) 21:12, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I added {{PD-USGov}}. Please complete ass necessary. Yann (talk) 08:49, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission received in Ticket:2015072910016595. XenonX3 (talk) 13:47, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: Kannst Du die Userin bitte um ein paar mehr Bilder anbetteln? :-)) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Outside In Front Cover.jpg is the cover image for the novel Outside In that I own the copyright for so have permission to use the image.

--Trubelo (talk) 17:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)trubelo


 Not done: Please send permission to OTRS. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

out of process deletion, of user uploaded photo of UK sculpture in a public place. see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Kingdom = PUBLIC DOMAIN. Slowking4Farmbrough's revenge 23:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

I agree that this should be undeleted. As noted at Commons:Freedom of panorama#United Kingdom, under UK law a photograph taken of a sculpture in a museum or gallery to which the public have access belongs solely to the photographer. I believe this work is on display at the Dean Gallery in Edinburgh (see also [13]).
@Yann and Ellin Beltz: As deleter and speedy nominator respectively, do you agree that this image should be restored? WJBscribe (talk) 19:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 Question Is the statue permanently situated in a public place or premises open to the public? If yes, then FOP-UK. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:36, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Didn't notice the link. Clearly FOP. Sorry 'bout that. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Added {{FOP-UK}}. Yann (talk) 08:45, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undeleted this image because the owner release a letter of permission to OTRS. In fact, I ask her to sent a letter to OTRS proved that she granted me a permission to reuse this image form the source http://www.samanthamariko.com/2015/07/shore-magazine-launch-party.html.

--RenRen070193 09:37, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Nonsense. Sending the same text three times and not responding to questions speaks volumes. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:19, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have made these cover art, so I'm the owner of the rights. El zausa (talk) 12:56, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Please have all the photographs of your collage send permission to OTRS Thanks! Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The Band Clashman was informed about the use of their Band-Photo for Wikimedia and they agreed. ProfessorProper (talk) 13:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: The copyright owner needs to send permission. Please see OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The Band Clashman was informed about the use of their Band-Photo for Wikimedia and they agreed. ProfessorProper (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: The copyright owner needs to send permission. Please see OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:12, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Die Freigabe der Datei ist von dem Unternehmen her erfolgt. Bitte die Datei wieder freigeben. FabianErnst185 (talk) 07:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Bitte OTRS Ergebnis abwarten. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:10, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Este es un archivo personal creado por Mi, para la información. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmaurisRivas (talk • contribs) 23:49, 23 July 2015‎ (UTC)

No file by that name has ever existed on Commons. Perhaps you meant File:Amauris.png? LX (talk, contribs) 18:42, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done No answer. Yann (talk) 10:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The reasoning was invalid. {{PD-Somalia}} would clearly apply. Fry1989 eh? 20:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

I think we can restore them, but the issue was that the tag said "own work" (Except the national anthem that it says "Government of Somalia") and it were licensed under "cc-by-sa 3.0" instead of "PD-Somalia" --Ezarateesteban 21:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
I do wonder why this argument wasn't brought up during the DR.... Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Does it matter? The license applies so undelete them. Fry1989 eh? 21:37, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes it does matter and no I won't be undeleting them since I am not familiar with Somalian copyright law. Natuur12 (talk) 21:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
No, it doesn't matter. What matters is that there is a license which applies. That is all that matters. Fry1989 eh? 00:14, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
There is no Somalian copyright law, basically. That is kind of the point of the tag. If they did, we should at least respect their terms (even if not part of Berne). The last line on the tag is actually the most important, for us. For personal works, it could be touchier -- if a Somali citizen got a work initially or simultaneously published in another country, then it would be protected under the Berne Convention. But these appear to be Somali government works mostly, which probably are the definition of works first published in Somalia. If a country has no copyright law and is part of no copyright treaties... well... it would seem to be PD. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Well unless there is any reason to oppose (which I have yet to see), this should be done and over. Fry1989 eh? 19:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 Info File:National Intelligence and Security Agency.png ✓ Done The other files  Not done Anthem has no source, the other files have strange sources that can't be verified. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I restored the logos. These are not copies, but recreations. No idea/opinion about the anthem. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Image should be restored because provided below is the proper licensing information from the photographer himself: "This is a copyrighted image (© christopher barr photography 2015) but may be used for any purpose, including commercially if the copyright holder is properly attributed." Brooksball86 (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Where says "This is a copyrighted image (© christopher barr photography 2015) but may be used for any purpose, including commercially if the copyright holder is properly attributed." I can't find it in [14] --Ezarateesteban 21:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: © 2015 Jeff Danna Music is the only note regarding copyright on www.jeffdanna.com Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:17, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have complete permission from author to publish his book's front & back cover images and it's inner texts.
the book is:
"ZABAN-I KAVIR" (Language of desert) by "Abbas Alijanzadeh" Arani1392 (talk) 12:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Please send the permission to our OTRS Team. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Public domain since 2014-01-01, see en:File:PerrinPlot2.gif. I've already transferred the vectorised version created by enwiki users, File:PerrinPlot2.svg. —innotata 03:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

i am not an administrator but i will talk to the people at the irc channel that is how the fsfs windows 8 was restored--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 22:19, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Update i have talked to the people in the IRC channel it is in the public domain in the united states but we do not know about the country of origin please state the country of origin for this picture.--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 22:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

 Support It looks like a French publication. The author died in 1942, so it should have been PD in France since 2013. If it was even copyrightable to begin with -- it sounds like the points were based on what Perrin saw through a microscope, so the copyrightability is probably dubious to begin with (other than maybe the presentation). But that discussion is moot anyways, as it is both PD-old-70 and PD-1923 if there is anything copyrightable. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD by age. PD-inelegible, maybe. Restored, added info template. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:43, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Solicito que se restaure la imagen, ya que creo que no es una violacion de derechos de autor, considero que en la imagen solo aparecen formas geometricas simples con las siglas FaM. Ademas la imagen es similar a este archivo en Commons con la unica diferencia de las siglas FaM a ENM. El archivo en cuestion se utilizaria en un articulo de Wikipedia. Rivetal (talk) 17:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: Restored, PD-textlogo and trademark added. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: THE ART COVER IS OUR OWN DESIGN, AND WE HAVE ALL RIGHTS OF THIS ART WORK! Sudestada Sounds (talk) 12:33, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Yelling doesn't change anything. Please have the copyright owner to send permission to OTRS Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

User:Mirza Mushtaq Baig

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am a real user - already on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mirza_Mushtaq_Baig So why was I deleted? Please reinstate. Thanking you, Mirza Mirza Mushtaq Baig (talk) 20:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Commons is not a social network site, no linkfarm, and does not accept blatant promotional material. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I´m Montesbradley, owner of the artwork, designer and author of the concept and the photography therein. Please reinstate. Thank You Eduardo Montes-Bradley 00:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Please send permission to OTRS using an official email adress. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photos is made from me 2004. Can you restore please.


 Not done: Source: http://clubiliana.com/ans/85.jpg. Please send permission to OTRS using an official email account. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have explicit permission from the author and owner of this photograph for it to be used on wikipedia. The photo was deleted because it is also found on his website. This photograph, however, was not borrowed from his website. It was given by the owner to me with the permission and specific understanding that it would be publicly used on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KjpTI31 (talk • contribs)

Permission to use on Wikipedia is not enough. Commons can only host free media - the photographer would need to release the photo under a free license, i.e. allow its use by anyone for any purpose, before it could be hosted here. WJBscribe (talk) 17:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Please have the copyright owner send permission to OTRS. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:42, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear Veertje Thank you for compliments. This is my own work. Painting on a wood cigarre box cover. with acryl. Sergio Fabris 2015-08-13


 Not done: Please send permission to OTRS. Thanks. (I like it as well) ;-)) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photographs I have submitted called Brenda Smith Epic Records are of myself and I have the rights to place them in the public. There are no copyrights that keep me from posting my own photographs placed on these pictures. If there is I would like to see these copyrights placed on pictures of myself so that I can dispute them legally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.106.241.44 (talk • contribs)

The pictures of Brenda Cole my stage name from my first marriage (previously known as Brenda Smith my birth name) are of my self and I would like to make them available to the public. I have the right to release these pictures to the public. There are no copyrights on these pictures that should prevent them from being released to the public. I am also the co-owner of Melody Dawn Records and I have ownership to all materials that I am releasing to the public through wikipedia. If there is a copyright claim on these Brenda Cole pictures I would like to know who is claiming my image so that I can respond legally to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.106.241.44 (talk • contribs)
There are several Brend Smith images and I presume you are talking about those uploaded by User:Brenda Evonne Smith this time last year. Well there don't appear to be any problems with most of the uploads by this user except that 5 images were deleted. Have a look at this log [15]. Exactly what images are you talking about? BTW, all images are copyright and usually the photographer is the copyright holder unless the copyright was transferred to someone else in a contract. If you are the copyright holder you can confirm your copyright by following the procedure found on our OTRS page otherwise get the photographer to do it. Please don't post the same question multiple times, just respond in this post. Ww2censor (talk) 22:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ww2censor Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:50, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am requesting restoration of the file i can understand why you would delete the image but this specific image is from here http://www.fsf.org/windows8 i have checked the image license on the image it says this work produced by the free software foundation is under CC By 3.0 U.S license. I am very sure this image is under a free license approved by Wikimedia commons here is the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! In fact, we have two licenses at http://www.fsf.org/windows8 = (1.) Copyright © 2004-2015 Free Software Foundation + (2.) "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 license (or later version)"my underline = CC BY-ND 3.0. Both are not compatible with COM:L... but... wait: from this site, you mean this image here: http://static.fsf.org/nosvn/windows8/win8_infographic_web.png ?? Well, indeed we have a byline (see bottom of the image) saying that it is {{Cc-by-3.0-us}}. This is a little bit confusional. Let's wait for another [admin] opinion, also to check if the deleted file corresponds to the file I am guessing... Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

The image that you linked to is the image i am talking about and is the image that got deleted.--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i would love restoration of this file i know i went here once but the file was not restored if it was actual copyright i would not be here again here is the entire conversation below

i am request restoration of this file and i know it is not a copyright infringement the file came from here http://static.fsf.org/fsforg/graphics/win8_infographic_final.png

i know it is under a free licence Attribution 3.0 United States (CC BY 3.0 US)

i have requested undeletion and it has not happened here is the entire undeletion conversation

I am requesting restoration of the file i can understand why you would delete the image but this specific image is from here http://www.fsf.org/windows8 i have checked the image license on the image it says this work produced by the free software foundation is under CC By 3.0 U.S license. I am very sure this image is under a free license approved by Wikimedia commons here is the license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi! In fact, we have two licenses at http://www.fsf.org/windows8 = (1.) Copyright © 2004-2015 Free Software Foundation + (2.) "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 license (or later version)"my underline = CC BY-ND 3.0. Both are not compatible with COM:L... but... wait: from this site, you mean this image here: http://static.fsf.org/nosvn/windows8/win8_infographic_web.png ?? Well, indeed we have a byline (see bottom of the image) saying that it is {{Cc-by-3.0-us}}. This is a little bit confusional. Let's wait for another [admin] opinion, also to check if the deleted file corresponds to the file I am guessing... Gunnex (talk) 20:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC) The image that you linked to is the image i am talking about and is the image that got deleted.--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

It looks like it's a "CC BY 3.0 US" image embedded in a "CC BY-ND 3.0" page, in which case the image itself should be OK. --ghouston (talk) if that is the case can you restore the image. or find an administrator who canJonnymoon96 (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Jonnymoon96 (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Please don't start multiple sections concerning the same file. I've moved your second post up here under the existing heading. LX (talk, contribs) 17:45, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: Done by Yann. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

A autora Paula Parisot, não é muito conhecida ainda. E existe pouco material sobre ela na internet. Então, ela pediu para criar uma página na Wikipedia, contendo as informações e tudo mais. Porém, preciso que a foto seja incluída novamente, pois não adiantaria nada eu fazer o upload da mesma e vocês deletarem de novo. Não sou uma usuária ativa, pois criei a conta somente para fazer a página dela.


The author Paula Parisot , is not well known yet. And there is little material about her on the internet. Then she asked to create a page on Wikipedia, containing the information and everything. However , I need the picture to be included again because I will upload the photo and you delete it again. I am not active user as created the account only to make that article.

Thanks, --Mizue14 (talk) 15:48, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: The holder of the copyright needs to send permission to OTRS. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

  • Español: Vamos a ver, porque esto ya parece una broma pesada… esta imagen cumple los requisitos de Wikipedia, fue extraída de Flirk bajo la licencia correcta, y lo del copyright ese es una tontería… se trata de una imagen de un cartel promocional de la gira de Madonna en las calles de Estocolmo… desde cuando eso es violar los derechos de autor? Si los carteles son promocionales por el amor de dios! Están hechos para esto! Para que la gente lo vea y lo comparta! Por favor, deshacer el borrado, os lo pido por favor, esta imagen no debió ser borrada… por favor…
  • English: Let's see, because it already seems a joke ... this meets the requirements of Wikipedia, was extracted from Flirk under the correct license and copyright that is nonsense ... it is an image of a promotional poster for the tour Madonna on the streets of Stockholm ... since when that is violating copyright? If you are promotional posters for the love of god! They are made for this! For people to see and share! Please undelete, I would ask you please, this should not have been deleted ... please ...


les dejo el link para que vean que no es una imagen que viole ningún tipo de derecho. // I leave the link to see that is not an image that violates any law.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/perolofforsberg/20129956112/

Gracias / Thanks. --SergiSmiler BCN (talk) 13:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


In normal situations, since it is a photograph focusing on a poster, the photograph is a derivative work of the other photograph on the Madonna poster. In that case, we need a license for both the photograph (which Flickr provides) plus a license for the underlying work (which we do not have). Some countries have freedom of panorama, which can allow photographs of public works. For this case, we would have to be able to apply {{FoP-Sweden}}, which states that A work of art may be depicted if it is permanently placed on or at a public place outdoors. Buildings may be freely depicted. The Madonna photo is a work of art, and it is in a public place outdoors. However, the question here is permanently placed, which usually is not true if there is a time where the work is intended to be removed. I'm not sure the poster qualifies for that (see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Posters). While it is true such posters are made to be seen as much as possible, that does not mean something is free -- similar to Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Press_photos, that often does not include permission to make derivative works, use commercially, etc. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
That's all very well and I appreciate the argument and interest, but if we follow this rule, all the photos of Times Square in New York should be eliminated too ... they are too stupid for a simple poster that is public ...--SergiSmiler BCN (talk) 13:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
It's the fact that it's focusing on the poster in particular, without much other context, which creates the problem. Most copyright laws are OK with incidental inclusion -- so if you are taking an overall photo of Times Square with whatever ads happen to be there, that is generally OK, but if you are focusing on one ad in particular with an interest for that ad's content, then it would become an issue. There was a somewhat similar issue in the s:Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc. case -- that was about a photo of a vodka bottle, where one of the claims was that the photo was derivative of the label on the bottle. The judge ruled that since the photo was of the entire bottle, the label was incidental -- but also said that photos focusing on the label could be derivative works. Obviously fair use would mean your photo would be legal in a great many circumstances without getting any permission, but when commercial use is involved -- say if you or someone else tried to sell a postcard of your photo -- that situation would probably change (and part of being "free" is also being OK to use commercially). Copyright can have some pretty twisted corners... there was once a case where a photographer had a model wear a particular pair of fancy glasses for a clothing advertising shot -- the glasses turned out to be copyrighted (they weren't normal glasses), and the photographer (since he intentionally included them to enhance his photo) was guilty of infringement. If you took a photo of someone who just happened to be wearing those same glasses then it should have been OK. But this is basically a photograph directly of a copyrighted poster -- and the Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Posters link explains the usual policy. Yes it kind of sucks, but we do have to follow copyright law pretty stringently. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Carl Lindberg . Sorry Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

See the "How to request that a gallery page be moved to the Category: namespace?" section of COM:HD for this request. Basically, someone asked about how best to disambiguate among two places named "Lurë", and User:Ghouston says that a now-deleted revision of the page was the disambiguation category page that we need. I'm not sure about this (the deletion log for this title is empty), but it would help if someone would check anyway, since I know that I can make mistakes. Nyttend (talk) 11:52, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: by R'n'B Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I transfer it from en.wp. The file is from 1926 [16][17]. I wrote it in the discription. The original user/uploader is no longer active. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎  19:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

We need solid evidence of its public-domain status; something from 1926 can easily still be under copyright, so we need either a copyright release or evidence that it didn't comply with the requirements for copyright. The now-deleted en:wp page didn't have anything of the sort, so unless you added more information to the Commons description page, it will need to remain deleted. Nyttend (talk) 22:18, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Unclear (c)status. Dang :( Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:24, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Buenos días:

Esta imagen ha sido aportada por Evelop Airlines, S.L., publicándose con licencia Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. Esta misma imagen se utiliza en canales sociales que representan oficialmente a la marca y webs oficiales de la compañía.

Atentamente,

evelop! Evelopair (talk) 09:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


It wasn't deleted, the image is ok with the permissions granted Ezarateesteban 22:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete this file. I have explicit permission from Greg McKeown to use and share this photograph. It was most likely deleted because it is also on his official website, but this photograph was not taken from his website. I have permission to publish and share it. --- Not done in COM:OTRS is the true sentences to license a picture to be uploaded to Commons Ezarateesteban 22:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: la foto è mia 151.65.29.160 08:23, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

 Question And who would you be? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done No answer. Yann (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: 貴財団より下記のページが著作権法に違反しているため、削除されたのメールがありました事に関して以下の通り主張・要望いたします。

問題の画像は日高裕之氏の撮影・著作によるものですが、日高裕之氏からSingerSongWriter実愛が著作権を含め同画像の使用権を認められているものです。 又、builder-sinこと田中伸一はSingerSongWriter実愛からWikimedia にプロフィールと共に掲載する同意を得ております。 著作権法違反との指摘がレコード会社等からなされたものであれば、レコード会社がSingerSongWriter実愛との専属契約を締結するより相当以前に掲載しものであり、著作権侵害には該当いたしません。

このページの掲載はSingerSongWriter実愛のプロフィール公開による認知度の向上を目的として、SingerSongWriter実愛の同意・検収の上作成しアップロードしています。 この画像の著作権・使用権等の全ての権利は日高裕之とSingerSongWriter実愛に属すものであり、この2人以外からの著作権侵害の申し立ては越権行為です。

以上のことから、速やかなWEBページの復旧を要請いたします。

Builder-sin (talk) 02:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Builder-sinさん,Commons:OTRS/jaをご覧ください.許諾が確認され次第,ファイルは復元されます. --KurodaSho (talk) 13:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 14:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

dear admin

this photo is owned by me http://www.abdoadel.net/site/index.php/home/bio

i'm admin of abdoadel.net website and i have full permission to use it on wikimedia , so please don't delete it ,

--Zeeny (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Could you read COM:OTRS? Thank you. --KurodaSho (talk) 12:55, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vanessa zamora.jpg undeletion of file

Hello, there seems to be a sincere mistake where this file is being requested for deletion, I state this is my property, so there cannot be any copyright violations in acordance with wikipedia copyright policy, it is correct, I thank you for you're time and patience, and Im at disposition for any questions regarding this issue.

Sincerely, --K3rb3r0S (talk) 23:53, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

@K3rb3r0S: I feel bad that my English made you confused. This file has not been deleted yet. You can use Commons:OTRS procedures for this file. Regards, KurodaSho (talk) 00:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done Not deleted yet. Yann (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

--Jrhdzporg (talk) 01:25, 16 August 2015 (UTC) tengo una imagen pero sin licencia de los derechos de autor


 Not done Not yet deleted. Please send a permission. Yann (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I would like to request undeletion as the file fall under fair use terms.--Catlemur (talk) 14:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Commons is not allowed to host works on a fair use basis. See Commons:Fair use. Such files need to be uploaded directly to the project where they are needed. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 14:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kundan.jpg

File:Kundan.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by KundanGuptaInfo (talk • contribs)


Not done Not reason give to restore it and copyright violation --Ezarateesteban 00:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my personal Photo there are no copyright issues I own it and have agreed to the wikiCommons agreement, for all to use.

Thanks for upload your photo, but it is out of project scope, Commons is not a repository of personal photos. Regards!!Ezarateesteban 00:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 1:31, 19 August 2015. --KurodaSho (talk) 06:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Ummmm.... that is very much in scope. It is a photo of w:River Phoenix. Might need OTRS permission though. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Good morning, the photo File:Luca Rastello.jpg that you have deleted was taken from me. This is the page where I posted the pictures the first time: https://photos.google.com/u/0/album/AF1QipPFFdlySdAR4KlCKBPb6oWdvXOOz7PyY-J62Fi1

best regards --Lucaxino (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

It hasn't been deleted yet, but it's best to use the procedure at COM:OTRS to verify permission, as we usually require that when images are previously published. I do see photos out there from the same set marked as taken by Luca Perino, and the photographer does seem to use the same username as here on other social media sites, so it's most probably the same person. The OTRS email therefore may just need to confirm that you are Luca Perino; the permission has been given on the image already. Accounts here are basically anonymous so we are more careful about professional photos taken from the web; it's rare that someone would create a fake username just to upload photos by that person, but I think it has happened. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:49, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done Not deleted yet. Yann (talk) 08:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Biyani_college_logo.jpg Please Undelete image

Here is Creative commons license information on Official website http://www.biyanicolleges.org/terms-and-conditions/


✓ Done Yann (talk) 09:03, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file was removed given this as a reason: Deleted: No source for the base map itself. Ellin Beltz (Discusión) 18:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


I request the undeletion as the source for the base map is this: http://althistory.wikia.com/wiki/File:Blank_world_map_with_subdivisions.png

It's created by IstocnoSarajevo in althistory.wikia.com, I'm just planning to add this information in the description, so the complete description field would be like this:

"Source base map: http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130906162152/althistory/images/b/bd/Blank_world_map_with_subdivisions.png Data: Explanations in Talk added. My original sources were a mixture between data in the same article ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_diaspora ) where the map is, and in countries where the information is detailed enough are taking numbers from censuses from the Russian Wikipedia for all the provinces, oblasts, autonomous regions, etc(see below), censuses from the USA 2010 (numbers listed in http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-05.pdf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_American ), Australian 2011 census http://www.abs.gov.au/census , and Canada (numbers listed in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Canada ), and taking into account the number of non-European migrants in the countries of the EU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Europe .

Kazakhstan: Each province was searched, I went to the russian article where ethnic compositions are given (in Russian). For example, the Akmola region: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_Kazakhstan https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BA%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C Same with the rest (take all the provinces, look for them in the Russian wikipedia, etc): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%BB%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C I continued with the rest. Russia: http://pop-stat.mashke.org/russia-ethnic2002.htm Russian and mixed groups originally from Europe counted as Europeans. Brazil: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:People_of_European_Ancestry_in_Brazil.png "

Thank you

Nagihuin (talk) 19:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Source has no explicit license and is likely not own work by the uploader IstocnoSarajevo. Com:DW w/ unfree content Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The original Flickr photo has the proper licensing necessary to be featured in the Commons. It has an "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic" licence, which allows me to use and edit the photo in any non-commercial way, as long as I attribute credit to the source. I followed all the rules in my upload. Please return the photo.

Original photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/34186459@N00/7816455100/in/album-72157647583014371/

License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ ImWithStoopid13 (talk) 09:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Non commercial licenses are forbidden at Commons. Please see com:L Natuur12 (talk) 10:38, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws because:

1. It illustrates educational articles about the album from which the cover illustration was taken. 2. The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article topic. 3. The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original. In particular, copies of the image could not be used to make illegal copies of the album artwork on another CD. 4. It is a low resolution image. 5. The image is only a small portion of the commercial product. 6. It is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value.

The use of low-resolution images of album covers, solely to illustrate the audio recording in question, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law.


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This copyright belongs to Autosports india. I work in the company as Editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Er. Avinash Singh (talk • contribs) 14:41, 17 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Please send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in the format given here. Permission must be sent from an email address linked to where your content was originally published. The file will be restored as soon as permission is confirmed. If you would like to inquire about the status of your email in the OTRS system, please ask on the OTRS noticeboard as only OTRS members can view the email. MorganKevinJ(talk) 15:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i am the owner of picture. The pic of Uma Maheshwar is captured by me using my mobile phone camera when i went Shivdwar for the worship of Lord Shiva on 3rd August 2015 morning. So there is no copyright violation. So please undelete my picture Kartiktiwary3 (talk) 17:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done AGF, no copy elsewhere. Yann (talk) 09:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file is entirely my work and I consent to the terms. Why was it deleted, and what can I do to have it reinstated or undeleted? Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Montesbradley (talk • contribs)

As for all documents previously published elsewhere, please send a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:00, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear deleter,

I am new to wikipedia, and may have made some mistakes, but:

The picture you deleted is made by myself (I understood that "own" in the source field would indicate this). It has indeed been published on lieverbeter.nl which is my own site, and the other site you mentioned had quoted my site, (and even mentioned lieverbeter.nl as source. I didn't know of it's existence, thanks for the info :o)

Is the picture too small? I can send a larger one, but didn't want to send too much. What is the preferred size?

P.S. I also uploaded 2 pictures where my camera had inserted my (c) notice. I understand that this is of course confusing. I removed the notice and resent the files. These were "Bach_zonnemethode_Centaury" and "Bach_kokenmethode_Mustard"

Regards, HennyGieles (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Update

In the mean time I understand that the fact that the picture has also been published on my own site is already a copyright violation. Since my previous upload I have added the "CC-BY-SA-3.0/GFDL" license to the page with the picture ([18]). The picture itself does not contain a copyright notice in the jpg's Exif-metadata. I hope this solves the problem? If so: please undelete. If there is still a problem, would you please let me know? Thanks in advance, HennyGieles (talk) 00:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC).


 Not done This file is so small that it is barely usable. I suggest that you reupload it in a bigger size. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"><img alt="クリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンス" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png" /></a>
この 作品 は <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">クリエイティブ・コモンズ 表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止 4.0 国際 ライセンスの下に提供されています。</a> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yokohamacc (talk • contribs) 04:30, 18 August 2015‎ (UTC)

@Yokohamacc: Do you mean you want restore this file under CC-BY-NC-ND licence? CC-BY-NC-ND licence is not accepted in commons. See COM:L. (非営利・改変禁止のライセンスはコモンズではご遠慮いただいております.Yokohamaccさんが写真の著作権者でいらっしゃるのであればCC-BY-SAやPD等のライセンスでご提供いただくことになります.詳しくは「Commons:ライセンシング」および「Commons:OTRS/ja」をお読みください) --KurodaSho (talk) 05:13, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done CC-BY-NC-ND licence not accepted in Commons. Yann (talk) 10:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The above mentioned image was released by Jewish Museum in Prague to be used freely, given the copyright holder, Jewish Museum in Prague, is credited, as this webpage Photographs for Download, part of its official website, declares. MitnadevetJMP (talk) 10:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I don't think this is sufficient. I don't read Czech, but Google translates that to "Photos on this page are available for download without registration. They are designed for direct promotion of the Jewish Museum in Prague." That's not a free license. On the same page, there is "© 2013-2015 ŽIDOVSKÉ MUZEUM V PRAZE". Regards, Yann (talk) 09:13, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

es el logo de mi empresa lo descargue de la pagina web y necesito subir el archivo a wikipedia--ENI Escuela de Negocios Iberoamericana 14:03, 19 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Escuela de Negocios Iberoamericana "ENI" (talk • contribs) 14:03, 19 August 2015‎ (UTC)


 Not done Not deleted, license OK. Yann (talk) 10:15, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wiki xWDC.jpg Own image. No infringement. File not now needed

Did not realise edit box would appear. Hope the Subject is clear. Roy Lewis (talk) 16:21, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Screenshot from YouTube video, not own work, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

este archivo es propiedad de (juangabiriam) es trabajo propio. Template:Unisgned


 Not done Copy from the web, no permission. Yann (talk) 10:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Dina Panayotis

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: permission from artist: ticket:2015041910013595 Максим Підліснюк (talk) 14:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

 Comment The ticket is not in English. Yann (talk) 10:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Not sure why I deleted this files back than but likely because I overlooked the comment about the OTRS-ticket or perhaps it was becase it wan't excactly made clear which files are covered and which are not. Perhaps @Ahonc: wants to take a peek? The first question that pops my mind is how the agent validated the artists indentity. Natuur12 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 Support IMO, the ticket is OK. @Natuur12: The artist's identity is easily verifiable (see note in the ticket). I wonder the images were ever deleted. Ankry (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I consider the ticket valid. Ankry (talk) 15:34, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Permission provided via OTRS, see en:File:Inéquilibre.jpginnotata 03:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 16:17, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Permission provided via OTRS, see en:File:Maria Sansone headshot.jpginnotata 03:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 16:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by H4pc1

These files were deleted because "No evidence of permission(s)." The permission is arrived to OTRS so I ask to undelete them. --Rlevente (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done @Rlevente: Please add the template. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Die Datei wurde ohne Nennung von Gründen gelöscht. Der angebliche Grund "copyright violation" wurde nicht belegt. Willkür. Tieger (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Obviously under a copyright by the cartoonist Luz or/and Charlie Hebdo. Yann (talk) 20:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo has been given to me to be published freely on the internet.

--Elioerking (talk) 12:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, The copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file was nominated by Hedwig in Washington in a mass deletion request and later deleted by Ellin Beltz with rationale that passports are (C) by issuing country. Which may be a general rule, but is definitely false in this case:

  1. The "issuing country" does not exist since 1939
  2. its successor copyright law exclude official documents from copyright (see {{PD-Polishsymbol}})
  3. this type os passports was issed in 1923-1936 (+/- 1 year), so even if it was copyrightable, the copyright expires in 1975 (1924+1+50pma at this time in Poland) and no-way URAA can be applicable here.

Of course, the {{Own}} template does not apply here, but its presence was not the direct deletion reason.

Please restore, comment if you wish, and renominate for deletion if you disagree with the above. Ankry (talk) 14:27, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Support I restored that file, but actually many files in this DR are OK. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Passports of the United Kingdom. Yann (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 Comment The deletion nomination clearly read "not own work. And agreeing with that statement is why I deleted the files. They were clearly not own work, but culled from unsourced internet images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: But the deletion rationale was passports are (C) and not not own work (incorrect of missing information). If you were more precise, we would avoid this UDR :)
@Yann: Maybe close this case? I do not feel familiar enough with UK & UK-dependency copyright to handle cases of other passports from this DR. Ankry (talk) 15:50, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: Do you agree about restoring these files? And I would like to have the opinion of Hedwig, who deleted the files. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: I think our time would be better spent getting validly sourced images. None of the images were own work. "Own work" was the only source, and of course they were all self licensed, so who knows where all this came from. During the time they were nominated no one had worked to provide sources. I think time would be better spent seeing if anything removed materially affected our holdings in Category:Passports by country which is comprehensive and stop running ourselves in circles on a pile of files which were uploaded incorrectly and are obviously not own work, and with no idea where they actually came from. If we restore these, we're right bck to where we were - up mystery creek with no clue where the images came from regardless of their possible (c) or non (c) status by decree of each of their governments. Far better to make a project of getting the real ones from each country with official permissions attached than to do the same pile of work on mystery material. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
P.S. Please see [19] for the UK passports; the Crown considers them Crown copyright with legal penalties for reproduction. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: This applies to File:British passport bio page.jpg, but not to the cover, which is simply a reproduction of UK coat of arms (i.e. File:Stone royal coat of arms.JPG). Regards, Yann (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: Did you read section 2.2? Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: I don't think that is a copyright rule. I think it means that you can't use the UK coat of arms as your own. The UK CoA is certainly not under a copyright: File:Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (HM Government).svg, etc. Yann (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: It says using them is a violation of crown copyright and further down the document specifically states about uploading to internet is not permitted. I think we need a UK expert at this point. I don't have a vested personal interest one way or the other, but the UK document seems comprehensive. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Right: see Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#UK coat of arms. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
PD-POL is nonsense. The Free State of Danzig wasn't Polish but a Free State. Hence the name :-) 1920 - 1939 (annexed by Nazi-Germany) Danzig was a Free State, therefore Polish law doesn not apply for this period. Danzig was annexed by Poland 1945. 1920-1939 Danzig was protected by the League of Nations. Only PD-old-70 applies, author is know = State of Danzig. The Danzig passport got steamrolled in this DR by all the other passports missing essential information / bogus own work. Yeah, sure undelete if license gets changed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:23, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Except that Poland is the successor in law to that area, so the tag still might make sense. Although not sure what the owner of Free State governmental works might be... bit twisted there. But it should be PD however you look at it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:12, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Discussion will continue on VPC for the rest. Yann (talk) 14:38, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have emailed the copyright permission letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Thank you. Emitchell62000 (talk) 21:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done by Sphilbrick. Yann (talk) 14:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It is {{PD-MacaoGov}} and the emblem of the People's Republic of China is {{PD-PRC-exempt}}.--Hang9417 (talk) 17:08, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It is {{PD-GermanGov}}--Hang9417 (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

3 files

Hello,

Please undelite these 3 photos:

There was a notice that family of a dead actor has all rights for these photos, but photos were deleted. The photographer was hired by family for money and he gave all exclusive rights to a family of an actor. Family gave me the right to post them. Also I did a personal work as a photographer improving these photos in Photoshop: improving scratches, lights ect. In Russian legislation if you improving photo (just photo, not serious piece of art), the right belongs both to physical photographer and to digital photographer. Nowadays nobody doing only photos: it's always work of 2 people at least: photographer and a person who are making changes in Photoshop. And in Russian legislation rights belongs to both.

--AndreyVorobyov (talk) 18:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, The copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I ask for undeletion of this picture because i have right given by owner of picture, that is Igor Milic himself (who is on the picture) to publish it. Igor Milic is the owner of this picture and he sent me letter according to wikipedia's rules for common publishing saying that he is giving picture to be free used. I have fowarded his letter to Wikimedia Commons so please put back this picture for using. This is the picture that Igor Milic himself wanted to be on his wiki page. --MayaSophia (talk) 18:07, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, The copyright owner, i.e. the photographer, needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo is my own work. It was removed because of potential copyright violation, but it is my work and it does not show any people. Please reinstate it. If you fell you can't please tell why so that I can address your concerns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrookedTreeCreative (talk • contribs) 00:39, 18 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, The copyright owner, i.e. Asheville Ale Trail as mentioned in EXIF, needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file "Biancapenco,jpg" has been deleted apparently because of suspicion of copy-write abuse (and for missing metadata). The picture has been given to me by my brother in law to be put on the web page of a relevant Italian figure (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bianca_Penco). I missed the discussion. I have all the permission to publish it, especially after the death of the person. The same picture has been published in different newspapers and it is a recognised picture of the person by everybody knowing her.

The file "Carlodallapozza,jpg" has been deleted apparently for similar motives. The picture has been sent to me by Dalla Pozza's students to put it on the wikipedia page – they use the same picture on the commemorating page of their teacher: https://sites.google.com/site/sitocarlodallapozza/home. The picture has been made by a friend who prefers not to appear and kept by Dalla Pozza's companion. The fact that the picture is missing on the wikipedia page is distressing for the students and friends of Dalla Pozza.

Carlopenco (talk) 17:15, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Carlo Penco August 18 2015

Hi, The copyright owner, i.e. the photographer, needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi,

This image is the property of Stéphane Davi who gave all the rights to the artist Kouka.

What are the next steps ? I don't think contacting OTRS is relevant, I have the right to use it on Wikipédia, but I do not think it should be downloadable in high res by everyone though.

Thanks,

--Filoufr (talk) 19:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, The copyright owner, i.e. the photographer, needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi...

The file that was deleted is the logo of my band, Insane Driver. I'm the owner of the logo and I have all the rights on this image. Considering that, I ask, please, to undelete my image.

Thanks - Danilo Bigal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danbigal (talk • contribs) 12:54, 19 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, The copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:13, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

It is my own work.--Raymartsanjose (talk) 13:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, The copyright owner, i.e. the University, needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I requested that the original photo on Flickr be relicensed under a Creative Commons licence, and the original uploader agreed. However, they were unable to carry out the relicensing for some reason. I've spoken to them via email, and they are willing for the photo to be used here under a free licence. PeeJay2K3 (talk) 15:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Please send the permission to COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:23, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
I've forwarded the email conversation to the OTRS email address, along with a link to the original photo on Flickr, which contains comments from the uploader granting consent. PeeJay2K3 (talk) 13:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done License now OK at source. Yann (talk) 10:05, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image is not under any form of copyright violation because it is OWNED 100% BY ME, and I allow the image to be used under fair-use purposes. This is the same image being used to identify JT Curtis on the facebook page, on the playbill.com page and all pages identifying the subject. Please undelete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JTCBlues (talk • contribs) 00:17, 21 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Images on Commons must be freely licensed, i.e. available to anyone for any purpose (copyright anyways; publicity rights are unaffected). See Commons:Fair use; we cannot host fair use files. Such works must be uploaded to projects like English Wikipedia directly, if they qualify under that project's fair use rules. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Este escudo, el escudo del Círculo Tradicionalista Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, es de uso público, es el usado por la organización política públicamente. Solicito se restaure.

Solicito esto ya que recientemente ha sido borrado-

www.carlistasaviles.blogspot.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fáez sin tierra (talk • contribs)

Hi, The copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Solicito se restaura Pegatina del Círculo Tradicionalista Pedro Menéndez de Avilés.png

Es material público y no sujeto a licencia alguna. Muchas gracias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fáez sin tierra (talk • contribs)

Hi, The copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file is completely innocent. It was not grabbed from the internet.

It sat quite happily in its Infobox from around the end of the first week in August until various folk started sending me messages about suspected copyright infringement - there seems to have been a sort of feeding frenzy, and suddenly this file was regarded as suspect as well.

I shall be grateful if it can be undeleted. It looked rather well in the Infobox. Roy Lewis (talk) 11:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose This is a screenshot from a YouTube video (probably [20]) from Rebecca Newman Official Channel. You need a permission before copying it here. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This was speedily deleted on 2014-03-16T01:31:30 with the rationale «Out of project scope», however COM:SCOPE is not a valid reason for such deletion. It sould be undeleted and subjected to a regular deletion request. -- Tuválkin 23:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done OK fine. Yann (talk) 10:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

3 photos of David Jane Ajana

These three photos were included in a mass DR submitted by an IP:

User:DarwIn pleaded for their specific keeping, on scope grounds (notability), and argued for generic dismissal of the whole DR, which was seconded by several other users; it was indeed closed as general keep by User:INeverCry. These three photos were speedily deleted 3 months later with the rationale «Out of project scope»; this ignores the mentioned DR and misquotes COM:SCOPE as a valid reason for a speedy deletion. These photos sould be undeleted. Should their scope cause concern a regular deletion request can be filed. -- Tuválkin 20:53, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I decided to undelete the photos. Tuválkin, please describe and categorize them properly. O, actually they are described and categorized. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Free license (CC BY-SA 3.0) granted at http://www.mikaronkainen.com/photos/


✓ Done Yann (talk) 09:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo was made more than 95 years down the road. This is more than requested by any copyright law. Therefore and because it is the most beautiful photo of my uncle, it should be undeleted, so, that I can use it again for the Wikipedia site about Ludwig Kaiser, one of the most famous pianists of the 20th century. Thank you in advance, Peter Michael Kaiser — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiserpm (talk • contribs) 11:18, 12. Aug. 2015‎ (UTC)

Actually, "life of author + 70 years" is probably the most likely copyright period applicable to this work. Can you provide further infromation about the circumstances in which the photograph was taken (i.e. date, location, identity of photographer)? WJBscribe (talk) 15:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
There's a watermark, lower right corner. Can't quite make it out. Is there anything written on the backside that might help to identify the author and the year? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done - No response to questions regarding identify of photographer, who has not given permission. It is unlikely the photographer has been deceased for more than 70 years. WJBscribe (talk) 10:58, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photograph was taken by my friend Tracy Connell and I have permission to use this photo as I please. This photo is also available to use freely by anyone. It was taken at Collectormania 2010 in a public place where photography allowed. Multiple similar photos from different people are also exist due to the allowance of photography.

Perhaps I put this photo in the wrong category? I don't see why my photo own personal photo should be taken down. We both don't mind anyone using it as they please.

I hope you get back to my query quickly. --Darkthornduchess (talk) 13:02, 22 August 2015 (UTC) DADK 22/8/15

Hi, Tracy Connell needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The image may be licensed improperly. I'll make the proper changes once the request is approved. Suvozit (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the owner of the website with this photo so can you please put it back on this website as i wanted to donate it to you guys for other website like wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newphotos (talk • contribs) 00:02, 23 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is my photo and I give permission to use it. Link with appropriate details here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/count3d/20515036672/in/album-72157656753006470/

--Count3D (talk) 20:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose License at source is CC-BY-NC-SA, not sufficient. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

They fixed it. Thanks. --Count3D (talk) 00:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done see above. Yann (talk) 10:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file exists under the name of en:File:Peter Avery.jpg at the English Wikipedia. The original uploader at the English Wikipedia is a famous Iranian journalist who has a Wikipedia article himself and has interviewed Fidel Castro, among others . He is also a Wikipedian, although hardly active. Peter Avery is an eminent British scholar of Persian language. It seems highly probable that a famous Iranian journalist has interviewed a scholar of Persian language. Please also take a look at this photo which you can see Abdolrashidi, the interviewer and the uploader, as well as Peter Avery, the interviewee. And then take a look at this portrait in Abdolrashidi Wikipedia article. I raised this problem at Help desk and it sounded reasonable to User:Jmabel, although he had one concern: " it may be that Abdolrashidi has been posting photos taken by his colleagues rather than himself without going through OTRS (and without giving appropriate photo credit)". 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Please ping me if you have an answer. This page is heavily edited and thus is hard to watch. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
4nn1l2: All restored. Thank you. −ebrahimtalk 22:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done see above. Yann (talk) 10:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Изображение было использовано мной после согласования с самим Корчаговым Юрием Филипповичем. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VitalyMuz (talk • contribs) 18:58, 16 August 2015‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Эта фотография опубликовано в Фейсбуке. Так что теперь она является имуществом Фейсбука и не может быть загружен в Викисклад без разрешении Фейсбука. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as per above. Yann (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This was speedily deleted on 2014-03-16T01:50:16 with the rationale «Out of project scope», however COM:SCOPE is not a valid reason for such deletion. It sould be undeleted and subjected to a regular deletion request. -- Tuválkin 23:18, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

I can't see this file, so I don't know if is in or out of scope, but deletion policy does permit the speedy deletion of files "which very clearly fall outside of Commons' project scope." Presumably the deleting admin felt that this file met that criteria. Do you have reason to believe this file is in scope, or do you object to the speedy deletion purely on procedural grounds? —RP88 (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Of course it is not only on procedural grounds. This image had been before subject of discussion within one of those lazy deletion requests listing dozens of unrelated photos (sometimes filed even by I.P.s — no, that’s not sockpuppeting at all: unregistered users know how to create a mass deletion, they do, yessiree!), under some generic rationale (often a bad disguise for «I don’t like brown people»). In that previous discussion, it was argued that this photo uniquely shows Valentine’s Day practices in India, and should be thus kept on scope grounds. I did not search around to see if this speedy deletion went against the closing decision of that DR (though it happen before with other images), nor if meanwhile better images were newly uploaded and/categorized to enable illustration of Valentine’s Day practices in India, but all that can be publicly assessed and decided upon in a regular DR — after the hereby requested undeletion. -- Tuválkin 20:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
That's a much better reason for undeletion than the one you articulated originally. Just on procedural grounds alone, if a file survived a previous deletion discussion it is no longer eligible for speedy deletion on grounds of scope per policy: "If a page has survived a prior deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations." I can't find the DR in which it was argued that this photo uniquely shows Valentine’s Day practices in India. Do you have a URL for that DR? I did, however, find Commons:Deletion requests/Some unused self-portraits 20131207 in which this file was listed, but never specifically discussed. In that discussion you say File:Me_And_My_Photos_(256387720).jpg is an outstandingly important image, so you might want to request its undeletion as well (it was also deleted as out of scope). Looking at the File:This me and my mum is called veronica wlff 2013-09-24 17-47.jpg which was recently undeleted it looks like the problem was that the admin who originally kept these images did not put {{Kept}} on the file talk pages when he closed the discussion, so the admin who processed the speedy "out of scope" request was not aware that these images had been previously kept in a DR. —RP88 (talk) 22:43, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 Oppose This is very poor quality picture (extremely noisy). I don't see how it is in scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
You can see it because you are an admin. (Others cannot.) Nowhere it is said that this admin ability should be used to replace the community decisions concerning scope. -- Tuválkin 20:33, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 Oppose I agree with Yann. Bad quality. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as per above. Yann (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The nomination reason was invalid. There have been two AN's regarding the nominator's behaviour regarding fictional flags and deleting the file is unacceptable in this situation. Fry1989 eh? 18:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done as per above. Yann (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I don't believe that any deletion nomination notification was placed on that file's description page, so I was not notified, and didn't have any opportunity to participate in the deletion discussion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sexy dancer 04.jpg). In any case, the closing admin's complete silence on the subject of the claimed 2006 permission text (User:Slarre~commonswiki/Zappel Jazz) would appear to be inadequate and inappropriate... AnonMoos (talk) 04:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

 Comment The other, additional photos were really not properly marked for deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 Support. The email to the author was very clear about what rights were being given up. There was a file deleted in 2007 (Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Lanny Barbie.jpg) because the reply didn't specifically say "GFDL" but I don't think that is enough reason -- the email didn't specifically request that, so it's understandable it was not there. The files were uploaded prior to OTRS being really implemented, so they are grandfathered (Commons:Grandfathered old files) and do not need explicit OTRS permission (which was the deletion reason in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sexy dancer 01.jpg, which was kept at the time). I think the email and permission stuff conformed to the usual practices at the time (which was rapidly changing, to avoid gray areas like this, but I don't think we should impose later standards on these earlier files). Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done as per above. Yann (talk) 11:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello,

As I said in the DR, I think the ad is not the main subject of the picture, and therefore is De Minimis. But if this ad is too prominent, I would suggest that the picture is undeleted with the ad blurred. Because the file remains useful to illustrate the train platform of Montpellier train station, with the "running in board" sign. Thank you for your help. Jeriby (talk) 08:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose The decision was correct. The ad was main object of the file. Taivo (talk) 08:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
But if the ad is blurred or blanked? It seems not to be out of scope with this layout. Jeriby (talk) 09:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 Oppose If the ad is blurred, nothing useful is left. Yann (talk) 10:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as per above. Yann (talk) 11:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request undeletion because the file in in public domain. It is public domain because it came from the AFRTS Network (US Government) and was produced by them in 1966.

Thank you.

Best regards sinclairindex Sinclairindex (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done as above. See also en:Magic Mansion. Yann (talk) 19:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear,

We are still trying to undelete the photo's you have taken the liberty of deleting.

No one can have published a copyright infringement as its me - the photographer - the artist Nabiha, the management (Pitt Buhl Ltd/Mette Buhl) and record company (DiscoWax/Sony Music) who owns it!

We have all tried to rectify this without luck, which is getting rather frustrating as its damaging for all of us that this issue is being stalled, which right now allows a very bad published picture (not approved by any involved with the project) to be Nabiha's profile pic. -This is harmful for the artist as well...

Look forward to your prompt reply.

Kind regards, Sarah Hesselbo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahhesselbo (talk • contribs) 14:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Restored and created a regular DR instead, as HR with EXIF data, so the copy mentioned is not the source. Since this was published elsewhere before, you may want to send a formal permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done as above. Discussion can continue in the DR. Yann (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Clint Boon DJing in Castlefield, Manchester at D:Percussion on 7th August 2004. Photograph © Emma Farrer and used with her permission.

Please undelete this image. It was taken by me Emma Farrer, Wikipedia username Missus_IP and uploaded to creative commons because I own the copyright.

It is also marked on my Flickr stream as being a share-a-like file available to use. https://www.flickr.com/photos/emmafarrer/9389537159/in/photolist-fiHQgH-fiHQdX-fiY4j7-fiHQjX

I have not violated copyright because it is my copyright.

Thank you.

(Missus IP (talk) 14:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)) 26/08/2015

 Support Looks like the license was changed to CC-BY-SA-2.0 at the source. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 19:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image is of an Open Access academic journal which provides its content under a CC licence.

This file is provided by the web site for use under a CC licence per the request on your file submission form. There are two images on the web site screen capture: one of which is from the Wikimedia Commons itself (File:Bute Book of Hours by English School.jpg) and the other is of a book cover produced by the web site publisher and again made available under a CC licence.

There is no copyright violation in this image and your deletion of it directly affects the journal's Wikipedia page.

Your co-operation in restoring the image would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CTetC (talk • contribs) 15:37, 24 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons (this site) is a repository of free, educational media files used by Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, and others. The free part is very important – it's a founding principle of Commons that we should only host content that can be used by anyone for any purpose. Not all Creative Commons licenses are free. The license which http://catalogustranslationum.org/ is covered by according to its footer is non-free, both because it prohibits commercial use and because it prohibits the creation of derivative works. LX (talk, contribs) 15:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done CC-BY-NC-ND license, not sufficient. Yann (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have explicit permission of the photographer (Bart van Overbeeke) to add this picture. On Flickr I've changed the license into 'Attribution-ShareAlike': https://www.flickr.com/photos/robocup2013/9175737968/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobinSoetens (talk • contribs)


✓ Done Yann (talk) 20:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

What is the violation in this image Kongu_Vettuvagounder_mamannar_Valvil_ori.jpg? This image represent the valvil ori statue in kollimalai.So please do not remove the image in any of the wiki pages if the topic related to valvil ori.(Best king in Tamil nadu).

 Oppose Image is from a Youtube video which is tagged with the standard Youtube license, which is Commons incompatible. Yann (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please help me understand how this was a copyright violation.

I designed the logo and have full authorization to use it.

Please consult www.missiraq.net

Hi, As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file has been donated by Διαμαντής Αξιώτης himself. Original uploader can verify this and can be asked to provide what has been missing.--ManosHacker (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Please ask Διαμαντής Αξιώτης to send a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hüner_Tuncer : She's my teacher, and i know her at rl for long time, i got photo from her, for using at her wikipedia page.--Seckinx (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Please ask her to send a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete file uploaded from Google Books. The discussion on deletion is here. However, other similar books with same properties were not deleted under my request (seeCommons:Deletion requests/Google books with Google first page). That's not fair. I consider it should be used the same policy - either delete all such books, or restore the book I uploaded. Игорь Филиппов (talk) 05:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done No matter what Google says, this is in the public domain. Yann (talk) 10:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Forever Art

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This message was sent to OTRS via email

I hereby affirm that I, ​Jonathan Kis-Lev, am​ the sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work​s​​ ​attached​, and own the full copyrights for these photos taken by myself, photographer Derek Smith and photographer Doug Ellis.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Jonathan Kis-Lev​ Copyright holder August 26 2015​

Jonathan Kis-Lev Interdisciplinary Artist Kis-Lev Studio www.kis-lev.com Forever Art (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Please send this permission to COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done by Sphilbrick. Yann (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

umm, it is a tree? and now you have a conceptual art dilemma: does the act of naming a tree, and setting it in a gallery setting, transform a tree into a sculpture? by extension, are christmas trees sculptures? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slowking4 (talk • contribs)


✓ Done as above. No copyright issue here. Yann (talk) 17:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Similar reason to undeletion of File:Sexy dancer 02.jpg above. These were others deleted on the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sexy dancer 04.jpg but only one was restored.

It looks like the files qualify for Commons:Grandfathered old files, and were deleted because User:Slarre~commonswiki/Zappel Jazz moved due to a username change but the links were not updated to point to the new location. For the last one, it looks like it was deleted due to Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Lanny Barbie.jpg because the grandfather policy was not yet in place -- the files were uploaded before Commons:Email templates (and the OTRS policy) was created but that was the deletion reason (no OTRS permission). Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sexy dancer 01.jpg is another related DR but that was a keep at the time. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

(Sorry I didn't mention the others in my request, but "02" was the only one on my watchlist, and probably the only one involved with derivative files. AnonMoos (talk) 18:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC))

✓ Done as above. Yann (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Это фото с сайта кафедры "Экономика и финансы", которую Игорь Александрович возглавляет. Я его аспирант и он разрешает использовать данное фото в википедии. I take this photo from this website http://ef.susu.ac.ru/pages.php?page=71. This is the website of department, which Игорь Александрович leads. I'm his post-graduate student and he permits using this photo in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizaveta74 (talk • contribs)

Hi, The copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
It should be mentioned that Baev could be not the holder of the copyright. Игорь Филиппов (talk) 05:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:58, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:20131104_b11c53.jpg deleted for no reason

I sent all the information required to prove I have autorization to use the image which was deleted. What else do I need to do?--CVR Alentejana (talk) 13:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the owner of the photo, haven't published it under any licence yet, I just previously used it on my website www.marekpavelec.com, I would like to make the image available for public use in order to make it usable for wikipedia articles. Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rewq11 (talk • contribs)

Hi, As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 09:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Actually this is my works and I want to show them with my user profile Bijutoha like before. Please do something if possible. Bijutoha (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete the file as this is not a copyright violation. This image can also be found on the internet. This is a Soft copy of the drawing under the aegis of Sri (Dr.) Bannanje Govindacharya.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitinc (talk • contribs) 06:12, 27 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, Files copied from the Internet are not free. As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:53, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/la_bretagne_a_paris/1391942181/

This station architecture is like a lot of other Paris métro stations, so no threshold of originality.

The only difference is it's not in service and used for filming.

Gonioul (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done No architecture, no copyright. Yann (talk) 09:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The file has been deleted an 24th July 2015 as copyright violation but it was just a cropped version of Dieter Josef Przewdzing.jpg that has been kept after this discussion. So I see no reason for the speedy deletion of the cropped version. Hic et nunc (talk) 06:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done as above. Yann (talk) 09:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

i guess there are no other men participating in wikipedia foundation (my name is 'book' --it is rune fehu) i sign my right to edit and to maintain wikipedia by opening my derivation/birth energetic fact: 'i am a baby was been rescued by quantum computer(s) from low earth orbit in year-fifty-eighth-ago.

i was "primitive satellite one" then and they did turned me to ursula kreber le guin.
in year thirty-sixth-ago (at the twenty fifth of august) i did started my life as an organical being.
there are twelve kids did derived from me by so-called "cloning rules" --no one of them did not started their own lines particularly'

sov thad tage em ereb ᛋ ᚠ ᚺ ᛃ ᛃᚨ --Eine erste hai (talk) 10:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Movie by David Lynch. Obviously not free. Yann (talk) 10:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file has been deleted on the grounds that "fair use" is not permitted. The file was not used on this basic, but was uploaded using the upload wizard from a source (flikr) that had released it under a Commons attribution 2.0 licence. On these grounds I request undeletion. Klbrain (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, There is no link to Flickr. This is a CD cover. So, as any content which was previously published elsewhere, it needs a formal written permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grzegorz Ślak Bio.jpg

Hello, I used this picture on request from person, who have rights for it. Why it was deleted?

best regards Kuba — Preceding unsigned comment added by AutorWrocław (talk • contribs)


 Not done: Please have the owner of the copyright send permission to OTRS. Thanks! Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hello: I recently uploaded the above image, which has since been deleted. It's the February 2015 issue of Bloomberg Markets magazine, showing hedge fund manager Bill Ackman. The photo also lives at Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/135742071@N05/20890820332/. I work at the magazine and am simply trying to update our entry with a more current cover image; the previous one is several years old already. The cover should be allowed on Wikipedia under Fair Use, no? Apologies, I may have incorrectly specified its intended category during upload. Thanks for your consideration. --Joelweber (talk) 11:18, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Fair use is only allowed on the English Wikipedia, not here (see en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline). The file on Flickr seems license washing to me. If you work at the magazine, you may be able to send a permission. See COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: No fair use on Commons allowed Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[File:Jimmy Barnatán.jpg]]

Esta imagen ha sido publicada en un medio de comunicación de una manera diferente a la que se muestra en el artículo. Se le ha extraído el fondo negro. Ha circulado libremente sin problema alguno.

File:Jimmy Barnatán.jpg


 Not done: Not a free image. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The i2p website (https://geti2p.net/en/docs/how/intro) site now clearly says all content is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Acebarry (talk) 17:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: per above. Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Prakash_Mishra.jpg this is my own photo. This may please undeleted.

The title photo uploaded earlier is my own photo. It is deleted recently. Can you please undelete it. The passport size photo is helpful for the easy identification of me to the web viewers.

Please do the needful.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcmishra69 (talk • contribs) 07:55‎, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Who did take this picture? Who is the photographer? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done No answer. Yann (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)