User talk:Rlevente

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rlevente!

-- 19:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Cultural heritage monuments in Hungary[edit]

Szia! VinceB mondta, hogy te is kategorizálod a fenti kategóriában levő képeket. Annyit szeretnék kérni, hogy a templomokat hadd én kategorizáljam, mert 1 hónapja megcsináltam már a Churches in Hungary kategóriában a templomokat. Szajci pošta 17:35, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Igen, én a reformátust úgy, ahogy te, de ha van város, akkor a városba teszem be. A római katolikust pedig nemcsak védőszent szerint, de megye ill. városba is beteszem. Arra már nem vállalkoztam, hogy stílus ill. évszázad szerint is bekategorizálom, mert az már sok lenne. A védőszentet egyébként a nagyvofely.hu oldalról nézem :D Szajci pošta 18:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Megnéztem a képet, egy dolgot hagytál ki, hogy gyms megyei római katolikus templomok, most beletettem. De a többi kategória rendben van. Arra figyelj még, hogy lehet, hogy én korábban bekategorizáltam egy templomot, de külön kategóriát nem hoztam létre neki, mert csak 1 kép volt róla, de 2 képnél már külön kategóriát csinálok neki. Szajci pošta 18:26, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rendben. Én a fenti kategóriában rendezgetem a templomokat éppen. Szajci pošta 18:42, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rlevente. You have new messages at Rotatebot's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pope Francis coat of arms[edit]

Ok. Tomorrow. Poznaniak (dyskusja) 20:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Poznaniak (dyskusja) 12:22, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover?[edit]

Maybe you want request the filemover right here. I think you are experienced enough. --Didym (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Rlevente, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.
--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Rlevente (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Rlevente, where exactly is this relief located, inside the church or outside? --Túrelio (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nagybánya, Szentháromság-templom 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry; I thought it was located in Hungary. But Romania has no freedom-of-panorama exemption. As it seems to be a recent work, you might try to contact the sculptor and ask him/her for a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Rlevente,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Rlevente,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Szia! Az lenne a kérdésem a 'World War I memorial in Újpest.JPG' kép hol készült pontosan? Köszi előre is. - - Globetrotter19

Várkert bazár[edit]

Szia! Nem ugyanaz, a Várkert Palace ez akar lenni: [1]. Ennek megfelelően ki kellene takarítani onnan a Várkert Bazáros képeket, és valószínűleg érdemes leírást adni hozzá ami linkel a wp cikkre is. --Antissimo (talk) 21:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fidesz-KDNP.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tgr (talk) 04:18, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deák Ferenc sírja 1.JPG[edit]

Szia! Review-oltam néhány képet, s ennél a képnél (File:Deák Ferenc sírja 1.JPG) észrevettem, hogy egy korábbi változat teljesen másképp' néz ki, azaz lehetségesnek tartom, hogy a feltöltő két különböző képet is fel szeretett volna tölteni, de valahogyan így sikerült neki; de persze ebben nem vagyok biztos. Ha mégis, akkor szerinted meg lehet valahogyan oldani, hogy esetleg az első kép is felkerüljön ide? Köszönettel: --Sphenodon (talk) 11:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Köszi! :) --Sphenodon (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Megcsináltam útmutatásod alapján a feltöltést (ez volt az első ilyen feltöltésem, korábban csak olyant tettem, hogy rátöltöttem egyre egy újabb verziót). Nem tudtam, hogyan adjam meg a licencet: végül egy „kisregényt” írtam, hogy látni lehessen, mi az ábra. Ha megkérlek, majd ránézel, hogy így rendben van-e? Köszönettel: --Sphenodon (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Köszönöm szépen, így most nyugodt vagyok! :) --Sphenodon (talk) 07:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

pls check[edit]

Hi, is this edit valid? If not pls invstigate. Thx. --JuTa 19:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

szia[edit]

a magyar wikipédiában létre hoznád eszta három szócliket ami it alul leirok előre is köszönöm

  • nyíregyházi Göllesz Viktor Speciális Szakiskola, Általános Iskola
  • Nyíregyházi Bárczi Gusztáv Speciális Iskola
  • nyiregyházi nevelési tanácsadó

Levente 2 -2014. október 22., 15:43 HA ha írni akarsz it van-https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Levente_2

File:Szokolay in Parndorf with the Huszti-Duo Vienna cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Szokyorsi (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reagáltam rá a vitalapomon Madboy74 (talk) 18:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 20:53, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts of Red Army in Budapest[edit]

Hi, Would you please leave me a message to let me know why you reverted my edits of red army soldiers in Budapest from the category "Red Army in Bucharest‎". It sounds like the right place for them to be. Thank you.Monopoly31121993 (talk) 12:01, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karosi Júlia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mhhossein talk 13:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Népsport 1953-11-26.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Népsport 1953-11-26.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönet[edit]

Köszönöm a tanácsokat a képek kategórizálásánál. .Elfogadok más példákat is mivel az angol tudásom 0,2 Utolsó bejezésnél íród, hogy egy képnél nem kell külön kategoriát készíteni. Csináltam én ilyet? Holaci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holaci (talk • contribs) 15:19, 02 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Müller Péter.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Szilágyi-engedély has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Malatinszky (talk) 15:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Köszönet és segítségkérés[edit]

Szia! Elősször is köszönet a segítségért File:Nagyvasútállomásnál. Tata várostérkép. - Komárom-Esztergom megye, Tata.JPG kép ügyében. Ennek hatására két napja a kép származékát is helyreállították a File:Nagyvasútállomásnál. Tatai buszjáratok, térkép. - Komárom-Esztergom megye, Tata.JPG.

Sajnos alig egy nappal később ismét egy FoP-os képet töröltek.

A File:Gyömrő fitness, logo in Hungary.jpg képet,- amely egy épületelemet ábrázol, (kb 1m-szer fél méter),- amit az utcán késztettem, szóval szerintem ez FoP licenszes.

Pechemre nincs streetview a googlen (pedig ez a város főtere), és nekem sincs a teljes épületről képem, de találtam az interneten egy képet,- itt,- ami mutatja hogy az épületen kívűl (középen) található a jel.

A File:Ignácz Ilona City Sports Hall in Gyömrő, Hungary.jpg és a File:Hankó István Art Center (SE) in Gyömrő Hungary.jpg képek két szomszédos épületet ábrázolnak amiket én tettem fel (egy-egy perccel korábbi ill. későbbi késztésűek az Exif alapján) ez igazolhatja még azt, hogy ott jártam.

Abban kérném a segítségedet,-ha úgy gondolod, hogy az ilyen kép FoP,-hogy segíts angolul megfogalmazni a kérelmem. Esetleg jelezni annál aki törölte. Utána én egyedül megpróbálom a 'helyreállító oldalon'.

Köszönettel! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 11:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Szia @Globetrotter19! Én valami ilyet írnék: Please undelete this photo, because it shows a part of a building. It was shot from the street, so it is under FoP. The building can be see here, the logo is on the center of the house. - Ugye az épület közepén levő zöld alapon fehér figurát ábrázoló logóról van szó? --Rlevente (talk) 16:30, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Szia @Rlevente! Igen. Elösszőr irjak annak aki törölte vagy egyből a helyreállító oldalra. Az illetőnek már írtam saját oldalamon is, nála is igaz angolul csak, hogy street photo. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Most látom csak ezt írta itt

A logo on a wall isn't erected with a permanent character. Ping deleting admin Jcb. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 10:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC) I agree. FoP does not mean that one can publish pictures of whatever object, one has to take into account the country specific rules. Jcb (talk)

Szia! Köszönöm! Sikerült! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 22:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Törlés[edit]

Szia! Nem tudom láttad-e ezt ezt. Mivel nem tudok angolul (sem), nem tudom mire hivatkozik a jelölő? Az is érdekes, hogy egy 1942-ben készült igazolványképnek ki kellene nyomozni a szerzőjét. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 09:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sajnos nem tudok vele szót érteni. Kösz, hogy válaszoltál. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 12:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Segítségkérés Szajci és a 71-es út ügyében[edit]

Szia! Kérlek segíts. A 71-es út mentén számos fotót készítettem Szajci sorra levette őket. Probáltam beszélni vele, de nem értett meg. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 12:28, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Márki-Zay[edit]

Ha még OTRS-kezelő lennél, láthatnád, hogy van ott még, ahonnan ez jött. :-D Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hungarikusz Firkász: már nem vagyok. Viszont Te is láthattad, hogy megvágtam a képet "szabványos" 3:4-es formátumúra. Lecserélhetem a szócikkben erre? --Rlevente (talk) 12:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Igen, ezért mondtam, hogy ha még az lennél...

Persze, nem ragaszkodom ahhoz, feltétlenül az a változat legyen a cikkben, ami az én azonosítóm alól lett feltöltve. :-) Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hungarikusz Firkász: Nem az a cél, hogy még a nyomodat is eltüntessem , hanem szerintem jobban néz ki egy ilyen arányú portré. --Rlevente (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teljes az egyetértés. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:29, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beata Szydło (2016) cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:40, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tibor Csík.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rodolfo cropped.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 12:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BevinKacon: thank you for your Christmas gift. --Rlevente (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:MartinLandau2008TIFF cropped.jpg[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:MartinLandau2008TIFF cropped.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kosztolányi Dezső.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Ship stations in Hungary has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 09:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Иван Александрович Серов.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 09:54, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kulin György cropped retouched.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 15:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Üdvözlettel, Regasterios (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bánfalvy Ági cropped.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ba2019 (talk) 08:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Migrants in Hungary 2015 Aug 018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chaddy (talk) 15:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Üdvözlettel, Regasterios (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure about the date of the photo? As far as I know, the 2013 World Championship was held in Duisburg. The Championship in Szeged probably dates back to 2011.--Yellow Horror (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Elisabeth of Hungary church in Rákoscsaba 05.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 09:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Szeretném ezt a teljesen előnytelen fényképet törölni és helyette másikat feltenni.[edit]

Kedves Rlevente! Hirtling István lapjáról szeretném az Ön által feltett képet töröltetni és helyette másikat feltenni. Köszönettel, Hirtling Csilla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csicsu4 (talk • contribs) 11:58, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File:Migrants in Hungary 2015 Aug 018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Chaddy (talk) 11:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frohe Geburtstag 7.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:C0:8F44:2400:1112:E497:2EBC:1D3D 05:53, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]